CN103955785A - Emergency capacity assessment method of power grid enterprise - Google Patents
Emergency capacity assessment method of power grid enterprise Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103955785A CN103955785A CN201410137868.6A CN201410137868A CN103955785A CN 103955785 A CN103955785 A CN 103955785A CN 201410137868 A CN201410137868 A CN 201410137868A CN 103955785 A CN103955785 A CN 103955785A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- assessment
- emergency
- evaluation
- enterprise
- management
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E40/00—Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y02E40/70—Smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the energy generation sector
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of power systems, in particular to an emergency capacity assessment method of a power grid enterprise. Particularly, a common criterion is provided for emergency capacity assessment of the power grid enterprise, a scientific and simple evaluation and identification method is provided, and an emergency capacity assessment method auxiliary system of the power grid enterprise is built. The emergency capacity assessment method of the power grid enterprise comprises the steps of building an indicator system and distributing indicator scores and an assessment auxiliary system. By means of the emergency capacity assessment method of the power grid enterprise, emergency management work of the enterprise can be modified continuously, effectiveness of emergency management work of the power grid enterprise is guaranteed, the professional level of emergency rescue organizations of all levels of power grid enterprises is improved, the integration degree of emergency management work of all levels of power grid enterprises can be assessed conveniently, the emergency management capacity forming the emergency management minimum requirement of the power grid enterprise and development trend of the emergency management capacity can be known correctly, the emergency preparation conditions can be checked before dangers happen, the influence and loss caused by serious accidents can be prevented and reduced, and the emergency activities can be carried out efficiently and orderly when serious accidents happen.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to technical field of power systems, relate in particular to a kind of power grid enterprises contingency capabilities assessment method, for carrying out contingency capabilities assessment, power grid enterprises provide a Common Criteria exactly concretely, provide a science to evaluate easily recognition methods, set up power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method backup system.
Background technology
Since the nineties in last century, rescue system, mechanism and legal system are at national developments and perfect very soon such as the U.S., Japan, Canada, Germany.The U.S. is combined and has been worked out < < state emergency capability preparation assessment condition evaluation way > > by national contingency management association and FEMA, the < < state method > > of version in 2000 comprises 1801 assessment key elements, each side situation that can each state contingency management work of comprehensive assessment, be convenient to FEMA and obtain nationwide assessment data, understand the emergent preparation of whole country.Mainly for legal basis, Hazard Recognition and risk assessment, danger slow down, resource management and logistics support, emergency preplan establishment, commander, control and coordination, communication and warning, management and program, Police Command Center facility, training, rehearsal, assessment and correct action, crisis communication, public education and news briefing, fund guarantee, administration and 13 management functions of planning management assess.Japan in 2002 by fire-fighting class, take precautions against natural calamities and organized with Institute of Social Science Information " local public organization's region Disaster Defense Capability and crisis management assessment self-criticism meeting ".The grasp that its evaluation item mainly comprises crisis with mainly estimate, hypothesis, the disaster mitigation situation countermeasure of disaster scenarios it, rectify system, Intelligence Liaison system, education and training and and the maintaining and promoting etc. of activity level.In evaluation process, mainly utilize the concrete problem of form answer, then can directly revise the deficiency of oneself taking precautions against natural calamities with crisis management according to result.
Along with on January 8th, 2006, the < < national master plan for responding to public emergencies > > of State Council's issue put into effect, and China's emergency preplan frame system begins to take shape.China starts the correlative study of city emergency ability in the burst major accident risk control of < < city and emergence technology research and pilot > > (country's " 15 " tackling of key scientific and technical problems rolling planning), and in experimental city, has carried out actual assessment.Contingency management at different levels department of government has also started research and the practice of this respect.
The contingency management of Guo Wang company is walked at precedent in enterprise at home, has accumulated many successful experiences in theory and practice, has obtained good achievement.But in contingency management evaluation work, still belong to the starting stage.Contingency capabilities assessment is prepared the adequacy of situation and is engaged in the ability that crash-rescue operations possesses mainly for assessment of resource, and the demand of clear and definite emergency management and rescue and deficiency, to propose to take in time perfect corrective action.Due to the contingency capabilities assessment system of present stage without science, make contingency management work in empirical management phase, cannot check and rate and assessment enterprise's contingency management, without emergency resources and the System Construction equipping rules of science.
Summary of the invention
The present invention is directed to the problem of above-mentioned existence, a kind of power grid enterprises contingency capabilities assessment method is provided, specifically general power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method index system, has set up index and has composed minute standard and power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method backup system.Object is that check power grid enterprises contingency management, resource are prepared the adequacy of situation and be engaged in the ability that emergency disposal, pick-up operation possess.By systems approach, find in time demand and the deficiency of contingency management and disposal rescue aspect, be convenient to propose to take in time perfect corrective action.
The technical solution adopted for the present invention to solve the technical problems is:
Power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method, comprises and sets up that index system, indicator of distribution are composed minute and assessment backup system;
(1) the described index system of setting up: be from numerous service datas, parameter, select the emergent larger index of capacity, and index request be truly available, system sufficiently complete; Take " a case three system " be core, for the emergent prevention of power grid enterprises, emergent preparation, emergency response, four aspects of later stage disposal, power grid enterprises' emergency capability is comprehensively assessed; Include some indexs in evaluation system constructively, make assessment more comprehensive; Index system adopts the classical formalism structure of layer-stepping, is divided into two large classes: Static State Index and dynamic indicator by attribute; Under these attributes, specifically mark off 4 evaluation attribute of enterprise's emergency capability, according to the base program of contingency management, conclude the content of " emergent prevention, emergent preparation, emergency response, later stage are disposed " four professional aspects, by " five individual system ", " six kinds of abilities ", " two systems " construction of totally 13 subsystems and level of control realize situation and be included into one by one in these classification, all the other indexs that finally again this attribute also related to itself add, improve system one by one;
(2) described indicator of distribution is composed and is divided: comprise evaluation index classification, assessment methods of marking, assessment assignment method and emergency capability discrimination standard;
(3) described assessment backup system: comprise system management, evaluation criteria management, parameter confirmation and enterprise evaluation management.
Described emergent prevention mainly comprises: the assessment of emergency organization system, emergency preplan system, rules and regulations system content;
Described emergent preparation mainly comprises: the assessment of training exercise system, emergent science and technology support system, troop's organizational capacity, overall support capability, prevention prediction and monitoring early-warning system and emergency information and command system construction content;
Described emergency response mainly comprises: the assessment of public opinion guidance capability, rescue disposing capacity content;
The described later stage is disposed assessment and mainly comprises: the assessment of restoration and reconstruction ability, Continual Improvement ability content.
