CN103761581A - Method for civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation - Google Patents
Method for civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103761581A CN103761581A CN201310754544.2A CN201310754544A CN103761581A CN 103761581 A CN103761581 A CN 103761581A CN 201310754544 A CN201310754544 A CN 201310754544A CN 103761581 A CN103761581 A CN 103761581A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- rationality
- machine interface
- civil aircraft
- evaluation
- omega
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method for civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation. The method comprises the steps that an evaluation index of a human-computer interface is selected through a comprehensive method or an analysis method or a composite algorithm method or an index attribute grouping method; a civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation index system is determined; grading is conducted on each index of civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface evaluation and an initial grading value of the index is determined; data collection is conducted on a given human-computer interface sample, prepared inspection data are substituted, and a relative error of an output actual value and a predicted value is calculated; the accuracy of the relative error is inspected, data of each index of the civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface to be evaluated are input and are calculated through an established BP nerve network module, and a final evaluation result is obtained. The method can conduct objective and accurate evaluation on the civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface the Automation Design technology.
Background technology
Man-machine interface, as a multidisciplinary crossing domain that relates to the subjects such as computer science, artificial intelligence, ergonomics, computational linguistics, cognitive science, social psychology, is being brought into play important function served as bridge in the information interchange between human and computer, environment.Whether the information interaction passage of human and computer and environment is natural, smooth and easy, efficient, accurate, for improving the availability of man-machine interface and user, experience, for excavating personnel's job interest and potential, minimizing personnel work fatigue and misoperation, enhance productivity and economic benefit all most important.Civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface, as the tie that connects aircraft system and pilot, becomes pilot and flight system and carries out mutual main media, and pilot completes aerial mission by controlling man-machine interface.Traditional aircraft cockpit Human Machine Interface is mainly paid close attention to the Man-Machine Engineering Problems relevant to hardware device space layout, and the cognition of less consideration interface information and interaction problems.Along with developing rapidly of high speed processing chip, computer graphics techniques and multimedia technology, use the computer generalization display device of high-resolution giant-screen and touch-sensitive formula control interface to replace the inexorable trend that traditional mechanical type interface has become aircraft cockpit design of new generation.There is the aobvious control techniques of flexible data digitizing comprehensive and graphics display capability and for optimizing man-machine interface and man-machine interaction, provide condition on the one hand, but then, if the design to the information content at interface, Information Organization and display mode is unreasonable, by increasing pilot's cognitive load, affect flight safety.Therefore people more and more pay attention to the design of driving cabin man-machine interface, in design process, the mankind's the imagination is also more and more bold, but the application of everything is all the degree based on human-machine interface evaluation, whether really rationally, comprehensive evaluation man-machine interface how, be a difficult problem be also one must research major issue.
Human-machine interface evaluation belongs to the category of systems engineering, its essence is large system is evaluated, and is in conjunction with the feature of institute's descriptive system, to construct an energy and from a plurality of visual angles and level, to reflect objectively the integral level of system.Civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation is that the cognition according to relevant design criteria and pilot self judges whether the design of the matching relationship of pilot in man-machine interface and relevant display, controller and accessory (as seat etc.) meets the requirement of ergonomics, carry out human-machine interface evaluation and can help to judge the state of overall and each inscape of existing man-machine interface, also can find whereby the problem existing in design, to feed back in time design department, modify.Because relating between many factors and each factor, civil aircraft driving cabin there is complex relationship, and factor in common evaluation method often just rule of thumb or select from the related data of collecting, this produces the large key element of not high, the man-machine ring three of confidence level by the selection course that causes factor of evaluation and is difficult to the problems such as the some factors all listing, list and human-machine interface evaluation have nothing to do.Therefore, make human-computer interface system reach rational requirement, must have a suitable evaluation means.At present, the evaluation of civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface has obtained sufficient application and development abroad, the existing sleeve forming of Boeing and Air Passenger company and supporting human-machine interface evaluation method, but have no open report in view of technique sensitive.The domestic evaluation about man-machine interface adopts the method for qualitative analysis and virtual emulation more, and quantitative analysis and research are less, does not form the evaluation method of system synthesis.
