CN102499330A - Feed additive for dairy cow - Google Patents
Feed additive for dairy cow Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102499330A CN102499330A CN2011104460142A CN201110446014A CN102499330A CN 102499330 A CN102499330 A CN 102499330A CN 2011104460142 A CN2011104460142 A CN 2011104460142A CN 201110446014 A CN201110446014 A CN 201110446014A CN 102499330 A CN102499330 A CN 102499330A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- milk
- group
- additive
- cow
- feed
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
- Fodder In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the field of the feed additive, in particular to a feed additive for a dairy cow. The feed additive comprises the following ingredients in percentage by weight: 3-5% of cellulose complex enzyme preparation, 62-66% of yeast culture and 30-34% of mould adsorbent. The feed additive has the advantages that the mould adsorbent is used for alleviating damage of mycotoxin in the feed and lowering harm to dairy products and the organism immunity of the dairy cow; the cellulose complex enzyme preparation is used for improving the digestibility availability of inferior coarse feed and guaranteeing the fiber ingredient in the daily ration of the dairy cow; the yeast culture is used for reasonably regulating the balance of the rumen flora of the dairy cow, improving the internal environment of the rumen, improving the pH value of the rumen, accelerating fiber decomposer to grow, enhancing the organism immunity and improving the productivity of the dairy cow.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to feed additive field, particularly, the present invention relates to a kind of cow feed additive.
Background technology
Cellulose is a reproducible biomass resource the abundantest on the earth.It is reported that the annual cellulose that produces through photosynthesis in the whole world surpasses 1,000 hundred million tons, but be utilized few.Current; The serious lack of feedstuff resource has hindered China's Developing of Animal Industry; How to improve the digestive utilization ratio of feedstuff, solve the problem that existing people and animals strive grain in the animal husbandry development as early as possible, become researcher in the industry just in the important topic of active research.Therefore, successfully develop this potential feed resource and seem particularly urgent and important.
Cellulose complex enzyme is by refining the forming of multiple Avirulent microbes fermentation; Contain multiple enzymes such as abundant cellulase, hemicellulase, carbohydrase, acid protease, can effectively break plant cell wall in the feed, nutrient is better discharged; Improve the absorbability of livestock and poultry to nutriment; Improve low-quality roughage utilization efficient, and can replenish the deficiency of animal body endogenous enzymes, thereby improved the transformation efficiency of feed and the productivity of animal.Wang Zhaozhong etc. select for use holstein cows to carry out daily ration interpolation cellulose complex enzyme feeding experiment; The result shows: test group is added 1% cellulose complex enzyme in former daily ration; Average butterfat percnetage has improved 1.03% than the average butterfat percnetage of control group, and the output of milk has improved 22.1%, and group difference is extremely remarkable; Liu Dehai etc. add cellulose complex enzyme 53g/td in milk cow forage, the milk cow average daily milk production improves 4.5%, and material milk is than descending 4.32%; Exhale and wait in dairy cow diet that to add with the cellulase be main complex enzyme formulation 1%, milk production of cow is compared average raising 2.5kg with control group, and milk compositions such as butterfat, lactoprotein do not descend less than the rising because of the output of milk, and economic benefit is obvious.
