CN102982202B - Based on the structural model modification method of defect mode - Google Patents
Based on the structural model modification method of defect mode Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102982202B CN102982202B CN201210458446.XA CN201210458446A CN102982202B CN 102982202 B CN102982202 B CN 102982202B CN 201210458446 A CN201210458446 A CN 201210458446A CN 102982202 B CN102982202 B CN 102982202B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- matrix
- modal data
- data
- freedom
- model
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000002715 modification method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 72
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002194 synthesizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 abstract description 12
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006068 polycondensation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000014605 Carvalhoa <true fly> Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Complex Calculations (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of structural model modification method based on defect mode.First primary data formats by the method, is obtained the primary data of required form by the adjustment of degree of freedom numbering and complex mode real number; The expansion of defect modal data, treats correction modal data and carries out Matrix QR Decomposition, finally obtain the matrix equation of defect modal data and solve by least square method after format; The determination of corrected parameter, utilizes the modal data after expansion set up the matrix equation of corrected parameter and utilize the iterative algorithm of structure-preserving to solve; Modifying model, the corrected parameter namely utilizing the iterative algorithm of structure-preserving to try to achieve and without spilling modified formulation calculate revised finite element model.The present invention can not only process the incomplete difficulty of modal data degree of freedom in actual measurement, thus avoid the process of modal expanding or model reduction, and revised model maintain original symmetrical structure and ensure that do not need revise mode updating before and after remain unchanged.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to finite element model correction technology, in particular to a structural model correction method based on defect mode.
Background
In the technical fields of engineering such as aerospace, aviation, machinery, civil engineering, traffic and the like, a dynamic model of a structure must be established firstly to quantitatively and accurately analyze structure dynamics and solve the problem of structural vibration control commonly existing in engineering. The general modeling method includes theoretical modeling and experimental modeling.
Finite element method is commonly used in theoretical modeling engineering. The finite element method has the advantages of wide adaptability, high analysis speed, short design period, low cost compared with a structure dynamic test and the like, and is widely applied to engineering practice. However, in most cases the results obtained by finite element analysis do not match well with the results obtained experimentally. The phenomenon has two reasons, namely, errors exist in the finite element model due to improper modeling assumption, uncertainty of material characteristics, incorrect boundary conditions and the like during finite element modeling; the other is that the measured data is inaccurate due to the failure of experimental test equipment, the interference of experimental environment noise, improper sensor placement and the like. With the development of testing techniques, one generally considers the measured data to be reliable. When the deviation between the result obtained by the finite element analysis and the test result exceeds the range allowed by the engineering, the finite element model needs to be corrected, namely, the mass matrix, the damping matrix and the rigidity matrix are corrected, so that the dynamic analysis result of the corrected model is consistent with the corresponding test result.
In structural model correction, the following challenging practical problems are mainly faced: (ii) no overflow correction. The correction method not only fuses the measured modal data to the correction model, but also ensures that the residual modal of the correction model is consistent with the original model. ② the positive qualitative retention. The general correction method can only ensure that the corrected model has symmetry, and the positive or semi-positive nature can not be ensured, so that the model loses the physical significance. And incomplete measurement data freedom. The usual correction methods almost require that the measured mode degrees of freedom coincide with the analytical model degrees of freedom. However, in actual measurement, due to the limitation of the measurement equipment, the measurement points for obtaining feedback information are quite limited, and the measurement freedom degree is far smaller than that of the analysis model, i.e. the measured modal data is defective. To overcome this difficulty, two approaches are often employed, namely model reduction and modal expansion. The model reduction is to reduce the degree of freedom of the original analysis model, most typically Guyan's static polycondensation method and various improved and popularized polycondensation methods; the modal expansion is mainly realized by using an interpolation technology for each measured order of modes. Both model order reduction and modal expansion introduce computational errors.
