CN104460321A - Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating - Google Patents
Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104460321A CN104460321A CN201410776189.3A CN201410776189A CN104460321A CN 104460321 A CN104460321 A CN 104460321A CN 201410776189 A CN201410776189 A CN 201410776189A CN 104460321 A CN104460321 A CN 104460321A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- rho
- formula
- beta
- theta
- hysteresis
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating. The method comprises the steps that 1. a double-vane motor position servo system mathematical model with hysteresis is established; 2. a preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating is designed; and 3. system parameters are designed. Preset performance requirements are fully considered, system hysteresis nonlinearity and high gain feedback are considered, the hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating is provided, according to the method, hysteresis nonlinearity is subjected to modeling to form the sum of a linear term and a bounded disturbance term, designing of a following moving controller is very convenient, for system parameter uncertainty and a non-modeling disturbance term, a self-adaptation robust control method is used, and meanwhile good parameter estimation and robust boundedness stability are guaranteed.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of control method, particularly a kind of oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation.
Background technology
Electrohydraulic servo system has the outstanding advantages such as power density is large, response is fast, power output/moment is large, is widely used, such as mechanical arm, aircraft manipulation, load simulator etc. in industry and national defence.And among this, hydraulic servo motor is due to can direct output torque, and having, the applications of rotary motion requirements is extensive.But extensively there is many model uncertainties in electrohydraulic servo system, comprise parameter uncertainty (flow gain, the bulk modulus of hydraulic oil, the leakage coefficient etc. of motor as servo-valve) and Uncertain nonlinear (as non-modeling disturb outward, non-linear friction, magnetic hysteresis etc.), these bring great difficulty all to the design of controller.
For parameter uncertainty, adaptive control is conventional means, it is to the parameterisable part in parameter uncertainty and Uncertain nonlinear, effectively can estimate and realize certain model compensation, but for can not parameterized uncertain nonlinearities, adaptive control is helpless, and there is the occasion of comparatively strong outer interference, and adaptive control even faces the danger of dispersing.For Uncertain nonlinear, synovial membrane, robust control, ANN (Artificial Neural Network) Control are all attempted, and achieve good control effects, but the chatter phenomenon that in synovial membrane controller, discontinuous sign function brings, easily cause the decay of system control performance, cause system unstability, existing improve synovial membrane shake measure control method less and complicated; The control performance that robust control realizes is usually with the risk of High Gain Feedback; The calculated amount of ANN (Artificial Neural Network) Control is comparatively large, and real-time is affected, and there is with the high response speed characteristic of electrohydraulic servo system conflict, causes it to occur bottleneck in the application of Practical Project.
For the occasion that some are special, as turntable, aircraft steering engine etc., the tracking performance Index For Steady-state that not only demand fulfillment is certain of electrohydraulic servo system, and the loading methods such as the speed of convergence of tracking error, overshoot, also must meet the boundary preset sometimes.In addition, torque-motor ubiquity magnetic hysteresis nonlinear characteristic in electrohydraulic servo valve, although it does not constitute a serious threat to the stability of valve-controlled motor servo-drive system, but very easily cause the delayed phase of system when low frequency, thus affect the final performance of controller.
Generally speaking, the weak point of existing motor servo system control technology mainly contain following some: (1) for system default capabilities pay close attention to less.When there is default capabilities demand for system in engineering reality, how in Controller gain variations, to be integrated into these preset need, how to ensure the loading methods such as the speed of convergence of tracking error, overshoot, take into account again the Index For Steady-states such as steady-state tracking precision, be the thorny problem faced at present simultaneously; (2) do not consider that magnetic hysteresis is non-linear.The non-linear inherent characteristic as torque-motor of magnetic hysteresis, if do not taken in Controller gain variations, but very easily causes valve-controlled motor servo-drive system at the delayed phase of low-frequency range, the final performance of the designed motion controller of impact; (3) High Gain Feedback.This is comparatively common in traditional robust controller, reduce tracking error using the Greatest lower bound of indeterminate as negative feedback, although good tracking performance can be obtained, have to face the risk of High Gain Feedback, easy activating system high frequency Unmarried pregnancy, causes system unstability.