Yeast culture typically refers to solid or fluid nutrient medium after the zymophyte fermentation; Contain culture and saccharomycetic mixture; Nutrition is very abundant, except that containing B family vitamin that we know, mineral matter, digestive ferment, organic acid, oligosaccharides, somatomedin and than also containing many people institutes unfamiliar " UGF " the complete amino acid.It can be through promoting the growth of animal gastrointestinal tract beneficial microorganism, and adjustment micro ecology of gastrointestinal tract balance improves the digestion power of animal to feed, keeps the health of animal body, improves immunity of organisms, promotes growth of animal.Wang Chuanhuai etc. once did the problem of Poplar leaves bio-transformation research.Can find out from analysis result: the Poplar leaves yeast culture behind microbial fermentation, its total amino acid content has increased by 92.5%, and the cystine growth rate that wherein has high nutritive value is up to 2～3 times.Yeast culture also contains the glucan and absorption pathogen that the microorganism of invading in the animal body is on the defensive, and the manna oligosacchride of regulating immunity function.New bold, Dawson, Wallace and domestic and international big quantity research have all disclosed the mechanism of yeast culture raising breeding performonce fo animals; Yeast culture provides the nutrition substrate to improve gastrointestinal tract environment through the microorganism species in animal body, quickens the metabolism of microorganism, adjustment flora structure; Stimulate lactic acid to utilize the activity of bacterium; Improve its lactic acid and utilize ability, reduce Lactated generation, improve the stability of pH; Stable p H can increase the valid density of beneficial bacteriums such as saccharomycete, lactic acid bacteria, fiber bacterium again, and particularly the growth to fiber digestion bacterium has obvious facilitation.Can promote intestines and stomach to the decomposition of feed nutrition material, synthetic, digestion, absorb and utilize, thereby increase animal feed intake, improve the utilization rate of animal to nutriment, promote growth, make the production performance of animal obtain the performance of higher level.Saccharomycete is bred and the vigor enhancing after getting into intestines and stomach as the bacterium precursor of living; Yeast cell wall mainly is made up of glucan, mannosan, glycoprotein and chitin; Shao Mingli etc. were with Yue Zhihua, once the found a capital people etc. thought that contained a kind of manna oligosacchride (MOS) in the yeast cell wall can greatly influence the immune system of animal, and non-immune defence mechanism is regulated in absorption and suppress intestines and stomach cause of disease bacterium; Prevent the absorption of toxin and refuse, repel pathogenic microbes adhering on the gastrointestinal mucosa surface; Can induce stimulates body to produce cellular immunity and humoral immunity, regulates immune defence mechanism.Therefore, yeast cell wall not only can excite, the immunity of enhancing body and premunition, also can safeguard the micro ecology of gastrointestinal tract balance, and selectivity promotes intestines and stomach profitable strain propagation, suppresses the breeding of harmful bacterium.
In recent years, owing to increasing the weight of of Global Greenhouse Effect, grain and feed were become clear day by day by the scope of mould and endotoxin contamination thereof and degree.According to statistics, there is 25% cereal every year in the whole world by mycotoxin contamination.Mycotoxin directly makes outside livestock and poultry poison to cause death; Even more serious immunity function that makes livestock and poultry and production performance descend; Be in sub-health state for a long time; Caused many immuning failures and the disease that seriously takes place and be difficult to place again and again, through food chains such as meat, egg, milk health has been worked the mischief simultaneously.Feed contain the feed of mycotoxin after, it is that feed intake decline, diarrhoea, speed of production are slow, the output of milk of laying eggs reduces, reproductive capacity descends and efficiency of feed utilization is low that livestock and poultry the most directly show.Research shows, even slight pollution, efficiency of feed utilization just can reduce by 10%～20%, only this item, and at least 1,000 ten thousand tons of national waste feeds are worth 30,000,000,000 yuan.Having under the situation of mycotoxin contamination, in a single day animal has the pathogenic microorganism invasion and attack, is easy to break out disease.In recent years, the situation is tense for China's animal epidemics prevention and control, and all kinds of deadly infectious diseases occur repeatedly; Serious harm animal health not only; Reduce the level of production and efficient, and use antibiotic in a large number, increase the potential safety hazard of livestock products; Cause the continuous reason of animal epidemic a lot, whether the generally pollution of mycotoxins in feed is therewith about being worth research.The material that is used for mycotoxin absorption at present mainly contains active carbon, aluminum silicate, organic matter class (like yeast cell wall etc.) and other resinae (like cholestyramine etc.).Researchs such as Yuan Yaoming show, give and add mould bacteria adsorbent 20g/ head/sky in the milk cow in lactation period feed, under the situation that does not influence butterfat, lactoprotein, have improved milk production of cow and have reduced the Ruzhong somatic number; Researchs such as Wang Genlin show, add mould bacteria adsorbent, and aflatoxin has certain effect and improved milk production of cow in the reduction milk.
Summary of the invention
The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of cow feed additive.