Summary of the invention
For overcome prior art evaluation procedure exist the subjective uncertainty of the randomness of decision process, the personnel that participate in evaluation and electing with and understanding on the deficiencies such as ambiguity, the present invention proposes a kind of civil aircraft driving cabin Human-Machine Interface Comprehensive Evaluation method based on BP neural network (Back-Propagation Neural Network).
The technical solution adopted for the present invention to solve the technical problems comprises the following steps:
1) use overall approach, analytic approach, composite algorithm or Criterion Attribute method of grouping are chosen the evaluation index of man-machine interface, evaluation index comprises total arrangement, demonstration information, display frame, controller and materiality principle, function proximity, frequency of utilization principle, use Ordinal Consistency, visual angle rationality, accuracy, information content, the high-lighting of important information, information Comprehensible, information is acceptable, the easy perceptibility of danger signal, picture layout's rationality, color rationality, the rationality of character design, the rationality of icon design, the form size of scale instrument, the rationality of meter dial design, the science of element limit operation position, function division definition, rationality and handling comfort that important executor is placed,
2) determine civil aircraft driving cabin Human-Machine Interface Comprehensive Evaluation index system, comprising: E-civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation, B
1-total arrangement, B
2-demonstration information, B
3-display frame, B
4-controller, C
1-materiality principle, C
2-function proximity, C
3-frequency of utilization principle, C
4-use Ordinal Consistency, C
5-visual angle rationality, C
6-accuracy, C
7-information content, C
8the high-lighting of-important information, C
9-information Comprehensible, C
10-information is acceptable, C
11the easy perceptibility of-danger signal, C
12-picture layout rationality, C
13-color rationality, C
14the rationality of-character design, C
15the rationality of-icon design, C
16the form size of-scale instrument, C
17the rationality of-meter dial design, C
18the science of-element limit operation position, C
19-function division definition, C
20the rationality of-important executor placement, C
21-handling comfort;
3) adopt 5 grades of comment collection excellent, good, in, poor, the bad indices to civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation carries out grade classification, determines its initial score value;
4) according to civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation system, given man-machine interface sample is carried out to data acquisition, the marking of each index is input, and evaluation result is output, and the learning sample using N the data sample gathering as BP neural network
k=1,2,3 ..., n;
5) by learning sample input vector X
klength n determine that network input layer number is n, by learning sample output vector
length m determine that network output layer nodes is m; Determine network number of plies L and each the number of hidden nodes, wherein, L>=3, the nodes of l layer is n
(l), and n
(1)=n, n
(L)=m;
Define each interlayer connection weight matrix, l layer connects the connection weight matrix of l+1 layer
l=1,2,3 ..., L-1, the element value of each connection weight matrix of initialization;
6) input permissible error ε and learning rate η, initialization iterative computation number of times t=1, learning sample sequence number k=1; Get k learning sample
x
k=(x
1k, x
2k..., x
nk),
by Xk, carry out forward-propagating calculating;
First calculate the output of each node of input layer
And the input of successively calculating each node in each layer
And output
Finally calculate the error of each output node of output layer
If the arbitrary sample k value to N learning sample, has E
jk≤ ε, j=1,2 ..., m, learning process finishes; Otherwise, carry out error back propagation, revise each connection weight matrix;
First revise L-1 layer hidden layer to the connection weight matrix of output layer
Finally make k and t add one, re-start study; When error amount is less than predefined determined value, circulation finishes;
7) by ready check data substitution, calculate the actual value of output and the relative error of desired value, check its accuracy, when meeting the demands, can be used to evaluate the man-machine interface of civil aircraft driving cabin;
8) by the indices data input of civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface to be evaluated, by the BP neural network model establishing, calculate, draw final evaluation result.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows: this method can be made objective and accurate evaluation to civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface, for the Automation Design of man-machine interface lays the foundation, relatively to there is significant progress and application widely with existing method.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is civil aircraft driving cabin Human-Machine Interface Comprehensive Evaluation index system structural representation;
Fig. 2 is network error curve map.
