CN104023230A - Non-reference image quality evaluation method based on gradient relevance - Google Patents

Non-reference image quality evaluation method based on gradient relevance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104023230A
CN104023230A CN201410284237.7A CN201410284237A CN104023230A CN 104023230 A CN104023230 A CN 104023230A CN 201410284237 A CN201410284237 A CN 201410284237A CN 104023230 A CN104023230 A CN 104023230A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
image
gradient
character
avg
distortion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201410284237.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104023230B (en
Inventor
刘利雄
化毅
赵清杰
黄华
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Original Assignee
Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Institute of Technology BIT filed Critical Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Priority to CN201410284237.7A priority Critical patent/CN104023230B/en
Publication of CN104023230A publication Critical patent/CN104023230A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104023230B publication Critical patent/CN104023230B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Image Analysis (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a non-reference image quality evaluation method based on gradient relevance, and belongs to computer image analysis. The method comprises the following steps: firstly, determining three sub-characters, namely, an image gradient amplitude character, an image gradient direction change character and an image gradient amplitude change character, which are easily influenced by distortion in an image gradient; performing M*M image blocking on the three characters, and determining a statistic variance of the three characters in each image block, wherein the average number of the statistic variances of all the image blocks in the whole image is taken as an image characteristic; and finally, determining the image quality by combining a support vector with a two-step frame in image quality evaluation. The method provided by the invention has the advantages of being small in time complexity, high in subjective consistency, low in image feature dimension and good in universality; the method can be applied to applications related to small computer devices or image quality, and is high in practical value.

Description

A kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of image quality evaluating method, relate in particular to a kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance, belong to image analysis technology field.
Background technology
Vision is the human cognitive world one of the most effective approach, and image is based upon on human vision basis.Image information can accurately directly help people to obtain this information environment to be expressed and the meaning, and this is that the information such as voice, word are incomparable.So art of image analysis has very consequence in computer research field.Recording image the state of a certain environment at a time, in the process of this recording status, there will be a little error, such as take pictures can be subject in process taking a picture impact, the X-ray image of hand tremor of camera can be subject to impact of X ray power and film etc. in imaging process.These impacts can be arrived the definition of imaging by direct interference, and then make the information reduction comprising in the middle of image and introduce distortion.
Image quality evaluating method is generally divided into subjective evaluation method and method for objectively evaluating.Usually, subjective evaluation method is individual to be evaluated to the quality score of this sub-picture to the visual experience of piece image based on self, and averages as the final score value of this sub-picture for the score value of same piece image many people.Although this evaluation method is the most accurately, the human resources of its consumption are large, and the time consuming time is long, are also easy to be subject to the impact of the factors such as knowledge, viewpoint between evaluation personnel simultaneously.Method for objectively evaluating is appliance computer evaluation map image quality, has got rid of the factor that personnel participate in, and assess effectiveness is increased greatly.
On the whole, method for evaluating objective quality is that Applied Computer Techniques substitutes human factor among subjective evaluation method, makes the result of result that method for evaluating objective quality evaluates and subjective evaluation method close.Finally complete the process of computer simulation human perception picture signal.Method for evaluating objective quality all has application in many aspects: 1. as image co-registration, cut apart the evaluation algorithms of the effect of scheduling algorithm; 2. as the preposition algorithm of image processing algorithm, for after algorithm initial value etc. is provided; 3. weigh the quality of communication channel; 4. be embedded into and apply in the middle of compact image collecting device etc.
Method for evaluating objective quality can be divided three classes again: full reference image quality appraisement method, partial reference image quality appraisement method and non-reference picture quality appraisement method.As its name suggests, full reference image quality appraisement method not only needs distorted image, also needs and the corresponding not distorted image of distorted image.Partial reference image quality appraisement method is the partial information of contrast distorted image and the corresponding not distorted image of distorted image, as feature of extracting etc., evaluates the quality of distorted image.Non-reference picture quality appraisement is only to need this kind of information of distorted image to evaluate the quality of distorted image.In the middle of practical application, with non-reference picture quality appraisement, there is the most Practical significance because in actual applications, with the corresponding original image of distorted image be very unobtainable.
