CN104062968A - Continuous chemical process fault detection method - Google Patents

Continuous chemical process fault detection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104062968A
CN104062968A CN201410256142.4A CN201410256142A CN104062968A CN 104062968 A CN104062968 A CN 104062968A CN 201410256142 A CN201410256142 A CN 201410256142A CN 104062968 A CN104062968 A CN 104062968A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
data
beta
statistic
sigma
alpha
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201410256142.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
江晓栋
赵海涛
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
East China University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
East China University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by East China University of Science and Technology filed Critical East China University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201410256142.4A priority Critical patent/CN104062968A/en
Publication of CN104062968A publication Critical patent/CN104062968A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Complex Calculations (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a continuous chemical process fault detection method. The continuous chemical process fault detection method comprises the following steps that (1) a linear regression model of a vector Xj and a vector Y is built, and a regression constraint function is introduced; (2) data compression is carried out through haar wavelet transformation to improve computational efficiency; (3) a regression constraint construction sparse pivot element model with the addition of 1-norm and 2-norm is built, and an optimal solution of a sparse pivot element is worked out through derivation of the SPCA algorithm; (4) the optimal threshold value of the T2 statistic and the optimal threshold value of the SPE statistic are estimated through the kernel density estimation (kde) method; (5) calculation of the T2 statistic and the SPE statistic is conducted on fault data, and the value of the T2 statistic and the value of the SPE statistic of the fault data are obtained in sequence; (6) whether a fault exists in the data is detected. According to the continuous chemical process fault detection method, the data size related to a pivot element after sparsity is reduced, so that the calculated quantity is reduced, the computation time is shortened, real-time performance of monitoring is improved, and accuracy and efficiency of fault detection can be improved.

Description

A kind of chemical industry procedure failure testing method continuously
Technical field
The present invention relates to Intelligent Information Processing field, especially relate to a kind of chemical industry procedure failure testing method continuously.
Background technology
Along with controlling the progress of the reach of science and industrial technology, productive capacity and the modernization level of industrial system improve day by day, also becoming increasingly complex thereupon of production technology, production equipment and production run.Meanwhile, the Potential feasibility that these complicated systems break down also improves accordingly, and the seriousness of fault also can be along with the complexity of system significantly increases, once there is fault, will cause very large personnel and property loss so.So how Real-Time Monitoring production run and fault is detected in advance and just seems particularly important.Only carry out effective process monitoring, just can guarantee the quality of production safety and raising product.
Four steps of process monitoring are that fault detect, Fault Identification, fault diagnosis and process are recovered.By the method for pattern-recognition, lay particular emphasis on by fault detect out.Fault detect, popular says, determines exactly whether fault has occurred.Detect in time and can, to the problem there will be is proposed to valuable warning, by taking appropriate measures, avoid serious process to overturn.
Traditional fault detection method mainly contains detection method, the method based on data-driven and the method based on priori based on model.Wherein the method based on data-driven is to utilize statistical thinking, to the data analysis producing in production run, first in normal data, tests, then is applied to the monitoring to production process data.In the method for data-driven, PCA detection method is a kind of detection method of classics, is widely used in production practices.But PCA detection method also has its limitation, PCA method has two Utopian results: the one, and the maximum that pivot can embody data changes, and information loss is minimum; The 2nd, between pivot, be independently, a pivot is uncorrelated with other pivots.Obtaining of the above results is because the detection method of PCA hypothesis process data is linear Gauss, in the case, chooses pivot can obtain good result according to variance contribution ratio.But in large-scale industrial processes, tend to exist various process variable in system, can not meet linear Gauss's hypothesis completely, often calculated amount is very large for traditional PCA detection method in addition, has affected the actual effect of counting yield and process monitoring.
Summary of the invention
The object of the invention is to the deficiency existing in existing method, a kind of chemical industry procedure failure testing method is continuously proposed, by introducing the thought of sparse pivot, traditional dimensionality reduction problem is converted into recurrence optimization problem, improve the precision of detection and the efficiency of detection with this.The method is detected for continuous chemical industry procedure fault, can improve the precision of detection.
