CA2544248A1 - Low level glucosinolate brassica - Google Patents
Low level glucosinolate brassica Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2544248A1 CA2544248A1 CA002544248A CA2544248A CA2544248A1 CA 2544248 A1 CA2544248 A1 CA 2544248A1 CA 002544248 A CA002544248 A CA 002544248A CA 2544248 A CA2544248 A CA 2544248A CA 2544248 A1 CA2544248 A1 CA 2544248A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- glucosinolate
- seed
- glucosinolates
- seeds
- lines
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Landscapes
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
A plant cell line comprising a Brassica napus canola variety which produces seeds having a maximum content of glucosinolates of about 3.4 moles per g seed and in which said glucosinolates content is stabilized for both the generation to which the seed belongs and its parent generation.
Description
PATENT
ATTORNEY DOCKET NO: BB-1048-A
TITLE
LOW LEVEL GLUCOSINOLATE BRASSICA
The present invention relates to 8rassica seeds, meal, plant lines and progeny thereof having a reduced level of glucosinolates.
Canola meal is widely employed as a protein _0 supplement in animal feed. The feeding value of canola meal is reduced due to the anti-nutritive effects of the breakdown products of the glucosinolates, which reduce feed intake and growth in non-ruminant animals.
Glucosinolates in the seed are broken down during the L5 extraction process by the enzyme myrosinase to form isothiocyanates and nitriles. These breakdown products may also inhibit thyroid function, leading to goiter.
The feed value of canola meal can be improved by reducing or eliminating glucosinolates from canola seeds.
Z0 Typical glucosinolate levels in.canola meal and seed are disclosed in the following references: 1) Shahidi et al.
Journal of Food Quality, 11, 421-431 (1989), and 2) Lichter et al., Plant Breeding 100, 209-221 (1988) and 3) Kraling et al., Plant Breeding, 105, 33-39 (1990). The 25 typical range for the glucosinolates content of conventional B.~ napus double low canola varieties in ~mol/g of seed at 40%. oil content and 8.5% moisture is as follows:
ATTORNEY DOCKET NO: BB-1048-A
TITLE
LOW LEVEL GLUCOSINOLATE BRASSICA
The present invention relates to 8rassica seeds, meal, plant lines and progeny thereof having a reduced level of glucosinolates.
Canola meal is widely employed as a protein _0 supplement in animal feed. The feeding value of canola meal is reduced due to the anti-nutritive effects of the breakdown products of the glucosinolates, which reduce feed intake and growth in non-ruminant animals.
Glucosinolates in the seed are broken down during the L5 extraction process by the enzyme myrosinase to form isothiocyanates and nitriles. These breakdown products may also inhibit thyroid function, leading to goiter.
The feed value of canola meal can be improved by reducing or eliminating glucosinolates from canola seeds.
Z0 Typical glucosinolate levels in.canola meal and seed are disclosed in the following references: 1) Shahidi et al.
Journal of Food Quality, 11, 421-431 (1989), and 2) Lichter et al., Plant Breeding 100, 209-221 (1988) and 3) Kraling et al., Plant Breeding, 105, 33-39 (1990). The 25 typical range for the glucosinolates content of conventional B.~ napus double low canola varieties in ~mol/g of seed at 40%. oil content and 8.5% moisture is as follows:
2-hydroxy 3-butenyl glucosinolate 2.40-7.32 30 allyl glucosinolate 0-1.16 2-hydroxy 4-pentenyl glucosinolate 0-0.43 ~ ' 3-butenyl glucosinolate 1.65-3.44 4-hydroxy 3-indolymethyl glucosinolate 2.60-4.40 4-pentenyl glucosinolate 0-1.14 3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate 0-4.18 Total glucosinolates 12.06-18.23 By creating specific mutations in the glucosinolate biosynthetic pathway, mutations at various steps in the pathway may be combined to reduce the total glucosinolate levels in finished varieties. A. B. raps line (BC86-18) with low glucosinolates levels has been identified via selection by Bell et al., Can: J. Animal Sci., 71, 497-506 (1991 ). However, the variability in glucosinolates content of B. napus germplasm is limited. The present invention provides B. napus lines, seeds, and meal having a reduced level of glucosinolates.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, plant cell line comprising a Brassica napus canola variety which produces seeds having a maximum content of glucosinolates of about 3.4,~moles per g seed and in which said glucosinolates content is stabilized for both the generation to which the seed belongs and its parent generation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides seeds, meal and plant lines having a reduced level of glucosinolates generated by creating specific mutations in the glucosinolate biosynthetic pathway. Scheme I depicts the biosynthetic pathway of major aliphatic glucosinolates in erassica.
a _ ~ G
~' C
O
v C
C O N V M V N GJ a v ~b ~c~C ~ y Z
, ~
G
O
a ~ p -~ Gu. _ ~ O
u---a ~ -~
' _ ~' -G
r.~7 .~
_ H
N >, C O i.. v V b _ ' ~ ~ 1 N
v G
O
M
G
_O
v W
' N .a.
U
~.
L M
_(d (d V ~ V
C a ~ d H
~ C7 ~ ~ ~, ~
'~ ~
. ,~ O ~ .--~ W - Z ~ '~
u---, ~ ~
M N b0 N O ~ 'v~
O
V
V j, V
~
W
G
a _ o ' '''N
W
O
r.
O W
M
U
a.
V V
C
d .
O
O
V
c0 r1 C1 O
ry _ ~ L
_ ' .~
O
W - . . - .-a p., V
W '~ ~
' b0 N ~~ a U
C
L
G ~
_ _ Y~
~c ' As used herein, a "line" is a group of plants that display little or no genetic variation between individuals for at least one trait. Such lines may be created by several generations of self-pollination and selection, or vegetative propagation from a single parent using tissue or cell culture techniques. As used herein, the term "variety" refers to a line which is used for commercial production.
As used herein, "mutation" refers to a detectable and heritable genetic change not caused by segregation or genetic recombination. "Mutant" refers to an individual, or lineage of individuals, possessing a genetic mutation.
The term "Mutagenesis" refers to the use of a mutagenic agent to induce random genetic iautations within a population of individuals. The treated population, or a subsequent generation of that population, is then screened for usable traits) that result from the mutations. A "population" is any group of individuals that share a common gene pool. As used herein "MD" is untreated seed. As used herein, "M1" is the seed (and resulting plants) exposed to a mutagenic agent, while "M2" is the progeny (seeds and plants) of self-polinated M1 plants, "M3" is the progeny of self-pollinated MZ
plants, and "M4" is the progeny of self-pollinated M3 i plants "M5" is the progeny of self-pollinated M4 plants.
"M6", "M~", etc. are each the progeny of self-pollinated plants of the previous generation.
The term "progeny" as used herein means the plants and seeds of all subsequent generations resulting from a 7 particular designated generation.
The term "selfed" as used herein means self-pollinated.
"Stability" or "stable" as used herein means that with respect to a given component, the component is' maintained from generation to generation for at least two . generations and preferably at least three generations at substantially the same level, e.g., preferably ~ 15%~, more preferably ~ 10%, most preferably ~ 5%. The method of invention is capable of creating lines with improved glucosinolate compositions stable up to ~ 5% from generation to generation. The above stability may be affected by temperature, location, soil fertility, stress and time of planting. Thus, comparison of glucosinolate profiles should be made from seeds produced under similar growing conditions. Stability may be measured based on knowledge of prior generation.
Intensive breeding has produced Brassica plants whose seed oil contains less than 2% erucic acid. The same varieties have also been bred so that the defatted meal contains less than 30 ~Cmol glucosinolates/gram.
"Canola seed" is referred to herein as the seed of the genus Brassica which shall contain less than 30 moles of total glucosinolates per gram of whole seed at a moisture content of 8.5%; and the oil component of such seed shall contain less than 2% of all fatty acids as erucic acid.
The term "canola meal" is used herein to describe a protein meal derived from seeds of the genus 8rassica containing less than 30 ,moles of total glucosinolates per gram of defatted meal at a moisture content of 8.5%.
i The term"canola oil" is used herein to describe an oil derived from the seed of the genus Erassica, with less than 2% of all fatty acids as erucic acid.
The glucosinolate contents for the present invention are reported as ~,mol/gm seed at 40% oil content and at a moisture content of 8.5%. To compare, the reported values to older references ~cmol/gm of seed can be converted to ~mol/gm of oil free meal, at 8.5%
moisture using the following conversion: (~tmol/gm~
seed)/(1.0-0.4). A comparison of this conversion from ~mol of glucosinolates/gm of seed to ~mol of glucosinolates/gm of defatted meal at 8.5% moisture using field grown IMC 129 seed is presented in Table V in Example 1 hereinafter.
The general experimental scheme for developing lines with stable lowered glucosinolate mutations is shown in Scheme II hereinafter. , -scxEME Ii IMC 129 (Mp) Treatment with N-methyl-N'-nitrosoguanidine Greenhouse grow out Self-pollination Greenhouse grow out Self-pollination ~-.---- Chemical analysis (Total glucosinolates) ~---- Select mutants based on statistical analysis of control population ~--- Grow out select mutants in greenhouse ~---- Self-pollination Chemical analysis (Individual glucosinolates) 5 ~--.- Select mutants based on statistical analysis of control population E--- Confirm altered glucosinolate ~---- Composition .,. , , IMC 129 seeds (MO) were mutagenized with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). IMC 129 is a canola quality commercial Spring variety with high oleic acid grown by InterMountain Canola Inc. in the northwestern United States registered under U.S. Plant Variety Protection Certificate 9100151. The glucosinolate composition of field-grown IMC 129 has remained stable under commercial production. The glucosinolate composition as moles per gram of whole seed at a moisture content of 8.5% and 40% oil content is as follows: 8.77 of total glucosinolates, 3.97 of 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate, 0.38 of allyl glucosinolate, 0.35 of 2-hydroxy-4-pentyl glucosinolate, 1.84 of 3-butenyl glucosinolate, 1.66 of 4-hydroxy-3-indolyl methyl glucosinolate, 0.22 of 4-pentyl glucosinolate, and 0.32 of 3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate.
The disclosed method may be applied to all oilseed Brassica species, and to both Spring and Winter maturing types within each species. Physical mutagens, including but not limited to X-rays, W rays, and other physical treatments which cause chromosome damage, and other chemical mutagens, including but not limited to ethidium bromide, nitrosoguanidine, diepoxybutane etc.
may also be used to induce mutations. The mutagenesis treatment may also be applied to other stages of plant development, including but not limited to cell culture, embryos, microspores and shoot apices. Once the mutation has been identified it can be transferred into other B.
napus varieties by cross pollination. The present invention includes such cross-pollinated species.
The M1 seeds derived from the mutagenesis treatment were planted in the greenhouse and M1 plants were individually self-pollinated. M2 seed was harvested and planted in the greenhouse, and individually self-pollinated to advance to the next generation. M3 seeds were screened for total glucosinolate content using a TruBluGlu meter. This meter is available from Dr. R.J.W.
Truscott at Systrix Pty. Ltd., University of Wollongong, P.O. Box 1144, Wollongong, N.S.W. 25000, Australia. The analytical procedure employed is detailed in Truscott et al. Proceedings of the Eighth International Rapeseed Congress 1991, McGregor, D., Ed., Vol. 5, pp. 1425-1427.
Further details are provided in Example 1 herein after.
M4 seeds were analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography to determine specific alterations in the glucosinolate composition. Those lines which remained stable in glucosinolate content were regarded as stable mutations.
M4 seeds were evaluated for mutations on the basis of a Z-distribution. An extremely stringent 1 in 10,000 rejection rate was employed to establish statistical thresholds to distinguish mutation events from existing variation. Mean and standard deviation values were determined from the non-mutagenized IMC 129 control population. The upper and lower statistical thresholds for each glucosinolate were determined from the mean value of the population ~ the standard deviation, multiplied by the Z-distribution. Based on a population size of 10,000, the confidence interval is 99.99%.
"Stable mutations" as used herein are defined as M3 or more advanced lines which maintain a selected altered glucosinolate profile for a minimum of three generations, and exceeding established statistical thresholds .for a minimum of two generations, as determined by liquid chromatographic analysis of a minimum of 200 mg (approximately 50 seeds) of randomly selected seeds. Alternatively, stability. may be measured in the same way by comparing to subsequent generations.
In subsequent generations, stability is defined as having similar glucosinolate profiles in the seed as that of the ., , prior-. or subsequent generation when grown under substantially similar conditions.
The seeds of several lines having lowered glucosinolate content have been deposited with the American Type Culture Collection and have the following accession numbers.
Line Deposit Date Accession No.
3Q0211 Feb. 25, 1993 75419 3Q1552 Feb. 25, 1993 75420 3Q0811 Feb. 25, 1993 75421 3Q1273 Feb. 25, 1993 75422 Stable mutants having reduced levels of glucosinolates were obtained. Seeds and plant lines producing such seeds, having a maximum glucosinolate content of 3.4 moles per g seed were obtained.
Generally, the total glucosinolate as ~mol/g of seed ranged from 2.01 to 3.41. The maximum content and range for the individual glucosinolates is as follows as mol/g seed at 8.5% moisture and 40% oil content:
. ~ moles/g seed Glucosinolate Ranae Maximum 2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl 0.26-1.50 1.50 2-Hydroxy-4-pentenyl 0.03-0.13 0.13 3-Butenyl 0.15-1.10 w 1.10 4-Hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl 0.67-1.05 1.05 4-Pentenyl 0.01-0.06 0.06 3-Indolylmethyl 0.06-0.15 0.15 Total Glucosinolates 2.01-3.41 3.41 The glucosinolate content of the canola meal derived from the seeds of these stable mutants was calculated as previously described,from the seed , glucosinolate content. The meal has a maximum total glucosinolate content of 5.7 ~ mol/g on an oil free basis at 8.5% moisture. Generally, the total glucosinolate ~ r , ~ - s . . ~ _ - ~
content ranged from 3.4 to 5.7 ;t mol/g. The individual glucosinolate levels are as follows in ~ mol/g of oil free meal at 8.5% moisture.
Glucosinolate umoles,/q meal 2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl 0.43 - 2.50 2-Hydroxy-4-pentenyl 0.05 - 0.22 3-Butenyl 0.25 - 1.83 4-Hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl I 1.12 - 1.75 4-Pentenyl 0.02 - 0.10 3-Indolylmethyl 0.10 - 0.25 Total Glucosinolates 3.35 - 5.68 While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, certain specific embodiments thereof are described in the general methods and examples set forth below. For example the invention may be applied to all Brassica species, including B.
rape, B juncea, and B. hirta, to produce substantially similar results. It should be understood, however, that these examples are not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed but, instead the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention.
This includes the use of somaclonal variation; antisense expression; transposon mutagenesis; physical or chemical mutagenesis of plant parts; anther, microspore or overy culture followed by chromosome doubling; or self- or cross-pollination to transmit the glucosinolate trait, alone in combination with other traits, to develop new Brassica lines.
.,. IMC 129 seeds (MD) were mutagenized,with N-methyl-N~-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). IMC 129 is a canola quality commercial Spring variety with high oleic acid grown by InterMountain Canola Inc. in the northwestern United States. The glucosinolate composition of field-grown IMC 129 is a described above and has remained .
stable under commercial production.
Prior to mutagenesis, 45,000 seeds of IMC129 were i preimbibed in 300 seed lots for two hours on wet filter paper saturated in 0.05 M Sorenson's buffer (pH 6.1).
The preimbibed seeds were placed in 1.0 mM MNNG for three hours. Following mutagenesis, the seeds were rinsed three times in Sorenson's buffer. The Ml seeds were sown in 4 inch pots containing Pro-Mix. Approximately 21% of the mutagenized seed survived. The plants were maintained at 25°C/15°C, 14/10 hour day/night conditions in the greenhouse. At flowering, each plant was individually self-pollinated.
The M2 seed from individual plants were catalogued and stored. Approximately 9,500 individual M2 lines were sown in the greenhouse in 4 inch pots containing Pro-Mix soil.. The plants were maintained at 25°C/15°C, 14/10 hour day/night cycle in the greenhouse. At flowering, 7 the terminal raceme was self-pollinated by bagging. At maturity, selfed Mg seed was individually harvested from each plant and catalogued.
The M3 seed was screened using the TruBluGlu meter available from Dr. R.J.W. Truscott at Systrix Pty, Ltd., University of Wollongong, P.O. Box 1144, Wollongong, N.S.W. 2500, Australia. The details of the method used are as follows:
Two hundred milligrams (200 mg) of whole seeds were placed in a 15 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube.
0 The seeds were crushed with a glass rod manually. Then 1.0 mL of 5o mM glycine-sodium hydroxide buffer, pH 9.0, was added and mixed well by using the glass rod. Thd rod was rinsed with 4.0 mL of glycine-sodium hydroxide~buffer and filled to the 5 mL mark on the tube. The sample was 5 incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Then 1.0 mL of chloroform was added, the tube capped and shaken vigorously. 50 mL of 10%
chlorohexidine/methanol solution was added and mixed well. 1.0 mL of 100 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.0, was added and mixed. Approximately 250 mg of activated carbon was added, shaken vigorously, and centrifuged for 15 min. using a bench-top centrifuge at 2000 rpm. One Clinistix~ (NDC
0193-2844-50, Miles) was immersed into the clean supernatant for 5 sec., excess supernatant shaken off and set aside for exactly 2 mm. The color change was read by a TruBIuGlu meter. Triplicate determinations were made for each sample. The TruBIuGlu meters were calibrated using water and 1 mM glucose solution before reading samples.
Selected M3 lines with less than 3~ mol/g of seed of total glucosinolates were sown in the greenhouse in 4 inch pots containing ProMix soil. The plants were maintained at 25°C/15°C under 14/10 hour day/night conditions in the greenhouse. At flowering, each plant was individually self-15 pollinated. At maturity, the N4 seed was harvested from each plant and catalogued.
Bulk seed of selected M4 lines was analyzed for glucosinolate composition via high pressure liquid chromatography. The method developed by Daun and McGregor (1991 ) was used with modification to analyze the.
2o seeds as follows.
Extraction of glucosinolates: Ground seed (200 mg) was weighed into a test tube. The tube containing ground seed was placed in a water bath at 95°C and left for 15 mm. One mL boiling water was added to the tube and mixed well with the ground seed. After 3 mm. the tube was withdrawn and 25 cooled for 30 mm. One mL of 1 mM benzyl glucosinolate solution was added into the tube as the internal standard and then mixed by vortexing. 100.1 of lead acetate and barium acetate solution were added and then centrifuged at 5000 xg for 20 mm. The supernatant was retained as the glucosinolate extract.
Preparation of desulfoglucosinolates: One mL of glucosinolates extract was transferred to a micro column containing DEAE-Sephadex~ A-25 ion exchange resin. The extract was run into the column and washed with 3 mL of 0.02M pyridine acetate solution. Purified sulfatase solution (0.5 mL) was added into the column. When the enzyme solution had completely entered the column, the flow, was stopped, the column capped, and allowed to stand at room temperature overnight. The desulfoglucosinolates were 1o eluted with 2mL of water into vials for HPLC analysis.
Profile analysis by HPLC: Fifty microliters (501) of the desulfoglucosinolates preparation were injected into a high performance liquid chromatograph (Hewlett-Packard 1050) equipped with a C-18 column (Pierce, 220 x 4. 6 mm). The run was carried out with a solvent gradient program of 1 15 mm. at 100% water, linear gradient over 15 mm. to 75% water and 25%
acetonitrile, held for 5 Thin., linear gradient over 5 mm, to 100% water, held for 5 mm. The flow rate was 1.5 ml/mm. and the column temperature was 30°C. A UV detector was used at 227 nm.
The means and standard deviations were calculated from an external 2o control population of non-mutagenized IMC 129 grown next to the mutagenized lines. Statistical thresholds were established for the glucosinolates using the control populations. The lower thresholds were determined to be 3.6 standard deviations below the IMC 129 control means with a 99.99% confidence interval. The lower thresholds used in the greenhouse selection are listed in Table IV. Selected M3 lines with altered glucosinolate compositions were planted in the greenhouse to advance the next generation.
Table I summarizes the reduced level of glucosinolates for the mutant lines generated.
Significant reductions in the levels of 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate, 3-butenyl glucosinolate, and 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate contributed to the overall low lvels of total glucosinolates.
Fifteen lines with low progoitrin (2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate) of less than 1.5 ~mol/g seed have been produced via mutagenesis (Table II). The range of progoitrin in the mutations is 0.26-0.97 ~mol/gm of seed.
These lines also exceed the lower statistical threshold for 3-butenyl glucosinolate. Five of the low progoitrin selection were also below the lower selection for 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate.
Six additional lines with low 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate of less than 1.05 ~,mol/g seed have been produced via mutagenesis (Table III). The individual mutants range from 0.75-0.84 ~mol/g seed. All of these mutations are below the statistical threshold for low total glucosinolates.
Table I presents the resulting overall glucosinolate compositions for the mutant lines of the present invention. Table II presents the resulting glucosinolate compositions of mutants having low 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate for several indicated lines. Table III presents the glucosinolate compositions of selected mutants with low 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate for the lines indicated. Table IV
illustrates the statistical thresholds employed for selection of the low glucosinolate mutations. Table V
presents glucosinolate values for the control IMC 129.
All values represent moles glucosinolate per gram of seed at 8.5% moisture and 40% oil content or per gram of oil free meal at 8.5% moisture as indicated.
The following abbreviations are used in Tables I
through V for the various glucosinolates:
PROG (Progoitrin) 2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate ALLYL (Sinigrin) Allyl glucosinolate NAPOL (Napoleiferin) 2-Hydroxy-4-pentenyl glucosinolate GLUCO (Gluconapin) 3-Butenyl glucosinolate 4-OH (4-OH 4-Hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl Glucobrassicin) glucosinolate GLUCOBN (Gluco- 4-Pentenyl glucosinolate brassicanapin) GLUCOBB (Gluco- 3-Indolylmethyl glucosinolate brassicin) Table I
Glucosinolate Compositions of All Mutant Lines ~unoles glucosinolate/g seed max. 1.50 - 0.13 1.10 1.05 0.06 0.15 3.41 observed min. 0.26 - 0.03 0.15 0.67 0.01 0.06 2.01 observed Table II
Glucosinolate onQositions Low Progoitrin C of Mutants with pnolesucosinolate/g 9l seed 3015530.26 tr tr 0.15 1.85 0.01 0.15 2.42 3002110.46 tr 0.06 1.10 0.92 0.02 0.09 2.64 3x15520.47 tr 0.05 0.27 1.38 0.01 0.09 2.27 3613140.65 tr 0.05 0.40 1.37 0.02 0.08 2.57 3614790.65 tr 0.08 0.38 1.43 0.02 0.13 2.69 3x05170.72 tr 0.06 0.46 0.67 0.02 0.08 2.01 3013620.79 tr 0.06 0.45 0.88 0.02 0.09 2.29 3008370.81 tr 0.05 0.38 1.33 0.03 0.10 2.69 3010500.85 tr 0.08 0.48 1.01 0.03 0.07 2.52 3612830.88 tr 0.06 0.41 0.92 0.03 0.11 2.40 30A2080.89 tr 0.08 0.54 1.06 0.03 0.09 2.69 3613870.91 tr 0.10 0.55 0.74 0.05 0.09 2.45 3604820.95 tr 0.09 0.32 1.17 0.04 0.12 ~.~
3089300.96 tr 0.03 0.57 1.20 0.03 0.12 2.91 3092890.97 tr 0.09 0.52 1.34 0.03 0.09 3.05 ' Table III
_ 1~ _ Glucosinolate Glucobrassicin Compositions of Selected Mutants with Low ~unoles glucosinolate/g seed LINES PR ALLI'LNAPOLGLUCO 4-ONON GLUC N GLUCOBB TOT
L
301273 1.32 tr 0.090.72 0.75 0.03 0.09 2.99 300811 1.03 tr 0.090.54 0.79 0.03 0.09 2.58 361269 1.50 tr 0.110.86 0.80 0.04 0.09 3.40 341372 1.36 tr 0.100.74 0.80 0.03 0.11 3.14 361367 1,47 tr 0.130.86 0.81 0.06 0.06 3.41 301350 1.32 tr 0.070.56 ,0.84 0.03 0.07 2.89 Table IV
Sta tisticalThresholds for Selecting Low Glucosinolates Mutations Wnoles glucosinolate/g seed LINES PROG ALL'fLNAPOLGLUCO 4-OH GLUCOBN GLUC B TOTAL
Average 2.71 tr 0.221.49 1.3T 0.11 0.40 6.23 Std. DevØ13 tr 0.010.06 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.24 Loner 2.24 tr 0.181.2T 1.05 0.07 0.33 5.37 Threshold Table V
Control: IRC 129 Glucosinolate values 1 Wholes glucosinolate per g seed o~
per g meat Hhole 3.9T 0.38 0.351.84 1.66 0.22 0.32 8.7T
Seed Oil Free 6.43 0.61 0.552.9T 2.69 0.35 0.515 14.14 i Meel
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, plant cell line comprising a Brassica napus canola variety which produces seeds having a maximum content of glucosinolates of about 3.4,~moles per g seed and in which said glucosinolates content is stabilized for both the generation to which the seed belongs and its parent generation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides seeds, meal and plant lines having a reduced level of glucosinolates generated by creating specific mutations in the glucosinolate biosynthetic pathway. Scheme I depicts the biosynthetic pathway of major aliphatic glucosinolates in erassica.
