CA2406862A1 - Native protein mimetic fibers, fiber networks and fabrics for medical use - Google Patents
Native protein mimetic fibers, fiber networks and fabrics for medical use Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2406862A1 CA2406862A1 CA002406862A CA2406862A CA2406862A1 CA 2406862 A1 CA2406862 A1 CA 2406862A1 CA 002406862 A CA002406862 A CA 002406862A CA 2406862 A CA2406862 A CA 2406862A CA 2406862 A1 CA2406862 A1 CA 2406862A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- fiber
- elastin
- fibers
- nonwoven fabric
- collagen
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 230
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 title claims abstract description 108
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 title claims abstract description 107
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 title description 42
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 108010010803 Gelatin Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 239000008273 gelatin Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 235000011852 gelatine desserts Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 239000004745 nonwoven fabric Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 210000003709 heart valve Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000029663 wound healing Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 210000000626 ureter Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 108010014258 Elastin Proteins 0.000 claims description 100
- 102000016942 Elastin Human genes 0.000 claims description 94
- 229920002549 elastin Polymers 0.000 claims description 92
- 229920003171 Poly (ethylene oxide) Polymers 0.000 claims description 70
- 238000004132 cross linking Methods 0.000 claims description 67
- FQPSGWSUVKBHSU-UHFFFAOYSA-N methacrylamide Chemical group CC(=C)C(N)=O FQPSGWSUVKBHSU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 22
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 14
- -1 poly(ethylene oxide) Polymers 0.000 claims description 12
- 210000000329 smooth muscle myocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 210000002435 tendon Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000012620 biological material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 claims description 5
- 125000000524 functional group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000001367 artery Anatomy 0.000 claims description 4
- 210000002889 endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 4
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 claims description 4
- SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glutaraldehyde Chemical compound O=CCCCC=O SXRSQZLOMIGNAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000002847 Surgical Wound Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 206010052428 Wound Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000003238 esophagus Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000003932 urinary bladder Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 125000000391 vinyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])=C([H])[H] 0.000 claims description 3
- HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylamide Chemical group NC(=O)C=C HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000004102 animal cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000001574 biopsy Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000005260 human cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000968 intestinal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000000936 intestine Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000004165 myocardium Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000000963 osteoblast Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000003491 skin Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000002784 stomach Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 claims 4
- 229920001059 synthetic polymer Polymers 0.000 claims 2
- 229920003169 water-soluble polymer Polymers 0.000 claims 2
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 abstract description 57
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 abstract description 48
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 43
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 18
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 abstract description 4
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 abstract description 4
- 208000007536 Thrombosis Diseases 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 105
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 91
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 40
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 36
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 33
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 32
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 30
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 29
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 23
- 238000001523 electrospinning Methods 0.000 description 22
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 21
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 21
- SEACYXSIPDVVMV-UHFFFAOYSA-L eosin Y Chemical group [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1C1=C2C=C(Br)C(=O)C(Br)=C2OC2=C(Br)C([O-])=C(Br)C=C21 SEACYXSIPDVVMV-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 18
- 230000005415 magnetization Effects 0.000 description 18
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acrylate Chemical compound [O-]C(=O)C=C NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 17
- 229920002521 macromolecule Polymers 0.000 description 16
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 16
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 15
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 15
- GSEJCLTVZPLZKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Triethanolamine Chemical compound OCCN(CCO)CCO GSEJCLTVZPLZKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 13
- 238000005004 MAS NMR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 12
- 238000007306 functionalization reaction Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 12
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 12
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000005388 cross polarization Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 11
- 108010054022 valyl-prolyl-glycyl-valyl-glycine Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 10
- LFTRJWKKLPVMNE-RCBQFDQVSA-N 2-[[(2s)-2-[[2-[[(2s)-1-[(2s)-2-amino-3-methylbutanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carbonyl]amino]acetyl]amino]-3-methylbutanoyl]amino]acetic acid Chemical compound CC(C)[C@H](N)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)NCC(O)=O LFTRJWKKLPVMNE-RCBQFDQVSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 9
- CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetone Chemical compound CC(C)=O CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- WHNWPMSKXPGLAX-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-Vinyl-2-pyrrolidone Chemical compound C=CN1CCCC1=O WHNWPMSKXPGLAX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 229920001222 biopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 8
- DCUFMVPCXCSVNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N methacrylic anhydride Chemical compound CC(=C)C(=O)OC(=O)C(C)=C DCUFMVPCXCSVNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000000425 proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum Methods 0.000 description 8
- 150000003254 radicals Chemical class 0.000 description 8
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 238000000371 solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000004627 transmission electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 7
- GJKGAPPUXSSCFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-Hydroxy-4'-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone Chemical compound CC(C)(O)C(=O)C1=CC=C(OCCO)C=C1 GJKGAPPUXSSCFI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 6
- 102100033167 Elastin Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 101100180648 Homo sapiens KCNK6 gene Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 102100023203 Potassium channel subfamily K member 6 Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 125000003277 amino group Chemical group 0.000 description 6
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000003999 initiator Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002121 nanofiber Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 125000002924 primary amino group Chemical group [H]N([H])* 0.000 description 6
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004481 total suppression of sideband Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004482 13C cross polarization magic angle spinning Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229920000954 Polyglycolide Polymers 0.000 description 5
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 125000003275 alpha amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 210000004204 blood vessel Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000001198 high resolution scanning electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000017 hydrogel Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005191 phase separation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000004633 polyglycolic acid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000012460 protein solution Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000002166 wet spinning Methods 0.000 description 5
- HZNVUJQVZSTENZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone Chemical compound ClC1=C(Cl)C(=O)C(C#N)=C(C#N)C1=O HZNVUJQVZSTENZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- OZAIFHULBGXAKX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(2-cyanopropan-2-yldiazenyl)-2-methylpropanenitrile Chemical compound N#CC(C)(C)N=NC(C)(C)C#N OZAIFHULBGXAKX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycine Chemical compound NCC(O)=O DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isopropanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lysine Natural products NCCCCC(N)C(O)=O KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000004472 Lysine Substances 0.000 description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 4
- 125000003588 lysine group Chemical group [H]N([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])(N([H])[H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 4
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 4
- MYWUZJCMWCOHBA-VIFPVBQESA-N methamphetamine Chemical compound CN[C@@H](C)CC1=CC=CC=C1 MYWUZJCMWCOHBA-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004879 turbidimetry Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004922 13C solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 102000012422 Collagen Type I Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010022452 Collagen Type I Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000005481 NMR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 3
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical compound [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000002808 connective tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000005384 cross polarization magic-angle spinning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011243 crosslinked material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002425 crystallisation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008025 crystallization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008034 disappearance Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011067 equilibration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001125 extrusion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000035876 healing Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000036571 hydration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006703 hydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001208 nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequence Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000008055 phosphate buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000005020 polyethylene terephthalate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000004810 polytetrafluoroethylene Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000001338 self-assembly Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920002994 synthetic fiber Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 3
- YMXHPSHLTSZXKH-RVBZMBCESA-N (2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) 5-[(3as,4s,6ar)-2-oxo-1,3,3a,4,6,6a-hexahydrothieno[3,4-d]imidazol-4-yl]pentanoate Chemical compound C([C@H]1[C@H]2NC(=O)N[C@H]2CS1)CCCC(=O)ON1C(=O)CCC1=O YMXHPSHLTSZXKH-RVBZMBCESA-N 0.000 description 2
- BYEAHWXPCBROCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropan-2-ol Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(O)C(F)(F)F BYEAHWXPCBROCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OMIGHNLMNHATMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-hydroxyethyl prop-2-enoate Chemical compound OCCOC(=O)C=C OMIGHNLMNHATMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LJROKJGQSPMTKB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)-pyridin-2-ylmethyl]phenol Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=CC=C1C(C=1N=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 LJROKJGQSPMTKB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 2
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004971 Cross linker Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920004934 Dacron® Polymers 0.000 description 2
- QOSSAOTZNIDXMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dicylcohexylcarbodiimide Chemical compound C1CCCCC1N=C=NC1CCCCC1 QOSSAOTZNIDXMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004471 Glycine Substances 0.000 description 2
- QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-REOHCLBHSA-N L-alanine Chemical compound C[C@H](N)C(O)=O QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108010038807 Oligopeptides Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000015636 Oligopeptides Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010008281 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000007056 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710172711 Structural protein Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000004474 TOSS sequence Methods 0.000 description 2
- RHQDFWAXVIIEBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Trifluoroethanol Chemical compound OCC(F)(F)F RHQDFWAXVIIEBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LXEKPEMOWBOYRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N [2-[(1-azaniumyl-1-imino-2-methylpropan-2-yl)diazenyl]-2-methylpropanimidoyl]azanium;dichloride Chemical compound Cl.Cl.NC(=N)C(C)(C)N=NC(C)(C)C(N)=N LXEKPEMOWBOYRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000004279 alanine Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium sulfate Chemical compound N.N.OS(O)(=O)=O BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052921 ammonium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000011130 ammonium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 150000008064 anhydrides Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001112 coagulating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910021641 deionized water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000502 dialysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- BNIILDVGGAEEIG-UHFFFAOYSA-L disodium hydrogen phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].OP([O-])([O-])=O BNIILDVGGAEEIG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 238000000578 dry spinning Methods 0.000 description 2
- YSMODUONRAFBET-UHNVWZDZSA-N erythro-5-hydroxy-L-lysine Chemical group NC[C@H](O)CC[C@H](N)C(O)=O YSMODUONRAFBET-UHNVWZDZSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920000295 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000003733 fiber-reinforced composite Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004108 freeze drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011850 initial investigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 2
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000009878 intermolecular interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003041 ligament Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N methanoic acid Natural products OC=O BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 125000000325 methylidene group Chemical group [H]C([H])=* 0.000 description 2
- 238000010369 molecular cloning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005232 molecular self-assembly Methods 0.000 description 2
- PSHKMPUSSFXUIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N n,n-dimethylpyridin-2-amine Chemical compound CN(C)C1=CC=CC=N1 PSHKMPUSSFXUIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920002959 polymer blend Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002028 premature Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000376 reactant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920002545 silicone oil Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007790 solid phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002456 spin diffusion experiment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- KZNICNPSHKQLFF-UHFFFAOYSA-N succinimide Chemical compound O=C1CCC(=O)N1 KZNICNPSHKQLFF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004753 textile Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000017423 tissue regeneration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- BSQTUVXJJUHMPJ-USJZOSNVSA-N (2s)-2-[[2-[[(2s)-2-[[2-[[(2s)-1-[(2s)-2-aminopropanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carbonyl]amino]acetyl]amino]-3-methylbutanoyl]amino]acetyl]amino]-3-methylbutanoic acid Chemical compound CC(C)[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1C(=O)[C@H](C)N BSQTUVXJJUHMPJ-USJZOSNVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ODIGIKRIUKFKHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N (n-propan-2-yloxycarbonylanilino) acetate Chemical compound CC(C)OC(=O)N(OC(C)=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 ODIGIKRIUKFKHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000001644 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005160 1H NMR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-(3-methoxyphenyl)aniline Chemical compound COC1=CC=CC(C=2C=CC(N)=CC=2)=C1 OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010030147 Abductin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C=C NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NLHHRLWOUZZQLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylonitrile Chemical compound C=CC#N NLHHRLWOUZZQLW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010088751 Albumins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000009027 Albumins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 244000105975 Antidesma platyphyllum Species 0.000 description 1
- 201000001320 Atherosclerosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000005653 Brownian motion process Effects 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010053567 Coagulopathies Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010002947 Connectin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000012410 DNA Ligases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010061982 DNA Ligases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000007399 DNA isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000016928 DNA-directed DNA polymerase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010014303 DNA-directed DNA polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000010834 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010037362 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010067306 Fibronectins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016359 Fibronectins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000288 Glycoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000003886 Glycoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229920002683 Glycosaminoglycan Polymers 0.000 description 1
- HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Heparin Chemical compound OC1C(NC(=O)C)C(O)OC(COS(O)(=O)=O)C1OC1C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(O)C(OC2C(C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(OC3C(C(O)C(O)C(O3)C(O)=O)OS(O)(=O)=O)C(CO)O2)NS(O)(=O)=O)C(C(O)=O)O1 HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010019909 Hernia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000004705 High-molecular-weight polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101000817629 Homo sapiens Dymeclin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000004566 IR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102100023915 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- OWYWGLHRNBIFJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ipazine Chemical compound CCN(CC)C1=NC(Cl)=NC(NC(C)C)=N1 OWYWGLHRNBIFJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RNKSNIBMTUYWSH-YFKPBYRVSA-N L-prolylglycine Chemical compound [O-]C(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H]1CCC[NH2+]1 RNKSNIBMTUYWSH-YFKPBYRVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001417092 Macrouridae Species 0.000 description 1
- CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-M Methacrylate Chemical compound CC(=C)C([O-])=O CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methacrylic acid Chemical compound CC(=C)C(O)=O CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004793 Polystyrene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000028344 Primula vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000016311 Primula vulgaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000012300 Sequence Analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004990 Smectic liquid crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009233 Stachytarpheta cayennensis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 108700005078 Synthetic Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100026260 Titin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- SJRUJQFQVLMZFW-WPRPVWTQSA-N Val-Pro-Gly Chemical compound CC(C)[C@H](N)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(=O)NCC(O)=O SJRUJQFQVLMZFW-WPRPVWTQSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000251539 Vertebrata <Metazoa> Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000003929 acidic solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011149 active material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940050528 albumin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000000539 amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037037 animal physiology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001772 anti-angiogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002260 anti-inflammatory agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940121363 anti-inflammatory agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000000259 anti-tumor effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940030225 antihemorrhagics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002246 antineoplastic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002473 artificial blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004630 atomic force microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003416 augmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001588 bifunctional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000975 bioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008827 biological function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002977 biomimetic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001400 block copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008468 bone growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005537 brownian motion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000309464 bull Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011088 calibration curve Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000001732 carboxylic acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 210000000845 cartilage Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000021164 cell adhesion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004956 cell adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013592 cell lysate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001612 chondrocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035602 clotting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007887 coronary angioplasty Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002537 cosmetic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002316 cosmetic surgery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018044 dehydration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006297 dehydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004925 denaturation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036425 denaturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005137 deposition process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZWIBGKZDAWNIFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N disuccinimidyl suberate Chemical compound O=C1CCC(=O)N1OC(=O)CCCCCCC(=O)ON1C(=O)CCC1=O ZWIBGKZDAWNIFC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012377 drug delivery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004177 elastic tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004070 electrodeposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006911 enzymatic reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- OYQYHJRSHHYEIG-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethyl carbamate;urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O.CCOC(N)=O OYQYHJRSHHYEIG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000002744 extracellular matrix Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007380 fibre production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- GNBHRKFJIUUOQI-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluorescein Chemical compound O1C(=O)C2=CC=CC=C2C21C1=CC=C(O)C=C1OC1=CC(O)=CC=C21 GNBHRKFJIUUOQI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019253 formic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001879 gelation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002682 general surgery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009477 glass transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000550 glycopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000009424 haa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052736 halogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002367 halogens Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002216 heart Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002874 hemostatic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000669 heparin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229960002897 heparin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003090 iliac artery Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000028709 inflammatory response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000001449 isopropyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])(*)C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- 150000002540 isothiocyanates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002535 lyotropic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108010064235 lysylglycine Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000001840 matrix-assisted laser desorption--ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000005641 methacryl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000001000 micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000386 microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000004682 monohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000403 monosodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019799 monosodium phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000000655 nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007899 nucleic acid hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000269 nucleophilic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004789 organ system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000399 orthopedic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000016446 peptide cross-linking Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000813 peptide hormone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003516 pericardium Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007888 peripheral angioplasty Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000144 pharmacologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- NMHMNPHRMNGLLB-UHFFFAOYSA-N phloretic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CCC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 NMHMNPHRMNGLLB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008363 phosphate buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004962 physiological condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010072180 poly(glycyl-valyl-glycyl-valyl-prolyl) Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000002264 polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920000139 polyethylene terephthalate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920006254 polymer film Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000006116 polymerization reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002223 polystyrene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000012805 post-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003449 preventive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108010029020 prolylglycine Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003815 prostacyclins Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000004252 protein component Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000012846 protein folding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006337 proteolytic cleavage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000541 pulsatile effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001472 pulsed field gradient Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010453 quartz Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008707 rearrangement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011514 reflex Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003014 reinforcing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005067 remediation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000037803 restenosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108091008146 restriction endonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004626 scanning electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018448 secretion by cell Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004062 sedimentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920006126 semicrystalline polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007086 side reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon dioxide Inorganic materials O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010093457 silk-like protein polymer Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- AJPJDKMHJJGVTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium dihydrogen phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].OP(O)([O-])=O AJPJDKMHJJGVTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000002415 sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000279 solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000935 solvent evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011877 solvent mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012453 sprague-dawley rat model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012086 standard solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012916 structural analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000005504 styryl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229960002317 succinimide Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000011477 surgical intervention Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004876 tela submucosa Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003860 topical agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000699 topical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108010003885 valyl-prolyl-glycyl-glycine Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010078348 valyl-prolyl-glycyl-valyl-glycine polypeptide Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000011179 visual inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
- D01F4/00—Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of proteins; Manufacture thereof
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L15/00—Chemical aspects of, or use of materials for, bandages, dressings or absorbent pads
- A61L15/16—Bandages, dressings or absorbent pads for physiological fluids such as urine or blood, e.g. sanitary towels, tampons
- A61L15/22—Bandages, dressings or absorbent pads for physiological fluids such as urine or blood, e.g. sanitary towels, tampons containing macromolecular materials
- A61L15/32—Proteins, polypeptides; Degradation products or derivatives thereof, e.g. albumin, collagen, fibrin, gelatin
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/14—Macromolecular materials
- A61L27/22—Polypeptides or derivatives thereof, e.g. degradation products
- A61L27/222—Gelatin
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/14—Macromolecular materials
- A61L27/22—Polypeptides or derivatives thereof, e.g. degradation products
- A61L27/227—Other specific proteins or polypeptides not covered by A61L27/222, A61L27/225 or A61L27/24
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/14—Macromolecular materials
- A61L27/22—Polypeptides or derivatives thereof, e.g. degradation products
- A61L27/24—Collagen
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/50—Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
- A61L27/507—Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials for artificial blood vessels
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L33/00—Antithrombogenic treatment of surgical articles, e.g. sutures, catheters, prostheses, or of articles for the manipulation or conditioning of blood; Materials for such treatment
- A61L33/0076—Chemical modification of the substrate
- A61L33/0082—Chemical modification of the substrate by reacting with an organic compound other than heparin
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07F—ACYCLIC, CARBOCYCLIC OR HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS CONTAINING ELEMENTS OTHER THAN CARBON, HYDROGEN, HALOGEN, OXYGEN, NITROGEN, SULFUR, SELENIUM OR TELLURIUM
- C07F9/00—Compounds containing elements of Groups 5 or 15 of the Periodic Table
- C07F9/02—Phosphorus compounds
- C07F9/06—Phosphorus compounds without P—C bonds
- C07F9/08—Esters of oxyacids of phosphorus
- C07F9/09—Esters of phosphoric acids
- C07F9/10—Phosphatides, e.g. lecithin
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Dermatology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
- Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Artificial Filaments (AREA)
Abstract
The present disclosure provides spun fibers of proteins useful for the fibers, fiber networks and nonwoven fabrics for medical use, with these materials characterized by good biocompatibility properties (e.g., low tendency toward thromboses and inflammation when implanted into a human or animal). These materials can be fabricated from gelatin, collagen or elastin-mimetic proteins, functionalized proteins of the foregoing types, crosslinked functionalized proteins of the foregoing types, and there may be incorporated nonproteinaceous polymers and/or therapeutic proteins or other medicinal compounds. Additionally, there may be living cells colonized on the material of the present invention or living cells may be incorporated during the fabrication process. These materials can be used in medical applications including, without limitation, vascular grafts, reinforcement of injured tissue, wound healing, artificial organs and tissues, prosthetic heart valves and prosthetic ureters.
Description
NATIVE PROTEIN MIMETIC FIBERS, FIBER NETWORKS AND
FABRICS FOR MEDICAL USE.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FEDERAL RESEARCH SUPPORT
0 This invention was made, at least in part, with funding from the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation and the NASA Research Agency. Accordingly, the United States Government may have certain rights in this invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
5 The present invention relates to fibers, fiber networks and fabrics formed, at least in part, from synthetic elastin-mimetic proteins, functionalized elastin mimetic proteins including methacrylate-, vinyl- or acrylate-modified elastin-mimetic proteins, functionalized collagen such as acrylate-, vinyl- or or methacrylate modified collagen, functionalized gelatin modified in a similar manner to the foregoing proteins, collagen fibers, gelatin fibers, crosslinked ;0 collagen, gelatin or elastin mimetic fibers, and fiber networks and fabrics made using these materials.
Atherosclerosis is a serious cause of morbidity and death despite advances in preventive measures and pharmacological therapeutics. Nearly 700,000 vascular surgical procedures are !5 performed annually in the United States, along with several hundred thousand peripheral and coronary angioplasties. Prosthetic bypass grafts and, more recently, arterial stems arid other endovascular prostheses have been utilized in association with these reconstructive procedures.
Although large diameter vascular grafts (z6 mm internal diameter) have been successfully developed from polymers such as polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene terephthalate, the S 0 fabrication of a durable small diameter prostheses (<_ 6 mm internal diameter) remains unsolved.
Furthermore, while prosthetic bypass grafting can be performed in the infrainguinal position with reasonable short-term success, within 5 five years 30 % to 60 % of these grafts will fail.
Likewise, restenosis and/or occlusion occurs in as many as 50 % of all patients within 6 months of stmt placement, depending upon the site and the extent of the disease.