Embodiment
The present invention includes following steps:
1. choose evaluation index
The way of thinking single or that be combined with overall approach, analytic approach, composite algorithm and four kinds of structure indexs of Criterion Attribute method of grouping is chosen the evaluation index of man-machine interface.Choose total arrangement, demonstration information, display frame, controller and materiality principle, function proximity, frequency of utilization principle, use Ordinal Consistency, visual angle rationality, accuracy, information content, the high-lighting of important information, information Comprehensible, information is acceptable, the easy perceptibility of danger signal, picture layout's rationality, color rationality, the rationality of character design, the rationality of icon design, the form size of scale instrument, the rationality of meter dial design, the science of element limit operation position, function division definition, the rationality that important executor is placed, these 25 indexs of handling comfort are as the evaluation index of civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface.
2. determine assessment indicator system
" hierarchy of objectivies formula " and " Factor Decomposition formula " this two type systematics Structural Tectonics mode of employing, and carry out structure optimization from four aspects such as completeness, rationality, validity, reliabilities, determine civil aircraft driving cabin Human-Machine Interface Comprehensive Evaluation index system as shown in Figure 1.This assessment indicator system is by 4 two-level index and 21 three grades of index constitutes, being wherein expressed as follows of various indexs: E-civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation, B
1-total arrangement, B
2-demonstration information, B
3-display frame, B
4-controller, C
1-materiality principle, C
2-function proximity, C
3-frequency of utilization principle, C
4-use Ordinal Consistency, C
5-visual angle rationality, C
6-accuracy, C
7-information content, C
8the high-lighting of-important information, C
9-information Comprehensible, C
10-information is acceptable, C
11the easy perceptibility of-danger signal, C
12-picture layout rationality, C
13-color rationality, C
14the rationality of-character design, C
15the rationality of-icon design, C
16the form size of-scale instrument, C
17the rationality of-meter dial design, C
18the science of-element limit operation position, C
19-function division definition, C
20the rationality of-important executor placement, C
21-handling comfort.
3. pair indices carries out initial score
Adopt 5 grades of comment collection excellent, good, in, poor, bad (0-59 is bad, and 60-69 is for poor, and during 70-79 is, 80-89 is good, and 90-100 is excellent), the indices of civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation is carried out to grade classification, determine its initial score value.
4. gather and evaluate sample
Civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation system index structure according to providing in Fig. 1, carries out data acquisition to given man-machine interface sample, and the marking of each index is input, and evaluation result is output.And the learning sample using N the data sample gathering as BP neural network
, k=1,2,3 ..., n.
5. set up BP neural network structure model
By learning sample input vector X
klength n determine that network input layer number is n, by learning sample output vector
length m determine that network output layer nodes is m; Determine the network number of plies (L>=3) and each the number of hidden nodes.Wherein, the nodes of l layer is n
(l), and n
(1)=n, n
(L)=m.
Define each interlayer connection weight matrix, the connection weight matrix that l layer connects l+1 layer is:
The element value of each connection weight matrix of initialization.
6. pair BP neural network is learnt
Input permissible error ε and learning rate η, initialization iterative computation number of times t=1, learning sample sequence number k=1.Get k learning sample
x
k=(x
1k, x
2k..., x
nk),
by X
kcarry out forward-propagating calculating.
First calculating each node of input layer is output as:
And the input and output of successively calculating each node in each layer are:
L=1 wherein, 2 ..., L-1; J=1,2 ..., n
(l).
The error of finally calculating each output node of output layer (L layer) is:
If the arbitrary sample k value to N learning sample, has E
jk≤ ε, j=1,2 ..., m, learning process finishes; Otherwise, carry out error back propagation, revise each connection weight matrix.
First revise L-1 layer hidden layer to the connection weight matrix of output layer (L layer):
Wherein, j=1,2 ..., m; I=1,2 ..., n
(L-1).
Then oppositely successively revise the connection weight matrix that connects each hidden layer:
Wherein, l=L-1 ..., 2,1; J=1,2 ..., n
(l); I=1,2 ..., n
(l-1).
Finally make k=k+1, t=t+1 re-starts study.When error amount is less than predefined determined value, circulation finishes, and learning process is also just through with.
7. check BP neural network model
By ready check data substitution, calculate the actual value of output and the relative error of desired value, check its accuracy, when meeting the demands, can be used to evaluate the man-machine interface of civil aircraft driving cabin.
8. draw evaluation result
By the indices data input of civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface to be evaluated, by the BP neural network model establishing, calculate, draw final evaluation result.
