CA2538977C - Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system - Google Patents
Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2538977C CA2538977C CA2538977A CA2538977A CA2538977C CA 2538977 C CA2538977 C CA 2538977C CA 2538977 A CA2538977 A CA 2538977A CA 2538977 A CA2538977 A CA 2538977A CA 2538977 C CA2538977 C CA 2538977C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- quasi
- fabric
- conductive
- coating
- conductive fibers
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Woven Fabrics (AREA)
- Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
- Chemical Or Physical Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides for an antistatic flexible fabric material (10) formed from woven, axially oriented crystalline polypropylene yarn (11,12) having a coating of flexible thermoplastic polymer or blend (22) on one or both sides. The fabric may also contain a layer of cellulose material (24) laminated to the uncoated side. Antistatic properties are imparted to the fabric by including a polyol ester of a C10 to C28 fatty acid in the coating and optionally in the polypropylene yarn (11, 12). The present invention also provides for a quasi-conductive woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers which reduce the potential for incendiary discharge. The woven fabric section (10) may further include an antistatic coating. The coating may be applied to an entire surface of the woven fabric section or it may coat about one-half of the section.
Description
ANTI-INCENDIARY FLEXIBLE
INTERMEDIATE BULK CONTAINER SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed at decreasing the potential for incendiary discharges caused by electrostatic charges that can accumulate on flexible containers. More particularly the present invention is directed toward decreasing the potential for incendiary discharges caused by electrostatic charges in flexible containers such as flexible intermediate bulk containers (FIBCs).
Containers formed of flexible fabric are being used in commerce more and more widely to carry free-flowable materials in bulk quantities. Flexible intermediate bulk containers have been utilized for a number of years to transport and deliver finely divided solids such as cement, fertilizers, salt, sugar, and barite, among others. Such bulk containers can in fact be utilized for transporting almost any type of free-flowable finely divided solid. The fabric from which they are generally constructed is a weave of a polyolefin, e.g., polypropylene, which may optionally receive a coating of a similar polyolefin on one or both sides of the fabric. If such a coating is applied, the fabric will be non-porous, while fabric without such coating will be porous. The usual configuration of such flexible bulk containers involves a rectilinear or cylindrical body having a wall, base, cover, and a closable spout secured to extend from the base or the top or both.
INTERMEDIATE BULK CONTAINER SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed at decreasing the potential for incendiary discharges caused by electrostatic charges that can accumulate on flexible containers. More particularly the present invention is directed toward decreasing the potential for incendiary discharges caused by electrostatic charges in flexible containers such as flexible intermediate bulk containers (FIBCs).
Containers formed of flexible fabric are being used in commerce more and more widely to carry free-flowable materials in bulk quantities. Flexible intermediate bulk containers have been utilized for a number of years to transport and deliver finely divided solids such as cement, fertilizers, salt, sugar, and barite, among others. Such bulk containers can in fact be utilized for transporting almost any type of free-flowable finely divided solid. The fabric from which they are generally constructed is a weave of a polyolefin, e.g., polypropylene, which may optionally receive a coating of a similar polyolefin on one or both sides of the fabric. If such a coating is applied, the fabric will be non-porous, while fabric without such coating will be porous. The usual configuration of such flexible bulk containers involves a rectilinear or cylindrical body having a wall, base, cover, and a closable spout secured to extend from the base or the top or both.
2 Such containers are handled by placing the forks of forklift hoist through loops attached to the container. The weight of such bulk container when loaded is usually between 500 pounds and 4,000 pounds, depending upon the density of the material being transported.
Crystalline (isotactic) polypropylene is a particularly useful material from which to fabricate monofilament, multifilament or flat tape yarns for use in the construction of such woven fabrics. In weaving fabrics of polypropylene, it is the practice to orient the yarns monoaxially, which may be of rectangular or circular cross-section. This is usually accomplished by hot-drawing, so as to irreversible stretch the yarns and thereby orient their molecular structure.
Fabrics of this construction are exceptionally strong and stable as well as being light-weight.
Examples of textile fabrics of the type described above and flexible bulk containers made using such fabrics are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,470,928, 4,207,937, 4,362,199, and 4,643,119.
It has been found that the shifting of specific materials within containers made of woven fabrics, as well as particle separation between the materials and such containers during loading and unloading of the container cause triboelectrification and create an accumulation of static 25) electricity on the container walls. The accumulation of static electricity is greater at lower relative humidity and increases as the relative humidity drops. Also, highly charged material entering such
Crystalline (isotactic) polypropylene is a particularly useful material from which to fabricate monofilament, multifilament or flat tape yarns for use in the construction of such woven fabrics. In weaving fabrics of polypropylene, it is the practice to orient the yarns monoaxially, which may be of rectangular or circular cross-section. This is usually accomplished by hot-drawing, so as to irreversible stretch the yarns and thereby orient their molecular structure.
Fabrics of this construction are exceptionally strong and stable as well as being light-weight.
Examples of textile fabrics of the type described above and flexible bulk containers made using such fabrics are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,470,928, 4,207,937, 4,362,199, and 4,643,119.
It has been found that the shifting of specific materials within containers made of woven fabrics, as well as particle separation between the materials and such containers during loading and unloading of the container cause triboelectrification and create an accumulation of static 25) electricity on the container walls. The accumulation of static electricity is greater at lower relative humidity and increases as the relative humidity drops. Also, highly charged material entering such
3 containers can create an accumulation of static electricity on the container walls. Electrostatic discharges from a charged container can be incendiary, i.e. cause combustion in dusty atmospheres or in flammable vapor atmospheres.
Moreover, discharges can be quite uncomfortable to workers handling such containers.
One proposed technique for dissipating electrostatic charges that might otherwise build up during the handling of bulk containers is to provide a fabric wherein conductive yarns are interwoven with the other yarns used in the weaving of the fabric. The conductive yarns are interconnected and one or more connection points are provided for an external ground source. For example, Canadian Patent 1,143,673 and U.S. Patent No. 4,431,310 disclose a fabric construction based on polyolefin yarn having conductive fibers in the yarns. Alternatively, the fabric may be coated with a layer of plastic film having an outer metalized surface. See United States Patent No. 4,833,088 for an example of such a fabric.
One of the disadvantages of these types of construction is that the container made therefrom, if not grounded, may generate a spark discharge capable of igniting flammable vapors or dust clouds and therefore must be grounded during the fill and emptying operations to provide a path for 25) electrical discharge.
Another conventional approach to decreasing the potential for incendiary discharges in flexible containers has been directed toward decreasing the surface
Moreover, discharges can be quite uncomfortable to workers handling such containers.
One proposed technique for dissipating electrostatic charges that might otherwise build up during the handling of bulk containers is to provide a fabric wherein conductive yarns are interwoven with the other yarns used in the weaving of the fabric. The conductive yarns are interconnected and one or more connection points are provided for an external ground source. For example, Canadian Patent 1,143,673 and U.S. Patent No. 4,431,310 disclose a fabric construction based on polyolefin yarn having conductive fibers in the yarns. Alternatively, the fabric may be coated with a layer of plastic film having an outer metalized surface. See United States Patent No. 4,833,088 for an example of such a fabric.
One of the disadvantages of these types of construction is that the container made therefrom, if not grounded, may generate a spark discharge capable of igniting flammable vapors or dust clouds and therefore must be grounded during the fill and emptying operations to provide a path for 25) electrical discharge.
Another conventional approach to decreasing the potential for incendiary discharges in flexible containers has been directed toward decreasing the surface
4 electrostatic field of the container. If the magnitude of the electrostatic field on the surface of a container is above a certain threshold level, the potential for an incendiary discharge due to the electrostatic charge exists. That threshold level is about -500 kilovolts per meter (kV/m) for intermediate bulk containers made from woven polypropylene fabric. By decreasing the surface electrostatic field below about -500 kV/m, the potential for an incendiary discharge is greatly decreased and believed to be rendered virtually non-existent. Attempts at reducing the surface electrostatic field level below about -500 kV/m have not, however, proven successful without proper grounding.
L5 One such effort at decreasing surface electrostatic fields has focused on the creation of corona discharges.
There are four basic types of electrostatic discharges:
spark discharges; brush discharges; propagating brush discharges; and, corona discharges. Of the four ?0 electrostatic discharges, the spark, the brush and the propagating brush electrostatic discharges can all create incendiary discharges. The corona discharge is not known to create incendiary discharges for common flammable atmospheres.
>.5 By incorporating certain materials into the flexible fabric container, as the electrostatic field increases, corona discharges from such materials limit the maximum field. This electrostatic field level, however, is above 30 the -500 kV/m threshold level at which the potential for incendiary discharge first appears. Examples of this conventional approach include U.S. Patent No. 4,207,376 (Nagayasu), U.S. Patent No. 4,989,995 (Rubenstein), U.S.
Patent No. 4,900,495 (Lin), U.S. Patent No. 4,997,712 (Lin), U.S. Patent No. 5,116,681 (Lin) and U.S. Patent No. 5,147,704 (Lin).
Another proposed technique for dissipating electrostatic
L5 One such effort at decreasing surface electrostatic fields has focused on the creation of corona discharges.
There are four basic types of electrostatic discharges:
spark discharges; brush discharges; propagating brush discharges; and, corona discharges. Of the four ?0 electrostatic discharges, the spark, the brush and the propagating brush electrostatic discharges can all create incendiary discharges. The corona discharge is not known to create incendiary discharges for common flammable atmospheres.
>.5 By incorporating certain materials into the flexible fabric container, as the electrostatic field increases, corona discharges from such materials limit the maximum field. This electrostatic field level, however, is above 30 the -500 kV/m threshold level at which the potential for incendiary discharge first appears. Examples of this conventional approach include U.S. Patent No. 4,207,376 (Nagayasu), U.S. Patent No. 4,989,995 (Rubenstein), U.S.
Patent No. 4,900,495 (Lin), U.S. Patent No. 4,997,712 (Lin), U.S. Patent No. 5,116,681 (Lin) and U.S. Patent No. 5,147,704 (Lin).
Another proposed technique for dissipating electrostatic
5 charges is the addition of an antistatic agent. The antistatic agent, e.g., a polyol ester, may be in the form of a thermoplastic coating and/or may be added to the polypropylene yarn. One example of a yarn containing an antistatic agent additive is disclosed in United States Patent No. 5,071,699. Other antistatic agents that can be used are amines, amides, carbon black, Hyperion graphite FibrilsTM, conductive polymers such as polyaniline, and elemental metals such as aluminum.
The present invention overcomes the problems of the prior art by providing new antistatic flexible fabrics designed to minimize resulting incendiary static discharges without requiring a physical electrical ground. The present invention also alleviates the deficiencies of the prior art to a great extent by creating a quasi-conductive woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers.
SUNIIMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the invention is to provide an antistatic flexible fabric comprising interwoven polypropylene yarns optionally containing an antistatic agent and a coating on one or both sides consisting of a thermoplastic polymers composition optionally containing an antistatic agent.
The present invention overcomes the problems of the prior art by providing new antistatic flexible fabrics designed to minimize resulting incendiary static discharges without requiring a physical electrical ground. The present invention also alleviates the deficiencies of the prior art to a great extent by creating a quasi-conductive woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers.
SUNIIMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the invention is to provide an antistatic flexible fabric comprising interwoven polypropylene yarns optionally containing an antistatic agent and a coating on one or both sides consisting of a thermoplastic polymers composition optionally containing an antistatic agent.
6 A further object of the invention is to provide an antistatic fabric of polypropylene yarns containing a coating of a polypropylene and polyethylene blend on one or both sides and a layer of cellulose material laminated to either side.
A still further object of the invention is to provide an antistatic fabric containing a fabric body of interwoven polypropylene yarns that contain a polyol ester as an antistatic agent and which are coated on both sides with a polypropylene or polypropylene and polyethylene blend that contains from 1 to 15% of an antistatic agent.
Another object of the invention is to provide an FIBC
constructed from each of the antistatic fabrics.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a woven fabric section with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge. That reduced potential for incendiary discharge is created through the use of quasi-conductive fibers or through a combination of quasi-conductive fibers and an antistatic coating.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a flexible fabric container with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge using quasi-conductive fibers or a combination of quasi-conductive fibers and an antistatic coating.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the discussion that follows and in part will be obvious from the description or may be
A still further object of the invention is to provide an antistatic fabric containing a fabric body of interwoven polypropylene yarns that contain a polyol ester as an antistatic agent and which are coated on both sides with a polypropylene or polypropylene and polyethylene blend that contains from 1 to 15% of an antistatic agent.
Another object of the invention is to provide an FIBC
constructed from each of the antistatic fabrics.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a woven fabric section with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge. That reduced potential for incendiary discharge is created through the use of quasi-conductive fibers or through a combination of quasi-conductive fibers and an antistatic coating.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a flexible fabric container with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge using quasi-conductive fibers or a combination of quasi-conductive fibers and an antistatic coating.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the discussion that follows and in part will be obvious from the description or may be
7 learned by the practice of the invention. The object and advantages of the invention will be obtained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
To achieve the objects and in accordance with the purpose of the invention as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention provides for anti-static flexible fabric materials formed from woven, axially oriented crystalline polypropylene yarn. In one embodiment of the invention, the fabric is further characterized as having a coating of a flexible, thermoplastic polymer on one side of the fabric and having cellulose material laminated to either side.
In another embodiment, the fabric is further characterized as having a coating of a flexible, thermoplastic polymer on both sides of the fabric.
Antistatic properties are imparted to the fabric by formulating the thermoplastic coating to contain from about 1 to about 15% by weight of a polyol ester (preferably glycerol) of a Clo to CZ8 fatty acid. Other antistatic agents that can be used are amines, amides, carbon black, Hyperion graphite Fibrils2"', conductive polymers such as polyaniline, and elemental metals such as aluminum. The polypropylene yarn may optionally itself also contain a lesser amount of the polyol ester of a Clo to C28 fatty acid to provide a fabric having even more enhanced antistatic properties. The other antistatic agents previously described can also be used in this manner.
A particular advantage of the fabrics of the present invention is that specific surface resistivities, e.g.,
To achieve the objects and in accordance with the purpose of the invention as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention provides for anti-static flexible fabric materials formed from woven, axially oriented crystalline polypropylene yarn. In one embodiment of the invention, the fabric is further characterized as having a coating of a flexible, thermoplastic polymer on one side of the fabric and having cellulose material laminated to either side.
In another embodiment, the fabric is further characterized as having a coating of a flexible, thermoplastic polymer on both sides of the fabric.
Antistatic properties are imparted to the fabric by formulating the thermoplastic coating to contain from about 1 to about 15% by weight of a polyol ester (preferably glycerol) of a Clo to CZ8 fatty acid. Other antistatic agents that can be used are amines, amides, carbon black, Hyperion graphite Fibrils2"', conductive polymers such as polyaniline, and elemental metals such as aluminum. The polypropylene yarn may optionally itself also contain a lesser amount of the polyol ester of a Clo to C28 fatty acid to provide a fabric having even more enhanced antistatic properties. The other antistatic agents previously described can also be used in this manner.
A particular advantage of the fabrics of the present invention is that specific surface resistivities, e.g.,
8 between 109 and 1012 ohm/square, are achieved.and when containers are normally constructed therefrom, need not be grounded during filling and emptying operations. As static charges are generated, the electrostatic charge can flow across the fabric and dissipate as low energy corona or low energy static discharges in the discharge channel. Thus, containers constructed from the fabrics of the present invention, under certain conditions, will not produce an incendiary static discharge, and do not require the use of a physical electrical ground.
To achieve the objects and in accordance with the purpose of the invention as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention also provides for a quasi-conductive woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers. As an additional step, an antistatic coating can be applied to the woven fabric section. A coating with a specific surface resistivity range, for example an antistatic coating, can be applied so that it covers the entire surface, or it can be applied so that it covers a portion of the surface.
The present invention also provides a process for making flexible containers with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge made of woven fabric sections including the quasi-conductive fibers. In addition, a process is provided for making such flexible containers with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge that includes an antistatic coating on the containers, either over the entire surface or over a portion of the surface.
By leaving a portion of the surface uncoated, the product packaged within the flexible containers can "breath," which is required in certain applications, such as in the
To achieve the objects and in accordance with the purpose of the invention as embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention also provides for a quasi-conductive woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers. As an additional step, an antistatic coating can be applied to the woven fabric section. A coating with a specific surface resistivity range, for example an antistatic coating, can be applied so that it covers the entire surface, or it can be applied so that it covers a portion of the surface.
The present invention also provides a process for making flexible containers with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge made of woven fabric sections including the quasi-conductive fibers. In addition, a process is provided for making such flexible containers with a reduced potential for incendiary discharge that includes an antistatic coating on the containers, either over the entire surface or over a portion of the surface.
By leaving a portion of the surface uncoated, the product packaged within the flexible containers can "breath," which is required in certain applications, such as in the
9 transportation of talc or kaolin clay. While the coating of a portion of the surface can be applied in any pattern, applying the coating in strips allows for greater manufacturing efficiency. Furthermore, the strips can be either in the warp or the weft direction.
The invention also provides in one aspect for a fabric for use in an ungrounded type flexible fabric container with a reduced energy of electrostatic discharge for use in a combustible environment comprising a woven fabric configured to form the flexible fabric container.
9a BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A fuller understanding of the invention may be had by referring to the following description and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic of the body of woven yarn material used in forming a fabric according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a first preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a second preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a third preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a fourth preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 6 is a partial view of a woven fabric section including fibers in the warp and weft directions;
FIG. 7 is a partial view of a woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers woven in the warp direction;
5 FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a first embodiment of the quasi-conductive fiber of FIG. 7, taken along line 3-3;
FIG. 9 is a side view of a woven flexible fabric
The invention also provides in one aspect for a fabric for use in an ungrounded type flexible fabric container with a reduced energy of electrostatic discharge for use in a combustible environment comprising a woven fabric configured to form the flexible fabric container.
9a BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A fuller understanding of the invention may be had by referring to the following description and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic of the body of woven yarn material used in forming a fabric according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a first preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a second preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a third preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic of a laminated structure according to a fourth preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 6 is a partial view of a woven fabric section including fibers in the warp and weft directions;
FIG. 7 is a partial view of a woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers woven in the warp direction;
5 FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a first embodiment of the quasi-conductive fiber of FIG. 7, taken along line 3-3;
FIG. 9 is a side view of a woven flexible fabric
10 container including quasi-conductive fibers and further including a strip of an antistatic coating;
FIG. 10 is a graph depicting the potential for incendiary discharge on a conventional flexible intermediate bulk container;
FIG. 11 is a graph depicting the potential for incendiary discharge on a flexible intermediate bulk container which has antistatic coating;
FIG. 12 is a graph depicting the potential for incendiary discharge on a flexible intermediate bulk container including quasi-conductive fibers and an antistatic coating;
FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber according to the present invention; and FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a third embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber according to the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a graph depicting the potential for incendiary discharge on a conventional flexible intermediate bulk container;
FIG. 11 is a graph depicting the potential for incendiary discharge on a flexible intermediate bulk container which has antistatic coating;
FIG. 12 is a graph depicting the potential for incendiary discharge on a flexible intermediate bulk container including quasi-conductive fibers and an antistatic coating;
FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber according to the present invention; and FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a third embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber according to the present invention.
11 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Reference will now be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention, which, together with the following examples, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, the fabric material 10 is composed of a plurality of vertically extending flat warp yarns 11 interwoven with a plurality of horizontally extending flat weft or filling yarns 12. These yarns are interwoven by techniques well known in the art on a textile loom to form a sheet-like material relatively free of interstices. The tightness of the weave depends on the end use. Where the fabric is to be used to form containers for holding large particle size bulk material such as tobacco or pellets, then a fairly open weave or mono or multifilament yarn may be used in a count range of from about 1000 to 3000 denier in each weave direction.
In one preferred embodiment, the yarns are composed of a tight weave of axially oriented polypropylene flat tape material having a preferred thickness of from about 0.5 to about 2 mils and a preferred width of from about 50 to about 250 mils. It will be appreciated that by use of the flat tape yarns, maximum coverage is obtained with the least amount of weaving since it requires relatively few flat yarns per inch to cover a given surface as compared to yarns of circular cross section. It is important that the ribbon-like yarns be highly oriented mono-axially in the longitudinal direction or biaxially in the longitudinal and transverse directions. This is accomplished by so drawing
Reference will now be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention, which, together with the following examples, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, the fabric material 10 is composed of a plurality of vertically extending flat warp yarns 11 interwoven with a plurality of horizontally extending flat weft or filling yarns 12. These yarns are interwoven by techniques well known in the art on a textile loom to form a sheet-like material relatively free of interstices. The tightness of the weave depends on the end use. Where the fabric is to be used to form containers for holding large particle size bulk material such as tobacco or pellets, then a fairly open weave or mono or multifilament yarn may be used in a count range of from about 1000 to 3000 denier in each weave direction.
In one preferred embodiment, the yarns are composed of a tight weave of axially oriented polypropylene flat tape material having a preferred thickness of from about 0.5 to about 2 mils and a preferred width of from about 50 to about 250 mils. It will be appreciated that by use of the flat tape yarns, maximum coverage is obtained with the least amount of weaving since it requires relatively few flat yarns per inch to cover a given surface as compared to yarns of circular cross section. It is important that the ribbon-like yarns be highly oriented mono-axially in the longitudinal direction or biaxially in the longitudinal and transverse directions. This is accomplished by so drawing
12 the flat yarn or the web from which flat yarn ribbons are slit, so as to irreversibly stretch the yarn or web, thereby orienting the molecular structure of the material.
In biaxially oriented yarns or sheeting, the material is hot or cold-stretched both in the transverse and longitudinal directions, but for purposes of the present invention, it is desirable that the orientation be carried out mainly in the longitudinal direction.
When axially oriented polypropylene yarns are interwoven, they cross over in the warp and weft directions, and because of their high tear and tensile strength, as well as their hydrophilic properties, the resultant fabric is highly stable. Thus the bag, if properly seamed, is capable of supporting unusually heavy loads without sagging or stretching of the walls of the bag.
FIG. 2 represents another embodiment of the present invention. Layer 21 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns of the type described above. The polypropylene weave is then coated on one side with a polyolefin polymer blend 22. In addition, a layer of cellulose material 24 is laminated to the polypropylene layer on the side opposite of the polyolefin coating. The cellulose material is laminated using a hot melt adhesive 23. A typical hot melt adhesive is Nylco E9 pressure sensitive adhesive.
FIG. 3 represents another embodiment of the present invention. Layer 31 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns of the type described above. The polypropylene weave is then coated on one side with a
In biaxially oriented yarns or sheeting, the material is hot or cold-stretched both in the transverse and longitudinal directions, but for purposes of the present invention, it is desirable that the orientation be carried out mainly in the longitudinal direction.
When axially oriented polypropylene yarns are interwoven, they cross over in the warp and weft directions, and because of their high tear and tensile strength, as well as their hydrophilic properties, the resultant fabric is highly stable. Thus the bag, if properly seamed, is capable of supporting unusually heavy loads without sagging or stretching of the walls of the bag.
FIG. 2 represents another embodiment of the present invention. Layer 21 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns of the type described above. The polypropylene weave is then coated on one side with a polyolefin polymer blend 22. In addition, a layer of cellulose material 24 is laminated to the polypropylene layer on the side opposite of the polyolefin coating. The cellulose material is laminated using a hot melt adhesive 23. A typical hot melt adhesive is Nylco E9 pressure sensitive adhesive.
FIG. 3 represents another embodiment of the present invention. Layer 31 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns of the type described above. The polypropylene weave is then coated on one side with a
13 polyolefin polymer blend 32. At the same time the weave is being coated, a layer of cellulose material 33 is laminated to the polypropylene layer using the polyolefin polymer blend as the adhesive.
FIG. 4 represents another embodiment of the present invention. Layer 41 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns also of the type described above that contains a coating of thermoplastic polymer material (42, 43) adhered to both sides of the fabric.
Fig. 5 represents one embodiment of the present invention. Layer 51 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns of the type described above. A layer of cellulose material (52, 53) is laminated to each side of the polypropylene using either of the methods described above.
The purpose of the thermoplastic coating 22 in FIG. 2 and coating (42, 43) in FIG. 4 is primarily to seal the interstices of the yarn weave to prevent leakage of any finely divided contents of containers made from the fabric, and also to impart moisture barrier properties to containers or in other fabric applications such as tarpaulin or tent fabrics. In the present invention, the thermoplastic coating may also serve as a dispersing base for an antistatic agent which helps impart antistatic properties to the fabric as more fully discussed below.
The thermoplastic coating may be composed of any thermoplastic polymer composition which is sufficiently non-brittle so that the flexible characteristics of the woven fabric are not seriously diminished and which is
FIG. 4 represents another embodiment of the present invention. Layer 41 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns also of the type described above that contains a coating of thermoplastic polymer material (42, 43) adhered to both sides of the fabric.
Fig. 5 represents one embodiment of the present invention. Layer 51 is a weave of polypropylene flat ribbon yarns of the type described above. A layer of cellulose material (52, 53) is laminated to each side of the polypropylene using either of the methods described above.
The purpose of the thermoplastic coating 22 in FIG. 2 and coating (42, 43) in FIG. 4 is primarily to seal the interstices of the yarn weave to prevent leakage of any finely divided contents of containers made from the fabric, and also to impart moisture barrier properties to containers or in other fabric applications such as tarpaulin or tent fabrics. In the present invention, the thermoplastic coating may also serve as a dispersing base for an antistatic agent which helps impart antistatic properties to the fabric as more fully discussed below.
The thermoplastic coating may be composed of any thermoplastic polymer composition which is sufficiently non-brittle so that the flexible characteristics of the woven fabric are not seriously diminished and which is
14 adherable to the polypropylene yarn material_forming the fabric base. Preferred thermoplastics forming the coating include polypropylene, polyethylene, or blend thereof, e.g., 80%/20% respectively, polyisobutylene copolymers of ethylene and a lower olefin such as propylene or butene, as well as mixtures of such polymers. One preferred coating contains a major proportion of polypropylene. The coating may also contain other additives such as fillers, UV
absorbers, plasticizers, and like ingredients normally formulated into polymeric-coatings.
The thermoplastic coating is applied to one or both surfaces of the woven fabric by techniques known in the art such as extrusion coating, dip coating, and spray coating.
Generally speaking, the coating may be applied to a dry coating thickness within the range of from about 0.5 to about 3.0 mils, preferably from about 0.8 to about 1.5 mils.
Antistatic properties are imparted to the fabric structures depicted in FIG. 3 of this invention by the inclusion of a minor amount of a polyol ester of a Clo to C28 monocarboxylic acid or mixture of such acids into the thermoplastic coating formulation, and optionally into both the thermoplastic coating formulation and the polypropylene formulation used to prepare the fabric yarn material.
Suitable polyols from which these esters may be derived include ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, pentaerythritol and like materials. Preferred esters include mixtures of mono-, di, and triglycerides (glycerol esters) of Clo to C28 monocarboxylic acids such as decanoic, lauric, myristic, palmitic or stearic acids, as well as mixtures of such esters. The most preferred esters are esters of Clo to C22 monocarboxylic acids, and are most preferably stearyl monoglycerides containing at least about 80% by weight of the gylcerol monostearate monoester. A
preferred group of anti-static compounds are polyol partial 5 fatty acid esters marketed by the Henkel Company under the trade designation DEHYDATTM 8312 and DEHYDATTM 8316.
In general, good antistatic properties may be obtained by the inclusion of from about 1.0% to about 15% by weight of the antistatic agent into the coating formulation based on 10 the weight of polymer in the coating. More preferred levels of antistatic compound are about 4% to about 10% with about 6% by weight being most preferred.
The antistatic compound may also be incorporated into the polypropylene composition used to prepare the yarn
absorbers, plasticizers, and like ingredients normally formulated into polymeric-coatings.
The thermoplastic coating is applied to one or both surfaces of the woven fabric by techniques known in the art such as extrusion coating, dip coating, and spray coating.
Generally speaking, the coating may be applied to a dry coating thickness within the range of from about 0.5 to about 3.0 mils, preferably from about 0.8 to about 1.5 mils.
Antistatic properties are imparted to the fabric structures depicted in FIG. 3 of this invention by the inclusion of a minor amount of a polyol ester of a Clo to C28 monocarboxylic acid or mixture of such acids into the thermoplastic coating formulation, and optionally into both the thermoplastic coating formulation and the polypropylene formulation used to prepare the fabric yarn material.
Suitable polyols from which these esters may be derived include ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, pentaerythritol and like materials. Preferred esters include mixtures of mono-, di, and triglycerides (glycerol esters) of Clo to C28 monocarboxylic acids such as decanoic, lauric, myristic, palmitic or stearic acids, as well as mixtures of such esters. The most preferred esters are esters of Clo to C22 monocarboxylic acids, and are most preferably stearyl monoglycerides containing at least about 80% by weight of the gylcerol monostearate monoester. A
preferred group of anti-static compounds are polyol partial 5 fatty acid esters marketed by the Henkel Company under the trade designation DEHYDATTM 8312 and DEHYDATTM 8316.
In general, good antistatic properties may be obtained by the inclusion of from about 1.0% to about 15% by weight of the antistatic agent into the coating formulation based on 10 the weight of polymer in the coating. More preferred levels of antistatic compound are about 4% to about 10% with about 6% by weight being most preferred.
The antistatic compound may also be incorporated into the polypropylene composition used to prepare the yarn
15 material and at levels of from 0 to about 2% by weight based on the content of polypropylene polymer. Best results are achieved where the antistatic compound is present in the yarn material at levels less than it is present in the coating composition. The preferred content of antistatic compound when present in the yarn material ranges from about 0.05 to about 1% by weight, with about 0.1 to about 0.8% by weight being most preferred.
The antistatic additive may be mixed with the base polymer in the molten state or with polymer pellets in an extruder. Preferably the antistatic compound is first formulated into a concentrate also containing an olefin polymer such as polyethylene or polypropylene and any other ingredients to be added such as a UV-absorber, plasticizer, filler, dye or the like, and this concentrate is then thoroughly admixed with the base polymer.
The antistatic additive may be mixed with the base polymer in the molten state or with polymer pellets in an extruder. Preferably the antistatic compound is first formulated into a concentrate also containing an olefin polymer such as polyethylene or polypropylene and any other ingredients to be added such as a UV-absorber, plasticizer, filler, dye or the like, and this concentrate is then thoroughly admixed with the base polymer.
16 It is to be understood that the application of the teaching of the present invention to a specific problem will be within the capabilities of one having ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings contained herein. Examples of some of the products of the present invention and processes for their operation and their use appear in the following examples.
Warp and weft yarn material for use in preparing a woven fabric was prepared by forming a mixture comprising about 96 parts by weight of a crystalline polypropylene having a melt flow index of 2-3 and about 4 parts by weight of an antistatic concentrate which contained a mixture of low density polyethylene, polypropylene having a melt flow index of 12, an ultra violet absorber, a filler, and a quantity of antistatic agent identified in Table 1 sufficient to provide the indicated content of antistatic in the final polymer formulation.
The formulation was extruded into a film, slit and drawn to provide 1060 denier warp and 2500 denier weft (or fill) fibrillated strips of monoaxially oriented polypropylene. The processing conditions were generally as follows:
Extrusion temperature 255-265 C
Quench gap 1-3 inches Quench temperature 25-35 C
Orienting temperature 160-190 C
Warp and weft yarn material for use in preparing a woven fabric was prepared by forming a mixture comprising about 96 parts by weight of a crystalline polypropylene having a melt flow index of 2-3 and about 4 parts by weight of an antistatic concentrate which contained a mixture of low density polyethylene, polypropylene having a melt flow index of 12, an ultra violet absorber, a filler, and a quantity of antistatic agent identified in Table 1 sufficient to provide the indicated content of antistatic in the final polymer formulation.
The formulation was extruded into a film, slit and drawn to provide 1060 denier warp and 2500 denier weft (or fill) fibrillated strips of monoaxially oriented polypropylene. The processing conditions were generally as follows:
Extrusion temperature 255-265 C
Quench gap 1-3 inches Quench temperature 25-35 C
Orienting temperature 160-190 C
17 Annealing temperature 145-155 C
Draw ratio 6:1-8:1 A loom was set up to produce three 42" wide fabric cells using 2994 warp ends. The strips produced above were woven to produce a solid fabric material composed of 1060 denier warp yarns and 2500 denier weft or fill yarns, with about 10-12 yarn ends per linear inch of fabric.
A polypropylene fabric was constructed according to the method described in Example 1 except the fabric contained only crystalline polypropylene and no antistatic concentrate. The polypropylene was formulated and woven according to the methods described in Example 1.
Various coating compositions for use on the woven fabrics of Examples 1 and 2 were constructed. The coatings were based on a polymer mixture of about 70-75% by weight of polypropylene having a melt flow index of 30-40, about 15-25% by weight of low density polyethylene having a melt flow index of 6-9, and an ultraviolet absorber. In some embodiments, a quantity of antistatic compound as indicated in Table 1 was added to the coating. In other embodiments, the coatings were a polypropylene - polyethylene blend.
The coatings were extrusion-coated through a slot die onto the fabric material prepared in accordance with Examples 1 and 2 by passing a moving web of the fabric under a hot melt of the coating from the extruder die,
Draw ratio 6:1-8:1 A loom was set up to produce three 42" wide fabric cells using 2994 warp ends. The strips produced above were woven to produce a solid fabric material composed of 1060 denier warp yarns and 2500 denier weft or fill yarns, with about 10-12 yarn ends per linear inch of fabric.
A polypropylene fabric was constructed according to the method described in Example 1 except the fabric contained only crystalline polypropylene and no antistatic concentrate. The polypropylene was formulated and woven according to the methods described in Example 1.
Various coating compositions for use on the woven fabrics of Examples 1 and 2 were constructed. The coatings were based on a polymer mixture of about 70-75% by weight of polypropylene having a melt flow index of 30-40, about 15-25% by weight of low density polyethylene having a melt flow index of 6-9, and an ultraviolet absorber. In some embodiments, a quantity of antistatic compound as indicated in Table 1 was added to the coating. In other embodiments, the coatings were a polypropylene - polyethylene blend.
The coatings were extrusion-coated through a slot die onto the fabric material prepared in accordance with Examples 1 and 2 by passing a moving web of the fabric under a hot melt of the coating from the extruder die,
18 followed by cooling the composite to solidify the coating.
The dry coating thickness was between 0.8 and 1.5 mils.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the fabric was coated on one side with the polypropylene -polyethylene blend and laminated on the other side with cellulose material. The cellulose material is laminated to the uncoated side using a hot melt adhesive such as Nylco E9. An FIBC container was then constructed with the paper side on the outside of the container.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the fabric is coated on one side with the polypropylene -polyethylene blend. At the same time the weave is being coated, a layer of cellulose material is laminated to the polypropylene layer using the polypropylene - polyethylene blend as the adhesive.
Various samples of fabric prepared in accordance with Examples 1-5 above were evaluated for surface resistivities.
Surface resistivity measures the surface resistance to electron flow across the fabric surface between two electrodes placed on the surface of the fabric specimens.
The measurement is the ratio of the direct voltage applied to one electrode to that portion of the current between the electrodes, which is primarily in a thin surface layer.
This test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D-257-78.
The dry coating thickness was between 0.8 and 1.5 mils.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the fabric was coated on one side with the polypropylene -polyethylene blend and laminated on the other side with cellulose material. The cellulose material is laminated to the uncoated side using a hot melt adhesive such as Nylco E9. An FIBC container was then constructed with the paper side on the outside of the container.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the fabric is coated on one side with the polypropylene -polyethylene blend. At the same time the weave is being coated, a layer of cellulose material is laminated to the polypropylene layer using the polypropylene - polyethylene blend as the adhesive.
Various samples of fabric prepared in accordance with Examples 1-5 above were evaluated for surface resistivities.
Surface resistivity measures the surface resistance to electron flow across the fabric surface between two electrodes placed on the surface of the fabric specimens.
The measurement is the ratio of the direct voltage applied to one electrode to that portion of the current between the electrodes, which is primarily in a thin surface layer.
This test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D-257-78.
19 Examples 6-10 were tested according to,the following method:
As described below, an FIBC was mounted onto a filling stand where polypropylene pellets were loaded into the FIBC while being naturally and/or artificially charged to very high levels. During these tests the charge per unit mass of the pellets entering the FIBC was approximately -1 x 10'6 C/kg. This charge density was high enough to give rise to electric field levels exceeding -2000 kV/M on the surface standard (insulating) polypropylene FIBCs. The static levels achieved on the FIBC surface were essentially the highest practical static levels possible for polypropylene fabric under normal conditions and were intended to create intense conditions for static discharges from the FIBC surface. During filling, static field measurements were taken and a "gas ignition probe" was brought toward the fabric to determine if an incendive discharge could be produced from the fabric surface. This probe used a propane/air mixture which has an ignition energy (MIE approximately 0.25 mJ) which is equivalent to typical minimum ignition energies of common flammable vapors. For dust explosions, the minimum ignition energy is normally higher than that for vapors.
The propane/air mixture was adjusted to be capable of being ignited by electrostatic discharge energies of 0.25 millijoules (mJ) or greater. The FIBC was evaluated at ambient humidity, usually 50 to 55% relative humidity (RH) and at low humidity, usually between 10 to 15% RH. In general for chemical antistats, as relative humidity decreases the static protective properties also decrease.
Results of the evaluation of antistatic properties for a number of fabric structures are reported in Table 1.
^ 1 1 1 O o O O o C) r~1 0, ri r-I ~ r-1 r-1. ~ e--I. ~ o r M O x kx k k O k O O O
=rl O x Ql l0 lG -w d' x qw x x x -rl ~--1 .
1-~ /~ + ) Nr~ N. M N-W u) c1' N f'7 ~
.,~
v) 1 1 N
N
c~i 3 1~ o 0 r-i v-4 v-1~' 1 w F-07 1 ~C r-I x r-4 k k ?C k f4 ef' DC Nx l- l- t0 v . . . .
(n ~ t- N N ~-1 01 N N
N N
Ub O 0 0 r. 0 G 0 W -rl w4.) :3 1J a-- 4-J a-- 4-) c E"' N N U U U 0 U U ~
U
4-) -i td 'O ~
-r I ri fd ~ 1 1 1 1 N 1 1. 1 1 1 y dJ 'C3 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 V1 ~y ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ I I I I I 0 to 0 ni 0 O W r-+ ~~ 1 1 1 tA 1 1 1 1 1 1 a r1 RS 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ V
O r-1 N 1 1 1 ~+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 U p" r-1 44 U) N 1 1 1 a) N O 0 0 0 N -ri ~ I I 1 O O H H H E- 0 4-J 3 1 1 1 1 1 O O
b dp I 1 1 I 1 d' r ~ ~ ~ I~ f+) *
U
N N
+ a--~ 'Zy 1J 4J N N 0 N O a)OD 4) r-I 4) N -r-1 r-1 Rf RS 9: 0 0 .SG 4-J .k 4-1 V m V P') 4 =r1 o v z z z 0 b a~i b a o a o ~ A
o z z ~ xv a~`" ~ ~ w U A A
u') Ln uO LO LO Ln '~ I 1 1 1 ~ r ~ r-1 .--1 .--i ~ O 1 1 1 1 O O O O O
~ b 1 ~ O cn~ ~ ~ ~ ~~n cn cn U) U) $a z26 6 6 6 6 w a~ z z U
N
04 rl N ~') d' N tO t- Oo 41 ~
t0 x W
As indicated in Table 1, Example 3 is a control FIBC
containing no antistatic compounds or cellulose materials.
Examples 8, 9, and 10 are samples containing the specified amounts of antistat. In each case these examples produced incendiary discharges and failed in the filling tests by regularly igniting the propane/air mixture from the gas ignition probe.
Example 4 passed a limited number of filling tests at both humidities at static electric field levels where gas probe ignitions were observed for fabric used in Example 3.
Example 6, under certain circumstances, did not ignite the gas probe at both humidities. Example 7 was not tested.
Example 5 was not constructed into an FIBC.
The test data indicates that by coating the surface of the fabric the surface resistivity is reduced by a factor of about 10 to 100. Also, the test data indicates that the best static discharge incendiary control properties, in the range of relative humidities previously described, are achieved with a surface resistivity range between 10' and 1012 ohm/square (S2/0) .
The use of certain materials having a surface resistivity range between 109 and 1012 ohm/square results in a system having low incendiary static discharge. While the invention heretofore described is primarily directed to the use of such a material in the formation of an antistatic fabric, the certain materials may also be used in other circumstances when it is desirable to dissipate static electricity and minimize resulting incendiary static discharge. An example of such a use is the inside of a silo or grain container, conveying equipment, or other appli-cations where electrostatic discharge will result in a spark discharge.
The present invention is also directed to a quasi-conduc-tive woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers.
As an additional step, an antistatic coating can be applied to the woven fabric section. A coating with a specific surface resistivity range, for example an antistatic coating, can be applied so that it covers the entire surface, or it can be applied so that it covers a portion of the surface.
Referring now to the drawings, where like reference numerals indicate like elements, there is shown in FIG. 6 a woven fabric section 60 including vertically extending warp fibers 64 interwoven with horizontally extending weft or filling fibers 66. These yarns are interwoven by techniques well known in the art on a textile loom to form a sheet-like material relatively free of interstices.
Shown in FIG. 7 is a quasi-conductive fabric section 68 that includes the warp fibers 64, the weft fibers 66 and quasi-conductive fibers 62, which are woven with and in parallel to some of the warp fibers 64. While the quasi-conductive fibers 62 are shown parallel to the warp fibers 64, they could be positioned parallel to the weft fibers 66.
Furthermore, while the quasi-conductive fibers 62 are shown in FIG. 7 in a standard over one - under one pattern, the fibers 62 can be woven in any pattern.
A quasi-conductive fabric conducts sufficiently to effect corona discharge, but not in a manner sufficient to substantially effect incendiary discharges. One embodiment of a quasi-conductive fabric may include quasi-conductive fibers.
A quasi-conductive fiber effects corona discharge, such as at its ends or at other discharge points, but has sufficient resistance to substantially avoid incendiary discharge at its ends or along its length at a rate that results in incendiary type discharges. One embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber may include a relatively conductive core, at least partially ensheathed in a relatively quasi-conductive or non-conductive material. Other configurations could include a fiber having a substantially homogeneous material or a relatively more heter-ogeneous mixture of materials with larger regions of different materials relative to the fiber 62 diameter.
A quasi-conductive fiber according to the present inven-tion could include more than one sheath-type layer or other combination. Therefore, while certain combinations have been illustrated herein for the quasi-conductive fibers of the invention, there could be other configurations which include components of conductive, quasi-conductive, and non-conductive materials that would fall within the scope of the invention.
Conductive materials that may result in incendiary dis-charges have a surface resistivity on the order of 105 ohms per square (0/0) and below. Non-conductive materials general-ly have a surface resistivity on the order of 1012 to 1013 ohms per square (0/0) and above. Antistatic coating materials, which are an example of coatings of materials with a specific surface resistivity range used in described embodiments of the present invention, have a surface resistivity on the order of 109 to 1012 ohms per square 02/0). Insulating sheath material, as is used in one embodiment of the quasi-conductive fiber, may have an electrical resistivity per length on the order of 108 ohms per meter.
FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a first embodiment of the quasi-conductive fiber 62 taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 7. The quasi-conductive fiber 62 depicted in FIG. 8 contains a conductive portion 84 and an 10 insulating outer sheath portion 86. The conductive core 84 may take other shapes, and thus the present invention is not limited to the conductive core shape or the quasi-conductive fiber depicted in FIG. 8. Other embodiments may not include distinct conductive cores with 15 non-conductive sheaths.
One currently available fiber that may be adapted for use as a quasi-conductive fiber like the embodiment of fiber 62 depicted in FIG. 8 is the P-190 fiber created by
As described below, an FIBC was mounted onto a filling stand where polypropylene pellets were loaded into the FIBC while being naturally and/or artificially charged to very high levels. During these tests the charge per unit mass of the pellets entering the FIBC was approximately -1 x 10'6 C/kg. This charge density was high enough to give rise to electric field levels exceeding -2000 kV/M on the surface standard (insulating) polypropylene FIBCs. The static levels achieved on the FIBC surface were essentially the highest practical static levels possible for polypropylene fabric under normal conditions and were intended to create intense conditions for static discharges from the FIBC surface. During filling, static field measurements were taken and a "gas ignition probe" was brought toward the fabric to determine if an incendive discharge could be produced from the fabric surface. This probe used a propane/air mixture which has an ignition energy (MIE approximately 0.25 mJ) which is equivalent to typical minimum ignition energies of common flammable vapors. For dust explosions, the minimum ignition energy is normally higher than that for vapors.
The propane/air mixture was adjusted to be capable of being ignited by electrostatic discharge energies of 0.25 millijoules (mJ) or greater. The FIBC was evaluated at ambient humidity, usually 50 to 55% relative humidity (RH) and at low humidity, usually between 10 to 15% RH. In general for chemical antistats, as relative humidity decreases the static protective properties also decrease.
Results of the evaluation of antistatic properties for a number of fabric structures are reported in Table 1.
^ 1 1 1 O o O O o C) r~1 0, ri r-I ~ r-1 r-1. ~ e--I. ~ o r M O x kx k k O k O O O
=rl O x Ql l0 lG -w d' x qw x x x -rl ~--1 .
1-~ /~ + ) Nr~ N. M N-W u) c1' N f'7 ~
.,~
v) 1 1 N
N
c~i 3 1~ o 0 r-i v-4 v-1~' 1 w F-07 1 ~C r-I x r-4 k k ?C k f4 ef' DC Nx l- l- t0 v . . . .
(n ~ t- N N ~-1 01 N N
N N
Ub O 0 0 r. 0 G 0 W -rl w4.) :3 1J a-- 4-J a-- 4-) c E"' N N U U U 0 U U ~
U
4-) -i td 'O ~
-r I ri fd ~ 1 1 1 1 N 1 1. 1 1 1 y dJ 'C3 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 V1 ~y ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ I I I I I 0 to 0 ni 0 O W r-+ ~~ 1 1 1 tA 1 1 1 1 1 1 a r1 RS 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ V
O r-1 N 1 1 1 ~+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 U p" r-1 44 U) N 1 1 1 a) N O 0 0 0 N -ri ~ I I 1 O O H H H E- 0 4-J 3 1 1 1 1 1 O O
b dp I 1 1 I 1 d' r ~ ~ ~ I~ f+) *
U
N N
+ a--~ 'Zy 1J 4J N N 0 N O a)OD 4) r-I 4) N -r-1 r-1 Rf RS 9: 0 0 .SG 4-J .k 4-1 V m V P') 4 =r1 o v z z z 0 b a~i b a o a o ~ A
o z z ~ xv a~`" ~ ~ w U A A
u') Ln uO LO LO Ln '~ I 1 1 1 ~ r ~ r-1 .--1 .--i ~ O 1 1 1 1 O O O O O
~ b 1 ~ O cn~ ~ ~ ~ ~~n cn cn U) U) $a z26 6 6 6 6 w a~ z z U
N
04 rl N ~') d' N tO t- Oo 41 ~
t0 x W
As indicated in Table 1, Example 3 is a control FIBC
containing no antistatic compounds or cellulose materials.
Examples 8, 9, and 10 are samples containing the specified amounts of antistat. In each case these examples produced incendiary discharges and failed in the filling tests by regularly igniting the propane/air mixture from the gas ignition probe.
Example 4 passed a limited number of filling tests at both humidities at static electric field levels where gas probe ignitions were observed for fabric used in Example 3.
Example 6, under certain circumstances, did not ignite the gas probe at both humidities. Example 7 was not tested.
Example 5 was not constructed into an FIBC.
The test data indicates that by coating the surface of the fabric the surface resistivity is reduced by a factor of about 10 to 100. Also, the test data indicates that the best static discharge incendiary control properties, in the range of relative humidities previously described, are achieved with a surface resistivity range between 10' and 1012 ohm/square (S2/0) .
The use of certain materials having a surface resistivity range between 109 and 1012 ohm/square results in a system having low incendiary static discharge. While the invention heretofore described is primarily directed to the use of such a material in the formation of an antistatic fabric, the certain materials may also be used in other circumstances when it is desirable to dissipate static electricity and minimize resulting incendiary static discharge. An example of such a use is the inside of a silo or grain container, conveying equipment, or other appli-cations where electrostatic discharge will result in a spark discharge.
The present invention is also directed to a quasi-conduc-tive woven fabric section including quasi-conductive fibers.
As an additional step, an antistatic coating can be applied to the woven fabric section. A coating with a specific surface resistivity range, for example an antistatic coating, can be applied so that it covers the entire surface, or it can be applied so that it covers a portion of the surface.
Referring now to the drawings, where like reference numerals indicate like elements, there is shown in FIG. 6 a woven fabric section 60 including vertically extending warp fibers 64 interwoven with horizontally extending weft or filling fibers 66. These yarns are interwoven by techniques well known in the art on a textile loom to form a sheet-like material relatively free of interstices.
Shown in FIG. 7 is a quasi-conductive fabric section 68 that includes the warp fibers 64, the weft fibers 66 and quasi-conductive fibers 62, which are woven with and in parallel to some of the warp fibers 64. While the quasi-conductive fibers 62 are shown parallel to the warp fibers 64, they could be positioned parallel to the weft fibers 66.
Furthermore, while the quasi-conductive fibers 62 are shown in FIG. 7 in a standard over one - under one pattern, the fibers 62 can be woven in any pattern.
A quasi-conductive fabric conducts sufficiently to effect corona discharge, but not in a manner sufficient to substantially effect incendiary discharges. One embodiment of a quasi-conductive fabric may include quasi-conductive fibers.
A quasi-conductive fiber effects corona discharge, such as at its ends or at other discharge points, but has sufficient resistance to substantially avoid incendiary discharge at its ends or along its length at a rate that results in incendiary type discharges. One embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber may include a relatively conductive core, at least partially ensheathed in a relatively quasi-conductive or non-conductive material. Other configurations could include a fiber having a substantially homogeneous material or a relatively more heter-ogeneous mixture of materials with larger regions of different materials relative to the fiber 62 diameter.
A quasi-conductive fiber according to the present inven-tion could include more than one sheath-type layer or other combination. Therefore, while certain combinations have been illustrated herein for the quasi-conductive fibers of the invention, there could be other configurations which include components of conductive, quasi-conductive, and non-conductive materials that would fall within the scope of the invention.
Conductive materials that may result in incendiary dis-charges have a surface resistivity on the order of 105 ohms per square (0/0) and below. Non-conductive materials general-ly have a surface resistivity on the order of 1012 to 1013 ohms per square (0/0) and above. Antistatic coating materials, which are an example of coatings of materials with a specific surface resistivity range used in described embodiments of the present invention, have a surface resistivity on the order of 109 to 1012 ohms per square 02/0). Insulating sheath material, as is used in one embodiment of the quasi-conductive fiber, may have an electrical resistivity per length on the order of 108 ohms per meter.
FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a first embodiment of the quasi-conductive fiber 62 taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 7. The quasi-conductive fiber 62 depicted in FIG. 8 contains a conductive portion 84 and an 10 insulating outer sheath portion 86. The conductive core 84 may take other shapes, and thus the present invention is not limited to the conductive core shape or the quasi-conductive fiber depicted in FIG. 8. Other embodiments may not include distinct conductive cores with 15 non-conductive sheaths.
One currently available fiber that may be adapted for use as a quasi-conductive fiber like the embodiment of fiber 62 depicted in FIG. 8 is the P-190 fiber created by
20 DuPont. The effectiveness of the claimed quasi-conductive woven fabric sections including quasi-conductive fibers in reducing the potential for incendiary discharge was tested by incorporating the P-190 fiber into various woven bulk containers made of a standard 6.5 ounce (180 gram) white 25 fabric at about 0 to 4 or more inch and preferably at about one half inch to about 4 inch (1.3 to 10 centimeter) spacings with and without antistatic coatings of glycerol monostearate (GMS) and measuring, while the bag is being filled and emptied (a "fill/empty trial"), the number of gas ignitions which resulted upon the deliverance of,a combustible gas mixture onto the surface of the bulk containers.
Out of over one thousand fill/empty trials, no probe ignitions were observed. These results indicate that the claimed quasi-conductive woven fabric sections including quasi-conductive fibers are highly effective at reducing the potential for incendiary discharge in woven bulk containers when P-190 fibers, with or without GMS, are incorporated as the quasi-conductive fibers.
FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber 162. The quasi-conductive fiber 162 includes a conductive core 113 and a non-conductive sheath 117.
FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a third embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber 163. The quasi-conductive fiber 163 includes an insulative core 119 and a conductive outer sheath 121.
The effectiveness of the claimed quasi-conductive woven fabric sections including quasi-conductive fibers in reducing the potential for incendiary discharge was tested by separately incorporating the fibers 162 and 163 into woven bulk containers made of standard 6.5 ounce white fabric at 1 inch spacings with antistatic coatings of about 6 percent GMS and measuring, while the bag is being filled and emptied (a "fill/empty trial"), the number of gas ignitions which resulted upon the deliverance of a combustible gas mixture onto the surface of the bulk containers.
The maximum electric field strength measured during the trials was substantially similar to that measured with the woven bulk containers including P-190 fibers. Out of about 200 fill/empty trials, no ignitions resulted. These results indicate that the claimed quasi-conductive woven fabric sections including quasi-conductive fibers are highly effective at reducing the potential for incendiary discharge in woven bulk containers when fibers 162 and 163 are incorporated as the quasi-conductive fibers.
According to the invention, as an electrostatic field builds up on the flexible container 90 (as shown in FIG. 9) including quasi-conductive fibers 62, a localized zero potential charge is created at some midline between the quasi-conductive fibers 62. This.causes a potential to be created between that midline and the quasi-conductive fibers 62, causing ions to migrate into the quasi-conductive fibers 62.
The quasi-conductive fibers 62 have a resistivity that prevents an incendiary discharge from occurring from the fiber surface. As shown in FIG. 8, this is due to the insulating sheath 86 surrounding the conductive core 84.
The electric energy instead travels down the length of the quasi-conductive fiber cores 84 and exits the ends of the quasi-conductive fibers 62 as a corona discharge. If conductive yarns are used, the capacitance of the system is increased and a large charge of energy may build up. If a ground source approaches the ascribed conductive system, an energetic discharge may occur at such a level as to be incendiary.
Quasi-conductive fibers 62, 162, and/or 163 can be used in flexible intermediate bulk containers 90 (as shown in FIG. 9) either by themselves or in conjunction with an antistatic coating 92. Flexible intermediate bulk containers are used to transport finely divided solids such as cement, fertilizer, salt, sugar, and barite as well as virtually any type of finely divided solids. An antistatic coating 92 may be applied to cover the entire surface of the flexible fabric container 90 or a portion of the surface as depicted in FIG. 9. While the coating 92 shown in FIG. 9 is substantially parallel to the fibers 62, the coating 92 may be applied substantially perpendicular to fibers 62.
Antistatic coatings are laminates or coverings of thermoplastic or other materials, such as paper, over fabrics or fabric components that disperse potential localized energetic static charges over the surface and allow for controlled discharge of the charges. This combination increases the electrostatic charge level at which an incendiary discharge may occur. For example, such antistatic thermoplastic-type coatings may be imparted by the inclusion of a minor amount of a polyol ester of a Clo to C28 monocarboxylic acid.
In addition, a mixture of such acids may be included in a thermoplastic coating (not shown), which is primarily for sealing interstices in the yarn weave to prevent leakage of any finely divided contents of containers.
Optionally, a mixture of such acids may be included within both the thermoplastic coating and the polypropylene, mixed during each formulation. Suitable polyols from which these esters may be derived include ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, pentaerythritol and like materials.
Preferred esters include mixtures of mono-, di-, and triglycerides (glycerol esters) of C,a to C28 monocarboxylic acids such as decanoic, lauric, myristic, palmitic or stearic acids, as well as mixtures of such esters. The most preferred esters are esters of C10 to C22 monocarboxylic acids, and are most preferably stearyl monoglycerides containing at least about 80% by weight of the glycerol monostearate monoester. A preferred group of anti-static compounds are polyol partial fatty acid esters marketed by the Henkel Company under the trade designation DEHYDATTM 8312 and DEHYDATTM
8316.
In general, good antistatic properties may be obtained by the inclusion of from about 1.0% to about 15% by weight of the antistatic agent into the coating formulation, based on the weight of polymer in the coating. More preferred levels of antistatic compound are around 6% actual by weight.
The antistatic compound may also be incorporated into the polypropylene composition used to prepare the yarn material and at levels of from 0 to about 2% by weight based on the content of polypropylene polymer. The preferred content of antistatic compound when present in the yarn material ranges from about 0.05 to about 1% by weight, with about 0.1 to about 0.8% by weight being most preferred.
The antistatic additive may be missed with the base polymer in the molten state or with polymer pellets in an extruder. Preferably the antistatic compound is first formulated into a concentrate also containing an olefin polymer such as polyethylene or polypropylene and any other ingredients to be added such as a UV-absorber, plasticizer, filler, dye or the like, and this concentrate is then thoroughly admixed with the base polymer.
Antistatic coatings 92 (as shown in FIG. 9) cause the threshold level for the potential for an incendiary charge to be increased. With reference to FIGS. 10-12, the 5 utility of antistatic coatings 92 is shown. In each of these figures, each axis division on both the x and y axes represents -500 kV/M. FIG. 10 depicts the ignition profile of a flexible fabric container that does not have an antistatic coating 92 or quasi-conductive fibers 62. As 10 shown in FIG. 10, the threshold level at which an incendiary charge can occur is at about -500 kilovolts per meter.
With reference to FIG. 11, an ignition profile is 15 depicted for a flexible fabric container with an antistatic coating 92 applied over the entire surface of the container. As can be seen in FIG. 11, the threshold ignition level has been raised to about -1500 kilovolts per meter.
FIG. 12 depicts the ignition profile of the flexible container 90 (as shown in FIG. 9) including the antistatic coating 92 and the quasi-conductive fibers 62. As is apparent from FIG. 12, the ignition zone threshold is higher than the electrostatic field that can accumulate on the surface of the flexible fabric container 90. The result is that the flexible fabric container 90 including the quasi-conductive fibers 62 has a threshold electrostatic field on the surface of the container 90 that is no greater than approximately -900 kV/m. This is well below the ignition zone profile of about -1500 kV/m caused by the use of the antistatic coating 92. The result of a threshold electrostatic field on the container 90 being below the ignition zone profile of the coating 92 occurs whether the coating 92 covers the entire surface of container 90 or only about one-half of the surface. In this way, the potential for incendiary discharge in flexible containers is significantly.decreased.
While the present invention has been described in relation to its use in flexible fabric containers, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that other applications are envisioned. Examples of other applications include use in pneumatic conveyor tubes or gravity slides or as liners in other containment vessels that transport products in situations where triboelectric charging may take place. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that may fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Out of over one thousand fill/empty trials, no probe ignitions were observed. These results indicate that the claimed quasi-conductive woven fabric sections including quasi-conductive fibers are highly effective at reducing the potential for incendiary discharge in woven bulk containers when P-190 fibers, with or without GMS, are incorporated as the quasi-conductive fibers.
FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber 162. The quasi-conductive fiber 162 includes a conductive core 113 and a non-conductive sheath 117.
FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a third embodiment of a quasi-conductive fiber 163. The quasi-conductive fiber 163 includes an insulative core 119 and a conductive outer sheath 121.
The effectiveness of the claimed quasi-conductive woven fabric sections including quasi-conductive fibers in reducing the potential for incendiary discharge was tested by separately incorporating the fibers 162 and 163 into woven bulk containers made of standard 6.5 ounce white fabric at 1 inch spacings with antistatic coatings of about 6 percent GMS and measuring, while the bag is being filled and emptied (a "fill/empty trial"), the number of gas ignitions which resulted upon the deliverance of a combustible gas mixture onto the surface of the bulk containers.
The maximum electric field strength measured during the trials was substantially similar to that measured with the woven bulk containers including P-190 fibers. Out of about 200 fill/empty trials, no ignitions resulted. These results indicate that the claimed quasi-conductive woven fabric sections including quasi-conductive fibers are highly effective at reducing the potential for incendiary discharge in woven bulk containers when fibers 162 and 163 are incorporated as the quasi-conductive fibers.
According to the invention, as an electrostatic field builds up on the flexible container 90 (as shown in FIG. 9) including quasi-conductive fibers 62, a localized zero potential charge is created at some midline between the quasi-conductive fibers 62. This.causes a potential to be created between that midline and the quasi-conductive fibers 62, causing ions to migrate into the quasi-conductive fibers 62.
The quasi-conductive fibers 62 have a resistivity that prevents an incendiary discharge from occurring from the fiber surface. As shown in FIG. 8, this is due to the insulating sheath 86 surrounding the conductive core 84.
The electric energy instead travels down the length of the quasi-conductive fiber cores 84 and exits the ends of the quasi-conductive fibers 62 as a corona discharge. If conductive yarns are used, the capacitance of the system is increased and a large charge of energy may build up. If a ground source approaches the ascribed conductive system, an energetic discharge may occur at such a level as to be incendiary.
Quasi-conductive fibers 62, 162, and/or 163 can be used in flexible intermediate bulk containers 90 (as shown in FIG. 9) either by themselves or in conjunction with an antistatic coating 92. Flexible intermediate bulk containers are used to transport finely divided solids such as cement, fertilizer, salt, sugar, and barite as well as virtually any type of finely divided solids. An antistatic coating 92 may be applied to cover the entire surface of the flexible fabric container 90 or a portion of the surface as depicted in FIG. 9. While the coating 92 shown in FIG. 9 is substantially parallel to the fibers 62, the coating 92 may be applied substantially perpendicular to fibers 62.
Antistatic coatings are laminates or coverings of thermoplastic or other materials, such as paper, over fabrics or fabric components that disperse potential localized energetic static charges over the surface and allow for controlled discharge of the charges. This combination increases the electrostatic charge level at which an incendiary discharge may occur. For example, such antistatic thermoplastic-type coatings may be imparted by the inclusion of a minor amount of a polyol ester of a Clo to C28 monocarboxylic acid.
In addition, a mixture of such acids may be included in a thermoplastic coating (not shown), which is primarily for sealing interstices in the yarn weave to prevent leakage of any finely divided contents of containers.
Optionally, a mixture of such acids may be included within both the thermoplastic coating and the polypropylene, mixed during each formulation. Suitable polyols from which these esters may be derived include ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, pentaerythritol and like materials.
Preferred esters include mixtures of mono-, di-, and triglycerides (glycerol esters) of C,a to C28 monocarboxylic acids such as decanoic, lauric, myristic, palmitic or stearic acids, as well as mixtures of such esters. The most preferred esters are esters of C10 to C22 monocarboxylic acids, and are most preferably stearyl monoglycerides containing at least about 80% by weight of the glycerol monostearate monoester. A preferred group of anti-static compounds are polyol partial fatty acid esters marketed by the Henkel Company under the trade designation DEHYDATTM 8312 and DEHYDATTM
8316.
In general, good antistatic properties may be obtained by the inclusion of from about 1.0% to about 15% by weight of the antistatic agent into the coating formulation, based on the weight of polymer in the coating. More preferred levels of antistatic compound are around 6% actual by weight.
The antistatic compound may also be incorporated into the polypropylene composition used to prepare the yarn material and at levels of from 0 to about 2% by weight based on the content of polypropylene polymer. The preferred content of antistatic compound when present in the yarn material ranges from about 0.05 to about 1% by weight, with about 0.1 to about 0.8% by weight being most preferred.
The antistatic additive may be missed with the base polymer in the molten state or with polymer pellets in an extruder. Preferably the antistatic compound is first formulated into a concentrate also containing an olefin polymer such as polyethylene or polypropylene and any other ingredients to be added such as a UV-absorber, plasticizer, filler, dye or the like, and this concentrate is then thoroughly admixed with the base polymer.
Antistatic coatings 92 (as shown in FIG. 9) cause the threshold level for the potential for an incendiary charge to be increased. With reference to FIGS. 10-12, the 5 utility of antistatic coatings 92 is shown. In each of these figures, each axis division on both the x and y axes represents -500 kV/M. FIG. 10 depicts the ignition profile of a flexible fabric container that does not have an antistatic coating 92 or quasi-conductive fibers 62. As 10 shown in FIG. 10, the threshold level at which an incendiary charge can occur is at about -500 kilovolts per meter.
With reference to FIG. 11, an ignition profile is 15 depicted for a flexible fabric container with an antistatic coating 92 applied over the entire surface of the container. As can be seen in FIG. 11, the threshold ignition level has been raised to about -1500 kilovolts per meter.
FIG. 12 depicts the ignition profile of the flexible container 90 (as shown in FIG. 9) including the antistatic coating 92 and the quasi-conductive fibers 62. As is apparent from FIG. 12, the ignition zone threshold is higher than the electrostatic field that can accumulate on the surface of the flexible fabric container 90. The result is that the flexible fabric container 90 including the quasi-conductive fibers 62 has a threshold electrostatic field on the surface of the container 90 that is no greater than approximately -900 kV/m. This is well below the ignition zone profile of about -1500 kV/m caused by the use of the antistatic coating 92. The result of a threshold electrostatic field on the container 90 being below the ignition zone profile of the coating 92 occurs whether the coating 92 covers the entire surface of container 90 or only about one-half of the surface. In this way, the potential for incendiary discharge in flexible containers is significantly.decreased.
While the present invention has been described in relation to its use in flexible fabric containers, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that other applications are envisioned. Examples of other applications include use in pneumatic conveyor tubes or gravity slides or as liners in other containment vessels that transport products in situations where triboelectric charging may take place. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that may fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. Fabric for use in an ungrounded type flexible fabric container with a reduced energy of electrostatic discharge for use in a combustible environment, comprising:
a woven fabric configured to form the flexible fabric container, said woven fabric including quasi-conductive fibers, each of said quasi-conductive fibers being configured to effect corona discharge at their ends or at other corona discharge points, and having resistance to avoid incendiary discharge at their ends or along their lengths at a rate that results in incendiary type discharges from said woven fabric in use in said ungrounded type flexible fabric container in a combustible environment having a minimum ignition energy of 0.25mJ, at least one of said quasi-conductive fibers comprises a plurality of conductive, quasi-conductive, and non-conductive materials.
a woven fabric configured to form the flexible fabric container, said woven fabric including quasi-conductive fibers, each of said quasi-conductive fibers being configured to effect corona discharge at their ends or at other corona discharge points, and having resistance to avoid incendiary discharge at their ends or along their lengths at a rate that results in incendiary type discharges from said woven fabric in use in said ungrounded type flexible fabric container in a combustible environment having a minimum ignition energy of 0.25mJ, at least one of said quasi-conductive fibers comprises a plurality of conductive, quasi-conductive, and non-conductive materials.
2. Fabric for use in an ungrounded type flexible fabric container with a reduced energy of electrostatic discharge for use in a combustible environment, comprising:
a woven fabric configured to form the flexible fabric container, said woven fabric including quasi-conductive fibers, each of said quasi-conductive fibers being configured to effect corona discharge at their ends or at other corona discharge points, and having resistance to avoid incendiary discharge at their ends or along their lengths at a rate that results in incendiary type discharges from said woven fabric in use in said ungrounded type flexible fabric container in a combustible environment having a minimum ignition energy of 0.25mJ, at least one of said quasi-conductive fibers comprises a plurality of conductive and non-conductive materials.
a woven fabric configured to form the flexible fabric container, said woven fabric including quasi-conductive fibers, each of said quasi-conductive fibers being configured to effect corona discharge at their ends or at other corona discharge points, and having resistance to avoid incendiary discharge at their ends or along their lengths at a rate that results in incendiary type discharges from said woven fabric in use in said ungrounded type flexible fabric container in a combustible environment having a minimum ignition energy of 0.25mJ, at least one of said quasi-conductive fibers comprises a plurality of conductive and non-conductive materials.
3. The fabric according to claim 1, wherein said quasi-conductive fibers comprise a first plurality of said quasi-conductive fibers substantially parallel to one another.
4. The fabric according to claim 3, further comprising a second plurality of said quasi-conductive fibers substantially perpendicular to said first plurality of said quasi-conductive fibers.
5. The fabric according to claim 1, wherein said quasi-conductive fibers are continuous fibers.
6. The fabric according to claim 1, further comprising corona discharge points at ends or along the lengths of said conductive and quasi-conductive materials.
7. The fabric according to claim 2, wherein said quasi-conductive fibers comprise a first plurality of said quasi-conductive fibers substantially parallel to one another.
8. The fabric according to claim 7, further comprising a second plurality of said quasi-conductive fibers substantially perpendicular to said first plurality of said quasi-conductive fibers.
9. The fabric according to claim 2, wherein said quasi-conductive fibers are continuous fibers.
10. The fabric according to claim 2, further comprising corona discharge points at ends or along the lengths of said conductive and quasi-conductive materials.
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13911393A | 1993-10-21 | 1993-10-21 | |
| US08/139,113 | 1993-10-21 | ||
| US08/252,660 US5478154A (en) | 1994-06-01 | 1994-06-01 | Quasi-conductive anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container |
| US08/252,660 | 1994-06-01 | ||
| CA002173346A CA2173346C (en) | 1993-10-21 | 1994-10-21 | Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002173346A Division CA2173346C (en) | 1993-10-21 | 1994-10-21 | Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2538977A1 CA2538977A1 (en) | 1995-04-27 |
| CA2538977C true CA2538977C (en) | 2010-02-09 |
Family
ID=36676974
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2538977A Expired - Lifetime CA2538977C (en) | 1993-10-21 | 1994-10-21 | Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2538977C (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109132159A (en) * | 2017-06-27 | 2019-01-04 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of antistatic chemical powder packaging bag |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20230295392A1 (en) | 2022-03-15 | 2023-09-21 | Taghleef Industries Inc. | Triboelectric mitigator coating |
-
1994
- 1994-10-21 CA CA2538977A patent/CA2538977C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109132159A (en) * | 2017-06-27 | 2019-01-04 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of antistatic chemical powder packaging bag |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2538977A1 (en) | 1995-04-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU686684B2 (en) | Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system | |
| US5071699A (en) | Antistatic woven coated polypropylene fabric | |
| US5478154A (en) | Quasi-conductive anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container | |
| US10023380B2 (en) | Flexible intermediate bulk container with induction control | |
| US6112772A (en) | Low discharge anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container | |
| JP2977900B2 (en) | Flexible bulk containers | |
| US7115311B2 (en) | Anti-static woven flexible bulk container | |
| AU2002239488A1 (en) | Anti-static woven fabric and flexible bulk container | |
| US20040076791A1 (en) | Flexible intermediate bulk container | |
| US6572942B2 (en) | Static dissipative fabric for flexible containers for bulk material | |
| US5512355A (en) | Anti-static woven coated fabric and flexible bulk container | |
| CA2538977C (en) | Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system | |
| US20060078234A1 (en) | Flexible intermediate bulk container having optimum discharge of hazardous charge | |
| US20070087149A1 (en) | Anti-static woven flexible bulk container | |
| CA2173346C (en) | Anti-incendiary flexible intermediate bulk container system | |
| WO2009135998A1 (en) | Multilayer packagings | |
| JPH06247492A (en) | Base cloth for electricity controllable flexible container |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20141021 |