According to cow feed additive of the present invention; The weight percentage of said additive is: cellulose complex enzyme preparation 3%-5%, yeast culture 62%-66%, mould bacteria adsorbent 30%-34%; As preferably; The weight percentage of said additive is: cellulose complex enzyme preparation 3.23%, yeast culture 64.52%, mould bacteria adsorbent 32.25%.
Milk cow forage according to the present invention adds additive; Wherein said cellulose complex enzyme preparation can be contained the milk cow complex enzyme formulation for the summer; Purchase is Xia Sheng group from Ningxia, and the milk cow special composite enzyme is used to improve the degraded and absorbed of milk cow to roughage; Said yeast culture Ke Yi is Sai Keling; The development in agricultural science and technology Co., Ltd of purchase profit from the BeiJing ZhongKe is to be made up of materials such as active yeast cell, metabolite, culture mediums, the enhance immune function is improved various production performances have remarkable effect., said mould bacteria adsorbent can be inhaled for mould, buys from Ao Teqi company, and absorbing mycotoxin improves feed quality, improves the price of deed, and above product is all buied from producer.
The inventor finds after deliberation, and the milk cow fiber composite enzyme of feeding can effectively improve milk cow roughage digestibility, improves fat of milk cow fat content; The feeding yeast culture can effectively improve environment in the cow rumen, improves production performance, improves immunity of organisms; Add mould bacteria adsorbent, can effectively reduce mycotoxin content in the feed, improve milk cow production performance and immunity.
The present invention is that common milk cow forage mould contamination, roughage are of low nutritive value in order to solve, a series of problems of milk cow production performance difference and a kind of milk cow functional feedstuff additive prescription of proposing is formed, and its advantage is:
1, uses mould bacteria adsorbent, alleviate the harm of mycotoxin in the feed, reduce to the harm of milk product and to the infringement of milk cow immunity of organisms;
2, use the cellulose complex enzyme preparation, improve roughage digestive utilization ratio inferior, guarantee fibre composition in the dairy cow diet;
3, use yeast culture, rationally regulate the cow rumen colony balance, improve environment in the cud, improve ruminal pH value, promote the cellulose-decomposing bacteria growth, enhancing body immunity is improved milk cow production performance.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is a different tests group milk production of cow variation diagram in the embodiment of the invention 1;
Fig. 2 is a different tests group milk conventional index variation diagram in the embodiment of the invention 1;
Fig. 3 is the contained body cell variation diagram of different tests group milk in the embodiment of the invention 1;
Fig. 4 is a different tests group milk production of cow variation diagram in the embodiment of the invention 2;
Fig. 5 is the contained body cell variation diagram of different tests group milk in the embodiment of the invention 2.
The specific embodiment
Embodiment 1
One, the additive that the different tests group is selected for use among the embodiment 1 is formed and proportioning
The different tests group is selected for use among the embodiment 1 additive composition and proportioning are as shown in table 1
The feed that table 1 different tests group is selected for use is formed and proportioning
| Sequence number | Complex enzyme (wt%) | Yeast culture (wt%) | Mould bacteria adsorbent (wt%) |
| 1 | 3.23 | 64.52 | 32.25 |
| 2 | 3 | 62 | 30 |
| 3 | 5 | 66 | 34 |
| 4 | 2.5 | 61 | 36.5 |
| 5 | 5.5 | 57.5 | 37 |
Two, the functional test of cow feed additive of the present invention test
1, test objective
A large amount of experimental studies show that cellulose complex enzyme can improve the roughage utilization rate, increase the endogenous enzymes secretion, improve the milk cow milk-quality and the output of milk; Yeast culture can effectively improve environment in the alimentary canal, regulates ruminal pH value, promotes the fiber bacteria growing, improves the lactic acid utilization rate, improves immunity of organisms; Add mould bacteria adsorbent in the daily ration, can prevent common mycotoxins in feed to pollute, reduce somatic number, guarantee the production performance performance.The present invention only exploring a kind of functional additive combination, improves milk cow roughage utilization rate, improves environment and body immunity in the cud, guarantees milk cow production performance.