The finite element model revision problem has been of widespread interest and research over the past forty years. Berman, Baruch, et al established the foundation work in this area in the first 70's of the last century. In the 90 s, Friswell and Motterhead (1.Friswell MI, Motterhead JE. FiniteElementmodel applying therapeutics, structures, Klume Acad academic publishers, 1995) summarized and reviewed the results of this field. The previous research mainly focuses on model correction of an undamped damping system, and the problem of model correction of a damping system is emphasized in recent years. Two damping system model correction methods for giving complete degree of freedom modal data are proposed by Kuo and Lin, etc., using the theory and method of secondary eigenvalue inverse problem (2.KuoYC, LinWWandXuSF. New methods for designing model updating schemes. AIAAjournal, 2006, 44 (6): 1310-13163. KuoYC, LinWWandXuSF. Anewmodel correcting methods for designing damping system model estimating arrangement. AIAAjournal, 2005, 43 (12): 2593-2598). Another type of method for damping system model correction is symmetric low rank correction. Zimmerman and widegren (4. zimmermann dc, widegren m. correctingfinitenestringmechaniste. aiaajournal, 1990, 28 (9): 1670-1676) developed methods of model correction using feature configuration. Carvalho et al (5.CarvalhoJ, DattaBN, LinWW, et al. symmetry typ reviviervationvaluebedinginfinite-elementmodeupdatin virostringstructures. journal of Soundand Vibration, 2006, 290 (3-5): 839-864) propose a feature value embedding technique, which not only ensures the symmetry of a modified model, but also keeps the residual modal data of the modified model consistent with the original model (no overflow), and has the disadvantage of not considering information for measuring feature vectors. Recently, Chu et al theoretically studied the overflow phenomenon of the damping system model correction and proposed a model correction method without overflow (6.ChuMT, LinWWand XuSF. Updatg quadrate model and switch on the top of the damping system model correction method. InversP Problers, 2007, 23 (1): 243-256), ChuDelin et al (7.ChuD, ChuMTand WW. Quadrature model up with the same precision, positivedefinition, and not-over. SIAMJohnalor model and analysis application, 2009, 31 (2): 546-564), and further discussed the model correction problem of maintaining the positive and no overflow of the damping system on the basis.
Since it is almost impossible to give modal data of complete degree of freedom in actual model correction, Carvalhoa et al (8.CarvalhoaJ, DattaBN, GuptaCA, et. effective. additional method for modeling with complete degrees of freedom and having no damping system model correction method is proposed, which uses modal data of incomplete degree of freedom measurement to perform model correction and can ensure that the correction is free from overflow, but for damping systems, no corresponding method has been proposed until no overflow model correction is performed using defective modal data of incomplete degree of freedom measurement.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a finite element model correction method for performing overflow-free correction on a damping vibration system based on defect modal data with incomplete measurement freedom.
The technical solution for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows: a structural model correction method based on defect mode comprises the following steps:
step 1, formatting initial data, namely separating the measured freedom degree from the unmeasured freedom degree in modal data through freedom degree number adjustment, and performing real-valued transformation on complex modal data so as to ensure that all operations are executed in a real form;
step 2, expanding the defective modal data, namely performing matrix QR decomposition on the modal data to be corrected after formatting to obtain a matrix equation of the defective modal data, and solving the matrix equation through a least square algorithm;
step 3, determining correction parameters, establishing a matrix equation of the correction parameters by using the expanded modal data, and solving the correction parameters by a matrix equation iterative algorithm keeping a symmetrical structure;
and 4, correcting the original finite element model, namely determining the corrected structural finite element model by using the correction parameters obtained in the step 3 and the overflow-free correction format.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following remarkable advantages: 1) the method can process the defective modal data with incomplete measurement freedom without modal expansion or model reduction, and avoids introducing unnecessary errors, thereby improving the precision of the corrected model; 2) the correction method not only fuses the measured modal data with the corrected finite element model, but also keeps the modal data which does not participate in the correction unchanged before and after the correction, thereby ensuring that the corrected modal data in the corrected finite element model is consistent with the measured data, and the modal data which is not corrected is kept unchanged, namely the correction method is overflow-free.
The present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a structural model modification method based on defect modalities.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of an initial data formatting process.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a modified parameter matrix solution.