Described evaluation index classification: establish altogether 4 of one-level evaluation indexes with < < evaluation criteria > >, 13 of secondary evaluation indexes, 38 of three grades of evaluation indexes, according to it, number to carry out index classification, be about to three grades of titles and be divided into by number first class index, two-level index, three grades of indexs, level Four index and Pyatyi indexs, and do following regulation:
First class index: as 1 emergent prevention, 2 emergent preparations, 3 emergency responses, 4 later stages are disposed;
Two-level index: as 1.1 emergency organization systems, 2.2 support systems;
Three grades of indexs: as 1.1.1 emergency organization, 1.2.1 venture analysis;
Level Four index: guarantee system as emergent in 1.1.1.2;
Pyatyi index: as 1.2.1.2.1 vulnerable areas and vulnerability analysis.
Described assessment methods of marking: beyond Shi You our unit, professional assessment mechanism or professional form expert assessment and evaluation group, according to set < < evaluation criteria > >, adopt dynamically examination to comment the appraisal procedure combining, the actual emergency capability of the evaluated enterprise of emphasis evaluation with static looking into;
(1) static state is looked into and is commented: the main method of examining that adopts, by listening report, consult reference materials, look into record, the method such as material object is checked, according to this evaluation criteria, contingency management and Emergency System construction situation are carried out to static state and look into and comment.Static state is looked into score value 515 minutes, 64.37% of some total points;
(2) dynamically examination: the main modes such as examination, deduction that adopt are carried out practice examining to the contingency management of enterprise and disposing capacity.Dynamically examination divides 285 minutes, accounts for 35.63% of total points.Dynamically following method is mainly taked in examination:
Examination: set up emergent examination pool.To examination unit, choose respectively a certain proportion of emergent member of leading group, department head, managerial personnel, a line rescue repairing employee puts question to, inquires, organizes answer examination, the content of examination mainly comprises emergent consciousness, emergency organization, emergency preplan, emergent technical ability
,rules and regulations, the relevant function of training exercise and general knowledge;
Rehearsal: taxonomic organization's desktop maneuvers, on-the-spot combat exercise, each assessment rehearsal is no less than 3 times.The scientific rationality of check emergency preplan, emergency mechanism from actual combat, check accident adaptibility to response; Each assessment rehearsal is no less than 3 times, its specialized prediction scheme rehearsal is in desktop maneuvers mode, emphasis checks and rates whole emergency mechanism and flow process is no less than 1 time, the rehearsal of site disposal scheme be take on-the-spot combat exercise as main, be no less than 2 times, emergency response and the disposing task flow processs such as the emergent prediction of complete examination early warning, emergency starting, emergency response, orchestration, event disposal, public opinion guiding and information issue, the scientific rationality of check emergency preplan, emergency mechanism from actual combat, check accident adaptibility to response;
Analysis and judgment: past three year or 5 years accident reply case is analyzed, comprehensive above-mentioned verification and examination situation, the construction and the real work situation that for 13 two-level index of Emergency System construction, are " five individual system ", " six kinds of abilities ", " two systems " are analyzed and are assessed the emergency capability of enterprise, thereby draw subitem and the overall capacity Current Level of enterprise's emergency capability.
Described assessment assignment method is: this < < evaluation criteria > > adopts scoring mechanism, total points 800 minutes, each several part score value is respectively: emergent prevention 185 minutes, emergent preparation 335 minutes, emergency response 180 minutes, the later stage is disposed 100 minutes; The score value that each evaluation item is different according to it, gives different index classifications, each evaluation item is set up to the standard of deducting point of refinement; Determine that index weights not only can reflect the feature of objective system more realistically, and assessment is made a distinction between the important and the lesser one, in mains supply capability evaluation index system, determining of each index weights directly embodied the guide effect to Electric Power Network Planning; For the setting of index weights, mainly adopt expert consulting and direct experience tentatively to determine, then can cross the object information feedback of example, constantly update the system.
Described emergency capability discrimination standard: be comprehensively to weigh the emergency capability of evaluation object by the scoring average of PTS rate and all kinds of indexs; This standard is divided into four grades by the emergency capability of electric power enterprise, and has stipulated that different scoring average intervals represents different emergency capability grades; Scoring average mainly for 13 two-level index during examination separates four grades item by item, outstanding, good, general, poor, and wherein, outstanding scoring average should be >=and 85%; Good scoring average >=75% of 85% >; General scoring average >=60% of 75% >; Poor scoring average should be below 60%.Meanwhile, according to overall scoring average, overall emergency capability is evaluated; Scoring average=real score/reserved portion * 100%.
Described system management comprises: realize the correlation parameter configuration features such as enterprise's rank, assessment mode, assessment cycle, user right; Described evaluation criteria management: comprise functions such as realizing static, dynamic estimation standard management; Described parameter is confirmed to comprise: realize assessment correlation parameter confirmation work; Described enterprise evaluation management comprises: realize the functions such as enterprise's static evaluation, dynamic evaluation, rectification management, assessment form, assessment report.
Described assessment backup system adopts J2EE framework to build the mode of WEB infosystem; Adopt unified procotol (HTTP) and standard, adopt unified browser interface, distributed computing technology completes electric network emergency capability evaluation system;
(1) industrial standard;
Distributed object technology has the Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) DCOM (Componet Object Model) of three kinds of industrial standard: MS, the J2EE of the public object request broker program structure CORBA of OMG (Object Management Group) (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) and SUN.The fatal shortcoming of DCOM is that cross-platform performance is poor, can only adopt the platform of Microsoft from being deployed to operation; The shortcoming of CORBA is huge and complicated, and the renewal of standard is relatively slow; And J2EE simplifies and standard the develop and field of multi-storey Distributed System, obtain the extensive support of industry, be usually the first-selected platform of enterprise-level distributed application program; J2EE provides the distributed application program model of a sandwich construction, this model has the JDBC technology that facilitates access database, Data Interchange Technology based on XML, component reuse ability, unified safe mode and flexibly affairs controlling mechanism, comprehensive support of Servlets and JSP is also provided EJB;
(2) system frame structure model;
On the basis that framework can make programming personnel realize at a general utility functions, start concrete system development, it provides reusable abstract algorithm and High-rise Building Design, and can be by the member of large system decomposition Cheng Geng little, and the internal interface between member can be described, these standard interfaces make by assembling, to set up various systems on existing member basis becomes possibility; Common Web Information System Frame is a general-purpose system development model that meets MVC Design Mode;
(3) estimation flow;
This system architecture is divided into system management and two parts of assessment management;
Described system management part: mainly comprise that basic data maintenance, evaluation criteria are safeguarded and related data management, by system manager and dependent evaluation expert, carry out data typing, basic data maintenance comprises: configuration enterprise rank, configuration company information, configuration assessment cycle, configure user authority, emergent relevant documentation; Evaluation criteria is safeguarded and is comprised: normal manual is safeguarded, standard-run quantity is safeguarded, evaluation criteria is confirmed; Related data management comprises: examination pool management, generation paper;
Described assessment administrative section: mainly comprise the report of assessment form, enterprise evaluation, enterprise's rectification, enterprise or assessment experts are carried out scoring mechanism according to evaluation criteria to each, score value is presented in final assessment form and assessment report, and assessment form report comprises: assessment report, business valuation studies standard forms, assess total submeter, assessment detail list, assessment difference table, evaluation grade result, assessment comparative analysis figure; Enterprise evaluation mainly comprises: enterprise evaluation, online testing, calculating folding minute; Enterprise's rectification mainly comprises: subject matter rectification suggestion, modification report and emergent document viewing;
Described coupling system structure adopts the mode that enterprise's self-evaluating merges mutually with expert assessment and evaluation to assess, each business organization's self-evaluating.System manager primarily checks whether enterprise's basic data of self-evaluating in system is safeguarded completely, whether evaluation criteria needs is modified, complete after self-evaluating confirmation, superior responsible institution send in one's application, and the safety evaluation intermediary that organizes expert or trust to have relevant qualification by superior administrative unit carries out expert assessment and evaluation;
Expert group is checked, inquires, checks, examines, is exchanged views with the leader of enterprise and managerial personnel by scene, draws expert assessment and evaluation conclusion.Organize expert assessment and evaluation summing-up meeting, announce assessment result; After evaluation work finishes, expert group answers superior responsible institution and evaluated unit to submit written assessment report and dependent evaluation form;
Evaluated unit should organize relevant departments to formulate improvement plan according to self-evaluating result and expert assessment and evaluation result, and improvement plan must clearly be rectified and improved content, measures to rectify and reform, completes the time limit, rectify and improve responsible official and acceptor; Improvement plan should have person in charge's examination and approval Bing Bao higher authority to put on record;
Evaluated unit should summarize, circulate a notice of our unit's contingency capabilities assessment improvement plan performance in mid-term in year and latter stage, present one's view in time and advise, to completing the project of rectification, do not carry out risk assessment, should revise improvement plan if desired, implement closed loop management;
Last evaluated unit should report higher authority by contingency capabilities assessment improvement plan performance and rectifying and improving annual summary.
Described system frame structure model: system General Catalog structure comprises that Images catalogue deposits framework picture concerned, and script catalogue is placed conventional Web control, and Css catalogue is deposited style sheet file; WEB-INF catalogue comprises all Java class files and for the APMB package of disparate databases.Adopt server page mould plate technique, the final display page of dynamic combined; Action Servlet is the Controller of application, entrance and the Distribution Center of all requests, it determines the operation that will carry out according to the address path of server request, and from Handermapping, find corresponding processing class, be responsible for the request of processing server, collection parameter, calls corresponding Businesslogic class, result is put into HttpRequest/Http Session object, format process information simultaneously.By explaining that extensible markup language document determines next page address path.
In system, under the functional requirement of stipulating in fully meeting technical requirement and the key technical indexes prerequisite, follow system complete, unobstructed practicality, design philosophy and principle safe and reliable, advanced and mature, codes and standards and carry out system and lectotype selection.Base oneself upon now, face the future, both considered the integrated of existed system, consider again the exploitation of application system from now on, therefore, this programme is based on following starting point Method of Spreading Design:
The continuity of technology.Corporate information system generally adopts the framework based on B/S, from database, all kinds of middleware, to the technical system of system, already basically forms, and this project adopts identical system software (as application server middleware, database), keeps the continuity of technology;
Globality.The integration of existing application system and the expansion of application system are from now on merged in a system architecture, are the operational management platform of an application system, are also the secondary developing platforms of an application system;
Advanced.Be different from traditional program code and data maintenance mode, platform adopts model-driven mode, by the inner structure of the each side such as the data of application system, function, interface, form extract for various can intuitivism apprehension and the model of maintenance, and by the execution engine of platform, change into the program of actual motion, improved greatly the automaticity of application system maintenance;
Reliability: comprise the reliability of hardware device and the fault-tolerance of software systems.Major equipment parts in scheme and critical component are selected domestic and international renowned company standard, maturation, reliable product.Equipment and system just can come into operation after strict test.Tool software is selected ripe outstanding platform and tool software, adopts modular design, has strategy and the function of safety management, and optimization system as far as possible.
Ease for use.The various maintenance tools easy to learn that facilitate are provided, without special technical professional, by training the equal method that can grasp system maintenance, avoid a large amount of coding works, shorten the implementation cycle of application system, reduce daily servicing difficulty;
Open.Application system after integration externally all provides the routine call interface based on Web Service, and Jiang Qiyu company, in other application integration, realizes wider business integration at an easy rate.
Extensibility.In line with the thought of " on-demand customization, become with need ", integration platform can rapid configuration goes out to meet the application software of individualities of enterprises demand, adapts to following extendability requirement, facilitates the expansion of application category.
The use of power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method backup system technological frame is mainly in order to process the demand of some versatilities, for example the page shows, the operation of database, the functions such as the verification of data, use Development of Framework can save time and the complexity of exploitation, and can improve the stability of system.Simple in order to guarantee that system follow-up system is safeguarded, in development system, should adopt unified system framework.We are according to the characteristic of framework, easy-to-use degree, supporting dynamics, the attribute degree of project team to framework to exploitation, and each subsystem we adopt technological frame mainly to comprise four levels: represent layer, key-course, Business Logic and persistent layer.
System realizes and requiring: based on B/S framework, system disposes flexibly, safeguards simple; The graphical real time data inspecting of browser end; Graphic monitoring view is according to user's request flexible configuration; Report form template flexible customization, automatically generates and reports; Provide standard unified data integration interface, can adapt to the integrated of different product; Objectification storage and the inquiry of O&M data; Authority and service logic itself are mutually to merge complementaryly, and we are integrated into permission system by generic logic in service logic, have both ensured the versatility of authority, the secure fine granularity of control of authority.
Advantage of the present invention and effect are:
1, be convenient to the contingency management work of Continual Improvement enterprise, guarantee the validity of power grid enterprises' contingency management work; Can help to improve the professional level of power grid enterprises at different levels emergency management and rescue tissue;
2, be convenient to assess the integrated degree of power grid enterprises at different levels contingency management work and contingency management ability and the development trend thereof that correct understanding forms power grid enterprises' contingency management bottom line;
3, be convenient to the emergent preparation of examination before danger is arrived.
Carry out power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method, impact and the loss in order to prevent and reduce major accident to cause exactly, when major accident occurs, can to carry out emergent movable effective, reach " efficient---internal system is coordinated and the effect of taking action fast "; " in order---press pre-set program commander, decisions and arrangements "; " comprehensive---integrate various resources, mobilize inside and outside strength "; " appropriateness drops into---and according to enterprise's emergency capability horizontal safety contingency tasks, do not surmount enterprise's ability to bear ".
accompanying drawing explanation
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments, the present invention is further detailed explanation.
Fig. 1 is system framework model of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is evaluating system structural representation of the present invention.
Embodiment
The present invention is power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment methods, it relates to three aspects, main contents respectively are: set up that index system, indicator of distribution are composed minute and the content of assessment backup system three aspects:, specific works is divided into 6 stages, is respectively plan, analysis, design, system realization, test, online implementing and support.Mainly for assessment of power grid enterprises' contingency management, resource, prepare the adequacy of situation and be engaged in the ability that emergency disposal, pick-up operation possess.By systems approach, find in time demand and the deficiency of contingency management and disposal rescue aspect, be convenient to propose to take in time perfect corrective action.Power grid enterprises answer:
(1) set up index system.
First from the service data of numerous complicated, parameter, select the emergent larger index of capacity, and index request is truly available, and system sufficiently complete.Take " a case three system " be core, for the emergent prevention of power grid enterprises, emergent preparation, emergency response, four aspects of later stage disposal, power grid enterprises' emergency capability is comprehensively assessed.Include some indexs in evaluation system constructively, make assessment more comprehensive." a case " refers to establish and improve emergency preplan system, and " three systems " refers to establish and improve organizational structure and mechanism and the legal system of contingency management.
Index system adopts the classical formalism structure of layer-stepping, and the various factors that affect power distribution network power supply capacity are concluded, and is divided into two large classes: Static State Index and dynamic indicator according to attribute.Under these attributes, specifically mark off several evaluation attribute of enterprise's emergency capability, according to the base program of contingency management, conclude the content of " emergent prevention, emergent preparation, emergency response, later stage are disposed " four professional aspects, by " five individual system ", " six kinds of abilities ", " two systems " construction of totally 13 subsystems and level of control realize situation and be included into one by one in these classification, all the other indexs that finally again this attribute also related to itself add, improve system one by one.
" five individual system " refers to emergency organization system, emergency preplan system, rules and regulations system, training exercise system, emergent science and technology support system.
" six kinds of abilities " refers to troop's organizational capacity, overall support capability, rescue disposing capacity, public opinion guidance capability, restoration and reconstruction ability, Continual Improvement ability.
" two systems " refers to prevent prediction and monitoring early-warning system, emergency information and command system.
(1) emergent prevention mainly comprises: the assessment of emergency organization system, emergency preplan system, rules and regulations system content;
(2) emergent preparation mainly comprises: the assessment of training exercise system, emergent science and technology support system, troop's organizational capacity, overall support capability, prevention prediction and monitoring early-warning system and emergency information and command system construction content;
(3) emergency response mainly comprises: the assessment of public opinion guidance capability, rescue disposing capacity content;
(4) later stage is disposed to assess and mainly comprises: the assessment of restoration and reconstruction ability, Continual Improvement ability content.
(2) indicator of distribution is composed and is divided.
1. evaluation index classification.
With < < evaluation criteria > >, establish altogether 4 of one-level evaluation indexes, 13 of secondary evaluation indexes, 38 of three grades of evaluation indexes, according to it, number to carry out index classification, be about to three grades of titles and be divided into by number first class index, two-level index, three grades of indexs, level Four index and Pyatyi indexs, and do following regulation:
First class index: as 1 emergent prevention, 2 emergent preparations, 3 emergency responses, 4 later stages are disposed;
Two-level index: as 1.1 emergency organization systems, 2.2 support systems;
Three grades of indexs: as 1.1.1 emergency organization, 1.2.1 venture analysis;
Level Four index: guarantee system as emergent in 1.1.1.2;
Pyatyi index: as 1.2.1.2.1 vulnerable areas and vulnerability analysis.
2. assess methods of marking.
By professional assessment mechanism beyond our unit or professional, form expert assessment and evaluation group, according to set < < evaluation criteria > >, adopt dynamically examination to comment the appraisal procedure combining, the actual emergency capability of the evaluated enterprise of emphasis evaluation with static looking into.
(1) static state is looked into and is commented.The main method of examining that adopts, by listening report, consult reference materials, look into record, the method such as material object is checked, according to this evaluation criteria, contingency management and Emergency System construction situation are carried out to static state and look into and comment.Static state is looked into score value 515 minutes, 64.37% of some total points.
(2) dynamically examination.The main modes such as examination, deduction that adopt are carried out practice examining to the contingency management of enterprise and disposing capacity.Dynamically examination divides 285 minutes, accounts for 35.63% of total points.Dynamically following method is mainly taked in examination:
Examination.Set up emergent examination pool.To examination unit, choose respectively a certain proportion of emergent member of leading group, department head, managerial personnel, a line rescue repairing employee puts question to, inquires, organizes answer examination, the content of examination mainly comprises emergent consciousness, emergency organization, emergency preplan, emergent technical ability, rules and regulations, the relevant function of training exercise and general knowledge.
Rehearsal.Taxonomic organization's desktop maneuvers, on-the-spot combat exercise, each assessment rehearsal is no less than 3 times.The scientific rationality of check emergency preplan, emergency mechanism from actual combat, check accident adaptibility to response.Each assessment rehearsal is no less than 3 times, its specialized prediction scheme rehearsal, in desktop maneuvers mode, emphasis is checked and rated whole emergency mechanism and flow process, be no less than 1 time, the rehearsal of site disposal scheme, take on-the-spot combat exercise as main, be no less than 2 times, emergency response and the disposing task flow processs such as the emergent prediction of complete examination early warning, emergency starting, emergency response, orchestration, event disposal, public opinion guiding and information issue, the scientific rationality of check emergency preplan, emergency mechanism from actual combat, check accident adaptibility to response.
Analysis and judgment.Past three year or 5 years accident reply case is analyzed, comprehensive above-mentioned verification and examination situation, the construction and the real work situation that for 13 two-level index of Emergency System construction, are " five individual system ", " six kinds of abilities ", " two systems " are analyzed and are assessed the emergency capability of enterprise, thereby draw subitem and the overall capacity Current Level of enterprise's emergency capability.
3. assess assignment method.
This < < evaluation criteria > > adopts scoring mechanism, total points 800 minutes, each several part score value is respectively: emergent prevention 185 minutes, emergent preparation 335 minutes, emergency response 180 minutes, the later stage is disposed 100 minutes.The score value that each evaluation item is different according to it, gives different index classifications, each evaluation item is set up to the standard of deducting point of refinement.
Determine that index weights not only can reflect the feature of objective system more realistically, and assessment is made a distinction between the important and the lesser one, in mains supply capability evaluation index system, determining of each index weights directly embodied the guide effect to Electric Power Network Planning.
For the setting of index weights, mainly adopt expert consulting and direct experience tentatively to determine, then can cross the object information feedback of example, constantly update the system.
4. emergency capability discrimination standard.
By the scoring average of PTS rate and all kinds of indexs, comprehensively weigh the emergency capability of evaluation object.This standard is divided into four grades by the emergency capability of electric power enterprise, and has stipulated that different scoring average intervals represents different emergency capability grades.
Scoring average mainly for 13 two-level index during examination separates four grades item by item, outstanding, good, general, poor, and wherein, outstanding scoring average should be >=and 85%; Good scoring average >=75% of 85% >; General scoring average >=60% of 75% >; Poor scoring average should be below 60%.Meanwhile, according to overall scoring average, overall emergency capability is evaluated.
Scoring average=real score/reserved portion * 100%.
(3) assessment backup system.
Power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method assessment backup system: the software systems that are a set of comprehensive making assessments of the performance of each enterprise contingency capabilities assessment, utilize the contingency capabilities assessment method > > of < < power grid enterprises standard, emergent preparation to enterprise is analyzed, find advantage and deficiency in contingency management and emergency capability process of construction, analyse in depth the problem existing, suggest improvements and Construction Party to, finally reach assessment and construction are combined, for enterprise investment and resource rational allocation provide scientific basis, make enterprise investment and resource better bring into play benefit.This system realizes the examination of enterprise by static, dynamic two kinds of modes, through enterprise's self-evaluating, expert assessment and evaluation and three links of enterprise's rectification, the assessment form that obtains being correlated with, report and enterprise's modification report, with this, reflect enterprise's emergency capability details, be convenient to enterprise and improve contingency management work, guarantee standardization, the validity of power grid enterprises' contingency management work, be convenient to assess the integrated degree of power grid enterprises at different levels contingency management work.
Major function has: system management, evaluation criteria management, parameter are confirmed, enterprise evaluation management.
Described system management comprises: realize the correlation parameter configuration features such as enterprise's rank, assessment mode, assessment cycle, user right;
Described evaluation criteria management: comprise functions such as realizing static, dynamic estimation standard management;
Described parameter is confirmed to comprise: realize assessment correlation parameter confirmation work;
Described enterprise evaluation management comprises: realize the functions such as enterprise's static evaluation, dynamic evaluation, rectification management, assessment form, assessment report.
The auxiliary evaluating system of power grid enterprises' emergency capability has following technical characterstic:
1) appraisal procedure adopts examination under battle conditions and the static actual emergency capability of commenting the mode combining, emphasis evaluation to be evaluated enterprise of looking into;
2) according to assessment result, can provide accurately for company manager, efficiently, comprehensively, information flexibly, help that it is better analyzed, decision-making;
3) system is reminded pending estimation items automatically, rapidly and efficiently;
4) system combination, unified entrance, succinctly convenient;
5) adopt unified < < evaluation criteria > >, guaranteed the data consistency between each enterprise.
6) algorithm is simple and quick, only needs rational algebraic operation, irrelevant with network size, and computing time, nanosecond, guaranteed the accuracy of assessment result;
7) adopt modularization hierarchical design flexibly, guarantee stability, compatibility and the extendability of system.
8) according to assessment data, produce evaluation criteria proportion map, the comparative analysis figure of each enterprise, more intuitively represent the emergency capability of enterprise.
Native system will adopt J2EE framework to build the mode of WEB infosystem.Adopt unified procotol (HTTP) and standard, adopt unified browser interface, distributed computing technology, utilizes up-to-date technology to complete electric network emergency capability evaluation system.
1. industrial standard.
Distributed object technology has the Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) DCOM (Componet Object Model) of three kinds of industrial standard: MS, the J2EE of the public object request broker program structure CORBA of OMG (Object Management Group) (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) and SUN.The fatal shortcoming of DCOM is that cross-platform performance is poor, can only adopt the platform of Microsoft from being deployed to operation; The shortcoming of CORBA is huge and complicated, and the renewal of standard is relatively slow; And J2EE simplifies and standard the develop and field of multi-storey Distributed System, obtain the extensive support of industry, be usually the first-selected platform of enterprise-level distributed application program.J2EE provides the distributed application program model of a sandwich construction, this model has the JDBC technology that facilitates access database, Data Interchange Technology based on XML, component reuse ability, unified safe mode and flexibly affairs controlling mechanism, comprehensive support of Servlets and JSP is also provided EJB.
2. system frame structure model.
On the basis that framework can make programming personnel realize at a general utility functions, start concrete system development, it provides reusable abstract algorithm and High-rise Building Design, and can be by the member of large system decomposition Cheng Geng little, and the internal interface between member can be described, these standard interfaces make by assembling, to set up various systems on existing member basis becomes possibility.Common Web Information System Frame is a general-purpose system development model that meets MVC Design Mode, by this model, will greatly simplify system development complexity, makes program layer aggregated(particle) structure clear, and debugging is simple.
As shown in Figure 1, Fig. 1 middle frame public page bread is containing all static pages relevant with framework; System General Catalog structure comprises that Images catalogue deposits framework picture concerned, and script catalogue is placed conventional Web control, and Css catalogue is deposited style sheet file; WEB-INF catalogue comprises all Java class files and for the APMB package of disparate databases.Adopt server page mould plate technique, the final display page of dynamic combined; Action Servlet is the Controller of application, entrance and the Distribution Center of all requests, it determines the operation that will carry out according to the address path of server request, and from Handermapping, find corresponding processing class, be responsible for the request of processing server, collection parameter, calls corresponding Businesslogic class, result is put into HttpRequest/Http Session object, format process information simultaneously.By explaining that extensible markup language document determines next page address path.
3. estimation flow.
As shown in Figure 2, Fig. 2 is evaluating system structural representation of the present invention.
This system architecture is divided into system management and two piths of assessment management.
Wherein system management part is mainly that basic data maintenance, evaluation criteria are safeguarded and related data management, by system manager and dependent evaluation expert, carry out data typing, basic data maintenance comprises: configuration enterprise rank, configuration company information, configuration assessment cycle, configure user authority, emergent relevant documentation; Evaluation criteria is safeguarded and is comprised: normal manual is safeguarded, standard-run quantity is safeguarded, evaluation criteria is confirmed; Related data management comprises: examination pool management, generation paper.
Assessment administrative section is mainly the report of assessment form, enterprise evaluation, enterprise's rectification, enterprise or assessment experts are carried out scoring mechanism according to evaluation criteria to each, score value is presented in final assessment form and assessment report, and assessment form report comprises: assessment report, business valuation studies standard forms, assess total submeter, assessment detail list, assessment difference table, evaluation grade result, assessment comparative analysis figure; Enterprise evaluation mainly comprises: enterprise evaluation, online testing, calculating folding minute; Enterprise's rectification mainly comprises: subject matter rectification suggestion, the emergent document viewing of modification report.
Coupling system structure adopts the mode that enterprise's self-evaluating merges mutually with expert assessment and evaluation to assess, each business organization's self-evaluating.System manager primarily checks whether enterprise's basic data of self-evaluating in system is safeguarded completely, whether evaluation criteria needs is modified, complete after self-evaluating confirmation, superior responsible institution send in one's application, and the safety evaluation intermediary that organizes expert or trust to have relevant qualification by superior administrative unit carries out expert assessment and evaluation.
Expert group is checked, inquires, checks, examines, is exchanged views with the leader of enterprise and managerial personnel by scene, draws expert assessment and evaluation conclusion.Organize expert assessment and evaluation summing-up meeting, announce assessment result.After evaluation work finishes, expert group answers superior responsible institution and evaluated unit to submit written assessment report and dependent evaluation form.
Evaluated unit should organize relevant departments to formulate improvement plan according to self-evaluating result and expert assessment and evaluation result, and improvement plan must clearly be rectified and improved content, measures to rectify and reform, completes the time limit, rectify and improve responsible official and acceptor; Improvement plan should have person in charge's examination and approval Bing Bao higher authority to put on record.
Evaluated unit should summarize, circulate a notice of our unit's contingency capabilities assessment improvement plan performance in mid-term in year and latter stage, present one's view in time and advise, to completing the project of rectification, do not carry out risk assessment, should revise improvement plan if desired, implement closed loop management.
Last evaluated unit should report higher authority by contingency capabilities assessment improvement plan performance and rectifying and improving annual summary.
Claims (9)
1. power grid enterprises' contingency capabilities assessment method, is characterized in that: comprise and set up that index system, indicator of distribution are composed minute and assessment backup system;
(1) the described index system of setting up: be from numerous service datas, parameter, select the emergent larger index of capacity, and index request be truly available, system sufficiently complete; Take " a case three system " be core, for the emergent prevention of power grid enterprises, emergent preparation, emergency response, four aspects of later stage disposal, power grid enterprises' emergency capability is comprehensively assessed; Include some indexs in evaluation system constructively, make assessment more comprehensive;
Index system adopts the classical formalism structure of layer-stepping, is divided into two large classes: Static State Index and dynamic indicator by attribute;
Under these attributes, specifically mark off 4 evaluation attribute of enterprise's emergency capability, according to the base program of contingency management, conclude " emergent prevention, emergent preparation, emergency response, later stage disposal
"the content of four professional aspects, by " five individual system ", " six kinds of abilities ", " two systems " construction of totally 13 subsystems and level of control realize situation and be included into one by one in these classification, all the other indexs that finally again this attribute also related to itself add, improve system one by one;
(2) described indicator of distribution is composed and is divided: comprise evaluation index classification, assessment methods of marking, assessment assignment method and emergency capability discrimination standard;
(3) described assessment backup system: comprise system management, evaluation criteria management, parameter confirmation and enterprise evaluation management.
2. power grid enterprises according to claim 1 contingency capabilities assessment method, is characterized in that:
Described emergent prevention mainly comprises: the assessment of emergency organization system, emergency preplan system, rules and regulations system content;
Described emergent preparation mainly comprises: the assessment of training exercise system, emergent science and technology support system, troop's organizational capacity, overall support capability, prevention prediction and monitoring early-warning system and emergency information and command system construction content;
Described emergency response mainly comprises: the assessment of public opinion guidance capability, rescue disposing capacity content;
The described later stage is disposed assessment and mainly comprises: the assessment of restoration and reconstruction ability, Continual Improvement ability content.
3. power grid enterprises according to claim 1 contingency capabilities assessment method, is characterized in that:
Described evaluation index classification: establish altogether 4 of one-level evaluation indexes with < < evaluation criteria > >, 13 of secondary evaluation indexes, 38 of three grades of evaluation indexes, according to it, number to carry out index classification, be about to three grades of titles and be divided into by number first class index, two-level index, three grades of indexs, level Four index and Pyatyi indexs, and do following regulation:
First class index: as 1 emergent prevention, 2 emergent preparations, 3 emergency responses, 4 later stages are disposed;
Two-level index: as 1.1 emergency organization systems, 2.2 support systems;
Three grades of indexs: as 1.1.1 emergency organization, 1.2.1 venture analysis;
Level Four index: guarantee system as emergent in 1.1.1.2;
Pyatyi index: as 1.2.1.2.1 vulnerable areas and vulnerability analysis.
4. power grid enterprises according to claim 1 contingency capabilities assessment method, is characterized in that:
Described assessment methods of marking: beyond Shi You our unit, professional assessment mechanism or professional form expert assessment and evaluation group, according to set < < evaluation criteria > >, adopt dynamically examination to comment the appraisal procedure combining, the actual emergency capability of the evaluated enterprise of emphasis evaluation with static looking into;
(1) static state is looked into and is commented: the main method of examining that adopts, by listening report, consult reference materials, look into record, the method such as material object is checked, according to this evaluation criteria, contingency management and Emergency System construction situation are carried out to static state and look into and comment; Static state is looked into score value 515 minutes, 64.37% of some total points;
(2) dynamically examination: the main modes such as examination, deduction that adopt are carried out practice examining to the contingency management of enterprise and disposing capacity; Dynamically examination divides 285 minutes, accounts for 35.63% of total points; Dynamically following method is mainly taked in examination:
The one, examination: set up emergent examination pool; To examination unit, choose respectively a certain proportion of emergent member of leading group, department head, managerial personnel, a line rescue repairing employee puts question to, inquires, organizes answer examination, the content of examination mainly comprises emergent consciousness, emergency organization, emergency preplan, emergent technical ability
,rules and regulations, the relevant function of training exercise and general knowledge;
The 2nd, rehearsal: taxonomic organization's desktop maneuvers, on-the-spot combat exercise, each assessment rehearsal is no less than 3 times; The scientific rationality of check emergency preplan, emergency mechanism from actual combat, check accident adaptibility to response; Each assessment rehearsal is no less than 3 times, its specialized prediction scheme rehearsal is in desktop maneuvers mode, emphasis checks and rates whole emergency mechanism and flow process is no less than 1 time, the rehearsal of site disposal scheme be take on-the-spot combat exercise as main, be no less than 2 times, emergency response and the disposing task flow processs such as the emergent prediction of complete examination early warning, emergency starting, emergency response, orchestration, event disposal, public opinion guiding and information issue, the scientific rationality of check emergency preplan, emergency mechanism from actual combat, check accident adaptibility to response;
The 3rd, analysis and judgment: past three year or 5 years accident reply case is analyzed, comprehensive above-mentioned verification and examination situation, the construction and the real work situation that for 13 two-level index of Emergency System construction, are " five individual system ", " six kinds of abilities ", " two systems " are analyzed and are assessed the emergency capability of enterprise, thereby draw subitem and the overall capacity Current Level of enterprise's emergency capability.
5. power grid enterprises according to claim 1 contingency capabilities assessment method, it is characterized in that: described assessment assignment method is: this < < evaluation criteria > > adopts scoring mechanism, total points 800 minutes, each several part score value is respectively: emergent prevention 185 minutes, emergent preparation 335 minutes, emergency response 180 minutes, the later stage is disposed 100 minutes; The score value that each evaluation item is different according to it, gives different index classifications, each evaluation item is set up to the standard of deducting point of refinement;
Determine that index weights not only can reflect the feature of objective system more realistically, and assessment is made a distinction between the important and the lesser one, in mains supply capability evaluation index system, determining of each index weights directly embodied the guide effect to Electric Power Network Planning;
For the setting of index weights, mainly adopt expert consulting and direct experience tentatively to determine, then can cross the object information feedback of example, constantly update the system.
6. power grid enterprises according to claim 1 contingency capabilities assessment method, is characterized in that:
Described emergency capability discrimination standard: be comprehensively to weigh the emergency capability of evaluation object by the scoring average of PTS rate and all kinds of indexs;
This standard is divided into four grades by the emergency capability of electric power enterprise, and has stipulated that different scoring average intervals represents different emergency capability grades;
Scoring average mainly for 13 two-level index during examination separates four grades item by item, outstanding, good, general, poor, and wherein, outstanding scoring average should be >=and 85%; Good scoring average >=75% of 85% >; General scoring average >=60% of 75% >; Poor scoring average should be below 60%; Meanwhile, according to overall scoring average, overall emergency capability is evaluated;
Scoring average=real score/reserved portion * 100%.
7. power grid enterprises according to claim 1 contingency capabilities assessment method, is characterized in that:
Described system management comprises: realize the correlation parameter configuration features such as enterprise's rank, assessment mode, assessment cycle, user right;
Described evaluation criteria management: comprise functions such as realizing static, dynamic estimation standard management;
Described parameter is confirmed to comprise: realize assessment correlation parameter confirmation work;
Described enterprise evaluation management comprises: realize the functions such as enterprise's static evaluation, dynamic evaluation, rectification management, assessment form, assessment report.
8. power grid enterprises according to claim 1 contingency capabilities assessment method, is characterized in that:
Described assessment backup system adopts J2EE framework to build the mode of WEB infosystem; Adopt unified procotol (HTTP) and standard, adopt unified browser interface, distributed computing technology completes electric network emergency capability evaluation system;
(1) industrial standard;
Distributed object technology has the Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) DCOM (Componet Object Model) of three kinds of industrial standard: MS, the J2EE of the public object request broker program structure CORBA of OMG (Object Management Group) (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) and SUN; The fatal shortcoming of DCOM is that cross-platform performance is poor, can only adopt the platform of Microsoft from being deployed to operation; The shortcoming of CORBA is huge and complicated, and the renewal of standard is relatively slow; And J2EE simplifies and standard the develop and field of multi-storey Distributed System, obtain the extensive support of industry, be usually the first-selected platform of enterprise-level distributed application program; J2EE provides the distributed application program model of a sandwich construction, this model has the JDBC technology that facilitates access database, Data Interchange Technology based on XML, component reuse ability, unified safe mode and flexibly affairs controlling mechanism, comprehensive support of Servlets and JSP is also provided EJB;
(2) system frame structure model;
On the basis that framework can make programming personnel realize at a general utility functions, start concrete system development, it provides reusable abstract algorithm and High-rise Building Design, and can be by the member of large system decomposition Cheng Geng little, and the internal interface between member can be described, these standard interfaces make by assembling, to set up various systems on existing member basis becomes possibility; Common Web Information System Frame is a general-purpose system development model that meets MVC Design Mode;
(3) estimation flow;
This system architecture is divided into system management and two parts of assessment management;
Described system management part: mainly comprise that basic data maintenance, evaluation criteria are safeguarded and related data management, by system manager and dependent evaluation expert, carry out data typing, basic data maintenance comprises: configuration enterprise rank, configuration company information, configuration assessment cycle, configure user authority, emergent relevant documentation; Evaluation criteria is safeguarded and is comprised: normal manual is safeguarded, standard-run quantity is safeguarded, evaluation criteria is confirmed; Related data management comprises: examination pool management, generation paper;
Described assessment administrative section: mainly comprise the report of assessment form, enterprise evaluation, enterprise's rectification, enterprise or assessment experts are carried out scoring mechanism according to evaluation criteria to each, score value is presented in final assessment form and assessment report, and assessment form report comprises: assessment report, business valuation studies standard forms, assess total submeter, assessment detail list, assessment difference table, evaluation grade result, assessment comparative analysis figure; Enterprise evaluation mainly comprises: enterprise evaluation, online testing, calculating folding minute; Enterprise's rectification mainly comprises: subject matter rectification suggestion, modification report and emergent document viewing;
Described coupling system structure adopts the mode that enterprise's self-evaluating merges mutually with expert assessment and evaluation to assess, each business organization's self-evaluating; System manager primarily checks whether enterprise's basic data of self-evaluating in system is safeguarded completely, whether evaluation criteria needs is modified, complete after self-evaluating confirmation, superior responsible institution send in one's application, and the safety evaluation intermediary that organizes expert or trust to have relevant qualification by superior administrative unit carries out expert assessment and evaluation;
Expert group is checked, inquires, checks, examines, is exchanged views with the leader of enterprise and managerial personnel by scene, draws expert assessment and evaluation conclusion; Organize expert assessment and evaluation summing-up meeting, announce assessment result; After evaluation work finishes, expert group answers superior responsible institution and evaluated unit to submit written assessment report and dependent evaluation form;
Evaluated unit should organize relevant departments to formulate improvement plan according to self-evaluating result and expert assessment and evaluation result, and improvement plan must clearly be rectified and improved content, measures to rectify and reform, completes the time limit, rectify and improve responsible official and acceptor; Improvement plan should have person in charge's examination and approval Bing Bao higher authority to put on record;
Evaluated unit should summarize, circulate a notice of our unit's contingency capabilities assessment improvement plan performance in mid-term in year and latter stage, present one's view in time and advise, to completing the project of rectification, do not carry out risk assessment, should revise improvement plan if desired, implement closed loop management;
Last evaluated unit should report higher authority by contingency capabilities assessment improvement plan performance and rectifying and improving annual summary.
9. power grid enterprises according to claim 8 contingency capabilities assessment method, it is characterized in that: described system frame structure model: system General Catalog structure comprises that Images catalogue deposits framework picture concerned, script catalogue is placed conventional Web control, and Css catalogue is deposited style sheet file; WEB-INF catalogue comprises all Java class files and for the APMB package of disparate databases; Adopt server page mould plate technique, the final display page of dynamic combined; Action Servlet is the Controller of application, entrance and the Distribution Center of all requests, it determines the operation that will carry out according to the address path of server request, and from Handermapping, find corresponding processing class, be responsible for the request of processing server, collection parameter, calls corresponding Businesslogic class, result is put into HttpRequest/Http Session object, format process information simultaneously; By explaining that extensible markup language document determines next page address path.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201410137868.6A CN103955785A (en) | 2014-04-08 | 2014-04-08 | Emergency capacity assessment method of power grid enterprise |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201410137868.6A CN103955785A (en) | 2014-04-08 | 2014-04-08 | Emergency capacity assessment method of power grid enterprise |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN103955785A true CN103955785A (en) | 2014-07-30 |
Family
ID=51333058
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201410137868.6A Pending CN103955785A (en) | 2014-04-08 | 2014-04-08 | Emergency capacity assessment method of power grid enterprise |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN103955785A (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104881783A (en) * | 2015-05-14 | 2015-09-02 | 中国科学院信息工程研究所 | E-bank account fraudulent conduct and risk detecting method and system |
| CN109272797A (en) * | 2018-11-20 | 2019-01-25 | 四川启志创新科技有限公司 | A kind of intelligence assessment system and method for the test of scientific and technical innovation potentiality |
| CN109657925A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-19 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司宁波供电公司 | Electric network emergency ability dynamic evaluation method based on grey target theory |
| CN110942235A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-03-31 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Electric power emergency evaluation system |
| CN111222834A (en) * | 2018-11-27 | 2020-06-02 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Enterprise field emergency work data analysis method and system |
| CN111667150A (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2020-09-15 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Power grid emergency operation management method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112508345A (en) * | 2020-11-12 | 2021-03-16 | 聚通智用(重庆)信息科技有限公司 | Rectification work management system and method |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050125104A1 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2005-06-09 | Wilson Thomas L. | Electrical power distribution control systems and processes |
| CN103227797A (en) * | 2013-05-08 | 2013-07-31 | 上海电机学院 | Distributive management system of information network security for power enterprises |
| CN103593739A (en) * | 2013-11-25 | 2014-02-19 | 国家电网公司 | Urban power grid emergency ability assessment method |
| CN103646352A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2014-03-19 | 国网上海市电力公司 | Electric-power emergency system evaluation model construction method based on frangibility |
-
2014
- 2014-04-08 CN CN201410137868.6A patent/CN103955785A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050125104A1 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2005-06-09 | Wilson Thomas L. | Electrical power distribution control systems and processes |
| CN103227797A (en) * | 2013-05-08 | 2013-07-31 | 上海电机学院 | Distributive management system of information network security for power enterprises |
| CN103646352A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2014-03-19 | 国网上海市电力公司 | Electric-power emergency system evaluation model construction method based on frangibility |
| CN103593739A (en) * | 2013-11-25 | 2014-02-19 | 国家电网公司 | Urban power grid emergency ability assessment method |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘超 等: ""城市电网企业应急能力评估理念、指标及方法研究"", 《华东电力》 * |
| 朱少如: ""电力应急***的研究"", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅱ辑》 * |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104881783A (en) * | 2015-05-14 | 2015-09-02 | 中国科学院信息工程研究所 | E-bank account fraudulent conduct and risk detecting method and system |
| CN109272797A (en) * | 2018-11-20 | 2019-01-25 | 四川启志创新科技有限公司 | A kind of intelligence assessment system and method for the test of scientific and technical innovation potentiality |
| CN109657925A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-19 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司宁波供电公司 | Electric network emergency ability dynamic evaluation method based on grey target theory |
| CN111222834A (en) * | 2018-11-27 | 2020-06-02 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Enterprise field emergency work data analysis method and system |
| CN110942235A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-03-31 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Electric power emergency evaluation system |
| CN110942235B (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2022-05-20 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Emergent evaluation system of electric power |
| CN111667150A (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2020-09-15 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Power grid emergency operation management method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN111667150B (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2023-06-20 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Power grid emergency operation management method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112508345A (en) * | 2020-11-12 | 2021-03-16 | 聚通智用(重庆)信息科技有限公司 | Rectification work management system and method |
| CN112508345B (en) * | 2020-11-12 | 2022-04-22 | 聚通智用(重庆)信息科技有限公司 | Management system and method for work checking and correcting |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103955785A (en) | Emergency capacity assessment method of power grid enterprise | |
| Sorensen | Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art | |
| Garrett et al. | Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety | |
| Zhang et al. | Perceiving interactions and dynamics of safety leadership in construction projects | |
| Burke et al. | General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model | |
| Cui et al. | An integrative model of organizational safety behavior | |
| Stambler et al. | Engineering the incident command and multiagency coordination systems | |
| Haight et al. | Safety management systems: comparing content & impact | |
| Cao et al. | Modern emergency management | |
| dos Santos et al. | Human factors applied to alarm panel modernization of nuclear control room | |
| Flannery | Safety culture and its measurement in aviation | |
| Zheng et al. | Routes to failure and prevention recommendations in work systems of hydropower construction | |
| Irizarry et al. | Situation awareness (SA), a qualitative user-centered information needs assessment approach | |
| Lestiani et al. | Developing a conceptual model of organizational safety risk: Case studies of aircraft maintenance organizations in Indonesia | |
| Mollo et al. | Training-Within-Industry Job Programs for Improved Construction Safety | |
| Leva et al. | Total Safety and the Productivity Challenge | |
| Kontogiannis | Total Safety Management: Why? | |
| Li et al. | Dynamic simulation and control strategy exploration of the unsafe behavior of coal mine employees | |
| Sivaraman | Operational Team Leader Behaviors in a High Reliability-Risk Technical Environment: Analysis of Critical Incidents | |
| Tanabe et al. | Development of the Management Cycle and Supporting Tool for Assisting Organizational Workers in Learning Themselves How to Detect Safety-related Problems | |
| CHEROTICH | ASSESSMENT OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE AT THE KENYA POWER AND LIGHTING COMPANY, NAKURU COUNTY | |
| Kim et al. | System thinking perspective on the dynamic relationship between organizational characteristics of nuclear safety culture | |
| Harpen | Preparing the US Army Corps of Engineers for future pandemic response operations: a case study of alternate care facility support during the COVID-19 pandemic | |
| Dingee | The Traits of a High Reliable Organization HRO | |
| Vasconcelos et al. | Safety, reliability, risk management and human factors: an integrated engineering approach applied to nuclear facilities |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20140730 |