Object of the present invention can be achieved through the following technical solutions:
A kind of chemical industry procedure failure testing method continuously, the method comprises the following steps:
1) from Tennessee-Yi Siman industrial process model, obtain normal data and fault data, using normal data as training data, using fault data as test data, and the test data obtaining is carried out to standardization;
2) training data is carried out to wavelet transformation, packed data;
3) introduce, with the recurrence constraint function of 1-norm and 2-norm, training data is returned to calculating, utilize rarefaction principle component analysis to calculate the load vector of rarefaction;
4) T of the training data of calculating after small echo changes 2statistic and SPE statistic;
5) method of utilizing probability density to estimate is tried to achieve T 2threshold value with SPE statistic;
6) according to step 3), 4) test data of carrying out after small echo variation is calculated to corresponding T 2with SPE statistic, judge whether test data exists fault:
When using T 2when statistic detects, if the T trying to achieve 2the value of statistic is greater than its corresponding threshold value, and corresponding one group of data exist fault; If the T trying to achieve 2the value of statistic is less than its corresponding threshold value, and corresponding one group of data are normal;
In the time using SPE statistic to detect, if the value of the SPE statistic of trying to achieve is greater than its corresponding threshold value, there is fault in corresponding one group of data; If the value of the SPE statistic of trying to achieve is less than its corresponding threshold value, corresponding one group of data are normal.
Step 1) in, described standardization adopts Z-score standardized method, and computing formula is:
X * = X - μ σ
In formula, X={x 1, x 2..., x nbe data matrix, X *represent the data matrix after standardization, the average that μ is training data, the standard deviation that σ is training data, μ and σ computing formula are:
μ = 1 n Σ i = 1 n x i
σ = [ 1 n - 1 Σ i = 1 n ( x i - μ ) 2 ] 1 2
Step 2) in, described wavelet transformation is haar wavelet transformation.
Described step 3) be specially:
301) establish current sample data and integrate as X, pivot load vector is α k, sample data collection variance matrix is:
α k T ( X T X ) α k
It meets constraint condition:
&alpha; k T &alpha; k = 1 ( k &GreaterEqual; 2 ) , &alpha; h T &alpha; k = 0 ( h < k )
Definition t is that sparse property regulates parameter, has:
&Sigma; j = 1 p | &alpha; k , j | &le; t
Suppose that Y is the pivot matrix of sample data, Y jfor the column vector of Y, be j pivot, if there is parameter lambda > 0, return and be estimated as:
&beta; ^ = arg min &beta; | Y - &Sigma; j = 1 p X j &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j |
Wherein, parameter lambda is for returning constrained parameters, β jfor corresponding regression coefficient vector;
302) introduce other non-negative parameter lambda 1, above formula expansion is obtained to following optimization problem:
&beta; ^ = arg min &beta; | Y - &Sigma; j = 1 p X j &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; 1 | | &beta; j | | 1
Wherein, | | &beta; j | | 1 = &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j | It is the 1-norm of β;
Try to achieve after, the related coefficient V of calculating constraint function j:
V j = &beta; ^ j | &beta; ^ j |
XV jbe j pivot;
303) choose front k pivot in pivot matrix, definition α and β are parameter matrix, and dimension is all p × k, X ifor the row vector of X, β jfor the column vector of β, if there is parameter lambda > 0, and α tα=I k, consider elastic network(s) constraint simultaneously:
( &alpha; ^ , &beta; ^ ) = arg min &alpha; , &beta; &Sigma; i n | X i - &alpha; &beta; T X i | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 k | &beta; j | 2 + &Sigma; k = 1 k &lambda; 1 , j | &beta; j |
Wherein, λ 1, jthe λ of corresponding j pivot 1value, j=1,2..., k;
304) utilize the β after the convergence of finally trying to achieve to be normalized, and solve a final k pivot, obtain the load vector of rarefaction:
P j≈XV j=Xβ j/|β j|(j=1,2,…k)
Step 4) in, T 2the computing formula of statistic is:
T 2=X TV(∑ T∑) -1V TX
Wherein, V is the covariance matrix ∑=X of sample tx carries out orthogonal vector after svd, and X is sample data collection;
The computing formula of SPE statistic is:
SPE=[(I-PP T)X] T(I-PP T)X
The matrix of loadings of the load vector composition that wherein, P is rarefaction.
Step 5) in, described probability density method of estimation adopts Parzen window method, i.e. kernel probability density estimation method.
Compared with prior art, the present invention has the following advantages.
1) the present invention utilizes statistical thinking, a kind of continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method has been proposed, on the basis of PCA detection technique, introduce the thought of sparse pivot, utilize a recurrence constraint function with 1-norm and 2-norm to build sparse principal component model, utilize statistical thinking, dimensionality reduction thinking conventional in fault detect is converted into recurrence optimization problem.By restriction load the nonzero coefficient in vector number so that try to achieve sparse load vector.Be different from according to variance contribution ratio and choose pivot, sparse pivot analysis is to obtain pivot by the load number of the nonzero element in vector of restriction.Sparse pivot analysis has better utilized the characteristic of process data itself, rarefaction representation by process data self is chosen pivot, break through original mode of choosing pivot by variance contribution ratio, be more applicable to continuous chemical process, and can obtain better fault detect effect.