Detailed Description
With reference to fig. 1, a method for modifying a structural model based on a defect mode includes the following steps:
step 1, formatting initial data, namely separating the measured freedom degree from the unmeasured freedom degree in modal data through freedom degree number adjustment, and performing real-valued transformation on complex modal data so as to ensure that all operations are executed in a real form; with reference to fig. 2, the specific steps for formatting the initial data are:
step 1-1, setting all degrees of freedom as {1,2, … N }, { m1,m2,…mlL measured degrees of freedom, the remaining unmeasured degrees of freedom are denoted as ml+1,…mN};
Step 1-2, separating the measured degree of freedom from the unmeasured degree of freedom to obtain an arrangement matrix P (m)1,m2,…ml,ml+1,…mN) Wherein P (m)1,m2,…ml,m1+1,…mN) Is given by all column vectors of the identity matrix of order N according to (m)1,m2,…ml,ml+1,…mN) The order of the two groups is rearranged to obtain;
step 1-3, passing the initial data through an array P (m)1,m2,…ml,ml+1,…mN) And (3) performing transformation, namely performing the following transformation on the known modal data to be corrected:
wherein,the modal data matrix to be corrected, X, for the initial measurement1Is a transformed modal data matrix;
step 1-4, the complex modal data is real-valued, namely
In the formula, Λ1And X1An eigenvalue matrix and an eigenvector matrix respectively composed of p pairs of features to be corrected, wherein the first 2k (2k ≤ p) are complex conjugate pairs ∑1Andrespectively, an eigenvalue matrix consisting of p measured pairs of features and an eigenvector matrix of measured degrees of freedom, wherein the first 2n (2n ≦ p) are complex conjugate pairs, Λ1R,X1R,∑1R,The real modal data matrix is obtained after the corresponding complex modal data matrix is transformed; the corresponding transformation matrix is
Step 2, expanding the defective modal data, namely performing matrix QR decomposition on the modal data to be corrected after formatting to obtain a matrix equation of the defective modal data, and solving the matrix equation through a least square algorithm; the specific steps for expanding the defect modal data are as follows:
step 2-1, the modal matrix X to be corrected1RCarrying out matrix QR decomposition to obtain a matrix [ Q ]1,Q2]I.e. by
Step 2-2, constructing defect modal dataEquation of matrix (2)
Wherein El=[e1,...,ek],Er=[ek+1,…,eN],eiN is an N-order unit array INThe ith column;
step 2-3, solving least square solution of the matrix equation
WhereinIs a matrixMoore-Penrose generalized inverse of (1);
step 2-4, synthesizing the data determined in the step 2-3 to obtain an expanded real mode data matrix
Step 3, determining correction parameters, establishing a matrix equation of the correction parameters by using the expanded modal data, and solving the correction parameters by a matrix equation iterative algorithm keeping a symmetrical structure;
building modifications using extended modal dataPositive parameter phiRSolving the correction parameters by a matrix equation iterative algorithm keeping a symmetrical structure, and combining the figure 3, the concrete steps of solving are as follows:
step 3-1, determining a matrix equation A phiRBT+EΦRFTThe coefficient matrix for W is as follows:
A=MaX1RΛ1R,
E=-KaX1R,
wherein M isa,Ca,KaThe matrix of the mass, the damping and the rigidity of the original finite element model before correction;
step 3-2, determining a normal equation corresponding to the matrix equation, specifically:
ATAΦRBTB+ATEΦRFTB+ETAΦRBTF+ETEΦRFTF+BTBΦRATA+BTFΦRETA+FTBΦRATE+FTFΦRETE=ATWB+ETWF+(ATWB+ETWF)T.
step 3-3, arranging the normal equation into a matrix equation form related to X as follows:
in the formula
A1=ATA,A2=ATE,A3=ETE,A4=ETA,
B1=BTB,B2=BTF,B3=FTF,B4=FTB,
Ω=ATWB+ETWF+(ATWB+ETWF)T;
Step 3-4, solving the normal equation and setting an initial estimation X0Is an identity matrix and a termination criterion Tol of 10-8;
Step 3-5, making i equal to 0 and calculating
Step 3-6, judging the termination condition, if | | | Ri||F< Tol, wherein | | | | noncircular visionFIf the Frobenius norm is the Frobenius norm of the matrix, the calculation is terminated, otherwise, i is made to be i + 1;
step 3-7, calculating
And then returning to the step 3-6.
And 4, correcting the original finite element model, namely determining the corrected structural finite element model by using the correction parameters obtained in the step 3 and the overflow-free correction format, and finishing the correction of the original finite element model. The modified finite element model can be obtained by the following non-overflow modification format:
therefore, the method can process the defective modal data with incomplete measurement freedom degree without modal expansion or model order reduction, avoids introducing unnecessary errors and improves the precision of the corrected model; meanwhile, modal data which do not participate in the correction are kept unchanged before and after the correction, so that the correction is ensured to be free of overflow.
Claims (5)
1. A structural model correction method based on defect mode is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, formatting modal data to be corrected, namely separating the measured freedom degree from the unmeasured freedom degree in the modal data through the adjustment of the number of the freedom degrees, and performing real-valued computation on complex modal data so as to ensure that all operations are executed in a real form;
step 2, expanding the defective modal data, namely performing matrix QR decomposition on the formatted to-be-corrected modal data to obtain a matrix equation of the defective modal data, and solving the matrix equation through a least square algorithm;
step 3, determining correction parameters, establishing a matrix equation of the correction parameters by using the expanded modal data, and solving the correction parameters by a matrix equation iterative algorithm keeping a symmetrical structure;
and 4, correcting the original finite element model, namely determining the corrected structural finite element model by using the correction parameters obtained in the step 3 and the overflow-free correction format.