It is recognized that the adverse events leading to the failure of many vascular prostheses are related to maladaptive biological reactions at the blood-material and tissue-0 material interface. Grafts and stems have been coated with albumin, heparin, or prostacyclin analogues, which inhibit the clotting cascade and platelet reactivity, or with relatively inert materials, such as polyethylene oxide. An alternate approach has been to design arterial substitutes on the basis of tissue engineering principles in which a vessel construct is created using cultured endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells (SMC), and fibroblasts, which are 5 reformulated to yield an artificial intima, media, and adventitia, respectively. Initial investigations utilizing this strategy have included seeding endothelial cells into the lumen of a compacted SMC/collagen tubular construct. This approach was limited by the requirement for a surrounding Dacron enclosure, which was necessary to provide adequate tensile strength for successful ih vivo implantation. Cellular constructs with more robust mechanical properties ;0 have been produced by growing sheets of smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts in tissue culture flasks that are then rolled onto a mandrel and allowed to mature ah vitro over a period of up to 12 weeks. When combined with reconstituted tubular sheets of freeze-dried collagen, burst strengths exceeded 2,000 mm Hg. The necessity for eight or more weeks of ih vitro preconditioning has been reported despite utilization of an internal polyglycolic acid (PGA) !5 scaffold onto which SMCs were seeded. Thus, all current tissue engineering approaches directed at the generation of a bioengineered blood vessel remain limited by a continued requirement for a several month preconditioning period, a surrounding synthetic polymeric sheath, or an internal synthetic biodegradable scaffold. Significantly, the use of a Dacron or PGA mesh does not recapitulate the biomechanical characteristics of a native blood vessel.
>0 Moreover, these synthetic materials uniformly induce an undesirable inflammatory response in the patient after implantation.
There is a longfelt need in the art for durable materials for medical and veterinary use in organ substitutes including, without limitation, blood vessels, heart valves, ligaments, i5 tendons, and other load bearing prosthetic materials, as well as those materials to facilitate wound closing and/or healing, and where the resident tissue will benefit from reinforcement, where those materials are compatible with human and animal physiologies such that thromboses, inflammation and other harmful physiological reactions are not induced. It is also important that there be durable and biologically compatible materials which do not require lengthy preconditioning periods prior to implantation in a patient in need of the prosthetic 0 material.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present inventionplVrovides biologically compatible protein fibers, fiber networks, fabrics and crosslinked fibers for use in medical and veterinary applications.
These materials 5 are characterized by resilience, flexibility, extensibility, tensile strength, mechanical strength and ability to recover shape after distortion, ~ similar to that of native proteins in biological materials. The present materials, especially those which comprise crosslinked elastin, crosslinked elastin mimetic protein, crosslinked collagen and/or crosslinked gelatin, are especially useful in the medical or veterinary area because of the similarity of the physical !0 properties of the materials as well as the biological compatibility which is improved over many synthetic materials which induce inflammation and/or thrombosis, depending on the site used.
Functionally modified elastin, elastin mimetic protein, collagen and gelatin can also form the materials of the present invention. Alternatively, crosslinked proteinaceousibers, networks and nonwoven fabrics can be form of proteins which are crosslinked with glutaraldehyde treatment !5 or other means known to the art which preserves the desirable physical properties of the material, i.e., flexibility, entensibility, tensile strength and the like.
The present invention provides elastin mimetic proteins and crosslinked materials formed into fibers, fiber networks, fabrics and tubing. The fibers can be in the form of thin ~0 filaments, beaded fibers or ribbon like structures, with fiber diameters from about 200 to about 3000 nm, depending on the electrospinning conditions as taught hereinbelow.
These materials can optionally include at least one additional material which is fiber-forming but which does not include functional groups which can mediate crosslinking such as polyethylene oxide) which provides some physical strength to the material and again, optionally, a biologically ~5 active material such as a therapeutic protein or other pharmacologically compound. A
FABRICS FOR MEDICAL USE.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FEDERAL RESEARCH SUPPORT
0 This invention was made, at least in part, with funding from the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation and the NASA Research Agency. Accordingly, the United States Government may have certain rights in this invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
5 The present invention relates to fibers, fiber networks and fabrics formed, at least in part, from synthetic elastin-mimetic proteins, functionalized elastin mimetic proteins including methacrylate-, vinyl- or acrylate-modified elastin-mimetic proteins, functionalized collagen such as acrylate-, vinyl- or or methacrylate modified collagen, functionalized gelatin modified in a similar manner to the foregoing proteins, collagen fibers, gelatin fibers, crosslinked ;0 collagen, gelatin or elastin mimetic fibers, and fiber networks and fabrics made using these materials.
Atherosclerosis is a serious cause of morbidity and death despite advances in preventive measures and pharmacological therapeutics. Nearly 700,000 vascular surgical procedures are !5 performed annually in the United States, along with several hundred thousand peripheral and coronary angioplasties. Prosthetic bypass grafts and, more recently, arterial stems arid other endovascular prostheses have been utilized in association with these reconstructive procedures.
Although large diameter vascular grafts (z6 mm internal diameter) have been successfully developed from polymers such as polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene terephthalate, the S 0 fabrication of a durable small diameter prostheses (<_ 6 mm internal diameter) remains unsolved.
Furthermore, while prosthetic bypass grafting can be performed in the infrainguinal position with reasonable short-term success, within 5 five years 30 % to 60 % of these grafts will fail.
Likewise, restenosis and/or occlusion occurs in as many as 50 % of all patients within 6 months of stmt placement, depending upon the site and the extent of the disease.
It is recognized that the adverse events leading to the failure of many vascular prostheses are related to maladaptive biological reactions at the blood-material and tissue-0 material interface. Grafts and stems have been coated with albumin, heparin, or prostacyclin analogues, which inhibit the clotting cascade and platelet reactivity, or with relatively inert materials, such as polyethylene oxide. An alternate approach has been to design arterial substitutes on the basis of tissue engineering principles in which a vessel construct is created using cultured endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells (SMC), and fibroblasts, which are 5 reformulated to yield an artificial intima, media, and adventitia, respectively. Initial investigations utilizing this strategy have included seeding endothelial cells into the lumen of a compacted SMC/collagen tubular construct. This approach was limited by the requirement for a surrounding Dacron enclosure, which was necessary to provide adequate tensile strength for successful ih vivo implantation. Cellular constructs with more robust mechanical properties ;0 have been produced by growing sheets of smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts in tissue culture flasks that are then rolled onto a mandrel and allowed to mature ah vitro over a period of up to 12 weeks. When combined with reconstituted tubular sheets of freeze-dried collagen, burst strengths exceeded 2,000 mm Hg. The necessity for eight or more weeks of ih vitro preconditioning has been reported despite utilization of an internal polyglycolic acid (PGA) !5 scaffold onto which SMCs were seeded. Thus, all current tissue engineering approaches directed at the generation of a bioengineered blood vessel remain limited by a continued requirement for a several month preconditioning period, a surrounding synthetic polymeric sheath, or an internal synthetic biodegradable scaffold. Significantly, the use of a Dacron or PGA mesh does not recapitulate the biomechanical characteristics of a native blood vessel.
>0 Moreover, these synthetic materials uniformly induce an undesirable inflammatory response in the patient after implantation.
There is a longfelt need in the art for durable materials for medical and veterinary use in organ substitutes including, without limitation, blood vessels, heart valves, ligaments, i5 tendons, and other load bearing prosthetic materials, as well as those materials to facilitate wound closing and/or healing, and where the resident tissue will benefit from reinforcement, where those materials are compatible with human and animal physiologies such that thromboses, inflammation and other harmful physiological reactions are not induced. It is also important that there be durable and biologically compatible materials which do not require lengthy preconditioning periods prior to implantation in a patient in need of the prosthetic 0 material.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present inventionplVrovides biologically compatible protein fibers, fiber networks, fabrics and crosslinked fibers for use in medical and veterinary applications.
These materials 5 are characterized by resilience, flexibility, extensibility, tensile strength, mechanical strength and ability to recover shape after distortion, ~ similar to that of native proteins in biological materials. The present materials, especially those which comprise crosslinked elastin, crosslinked elastin mimetic protein, crosslinked collagen and/or crosslinked gelatin, are especially useful in the medical or veterinary area because of the similarity of the physical !0 properties of the materials as well as the biological compatibility which is improved over many synthetic materials which induce inflammation and/or thrombosis, depending on the site used.
Functionally modified elastin, elastin mimetic protein, collagen and gelatin can also form the materials of the present invention. Alternatively, crosslinked proteinaceousibers, networks and nonwoven fabrics can be form of proteins which are crosslinked with glutaraldehyde treatment !5 or other means known to the art which preserves the desirable physical properties of the material, i.e., flexibility, entensibility, tensile strength and the like.
The present invention provides elastin mimetic proteins and crosslinked materials formed into fibers, fiber networks, fabrics and tubing. The fibers can be in the form of thin ~0 filaments, beaded fibers or ribbon like structures, with fiber diameters from about 200 to about 3000 nm, depending on the electrospinning conditions as taught hereinbelow.
These materials can optionally include at least one additional material which is fiber-forming but which does not include functional groups which can mediate crosslinking such as polyethylene oxide) which provides some physical strength to the material and again, optionally, a biologically ~5 active material such as a therapeutic protein or other pharmacologically compound. A
polysaccharide can also be incorporated. The fiber morphology and physical properties are affected by the PEO molecular weight as well as by the relative amount of PEO
in the fiber forming solution. The PEO dissolves relatively slowly under physiological conditions, which can provide for release of the additional material(s). Anti-inflammatory agents and/or growth factors which stimulate wound healing or tissue repair and antitumor agents are but a few of 0 the biologically and pharmacologically agents which occur to one of ordinary skill in the art for inclusion in the material of the present invention. The skilled artisan knows how to choose a therapeutic protein or other compound according to the needs of the human or animal patient in which the material is used. Where the fibers are to be crosslinked prior to use, an initiator of crosslinkage, e.g., a photoinitiator, can be incorporated into the solution from which the 5 fibers are spun, with the result that the initiator is then present within the fiber.
The present invention further provides improved prosthetic materials for medical and veterinary use. These materials are formed of functionally modified elastin mimetic fibers which have been crosslinked using photoinitiators (i.e., under relatively mild conditions with ;0 respect to free radicals and temperature) and photoirradiation, and/or collagen or gelatin fibers which are crosslinked. Prosthetic materials can include, without limitation, tubing for vascular prostheses, ureters, esophagus, bladder, intestine, heart planar materials for use in reinforcing injured tissues (cartilage, tendons, heart valves, heart muscle, bladder, esophagus, ligament, stomach, among others) and for use as topical applies materials for promoting wound healing ;5 after injury or in facilitating healing of surgical incisions (including without limitation intestinal anastomeses or lung biopsy) or remediation of hernias. Crosslinking can be effected after casting each protein layer or crosslinking can take place after a multilayer material has been produced. Where used in surgical applications, hydrophilic polysaccharides and/or glycopolymers can be incorporated to reduce adhesion formation after surgical intervention ~0 by placing the material at the surgical site.
Within the scope of the present invention are hybrid elastin/collagen materials, which can be formed by depositing alternating layers of elastin or an elastin mimetic protein, either as protein fibers or as cast films of native protein and/or elastin mimetic protein and collagen .5 or functionalized collagen. Nonwoven fabrics are especially useful products of the present invention. The functionally modified elastin or elastin mimetic protein and/or collagen can be crosslinked once formed into nonwoven fabrics for improved stability, resistance to dissolution and improved physical properties. An advantageous aspect of the present invention is a lamellar repeat of an elastin mimetic layer sandwiched between collagen layers. The nonwoven fabric of this aspect of the invention can have from one lamellar repeat up to about ten 0 thousand sequentially layered lamellar repeats. The thickness of each lamellar repeat layer affects the ultimate physical properties of the product.
It is a further aspect of the present invention to provide an elastin, elastin mimetic, elastin mimetic/collagen hybrid, gelatin or collagen nonwoven fabric which further comprises 5 living cells. The living cells can be at least one of, but not limited to endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, stem cells, chondrocytes, osteoblasts or a human or animal cell which has been genetically engineered to produce a protein of interest. The protein of interest can be a growth factor which could promote wound healing, or a peptide hormone such as insulin in the context of an artificial organ, or an antiangiogenic protein to be used in an antitumor :0 application, and others will readily occur to one of ordinary skill in the art. The living cells can be incorporated between lamellar repeat units, and the cells can be deposited by techniques including, but not limited to, electrodeposition and sedimentation.
The materials of the present invention can be used in the form of conduits, or planar '.5 sheets or they can be formed into other shapes by rolling to form hollow tubing or by sequential deposition onto a rotating mandrel or other forms or molds.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figs 1A-1B show the Vs~art and Vstop for various solution concentrations (Fig.
1A) and .0 corresponding viscosities (Fig. 1B) of elastin-mimetic peptide aqueous solutions.
Figs. 2A-2D present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 5 wt% solution at 50 ~,l/ml (Fig. 2A), 100 ,ul/ml (Fig. 2B), 150 ~,1/ml (Fig.
2C), 200 ~cl/ml (Fig.
2D) flow rate.
Figs. 3A-3D present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 10 wt% solution at 50 ~cl/ml (Fig. 3A), 100 ~,1/ml (Fig. 3B), 150 ,ul/ml (Fig.
3C), 200 ,ul/ml (Fig.
3D) flow rate.
Figs. 4A-4D present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 15 0 wt% solution at 50 ~d/ml (Fig. 4A), 100 ~,l/ml (Fig. 4B), 150 ~,1/ml (Fig.
4C), 200 ~,1/ml (Fig.
4D) flow rate.
Figs. SA-SD present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 20 wt% solution at 50 ~cl/ml (Fig. 5A), 100 ,ul/ml (Fig. 53B), 150 ~,1/ml (Fig.
53C), 200 ,ul/ml 5 (Fig. SD) flow rate.
Figs. 6A-6D are high resolution SEM (Figs.6A and 6B) and TEM (Figs. 6C and 6D) micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from a 20 % wt % solution at 100 ~,1/ml flow rate, which demonstrate a twisted ribbon-like morphology.
,0 Figs. 7A-7B are SEM micrographs (Figs. 7A and 7B) of a non-woven fabric spun from a 15 % wt. solution of elastin-mimetic peptide at 150 ,ul/ml.
Fig. 8 illustrates fiber diameter distribution within a non-woven fabric spun from a 15 ;5 wt% solution of elastin-mimetic peptide at 150 ~,1/ml.
Fig. 9 shows distribution of fiber orientation within a non-woven fabric spun from a wt% solution of elastin-mimetic peptide at 150 ,ul/ml.
~0 Fig. 10 is a representative uniaxial stress-strain curve for drying a non-woven fabric of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers.
Figs. 11A shows 1H NMR spectra of elastin and elastin methacrylamide measured in Da~ (*) at room temperature. Expanded region of the protons corresponding to the double l5 bonds (Ha, Hb) is also shown for the elastin methacrylamide spectrum. Fig.
11B shows an expanded version of the figure between 2.6 and 3.1 ppm. The spectra indicate the shift in the methylene protons a to the amino group prior (H°) and subsequent (Hd) to methacryloylation.
Fig. 12 shows 1H NMR spectra of elastin and AME. The DOF of AME's is provided in the brackets. The expanded portion of the spectra between 2.6 and 3.1 ppm.
As DOF
0 increases the Hd peak grows in intensity at the expense of the H°
peak. The DOF can be computed from the integrated intensities of the H° and Hd peaks.
Fig. 13 shows temperature-dependent turbidimetry data for elastin and acrylate-modified elastin with different degrees of functionalization. The inverse transition temperature 5 (T~ decreases with increase in the degree of functionalization (DOF). DOF
dictates the temperature (processing window) at which fibers can be formed from aqueous solutions. The temperature window to the left of Tt is amenable for fiber formation.
Fig. 14 shows SEM micrographs of fibers spun from a 10 wt% AME(65) solution at 0 room temperature. Flow rate = 50 ~,1/min, Photoinitiator = EY (3 wt% of protein content).
Long uniform fibers are produced with occasional triangle type bifurcation points. Fibers in the diameter range from 300-500 nm were produced.
Fig. 15 presents SEM micrographs of fibers spun from a 15 wt% AME(65) solution 5 at room temperature. Flowrate = 50 ~1/min, Photoinitiator = EY (3 wt% of protein content).
Long uniform fibers are produced with a flattened or ribbon shaped morphology.
Fibers in a variety of diameter ranges are produced (typically from 300 nm - 2 ,um).
Fig. 16 shows 13C CP/MAS/TOSS spectra of elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide, ~0 methacrylate-modified elastin and crosslinked elastin recorded at room temperature (23 °C).
Contact time = lms and spinning speed (wr/2~) = 5 kHz. Disappearance of the peaks Ca and Cb in the spectrum for the crosslinked material indicate complete crosslinking after exposure either to UV at 365 nm or visible light. The peaks labeled "*" are from the photoinitiator (Irgacure 2959~) employed for crosslinking.
~5 Fig. 17 illustrates degree of crosslinking of AME(88) determined by 13C solid-state NMR as a function of irradiation time. Data presented as mean ~ standard deviation.
Fig. 18(A) shows a stress-strain curve of crosslinked and uncrosslinked fabric samples of elastin methacrylamide in the dry state. Crosslinking increases both tensile strength and 0 modulus of the sample. Fig. 18B shows stress-strain curves of dry and hydrated (O) crosslinked AME(65) fabric samples of elastin methacrylamide measured at a strain rate of 1 mrn/min at room temperature.
Figs. 19A-19D are SEM micrographs of collagen-PEO (1:1) fibers spun from 2wt%
5 acid solution at a flow rate of 100 ~L/min and at different NaCI
concentrations: Fig. 19A, lSmM NaCI, 10 kX magnification; Fig. 19B, 25mM NaCI, SkX magnification; Fig.
19C, 34mM NaCI, 2 kX magnification; and Fig. 19D, 68mM NaCI, 5 kX magnification.
Figs. 20A-20D are SEM micrographs of collagen-PEO (1 :1 (w/w), 34 mM NaCI) 0 fibers spun from 2wt% acid solution at different flow rates (,uL/min): Fig.
20A, 25; Fig. 20B, 75; Fig. 20C, 100; and Fig. 20D, 150.
Fig. 21 shows 13C MAS spectra of collagen, PEO and a 1:2 collagen-PEO blended fabric. The CP spectrum of the blend appears to be a simple superposition of the CP spectrum 5 of PEO (*) and collagen (C). The DP spectrum of the blend (DP discriminates against the more rigid components) shows that PEO is highly mobile in the sample when compared to collagen at the measuring temperature (24 °C).
Fig. 22A shows the 1H NMR spectrum of 1:2 collagen-PEO fabric is shown before and 0 after the application of the Bipolar filter. The Bipolar filter eliminates the broad component of the spectrum and retains the narrow component. Fig. 22B shows the 13C
CP/MAS/TOSS
spectra before and after application of the Bipolar filter. After selection, only the PEO
resonance is retained demonstrating that effective selection of mobile component has been achieved using the Bipolar filter.
in the fiber forming solution. The PEO dissolves relatively slowly under physiological conditions, which can provide for release of the additional material(s). Anti-inflammatory agents and/or growth factors which stimulate wound healing or tissue repair and antitumor agents are but a few of 0 the biologically and pharmacologically agents which occur to one of ordinary skill in the art for inclusion in the material of the present invention. The skilled artisan knows how to choose a therapeutic protein or other compound according to the needs of the human or animal patient in which the material is used. Where the fibers are to be crosslinked prior to use, an initiator of crosslinkage, e.g., a photoinitiator, can be incorporated into the solution from which the 5 fibers are spun, with the result that the initiator is then present within the fiber.
The present invention further provides improved prosthetic materials for medical and veterinary use. These materials are formed of functionally modified elastin mimetic fibers which have been crosslinked using photoinitiators (i.e., under relatively mild conditions with ;0 respect to free radicals and temperature) and photoirradiation, and/or collagen or gelatin fibers which are crosslinked. Prosthetic materials can include, without limitation, tubing for vascular prostheses, ureters, esophagus, bladder, intestine, heart planar materials for use in reinforcing injured tissues (cartilage, tendons, heart valves, heart muscle, bladder, esophagus, ligament, stomach, among others) and for use as topical applies materials for promoting wound healing ;5 after injury or in facilitating healing of surgical incisions (including without limitation intestinal anastomeses or lung biopsy) or remediation of hernias. Crosslinking can be effected after casting each protein layer or crosslinking can take place after a multilayer material has been produced. Where used in surgical applications, hydrophilic polysaccharides and/or glycopolymers can be incorporated to reduce adhesion formation after surgical intervention ~0 by placing the material at the surgical site.
Within the scope of the present invention are hybrid elastin/collagen materials, which can be formed by depositing alternating layers of elastin or an elastin mimetic protein, either as protein fibers or as cast films of native protein and/or elastin mimetic protein and collagen .5 or functionalized collagen. Nonwoven fabrics are especially useful products of the present invention. The functionally modified elastin or elastin mimetic protein and/or collagen can be crosslinked once formed into nonwoven fabrics for improved stability, resistance to dissolution and improved physical properties. An advantageous aspect of the present invention is a lamellar repeat of an elastin mimetic layer sandwiched between collagen layers. The nonwoven fabric of this aspect of the invention can have from one lamellar repeat up to about ten 0 thousand sequentially layered lamellar repeats. The thickness of each lamellar repeat layer affects the ultimate physical properties of the product.
It is a further aspect of the present invention to provide an elastin, elastin mimetic, elastin mimetic/collagen hybrid, gelatin or collagen nonwoven fabric which further comprises 5 living cells. The living cells can be at least one of, but not limited to endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, stem cells, chondrocytes, osteoblasts or a human or animal cell which has been genetically engineered to produce a protein of interest. The protein of interest can be a growth factor which could promote wound healing, or a peptide hormone such as insulin in the context of an artificial organ, or an antiangiogenic protein to be used in an antitumor :0 application, and others will readily occur to one of ordinary skill in the art. The living cells can be incorporated between lamellar repeat units, and the cells can be deposited by techniques including, but not limited to, electrodeposition and sedimentation.