a _ ~ G
~' C
O
v C
C O N V M V N GJ a v ~b ~c~C ~ y Z
, ~
G
O
a ~ p -~ Gu. _ ~ O
u---a ~ -~
' _ ~' -G
r.~7 .~
_ H
N >, C O i.. v V b _ ' ~ ~ 1 N
v G
O
M
G
_O
v W
' N .a.
U
~.
L M
_(d (d V ~ V
C a ~ d H
~ C7 ~ ~ ~, ~
'~ ~
. ,~ O ~ .--~ W - Z ~ '~
u---, ~ ~
M N b0 N O ~ 'v~
O
V
V j, V
~
W
G
a _ o ' '''N
W
O
r.
O W
M
U
a.
V V
C
d .
O
O
V
c0 r1 C1 O
ry _ ~ L
_ ' .~
O
W - . . - .-a p., V
W '~ ~
' b0 N ~~ a U
C
L
G ~
_ _ Y~
~c ' As used herein, a "line" is a group of plants that display little or no genetic variation between individuals for at least one trait. Such lines may be created by several generations of self-pollination and selection, or vegetative propagation from a single parent using tissue or cell culture techniques. As used herein, the term "variety" refers to a line which is used for commercial production.
As used herein, "mutation" refers to a detectable and heritable genetic change not caused by segregation or genetic recombination. "Mutant" refers to an individual, or lineage of individuals, possessing a genetic mutation.
The term "Mutagenesis" refers to the use of a mutagenic agent to induce random genetic iautations within a population of individuals. The treated population, or a subsequent generation of that population, is then screened for usable traits) that result from the mutations. A "population" is any group of individuals that share a common gene pool. As used herein "MD" is untreated seed. As used herein, "M1" is the seed (and resulting plants) exposed to a mutagenic agent, while "M2" is the progeny (seeds and plants) of self-polinated M1 plants, "M3" is the progeny of self-pollinated MZ
plants, and "M4" is the progeny of self-pollinated M3 i plants "M5" is the progeny of self-pollinated M4 plants.
"M6", "M~", etc. are each the progeny of self-pollinated plants of the previous generation.
The term "progeny" as used herein means the plants and seeds of all subsequent generations resulting from a 7 particular designated generation.
The term "selfed" as used herein means self-pollinated.
"Stability" or "stable" as used herein means that with respect to a given component, the component is' maintained from generation to generation for at least two . generations and preferably at least three generations at substantially the same level, e.g., preferably ~ 15%~, more preferably ~ 10%, most preferably ~ 5%. The method of invention is capable of creating lines with improved glucosinolate compositions stable up to ~ 5% from generation to generation. The above stability may be affected by temperature, location, soil fertility, stress and time of planting. Thus, comparison of glucosinolate profiles should be made from seeds produced under similar growing conditions. Stability may be measured based on knowledge of prior generation.
Intensive breeding has produced Brassica plants whose seed oil contains less than 2% erucic acid. The same varieties have also been bred so that the defatted meal contains less than 30 ~Cmol glucosinolates/gram.
"Canola seed" is referred to herein as the seed of the genus Brassica which shall contain less than 30 moles of total glucosinolates per gram of whole seed at a moisture content of 8.5%; and the oil component of such seed shall contain less than 2% of all fatty acids as erucic acid.
The term "canola meal" is used herein to describe a protein meal derived from seeds of the genus 8rassica containing less than 30 ,moles of total glucosinolates per gram of defatted meal at a moisture content of 8.5%.
i The term"canola oil" is used herein to describe an oil derived from the seed of the genus Erassica, with less than 2% of all fatty acids as erucic acid.
The glucosinolate contents for the present invention are reported as ~,mol/gm seed at 40% oil content and at a moisture content of 8.5%. To compare, the reported values to older references ~cmol/gm of seed can be converted to ~mol/gm of oil free meal, at 8.5%
moisture using the following conversion: (~tmol/gm~
seed)/(1.0-0.4). A comparison of this conversion from ~mol of glucosinolates/gm of seed to ~mol of glucosinolates/gm of defatted meal at 8.5% moisture using field grown IMC 129 seed is presented in Table V in Example 1 hereinafter.
The general experimental scheme for developing lines with stable lowered glucosinolate mutations is shown in Scheme II hereinafter. , -scxEME Ii IMC 129 (Mp) Treatment with N-methyl-N'-nitrosoguanidine Greenhouse grow out Self-pollination Greenhouse grow out Self-pollination ~-.---- Chemical analysis (Total glucosinolates) ~---- Select mutants based on statistical analysis of control population ~--- Grow out select mutants in greenhouse ~---- Self-pollination Chemical analysis (Individual glucosinolates) 5 ~--.- Select mutants based on statistical analysis of control population E--- Confirm altered glucosinolate ~---- Composition .,. , , IMC 129 seeds (MO) were mutagenized with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). IMC 129 is a canola quality commercial Spring variety with high oleic acid grown by InterMountain Canola Inc. in the northwestern United States registered under U.S. Plant Variety Protection Certificate 9100151. The glucosinolate composition of field-grown IMC 129 has remained stable under commercial production. The glucosinolate composition as moles per gram of whole seed at a moisture content of 8.5% and 40% oil content is as follows: 8.77 of total glucosinolates, 3.97 of 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate, 0.38 of allyl glucosinolate, 0.35 of 2-hydroxy-4-pentyl glucosinolate, 1.84 of 3-butenyl glucosinolate, 1.66 of 4-hydroxy-3-indolyl methyl glucosinolate, 0.22 of 4-pentyl glucosinolate, and 0.32 of 3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate.