2) the present invention is applied in continuous chemical industry procedure fault detection, can improve the accuracy of detection.Carry out data analysis by relatively traditional PCA method, analysis result shows that the present invention effectively reduces error rate and the loss of fault detect.
3) the present invention, in the time that process data is carried out to pre-service, carries out wavelet transformation by haar small echo to data, both can reach the effect of the denoising to data, also can amount of compressed data, and reduce the calculated amount detecting and then improve the efficiency detecting.
4) the inventive method has utilized the method for kernel probability density estimation to solve T 2with the threshold value of SPE statistic, the threshold value of obtaining can reflect the criterion of normal data more.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is TEP process process flow diagram;
Fig. 2 is the overall procedure block diagram of the inventive method;
Fig. 3 is the T based on continuous chemical industry procedure fault Class1 3 that adopts traditional PCA technology 2the testing result figure of statistic detection and SPE statistic;
Fig. 4 adopts the testing result figure based on continuous chemical industry procedure fault Class1 3 of the present invention.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments, the present invention is described in detail.The present embodiment is implemented as prerequisite taking technical solution of the present invention, provided detailed embodiment and concrete operating process, but protection scope of the present invention is not limited to following embodiment.
Carrying out in the process of fault detect, the data of utilizing are the data that gather in Tennessee-Yi Siman (TEP) process model.TEP process model is created by Yisiman Chemical Company, and its object is exactly to provide a real industrial process for evaluation procedure control and method for supervising.Test process is based on a true chemical industry industrial process continuously, and composition wherein, dynamics, service condition etc. are because the problem of patent right has all been done amendment.Process comprises five formants: reactor, condenser, compressor, separation vessel and stripping tower; And comprise eight kinds of composition: A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H.Fig. 1 is the process chart of this commercial unit.
The process model of Tennessee-Yi Siman problem comprises 21 faults that preset.In these faults, 16 is known, and 5 is unknown.Fault 1-7 is relevant with the step variation of process variable, as, the variation of cold water inlet temperature or charging composition.Fault 8-12 increases relevant with the changeability of some process variable.Fault 13 is the slow drifts in reaction kinetics, and fault 14,15 is relevant with sticking valve with 21.As shown in table 1 is the procedure fault description of Tennessee-Yi Siman process model.
Table 1: procedure fault is described
As shown in Figure 2, a kind of chemical industry procedure failure testing method continuously, step comprises:
Step 1, build vectorial X jwith the linear regression model (LRM) of Y, introduce and return constraint function.
Step 1.1, from Tennessee-Yi Siman (TEP) industrial process model, obtain continuous chemical industry procedure fault data.Obtain a sample matrix X (p × n), the hits that wherein n is sample, the number that p is observation data.Choose arbitrarily X jrelevant pivot column vector, is defined as Y:
Y=(y 1,y 2,…y n) T
P different observed readings:
X j=(x 1j,x 2j,…,x nj) T,j=1,2,…P
X jthe linear regression constraint function relevant with Y, its least estimated formula is as follows:
&beta; ^ = arg min &beta; | Y - &Sigma; j = 1 p X j &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j |
In formula, λ is non-negative parameter, β jfor corresponding regression coefficient vector.
Step 1.2, from Tennessee-Yi Siman (TEP) process model, obtain normal data and fault data, wherein normal data is as training data, and fault data is as test data.
Step 2, test data is carried out to standardization, wherein in the time of standardization, all take from training set as the average of subtrahend with as the standard deviation of divisor.
The method of step 2.1, data normalization, adopts Z-score standardization, also referred to as standard deviation standardization.
X * = X - &mu; &sigma;
In formula, X represents test data matrix, and μ is the average of taking from training data.
&mu; = 1 n &Sigma; i = 1 n x i
σ is the standard deviation of taking from training data;
&sigma; = [ 1 n - 1 &Sigma; i = 1 n ( x i - &mu; ) 2 ] 1 2
Step 2.2, data after Z-score standardization, data fit standardized normal distribution, average is 0, standard deviation is 1.
Step 3, normal data is done to small echo change, it is for amount of compressed data that this method is used wavelet transform process data, raises the efficiency.Here select haar wavelet transformation.