2. The structural model modification method based on defect modality according to claim 1, wherein the specific steps of formatting the data of the modality to be modified in step 1 are as follows:
step 1-1, setting all degrees of freedom as {1,2, … N }, { m1,m2,…mlL measured degrees of freedom, the remaining unmeasured degrees of freedom are denoted as ml+1,…mN};
Step 1-2, separating the measured degree of freedom from the unmeasured degree of freedom to obtain an arrangement matrix P (m)1,m2,…ml,ml+1,…mN) Wherein P (m)1,m2,…ml,ml+1,…mN) Is given by all column vectors of the identity matrix of order N according to (m)1,m2,…ml,ml+1,…mN) The order of the two groups is rearranged to obtain;
step 1-3, passing the modal data to be corrected through an arrangement matrix P (m)1,m2,…ml,ml+1,…mN) And (3) performing transformation, namely performing the following transformation on the known modal data to be corrected:
wherein,for initially measured modal data to be corrected, X1For transformed modal data;
Step 1-4, the complex modal data is real-valued, namely
In the formula, Λ1And X1Respectively forming an eigenvalue matrix and an eigenvector matrix which are formed by p feature pairs to be corrected, wherein the first 2k (2k is less than or equal to p) feature pairs are complex conjugate pairs; sigma1Anda matrix of eigenvalues and measured degrees of freedom of eigenvectors, respectively, of p measured pairs of eigenvalues, the first 2n (2n ≦ p) of which are complex conjugate pairs Λ1R,X1R,Σ1R,The real modal data matrix is obtained after the corresponding complex modal data matrix is transformed; the corresponding transformation matrix is
3. The method for modifying a structural model based on a defect modality according to claim 1, wherein the step 2 of expanding the data of the defect modality is specifically as follows:
step 2-1, the modal matrix X to be corrected1RCarrying out matrix QR decomposition to obtain a matrix [ Q ]1,Q2]I.e. by
Step 2-2, constructing defect modal dataEquation of matrix (2)
Wherein El=[e1,...,ek],Er=[ek+1,...,eN],eiN is an N-order unit array INThe ith column;
step 2-3, solving least square solution of the matrix equation
WhereinIs a matrixMoore-Penrose generalized inverse of (1);
step 2-4, synthesizing the data determined in the step 2-3 to obtain an expanded real mode data matrix
4. The method for modifying a structural model based on a defect modality according to claim 1, wherein step 3 establishes a modification parameter Φ using the extended modality dataRSolving the correction parameters by a matrix equation iterative algorithm keeping a symmetrical structure, wherein the concrete steps of solving are as follows:
step 3-1, determining a matrix equation A phiRBT+EΦRFTThe coefficient matrix for W is as follows:
A=MaX1RΛ1R,
E=-KaX1R,
wherein M isa,Ca,KaThe matrix of the mass, the damping and the rigidity of the original finite element model before correction;
step 3-2, determining a normal equation corresponding to the matrix equation, specifically:
ATAΦRBTB+ATEΦRFTB+ETAΦRBTF+ETEΦRFTF+
BTBΦRATA+BTFΦRETA+FTBΦRATE+FTFΦRETE
=ATWB+ETWF+(ATWB+ETWF)T;
step 3-3, arranging the normal equation into a matrix equation form related to X as follows:
in the formula
A1=ATA,A2=ATE,A3=ETE,A4=ETA,
B1=BTB,B2=BTF,B3=FTF,B4=FTB,
Ω=ATWB+ETWF+(ATWB+ETWF)T;
Step 3-4, solving the normal equation and setting an initial estimation X0Is an identity matrix and a termination criterion Tol of 10-8;
Step 3-5, making i equal to 0 and calculating
Step 3-6, judging the termination condition, if | | | Ri||F< Tol, where | | | Ri||FIf the Frobenius norm is the Frobenius norm of the matrix, the calculation is terminated, otherwise, i is made to be i + 1;
step 3-7, calculating
And then returning to the step 3-6.
5. The defect mode based structural model modification method of claim 1, wherein the finite element model modified in step 4 is obtained by the following non-overflow modification format:
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210458446.XA CN102982202B (en) | 2012-11-15 | 2012-11-15 | Based on the structural model modification method of defect mode |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210458446.XA CN102982202B (en) | 2012-11-15 | 2012-11-15 | Based on the structural model modification method of defect mode |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN102982202A CN102982202A (en) | 2013-03-20 |
CN102982202B true CN102982202B (en) | 2016-01-20 |
Family
ID=47856217
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210458446.XA Expired - Fee Related CN102982202B (en) | 2012-11-15 | 2012-11-15 | Based on the structural model modification method of defect mode |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN102982202B (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103886160B (en) * | 2014-04-04 | 2016-09-14 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | A kind of model modification method considering damping based on basic excitation response data |
CN105929193B (en) * | 2016-04-15 | 2019-01-04 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of velocity field rapid correction method and device based on hydrodynamics continuity equation |
CN106294975B (en) * | 2016-08-05 | 2019-01-01 | 大连理工大学 | A kind of girder structure free vibration analysis method based on reduced-order model |
CN107292045B (en) * | 2017-06-30 | 2020-07-28 | 南京航空航天大学 | Complex modal evaluation method of finite element model with damping structure |
CN107644134B (en) * | 2017-09-20 | 2019-01-22 | 北京安怀信科技股份有限公司 | A kind of dynamics tests die worker's tool |
CN109711030B (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2023-04-18 | 长安大学 | Finite element model correction method based on incomplete data |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101013449A (en) * | 2006-12-31 | 2007-08-08 | 中国海洋大学 | Method for modifying structural model by cross modal of cross model |
CN101794338A (en) * | 2010-03-22 | 2010-08-04 | 南京航空航天大学 | Correction method of matrix dynamics model based on structure modal test |
-
2012
- 2012-11-15 CN CN201210458446.XA patent/CN102982202B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101013449A (en) * | 2006-12-31 | 2007-08-08 | 中国海洋大学 | Method for modifying structural model by cross modal of cross model |
CN101794338A (en) * | 2010-03-22 | 2010-08-04 | 南京航空航天大学 | Correction method of matrix dynamics model based on structure modal test |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN102982202A (en) | 2013-03-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN102982202B (en) | Based on the structural model modification method of defect mode | |
Ródenas et al. | A recovery‐type error estimator for the extended finite element method based on singular+ smooth stress field splitting | |
Yu et al. | Generalized Timoshenko theory of the variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis | |
Yu et al. | Variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis–an updated version | |
Saputra et al. | Computation of three-dimensional fracture parameters at interface cracks and notches by the scaled boundary finite element method | |
Mohammadi et al. | An equivalent model for trapezoidal corrugated cores based on homogenization method | |
CN104573274B (en) | Structural finite element model correction method based on displacement time-course area under vehicle load | |
CN106777549B (en) | Bridge multi-scale finite element simulation method for load test | |
CN108108559B (en) | Structure response obtaining method and sensitivity obtaining method based on substructure | |
CN107273609A (en) | One kind is based on Kriging model gear drive reliability estimation methods | |
Gu et al. | Adaptive orthotropic XIGA for fracture analysis of composites | |
CN104165642A (en) | Method for directly correcting and compensating course angle of navigation system | |
CN105445785A (en) | Transverse wave offset velocity modeling method | |
Steinbrecher et al. | Consistent coupling of positions and rotations for embedding 1D Cosserat beams into 3D solid volumes | |
Aslmand et al. | Dynamic soil-structure interaction in a 3D layered medium treated by coupling a semi-analytical axisymmetric far field formulation and a 3D finite element model | |
Pargana et al. | Fully integrated design and analysis of Tensioned Fabric Structures: Finite elements and case studies | |
CN107656227A (en) | Magnetometer calibration method based on Levenberg Marquardt algorithms | |
CN105136150B (en) | A kind of attitude determination method based on the fusion of multiple star sensor metrical information | |
Aristizabal-Ochoa | Stability of imperfect columns with nonlinear connections under eccentric axial loads including shear effects | |
CN103616027B (en) | A kind of based on the Gravity Matching method improving MSD | |
Lei et al. | Simultaneous assessment of damage and unknown input for large structural systems by UKF-UI | |
CN113239464B (en) | Method and device for determining vehicle body section | |
Lou et al. | Modal perturbation method and its applications in structural systems | |
CN104008234A (en) | Method for correcting closely spaced mode model with damping structure | |
Roller et al. | On the use of geometrically exact shells for dynamic tire simulation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20160120 |