Below in conjunction with drawings and Examples, the present invention is further described, the present invention includes but be not limited only to following embodiment.
1. the civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation index of choosing by overall approach, analytic approach, composite algorithm and Criterion Attribute method of grouping, is included as 25 altogether.
2. adopt " hierarchy of objectivies formula " and " Factor Decomposition formula " two kinds of system Structural Tectonics modes to set up civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation index system, as shown in Figure 1.
3. adopt 5 grades of comment collection excellent, good, in, poor, the bad indices to civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation carries out initial score, as shown in table 1.
The scoring of table 1 human-machine interface evaluation indices
4. gather human-machine interface evaluation sample, choose ten samples (X1-X10) as training sample, three samples (Y1-Y3) are made test samples, and the data of collection are as shown in table 2.Because gathered data provide with marking form, there is unitarity, thus can be directly divided by 100 when carrying out standardization processing, the percentages drawing can be used to train.
Table 2BP neural network learning sample
? | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 |
C1 | 93 | 94 | 98 | 88 | 81 | 96 | 86 | 95 | 88 | 89 | 86 | 82 | 92 |
C2 | 81 | 88 | 95 | 83 | 73 | 88 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 85 | 89 | 91 |
C3 | 77 | 86 | 94 | 78 | 91 | 93 | 87 | 94 | 85 | 91 | 97 | 94 | 88 |
C4 | 75 | 82 | 93 | 88 | 95 | 91 | 92 | 92 | 84 | 86 | 92 | 78 | 89 |
C5 | 95 | 90 | 96 | 89 | 78 | 98 | 89 | 90 | 89 | 92 | 84 | 93 | 97 |
C6 | 88 | 87 | 89 | 78 | 88 | 92 | 75 | 96 | 87 | 75 | 87 | 77 | 88 |
C7 | 77 | 86 | 90 | 76 | 83 | 95 | 73 | 90 | 90 | 84 | 77 | 86 | 87 |
C8 | 84 | 75 | 91 | 89 | 76 | 89 | 69 | 93 | 84 | 86 | 90 | 91 | 86 |
C9 | 89 | 84 | 87 | 90 | 96 | 87 | 89 | 89 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 81 | 85 |
C10 | 81 | 86 | 80 | 73 | 93 | 83 | 84 | 86 | 83 | 77 | 84 | 72 | 91 |
C11 | 86 | 78 | 83 | 91 | 66 | 90 | 93 | 84 | 78 | 76 | 91 | 94 | 92 |
C12 | 90 | 79 | 78 | 82 | 72 | 88 | 67 | 82 | 89 | 73 | 76 | 85 | 89 |
C13 | 90 | 88 | 76 | 75 | 84 | 86 | 81 | 83 | 85 | 68 | 83 | 76 | 93 |
C14 | 91 | 93 | 92 | 71 | 76 | 76 | 89 | 85 | 76 | 89 | 82 | 87 | 84 |
C15 | 92 | 89 | 84 | 72 | 82 | 66 | 88 | 76 | 91 | 85 | 73 | 75 | 83 |
C16 | 87 | 81 | 95 | 94 | 73 | 69 | 85 | 73 | 93 | 83 | 86 | 76 | 81 |
C17 | 78 | 77 | 90 | 76 | 79 | 89 | 76 | 91 | 83 | 74 | 71 | 77 | 78 |
C18 | 89 | 90 | 85 | 67 | 65 | 75 | 93 | 86 | 87 | 90 | 88 | 84 | 79 |
C19 | 87 | 83 | 88 | 88 | 61 | 74 | 84 | 81 | 88 | 85 | 91 | 87 | 94 |
C20 | 86 | 77 | 82 | 84 | 83 | 89 | 86 | 77 | 85 | 67 | 84 | 72 | 73 |
C21 | 66 | 75 | 80 | 80 | 78 | 81 | 87 | 64 | 71 | 84 | 85 | 91 | 88 |
OUT | 86 | 85 | 89 | 81 | 79 | 86 | 85 | 86 | 86 | 83 | 85 | 83 | 87 |
5. according to the civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation index system structure of having set up, set up BP neural network structure model, adopt three layers of BP neural network to assess the man-machine interface of civil aircraft driving cabin, according to the content in Fig. 1, input layer is chosen 21 nodes, and output layer node is 1.Selection for hidden layer, generally by testing model evaluating ability, determine, between repeatedly computing comparative experiments data and the model calculated value that obtains through identification, error square chooses, adopt trial and error, hidden layer is chosen to different nodes at every turn, the training effect of supervising network respectively, take that to train iterations and output valve be evaluation criteria, finally determines that hidden layer node number is 10.Because the training algorithm of BP neural network can self-adaptation be determined network structure, do not need in advance the initial weight of evaluation index to be carried out to assignment, only need to utilize the evaluation sample having gathered to train network, make e-learning, understand implicit weight rule in training data.