The materials of the present invention can be used in the form of conduits, or planar '.5 sheets or they can be formed into other shapes by rolling to form hollow tubing or by sequential deposition onto a rotating mandrel or other forms or molds.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figs 1A-1B show the Vs~art and Vstop for various solution concentrations (Fig.
1A) and .0 corresponding viscosities (Fig. 1B) of elastin-mimetic peptide aqueous solutions.
Figs. 2A-2D present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 5 wt% solution at 50 ~,l/ml (Fig. 2A), 100 ,ul/ml (Fig. 2B), 150 ~,1/ml (Fig.
2C), 200 ~cl/ml (Fig.
2D) flow rate.
Figs. 3A-3D present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 10 wt% solution at 50 ~cl/ml (Fig. 3A), 100 ~,1/ml (Fig. 3B), 150 ,ul/ml (Fig.
3C), 200 ,ul/ml (Fig.
3D) flow rate.
Figs. 4A-4D present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 15 0 wt% solution at 50 ~d/ml (Fig. 4A), 100 ~,l/ml (Fig. 4B), 150 ~,1/ml (Fig.
4C), 200 ~,1/ml (Fig.
4D) flow rate.
Figs. SA-SD present SEM micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from 20 wt% solution at 50 ~cl/ml (Fig. 5A), 100 ,ul/ml (Fig. 53B), 150 ~,1/ml (Fig.
53C), 200 ,ul/ml 5 (Fig. SD) flow rate.
Figs. 6A-6D are high resolution SEM (Figs.6A and 6B) and TEM (Figs. 6C and 6D) micrographs of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers spun from a 20 % wt % solution at 100 ~,1/ml flow rate, which demonstrate a twisted ribbon-like morphology.
,0 Figs. 7A-7B are SEM micrographs (Figs. 7A and 7B) of a non-woven fabric spun from a 15 % wt. solution of elastin-mimetic peptide at 150 ,ul/ml.
Fig. 8 illustrates fiber diameter distribution within a non-woven fabric spun from a 15 ;5 wt% solution of elastin-mimetic peptide at 150 ~,1/ml.
Fig. 9 shows distribution of fiber orientation within a non-woven fabric spun from a wt% solution of elastin-mimetic peptide at 150 ,ul/ml.
~0 Fig. 10 is a representative uniaxial stress-strain curve for drying a non-woven fabric of elastin-mimetic peptide fibers.
Figs. 11A shows 1H NMR spectra of elastin and elastin methacrylamide measured in Da~ (*) at room temperature. Expanded region of the protons corresponding to the double l5 bonds (Ha, Hb) is also shown for the elastin methacrylamide spectrum. Fig.
11B shows an expanded version of the figure between 2.6 and 3.1 ppm. The spectra indicate the shift in the methylene protons a to the amino group prior (H°) and subsequent (Hd) to methacryloylation.
Fig. 12 shows 1H NMR spectra of elastin and AME. The DOF of AME's is provided in the brackets. The expanded portion of the spectra between 2.6 and 3.1 ppm.
As DOF
0 increases the Hd peak grows in intensity at the expense of the H°
peak. The DOF can be computed from the integrated intensities of the H° and Hd peaks.
Fig. 13 shows temperature-dependent turbidimetry data for elastin and acrylate-modified elastin with different degrees of functionalization. The inverse transition temperature 5 (T~ decreases with increase in the degree of functionalization (DOF). DOF
dictates the temperature (processing window) at which fibers can be formed from aqueous solutions. The temperature window to the left of Tt is amenable for fiber formation.
Fig. 14 shows SEM micrographs of fibers spun from a 10 wt% AME(65) solution at 0 room temperature. Flow rate = 50 ~,1/min, Photoinitiator = EY (3 wt% of protein content).
Long uniform fibers are produced with occasional triangle type bifurcation points. Fibers in the diameter range from 300-500 nm were produced.
Fig. 15 presents SEM micrographs of fibers spun from a 15 wt% AME(65) solution 5 at room temperature. Flowrate = 50 ~1/min, Photoinitiator = EY (3 wt% of protein content).
Long uniform fibers are produced with a flattened or ribbon shaped morphology.
Fibers in a variety of diameter ranges are produced (typically from 300 nm - 2 ,um).
Fig. 16 shows 13C CP/MAS/TOSS spectra of elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide, ~0 methacrylate-modified elastin and crosslinked elastin recorded at room temperature (23 °C).
Contact time = lms and spinning speed (wr/2~) = 5 kHz. Disappearance of the peaks Ca and Cb in the spectrum for the crosslinked material indicate complete crosslinking after exposure either to UV at 365 nm or visible light. The peaks labeled "*" are from the photoinitiator (Irgacure 2959~) employed for crosslinking.
~5 Fig. 17 illustrates degree of crosslinking of AME(88) determined by 13C solid-state NMR as a function of irradiation time. Data presented as mean ~ standard deviation.
Fig. 18(A) shows a stress-strain curve of crosslinked and uncrosslinked fabric samples of elastin methacrylamide in the dry state. Crosslinking increases both tensile strength and 0 modulus of the sample. Fig. 18B shows stress-strain curves of dry and hydrated (O) crosslinked AME(65) fabric samples of elastin methacrylamide measured at a strain rate of 1 mrn/min at room temperature.
Figs. 19A-19D are SEM micrographs of collagen-PEO (1:1) fibers spun from 2wt%
5 acid solution at a flow rate of 100 ~L/min and at different NaCI
concentrations: Fig. 19A, lSmM NaCI, 10 kX magnification; Fig. 19B, 25mM NaCI, SkX magnification; Fig.
19C, 34mM NaCI, 2 kX magnification; and Fig. 19D, 68mM NaCI, 5 kX magnification.
Figs. 20A-20D are SEM micrographs of collagen-PEO (1 :1 (w/w), 34 mM NaCI) 0 fibers spun from 2wt% acid solution at different flow rates (,uL/min): Fig.
20A, 25; Fig. 20B, 75; Fig. 20C, 100; and Fig. 20D, 150.
Fig. 21 shows 13C MAS spectra of collagen, PEO and a 1:2 collagen-PEO blended fabric. The CP spectrum of the blend appears to be a simple superposition of the CP spectrum 5 of PEO (*) and collagen (C). The DP spectrum of the blend (DP discriminates against the more rigid components) shows that PEO is highly mobile in the sample when compared to collagen at the measuring temperature (24 °C).
Fig. 22A shows the 1H NMR spectrum of 1:2 collagen-PEO fabric is shown before and 0 after the application of the Bipolar filter. The Bipolar filter eliminates the broad component of the spectrum and retains the narrow component. Fig. 22B shows the 13C
CP/MAS/TOSS
spectra before and after application of the Bipolar filter. After selection, only the PEO
resonance is retained demonstrating that effective selection of mobile component has been achieved using the Bipolar filter.
Fig. 23 provides spin diffusion data for 1:1 and 1:2 collagen-PEO fabrics. The initial portion of the curve, corresponding to times less than 9 ms, is shown in the inset. The data illustrates the presence of an interface for a 1:1 blend while showing no appreciable interface for a 1:2 blend. The dotted lines indicate the theoretical end point values for spin diffusion in case of 1:1 (~) and 1:2 (o) blends.
Fig. 27 provides the 13C CP/MAS/TOSS solid-state spectra of gelatin methacrylamide and crosslinked gelatin methacrylamide (MAS rate = 6 kI~z). The inset shows the resonances from the double carbons (a, b). Spectrum of the crosslinked sample was collected on a film sample which was irradiated under visible light for 2 hours. The disappearance of the double 5 bonds indicates complete crosslinking in the sample.
Fig. 28A-28B depict nonwoven crosslinked tubes of gelatin methacrylamide (Fig.
28A) prior to hydration and (Fig. 28B) in hydrated state. A 5 cm 14 mm tube is shown.
,0 Fig. 29A shows the diffusion profiles obtained from PFGNMR measurements for varying diffusion times are shown as a function of the magnetic field gradient. Fig. 29B
shows the 1000-ms profile in (a) has been remade showing the normalized intensity as a a2 - YzSzGa function of a parameter a2 ( 5 ). The data has been fitted to a Gaussian distribution of pore sizes.
;5 Figure 30A-30B provide a comparison of data between natural systems and electrospun fabrics produced in the lab. Fig. 30A shows the stress-strain behavior of human iliac artery, data from Roach M.R. and Burton A.L. (1957) Cah. J. Biochem. Physiol. 35: 681, 1957. Fig.
30B shows the stress-strain behavior of crosslinked collagen and elastin fabrics produced by ~0 electrospinning. The mechanical behavior of the fabricated materials qualitatively mimics the behavior of natural artery.
Fig. 27 provides the 13C CP/MAS/TOSS solid-state spectra of gelatin methacrylamide and crosslinked gelatin methacrylamide (MAS rate = 6 kI~z). The inset shows the resonances from the double carbons (a, b). Spectrum of the crosslinked sample was collected on a film sample which was irradiated under visible light for 2 hours. The disappearance of the double 5 bonds indicates complete crosslinking in the sample.
Fig. 28A-28B depict nonwoven crosslinked tubes of gelatin methacrylamide (Fig.
28A) prior to hydration and (Fig. 28B) in hydrated state. A 5 cm 14 mm tube is shown.
,0 Fig. 29A shows the diffusion profiles obtained from PFGNMR measurements for varying diffusion times are shown as a function of the magnetic field gradient. Fig. 29B
shows the 1000-ms profile in (a) has been remade showing the normalized intensity as a a2 - YzSzGa function of a parameter a2 ( 5 ). The data has been fitted to a Gaussian distribution of pore sizes.
;5 Figure 30A-30B provide a comparison of data between natural systems and electrospun fabrics produced in the lab. Fig. 30A shows the stress-strain behavior of human iliac artery, data from Roach M.R. and Burton A.L. (1957) Cah. J. Biochem. Physiol. 35: 681, 1957. Fig.
30B shows the stress-strain behavior of crosslinked collagen and elastin fabrics produced by ~0 electrospinning. The mechanical behavior of the fabricated materials qualitatively mimics the behavior of natural artery.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Abbreviations used in the present application include the following: PEO, poly (ethylene oxide); PGA, polyglycolic acid; AME, acrylate modified elastin (or elastin mimetic); DOF, degree of functionalization; DCC, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; DDG, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone; DMAP, N,N dimethylaminopyridine; EY, eosin Y; FITC, fluorescein 0 isothiocyanate; NHS-Biotin, N hydroxysuccinimidobiotin; EMC, -~
maleimidocaproyl; FMCS, -~-maleimidocaproyl succinimide; PMB, p-methoxybenzyl; Ti~oc-amide, 2, ~, 2-trichloroethoxyamide; PEU, poly(ether urethaneurea); PFTE, polytetrafluoroethylene; ePFTE, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene; HEA, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate; AOD, 3-acryloyl-e-3-(N,N-dioctadecylcarbamoyl propionate); AAPD, 2,2'-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride; AIBN, 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile; SS, styryl sulfonate.
Standard one- and three-letter abbreviations for the twenty naturally occurring, protein building bloclc amino acids are used herein.
As part of our program in biomimetic materials and tissue engineering, we have ',0 targeted several elements of the arterial wall as structural models for the design of an artificial blood vessel based upon the assembly of component structures. The arterial wall as representative of other tissues and organ systems can be considered in general terms as a fiber reinforced composite material with associated mechanical properties largely a consequence of protein fiber networks. Moreover, the local mechanical environment within the vessel wall ;5 may in turn influence the functional responses of component cells.
Biocompatibility (or biological compatibility) refers to the interactions of living body tissues, compounds and fluids, including blood, etc. , with any implanted or contacting material (biomaterial). Biocompatible biomaterials are of great importance in any biomedical .0 application including, for example, in the implantation of vascular grafts and medical devices such as artificial organs, artificial heart valves, artificial joints, catheters and various other prosthetic devices into or on the body . Biomaterials with good biocompatibility do not trigger inflammatory reactions after implantation in or contact with human or animal tissue nor do they provide surfaces which are prone to thromboses.
.5 In the context of the present invention, a functionalized protein is one which has, covalently bound to it, at least one moiety which mediates polymerization or crosslinkage with another moiety of the same chemical structure. The functionalized elastin mimetic protein, elastin, collagen or gelatin of the present invention comprise at least one polymerizable monomeric group, e.g., an acryloyloxy group, methacryl, dienyl, sorbyl, styryl, acrylamide, 0 acrylonitrile, N-vinyl pyrrolidone, etc., which group is covalently attached to the protein and which modulates crosslinking between ' similarly functionalized proteins.
Desirably, photoirradiation mediates the crosslinking reaction in the presence of a suitable photoinitiator, under mild conditions of temperature and radical formation to minimize damage to the proteins.
Functionalization of the protein is carried out so that the desirable mechaiucal and structural 5 properties of the protein superstructure comprised of it are generally maintained. Conditions and initiators for crosslinking reactions are well known to the art.
As used herein, an elastin mimetic protein is one which has an amino acid sequence and secondary structure derived from native (naturally occurring) elastin. As specifically exemplified ,0 herein, the elastin mimetic protein is recombinantly produced in Escheriehia coli, and it is described in McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 3643-3648. This elastin mimetic protein contains 39 repeats ofthe amino acid sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (SEQ ID N0:4). See also Huang et al. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 2989-2997 and McMillan et al. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821. It is critical that it has elastomeric ,5 properties and tensile strength similar to those elastin when assembled into supramolecular structures such as fibers, fiber networlcs and nonwoven fabrics.
Elastomeric proteins are widely distributed among a diverse range of animal species and tissues where they have evolved precise structures to perform specific biological functions.
~0 These proteins, which include for example, abductin [Cao et al. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7: 8677-8], tropoelastin [Gray et al. (1973) Nature 246: 461-6; Sandberg et al. (1981) N.
Ehgl. J. Meet.
304: 566-579; Urry et al. Ed., Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177] bysuss [Deming, T. J.
(1999) Curr. Opih. Chem. Biol. 3: 100-5], silk [Hayashi et al. (1999) Iht. J.
Biol. Macromol.
24: 271-5; Hayashi, C. Y. and Lewis, R. V. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 275: 773-84], and titin all ~5 possess rubber-like elasticity, undergoing high deformation without rupture, storing energy involved in deformation, and then recovering to their original state when the stress is removed.
The ability of proteins to exhibit rubber-like elasticity relates both to their primary and secondary structure, as well as to those features, such as protein self assembly and other intermolecular interactions that dictate the formation of true or virtual networks. Elastomeric materials must satisfy two criteria. First, in order to respond quickly to an applied force, the 0 monomers, which in elastomeric proteins typically consist of repetitive glycine-rich peptide motifs, must be flexible and conformationally free. Second, elastomeric macromolecules must be crosslinked to form a network. Characteristically, elastic proteins combine elastomeric domains with domains that form covalent or noncovalent crosslinks. Thus, the size and properties of the elastic domains and the degree of crosslinking influence the elastic behavior 5 of protein-based materials. Tensile strength is important in certain applications, and collagen and gelatin and crosslinked acrylate modified collagen improves the tensile strength of artificial fibers, fiber networks and fabrics and the like.
Elastin, which is derived from the soluble precursor tropoelastin, is widely distributed !0 in vertebrate tissues. The elastin protein consists of repetitive glycine-rich hydrophobic elastomeric domains of variable length that alternate with alanine-rich, lysine-containing domains that form crosslinks [Sandberg et al. (1981). N. Engl. J. Med. 304:
566-579; Urry.et al., Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177; Sandberg et al. (1981). N.
Engl. J. Med. 304:
566-579; Urry et al., Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177]. Native elastin's intrinsic !5 insolubility has largely limited its capacity to be purified and processed into forms suitable for biomedical or industrial applications. Recently, this limitation has been largely overcome, in part, by the structural characterization of the elastomeric domains.
Specifically, comprehensive sequence analysis has revealed the presence of consensus tetra-(VPGG), penta-(VPGVG), and hexapeptides (APGVGV) repeat motifs [Gray et al. (1973) Nature 246: 461-6;
.0 Urry et al. (1975) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 393: 296-306; Sandberg et al.
(1977) Adv. Exp.
Med. Bio1.79: 277-84; Inhaled et al. (1976) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98: 7547-53;
Rapaka et al.
(1978) htt. J. Pept. Protein Res. 11: 109-27; Urry et al. (1986) Int. J. Pept.
Protein Res. 6:
28, 649-660; Broch et al. (1998) Biomol. Struct. Dyrc. 15: 1073-1091]. VPGG, VPGVG and APGVGV are given in SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID N0:2 and SEQ ID N0:3, respectively.
5 Polymers of the pentapeptide exhibit elastic behavior with spectroscopic features, including a highly mobile backbone and the presence of (3-turns and a loose helical ~i-spiral, that are consistent with those of native elastin [Urry et al. (1974) Biochemistry 13:
609-16; Urry et a1.(1985) Biopolymers 24: 2345-2356]. Thus, the pentapeptide sequence (VPGVG) (SEQ ID
N0:2) has formed the basis fox the synthesis of protein polymers with elastomeric domains by standard solution and solid phase chemical methodologies and, more recently, by genetic 0 engineering strategies [McPherson et al. (1992) Biotechnology Progress 8:
347-352;
McPherson et al. (1996) Protein Expression Purification 7: 51-57; Panitch et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 1701-1703; McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 3643-3648;
McMillan R.A. and Conticello, R. P. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821].
5 In tissues, such as arterial blood vessels, where energy and shape recovery are critical parameters, elastin networks dominate low strain mechanical responses.
Avoidance of artery wall fatigue and failure is dependent upon the resilience of elastin, which prevents the dissipation of transmitted pulsatile energy as heat. While elastin fibers are structurally complex and may contain glycoproteins and glycosaminoglycans, the physical properties of the ,0 network have been attributed primarily to the elastin protein component produced from the soluble precursor tropoelastin [Debelle et al. (1999) Internat. J. Biochem.
Cell Biol. 31:261-272]. Furthermore, extensive investigations by Urry and others [Urry et al.
(1985) Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 130: 50-57; Thomas et al. (1987) Biopolymers 26:921-934;
Urry, D.W. (1988) J. Prot. Chem. 7: 1-34; Chang et al. (1988) Chem. Phys. Lett. 147:
395-400;
;5 Urry et al. (1989) Biopolymers 28: 819-833; Chang et al. (1989) J.
Biomolec. Struct. Dyn.
6: 851-858; Urry, D.W. (1993) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 32: 819-841; Urry et al. (1995) Ciba Foundation Symposium 192: 4-30; Urry et al. Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177; Sandberg et al. (1977) J. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 79: 277; Foster et al.
(1973) J. Biol.
Chem. 24:2876; Sandberg et al. (1985) Pathol. Biol. 33:266-274; Wasserman et al. (1990) ~0 Biopolymers 29:1613-1628] since the mid-1970s have revealed that the molecular folding and/or self assembly of tropoelastin into more ordered structures, as well as its elastomeric nature are due to the frequent appearance of a pentapeptide unit (Valine-Proline-Glycine-Valine-Glycine; SEQ ID NO:1). The presence of lysine residues along the native protein backbone facilitates intermolecular crosslinking, which further influences the mechanical .5 responses of the elastin fiber network. Model polymers based upon the pentapeptide sequence have been synthesized by solution chemistry and solid phase approaches [Urry et al. (1985) Syntheses, Characterizations a~td Medical Uses of the Polypentapeptide of Elastih and its Analogs; William D.F. Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL] and recently by more efficient recombinant genetic engineering methodologies [McPherson et al. (1992) Biotechnology Progress 8: 347-352; McPherson et al. (1996) Protein Expression Purification 7: 51-57;
0 Panitch et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 1701-1703; McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 3643-3648]. These protein polymers have been processed into elastomeric hydrogels of various forms including sheets and tubular constructs by chemical, enzymatic, and ~-irradiation mediated crosslinking of protein solutions (Urry et al (1997) supra]. These polymers have also been used in generating thin films. For example, Panitch et al. (1999) supra have produced 5 elastin-like protein polymers containing a periodically spaced cell binding fibronectin CSS
domain. When cast from solution onto an otherwise non-adhesive substrate, these polymers promoted cell adhesion and growth. Efficient processing strategies, which can convert elastin peptide polymers into fibers and networks that mimic native structures, enhance the utility of these materials.
;0 The production of fibers from protein solutions has typically relied upon the use of wet or dry spinning processes [Martin et al. Processing and Characterization of Protein Polymers;
McGrath, K. and Kaplan, D., Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp.339-370; Hudson, S.M. The Spi~cnihg of Silk-like Proteins into Fibers; McGrath, K. and Kaplan, D., Ed.:
Birkhauser:
;5 Boston, 1997, pp. 313-337]. Wet spinning, more commonly used, involves the extrusion of a protein solution through a spinneret into an acid-salt coagulating bath, which usually contains aqueous ammonium sulfate, acetic acid, isopropanol, or acetone. Alternatively, dry spinning consists of extrusion into an evaporative atmosphere. Both approaches yield large diameter fibers which do not mimic the morphological characteristics of native protein fibers.
~0 Furthermore, both strategies rely on biologically toxic solvent systems that preclude the fabrication in real time of hybrid protein-cell constructs. Electrospinning is a third approach that has been recently utilized to generate protein fibers [Reneker et al.
(1996) Nahotechuology 7: 216-223; Doshi et al. (1995) J. Electrostatics 35: 151-160]. In this technique, a polymer solution is subjected to an electric field that induces the accumulation of charge on the surface .5 of a pendent drop. Mutual charge repulsion causes a force which directly opposes that produced by surface tension. At a critical value of electric field strength, a repulsive electric force exceeds the surface tension force, and a charged jet of solution is ejected. The jet splays into a series of fine filaments with a range of diameters that are characteristically on the order of several tens or hundreds of nanometers. Given the high surface area to volume ration of these nanofibers, solvent evaporation occurs relatively quickly even when operating with 0 aqueous solutions at ambient temperature and pressure. Several examples of protein nanofibers produced by the application of electrospinning techniques have been reported.