Summary of the invention
In order to overcome prior art Problems existing, the present invention takes into full account that default capabilities demand, system magnetic hysteresis are non-linear and there is the problem of High Gain Feedback, proposes a kind of oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation.
Containing an oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method for Hysteresis compensation, comprise the following steps:
Step 1, set up the twayblade motor position servo-drive system mathematical model containing magnetic hysteresis, detailed process is as follows:
Step 1.1, according to characteristic and the oil motor operating characteristic of Newton second law, electrohydraulic servo valve, the twayblade motor position dynamics of servosystem equation set up containing magnetic hysteresis turns
u=cv(t)+d(v) (5-1)
The kinetics equation that formula (3) is inertia load, wherein J is inertia load, y,
with
be respectively alliance, speed and acceleration, P
l=P
1-P
2for oil motor load pressure, P
1and P
2for motor two cavity pressure, D
mfor motor volume discharge capacity, B is total viscous damping coefficient,
for all non-modeling distracters;
The pressure flow equation that formula (4) is motor, wherein V
tfor total containing volume in motor two chamber, β
efor the effective bulk modulus of hydraulic oil, C
tfor total leakage coefficient of motor, Q
l=(Q
1+ Q
2)/2 are load flow, Q
1and Q
2be respectively oil-feed and oil return flow,
represent all non-modeling distracters in pressure flow equation;
K in formula (5)
t=k
ik
qfor the overall throughput gain relative to control inputs voltage, k
ifor voltage-spool displacement gain coefficient,
c
dfor servo-valve throttle orifice coefficient, w is servo-valve throttle hole area gradient, and ρ is hydraulic oil density, P
sfor system charge oil pressure, system oil return pressure P
r=0, sign (u) is sign function;
Formula (5-1) is the hysteresis model after simplifying, and wherein u is that hysteresis model exports, and c is hysteresis characteristic parameter, the output controlled quentity controlled variable that v (t) is t controller, and d (v) is the BOUNDED DISTURBANCES of being given birth to by nonlinear magnetism bradytoia;
Step 1.2, definition status variable
then kinetics equation is converted into:
θ in formula (8)
1=B/J, θ
2=c β
ek
t/ J, θ
3=β
e/ J, θ
4=β
ec
t,
g,f
1, f
2, d
2be defined as follows:
Step 2, design, containing the default capabilities tracking and controlling method of Hysteresis compensation, comprises following steps:
Step 2.1, definition default capabilities function:
Tracking error e=x in formula (13)
1-x
1d, x
1dfor the position command of system keeps track, z
1for transformed error amount,
δwith
for positive can design parameter, ρ (t) is the positive smooth function that increases progressively; Tracking error e meets following performance index:
Can obtain formula (13) function of negating:
Step 2.2, definition assisted error amount
z
3=x
3-α
2, wherein k
1for programmable feedback gain, α
2for virtual controlling amount, then can be obtained by formula (8) and formula (14):
In formula (17)
Design virtual controlling amount α
2for:
K in formula (18)
2>0 is feedback gain to be designed, α
2afor model compensation item, α
2sfor robust item, ε
1>0 be arbitrarily small can design parameter,
for θ
1estimated value;
Step 2.3, definition assisted error amount z
3
In formula (12)
with
represent virtual controlling amount α respectively
2derivative in can calculating section and can not calculating section.
Step 2.4, determines working control device input v
V in formula (13)
arepresent model compensation controller, v
srepresent robust controller, v
s1for linear robust feedback term, v
s1for non linear robust feedback term,
the each unknown parameter estimated value of expression system,
represent parameter update law, Γ represents self-adaptation regression parameter matrix,
all represent parametric regression device, k
3for positive feedback gain, ε
2for can design parameter, θ
m=θ
max-θ
minrepresent the maximal oxygen momentum of parameter, θ
maxand θ
minrepresent the estimation upper bound of each parameter respectively and estimate lower bound;
Step 2.5, definition Liapunov function is as follows:
Step 2.6, definition matrix Λ
Step 3, design k
1, k
2, k
3, ε
1, ε
2, δwith
system is met the following conditions: matrix Λ is positive definite matrix, and tracking error e is minimum.