6. setting maximum train epochs is 10000, and the minimum error values of network is 0.000001, selects the data of this 10 personal-machine interface rating sample of X1-X10 as the input of BP neural network, according to the BP neural network structure model training of setting up.
Wherein, a is the data of each index in front ten personal-machine interface samples:
a=[0.93,0.94,0.98,0.88,0.81,0.96,0.86,0.95,0.88,0.89;0.81,0.88,0.95,0.83,0.73,0.88,0.84,0.85,0.86,0.87;0.77,0.86,0.94,0.78,0.91,0.93,0.87,0.94,0.85,0.91;0.75,0.82,0.93,0.88,0.95,0.91,0.92,0.92,0.84,0.86;0.95,0.90,0.96,0.89,0.78,0.98,0.89,0.90,0.89,0.92;0.88,0.87,0.89,0.78,0.88,0.92,0.75,0.96,0.87,0.75;0.77,0.86,0.90,0.76,0.83,0.95,0.73,0.90,0.90,0.84;0.84,0.75,0.91,0.89,0.76,0.89,0.69,0.93,0.84,0.86;0.89,0.84,0.87,0.90,0.96,0.87,0.89,0.89,0.91,0.92;0.81,0.86,0.80,0.73,0.93,0.83,0.84,0.86,0.83,0.77;0.86,0.78,0.83,0.91,0.66,0.90,0.93,0.84,0.78,0.76;0.90,0.79,0.78,0.82,0.72,0.88,0.67,0.82,0.89,0.73;0.90,0.88,0.76,0.75,0.84,0.86,0.81,0.83,0.85,0.68;0.91,0.93,0.92,0.71,0.76,0.76,0.89,0.85,0.76,0.89;0.92,0.89,0.84,0.72,0.82,0.66,0.88,0.76,0.91,0.85;0.87,0.81,0.95,0.94,0.73,0.69,0.85,0.73,0.93,0.83;0.78,0.77,0.90,0.76,0.79,0.89,0.76,0.91,0.83,0.74;0.89,0.90,0.85,0.67,0.65,0.75,0.93,0.86,0.87,0.90;0.87,0.83,0.88,0.88,0.61,0.74,0.84,0.81,0.88,0.85;0.86,0.77,0.82,0.84,0.83,0.89,0.86,0.77,0.85,0.67;0.66,0.75,0.80,0.80,0.78,0.81,0.87,0.64,0.71,0.84]
B is the evaluation result of output:
b=[0.860873,0.849957,0.888184,0.812415,0.794577,0.855947,0.847210,0.862129,0.855973,0.832882]
A in training sample and b respectively as mentioned above, carry out after error calculating, and network error curve as shown in Figure 2.
Result shows, when training, has carried out after 215 times, and error has reached the least error setting.The input of X1-X10 Zhe10Ge sample index data can be obtained to actual Output rusults, and after expected results, find that relative error is little.
7. after training finishes, using the data of this 3 personal-machine interface rating sample of Y1-Y3 gathering as test samples, bring BP neural network into and test, assay is as shown in table 3.
Table 3 Sample result
Test samples | Desired value | Actual value | Absolute error | Relative error (%) |
Y1 | 85.1420 | 86.7573 | 1.6153 | 1.8972 |
Y2 | 83.3562 | 85.5183 | 2.1621 | 2.5938 |
Y3 | 86.5141 | 88.1643 | 1.6502 | 1.9074 |
As can be seen from the above table, relative error between desired value and actual value is all less than 3%, and the sequence of the actual value of exporting and desired value is also in full accord, therefore can think that this network model has superior generalization ability, can be used for new civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface to evaluate.