Anderson et al.
have electrospun a series of silk-like protein polymers from formic acid and investigated their capacity to modify the cell adhesive characteristics of an underlying solid substrate [Anderson et al. Bioactive Silk-like Protein Polymer Films oh Silicon Devices; Alper, M., Bayby, H., 5 Kaplan, D. and Navia, M., ed.; Materials Research Society: Pittsburgh, PA;
1994, Vol. 330, pp. 171-177.
We describe herein fiber formation from natural elastin, a recombinant elastin mimetic polypeptide, from collagen and from gelatin. Electrospinning techniques were employed to ;0 produce fibers in a form that mimics native elastin fiber diameter utilizing an 81 kD synthetic elastin peptide polymer based upon the elastin-mimetic repeat sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (SEQ ID NO:4). The effects of process parameters on fiber morphology including solution viscosity, flow rate, electric field strength, and the distance between the spinneret tip and the collecting surface were defined. In addition, non-woven ',5 fabrics based upon this elastin analogue were produced, and component fiber properties, including the distribution of fiber diameter and orientation, were characterized. A framework has been established for investigating the influence of fiber processing on both the structural features and mechanical properties of single protein fibers and fiber networks formulated as non-woven fabrics. As a consequence, the capacity to engineer tissue like constructs whose ~0 mechanical and biological properties are based upon a hierarchical arrangement of protein networks has been significantly enhanced.
Initial investigations focused on defining the electric potential necessary to initiate or terminate jet formation from aqueous solutions of the elastin analogue.
Overall, values for .5 both VS~~ and VstoP were proportionately related to the concentration of the peptide in solution and the corresponding viscosity (Fig. 1). Vst~t was greater than 6.4 kV for all concentrations tested, and the splay was found to be unstable above 25 kV. Therefore, 18 kV
was the chosen field strength for subsequent fiber formation investigations. Jet instability was observed at concentrations above 20 wt% , with an accompanying inability to form fibers. A
systematic study of the influence on fiber morphology of the distance between the spinneret tip and the 0 collecting plate revealed that 15 cm was an optimal distance for fiber formation.
The major determinants of fiber morphology are solution concentration and flow rate.
Fibers formed from a 5 wt% solution, regardless of the mass flow rate, are short, fragmented and characterized by a triangular or spindle shaped beaded morphology (Fig.
2). Long 5 uniform fibers were generated at solution concentrations above 10 wt% which corresponded to solution viscosities greater than 25 centipoise (Fig. 3). Fiber diameters range between 300 and 400 nm over all flow rates tested with little variation in morphology with the infrequent exception of fiber splitting at triangle-shaped bifurcation points. At a flow rate of 100 ~,l/min, it was estimated that 1500 meters of thin filament were produced per minute.
At solution '.0 concentrations of 15 and 20 wt% , a new morphological pattern was noted:
flattened or ribbon shaped fibers which appeared, on occasion, twisted during the spinning and deposition process (Figs. 4, 5). The formation of ribbon shaped fibers from the 20 wt% solution was a relatively common occurrence with an average fiber width of approximately 3 .0 ~.m.
However, both thin filaments (250-600 nm) and wider ribbon-like structures (~3 ~cm) were observed together, !5 particularly when fibers from this solution were formed at low flow rates.
Molecular-level microstructure was observed on the surface of elastin-like ribbons, characterized by aligned axially oriented ridges with an apparent height and width of 10 to 20 nm (Fig.
6). Although twisted ribbons were also examined by TEM, additional higher order structural features were not observed.
.0 Fong et al. (1999) Polymer 40: 4585-4592, have reported that a solution viscosity of at least 500 centipoise was required for effective electrospinning of non-beaded fibers from aqueous solutions of high molecular weight polyethylene oxide) (MW 900 kD). In contrast, a relatively low viscosity solution (25 centipoise) of elastin peptide polymer yielded electrospun S 5 fibers of uniform diameter. This phenomenon is believed to be related to molecular self assembly processes that are operative for the elastin analogue and, thereby, may be an important determinant of thin filament and ribbon formation at low and high solution concentrations, respectively. LTrry et al. (1988) supra and (1989) supra have noted that the central "Pro-Gly" element of the pentapeptide repeat (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly) (SEQ ID N0:2.) adopts a type II reverse turn structure, forming a flexible helix or "(3-spiral" on tandem 0 sequence repetition. Specifically, a conformational rearrangement from a random coil to a [3-spiral structure has been noted for model poly(VPGVG) (SEQ ID N0:2)peptides on phase separation of the polymer. This conformation promotes both intra- and intermolecular hydrophobic interactions and underlies the elastomeric restoring force in elastin. Therefore, during the process of nanofiber formation, progressive solvent loss probably reduces the 5 inverse transition temperature of the peptide solution, facilitating both hydrophobically mediated polypeptide folding and molecular self assembly. Under appropriate conditions ih vitro, tropoelastin molecules have a well-known tendency to aggregate into thin filaments.
Likewise, the formation of elastin filaments ih vivo, as basic building blocks of larger elastin fibers, has been observed by atomic force microscopy and high resolution cryoelectron ,0 microscopy [Pasquali-Ronchetti et al. (1995) Ciba Fouhdation Symposium 192:
31-50;
Pasquali-Ronchetti et al. (1998) Matrix Biology 17: 75-83]. These studies have demonstrated that native elastin fibers can be resolved into a three-dimensional bundle of 7 nm wide filaments oriented in the direction of the fiber. High resolution SEM of electrospun elastin fibers revealed the presence of 10 nm wide filament-like surface folds running parallel to the ,5 direction of the fiber. Given reported electrospinning strain rates on the order of 104 s 1, it is conceivable that elongational flow promotes the orientation and self assembly of polymer molecules in the direction of elongation [Reneker et al. (1995) Bull Am. Phys.
Soc. 40: 351].
Non-woven fabrics were formed from fibers generated from a 15 wt% of polypeptide 0 solution at a flow rate of 150 ,ul/ml (Fig. 7). As noted above, short time frame deposition studies had demonstrated that these conditions afforded the highest proportion of uniform, thin fibers with diameters of approximately 400 nm. Image analysis of the non-woven fabric revealed a unimodal distribution of fiber diameters with an observed average diameter of 450 nm (Fig. 8). The distribution of fiber orientation within this network followed a random .5 pattern of fiber deposition with consequent generation of an isotropic nonwoven fabric (Fig.
9). Uniaxial stress-strain properties were characterized in dry non-woven fabrics, and a representative data set is illustrated in Fig. 10. The ultimate tensile strength of the sample was 35 MPa and the material modulus 1.8 GPa. Hydration and peptide crosslinking modulate these properties .
0 Urry et al. have demonstrated that non-conservative amino acid substitutions for Valine-4 can be performed without disruption of the (3-spiral structure [Urry et al.
(1985) supra;
Thomas et al. (1987) supra; Urry et al (1989) supra; Chang et al. (1989) supra]. Thus, the incorporation of lysine in the four position of the pentapeptide and subsequent synthesis of the elastin-mimetic repeat sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (SEQ ID N0:4) 5 permits spatially controlled chemical or enzymatic crosslinking [McMillan et al (2000) supra;
Kagan et al. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255: 3656].
The genetic engineering of synthetic peptide polymers based upon a design derived from a native structural protein typically requires the incorporation of repetitive oligopeptide ,0 sequences that impart critical structural properties from the parent protein to the recombinant polypeptide. In the process, model systems for investigating the structure-function properties of the native protein are generated. Moreover, genetic engineering based strategies facilitate the alteration of peptide chain length, consensus repeat sequence, as well as the introduction of additional functional groups or oligopeptide units that modulate the biological, ;5 thermodynamic, and mechanical properties of the peptide polymer. For example, the appropriate choice of peptide sequence has led to the development of recombinant proteins that self assemble into thermoreversible gels [Petka et al. (1998) Science 281:389-392], lyotropic smectic mesophases [Yu et al. (1997) Natut~e 389: 167-170], and lamellar crystallites [Krejchi et al. (1994) Science 265:1427-1432]. The uniformity of macromolecular structure achieved ~0 by this approach provides exquisite control over macroscopic polymer properties, including processability. The successful generation of fibers from elastin-mimetic peptide polymers has provided a unique opportunity to characterize the physiochemical and biological properties of single fibexs as well as structures with higher levels of architectural order.
In particular, the creation of fiber-reinforced composites based upon a careful choice of protein polymer types and network structures allows the engineering of improved human tissue constructs as well as completely synthetic artificial organs with enhanced clinical performance capabilities.
Elastin-mimetic protein fibers and fiber networks were produced by the electrospinning of an aqueous solution of a genetically engineered 81 kD peptide polymer based upon the 0 repeat sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (repeats of SEQ
ID N0:4).
Fibers were generated at ambient temperature and pressure with optimal fiber formation observed with use of an 18 kV electric field and a 15 cm distance between the spinneret and plate collector. High resolution SEM and TEM confirmed that fiber morphology was primarily influenced by solution concentration and mass flow rate.
Characteristically, fiber 5 diameters varied between 200 - 3000 nm and three morphological patterns were noted: beaded fibers, thin filaments, and broad ribbon-like structures. At solution concentrations above 10 wt% , long uniform fibers were predominantly observed. Image analysis of non-woven fabrics produced from a solution concentration of 15 wt% revealed the isotropic orientation of individual fibers with an average fiber diameter of 450 nm. The ultimate tensile strength of ;0 these non-woven fabrics was 35 MPa and the material modulus was 1.8 GPa.
In its native form, elastin is present as a network of elastic fibers that are crosslinked through available lysine residues found in interspersed alanine-rich regions jRobins, S. P.
(1982) Methods Biochem. Anal. 28: 329-379; Miyoshi et al. (1976) J. Biochem.
(Tokyo) 79:
;5 1235-1243; Franzblau et al. (1977) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 79: 313-327;
Akagawa, M. and Suyama, K. (2000) Connect. Tissue Res. 41: 131-141] . Characteristically, crosslinking occurs in the solid-state; that is, after cellular secretion of tropoelastin with local fiber deposition. In this fashion, the biostability of elastin is enhanced and its mechanical properties modulated.
In contrast, crosslinking of synthetic elastin-mimetic protein polymers has been largely ~0 investigated in solution phase systems using either 'y-irradiation [Zhang et al. (1989) J. Protein Chem. 8, 173-182], chemical, or enzymatic based approaches [Kagan et al.
(1980) J. Biol.
Chem. 255: 3656-3659] . Urry et al. have demonstrated the feasibility of generating tubular hydrogels by 'y-irradiation mediated crosslinking jUrry et al. (1997) supra]
and Welsh et al.
have used glutaraldehyde to crosslink an elastin-mimetic protein film [Welsh, E. R. and .5 Tirrell, D. A. (2000) Biomac~omolecules 1: 23-30; McMillan et al. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821]. While these approaches provide a measure of control over the degree of crosslinking, the chemical nature, and the location of the crosslink are often ill-defined.
Furthermore, none of these reaction schemes are appropriate for heterogeneous multicomponent systems in which there may be a need to control either the degree of crosslinking among individual constituents or otherwise to incorporate elements within the 0 structure that may be adversely effected by unintended side reactions. In summary, the approaches that have been described to date have provided important insights into the physiochemical behavior of bioelastic systems under a variety of environmental conditions and have lead to novel processing strategies for creating elastomeric hydrogels for drug delivery and other applications. However, we believe that the generation of meaningful constructs for 5 the engineering of human tissues and artificial organs will require the processing of elastomeric protein polymers into fibers and fabrics in which the protein polymer forms a crosslinked network. Thus, it is desirable to utilize a crosslinking strategy that is efficient in the solid-state, achieves precise control over the nature and degree of crosslinking, and facilitates spatial and temporal control over the reaction process.
;0 We have optimized an electrospinning process to produce uniform nanofibers (d < 1 ,um) and non-woven fabrics of an elastin protein polymer poly((Va1-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly))39 , 39 repeats of SEQ ID N0:4. Notably, amino acid substitution in the fourth position of the pentapeptide does not affect the formation of a ~i-spiral [Huang (2000) !5 Macromolecules 33: 2989; Thomas et al. (1987) Biopolymers 26: 921-934;
Chang et al. (1989) J. Biomolec. St~uct. Dyh. 6: 851-858; Urry et al. (1989) Biopolymers 28: 819-833], which is critical for the biomechanical behavior of elastin analogues. The incorporated lysine group at position 24 within the repeat of SEQ ID N0:4 (Lys-24) provides an amino functionality that can be conveniently utilized for polymer crosslinking. Indeed, McMillan et al.
have recently .0 reported the formation of structurally well-defined crosslinked elastin-mimetic hydrogels using an N hydroxysuccinimide ester of a bifunctional carboxylic acid, specifically, disuccinimidyl suberate, as crosslinker of available amino groups in the solution phase [McMillan et al. (1999) MacYOmolecules 32: 9067-9070]. Herein we describe the incorporation of functional groups into the protein polymer backbone that facilitate site-specific solid-state photocrosslinking using 45 either UV or visible light active photoinitiators. Significantly, this approach provides for both spatial and temporal control over the crosslinking reaction. The generation of crosslinked elastin-mimetic fibers and films i~ reported, and mechanical properties characterized.
The synthesis of acrylate-modified elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide has been accomplished. 1H NMR spectra of the elastin-mimetic protein polymer and its acrylate-0 modified analogue (AME) recorded at room temperature in D20 are shown in Fig. 11A-118.
The spectrum of the modified material expanded between 5.0 and 5.7 ppm is shown in the inset in Fig. 11A. The spectrum clearly indicates the incorporation of the double bonds through peaks at 5.3 (Ha) and 5.6 ppm (Hb). Fig. 11B is the expanded version of the spectra, between 2.6 and 3.1 ppm. Acrylate modification results in about 0.25 ppm (Hd) downfield shift for the 5 methylene protons alpha to the amino group (H~). This shift can be used to directly calculate the degree of functionalization (DOF). The ratio of the integrated intensity of the 3 ppm peak to the sum of the integrated intensities of the 3 and 2.75 ppm peaks defines the DOF.
Additionally, IR spectroscopy can be used to evaluate DOF. The NHZ band at 3500 cm-1 decreases with functionalization.
!0 The DOF can be varied by changing the molar reactant ratio of the methacryloyl anhydride to the amino groups in the peptide polymer. Fig. 12 illustrates the variation in the DOF that can be achieved, as demonstrated by changes in peak intensities in the 1H NMR
spectrum. In the unmodified material the 3 ppm peak is absent. As the molar ratio of the !5 anhydride is increased, the intensity of the 3 ppm peak increases at the expense of the 2.75 ppm peak, indicating an increased degree of functionalization. The DOF can be varied from 33 % to 88 % by changing the feed ratio from 1:1 to 3:1. Thus, using the same reaction scheme a wide variety of AMEs can be produced, resulting in materials having a wide range of mechanical properties (subsequent to crosslinking). For the remainder of the discussion, the .0 AMEs will be represented by their respective DOF in brackets.
The inverse temperature transition (Tt) of elastin-mimetic and acrylate-modified analogues has been analyzed. Mutual compatibility of a polymer and a solvent has been extensively studied and is often critical for processing needs. Urry et. al.
have shown that a .5 family of protein polymers based on the VPGVG (SEQ ID N0:2) repeat undergo an inverse temperature transition [Urry et al. (1985) Biopolymers 24: 2345-56]. On increasing the temperature from below to above the transition temperature, the proteins were found to undergo molecular assembly by protein folding with phase separation. For example, poly(GVGVP) is miscible with water in all proportions below 25°C, but on increasing the temperature above 25 °C, the solution becomes turbid with complete phase separation. Thus, 0 temperature-dependent turbidimetry measurements can be used to quantify the inverse transition temperature.
Results of turbidimetry measurements on elastin and acrylate-modified elastin materials in ddH20 are shown in Fig. 13. The temperature corresponding to one-half maximal turbidity 5 can be considered the Tt. The data demonstrate that acrylate-modification causes a reduction in the inverse temperature transition with 88 % conversion of the amino groups, producing a reduction in the transition temperature by about 50 °C (Tt ~
23°C). This reduction is consistent with the Tt based hydrophobicity scale developed by Urry et. al.
[Urry et al. (1985) Biopolymers 24: 2345-56]. Their investigations established that an increase in the ,0 hydrophobicity of model protein polymers, as a result of substitution at the fourth position, is thermodynamically offset with a decrease in the transition temperature. The measurement of T~ assumes particular importance in our studies, because the processing temperature for fiber formation is dictated by Tt. The phase separation phenomenon occurring above T~ precludes fiber formation. For example, in principle, fibers can be spun from aqueous solutions of :5 AME(33) and AME(65) at room temperature, which is well below the Tt.
However, the onset of turbidity begins close to room temperature for AME(88). Thus, fibers from 10-15 wt%
AME(88) in water (pH 7) required cold room spinning (at about 5 °C).
The crosslinlcing of the acrylate moiety is mediated through a photoinitiator.
The .0 mechanism for photocrosslinking has been extensively reviewed [Eaton, D. F.
(1986) Advances in PhotochemistYy 13 : 427-487] . Because fiber spinning is conducted from aqueous solutions, water-soluble photoinitiators are desirable. Two photoinitiators were investigated: eosin Y/triethanolamine/vinyl pyrillidone system and IRGACURE 2959 (Irgacure 2959 is 1-[4-hydroxyethoxy)-pheny]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-propane-1-one; Ciba Geigy), both of which have ~5 been used as photoinitiators in water-based systems [Van Den Bulcke et al.
(2000) BiomacYOmolecules 1: 31; Cruise et al. (1998) Biotechnol. Bioehg. 57: 655-65].
While both photoinitiators were tested for crosslinking efficiency, the reported mechanical results are for the EY-based systems. Other photoinitiators which function under mild conditions of temperature and without producing a level of free radicals which lead to protein damage can be used, and the selection of light wavelength and temperature for a particular combination of 0 wavelength and functional group are well understood in the art.
Figs. 14 and 15 show SEM micrographs of the fibers produced from 10 and 15 wt%
solutions at a flow rate of 50 ~,1/min, as described in Example 4. In both cases, long uniform fibers were produced. In fibers spun from the 10 wt% solution, average diameter ranged 5 between 300 - 500 nm with occasional triangle shaped bifurcation points noted. In contrast, fibers spun from the 15 wt% solution were exhibited a flat or ribbon type morphology with the absence of triangular bifurcation points. In comparison to our previous investigation of unmodified elastin-mimetic fibers, neither acrylate-modification nor the addition of photoinitiator to the spinning solution had any appreciable effect on fiber morphology.
;0 Solubility in water was used as a simple test to determine the efficiency of crosslinking.
While elastin samples that did not contain photoinitiator dissolved completely in water, those containing Eosin Y or Irgacure were insoluble in water. The extent and nature of crosslinking was more precisely determined using 13C solid-state NMR. Owing to its inherent structural ;5 specificity, solid-state NMR has been extensively used in the past to study chemical changes ensuing after crosslinking [O'Donnell, J. H. and Whittaker, A. K. (1992) Radiat. Phys. Chem.
36: 209; O'Donnell, J. H. and Whittaker, A. K. (1992) J. Polym. Chem. Ed. 30:
185]. Fig.
16 shows the 13C solid-state MAS/TOSS NMR spectra of elastin, elastin methacrylamide, and crosslinked elastin methacrylamide. The addition of double bonds to elastin via ~0 methacryloylation is clearly evidenced by the appearance of peaks Ca and Cb in the spectrum of elastin methacrylamide. For the sake of clarity, the double bond region is magnified and shown as an inset along with the elastin methacrylamide spectrum. The spectra for samples crosslinked either by Eosin Y or Irgacure show the complete disappearance of the double bonds and appearance of new peaks corresponding to the photoinitiator labeled as "*'°. For the irradiation time employed, solid-state NMR spectra confirm complete crosslinking. No evidence of crosslinking was detected in the absence of photoinitiator.
The dependence of protein crosslinking on irradiation time was investigated in detail for the 15 wt% AME(88)/EY system. Samples were irradiated for up to 60 minutes, 0 lyophilized in the dark, and stored at -20 ° C in brown bottles to avoid light exposure prior to solid-state NMR analysis. The double bond region (peaks Ca and Cb) were integrated for each sample and the integrated double bond areas were normalized with respect to that of the unirradiated sample. Fig. 18 shows the degree of crosslinking as a function of irradiation time.
After an hour of visible light irradiation, the crosslinking process was complete. Increased 5 variability of experimental data obtained at higher degrees of crosslinking was attributed to decreasing signal to noise ratio in the integrated region.
The crosslinked and the uncrosslinked samples were subject to tensile testing to determine the mechanical effect of crosslinking. Fig. 17 shows representative stress-strain :0 curves of the two samples. The uncrosslinked material (elastin methacrylamide) had a modulus of 0.7 ~ 0.15 GPa and a tensile strength of 16.2 ~ 6.3 MPa, while the crosslinked sample had a modulus of 1.8 ~ 0.4 GPa and a tensile strength of 43.3 ~ 5.2 MPa. As anticipated, crosslinking enhanced both Young's modulus and tensile strength with a concomitant decrease in the strain to failure from 3.9 ~ 0.2 % to 2.1 ~ 0.35 % . In the dry state, crosslinking !5 renders the sample stiffer and more brittle as compared to the uncrosslinked sample. Fig. 18 shows the comparative stress-strain behavior of dry and hydrated crosslinked samples of AME(65). Clearly rubber elastic behavior ensues subsequent to hydration. The hydrated sample had an average modulus of 0.45 ~ 0.08 MPa and a strain to failure of lOS ~ 8 % .