Female small echo (mother wavelet) of step 3.1, haar small echo can be expressed as:
And corresponding convergent-divergent equation can be expressed as:
Its wave filter h[n] be defined as:
Step 4, will be applied in principal component model with the lasso constraint function of 1-norm and 2-norm, obtain the restrictive algorithm of sparse pivot.
Step 4.1, suppose that pivot now load vector is α k, sample data integrates as X, and its variance matrix is:
&alpha; k T ( X T X ) &alpha; k
Meeting constraint condition is:
&alpha; k T &alpha; k = 1 ( k &GreaterEqual; 2 ) , &alpha; h T &alpha; k = 0 ( h < k )
Definition t is that sparse property regulates parameter, has:
&Sigma; j = 1 p | &alpha; k , j | &le; t
In the time that t reduces, more load vector coefficient will converge to 0, so the size of t value has influence on the sparse degree of pivot.
SPCA is based upon on the basis of pivot analysis (PCA), supposes that Y is the pivot matrix of sample data, Y jfor the column vector of Y, be j pivot, if there is parameter lambda > 0, return and be estimated as:
&beta; ^ = arg min &beta; | Y - &Sigma; j = 1 p X j &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j |
Wherein, parameter lambda is the constrained parameters in regretional analysis, and can be used for the reconstruct of pivot.
Step 4.2, on the basis of the recurrence constraint of step 4.1, introduce again other non-negative parameter lambda 1, above formula expansion is obtained to following optimization problem:
&beta; ^ = arg min &beta; | Y - &Sigma; j = 1 p X j &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; 1 | | &beta; j | | 1
Here | | &beta; j | | 1 = &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j | It is the 1-norm of β.
Try to achieve after, the related coefficient V of calculating constraint function j:
V j = &beta; ^ j | &beta; ^ j |
XV jbe exactly j pivot.The extraction algorithm of pivot that Here it is.
Step 4.3, choose front k pivot of sample, wherein α and β are parameter matrix, and dimension is all p × k, X ifor the row vector of X, β jfor the column vector of β, if there is parameter lambda > 0, and α tα=I k:
( &alpha; ^ , &beta; ^ ) = arg min &alpha; , &beta; &Sigma; i n | X i - &alpha; &beta; T X i | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 k | &beta; j | 2
The Solve problems of k pivot is converted into linear regression problem, sets the objective function returning as follows:
x = &Sigma; i = 1 n | X i - &alpha; &beta; T X i | 2
If make β=α, it is PCA method.
If in formula
( &alpha; ^ , &beta; ^ ) = arg min &alpha; , &beta; &Sigma; i n | X i - &alpha; &beta; T X i | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 k | &beta; j | 2
Basis on consider elastic network(s) constrained procedure, can obtain:
Work as α tα=I ktime
( &alpha; ^ , &beta; ^ ) = arg min &alpha; , &beta; &Sigma; i n | X i - &alpha; &beta; T X i | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 k | &beta; j | 2 + &Sigma; k = 1 k &lambda; 1 , j | &beta; j |
Wherein, λ 1, jcorresponding k different λ 1value.
The solution procedure of the optimum solution of rarefaction is as follows:
(1) solve k pivot of sample matrix, the initial value of parameter matrix α is V i(i=1: k).
(2) for fixing α value, in parameter j=1,2 ... when k, another parameter beta of compute sparse constraint:
&beta; j = arg min &beta; ( &alpha; j - &beta; ) T X T X ( &alpha; j - &beta; ) + &lambda; | | &beta; | | 2 + &lambda; 1 , j | | &beta; | | 1
(3) solve after parameter beta, solve now corresponding parameter alpha.β value is carried out to svd, has:
X TXβ=UDV T
(4) repeat above two steps, undated parameter α and parameter beta repeatedly, until β convergence.
(5) utilize the final β after convergence to be normalized, and solve a final k pivot, obtain sparse optimum solution, i.e. the load vector of rarefaction:
P j≈xV j=xβ j/|β j|(j=1,2,…k)
Step 5, solve normal data (training data) each group data calculate T 2statistic or SPE statistic.
Wherein T 2the computing formula of statistic is:
T 2=X TV(∑ T∑) -1V TX
Wherein V is sample covariance matrix ∑=X tx carries out orthogonal vector after svd.
The computing formula of SPE statistic is:
SPE=[(I-PP T)X] T(I-PP T)X
The matrix of the load vector composition that wherein P is rarefaction.
Step 6, for each group data corresponding T of normal data 2statistic or SPE statistics value, the method for utilizing probability density to estimate is obtained the threshold line of normal data, using this as the standard that judges that whether normal data are.
The method that probability density is estimated: have " Parzen window method " and k n-nearest neighbour method.This method is used Parzen window method, claims again kernel probability density estimation method (KDE).
Parzen window method: according to some definite volume functions, such as shrink gradually a given initial space.This just requires stochastic variable k nwith can ensure P n(x) can converge to P (x).
To different T 2statistic and SPE statistic are done probability density estimation, finally obtain respectively a T 2statistic and SPE statistic are as the standard value of normal data, i.e. threshold value.
Step 7, fault data is detected, according to the formula of step 6, obtain respectively every group of fault data T 2statistic and SPE statistic, then utilize threshold line to detect data:
When using T 2when statistic detects, if the T trying to achieve 2the value of statistic is greater than its corresponding threshold value, and corresponding one group of data exist fault; If the T trying to achieve 2the value of statistic is less than its corresponding threshold value, and corresponding one group of data are normal;
In the time using SPE statistic to detect, if the value of the SPE statistic of trying to achieve is greater than its corresponding threshold value, there is fault in corresponding one group of data; If the value of the SPE statistic of trying to achieve is less than its corresponding threshold value, corresponding one group of data are normal.
In example, training data has 500 groups of data, and every group of data have 52 observed readings.Test data one has 960 groups of data, and every group of test data contains 52 observed readings, and wherein front 160 groups of data are normal data, and then 800 groups of data are fault data.
In order to embody a kind of chemical industry procedure failure testing method superiority continuously, itself and the traditional detection technique of utilizing PCA technology are compared.
When tradition utilizes PCA to carry out fault detect, be all to utilize T 2with these two statistics of SPE, fault is detected.Wherein T 2statistic is used for multivariable process data to carry out fault detect.A given observation vector x also supposes ∧=∑ t∑ is reversible, T 2statistic can directly calculate by PCA expression formula:
T 2=X TV(∑ T∑) -1V Tx
And T2 statistic threshold value can be expressed as:
T a 2 = a ( n - 1 ) ( n + 1 ) n ( n - a ) F a ( a , n - a )
SPE is square prediction error, be 2-norm square, claim again Q statistic.Be used for measuring the deviation that observed reading represents with respect to low-dimensional PCA, Q statistic can be expressed as:
Q=[(I-PP T)x] T(I-PP T)x
Here P is matrix of loadings.
And SPE statistic threshold value can be expressed as:
Q a = &theta; 1 [ h 0 c a 2 &theta; 2 &theta; 1 + 1 + &theta; 2 h 0 ( h 0 - 1 ) &theta; 1 2 ] 1 / h 0
Here c abe and (1-α) standard deviation that quantile is corresponding.
It is exactly the threshold value of trying to achieve respectively T2 statistic and SPE statistic in present normal data with the basic thought that PCA method detects fault, then fault data is asked respectively to T2 statistic and SPE statistic, be judged to normally lower than the data of threshold line, the data that exceed threshold line are judged to fault data.Whole process is all carried out simulation study based on TEP process, and the step of process monitoring is as follows:
Step 1, concentrate and obtain sampled data from TEP process data, and carry out standardization by the average of normal condition drag and variance, obtain normal data and the fault data of every kind of fault type;
Step 2, normal data is carried out to the conversion of PCA dimensionality reduction, obtain matrix of loadings;
Step 3, calculate the T of normal data 2the threshold value of statistic and SPE statistic;
The T of step 4, calculating fault data 2statistic and SPE statistic;
The T of step 5, supervision fault data 2the whether paranormal threshold line of statistic and SPE statistic;
We choose fault type 13 and provide the result of fault detect, utilize respectively the method for PCA and SPCA to detect, and respectively as shown in Figure 3,4, as shown in table 2 is PCA method testing result to analysis result data figure, the testing result that table 3 is the inventive method.
Table 2: error rate and loss that the PCA based on continuous chemical industry procedure fault Class1 3 detects
Table 3: error rate and loss that the SPCA based on continuous chemical industry procedure fault Class1 3 detects
By the data results of example, can find out that a kind of continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method utilizes the method for dimensionality reduction, on different dimensions, testing result is different, and the testing result in some dimensions is better than the detection method of PCA.

Claims (6)

1. a continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method, is characterized in that, the method comprises the following steps:
1) from Tennessee-Yi Siman industrial process model, obtain normal data and fault data, using normal data as training data, using fault data as test data, and the test data obtaining is carried out to standardization;
2) training data is carried out to wavelet transformation, packed data;
3) introduce, with the recurrence constraint function of 1-norm and 2-norm, training data is returned to calculating, utilize rarefaction principle component analysis to calculate the load vector of rarefaction;
4) T of the training data of calculating after small echo changes 2statistic and SPE statistic;
5) method of utilizing probability density to estimate is tried to achieve T 2threshold value with SPE statistic;
6) according to step 3), 4) test data of carrying out after small echo variation is calculated to corresponding T 2with SPE statistic, judge whether test data exists fault:
When using T 2when statistic detects, if the T trying to achieve 2the value of statistic is greater than its corresponding threshold value, and corresponding one group of data exist fault; If the T trying to achieve 2the value of statistic is less than its corresponding threshold value, and corresponding one group of data are normal;
In the time using SPE statistic to detect, if the value of the SPE statistic of trying to achieve is greater than its corresponding threshold value, there is fault in corresponding one group of data; If the value of the SPE statistic of trying to achieve is less than its corresponding threshold value, corresponding one group of data are normal.
2. the continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method of one according to claim 1, is characterized in that step 1) in, described standardization adopts Z-score standardized method, and computing formula is:
X * = X - &mu; &sigma;
In formula, X={x 1, x 2..., x nbe data matrix, X *represent the data matrix after standardization, the average that μ is training data, the standard deviation that σ is training data, μ and σ computing formula are:
&mu; = 1 n &Sigma; i = 1 n x i
&sigma; = [ 1 n - 1 &Sigma; i = 1 n ( x i - &mu; ) 2 ] 1 2
3. the continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method of one according to claim 1, is characterized in that step 2) in, described wavelet transformation is haar wavelet transformation.
4. the continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method of one according to claim 1, is characterized in that described step 3) be specially:
301) establish current sample data and integrate as X, pivot load vector is α k, sample data collection variance matrix is:
&alpha; k T ( X T X ) &alpha; k
It meets constraint condition:
&alpha; k T &alpha; k = 1 ( k &GreaterEqual; 2 ) , &alpha; h T &alpha; k = 0 ( h < k )
Definition t is that sparse property regulates parameter, has:
&Sigma; j = 1 p | &alpha; k , j | &le; t
Suppose that Y is the pivot matrix of sample data, Y jfor the column vector of Y, be j pivot, if there is parameter lambda > 0, return and be estimated as:
&beta; ^ = arg min &beta; | Y - &Sigma; j = 1 p X j &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j |
Wherein, parameter lambda is for returning constrained parameters, β jfor corresponding regression coefficient vector;
302) introduce other non-negative parameter lambda 1, above formula expansion is obtained to following optimization problem:
&beta; ^ = arg min &beta; | Y - &Sigma; j = 1 p X j &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j | 2 + &lambda; 1 | | &beta; j | | 1
Wherein, | | &beta; j | | 1 = &Sigma; j = 1 p | &beta; j | It is the 1-norm of β;
Try to achieve after, the related coefficient V of calculating constraint function j:
V j = &beta; ^ j | &beta; ^ j |
XV jbe j pivot;
303) choose front k pivot in pivot matrix, definition α and β are parameter matrix, and dimension is all p × k, X ifor the row vector of X, β jfor the column vector of β, if there is parameter lambda > 0, and α tα=I k, consider elastic network(s) constraint simultaneously:
( &alpha; ^ , &beta; ^ ) = arg min &alpha; , &beta; &Sigma; i n | X i - &alpha; &beta; T X i | 2 + &lambda; &Sigma; j = 1 k | &beta; j | 2 + &Sigma; k = 1 k &lambda; 1 , j | &beta; j |
Wherein, λ 1, jthe λ of corresponding j pivot 1value, j=1,2..., k;
304) utilize the β after the convergence of finally trying to achieve to be normalized, and solve a final k pivot, obtain the load vector of rarefaction:
P j≈XV j=Xβ j/|β j|(j=1,2,…k)
5. the continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method of one according to claim 4, is characterized in that step 4) in, T 2the computing formula of statistic is:
T 2=X TV(∑ T∑) -1V TX
Wherein, V is the covariance matrix ∑=X of sample tx carries out orthogonal vector after svd, and X is sample data collection;
The computing formula of SPE statistic is:
SPE=[(I-PP T)X] T(I-PP T)X
The matrix of loadings of the load vector composition that wherein, P is rarefaction.
6. the continuous chemical industry procedure failure testing method of one according to claim 1, is characterized in that step 5) in, described probability density method of estimation adopts Parzen window method, i.e. kernel probability density estimation method.
CN201410256142.4A 2014-06-10 2014-06-10 Continuous chemical process fault detection method Pending CN104062968A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410256142.4A CN104062968A (en) 2014-06-10 2014-06-10 Continuous chemical process fault detection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410256142.4A CN104062968A (en) 2014-06-10 2014-06-10 Continuous chemical process fault detection method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104062968A true CN104062968A (en) 2014-09-24

Family

ID=51550729

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410256142.4A Pending CN104062968A (en) 2014-06-10 2014-06-10 Continuous chemical process fault detection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104062968A (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104700200A (en) * 2014-12-18 2015-06-10 西安交通大学 Multivariate product quality monitoring method oriented to digital workshop
CN105739489A (en) * 2016-05-12 2016-07-06 电子科技大学 Batch process fault detecting method based on ICA-KNN
CN105893700A (en) * 2016-04-26 2016-08-24 陆新建 Chemical production on-line fault detection and diagnosis technique based on physical-large data hybrid model
CN106444666A (en) * 2016-09-22 2017-02-22 宁波大学 Dynamic process monitoring method based on weighted dynamic distributed PCA model
CN106444665A (en) * 2016-09-22 2017-02-22 宁波大学 Fault classification diagnosis method based on non-Gaussian similarity matching
CN106710653A (en) * 2016-12-05 2017-05-24 浙江大学 Real-time data abnormal diagnosis method for monitoring operation of nuclear power unit
CN108062565A (en) * 2017-12-12 2018-05-22 重庆科技学院 Double pivots-dynamic kernel principal component analysis method for diagnosing faults based on chemical industry TE processes
CN108594790A (en) * 2018-04-11 2018-09-28 浙江大学 A kind of fault detect and separation method based on structural sparse type pivot analysis
CN109859241A (en) * 2019-01-09 2019-06-07 厦门大学 Adaptive features select and time consistency robust correlation filtering visual tracking method
CN110083797A (en) * 2019-04-19 2019-08-02 大禹节水集团股份有限公司 A kind of drip irrigation pipe production line exception method of real-time and system
CN110288724A (en) * 2019-06-27 2019-09-27 大连海事大学 A kind of batch process monitoring method based on wavelet function pivot analysis
CN110529746A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-12-03 北京化工大学 Detection method, device and the equipment of pipe leakage
US10656102B2 (en) 2015-10-22 2020-05-19 Battelle Memorial Institute Evaluating system performance with sparse principal component analysis and a test statistic
CN111650898A (en) * 2020-05-13 2020-09-11 大唐七台河发电有限责任公司 Distributed control system and method with high fault tolerance performance
CN111752259A (en) * 2020-06-02 2020-10-09 上海交通大学 Fault identification method and device for gas turbine sensor signal

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050055175A1 (en) * 2003-09-10 2005-03-10 Jahns Gary L. Industrial process fault detection using principal component analysis
CN1996190A (en) * 2006-11-23 2007-07-11 浙江大学 Industrial process fault diagnosis system and method based on wavelet analysis

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050055175A1 (en) * 2003-09-10 2005-03-10 Jahns Gary L. Industrial process fault detection using principal component analysis
CN1996190A (en) * 2006-11-23 2007-07-11 浙江大学 Industrial process fault diagnosis system and method based on wavelet analysis

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
彭必灿、张正道: "基于稀疏主元分析的过程监控研究", 《计算机工程与应用(CNKI网络优先出版)》 *
李成: "基于提升小波的数据处理及过程监测研究", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库:浙江大学博士学位论文,2005》 *
许迎军: "《语言研究统计方法》", 31 January 2012, 国防工业出版社 *

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104700200A (en) * 2014-12-18 2015-06-10 西安交通大学 Multivariate product quality monitoring method oriented to digital workshop
CN104700200B (en) * 2014-12-18 2018-03-16 西安交通大学 A kind of product multivariate quality monitoring method towards digitlization workshop
US10656102B2 (en) 2015-10-22 2020-05-19 Battelle Memorial Institute Evaluating system performance with sparse principal component analysis and a test statistic
CN105893700B (en) * 2016-04-26 2019-05-31 陆新建 Based on the online fault detection and diagnosis technology of physics-big data mixed model Chemical Manufacture
CN105893700A (en) * 2016-04-26 2016-08-24 陆新建 Chemical production on-line fault detection and diagnosis technique based on physical-large data hybrid model
CN105739489A (en) * 2016-05-12 2016-07-06 电子科技大学 Batch process fault detecting method based on ICA-KNN
CN105739489B (en) * 2016-05-12 2018-04-13 电子科技大学 A kind of batch process fault detection method based on ICA KNN
CN106444666A (en) * 2016-09-22 2017-02-22 宁波大学 Dynamic process monitoring method based on weighted dynamic distributed PCA model