8. the input of the indices data using the initial score in the 3rd step as civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface to be evaluated, final result is 83.92, belongs to good level.
Claims (1)
1. a civil aircraft driving cabin Human-Machine Interface Comprehensive Evaluation method, is characterized in that comprising the steps:
1) use overall approach, analytic approach, composite algorithm or Criterion Attribute method of grouping are chosen the evaluation index of man-machine interface, evaluation index comprises total arrangement, demonstration information, display frame, controller and materiality principle, function proximity, frequency of utilization principle, use Ordinal Consistency, visual angle rationality, accuracy, information content, the high-lighting of important information, information Comprehensible, information is acceptable, the easy perceptibility of danger signal, picture layout's rationality, color rationality, the rationality of character design, the rationality of icon design, the form size of scale instrument, the rationality of meter dial design, the science of element limit operation position, function division definition, rationality and handling comfort that important executor is placed,
2) determine civil aircraft driving cabin Human-Machine Interface Comprehensive Evaluation index system, comprising: E-civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation, B
1-total arrangement, B
2-demonstration information, B
3-display frame, B
4-controller, C
1-materiality principle, C
2-function proximity, C
3-frequency of utilization principle, C
4-use Ordinal Consistency, C
5-visual angle rationality, C
6-accuracy, C
7-information content, C
8the high-lighting of-important information, C
9-information Comprehensible, C
10-information is acceptable, C
11the easy perceptibility of-danger signal, C
12-picture layout rationality, C
13-color rationality, C
14the rationality of-character design, C
15the rationality of-icon design, C
16the form size of-scale instrument, C
17the rationality of-meter dial design, C
18the science of-element limit operation position, C
19-function division definition, C
20the rationality of-important executor placement, C
21-handling comfort;
3) adopt 5 grades of comment collection excellent, good, in, poor, the bad indices to civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation carries out grade classification, determines its initial score value;
4) according to civil aircraft driving cabin human-machine interface evaluation system, given man-machine interface sample is carried out to data acquisition, the marking of each index is input, and evaluation result is output, and the learning sample using N the data sample gathering as BP neural network
, k=1,2,3 ... n;
5) by learning sample input vector X
klength n determine that network input layer number is n, by learning sample output vector
length m determine that network output layer nodes is m; Determine network number of plies L and each the number of hidden nodes, wherein, L>=3, the nodes of l layer is n
(l), and n
(1)=n, n
(L)=m;
Define each interlayer connection weight matrix, l layer connects the connection weight matrix of l+1 layer
l=1,2,3 ..., L-1, the element value of each connection weight matrix of initialization;
6) input permissible error ε and learning rate η, initialization iterative computation number of times t=1, learning sample sequence number k=1; Get k learning sample
xk=(x
1k, x
2k..., x
nk),
by X
kcarry out forward-propagating calculating;
First calculate the output of each node of input layer
And the input of successively calculating each node in each layer
And output
Finally calculate the error of each output node of output layer
If the arbitrary sample k value to N learning sample, has E
jk≤ ε, j=1,2 ..., m, learning process finishes; Otherwise, carry out error back propagation, revise each connection weight matrix;
First revise L-1 layer hidden layer to the connection weight matrix of output layer
Then oppositely successively revise the connection weight matrix that connects each hidden layer
Finally make k and t add one, re-start study; When error amount is less than predefined determined value, circulation finishes;
7) by ready check data substitution, calculate the actual value of output and the relative error of desired value, check its accuracy, when meeting the demands, can be used to evaluate the man-machine interface of civil aircraft driving cabin;
8) by the indices data input of civil aircraft driving cabin man-machine interface to be evaluated, by the BP neural network model establishing, calculate, draw final evaluation result.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310754544.2A CN103761581A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2013-12-31 | Method for civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310754544.2A CN103761581A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2013-12-31 | Method for civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN103761581A true CN103761581A (en) | 2014-04-30 |
Family
ID=50528815
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201310754544.2A Pending CN103761581A (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2013-12-31 | Method for civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN103761581A (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104680312A (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2015-06-03 | 中国海洋大学 | Evaluation index system for comprehensive benefits of aquaculture |