Notably, the degree of crosslinking estimated from ideal rubber elasticity theory compares well .0 with that obtained from solid-state NMR.
45 min of irradiation - > calibration curve - > 75 % x 0.65 In summary, post processing solid-state crosslinking of elastin-mimetic fibers was investigated. Through available lysine residues, an elastin-mimetic protein polymer was SS modified to incorporate an acrylate moiety. The degree of acrylate functionalization could be varied by changing the reactant ratio of anhydride to elastin. The AME's were found to have lower inverse transition temperature than the unmodified sample. This was attributed to the increase in the hydrophobicity of the sample with the introduction of the acrylate group. The inverse transition temperature in turn dictated the temperature for fiber formation. Fibers and fabric samples of AME were prepared by electrospinning at appropriate temperatures.
0 Depending upon the concentration of the solution, fibers with diameter ranging from 300 nm to 1.5 ~,m were produced. The fibers were subsequently crosslinked using photoirradiation.
The insolubility of the resulting sample in water indicated a high degree of crosslinking with complete crosslinking confirmed by 13C solid-state NMR. The mechanical properties of 5 the samples were commensurate with that expected, in that modulus and tensile strength increased upon crosslinking. Moreover, hydrated samples displayed rubber-like behavior with high extensibility. Thus acrylate modification provides a viable route for solid-state crosslinking of elastin-mimetic protein-based materials. With the production of crosslinked elastin-mimetic fabrics, the capacity to engineer tissue-like constructs has been significantly 0 enhanced.
Collagen is a biodegradable, biocompatible, and non-immunogenic structural protein, which makes it a suitable compound for a variety of biomedical applications.
Examples include collagen use in cosmetic and urological surgery as an injectable compound for tissue ,5 augmentation, in orthopedic surgery as an implantable matrix to promote bone growth, and in plastic and general surgery as a topical agent for the treatment of both chronic non-healing wounds and burn injuries or as a template for tissue regeneration. The most abundant form of collagen isolated from adult connective tissues, such as skin, tendon, and bone, is type I
collagen. Characteristically, it is composed of two ec1(I) chains and one a2(I) chain, each 0 slightly more than 1000 amino acids long, that are organized as a triple helix and stabilized primarily by hydrogen bonds. A single molecule of type I collagen has a molecular mass of 285 kD, a width of " 14 A, and a length of ~ 3000 A. As a biomaterial, collagen has been predominantly used after processing into a dry powder or slurry, a hydrogel after solution phase crosslinking, or as a porous matrix with or without the addition of other components ~5 after freeze-drying. However, in native connective tissues, type I collagen molecules form fibrillar elements, twenty to several hundred nanometers in diameter that are organized into protein networks of varying architecture. Functionally, collagen fiber networks act to resist high strain deformation and in the process transmit forces, dissipate energy, and prevent premature tissue mechanical failure. These fiber networks constitute the principle structural elements of a variety of acellular bioprosthetic tissue substitutes, such as porcine heart valves 0 and bovine artery heterografts, as well as other tissue derived matrices, including porcine subintestinal submucosa and bovine pericardium. The versatility of collagen as a scaffold for tissue engineering applications is significantly enhanced when used as a native protein network.
To date, attempts to reformulate tissue extracted native collagen into protein fiber networks and fabrics have been limited.
PEO is non-toxic, chemically stable in acidic solution, and when of sufficient molecular weight is capable of forming electrospun fibers. Significantly, fibers could not be formed from a 1-2 wt% pure collagen in aqueous solution, but were observed after the addition of PEO.
High resolution SEM demonstrated unique morphological features as a function of the weight ;0 ratio of PEO to collagen, as well as solution conductivity and flow rate.
Solution viscosity as related to PEO content and the effect of sodium chloride concentration on solution conductivity are summarized in Tables I and II. The effect of the collagen:PEO ratio on tensile strength and modulus is shown in Table III. Increasing the concentration of PEO
increased the yield of uniform fibers, while reducing bead formation. Beads predominated at collagen PEO
;5 weight ratios of 10:1 and 5:1, with only rare beads noted at a ratio of 1:1 and none observed at a collagen-PEO ratio of 1:2. Under this condition, uniform fibers were produced with diameters ranging between 50 - 150 nm. The formation of beads has been attributed to jet instability, which is believed reduced upon increasing solution viscosity due to addition of high molecular weight PEO. Likewise, solution conductivity was also found to influence fiber 0 formation. When an electric field is applied to an electrolyte-containing aqueous polymer solution, field induced ion movement carries the solution along by an additional viscous drag force. This phenomenon enhances jet stability and, as a consequence, reduces bead formation.
While fiber uniformity increased with the addition of sodium chloride, crystal formation was observed at high salt concentrations (Figs. 19A-19F). Finally, we observed that small changes ~5 in flow rate had a marked impact on collagen/PEO fiber morphology. Below 100 ,uL/min, bead formation was increasingly pronounced, while at flow rates above this level, the limited volatility of the polymer solution prevented adequate fiber drying under conditions of ambient temperature and pressure. TEM imaging confirmed IiRSEM analysis and did not reveal any additional internal structural features. See Figs. 19A-19D.
0 We determined the microphase structure of collagen-PEO blends by solid-state NMR.
The dipolar magnetization transfer method depends on creating a magnetization gradient across the sample and then monitoring the time it takes for spin equilibration to occur following the creation of the gradient. This equilibration time will depend upon the domain sizes in the system and the spin diffusion coefficients associated with each phase. If the diffusion 5 coefficients of different regions and the dimensionality of the diffusion process are known a prioYi, then the domain sizes in the system can be extracted by fitting a simulated diffusion profile to the experimental data. The simulated profile can be obtained by numerically solving the diffusion equation with appropriate initial and boundary conditions. It is also clear that if diffusivities are isotropic, then only the minimum domain distances will be probed since the 0 shortest path for the establishment of spin equilibration lies along this direction (D. L.
Vanderhart (1990) Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp. 34: 125). The domain distances that can be observed using spin diffusion range from about 2 nm to 100 nm. The upper bound for the observable domain distance will depend upon the time in which it is possible to observe the magnetization polarization. This is governed by the spin lattice relaxation of protons in the 5 sample. Though there is a limitation on the maximum domain distance observable, there are many multiphase polymer systems that exhibit domains of the order that can be investigated by the spin diffusion technique. For example, long periods in semicrystalline polymers and domain sizes in many block copolymers fall well within the range of detection by spin diffusion [K. J. Packer et al. (1984) J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. 22: 589; Kimura et al (1992) PolymeY
0 33: 493; Cai et al. (1993) Polymer 34: 267].
Collagen fibers were spun and cross linked into fibers using collagen dissolved in fluorinated solvent or dissolved in a water-fluorinated solvent mixture.
Although collagen fibers could not be produced from 1-2 wt% solutions in water, either changing the temperature .5 or altering the solvent system can produce pure collagen fibers. By increasing the temperature to 36 °C formation of collagen fibers were noted. Fluorinated alcohol/water mixtures can serve as alternate solvents systems to produce collagen fibers. For example production of collagen fibers in the 300-800 nm diameter range could be achieved from spinning 10-15 wt% of collagen in such fluorinated solvents. The solvent compositions used were (a) 10 mole%
trifluoroethanol (TFE)/90 mole % water and (b) 10 mole % hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)/90 0 mole% water. Collagen spinning can also be effected from combinations of water with other fluorinated alcohols.
The most important step in the spin diffusion experiment is the creation of the magnetization gradient. The magnetization gradient is usually realized by using an appropriate 5 selection sequence. For multiphase systems that display a large gradient in mobility between constituent phases, a simple filter based on spin-spin relaxation (T2) can be used to selectively retain the magnetization of the more mobile phase. For example, consider a blend of two components A and B with disparately different T2's. If A has a TZ of 100 ,us and B has a T2 of 1 ms, then by applying a T2 filter of 700 ~s, one can destroy the magnetization in A and ;0 selectively retain the magnetization in B, thereby creating a magnetization gradient. This is the basis of the Goldman-Shen experiment and many variations thereof that have been used to probe domain distances in polymer blends [US Patent No. 5,911,942 (1999)]. For the system under consideration, the two components, PEO and collagen, have very different Tg's (Tg,~°llagen 125 °C and Tg,PEO ~ -65 °C) and are hence amenable for investigation via the mobility-based ;5 approach. The simple TZ filter was replaced with a dipolar filter selection sequence. The dipolar filter was selected since it provides greater tunability and has been presented as a technique that can overcome spectral distortions produced by multi-quantum effects that are prevalent at short spin diffusion times [Egger et al. (1992) J. Appl. Poly.
Sci. 44: 289].
.0 Fig. 21 shows the CP/MAS/TOSS and DP/MAS spectra of collagen, PEO and an electrospun fabric of 1:2 collagen/PEO. The CP spectrum of the collagen/PEO
fabric appears to be a simple superposition of the CP spectra of collagen and PEO in that it shows the resonances from both collagen and PEO. The DP spectra typically discriminate against the more rigid regions in the sample. The DP spectrum of collagen (not shown) indicates that it 45 is very rigid at the measuring temperature (24 °C). The reported glass transition of dry collagen is approximately 125 °C rendering collagen rigid at room temperature. The DP
spectrum of PEO (not shown) indicates that PEO is highly mobile at room temperature (Tg, PEO - 65 °C). In the case of the collagen/PEO fabric the DP spectrum clearly shows that PEO
is highly mobile when compared to collagen. This vast difference in mobility between collagen and PEO can be exploited in terms of a 1H dipolar magnetization transfer experiment to 0 provide information about the domain sizes in the fabric.
The most important step in the spin diffusion experiment is the establishment of the initial magnetization gradient. Fig. 22A shows the 1H spectra of an electrospun 1:2 collagen-PEO fabric before and after the application of the dipolar filter. The spectrum acquired before 5 the application of the filter is a superposition of a broad (rigid) and a narrow (mobile) component. ' The spectrum acquired after the application of the filter shows only the narrow component indicating that the filter has destroyed the magnetization associated with the rigid regions. In order to ascertain the chemical identity of the regions selected after the application of the filter, a CP/MAS sequence was appended to the spin diffusion sequence as described in 0 the experimental section. The 13C CP/MAS spectra are shown in Fig. 22B. It is clear from the CP/MAS spectra that the filter selectively retains magnetization in the more mobile PEO
regions while destroying the magnetization in the more rigid collagen regions.
Thus the chosen filter parameters result in an efficient establishment of magnetization gradient in the sample. Similar results were obtained with a 1:1 fabric sample.
,5 The spin diffusion data for l: l and 1:2 fabric blends are shown in Fig. 23.
The inset in Figure 7 shows the initial time data. From the inset it is clear that the magnetization in the source phase contacts the sink phase slower in the 1:1 blend than in the 1:2 blend (the initial portion of the curve for the 1:1 blend is sigmoidal while it is linear for the 1:2 blend). This 0 is indicative of the presence of an interface in the 1:1 blend while there is very little or no interface in the 1:2 blend. The formation of an interface in the case of the 1:1 blend is not surprising since the potential exists for hydrogen bonding between the ether oxygen of the PEO
and protons of the amino group in collagen. The presence of associative interactions has known to produce phase mixing in polymer blends. Thus, mere visual inspection of the initial time data suggests that mechanically stronger fabrics could be produced from the 1:1 blend due to the presence of an interface.
The dotted lines in the figure represent the theoretical (expected) end value of spin diffusion. As expected the theoretical end value for the 1:2 blend (0.74) is greater than the 1:1 0 blend (0.59) since more of the mobile phase is available for selection in the 1:2 blend. These theoretical values are calculated assuming that the entire PEO phase is available for selection.
However it must be borne in mind that PEO is capable of crystallizing in the blend.
Crystallization of PEO accounts for the difference between the observed and expected end values of spin diffusion. Crystallization of the source phase results in the lowering of the 5 expected end value. From the observed end values it becomes evident that the 1:2 blend has a higher degree of crystallinity than the 1:1 blend. Indeed DSC experiments conducted on the electrospun fabrics show that the degree of crystallinity in the 1:2 blend is around 36 % while that in the 1:1 blend is 12 % . From these data it can be surmised that crystallization induced phase separation occurs in the 1:2 blend precluding the formation of a substantial interface.
,0 Non-woven fabrics were formed from collagen/PEO fibers generated from a 2 wt%
of type I collagen-PEO solution at a flow rate of 100~,LlmL and uniaxial stress-strain properties characterized in the dry state. A pure PEO fabric sample had the lowest tensile strength of 90 KPa and a modulus of 7 MPa. The tensile strength and modulus of. a 1:2 collagen-PEO blend ,5 were 270 KPa and 8 MPa, respectively. Maximum values were observed for the 1:1 blend with a tensile strength of 370 I~I'a and a modulus of 12 MPa. NMR analysis, as reported .
above, suggested that the superior mechanical properties, observed for collagen-PEO blends of weight ratio 1:1, were due to the maximization of intermolecular interactions between the PEO and collagen components.
.0 Type I collagen-PEO fibers and non-woven fiber networks were produced by the electrospimiing of a weak acid solution of lyophilized collagen purified from rat tail tendon.
Fibers were generated at ambient temperature and pressure with optimal fiber formation observed with use of an 18 kV electric field and a 15-cm distance between the spinneret and .5 plate collector. Fiber morphology was influenced by solution viscosity, conductivity, and flow rate. As determined by high-resolution SEM and TEM, highly uniform fibers with a diameter range of 100 - 150 nm were produced from a 2 wt% solution of collagen-PEO (1:l weight ratio, 34 mM NaCI) at a flow rate of 100~,L/min. The ultimate tensile strength of the resulting non-woven fabric was 370 KPa with an elastic modulus of 12 MPa.
0 Efforts to process collagen into man-made fibers have been limited, and generally approaches to date have been confined to wet spinning methodologies. Wet spinning involves the extrusion of a protein solution through a spinneret into an acid-salt coagulating bath, which usually contains aqueous ammonium sulfate, acetic acid, isopropanol, or acetone. Further treatments in ethanol and acetone solutions are often required for fiber dehydration.
5 Limitations of this approach include the use of biologically toxic solvent systems that preclude the fabrication in real time of hybrid protein-cell constructs, as well as conditions which likely induce significant conformational changes in native protein structure, including protein denaturation. Finally, wet spinning is largely confined to the generation of fibers that range from tens to hundreds of microns in diameter. In contrast, the process outlined herein provides 0 a convenient, non-toxic, non-denaturing approach for the generation collagen-containing nanofibers and non-woven fabrics that have applications in medical and veterinary prostheses, artificial organs, wound healing and tissue engineering, and as hemostatic agents.
Bioconjugate techniques involving the manipulation of various amino acid side chain ,5 residues have become commonplace in modern biochemistry. Our strategy involved the covalent attachment of an acrylate moiety to lysine and hydroxylysine side chains. Via nucleophilic attack, methacryloyl anhydride was used to acylate the E-amino group of the lysine and hydroxylysine residues. Once modified, the gelatin was crosslinked using eosin-Y/
triethanolamine/ 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone free radical photoinitiation [Cruise et al. (1998) supra].
.0 By using the technique of electrospinning [Renelcer, (1996; supra; Huang (2000) supra], we formed fibers with diameters in the nanometer range (<1 ~,m). These sizes have been reported to closely approximate fiber morphology through out much of the extracellular matrix. [Birk, 1991 #10] By spinning acrylate-modified gelatin into various constructs (i.e.
sheets and tubes) and subsequent crosslinking, an integrated protein matrix structure can be formed in an expeditious and precise manner.
Fig. 24 shows the 1H NMR spectra of gelatin and acrylate modified gelatin in recorded at 45 °C. Incorporation of double bonds in the system can be inferred from the 0 presence of two new peaks in the spectrum of gelatin methacrylamide.
Integrating the double bond region provides a measure of the degree of functionalization (DOF). DOF
was defined as the ratio of the amino moieties functionalized to the total number of amino moieties in the gelatin prior to functionalization. In this case the DOF was calculated be around 73 % . It has already been shown by Van de Bulcke et. al (vide infra) that the DOF could be varied by 5 changing the methacryloyl anhydride to the gelatin ratio. A range of gelatin-based materials with different DOF's can be obtained using this reaction.
Acrylate functionalized gelatin was processed into films to examine the effect of crosslinking on mechanical properties. The film samples for the study were prepared ;0 according to the procedures outlined hereinbelow. The effects of photoinitiator concentration and irradiation time on the crosslinking process were investigated. The results of these studies could then be used to optimize the crosslinking conditions during fiber production.
Crosslinking optimization studies were performed on film samples since they were much easier to process than the fiber samples.
;5 For the first study three samples were prepared. The concentration of gelatin methacrylamide was the same in each of the three samples while the photoinitiator concentration was varied from standard to high. The solvent was allowed to evaporate and the film samples were formed. The dry films were exposed to an hour of irradiation using a Dyna-~0 Lume visible light source at 70mW/cm2. The sample was cut into strips for tensile testing.
The studies were then performed on the hydrated samples. Eight samples were tested for each photoinitiator concentration.
Fig. 25 shows the stress-strain data for crosslinked gelatin methacrylamide films with 45 varying photoinitiator concentration. Going from the standard to medium photoinitiator concentration provides a moderate increase in modulus while significantly decreasing the strain to failure. However, going from medium to high photoinitiator concentrations decreased the modulus slightly. Hubell et. al have previously reported that the photopolymerization process can be adversely affected by increasing the concentration of TEA. Increased TEA
concentrations are believed to lead to more radicals being generated, and these radicals in turn 0 can react and terminate the process. However, increasing VP concentration negates the effect of increasing TEA concentration by providing more sites where the photo-generated radicals can attack. The potentially negative effect of increased TEA concentration is overcome by increased VP concentration at medium photoinitiator concentration. However at the high concentration conditions, the TEA effect dominates, leading to a decrease in the modulus. In 5 going from standard to medium concentration the gain in the modulus was not appreciable.
Moreover, it is desirable to use as little of the photoinitiator as possible to achieve the desired level of crosslinking. Accordingly, it was decided to use the standard concentration for the remainder of the study.
.0 To study the effect of irradiation time on the degree of crosslinking, seven 5 wt%
gelatin methacrylamide solution samples were prepared. Each sample was irradiated by a visible light source for varying lengths of time starting from 1/a hour to 3 1/a hours. Fig. 26 shows the ultimate tensile strength, modulus, and strain to failure of hydrated samples as a function of irradiation time. The ultimate tensile strength and the modulus increased. with ;5 increasing irradiation times while the strain to failure decreased. No significant change in the mechanical properties is observed past two hours of irradiation. The mechanical data indicate that two hours of visible light irradiation is sufficient to complete the crosslinking reaction in the conditions described herein. .
~0 To ascertain whether the reaction had gone to completion, 13C solid-state NMIZ
spectroscopy was conducted on the samples from the same batch that was used for used for tensile testing. The crosslinked sample was irradiated for two hours. The 13C
CP/MAS/TOSS
spectra of gelatin methacrylamide and crosslinked gelatin methacrylamide is shown in Fig. 27.
The gelatin methacrylamide spectrum shows two resonances due to the double bond carbons.
s 5 However, in the spectrum of the crosslinked material these resonances have completely disappeared, indicating that the crosslinking reaction has gone to completion.
When the NMR
data is taken in conjunction with the mechanical data, it conclusively shows that crosslinking is complete for the given DOF in two hours. Although time consuming, solid-state NMR can be used to map the degree of crosslinking as a function of irradiation time.
An approximate degree of crosslinking can be calculated using the rubber elasticity theory.
According to the 0 theory the modulus is given by E=3pRTlM~
where E is the modulus, p is the density, R the gas constant, T the temperature, and M~the average molecular weight between crosslinks. M~ can be calculated from the measured modulus (from the tensile testing experiments) and this quantity is inversely proportional to the 5 degree of crosslinking. Thus degree of crosslinking is directly proportional to the modulus of the material. Thus modulus measurements can also be used to provide a rough estimate of the degree of crosslinking. Natural elastin has a modulus of abut 0.9 to about 1.1 MP*.
Calculations show that about 50 to about 75 % cross linking is needed in the crosslinked modified elastin or elastin mimetic in order to mimic the elastic modulus of native arterial ;0 elastin. An IR spectroscopic analysis, especially with respect to the C=C
stretch at 1650-1680 cm 1 of the methacrylamide-functionalized elastin led to an estimate of the %
of cross linkage (based on Peak deconvolution) at about 53 to 64 % .
Electrospinning was also used to produce acrylate modified fibers and fabric networks ;5 of crosslinked gelatin. The description of the apparatus has been provided in detail in the previous section. The field strength, deposition distance and flow rate were kept constant at 18 kV, 10 cm, and 30 ~,L/min respectively. 18-kV field strength and 10-cm deposition distance seemed to provide the best fiber splays, while increasing the flow rate beyond 30~,L/min lead to the formation of droplets. Fibers formed from both unmodified gelatin and ~0 acrylate modified gelatin using the aforementioned parameters were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy to delineate their morphology. The concentration of gelatin in solution was found to be the major variable affecting fiber morphology.
SEM micrographs of unmodified gelatin fibers electrospun from a 25 wt%
solution .5 show that uniform fibers in the 200-500 nm diameter range were produced.
For SEM
examination of fibers spun from 15 and 20 wt% solutions of acrylated gelatin containing standard concentration of the photoinitiator, the fibers formed from the 15 wt% solution showed significant beading. Beading in electrospun fibers is undesirable and lead to poor mechanical properties. Reneker et. al have reported that addition of NaCI to the solution mixture decreases the beads formed during electrospinning. However, the fibers formed from LO the 20 wt% solution of gelatin methacrylamide showed lesser propensity to form beads when compared to fibers formed from the 15 wt% solution. Although spinning experiments have not been carried out on 25 wt% solutions of the acrylated gelatin, the fibers formed from 25 wt% unmodified gelatin in water suggest that increasing concentration will yield non-beaded fibers obviating the need for the addition of NaCI or any other salt. The fiber diameters in case 5 of the acrylate modified samples were in the 500 to 1500nm diameter range.
The significant increase in the fiber diameter in the acrylated fibers is due to bead formation.
Electrospinning for extended periods of time will yield a nonwoven fabric network that consists of nano-diameter fibers. However, if a rotating mandrel is used instead of a plate, a '0 nonwoven tube of crosslinked gelatin can be produced. Fig. 29A shows a nonwoven tube of crosslinked gelatin, 5 cm in length and 14 mm in diameter. The diameter of the tubes can be varied by increasing or decreasing the size of the mandrel. Fig. 29B also shows the tube in the hydrated state (i.e., immersed in water). The tube retains its shape even after prolonged immersion in water, indicating that the crosslinking reaction has proceeded to completion.
~.5 Thus using the electrospinning method and the chemistry outlined one can begin to form constructs, which may have applications in the medical field.
The network porosity of the nonwoven fabrics was measured using pulsed field gradient NMR spectroscopy (PFGNMR). In the case of free diffusion through Brownian motion, a .0 concentration gradient initially having the form of a pulse will gradually become Gaussian with time. However in case of diffusion in a confinement or pore, the concentration profile does not become Gaussian due to the limitation imposed by the pore boundaries. At a time when the diffusion profile in the pore becomes independent of time, it becomes a measure of the pore radius or size if the self diffusion coefficient (D) of the fluid is known a prioYi. PFGNMR
~5 utilizes this concept for the measurement of pore sizes.
Fig. 29A shows the diffusion profiles measured as a function of the magnetic field gradient strength (G) for varying lengths of time. It can be observed that the profiles measured at 800 ms and 1000 ms are almost similar indicating that the diffusion profile has equilibrated with time. Thus, the 1000-ms diffusion profile can be used to determine the pore size. In Fig.
29B the normalized intensity is plotted as a function of a parameter a2 that is given by az - Yz~zGz L 0 5 , where y is the gyromagnetic ratio, G the magnetic field gradient and b is the time between gradients. In the case where the pore sizes are uniform, a plot of normalized intensity versus a2 would be linear with a slope that is related to the pore size. It is clearly seen from the figure that the plot is nonlinear suggesting a distribution of pore sizes. In order to determine an average pore size one can use any distribution that is realistic and fits the data l5 well. In this case we have employed a Gaussian distribution of pore sizes.
The mathematical relationship between the diffusion profile and the pore radius in the case of a Gaussian distribution of pore sizes has already been determined by Callaghan et. al,.
~ IC~G)0) =-a2Ro2 ('1+a'zaz~ 1- 2lnCl+a'Zaz~ (1) where Rfl is the mean pore radius, and az is the twice the variance of the distribution. Figure ~0 10(b) shows the fit using (1) to the 1000-ms data. Nonlinear optimization module of Mathematics software was used for fit. From the fit, an average pore size of 73.4 ~,m with a standard deviation of 33.6 ~,m was obtained.
Monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies, preferably monoclonal, specifically reacting with 25 a particular protein of interest rnay be made by methods known in the art.
See, e. g. , Harlow and Lane (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories; Goding (1986) Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice, 2d ed., Academic Press, New York.
Standard techniques for cloning, DNA isolation, amplification and purification, for 30 enzymatic reactions involving DNA ligase, DNA polymerase, restriction endonucleases and the like, and various separation techniques are those known and commonly employed by those skilled in the art. A number of standard techniques are described in Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Plainview, New York;
Maniatis et al. (1982) Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Plainview, New York; Wu (ed.) (1993) Meth. Enzymol. 2~8, Part I; Wu (ed.) (1979) Meth Enzymol. 68; Wu et al. (eds.) (1983) Meth. Enzymol. 100 and 101; Grossman and Moldave (eds.) Meth.
Enzymol. 65; Miller (ed.) (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor 0 Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Old and Primrose (1981) Principles of Gene Manipulation, University of California Press, Berkeley; Schleif and Wensink (1982) Practical Methods in Molecular Biology; Glover (ed.) (1985) DNA Cloning Vol. I and II, IRL Press, Oxford, UK; Hames and Higgins (eds.) (1985) NucleicAcid Hybridization, IRL
Press, Oxford, UK; and Setlow and Hollaender (1979) Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, Vols.
5 1-4, Plenum Press, New York. Abbreviations and nomenclature, where employed, are deemed standard in the field and commonly used in professional journals such as those cited herein.
All references cited in the present application are incorporated by reference herein to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the present disclosure.
;0 The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as claimed herein. Any variations in the exemplified articles which occur to the skilled artisan are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention.
;5 EXAMPLES
Example 1: Production of the Synthetic Elastin An elastin-mimetic synthetic protein ((-Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly-)4(-Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly ))s9 of molecular weight 81 kDa was synthesized by a recombinant genetic engineering method, ~0 the details of which have been reported elsewhere (McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32:
3643-3648; McMillan, R. A. and Conticello, R. P. (2000) Macromolecules 33:
4809-4821;
McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 9067-9070]. A concatameric synthetic gene of 3000 base pairs encodes a repetitive polypeptide comprising 39 repeats of the elastin-mimetic sequence. The protein polymer was expressed from recombinant plasmid pRAMl in E. coli ~5 strain BLR(DE3) under the regulatory control of a lac promoter with isopropyl ~3-thiogalactopyranoside induction. It was purified to a high yield (64 mg/L) by reversible, temperature-induced precipitation from the cell lysate. The sequence of the protein polymer has been confirmed by automated Edman degradation and MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy of site-specific proteolytic cleavage fragments. Structural analysis of this recombinant protein has also included SDS PAGE, as well as 1H and 13C NMR [McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 0 32: 3643-3648; McMillan, R. A. and Conticello, R. P. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821] .
Example 2: Other Materials Low molecular weight silicone oils from Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
5 were used as standards for measurements of solution viscosity.
Methacryloyl anhydride, eosin Y (EY, 5 wt% in water), triethanolamine (TEA) and 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (VP) were obtained from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI) and were used as received. A UV sensitive radical photoinitiator 1-(4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl)-2-hydroxy-2-,0 methyl-1-propan-1-one (Irgacure 2959) was kindly supplied by Ciba Speciality Chemicals (Tarrytown, NY). Dialysis was conducted using Spectra/pro membrane (MWCO 6000-8000) obtained from VWR Scientific (West Chester, PA).
Polyethylene oxide) (PEO) with a nominal molecular weight of 900 kD was obtained ;5 from Aldrich. Acid-soluble collagen was derived from tail tendons obtained from Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 250 to 350 grams using a protocol similar to that described by Silver and Trelstad.l9 Briefly, tendon fibers were extracted from rat tails using a wire stripper, immersed in 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0; 10 fibers per 100 mL), and stirred for 4 hours at room temperature. The soluble component was separated from the insoluble portion after .0 centrifugation at 30,OOOg at 4 °C for 30 min and then sequentially filtered through 0.65 and 0.45 ~,m filters (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). NaCI was added to the filtrate so as to obtain a salt concentration of 0.7 M. The mixture was then allowed to stir for 1 hour and the precipitate collected after an one-hour centrifugation at 30,000 g and 4 °C. The pellet was allowed to dissolve overnight in 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0) and dialyzed against 20 mM
phosphate 05 buffer (disodium hydrogen phosphate at pH 7.4) for at least 8 hours at room temperature. A
second dialysis was then performed against a 20 mM phosphate buffer solution for at least 4 hours at 4 °C. The dialyzate was centrifuged at 30,000 g at 4 °C
for 1 hour and the pellet was then dialyzed overnight against a solution of 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0) to obtain a collagen solution at a final concentration of 10 mg/mL. The solution was stored at 4 °C.
0 Lyophilized collagen was obtained by dialyzing the collagen solution overnight against distilled, deionized water (18 MS2~cm, Continental), followed by lyophilization. Prior to use, lyophilized collagen was dissolved in 10 mM HCl at room temperature for 1 hour. The identity and purity of the collagen samples was confirmed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis .
Gelatin (Type A - Porcine Skin, 300 Bloom; product #G-2500) and 2,2,2-trifluororethanol were purchased from Sigma Chemical Inc., St. Louis, MO.
Methacryloyl anhydride (94 % ), Eosin-Y Swt. % in water, 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (99 + %), and triethanolamine (98 % ) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Inc. , Milwaukee, WI.
;0 Phosphate buffer used was an aqueous solution of sodium dihydrogen phosphate, monohydrate (J.T.Baker Inc., Phillipsburg, NJ) and disodium hydrogen phosphate (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) .
Example 3: Fiber Spinning ;5 Elastin-mimetic peptide polymers were spun into fibers using an electrospinning technique, as detailed elsewhere. Briefly, peptide polymer solutions (10 - 15 wt% ) were prepared in ultrafiltered grade, distilled, deionized water (18 MS~~cm, Continental) by mixing for 12 hrs at 4°C. With the aid of a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Inc., Holliston, MA), the solution was extruded at ambient temperature and pressure and at a defined flow rate .0 through a positively charged metal blunt tipped needle (22Gx1.5 inch). The needle was connected to a 1 mL syringe using TygonT"" (trademark of San Diego Plastics, Inc. National City, CA, plastic tubing) tubing (l.6mm i.d.). Fibers were collected on a grounded aluminum plate located below the tip of the needle. A high voltage, low current power supply (ES30P/DDPM, Gamma High Voltage Research, Inc., Ormand Beach, FL) was utilized to establish the necessary electric potential gradient, which was varied between 0 and 30 kV as indicated. Either positive or negative polarity can be used to run the electrospinning process.
Vstart and Vstop, defined as the electric potential necessary to initiate or terminate jet formation, respectively were determined for different concentrations of elastin-mimetic polypeptide solutions .
Fabric samples were produced by electrospinning solutions for extended periods of time. The apparatus was modified to include a rotating mandrel to produce fabric samples.
The fabric samples were collected on an aluminum foil wrapped around the grounded mandrel placed at a prescribed horizontal distance with respect to the charged tip of the needle.
Collagen-PEO solutions (1-2 wt % ) were prepared in 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0) by mixing for 2 hours at ambient temperature. With the aid of a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Inc.), the solution was extruded at ambient temperature and pressure and at a defined flow rate through a positively charged metal blunt tipped needle (22G x 1.5 inch).
Fibers were collected ,0 on a grounded aluminum plate located below the tip of the needle. A high voltage, low current power supply (ES30P/DDPM, Gamma High Voltage Research, Inc) was utilized to establish the electric potential gradient, which was varied between 0 and 30 kV, as indicated.
Example 4: Synthesis of Methacrylate-Modified Elastin and Fiber Spinning ;5 The procedure for acrylate modification of amino-containing compounds developed by Van den Bulcke et al. was followed [Van Den Bulcke et al. (2000) Biomacromolecules 1: 31] .
The elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide was dissolved in pH 7.5 phosphate buffer solution. The solution was cooled to 5 °C and an excess of methacryloyl anhydride was added. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 8 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted and was dialyzed .0 against distilled water at room temperature for 48 hours with frequent changes in the dialyzate solution. The dialyzate was subsequently freeze-dried and stored at room temperature. The degree of functionalization (DOF) was defined as the ratio of amino moieties functionalized to the total number of amino moieties in elastin prior to functionalization.
DOF could be varied by changing the methacryloyl anhydride to elastin ratio.
Electrospinning was used to spin fibers of AME from aqueous solutions.
Solution concentration, flow rate and operating voltage were found to be the critical parameters 0 affecting the spinning process. The details of the technique and optimization of process parameters to yield smooth nanofibers have been discussed in detail in an earlier report.
[Huang et al. (2000) MacYOmolecules 33, 2989]. A solution of 10-15 wt% AME(65) polymer in ddH20 was prepared with the addition of 5 wt% (of the protein polymer content) of triethanolamine, as free radical crosslinker. For example, to each 100 mgs of protein polymer, 5 5 mgs of triethanolamine or approximately 50 ,uL of the stock EY/TEA/VP
solution was added. A field strength of 18 kV was chosen for fiber formation and the distance between the syringe tip and the collecting plate was fixed at 15 cm. The flow rate was 50 ~.1/min. A stock solution of EY photoinitiator was prepared as 10 mM EY, 225 mM TEA, and 37 mM
VP in water. Irgacure 2959 was directly added to the prepared protein solution.
,0 For the purpose of crosslinking studies four samples of 15 wt% AME(65) solution in ddH20 were prepared. Eosin Y was added to the first solution (amount of photoinitiator corresponded to 3 wt% of the protein in solution) and IRGACURE 2959°
was added to the second (amount of photoinitiator corresponded to 6 wt% of the protein in solution). In order ;5 to ensure uniform dispersion of the photoinitiator, both solutions were stirred in the dark for 12 hours. Additional samples that did not contain photoinitiator were irradiated and used for comparative analysis. All samples were dried under vacuum for 24 hours.
Subsequent to drying, the Eosin Y and Irgacure containing samples were irradiated under visible light for 45 minutes and UV light (365 nm) for 30 minutes, respectively.
.0 Example 5: Preparation of non-woven acrylated gelatin fabrics:
To prepare acrylate modified gelatin, a 5-weight % solution of gelatin was made in lOmM phosphate buffer solution, pH 7.5. To this solution a four times excess of methacryloyl anhydride (in relation to target amino acid residues) was added to the solution.
The reaction was then stirred at 40°C for 4 hours. The solution was then dialyzed using a SpectralPor membrane (MWCO: 6-8,000) against 60 volumes of ddH20 at 40°C for 48hrs with constant changes in the dialyzing solution. The solution was then lyophilized and the dialyzate was stored at -30°C.
5 % weight solutions (150mg of acrylated gelatin in 1278~,L ddH20/ 222,uL
photo initiator solution) were prepared and plated into 29.14 cm2 polystyrene dishes. Solutions were made using the standard, medium and high photoinitiator preparations. The solvent was allowed to evaporate at room temperature (24°C, 43 % relative humidity). After drying, the 5 samples were exposed to a visible light source (Dyna-Lume "dyna-light" #240-380, 70mW/cm2) for various periods from 30 minutes to 31/2 hours for crosslinking.
The films were then prepared for mechanical testing as outlined earlier.
The gelatin electrospinning apparatus consisted of a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus), ;0 a syringe, an I8 gauge blunt end needle (Popper and Sons, Inc.), a grounded rotating metallic l4mm O.D. mandrel (for production of tubes), a grounded lOcm by 10 cm aluminum covered plate (for flat fabric production), an electric mandrel rotor, a Dyna-Lume °'dyna-light" #240-380, and a high voltage source (Gamma High Voltage, HV power supply, c.f., Figure 1(a)).
Solutions of gelatin and acrylated gelatin (150 mgs) were prepared in concentrations from '.5 l0wt% to 25wt% in ddH20 along with 222 ~,L of the high concentration photo initiator solution. The syringe containing the acrylated gelatin/photo initiator solution was shielded during spinning with an opaque tape to prevent premature crosslinking. The needle was heated using a heating lamp to avoid gelation in the needle and to maintain uniform flow rate.
The temperature profile across the syringe and the needle was obtained with a type K
.0 thermocouple. Temperature readings were obtained across four points (labeled Tl through T4 in the figure) in the syringe. The profiles were measured after steady state had been achieved.
By varying the setting on the heat lamp, the temperature in the needle could be adjusted to desired levels. The temperature was maintained between 45 and 55 °C.
The applied field of lBkV and deposition distance of 10 cm were kept constant for all runs. A flow rate of 30 ~uL/min was maintained during electrospinning, because flow rates in excess of 30 ,uL/min produced droplets. The fibers on deposition were exposed to light throughout the spinning process and for an additional two hours after fiber spinning had ceased. To function as a release agent a layer of polyethylene oxide (MW " 900 kDa) was deposited on the aluminum foil to achieve a 100~,m thick covering. The acrylated gelatin fibers were then deposited on 0 top of the PEO layer. Deposition time varied depending on the volume of material to be spun.
Example 6: Image capture of non-woven fabric samples and analysis of fiber diameter and orientation distribution Fabrics were generated by electrospinning at a 150 ,ul/min from a 15 wt%
solution of 5 elastin-mimetic peptide polymer. Specimens were placed directly on a mirror and imaged using a directional lighting arrangement where light is collimated using an "on-axis" system comprised of both a diffuser and a beam-splitter. Light passes through the sample and is reflected vertically off the mirror surface back to a CCD camera. Specular reflections from fiber surfaces do not reach the camera. Thus, fibers, regardless of their position within the ,0 fabric, merely block the light, appear dark, and are in focus. Captured images underwent segmentation or "threshholding" in order to isolate individual fibers from background. In this process, local contrast enhancement procedures were utilized including relaxation and edge thresholding techniques. Analysis also required skeletonizing of the image in which the backbone of individual fibers, corresponding to an image one pixel wide, was determined.
;5 Skeletonizing requires generating a "distance map" of the image that represents the minimum distance from each pixel belonging to an object to the background. Therefore, the highest value in the distance transform image correlates with the object center, and the peak line coincides with the axis or skeleton of the object. By using the skeleton as a guide for tracking the distance transformed image, the intensities (distances) from the fiber center to background ~0 can be determined in order to compute the diameter at all points along the skeleton. Similarly, fiber orientation is characterized by utilizing a chord-tracking algorithm, which tracks fixed small segments of individual fibers. Details of these automated image analysis techniques, as applied to fiber networks in the form of non-woven fabrics, are provided elsewhere [Pourdeyhimi et al (1999) Textile Res. J. 69: 233-236; Pourdeyhimi et al (2001) Textile Res.
J. 71: 157-164]. Analysis of fiber diameter and orientation distribution was based upon a minimum of 10 image fields obtained from at least two separate samples.
Example 7: Stress-strain properties of non-woven fabrics Uniaxial tensile tests were performed elastin-mimetic materials on a Textechno Favimat 0 (Herbert Stein GmbH & Co. KG, Germany). Dry samples were tested at an extension rate of 5 mm/min and an initial gauge length of 10 mm. The maximum range of the load cell is 210 cN. A total of eight samples were analyzed.
Uniaxial tensile testing of collagen/PEO material was performed on a Minimat 5 (Miniature Materials Tester, Rheometric Scientific, Inc., Piscataway, NJ).
Dry collagen-PEO
fabric samples were tested at an extension rate of 2 mm/min and at an initial gage length of 8mm. The maximum range of the load cell is 20 N. A total of six samples were analyzed.
Samples thickness was determined by use of a profilometer (Tencor Alphastep 500) at different points along the sample and an average sample thickness of 0.05 mm was obtained. The ,0 samples were cut at a width of Smm.
A miniature materials tester Minimat 2000 (Rheometric Scientific, Piscataway, NJ) was used to determine the tensile properties of the unmodified and the modified elastin fabrics . The machine was used in the tensile deformation mode with a 20N load cell and a strain rate of 1 ;5 mm/min. Fabric samples (lOmm x 1.5 mm ~e 0.05 mm) were used as test specimens with a gauge length of 8mm. For each sample, eight specimens were tested and average modulus and tensile strength values were determined.
Example 8: Instrumentation .0 All 1H NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker AMX 500 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 500 MHz. Thirty-two scans were acquired for signal-to-noise averaging. A recycle delay of 30 seconds was used to ensure quantitative spectra. In all cases D20 was used as the internal standard and a concentration of IO mg/ml wa's employed.
All solid-state NMR experiments were conducted at room temperature on a Bruker DSX
300 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 300 MHz in a Bruker double 0 resonance MAS probehead. Standard cross polarization (CP) pulse sequence was employed under conditions of magic angle spinning (MAS). A spinning speed of 5 kHz was employed.
A TOSS sequence was used in conjunction with CP to provide a spectrum free of spinning sidebands [Dixon, W. T. (1982) J. Chem. Phys. 77, 1800; Dixon et al. (1982) J.
Magh.
Reson. 49, 341]. A 4.5-,us 1H 90° pulse, a 1-ms contact time, a 9-,us 13C 180° pulse and a 3-5 sec recycle delay were employed with 5000 - 16000 scans accumulated for signal averaging.
In studies of collagen fibers, all 1H NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker AMX 500 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 500 MHz.
Thirty-two scans were acquired for signal-to-noise averaging and a recycle delay of 30 seconds ,0 was used to ensure quantitative spectra. In all cases D2O was used as the internal standard and a concentration of 10 mg/mL was employed.
All solid-state NMR experiments were conducted at room temperature on a Bruker DSX
300 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 300 MHz in a Bruker double ,5 resonance MAS probehead. Standard cross polarization (CP) pulse sequence was employed under conditions of magic angle spinning (MAS). A spinning speed of S kHz was employed.
A TOSS sequence was used in conjunction with CP to provide a spectrum free of spinning sidebands.a° A 4.5-,us 1H 90° pulse, a 1-ms contact time, a 9-,us I3C 180° pulse, and a 3-sec recycle delay were employed with accumulation of 5000 to 16000 scans for signal averaging.
.0 Direct polarization (DP) experiments were conducted with a recycle delay of 1 s, a 13C
90°pulse length of 4.5 ,us, and a MAS rate of 5 kHz. For DP
experiments, 1024 scans were acquired.
1H Bipolar magnetization transfer experiments were conducted under static conditions (without magic-angle sample spinning). Recycle delays of 5 s, 1H 90°
pulse lengths of 4.5 ,us, and 1H 180° pulse lengths of 9 ,us were used. The timing diagram for the spin diffusion pulse sequence has been reported in detail elsewhere.21 A Bipolar filter selection sequence consisting of twelve 90° pulses separated by 10-,us delays was employed for 20 consecutive loops to 0 establish the initial magnetization gradient. Thirty-two scans were accumulated for signal averaging and the spin diffusion time (tSD) was incremented from 1,us to 800 ms. Correction for spin-lattice relaxation during the spin diffusion time was achieved by repeating the experiment with the selection filter removed (# Bipolar filter cycles, n = 0).
