Embodiment
Materials and methods
1 reagent
Unless stated otherwise, this research agents useful for same is Sigma (St.Louis, MO) Company products.
2 experimental animals
B6D2F1 mouse (C57BL/6 * DBA/2,8~12 weeks) is used to provide ovocyte and granulosa cell, and C57BL/6 (7~8 week) and the female mouse of ICR (8~12 week) provide zygote.The female mouse of 8~12 all ICR is also as the false pregnancy acceptor.The male mouse one of the ICR in 8~12 weeks is to be used for doing the public mouse of normal breeding, the 2nd, and ligation is used as joins the male mouse of false pregnancy.The male mouse of DBA, C57BL/6 and the female mouse of ICR and the male mouse of ICR are available from Beijing dimension tonneau China ltd.The B6D2F1 mouse obtains at this laboratory breeding, and all mouse are raised in cleaning level environment.
3 nutrient solutions
Each nutrient solution moity of table 1
Testing used nutrient solution mainly contains: CZB, M16, α MEM, KSOM.The ovocyte of collecting is temporarily cultivated in CZB, and nuclear transfer embryo is cultivated respectively at CZB, M16, α MEM, KSOM, M16+KSOM (D1), α MEM+KSOM.The reconstruct embryo activates the CZB+10 mM SrCl of liquid for no calcium ion
2+ 5 μ g/ml CB (cytochalasin B).Oocytes collection is used HEPES-CZB solution, and nuclear transplantation operates in the HEPES-CZB-CB solution to be carried out.
4 ovocytes, granulosa cell are collected
The female mouse of B6D2F1 and the female mouse abdominal injection of the ICR pregnant mare serum gonadotrop(h)in (PMSG) 10 (PMSG of unit in 8~12 ages in week; Ningbo), 48 hours pneumoretroperitoneum injection pregnancy urine extract 10 units (hCG, Ningbo); Inject back 15 hours disconnected necks and put to death mouse; Take off uterine tube, peel off the portion of expanding under the mirror, obtain ovarian cumulus ovocyte complex body (COC).(Costa Mesa CA) digests COC, and granulosa cell is separated with ovocyte, cleans secondary with HEPES-CZB for 300 U/ml, ICN Pharmaceuticals, and ovocyte moves in the CZB nutrient solution, is positioned over 37 ℃, 5%CO with Unidasa
2, cultivate in the incubator of saturated humidity.Granulosa cell is put in the nuclear transplantation operation liquid, get ovocyte after 20~30min carry out the nuclear transplantation operation.
The preparation of 5 normal fertilization ovum and body-cell neucleus transplanting (SCNT) clone embryos
After arranging with top program is ultra, C57BL/6 (7~8 week) and the female mouse of ICR (8~12 week) mate with DBA/2, the male mouse of ICR respectively; Examine bolt the next morning; The method of getting ovocyte with top description in 18~19 hours behind the injection hCG is got zygote, cultivates respectively in different culture liquid and observes developmental rate.
Single stage method (OSM) is all adopted in the body-cell neucleus transplanting operation, and the concrete operations step is with reference to report (Zhou et al., 2001 before us; Zhou et al., 2003).Reconstructed embryo is hatched the laggard line activating of 30min~60min in CZB, the SCNT reconstructed embryo is put among the no calcium ion CZB that contains 5 μ g/ml CB and handled 5~6 hours, and the clone embryos after the activation is incubated to be observed in the different culture liquid and the record developmental state.
6 fertilization embryo and clone embryos testing sequences
Table 2 fertilization embryo testing program
Table 3 clone embryos testing sequence
Fertilization embryo testing program is as shown in table 2.For example, for the D1 test group, the embryo that at first will be fertilized cultivates in the M16 substratum,, in the KSOM substratum, cultivates then to 2 cell stages until the fertilization fetal development, arrives blastaea until the fertilization fetal development.
The clone embryos testing sequence is as shown in table 3.For example,, at first clone embryos is cultivated in the M16 substratum behind the activation 0h-5h in activating liquid, grown to 2 cell stages, in the KSOM substratum, cultivate then, grow blastaea until clone embryos until clone embryos for the D1 test group.
The foundation of 7 NT-ES clones and stem cell are cultivated
The foundation of NT-ES clone (nuclear transfer embryo stem cell line) and cultivation are with reference to former report (Zhao et al., 2007).It is that the used white blood disease suppressor factor factor (LIF, leukaemia inhibitory factor) concentration is that (Chemicon, MA), and the used concentration of embryonic stem cell cultivation is 1000U to 2000 U that NT-ES clone is built.
8 embryo transfers
The SCNT blastaea is transplanted in 2.5 days the female mouse of the ICR uterus, and pregnant female mouse is c-section in 19.5 days after embryo transfer, and the birth offspring is through the female mouse replace-conceive of ICR.
9 data statistic analysis
Testing data adopts One-way ANOVA and the Fisher ' s Exact Test in SPSS 13.0 softwares to carry out data statistic analysis, and P in all analytical resultss<0.05 is a significant difference, and P<0.01 is that difference is extremely remarkable.
The result
The D culture method can significantly improve mouse somatic cell clone embryo's ectogenesis rate
In order to study cultural method to the ectogenetic influence of mice embryonic, we have compared the ectogenesis situation of B6D2F1 mouse SCNT embryo in the different culture method.
The result shows that different nutrient solutions are very big to the ectogenesis influence of clone embryos.Just evident difference occurs at 4 cell stages, wherein, do not had significant difference between embryo's 4 cell rates of cultivating among D1, α MEM, the α MEM/KSOM, and be significantly higher than CZB group (66.3%, P<0.05), but not remarkable with M16 and KSOM group difference.Simultaneously, M16 and KSOM group does not have significant difference with the CZB group yet.But arrived morula, variation has taken place in situation, and the morula rate utmost point that D1 organizes is significantly higher than other each group (P<0.01), and α MEM/KSOM group is only organized significant difference with M16, does not have significant difference between all the other each groups.In blastula stage, blastaea rate (62.3 ± 7.2%) utmost point of D1 group is significantly higher than other each group (P<0.01).The result shows that the D culture method can significantly improve mouse somatic cell clone embryo's ectogenesis rate.
Table 4 clone embryos and the ectogenesis rate of fertilization embryo in different cultural methods
The different letter representation significant differences (P<0.05) of shoulder motes in the same column
The influence that the D-method expires and grows SCNT (B6D2F1) embryo
For measuring the later stage developmental state of clone's blastaea that the D1 method cultivates, we transplant clone's blastaea that the D1 method is cultivated, and transplant and dissect 3 clone mouse in back 19.5 days; Body weight is respectively 2.10g, 1.32g, 1.54g; And placenta is respectively 0.27g; 0.20g, 0.11g, body weight and the placental weight of transplanting the back clone mouse that obtains with clone's blastaea of KOSM cultivation are similar.The fetus natality of D1 group almost is KOSM 2 times (1.5%vs.0.857%).The result shows that the D1 culture method can significantly improve mouse somatic cell clone embryo's the developmental rate that expires.
It is the influence of efficient that different cultural methods are built NT-ESCs
For further detecting the influence of D1 culture method to reprogramming of somatic cells, the building of nuclear transfer embryo stem cell line that we have compared clone's blastaea of different cultural methods acquisitions is efficient.The result shows that the degeneration blastaea ratio of D1 group is lower with the KSOM group than α MEM, and building is that efficient is more than the twice of α MEM group, also than KSOM group height.And the ratio of clone's blastaea that the D1 culture method obtains is significantly higher than other culture methods, therefore begins to calculate from reconstructed embryo, and it is efficient that the D1 culture method can significantly improve building of NT-ESCs.
Table 5: it is efficient that the NT-ESCs of different cultural methods builds
The different letter representation significant differences (P<0.05) of shoulder motes in the same column
The influence that EDTA and Glutamine grow clone embryos in the nutrient solution
Other for example cultivate also that α MEM/CZB+KSOM can not improve SCNT embryo's ectogenesis rate for the ectogenesis of understanding why M16 and KSOM combination can raising clone embryos; We compare the moity of CZB and M16; The result finds do not have EDTA and Glutamine among the M16; Just make M16+KSOM promote SCNT embryo's ectogenesis just because of lacking these two compositions? Therefore we have removed EDTA or/and Glutamine in CZB; The SCNT embryo is cultivated; The result shows; The morula of the body-cell neucleus transplanting of cultivation in D1 culture system and CZB-Gln-EDTA (promptly having removed the CZB substratum of EDTA and Glutamine composition)+KSOM culture system and blastaea rate all are significantly higher than other each group, and the morula and the blastaea rate of cultivating the body-cell neucleus transplanting in CZB-Gln-EDTA (promptly having removed the CZB substratum of EDTA and Glutamine composition)+KSOM culture system are respectively 61.2% and 52.5%.Blastaea rate minimum (15.9%) in the CZB+KSOM group; Not remarkable with CZB-Gln (promptly having removed the CZB substratum of Glutamine composition)+KSOM group difference; But significantly be lower than CZB-EDTA (promptly having removed the CZB substratum of EDTA composition)+KSOM group, this shows, removed the growth that CZB and KSOM combined utilization behind the EDTA also can improve clone embryos to a certain extent; But still do not reach the effect of D1 group, have only the culture effect of removing behind EDTA and the Glutamine just to organize identical with D1.
In order to prove that further M16+KSOM promotes the SCNT ectogenesis to be because do not contain EDTA and Glutamine among the M16; We have added in M16 and unite KSOM again behind the Glutamine (Sigma) of EDTA (Sigma) and 1.0mM of 0.11mM the SCNT embryo is carried out vitro culture; The result finds that the M16+KSOM that has added EDTA and Glutamine has lost the ectogenetic ability of promotion SCNT embryo (18.6% (interpolation) vs.62.3% (not adding)).
Research shows, proves to add early stage (late periods 2 cell before) growth that EDTA and Glutamine are unfavorable for clone embryos in the nutrient solution.Exactly because M16+KSOM combination nutrient solution M16 does not contain EDTA and Glutamine has just possessed the ectogenetic ability of raising SCNT embryo.
Therefore, D culture method of the present invention comprises D1 culture method and D2 culture method; The D1 culture method promptly, is cultured to clone embryos and grows two-cell stage after activating the reconstruct embryo in the M16 substratum; Change the KSOM substratum then into and cultivate, be cultured to clone embryos and grow blastaea; The D2 culture method promptly, the reconstruct embryo is cultured to clone embryos and grows two-cell stage after activating in not containing the CZB substratum of YD 30 and Stimulina, change the KSOM substratum then into and cultivate, and is cultured to clone embryos and grows blastaea.
Reference
[1]A.Jouneau,and?J.P.Renard,Reprogramming?in?nuclear?transfer.Curr?Opin?Genet?Dev?13(2003)486-91.
[2]T.Wakayama,and?R.Yanagimachi,Effect?of?cytokinesis?inhibitors,DMSO?and?the?timing?of?oocyte?activation?on?mouse?cloningusing?cumulus?cell?nuclei.Reproduction?122(2001)49-60.
[3]S.Wakayama,J.B.Cibelli,and?T.Wakayama,Effect?of?timing?ofthe?removal?of?oocyte?chromosomes?before?or?after?injection?ofsomatic?nucleus?on?development?of?NT?embryos.Cloning?StemCells?5(2003)181-9.
[4]A.Ogura,K.Inoue,K.Takano,T.Wakayama,and?R.Yanagimachi,Birth?of?mice?after?nuclear?transfer?by?electrofusion?using?tail?tipcells.Mol?Reprod?Dev?57(2000)55-9.
[5]T.Wakayama,A.C.Perry,M.Zuccotti,K.R.Johnson,and?R.Yanagimachi,Full-term?development?of?mice?from?enucleatedoocytes?injected?with?cumulus?cell?nuclei.Nature?394(1998)369-74.
[6]Q.Zhou,J.P.Renard,G.Le?Friec,V.Brochard,N.Beaujean,Y.Cherifi,A.Fraichard,and?J.Cozzi,Generation?of?fertile?clonedrats?by?regulating?oocyte?activation.Science?302(2003)1179.
[7]B.P.Enright,C.Kubota,X.Yang,and?X.C.Tian,Epigeneticcharacteristics?and?development?of?embryos?cloned?from?donorcells?treated?by?trichostatin?A?or?5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine.BiolReprod?69(2003)896-901.
[8]B.G.Jeon,G.Coppola,S.D.Perrault,G.J.Rho,D.H.Betts,andW.A.King,S-adenosylhomocysteine?treatment?of?adult?femalefibroblasts?alters?X-chromosome?inactivation?and?improves?invitro?embryo?development?after?somatic?cell?nuclear?transfer.Reproduction?135(2008)815-28.
[9]K.L.Jones,J.Hill,T.Y.Shin,L.Lui,and?M.Westhusin,DNAhypomethylation?of?karyoplasts?for?bovine?nuclear?transplantation.Mol?Reprod?Dev?60(2001)208-13.
[10]S.Kishigami,E.Mizutani,H.Ohta,T.Hikichi,N.V.Thuan,S.Wakayama,H.T.Bui,and?T.Wakayama,Significantimprovement?of?mouse?cloning?technique?by?treatment?withtrichostatin?A?after?somatic?nuclear?transfer.Biochem?BiophysRes?Commun?340(2006)183-9.
[11]A.Rybouchkin,Y.Kato,and?Y.Tsunoda,Role?of?histoneacetylation?in?reprogramming?of?somatic?nuclei?following?nucleartransfer.Biol?Reprod?74(2006)1083-9.
[12]B.D.B?avister,Culture?of?preimplantation?embryos:facts?andartifacts.Hum?Reprod?Update?1(1995)91-148.
[13]C.L.Chatot,C.A.Ziomek,B.D.Bavister,J.L.Lewis,and?I.Torres,An?improved?culture?medium?supports?development?ofrandom-bred?1-cell?mouse?embryos?in?vitro.J?Reprod?Fertil?86(1989)679-88.
[14]Y.G.Chung,M.R.Mann,M.S.Bartolomei,and?K.E.Latham,Nuclear-cytoplasmic″tug?of?war″during?cloning:effects?ofsomatic?cell?nuclei?on?culture?medium?preferences?ofpreimplantation?cloned?mouse?embryos.Biol?Reprod?66(2002)1178-84.
[15]D.K.Gardner,M.Lane,I.Calderon,and?J.Leeton,Environmentof?the?preimplantation?human?embryo?in?vivo:metabolite?analysisof?oviduct?and?uterine?fluids?and?metabolism?of?cumulus?cells.Fertil?Steril?65(1996)349-53.
[16]K.M.Dawson,J.L.Collins,and?J.M.Baltz,Osmolarity-dependentglycine?accumulation?indicates?a?role?for?glycine?as?an?organicosmolyte?in?early?preimplantation?mouse?embryos.Biol?Reprod59(1998)225-32.
[17]T.Hadi,M.A.Hammer,C.Algire,T.Richards,and?J.M.Baltz,Similar?effects?of?osmolarity,glucose,and?phosphate?on?cleavagepast?the?2-cell?stage?in?mouse?embryos?from?outbred?and?F1hybrid?females.Biol?Reprod?72(2005)179-87.
[18]M.Kamjoo,D.R.Brison,and?S.J.Kimber,Apoptosis?in?thepreimplantation?mouse?embryo:effect?of?strain?difference?and?invitro?culture.Mol?Reprod?Dev?61(2002)67-77.
[19]A.S.Doherty,M.R.Mann,K.D.Tremblay,M.S.Bartolomei,andR.M.Schultz,Differential?effects?of?culture?on?imprinted?H19expression?in?the?preimplantation?mouse?embryo.Biol?Reprod?62(2000)1526-35.
[20]S.Khosla,W.Dean,D.Brown,W.Reik,and?R.Feil,Culture?ofpreimplantation?mouse?embryos?affects?fetal?development?and?theexpression?of?imprinted?genes.Biol?Reprod?64(2001)918-26.
[21]M.Boiani,L.Gentile,V.V.Gambles,F.Cavaleri,C.A.Redi,andH.R.Scholer,Variable?reprogramming?of?the?pluripotent?stemcell?marker?Oct4?in?mouse?clones:distinct?developmentalpotentials?in?different?culture?environments.Stem?Cells?23(2005)1089-104.
[22]V.E.Papaioannou,and?K.M.Ebert,The?preimplantation?pigembryo:cell?number?and?allocation?to?trophectoderm?and?innercell?mass?of?the?blastocyst?in?vivo?and?in?vitro.Development?102(1988)793-803.
[23]F.A.Brook,and?R.L.Gardner,The?origin?and?efficient?derivationof?embryonic?stem?cells?in?the?mouse.Proc?Natl?Acad?Sci?U?S?A94(1997)5709-12.
[24]C.Zhao,R.Yao,J.Hao,C.Ding,Y.Fan,X.Dai,W.Li,T.Hai,Z.Liu,Y.Yu,Y.Wang,X.Hou,W.Ji,Q.Zhou,A.Jouneau,F.
Zeng,and?L.?Wang,Establishment?of?customized?mouse?stem?celllines?by?sequential?nuclear?transfer.Cell?Res?17(2007)80-7.
[25]F.Zeng,D.A.Baldwin,and?R.M.Schultz,Transcript?profilingduring?preimplantation?mouse?development.Dev?Biol?272(2004)483-96.
[26]D.K.Gardner,and?M.Lane,Amino?acids?and?ammonium?regulatemouse?embryo?development?in?culture.Biol?Reprod?48(1993)377-85.
[27]Y.Ho,K.Wigglesworth,J.J.Eppig,and?R.M.?Schultz,Preimplantation?development?of?mouse?embryos?in?KSOM:augmentation?by?amino?acids?and?analysis?of?gene?expression.Mol?Reprod?Dev?41(1995)232-8.
[28]A.van?Soom,M.T.Ysebaert,and?A.de?Kruif,Relationshipbetween?timing?of?development,morula?morphology,and?cellallocation?to?inner?cell?mass?and?trophectoderm?in?invitro-produced?bovine?embryos.Mol?Reprod?Dev?47(1997)47-56.
[29]C.L.Chatot,R.J.Tasca,and?C.A.Ziomek,Glutamine?uptake?andutilization?by?preimplantation?mouse?embryos?in?CZB?medium.JReprod?Fertil?89(1990)335-46.
[30]M.Lane,and?D.K.Gardner,Nonessential?amino?acids?andglutamine?decrease?the?time?of?the?first?three?cleavage?divisionsand?increase?compaction?of?mouse?zygotes?in?vitro.J?AssistReprod?Genet?14(1997)398-403.
[31]M.H.Nasr-Esfahani,N.J.Winston,and?M.H.Johnson,Effects?ofglucose,glutamine,ethylenediaminetetraacetic?acid?andoxygen?tension?on?the?concentration?of?reactive?oxygen?speciesand?on?development?of?the?mouse?preimplantation?embryo?invitro.J?Reprod?Fertil?96(1992)219-31.