The disclosed method may be applied to all oilseed Brassica species, and to both Spring and Winter maturing types within each species. Physical mutagens, including but not limited to X-rays, W rays, and other physical treatments which cause chromosome damage, and other chemical mutagens, including but not limited to ethidium bromide, nitrosoguanidine, diepoxybutane etc.
may also be used to induce mutations. The mutagenesis treatment may also be applied to other stages of plant development, including but not limited to cell culture, embryos, microspores and shoot apices. Once the mutation has been identified it can be transferred into other B.
napus varieties by cross pollination. The present invention includes such cross-pollinated species.
The M1 seeds derived from the mutagenesis treatment were planted in the greenhouse and M1 plants were individually self-pollinated. M2 seed was harvested and planted in the greenhouse, and individually self-pollinated to advance to the next generation. M3 seeds were screened for total glucosinolate content using a TruBluGlu meter. This meter is available from Dr. R.J.W.
Truscott at Systrix Pty. Ltd., University of Wollongong, P.O. Box 1144, Wollongong, N.S.W. 25000, Australia. The analytical procedure employed is detailed in Truscott et al. Proceedings of the Eighth International Rapeseed Congress 1991, McGregor, D., Ed., Vol. 5, pp. 1425-1427.
Further details are provided in Example 1 herein after.
M4 seeds were analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography to determine specific alterations in the glucosinolate composition. Those lines which remained stable in glucosinolate content were regarded as stable mutations.
M4 seeds were evaluated for mutations on the basis of a Z-distribution. An extremely stringent 1 in 10,000 rejection rate was employed to establish statistical thresholds to distinguish mutation events from existing variation. Mean and standard deviation values were determined from the non-mutagenized IMC 129 control population. The upper and lower statistical thresholds for each glucosinolate were determined from the mean value of the population ~ the standard deviation, multiplied by the Z-distribution. Based on a population size of 10,000, the confidence interval is 99.99%.
"Stable mutations" as used herein are defined as M3 or more advanced lines which maintain a selected altered glucosinolate profile for a minimum of three generations, and exceeding established statistical thresholds .for a minimum of two generations, as determined by liquid chromatographic analysis of a minimum of 200 mg (approximately 50 seeds) of randomly selected seeds. Alternatively, stability. may be measured in the same way by comparing to subsequent generations.
In subsequent generations, stability is defined as having similar glucosinolate profiles in the seed as that of the ., , prior-. or subsequent generation when grown under substantially similar conditions.
The seeds of several lines having lowered glucosinolate content have been deposited with the American Type Culture Collection and have the following accession numbers.
Line Deposit Date Accession No.
3Q0211 Feb. 25, 1993 75419 3Q1552 Feb. 25, 1993 75420 3Q0811 Feb. 25, 1993 75421 3Q1273 Feb. 25, 1993 75422 Stable mutants having reduced levels of glucosinolates were obtained. Seeds and plant lines producing such seeds, having a maximum glucosinolate content of 3.4 moles per g seed were obtained.
Generally, the total glucosinolate as ~mol/g of seed ranged from 2.01 to 3.41. The maximum content and range for the individual glucosinolates is as follows as mol/g seed at 8.5% moisture and 40% oil content:
. ~ moles/g seed Glucosinolate Ranae Maximum 2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl 0.26-1.50 1.50 2-Hydroxy-4-pentenyl 0.03-0.13 0.13 3-Butenyl 0.15-1.10 w 1.10 4-Hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl 0.67-1.05 1.05 4-Pentenyl 0.01-0.06 0.06 3-Indolylmethyl 0.06-0.15 0.15 Total Glucosinolates 2.01-3.41 3.41 The glucosinolate content of the canola meal derived from the seeds of these stable mutants was calculated as previously described,from the seed , glucosinolate content. The meal has a maximum total glucosinolate content of 5.7 ~ mol/g on an oil free basis at 8.5% moisture. Generally, the total glucosinolate ~ r , ~ - s . . ~ _ - ~
content ranged from 3.4 to 5.7 ;t mol/g. The individual glucosinolate levels are as follows in ~ mol/g of oil free meal at 8.5% moisture.
Glucosinolate umoles,/q meal 2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl 0.43 - 2.50 2-Hydroxy-4-pentenyl 0.05 - 0.22 3-Butenyl 0.25 - 1.83 4-Hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl I 1.12 - 1.75 4-Pentenyl 0.02 - 0.10 3-Indolylmethyl 0.10 - 0.25 Total Glucosinolates 3.35 - 5.68 While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, certain specific embodiments thereof are described in the general methods and examples set forth below. For example the invention may be applied to all Brassica species, including B.
rape, B juncea, and B. hirta, to produce substantially similar results. It should be understood, however, that these examples are not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed but, instead the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention.
This includes the use of somaclonal variation; antisense expression; transposon mutagenesis; physical or chemical mutagenesis of plant parts; anther, microspore or overy culture followed by chromosome doubling; or self- or cross-pollination to transmit the glucosinolate trait, alone in combination with other traits, to develop new Brassica lines.
.,. IMC 129 seeds (MD) were mutagenized,with N-methyl-N~-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). IMC 129 is a canola quality commercial Spring variety with high oleic acid grown by InterMountain Canola Inc. in the northwestern United States. The glucosinolate composition of field-grown IMC 129 is a described above and has remained .
stable under commercial production.
Prior to mutagenesis, 45,000 seeds of IMC129 were i preimbibed in 300 seed lots for two hours on wet filter paper saturated in 0.05 M Sorenson's buffer (pH 6.1).
The preimbibed seeds were placed in 1.0 mM MNNG for three hours. Following mutagenesis, the seeds were rinsed three times in Sorenson's buffer. The Ml seeds were sown in 4 inch pots containing Pro-Mix. Approximately 21% of the mutagenized seed survived. The plants were maintained at 25°C/15°C, 14/10 hour day/night conditions in the greenhouse. At flowering, each plant was individually self-pollinated.
The M2 seed from individual plants were catalogued and stored. Approximately 9,500 individual M2 lines were sown in the greenhouse in 4 inch pots containing Pro-Mix soil.. The plants were maintained at 25°C/15°C, 14/10 hour day/night cycle in the greenhouse. At flowering, 7 the terminal raceme was self-pollinated by bagging. At maturity, selfed Mg seed was individually harvested from each plant and catalogued.
The M3 seed was screened using the TruBluGlu meter available from Dr. R.J.W. Truscott at Systrix Pty, Ltd., University of Wollongong, P.O. Box 1144, Wollongong, N.S.W. 2500, Australia. The details of the method used are as follows:
Two hundred milligrams (200 mg) of whole seeds were placed in a 15 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube.
0 The seeds were crushed with a glass rod manually. Then 1.0 mL of 5o mM glycine-sodium hydroxide buffer, pH 9.0, was added and mixed well by using the glass rod. Thd rod was rinsed with 4.0 mL of glycine-sodium hydroxide~buffer and filled to the 5 mL mark on the tube. The sample was 5 incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Then 1.0 mL of chloroform was added, the tube capped and shaken vigorously. 50 mL of 10%
chlorohexidine/methanol solution was added and mixed well. 1.0 mL of 100 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.0, was added and mixed. Approximately 250 mg of activated carbon was added, shaken vigorously, and centrifuged for 15 min. using a bench-top centrifuge at 2000 rpm. One Clinistix~ (NDC
0193-2844-50, Miles) was immersed into the clean supernatant for 5 sec., excess supernatant shaken off and set aside for exactly 2 mm. The color change was read by a TruBIuGlu meter. Triplicate determinations were made for each sample. The TruBIuGlu meters were calibrated using water and 1 mM glucose solution before reading samples.
Selected M3 lines with less than 3~ mol/g of seed of total glucosinolates were sown in the greenhouse in 4 inch pots containing ProMix soil. The plants were maintained at 25°C/15°C under 14/10 hour day/night conditions in the greenhouse. At flowering, each plant was individually self-15 pollinated. At maturity, the N4 seed was harvested from each plant and catalogued.
Bulk seed of selected M4 lines was analyzed for glucosinolate composition via high pressure liquid chromatography. The method developed by Daun and McGregor (1991 ) was used with modification to analyze the.
2o seeds as follows.
Extraction of glucosinolates: Ground seed (200 mg) was weighed into a test tube. The tube containing ground seed was placed in a water bath at 95°C and left for 15 mm. One mL boiling water was added to the tube and mixed well with the ground seed. After 3 mm. the tube was withdrawn and 25 cooled for 30 mm. One mL of 1 mM benzyl glucosinolate solution was added into the tube as the internal standard and then mixed by vortexing. 100.1 of lead acetate and barium acetate solution were added and then centrifuged at 5000 xg for 20 mm. The supernatant was retained as the glucosinolate extract.
Preparation of desulfoglucosinolates: One mL of glucosinolates extract was transferred to a micro column containing DEAE-Sephadex~ A-25 ion exchange resin. The extract was run into the column and washed with 3 mL of 0.02M pyridine acetate solution. Purified sulfatase solution (0.5 mL) was added into the column. When the enzyme solution had completely entered the column, the flow, was stopped, the column capped, and allowed to stand at room temperature overnight. The desulfoglucosinolates were 1o eluted with 2mL of water into vials for HPLC analysis.
Profile analysis by HPLC: Fifty microliters (501) of the desulfoglucosinolates preparation were injected into a high performance liquid chromatograph (Hewlett-Packard 1050) equipped with a C-18 column (Pierce, 220 x 4. 6 mm). The run was carried out with a solvent gradient program of 1 15 mm. at 100% water, linear gradient over 15 mm. to 75% water and 25%
acetonitrile, held for 5 Thin., linear gradient over 5 mm, to 100% water, held for 5 mm. The flow rate was 1.5 ml/mm. and the column temperature was 30°C. A UV detector was used at 227 nm.
The means and standard deviations were calculated from an external 2o control population of non-mutagenized IMC 129 grown next to the mutagenized lines. Statistical thresholds were established for the glucosinolates using the control populations. The lower thresholds were determined to be 3.6 standard deviations below the IMC 129 control means with a 99.99% confidence interval. The lower thresholds used in the greenhouse selection are listed in Table IV. Selected M3 lines with altered glucosinolate compositions were planted in the greenhouse to advance the next generation.
Table I summarizes the reduced level of glucosinolates for the mutant lines generated.
Significant reductions in the levels of 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate, 3-butenyl glucosinolate, and 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate contributed to the overall low lvels of total glucosinolates.
Fifteen lines with low progoitrin (2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate) of less than 1.5 ~mol/g seed have been produced via mutagenesis (Table II). The range of progoitrin in the mutations is 0.26-0.97 ~mol/gm of seed.
These lines also exceed the lower statistical threshold for 3-butenyl glucosinolate. Five of the low progoitrin selection were also below the lower selection for 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate.
Six additional lines with low 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate of less than 1.05 ~,mol/g seed have been produced via mutagenesis (Table III). The individual mutants range from 0.75-0.84 ~mol/g seed. All of these mutations are below the statistical threshold for low total glucosinolates.
Table I presents the resulting overall glucosinolate compositions for the mutant lines of the present invention. Table II presents the resulting glucosinolate compositions of mutants having low 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate for several indicated lines. Table III presents the glucosinolate compositions of selected mutants with low 4-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl glucosinolate for the lines indicated. Table IV
illustrates the statistical thresholds employed for selection of the low glucosinolate mutations. Table V
presents glucosinolate values for the control IMC 129.
All values represent moles glucosinolate per gram of seed at 8.5% moisture and 40% oil content or per gram of oil free meal at 8.5% moisture as indicated.