The data acquired with and without the selection cycles were normalized with respect to the first time point and 5 the spectral intensity corresponding to the mobile domain. The ratio of IPSO
(with selection) to IpEO (without selection) provided the spin diffusion data as a function of tSD.
In order to examine the chemical structure of the component selected using the Bipolar filter, a CP sequence was appended to the Bipolar filter sequence. For this experiment, a 3-sec !0 recycle delay, a 4.5-,us 1H 90° pulse, and a 1-ms contact time were used. The experiment was conducted under conditions of MAS with a spinning speed of 5 kHz and 10,000 scans were acquired for signal averaging.
Temperature-dependent turbidimetry measurements were recorded in an Ultrospec !5 UV/visible spectrophotometer equipped with a programmable Peltier Cell and temperature control unit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. (Piscataway, NJ). Inverse temperature transitions of elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide and its acrylate modified analogs were monitored in ddH20 solution (concentration of 0.5 - 0.7 mg/ml) at 280 nm.
SO An in-lens field emission scamiing electron microscope (ISI DS-130F
Schottky Field Emission SEM, York Electron Optics Ltd., York, UK) was used and operated at 5 or 25 kV.
High-definition topographic images at low ("' 1,000 x) and medium (30,000 x) magnifications and high resolution, and high magnification images (z 100,000x) were digitally recorded with very short dwell times and without beam induced damage. Fiber samples were deposited onto i5 silicon chips for SEM studies. The silicon chips were subsequently mounted onto aluminum specimen stubs with silver paste, degassed for 30 minutes, and coated with a 1 nm chromium (Cr) ultrathin film using a Denton DV-602 Turbo Magnetron Sputter System.
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging a JEOL 1210 TEM was operated at 70 kV voltage. Fiber samples were deposited onto silicon chips and carbon coated grids for 0 scanning and transmission EM studies, respectively. Samples containing silicon chips were subsequently mounted onto aluminum specimen stubs with silver paste, degassed for 30 minutes, and coated with a 1 nm chromium (Cr) ultrathin film using a Denton DV-602 Turbo Magnetron Sputter System.
5 Visible light irradiation was performed using a DynaLume quartz halogen illuminator equipped with a heat shield obtained from Scientific Instruments. Ultraviolet irradiation was performed with an UVP 8-watt handheld model (model UVL-18) operating at 365 nm.
Bulk viscosity was determined using silicone oil viscosity standards (Brookfield ;0 Engineering Laboratories, Inc.) and solution conductivity determined using a conductivity flow cell (BIORAD, Hercules, CA).
Table I. The viscosity for the 2wt% Lyophilized Collagen of different PEO
ratio and fixed 34 mM NaCI
Collagen PEO Collagen / PEO weightViscosity Concentration Concentration ratio (cp) m /ml Mg/ml 20 0.67 30 : 1 289 20 2 10 : 1 475 20 4 5 : 1 592 20 10 2 : 1 1150 20 20 1 : 1 5536 40 I 1 : 2 - ~ 6198 Table II. Conductivity of the 2wt% Lyophilized Collagen Dissolved in the HCl solution (pH=2.0) [NaCI] mM 1 2 3 Average Conductivity 0 1.45 1.42 1.44 1.44 15 1.54 1.56 1.55 1.55 25 2.06 2.05 2.06 ~ 2.06 _ -34 2.27 2.26 2.25 2.26 Table III. The ultimate tensile strength and modulus of pure PE , collagen/PEO
of 1 1 and 1 : 2 weight ratio nonwoven fabric samples Fabric Samples Tensile Strength (Mpa)Modulus (Gpa) Pure PEO 0.09 0.007 1 : 1 Collagen/PEO 0.37 0.012 1 : 2 Collagen/PEO 0.27 0.008 SEQUENCE LISTING
<110> Emory University Chaikof, Elliot Huang, Lei Nagapudi, Karthik Conticello, Vincent <120> Native Protein Mimetic Fibers, Fiber Networks and Fabrics for Medical Use <130> 29-OZ WO
<140> unassigned <141> 2001-04-20 <l50> US 60/221,828 <151> 2000-07-28 <150> US 60/198,792 <151> 2000-04-20 <160> 4 <170> PatentIn version 3.0 <210> 1 <211> 4 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motif of elastin mimetic protein.
<400> 1 Val Pro Gly Gly <210> 2 <211> 5 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motif in elastin mimetic protein <400> 2 Val Pro Gly Val Gly , <210> 3 <211> 6 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motif in elastin mimetic protein <400> 3 Ala Pro Gly Val Gly Val <210> 4 <211> 25 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motifs in elastin mimetic protein <400> 4 Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Lys Gly
Abbreviations used in the present application include the following: PEO, poly (ethylene oxide); PGA, polyglycolic acid; AME, acrylate modified elastin (or elastin mimetic); DOF, degree of functionalization; DCC, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; DDG, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone; DMAP, N,N dimethylaminopyridine; EY, eosin Y; FITC, fluorescein 0 isothiocyanate; NHS-Biotin, N hydroxysuccinimidobiotin; EMC, -~
maleimidocaproyl; FMCS, -~-maleimidocaproyl succinimide; PMB, p-methoxybenzyl; Ti~oc-amide, 2, ~, 2-trichloroethoxyamide; PEU, poly(ether urethaneurea); PFTE, polytetrafluoroethylene; ePFTE, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene; HEA, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate; AOD, 3-acryloyl-e-3-(N,N-dioctadecylcarbamoyl propionate); AAPD, 2,2'-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride; AIBN, 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile; SS, styryl sulfonate.
Standard one- and three-letter abbreviations for the twenty naturally occurring, protein building bloclc amino acids are used herein.
As part of our program in biomimetic materials and tissue engineering, we have ',0 targeted several elements of the arterial wall as structural models for the design of an artificial blood vessel based upon the assembly of component structures. The arterial wall as representative of other tissues and organ systems can be considered in general terms as a fiber reinforced composite material with associated mechanical properties largely a consequence of protein fiber networks. Moreover, the local mechanical environment within the vessel wall ;5 may in turn influence the functional responses of component cells.
Biocompatibility (or biological compatibility) refers to the interactions of living body tissues, compounds and fluids, including blood, etc. , with any implanted or contacting material (biomaterial). Biocompatible biomaterials are of great importance in any biomedical .0 application including, for example, in the implantation of vascular grafts and medical devices such as artificial organs, artificial heart valves, artificial joints, catheters and various other prosthetic devices into or on the body . Biomaterials with good biocompatibility do not trigger inflammatory reactions after implantation in or contact with human or animal tissue nor do they provide surfaces which are prone to thromboses.
.5 In the context of the present invention, a functionalized protein is one which has, covalently bound to it, at least one moiety which mediates polymerization or crosslinkage with another moiety of the same chemical structure. The functionalized elastin mimetic protein, elastin, collagen or gelatin of the present invention comprise at least one polymerizable monomeric group, e.g., an acryloyloxy group, methacryl, dienyl, sorbyl, styryl, acrylamide, 0 acrylonitrile, N-vinyl pyrrolidone, etc., which group is covalently attached to the protein and which modulates crosslinking between ' similarly functionalized proteins.
Desirably, photoirradiation mediates the crosslinking reaction in the presence of a suitable photoinitiator, under mild conditions of temperature and radical formation to minimize damage to the proteins.
Functionalization of the protein is carried out so that the desirable mechaiucal and structural 5 properties of the protein superstructure comprised of it are generally maintained. Conditions and initiators for crosslinking reactions are well known to the art.
As used herein, an elastin mimetic protein is one which has an amino acid sequence and secondary structure derived from native (naturally occurring) elastin. As specifically exemplified ,0 herein, the elastin mimetic protein is recombinantly produced in Escheriehia coli, and it is described in McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 3643-3648. This elastin mimetic protein contains 39 repeats ofthe amino acid sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (SEQ ID N0:4). See also Huang et al. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 2989-2997 and McMillan et al. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821. It is critical that it has elastomeric ,5 properties and tensile strength similar to those elastin when assembled into supramolecular structures such as fibers, fiber networlcs and nonwoven fabrics.
Elastomeric proteins are widely distributed among a diverse range of animal species and tissues where they have evolved precise structures to perform specific biological functions.
~0 These proteins, which include for example, abductin [Cao et al. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7: 8677-8], tropoelastin [Gray et al. (1973) Nature 246: 461-6; Sandberg et al. (1981) N.
Ehgl. J. Meet.
304: 566-579; Urry et al. Ed., Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177] bysuss [Deming, T. J.
(1999) Curr. Opih. Chem. Biol. 3: 100-5], silk [Hayashi et al. (1999) Iht. J.
Biol. Macromol.
24: 271-5; Hayashi, C. Y. and Lewis, R. V. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 275: 773-84], and titin all ~5 possess rubber-like elasticity, undergoing high deformation without rupture, storing energy involved in deformation, and then recovering to their original state when the stress is removed.
The ability of proteins to exhibit rubber-like elasticity relates both to their primary and secondary structure, as well as to those features, such as protein self assembly and other intermolecular interactions that dictate the formation of true or virtual networks. Elastomeric materials must satisfy two criteria. First, in order to respond quickly to an applied force, the 0 monomers, which in elastomeric proteins typically consist of repetitive glycine-rich peptide motifs, must be flexible and conformationally free. Second, elastomeric macromolecules must be crosslinked to form a network. Characteristically, elastic proteins combine elastomeric domains with domains that form covalent or noncovalent crosslinks. Thus, the size and properties of the elastic domains and the degree of crosslinking influence the elastic behavior 5 of protein-based materials. Tensile strength is important in certain applications, and collagen and gelatin and crosslinked acrylate modified collagen improves the tensile strength of artificial fibers, fiber networks and fabrics and the like.
Elastin, which is derived from the soluble precursor tropoelastin, is widely distributed !0 in vertebrate tissues. The elastin protein consists of repetitive glycine-rich hydrophobic elastomeric domains of variable length that alternate with alanine-rich, lysine-containing domains that form crosslinks [Sandberg et al. (1981). N. Engl. J. Med. 304:
566-579; Urry.et al., Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177; Sandberg et al. (1981). N.
Engl. J. Med. 304:
566-579; Urry et al., Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177]. Native elastin's intrinsic !5 insolubility has largely limited its capacity to be purified and processed into forms suitable for biomedical or industrial applications. Recently, this limitation has been largely overcome, in part, by the structural characterization of the elastomeric domains.
Specifically, comprehensive sequence analysis has revealed the presence of consensus tetra-(VPGG), penta-(VPGVG), and hexapeptides (APGVGV) repeat motifs [Gray et al. (1973) Nature 246: 461-6;
.0 Urry et al. (1975) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 393: 296-306; Sandberg et al.
(1977) Adv. Exp.
Med. Bio1.79: 277-84; Inhaled et al. (1976) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98: 7547-53;
Rapaka et al.
(1978) htt. J. Pept. Protein Res. 11: 109-27; Urry et al. (1986) Int. J. Pept.
Protein Res. 6:
28, 649-660; Broch et al. (1998) Biomol. Struct. Dyrc. 15: 1073-1091]. VPGG, VPGVG and APGVGV are given in SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID N0:2 and SEQ ID N0:3, respectively.
5 Polymers of the pentapeptide exhibit elastic behavior with spectroscopic features, including a highly mobile backbone and the presence of (3-turns and a loose helical ~i-spiral, that are consistent with those of native elastin [Urry et al. (1974) Biochemistry 13:
609-16; Urry et a1.(1985) Biopolymers 24: 2345-2356]. Thus, the pentapeptide sequence (VPGVG) (SEQ ID
N0:2) has formed the basis fox the synthesis of protein polymers with elastomeric domains by standard solution and solid phase chemical methodologies and, more recently, by genetic 0 engineering strategies [McPherson et al. (1992) Biotechnology Progress 8:
347-352;
McPherson et al. (1996) Protein Expression Purification 7: 51-57; Panitch et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 1701-1703; McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 3643-3648;
McMillan R.A. and Conticello, R. P. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821].
5 In tissues, such as arterial blood vessels, where energy and shape recovery are critical parameters, elastin networks dominate low strain mechanical responses.
Avoidance of artery wall fatigue and failure is dependent upon the resilience of elastin, which prevents the dissipation of transmitted pulsatile energy as heat. While elastin fibers are structurally complex and may contain glycoproteins and glycosaminoglycans, the physical properties of the ,0 network have been attributed primarily to the elastin protein component produced from the soluble precursor tropoelastin [Debelle et al. (1999) Internat. J. Biochem.
Cell Biol. 31:261-272]. Furthermore, extensive investigations by Urry and others [Urry et al.
(1985) Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 130: 50-57; Thomas et al. (1987) Biopolymers 26:921-934;
Urry, D.W. (1988) J. Prot. Chem. 7: 1-34; Chang et al. (1988) Chem. Phys. Lett. 147:
395-400;
;5 Urry et al. (1989) Biopolymers 28: 819-833; Chang et al. (1989) J.
Biomolec. Struct. Dyn.
6: 851-858; Urry, D.W. (1993) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 32: 819-841; Urry et al. (1995) Ciba Foundation Symposium 192: 4-30; Urry et al. Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp 133-177; Sandberg et al. (1977) J. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 79: 277; Foster et al.
(1973) J. Biol.
Chem. 24:2876; Sandberg et al. (1985) Pathol. Biol. 33:266-274; Wasserman et al. (1990) ~0 Biopolymers 29:1613-1628] since the mid-1970s have revealed that the molecular folding and/or self assembly of tropoelastin into more ordered structures, as well as its elastomeric nature are due to the frequent appearance of a pentapeptide unit (Valine-Proline-Glycine-Valine-Glycine; SEQ ID NO:1). The presence of lysine residues along the native protein backbone facilitates intermolecular crosslinking, which further influences the mechanical .5 responses of the elastin fiber network. Model polymers based upon the pentapeptide sequence have been synthesized by solution chemistry and solid phase approaches [Urry et al. (1985) Syntheses, Characterizations a~td Medical Uses of the Polypentapeptide of Elastih and its Analogs; William D.F. Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL] and recently by more efficient recombinant genetic engineering methodologies [McPherson et al. (1992) Biotechnology Progress 8: 347-352; McPherson et al. (1996) Protein Expression Purification 7: 51-57;
0 Panitch et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 1701-1703; McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 3643-3648]. These protein polymers have been processed into elastomeric hydrogels of various forms including sheets and tubular constructs by chemical, enzymatic, and ~-irradiation mediated crosslinking of protein solutions (Urry et al (1997) supra]. These polymers have also been used in generating thin films. For example, Panitch et al. (1999) supra have produced 5 elastin-like protein polymers containing a periodically spaced cell binding fibronectin CSS
domain. When cast from solution onto an otherwise non-adhesive substrate, these polymers promoted cell adhesion and growth. Efficient processing strategies, which can convert elastin peptide polymers into fibers and networks that mimic native structures, enhance the utility of these materials.
;0 The production of fibers from protein solutions has typically relied upon the use of wet or dry spinning processes [Martin et al. Processing and Characterization of Protein Polymers;
McGrath, K. and Kaplan, D., Ed.; Birkhauser: Boston, 1997, pp.339-370; Hudson, S.M. The Spi~cnihg of Silk-like Proteins into Fibers; McGrath, K. and Kaplan, D., Ed.:
Birkhauser:
;5 Boston, 1997, pp. 313-337]. Wet spinning, more commonly used, involves the extrusion of a protein solution through a spinneret into an acid-salt coagulating bath, which usually contains aqueous ammonium sulfate, acetic acid, isopropanol, or acetone. Alternatively, dry spinning consists of extrusion into an evaporative atmosphere. Both approaches yield large diameter fibers which do not mimic the morphological characteristics of native protein fibers.
~0 Furthermore, both strategies rely on biologically toxic solvent systems that preclude the fabrication in real time of hybrid protein-cell constructs. Electrospinning is a third approach that has been recently utilized to generate protein fibers [Reneker et al.
(1996) Nahotechuology 7: 216-223; Doshi et al. (1995) J. Electrostatics 35: 151-160]. In this technique, a polymer solution is subjected to an electric field that induces the accumulation of charge on the surface .5 of a pendent drop. Mutual charge repulsion causes a force which directly opposes that produced by surface tension. At a critical value of electric field strength, a repulsive electric force exceeds the surface tension force, and a charged jet of solution is ejected. The jet splays into a series of fine filaments with a range of diameters that are characteristically on the order of several tens or hundreds of nanometers. Given the high surface area to volume ration of these nanofibers, solvent evaporation occurs relatively quickly even when operating with 0 aqueous solutions at ambient temperature and pressure. Several examples of protein nanofibers produced by the application of electrospinning techniques have been reported.
Anderson et al.
have electrospun a series of silk-like protein polymers from formic acid and investigated their capacity to modify the cell adhesive characteristics of an underlying solid substrate [Anderson et al. Bioactive Silk-like Protein Polymer Films oh Silicon Devices; Alper, M., Bayby, H., 5 Kaplan, D. and Navia, M., ed.; Materials Research Society: Pittsburgh, PA;
1994, Vol. 330, pp. 171-177.
We describe herein fiber formation from natural elastin, a recombinant elastin mimetic polypeptide, from collagen and from gelatin. Electrospinning techniques were employed to ;0 produce fibers in a form that mimics native elastin fiber diameter utilizing an 81 kD synthetic elastin peptide polymer based upon the elastin-mimetic repeat sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (SEQ ID NO:4). The effects of process parameters on fiber morphology including solution viscosity, flow rate, electric field strength, and the distance between the spinneret tip and the collecting surface were defined. In addition, non-woven ',5 fabrics based upon this elastin analogue were produced, and component fiber properties, including the distribution of fiber diameter and orientation, were characterized. A framework has been established for investigating the influence of fiber processing on both the structural features and mechanical properties of single protein fibers and fiber networks formulated as non-woven fabrics. As a consequence, the capacity to engineer tissue like constructs whose ~0 mechanical and biological properties are based upon a hierarchical arrangement of protein networks has been significantly enhanced.
Initial investigations focused on defining the electric potential necessary to initiate or terminate jet formation from aqueous solutions of the elastin analogue.
Overall, values for .5 both VS~~ and VstoP were proportionately related to the concentration of the peptide in solution and the corresponding viscosity (Fig. 1). Vst~t was greater than 6.4 kV for all concentrations tested, and the splay was found to be unstable above 25 kV. Therefore, 18 kV
was the chosen field strength for subsequent fiber formation investigations. Jet instability was observed at concentrations above 20 wt% , with an accompanying inability to form fibers. A
systematic study of the influence on fiber morphology of the distance between the spinneret tip and the 0 collecting plate revealed that 15 cm was an optimal distance for fiber formation.
The major determinants of fiber morphology are solution concentration and flow rate.
Fibers formed from a 5 wt% solution, regardless of the mass flow rate, are short, fragmented and characterized by a triangular or spindle shaped beaded morphology (Fig.
2). Long 5 uniform fibers were generated at solution concentrations above 10 wt% which corresponded to solution viscosities greater than 25 centipoise (Fig. 3). Fiber diameters range between 300 and 400 nm over all flow rates tested with little variation in morphology with the infrequent exception of fiber splitting at triangle-shaped bifurcation points. At a flow rate of 100 ~,l/min, it was estimated that 1500 meters of thin filament were produced per minute.
At solution '.0 concentrations of 15 and 20 wt% , a new morphological pattern was noted:
flattened or ribbon shaped fibers which appeared, on occasion, twisted during the spinning and deposition process (Figs. 4, 5). The formation of ribbon shaped fibers from the 20 wt% solution was a relatively common occurrence with an average fiber width of approximately 3 .0 ~.m.
However, both thin filaments (250-600 nm) and wider ribbon-like structures (~3 ~cm) were observed together, !5 particularly when fibers from this solution were formed at low flow rates.
Molecular-level microstructure was observed on the surface of elastin-like ribbons, characterized by aligned axially oriented ridges with an apparent height and width of 10 to 20 nm (Fig.
6). Although twisted ribbons were also examined by TEM, additional higher order structural features were not observed.
.0 Fong et al. (1999) Polymer 40: 4585-4592, have reported that a solution viscosity of at least 500 centipoise was required for effective electrospinning of non-beaded fibers from aqueous solutions of high molecular weight polyethylene oxide) (MW 900 kD). In contrast, a relatively low viscosity solution (25 centipoise) of elastin peptide polymer yielded electrospun S 5 fibers of uniform diameter. This phenomenon is believed to be related to molecular self assembly processes that are operative for the elastin analogue and, thereby, may be an important determinant of thin filament and ribbon formation at low and high solution concentrations, respectively. LTrry et al. (1988) supra and (1989) supra have noted that the central "Pro-Gly" element of the pentapeptide repeat (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly) (SEQ ID N0:2.) adopts a type II reverse turn structure, forming a flexible helix or "(3-spiral" on tandem 0 sequence repetition. Specifically, a conformational rearrangement from a random coil to a [3-spiral structure has been noted for model poly(VPGVG) (SEQ ID N0:2)peptides on phase separation of the polymer. This conformation promotes both intra- and intermolecular hydrophobic interactions and underlies the elastomeric restoring force in elastin. Therefore, during the process of nanofiber formation, progressive solvent loss probably reduces the 5 inverse transition temperature of the peptide solution, facilitating both hydrophobically mediated polypeptide folding and molecular self assembly. Under appropriate conditions ih vitro, tropoelastin molecules have a well-known tendency to aggregate into thin filaments.
