CA2447257C - Modular lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant - Google Patents
Modular lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2447257C CA2447257C CA002447257A CA2447257A CA2447257C CA 2447257 C CA2447257 C CA 2447257C CA 002447257 A CA002447257 A CA 002447257A CA 2447257 A CA2447257 A CA 2447257A CA 2447257 C CA2447257 C CA 2447257C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- implant
- modular members
- vertebral bodies
- modular
- bone
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Prostheses (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention is directed to interbody spinal fusion implants having a structural configuration that provides for the maintaining and creating of the normal anatomic angular relationship of two adjacent vertebrae of the spine to maintain and create spinal lordosis. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention are sized to fit within the disc space created by the removal of disc material between two adjacent vertebrae and conform wholly or in part to the disc space created. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention have upper and lower surfaces that form a support structure for bearing against the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae. The upper and lower surfaces are disposed in converging angular relationship to each other such that the implants of the present invention have an overall wedged shape in an elevation side view.
Description
MODULAR LORDOTIC INTERBODY
SPINAL FUSION IMPLANT
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to interbody spinal fusion implants, and in particular to spinal fusion implants configured to restore and maintain two adjacent vertebrae of the spine in correct anatomical angular relationship.
Description of the Related Art Both the cervical and lumbar areas of the human spine are, in a healthy state, lordotic such that they are curved convex forward. It is not uncommon that in degenerative conditions of the spine that lordosis is lost. This effectively shortens the spinal canal which decreases its capacity. Further, the absence of lordosis.moves the spinal cord anteriorly where it may be compressed against the posterior portions of the vertebral bodies and discs.
Finally, such a loss of lordosis disturbs the overall mechanics of the spine which may cause cascading degenerative changes. throughout the adjacent spinal segments.
SPINAL FUSION IMPLANT
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to interbody spinal fusion implants, and in particular to spinal fusion implants configured to restore and maintain two adjacent vertebrae of the spine in correct anatomical angular relationship.
Description of the Related Art Both the cervical and lumbar areas of the human spine are, in a healthy state, lordotic such that they are curved convex forward. It is not uncommon that in degenerative conditions of the spine that lordosis is lost. This effectively shortens the spinal canal which decreases its capacity. Further, the absence of lordosis.moves the spinal cord anteriorly where it may be compressed against the posterior portions of the vertebral bodies and discs.
Finally, such a loss of lordosis disturbs the overall mechanics of the spine which may cause cascading degenerative changes. throughout the adjacent spinal segments.
The surgical treatment of those degenerative conditions of the spine in which the spinal discs are in various states of collapse, and out of lordosis, commonly involves spinal fusion. That is the joining together of adjacent vertebrae through an area of shared bone. When the shared bone is in the area previously occupied by the intervertebral disc that is referred to as an interbody fusion.
The Parent Application taught the use of artificial spinal fusion implants that were capable of being placed between adjacent vertebrae, and which implants were capable of containing and providing fusion promoting substances including bone at the fusion site.
These devices were further capable of restoring the height of the disc space and of supporting the spine, and were self stabilizing as well as being stabilizing to the spinal area where implanted.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect, the present invention relates to an interbody spinal fusion implant for fusion of two adjacent vertebral bodies in the human spine, comprising a plurality of modular members, each of the modular members having a height substantially equal to the surgically corrected height of the disc space and a width substantially less than the transverse width of the vertebral bodies, each of the modular members comprising an insertion end, a trailing end, opposed upper and lower portions adapted to be placed in contact with the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, and side walls connecting the upper and lower portions, the upper and lower portions forming a support structure including at least a part of the surfaces of the upper and lower portions between the side walls for bearing against the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, the upper and lower portions being disposed at least in part in a converging angular relationship along a longitudinal axis between the insertion and trailing ends to induce angulation of the adjacent vertebral bodies, the side walls of each of the modular members adapted to be positioned beside and in contact with at least another of the modular members in a side to side orientation within the space created between the adjacent vertebral bodies, whereby the plurality of modular members placed together form the spinal implant.
2a The present invention is directed to interbody spinal fusion implants having a structural configuration that provides for the maintaining and creating of the normal anatomic angular relationship of two adjacent vertebrae of the spine to maintain and create spinal lordosis. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention are sized to fit within the disc space created by the removal of disc material between two adjacent vertebrae and conform wholly or in part to the disc space created. The spinal fusion implants of the upper and lower surfaces that form a support structure for bearing against the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae.
In the preferred embodiments, the upper and lower surfaces are disposed in a converging angular relationship, to each other such that the -implants of the present invention have an overall "wedged-shape" in an elevational side view. The angular relationship of the wpper and lower surfaces places and maintains the vertebrae adjacent to those surfaces in an angular relationship to each other, creating and l0 maintaining the desired lordosis.
The implants of the present invention may have surface irregularities to increase their surface area;
and/or to further engage the adjacent vertebrae and to enhance stability. The lordotic implants of the present invention may have surface irregularities that are uniform in height along the longitudinal axis of the upper and lower vertebrae engaging surfaces, or may increase in height from one end of the implant to the other. That is, the implant body and the surface formed and the projections may be similarly wedged. The outer contour of the surface projections may be more or less rectangular while the underlying implant may be wedge-shaped; or the reverse wherein the underlying implant body is more or less rectangular while the contour of the surface projections are' wedge-shaped from one end of the implant to the other..
The implants of the present invention have various faces which may be curved so as to conform to the shape of the vertebral surfaces adjacent to the area of the disc removal. specifically the upper and/or lower surfaces may be convex, and/or the front and/or rear surfaces may be convex. The surfaces of the implants of the present invention may have openings Which may or may not pass all ' the way through them, and a ~ central chamber in communication to the surface through holes. The openings may be of random sizes, and/or shapes, and/or 5~ distributions. The implants themselves may be composed of materials, and/or have surface treatments, to encourage microscopic bone ingrowth into the implants.
In the performing of a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, it is not possible to replace the removed portions to of the disc, if a total nuclear discectomy has been performed, with a single large implant as the delicate dural sac containing the spinal cord, and the nerve roots cover at all times at least some portion of the posterior disc space. As set forth in the Parent Application, the 15 use of "modular implants" is appropriate in such cases.
,The modular implants being approximately as long as the depth of the disc material removed, but being considerably narrower, such that they can be introduced into the disc space from the posterior aspect to either side of the dural 2o sac, and then aligned side to side within the disc space so that a number of them each having a length consistent with the depth of the disc removed in that area would in combination have a width equal to the width of the disc material removed.
25 The modular implants of the present invention may be generally wedge-shaped and may have upper and lower surf aces conforming to the contours of the vertebral endplates, which contours include but are not limited to being relatively flat or convex. As the disc spaces in the 3o lumbar spine are generally lordotic, said implants in the preferred embodiment would be taller anteriorly, that is at CA 02447257 2003-11-19 .
the implant's insertion end, and less tall posteriorly, that is at the implant's trailing end. To introduce an implant that is taller at its insertion end than the space available at the posterior aspect of the disc space, even 5 when that disc space is optimally distracted, is problematic.
The modular implants of the present invention provide two solutions to the problem. In the first , embodiment, the modular implants may have a reduced size at their insertion end, including but not limited to a bullet nose, a convexity, and a chamfer to a smaller front surface. This then provides that the implant has an area small enough to be introduced into the posterior aspect of the disc space when the disc space is adequately distracted and the contour of that specialized leading portion of the implant is such that it then allows for a ramping up of the adjacent vertebrae relative to the implant as the implant is advanced forward into the disc space.
The implants of the present invention provide a second solution to this same problem. In the preferred embodiment of the modular implant, the implant is again wedge-shaped in the side elevational view and is taller at its insertion end than a;t its trailing end. However, the implant incorporates at its trailing end a means for engaging insertion instrumentation such as the box and.
threaded opening configuration disclosed in the Parent Application. Since in the preferred embodiment these implants are wedge-shaped in the side elevational view when upright but are generally rectangular when viewed from the top plan view, these implants are therefore designed to be introduced into the disc space on their side such that the CA 02447257 2003-11-19 .
side walls of the implants are adjacent to the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae. The implants have a- side:-to-side dimension that is less than the dimension through the insertion end of the implant when upright. It is .possible to easily insert these implants with them on their side and then to use the insertion instrument engaged to the implant to rotate the implants ninety degrees into the fully upright position, once they have been fully inserted. Once inserted, the upper and lower surfaces are adjacent to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae and create and maintain the desired angular relationship of the adjacent vertebrae as the upper and lower walls are angled with respect to each other.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, a mechanical implant which may be inserted in a collapsed position and which may then .be adjusted to increase in height so as to provide for the optimal restoration of the height of the space between the adjacent vertebrae is disclosed. The mechanical implant may, be wedge-shaped, and have upper and lower surfaces, th-a contours of which generally conform to the contacted areas of the adjacent vertebral endplates and which contours may include but are not limited to being relatively flat, or convex. Further, the mechanical implant may be wedge-shaped or generally rectangular, but capable of increasing in both height and the extent of wedging when adjusted.
This may easily be achieved by having one of the two wedge mechanisms employed in the example given being larger, or steeper than the other. Alternatively, a single wedge may be utilized, and if it is desired to achieved increased height at one end of the implant while restricting the height at the other, then the end of the implant may incorporate a hinge means and the height expansion at the other end achieved by drawing a wedge member, bar, ball, or other means from the far end towardlthe hinged end so as to 5~ drive said upper and lower surfaces apart in a wedged fashion.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, an implant having a mechanically deployable bone engaging means is taught. Such an implant is generally wedge-shaped in the side elevational view and has upper and lower surfaces generally conforming to the contour of the vertebral endplates where contacted by the implant, and which upper and lower surfaces may be but are not limited to being either flat ox convex. The use of such deployable bone engaging means are particularly of value in that the largest possible implant may be inserted into a disc space and the vertebral engaging means, which if, fixed to the surface would have blocked the insertion of the implant, may then be deployed after the insertion such that the distance from the tip of the upper and lower bone engagement means exceeds the height of the space available for insertion. Such a feature is of particular value when the implant itself is wedge-shaped as the considerable compressive loads across the lumbar spine would tend to drive a wedge-shaped implant out of the disc space.
OBE--TF. T.~~ OF ~F PRESENT
It is an object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is easily inserted into the spine, having a tapered leading end;
It is another object of the present invention to a provide a spinal fusion implant that tapers in height from one end to the other consistent with the taper of a normal spinal disc; , It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of maintaining anatomic alignment and lordosis of two adjacent vertebrae during the spinal fusion process;
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is self stabilizing within the spine;
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of providing stability between adjacent vertebrae when inserted;
It is further another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of spacing apart and supporting adjacent vertebrae in an angular relationship during the spinal fusion process;
It is still further another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that fits between to adjacent vertebrae and preserves the end plants of those vertebrae; and It is another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant having a shape which conforms to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae; and These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from a review of the accompanying drawings and the detailed description of the drawings.
BRTF D ~ RT TTON OF TT-~F D AWTNC''~
Figure 1 is a perspective view of the lordotic g.
interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention ' with a slidable door shown in a.partially open position providing access to the internal chamber of the implant.
Figure 2 is a top plan view of the lordotic 5~ interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 3 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 4 is a right side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 5 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention showing the slidable door in a partially open position.
Figure 6 is a rear end view of the lordotic ~interbody spinal fusion implant of tie present invention showing the means for engaging insertion instrumentation.
Figure 7 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 7 of Figure ,2 illustrating the bone engaging surface configuration of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 7A is an elevational side view of a segment of the spinal column having the lordotic implant of the present invention inserted in the disc space at different disc levels between adjacent vertebrae to restore and maintain the correct anatomical alignment of the adjacent vertebrae.-Figure 8 is a top plan view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 9 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 8.
Figure 10 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 8.
Figure 11 is a rear end view of the lordotic 5 interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 8 showing the means for engaging insertion instrumentation.
Figure 12 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 12 of Figure 8 illustrating the surface configuration the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present 10 invention.
Figure 13 is a top plan view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention made of a mesh-like material.
Figure 14 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 13.
Figure 15 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 13.
Figure 16 is a rear end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 13 showing the means for engaging insertion instrumentation.
Figure 17 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 17 of Figure 13 illustrating the surface configuration of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention Figure 18 is a perspective view of an alternative.
embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 19 is a top plan view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 18.
Figure 20 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 18. --Figure 21 is a rear end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant'of Figure 18.
Figure 22 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of~Figure l8.
5' . Figure 23 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 23 of Figure 18 illustrating the surface configuration the~lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 24 is a top plan view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 25 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24.
Figure 26 is a rear end view of the lordotic 'I5 ~ interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24.
Figure 27 is a front end v~.ew of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24.
Figure 28 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 28 of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24 illustrating the surface configuration of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 29 is a sectional view along lines 29--29 of Figure 28 the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 30 is a side elevational view of a segment of the human spinal column shown with an alternative embodiment of the lordotic spinal fusion implant of the present invention that is adjustable and expandable shown in sectional view inserted in the disc space levels to restore and maintain the correct anatomical alignment of the adjacent vertebrae.
Figure 31 is a side cross sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic implant of the present invention having movable projections, in the form 5' of spikes 708, which are movable from a first position within the implant 700 to a second position extending to the~exterior of the implant.
j~,ETAT .RD D .~ .$TPTTON OF THE i[1~AWT
Referring to Figures 1 through 7 the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention for use in the disc space between two adjacent vertebrae, generally referred to by the numeral 100, is shown. The implant 100 has a generally rectangular configuration, having an upper surface 112 and a lower surface 114. In the preferred embodiment, the upper and lower surfaces 112 ,and 114 of implant 100 are disposed in.a converging angular relationship toward each other such that the implant 100 appears "wedge-shaped" from a side elevational view .as shown in Figures 3 and 4. The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 have an interior surface which form a support structure for bearing against the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae between which the implant 100 is inserted. The angular relationship of the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 places and maintains the vertebrae adjacent to those surfaces in an angular relationship, creating and maintaining the desired lordosis of the spine.
The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 of the implant 100 may be flat or curved to conform to the shape of the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae between which the implant 100 is inserted. The implant 100 conforms t.o the shape of the nucleus pulposus and a porpon of the 13 , annulus fibrosus removed from the vertebrae. The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 comprise surface roughenings that provide a surface suitable for engaging the adjacent vertebrae to stabilize the implant 100 within the disc space once surgically implanted. The-surface roughenings of the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 comprise surface knurling 121.
Referring to Figure 7, an enlarged fragmentary view of the surface knurling 121 of the implant 100 is l0 shown as a diamond-shaped bone engaging pattern. The implant 100 may have surface knurling 121 throughout the entire upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114, throughout only a portion of the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114, or any combination thereof, without departing from the scope of the present invention. It is also appreciated that the surface knurling 121 may have various configuration other than the configuration shown.
In this embodiment; the implant 100 is hollow and comprises a plurality of openings 115 of passing through the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 and into a central hollow chamber 116. The openings 115 provide for bone growth to occur from thevertebrae through the openings 115 to the internal chamber 116. While the openings 115 have been shown in the drawings as being circular, it is-appreciated that the openings 115 may have any shape, size, configuration or distribution suitable for use in a spinal implant without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, the openings may have a tear-drop configuration as shown in opening 115a in Figures l and 2.
The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 of the implant 100 are supported and spaced apart by a side wall 118, which may also comprise a plurality of, openings 122.
The implant lOO has an insertion end 120 and a trailing end 130 both of which maybe curved or flat. The 5' trailing end 130 of the implant may be convex to conform to the curvature of the vertebrae and .has a means for enlarging an implant insertion instrument comprising a depressed portion 124 with a central threaded opening 26 for receiving the engaging end of a driving instrument.
The insertion end 120 of the implant 100 comprises an access opening 132 and a slidable door 134 which closes_the opening 132. The slidable door 134 covers the opening 132 into the chamber 116 and permits the insertion of autogenous bone material into the chamber 116.
'15 In use; the slidable door 134 is placed in the ppen position for loading material into the chamber 116.
The slideable door 134 has a. depression 136 for facilitating the opening and closing of the door 134. The internal chamber 116 can be filled and hold any natural or artificial osteoconductive, osteoinductive, osteogenic, or other fusion enhancing material. Some examples of such materials are bone harvested from the patient, or bone growth inducing material such as; but not limited to, hydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate; or bone morphogenic protein. The implant 100 itself is made of material appropriate for human implantation such as titanium and/or may be made of, and/or filled and/or coated with a. bone ingrowth inducing material such as, but not limited to, hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate or any other osteoconductive, osteoinductive, osteogenic, or other fusion enhancing material.
The fusion enhancing material that is packed within the chamber 116 of the implant 10 serves to promote bone 5 ingrowth between the implant 100 and the adjacent vertebrae.
Once the bone ingrowth occurs, the implant 100 will be a permanent fixture preventing dislodgement of~the implant as well as preventing any movement between the adjacent vertebrae.
10 The slidable door 134 is then closed prior to implantation. In the closed position, the slideable door conforms to the curvature of the insertion end 120 of the implant 100. Various methods of packing the implant 100 with the autogenous bone material may be used to Obtain a 15 completely packed implant 100.
The threaded end of a driving instrument is attached to the threaded opening 126 in the trailing end 120 of the implant 100 and the fitting of the driving instrument into the depressed portion 124 prevents movement of the implant 100 in relationship to the driving instrument. The implant 100 is then placed at the entrance to the disc space between the two adjacent vertebrae V. The driver instrument is then tapped with a hammer sufficiently hard enough to-drive the implant 100 into the disc space.
The size of the implant 100 is substantially the same size as the disc material that it is replacing and thus will be larger or smaller depending on the amount of disc material removed to create the disc space in which it is to be used. In the preferred embodiment in regard to the lumbar spine the implant l00 is approximately 28-48 mm 16 , , wide, approximately 36 mm being preferred. The implant 100 has a height conforming to the restoration of the anatomic height of the disc space the average height would range from e-16 mm, with 10-12 of which being the .preferred average height. The depth would at is maximum range from 20 to 34~;mm with 26 to 32 being the preferred maximum depth. In the cervical spine the width of the implant is in the range of approximately 14-28 mm; with the preferred width being 18-22 mm. The implant has a height in the range of approximately 5-10 mm with the preferred height being 6-8 mm. The implant has a depth in the range of approximately 11-21 mm with the preferred depth being 11-13 mm.
Referring to Figure 7A, a side elevational view of the lateral aspect of a segment of the spinal column' S
is shown with the implant 100 inserted in the disc space DZ
between two adjacent vertebrae v2 and V3. The implant'100 is inserted in the direction of arrow A into the disc space D2 and maintains the two vertebrae V2 and V3 in anguhar relationship to each other such that the natural lordosis of that segment of the spinal column S is restored. The forward advancement of the implant 100 is blocked by the natural bone processes B in the endplates of the vertebrae VZ and V3. Backing out of the implant 100 is prevented by the bone engaging surface knurling 121 of the upper and lower surfaces 1I2 and 114.
Referring to Figure 8-12, an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 200, is shown. The implant 200 has a similar overall configuration as the implant 100 described above.
In the preferred embodiment, the implant 200 is solid and comprises a plurality of channels~2Z5 passing from the upper surface 212 to the lower surface 214 through the implant 200. The channels 215 provide for bone ingrowth 5~ and facilitate the incorporation of the implant 200 into the spinal fusion mass. The channels may also be loaded with fusion promoting materials such as those described above, prior to implantation. It is appreciated that the channels 215 need not pass all the way through the implant.
200, but can have a configuration similar to wells, which may hold fusion promoting materials and permit bone ingrowth into the upper and lower surfaces 212 and 214 of the implant 200.
In addition to the channels 215, the implant 200 may have small openings 222 on the side wall 218 which may ,or may not pass through the entire implant 200. The same openings 222 may be in communication with the channels 215 such that bone ingrowth may occur from the openings 222 to the channels 215 ~o lock the implant 200 into the fusion mass. If the openings 222 do not pass through the entire implant 200, the may function as small wells for holding fusion promoting materials or described above.
In the preferred embodiment of implant 200, the channels 215 have a diameter in the range of 0.1 mm to 6 mm, with 2-3 mm being the preferred diameter. The openings 222 have a diameter in the range of 0.1 mm to &
mm, with 1-3 mm being the preferred.diameter range. It is appreciated that although the channels 215 and openings 222 are shown having a generally rounded configuration, it is within the scope of the present invention that the channels 215 and openings 222 may have any size, shape, 18 , .
w configuration, and distribution suitable for the intended purpose. The implant 200, has a plurality~of ratchetings 250 on the upper and lower surface 212 and 214 for engaging the bone of the adjacent vertebrae.. The ratchetings 250 comprise a bone engaging edge 252 and angled segment 254.
Referring specifically to Figure 9, the implant' 200 has a wedge-shaped elevational side view in which the trailing end 230 is taller than the insertion end 220: The plurality of ratchetings 250 are oriented in the direction of the insertion end 220 to provide for a one-way insertion of the implant 200 as the bone engaging edge 252 engages the vertebrae and prevents the implant from backing out once implanted. Alternatively, the trailing end ratchetings could be of a lessor height such that the overall shape of the ratchetings as a group is convex.
Referring to Figure 11, the trailing end 230 of implant 200 has means for engaging insertion instrumentation comprising a thread opening 226 ,as described above for implant 100.
Referring to Figure 12, an enlarged fragmentary view along line 12 of Figure 8 illustrating the surface configuration the implant 200-is shown. The upper and lower surfaces 212 and 214 of implant 200, in addition to the ratcheting 250 comprise a porous texture 260 to present an irregular surface to the bone to promote bone ingrowth.
The porous texture 260 is also able to hold fusion promoting materials and provides for an increased surface area to engage the bone in the fusion process and to provide further stability. The porous texture 260 may also be present on the side walls 218. It is appreciated that the outer surface and/or the entire' implant 200, may comprise any other porous material or roughened surface sufficient to hold fusion promoting substances and/or allow for bone ingrowth and/or engage the bone during the fusion , process: The implant 200 may be further coated with bioactive fusion promoting substances ihcluding; but not limited to, hydroxyapatite compounds, osteogenic proteins and bone morphogenic proteins.
Referring to Figures 13-17, an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant, generally referred to by the numeral 300, is shown. The implant 300 is made of a mesh-like, material comprising strands, which may be made of metal, that are pressed together and molded. The upper and lower surfaces 312 and 314 may be convex and conform to the natural surface curvature of the end plates of the. vertebrae. In addition, the entire implant 300 may be molded to .a shape that canforms to the shape of the disc space created by the removal of discmaterial from between two adjacent vertebrae. In this manner, the implant 300 has curved upper and lower surfaces 312 and 314, a curved side wall.
318 and chamfered edges 319.
Referring to Figure 7A, the implant 300 is shown inserted in the direction of arrow A into the disc space D1 between adjacent vertebrae Vl and V2. The implant 300 conforms to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae V, and VZ as the upper and lower surfaces 312 and 314 are convex, and the side walls 318 are curved to conform to the natural curvature of the vertebrae Vl and V2. In this manner, the implant 300 has the same dimensions as the disc material removed from between the two adjacent vertebrae VI and V2.
20 ,.
The implant 300 may be made wholly or in part of a solid material and/or a porous material, and/or a mesh-like material. The implant 300 may have a surface comprising of a porous material, a mesh-like material, or have a surface that is roughened. It is appreciated that the implant 300 may be solid or may be partially hollow and include at least one internal chamber in communication with said upper and lower surfaces.
As shown in Figure 17, the mesh-like material comprises strands that are formed and pressed together such that interstices 339, capable of retaining fusion promoting material and for allowing for bone ingrowth, are present between the strands in at least the outer surface of implant 300. Alternatively, it is appreciated that the implant 300 may be made of a cancellous material, similar in configuration to human cancellous bone, having interstices allowing for bone ingrowth. As the implant 300 may be made entirely or in part of the cancellous material, the interstices may be present in the outer surface of the implant 300 and/or within the entire implant to promote bone ingrowth and hold bone fusion promoting materials.
Referring to Figures 18-23 an alternative embodiment of the implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 400, is disclosed.
The implant 400 has a substantially rectangular shape having upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414. The upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 support the adjacent vertebrae and are disposed in a converging angular relationship to each other in the same manner described above.
The implant 400 has a width W that is substantially less than the width of the implants 100-300 such that a series of such implants 400 are used as the interbody spinal implant, each placed closely adjacent to one another to approximate the size of the removed disc.
The size of the implant 400 is approximately 26 millimeters 5~ in length and is wide enough so that four of them will substantially fill the intervertebral space, depending on which vertebrae are fused.
In the performing of a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, it is not possible to replace the removed portions of the disc, if a total nuclear discectomy has been performed, with a single large implant as the delicate dural sac containing the spinal cord and nerve roots covers at all times at least some portion of the posterior disc space. The use of modular implants 400 that are inserted 'separately into the disc space is appropriate in such case.
The modular implants 400 being approximately as long as the depth of the disc material removed, but being considerably narrower, such that they could be introduced into the disc space from the posterior aspect to either side of the dural sac, and then realigned side to side with the disc space so that a number of them each having a length consistent with the depth of the disc removed in that area would in combination have a width equal to the width of the disc material removed. As the disc spaces in the lumbar spine are generally lordotic, the insertion end 420 of the modular implants 400 would have to be taller and less tall posteriorly at the trailing end 430.
To introduce the modular implant 400 that is taller at its insertion end 420 than the space available at the posterior aspect of the disc space, even when that disc space is optimally distracted, is problematic. The modular implants 400 of provide two solutions to the problem. The modular implants 400 may have a reduced size at their insertion end 420, including but not limited to, a bullet nose, a convexity, and a chamfer to a smaller front surface. This then provides that the implant 400 has an area small enough to be introduced into .the posterior aspect of the disc space when the disc space is adequately distracted and the contour of that specialized insertion.
end of the implant 400 is such that it then allows for a ramping up of the adjacent vertebrae relative to the implant 400 as the implant is advanced forwardinto the disc space.
Alternatively, or in combination with the above, since in the preferred embodiment the implants 400 are wedge-shaped in the side elevational view when upright but are generally rectangular when viewed from the top plan view, these implants may be introduced into the disc space on their side such that the side walls of the implants are adjacent to the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae. The implants 400 have a side-to-side dimension that is less than the dimension through the insertion end of the implant 400 when upright. It is possible to easily insert the implant 400 first on their side and then to use the insertion instrument engaged to the implant 400 to rotate the implant ninety degrees into the fully upright position, once it has been fully inserted. Once inserted, the upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 are adjacent to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae and create and maintain the desired angular relationship of the adjacent vertebrae as the upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 of the implant 400 are angled with respect to each other.
The implant 400 has large openings 4~.5 in the form of rectangular slots for holding fusion promoting ,, materials to promote bone growth from the vertebrae through 5~ the upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 and into the-interior of the implant 400. As the implant 400 is modular and more than one is implanted at a time, 'the large openings 415 are also present in the side walls 418 of the implant 400 to provide for bone growth from one implant to another implant such that after successful fusion; the modular implants 400 are interconnected to form a single unit.
Referring to Figure 21, the trailing end 430 of the implant 400 is shown having an insertion instrument engaging means comprising a rectangular slot 424 and threaded opening 426. '.
Referring to Figure 23, an enlarged fragmentary view along line 23 of Figure l8 illustrating the surf ace configuration they implant 400 is shown. The surface configuration of the implant 400 is the same as the porous texture 260 described above.
Referring to Figure 24, an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 500, is shown. The implant 500 is a modular implant and has a similar overall configuration as implant 400. The implant 500 instead of having slots 415 has an upper and lower surfaces 512 and 514 that are capable of receiving and holding bone, or other materials capable of participating in the fusion process and/or capable of promoting bone ingrowth. In the preferred embodiment, the . upper and lower surfaces 512 and 514 comprise a plurality of posts 540 that are spaced apart to provide a plurality of interstices 542 which axe partial wells with incomplete walls capable of holding and retaining milled bone material or any artificial bone ingrowth promoting material. The implant 520 maybe prepared for implantation by grouting or otherwise coating the surface 538 with the appropriate fusion promoting substances.
Referring to Figure 28 and 29, an enlarged view.
of the upper surface 512 of the implant 500 and a partial cross section thereof are shown. In the preferred embodiment, the posts 540 have a head portion 544 of a larger diameter than the remainder of. the posts 540, and each of the interstices 542 is the reverse configuration of the posts 544, having a bottom 546 that is wider than the entrance 548 to the interstices 542. Such a configuration of the posts 540 and interstices 542 aids in the retention of bone material in the surface 538 of the implant 520 and further assists in the locking of the implant 520 into the bone fusion mass created from the bone ingrowth. As the bone ingrowth at the bottom 546 of the interstices 542 is wider than the entrance 548, the bone ingrowth cannot exit from the entrance 548 and is locked within the interstice 542. The surface 538 of the implant 520 provides for an improvement in the available amount of surface area which may be still further increased by rough finishing, flocking or otherwise producing a non smooth surface.
In the preferred embodiment, the posts 540 have a maximum diameter in the range of approximately 0.1-2 mm 3d and a height of approximately 0.1-2 mm and are spaced apart a distance of approximately 0.1-2 mm such that the interstices 542 have a width in the range of approximately 0.1 to 2 mm. The post sizes, shapes, and distributions may be varied within the same implant.
It is appreciated that the implant 500 shares the 5 ~ same structure and features of the implant 400 described above.
Figure 30 is a side elevational view of a segment of the human spinal column S shown in lordosis with an alternative embodiment of the lordotic spinal fusion l0 implant referred to by the numeral 600, that is adjustable and expandable shown inserted in a space to xestore and maintain the correct anatomical alignment of the adjacent vertebrae. The implant 600 comprises a lower member 682 and an upper member 684 which when fitted together form an ~15 essentially rectangular implant. The upper member 684 and the lower member 682 have hollow portions that face one another and receive tapered wedges 686 and 688 that fit within the hollow portion of the upper and lower members 682 and 684. The upper and lower members 682 and 684 each 20 have a wedged interior surface 689a and 689b which are angled towards the interior of the implant 600. The wedges 682 and 684 are such that at their large end, they are higher than the combined hollow space between the upper and lower members 684 and 682; and shallower at the other end 25 than the hollow space between the upper and lower members.
The wedges 686 and 688 have a central threaded opening 690 and 692 in alignment with each other for receiving threaded screw 694. As the screw 694 is threaded into the opening 690, the wedges 686 and 688 abut the interior sloped surfaces 689a and 689b of the upper and lower members 682 and 684. As the screw 694 is turned, the wedges 686 and 688 are drawn together, and the sloped portions of the wedges force the upper member 682 away from the lower member 684. As the interior sloped surfaces 6f9a and 689b have a greater slope near the trailing end 630, than near the insertion end 620, the upper and lower members 6,82 and 684 are forced apart more at the .insertion end 620 than at.the trailing end 630. As a result, the upper and lower members 682 and 684 are disposed at a converging angular relationship to each other and support the adjacent vertebrae V1 and VZ in the same angular relationship.
Referring to Figure 31, an alternative embodiment of the implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 700, is shown. The implant 700 has movable projections, in the form of spikes 708, which are movable from a first position within the implant 700 to a second position extending outside of the implant. The implant 700 is of .a generally rectangular configuration, having a top surface 702 and a bottom surface 704 of the implant with slots 706 for permitting pivotal member 707 having spikes 708 at their ends to project through said .
slots 706. The spikes 708 are pinned at one end 710 within the, implant 700.
The implant 700 has opposing wedge shaped members.
?12 and 714 having a central threaded opening 716 for receiving a threaded screw 718 having a head 720 and a slot 722. The wedges 712 and 714 are facing each other so that upon turning of the screw 718, will the two wedges 712 and 714 are drawn together to cause the spikes 708 to pivot about their end 710 and project to the exterior of the implant 700 through the aligned slots 706. The implant 700 may comprise a series of holes in the upper and lower surfaces 702 and 704 for promoting bone ingrowth and fusion.
Iri use, after the removal of the'disc material, the implant 700 with the spikes 708 in their withdrawn position, is inserted into the disc space. Then the screw 718 is turned until the spikes 708 are forced to enter the vertebrae and the implant 700 is thus held firmly in place.
While the invention has been described with regards to the preferred embodiment. and a number of alternative embodiments, it is. recognized that other embodiments of the present invention may be devised which would not depart. from the scope of the present invention.
The Parent Application taught the use of artificial spinal fusion implants that were capable of being placed between adjacent vertebrae, and which implants were capable of containing and providing fusion promoting substances including bone at the fusion site.
These devices were further capable of restoring the height of the disc space and of supporting the spine, and were self stabilizing as well as being stabilizing to the spinal area where implanted.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect, the present invention relates to an interbody spinal fusion implant for fusion of two adjacent vertebral bodies in the human spine, comprising a plurality of modular members, each of the modular members having a height substantially equal to the surgically corrected height of the disc space and a width substantially less than the transverse width of the vertebral bodies, each of the modular members comprising an insertion end, a trailing end, opposed upper and lower portions adapted to be placed in contact with the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, and side walls connecting the upper and lower portions, the upper and lower portions forming a support structure including at least a part of the surfaces of the upper and lower portions between the side walls for bearing against the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, the upper and lower portions being disposed at least in part in a converging angular relationship along a longitudinal axis between the insertion and trailing ends to induce angulation of the adjacent vertebral bodies, the side walls of each of the modular members adapted to be positioned beside and in contact with at least another of the modular members in a side to side orientation within the space created between the adjacent vertebral bodies, whereby the plurality of modular members placed together form the spinal implant.
2a The present invention is directed to interbody spinal fusion implants having a structural configuration that provides for the maintaining and creating of the normal anatomic angular relationship of two adjacent vertebrae of the spine to maintain and create spinal lordosis. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention are sized to fit within the disc space created by the removal of disc material between two adjacent vertebrae and conform wholly or in part to the disc space created. The spinal fusion implants of the upper and lower surfaces that form a support structure for bearing against the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae.
In the preferred embodiments, the upper and lower surfaces are disposed in a converging angular relationship, to each other such that the -implants of the present invention have an overall "wedged-shape" in an elevational side view. The angular relationship of the wpper and lower surfaces places and maintains the vertebrae adjacent to those surfaces in an angular relationship to each other, creating and l0 maintaining the desired lordosis.
The implants of the present invention may have surface irregularities to increase their surface area;
and/or to further engage the adjacent vertebrae and to enhance stability. The lordotic implants of the present invention may have surface irregularities that are uniform in height along the longitudinal axis of the upper and lower vertebrae engaging surfaces, or may increase in height from one end of the implant to the other. That is, the implant body and the surface formed and the projections may be similarly wedged. The outer contour of the surface projections may be more or less rectangular while the underlying implant may be wedge-shaped; or the reverse wherein the underlying implant body is more or less rectangular while the contour of the surface projections are' wedge-shaped from one end of the implant to the other..
The implants of the present invention have various faces which may be curved so as to conform to the shape of the vertebral surfaces adjacent to the area of the disc removal. specifically the upper and/or lower surfaces may be convex, and/or the front and/or rear surfaces may be convex. The surfaces of the implants of the present invention may have openings Which may or may not pass all ' the way through them, and a ~ central chamber in communication to the surface through holes. The openings may be of random sizes, and/or shapes, and/or 5~ distributions. The implants themselves may be composed of materials, and/or have surface treatments, to encourage microscopic bone ingrowth into the implants.
In the performing of a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, it is not possible to replace the removed portions to of the disc, if a total nuclear discectomy has been performed, with a single large implant as the delicate dural sac containing the spinal cord, and the nerve roots cover at all times at least some portion of the posterior disc space. As set forth in the Parent Application, the 15 use of "modular implants" is appropriate in such cases.
,The modular implants being approximately as long as the depth of the disc material removed, but being considerably narrower, such that they can be introduced into the disc space from the posterior aspect to either side of the dural 2o sac, and then aligned side to side within the disc space so that a number of them each having a length consistent with the depth of the disc removed in that area would in combination have a width equal to the width of the disc material removed.
25 The modular implants of the present invention may be generally wedge-shaped and may have upper and lower surf aces conforming to the contours of the vertebral endplates, which contours include but are not limited to being relatively flat or convex. As the disc spaces in the 3o lumbar spine are generally lordotic, said implants in the preferred embodiment would be taller anteriorly, that is at CA 02447257 2003-11-19 .
the implant's insertion end, and less tall posteriorly, that is at the implant's trailing end. To introduce an implant that is taller at its insertion end than the space available at the posterior aspect of the disc space, even 5 when that disc space is optimally distracted, is problematic.
The modular implants of the present invention provide two solutions to the problem. In the first , embodiment, the modular implants may have a reduced size at their insertion end, including but not limited to a bullet nose, a convexity, and a chamfer to a smaller front surface. This then provides that the implant has an area small enough to be introduced into the posterior aspect of the disc space when the disc space is adequately distracted and the contour of that specialized leading portion of the implant is such that it then allows for a ramping up of the adjacent vertebrae relative to the implant as the implant is advanced forward into the disc space.
The implants of the present invention provide a second solution to this same problem. In the preferred embodiment of the modular implant, the implant is again wedge-shaped in the side elevational view and is taller at its insertion end than a;t its trailing end. However, the implant incorporates at its trailing end a means for engaging insertion instrumentation such as the box and.
threaded opening configuration disclosed in the Parent Application. Since in the preferred embodiment these implants are wedge-shaped in the side elevational view when upright but are generally rectangular when viewed from the top plan view, these implants are therefore designed to be introduced into the disc space on their side such that the CA 02447257 2003-11-19 .
side walls of the implants are adjacent to the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae. The implants have a- side:-to-side dimension that is less than the dimension through the insertion end of the implant when upright. It is .possible to easily insert these implants with them on their side and then to use the insertion instrument engaged to the implant to rotate the implants ninety degrees into the fully upright position, once they have been fully inserted. Once inserted, the upper and lower surfaces are adjacent to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae and create and maintain the desired angular relationship of the adjacent vertebrae as the upper and lower walls are angled with respect to each other.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, a mechanical implant which may be inserted in a collapsed position and which may then .be adjusted to increase in height so as to provide for the optimal restoration of the height of the space between the adjacent vertebrae is disclosed. The mechanical implant may, be wedge-shaped, and have upper and lower surfaces, th-a contours of which generally conform to the contacted areas of the adjacent vertebral endplates and which contours may include but are not limited to being relatively flat, or convex. Further, the mechanical implant may be wedge-shaped or generally rectangular, but capable of increasing in both height and the extent of wedging when adjusted.
This may easily be achieved by having one of the two wedge mechanisms employed in the example given being larger, or steeper than the other. Alternatively, a single wedge may be utilized, and if it is desired to achieved increased height at one end of the implant while restricting the height at the other, then the end of the implant may incorporate a hinge means and the height expansion at the other end achieved by drawing a wedge member, bar, ball, or other means from the far end towardlthe hinged end so as to 5~ drive said upper and lower surfaces apart in a wedged fashion.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, an implant having a mechanically deployable bone engaging means is taught. Such an implant is generally wedge-shaped in the side elevational view and has upper and lower surfaces generally conforming to the contour of the vertebral endplates where contacted by the implant, and which upper and lower surfaces may be but are not limited to being either flat ox convex. The use of such deployable bone engaging means are particularly of value in that the largest possible implant may be inserted into a disc space and the vertebral engaging means, which if, fixed to the surface would have blocked the insertion of the implant, may then be deployed after the insertion such that the distance from the tip of the upper and lower bone engagement means exceeds the height of the space available for insertion. Such a feature is of particular value when the implant itself is wedge-shaped as the considerable compressive loads across the lumbar spine would tend to drive a wedge-shaped implant out of the disc space.
OBE--TF. T.~~ OF ~F PRESENT
It is an object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is easily inserted into the spine, having a tapered leading end;
It is another object of the present invention to a provide a spinal fusion implant that tapers in height from one end to the other consistent with the taper of a normal spinal disc; , It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of maintaining anatomic alignment and lordosis of two adjacent vertebrae during the spinal fusion process;
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is self stabilizing within the spine;
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of providing stability between adjacent vertebrae when inserted;
It is further another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of spacing apart and supporting adjacent vertebrae in an angular relationship during the spinal fusion process;
It is still further another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that fits between to adjacent vertebrae and preserves the end plants of those vertebrae; and It is another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant having a shape which conforms to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae; and These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from a review of the accompanying drawings and the detailed description of the drawings.
BRTF D ~ RT TTON OF TT-~F D AWTNC''~
Figure 1 is a perspective view of the lordotic g.
interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention ' with a slidable door shown in a.partially open position providing access to the internal chamber of the implant.
Figure 2 is a top plan view of the lordotic 5~ interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 3 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 4 is a right side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 5 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention showing the slidable door in a partially open position.
Figure 6 is a rear end view of the lordotic ~interbody spinal fusion implant of tie present invention showing the means for engaging insertion instrumentation.
Figure 7 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 7 of Figure ,2 illustrating the bone engaging surface configuration of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 7A is an elevational side view of a segment of the spinal column having the lordotic implant of the present invention inserted in the disc space at different disc levels between adjacent vertebrae to restore and maintain the correct anatomical alignment of the adjacent vertebrae.-Figure 8 is a top plan view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 9 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 8.
Figure 10 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 8.
Figure 11 is a rear end view of the lordotic 5 interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 8 showing the means for engaging insertion instrumentation.
Figure 12 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 12 of Figure 8 illustrating the surface configuration the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present 10 invention.
Figure 13 is a top plan view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention made of a mesh-like material.
Figure 14 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 13.
Figure 15 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 13.
Figure 16 is a rear end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 13 showing the means for engaging insertion instrumentation.
Figure 17 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 17 of Figure 13 illustrating the surface configuration of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention Figure 18 is a perspective view of an alternative.
embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 19 is a top plan view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 18.
Figure 20 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 18. --Figure 21 is a rear end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant'of Figure 18.
Figure 22 is a front end view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of~Figure l8.
5' . Figure 23 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 23 of Figure 18 illustrating the surface configuration the~lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 24 is a top plan view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 25 is a left side elevational view of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24.
Figure 26 is a rear end view of the lordotic 'I5 ~ interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24.
Figure 27 is a front end v~.ew of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24.
Figure 28 is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 28 of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of Figure 24 illustrating the surface configuration of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 29 is a sectional view along lines 29--29 of Figure 28 the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention.
Figure 30 is a side elevational view of a segment of the human spinal column shown with an alternative embodiment of the lordotic spinal fusion implant of the present invention that is adjustable and expandable shown in sectional view inserted in the disc space levels to restore and maintain the correct anatomical alignment of the adjacent vertebrae.
Figure 31 is a side cross sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the lordotic implant of the present invention having movable projections, in the form 5' of spikes 708, which are movable from a first position within the implant 700 to a second position extending to the~exterior of the implant.
j~,ETAT .RD D .~ .$TPTTON OF THE i[1~AWT
Referring to Figures 1 through 7 the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention for use in the disc space between two adjacent vertebrae, generally referred to by the numeral 100, is shown. The implant 100 has a generally rectangular configuration, having an upper surface 112 and a lower surface 114. In the preferred embodiment, the upper and lower surfaces 112 ,and 114 of implant 100 are disposed in.a converging angular relationship toward each other such that the implant 100 appears "wedge-shaped" from a side elevational view .as shown in Figures 3 and 4. The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 have an interior surface which form a support structure for bearing against the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae between which the implant 100 is inserted. The angular relationship of the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 places and maintains the vertebrae adjacent to those surfaces in an angular relationship, creating and maintaining the desired lordosis of the spine.
The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 of the implant 100 may be flat or curved to conform to the shape of the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae between which the implant 100 is inserted. The implant 100 conforms t.o the shape of the nucleus pulposus and a porpon of the 13 , annulus fibrosus removed from the vertebrae. The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 comprise surface roughenings that provide a surface suitable for engaging the adjacent vertebrae to stabilize the implant 100 within the disc space once surgically implanted. The-surface roughenings of the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 comprise surface knurling 121.
Referring to Figure 7, an enlarged fragmentary view of the surface knurling 121 of the implant 100 is l0 shown as a diamond-shaped bone engaging pattern. The implant 100 may have surface knurling 121 throughout the entire upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114, throughout only a portion of the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114, or any combination thereof, without departing from the scope of the present invention. It is also appreciated that the surface knurling 121 may have various configuration other than the configuration shown.
In this embodiment; the implant 100 is hollow and comprises a plurality of openings 115 of passing through the upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 and into a central hollow chamber 116. The openings 115 provide for bone growth to occur from thevertebrae through the openings 115 to the internal chamber 116. While the openings 115 have been shown in the drawings as being circular, it is-appreciated that the openings 115 may have any shape, size, configuration or distribution suitable for use in a spinal implant without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, the openings may have a tear-drop configuration as shown in opening 115a in Figures l and 2.
The upper and lower surfaces 112 and 114 of the implant 100 are supported and spaced apart by a side wall 118, which may also comprise a plurality of, openings 122.
The implant lOO has an insertion end 120 and a trailing end 130 both of which maybe curved or flat. The 5' trailing end 130 of the implant may be convex to conform to the curvature of the vertebrae and .has a means for enlarging an implant insertion instrument comprising a depressed portion 124 with a central threaded opening 26 for receiving the engaging end of a driving instrument.
The insertion end 120 of the implant 100 comprises an access opening 132 and a slidable door 134 which closes_the opening 132. The slidable door 134 covers the opening 132 into the chamber 116 and permits the insertion of autogenous bone material into the chamber 116.
'15 In use; the slidable door 134 is placed in the ppen position for loading material into the chamber 116.
The slideable door 134 has a. depression 136 for facilitating the opening and closing of the door 134. The internal chamber 116 can be filled and hold any natural or artificial osteoconductive, osteoinductive, osteogenic, or other fusion enhancing material. Some examples of such materials are bone harvested from the patient, or bone growth inducing material such as; but not limited to, hydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate; or bone morphogenic protein. The implant 100 itself is made of material appropriate for human implantation such as titanium and/or may be made of, and/or filled and/or coated with a. bone ingrowth inducing material such as, but not limited to, hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate or any other osteoconductive, osteoinductive, osteogenic, or other fusion enhancing material.
The fusion enhancing material that is packed within the chamber 116 of the implant 10 serves to promote bone 5 ingrowth between the implant 100 and the adjacent vertebrae.
Once the bone ingrowth occurs, the implant 100 will be a permanent fixture preventing dislodgement of~the implant as well as preventing any movement between the adjacent vertebrae.
10 The slidable door 134 is then closed prior to implantation. In the closed position, the slideable door conforms to the curvature of the insertion end 120 of the implant 100. Various methods of packing the implant 100 with the autogenous bone material may be used to Obtain a 15 completely packed implant 100.
The threaded end of a driving instrument is attached to the threaded opening 126 in the trailing end 120 of the implant 100 and the fitting of the driving instrument into the depressed portion 124 prevents movement of the implant 100 in relationship to the driving instrument. The implant 100 is then placed at the entrance to the disc space between the two adjacent vertebrae V. The driver instrument is then tapped with a hammer sufficiently hard enough to-drive the implant 100 into the disc space.
The size of the implant 100 is substantially the same size as the disc material that it is replacing and thus will be larger or smaller depending on the amount of disc material removed to create the disc space in which it is to be used. In the preferred embodiment in regard to the lumbar spine the implant l00 is approximately 28-48 mm 16 , , wide, approximately 36 mm being preferred. The implant 100 has a height conforming to the restoration of the anatomic height of the disc space the average height would range from e-16 mm, with 10-12 of which being the .preferred average height. The depth would at is maximum range from 20 to 34~;mm with 26 to 32 being the preferred maximum depth. In the cervical spine the width of the implant is in the range of approximately 14-28 mm; with the preferred width being 18-22 mm. The implant has a height in the range of approximately 5-10 mm with the preferred height being 6-8 mm. The implant has a depth in the range of approximately 11-21 mm with the preferred depth being 11-13 mm.
Referring to Figure 7A, a side elevational view of the lateral aspect of a segment of the spinal column' S
is shown with the implant 100 inserted in the disc space DZ
between two adjacent vertebrae v2 and V3. The implant'100 is inserted in the direction of arrow A into the disc space D2 and maintains the two vertebrae V2 and V3 in anguhar relationship to each other such that the natural lordosis of that segment of the spinal column S is restored. The forward advancement of the implant 100 is blocked by the natural bone processes B in the endplates of the vertebrae VZ and V3. Backing out of the implant 100 is prevented by the bone engaging surface knurling 121 of the upper and lower surfaces 1I2 and 114.
Referring to Figure 8-12, an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 200, is shown. The implant 200 has a similar overall configuration as the implant 100 described above.
In the preferred embodiment, the implant 200 is solid and comprises a plurality of channels~2Z5 passing from the upper surface 212 to the lower surface 214 through the implant 200. The channels 215 provide for bone ingrowth 5~ and facilitate the incorporation of the implant 200 into the spinal fusion mass. The channels may also be loaded with fusion promoting materials such as those described above, prior to implantation. It is appreciated that the channels 215 need not pass all the way through the implant.
200, but can have a configuration similar to wells, which may hold fusion promoting materials and permit bone ingrowth into the upper and lower surfaces 212 and 214 of the implant 200.
In addition to the channels 215, the implant 200 may have small openings 222 on the side wall 218 which may ,or may not pass through the entire implant 200. The same openings 222 may be in communication with the channels 215 such that bone ingrowth may occur from the openings 222 to the channels 215 ~o lock the implant 200 into the fusion mass. If the openings 222 do not pass through the entire implant 200, the may function as small wells for holding fusion promoting materials or described above.
In the preferred embodiment of implant 200, the channels 215 have a diameter in the range of 0.1 mm to 6 mm, with 2-3 mm being the preferred diameter. The openings 222 have a diameter in the range of 0.1 mm to &
mm, with 1-3 mm being the preferred.diameter range. It is appreciated that although the channels 215 and openings 222 are shown having a generally rounded configuration, it is within the scope of the present invention that the channels 215 and openings 222 may have any size, shape, 18 , .
w configuration, and distribution suitable for the intended purpose. The implant 200, has a plurality~of ratchetings 250 on the upper and lower surface 212 and 214 for engaging the bone of the adjacent vertebrae.. The ratchetings 250 comprise a bone engaging edge 252 and angled segment 254.
Referring specifically to Figure 9, the implant' 200 has a wedge-shaped elevational side view in which the trailing end 230 is taller than the insertion end 220: The plurality of ratchetings 250 are oriented in the direction of the insertion end 220 to provide for a one-way insertion of the implant 200 as the bone engaging edge 252 engages the vertebrae and prevents the implant from backing out once implanted. Alternatively, the trailing end ratchetings could be of a lessor height such that the overall shape of the ratchetings as a group is convex.
Referring to Figure 11, the trailing end 230 of implant 200 has means for engaging insertion instrumentation comprising a thread opening 226 ,as described above for implant 100.
Referring to Figure 12, an enlarged fragmentary view along line 12 of Figure 8 illustrating the surface configuration the implant 200-is shown. The upper and lower surfaces 212 and 214 of implant 200, in addition to the ratcheting 250 comprise a porous texture 260 to present an irregular surface to the bone to promote bone ingrowth.
The porous texture 260 is also able to hold fusion promoting materials and provides for an increased surface area to engage the bone in the fusion process and to provide further stability. The porous texture 260 may also be present on the side walls 218. It is appreciated that the outer surface and/or the entire' implant 200, may comprise any other porous material or roughened surface sufficient to hold fusion promoting substances and/or allow for bone ingrowth and/or engage the bone during the fusion , process: The implant 200 may be further coated with bioactive fusion promoting substances ihcluding; but not limited to, hydroxyapatite compounds, osteogenic proteins and bone morphogenic proteins.
Referring to Figures 13-17, an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant, generally referred to by the numeral 300, is shown. The implant 300 is made of a mesh-like, material comprising strands, which may be made of metal, that are pressed together and molded. The upper and lower surfaces 312 and 314 may be convex and conform to the natural surface curvature of the end plates of the. vertebrae. In addition, the entire implant 300 may be molded to .a shape that canforms to the shape of the disc space created by the removal of discmaterial from between two adjacent vertebrae. In this manner, the implant 300 has curved upper and lower surfaces 312 and 314, a curved side wall.
318 and chamfered edges 319.
Referring to Figure 7A, the implant 300 is shown inserted in the direction of arrow A into the disc space D1 between adjacent vertebrae Vl and V2. The implant 300 conforms to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae V, and VZ as the upper and lower surfaces 312 and 314 are convex, and the side walls 318 are curved to conform to the natural curvature of the vertebrae Vl and V2. In this manner, the implant 300 has the same dimensions as the disc material removed from between the two adjacent vertebrae VI and V2.
20 ,.
The implant 300 may be made wholly or in part of a solid material and/or a porous material, and/or a mesh-like material. The implant 300 may have a surface comprising of a porous material, a mesh-like material, or have a surface that is roughened. It is appreciated that the implant 300 may be solid or may be partially hollow and include at least one internal chamber in communication with said upper and lower surfaces.
As shown in Figure 17, the mesh-like material comprises strands that are formed and pressed together such that interstices 339, capable of retaining fusion promoting material and for allowing for bone ingrowth, are present between the strands in at least the outer surface of implant 300. Alternatively, it is appreciated that the implant 300 may be made of a cancellous material, similar in configuration to human cancellous bone, having interstices allowing for bone ingrowth. As the implant 300 may be made entirely or in part of the cancellous material, the interstices may be present in the outer surface of the implant 300 and/or within the entire implant to promote bone ingrowth and hold bone fusion promoting materials.
Referring to Figures 18-23 an alternative embodiment of the implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 400, is disclosed.
The implant 400 has a substantially rectangular shape having upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414. The upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 support the adjacent vertebrae and are disposed in a converging angular relationship to each other in the same manner described above.
The implant 400 has a width W that is substantially less than the width of the implants 100-300 such that a series of such implants 400 are used as the interbody spinal implant, each placed closely adjacent to one another to approximate the size of the removed disc.
The size of the implant 400 is approximately 26 millimeters 5~ in length and is wide enough so that four of them will substantially fill the intervertebral space, depending on which vertebrae are fused.
In the performing of a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, it is not possible to replace the removed portions of the disc, if a total nuclear discectomy has been performed, with a single large implant as the delicate dural sac containing the spinal cord and nerve roots covers at all times at least some portion of the posterior disc space. The use of modular implants 400 that are inserted 'separately into the disc space is appropriate in such case.
The modular implants 400 being approximately as long as the depth of the disc material removed, but being considerably narrower, such that they could be introduced into the disc space from the posterior aspect to either side of the dural sac, and then realigned side to side with the disc space so that a number of them each having a length consistent with the depth of the disc removed in that area would in combination have a width equal to the width of the disc material removed. As the disc spaces in the lumbar spine are generally lordotic, the insertion end 420 of the modular implants 400 would have to be taller and less tall posteriorly at the trailing end 430.
To introduce the modular implant 400 that is taller at its insertion end 420 than the space available at the posterior aspect of the disc space, even when that disc space is optimally distracted, is problematic. The modular implants 400 of provide two solutions to the problem. The modular implants 400 may have a reduced size at their insertion end 420, including but not limited to, a bullet nose, a convexity, and a chamfer to a smaller front surface. This then provides that the implant 400 has an area small enough to be introduced into .the posterior aspect of the disc space when the disc space is adequately distracted and the contour of that specialized insertion.
end of the implant 400 is such that it then allows for a ramping up of the adjacent vertebrae relative to the implant 400 as the implant is advanced forwardinto the disc space.
Alternatively, or in combination with the above, since in the preferred embodiment the implants 400 are wedge-shaped in the side elevational view when upright but are generally rectangular when viewed from the top plan view, these implants may be introduced into the disc space on their side such that the side walls of the implants are adjacent to the end plates of the adjacent vertebrae. The implants 400 have a side-to-side dimension that is less than the dimension through the insertion end of the implant 400 when upright. It is possible to easily insert the implant 400 first on their side and then to use the insertion instrument engaged to the implant 400 to rotate the implant ninety degrees into the fully upright position, once it has been fully inserted. Once inserted, the upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 are adjacent to the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae and create and maintain the desired angular relationship of the adjacent vertebrae as the upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 of the implant 400 are angled with respect to each other.
The implant 400 has large openings 4~.5 in the form of rectangular slots for holding fusion promoting ,, materials to promote bone growth from the vertebrae through 5~ the upper and lower surfaces 412 and 414 and into the-interior of the implant 400. As the implant 400 is modular and more than one is implanted at a time, 'the large openings 415 are also present in the side walls 418 of the implant 400 to provide for bone growth from one implant to another implant such that after successful fusion; the modular implants 400 are interconnected to form a single unit.
Referring to Figure 21, the trailing end 430 of the implant 400 is shown having an insertion instrument engaging means comprising a rectangular slot 424 and threaded opening 426. '.
Referring to Figure 23, an enlarged fragmentary view along line 23 of Figure l8 illustrating the surf ace configuration they implant 400 is shown. The surface configuration of the implant 400 is the same as the porous texture 260 described above.
Referring to Figure 24, an alternative embodiment of the lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 500, is shown. The implant 500 is a modular implant and has a similar overall configuration as implant 400. The implant 500 instead of having slots 415 has an upper and lower surfaces 512 and 514 that are capable of receiving and holding bone, or other materials capable of participating in the fusion process and/or capable of promoting bone ingrowth. In the preferred embodiment, the . upper and lower surfaces 512 and 514 comprise a plurality of posts 540 that are spaced apart to provide a plurality of interstices 542 which axe partial wells with incomplete walls capable of holding and retaining milled bone material or any artificial bone ingrowth promoting material. The implant 520 maybe prepared for implantation by grouting or otherwise coating the surface 538 with the appropriate fusion promoting substances.
Referring to Figure 28 and 29, an enlarged view.
of the upper surface 512 of the implant 500 and a partial cross section thereof are shown. In the preferred embodiment, the posts 540 have a head portion 544 of a larger diameter than the remainder of. the posts 540, and each of the interstices 542 is the reverse configuration of the posts 544, having a bottom 546 that is wider than the entrance 548 to the interstices 542. Such a configuration of the posts 540 and interstices 542 aids in the retention of bone material in the surface 538 of the implant 520 and further assists in the locking of the implant 520 into the bone fusion mass created from the bone ingrowth. As the bone ingrowth at the bottom 546 of the interstices 542 is wider than the entrance 548, the bone ingrowth cannot exit from the entrance 548 and is locked within the interstice 542. The surface 538 of the implant 520 provides for an improvement in the available amount of surface area which may be still further increased by rough finishing, flocking or otherwise producing a non smooth surface.
In the preferred embodiment, the posts 540 have a maximum diameter in the range of approximately 0.1-2 mm 3d and a height of approximately 0.1-2 mm and are spaced apart a distance of approximately 0.1-2 mm such that the interstices 542 have a width in the range of approximately 0.1 to 2 mm. The post sizes, shapes, and distributions may be varied within the same implant.
It is appreciated that the implant 500 shares the 5 ~ same structure and features of the implant 400 described above.
Figure 30 is a side elevational view of a segment of the human spinal column S shown in lordosis with an alternative embodiment of the lordotic spinal fusion l0 implant referred to by the numeral 600, that is adjustable and expandable shown inserted in a space to xestore and maintain the correct anatomical alignment of the adjacent vertebrae. The implant 600 comprises a lower member 682 and an upper member 684 which when fitted together form an ~15 essentially rectangular implant. The upper member 684 and the lower member 682 have hollow portions that face one another and receive tapered wedges 686 and 688 that fit within the hollow portion of the upper and lower members 682 and 684. The upper and lower members 682 and 684 each 20 have a wedged interior surface 689a and 689b which are angled towards the interior of the implant 600. The wedges 682 and 684 are such that at their large end, they are higher than the combined hollow space between the upper and lower members 684 and 682; and shallower at the other end 25 than the hollow space between the upper and lower members.
The wedges 686 and 688 have a central threaded opening 690 and 692 in alignment with each other for receiving threaded screw 694. As the screw 694 is threaded into the opening 690, the wedges 686 and 688 abut the interior sloped surfaces 689a and 689b of the upper and lower members 682 and 684. As the screw 694 is turned, the wedges 686 and 688 are drawn together, and the sloped portions of the wedges force the upper member 682 away from the lower member 684. As the interior sloped surfaces 6f9a and 689b have a greater slope near the trailing end 630, than near the insertion end 620, the upper and lower members 6,82 and 684 are forced apart more at the .insertion end 620 than at.the trailing end 630. As a result, the upper and lower members 682 and 684 are disposed at a converging angular relationship to each other and support the adjacent vertebrae V1 and VZ in the same angular relationship.
Referring to Figure 31, an alternative embodiment of the implant of the present invention, generally referred to by the numeral 700, is shown. The implant 700 has movable projections, in the form of spikes 708, which are movable from a first position within the implant 700 to a second position extending outside of the implant. The implant 700 is of .a generally rectangular configuration, having a top surface 702 and a bottom surface 704 of the implant with slots 706 for permitting pivotal member 707 having spikes 708 at their ends to project through said .
slots 706. The spikes 708 are pinned at one end 710 within the, implant 700.
The implant 700 has opposing wedge shaped members.
?12 and 714 having a central threaded opening 716 for receiving a threaded screw 718 having a head 720 and a slot 722. The wedges 712 and 714 are facing each other so that upon turning of the screw 718, will the two wedges 712 and 714 are drawn together to cause the spikes 708 to pivot about their end 710 and project to the exterior of the implant 700 through the aligned slots 706. The implant 700 may comprise a series of holes in the upper and lower surfaces 702 and 704 for promoting bone ingrowth and fusion.
Iri use, after the removal of the'disc material, the implant 700 with the spikes 708 in their withdrawn position, is inserted into the disc space. Then the screw 718 is turned until the spikes 708 are forced to enter the vertebrae and the implant 700 is thus held firmly in place.
While the invention has been described with regards to the preferred embodiment. and a number of alternative embodiments, it is. recognized that other embodiments of the present invention may be devised which would not depart. from the scope of the present invention.
Claims (27)
1. An interbody spinal fusion implant for fusion of two adjacent vertebral bodies in the human spine, comprising:
a plurality of modular members, each of said modular members having a height substantially equal to the surgically corrected height of the disc space and a width substantially less than the transverse width of the vertebral bodies, each of said modular members comprising:
an insertion end, a trailing end, opposed upper and lower portions adapted to be placed in contact with the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, and side walls connecting said upper and lower portions, said upper and lower portions forming a support structure including at least a part of the surfaces of said upper and lower portions between said side walls for bearing against the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, said upper and lower portions being disposed at least in part in a converging angular relationship along a longitudinal axis between said insertion and trailing ends to induce angulation of the adjacent vertebral bodies, said side walls of each of said modular members adapted to be positioned beside and in contact with at least another of said modular members in a side to side orientation within the space created between the adjacent vertebral bodies, whereby said plurality of modular members placed together form said spinal implant.
a plurality of modular members, each of said modular members having a height substantially equal to the surgically corrected height of the disc space and a width substantially less than the transverse width of the vertebral bodies, each of said modular members comprising:
an insertion end, a trailing end, opposed upper and lower portions adapted to be placed in contact with the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, and side walls connecting said upper and lower portions, said upper and lower portions forming a support structure including at least a part of the surfaces of said upper and lower portions between said side walls for bearing against the end plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies, said upper and lower portions being disposed at least in part in a converging angular relationship along a longitudinal axis between said insertion and trailing ends to induce angulation of the adjacent vertebral bodies, said side walls of each of said modular members adapted to be positioned beside and in contact with at least another of said modular members in a side to side orientation within the space created between the adjacent vertebral bodies, whereby said plurality of modular members placed together form said spinal implant.
2. The implant of claim 1, wherein at least one of said modular members has a plurality of openings capable of retaining fusion promoting material, at least one of said plurality of openings being in said upper portion and at least another of said plurality of openings being in said lower portion.
3. The implant of claim 2, wherein said plurality of openings comprise wells.
4. The implant of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein at least one of said modular members includes means for engaging said implant to the bone of the adjacent vertebral bodies of the spine.
5. The implant of claim 4, wherein said bone engaging means includes a plurality of surface roughenings for engaging the adjacent vertebral bodies and for maintaining said implant in place, said surface roughenings being present on at least a portion of said upper and lower portions.
6. The implant of claim 5, wherein said surface roughenings comprise a plurality of ridges.
7. The implant of claim 6, wherein said plurality of ridges are facing the direction of insertion for preventing said implant from backing out once inserted between the adjacent vertebral bodies.
8. The implant of claim 5, wherein said surface roughenings comprise at least one groove.
9. The implant of claim 5, wherein said surface roughenings comprise a plurality of spike projections.
10. The implant of claim 9, wherein said implant includes means for retracting and extending said plurality of spike projections.
11. The implant of claim 5, wherein said surface roughenings include knurling.
12. The implant of claim 5, wherein said surface roughenings comprise a plurality of posts spaced apart along at least a portion of said implant.
13. The implant of claim 12, wherein said plurality of posts have a head portion and a stem portion, said head portion having a wider diameter than said stem portion.
14. The implant of claim 1, wherein at least one of said modular members comprises a mesh-like material having a plurality of interstices for receiving fusion promoting material.
15. The implant of claim 1, wherein at least one of said modular members has an exterior surface that is at least in part porous.
16. The implant of any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein at least one of said modular members has at least a portion of the surface of said upper and lower portions treated to promote bone ingrowth between said surface and a vertebral body.
17. The implant of any one of claims 1 to 16, wherein at least one of said modular members is at least in part bioabsorbable.
18. The implant of any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein at least one of said leading and trailing ends of at least one of said modular members includes means for engaging a driving instrument for implanting said at least one modular member within the disc space between the two adjacent vertebral bodies.
19. The implant of claim 2, wherein at least some of said plurality of openings pass through said upper and said lower walls forming a plurality of channels through said implant.
20. The implant of claim 2, wherein at least one of said modular members has a hollow interior with at least one of said plurality of openings being in communication with said hollow interior.
21. The implant of claim 20, wherein said implant includes an access opening for accessing said hollow interior.
22. The implant of claim 21, wherein said plurality of openings are smaller than said access opening.
23. The implant of claim 21, including a removable covering means for closing said access opening.
24. The implant of claim 1, wherein said implant dimensionally corresponds to the space created by the removal of a substantial portion of the nucleus pulposus and a portion of the annulus fibrosus when the adjacent vertebral bodies are distracted and placed in angular relationship to each other.
25. The implant of any one of claims 1 to 24, in combination with a fusion promoting substance in contact with said implant.
26. The implant of claim 25, wherein said fusion promoting substance includes at least one of bone, bone morphogenetic protein, hydroxyapatite, and hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate.
27. The implant of any one of claims 1 to 26, in combination with an implant driver adapted to insert said implant into the implantation space.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/482,146 US5609635A (en) | 1988-06-28 | 1995-06-07 | Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants |
| US08/482,146 | 1995-06-07 | ||
| CA002223964A CA2223964C (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1996-06-06 | Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002223964A Division CA2223964C (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1996-06-06 | Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2447257A1 CA2447257A1 (en) | 1996-12-19 |
| CA2447257C true CA2447257C (en) | 2007-02-06 |
Family
ID=30116394
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002447257A Expired - Fee Related CA2447257C (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1996-06-06 | Modular lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2447257C (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8906028B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2014-12-09 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery device and method of using the same |
| US10245159B1 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2019-04-02 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
| US10973656B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2021-04-13 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc. | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
| US9788971B1 (en) | 2013-05-22 | 2017-10-17 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Expandable fusion implant and related methods |
| US9801734B1 (en) | 2013-08-09 | 2017-10-31 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Lordotic expandable interbody implant |
| US9730802B1 (en) | 2014-01-14 | 2017-08-15 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Spinal fusion implant and related methods |
-
1996
- 1996-06-06 CA CA002447257A patent/CA2447257C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2447257A1 (en) | 1996-12-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6302914B1 (en) | Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants | |
| US6923810B1 (en) | Frusto-conical interbody spinal fusion implants | |
| US8057475B2 (en) | Threaded interbody spinal fusion implant | |
| US6478823B1 (en) | Artificial spinal fusion implants | |
| CA2447257C (en) | Modular lordotic interbody spinal fusion implant | |
| AU760382B2 (en) | Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants | |
| AU4872700A (en) | Translateral spinal implant |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20130606 |