The following abbreviations are used in Tables I
through V for the various glucosinolates:
PROG (Progoitrin) 2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl glucosinolate ALLYL (Sinigrin) Allyl glucosinolate NAPOL (Napoleiferin) 2-Hydroxy-4-pentenyl glucosinolate GLUCO (Gluconapin) 3-Butenyl glucosinolate 4-OH (4-OH 4-Hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl Glucobrassicin) glucosinolate GLUCOBN (Gluco- 4-Pentenyl glucosinolate brassicanapin) GLUCOBB (Gluco- 3-Indolylmethyl glucosinolate brassicin) Table I
Glucosinolate Compositions of All Mutant Lines ~unoles glucosinolate/g seed max. 1.50 - 0.13 1.10 1.05 0.06 0.15 3.41 observed min. 0.26 - 0.03 0.15 0.67 0.01 0.06 2.01 observed Table II
Glucosinolate onQositions Low Progoitrin C of Mutants with pnolesucosinolate/g 9l seed 3015530.26 tr tr 0.15 1.85 0.01 0.15 2.42 3002110.46 tr 0.06 1.10 0.92 0.02 0.09 2.64 3x15520.47 tr 0.05 0.27 1.38 0.01 0.09 2.27 3613140.65 tr 0.05 0.40 1.37 0.02 0.08 2.57 3614790.65 tr 0.08 0.38 1.43 0.02 0.13 2.69 3x05170.72 tr 0.06 0.46 0.67 0.02 0.08 2.01 3013620.79 tr 0.06 0.45 0.88 0.02 0.09 2.29 3008370.81 tr 0.05 0.38 1.33 0.03 0.10 2.69 3010500.85 tr 0.08 0.48 1.01 0.03 0.07 2.52 3612830.88 tr 0.06 0.41 0.92 0.03 0.11 2.40 30A2080.89 tr 0.08 0.54 1.06 0.03 0.09 2.69 3613870.91 tr 0.10 0.55 0.74 0.05 0.09 2.45 3604820.95 tr 0.09 0.32 1.17 0.04 0.12 ~.~
3089300.96 tr 0.03 0.57 1.20 0.03 0.12 2.91 3092890.97 tr 0.09 0.52 1.34 0.03 0.09 3.05 ' Table III
_ 1~ _ Glucosinolate Glucobrassicin Compositions of Selected Mutants with Low ~unoles glucosinolate/g seed LINES PR ALLI'LNAPOLGLUCO 4-ONON GLUC N GLUCOBB TOT
L
301273 1.32 tr 0.090.72 0.75 0.03 0.09 2.99 300811 1.03 tr 0.090.54 0.79 0.03 0.09 2.58 361269 1.50 tr 0.110.86 0.80 0.04 0.09 3.40 341372 1.36 tr 0.100.74 0.80 0.03 0.11 3.14 361367 1,47 tr 0.130.86 0.81 0.06 0.06 3.41 301350 1.32 tr 0.070.56 ,0.84 0.03 0.07 2.89 Table IV
Sta tisticalThresholds for Selecting Low Glucosinolates Mutations Wnoles glucosinolate/g seed LINES PROG ALL'fLNAPOLGLUCO 4-OH GLUCOBN GLUC B TOTAL
Average 2.71 tr 0.221.49 1.3T 0.11 0.40 6.23 Std. DevØ13 tr 0.010.06 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.24 Loner 2.24 tr 0.181.2T 1.05 0.07 0.33 5.37 Threshold Table V
Control: IRC 129 Glucosinolate values 1 Wholes glucosinolate per g seed o~
per g meat Hhole 3.9T 0.38 0.351.84 1.66 0.22 0.32 8.7T
Seed Oil Free 6.43 0.61 0.552.9T 2.69 0.35 0.515 14.14 i Meel
Claims (2)
1. A plant cell line comprising a Brassica napus canola variety which produces seeds having a maximum content of glucosinolates of about 3.4 µmoles per g seed and in which said glucosinolates content is stabilized for both the generation to which the seed belongs and its parent generation.
2. A plant cell line of the line of claim 1.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US2323893A | 1993-02-25 | 1993-02-25 | |
US08/023,238 | 1993-02-25 | ||
CA002157019A CA2157019C (en) | 1993-02-25 | 1994-02-22 | Low level glucosinolate brassica |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002157019A Division CA2157019C (en) | 1993-02-25 | 1994-02-22 | Low level glucosinolate brassica |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2544248A1 true CA2544248A1 (en) | 1994-09-15 |
Family
ID=36637836
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002544248A Abandoned CA2544248A1 (en) | 1993-02-25 | 1994-02-22 | Low level glucosinolate brassica |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2544248A1 (en) |
-
1994
- 1994-02-22 CA CA002544248A patent/CA2544248A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5866762A (en) | Low level glucosinolate brassica | |
CA2056988C (en) | Production of improved rapeseed exhibiting a reduced saturated fatty acid content | |
US5861187A (en) | Oil from canola seed with altered fatty acid profiles and a method of producing oil | |
CA2340958C (en) | Seeds, plants and oils with altered fatty acid profiles | |
Fernández-Martínez et al. | Sunflower mutant containing high levels of palmitic acid in high oleic background | |
JP2001523974A (en) | Preparation of improved rapeseed with yellow seed coat | |
Omar et al. | In vitro action of ethylmethanesulphonate on banana shoot tips | |
Rekha et al. | Induction and assessment of morpho-biochemical mutants in Artemisia pallens Bess. | |
Sangiacomo et al. | Introgression of wild species into the cultivated strawberry using synthetic octoploids | |
CA2157019C (en) | Low level glucosinolate brassica | |
CA2544248A1 (en) | Low level glucosinolate brassica | |
US20050172360A1 (en) | Corn products and methods for their production | |
Singh et al. | A review on efforts of induced mutagenesis for qualitative and quantitative improvement of oilseed brassicas | |
Kulkarni | Phenotypic recurrent selection for oil content in East Indian lemongrass | |
M’Ribu et al. | Fertility of doubled monoploids of Solanum phureja | |
Falzari et al. | Reducing fennel stand density increases pollen production, improving potential for pollination and subsequent oil yield | |
Naaz et al. | Physio-morphological Variations induced by methyl methane Sulphonate in Trigonella foenum-graecum L | |
CA3230107A1 (en) | Method for enhancing oil characteristics in brassica oilseeds | |
EP0648409A2 (en) | Safflower products and methods for their production | |
Repcak et al. | THE STABILITY OF A HIGH CONTENT OF<->-a-BISABOLOL IN CAMOMILE | |
EP1465475B1 (en) | Orobanche resistant sunflowers | |
Moh | Application of nuclear energy to agriculture. Triennial report, July 1, 1972--June 30, 1975 | |
JPH0449397B2 (en) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |