CN103605898A - Regional debris flow disaster risk assessment method - Google Patents
Regional debris flow disaster risk assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103605898A CN103605898A CN201310629155.7A CN201310629155A CN103605898A CN 103605898 A CN103605898 A CN 103605898A CN 201310629155 A CN201310629155 A CN 201310629155A CN 103605898 A CN103605898 A CN 103605898A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mud
- flow disaster
- index
- risk
- stone flow
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a regional debris flow disaster risk assessment method which comprises the following steps: a regional debris flow disaster risk assessment model is called; a risk assessment plug-in is created according to the regional debris flow disaster risk assessment model; at least one disaster-gestating factor and at least one disaster-inducing factor of at least one debris flow disaster site in a region of interest acquired from different data sources are input to the risk assessment plug-in, and at least one disaster-bearing body vulnerability evaluation factor is also input to the risk assessment plug-in. The risk assessment plug-in is used for executing the following operations that a debris flow disaster sensibility index is calculated based on at least one disaster-gestating factor, a debris flow disaster danger index is calculated based on the debris flow disaster sensibility index and at least one disaster-inducing factor, a debris flow disaster vulnerability index is calculated based on at least one disaster-bearing body vulnerability evaluation factor, a debris flow disaster risk index is calculated based on the debris flow disaster danger index and the debris flow disaster vulnerability index, and a debris flow disaster risk is assessed according to the calculated debris flow disaster risk index.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk method.
Background technology
Disaster is that energy exchange in celestial body, Earth Atmosphere System, the motion of matter are in an objective event of the ecosphere.Earth Atmosphere System ring layer is comprised of lithosphere, hydrosphere, air sphere, biosphere, and disaster organically combines by atmosphere disaster, biological epidemics and geologic hazard the system that forms mutually.
Take China as example, and physical geography, tectonic structure, topography and geomorphology and weather conditions are complicated, and geologic hazard is widely distributed, and type is many, frequency is high, intensity is large, are the most seriously one of countries of geologic hazard in the world.By the failure mode of geologic hazard, dynamic action, material, form and destroy speed and divide, Chinese Geological Disasters can be divided into 30 kinds of 10 classes, the type of different regions geologic hazard, assemblage characteristic and growth, the extent of injury are different, have obvious regional feature and regional change rule.From West to East, substantially take Helan Mountain-Liu Pan Shan-Longmenshan-sad firm mountain and Daxing'an Mountainrange-Taihang Mountain-Wuling Shan Mountain-Xuefeng Shan Mountain is boundary, be divided into San Ge great district (substantially close with three ladder boundaries of China map, slightly variant again), West is mountain region, plateau, height above sea level, depth of cut is large, geologic hazard is with earthquake, freeze thawing, landslide, rubble flow, desert turns to master, middle part is that plateau is to the zone of transition in Plain, landform is steep, cutting is violent, main growth earthquake, avalanche, landslide, rubble flow, soil erosion, desertification of land, ground deformation, Loess Collapsibility, the geologic hazards such as mine disaster, East is Plain and coastal zone and continental platform, and topographic relief is little, have a humid climate and rainfall amount abundant, important geologic hazard is earthquake, ground deformation, avalanche, landslide, rubble flow, lake, river disaster, seashore disaster, saline and alkaline, cold immersed field etc.
The distribution of geologic hazard and the extent of injury thereof and geologic setting condition, the meteorological hydrology and vegetation condition, human economy engineering activity and intensity thereof etc. have extremely close relation.Wherein, neotectonism is internal cause, and bad climate condition is main risk factor, and irrational human economy engineering activity aggravates the development degree of geologic hazard increasingly.In all geologic hazards, except earthquake, landslide and mud-stone flow disaster are comparatively outstanding, and landslide and rubble flow are two kinds of dissimilar many bulk movements.
The distribution of geologic hazard and the extent of injury thereof and geologic setting condition, the meteorological hydrology and vegetation condition, human economy engineering activity and intensity thereof etc. have extremely close relation.Wherein, neotectonism is internal cause, and bad climate condition is main risk factor, and irrational human economy engineering activity aggravates the development degree of geologic hazard increasingly.In all geologic hazards, except earthquake, landslide and mud-stone flow disaster are comparatively outstanding, and landslide and rubble flow are two kinds of dissimilar many bulk movements.In many cases, landslide is closely connected, is accompanied with rubble flow, transforms rapidly, is difficult to completely distinguish.
Summary of the invention
For solving problems of the prior art, the object of this invention is to provide a kind of regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk method, the method comprises: call regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model; According to this regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model, create evaluation of risk plug-in unit; At least one pregnant calamity factor at least one mud-stone flow disaster point in the area-of-interest obtaining from from different data sources to described evaluation of risk plug-in unit input causes the calamity factor with at least one, and inputs at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor; And described evaluation of risk plug-in unit is used for carrying out following operation: based on described at least one pregnant calamity factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index; Based on described in described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility exponential sum, at least one causes calamity factor calculating mud-stone flow disaster risk index; Based on described at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index; Based on described mud-stone flow disaster risk index and described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index, calculate mud-stone flow disaster risk index; And estimate mud-stone flow disaster risk according to the mud-stone flow disaster risk index calculating.
Other features and advantages of the present invention partly in detail are described the embodiment subsequently.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Accompanying drawing is to be used to provide a further understanding of the present invention, and forms a part for instructions, is used from explanation the present invention, but is not construed as limiting the invention with embodiment one below.In the accompanying drawings:
Fig. 1 is the process flow diagram of mud-stone flow disaster evaluation of risk method according to the embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is the process flow diagram of the step of evaluation of risk plug-in unit execution according to the embodiment of the present invention.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the specific embodiment of the present invention is elaborated.Should be understood that, embodiment described herein only, for description and interpretation the present invention, is not limited to the present invention.
Fig. 1 is the process flow diagram of regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk method according to the embodiment of the present invention.As shown in Figure 1, according to an embodiment of the invention, provide a kind of regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk method, the method comprises:
Call regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model;
According to this regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model, create evaluation of risk plug-in unit;
At least one pregnant calamity factor at least one mud-stone flow disaster point in the area-of-interest obtaining from from different data sources to described evaluation of risk plug-in unit input causes the calamity factor with at least one, and inputs at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor; And
Described evaluation of risk plug-in unit is for execution area mud-stone flow disaster evaluation of risk.
In embodiments of the present invention, can set up regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model according to required function, and distribute ID with easy-to-look-up and call can to this model.In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, can carry out this model by the form of plug-in unit.Setting up regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model modeling method used and program language can be method and the program language that programming those skilled in the art know.
In addition, the method can also comprise:
According to described evaluation of risk plug-in unit, produce user interface;
Described evaluation of risk plug-in unit is associated with described user interface.
Can carry out user interactions to trigger Plugin events by user interface, thereby enable/stop using this plug-in unit.
Fig. 2 is the process flow diagram of the step of evaluation of risk plug-in unit execution according to the embodiment of the present invention.As shown in Figure 2, specifically, evaluation of risk plug-in unit can be carried out following operation:
Based on described at least one pregnant calamity factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index;
Based on described in described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility exponential sum, at least one causes calamity factor calculating mud-stone flow disaster risk index;
Based on described at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index;
Based on described mud-stone flow disaster risk index and described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index, calculate mud-stone flow disaster risk index; And
According to the mud-stone flow disaster risk index calculating, estimate mud-stone flow disaster risk.
The pregnant calamity factor described here refer to breed produce disaster physical environment wherein for instance, the pregnant calamity factor can include but not limited to that the gradient, topographic relief degree, rock type, seismic zone distribute, active fault distributes, highway distributes, river distributes.
In simple terms, topographic relief degree plays a key role to the formation of rubble flow.Because topographic relief degree determines the size of potential energy, the topographic relief degree more dynamic condition of the larger formation rubble flow of high potential energy is more sufficient; Therefore rubble flow mainly occurs in high mountain, middle mountain and low-relief terrain.
The steep of the hillside gradient delayed, and affects distribution and the gathering of loose fines thing, the mountain region of every Debris Flow Evolution, and the hillside gradient is steeper.The gradient statistical data of various places shows: the debris flow gully on western part of China high mountain, middle mountain, the hillside gradient is average many at 28 ° to 50 °, 25 ° to 45 °, low mountain, east.The power of debris flow and hillside slope aspect have certain relation.Slope to the south on the Northern Hemisphere and westwards slope (tailo), the development degree of rubble flow, outburst degree are all greater than northwards broken and slope (Schattenseite) eastwards.
Basin shape has a significant effect to rainwater and Rainstorm-runoff process.The big or small direct relation of runoff and crest discharge the startup of various loose fines materials and is participated in debris flow, therefore rubble flow is related closely, and being conducive to the basin shape that debris flow body confluxes is most several shapes such as infundibulate, peach leaf shape, wicker leaf shape and strip.
Rubble flow cheuch has V-arrangement paddy, U-shaped paddy etc., and the drainage area of cheuch is less, and the loose fines thing quantity of corrode, carrying being piled up is large, and head erosion is fast.
Tectonic structure type has fracture, tomography, fold etc., and what debris flow formation growth tool was had a direct impact is rifting.The main feature of neotectonism is exactly remarkable in elevating movement, and continues into the present always, and the location that structure zone of fracture passes through is the violent region of landforms elevating movement, and relative height is large, is conducive to form rubble flow.
Earthquake can be divided into two classes to the impact of rubble flow: the rubble flow that a class earthquake triggers, is referred to as same hair style; Another kind of is rubble flow after shake, hair style after claiming again, and macroseism can be strengthened to some extent to debris flow and the condition of a disaster, and disaster is expanded, and impact is mainly manifested in the 1-2 after shake, weakens gradually backward.Maximum to the destruction of rock with physical weathering in weathering, weathering speed is the fastest, and the accumulation of loose fines material is quick, and reserves are abundant, large especially to the meaning of debris flow formation.
The described here calamity factor that causes refers to the factor that causes disaster to occur, for example, can include but not limited to earthquake, typhoon, storm etc.In embodiments of the present invention, thus the calamity factor be that rainfall intensity and/or effective precipitation are described embodiments of the present invention.
Hazard-affected body described here refers to the object of disaster effect, is the society at the mankind and movable place thereof and the set of various resources.
Described different data source can be such as being some databases about weather, geology, weather etc. of having opened, such as NASA SRTM, geoscience data shared platform, Meteorological Science Data shared platform etc.
Regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk of the present invention is based on a thought: mud-stone flow disaster is the pregnant calamity factor and causes the coefficient result of calamity factor pair hazard-affected body.Therefore,, when estimating disaster risk, can calculate the pregnant calamity factor and the impact that causes calamity factor pair disaster.
The impact of pregnant calamity factor pair risk disaster can represent with mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index.For certain appointed area, calculating mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index can comprise:
Described at least one pregnant calamity factor is normalized;
To each the pregnant calamity factor after processing, give weights;
Each pregnant calamity factor and corresponding weights are weighted to summation, to calculate described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index.
Because the impact of each pregnant calamity factor pair disaster occurrence risk is different, therefore, can to each pregnant calamity factor, give weights according to the impact of pregnant calamity factor pair disaster occurrence risk, to giving the pregnant calamity factor of weights, be weighted summation afterwards, can obtain mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index.
The pregnant calamity factor and cause the calamity factor and jointly can represent with mud-stone flow disaster risk index the impact of disaster occurrence risk.For certain appointed area, calculating mud-stone flow disaster risk index can comprise:
By described in described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility exponential sum, at least one causes the calamity factor and is multiplied by mutually and obtains described mud-stone flow disaster risk index.Here, the processing that at least one is caused to the calamity factor is identical with the pregnant calamity factor, to causing the calamity factor, is normalized, and to the calamity factor that causes after processing, gives weights, and then weighted sum, finally multiplies each other the result obtaining and mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index.
Similarly, calculating mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index can comprise:
Described at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor is normalized;
To each the hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor after processing, give weights;
Each hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor and corresponding weights are weighted to summation, to calculate described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index.
Above-mentioned to the pregnant calamity factor and/or cause the calamity factor and/or the hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor to be normalized can be the method that well known to a person skilled in the art, its effect is that required multi-source data in estimating is carried out to nondimensionalization processing.The selection of weights can be based on separately the pregnant calamity factor/the cause influence degree of the calamity factor/hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor pair mud-stone flow disaster risk, this can come suitablely to determine according to historical data and/or statistics.The weights of the pregnant calamity factor for example considered and can equal 1.In addition weights that cause the calamity factor of considering, and can equal 1.
Mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index represents that human socioeconomic system is to causing sensitivity (reflection) degree of the calamity factor.Conventionally fragility is larger, easily form the condition of a disaster after causing calamity, otherwise fragility is less, is difficult for forming the condition of a disaster after causing calamity.
Afterwards, described mud-stone flow disaster risk index and described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index are multiplied by mutually and obtain described mud-stone flow disaster risk index.
Can to mud-stone flow disaster risk, estimate according to the mud-stone flow disaster risk index calculating.In an embodiment of the invention, can adopt that for example least variance method and factor set are legal in this mud-stone flow disaster risk index divided rank, generate mud-stone flow disaster risk class, for example devoid of risk, low-risk, risk, excessive risk, but it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that mud-stone flow disaster risk class divide can be not limited to cited.
In the above-described embodiment, the pregnant calamity factor, the determining of value that cause the calamity factor and the hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor can be determined according to actual conditions are suitable.Introduce a kind of value of simplifying processing below and determine method.The gradient of take in the pregnant calamity factor is example, the gradient can be divided to some intervals from low to high, for example 4 intervals.These 4 intervals can be given respectively and are for example worth 0,1,2,3.For example, if one of them interval of the gradient of certain point-of-interest in area-of-interest, can be defined as the value of the gradient of this point-of-interest the corresponding value in fallen into interval (, 0,1,2,3 in).
Other pregnant calamity factors, cause the calamity factor and the hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor also can be done similar processing with this.But it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the method for the determined value that can also have other.
In some applications, according to different demands, may need the mud-stone flow disaster risk of for example nationwide to estimate.In some other application, what may pay close attention to is the mud-stone flow disaster risk in provincial or city or scope at county level for example.Therefore, the scope of area-of-interest can be at least one of following scope: national scope; Provincial scope; City or scope at county level.
In different range of interest, the hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor is also likely different.Take the whole country as example, and when mud-stone flow disaster evaluation of risk is carried out in nationwide, the hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor of consideration can be for example the national density of population and/or gross domestic product (GDP) (GDP) density.Therefore the mud-stone flow disaster evaluation of risk method that, embodiments of the present invention provide can define:
In the situation that the scope of described area-of-interest is described national scope, the described hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor comprises at least one in the national density of population and gross domestic product (GDP) density;
In the situation that the scope of described area-of-interest is described provincial scope, the described hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor comprises population aggregative index in this area-of-interest and at least one in economic aggregative index;
In the situation that the scope of described area-of-interest is described city or scope at county level, the described hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor comprises at least one in being worth of the density of population in this area-of-interest and road.
The regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk method that embodiments of the present invention provide, taking into full account on the basis of mud-stone flow disaster mechanism and distribution spatial and temporal pattern thereof, in conjunction with the pregnant calamity environmental characteristic of disaster, the comprehensive time of origin, scope, intensity etc. that cause the calamity factor of analyzing; Based on historical case data, by methods such as statistical study and probability analyses, analyze groundwater, cause the relation of the calamity factor and mud-stone flow disaster degree; Suitably choose some factors, determine the weight that each factor of influence is shared, calculate disaster risk index, finally carry out disaster risk class zoning.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that said method provided by the invention can realize with modular form by software programming.Applicable programming language can comprise such as but not limited to C language, VB, Java etc.Can also set up disaster risk estimation model etc. by XML technology.
The disaster evaluation of risk method that embodiments of the present invention provide, practical business demand for Ministry of Civil Affairs's country's mitigation center, guaranteeing on scientific basis, take into full account domestic all kinds of science data (weather data, remote sensing image data, geologic data, terrain data, hydrographic data, crop type distribution and the growth conditions data etc.) property obtained and degree of share at present, design and Implement the regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk method towards mitigation business.Through tracking and checking for many years, model accuracy is higher, meets the business demand of owner unit.
Aspect rubble flow evaluation of risk under national yardstick, from May 3rd, 2010 17Shi Qi， Ministry of Land and Resources, China Meteorological platform combine the forecast of issue geological hazard meteorological.Meanwhile, based on this technical method, make national geological disaster risk and estimate thematic product, by comparative analysis, two series products are basically identical to the space distribution scope of mud-stone flow disaster alarm.
Aspect rubble flow evaluation of risk under regional scale, participate in the data of modeling, in the situation that fiducial interval is 95%, actual conditions are that 0 the judgment accuracy that rubble flow does not occur is 85.5%, actual conditions are that the judgment accuracy of 1 generation rubble flow is 74.4%, to modeling data, to sentence accuracy be 80.0% in total returning, and this illustrates that this technical method is to the good predictive ability of having of study area mud-stone flow disaster.
Below describe by reference to the accompanying drawings the preferred embodiment of the present invention in detail; but; the present invention is not limited to the detail in above-mentioned embodiment; within the scope of technical conceive of the present invention; can carry out multiple simple variant to technical scheme of the present invention, these simple variant all belong to protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that in addition each the concrete technical characterictic described in above-mentioned embodiment, in reconcilable situation, can combine by any suitable mode.For fear of unnecessary repetition, the present invention is to the explanation no longer separately of various possible array modes.
In addition, between various embodiment of the present invention, also can carry out combination in any, as long as it is without prejudice to thought of the present invention, it should be considered as content disclosed in this invention equally.
Claims (10)
1. a regional debris flow hazards evaluation of risk method, the method comprises:
Call regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model;
According to this regional debris flow hazards risk estimation model, create evaluation of risk plug-in unit;
At least one pregnant calamity factor at least one mud-stone flow disaster point in the area-of-interest obtaining from from different data sources to described evaluation of risk plug-in unit input causes the calamity factor with at least one, and inputs at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor; And
Described evaluation of risk plug-in unit is used for carrying out following operation:
Based on described at least one pregnant calamity factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index;
Based on described in described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility exponential sum, at least one causes calamity factor calculating mud-stone flow disaster risk index;
Based on described at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index;
Based on described mud-stone flow disaster risk index and described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index, calculate mud-stone flow disaster risk index; And
According to the mud-stone flow disaster risk index calculating, estimate mud-stone flow disaster risk.
2. method according to claim 1, the method also comprises:
According to described evaluation of risk plug-in unit, produce user interface;
Described evaluation of risk plug-in unit is associated with described user interface.
3. method according to claim 1, wherein, based on described at least one pregnant calamity factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index and comprise:
Described at least one pregnant calamity factor is normalized;
To each the pregnant calamity factor after processing, give weights;
Each pregnant calamity factor and corresponding weights are weighted to summation, to calculate described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility index.
4. method according to claim 1, wherein, based on described in described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility exponential sum, at least one causes the calamity factor and calculates mud-stone flow disaster risk index and comprise:
By described in described mud-stone flow disaster susceptibility exponential sum, at least one causes the calamity factor and is multiplied by mutually and obtains described mud-stone flow disaster risk index.
5. method according to claim 1, wherein, based on described at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor, calculate mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index and comprise:
Described at least one hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor is normalized;
To each the hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor after processing, give weights;
Each hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor and corresponding weights are weighted to summation, to calculate described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index.
6. method according to claim 1, wherein, based on described mud-stone flow disaster risk index and described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index, calculate mud-stone flow disaster risk index and comprise:
Described mud-stone flow disaster risk index and described mud-stone flow disaster vulnerability index are multiplied by mutually and obtain described mud-stone flow disaster risk index.
7. method according to claim 1, wherein, according to the mud-stone flow disaster risk index calculating, estimate that mud-stone flow disaster risk comprises:
Adopt least variance method and factor set is legal that described mud-stone flow disaster risk index is carried out to grade classification, to generate mud-stone flow disaster risk class.
8. method according to claim 1, wherein:
The described pregnant calamity factor comprises at least one in the following: the gradient, topographic relief degree, rock type, seismic zone distribute, active fault distributes, highway distributes, river distributes;
The described calamity factor that causes comprises at least one in the following: rainfall intensity, effective precipitation.
9. method according to claim 1, wherein, the scope of described area-of-interest is at least one of following scope:
National scope; Provincial scope; City or scope at county level.
10. method according to claim 9, wherein:
In the situation that the scope of described area-of-interest is described national scope, the described hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor comprises at least one in the national density of population and gross domestic product (GDP) density;
In the situation that the scope of described area-of-interest is described provincial scope, the described hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor comprises population aggregative index in this area-of-interest and at least one in economic aggregative index;
In the situation that the scope of described area-of-interest is described city or scope at county level, the described hazard-affected body vulnerability assessment factor comprises at least one in being worth of the density of population in this area-of-interest and road.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201310629155.7A CN103605898A (en) | 2013-11-29 | 2013-11-29 | Regional debris flow disaster risk assessment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201310629155.7A CN103605898A (en) | 2013-11-29 | 2013-11-29 | Regional debris flow disaster risk assessment method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN103605898A true CN103605898A (en) | 2014-02-26 |
Family
ID=50124119
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201310629155.7A Pending CN103605898A (en) | 2013-11-29 | 2013-11-29 | Regional debris flow disaster risk assessment method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN103605898A (en) |
Cited By (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104200126A (en) * | 2014-09-23 | 2014-12-10 | 北京师范大学 | Rapid assessment method for personnel deaths caused by landslides due to earthquake |
| CN104240034A (en) * | 2014-09-23 | 2014-12-24 | 北京师范大学 | Method for quickly evaluating economic losses generated by landslides caused by earthquakes |
| CN107169198A (en) * | 2017-05-12 | 2017-09-15 | 成都理工大学 | A kind of mud-rock flow vulnerability computational methods |
| CN107704706A (en) * | 2017-10-24 | 2018-02-16 | 陕西理工大学 | Mud-stone flow disaster liability Forecasting Methodology based on gray theory |
| CN110400053A (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2019-11-01 | 宁波市气象台 | A kind of method of harbour Meteorological Services performance evaluation |
| CN112561297A (en) * | 2020-12-09 | 2021-03-26 | 中南大学 | Geological disaster risk evaluation method for neighborhood influence under different terrains |
| CN115471144A (en) * | 2022-11-14 | 2022-12-13 | 四川省公路规划勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Debris flow monitoring and early warning method, device and medium based on multi-source data fusion |
| CN116110210A (en) * | 2023-04-04 | 2023-05-12 | 中南大学 | Data-driven landslide hazard auxiliary decision-making method in complex environment |
| CN116562621A (en) * | 2023-05-04 | 2023-08-08 | 北京师范大学 | Sea ice disaster shipping risk assessment method and device and computing equipment |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102999694A (en) * | 2012-10-30 | 2013-03-27 | 四川大学 | Debris flow risk evaluation method in area with frequent mountain disasters |
| WO2013120199A1 (en) * | 2012-02-13 | 2013-08-22 | Kamran Khan | Warning system for infectious diseases and method therefor |
-
2013
- 2013-11-29 CN CN201310629155.7A patent/CN103605898A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2013120199A1 (en) * | 2012-02-13 | 2013-08-22 | Kamran Khan | Warning system for infectious diseases and method therefor |
| CN102999694A (en) * | 2012-10-30 | 2013-03-27 | 四川大学 | Debris flow risk evaluation method in area with frequent mountain disasters |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 付建飞: "辽宁省地质灾害的潜在性分布研究", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库基础科学辑》 * |
| 刘希林等: "泥石流风险区划方法及其应用——以四川西部地区为例", 《地理科学》 * |
| 彭宁 等: "区域滑坡灾害风险评估——以长江三峡库区秭归县为例", 《吉林大学学报（地球科学版）》 * |
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104200126A (en) * | 2014-09-23 | 2014-12-10 | 北京师范大学 | Rapid assessment method for personnel deaths caused by landslides due to earthquake |
| CN104240034A (en) * | 2014-09-23 | 2014-12-24 | 北京师范大学 | Method for quickly evaluating economic losses generated by landslides caused by earthquakes |
| CN104240034B (en) * | 2014-09-23 | 2017-03-29 | 北京师范大学 | A kind of earthquake causes the fast evaluation method of the economic loss caused by landslide |
| CN104200126B (en) * | 2014-09-23 | 2017-04-12 | 北京师范大学 | Rapid assessment method for personnel deaths caused by landslides due to earthquake |
| CN107169198A (en) * | 2017-05-12 | 2017-09-15 | 成都理工大学 | A kind of mud-rock flow vulnerability computational methods |
| CN107704706A (en) * | 2017-10-24 | 2018-02-16 | 陕西理工大学 | Mud-stone flow disaster liability Forecasting Methodology based on gray theory |
| CN110400053A (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2019-11-01 | 宁波市气象台 | A kind of method of harbour Meteorological Services performance evaluation |
| CN110400053B (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2021-11-16 | 宁波市气象台 | Port meteorological service benefit assessment method |
| CN112561297A (en) * | 2020-12-09 | 2021-03-26 | 中南大学 | Geological disaster risk evaluation method for neighborhood influence under different terrains |
| CN115471144A (en) * | 2022-11-14 | 2022-12-13 | 四川省公路规划勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Debris flow monitoring and early warning method, device and medium based on multi-source data fusion |
| CN116110210A (en) * | 2023-04-04 | 2023-05-12 | 中南大学 | Data-driven landslide hazard auxiliary decision-making method in complex environment |
| CN116562621A (en) * | 2023-05-04 | 2023-08-08 | 北京师范大学 | Sea ice disaster shipping risk assessment method and device and computing equipment |
| CN116562621B (en) * | 2023-05-04 | 2023-12-08 | 北京师范大学 | Sea ice disaster shipping risk assessment method and device and computing equipment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103605898A (en) | Regional debris flow disaster risk assessment method | |
| CN103593583A (en) | Area debris flow disaster risk estimation method | |
| Pradhan et al. | Relative effect method of landslide susceptibility zonation in weathered granite soil: a case study in Deokjeok-ri Creek, South Korea | |
| Rozos et al. | Application of the revised universal soil loss equation model on landslide prevention. An example from N. Euboea (Evia) Island, Greece | |
| Ozdemir et al. | A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: Sultan Mountains, SW Turkey | |
| Ozdemir | Using a binary logistic regression method and GIS for evaluating and mapping the groundwater spring potential in the Sultan Mountains (Aksehir, Turkey) | |
| Cervi et al. | Comparing predictive capability of statistical and deterministic methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in the northern Apennines (Reggio Emilia Province, Italy) | |
| Feizizadeh et al. | Landslide susceptibility mapping for the Urmia Lake basin, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS | |
| CN103605897A (en) | Regional landslide hazard risk assessment method | |
| Chiang et al. | Application of radar data to modeling rainfall-induced landslides | |
| Park et al. | Coupled model for simulation of landslides and debris flows at local scale | |
| Pradhan et al. | An ensemble landslide hazard model incorporating rainfall threshold for Mt. Umyeon, South Korea | |
| CN103593580A (en) | Area landslide disaster risk assessment method | |
| Raman et al. | The application of GIS-based bivariate statistical methods for landslide hazards assessment in the upper Tons river valley, Western Himalaya, India | |
| Sherpa et al. | Probabilistic mapping of August 2018 flood of Kerala, India, using space-borne synthetic aperture radar | |
| Ramesh | Response of Flood Events to Land Use and Climate Change: Analyzed by Hydrological and Statistical Modeling in Barcelonnette, France | |
| Es-smairi et al. | Landslide susceptibility assessment using analytic hierarchy process and weight of evidence methods in parts of the Rif chain (northernmost Morocco) | |
| Mekonnen et al. | GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation and risk assessment in complex landscape: A case of Beshilo watershed, northern Ethiopia | |
| Arumugam et al. | GIS based landslide susceptibility mapping and assessment using weighted overlay method in Wayanad: A part of Western Ghats, Kerala | |
| Arefin et al. | GIS and remotely sensed data-based morphometric elements analysis for determination of Bengal Basin evolution | |
| Sahaar | Erosion mapping and sediment yield of the Kabul River Basin, Afghanistan | |
| Roslee et al. | GIS application for comprehensive spatial soil erosion analysis with MUSLE model in Sandakan town area, Sabah, Malaysia | |
| Strehmel et al. | Assessment of geo-hazards in a rapidly changing landscape: the three Gorges Reservoir Region in China | |
| Ramya et al. | Climate-Induced and Geophysical Disasters and Risk Reduction Management in Mountains Regions | |
| Kumar et al. | Evaluating the impact of artificial groundwater recharge structures using geo-spatial techniques in the hard-rock terrain of Rajasthan, India |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20140226 |