2, material method
2.1, experimental animal
Periphery pasture, test and Selection Huhehaote milk cow
2.2, test handles
Each organizes basal diet, and to keep original daily ration level constant, and managerial skills are consistent, add three kinds of functional additives in the test group daily ration respectively, and control group does not add, and is 30 days experimental periods, specifically as shown in table 2.
Table 2 test disposition statistical form
2.3, testing index and detection method
2.3.1, the output of milk measures
Adopt milk Room formula to concentrate and milk the jigger counting; Milk for one day twice, totally morning, late sum are one day output of milk.Two days individual milk yield of METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS DETERMINATION are averaged and are counted once individual milk production of cow.
2.3.2, newborn conventional ingredient analysis
Every adopting at a distance from 10 days suckled appearance once, gets morning, late twice aggregate sample of milking in 6: 4 ratios.On-the-spot adding preservative agent 1-2 drips 4 ℃ of preservations.Adopt the milk composition automatic analyzer to measure butterfat percnetage (Fat), lactoprotein (Pro), lactose (Lac), milk dry matter newborn conventional ingredients such as (DM).
2.3.3, body cell detects
Adopt body cell numeration appearance (Somacount 150), simultaneously above-mentioned breast appearance is carried out the body cell numeration in the newborn routine of survey.
2.4, statistical analysis
Use SPSS 10 softwares the data that obtain are handled, the oneway-ANOVA variance analysis, significant difference then carries out multiple ratio with LSD.
3, result of the test and analysis
3.1, the basic data of cows before the test
Before on-test; At first the basic data of test cows is investigated; Write down the indexs such as the age in days of giving milk, daily milk yield and milk-quality thereof such as butterfat percnetage, lactoprotein, lactose, milk dry matter of every ox, particularly measured body cell quantity in the milk, the result is presented between control group and each group of experiment; The These parameters there was no significant difference, the result is as shown in table 3.
Cows basic data statistical form before table 3, the test
3.2, functional additive of the present invention is to the influence of milk production of cow
Duration of test, test group milk cow are fed behind the combined additive of various dose, and except that control group, the output of milk all rises.Wherein compare before the output of milk and the test after the test group A off-test and improve the 2.07kg/d head; Compare before the experiment group B output of milk and the test and improve the 0.44kg/d head; Compare before the test group C output of milk and the test and improve the 0.17kg/d head; The control group output of milk with the test before compare decline 1.21kg/d head, as table 4 with shown in Figure 1.
Table 4, different tests date are respectively organized output of milk statistical form (kg/d head)
| | |
10d | 20d | 30d | ||
| Control group | 23.38±2.90 | 24.36±2.77 | 23.51±1.13 | 22.17±1.56 | ||
| Test group A | 23.10±3.45 | 24.43±3.39 | 24.88±1.41 | 25.17*±1.56 | ||
| Experiment group B | 23.32±3.20 | 23.53±1.6 | 23.69±2.77 | 23.76±3.46 | ||
| Test group C | 23.58±4.20 | 23.69±2.46 | 23.89±2.84 | 23.75±2.77 |
Annotate: be marked with the expression significant difference * number, be marked with * number no specified otherwise in the following in this application form and all represent significant difference.
Can find out that through the data in the form there are significant difference in the output of milk of test group A and other groups, have non-show and be prone to existing effect.
3.3, functional additive is to the influence of butterfat, lactoprotein, lactose and Ruzhong dry
Also investigated the influence of functional additive to butterfat, lactoprotein, lactose and Ruzhong dry among the present invention, the result is as shown in table 5.
Respectively organize milk conventional index statistical form (%) before and after table 5, the test
Can know that from table 5 and Fig. 2 each test group and control group do not have significant difference before and after the test of indexs such as butterfat, lactoprotein, lactose, milk dry matter; Compare before test group A butterfat percnetage and the test and improve 11.14%; Lactoprotein improves 0.94%, and lactose improves 0.41%, and dry improves 0.33%.
3.4, functional additive is to the influence of somatic number in the milk
Also investigated the influence of functional additive to somatic number in the milk among the present invention, the result is as shown in table 6.
Table 6, different tests date are respectively organized somatic number statistical form in the milk (104/milliliter)
| | |
10d | 20d | 30d | ||
| Control group | 56.6±11 | 47.93±13.61 | 52.33±11.38 | 53.37±5.65 | ||
| Test group A | 53.4±12 | 40.03±5.65 | 33.85±2.07 | 29.32±3.90* | ||
| Experiment group B | 52.3±9 | 42.38±11.2 | 39.69±10.68 | 36.35±9.38 | ||
| Test group C | 49.0±10 | 43.26±10.35 | 39.69±10.32 | 35.98±8.32 |
Can know by table 6 and Fig. 3; In experimental period, test group Ruzhong somatic number is all on a declining curve, and somatic number and test preliminary phase are than descending 45.09% in wherein going into during test group A off-test; Experiment group B descends 30.49%; Test group C descends 26.57%, has significant difference with other groups, has non-showing and is prone to existing effect.
One, the feed that the different tests group is selected for use among the embodiment 2 is formed and proportioning
Feed demonstration simultaneously at additive of the present invention, and we are to complex enzyme, yeast culture, the combination of mould bacteria adsorbent and additive of the present invention (test group A among the embodiment 1) test of comparing, and detailed process is following:
1, test is handled
Each organizes basal diet, and to keep original daily ration level constant, and managerial skills are consistent, adds functional additive not of the same race in each test group daily ration respectively, and 30 days experimental periods, the kind and the content results of additive are as shown in table 7.
Table 7, test disposition statistical form
| Group | Additive | Addition (g/ days. head) |
| Control group | Do not add | 0 |
| Additive group A | Complex enzyme, yeast culture, mould bacteria adsorbent | 31 |
| Additive group B | Yeast culture, mould bacteria adsorbent | 31 |
| Additive group C | Complex enzyme, mould bacteria adsorbent | 31 |
| Additive group D | Complex enzyme, yeast culture | 31 |
2, test cows basic data
Cows basic data statistical form is as shown in table 8 before the test.
Cows basic data statistical form before table 8 test
3, result of the test and analysis
3.1, to the influence of the output of milk
Each test group milk production of cow changes sees table 9 and Fig. 4
Table 9, each additive group milk production of cow statistical form of different tests date
| | |
10d | 20d | 30d | ||
| Control group | 25.6±3.9 | 24.5±3.8 | 23.3±2.5 | 22.5±7.2 | ||
| Additive group A | 25.1±4.1 | 25.6±6.3 | 26.1±5.1 | 27.5＊±5.6 | ||
| Additive group B | 25.3±4.9 | 24.6±4.9 | 24.1±4.9 | 23.5±3.4 | ||
| Additive group C | 25.6±2.8 | 24.1±3.5 | 23.4±4.8 | 23.0±1.3 | ||
| Additive group D | 25.9±3.0 | 25.9±2.5 | 26.0±3.0 | 26.2±5.2 |
Can draw from table 9 and Fig. 4; The control group output of milk is obvious downward trend in experimental period, additive group A, the D output of milk promote than before testing to some extent, and wherein the additive group A output of milk increases by 9.56%; There is significant difference with other groups, has non-show and be prone to existing effect.
3.2, to the influence of Ruzhong somatic number
The different tests date, the result of each additive group milk cow Ruzhong somatic number was as shown in table 10.
Table 10, each additive group milk cow Ruzhong somatic number statistical form (104/milliliter) of different tests date
| | |
10d | 20d | 30d | ||
| Control group | 55.34±12.15 | 56.77±16.13 | 58.39±14.58 | 60.86±19.99 | ||
| Additive group A | 54.71±15.38 | 50.03±5.65 | 48.85±2.94 | 46.32±3.83 |
| Additive group B | 51.79±13.09 | 46.38±11.9 | 46.21±10.68 | 46.35±9.08 |
| Additive group C | 54.29±9.14 | 53.01±13.35 | 52.69±10.69 | 51.26±7.06 |
| Additive group D | 51.81±14.22 | 51.33±9.36 | 50.61±11.01 | 51.08±8.98 |
Can be known that by table 10 and Fig. 5 additive group A, B, C milk cow Ruzhong body cell number average have obvious decline, wherein additive group A descends 15.34%, and additive group B descends 10.50%, and additive group C descends 5.58%, compares rising 9.97% before control group and the test.Additive A has best effect to reducing the Ruzhong somatic number.
Draw through embodiment 1 data, when the weight percentage of said additive is: cellulose complex enzyme preparation 3%-5%, yeast culture 62%-66%; During mould bacteria adsorbent 30%-34%, the output of milk of milk cow has significant difference, and in the cow's milk in content and the cow's milk of various materials body cell quantity all improve significantly; And when consisting of cellulose complex enzyme preparation 3.23%; When yeast culture 64.52%, mould bacteria adsorbent 32.25%, better effects if; And draw cellulose complex enzyme preparation, yeast culture from the data of embodiment 2; When mixing in twos among the mould bacteria adsorbent three; Effect when its output of milk, Ruzhong body cell quantity etc. are all added not as the three simultaneously, when wherein the three added simultaneously, its output of milk had significant difference; Played collaborative effect, and body cell quantity improves significantly also in the cow's milk.
Claims (3)
1. a cow feed additive is characterized in that, the weight percentage of said additive is: cellulose complex enzyme preparation 3%-5%, yeast culture 62%-66%, mould bacteria adsorbent 30%-34%.
2. cow feed additive according to claim 1 is characterized in that, the weight percentage of said additive is: cellulose complex enzyme preparation 3.23%, yeast culture 64.52%, mould bacteria adsorbent 32.25%.
3. a cow feed additive is characterized in that, said cellulose complex enzyme is the summer to contain complex enzyme, and said yeast culture is Sai Keling, and said mould bacteria adsorbent is mould the suction.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201110446014.2A CN102499330B (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2011-12-28 | Feed additive for dairy cow |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201110446014.2A CN102499330B (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2011-12-28 | Feed additive for dairy cow |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102499330A true CN102499330A (en) | 2012-06-20 |
| CN102499330B CN102499330B (en) | 2014-01-15 |
Family
ID=46211511
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201110446014.2A Active CN102499330B (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2011-12-28 | Feed additive for dairy cow |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102499330B (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104000037A (en) * | 2014-05-05 | 2014-08-27 | 上海市奶牛研究所 | Premix preventing winter dysentery of cows |
| CN108887486A (en) * | 2018-06-20 | 2018-11-27 | 濮阳市天然林牧业科技开发有限公司 | A kind of dairy cow nutrition supplement feed |
| CN113261616A (en) * | 2021-04-27 | 2021-08-17 | 内蒙古优然牧业有限责任公司 | Feed additive containing yucca, and preparation method and application thereof |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1620904A (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2005-06-01 | 上海高龙生物科技有限公司 | Ruminant feed additive |
| CN101040691A (en) * | 2007-04-25 | 2007-09-26 | 浙江省农业科学院 | Milk cow feed yeast cultivating additive and the method of preparing the same |
| CN102100310A (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-22 | 沈阳爱特杰牧业有限公司 | Composite premix for cows |
| CN102113632A (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2011-07-06 | 内蒙古伊利实业集团股份有限公司 | Functional dairy cattle feed additive capable of preventing subclinical mastitis of dairy cattle |
-
2011
- 2011-12-28 CN CN201110446014.2A patent/CN102499330B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1620904A (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2005-06-01 | 上海高龙生物科技有限公司 | Ruminant feed additive |
| CN101040691A (en) * | 2007-04-25 | 2007-09-26 | 浙江省农业科学院 | Milk cow feed yeast cultivating additive and the method of preparing the same |
| CN102100310A (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-22 | 沈阳爱特杰牧业有限公司 | Composite premix for cows |
| CN102113632A (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2011-07-06 | 内蒙古伊利实业集团股份有限公司 | Functional dairy cattle feed additive capable of preventing subclinical mastitis of dairy cattle |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 《第三届中国牛业发展大会论文集》 20080701 左晓磊 酵母培养物'赛克灵'对奶牛乳品质的影响 第360-362页 1-2 , * |
| 左晓磊: "酵母培养物‘赛克灵’对奶牛乳品质的影响", 《第三届中国牛业发展大会论文集》, 1 July 2008 (2008-07-01), pages 360 - 362 * |
| 朱军等: "夏盛复合酶对奶牛产奶量和乳脂率的影响", 《宁夏农林科技》, no. 2, 31 December 2001 (2001-12-31), pages 33 - 34 * |
| 杨帆等: "两种奶牛功能性添加剂效果的对比试验", 《中国奶牛》, no. 22, 20 November 2011 (2011-11-20), pages 22 - 26 * |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104000037A (en) * | 2014-05-05 | 2014-08-27 | 上海市奶牛研究所 | Premix preventing winter dysentery of cows |
| CN108887486A (en) * | 2018-06-20 | 2018-11-27 | 濮阳市天然林牧业科技开发有限公司 | A kind of dairy cow nutrition supplement feed |
| CN113261616A (en) * | 2021-04-27 | 2021-08-17 | 内蒙古优然牧业有限责任公司 | Feed additive containing yucca, and preparation method and application thereof |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN102499330B (en) | 2014-01-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103798553B (en) | Environment-friendly pig feed additive and preparation method thereof | |
| CN101999558B (en) | Compound premix for pigs at different physiological stages | |
| CN102488084B (en) | Method for preparing protein feed by fermentation on straw and cake using aerobic mixed bacteria | |
| CN102550849B (en) | Functional milk cow feed additive capable of resisting heat stress and improving milk quality | |
| Boyko et al. | Biologically active additives for cows as a factor in the production of environmentally friendly products in animal husbandry | |
| JP2017510289A (en) | Use of enzyme compositions in ruminant feed | |
| CN104012803A (en) | Preparation method of fermented feed capable of preventing cow mastitis | |
| CN103330059A (en) | Health care composition for livestock as well as preparation method and application thereof | |
| CN110338292A (en) | A kind of mixed feed additive and its application | |
| CN105767571A (en) | Chlorella laying-chicken feed and feeding method thereof | |
| Pal et al. | Responses of addition of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) from rice distillers grains with solubles with or without trace minerals on the performance of Black Bengal kids | |
| CN108056260A (en) | Feed for beef cattle and preparation method thereof and the application in the special cultivation of Muslim beef | |
| CN102499330B (en) | Feed additive for dairy cow | |
| CN107912626A (en) | A kind of mulberry leaf feed for improving big porker growth performance and preparation method thereof | |
| CN101731481B (en) | Milk cow premix and preparation method thereof | |
| CN104273340B (en) | A kind of GL-B preparation of regulation and control rumen microflora | |
| CN103005227A (en) | Method for producing sow feed by using waste pichia pastoris | |
| CN107373164A (en) | A kind of chlorella broiler fodder and feeding method | |
| El-Galil et al. | Evaluation of nanocobalt particles addition in ruminant rations by in vitro gas production | |
| Sivilai et al. | Rice distillers’ byproduct and biochar as additives to a forage-based diet for native Moo Lath sows during pregnancy and lactation | |
| CN109170149A (en) | A method of microecological fermented forage is produced using antibiotic milk | |
| CN108419927A (en) | A kind of efficient, environmental protection and the beef cattle compound premixing feed for improving beef quality | |
| CN101218962A (en) | Feed additive improving milk quality | |
| CN107041456A (en) | Fermented bean dreg feed additive and preparation method and application thereof | |
| CN108200999B (en) | Yeast composition for ruminants, feed, preparation method and application |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| TR01 | Transfer of patent right | ||
| TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20170926 Address after: 010070, No. 13, No. 169, Hexi Road, Saihan District, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot Patentee after: Inner Mongolia excellent animal husbandry Co., Ltd. Address before: 010110 Jinshan Road, Jinshan Development Zone, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, No. 1 Patentee before: Yili Ind Co., Ltd., Inner Mongolia |