CA2840331C - Additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate - Google Patents
Additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2840331C CA2840331C CA2840331A CA2840331A CA2840331C CA 2840331 C CA2840331 C CA 2840331C CA 2840331 A CA2840331 A CA 2840331A CA 2840331 A CA2840331 A CA 2840331A CA 2840331 C CA2840331 C CA 2840331C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- additive
- wash water
- calcium
- efficiency
- glyoxal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C47/00—Compounds having —CHO groups
- C07C47/02—Saturated compounds having —CHO groups bound to acyclic carbon atoms or to hydrogen
- C07C47/12—Saturated compounds having —CHO groups bound to acyclic carbon atoms or to hydrogen containing more than one —CHO group
- C07C47/127—Glyoxal
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G29/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, with other chemicals
- C10G29/20—Organic compounds not containing metal atoms
- C10G29/22—Organic compounds not containing metal atoms containing oxygen as the only hetero atom
- C10G29/24—Aldehydes or ketones
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C37/00—Preparation of compounds having hydroxy or O-metal groups bound to a carbon atom of a six-membered aromatic ring
- C07C37/68—Purification; separation; Use of additives, e.g. for stabilisation
- C07C37/70—Purification; separation; Use of additives, e.g. for stabilisation by physical treatment
- C07C37/72—Purification; separation; Use of additives, e.g. for stabilisation by physical treatment by liquid-liquid treatment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G21/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by extraction with selective solvents
- C10G21/06—Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by extraction with selective solvents characterised by the solvent used
- C10G21/12—Organic compounds only
- C10G21/16—Oxygen-containing compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/20—Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
- C10G2300/201—Impurities
- C10G2300/202—Heteroatoms content, i.e. S, N, O, P
- C10G2300/203—Naphthenic acids, TAN
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/20—Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
- C10G2300/201—Impurities
- C10G2300/205—Metal content
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/80—Additives
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G29/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, with other chemicals
- C10G29/20—Organic compounds not containing metal atoms
- C10G29/22—Organic compounds not containing metal atoms containing oxygen as the only hetero atom
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
- Removal Of Specific Substances (AREA)
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
- Fats And Perfumes (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
- Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
Abstract
There is provided an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH as well as at high pH varying from 5 to 11, preferably from 6 to 11, more preferably from 7 to 11, wherein the additive is glyoxal and said pH is of the wash water for crude oil processing systems. There is also provided an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate, wherein crude oil is treated with wash water containing alkaline medium selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof, and wherein pH of the wash water or of the processing mixture in the desalter varies from 5 to 11, preferably from 6 to 11, preferably from 7 to 11, characterized in that the additive is glyoxal and the crude oil or its blend is treated with glyoxal.
Description
Title of the Invention:-Additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate.
Field of the Invention:-The present invention relates to an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or blends thereof containing calcium naphthenate, wherein the additive is effective to remove the calcium not only at low pH but also at high pH of the wash water or the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing systems.
In particular, the present invention relates to an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or blends thereof containing calcium naphthenate, wherein the additive is effective to remove the calcium at low pH as well as at high pH
varying from about 5 to 11 pH, particularly varying from about 5 to about 9 pH, more particularly varying from about 7 to about 9 pH of the wash water or the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing systems.
Background of the Invention:-The DOBA is a high acid crude oil originating from the Chad region of West Africa.
The DOBA is known to contain calcium naphthenate and the amount of calcium naphthenate varies over a range from about 150 to about 700 ppm. In a typically supplied DOBA crude oil, the amount of calcium naphthenate may vary from about 250 ¨
about 300 ppm.
The DOBA is a heavy high acid crude oil with Total Acid Number [TAN] ranging upwards of 4.0 mg KOH/gm of sample and the API gravity is about 19. The sulfur content in DOBA is very low to nil.
The DOBA is typically a crude oil with a lot of residue in it and for proper blending, typically internationally, refiners blend it with very light crude oil or condensates to increase the API of the resulted blend to more than 30. Such blending with light crude oil or condensates helps to create sufficient light ends to help achieve product yields for the crude distillation unit. The most of light crude oil or condensates thus selected generally have very little to nil sulfur contents, which means the overall sulfur content still remains very low.
Further, the hydrogen sulfide (H25) being oil soluble is not present in relatively higher quantities in these types of blends.
The pH of the wash water for desalter is generally adjusted by addition of or due to presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH
or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof. The pH of the wash water (before mixing with crude oil) or of the wash water in the desalter generally varies from 5 to 11 pH, preferably from 5 to 9 pH, more preferably from 6 to 9 pH, even more preferably from 7 to 9 pH.
The inventor of present invention has observed that if solution of calcium naphthenate in an organic solvent, for example toluene having concentration of Ca of about 2247 ppm is treated with equal weight of water by heating to about 130 degree C in a Parr autoclave under autogenous pressure, and separated into organic and aqueous layers in a separating funnel, no black layer is formed at the interface in presence of water. When organic layer, as separated, was dried by evaporating toluene, its acid value was found to be very low of about 48.36 (mg KOH per gm). The low Acid Value indicates that calcium naphthenate does not hydrolyze appreciably merely in presence of water.
The inventor of present invention has further observed that when DOBA or its blend containing calcium naphthenate is treated with additives as known in the art, for example with glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde (aromatic aldehyde) and glutaraldehyde (aliphatic di-aldehyde) it does not hamper removal of metals including calcium from such DOBA crude oil or its blend at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the selected additive in the wash water, but without adjusting it with addition of alkaline medium.
The inventor has, experimentally, found that the efficiency of glycolic acid to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
79.3% at the pH
of about 2.52 of the wash water containing the glycolic acid, which, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further to about 23.7% to 21%, to about 52.3% to 36.5%, to about 56.30% to 51.9% if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 to 9 respectively due to the presence of sodium hydroxide, ammonia and monoethanolamine (MBA) in the wash water or wash water in the desalter.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of malic acid to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
83.6% at the pH
of about 2.3 of the wash water containing the malic acid, which, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further to about 24.3% to 15%, to about 54.2% to 45.7%, to about 73.4% to 61.9% if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 to 9 respectively due to the presence of sodium hydroxide, ammonia and monoethanolamine in the wash water or wash water in the desalter.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of citric acid to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
78.2% at the pH
Field of the Invention:-The present invention relates to an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or blends thereof containing calcium naphthenate, wherein the additive is effective to remove the calcium not only at low pH but also at high pH of the wash water or the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing systems.
In particular, the present invention relates to an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or blends thereof containing calcium naphthenate, wherein the additive is effective to remove the calcium at low pH as well as at high pH
varying from about 5 to 11 pH, particularly varying from about 5 to about 9 pH, more particularly varying from about 7 to about 9 pH of the wash water or the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing systems.
Background of the Invention:-The DOBA is a high acid crude oil originating from the Chad region of West Africa.
The DOBA is known to contain calcium naphthenate and the amount of calcium naphthenate varies over a range from about 150 to about 700 ppm. In a typically supplied DOBA crude oil, the amount of calcium naphthenate may vary from about 250 ¨
about 300 ppm.
The DOBA is a heavy high acid crude oil with Total Acid Number [TAN] ranging upwards of 4.0 mg KOH/gm of sample and the API gravity is about 19. The sulfur content in DOBA is very low to nil.
The DOBA is typically a crude oil with a lot of residue in it and for proper blending, typically internationally, refiners blend it with very light crude oil or condensates to increase the API of the resulted blend to more than 30. Such blending with light crude oil or condensates helps to create sufficient light ends to help achieve product yields for the crude distillation unit. The most of light crude oil or condensates thus selected generally have very little to nil sulfur contents, which means the overall sulfur content still remains very low.
Further, the hydrogen sulfide (H25) being oil soluble is not present in relatively higher quantities in these types of blends.
The pH of the wash water for desalter is generally adjusted by addition of or due to presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH
or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof. The pH of the wash water (before mixing with crude oil) or of the wash water in the desalter generally varies from 5 to 11 pH, preferably from 5 to 9 pH, more preferably from 6 to 9 pH, even more preferably from 7 to 9 pH.
The inventor of present invention has observed that if solution of calcium naphthenate in an organic solvent, for example toluene having concentration of Ca of about 2247 ppm is treated with equal weight of water by heating to about 130 degree C in a Parr autoclave under autogenous pressure, and separated into organic and aqueous layers in a separating funnel, no black layer is formed at the interface in presence of water. When organic layer, as separated, was dried by evaporating toluene, its acid value was found to be very low of about 48.36 (mg KOH per gm). The low Acid Value indicates that calcium naphthenate does not hydrolyze appreciably merely in presence of water.
The inventor of present invention has further observed that when DOBA or its blend containing calcium naphthenate is treated with additives as known in the art, for example with glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde (aromatic aldehyde) and glutaraldehyde (aliphatic di-aldehyde) it does not hamper removal of metals including calcium from such DOBA crude oil or its blend at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the selected additive in the wash water, but without adjusting it with addition of alkaline medium.
The inventor has, experimentally, found that the efficiency of glycolic acid to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
79.3% at the pH
of about 2.52 of the wash water containing the glycolic acid, which, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further to about 23.7% to 21%, to about 52.3% to 36.5%, to about 56.30% to 51.9% if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 to 9 respectively due to the presence of sodium hydroxide, ammonia and monoethanolamine (MBA) in the wash water or wash water in the desalter.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of malic acid to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
83.6% at the pH
of about 2.3 of the wash water containing the malic acid, which, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further to about 24.3% to 15%, to about 54.2% to 45.7%, to about 73.4% to 61.9% if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 to 9 respectively due to the presence of sodium hydroxide, ammonia and monoethanolamine in the wash water or wash water in the desalter.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of citric acid to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
78.2% at the pH
2 of about 2 to 3 of the wash water containing the citric acid, which, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further to about 42.3% to 17%, to about 60.4% to 56.3% if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 to 9 respectively due to the presence of sodium hydroxide and ammonia in the wash water or wash water in the desalter.
Furthermore, the inventor has observed that when malic acid or citric acid is employed, they form precipitates, and hence, their use also suffer from problems of fouling of the equipments.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of maleic anhydride to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
83.5% at the pH of about 2 to 3 of the wash water containing the maleic anhydride, which, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further to about 43.9% to 15%, to about 53.0% to 41.3%, to about 73.3% to 51.4% if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 to 9 respectively due to the presence of sodium hydroxide, ammonia and monoethanolamine in the wash water or wash water in the desalter.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of benzaldehyde to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is very low, i.e. 20.3% at the pH of about 3.4 of the wash water containing the benzaldehyde, which, itself being very low, no further experiments were conducted to see effect of alkaline media generally present in the wash water.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of glutaraldehyde to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is very low, i.e. 35.9% at the pH of about 4.2 of the wash water containing the glutaraldehyde, which, itself being very low, no further experiments were conducted to see effect of alkaline media generally present in the wash water.
Accordingly, the industry processing DOBA or its blends containing calcium naphthenate faces serious problems in removing calcium from such oils or their blends, particularly when pH of wash water for desalter or of the wash water in the desalter varies between about 5 to about 11, particularly varies between about 6 to about 11, more particularly varies between about 7 to about 9,.
