CN100495851C - Method for saturating anti-current mutual inductor differential protection - Google Patents
Method for saturating anti-current mutual inductor differential protection Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN100495851C CN100495851C CNB2005100954415A CN200510095441A CN100495851C CN 100495851 C CN100495851 C CN 100495851C CN B2005100954415 A CNB2005100954415 A CN B2005100954415A CN 200510095441 A CN200510095441 A CN 200510095441A CN 100495851 C CN100495851 C CN 100495851C
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- centerdot
- relay
- delta
- fault component
- current
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
Abstract
This invention relates to a method for anti-saturation of a current mutual inductor of differential protection including a method for differential protection anti- TA saturation, the detecting process of a TA saturation testing relay includes the following steps: collecting each side current in the differential loop timely, computing the fault component of the differential current, computing the fault component of the braking current, judging the operation logic of the fault component relay, repeating M times of the above mentioned actions, if N times can meet the needs, then it is considered that the relay acts, judging the fault regions and judging the return of the relay.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of method that overcomes the saturated influence of current transformer, particularly a kind of saturated method of current transformer of resisting of differential protection.
Background technology
Differential protection is the main salvo of elements such as transformer, generator, high capacity motor and bus; basic principle be the reaction protected element respectively hold inflow current and flow out current phasor and; at the protection zone internal fault; current value in the differential circuit is greater than setting value; the differential protection instantaneous operation; and at the protection external area error, differential protection then should not move.
In recent years, following abnormal conditions repeatedly take place in the high-rating generator transformer group in power system operation:
1. after the external area error excision, because of each side current transformer transient characterisitics difference of transformer causes transformer differential protection or generator transformer group differential protection malfunction;
2. during two parallel operation of transformers, when a no-load transformer drops into, produce and echo surge current because and the aperiodic component in the echo surge current cause that the generator transformer group current transformer transient error of another operation increases, and causes differential protection malfunction.
High-rating generator transformer group protection malfunction meeting causes great economic loss, when serious even may threaten the stabilization of power grids.Therefore, analyze the reason of the problems referred to above and find the method for dealing with problems to have great importance.
Regard protected object as a node, then flow into or the electric current that flows out this node promptly is defined as spill current
According to basic ear hoff's law,
Be each side electric current.In theory, when external area error,
Protective device is failure to actuate.But in fact because current transformer may exist mutual inductor ratio, capacity difference (particularly tranformer protection); the remanent magnetism difference may cause that all current transformer transient state progress of disease error increases; make and produce unsymmetrical current in the differential circuit, can cause differential protection misoperation when serious.
Therefore to reduce the saturated influence to protection of current transformer transient state, avoid outside passing through property of transient state electric current to cause differential protection malfunction be the principal contradiction that realizes that differential protection need solve in the employing measure.
Summary of the invention
Purpose of the present invention is exactly can reduce the saturated influence to differential protection of current transformer transient state in order to overcome the defective of prior art, to provide a kind of, avoid differential protection malfunction not sacrifice simultaneously the differential protection sensitivity of method again.
Technical scheme of the present invention is: the saturated method of a kind of differential protection anti-current instrument transformer, and steps such as data acquisition, data processing and logic determines, the testing process of current transformer saturation detection relay specifically may further comprise the steps:
According to
Or
Calculate stalling current fault component mould
In the formula,
Be the fault component of spill current,
Be the fault component of stalling current, down together;
3. basis
Judge the action logic of difference stream fault component relay, α is the threshold definite value of difference stream fault component relay, and span is 0.2~0.4, is preferably 0.3;
In the formula, I
nBe protected equipment reference side Current Transformer Secondary rated current; K is the restraint coefficient of difference stream fault component relay, down together;
4. repeating step is 1. to step 3. M time, if having satisfy for N time step 3. condition think that then difference flows the actuating of relay of fault component relay;
5. basis
Judge the action logic of stalling current fault component relay; β is the threshold definite value of stalling current fault component relay, and span is 0.1~0.2, is preferably 0.15;
6. repeating step is 1., 2. and 5. M time, if having satisfy for N time step 5. condition then think the actuating of relay of stalling current fault component;
7. fault zone determining step: if only the actuating of relay of poor stream fault component or two relay actuation time difference be not more than 5ms and then be judged to be troubles inside the sample space, otherwise be judged to be external area error;
8. relay returns determining step:
If be judged to be external area error, judge that 1. the disappearance of stalling current fault component begins to repeat to judge from step;
If be judged to be troubles inside the sample space, 1. begin to repeat to judge from step after the involution of the whole group of differential protection task.
Principle of the present invention is:
Current transformer is a kind of nonlinear ferroelectric magnetic cell, and its core sataration will cause progress of disease error to increase, and particularly angular difference increases, if do not adopt an effective measure, only depends on the braking characteristic of differential protection to be difficult to resist.Consider:
1. the current transformer operate as normal carries out the transition to inelastic region at least 5~10ms at linear zone by linear zone;
2. for differential protection, when the generating region internal fault, difference stream fault component and stalling current fault component occur simultaneously; When external area error takes place when, the stalling current fault component appears earlier, difference stream fault component appears in the back, and its time difference promptly is not less than 5ms greater than current transformer transit time.
According to above-mentioned analysis; the present invention is provided with difference stream fault component relay and stalling current fault component relay carries out two logic determines; with difference stream fault component relay and stalling current fault component difference relay actuation time is basic criterion; and adopt many criterions coordination technique; can current transformer enter saturated before fast and reliable ground judge internal fault external fault, resist the saturated influence of current transformer to differential protection.
This method is implemented simple, and physical significance is clear, and the saturated performance of anti-current instrument transformer is guaranteed simultaneously.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is a program flow diagram of the present invention
Fig. 2 is the embodiment of the invention 1 a protection equipment for generator biased differential protection program flow diagram
Fig. 3 is the embodiment of the invention 1 a protection equipment for generator A phase ratio differential protection program flow diagram
Embodiment
The present invention has been used to realize the differential protection of elements such as generator, transformer, motor, is that example is described further below with the generator protection:
Embodiment 1
The saturated method of a kind of differential protection anti-current instrument transformer; comprise steps such as data acquisition, data processing and logic determines; the testing process of current transformer saturation detection relay may further comprise the steps; see Fig. 1; because differential relay three phase logics are identical, so only described A phase implementation step among the figure:
1. gather each the side electric current in the differential circuit in real time
According to
Or
Calculate stalling current fault component mould
In the formula,
Be the fault component of spill current,
Be the fault component of stalling current, down together;
3. basis
Judge the action logic of difference stream fault component relay; In the formula, I
nBe reference side Current Transformer Secondary rated current; K is the restraint coefficient of difference stream fault component relay;
4. repeating step is 1. to step 3. M time, if having satisfy for N time step 3. condition think that then difference flows the actuating of relay of fault component relay;
5. basis
Judge the action logic of stalling current fault component relay;
6. repeating step is 1., 2. and 5. M time, if having satisfy for N time step 5. condition then think the actuating of relay of stalling current fault component;
7. fault zone determining step: if only the actuating of relay of poor stream fault component or two relay actuation time difference be not more than 5ms and then be judged to be troubles inside the sample space, otherwise be judged to be external area error;
8. relay returns determining step:
If be judged to be external area error, judge that 1. the disappearance of stalling current fault component begins to repeat to judge from step;
If be judged to be troubles inside the sample space, 1. begin to repeat to judge from step after the involution of the whole group of differential protection task.
This step has been taked the sampled value algorithm based on fault component, and it is saturated to influences of protection fast such as differential protections that this method can effectively be resisted current transformer, and for indivedual sampling bad datas that may occur natural immunity is arranged.
In the determining step of fault zone: if only the actuating of relay of poor stream fault component or two relay actuation times difference be not more than 5ms and then be judged to be troubles inside the sample space, be defined as ' synchronously '; Otherwise be judged to be external area error and be defined as " asynchronous ".
Above-mentioned steps, we are defined as the lock-on relay based on " comprehensive time difference method ".
The differential protection logic is seen Fig. 2 in the present embodiment, comprising:
The initialization of 1. conventional percentage differential relay, lock-on relay;
2. the differential relay entry condition is judged: start for guaranteeing that protection is reliable, any one satisfies condition the jump-value of current of being on duty, spill current constant and lock-on relay, and then protection starts;
3. the differential logic determines of phase-splitting: A, B, the phase-splitting of C three-phase judge that three phase logics are identical, specifically see Fig. 3;
4. lock-on relay returns judgement: if lock-on relay is judged to be external area error, judge that the disappearance of stalling current fault component then drops into lock-on relay once more, guarantee outer troubles inside the sample space, the lock-on relay instant action of changeing in district;
5. the involution of the whole group of differential relay is judged.
Phase-splitting biased differential protection logic is seen Fig. 3 in the present embodiment, comprising:
1. as if direct generating region internal fault, then conventional percentage differential relay, lock-on relay all move, and protection is outlet fast;
2. if external area error takes place, current transformer does not have saturated, and then conventional percentage differential relay, lock-on relay all are failure to actuate, and protect reliable locking;
3. if external area error takes place, current transformer generation transient state or stable state are saturated, and then conventional percentage differential relay action, lock-on relay are failure to actuate, since saturated secondary or the triple-frequency harmonics of certainly leading to of current transformer, the reliable locking of protection after harmonic wave detects;
4. saturated if external area error and current transformer transient state take place earlier; generating region internal fault again subsequently; then conventional percentage differential relay possibility one direct acting, and lock-on relay only moves behind the generating region internal fault, can effectively guarantee the correctness of biased differential protection action.
Can know according to top description; according to judged result based on the lock-on relay of " comprehensive time difference method "; the logic of contrast ratio differential relay reconfigures, and can effectively resist the saturated influence to differential protection of current transformer, has improved the reliability of differential protection greatly.
Claims (3)
1, the saturated method of a kind of differential protection anti-current instrument transformer comprises steps such as data acquisition, data processing and logic determines, it is characterized in that the testing process of current transformer saturation detection relay specifically may further comprise the steps:
According to
Or
Calculate stalling current fault component mould
In the formula,
Be the fault component of spill current,
Be the fault component of stalling current, down together;
3. basis
Judge the action logic of difference stream fault component relay;
α is the threshold definite value of difference stream fault component relay, and span is 0.2-0.4; I
nBe reference side secondary rated current; K is the restraint coefficient of difference stream fault component relay;
4. repeating step is 1. to step 3. M time, if having satisfy for N time step 3. condition think that then difference flows the actuating of relay of fault component relay;
5. basis
Judge the action logic of stalling current fault component relay, β is the threshold definite value of stalling current fault component relay, and span is 0.1~0.2;
6. repeating step is 1., 2. and 5. M time, if having satisfy for N time step 5. condition then think the actuating of relay of stalling current fault component;
7. fault zone determining step: if only the actuating of relay of poor stream fault component or two relay actuation time difference be not more than 5ms and then be judged to be troubles inside the sample space, otherwise be judged to be external area error;
8. relay returns determining step:
If be judged to be external area error, judge that 1. the disappearance of stalling current fault component begins to repeat to judge from step;
If be judged to be troubles inside the sample space, 1. begin to repeat to judge from step after the involution of the whole group of differential protection task.
2, the saturated method of differential protection anti-current instrument transformer according to claim 1 is characterized in that, described step 3.
In the value of α be 0.3.
3, the saturated method of differential protection anti-current instrument transformer according to claim 1 is characterized in that, described step 5.
In the value of β be 0.15.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CNB2005100954415A CN100495851C (en) | 2005-11-16 | 2005-11-16 | Method for saturating anti-current mutual inductor differential protection |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CNB2005100954415A CN100495851C (en) | 2005-11-16 | 2005-11-16 | Method for saturating anti-current mutual inductor differential protection |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN1787313A CN1787313A (en) | 2006-06-14 |
CN100495851C true CN100495851C (en) | 2009-06-03 |
Family
ID=36784673
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CNB2005100954415A Expired - Fee Related CN100495851C (en) | 2005-11-16 | 2005-11-16 | Method for saturating anti-current mutual inductor differential protection |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN100495851C (en) |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101183783B (en) * | 2007-12-14 | 2011-04-06 | 国电南京自动化股份有限公司 | Graded hyperbolic anti-TA transient saturation differential protection method |
CN101710689B (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2012-06-13 | 南京中德保护控制***有限公司 | Method for protecting strong feed-in line current |
CN102324728B (en) * | 2011-07-18 | 2013-10-23 | 重庆电力高等专科学校 | Method for judging and compensating current transformer saturation |
CN102255283B (en) * | 2011-07-22 | 2013-11-13 | 重庆电力高等专科学校 | Current fault component vector phase comparison protection method |
CN102684176B (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2015-01-14 | 许继电气股份有限公司 | Networking differential protection method for power distribution network based on maintenance of terminal equipment |
CN103675386B (en) * | 2013-11-12 | 2016-04-13 | 中铁二十一局集团电务电化工程有限公司 | Upflow transformer for low-voltage energization |
CN104538927B (en) * | 2015-01-19 | 2017-10-10 | 国家电网公司 | The recognition methods of transformer saturation under the conditions of a kind of complexity is shoved |
CN106602519B (en) * | 2015-10-15 | 2019-08-16 | 中国电力科学研究院 | A kind of bus current differential protection starting element |
CN108173240B (en) * | 2017-12-19 | 2019-06-28 | 华中科技大学 | A kind of transformer excitation flow recognition method and system based on compound time difference method |
CN111030051B (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2021-10-08 | 国网江苏省电力有限公司检修分公司 | Differential protection method |
-
2005
- 2005-11-16 CN CNB2005100954415A patent/CN100495851C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1787313A (en) | 2006-06-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN100495851C (en) | Method for saturating anti-current mutual inductor differential protection | |
Kezunovic et al. | An expert system for transmission substation event analysis | |
CN100424955C (en) | Variable slope differential ratio protection method | |
CN100495850C (en) | Anti-current transformer saturation method for protecting line differential action | |
CN100449900C (en) | High-voltage ac. controllable parallel-connection reactor high-differential protection method | |
CN102570419B (en) | Power transmission line pilot protection method based on magnitude of current | |
CN105140893A (en) | Differential protection current transformer (CT) saturation recognition method | |
CN102522726A (en) | Method for locking magnetizing inrush current of transformer | |
CN103389422B (en) | The detection method of healthy phases bus differential protection reason of false action during circuit re-switching | |
CN104362591B (en) | Method and system for preventing heavy gas protection misoperation caused by large-crossing current | |
Xie et al. | Transformer monitoring and protection in dynamic power systems–a review | |
Shu et al. | A soft reclosing model for hybrid DC circuit breaker in VSC-MTDC system | |
CN103760435A (en) | Fault identification method for electric current semi-cycle absolute value integral differential formula of ratio restrain characteristics | |
Saleh et al. | Synthetic harmonic distance relaying for inverter-based islanded microgrids | |
Jahn et al. | Requirements for open specifications in multivendor HVDC protection systems | |
Ivanković et al. | Modeling 400 kV transmission grid with system protection and disturbance analysis | |
CN103427391A (en) | Method for identifying surge interference in microcomputer protection | |
CN110460028A (en) | A kind of device and method limiting short circuit malfunction electric current | |
Elsamahy et al. | An intelligent approach using SVM to enhance turn-to-turn fault detection in power transformers | |
CN206074791U (en) | A kind of faulty action preventing circuit and the normal station low-voltage protection device using the circuit | |
Brück et al. | Probabilistic analysis of faults affecting multiple trains of the electrical power supply system of nuclear power plants | |
Venkatanagaraju et al. | Synchrophasor-Based Wide Area Protection Scheme for System Stressed Conditions to Avoid Power System Blackout: Wide Area Protection Scheme for System Stressed Conditions | |
Mattei et al. | The response of a transformer differential relay to internal faults while influenced by geomagnetically induced currents | |
Sun et al. | Serious fault identification for VSC-HVDC converters | |
Timofeev et al. | Analysis of Possibility of Using Pmu Based Methods for Providing the Correct Operation of Distance Protection |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20090603 Termination date: 20151116 |
|
EXPY | Termination of patent right or utility model |