CN102185661B - Noise enhancement distributed detection method and system based on Bayes criterion of gradient method - Google Patents
Noise enhancement distributed detection method and system based on Bayes criterion of gradient method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102185661B CN102185661B CN2010106197462A CN201010619746A CN102185661B CN 102185661 B CN102185661 B CN 102185661B CN 2010106197462 A CN2010106197462 A CN 2010106197462A CN 201010619746 A CN201010619746 A CN 201010619746A CN 102185661 B CN102185661 B CN 102185661B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- noise
- gradient method
- transducer
- fusion center
- preliminary judgement
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a noise enhancement distributed detection method and a system based on the Bayes criterion of the gradient method. A multi-path observation vector is preliminary judged by a sensor and then is transmitted to a fusion center via a transmission channel for a final judgment. Before the final judgment, the noise is added under the Bayes criterion of the gradient method. Through adding the noise to the final judgment under the Bayes criterion of the gradient method, the performance of the distributed detection is enhanced. In the meanwhile, the distributed detection method is still effective even the channels and the fusion center of a distributed system are not independent, so the distributed detection method is suitable for various non-ideal distributed systems, and can improve the detection performance of the non-ideal distributed systems.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of noise and strengthen the Distributed Detection method and system, relate in particular to a kind of based on the enhancing distribution detection method of the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion and system.
Background technology
In the distributed multi-sensor treatment system, each transducer carries out certain preliminary treatment earlier to the observation data that obtains, and the data with compression send other transducer to then, are aggregated into fusion center at last.The compressibility preliminary treatment of data has been reduced requirement to communication bandwidth.The distributed multi-sensor structure can reduce performance requirement, the reduction cost to single-sensor.The signal processing mode that disperses can increase calculated capacity.Along with this distributed detection system is used more and more widely, how further to optimize distributed detection system and become the problem that receives much concern.Existing optimisation technique is generally carried out from the following aspects:
The optimization of local decision rule: distributed detection system is at first done a preliminary judgement for the information that is transferred to each transducer, delivers to fusion center again.The suboptimization criterion by improving the decision rule of each local detectors, improves the detectability of system exactly.
The optimization of fusion criterion: fusion center forms total judgement according to the compressed information that receives.If utilize bayesian criterion to optimize the Distributed Detection problem, generally make the cost function minimum of fusion center, and then seek optimum fusion criterion, the detection mistake of fusion center is minimized.
Distributed network structure design: at different distributed network structure and the signal transmission forms of user's request design, improve the input ability of system, finally reach customer objective.
At present prior art mostly be the local observed value of hypothesis be condition independently, and the output of the local sensor that receives of fusion center is without any loss, then under Niemann Pierre Si criterion, can draw the decision rule of the local sensor that optimum likelihood ratio detects.Channel at local sensor and fusion center is under the independent non-ideality, and optimum local likelihood ratio detects as can be known.The optimal policy of a large amount of local detectors is based in various degree, and the knowledge of channel statistical grows up.
In view of this, prior art and research are conceived to ideal situation more: the channel of local detector and fusion center is to carry out under the independent situation.Yet, along with the fast development of radio communication and wireless sensor network, produce the more actual constraints channel model different with needing exploitation.For example because limited bandwidth and a large amount of users, so the interference of interchannel also can not be left in the basket as receiving signal, so it is the function of the output of part local sensor.For example: Gauss's interference channel model.Therefore, in many methods, likelihood ratio detects rule and still is used widely in local sensor.But for distributed detection system, even adopt the optimum fusion rule at fusion center, the performance of whole system remains suboptimal.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem that the present invention solves is: make up a kind of based on the enhancing distribution detection method of the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion and system, overcome in the prior art for distributed detection system, when the channel of local detector and fusion center non-when separate, the technical problem that its performance is low relatively.
Technical scheme of the present invention is: provide a kind of and strengthen the distribution detection method based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, comprise and carry out the transducer that signal is handled, carry out the transmission channel of signal transmission, the fusion center that multiple signals are judged, described multichannel observation data constitutes the multichannel observation vector respectively, described detection method comprises the steps: that described multichannel observation vector carries out final decision by described transmission channel to described fusion center behind described transducer preliminary judgement, add noise before carrying out final decision under the bayesian criterion of gradient method, the probability density function of described noise is:
The probability density function of expression noise,
N wherein
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain.
Further technical scheme of the present invention is: described noise is used for described transducer at the preliminary judgement previous crops.
Further technical scheme of the present invention is: described noise final decision previous crops behind preliminary judgement is used for described fusion center.
Further technical scheme of the present invention is: described noise is used for described transducer at the preliminary judgement previous crops, and the final decision previous crops is used for described fusion center behind preliminary judgement simultaneously.
Technical scheme of the present invention is: make up a kind of based on the enhancing of the noise under gradient method bayesian criterion distributed detection system, comprise and carry out the transducer that signal is handled, carry out the transmission channel of signal transmission, the fusion center that multiple signals are judged, the noise module that adds noise, described multichannel observation data constitutes the multichannel observation vector respectively, described multichannel observation vector carries out final decision by described transmission channel to described fusion center behind described transducer preliminary judgement, described noise module adds noise in signal under the bayesian criterion of gradient method before carrying out final decision, and the probability density function of described noise is:
Wherein
The probability density function of expression noise,
The probability density function of expression noise,
N wherein
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain.
Further technical scheme of the present invention is: described noise module adds noise contributions in described transducer before preliminary judgement.
Further technical scheme of the present invention is: described noise module adds noise contributions in described fusion center before the final decision behind preliminary judgement.
Further technical scheme of the present invention is: described noise module adds noise contributions in described transducer before preliminary judgement, adds noise contributions simultaneously before the final decision in described fusion center behind preliminary judgement.
Technique effect of the present invention is: the present invention is a kind of to strengthen distribution detection method and system based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, multichannel observation vector of the present invention carries out final decision by described transmission channel to described fusion center behind described transducer preliminary judgement, before carrying out final decision, adding noise under the bayesian criterion of gradient method by adding noise under the bayesian criterion in gradient method before carrying out final decision, the present invention adds noise and judges, improved the performance of Distributed Detection, simultaneously, independently situation is still effectively mutually at each passage of distributed system and fusion center, be applicable to various imperfect distributed systems, make it to detect performance and improve.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is schematic flow sheet of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is Pe of the present invention and the change curve chart of Δ Pe in iterative process.
Fig. 3 is structural representation of the present invention.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with specific embodiment, technical solution of the present invention is further specified.
As shown in Figure 1, the specific embodiment of the present invention is: provide a kind of and strengthen the distribution detection method based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, comprise and carry out the transducer 1 that signal is handled, carry out the transmission channel 2 of signal transmission, the fusion center 3 that multiple signals are judged, described multichannel observation data constitutes the multichannel observation vector respectively, described detection method comprises the steps: that described multichannel observation vector is transferred to described fusion center 3 by described transmission channel 2 and carries out final decision behind described transducer 1 preliminary judgement, add noise before carrying out final decision under the bayesian criterion of gradient method, the probability density function of described noise is:
Wherein
The probability density function of expression noise,
The probability density function of expression noise,
N wherein
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain.Specifically, noise can be considered as DC level this moment.
As shown in Figure 1, specific implementation process of the present invention is as follows: y
1, y
2..., y
MBe the vector of the observation data formation of M transducer 1, by every road signal is increased noise n
1, n
2..., n
M, be sent to each transducer 1, by the processing of transducer, tentatively be judged as u
1, u
2..., u
M, through being transferred to fusion center 3, fusion center 3 increases suitable noise w earlier according to the data that receive and judges that again final decision is u
0
One, the multichannel observation data constitutes the multichannel observation vector respectively.
As shown in Figure 1, at first obtain observation data y from phenomenon
1, y
2..., y
M, multichannel observation data y
1, y
2..., y
MConstitute the multichannel observation vector.
As shown in Figure 1, in distributed detection system, noise both can act on the transducer 1, can act on fusion center 3 again, but also the two acted on simultaneously.Introduce the situation of noise contributions below.
Two, under bayesian criterion, can make systematic function reach optimum form of noise.
In distributed detection system, M transducer is as the response of associated electromagnetic field or sound field, and signal comes from different signal sources.Based on " 0 " " 1 " signal that transducer receives, make the judgement of dualism hypothesis, (H at fusion center
0) only there is noise, (H in the representative sensor
1) the representative input signal that is transferred to transducer comprises noise and signal.
u
nRepresent the output of n local sensor, its value is 0 or 1, has 2
MPlanting may.R representative hypothesis H
1The subclass of setting up namely " has signal to exist ".The false alarm probability that then obtains and detection probability are:
Pr (u
n| H
i) representative hypothesis H
1Set up time series u
nArrive the probability of fusion center.Sequence u
nCan be assigned to R territory or its supplementary set R according to Chair-Varshney fusion criterion or other judgement fusion criterion
0The territory.u
NkRepresent sequence u
nK element.By separate getting between transducer
P wherein
KiBe the detection probability of i=1 in k the transducer or the false alarm probability of i=0.
At first, suppose noise n in each transducer
kIndependent mutually, the probability density function of noise is f
N(n) satisfy condition
f
N(n)≥0 for all n (A2.3)
The noise probability density function is f in each local sensor
Nk(n
k), satisfy condition
f
Nk(n
k)≥0 for all n
k (A2.5)
After the process noise strengthens in each transducer be
It is equivalent to
(A2.8)
Because the n in each transducer
kSeparate, so
We stipulate
Then (A2.10) formula becomes
As seen, the noise n in the transducer
kWhen separate, f
N(n) be the Joint Distribution of probability density.
In fact, the noise n in each transducer
kNon-when independent, we still can obtain the conclusion of (A2.13) formula.Joint probability density still is f
N(n).But work as n
kNon-when independent, (A2.7) formula is false, so (A2.8) (A2.9) (A2.10) also is false.But false alarm probability or detection probability in k the transducer that noise strengthens still are P
Ik(n
k), so (A2.11) formula is set up.We make P
1(n) maximum is to find the most effective n.Yet n is random process, and the function of random process still is random process, asks P so the problem of maximizing has become
1(n) expectation E (P
1(n)) Zui Da problem, i.e. (A2.13) formula.We can expand to the problem that non-independent distribution formula detects, and expression formula is constant.This means no matter whether local sensor is independent, and false alarm probability or detection probability that noise strengthens all are the functions of accidental resonance noise.When in the channel loss being arranged, the independent distribution formula detects and has transposition error.That is to say that it is α that channel k can be expressed as the transposition error probability
kAnd β
kBinary channel.
Consider the influence of channel errors α and β, we obtain the detection probability P of equivalence
K1With false alarm probability P
K0For
So P
i(n) equivalent expression is
As seen, it still is the function of n.
Be p at prior probability
1And p
0Situation under, C
IjH is worked as in representative
jFor true time is judged to H
iCost function (i, j=0,1).For example: when satisfying C
10>C
00And C
01>C
11During condition, the mistaken verdict cost is higher than correct judgement cost.Overall risk R is expressed as
R(f
N)=C
00(1-P
FA(f
N))p
0+C
10P
FA(f
N)p
0+C
01(1-P
D(f
N))p
1+C
11P
D(f
N)p
1
(A2.16)
P wherein
FA(f
N)=P
0(f
N), P
D(f
N)=P
0(f
N).In order to find the optimum noise under the bayesian criterion, we need solve following problem:
Satisfy restrictive condition
The expression formula of Distributed Detection (A2.17) is (A2.19) (A2.18), and is identical with single channel noise enhancing input problem.Therefore, we obtain similar theorem by similar proof: the optimum or approaching optimum probability density function for the independent noise n in the local sensor that makes the Distributed Detection best performance under bayesian criterion is
Three, obtain optimum noise relevant parameter.
In the priori Probability p
1And p
0Under the known situation, C
IjH is worked as in representative
jFor true time is judged to H
iCost function (i, j=0,1).For example: when satisfying C
10>C
00And C
01>C
11During condition, the mistaken verdict cost is higher than correct judgement cost.Overall risk R is expressed as
R=C
00(1-P
FA)p
0+C
10P
FAp
0+C
01(1-P
D)p
1+C
11P
Dp
1
(A3.1)
C in particular cases in the error probability minimum
00=C
11=0, C
01=C
10=1, p
0=p
1=0.5, (A3.1) becomes behind the adding noise
Pe(n)=0.5P
FA(n)+0.5(1-P
D(n))
(A3.2)
Wherein, Pe (n) is error probability.
u
nRepresent the output of n local sensor, its value is 0 or 1, has 2
MPlanting may.R representative hypothesis H
1The subclass of setting up namely " has signal to exist ".The false alarm probability that then obtains and detection probability are
Wherein, Pr (u
n| H
i) representative hypothesis H
1Set up time series u
nArrive the probability of fusion center.
Fusion criterion hypothetical sequence u
nLikelihood ratio function at R or its supplementary set R ' is
Perhaps
Can also use other fusion criterion.u
NkRepresent sequence u
nK element.Because the independence between transducer gets
In order to make Pe (n) reach minimum by changing noise n.At any n
0Near the point, error Pe (n) can be similar to is expressed as n-n
0Binary function.
Wherein g is at n
0Gradient vector (the g of point
1, g
2..., g
M)
H is at n
0The extra large gloomy matrix of point, its matrix element is
At noise n
0Test set in, (A3.8) formula equal sign the right is minimum to have obtained a new set by making.To find the solution M system of linear equations for this reason.
The new set of noise is
n=n
0-h,h=H
-1g. (A3.11)
Error change value is
Value at k the element of n point gradient g is
(A3.6) (A3.7) must by (A3.3)
P wherein
Ki(n
k) be n
kProbability density function, u
NkN the sequence u that is
nDisregard k element.
As infructescence u
n Remove k element 0 or 1, so can equivalence be expressed as sequence
And sequence
If two sequences all are positioned at the R territory, (A3.14) sum term of formula is by every generation of cancelling each other, and one is 1-2u
Nk=1, another is 1-2u
Nk=-1.When
In the R territory,
When non-R territory, sum term only comprises u
n, (A3.14) formula is transformed to R
kDomain representation is
Wherein
∑
Ki, i=0,1 depends on fusion criterion and all quantization level except k element.(A3.15) k the element representation of gradient g is in the formula
g
k=0.5P
k1(n
k)∑
k1-0.5P
k0(n
k)∑
k0 (A3.18)
Suppose that the zero income equation that these elements are equivalent to local smallest error function is
The diagonal entry of the gloomy matrix in sea is
For off diagonal element, we differentiate (A3.15) formula substitution (A3.14) formula
Can obtain calculating any testing site n
0Gradient g and the method for Hai Sen matrix H, new testing site can be tried to achieve by (A3.11) formula.This process lasts till the change amount in (A3.12) | Δ Pe| is lower than ∈, and wherein ∈ belongs to Pe (n
0), value is ∈=0.0001
Here note 2 differences: at first, error Pe (n) minimum value is not unique, at the set R of these minimum values
MIn the non-positive definite of extra large gloomy matrix H, (A3.12) the Δ Pe in the formula may on the occasion of, so just can not determine next testing site n with (A3.11) formula
0Therefore current some n
0The right side of substitution (A3.19) formula, the left side of solving equation obtains new quantization level:
Consider that from integral body we should make up a Jacobi type method and find the solution (A3.19) formula like this, but its convergence effect is very slow.In the example of next joint, (A3.23) formula produces and shrinks sequence of mapping by taking the logarithm or Bessel function contrary, and finally obtains a testing site n during again for negative at C
0If but when data be non-negative, it is suboptimal separating when 1 or M-1 quantization level are zero.(A3.11) formula will cause some n
kBecome negative, for avoiding this result, we take following step.We calculate the quantity in each stage with the vector h in (A3.11) formula
If r<1 replaces with (A3.11) formula
Otherwise (A3.11) formula will be for next step.
The factor is in order to guarantee the new value n of all quantization level
0kNon-vanishing.The quantized value r of long run test point is that 0 situation also may take place, and will recomputate with new initial condition in this case.
Irregular Δ Pe>0 and r<1 situation only occurs once in a while in the starting stage.Gloomy matrix is regularly positive in the sea, in case the n point has advanced trench around minimum value, (A3.11) formula makes it arrive the valley point fast.The algorithm of this Pe of making (n) cost minimization sees Table I (the equation expression formula of corresponding this joint of numeral in the bracket).
For example: make numerical value n Rayleigh distributed
p
k0(nk)=exp(-(θ
k-n
k))U(θ
k-n
k),p
k1(n
k)=a
kexp(-a
k(θ
k-n
k))U(θ
k-n
k), (A3.27)
S wherein
kBe the signal to noise ratio of k transducer, U () is unit step function, θ
kBe threshold value,
Complementary cumulative distribution is
q
k0(n
k)=exp(-(θ
k-n
k))U(θ
k-n
k), (A3.30)
q
k1(n
k)=exp(-a
k(θ
k-n
k))U(θ
k-n
k),(A3.31)
(A3.26) the contrary of likelihood ratio is in the formula
This example assumes M=7, S
k=[7,14,21,28,35,42,49], threshold value is θ
k=[8,16,24,32,40,48,56] are namely as x>θ
kThe time, be judged to H
1, through after 67 iteration, C=0.0563 becomes C=0.0006 as can be seen from Figure 2, and optimum noise is υ=[3.1013,5.5130,13.7036,21.7963,29.8510,37.8872,45.9128].N thus
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain.
Detailed process is as follows:
0: initialization n
0=0
1: with μ
nSequence (A3.5) is categorized into R or R ' by (A3.4)
2: according to (A3.18) compute gradient g, (A3.21) calculate extra large gloomy matrix H according to (A3.20)
3: calculate
MThe vectorial h=H of unit
-1g
If ΔPe≥0
Calculate new n according to (A3.23);
Got back to for the 0th step;
Else
Calculate r according to (A3.25)
5:If r≥1
Calculate new n according to (A3.11);
Else
Calculate new n according to (A3.26);
End if
6:If|ΔPe|<∈Pe
Finish, quit a program.
Else
Got back to for the 0th step.
End if
End if
As shown in Figure 1, preferred implementation of the present invention is: described noise only acts on described transducer before preliminary judgement.Only act at noise under the situation of transducer, find under bayesian criterion, can make systematic function reach optimum form of noise, the optimum or approaching optimum probability density function for the independent noise n in the local sensor that makes the Distributed Detection best performance under bayesian criterion is
Wherein
The probability density function of expression noise,
N wherein
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain, detailed process is with above-mentioned process.
As shown in Figure 1, preferred implementation of the present invention is: described noise module adds noise contributions in described fusion center before the final decision behind preliminary judgement, and concrete processing procedure coexists and only acts on described transducer before the preliminary judgement.
As shown in Figure 1, preferred implementation of the present invention is: described noise is used for described transducer at the preliminary judgement previous crops, and the final decision previous crops is used for described fusion center behind preliminary judgement simultaneously.At this moment, described noise each passage of distributed system and fusion center mutually independently situation still effectively, concrete processing procedure coexists and only acts on described transducer before the preliminary judgement.
As shown in Figure 3, the specific embodiment of the present invention is: make up a kind of based on the enhancing of the noise under gradient method bayesian criterion distributed detection system, comprise and carry out the transducer 1 that signal is handled, carry out the transmission channel 2 of signal transmission, the fusion center 3 that multiple signals are judged, the noise module 4 that adds noise, described multichannel observation data constitutes the multichannel observation vector respectively, described detection method comprises the steps: that described multichannel observation vector is transferred to described fusion center 3 by described transmission channel 2 and carries out final decision behind described transducer 1 preliminary judgement, described noise module adds noise in signal under the bayesian criterion of gradient method before carrying out final decision, and the probability density function of described noise is:
Wherein
The probability density function of expression noise,
N wherein
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain.
Specific implementation process is the same with the implementation process that strengthens the distribution detection method based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion.
As shown in Figure 3, preferred implementation of the present invention is: described noise module 4 adds noise contributions in described transducer 1 before preliminary judgement.Specific implementation process is the same with the implementation process that strengthens the distribution detection method based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion.
As shown in Figure 3, preferred implementation of the present invention is: described noise module 4 adds noise contributions in described fusion center 3 before the final decision behind preliminary judgement.Specific implementation process is the same with the implementation process that strengthens the distribution detection method based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion.
As shown in Figure 3, preferred implementation of the present invention is: described noise module 4 adds noise contributions in described transducer 1 before preliminary judgement, adds noise contributions simultaneously before the final decision in described fusion center 3 behind preliminary judgement.Specific implementation process is the same with the implementation process that strengthens the distribution detection method based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion.
Above content be in conjunction with concrete preferred implementation to further describing that the present invention does, can not assert that concrete enforcement of the present invention is confined to these explanations.For the general technical staff of the technical field of the invention, without departing from the inventive concept of the premise, can also make some simple deduction or replace, all should be considered as belonging to protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (8)
1. one kind strengthens the distribution detection method based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that, comprise and carry out the transducer that signal is handled, carry out the transmission channel of signal transmission, the fusion center that multiple signals are judged, the multichannel observation data constitutes the multichannel observation vector respectively, described detection method comprises the steps: that described multichannel observation vector carries out final decision by described transmission channel to described fusion center behind described transducer preliminary judgement, add noise before carrying out final decision under the bayesian criterion of gradient method, the probability density function of described noise is: fN
Pt(n)=δ (n-n
0), wherein, fN
Opt(n) probability density function of expression noise,
N wherein
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain.
2. strengthen the distribution detection method according to claim 1 is described based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that described noise is used for described transducer at the preliminary judgement previous crops.
3. strengthen the distribution detection method according to claim 1 is described based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that, described noise final decision previous crops behind preliminary judgement is used for described fusion center.
4. strengthen the distribution detection method according to claim 1 is described based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that described noise is used for described transducer at the preliminary judgement previous crops, the final decision previous crops is used for described fusion center behind preliminary judgement simultaneously.
5. one kind strengthens distributed detection system based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that, comprise and carry out the transducer that signal is handled, carry out the transmission channel of signal transmission, the fusion center that multiple signals are judged, the noise module that adds noise, the multichannel observation data constitutes the multichannel observation vector respectively, described multichannel observation vector carries out final decision by described transmission channel to described fusion center behind described transducer preliminary judgement, described noise module adds noise in signal under the bayesian criterion of gradient method before carrying out final decision, and the probability density function of described noise is: fN
Pt(n)=δ (n-n
0), wherein, fN
Opt(n represents the probability density function of noise,
N wherein
0By being target with bayes cost minimum or error probability minimum, utilize gradient method to pass through repeatedly iteration, finally when the error probability variation equals or approaches zero, stop iteration and obtain.
6. strengthen distributed detection system according to claim 5 is described based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that described noise module adds noise contributions in described transducer before preliminary judgement.
7. strengthen distributed detection system according to claim 5 is described based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that, described noise module adds noise contributions in described fusion center before the final decision behind preliminary judgement.
8. strengthen distributed detection system according to claim 5 is described based on the noise under the gradient method bayesian criterion, it is characterized in that, described noise module adds noise contributions in described transducer before preliminary judgement, add noise contributions simultaneously before the final decision in described fusion center behind preliminary judgement.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN2010106197462A CN102185661B (en) | 2010-12-31 | 2010-12-31 | Noise enhancement distributed detection method and system based on Bayes criterion of gradient method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN2010106197462A CN102185661B (en) | 2010-12-31 | 2010-12-31 | Noise enhancement distributed detection method and system based on Bayes criterion of gradient method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN102185661A CN102185661A (en) | 2011-09-14 |
CN102185661B true CN102185661B (en) | 2013-08-21 |
Family
ID=44571736
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN2010106197462A Expired - Fee Related CN102185661B (en) | 2010-12-31 | 2010-12-31 | Noise enhancement distributed detection method and system based on Bayes criterion of gradient method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN102185661B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108732432B (en) * | 2018-05-30 | 2020-08-21 | 重庆大学 | Constrained noise enhancement signal detection method under maximum posterior probability criterion |
CN109657273B (en) * | 2018-11-16 | 2023-07-04 | 重庆大学 | Bayesian parameter estimation method based on noise enhancement |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1534598A (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2004-10-06 | Method of proceeding noise estimation using increment bayes lerning | |
CN101710848A (en) * | 2009-11-13 | 2010-05-19 | 北京邮电大学 | Cooperative frequency spectrum sensing method based on fuzzy integral and optimization theory |
CN101930590A (en) * | 2009-06-25 | 2010-12-29 | 公安部上海消防研究所 | Transform domain neighborhood self-adapting image denoising method for detecting fire accident |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7668699B2 (en) * | 2005-10-20 | 2010-02-23 | Syracuse University | Optimized stochastic resonance method for signal detection and image processing |
-
2010
- 2010-12-31 CN CN2010106197462A patent/CN102185661B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1534598A (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2004-10-06 | Method of proceeding noise estimation using increment bayes lerning | |
CN101930590A (en) * | 2009-06-25 | 2010-12-29 | 公安部上海消防研究所 | Transform domain neighborhood self-adapting image denoising method for detecting fire accident |
CN101710848A (en) * | 2009-11-13 | 2010-05-19 | 北京邮电大学 | Cooperative frequency spectrum sensing method based on fuzzy integral and optimization theory |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN102185661A (en) | 2011-09-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109408774B (en) | Method for predicting sewage effluent index based on random forest and gradient lifting tree | |
Zhang et al. | Asymptotically optimal data analysis for rejecting local realism | |
CN107392258B (en) | A kind of equipment fault element rows checking method and system | |
CN104750861B (en) | A kind of energy-accumulating power station mass data cleaning method and system | |
CN102469103B (en) | Trojan event prediction method based on BP (Back Propagation) neural network | |
CN111314353B (en) | Network intrusion detection method and system based on hybrid sampling | |
CN110874744B (en) | Data anomaly detection method and device | |
CN101783749B (en) | Network fault positioning method and device | |
CN102185661B (en) | Noise enhancement distributed detection method and system based on Bayes criterion of gradient method | |
Matei et al. | Almost sure convergence to consensus in Markovian random graphs | |
CN111711608A (en) | Method and system for detecting abnormal flow of power data network and electronic equipment | |
CN103916969A (en) | Combined authorized user perception and link state estimation method and device | |
Du et al. | Empirical approximation to invariant measures for McKean–Vlasov processes: Mean-field interaction vs self-interaction | |
Biagini et al. | Admissible strategies in semimartingale portfolio selection | |
Gao et al. | Event-based fault detection for T–S fuzzy systems with packet dropouts and (x, v)-dependent noises | |
Li | Mathematical notes on samtools algorithms | |
CN112949697A (en) | Method and device for confirming pipeline abnormity and computer readable storage medium | |
CN116827641A (en) | Vehicle-mounted CAN bus abnormal flow detection tracing method and system | |
CN102075268A (en) | Noise-enhanced distribution detecting method and system based on particle-group optimizing method | |
Morrison | Analysis of some overflow problems with queuing | |
CN102055540A (en) | Nyman Pearson rule based noise enhancement distributed detection method and system | |
CN109447490B (en) | User address-based abnormal change relation discrimination method | |
CN106685549B (en) | Primary user spectrum sensing method and device | |
CN104933861B (en) | The nonsynchronous traffic incidents detection method of data can be tolerated | |
CN112907009B (en) | Standardized model construction method and device, storage medium and equipment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20130821 Termination date: 20151231 |
|
EXPY | Termination of patent right or utility model |