CN106444665A (en) * 2016-09-22 2017-02-22 宁波大学 Fault classification diagnosis method based on non-Gaussian similarity matching
CN106710653A (en) * 2016-12-05 2017-05-24 浙江大学 Real-time data abnormal diagnosis method for monitoring operation of nuclear power unit
CN108062565A (en) * 2017-12-12 2018-05-22 重庆科技学院 Double pivots-dynamic kernel principal component analysis method for diagnosing faults based on chemical industry TE processes
CN108062565B (en) * 2017-12-12 2021-12-10 重庆科技学院 Double-principal element-dynamic core principal element analysis fault diagnosis method based on chemical engineering TE process
CN108594790A (en) * 2018-04-11 2018-09-28 浙江大学 A kind of fault detect and separation method based on structural sparse type pivot analysis
CN108594790B (en) * 2018-04-11 2019-12-10 浙江大学 Fault detection and separation method based on structured sparse principal component analysis
CN109859241A (en) * 2019-01-09 2019-06-07 厦门大学 Adaptive features select and time consistency robust correlation filtering visual tracking method
CN110083797A (en) * 2019-04-19 2019-08-02 大禹节水集团股份有限公司 A kind of drip irrigation pipe production line exception method of real-time and system
CN110083797B (en) * 2019-04-19 2023-03-31 大禹节水集团股份有限公司 Method and system for monitoring abnormity of drip irrigation pipe production line in real time
CN110288724A (en) * 2019-06-27 2019-09-27 大连海事大学 A kind of batch process monitoring method based on wavelet function pivot analysis
CN110529746A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-12-03 北京化工大学 Detection method, device and the equipment of pipe leakage
CN111650898A (en) * 2020-05-13 2020-09-11 大唐七台河发电有限责任公司 Distributed control system and method with high fault tolerance performance
CN111650898B (en) * 2020-05-13 2023-10-20 大唐七台河发电有限责任公司 Distributed control system and method with high fault tolerance performance
CN111752259A (en) * 2020-06-02 2020-10-09 上海交通大学 Fault identification method and device for gas turbine sensor signal

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104062968A (en) Continuous chemical process fault detection method
CN102361014B (en) State monitoring and fault diagnosis method for large-scale semiconductor manufacture process
CN100470417C (en) Fault diagnostic system and method for under industrial producing process small sample condition
CN101403923A (en) Course monitoring method based on non-gauss component extraction and support vector description
CN103914064B (en) Based on the commercial run method for diagnosing faults that multi-categorizer and D-S evidence merge
CN109739214B (en) Method for detecting intermittent faults in industrial process
CN100480926C (en) Industrial process fault diagnosis system and method based on wavelet analysis
CN108153267B (en) Industrial process monitoring method based on error principal component analysis model
CN103488091A (en) Data-driving control process monitoring method based on dynamic component analysis
CN103970092A (en) Multi-stage fermentation process fault monitoring method based on self-adaption FCM algorithm
CN103926919B (en) Industrial process fault detection method based on wavelet transformation and Lasso function
CN103853152A (en) Batch process failure monitoring method based on AR-PCA (Autoregressive Principal Component Analysis)
CN104914775B (en) Multi-modal procedure failure testing method and system based on the description of vine copula correlations
CN103901880A (en) Industrial process fault detection method based on multiple classifiers and D-S evidence fusion
CN110929765A (en) Convolution self-coding fault monitoring method based on batch imaging
CN104714537A (en) Fault prediction method based on joint relative change analysis and autoregression model
CN106529079A (en) Chemical process failure detection method based on failure-dependent principal component space
CN103389701B (en) Based on the level of factory procedure fault Detection and diagnosis method of distributed data model
CN108445867B (en) non-Gaussian process monitoring method based on distributed ICR model
CN108830006B (en) Linear-nonlinear industrial process fault detection method based on linear evaluation factor
CN105334823A (en) Supervision-based industrial process fault detection method of linear dynamic system model
CN108181893B (en) PCA-KDR-based fault detection method
CN103995985B (en) Fault detection method based on Daubechies wavelet transform and elastic network
CN103529337B (en) The recognition methods of nonlinear correlation relation between equipment failure and electric quantity information
Deng et al. Incipient fault detection of nonlinear chemical processes based on probability-related randomized slow feature analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20140924