The present invention compared with prior art, have the following advantages: (1) the present invention selects twayblade oil motor positional servosystem as research object, consider systematic parameter uncertainty simultaneously, non-modeling disturb outward and magnetic hysteresis non-linear, devise excellent tracking control unit; (2) non-linear for magnetic hysteresis, be linear term and BOUNDED DISTURBANCES item sum by magnetic hysteresis Nonlinear Modeling, greatly facilitate the design of subsequent motion controller; (3) and non-modeling distracter uncertain for systematic parameter, adopts adaptive robust control method, ensure that good parameter estimation and robust bounded stability simultaneously; (4) for default capabilities demand, adopt default capabilities function, achieve making rational planning for tracking error speed of convergence and maximum overshoot, by the tracking control unit to transformed error excellent in design, and then ensure that tracking error meets default performance requirement.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is twayblade oil motor positional servosystem schematic diagram of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is control method principle schematic of the present invention;
The position command curve of Fig. 3 system keeps track;
Fig. 4 is system tracking error correlation curve;
Fig. 5 formula system speed exports correlation curve;
Fig. 6 is system parameters estimated value curve;
Fig. 7 Systematical control input curve;
Fig. 8 is the inventive method process flow diagram.
Embodiment
Composition graphs 1, Fig. 2 and Fig. 8, a kind of concrete steps of the oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation are as follows:
Step 1, hysteresis characteristic model.Due to the discontinuous characteristic of conventional gap class hysteresis model, the Controller gain variations for nonlinear system is very unfavorable, and the present invention uses following hysteresis model:
In formula (1), u is that hysteresis model exports, i.e. effective control inputs voltage, c, α and B
1for hysteresis characteristic parameter, and meet c > B
1, v is the output controlled quentity controlled variable of controller, provides expression by follow-up Controller gain variations.Formula (1) can be converted into:
U in formula (2)
0and v
0represent initial value.Analytical formula (2) is known, and the linear term that the hysteresis model after changing is c by slope and distracter d (v) form, and the boundary of d (v) item is known.
Step 1.1, set up the twayblade oil motor positional servosystem model containing magnetic hysteresis, according to Newton second law, inertia load kinetics equation is:
In formula (3), J is inertia load, y,
with
be respectively alliance, speed and acceleration, P
l=P
1-P
2for oil motor load pressure, P
1and P
2for motor two cavity pressure, D
mfor motor volume discharge capacity, B is total viscous damping coefficient (comprising loading section and motor portion),
for all non-modeling distracters.The pressure flow equation of motor is:
V in formula (4)
tfor total containing volume in motor two chamber, β
efor the effective bulk modulus of hydraulic oil; C
tfor total leakage coefficient of motor, Q
l=(Q
1+ Q
2)/2 are load flow, Q
1and Q
2be respectively oil-feed and oil return flow,
represent all non-modeling distracters in pressure flow equation.Load flow Q
lwith valve core of servo valve displacement x
vpass be:
Flow gain k in formula (5)
qwith sign (x
v) as shown in the formula:
C in formula (6)
dfor servo-valve throttle orifice coefficient; W is servo-valve throttle hole area gradient; ρ is hydraulic oil density; P
sfor system charge oil pressure, system oil return pressure P
r=0.Because the frequency range of servo-valve is higher, reach hundreds of Hz, be far longer than the frequency range of system during work, therefore during modeling, we ignore the dynamic process of servo-valve, the control inputs of valve and spool displacement are considered as proportional component, i.e. x
v=k
iu, wherein u is control inputs voltage, k
ifor voltage-valve position moves gain coefficient, therefore formula (6) is converted into:
K in formula (7)
t=k
ik
qfor the overall throughput gain relative to control inputs voltage u.
Step 1.2, definition status variable
in conjunction with formula (3), formula (4) and formula (7), substitute into hysteresis model (2), the total mathematical model of system can be expressed as following state space form simultaneously:
θ in formula (8)
1=B/J, θ
2=c β
ek
t/ J, θ
3=β
e/ J, θ
4=β
ec
t,
g,f
1, f
2, d
2be defined as follows:
Before Controller gain variations, first make the following assumptions: systematic parameter θ
1, θ
2, θ
3, θ
4be unknown constant value; Nonlinear perturbations item d
1with
bounded, d in analytical formula (9)
2expression formula, in systems in practice, always can ensure g item bounded, know d again by (3) formula
h(v) item bounded, thus known Nonlinear perturbations item d
2bounded, namely || d
1||≤δ
1, || d
2||≤δ
2, δ
1and δ
2be known constant.The target of next step Controller gain variations is that guarantee system exports x
1trace command x as much as possible
1d.
Step 2, design is containing the default capabilities tracking and controlling method of Hysteresis compensation, and concrete steps are as follows:
Step 2.1, definition default capabilities function:
Definition tracking error e=x
1-x
1d, suppose that it need meet following performance index:
In formula (7)
δwith
for positive can design parameter, ρ (t) is the positive smooth function that increases progressively, and tool form is as follows:
ρ in formula (11)
0, ρ
∞with k be positive can design parameter.Obviously, formula (10) performance to tracking error gives concrete planning ,-
δρ
0with
constrain maximum lower momentum and the maximum overshoot of error respectively; Parameter k constrains the speed of convergence of tracking error; ρ
∞constrain the stable state of tracking error.For the ease of Controller gain variations subsequently, be defined as follows increasing function S (z
1):
Z in formula (12)
1for transformed error amount, for Controller gain variations subsequently, analytical formula (12) is known, and formula (10) is equivalent to e (t)=ρ (t) S (z
1), and z
1during bounded, formula (10) meets all the time, S (z
1) form of specifically choosing as follows:
By function of negating to formula (13), can obtain:
Step 2.2, definition assisted error variable:
For formula (14), differentiate is known:
In formula (15)
Can obtain further:
Definition assisted error amount
z
3=x
3-α
2, wherein α
2for virtual controlling amount, then:
Design virtual controlling amount α
2for:
K in formula (18)
2>0 is feedback gain to be designed; α
2afor model compensation item, for compensating corresponding system dynamic component and default capabilities function part; α
2sfor robust item.Formula (18) is substituted into formula (17) can obtain:
Design robust item α
2s2meet following Stabilization Conditions:
ε in formula (20)
1>0 be arbitrarily small can design parameter, meet the α of formula (20)
2s2design as follows:
Step 2.3, definition assisted error amount z
3, by formula (8) and assisted error amount z
3definition, have further:
In formula (22)
with
represent virtual controlling amount α respectively
2derivative in can calculating section and can not calculating section, be defined as follows respectively:
Step 2.4, determine working control device input v:
According to formula (22), final motion controller can be designed as follows:
V in formula (13)
arepresent model compensation controller, v
srepresent robust controller,
the each unknown parameter estimated value of expression system,
represent parameter update law, Γ represents self-adaptation regression parameter matrix,
all represent parametric regression device, k
3for positive feedback gain, ε
2for can design parameter, θ
m=θ
max-θ
minrepresent the maximal oxygen momentum of parameter, θ
maxand θ
minrepresent the estimation upper bound of each parameter respectively and estimate lower bound;
Formula (24) is substituted into formula (22) can obtain:
Step 2.5, verification system stability:
Selecting system starting condition meets
Namely
Definition Liapunov function is as follows:
To formula (26) differentiate, and substitute into formula (19), (25) can obtain:
Z=[z in formula (22)
1, z
2, z
3]
t, ε=ε
1+ ε
2.
Step 2.6, definition matrix Λ
Obviously, by rational design parameter k
1, k
2make matrix Λ be positive definite matrix, following formula can be made to meet:
λ in formula (29)
min(Λ) minimal eigenvalue of representing matrix Λ, analytical formula (29) is known, and controller (24) finally can ensure transformed error z
1stable state bounded, further by rational design parameter δ and
and function ρ (t), can ensure that, under system realizes the prerequisite of accurate tracking, tracking performance meets the characteristic preset.
Below in conjunction with embodiment, the present invention will be further described.
Twayblade oil motor positional servosystem parameter is inertia load: J=0.2kgm
2; B=90Nms/rad; k
t=1.1969 × 10
-8m
2/ s/V/Pa
-1/2, V
t=1.16 × 10
-4m
3; β
e=700MPa; C
t=1 × 10
12m
3/ s/Pa; D
m=5.8 × 10
-5m
3/ rad; P
s=10MPa; P
r=0.
In order to fully verify the validity of designed controller herein, choose traditional adaptive robust control (ARC) to carry out as a comparison, the design procedure of tradition ARC controller is similar to the controller designed herein, but lacked the Planning effect of default capabilities function, corresponding parameter choose is k
1=150, k
2=1000, k
3=30.
CONTROLLER DESIGN (being designated as PPARC) herein, i.e. formula (24): parameter choose is: k
1=150, k
2=2000, k
3=30, ρ
0=0.3, ρ
∞=0.001, k=0.5,
δ=5,
adaptation law coefficient is chosen for Γ
1=0.01, Γ
2=8e-6, Γ
3=1000, Γ
4=1e-10.Systematic parameter estimation range is chosen for: θ
min=[100,10,2e9,1e-4]
t, θ
max=[1000,100,5e9,4e-3]
t.
System interference be chosen for d=0.1sin (2 π t) (Fig. 3), system initial position is chosen for x
1(0)=0.1rad, this initial position obviously meets
choosing trace command is x
1d=0.8sin (t).
Control method action effect:
Fig. 4 is tracking error correlation curve, can find out in figure, because initial position does not mate, at tracking initial segment, under two controller actions, tracking error all restrains with fast speed, but there is larger overshoot in traditional ARC controller, design PPARC herein to control, under the effect of default capabilities function, occur without obvious overshoot, and speed of convergence to be faster than ARC.
Fig. 5 is the system output speed correlation curve under two kinds of controller actions, obvious unmatched initial position makes both all occur larger velocity perturbation at initial segment, PPARC very rapid convergence be tending towards smooth, but still there is velocity perturbation at about 0.25s place in traditional ARC controller.
Fig. 6 designs each parameter estimation curve under PPARC controller herein, although there is larger shake in initial segment estimation curve, but each parameter very rapid convergence, and tend towards stability.
Fig. 7 is control inputs curve, the smooth and bounded all the time of control inputs.
Claims (4)
1., containing an oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method for Hysteresis compensation, it is characterized in that, comprise the following steps:
Step 1, sets up the twayblade motor position servo-drive system mathematical model containing magnetic hysteresis;
Step 2, design is containing the default capabilities tracking and controlling method of Hysteresis compensation;
Step 3, design system parameter.
2. the oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, step 1 detailed process is as follows:
Step 1.1, according to characteristic and the oil motor operating characteristic of Newton second law, electrohydraulic servo valve, the twayblade motor position dynamics of servosystem equation set up containing magnetic hysteresis turns
u=cv(t)+d(v) (5-1)
The kinetics equation that formula (3) is inertia load, wherein J is inertia load, y,
with
be respectively alliance, speed and acceleration, P
l=P
1-P
2for oil motor load pressure, P
1and P
2for motor two cavity pressure, D
mfor motor volume discharge capacity, B is total viscous damping coefficient,
for all non-modeling distracters;
The pressure flow equation that formula (4) is motor, wherein V
tfor total containing volume in motor two chamber, β
efor the effective bulk modulus of hydraulic oil, C
tfor total leakage coefficient of motor, Q
l=(Q
1+ Q
2)/2 are load flow, Q
1and Q
2be respectively oil-feed and oil return flow,
represent all non-modeling distracters in pressure flow equation;
K in formula (5)
t=k
ik
qfor the overall throughput gain relative to control inputs voltage, k
ifor voltage-spool displacement gain coefficient,
c
dfor servo-valve throttle orifice coefficient, w is servo-valve throttle hole area gradient, and ρ is hydraulic oil density, P
sfor system charge oil pressure, system oil return pressure P
r=0, sign (u) is sign function;
Formula (5-1) is the hysteresis model after simplifying, and wherein u is that hysteresis model exports, and c is hysteresis characteristic parameter, the output controlled quentity controlled variable that v (t) is t controller, and d (v) is the BOUNDED DISTURBANCES of being given birth to by nonlinear magnetism bradytoia;
Step 1.2, definition status variable
Then kinetics equation is converted into:
θ in formula (8)
1=B/J, θ
2=c β
ek
t/ J, θ
3=β
e/ J, θ
4=β
ec
t,
wherein
(9)
3. the oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, in step 2, control method comprises following steps:
Step 2.1, definition default capabilities function:
Formula (13) tracking error e=x
1-x
1d, x
1dfor the position command of system keeps track, z
1for transformed error amount,
δwith
for positive can design parameter, ρ (t) is the positive smooth function that increases progressively; Tracking error e meets following performance index:
Can obtain formula (13) function of negating:
Step 2.2, definition assisted error amount
z
3=x
3-α
2, wherein k
1for programmable feedback gain, α
2for virtual controlling amount, then can be obtained by formula (8) and formula (14):
In formula (17)
Design virtual controlling amount α
2for:
α
2=(α
2a+α
2s1+α
2s2)/β
α
2s1=-k
2z
2
K in formula (18)
2>0 is feedback gain to be designed, α
2afor model compensation item, α
2sfor robust item, ε
1>0 be arbitrarily small can design parameter,
for θ
1estimated value;
Step 2.3, definition assisted error amount z
3
In formula (22)
with
represent virtual controlling amount α respectively
2derivative in can calculating section and can not calculating section.
Step 2.4, determines working control device input v
v
s1=-k
3z
3(24)
V in formula (13)
arepresent model compensation controller, v
srepresent robust controller, v
s1for linear robust feedback term, v
s2for non linear robust feedback term,
the each unknown parameter estimated value of expression system,
represent parameter update law, Γ represents self-adaptation regression parameter matrix,
all represent parametric regression device, k
3for positive feedback gain, ε
2for can design parameter, θ
m=θ
max-θ
minrepresent the maximal oxygen momentum of parameter, θ
maxand θ
minrepresent the estimation upper bound of each parameter respectively and estimate lower bound;
Step 2.5, definition Liapunov function is as follows:
Step 2.6, definition matrix Λ
4. the oil motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation according to claim 1, is characterized in that, design k in step 3
1, k
2, k
3, ε
1, ε
2,
δ, system is met the following conditions: matrix Λ is positive definite matrix, and tracking error e is minimum.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410776189.3A CN104460321A (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2014-12-15 | Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating |
CN201510650801.7A CN105700347B (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2015-10-09 | A kind of hydraulic motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410776189.3A CN104460321A (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2014-12-15 | Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104460321A true CN104460321A (en) | 2015-03-25 |
Family
ID=52906562
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410776189.3A Pending CN104460321A (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2014-12-15 | Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating |
CN201510650801.7A Expired - Fee Related CN105700347B (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2015-10-09 | A kind of hydraulic motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510650801.7A Expired - Fee Related CN105700347B (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2015-10-09 | A kind of hydraulic motor default capabilities tracking and controlling method containing Hysteresis compensation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (2) | CN104460321A (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105159076A (en) * | 2015-08-24 | 2015-12-16 | 南京理工大学 | Fusion type adaptive robust-based electro-hydraulic load simulator force control method |
CN105700347A (en) * | 2014-12-15 | 2016-06-22 | 南京理工大学 | Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensation |
CN105825016A (en) * | 2016-03-21 | 2016-08-03 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | Method for establishing internal leakage model of vane type continuous rotary electro-hydraulic servomotor |
CN106773691A (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2017-05-31 | 西北工业大学 | Hypersonic aircraft self adaptation time-varying default capabilities control method based on LS SVM |
CN107165892A (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2017-09-15 | 武汉科技大学 | A kind of sliding-mode control of electrohydraulic servo system |
CN107193210A (en) * | 2017-05-08 | 2017-09-22 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of adaptive learning default capabilities control method of nonlinear system |
CN109324503A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-02-12 | 南京理工大学 | Multilayer neural network electric system control method based on robust integral |
CN109884894A (en) * | 2019-03-08 | 2019-06-14 | 福州大学 | Electro-hydraulic servo steering system neural network integral sliding mode control method |
CN109991852A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-09 | 贵州大学 | Fractional order electrostatic drive micro electro mechanical system control method with hysteresis characteristic |
CN110096750A (en) * | 2019-04-02 | 2019-08-06 | 燕山大学 | Consider the adaptive dynamic surface control method of non-linear Active suspension actuator |
CN118092143A (en) * | 2024-03-12 | 2024-05-28 | 南京理工大学 | Proportional servo valve core displacement control method considering unknown hysteresis compensation |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109709809B (en) * | 2019-01-17 | 2020-11-06 | 合肥工业大学 | Modeling method and tracking method of electromagnetic/magneto-rheological actuator based on hysteresis kernel |
CN110578737B (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2021-04-16 | 南京理工大学 | Hydraulic servo system MRAC control method based on nonlinear neural network |
CN111736472B (en) * | 2020-07-22 | 2022-05-27 | 安徽工业大学 | Motor self-adaptive preset performance asymptotic control method based on RISE |
CN111781836B (en) * | 2020-07-22 | 2022-05-27 | 安徽工业大学 | Self-adaptive asymptotic control method for hydraulic pressure preset performance |
CN112415891B (en) * | 2020-10-20 | 2022-05-31 | 安徽工业大学 | Adaptive output feedback asymptotic control method for electro-hydraulic servo system |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8671973B2 (en) * | 2009-01-21 | 2014-03-18 | Hitachi Metals, Ltd. | Mass flow controller hysteresis compensation system and method |
EP2299308A1 (en) * | 2009-09-16 | 2011-03-23 | BAE Systems PLC | Compensation for hysteresis |
CN101833284B (en) * | 2010-05-28 | 2011-07-27 | 上海交通大学 | Method for compensating system in real time by using hysteresis inversion model |
CN104570733B (en) * | 2014-12-15 | 2017-05-17 | 南京理工大学 | Method for tracking control of preset performance in magnetic hysteresis compensation-containing motor servo system |
CN104460321A (en) * | 2014-12-15 | 2015-03-25 | 南京理工大学 | Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating |
-
2014
- 2014-12-15 CN CN201410776189.3A patent/CN104460321A/en active Pending
-
2015
- 2015-10-09 CN CN201510650801.7A patent/CN105700347B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105700347A (en) * | 2014-12-15 | 2016-06-22 | 南京理工大学 | Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensation |
CN105159076B (en) * | 2015-08-24 | 2018-01-05 | 南京理工大学 | Electrohydraulic load simulator force control method based on pattern of fusion ADAPTIVE ROBUST |
CN105159076A (en) * | 2015-08-24 | 2015-12-16 | 南京理工大学 | Fusion type adaptive robust-based electro-hydraulic load simulator force control method |
CN105825016B (en) * | 2016-03-21 | 2019-04-26 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | A method of establishing vane type continuous rotary electrohydraulic servo motor internal leakage model |
CN105825016A (en) * | 2016-03-21 | 2016-08-03 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | Method for establishing internal leakage model of vane type continuous rotary electro-hydraulic servomotor |
CN106773691A (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2017-05-31 | 西北工业大学 | Hypersonic aircraft self adaptation time-varying default capabilities control method based on LS SVM |
CN106773691B (en) * | 2016-12-19 | 2018-03-30 | 西北工业大学 | The adaptive time-varying default capabilities control method of hypersonic aircraft based on LS SVM |
CN107193210B (en) * | 2017-05-08 | 2020-10-16 | 西北工业大学 | Adaptive learning preset performance control method of nonlinear system |
CN107193210A (en) * | 2017-05-08 | 2017-09-22 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of adaptive learning default capabilities control method of nonlinear system |
CN107165892B (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2018-05-29 | 武汉科技大学 | A kind of sliding-mode control of electrohydraulic servo system |
CN107165892A (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2017-09-15 | 武汉科技大学 | A kind of sliding-mode control of electrohydraulic servo system |
CN109324503A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-02-12 | 南京理工大学 | Multilayer neural network electric system control method based on robust integral |
CN109324503B (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2022-02-15 | 南京理工大学 | Multilayer neural network motor system control method based on robust integration |
CN109884894A (en) * | 2019-03-08 | 2019-06-14 | 福州大学 | Electro-hydraulic servo steering system neural network integral sliding mode control method |
CN110096750A (en) * | 2019-04-02 | 2019-08-06 | 燕山大学 | Consider the adaptive dynamic surface control method of non-linear Active suspension actuator |
CN109991852A (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2019-07-09 | 贵州大学 | Fractional order electrostatic drive micro electro mechanical system control method with hysteresis characteristic |
CN109991852B (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2022-02-22 | 贵州大学 | Control method of fractional order electrostatic driving micro-electromechanical system with hysteresis characteristic |
CN118092143A (en) * | 2024-03-12 | 2024-05-28 | 南京理工大学 | Proportional servo valve core displacement control method considering unknown hysteresis compensation |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN105700347A (en) | 2016-06-22 |
CN105700347B (en) | 2019-02-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104460321A (en) | Hydraulic motor preset performance tracking control method with hysteresis compensating | |
CN104635490B (en) | A kind of output feedback ontrol method of asymmetric servo cylinder positional servosystem | |
CN104111607B (en) | A kind of control method of the electric machine position servo system considering input delay | |
CN106483844B (en) | The implementation method of electrohydraulic servo system adaptive location controller based on non linear robust | |
CN104345638A (en) | ADRAC (active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control) method for hydraulic motor position servo system | |
Ba et al. | Integrated model-based backstepping control for an electro-hydraulic system | |
CN104898428A (en) | Interference estimation-based self-adaption robustness control method of electro-hydraulic servo system | |
Ruderman | Full-and reduced-order model of hydraulic cylinder for motion control | |
CN104317198A (en) | Method for controlling nonlinear robust position of electro-hydraulic servo system with time-varying output constraints | |
CN112486021B (en) | Low-complexity control method for asymmetric servo hydraulic position tracking system | |
CN104698844A (en) | Uncertainty compensatory sliding-mode control method of hydraulic position servo system | |
CN107121932A (en) | Motor servo system error symbol integrates Robust Adaptive Control method | |
CN110308651B (en) | Electro-hydraulic servo system all-state constraint control method based on extended state observer | |
CN104345640A (en) | Motor servo system progressive tracking control method and system during input limitation | |
CN105068426B (en) | The continuous sliding-mode control of electro-hydraulic position servo system based on interference compensation | |
CN106444367A (en) | Realization method of input time lag-based motor servo system robust position controller | |
CN104570733B (en) | Method for tracking control of preset performance in magnetic hysteresis compensation-containing motor servo system | |
CN107165892A (en) | A kind of sliding-mode control of electrohydraulic servo system | |
Ye et al. | Model-based adaptive command filtering control of an electrohydraulic actuator with input saturation and friction | |
CN104806438A (en) | Non-minimum-phase-controlled hydraulic turbine set rotation speed regulating system and design method thereof | |
Mu et al. | A new mathematical model of twin flapper-nozzle servo valve based on input-output linearization approach | |
CN114296346B (en) | Electro-hydraulic position servo system reconstruction control method and device based on fuzzy active disturbance rejection control | |
Gu et al. | Electrohydraulic proportional position and pressure loading control utilizing a state perception and processing method | |
CN115236974A (en) | Composite anti-interference controller and control parameter optimization method thereof | |
CN107942665A (en) | A kind of modularization Auto-disturbance-rejection Control for angular speed proportional-integrating feedback |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20150325 |