Problem to be solved by the Invention:
It is understood from the foregoing description that the prior art additives, which =
may be effective to remove calcium from DOBA crude oil containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of said additive in the wash water, but without
Furthermore, the inventor has observed that when malic acid or citric acid is employed, they form precipitates, and hence, their use also suffer from problems of fouling of the equipments.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of maleic anhydride to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is low, i.e.
83.5% at the pH of about 2 to 3 of the wash water containing the maleic anhydride, which, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further to about 43.9% to 15%, to about 53.0% to 41.3%, to about 73.3% to 51.4% if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 to 9 respectively due to the presence of sodium hydroxide, ammonia and monoethanolamine in the wash water or wash water in the desalter.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of benzaldehyde to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is very low, i.e. 20.3% at the pH of about 3.4 of the wash water containing the benzaldehyde, which, itself being very low, no further experiments were conducted to see effect of alkaline media generally present in the wash water.
The inventor has, experimentally, also found that the efficiency of glutaraldehyde to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate is very low, i.e. 35.9% at the pH of about 4.2 of the wash water containing the glutaraldehyde, which, itself being very low, no further experiments were conducted to see effect of alkaline media generally present in the wash water.
Accordingly, the industry processing DOBA or its blends containing calcium naphthenate faces serious problems in removing calcium from such oils or their blends, particularly when pH of wash water for desalter or of the wash water in the desalter varies between about 5 to about 11, particularly varies between about 6 to about 11, more particularly varies between about 7 to about 9,.
Problem to be solved by the Invention:
It is understood from the foregoing description that the prior art additives, which =
may be effective to remove calcium from DOBA crude oil containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of said additive in the wash water, but without
3 Vddition of alkaline medium, but their efficiency to remove calcium, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially reduces further, if the pH of the wash water or wash water in the desalter is increased to 5 or above 5 due to the presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof.
Therefore, the problem to be solved by present invention is to provide an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or their blends containing calcium naphthenate, which should be effective to remove the calcium from crude oil or its blends not only at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of said additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium, but also at high pH of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, particularly when pH of wash water for desalter or of the wash water in the desalter varies between about 5 to about 11, particularly varies between about 6 to about 11, more particularly varies between about 7 to about 9.
Need of the Invention:
The mechanism of further reduced efficiency of prior art additives - glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde to remove calcium from crude oil containing calcium naphthenate at pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH of about 5 to 11, more particularly at pH of about 6 to 11, even more particularly at pH of about 7 to 9 could not be visualized at present.
However, the problem to remove calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium as well as at high pH of about 5 or more still remains unresolved, particularly for a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9.
Therefore, there is a need to have an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate which is effective in removing the calcium not only at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but also at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, particularly under a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9.
Objects and Advantages of the Invention:-Accordingly, the main object of the present invention is to provide an additive and method of its use which is effective for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends
Therefore, the problem to be solved by present invention is to provide an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or their blends containing calcium naphthenate, which should be effective to remove the calcium from crude oil or its blends not only at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of said additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium, but also at high pH of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, particularly when pH of wash water for desalter or of the wash water in the desalter varies between about 5 to about 11, particularly varies between about 6 to about 11, more particularly varies between about 7 to about 9.
Need of the Invention:
The mechanism of further reduced efficiency of prior art additives - glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde to remove calcium from crude oil containing calcium naphthenate at pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH of about 5 to 11, more particularly at pH of about 6 to 11, even more particularly at pH of about 7 to 9 could not be visualized at present.
However, the problem to remove calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium as well as at high pH of about 5 or more still remains unresolved, particularly for a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9.
Therefore, there is a need to have an additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate which is effective in removing the calcium not only at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but also at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, particularly under a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9.
Objects and Advantages of the Invention:-Accordingly, the main object of the present invention is to provide an additive and method of its use which is effective for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends
4 containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but also at high pH of about or more of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system particularly under a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11,
5 more particularly varies between 7 to 9.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an additive and method of its use which is effective for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but also at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system particularly under a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9, wherein said high pH of 5 or more of wash water of desalter is due to presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH
or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but also at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system particularly under a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9, wherein said high pH
of 5 or more of wash water of desalter is due to presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent when the following description is read in conjunction with following examples, which are not intended to limit the scope of present invention.
Description and Preferred Embodiments of the Invention:-With aim to solve above-described industrial problem of the prior art, the inventor of present invention has found that when glyoxal is employed as an additive in processing of crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate in presence of water, it not only removes the calcium from the crude oil or its blends at low pHõ i.e. at the pH
after addition of glyoxal additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but, surprisingly and unexpectedly, it effectively also removes calcium from the crude oil or its blends at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter or at high pH of about 5 or more of the desalter, and that's too without causing any problem including precipitations, and hence without causing fouling in the processing system.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an additive capable of removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH
of about 3.5 +1- 0.5 as well as at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water or wash water for the desalter used in the. crude oil processing systems, characterized in that the additive is glyoxal.
It may be noted that the "low pH" as referred herein is the pH after addition of glyoxal additive in the wash water and without addition of alkaline medium (i.e. in absence of alkaline medium). It has been observed that when about 0.488 gm of glyoxal is dissolved in about 75 gm of demineralized (DM) water its pH is about 3.5. Accordingly, depending upon concentration of glyoxal in the water (or wash water), its pH may vary from about 3 to about 4.
Therefore, as per present invention, the "low pH" has been referred as pH of about 3.5 +1- 0.5, as it is intended to include the pH of about 3 to about 4, which is the pH. of solution of glyoxal in wash water at various concentrations of glyoxal.
It may also be noted that the "high pH" as referred herein is intended to include the pH which may be arrived at after addition of or due to presence of alkaline medium (or basic solution), selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof. It has been observed that after addition of or due to presence of the alkaline medium (or basic solution) in the wash water, the pH of wash water increases to about 5 or more, and it generally varies between about 5 to about 11, particularly varies between about 6 to about 11, more particularly varies between about 7 to about 9 depending upon amount of the alkaline medium (or concentration of the basic solution) added or present in the wash water.
Therefore, as per present invention, the "high pH" of wash water or wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing systems is intended to include wash water having pH of about 5 or more, particularly wash water having pH varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly wash water having pH varying between about 7 to about 9, wherein said "high pH" of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium (or basic solution), selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an additive capable of removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH
of about 3 to
Another object of the present invention is to provide an additive and method of its use which is effective for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but also at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system particularly under a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9, wherein said high pH of 5 or more of wash water of desalter is due to presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH
or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method for removal of calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH, i.e. at the pH after addition of the additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but also at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system particularly under a situation when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 6 to 11, more particularly varies between 7 to 9, wherein said high pH
of 5 or more of wash water of desalter is due to presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent when the following description is read in conjunction with following examples, which are not intended to limit the scope of present invention.
Description and Preferred Embodiments of the Invention:-With aim to solve above-described industrial problem of the prior art, the inventor of present invention has found that when glyoxal is employed as an additive in processing of crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate in presence of water, it not only removes the calcium from the crude oil or its blends at low pHõ i.e. at the pH
after addition of glyoxal additive in the wash water without addition of alkaline medium but, surprisingly and unexpectedly, it effectively also removes calcium from the crude oil or its blends at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water for the desalter or at high pH of about 5 or more of the desalter, and that's too without causing any problem including precipitations, and hence without causing fouling in the processing system.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an additive capable of removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH
of about 3.5 +1- 0.5 as well as at high pH of about 5 or more of the wash water or wash water for the desalter used in the. crude oil processing systems, characterized in that the additive is glyoxal.
It may be noted that the "low pH" as referred herein is the pH after addition of glyoxal additive in the wash water and without addition of alkaline medium (i.e. in absence of alkaline medium). It has been observed that when about 0.488 gm of glyoxal is dissolved in about 75 gm of demineralized (DM) water its pH is about 3.5. Accordingly, depending upon concentration of glyoxal in the water (or wash water), its pH may vary from about 3 to about 4.
Therefore, as per present invention, the "low pH" has been referred as pH of about 3.5 +1- 0.5, as it is intended to include the pH of about 3 to about 4, which is the pH. of solution of glyoxal in wash water at various concentrations of glyoxal.
It may also be noted that the "high pH" as referred herein is intended to include the pH which may be arrived at after addition of or due to presence of alkaline medium (or basic solution), selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof. It has been observed that after addition of or due to presence of the alkaline medium (or basic solution) in the wash water, the pH of wash water increases to about 5 or more, and it generally varies between about 5 to about 11, particularly varies between about 6 to about 11, more particularly varies between about 7 to about 9 depending upon amount of the alkaline medium (or concentration of the basic solution) added or present in the wash water.
Therefore, as per present invention, the "high pH" of wash water or wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing systems is intended to include wash water having pH of about 5 or more, particularly wash water having pH varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly wash water having pH varying between about 7 to about 9, wherein said "high pH" of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium (or basic solution), selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an additive capable of removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate at low pH
of about 3 to
6 about 4, and also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water used in the crude oil processing systems, characterized in that the additive is glyoxal.
In another embodiment, the present= invention relates to a method for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that the crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with an additive, and the additive is glyoxal.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention relates to use of glyoxal for removal of calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with glyoxal.
In accordance with present invention the said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water for the desalter.
Accordingly, in accordance with present invention, the pH of the wash water for the desalter varies from about 5 to about 11 pH, particularly from about 6 to 11, more particularly from about 7 to about 11 pH.
In accordance with present invention, the additive of present invention is effective particularly when pH of wash water for desalter is above 6, more particularly when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 7 to 9.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an additive capable of removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that the additive is glyoxal, wherein said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, wherein the alkaline medium is selected from the group comprising
In another embodiment, the present= invention relates to a method for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that the crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with an additive, and the additive is glyoxal.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention relates to use of glyoxal for removal of calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with glyoxal.
In accordance with present invention the said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water for the desalter.
Accordingly, in accordance with present invention, the pH of the wash water for the desalter varies from about 5 to about 11 pH, particularly from about 6 to 11, more particularly from about 7 to about 11 pH.
In accordance with present invention, the additive of present invention is effective particularly when pH of wash water for desalter is above 6, more particularly when pH of wash water for desalter varies between 7 to 9.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an additive capable of removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that the additive is glyoxal, wherein said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, wherein the alkaline medium is selected from the group comprising
7 sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water for the desalter.
In another embodiment, the present invention also relates to a method for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that the crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with glyoxal, wherein said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, wherein the alkaline medium is selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH
or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water for the desalter.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention also relates to use of glyoxal for removal of calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with glyoxal, wherein said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, wherein the alkaline medium is selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water for the desalter.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the alkaline medium is preferably used as its aqueous solution.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the glyoxal additive is added in the wash water tank in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration varying from about 1:0.9 to 4:1, preferably about 2:1.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the crude oil and the glyoxal additive are reacted preferably at a temperature of about 80 C to 160 C.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the glyoxal additive is identifiable by cas no. 107-22-2.
In one of the preferred embodiments, the present invention relates to an additive for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate in presence E2561399.DOC;1 8 of alkaline medium or basic solution at high pH of about 5 or above, particularly at pH
varying from about 6 to about 1 1 , more particularly at pH varying from about 7 to about 9, wherein the additive is glyoxal;
the basic solution is preferably selected from the group comprising aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, ammonia, monoethanolamine, or mixture thereof;
said pH of about 5 or above, preferably of about 6 to about 11 is of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system;
the additive is added in the wash water tank in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration varying from about 1:0.9 to 4:1, preferably about 2:1.
In one of the another preferred embodiments, the present invention relates to a method for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate in presence of alkaline medium or basic solution at high pH of about 5 or above, particularly at pH varying from about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying from about 7 to about 9, wherein the crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with an additive;
the additive is glyoxal;
the basic solution is preferably selected from the group comprising aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, ammonia, monoethanolamine, or mixture thereof;
said pH of about 5 or above, preferably of about 6 to about 11 is of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system;
the additive is added in the wash water tank in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration varying from about 1:0.9 to 4:1, preferably about 2:1;
the crude oil and the additive are reacted preferably at a temperature of about 80 to 160 C.
It may be noted that the calcium concentration referred herein is based on concentration of calcium naphthenate present in crude oil to be treated.
In accordance with present invention, the glyoxal additive is used alone and not with an acid.
In accordance with present invention, the wash water is used in the desalter of crude oil processing systems.
In accordance with present invention, the calcium removal from crude oil or blends thereof includes removal of calcium from oil or its blends in oil production units comprising electrostatic separators or precipitators.
E2561399.DOC; 9 Generally, in the crude oil processing plants, the wash water is accumulated in a tank, and its pH is about 5 or above, preferably between about 6 to about 11, more preferably between about 7 to about 9, and such high pH is, generally, due to presence of basic solution, including sodium hydroxide, ammonia, nitrogen compounds, or amines, or mixtures thereof. In accordance with present invention, the present additive is added to this wash water having pH about 5 or above, preferably between 6 to about 11, more preferably between about 7 to about 9 before it enters the desalter. Upon addition of present additive ¨
glyoxal, the pH of wash water goes down preferably by about 1 to 2 pH
depending upon the amount of glyoxal added. It may be noted that in accordance with present invention, the present additive ¨ glyoxal, is added alone and not with an acid to reduce the pH of wash water. The wash water after addition of present additive is allowed to enter the desalter of the plant where present additive (already added in wash water) reacts with calcium naphthenate and causes removal of the calcium therefrom. The pH in desalter is generally between about 6 to 11, preferably between about 6 to about 9. It has been observed that even if pH of desalter is about 7 or above, no additional acid is required to reduce the pH
when present additive is used to remove the calcium from calcium naphthenate in crude oil or mixture thereof, because the present additive has been advantageously found to be substantially effective even if pH of desalter increases to 7 or above including pH of 9 to 11.
No additional acid is also required to reduce the pH of wash water when present additive is used to remove the calcium from calcium naphthenate in crude oil or mixture thereof, because the present additive has been advantageously found to be substantially effective even if pH of mixture in the desalter after addition of wash water increases to 7 or above including pH of 9 to 11. Therefore, the present additive and the method employing it will neither require excess amount of present additive nor the additional acid, and hence, the process for removing calcium from crude oil employing present additive will not be expensive, and hence, is commercially viable.
It may be noted that during the reaction of present additive with calcium naphthenate in the desalter, a care is taken that pH in desalter does not go lower than 5 to avoid acid corrosion.
It may also be noted that the calcium removal from crude oil as referred herein includes removal of calcium from oil or its blends in the oil production units comprising electrostatic separators or precipitators.
Accordingly, it can be concluded that the prior art additives ¨ glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde do not have required efficiency to remove calcium from calcium naphthenate in the crude oil or mixtures thereof, particularly when wash water also contains alkaline medium or basic solution, i.e. has pH of 5 or above, preferably pH varies between 6 to 11, more preferably pH varies between 7 to 9, and/or when pH of desalter is above 6, however, the present additive ¨ glyoxal has been, surprisingly and unexpectedly, found to have substantially high efficiency to remove calcium from calcium naphthenate in the crude oil or mixtures thereof as compared to the prior art additives, particularly when wash water also contains alkaline medium or basic solution, i.e. has pH of 5 or above, preferably pH varies between 6 to 11, more preferably pH varies between 7 to 9, and/or when pH of desalter is above 6 even for shorter period of treatment in the desalter without causing any disadvantages including precipitation or fouling during the processing of crude oils.
It may be noted that pH in the desalter may increase to 7 or above depending upon the concentration of the alkaline medium or basic solution in the wash water.
However, the present additive has been found to be effective even if pH in the desalter is between 5 to 11.
The present invention is now explained with the help of following experimental studies conducted by the inventor, which have been incorporated for explaining its best mode and are not intended to limit its scope.
Examples of the Invention:-In following experimental studies, each additive ¨ glyoxal (additive of present invention), glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde (additives of prior art) was individually charged with calcium naphthenate (Ca-naphthenate) solution in toluene into a stainless steel autoclave and reacted at 130 C.
In accordance with one of the embodiments, the solution of Ca-Napthenate was prepared in toluene followed by addition of selected additive and ultra pure water [demineralized (DM) water] without pH adjustment and with pH adjustment. The individual resulted solutions were heated to 130 C for 10 minutes followed by cooling to room temperature. The individual resulted reacted solution was poured into a separating funnel and shaken. The two separated layers were formed with top layer being the hydro-carbonaceous layer and the bottom layer being the aqueous layer. The top layer was analyzed for calcium (Ca) content using Inductive Coupled Plasma [ICP], and the dried sample from top layer was also analyzed for its Acid Value.
As per preferred method of experimental studies, about 75 grams of Ca-naphthenate in toluene having an amount of Ca of 2247 ppm in the hydrocarbon layer, and about 75 grams of DM water having amount of selected additive as per Tables, wherein amount of selected additive is expressed in its 100% active form. The mixtures were reacted for 10 mins, 20 mins and 30 mins. The pH of the solutions of additives and wash water were adjusted to 5, 6, 7, 8 and/or 9 by addition of alkaline medium selected from sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ammonia and monoethanolamine (MEA).
The Calcium removing efficiency for present additive and prior art additives without adjustment of pH after treatment for 10 mins was found to be:
pH of solution in DM % Efficiency Additive Water for removal of Ca Glyoxal 3.5 99.9 Glycolic Acid 2.5 79.3 Malic Acid 2.3 83.6 Citric Acid 2.4 78.2 Maleic Anhydride 2.5 83.5 Benzaldehyde 3.4 20.3 Glutaraldehyde 4.2 35.9 The above data confirms that present glyoxal additive has better efficiency to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate than the prior art additives.
It is observed that additives benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, being aldehydes have very poor efficiency to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate. On the contrary, present glyoxal additive also being an aldehyde has far better efficiency to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate.
In following Experiment Nos. 1 to 25, the pH of solution of additive in DM
water was adjusted to pH 9, 8, 7, 6, and 5 by using sodium hydroxide, and in Experiment Nos. 26 to 50, the pH of solution of additive in DM water was adjusted to pH 9, 8, 7, 6, and 5 by using ammonia, and in Experiment Nos. 51 to 66, the pH of solution of additive in DM
water was adjusted to pH 9, 7, 6, and 5 by using monoethanolamine (MEA) to simulate with a condition of wash water in crude oil processing plant, and the %Efficiency for removal of calcium has been given for treatment durations of 10 mins, 20 mins and 30 mins.
As %efficiency of present glyoxal additive in removing Ca was more than 99%, further experiments for treatment for 20 and 30 minutes were not performed for without adjustment of pH.
From the following Tables, it can be observed that the Ca content in the top layer is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, much lower for the layer obtained after treatment with additive of present invention as compared to= the top layers obtained after treatment with prior art additives indicating better efficiency of present additive to remove calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate.
The Acid Value of the dried sample obtained from the top layer after treatment with additive of present invention is higher than that of the dried samples obtained from the top layers after treatment with additives of prior art.
These experiments confirm that additive of present invention has much better efficiency to remove Ca from crude oil (or its blends) containing Ca-naphthenate even at low pH just after treatment of 10 mins (see above results for without adjustment of pH), and at high pH after treatment of about 10, 20 and 30 minutes [see following Tables 1 to 5 for sodium hydroxide, Tables 6 to 10 for ammonia and Tables 11 to 14 for monoethanolamine (MBA)], wherein the pH was adjusted to 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
It has been found that glyoxal and other prior art additives, i.e. glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde are effective in removing Ca from Ca-naphthenate (CaNaph) in crude oils at low pH of about 3 +/-1.7, however, the efficiency of glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, very high as compared to prior art additives, i.e. it is 99.9% for glyoxal against 79.3% for glycolic acid, 83.6% for malic acid, 78.20% for citric acid, 83.50% for maleic anhydride, 20.3% for benzaldehyde and 35.9% for glutaraldehyde.
The inventor has further found that the efficiency of all additives drops from their respective efficiency at low pH of about 3.0 +/- 1.7 on increase of pH of wash water to about 11, preferably to about 9, due to presence of basic medium or alkaline medium including NaOH, ammonia or amine in the wash water (Tables 15, 16 and 17).
However, the drop in efficiency of glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially very low as compared to drop in efficiency of prior art additives, i.e.
at pH 9 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.0%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 21.0%, and the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 15.7%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 17.0%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 15.0%.
Similarly, at pH 8 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 86.4%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 21.5%, and the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6%
to 17.2%%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 17.9%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 15.2%.
Similarly, at pH 7 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.7%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 21.7%, the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 15.4%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 18.1%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 17.2%.
Similarly, at pH 6 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 86.4%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 22.5%, the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 15.0%%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 20.8%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 30.8%.
Similarly, at pH 5 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 87.1%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 23.7%, the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 24.3%%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 42.3%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 43.9%.
Similarly, at pH 9 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.0%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 36.5%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 45.7%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 56.3%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 41.3%.
Similarly, at pH 8 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 91.7%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 37.7%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 48.8%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 58.9%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 42.2%.
Similarly, at pH 7 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 96.7%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 37.7%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 48.2%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 59.0%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 43.0%.
Similarly, at pH 6 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 98.8%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 46.8%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 47.9%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 59.2%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 47.9%.
Similarly, at pH 5 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 99.3%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 52.3%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 54.2%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 60.4%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 53.0%.
Similarly, at pH 9 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after .30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 80.0%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 51.9%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 61.9%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 51.4%.
Similarly, at pH 7 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 84.4%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 55.6%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 68.3%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 56.2%.
Similarly, at pH 6 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.6%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 53.7%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 66.2%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 60.5%.
Similarly, at pH 5 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 90.0%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 56.3%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 73.4%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 73.3%.
Therefore, the glyoxal has surprising and unexpected technical effects in removing the Ca from CaNaph in crude oils not only at low pH of about 3.0 +1- 1.7, but also at high pH varying from 5 to 11, preferably varying from 5 to 9, more preferably varying from 6 to 9, even more preferably varying from 7 to 9 in presence of basic medium including NaOH, amine or ammonia, and hence, overcomes the problems of prior art by providing a technical solution in removing Ca from CaNaph in crude oils even in presence of basic medium or alkaline medium or at pH varying from 5 to 11, preferably 'varying from 5 to 9, more preferably varying from 6 to 9, even more preferably varying from 7 to 9.
It may be noted that the %drop in efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium is just about 11.9 to 13.5%, however, the %drop in efficiency of glycolic acid for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 70.11 to 73.52%, the %drop in efficiency of malic acid for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 70.93 to 81.58%, the %drop in efficiency of citric acid for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 73.4 to 78.26% for pH from 6 to 9, and about 45.91% for pH 5, and the %drop in efficiency of maleic anhydride for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 63.11 to 82.04% for pH from 6 to 9, and about 47.43% for pH 5 in presence of sodium hydroxide.
It may also be noted that the %drop in efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium is just about 0.6 to 11.9%, however, the %drop in efficiency of glycolic acid for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 34.05 to 53.97%, the %drop in efficiency of malic acid for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 35.17 to 45.33%, the %drop in efficiency of citric acid for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 22.76 to 28.01%, and the %drop in efficiency of maleic anhydride for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 36.53 to 50.54% in presence of ammonia.
It may also be noted that the %drop in efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium is just about 9.91 to 19.92%, however, the %drop in efficiency of glycolic acid for removal of calcium is high in the range of about 29 to 34.55%, the %drop in efficiency of malic acid for removal of calcium is high in the range of about 12.2 to 25.96%, and the %drop in efficiency of maleic anhydride for removal of calcium is high in the range of about 12.22 to 38.44% in presence of monoethanolamine.
These unexpected findings also confirm that glyoxal has substantially very high performance as compared to prior art additive when wash water comprises sodium hydroxide, and substantially high performance when wash water comprises ammonia, and better performance when wash water comprises monoethanolamine.
Therefore, from these experimental studies, it can be concluded that glyoxal additive of present invention is far better additive than prior art additives, as the calcium removing efficiency of glyoxal, surprisingly and unexpectedly, is substantially very high.
From the above findings, it may be noted that at high pH of 5 or more, the efficiency to remove Ca is reduced for all the additives, however, the reduction in efficiency of present additive - glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, much lower than prior art additives.
These findings confirm that glyoxal is capable of overcoming above-described problems of the prior art.
From all of above Expts., it can be concluded that present additive ¨ glyoxal has substantially improved efficiency as compared to prior art additives -glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde to remove the Ca from calcium naphthenate (CaNaph) in the crude oil or its blends not only at high pH of about 5 and about 6, but also at further high pH of about 7, about 8 and about 9 of the wash water, wherein said pH is due to the presence of NaOH, ammonia, monoethanolamine or mixtures thereof, particularly due to the presence of NaOH and ammonia or mixtures thereto, more particularly due to the presence of NaOH, which, in present experiments were added to wash water till said pH of about 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 was achieved.
It may be noted that the drop in efficiency of present additive - glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially very low at said pH of about 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 as compared to the prior art additives, i.e. glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde which confirms that the present additive is far better than prior art additives even at high pH of the wash water used in crude oil processing systems.
=
Table -1 (pH 9.0 adjusted by NaOH) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins 0 no. additive n.) =
(gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % 'a n.) (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency .6.
.6.
layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal 1 (PM) of Ca (ppm) of Ca , (ppm) of Ca 1 Glyoxal 0.488 123.3 1010 55.0 197.7 292 87.0 199.43 270 88.0 , 2 Glycolic Acid 0.640 42.48 1795 20.1 41.49 1798 20.0 42.0 1775 21.0 3 Malic Acid 0.5645 31.34 1910 15.0 29.82 1900 15.4 30.24 1895 15.7 4 Citric Acid 0.539 32.5 1895 15.6 34.73 1875 16.6 35.66 1865 17.0 Maleic 0.412 32.97 1900 15.4 27.86 1910 15.0 28.25 1910 15.0 =
Anhydride n I.) co Table -2 (pH 8.0 adjusted by NaOH) a, u.) oo Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins H
no. additive Siv (km) , H
u.) Acid Value Ca A Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % I
H
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency iv layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal "
u.) (Pfmn) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca 6 Glyoxal 0.488 193.24 300 86.6 193.6 295 86.9 190.95 305 86.4 , 7 Glycolic Acid 0.64 42.96 1760 21.6 42.65 1755 21.9 42.21 1765 21.5
In another embodiment, the present invention also relates to a method for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that the crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with glyoxal, wherein said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, wherein the alkaline medium is selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH
or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water for the desalter.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention also relates to use of glyoxal for removal of calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate not only at low pH of about 3 to about 4, but also at high pH of about 5 or more, particularly at pH
varying between about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying between about 7 to about 9 of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system, characterized in that crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with glyoxal, wherein said high pH of wash water is due to addition or presence of alkaline medium, wherein the alkaline medium is selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, or mixture thereof in the wash water for the desalter.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the alkaline medium is preferably used as its aqueous solution.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the glyoxal additive is added in the wash water tank in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration varying from about 1:0.9 to 4:1, preferably about 2:1.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the crude oil and the glyoxal additive are reacted preferably at a temperature of about 80 C to 160 C.
In accordance with one of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the glyoxal additive is identifiable by cas no. 107-22-2.
In one of the preferred embodiments, the present invention relates to an additive for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate in presence E2561399.DOC;1 8 of alkaline medium or basic solution at high pH of about 5 or above, particularly at pH
varying from about 6 to about 1 1 , more particularly at pH varying from about 7 to about 9, wherein the additive is glyoxal;
the basic solution is preferably selected from the group comprising aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, ammonia, monoethanolamine, or mixture thereof;
said pH of about 5 or above, preferably of about 6 to about 11 is of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system;
the additive is added in the wash water tank in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration varying from about 1:0.9 to 4:1, preferably about 2:1.
In one of the another preferred embodiments, the present invention relates to a method for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate in presence of alkaline medium or basic solution at high pH of about 5 or above, particularly at pH varying from about 6 to about 11, more particularly at pH varying from about 7 to about 9, wherein the crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate is treated with an additive;
the additive is glyoxal;
the basic solution is preferably selected from the group comprising aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, ammonia, monoethanolamine, or mixture thereof;
said pH of about 5 or above, preferably of about 6 to about 11 is of the wash water for the desalter used in the crude oil processing system;
the additive is added in the wash water tank in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration varying from about 1:0.9 to 4:1, preferably about 2:1;
the crude oil and the additive are reacted preferably at a temperature of about 80 to 160 C.
It may be noted that the calcium concentration referred herein is based on concentration of calcium naphthenate present in crude oil to be treated.
In accordance with present invention, the glyoxal additive is used alone and not with an acid.
In accordance with present invention, the wash water is used in the desalter of crude oil processing systems.
In accordance with present invention, the calcium removal from crude oil or blends thereof includes removal of calcium from oil or its blends in oil production units comprising electrostatic separators or precipitators.
E2561399.DOC; 9 Generally, in the crude oil processing plants, the wash water is accumulated in a tank, and its pH is about 5 or above, preferably between about 6 to about 11, more preferably between about 7 to about 9, and such high pH is, generally, due to presence of basic solution, including sodium hydroxide, ammonia, nitrogen compounds, or amines, or mixtures thereof. In accordance with present invention, the present additive is added to this wash water having pH about 5 or above, preferably between 6 to about 11, more preferably between about 7 to about 9 before it enters the desalter. Upon addition of present additive ¨
glyoxal, the pH of wash water goes down preferably by about 1 to 2 pH
depending upon the amount of glyoxal added. It may be noted that in accordance with present invention, the present additive ¨ glyoxal, is added alone and not with an acid to reduce the pH of wash water. The wash water after addition of present additive is allowed to enter the desalter of the plant where present additive (already added in wash water) reacts with calcium naphthenate and causes removal of the calcium therefrom. The pH in desalter is generally between about 6 to 11, preferably between about 6 to about 9. It has been observed that even if pH of desalter is about 7 or above, no additional acid is required to reduce the pH
when present additive is used to remove the calcium from calcium naphthenate in crude oil or mixture thereof, because the present additive has been advantageously found to be substantially effective even if pH of desalter increases to 7 or above including pH of 9 to 11.
No additional acid is also required to reduce the pH of wash water when present additive is used to remove the calcium from calcium naphthenate in crude oil or mixture thereof, because the present additive has been advantageously found to be substantially effective even if pH of mixture in the desalter after addition of wash water increases to 7 or above including pH of 9 to 11. Therefore, the present additive and the method employing it will neither require excess amount of present additive nor the additional acid, and hence, the process for removing calcium from crude oil employing present additive will not be expensive, and hence, is commercially viable.
It may be noted that during the reaction of present additive with calcium naphthenate in the desalter, a care is taken that pH in desalter does not go lower than 5 to avoid acid corrosion.
It may also be noted that the calcium removal from crude oil as referred herein includes removal of calcium from oil or its blends in the oil production units comprising electrostatic separators or precipitators.
Accordingly, it can be concluded that the prior art additives ¨ glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde do not have required efficiency to remove calcium from calcium naphthenate in the crude oil or mixtures thereof, particularly when wash water also contains alkaline medium or basic solution, i.e. has pH of 5 or above, preferably pH varies between 6 to 11, more preferably pH varies between 7 to 9, and/or when pH of desalter is above 6, however, the present additive ¨ glyoxal has been, surprisingly and unexpectedly, found to have substantially high efficiency to remove calcium from calcium naphthenate in the crude oil or mixtures thereof as compared to the prior art additives, particularly when wash water also contains alkaline medium or basic solution, i.e. has pH of 5 or above, preferably pH varies between 6 to 11, more preferably pH varies between 7 to 9, and/or when pH of desalter is above 6 even for shorter period of treatment in the desalter without causing any disadvantages including precipitation or fouling during the processing of crude oils.
It may be noted that pH in the desalter may increase to 7 or above depending upon the concentration of the alkaline medium or basic solution in the wash water.
However, the present additive has been found to be effective even if pH in the desalter is between 5 to 11.
The present invention is now explained with the help of following experimental studies conducted by the inventor, which have been incorporated for explaining its best mode and are not intended to limit its scope.
Examples of the Invention:-In following experimental studies, each additive ¨ glyoxal (additive of present invention), glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde (additives of prior art) was individually charged with calcium naphthenate (Ca-naphthenate) solution in toluene into a stainless steel autoclave and reacted at 130 C.
In accordance with one of the embodiments, the solution of Ca-Napthenate was prepared in toluene followed by addition of selected additive and ultra pure water [demineralized (DM) water] without pH adjustment and with pH adjustment. The individual resulted solutions were heated to 130 C for 10 minutes followed by cooling to room temperature. The individual resulted reacted solution was poured into a separating funnel and shaken. The two separated layers were formed with top layer being the hydro-carbonaceous layer and the bottom layer being the aqueous layer. The top layer was analyzed for calcium (Ca) content using Inductive Coupled Plasma [ICP], and the dried sample from top layer was also analyzed for its Acid Value.
As per preferred method of experimental studies, about 75 grams of Ca-naphthenate in toluene having an amount of Ca of 2247 ppm in the hydrocarbon layer, and about 75 grams of DM water having amount of selected additive as per Tables, wherein amount of selected additive is expressed in its 100% active form. The mixtures were reacted for 10 mins, 20 mins and 30 mins. The pH of the solutions of additives and wash water were adjusted to 5, 6, 7, 8 and/or 9 by addition of alkaline medium selected from sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ammonia and monoethanolamine (MEA).
The Calcium removing efficiency for present additive and prior art additives without adjustment of pH after treatment for 10 mins was found to be:
pH of solution in DM % Efficiency Additive Water for removal of Ca Glyoxal 3.5 99.9 Glycolic Acid 2.5 79.3 Malic Acid 2.3 83.6 Citric Acid 2.4 78.2 Maleic Anhydride 2.5 83.5 Benzaldehyde 3.4 20.3 Glutaraldehyde 4.2 35.9 The above data confirms that present glyoxal additive has better efficiency to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate than the prior art additives.
It is observed that additives benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, being aldehydes have very poor efficiency to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate. On the contrary, present glyoxal additive also being an aldehyde has far better efficiency to remove calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate.
In following Experiment Nos. 1 to 25, the pH of solution of additive in DM
water was adjusted to pH 9, 8, 7, 6, and 5 by using sodium hydroxide, and in Experiment Nos. 26 to 50, the pH of solution of additive in DM water was adjusted to pH 9, 8, 7, 6, and 5 by using ammonia, and in Experiment Nos. 51 to 66, the pH of solution of additive in DM
water was adjusted to pH 9, 7, 6, and 5 by using monoethanolamine (MEA) to simulate with a condition of wash water in crude oil processing plant, and the %Efficiency for removal of calcium has been given for treatment durations of 10 mins, 20 mins and 30 mins.
As %efficiency of present glyoxal additive in removing Ca was more than 99%, further experiments for treatment for 20 and 30 minutes were not performed for without adjustment of pH.
From the following Tables, it can be observed that the Ca content in the top layer is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, much lower for the layer obtained after treatment with additive of present invention as compared to= the top layers obtained after treatment with prior art additives indicating better efficiency of present additive to remove calcium from crude oils or its blends containing calcium naphthenate.
The Acid Value of the dried sample obtained from the top layer after treatment with additive of present invention is higher than that of the dried samples obtained from the top layers after treatment with additives of prior art.
These experiments confirm that additive of present invention has much better efficiency to remove Ca from crude oil (or its blends) containing Ca-naphthenate even at low pH just after treatment of 10 mins (see above results for without adjustment of pH), and at high pH after treatment of about 10, 20 and 30 minutes [see following Tables 1 to 5 for sodium hydroxide, Tables 6 to 10 for ammonia and Tables 11 to 14 for monoethanolamine (MBA)], wherein the pH was adjusted to 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
It has been found that glyoxal and other prior art additives, i.e. glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde are effective in removing Ca from Ca-naphthenate (CaNaph) in crude oils at low pH of about 3 +/-1.7, however, the efficiency of glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, very high as compared to prior art additives, i.e. it is 99.9% for glyoxal against 79.3% for glycolic acid, 83.6% for malic acid, 78.20% for citric acid, 83.50% for maleic anhydride, 20.3% for benzaldehyde and 35.9% for glutaraldehyde.
The inventor has further found that the efficiency of all additives drops from their respective efficiency at low pH of about 3.0 +/- 1.7 on increase of pH of wash water to about 11, preferably to about 9, due to presence of basic medium or alkaline medium including NaOH, ammonia or amine in the wash water (Tables 15, 16 and 17).
However, the drop in efficiency of glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially very low as compared to drop in efficiency of prior art additives, i.e.
at pH 9 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.0%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 21.0%, and the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 15.7%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 17.0%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 15.0%.
Similarly, at pH 8 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 86.4%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 21.5%, and the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6%
to 17.2%%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 17.9%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 15.2%.
Similarly, at pH 7 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.7%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 21.7%, the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 15.4%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 18.1%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 17.2%.
Similarly, at pH 6 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 86.4%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 22.5%, the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 15.0%%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 20.8%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 30.8%.
Similarly, at pH 5 in presence of NaOH after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 87.1%, however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 23.7%, the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 24.3%%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 42.3%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 43.9%.
Similarly, at pH 9 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.0%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 36.5%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 45.7%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 56.3%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 41.3%.
Similarly, at pH 8 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 91.7%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 37.7%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 48.8%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 58.9%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 42.2%.
Similarly, at pH 7 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 96.7%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 37.7%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 48.2%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 59.0%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 43.0%.
Similarly, at pH 6 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 98.8%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 46.8%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 47.9%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 59.2%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 47.9%.
Similarly, at pH 5 in presence of ammonia after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 99.3%; however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 52.3%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 54.2%, and the efficiency of citric acid drops from 78.20% to 60.4%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5% to 53.0%.
Similarly, at pH 9 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after .30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 80.0%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 51.9%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 61.9%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 51.4%.
Similarly, at pH 7 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 84.4%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 55.6%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 68.3%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 56.2%.
Similarly, at pH 6 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 88.6%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 53.7%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 66.2%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 60.5%.
Similarly, at pH 5 in presence of monoethanolamine (MEA) after 30 mins, the efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium drops from 99.9% to 90.0%;
however, the efficiency of glycolic acid drops from 79.3% to 56.3%; the efficiency of malic acid drops from 83.6% to 73.4%, and the efficiency of maleic anhydride drops from 83.5%
to 73.3%.
Therefore, the glyoxal has surprising and unexpected technical effects in removing the Ca from CaNaph in crude oils not only at low pH of about 3.0 +1- 1.7, but also at high pH varying from 5 to 11, preferably varying from 5 to 9, more preferably varying from 6 to 9, even more preferably varying from 7 to 9 in presence of basic medium including NaOH, amine or ammonia, and hence, overcomes the problems of prior art by providing a technical solution in removing Ca from CaNaph in crude oils even in presence of basic medium or alkaline medium or at pH varying from 5 to 11, preferably 'varying from 5 to 9, more preferably varying from 6 to 9, even more preferably varying from 7 to 9.
It may be noted that the %drop in efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium is just about 11.9 to 13.5%, however, the %drop in efficiency of glycolic acid for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 70.11 to 73.52%, the %drop in efficiency of malic acid for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 70.93 to 81.58%, the %drop in efficiency of citric acid for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 73.4 to 78.26% for pH from 6 to 9, and about 45.91% for pH 5, and the %drop in efficiency of maleic anhydride for removal of calcium is substantially very high of the range of about 63.11 to 82.04% for pH from 6 to 9, and about 47.43% for pH 5 in presence of sodium hydroxide.
It may also be noted that the %drop in efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium is just about 0.6 to 11.9%, however, the %drop in efficiency of glycolic acid for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 34.05 to 53.97%, the %drop in efficiency of malic acid for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 35.17 to 45.33%, the %drop in efficiency of citric acid for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 22.76 to 28.01%, and the %drop in efficiency of maleic anhydride for removal of calcium is very high of the range of about 36.53 to 50.54% in presence of ammonia.
It may also be noted that the %drop in efficiency of glyoxal for removal of calcium is just about 9.91 to 19.92%, however, the %drop in efficiency of glycolic acid for removal of calcium is high in the range of about 29 to 34.55%, the %drop in efficiency of malic acid for removal of calcium is high in the range of about 12.2 to 25.96%, and the %drop in efficiency of maleic anhydride for removal of calcium is high in the range of about 12.22 to 38.44% in presence of monoethanolamine.
These unexpected findings also confirm that glyoxal has substantially very high performance as compared to prior art additive when wash water comprises sodium hydroxide, and substantially high performance when wash water comprises ammonia, and better performance when wash water comprises monoethanolamine.
Therefore, from these experimental studies, it can be concluded that glyoxal additive of present invention is far better additive than prior art additives, as the calcium removing efficiency of glyoxal, surprisingly and unexpectedly, is substantially very high.
From the above findings, it may be noted that at high pH of 5 or more, the efficiency to remove Ca is reduced for all the additives, however, the reduction in efficiency of present additive - glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, much lower than prior art additives.
These findings confirm that glyoxal is capable of overcoming above-described problems of the prior art.
From all of above Expts., it can be concluded that present additive ¨ glyoxal has substantially improved efficiency as compared to prior art additives -glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde to remove the Ca from calcium naphthenate (CaNaph) in the crude oil or its blends not only at high pH of about 5 and about 6, but also at further high pH of about 7, about 8 and about 9 of the wash water, wherein said pH is due to the presence of NaOH, ammonia, monoethanolamine or mixtures thereof, particularly due to the presence of NaOH and ammonia or mixtures thereto, more particularly due to the presence of NaOH, which, in present experiments were added to wash water till said pH of about 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 was achieved.
It may be noted that the drop in efficiency of present additive - glyoxal is, surprisingly and unexpectedly, substantially very low at said pH of about 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 as compared to the prior art additives, i.e. glycolic acid, malic acid, citric acid, maleic anhydride, benzaldehyde and glutaraldehyde which confirms that the present additive is far better than prior art additives even at high pH of the wash water used in crude oil processing systems.
=
Table -1 (pH 9.0 adjusted by NaOH) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins 0 no. additive n.) =
(gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % 'a n.) (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency .6.
.6.
layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal 1 (PM) of Ca (ppm) of Ca , (ppm) of Ca 1 Glyoxal 0.488 123.3 1010 55.0 197.7 292 87.0 199.43 270 88.0 , 2 Glycolic Acid 0.640 42.48 1795 20.1 41.49 1798 20.0 42.0 1775 21.0 3 Malic Acid 0.5645 31.34 1910 15.0 29.82 1900 15.4 30.24 1895 15.7 4 Citric Acid 0.539 32.5 1895 15.6 34.73 1875 16.6 35.66 1865 17.0 Maleic 0.412 32.97 1900 15.4 27.86 1910 15.0 28.25 1910 15.0 =
Anhydride n I.) co Table -2 (pH 8.0 adjusted by NaOH) a, u.) oo Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins H
no. additive Siv (km) , H
u.) Acid Value Ca A Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % I
H
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency iv layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal "
u.) (Pfmn) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca 6 Glyoxal 0.488 193.24 300 86.6 193.6 295 86.9 190.95 305 86.4 , 7 Glycolic Acid 0.64 42.96 1760 21.6 42.65 1755 21.9 42.21 1765 21.5
8 Malic Acid 0.5645 30.33 1880 16.3 _ 30.4 _ 1865 17.0 29.7 1860 17.2
9 Citric Acid 0.539 31.55 1870 16.8 34.76 1850 _ 17.7_ 32.09 1845 17.9 Maleic 0.412 31.71 1860 17.2 27.43 1910 15.0 29.25 1905 15.2 1-d r) Anhydride 1-i _ P.) tµ.)-O-o o .6.
u, Table -3 (pH 7.0 adjusted by NaOH) n.i Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins =
no. additive (gm) . 'a n.i .6.
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca A
oft (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca _ (ppm) of Ca 11 Glyoxal 0.488 191.25 315 86.0 195.36 280 87.5 198.59 255 88.7 12 Glycolic Acid 0.64 30.0 1890 15.9 43.98 1765 21.5 42.87 1760 21.7 13 Malic Acid 0.5645 34.08 1915 14.8 32.93 1905 15.2 32.93 1900 15.4 14 Citric Acid 0.539 34.30 1905 15.2 37.43 1890 15.9 37.78 1840 18.1 15 Maleic 0.412 41.77 1805 19.7 35.37 1900 15.4 34.56 1860 17.2 n Anhydride I.) Table -4 (pH 6.0 adjusted by NaOH) u.) CA
H
I+, Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins I.) no. additive H
CA
(gal) I
H
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca A Acid Value Ca % 1.) (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
u.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (I)Pm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca _ (ppm) of Ca 16 Glyoxal 0.488 188.5 345 84.6 188.4 320 85.6 190.25 305 86.4 -_17 Glycolic Acid 0.64 43.02 1760 21.7 43.25 1750 22.1 43.4 1740 22.5 _ 18 Malic Acid 0.5645 32.31 1900 15.4 29.7 1915 , 14.8 31.07 1910 15.0 19 Citric Acid 0.539 48.12 1810 19.5 54.78 1770 21.2 53.81 1780 20.8 1-d 20 Maleic 0.412 61.9 1575 30.0 61.03 1560 30.5 62.0 1555 30.8 n 1-i Anhydride P.) ).1 O-o o .6.
c,.)'"
Table -5 (pH 5.0 adjusted by NaOH) n.) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins no. additive 'a (gm) n.) .6.
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
ot (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal , (1)Pm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca 21 Glyoxal 0.488 193.9 310 86.2 191.81 300 86.6 191.54 290 87.1 22 Glycolic Acid 0.64 49.07 1685 25.0 49.44 1705 24.1 48.3 1715 23.7 _ 23 Malic Acid 0.5645 59.87 1595 29.0 50.56 1695 24.6 51.0 1700 24.3 24 Citric Acid 0.539 95.03 1280 43.0 93.48 1290 42.6 92.77 1295 42.3 _ 25 Maleic 0.412 98.23 1260 43.9 89.37 1300 42.1 97.15 1260 43.9 n Anhydride I.) a, u.) Table -6 (pH 9.0 adjusted by Ammonia) CA
H
t...) =1 Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins "
= 0 no. additive H
CA
(gin) I
H
I\ ) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % 1 (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
u.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca 26 Glyoxal 0.488 158.75 560 75.1 183.7 330 85.3 187.01 270 88.0 27 Glycolic Acid 0.64 94.36 1481 34.0 96.4 1467 34.7 101.34 1429 _ 36.5 28 Malic Acid 0.5645 101.93 1291 42.5 105.19 1261 46.86 108.76 1219 45.7 29 Citric Acid 0.539 115.0 1080 51.9 _ 123.0 1010 55.0 127.0 980 56.3 1-d n 30 Maleic 0.412 66.0 1691 24.7 84.4 1350 40.0 85.1 1320 41.3 Anhydride P.) O-r.) o 4a c,.)'"
Table -7 (pH 8.0 adjusted by Ammonia) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins n.) no. additive o (gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
.6.
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency cot o layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (PPm) of Ca _ (pM) of Ca (PPm) of Ca 31 Glyoxal 0.488 191.3 215 90.4 195.3 195 91.3 196.8 185 91.7 32 Glycolic Acid 0.64 95.5 1475 34.4 97.3 1445 35.7 100.54 1400 37.7 _ 33 Malic Acid 0.5645 103.7 1332 40.7 107.2 1220 45.7 114.0 1150 48.8 34 Citric Acid 0.539 _ - - - - -- 133.4 930 58.9 35 Maleic 0.412 - - - - -- 96.5 1300 42.2 n Anhydride .
I.) , co Table -8 (pH 7.0 adjusted by Ammonia) a, u.) IN)CA
/..1 Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins H
no. additive "
(gm) _ H
CA
-Acid Value Ca ok Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % 1 H
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOHJgm) in Top Efficiency iv layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal "
u.) (PPm) of Ca , (PPm) of Ca , (PPIn) of Ca _ 36 Glyoxal 0.488 210 113 94.8 211 90 96.0 211.3 75 96.7 _ _ _ 37 Glycolic Acid 0.64 92.7 1510 32.8 94.0 1465 34.8 99.8 1405 37.7 -38 Malic Acid 0.5645 . 104 1330 40.8 111.5 1200 46.6 113.7 1165 48.2 _ 39 Citric Acid 0.539 - , - - _ - -- 133.9 920 59.0 _ .
40 Maleic 0.412 - - - - -- 101.2 1280 43.0 1-d n Anhydride P.) -,-:--, =
=
.6.
= wu"
Table -9 (pH 6.0 adjusted by Ammonia) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins 0 n.) no. additive o (gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
.6.
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency oft layer for removal layer for removal layer for o (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal .
of Ca -41 Glyoxal 0.488 215.2 40 98.2 215.7 35 98.4 218.3 25 98.8 42 Glycolic Acid 0.64 _ 965 1213 46 98 1202 46.5 105.5 1195 46.8 43 Malic Acid 0.5645 _ 109 1255 44.1 111 1205 46.4 113.2 1170 47.9 44 Citric Acid 0.539 - - - -- 135 915 59.2 , 45 Maleic 0.412 - - - -- 110.9 1170 47.9 n Anhydride I.) (20 a, b.) Table -10 (pH 5.0 adjusted by Ammonia) u.) u.) IN) H
Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins I.) no. additive H
u.) (gm) _ _ _ H
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % iv (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
u.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca -.
46 Glyoxal 0.488 218.1 25 98.9 218.5 20 99.1 219 15 99.3 47 Glycolic Acid 0.64105.2 1190 47.0 107.2 1150 48.8 -113.2 1070 52.3 48 Malic Acid 0.5645 - 112 -1240 44.8 115 1120 50.2 121 1030 54.2 1-d 49 Citric Acid 0.539 - - - - -- -136.1 890 60.4 n 1-i 50 Maleic 0.412 - - - - -- 121.3 1055 53.0 P.) . Anhydride )µ.1 o o .6.
, ' Table - 11 (pH 9.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins n.) no. additive (gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
.6.
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency oft layer for removal layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 51 Glyoxal 0.488 107.27 700 68.8 117.27 605 73.0 144.6 450 80.0 52 Glycolic Acid 0.64 77.56 1113 50.5 66.05 1066 52.5 72.61 1081 51.9 53 Malic Acid 0.5645 88.02 950 57.7 72.61 966 57.0 101.53 855 61.9 54 Maleic 0.412 68.6 1091 51.4 70.27 1006 55.2 63.38 1091 51.4 Anhydride n I.) co Table - 12 (pH 7.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) a, u.) it4u.) c...) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins H
no. additive "
(gm) H
CA
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %' H
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency 1.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for "
u.) (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 55 Glyoxal 0.488 174.4 400 82.2 182.22 365 83.8 189.54 350 84.4 56 Glycolic Acid 0.64 97.87 1090 51.5 95.62 1076 52.1 95.41 998 55.6 57 Malic Acid 0.5645 103.11 906 59.7 100.2 770 65.7 100.3 712 68.3 58 Maleic 0.412 88.56 985 56.2 89.66 953 57.6 90.01 985 56.2 1-d n Anhydride P.) tµ.1 -,-:--, . =
=
.6.
wu"
Table - 13 (pH 6.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) n.) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins no. additive --,d5 (gm) n.) .6.
Acid Value .--- Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % .6.
oe (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency yo layer for removal layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 59 Glyoxal 0.488 191.5 315 86.0 195.6 285 87.3 198.3 255 88.6 60 Glycolic Acid 0.64 112.27 956 57.4 91.5 976 56.6 89.6 1050 53.7 _ 61 Malic Acid 0.5645 104.8 792 64.8 100.62 738 67.2 98.9 760 66.2 -62 Maleic 0.412 93.21 953 57.6 99.97 942 58 105.02 888 60.5 n Anhydride ' I.) co a, Table - 14 (pH 5.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) u.) CA
H
t=.) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins I.) 4.
no. additive H
(gm) CA
I
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % H
IV
I
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
.
u.) layer for removal . layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 63 Glyoxal 0.488 196.5 260 88.4 198.3 240 89.3 199.5 225 90.0 [present invention]
1-d 64 Glycolic Acid 0.64 92.4945 57.9 94.97 953 57.6 92.73 982 56.3 n 65 Malic Acid 0.5645 108.33 -605 73.0 106.57 695 69.0 108.97 598 73.4 66 Maleic 0.412 104.81 633 71.8 115.23 684 69.5 124.88 599 73.3 P.) Anhydride tµ.1 =
=
.6.
u, c,) Table 15 % Efficiency for removal of Ca under basic condition due to presence of NaOH, after 30 mins cio Additive at pH 3 +1- 0.7 at pH 9 % drop at pH 8 % drop at pH 7 % drop at pH 6 % drop at pH 5 % drop Glyoxal 99.90 88.0 11.91 86.4 13.51 88.7 11.21 86.4 13.51 87.1 12.81 Glycolic 79.30 21.0 73.52 21.5 72.89 21.7 72.64 22.5 71.63 23.7 70.11 acid Malic acid 83.60 15.7 -81.22 17.2 79.43 15.4 81.58 15.0 82.06 24.3 70.93 Citric Acid 78.20 17.0 78.26 17.9 77.11 18.1 76.85 20.8 73.40 42.3 45.91 Maleic 83.50 15.0 82.04 15.2 81.80 17.2 79.40 30.8 63.11 43.9 47.43 Anhydride UJ
UJ
Table 16 UJ
% Efficiency for removal of Ca under basic condition due to presence of Ammonia, after 30 mins UJ
Additive at pH 3 +1- 0.7 at pH 9 % drop at pH 8 % drop at pH 7 % drop at pH 6 % drop at pH 5 % drop Glyoxal 99.90 88.0 11.91 91.7 8.21 96.7 3.20 98.8 1.10 99.3 0.60 Glycolic acid 79.30 36.5 53.97 37.7 52.46 37.7 52.46 46.8 40.98 523 34.05 Malic acid 83.60 45.7 45.33 48.8 41.63 48.2 42.34 47.9 42.70 54.2 35.17 1-d Citric Acid 78.20 56.3 28.01 58.9 24.68 59.0 24.55 59.2 24.30 60.4 22.76 Maleic 83.50 41.3 50.54 42.2 49.46 43.0 48.50 47.9 42.63 53.0 36.53 P.) Anhydride Table 17 % Efficiency for removal of Ca under basic condition due to presence of Monoethanolamine (MEA), after 30 mins Additive at pH 3 +1- 0.7 at pH 9 % drop at pH 7 % drop at pH 6 %
drop at pH 5 % drop cio Glyoxal 99.90 80.0 19.92 84.40 15.52 88.60 11.31 90.00 9.91 Glycolic acid 79.30 51.9 34.55 55.60 29.89 53.70 32.28 56.30 29.00 Malic acid 83.60 61.9 25.96 68.30 18.30 66.20 20.81 73.40 12.20 Maleic 83.50 51.4 38.44 56.20 32.69 60.50 27.54 73.30 12.22 Anhydride UJ
UJ
ks.) UJ
UJ
t?.)
u, Table -3 (pH 7.0 adjusted by NaOH) n.i Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins =
no. additive (gm) . 'a n.i .6.
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca A
oft (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca _ (ppm) of Ca 11 Glyoxal 0.488 191.25 315 86.0 195.36 280 87.5 198.59 255 88.7 12 Glycolic Acid 0.64 30.0 1890 15.9 43.98 1765 21.5 42.87 1760 21.7 13 Malic Acid 0.5645 34.08 1915 14.8 32.93 1905 15.2 32.93 1900 15.4 14 Citric Acid 0.539 34.30 1905 15.2 37.43 1890 15.9 37.78 1840 18.1 15 Maleic 0.412 41.77 1805 19.7 35.37 1900 15.4 34.56 1860 17.2 n Anhydride I.) Table -4 (pH 6.0 adjusted by NaOH) u.) CA
H
I+, Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins I.) no. additive H
CA
(gal) I
H
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca A Acid Value Ca % 1.) (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
u.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (I)Pm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca _ (ppm) of Ca 16 Glyoxal 0.488 188.5 345 84.6 188.4 320 85.6 190.25 305 86.4 -_17 Glycolic Acid 0.64 43.02 1760 21.7 43.25 1750 22.1 43.4 1740 22.5 _ 18 Malic Acid 0.5645 32.31 1900 15.4 29.7 1915 , 14.8 31.07 1910 15.0 19 Citric Acid 0.539 48.12 1810 19.5 54.78 1770 21.2 53.81 1780 20.8 1-d 20 Maleic 0.412 61.9 1575 30.0 61.03 1560 30.5 62.0 1555 30.8 n 1-i Anhydride P.) ).1 O-o o .6.
c,.)'"
Table -5 (pH 5.0 adjusted by NaOH) n.) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins no. additive 'a (gm) n.) .6.
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
ot (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal , (1)Pm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca 21 Glyoxal 0.488 193.9 310 86.2 191.81 300 86.6 191.54 290 87.1 22 Glycolic Acid 0.64 49.07 1685 25.0 49.44 1705 24.1 48.3 1715 23.7 _ 23 Malic Acid 0.5645 59.87 1595 29.0 50.56 1695 24.6 51.0 1700 24.3 24 Citric Acid 0.539 95.03 1280 43.0 93.48 1290 42.6 92.77 1295 42.3 _ 25 Maleic 0.412 98.23 1260 43.9 89.37 1300 42.1 97.15 1260 43.9 n Anhydride I.) a, u.) Table -6 (pH 9.0 adjusted by Ammonia) CA
H
t...) =1 Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins "
= 0 no. additive H
CA
(gin) I
H
I\ ) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % 1 (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
u.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca 26 Glyoxal 0.488 158.75 560 75.1 183.7 330 85.3 187.01 270 88.0 27 Glycolic Acid 0.64 94.36 1481 34.0 96.4 1467 34.7 101.34 1429 _ 36.5 28 Malic Acid 0.5645 101.93 1291 42.5 105.19 1261 46.86 108.76 1219 45.7 29 Citric Acid 0.539 115.0 1080 51.9 _ 123.0 1010 55.0 127.0 980 56.3 1-d n 30 Maleic 0.412 66.0 1691 24.7 84.4 1350 40.0 85.1 1320 41.3 Anhydride P.) O-r.) o 4a c,.)'"
Table -7 (pH 8.0 adjusted by Ammonia) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins n.) no. additive o (gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
.6.
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency cot o layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal (PPm) of Ca _ (pM) of Ca (PPm) of Ca 31 Glyoxal 0.488 191.3 215 90.4 195.3 195 91.3 196.8 185 91.7 32 Glycolic Acid 0.64 95.5 1475 34.4 97.3 1445 35.7 100.54 1400 37.7 _ 33 Malic Acid 0.5645 103.7 1332 40.7 107.2 1220 45.7 114.0 1150 48.8 34 Citric Acid 0.539 _ - - - - -- 133.4 930 58.9 35 Maleic 0.412 - - - - -- 96.5 1300 42.2 n Anhydride .
I.) , co Table -8 (pH 7.0 adjusted by Ammonia) a, u.) IN)CA
/..1 Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins H
no. additive "
(gm) _ H
CA
-Acid Value Ca ok Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % 1 H
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOHJgm) in Top Efficiency iv layer for removal layer for removal layer for removal "
u.) (PPm) of Ca , (PPm) of Ca , (PPIn) of Ca _ 36 Glyoxal 0.488 210 113 94.8 211 90 96.0 211.3 75 96.7 _ _ _ 37 Glycolic Acid 0.64 92.7 1510 32.8 94.0 1465 34.8 99.8 1405 37.7 -38 Malic Acid 0.5645 . 104 1330 40.8 111.5 1200 46.6 113.7 1165 48.2 _ 39 Citric Acid 0.539 - , - - _ - -- 133.9 920 59.0 _ .
40 Maleic 0.412 - - - - -- 101.2 1280 43.0 1-d n Anhydride P.) -,-:--, =
=
.6.
= wu"
Table -9 (pH 6.0 adjusted by Ammonia) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins 0 n.) no. additive o (gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
.6.
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency oft layer for removal layer for removal layer for o (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal .
of Ca -41 Glyoxal 0.488 215.2 40 98.2 215.7 35 98.4 218.3 25 98.8 42 Glycolic Acid 0.64 _ 965 1213 46 98 1202 46.5 105.5 1195 46.8 43 Malic Acid 0.5645 _ 109 1255 44.1 111 1205 46.4 113.2 1170 47.9 44 Citric Acid 0.539 - - - -- 135 915 59.2 , 45 Maleic 0.412 - - - -- 110.9 1170 47.9 n Anhydride I.) (20 a, b.) Table -10 (pH 5.0 adjusted by Ammonia) u.) u.) IN) H
Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins I.) no. additive H
u.) (gm) _ _ _ H
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % iv (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
u.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca -.
46 Glyoxal 0.488 218.1 25 98.9 218.5 20 99.1 219 15 99.3 47 Glycolic Acid 0.64105.2 1190 47.0 107.2 1150 48.8 -113.2 1070 52.3 48 Malic Acid 0.5645 - 112 -1240 44.8 115 1120 50.2 121 1030 54.2 1-d 49 Citric Acid 0.539 - - - - -- -136.1 890 60.4 n 1-i 50 Maleic 0.412 - - - - -- 121.3 1055 53.0 P.) . Anhydride )µ.1 o o .6.
, ' Table - 11 (pH 9.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins n.) no. additive (gm) Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %
.6.
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency oft layer for removal layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 51 Glyoxal 0.488 107.27 700 68.8 117.27 605 73.0 144.6 450 80.0 52 Glycolic Acid 0.64 77.56 1113 50.5 66.05 1066 52.5 72.61 1081 51.9 53 Malic Acid 0.5645 88.02 950 57.7 72.61 966 57.0 101.53 855 61.9 54 Maleic 0.412 68.6 1091 51.4 70.27 1006 55.2 63.38 1091 51.4 Anhydride n I.) co Table - 12 (pH 7.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) a, u.) it4u.) c...) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins H
no. additive "
(gm) H
CA
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca %' H
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency 1.) layer for removal layer for removal layer for "
u.) (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 55 Glyoxal 0.488 174.4 400 82.2 182.22 365 83.8 189.54 350 84.4 56 Glycolic Acid 0.64 97.87 1090 51.5 95.62 1076 52.1 95.41 998 55.6 57 Malic Acid 0.5645 103.11 906 59.7 100.2 770 65.7 100.3 712 68.3 58 Maleic 0.412 88.56 985 56.2 89.66 953 57.6 90.01 985 56.2 1-d n Anhydride P.) tµ.1 -,-:--, . =
=
.6.
wu"
Table - 13 (pH 6.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) n.) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins no. additive --,d5 (gm) n.) .6.
Acid Value .--- Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % .6.
oe (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency yo layer for removal layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 59 Glyoxal 0.488 191.5 315 86.0 195.6 285 87.3 198.3 255 88.6 60 Glycolic Acid 0.64 112.27 956 57.4 91.5 976 56.6 89.6 1050 53.7 _ 61 Malic Acid 0.5645 104.8 792 64.8 100.62 738 67.2 98.9 760 66.2 -62 Maleic 0.412 93.21 953 57.6 99.97 942 58 105.02 888 60.5 n Anhydride ' I.) co a, Table - 14 (pH 5.0 adjusted by Monoethanolamine - MEA) u.) CA
H
t=.) Expt Additive Wt. of After 10 mins After 20 mins After 30 mins I.) 4.
no. additive H
(gm) CA
I
Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % Acid Value Ca % H
IV
I
(mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency (mgKOH/gm) in Top Efficiency "
.
u.) layer for removal . layer for removal layer for (ppm) of Ca (ppm) of Ca (ppm) removal of Ca 63 Glyoxal 0.488 196.5 260 88.4 198.3 240 89.3 199.5 225 90.0 [present invention]
1-d 64 Glycolic Acid 0.64 92.4945 57.9 94.97 953 57.6 92.73 982 56.3 n 65 Malic Acid 0.5645 108.33 -605 73.0 106.57 695 69.0 108.97 598 73.4 66 Maleic 0.412 104.81 633 71.8 115.23 684 69.5 124.88 599 73.3 P.) Anhydride tµ.1 =
=
.6.
u, c,) Table 15 % Efficiency for removal of Ca under basic condition due to presence of NaOH, after 30 mins cio Additive at pH 3 +1- 0.7 at pH 9 % drop at pH 8 % drop at pH 7 % drop at pH 6 % drop at pH 5 % drop Glyoxal 99.90 88.0 11.91 86.4 13.51 88.7 11.21 86.4 13.51 87.1 12.81 Glycolic 79.30 21.0 73.52 21.5 72.89 21.7 72.64 22.5 71.63 23.7 70.11 acid Malic acid 83.60 15.7 -81.22 17.2 79.43 15.4 81.58 15.0 82.06 24.3 70.93 Citric Acid 78.20 17.0 78.26 17.9 77.11 18.1 76.85 20.8 73.40 42.3 45.91 Maleic 83.50 15.0 82.04 15.2 81.80 17.2 79.40 30.8 63.11 43.9 47.43 Anhydride UJ
UJ
Table 16 UJ
% Efficiency for removal of Ca under basic condition due to presence of Ammonia, after 30 mins UJ
Additive at pH 3 +1- 0.7 at pH 9 % drop at pH 8 % drop at pH 7 % drop at pH 6 % drop at pH 5 % drop Glyoxal 99.90 88.0 11.91 91.7 8.21 96.7 3.20 98.8 1.10 99.3 0.60 Glycolic acid 79.30 36.5 53.97 37.7 52.46 37.7 52.46 46.8 40.98 523 34.05 Malic acid 83.60 45.7 45.33 48.8 41.63 48.2 42.34 47.9 42.70 54.2 35.17 1-d Citric Acid 78.20 56.3 28.01 58.9 24.68 59.0 24.55 59.2 24.30 60.4 22.76 Maleic 83.50 41.3 50.54 42.2 49.46 43.0 48.50 47.9 42.63 53.0 36.53 P.) Anhydride Table 17 % Efficiency for removal of Ca under basic condition due to presence of Monoethanolamine (MEA), after 30 mins Additive at pH 3 +1- 0.7 at pH 9 % drop at pH 7 % drop at pH 6 %
drop at pH 5 % drop cio Glyoxal 99.90 80.0 19.92 84.40 15.52 88.60 11.31 90.00 9.91 Glycolic acid 79.30 51.9 34.55 55.60 29.89 53.70 32.28 56.30 29.00 Malic acid 83.60 61.9 25.96 68.30 18.30 66.20 20.81 73.40 12.20 Maleic 83.50 51.4 38.44 56.20 32.69 60.50 27.54 73.30 12.22 Anhydride UJ
UJ
ks.) UJ
UJ
t?.)
Claims (17)
1. A method for removing calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate, the method comprises contacting the crude oil or its blends containing the calcium naphthenate with wash water for a desalter used in a crude oil processing system and an additive, wherein the wash water has a pH varying from 3 to 11, and wherein the additive consists of glyoxal.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said pH varies between 6 to 11.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said high pH varies between 7 to 9.
4. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said pH of the wash water is due to addition or presence of an alkaline medium in the wash water.
5. A method as claimed in claim 4, wherein said alkaline medium is selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, and mixture thereof.
6. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said glyoxal additive is added in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration varying from 1:0.9 to 4:1.
7. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said glyoxal additive is added in a mole ratio of additive to calcium concentration of 2:1.
8. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said crude oil or blends thereof and the glyoxal additive are reacted at a temperature of 80 C to 160 C.
9. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said glyoxal is used alone and not with an acid.
10. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein said wash water is used in the desalter of the crude oil processing system.
11. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein said calcium removal from the crude oil or blends thereof includes removal of calcium from oil or its blends in oil production units comprising electrostatic separators or precipitators.
12. Use of an additive consisting of glyoxal for removal of calcium from crude oil or its blends containing calcium naphthenate, the use comprises contacting the crude oil or its blends with wash water for a desalter used in a crude oil processing systems, and the additive, wherein the wash water has a pH varying from 3 to 11.
13. Use of the additive as claimed in claim 12, wherein said pH varies between 6 to 11.
14. Use of the additive as claimed in claim 12, wherein said pH varies between 7 to 9.
15. Use of the additive as claimed in any one of claims 12 to 14, wherein said pH of the wash water is due to addition or presence of an alkaline medium in the wash water.
16. Use of the additive as claimed in claim 15, wherein said alkaline medium is selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide (NaOH or caustic), ammonia or amine compound, and mixture thereof.
17. Use of the additive as claimed in any one of claims 12 to 16, wherein said glyoxal is used alone and not with an acid.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IN1885MU2011 | 2011-06-29 | ||
IN1885/MUM/2011 | 2011-06-29 | ||
PCT/IN2012/000453 WO2013024489A1 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2012-06-26 | Additive and method for removal of calcium from oils containing calcium naphthenate |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2840331A1 CA2840331A1 (en) | 2013-02-21 |
CA2840331C true CA2840331C (en) | 2016-04-26 |
Family
ID=47278927
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2840331A Active CA2840331C (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2012-06-26 | Additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate |
Country Status (20)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8840781B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2726577B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5970545B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101866927B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103797090B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2012296145B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112013032511B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2840331C (en) |
CL (1) | CL2013003764A1 (en) |
CO (1) | CO6862141A2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2572944T3 (en) |
HR (1) | HRP20160452T1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX342559B (en) |
MY (1) | MY164372A (en) |
PE (1) | PE20140705A1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL2726577T3 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2561273C1 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI551676B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013024489A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA201400191B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU2012296145B2 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2016-03-31 | Dorf Ketal Chemicals (India) Private Limited | Additive and method for removal of calcium from oils containing calcium naphthenate |
AU2014415242B2 (en) | 2014-12-23 | 2020-10-22 | Equinor Energy As | Process for removing metal naphthenate from crude hydrocarbon mixtures |
MY193752A (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2022-10-27 | Dorf Ketal Chemicals India Private Ltd | Additive composition for demulsification of water-in-oil emulsion, and method of use thereof, and method of demulsification |
KR101742295B1 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2017-06-01 | 한국에너지기술연구원 | Calcium removal method from hydrocarbon fractions using extraction comprising 2-oxopropanal or derivatives thereof |
WO2021011204A1 (en) | 2019-07-17 | 2021-01-21 | Bl Technologies, Inc. | Method of removal and conversion of amines in a refinery desalter |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS6361087A (en) * | 1986-08-28 | 1988-03-17 | シエブロン リサ−チ カンパニ− | Removal of metal from hydrocarbon supply raw material |
US4778589A (en) * | 1986-08-28 | 1988-10-18 | Chevron Research Company | Decalcification of hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks using citric acid and salts thereof |
US4853109A (en) * | 1988-03-07 | 1989-08-01 | Chevron Research Company | Demetalation of hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks using dibasic carboxylic acids and salts thereof |
FR2651500A1 (en) * | 1989-09-05 | 1991-03-08 | Hoechst France | NEW WATER-IN-OIL EMULSIONS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE REMOVAL OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE. |
DE4002132A1 (en) * | 1990-01-25 | 1991-08-01 | Hoechst Ag | METHOD FOR trapping SULFUR HYDROGEN WITH GLYOXAL |
TW230781B (en) * | 1991-05-13 | 1994-09-21 | Lubysu Co | |
JP3447408B2 (en) * | 1994-12-27 | 2003-09-16 | 株式会社ジャパンエナジー | Crude oil desalination method |
US7497943B2 (en) * | 2002-08-30 | 2009-03-03 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Additives to enhance metal and amine removal in refinery desalting processes |
JP2006249419A (en) * | 2005-02-10 | 2006-09-21 | Kokyo Sangyo Kk | Method of regenerating treatment for waste oil, and agent for regeneration |
US20070125685A1 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2007-06-07 | General Electric Company | Method for removing calcium from crude oil |
WO2007086661A1 (en) * | 2006-01-25 | 2007-08-02 | Sk Energy Co., Ltd. | Method of removing the calcium from hydrocarbonaceous oil |
KR101340718B1 (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2013-12-12 | 에스케이에너지 주식회사 | Method of removing the calcium from hydrocarbonaceous oil using maleic acid or its derivatives |
KR20140143419A (en) * | 2006-08-22 | 2014-12-16 | 도르프 케탈 케미칼즈 (인디아) 프라이비트 리미티드 | Method of removal of calcium from hydrocarbon feedstock |
MY160536A (en) * | 2008-01-24 | 2017-03-15 | Dorf Ketal Chemicals (I) Private Ltd | Method of removing metals from hydrocarbon feedstock using esters of carboxylic acids |
MX2011011744A (en) * | 2009-05-05 | 2011-12-08 | Dorf Ketal Chemicals I Pvt Ltd | Method of scavenging hydrogen sulfide from hydrocarbon stream. |
AU2012296145B2 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2016-03-31 | Dorf Ketal Chemicals (India) Private Limited | Additive and method for removal of calcium from oils containing calcium naphthenate |
-
2012
- 2012-06-26 AU AU2012296145A patent/AU2012296145B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2012-06-26 MY MYPI2013004729A patent/MY164372A/en unknown
- 2012-06-26 CA CA2840331A patent/CA2840331C/en active Active
- 2012-06-26 ES ES12795081.4T patent/ES2572944T3/en active Active
- 2012-06-26 MX MX2013015297A patent/MX342559B/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-06-26 EP EP12795081.4A patent/EP2726577B1/en active Active
- 2012-06-26 KR KR1020147001948A patent/KR101866927B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-06-26 US US14/128,231 patent/US8840781B2/en active Active
- 2012-06-26 JP JP2014518070A patent/JP5970545B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2012-06-26 PL PL12795081.4T patent/PL2726577T3/en unknown
- 2012-06-26 CN CN201280031664.3A patent/CN103797090B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2012-06-26 PE PE2013002853A patent/PE20140705A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-06-26 RU RU2014101661/04A patent/RU2561273C1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2012-06-26 WO PCT/IN2012/000453 patent/WO2013024489A1/en active Application Filing
- 2012-06-26 BR BR112013032511-9A patent/BR112013032511B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2012-06-29 TW TW101123624A patent/TWI551676B/en active
-
2013
- 2013-12-27 CL CL2013003764A patent/CL2013003764A1/en unknown
-
2014
- 2014-01-09 ZA ZA2014/00191A patent/ZA201400191B/en unknown
- 2014-01-27 CO CO14015824A patent/CO6862141A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2016
- 2016-04-28 HR HRP20160452TT patent/HRP20160452T1/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CL2013003764A1 (en) | 2014-06-13 |
KR101866927B1 (en) | 2018-06-14 |
RU2014101661A (en) | 2015-08-10 |
JP5970545B2 (en) | 2016-08-17 |
EP2726577B1 (en) | 2016-02-24 |
BR112013032511B1 (en) | 2020-11-03 |
BR112013032511A2 (en) | 2018-06-12 |
HRP20160452T1 (en) | 2016-06-03 |
ZA201400191B (en) | 2015-06-24 |
TWI551676B (en) | 2016-10-01 |
AU2012296145B2 (en) | 2016-03-31 |
CO6862141A2 (en) | 2014-02-10 |
WO2013024489A4 (en) | 2013-05-16 |
PE20140705A1 (en) | 2014-06-29 |
MX2013015297A (en) | 2014-10-24 |
CN103797090B (en) | 2015-09-16 |
US8840781B2 (en) | 2014-09-23 |
TW201311878A (en) | 2013-03-16 |
JP2014518314A (en) | 2014-07-28 |
WO2013024489A1 (en) | 2013-02-21 |
KR20140045508A (en) | 2014-04-16 |
EP2726577A1 (en) | 2014-05-07 |
CA2840331A1 (en) | 2013-02-21 |
MY164372A (en) | 2017-12-15 |
RU2561273C1 (en) | 2015-08-27 |
ES2572944T3 (en) | 2016-06-03 |
WO2013024489A8 (en) | 2014-01-30 |
PL2726577T3 (en) | 2016-09-30 |
US20140183102A1 (en) | 2014-07-03 |
CN103797090A (en) | 2014-05-14 |
MX342559B (en) | 2016-10-05 |
AU2012296145A1 (en) | 2014-01-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2840331C (en) | Additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate | |
RU2552651C2 (en) | Improved method of metals and amines removal from crude oil | |
US9938470B2 (en) | Multi-component scavenging systems | |
CA2712231C (en) | Method of removing metals from hydrocarbon feedstock using esters of carboxylic acids | |
US8778172B2 (en) | Method of scavenging hydrogen sulfide from hydrocarbon stream | |
KR101555479B1 (en) | Additive and method for removal of impurities formed due to sulfur compounds in crude oils containing calcium naphthenate | |
KR20140143419A (en) | Method of removal of calcium from hydrocarbon feedstock | |
TWI482851B (en) | Synergistic acid blend extraction aid and method for its use | |
US11377600B2 (en) | Hydrogen sulfide scavenging additive composition and method of use thereof | |
AU2001249542B2 (en) | Method for reducing the naphthenic acid content of crude oil and its fractions | |
KR101748417B1 (en) | Additive and method for removal of calcium from crude oils containing calcium naphthenate | |
US20100258480A1 (en) | Processes for inhibiting foulding in hydrocarbon processing | |
US20140378718A1 (en) | Method for reducing acids in crude oil | |
WO2013036344A1 (en) | Method of injecting solid organic acids into crude oil | |
US20080272061A1 (en) | Methods and Compositions for Deactivating Organic Acids in Oil | |
KR20160036638A (en) | Method of removal of calcium from hydrocarbon feedstock |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20131223 |