In sum, carry out thering is theory significance and important using value widely for the research of method for evaluating objective quality.The people such as Moorthy have proposed two step frameworks of non-reference picture quality appraisement in document < < A two-step framework for constructing blind image quality indices > >, and the basic background technology relating to is mainly image gradient character and soble operators.
(1) two step frameworks of non-reference picture quality appraisement
The people such as Moorthy propose two step frameworks of non-reference picture quality appraisement.In this framework, first the distorted image of input is classified, at the mark that this distorted image is predicted in each class distortion, be weighted summation afterwards.
When providing an image training set with type of distortion in n, first need to set up the mapping between characteristics of image and distortion classification, in training pattern, be in model, to input correct distortion classification and characteristics of image, the training of distortion disaggregated model is completed, can obtain image fault by this mode input characteristics of image afterwards and classify.
Special needs to be pointed out is, in this disaggregated model, need to set up a hard grader, what need is a distortion that this image can be described shared probability in the middle of every kind of type of distortion, to obtain the vectorial p of a n dimension thus, the every dimension value in p has just represented that the distortion of input picture is at every kind of probability that definite type of distortion is shared.
Afterwards, training, for the regression model of every kind of type of distortion, is the mapping of setting up between characteristics of image and picture quality.When training, image training set is divided into n part, and every portion only comprises a kind of image of definite type of distortion, therefore, in the time of need to training distortion that n regression model predict to exist in input picture for certain particular type, the picture quality mark under this type.This can strengthen the accuracy of mapping greatly.
By in n regression model of tape test image input, will obtain n mass fraction, these mass fractions are become to the quality vector q of n dimension according to the corresponding order of category of model vector p.
Finally, use distortion class vector in image to be weighted summation these mass fractions, thereby obtain objective prediction mark
Q = &Sigma; i = 1 n p i q i - - - ( 1 )
Wherein, p ithe i dimension component that represents vectorial p, q ithe i dimension component that represents vectorial q, n represents the kind number of distortion.
(2) image gradient information
The gradient information of image has comprised great amount of images structural information, and the gradient of image generally represents that this gradation of image value has the place of acute variation, and these places are generally image border parts, and being both is also human visual system's sensitizing range.
For discrete digital picture, its gradient magnitude is commonly defined as:
Gradient ( i , j ) = ( Gradient _ x ( i , j ) ) 2 + ( Gradient _ y ( i , j ) ) 2
Gradient_x (i, j) wherein, Gradient_y (i, j) be respectively use that various approximate Discrete Operators calculate at position i, the partial derivative of j point X and two orthogonal directions of Y, for example operator Sobel, Prewitt and Canny operator.
The direction of gradient is that gradient magnitude changes the fastest place, and the direction of image gradient is defined as:
orientation ( i , j ) = arc tan ( Gradient _ y ( i , j ) Gradient _ x ( i , j ) )
In a word, while there is edge in image, necessarily there is larger Grad; And more level and smooth part in image, gray-value variation is less, generally has less gradient.Image in processing often the mould of gradient referred to as gradient, the image consisting of image gradient is called gradient image.
Summary of the invention
The object of the invention is that the time, the space complexity that in current non-reference picture quality appraisement method, exist are high in order to solve, the low inferior problem of performance, by set up one have high-performance, low complex degree, with subjective assessment result mutually a property high without with reference to natural image quality method.
The inventive method is achieved through the following technical solutions.
A non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance, comprises the following steps:
Step 1, to input distorted image carry out feature extraction.
First, every piece image is asked for to it three kinds aspect image gradient different sub-character, i.e. gradient magnitude character GM, gradient direction qualitative change CO and gradient magnitude qualitative change CM.Wherein, three kinds of gradient character are respectively by formula 1,2,3 definition:
GM ( i , j ) = ( Gx ( i , j ) ) 2 + ( Gy ( i , j ) ) 2 - - - ( 1 )
CO(i,j)=orientation(i,j)-orientation avg(i,j) (2)
CM ( i , j ) = ( Gx ( i , j ) - Gx avg ( i , j ) ) 2 + ( Gy ( i , j ) - Gy avg ( i , j ) ) 2 - - - ( 3 )
Wherein,
orientation ( i , j ) = arc tan ( Gy ( i , j ) Gx ( i , j ) )
orientation avg ( i , j ) = arc tan ( Gy avg ( i , j ) Gx avg ( i , j ) )
Gx avg = &Sigma; i M &Sigma; j N Gx ( i , j ) M &times; N
Gy avg = &Sigma; i M &Sigma; j N Gy ( i , j ) M &times; N
Wherein, the direction of orientation (i, j) presentation video gradient, Gx and Gy be discrete digital picture at the derivative of X, two orthogonal directions of Y, M, N are the sizes of the window that sets of the variation in order to describe in region.And in asking for gradient G x and Gy, use sobel gradient calculation operator, and it is expanded to two groups by one group of orthogonal direction.Wherein comprise 0 degree and 90 one group of orthogonal direction of spending, and one group-45 is spent and 45 orthogonal directions of spending.
The sobel operator of orthogonal direction 0 degree and 90 degree is:
S y = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 2 0 - 2 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 With S x = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
The sobel operator of orthogonal direction-45 degree and 45 degree is:
S y = 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 With S x = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 2 0 - 2 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The operator that is designated as y is wherein for calculating the operator of Gy, and the operator that is designated as x on is wherein for calculating the operator of Gx.
Then, 6 above-mentioned tried to achieve width image gradient character images are carried out to piecemeal processing, in each piece gradient, ask in nature statistical variance, on this basis by this variance with log function standard after, to calculate statistical variance that the form of average asked for each piece gradient, be fused to the variance of general image gradient character.Specific as follows:
Each image gradient character is divided into the image gradient character image block of 128 * 128 sizes, and each image gradient character image block is asked for to its statistical variance, be i.e. the variance d of n piece image block n.Computing formula is suc as formula 4:
d n=∑(h(x)-E(h(x))) 2 (4)
Wherein,
h(x)=pdf(θ)
Wherein, θ is every kind of parameter in character image, the Distribution Statistics that pdf is this parameter, and h (x) represents that the statistical probability that θ is carried out after quantitative statistics represents, E (h (x)) represents the expectation of h (x).
Then the variance d each being obtained nwith the standardization of log function, and the statistical variance that the image block of the average method fused images gradient character of assembling of use is obtained is as final feature f, suc as formula 5.
f = 1 N &times; log ( &Pi; n = 1 N d n ) , n = 1,2 . . . . . . . N - - - ( 5 )
Finally, the distorted image of input is carried out down-sampled, become the image of the second yardstick, and repeat said process, finally obtain one group of 12 dimensional feature vector Feature.
Feature=[f GM,f CO,f CM×2orientation×2scale]
Step 2, the Feature Mapping of carrying out.Using 12 dimensional feature vectors that obtain through step 1 as final Image quality measures, set up accordingly the mapping relations between characteristics of image and image mark.
First, image library is divided into training set and test set.Described test set is used for setting up the mapping relations between characteristics of image and picture quality, and test set is used for testing the function of the mapping relations of setting up.Use the method for SVMs, the characteristics of image of image in test set is carried out to the training of the Environmental Evaluation Model of distortion disaggregated model and corresponding each distortion classification.
Then, flow process based on two step frameworks in non-reference picture quality appraisement, in test set, carry out the prediction test of mark, use distortion disaggregated model classified by the distortion of altimetric image, in the middle of distortion classification, service quality evaluation model is predicted tested picture quality again, thereby obtain tested picture quality mark, and then utilize existing algorithm performance standard to assess it.
Beneficial effect
The non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on image gradient relevance that the present invention proposes, compare with existing generic technology, have that subjective consistency is high, time and the little feature of space complexity, can be applied in the middle of mini-system, or be embedded in the algorithm and equipment that picture quality is relevant, there is very high using value.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of the method for the invention.
Fig. 2 is the inventive method and several in addition full references, the box diagram that nothing is carried out subjective consistency comparison with reference to algorithm in the specific embodiment of the invention 1.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments, the inventive method is described in further details.
Embodiment 1:
As shown in Figure 1, a kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance, comprises the following steps:
Step 1, input picture is carried out to feature extraction.
First, input picture is carried out the asking for of three character of the defined gradient of the present invention.By the image gradient of both direction being asked for to amplitude, direction variation and amplitude change information.
Then, by three character of both direction, six gradient character images carry out piecemeal processing altogether.Corresponding each piecemeal is asked for its corresponding statistical variance afterwards.
Afterwards, the statistical variance of the piecemeal of six kinds of gradient character images of gained is merged, use average mode of assembling, ask for the mean value of all block statistics variances in every kind of character, as the whole statistical variance of six kinds of final gradient character.
Finally, input picture is carried out down-sampled, is become the image of the second yardstick, repeat said process the most at last characteristics of image by 6 dimensions, be extended for 12 dimensions.
Step 2, the Feature Mapping of carrying out.Using 12 dimensional feature vectors that obtain through step 1 as final Image quality measures, set up accordingly the mapping relations between characteristics of image and image mark.
First use the method for SVMs (SVM), the characteristics of image of image in test set is carried out to the training of the Environmental Evaluation Model of distortion disaggregated model and corresponding each distortion classification.
Then the flow process based on two step frameworks in non-reference picture quality appraisement is carried out the prediction test of mark in test set.; first use distortion disaggregated model classified by the distortion of altimetric image; in the middle of distortion classification, service quality evaluation model is predicted tested picture quality again; thereby obtain tested picture quality mark, and then utilize existing algorithm performance index (SROCC) to assess the quality of algorithm.
In the present embodiment, by LIVE image data base, test efficiency of the present invention and performance.In order to make contrast, the present embodiment has been used some famous full reference image quality appraisement methods and without contrasting as of the present invention with reference to evaluation quality method.In test process, database is divided into test set and training set, according to five folding cross validation methods, test set and training set are set to respectively to 20% and 80%.Apply mechanically afterwards the mark that two step prediction framework of institute's foundation are herein predicted test set, and wherein needed classification and regression model characteristics of image in training set are trained.The final SROCC index of calculating prediction mark and true score is as evaluating foundation of the present invention.In order to reduce the impact of accidentalia, said process is repeated 1000 times, random division training set and test set, finally gets SROCC each time simultaneously, and the intermediate value of Spearman's correlation coefficient index is as final algorithm evaluation score (in Table 1).The value of SROCC has better correlation closer to 1 expression algorithm and human perception.In order to show more intuitively the good and bad relation of various algorithms, also drawn the box diagram of the SROCC value of various algorithms, as shown in Figure 2.
As can be seen from Table 1, performance of the present invention is best with reference to aggregate performance in the middle of algorithm (BIQI, DIIVINE, BLIINDS-II, BRISQUE and the present invention) five kinds of nothings.And all showing good subjective consistency for the image of each distortion classification, this just can prove that the present invention has good versatility, and in performance, has very large advantage.With respect to other three kinds of full reference image quality appraisement methods---Y-PSNR (PSNR), structural similarity algorithm (SSIM) and visual information fidelity algorithm (VIF), the performance than VIF algorithm of this algorithm is low.
In table 1 LIVE storehouse, each algorithm subjective consistency index (SROCC) relatively
JP2K JPEG NOISE BLUR FF ALL
PSNR 0.8990 0.8484 0.9835 0.8076 0.8986 0.8293
SSIM 0.9510 0.9173 0.9697 0.9513 0.9555 0.8996
VIF 0.9515 0.9104 0.9844 0.9722 0.9631 0.9521
BIQI 0.8551 0.7767 0.9764 0.9258 0.7695 0.7599
DIIVINE 0.9352 0.8921 0.9828 0.9551 0.9096 0.9174
BLIINDS-II 0.9462 0.9350 0.9634 0.9336 0.8992 0.9329
BRISQUE 0.9445 0.9221 0.9889 0.9578 0.9173 0.9432
Proposed 0.9531 0.9412 0.9858 0.9689 0.9079 0.9476
In order to prove that the present invention has good performance on time complexity, first by the present invention and three kinds famous in made relatively (DIIVINE, BLIINDS-II, the method proposing in BRISQUE and the present invention) with reference to the time complexity of evaluation algorithms.In table 2, listed these four kinds of algorithms and calculated required overall time and average every required time of width image of 982 width images in LIVE IQA database.Therefrom can know that the more other two kinds of nothings of time efficiency of the present invention exceed much with reference to algorithm DIIVINE and BLIINDS-II, and slightly more inferior than BRISQUE.
Table 2 is without the time complexity comparison of reference method
982 width image times used Average every width image time used
DIIVINE 2.9519*10(4)s 30.5294
BLIINDS-II 1.3112*10(5)s 133.5213
BRISQUE 109.3859s 0.111391s
The present invention 275.7670 0.280822s

Claims (1)

1. the non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance, is characterized in that comprising the following steps:
Step 1, to input distorted image carry out feature extraction;
First, every piece image is asked for to it three kinds aspect image gradient different sub-character, i.e. gradient magnitude character GM, gradient direction qualitative change CO and gradient magnitude qualitative change CM, wherein, three kinds of gradient character are defined as follows respectively:
GM ( i , j ) = ( Gx ( i , j ) ) 2 + ( Gy ( i , j ) ) 2 - - - ( 1 )
CO(i,j)=orientation(i,j)-orientation avg(i,j) (2)
CM ( i , j ) = ( Gx ( i , j ) - Gx avg ( i , j ) ) 2 + ( Gy ( i , j ) - Gy avg ( i , j ) ) 2 - - - ( 3 )
Wherein,
orientation ( i , j ) = arc tan ( Gy ( i , j ) Gx ( i , j ) )
orientation avg ( i , j ) = arc tan ( Gy avg ( i , j ) Gx avg ( i , j ) )
Gx avg = &Sigma; i M &Sigma; j N Gx ( i , j ) M &times; N
Gy avg = &Sigma; i M &Sigma; j N Gy ( i , j ) M &times; N
Wherein, the direction of orientation (i, j) presentation video gradient, Gx and Gy be discrete digital picture at the derivative of X, two orthogonal directions of Y, M, N are the sizes of the window that sets of the variation in order to describe in region; And in asking for gradient G x and Gy, use sobel gradient calculation operator, and it is expanded to two groups by one group of orthogonal direction; Wherein comprise 0 degree and 90 one group of orthogonal direction of spending, and one group-45 is spent and 45 orthogonal directions of spending;
The sobel operator of orthogonal direction 0 degree and 90 degree is:
S y = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 2 0 - 2 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 With S x = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
The sobel operator of orthogonal direction-45 degree and 45 degree is:
S y = 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 With S x = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 0 2 0 - 2 0 1 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The operator that is designated as y is wherein for calculating the operator of Gy, and the operator that is designated as x on is wherein for calculating the operator of Gx;
Then, above-mentioned tried to achieve image gradient character image is carried out to piecemeal processing, in each piece gradient, ask in nature statistical variance, on this basis by this variance with log function standard after, the statistical variance of each piece gradient being asked for the form of calculating average is fused to the variance of general image gradient character, specific as follows:
Each image gradient character is divided into the image gradient character image block of 128 * 128 sizes, and each image gradient character image block is asked for to its statistical variance, be i.e. the variance d of n piece image block n; Computing formula is suc as formula 4:
d n=∑(h(x)-E(h(x))) 2 (4)
Wherein,
h(x)=pdf(θ)
Wherein, θ is every kind of parameter in character image, the Distribution Statistics that pdf is this parameter, and h (x) represents that the statistical probability that θ is carried out after quantitative statistics represents, E (h (x)) represents the expectation of h (x);
Then the variance d each being obtained nwith the standardization of log function, and the statistical variance that the image block of the average method fused images gradient character of assembling of use is obtained is as final feature f, suc as formula 5;
f = 1 N &times; log ( &Pi; n = 1 N d n ) , n = 1,2 . . . . . . . N - - - ( 5 )
Finally, the distorted image of input is carried out down-sampled, becomes the image of the second yardstick, and repeat said process, finally obtain one group of 12 dimensional feature vector Feature:
Feature=[f GM,f CO,f CM×2orientation×2scale] (6)
Step 2, the Feature Mapping of carrying out, using 12 dimensional feature vectors that obtain through step 1 as final Image quality measures, set up the mapping relations between characteristics of image and image mark accordingly;
First, image library is divided into training set and test set; Described test set is used for setting up the mapping relations between characteristics of image and picture quality, and test set is used for testing the function of the mapping relations of setting up; Use the method for SVMs, the characteristics of image of image in test set is carried out to the training of the Environmental Evaluation Model of distortion disaggregated model and corresponding each distortion classification;
Then, flow process based on two step frameworks in non-reference picture quality appraisement, in test set, carry out the prediction test of mark, use distortion disaggregated model classified by the distortion of altimetric image, in the middle of distortion classification, service quality evaluation model is predicted tested picture quality again, thereby obtain tested picture quality mark, and then can utilize existing algorithm performance standard to assess it.
CN201410284237.7A 2014-06-23 2014-06-23 A kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance Expired - Fee Related CN104023230B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410284237.7A CN104023230B (en) 2014-06-23 2014-06-23 A kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410284237.7A CN104023230B (en) 2014-06-23 2014-06-23 A kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104023230A true CN104023230A (en) 2014-09-03
CN104023230B CN104023230B (en) 2016-04-13

Family

ID=51439772

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410284237.7A Expired - Fee Related CN104023230B (en) 2014-06-23 2014-06-23 A kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104023230B (en)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104899893A (en) * 2015-07-01 2015-09-09 电子科技大学 Image quality detection method based on vision attention
CN104902267A (en) * 2015-06-08 2015-09-09 浙江科技学院 No-reference image quality evaluation method based on gradient information
CN104915945A (en) * 2015-02-04 2015-09-16 中国人民解放军海军装备研究院信息工程技术研究所 Quality evaluation method without reference image based on regional mutual information
CN105007488A (en) * 2015-07-06 2015-10-28 浙江理工大学 Universal no-reference image quality evaluation method based on transformation domain and spatial domain
CN105338343A (en) * 2015-10-20 2016-02-17 北京理工大学 No-reference stereo image quality evaluation method based on binocular perception
CN105491371A (en) * 2015-11-19 2016-04-13 国家新闻出版广电总局广播科学研究院 Tone mapping image quality evaluation method based on gradient magnitude similarity
CN105528791A (en) * 2015-12-17 2016-04-27 广东工业大学 Quality evaluation device facing touch screen hand-drawn image and evaluation method thereof
CN105844640A (en) * 2016-03-24 2016-08-10 西安电子科技大学 Color image quality evaluation method based on gradient
CN105976361A (en) * 2016-04-28 2016-09-28 西安电子科技大学 Quality assessment method without reference image based on multistage dictionary set
CN106204548A (en) * 2016-06-30 2016-12-07 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 Image resolution method and device
CN107316323A (en) * 2017-06-28 2017-11-03 北京工业大学 The non-reference picture method for evaluating quality set up based on multiscale analysis method
CN108600745A (en) * 2018-08-06 2018-09-28 北京理工大学 A kind of method for evaluating video quality based on time-space domain slice multichannel chromatogram configuration
CN108717694A (en) * 2018-04-24 2018-10-30 天津大学 Electrical impedance tomography image quality evaluating method based on fuzzy C-means clustering
CN109345502A (en) * 2018-08-06 2019-02-15 浙江大学 A kind of stereo image quality evaluation method based on disparity map stereochemical structure information extraction
CN111524110A (en) * 2020-04-16 2020-08-11 北京微吼时代科技有限公司 Video quality evaluation model construction method, evaluation method and device
CN113658130A (en) * 2021-08-16 2021-11-16 福州大学 No-reference screen content image quality evaluation method based on dual twin network
CN117876321A (en) * 2024-01-10 2024-04-12 中国人民解放军91977部队 Image quality evaluation method and device

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20100102077A (en) * 2010-08-30 2010-09-20 연세대학교 산학협력단 Method and system for video quality measurement
CN103200421A (en) * 2013-04-07 2013-07-10 北京理工大学 No-reference image quality evaluation method based on Curvelet transformation and phase coincidence
CN103475898A (en) * 2013-09-16 2013-12-25 北京理工大学 Non-reference image quality assessment method based on information entropy characters

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20100102077A (en) * 2010-08-30 2010-09-20 연세대학교 산학협력단 Method and system for video quality measurement
CN103200421A (en) * 2013-04-07 2013-07-10 北京理工大学 No-reference image quality evaluation method based on Curvelet transformation and phase coincidence
CN103475898A (en) * 2013-09-16 2013-12-25 北京理工大学 Non-reference image quality assessment method based on information entropy characters

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104915945A (en) * 2015-02-04 2015-09-16 中国人民解放军海军装备研究院信息工程技术研究所 Quality evaluation method without reference image based on regional mutual information
CN104902267A (en) * 2015-06-08 2015-09-09 浙江科技学院 No-reference image quality evaluation method based on gradient information
CN104899893A (en) * 2015-07-01 2015-09-09 电子科技大学 Image quality detection method based on vision attention
CN104899893B (en) * 2015-07-01 2019-03-19 电子科技大学 The picture quality detection method of view-based access control model attention
CN105007488A (en) * 2015-07-06 2015-10-28 浙江理工大学 Universal no-reference image quality evaluation method based on transformation domain and spatial domain
CN105338343A (en) * 2015-10-20 2016-02-17 北京理工大学 No-reference stereo image quality evaluation method based on binocular perception
CN105491371A (en) * 2015-11-19 2016-04-13 国家新闻出版广电总局广播科学研究院 Tone mapping image quality evaluation method based on gradient magnitude similarity
CN105528791A (en) * 2015-12-17 2016-04-27 广东工业大学 Quality evaluation device facing touch screen hand-drawn image and evaluation method thereof
CN105528791B (en) * 2015-12-17 2019-08-30 广东工业大学 A kind of quality evaluation device and its evaluation method towards touch screen hand-drawing image
CN105844640A (en) * 2016-03-24 2016-08-10 西安电子科技大学 Color image quality evaluation method based on gradient
CN105976361A (en) * 2016-04-28 2016-09-28 西安电子科技大学 Quality assessment method without reference image based on multistage dictionary set
CN105976361B (en) * 2016-04-28 2019-03-26 西安电子科技大学 Non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on multistage wordbook
CN106204548A (en) * 2016-06-30 2016-12-07 上海联影医疗科技有限公司 Image resolution method and device
CN106204548B (en) * 2016-06-30 2021-09-28 上海联影医疗科技股份有限公司 Image distinguishing method and device
CN107316323A (en) * 2017-06-28 2017-11-03 北京工业大学 The non-reference picture method for evaluating quality set up based on multiscale analysis method
CN107316323B (en) * 2017-06-28 2020-09-25 北京工业大学 No-reference image quality evaluation method established based on multi-scale analysis method
CN108717694A (en) * 2018-04-24 2018-10-30 天津大学 Electrical impedance tomography image quality evaluating method based on fuzzy C-means clustering
CN108717694B (en) * 2018-04-24 2021-04-02 天津大学 Electrical impedance tomography image quality evaluation method based on fuzzy C-means clustering
CN108600745B (en) * 2018-08-06 2020-02-18 北京理工大学 Video quality evaluation method based on time-space domain slice multi-map configuration
CN109345502A (en) * 2018-08-06 2019-02-15 浙江大学 A kind of stereo image quality evaluation method based on disparity map stereochemical structure information extraction
CN109345502B (en) * 2018-08-06 2021-03-26 浙江大学 Stereo image quality evaluation method based on disparity map stereo structure information extraction
CN108600745A (en) * 2018-08-06 2018-09-28 北京理工大学 A kind of method for evaluating video quality based on time-space domain slice multichannel chromatogram configuration
CN111524110A (en) * 2020-04-16 2020-08-11 北京微吼时代科技有限公司 Video quality evaluation model construction method, evaluation method and device
CN111524110B (en) * 2020-04-16 2023-06-09 北京微吼时代科技有限公司 Video quality evaluation model construction method, evaluation method and device
CN113658130A (en) * 2021-08-16 2021-11-16 福州大学 No-reference screen content image quality evaluation method based on dual twin network
CN113658130B (en) * 2021-08-16 2023-07-28 福州大学 Dual-twin-network-based reference-free screen content image quality evaluation method
CN117876321A (en) * 2024-01-10 2024-04-12 中国人民解放军91977部队 Image quality evaluation method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104023230B (en) 2016-04-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104023230B (en) A kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on gradient relevance
Liu et al. Unsupervised blind image quality evaluation via statistical measurements of structure, naturalness, and perception
CN108428227B (en) No-reference image quality evaluation method based on full convolution neural network
CN104902267B (en) No-reference image quality evaluation method based on gradient information
US8494283B2 (en) Image quality assessment
CN103475898B (en) Non-reference image quality assessment method based on information entropy characters
EP3719708A1 (en) Model test method and device
Amirkhani et al. An objective method to evaluate exemplar‐based inpainted images quality using Jaccard index
CN101877127B (en) Image reference-free quality evaluation method and system based on gradient profile
CN112818737B (en) Video identification method, device, storage medium and terminal
CN110728656A (en) Meta-learning-based no-reference image quality data processing method and intelligent terminal
CN106920232A (en) Gradient similarity graph image quality evaluation method and system based on conspicuousness detection
CN105208374A (en) Non-reference image quality objective evaluation method based on deep learning
CN106504207B (en) A kind of image processing method
CN110766658B (en) Non-reference laser interference image quality evaluation method
CN104915945A (en) Quality evaluation method without reference image based on regional mutual information
Gu et al. Learning a unified blind image quality metric via on-line and off-line big training instances
Fu et al. Blind image quality assessment for multiply distorted images via convolutional neural networks
CN115131283A (en) Defect detection and model training method, device, equipment and medium for target object
CN105894507B (en) Image quality evaluating method based on amount of image information natural scene statistical nature
CN113505854A (en) Method, device, equipment and medium for constructing facial image quality evaluation model
CN105357519A (en) Quality objective evaluation method for three-dimensional image without reference based on self-similarity characteristic
CN109754390A (en) A kind of non-reference picture quality appraisement method based on mixing visual signature
Amirkhani et al. Inpainted image quality evaluation based on saliency map features
Bohr et al. A no reference image blur detection using cumulative probability blur detection (cpbd) metric

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20160413

Termination date: 20210623