CN108090654A (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2018-05-29 | 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 | A kind of man-machine function allocation method based on pilot's physiological data |
CN109461153A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-03-12 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Data processing method and device |
CN110889642A (en) * | 2019-12-04 | 2020-03-17 | 中国直升机设计研究所 | Helicopter cockpit display and alarm information priority ordering method |
CN116594858A (en) * | 2022-12-30 | 2023-08-15 | 北京津发科技股份有限公司 | Intelligent cabin man-machine interaction evaluation method and system |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070011609A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2007-01-11 | Florida International University Board Of Trustees | Configurable, multimodal human-computer interface system and method |
CN101770602A (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-07 | 国立成功大学 | Flight safety margin risk evaluating method, specialist system and establishing method thereof |
-
2013
- 2013-12-31 CN CN201310754544.2A patent/CN103761581A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070011609A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2007-01-11 | Florida International University Board Of Trustees | Configurable, multimodal human-computer interface system and method |
CN101770602A (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-07 | 国立成功大学 | Flight safety margin risk evaluating method, specialist system and establishing method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
崔旖娜: "基于BP神经网络的辽宁省建筑业评价及预测", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 经济与管理科学辑》 * |
徐海玉等: "飞机驾驶舱人机界面综合评估", 《科学技术与工程》 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104680312A (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2015-06-03 | 中国海洋大学 | Evaluation index system for comprehensive benefits of aquaculture |
CN108090654A (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2018-05-29 | 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 | A kind of man-machine function allocation method based on pilot's physiological data |
CN109461153A (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2019-03-12 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Data processing method and device |
CN109461153B (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2022-04-22 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Data processing method and device |
CN110889642A (en) * | 2019-12-04 | 2020-03-17 | 中国直升机设计研究所 | Helicopter cockpit display and alarm information priority ordering method |
CN116594858A (en) * | 2022-12-30 | 2023-08-15 | 北京津发科技股份有限公司 | Intelligent cabin man-machine interaction evaluation method and system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN103761581A (en) | Method for civil aircraft flight deck human-computer interface comprehensive evaluation | |
Zhou et al. | A hybrid approach for safety assessment in high-risk hydropower-construction-project work systems | |
CN104536881B (en) | Many survey error reporting prioritization methods based on natural language analysis | |
Boy | A human-centered design approach | |
CN103399994B (en) | Military aircraft regular inspection flow optimization method based on probabilistic network scheduling technology | |
CN102663182A (en) | Intelligent virtual maintenance training system for large equipment | |
Lakshminarayan et al. | Development and validation of a multi-strand solver for complex aerodynamic flows | |
Han et al. | Measuring the impact of immersive virtual reality on construction design review applications: Head-mounted display versus desktop monitor | |
CN104679945B (en) | System comprehensive estimation method based on colored Petri network | |
CN105868115A (en) | Building method and system for software test model of software intensive system | |
KR20140021389A (en) | Apparatus and method for separable simulation by model design and execution | |
German et al. | An experimental study of continuous and discrete visualization paradigms for interactive trade space exploration | |
Aurisano et al. | Visual Analytics for Ontology Matching Using Multi-linked Views. | |
Chen et al. | Evaluating aircraft cockpit emotion through a neural network approach | |
CN113793047A (en) | Pilot cooperative communication capacity evaluation method and device | |
CN107391289B (en) | Usability evaluation method for three-dimensional pen type interactive interface | |
Wei et al. | Visual diagnostics of parallel performance in training large-scale dnn models | |
CN113592311B (en) | Method for selecting personal factor method for complex man-machine system | |
Boulnois et al. | The onboard context-sensitive information system for commercial aircraft | |
Chen et al. | BP neural network-based model for evaluating user interfaces of human-computer interaction system | |
Liu et al. | Application of intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation method in aircraft cockpit display ergonomics. | |
Liu et al. | Research on the Usability Evaluation Model of Human-Computer Interaction for Command and Control System | |
Fan et al. | A New Era in Human Factors Engineering: A Survey of the Applications and Prospects of Large Multimodal Models | |
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski | A system approach to aircraft optimization | |
Wang et al. | Analysis on the competence characteristics of controllers in the background of air traffic control system with manmachine integration |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20140430 |
|
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |