CN104112204A - Evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality - Google Patents

Evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104112204A
CN104112204A CN201410308806.7A CN201410308806A CN104112204A CN 104112204 A CN104112204 A CN 104112204A CN 201410308806 A CN201410308806 A CN 201410308806A CN 104112204 A CN104112204 A CN 104112204A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
evaluation
service
power supply
same level
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201410308806.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
姚明路
郑培智
程宝华
贾培刚
钟珊
冯莹
孙洁
李国强
马生伟
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Corp of China SGCC, State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Priority to CN201410308806.7A priority Critical patent/CN104112204A/en
Publication of CN104112204A publication Critical patent/CN104112204A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality. The evaluation method includes the steps of: (1) defining a mutual degree of importance between indexes of the same level, adopting an analytic hierarchy process to calculate weights (2) of indexes of the same level in a superior index and converting an original data result of an internal evaluation index to a quantized index value of 0 to 100; (3) correcting a customer satisfaction calculation result; (4) establishing a variation trend function using evaluation time as a cross axis and an evaluation index as a longitudinal axis by an average value of multiple movements of a historical evaluation results of the evaluation index, and predicting an evaluation index of the next period; and (5) redefining the indexes of the same level. The evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality in the invention can provides a basis for revision of service quality standards, thereby realizing contrastive analysis of internal service quality evaluation and external customer evaluation, realizing power supply service quality monitoring, evaluation and auxiliary analysis functions based on a service process, and providing a basis for revising the quality standards.

Description

The evaluation method of the efficient operation of power supply quality
One, technical field
The invention belongs to electrical power services operation technical field, the evaluation method of the efficient operation of especially a kind of power supply quality.
Two, background technology
From 2007, State Grid Corporation of China has issued power supply service quality evaluation method (trying) the > > of < < State Grid Corporation of China, each province (city) company organizes one after another for service quality evaluation activity, but because power supply service quality lacks unified evaluation criterion and evaluation means, cause evaluation result objective not and comprehensive, also do not set up power supply service quality evaluation of tissue mechanism, evaluation criterion and evaluation flow process, power supply service quality evaluation system fails to realize normality operation.
Three, summary of the invention
The object of the invention is for the deficiencies in the prior art, and propose the efficient evaluation method of moving of a kind of power supply quality.
The present invention solves its technical matters and takes following technical scheme to realize:
An evaluation method for the efficient operation of power supply quality, comprises that step is as follows:
(1) analytic hierarchy process; Define the mutual significance level between index at the same level, adopt analytical hierarchy process to calculate the weight of index at the same level in higher level's index, the differentiation that solves index at the same level significance level in higher level's index;
Wherein, described index is divided into internal indicator and external indicator,
Internal indicator includes: service, bill service, the service of client's calibration and 95598 services are accepted in new clothes and increase-volume and change electricity consumption service, troublshooting service, consulting inquiry service, complaint, report and suggestion;
External indicator includes: outside overall target and outside special index,
Wherein, outside overall target further comprises: satisfaction, quality perception, value perception, image appraisal, user expectation, client's complaint, customer loyalty;
Wherein, outside special index comprises: power supply reliability, the quality of power supply, new clothes, increase-volume and change electricity consumption service, troublshooting service, consulting inquiry service, complaint, report and suggestion are accepted have a power failure informing service, Very Important Person of service, paying service, bill service, client's arrearage and stopped rationing the power supply and inform and serve and electricity consumption guide service;
(2) build multistage linear function, convert the raw data results of desk evaluation index to desired value that 0-100 quantizes;
(3) by the relation that affects of the structure variable in customer satisfaction computation model, calculate, then by factor of influence substitution customer satisfaction computation model, customer satisfaction result of calculation is revised;
(4), by the trend method of moving average, it is the variation tendency function that transverse axis, evaluation number are the longitudinal axis that the history evaluation result of evaluation index is built to evaluation time by moving average repeatedly, predicts the evaluation number in next cycle;
(5) redefining of index at the same level, while having desired value to be sky in index at the same level, redefines the new system into higher level's index by the index at the same level of non-NULL, carries out weight reallocation, guarantees that the weight sum of index at the same level equals 1 all the time.
And the weight in described step (2) adopts definitely important, very important, important, important a little and five ranks of no less important.
And the calculating in described step (3) and the specifically employing PLS method of revising are calculated and are revised.
Four, advantage of the present invention and good effect
1, the present invention realizes the robotization of Data Collection and analysis, has avoided human intervention;
2, the present invention improves the acquisition channel that external client evaluates feedback data, comprise channels such as utilizing 95598 voice platforms, 95598 intelligent interaction websites, SMS platform, business hall evaluation system, third party's investigation, customer evaluation feedback to comprehensive satisfaction and special service satisfactory situation gathers, and realizes the collection by all kinds of means of customer evaluation;
3, the present invention solve in the past with manual type carry out that the statistical computation workload existing in service quality appraisal is large, the lookup service short slab problem such as not in time;
4, the inventive method can be carried out multidimensional analysis and Continual Improvement to service quality, can find the service short slab of different services channels, service item; Can find different customer types and different power supply area service short slab;
5, the present invention can provide foundation for the revision of service quality standard, realize internal services quality evaluation and external client and evaluate comparative analysis, power supply service quality monitoring, evaluation and the assistant analysis function of realization based on service procedure, for revision quality standard provides foundation;
6, the present invention is that different levels represent the relevant information that power supply service quality is evaluated.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the functional digraph that in the present invention, piecewise function is derived;
Fig. 2 is structural model and the measurement model schematic diagram in PLS algorithm of the present invention.
Five, embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the invention process is further described, following examples are descriptive, are not determinate, can not limit protection scope of the present invention with this.
An evaluation method for the efficient operation of power supply quality, it is as follows that the method comprising the steps of:
(1) analytic hierarchy process; Define the mutual significance level between index at the same level, adopt analytical hierarchy process to calculate the weight of index at the same level in higher level's index, the differentiation that solves index at the same level significance level in higher level's index;
1. index comprises internal indicator and external indicator,
Internal indicator includes: service, bill service, the service of client's calibration and 95598 services are accepted in new clothes and increase-volume and change electricity consumption service, troublshooting service, consulting inquiry service, complaint, report and suggestion;
Wherein, new clothes and increase-volume and change electricity consumption service further comprises: power supply plan time for replying encashment ratio, be subject to electrical engineering design audit time encashment ratio, intermediate inspection time encashment ratio, completion check time encashment ratio, to client submit to contract for the supply and use of electricity text time encashment ratio, the dress table of intending signing to connect electricity time encashment ratio, client's industry expands the quantity of applying to install service time limit compliance rate, violation " three do not specify ";
Wherein, complaint, report and suggestion are accepted service and are further comprised: customer complaint contact time encashment ratio, complain time for replying encashment ratio, report time for replying encashment ratio, 1,000,000 clients to check and verify the rate of complaints and every 1,000,000 user quality event generation numbers;
Wherein, 95598 services further comprise: 95598 bell ring three sound (12s) are answered rate, 95598 manual service and answered that rate, 95598 business consultations inquiries rate of reply, 95598 regulation service handling work orders distribute accuracy rate, 95598 regulation business receipt confirm that promptness rates, 95598 regulation business repay time encashment ratios and 95598 regulation service handling work orders distribute promptness rate;
External indicator includes: outside overall target and outside special index,
Wherein, outside overall target further comprises: satisfaction, quality perception, value perception, image appraisal, user expectation, client's complaint, customer loyalty;
Wherein, outside special index comprises: power supply reliability, the quality of power supply, new clothes, increase-volume and change electricity consumption service, troublshooting service, consulting inquiry service, complaint, report and suggestion are accepted have a power failure informing service, Very Important Person of service, paying service, bill service, client's arrearage and stopped rationing the power supply and inform and serve and electricity consumption guide service;
2. the weight of above-mentioned these indexs is adopted to definitely important, very important, important, important a little, five ranks of no less important, as the foundation of determining judgement quantitative values, in this foundation, set A iwith A jwhen two factors are carried out importance degree comparison, compare yardstick a ijimplication as shown in table 1; For n factor x 1, x 2..., x n, utilize tournament method to carry out the comparative result of significance level between factor as shown in table 2; Obtain comparator matrix A:
A = a 11 a 12 . . . a 1 n a 21 a 22 . . . a 2 n &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; a n 1 a n 2 . . . a nn
Wherein: a ii=1, a ij=1/a ji
Table 1 is yardstick a relatively ijimplication
Table 2 is comparative result between two
Suppose to do in matrix A while comparing between two, make w ibe the significance level of i index, w jbe the significance level of j index, a ijbe that i index is with respect to the significance level fiducial value of j index, that is:
a ij = w i w j - - - ( a )
According to this matrix, can by certain method, obtain the value of weight vector, conventionally have and method, root method, eigenvalue method and least square method etc., here article eigenvalue method.
Eigenvalue method:
Make each component to clarification of objective vector be
W=(w 1,w 2,…,w n) T (b)
If had and matrix A meets
a ij = a ik a jk , i , j , k = 1,2 , &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; , n - - - ( c )
A becomes consistency matrix, is called for short consistent battle array, and n rank consistency matrix A has following character:
I, unique non-zero characteristics root that the order of A is 1, A is n;
II, arbitrary row (OK) vector of A is all to the proper vector with characteristic root n;
If the paired relatively judgment matrix obtaining is consistent battle array, the proper vector corresponding to characteristic root n normalizing represents the weight of each factor to target (or upper strata factor), and this vector is called weight vector;
If be not consistent battle array than the judgment matrix A of gained in pairs, but in inconsistent allowed band, corresponding to the maximum characteristic root λ of A macproper vector (after normalization) as weight vector W, W meets
AW=λ maxW (d)
Component (the w of W wherein 1, w 2..., w n) be exactly the weight coefficient corresponding to n factor;
(2) build multistage linear function, convert the raw data results of desk evaluation index to desired value that 0-100 quantizes;
The threshold value that touches the mark B obtains b and divides, and surpasses in the unit of threshold value B index mxm. x1 and obtains a and divide, and obtains c and divides, if index x between B and x1, must be divided into the * (A-b) of b+ (x-B)/(x1-B) lower than index minimum x2 in the unit of threshold value B; If index x between x2 and B, must be divided into the * (c-b) of b+ (x-B)/(X2-B).Index parameter comprises: a, and b, c, x1, x2,
The breakdown repair of take is shown up time limit compliance rate as example, first determine that the show up evaluation criterion segmentation separation of time limit compliance rate of breakdown repair is 100 minutes, 80 minutes, 60 minutes, 0 minute, if the breakdown repair time limit compliance rate 100% of showing up wherein, must be divided into 100,90% must be divided into 80,85% must be divided into 60,80% must be divided into 0.Setting up the breakdown repair time limit compliance rate piecewise function of showing up is:
Piecewise function, derives functional digraph as shown in Figure 1 thus;
As shown in Figure 1, it is 94% that assumed fault is rushed to repair the time limit compliance rate of showing up, and by this piecewise function of x=94% substitution, the score value that draws mapping is F (x)=88, be that breakdown repair the actual of time limit compliance rate of showing up must be divided into 88 minutes, the follow-up ranking operation that carries out aggregative index with this score.
b = y 1 X 2 - y 2 X 1 X 2 - X 1 ;
(3) by the relation that affects of the structure variable in customer satisfaction computation model, calculate, then by factor of influence substitution customer satisfaction computation model, customer satisfaction result of calculation is revised;
1. PLS side's ratio juris
The method that partial least square method adopts composition to extract, is provided with q dependent variable { y 1..., y qand p independent variable { x 1..., x p, in order to study the statistical relationship of dependent variable and independent variable, we have observed n sample point, have formed thus the tables of data X=[x of independent variable and dependent variable 1..., x p] n * pand Y=[y 1..., y q] n * q, partial least squares regression is extracted respectively composition t in X and Y 1and u 1(that is to say t 1x 1..., x plinear combination, u 1y 1..., y qlinear combination), when extracting this two compositions, for the needs of regretional analysis, have following two requirements:
A:t 1and u 1should carry as wide as possible their variation information in tables of data separately;
B:t 1and u 1degree of correlation can reach maximum,
These two requirements show, t 1and u 1representative data Table X and Y as well as possible, simultaneously the composition t of independent variable 1ingredient u to dependent variable 1there is again the strongest interpretability.
At first composition t 1and u 1after being extracted, partial least squares regression is implemented respectively X to t 1, recurrence and Y to u 1recurrence.If regression equation has reached satisfied precision, algorithm stops; Otherwise, will utilize X by t 1, the residual, information after explanation and Y are by u 1residual, information after explanation is carried out the second composition of taking turns and is extracted.If finally X has been extracted to m composition t altogether 1..., t m, partial least squares regression will be by carrying out y kto t 1..., t mrecurrence, and then be expressed as y kabout former variable x 1..., x pregression equation, k=1,2 ..., q.
2. the algorithm steps of PLS
First data are done to standardization.The data matrix of X after standardization is designated as E 0=(E 01..., E 0p) n * p, the data matrix of Y after standardization is designated as F 0=(F 01..., F 0q) n * q,
First step note t 1e 0first composition, t 1=E 0w 1, w 1e 0first axle, it is a vector of unit length, || w 1||=1,
Note u 1f 0first composition, u 1=F 0c 1, c 1f 0first axle, it is a vector of unit length, and || c 1||=1,
If t 1, u 1can represent well respectively the data variation information in X and Y, according to principal component analysis (PCA) principle, should have
Var(t 1)→max (1)
Var(u 1)→max (2)
On the other hand, due to the needs of regression modeling, require again t 1to u 1there is maximum interpretability, by the thinking of canonical correlation analysis, t 1with u 1the degree of correlation should reach maximal value,
r(t 1,u 1)→max (3)
Therefore, integrate, in partial least squares regression, we require t 1with u 1covariance reach maximum,
Cov ( t 1 , u 1 ) = Var ( t 1 ) var ( u 1 ) r ( t 1 , u 1 ) &RightArrow; max - - - ( 4 )
Solve above-mentioned optimization problem, adopt Lagrangian Arithmetic.
Try to achieve axle w, and c, after, composition can be obtained
t 1=E 0w 1 (5)
u 1=F 0c 1 (6)
W 1and c 1respectively matrix E ' 0f 0f ' 0e 0and F ' 0e 0e ' 0f 0the corresponding proper vector of eigenvalue of maximum, then, ask respectively E 0and F 0to t 1, u 1three regression equations
E 0=t 1p′ 1+E 1 (7)
F 0=u 1q′ 1+F′ 1 (8)
F 0=t 1r′ 1+F 1 (9)
In formula, p 1, q 1, r 1it is respectively regression coefficient vector
p 1 = E 0 &prime; t 1 | | t 1 | | 2 - - - ( 10 )
q 1 = F 0 &prime; u 1 | | u 1 | | 2 - - - ( 11 )
r 1 = F 0 &prime; t 1 | | t 1 | | 2 - - - ( 12 )
And E 1, F ' 1, F 1it is respectively the residual matrix of three regression equations.
Second step residual matrix E 1and F 1replace E 0and F 0, then, ask second axle w 2and c 2and second composition t 2, u 2, have
t 2=E 1w 2 (13)
W 2and c 2respectively matrix E ' 1f 1f ' 1e 1and F ' 1e 1e ' 1f 1the corresponding proper vector of eigenvalue of maximum.
Calculate again regression coefficient vector
p 2 = E 1 &prime; t 2 | | t 2 | | 2 - - - ( 14 )
r 2 = F 1 &prime; t 2 | | t 2 | | 2 - - - ( 15 )
Thereby obtain two regression equations
E 1=t 2p′ 2+E 2 (16)
F 1=t 2r′ 2+F 2 (17)
So calculate, according to intersecting the definite number m that extracts composition of validity, just can obtain final regression equation
F 0=t 1r′ 1+…+t kr′ k+F k,k=1,2,…,m (18)
As shown in Figure 2, two models, consist of: one is structural model, and another is measurement model, the relation in model between each variable can represent by three matrix equation formulas below,
η=Bη+Γξ+ζ
y=Λ yη+ε
x=Λ xξ+δ
Structural model specifically can be expressed as following system of equations:
&eta; 1 &eta; 2 &eta; 3 &eta; 4 &eta; 5 &eta; 6 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 &beta; 21 0 0 0 0 0 &beta; 31 &beta; 32 0 0 0 0 &beta; 41 &beta; 42 &beta; 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 &beta; 54 0 0 0 0 0 &beta; 64 &beta; 65 0 &CenterDot; &eta; 1 &eta; 2 &eta; 3 &eta; 4 &eta; 5 &eta; 6 + &gamma; 1 0 0 &gamma; 4 0 0 &CenterDot; &xi; + &zeta; 1 &zeta; 2 &zeta; 3 &zeta; 4 &zeta; 5 &zeta; 6
Measurement model specifically can be expressed as following system of equations:
x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 = &lambda; 1 &lambda; 2 &lambda; 3 &lambda; 4 &CenterDot; &xi; + &delta; 1 &delta; 2 &delta; 3 &delta; 4
In above formula: x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4for image transforms seven measurable variables that obtain; y 1, y 2, y 3y 19for user expectation, the perception of client to quality, client is to the perception being worth, customer satisfaction, client's complaint, these six variablees of customer loyalty transform and tested and assessed variable; λ i, λ ijbe regression coefficient, represent the influence degree between variable; δ i, ε ierror for model;
(4), by the trend method of moving average, it is the variation tendency function that transverse axis, evaluation number are the longitudinal axis that the history evaluation result of evaluation index is built to evaluation time by moving average repeatedly, predicts the evaluation number in next cycle;
The trend method of moving average;
If Single moving average number is double moving average number computing formula be:
M t ( 2 ) = M t ( 1 ) + M t - 1 ( 1 ) + &CenterDot; &CenterDot; &CenterDot; + M t - N + 1 ( 1 ) N = M t - 1 ( 2 ) + M t ( 1 ) - M t - N ( 1 ) N
Establish again time series y 1, y 2..., y tfrom certain period, start to there are trends of straight line, and think that future period also changes by these trends of straight line, can establish this trends of straight line forecast model to be:
y ^ t + T = a t + b t T
In formula, t is current epoch number; T is the epoch number to time span of forecast by current epoch number t, i.e. the time of model extrapolation after t; it is the predicted value of t+T phase; a tfor intercept; b tfor slope.A tb tbe called again smoothing factor.
According to moving average, can obtain intercept a twith slope b tcomputing formula be:
a t = 2 M t ( 1 ) - M t ( 2 )
b t = 2 N - 1 ( M t ( 1 ) - M t ( 2 ) ) ;
(5) redefining of index at the same level, while having desired value to be sky in index at the same level, redefines the new system into higher level's index by the index at the same level of non-NULL, carries out weight reallocation, guarantees that the weight sum of index at the same level equals 1 all the time;
By weight fitting process, by there is no the weighted value of index at the same level of the index of statistics, do not reallocate, form new system, according to the relation that influences each other between index, by step analysis algorithm, recalculate index weights, guarantee that the final higher level's index weights calculating is 1, avoid losing without the index weights of statistics.

Claims (3)

1. the evaluation method that power supply quality efficiently moves, is characterized in that comprising that step is as follows:
(1) analytic hierarchy process; Define the mutual significance level between index at the same level, adopt analytical hierarchy process to calculate the weight of index at the same level in higher level's index, the differentiation that solves index at the same level significance level in higher level's index;
Wherein, described index is divided into internal indicator and external indicator,
Internal indicator includes: service, bill service, the service of client's calibration and 95598 services are accepted in new clothes and increase-volume and change electricity consumption service, troublshooting service, consulting inquiry service, complaint, report and suggestion;
External indicator includes: outside overall target and outside special index,
Wherein, outside overall target further comprises: satisfaction, quality perception, value perception, image appraisal, user expectation, client's complaint, customer loyalty;
Wherein, outside special index comprises: power supply reliability, the quality of power supply, new clothes, increase-volume and change electricity consumption service, troublshooting service, consulting inquiry service, complaint, report and suggestion are accepted have a power failure informing service, Very Important Person of service, paying service, bill service, client's arrearage and stopped rationing the power supply and inform and serve and electricity consumption guide service;
(2) build multistage linear function, convert the raw data results of desk evaluation index to desired value that 0-100 quantizes;
(3) by the relation that affects of the structure variable in customer satisfaction computation model, calculate, then by factor of influence substitution customer satisfaction computation model, customer satisfaction result of calculation is revised;
(4), by the trend method of moving average, it is the variation tendency function that transverse axis, evaluation number are the longitudinal axis that the history evaluation result of evaluation index is built to evaluation time by moving average repeatedly, predicts the evaluation number in next cycle;
(5) redefining of index at the same level, while having desired value to be sky in index at the same level, redefines the new system into higher level's index by the index at the same level of non-NULL, carries out weight reallocation, guarantees that the weight sum of index at the same level equals 1 all the time.
2. the evaluation method of the efficient operation of power supply quality according to claim 1, is characterized in that: the weight in described step (2) adopts definitely important, very important, important, important a little and five ranks of no less important.
3. the evaluation method of the efficient operation of power supply quality according to claim 1, is characterized in that: the calculating in described step (3) and the specifically employing PLS method of revising are calculated and revised.
CN201410308806.7A 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 Evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality Pending CN104112204A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410308806.7A CN104112204A (en) 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 Evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410308806.7A CN104112204A (en) 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 Evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104112204A true CN104112204A (en) 2014-10-22

Family

ID=51708987

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410308806.7A Pending CN104112204A (en) 2014-07-01 2014-07-01 Evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104112204A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105574644A (en) * 2014-12-01 2016-05-11 曹树槐 Quality perception information management method and system based on three-dimensional evaluation and time domain retracing
CN106021882A (en) * 2016-05-11 2016-10-12 中国南方电网有限责任公司电网技术研究中心 Index weight acquiring method and system
CN106384256A (en) * 2016-11-11 2017-02-08 国家电网公司 Power supplying service satisfaction dynamic testing system based on index system dynamic change
CN110472852A (en) * 2019-08-02 2019-11-19 上海云扩信息科技有限公司 A kind of experience assessment implementation management method of electrical power services application
CN111325475A (en) * 2020-03-04 2020-06-23 国网江苏省电力有限公司扬州供电分公司 Emergency repair work order evaluation factor analysis method based on total log-likelihood algorithm

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050065754A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2005-03-24 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Quantification of operational risks
CN103247008A (en) * 2013-05-07 2013-08-14 国家电网公司 Quality evaluation method of electricity statistical index data

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050065754A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2005-03-24 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Quantification of operational risks
CN103247008A (en) * 2013-05-07 2013-08-14 国家电网公司 Quality evaluation method of electricity statistical index data

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
周文瑜 等: ""供电企业客户满意度测评体系及应用"", 《华东电力》 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105574644A (en) * 2014-12-01 2016-05-11 曹树槐 Quality perception information management method and system based on three-dimensional evaluation and time domain retracing
CN106021882A (en) * 2016-05-11 2016-10-12 中国南方电网有限责任公司电网技术研究中心 Index weight acquiring method and system
CN106384256A (en) * 2016-11-11 2017-02-08 国家电网公司 Power supplying service satisfaction dynamic testing system based on index system dynamic change
CN110472852A (en) * 2019-08-02 2019-11-19 上海云扩信息科技有限公司 A kind of experience assessment implementation management method of electrical power services application
CN110472852B (en) * 2019-08-02 2023-03-03 上海云扩信息科技有限公司 Experience evaluation implementation management method for power service application
CN111325475A (en) * 2020-03-04 2020-06-23 国网江苏省电力有限公司扬州供电分公司 Emergency repair work order evaluation factor analysis method based on total log-likelihood algorithm

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106779277B (en) Classified evaluation method and device for network loss of power distribution network
CN103617371A (en) Method for comprehensively evaluating electric energy quality based on grey theory
CN104112204A (en) Evaluation method for efficient operation of power supply quality
CN107563680A (en) A kind of distribution network reliability evaluation method based on AHP and entropy assessment
CN106329516A (en) Typical scene recognition based dynamic reconstruction method of power distribution network
CN105469196A (en) Comprehensive evaluation method and comprehensive evaluation system for evaluating mine construction project process
CN104318482A (en) Comprehensive assessment system and method of smart distribution network
CN104809660A (en) Dynamic screening and comprehensive weight setting method for low-voltage transformer area line loss rate analysis indexes
CN105389636A (en) Low-voltage area KFCM-SVR reasonable line loss prediction method
CN106921158B (en) demand coefficient analysis method for historical collected data based on time sequence of distribution transformer
CN104021300B (en) Comprehensive assessment method based on effect of distribution type electrical connection on power distribution network
CN105184662A (en) Effective power grid security risk assessment method
CN103514491A (en) Power load forecasting method
CN104881003A (en) Effectiveness evaluation method for metering production facilities
CN110490409B (en) DNN-based low-voltage transformer area line loss rate benchmarking value setting method
CN104077493B (en) Method for constructing state evaluation index system of electric relaying protection system
CN113487447A (en) Power distribution network load prediction and line loss cause analysis method based on big data
CN110363432A (en) Based on improvement entropy weight-grey correlation distribution network reliability impact analysis method
CN105303466A (en) Intelligent power grid engineering project comprehensive evaluation method based on AHP-GRA
CN104504619A (en) Temperature/ economic growth factor considered monthly total electricity consumption predication method
CN104036364A (en) Evaluation method for network structure level of power distribution network
CN109685296A (en) The power information acquisition system fuzzy synthetic appraisement method of meter and historic state
CN104036434A (en) Evaluation method for load supply capacity of power distribution network
CN111008870A (en) Regional logistics demand prediction method based on PCA-BP neural network model
CN104218569A (en) Evaluative analysis method for static security check of large-scaled power grid

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C53 Correction of patent of invention or patent application
CB02 Change of applicant information

Address after: 300010 Tianjin city Hebei District Wujing Road No. 39

Applicant after: State Grid Corporation of China

Applicant after: State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company

Address before: 100031 Xicheng District West Chang'an Avenue, No. 86, Beijing

Applicant before: State Grid Corporation of China

Applicant before: State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company

C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20141022