Likewise, the formation of elastin filaments ih vivo, as basic building blocks of larger elastin fibers, has been observed by atomic force microscopy and high resolution cryoelectron ,0 microscopy [Pasquali-Ronchetti et al. (1995) Ciba Fouhdation Symposium 192:
31-50;
Pasquali-Ronchetti et al. (1998) Matrix Biology 17: 75-83]. These studies have demonstrated that native elastin fibers can be resolved into a three-dimensional bundle of 7 nm wide filaments oriented in the direction of the fiber. High resolution SEM of electrospun elastin fibers revealed the presence of 10 nm wide filament-like surface folds running parallel to the ,5 direction of the fiber. Given reported electrospinning strain rates on the order of 104 s 1, it is conceivable that elongational flow promotes the orientation and self assembly of polymer molecules in the direction of elongation [Reneker et al. (1995) Bull Am. Phys.
Soc. 40: 351].
Non-woven fabrics were formed from fibers generated from a 15 wt% of polypeptide 0 solution at a flow rate of 150 ,ul/ml (Fig. 7). As noted above, short time frame deposition studies had demonstrated that these conditions afforded the highest proportion of uniform, thin fibers with diameters of approximately 400 nm. Image analysis of the non-woven fabric revealed a unimodal distribution of fiber diameters with an observed average diameter of 450 nm (Fig. 8). The distribution of fiber orientation within this network followed a random .5 pattern of fiber deposition with consequent generation of an isotropic nonwoven fabric (Fig.
9). Uniaxial stress-strain properties were characterized in dry non-woven fabrics, and a representative data set is illustrated in Fig. 10. The ultimate tensile strength of the sample was 35 MPa and the material modulus 1.8 GPa. Hydration and peptide crosslinking modulate these properties .
0 Urry et al. have demonstrated that non-conservative amino acid substitutions for Valine-4 can be performed without disruption of the (3-spiral structure [Urry et al.
(1985) supra;
Thomas et al. (1987) supra; Urry et al (1989) supra; Chang et al. (1989) supra]. Thus, the incorporation of lysine in the four position of the pentapeptide and subsequent synthesis of the elastin-mimetic repeat sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (SEQ ID N0:4) 5 permits spatially controlled chemical or enzymatic crosslinking [McMillan et al (2000) supra;
Kagan et al. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255: 3656].
The genetic engineering of synthetic peptide polymers based upon a design derived from a native structural protein typically requires the incorporation of repetitive oligopeptide ,0 sequences that impart critical structural properties from the parent protein to the recombinant polypeptide. In the process, model systems for investigating the structure-function properties of the native protein are generated. Moreover, genetic engineering based strategies facilitate the alteration of peptide chain length, consensus repeat sequence, as well as the introduction of additional functional groups or oligopeptide units that modulate the biological, ;5 thermodynamic, and mechanical properties of the peptide polymer. For example, the appropriate choice of peptide sequence has led to the development of recombinant proteins that self assemble into thermoreversible gels [Petka et al. (1998) Science 281:389-392], lyotropic smectic mesophases [Yu et al. (1997) Natut~e 389: 167-170], and lamellar crystallites [Krejchi et al. (1994) Science 265:1427-1432]. The uniformity of macromolecular structure achieved ~0 by this approach provides exquisite control over macroscopic polymer properties, including processability. The successful generation of fibers from elastin-mimetic peptide polymers has provided a unique opportunity to characterize the physiochemical and biological properties of single fibexs as well as structures with higher levels of architectural order.
In particular, the creation of fiber-reinforced composites based upon a careful choice of protein polymer types and network structures allows the engineering of improved human tissue constructs as well as completely synthetic artificial organs with enhanced clinical performance capabilities.
Elastin-mimetic protein fibers and fiber networks were produced by the electrospinning of an aqueous solution of a genetically engineered 81 kD peptide polymer based upon the 0 repeat sequence (Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly) (repeats of SEQ
ID N0:4).
Fibers were generated at ambient temperature and pressure with optimal fiber formation observed with use of an 18 kV electric field and a 15 cm distance between the spinneret and plate collector. High resolution SEM and TEM confirmed that fiber morphology was primarily influenced by solution concentration and mass flow rate.
Characteristically, fiber 5 diameters varied between 200 - 3000 nm and three morphological patterns were noted: beaded fibers, thin filaments, and broad ribbon-like structures. At solution concentrations above 10 wt% , long uniform fibers were predominantly observed. Image analysis of non-woven fabrics produced from a solution concentration of 15 wt% revealed the isotropic orientation of individual fibers with an average fiber diameter of 450 nm. The ultimate tensile strength of ;0 these non-woven fabrics was 35 MPa and the material modulus was 1.8 GPa.
In its native form, elastin is present as a network of elastic fibers that are crosslinked through available lysine residues found in interspersed alanine-rich regions jRobins, S. P.
(1982) Methods Biochem. Anal. 28: 329-379; Miyoshi et al. (1976) J. Biochem.
(Tokyo) 79:
;5 1235-1243; Franzblau et al. (1977) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 79: 313-327;
Akagawa, M. and Suyama, K. (2000) Connect. Tissue Res. 41: 131-141] . Characteristically, crosslinking occurs in the solid-state; that is, after cellular secretion of tropoelastin with local fiber deposition. In this fashion, the biostability of elastin is enhanced and its mechanical properties modulated.
In contrast, crosslinking of synthetic elastin-mimetic protein polymers has been largely ~0 investigated in solution phase systems using either 'y-irradiation [Zhang et al. (1989) J. Protein Chem. 8, 173-182], chemical, or enzymatic based approaches [Kagan et al.
(1980) J. Biol.
Chem. 255: 3656-3659] . Urry et al. have demonstrated the feasibility of generating tubular hydrogels by 'y-irradiation mediated crosslinking jUrry et al. (1997) supra]
and Welsh et al.
have used glutaraldehyde to crosslink an elastin-mimetic protein film [Welsh, E. R. and .5 Tirrell, D. A. (2000) Biomac~omolecules 1: 23-30; McMillan et al. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821]. While these approaches provide a measure of control over the degree of crosslinking, the chemical nature, and the location of the crosslink are often ill-defined.
Furthermore, none of these reaction schemes are appropriate for heterogeneous multicomponent systems in which there may be a need to control either the degree of crosslinking among individual constituents or otherwise to incorporate elements within the 0 structure that may be adversely effected by unintended side reactions. In summary, the approaches that have been described to date have provided important insights into the physiochemical behavior of bioelastic systems under a variety of environmental conditions and have lead to novel processing strategies for creating elastomeric hydrogels for drug delivery and other applications. However, we believe that the generation of meaningful constructs for 5 the engineering of human tissues and artificial organs will require the processing of elastomeric protein polymers into fibers and fabrics in which the protein polymer forms a crosslinked network. Thus, it is desirable to utilize a crosslinking strategy that is efficient in the solid-state, achieves precise control over the nature and degree of crosslinking, and facilitates spatial and temporal control over the reaction process.
;0 We have optimized an electrospinning process to produce uniform nanofibers (d < 1 ,um) and non-woven fabrics of an elastin protein polymer poly((Va1-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly)4(Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly))39 , 39 repeats of SEQ ID N0:4. Notably, amino acid substitution in the fourth position of the pentapeptide does not affect the formation of a ~i-spiral [Huang (2000) !5 Macromolecules 33: 2989; Thomas et al. (1987) Biopolymers 26: 921-934;
Chang et al. (1989) J. Biomolec. St~uct. Dyh. 6: 851-858; Urry et al. (1989) Biopolymers 28: 819-833], which is critical for the biomechanical behavior of elastin analogues. The incorporated lysine group at position 24 within the repeat of SEQ ID N0:4 (Lys-24) provides an amino functionality that can be conveniently utilized for polymer crosslinking. Indeed, McMillan et al.
have recently .0 reported the formation of structurally well-defined crosslinked elastin-mimetic hydrogels using an N hydroxysuccinimide ester of a bifunctional carboxylic acid, specifically, disuccinimidyl suberate, as crosslinker of available amino groups in the solution phase [McMillan et al. (1999) MacYOmolecules 32: 9067-9070]. Herein we describe the incorporation of functional groups into the protein polymer backbone that facilitate site-specific solid-state photocrosslinking using 45 either UV or visible light active photoinitiators. Significantly, this approach provides for both spatial and temporal control over the crosslinking reaction. The generation of crosslinked elastin-mimetic fibers and films i~ reported, and mechanical properties characterized.
The synthesis of acrylate-modified elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide has been accomplished. 1H NMR spectra of the elastin-mimetic protein polymer and its acrylate-0 modified analogue (AME) recorded at room temperature in D20 are shown in Fig. 11A-118.
The spectrum of the modified material expanded between 5.0 and 5.7 ppm is shown in the inset in Fig. 11A. The spectrum clearly indicates the incorporation of the double bonds through peaks at 5.3 (Ha) and 5.6 ppm (Hb). Fig. 11B is the expanded version of the spectra, between 2.6 and 3.1 ppm. Acrylate modification results in about 0.25 ppm (Hd) downfield shift for the 5 methylene protons alpha to the amino group (H~). This shift can be used to directly calculate the degree of functionalization (DOF). The ratio of the integrated intensity of the 3 ppm peak to the sum of the integrated intensities of the 3 and 2.75 ppm peaks defines the DOF.
Additionally, IR spectroscopy can be used to evaluate DOF. The NHZ band at 3500 cm-1 decreases with functionalization.
!0 The DOF can be varied by changing the molar reactant ratio of the methacryloyl anhydride to the amino groups in the peptide polymer. Fig. 12 illustrates the variation in the DOF that can be achieved, as demonstrated by changes in peak intensities in the 1H NMR
spectrum. In the unmodified material the 3 ppm peak is absent. As the molar ratio of the !5 anhydride is increased, the intensity of the 3 ppm peak increases at the expense of the 2.75 ppm peak, indicating an increased degree of functionalization. The DOF can be varied from 33 % to 88 % by changing the feed ratio from 1:1 to 3:1. Thus, using the same reaction scheme a wide variety of AMEs can be produced, resulting in materials having a wide range of mechanical properties (subsequent to crosslinking). For the remainder of the discussion, the .0 AMEs will be represented by their respective DOF in brackets.
The inverse temperature transition (Tt) of elastin-mimetic and acrylate-modified analogues has been analyzed. Mutual compatibility of a polymer and a solvent has been extensively studied and is often critical for processing needs. Urry et. al.
have shown that a .5 family of protein polymers based on the VPGVG (SEQ ID N0:2) repeat undergo an inverse temperature transition [Urry et al. (1985) Biopolymers 24: 2345-56]. On increasing the temperature from below to above the transition temperature, the proteins were found to undergo molecular assembly by protein folding with phase separation. For example, poly(GVGVP) is miscible with water in all proportions below 25°C, but on increasing the temperature above 25 °C, the solution becomes turbid with complete phase separation. Thus, 0 temperature-dependent turbidimetry measurements can be used to quantify the inverse transition temperature.
Results of turbidimetry measurements on elastin and acrylate-modified elastin materials in ddH20 are shown in Fig. 13. The temperature corresponding to one-half maximal turbidity 5 can be considered the Tt. The data demonstrate that acrylate-modification causes a reduction in the inverse temperature transition with 88 % conversion of the amino groups, producing a reduction in the transition temperature by about 50 °C (Tt ~
23°C). This reduction is consistent with the Tt based hydrophobicity scale developed by Urry et. al.
[Urry et al. (1985) Biopolymers 24: 2345-56]. Their investigations established that an increase in the ,0 hydrophobicity of model protein polymers, as a result of substitution at the fourth position, is thermodynamically offset with a decrease in the transition temperature. The measurement of T~ assumes particular importance in our studies, because the processing temperature for fiber formation is dictated by Tt. The phase separation phenomenon occurring above T~ precludes fiber formation. For example, in principle, fibers can be spun from aqueous solutions of :5 AME(33) and AME(65) at room temperature, which is well below the Tt.
However, the onset of turbidity begins close to room temperature for AME(88). Thus, fibers from 10-15 wt%
AME(88) in water (pH 7) required cold room spinning (at about 5 °C).
The crosslinlcing of the acrylate moiety is mediated through a photoinitiator.
The .0 mechanism for photocrosslinking has been extensively reviewed [Eaton, D. F.
(1986) Advances in PhotochemistYy 13 : 427-487] . Because fiber spinning is conducted from aqueous solutions, water-soluble photoinitiators are desirable. Two photoinitiators were investigated: eosin Y/triethanolamine/vinyl pyrillidone system and IRGACURE 2959 (Irgacure 2959 is 1-[4-hydroxyethoxy)-pheny]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-propane-1-one; Ciba Geigy), both of which have ~5 been used as photoinitiators in water-based systems [Van Den Bulcke et al.
(2000) BiomacYOmolecules 1: 31; Cruise et al. (1998) Biotechnol. Bioehg. 57: 655-65].
While both photoinitiators were tested for crosslinking efficiency, the reported mechanical results are for the EY-based systems. Other photoinitiators which function under mild conditions of temperature and without producing a level of free radicals which lead to protein damage can be used, and the selection of light wavelength and temperature for a particular combination of 0 wavelength and functional group are well understood in the art.
Figs. 14 and 15 show SEM micrographs of the fibers produced from 10 and 15 wt%
solutions at a flow rate of 50 ~,1/min, as described in Example 4. In both cases, long uniform fibers were produced. In fibers spun from the 10 wt% solution, average diameter ranged 5 between 300 - 500 nm with occasional triangle shaped bifurcation points noted. In contrast, fibers spun from the 15 wt% solution were exhibited a flat or ribbon type morphology with the absence of triangular bifurcation points. In comparison to our previous investigation of unmodified elastin-mimetic fibers, neither acrylate-modification nor the addition of photoinitiator to the spinning solution had any appreciable effect on fiber morphology.
;0 Solubility in water was used as a simple test to determine the efficiency of crosslinking.
While elastin samples that did not contain photoinitiator dissolved completely in water, those containing Eosin Y or Irgacure were insoluble in water. The extent and nature of crosslinking was more precisely determined using 13C solid-state NMR. Owing to its inherent structural ;5 specificity, solid-state NMR has been extensively used in the past to study chemical changes ensuing after crosslinking [O'Donnell, J. H. and Whittaker, A. K. (1992) Radiat. Phys. Chem.
36: 209; O'Donnell, J. H. and Whittaker, A. K. (1992) J. Polym. Chem. Ed. 30:
185]. Fig.
16 shows the 13C solid-state MAS/TOSS NMR spectra of elastin, elastin methacrylamide, and crosslinked elastin methacrylamide. The addition of double bonds to elastin via ~0 methacryloylation is clearly evidenced by the appearance of peaks Ca and Cb in the spectrum of elastin methacrylamide. For the sake of clarity, the double bond region is magnified and shown as an inset along with the elastin methacrylamide spectrum. The spectra for samples crosslinked either by Eosin Y or Irgacure show the complete disappearance of the double bonds and appearance of new peaks corresponding to the photoinitiator labeled as "*'°. For the irradiation time employed, solid-state NMR spectra confirm complete crosslinking. No evidence of crosslinking was detected in the absence of photoinitiator.
The dependence of protein crosslinking on irradiation time was investigated in detail for the 15 wt% AME(88)/EY system. Samples were irradiated for up to 60 minutes, 0 lyophilized in the dark, and stored at -20 ° C in brown bottles to avoid light exposure prior to solid-state NMR analysis. The double bond region (peaks Ca and Cb) were integrated for each sample and the integrated double bond areas were normalized with respect to that of the unirradiated sample. Fig. 18 shows the degree of crosslinking as a function of irradiation time.
After an hour of visible light irradiation, the crosslinking process was complete. Increased 5 variability of experimental data obtained at higher degrees of crosslinking was attributed to decreasing signal to noise ratio in the integrated region.
The crosslinked and the uncrosslinked samples were subject to tensile testing to determine the mechanical effect of crosslinking. Fig. 17 shows representative stress-strain :0 curves of the two samples. The uncrosslinked material (elastin methacrylamide) had a modulus of 0.7 ~ 0.15 GPa and a tensile strength of 16.2 ~ 6.3 MPa, while the crosslinked sample had a modulus of 1.8 ~ 0.4 GPa and a tensile strength of 43.3 ~ 5.2 MPa. As anticipated, crosslinking enhanced both Young's modulus and tensile strength with a concomitant decrease in the strain to failure from 3.9 ~ 0.2 % to 2.1 ~ 0.35 % . In the dry state, crosslinking !5 renders the sample stiffer and more brittle as compared to the uncrosslinked sample. Fig. 18 shows the comparative stress-strain behavior of dry and hydrated crosslinked samples of AME(65). Clearly rubber elastic behavior ensues subsequent to hydration. The hydrated sample had an average modulus of 0.45 ~ 0.08 MPa and a strain to failure of lOS ~ 8 % .
Notably, the degree of crosslinking estimated from ideal rubber elasticity theory compares well .0 with that obtained from solid-state NMR.
45 min of irradiation - > calibration curve - > 75 % x 0.65 In summary, post processing solid-state crosslinking of elastin-mimetic fibers was investigated. Through available lysine residues, an elastin-mimetic protein polymer was SS modified to incorporate an acrylate moiety. The degree of acrylate functionalization could be varied by changing the reactant ratio of anhydride to elastin. The AME's were found to have lower inverse transition temperature than the unmodified sample. This was attributed to the increase in the hydrophobicity of the sample with the introduction of the acrylate group. The inverse transition temperature in turn dictated the temperature for fiber formation. Fibers and fabric samples of AME were prepared by electrospinning at appropriate temperatures.
0 Depending upon the concentration of the solution, fibers with diameter ranging from 300 nm to 1.5 ~,m were produced. The fibers were subsequently crosslinked using photoirradiation.
The insolubility of the resulting sample in water indicated a high degree of crosslinking with complete crosslinking confirmed by 13C solid-state NMR. The mechanical properties of 5 the samples were commensurate with that expected, in that modulus and tensile strength increased upon crosslinking. Moreover, hydrated samples displayed rubber-like behavior with high extensibility. Thus acrylate modification provides a viable route for solid-state crosslinking of elastin-mimetic protein-based materials. With the production of crosslinked elastin-mimetic fabrics, the capacity to engineer tissue-like constructs has been significantly 0 enhanced.
Collagen is a biodegradable, biocompatible, and non-immunogenic structural protein, which makes it a suitable compound for a variety of biomedical applications.
Examples include collagen use in cosmetic and urological surgery as an injectable compound for tissue ,5 augmentation, in orthopedic surgery as an implantable matrix to promote bone growth, and in plastic and general surgery as a topical agent for the treatment of both chronic non-healing wounds and burn injuries or as a template for tissue regeneration. The most abundant form of collagen isolated from adult connective tissues, such as skin, tendon, and bone, is type I
collagen. Characteristically, it is composed of two ec1(I) chains and one a2(I) chain, each 0 slightly more than 1000 amino acids long, that are organized as a triple helix and stabilized primarily by hydrogen bonds. A single molecule of type I collagen has a molecular mass of 285 kD, a width of " 14 A, and a length of ~ 3000 A. As a biomaterial, collagen has been predominantly used after processing into a dry powder or slurry, a hydrogel after solution phase crosslinking, or as a porous matrix with or without the addition of other components ~5 after freeze-drying. However, in native connective tissues, type I collagen molecules form fibrillar elements, twenty to several hundred nanometers in diameter that are organized into protein networks of varying architecture. Functionally, collagen fiber networks act to resist high strain deformation and in the process transmit forces, dissipate energy, and prevent premature tissue mechanical failure. These fiber networks constitute the principle structural elements of a variety of acellular bioprosthetic tissue substitutes, such as porcine heart valves 0 and bovine artery heterografts, as well as other tissue derived matrices, including porcine subintestinal submucosa and bovine pericardium. The versatility of collagen as a scaffold for tissue engineering applications is significantly enhanced when used as a native protein network.
To date, attempts to reformulate tissue extracted native collagen into protein fiber networks and fabrics have been limited.
PEO is non-toxic, chemically stable in acidic solution, and when of sufficient molecular weight is capable of forming electrospun fibers. Significantly, fibers could not be formed from a 1-2 wt% pure collagen in aqueous solution, but were observed after the addition of PEO.
High resolution SEM demonstrated unique morphological features as a function of the weight ;0 ratio of PEO to collagen, as well as solution conductivity and flow rate.
Solution viscosity as related to PEO content and the effect of sodium chloride concentration on solution conductivity are summarized in Tables I and II. The effect of the collagen:PEO ratio on tensile strength and modulus is shown in Table III. Increasing the concentration of PEO
increased the yield of uniform fibers, while reducing bead formation. Beads predominated at collagen PEO
;5 weight ratios of 10:1 and 5:1, with only rare beads noted at a ratio of 1:1 and none observed at a collagen-PEO ratio of 1:2. Under this condition, uniform fibers were produced with diameters ranging between 50 - 150 nm. The formation of beads has been attributed to jet instability, which is believed reduced upon increasing solution viscosity due to addition of high molecular weight PEO. Likewise, solution conductivity was also found to influence fiber 0 formation. When an electric field is applied to an electrolyte-containing aqueous polymer solution, field induced ion movement carries the solution along by an additional viscous drag force. This phenomenon enhances jet stability and, as a consequence, reduces bead formation.
While fiber uniformity increased with the addition of sodium chloride, crystal formation was observed at high salt concentrations (Figs. 19A-19F). Finally, we observed that small changes ~5 in flow rate had a marked impact on collagen/PEO fiber morphology. Below 100 ,uL/min, bead formation was increasingly pronounced, while at flow rates above this level, the limited volatility of the polymer solution prevented adequate fiber drying under conditions of ambient temperature and pressure. TEM imaging confirmed IiRSEM analysis and did not reveal any additional internal structural features. See Figs. 19A-19D.
0 We determined the microphase structure of collagen-PEO blends by solid-state NMR.
The dipolar magnetization transfer method depends on creating a magnetization gradient across the sample and then monitoring the time it takes for spin equilibration to occur following the creation of the gradient. This equilibration time will depend upon the domain sizes in the system and the spin diffusion coefficients associated with each phase. If the diffusion 5 coefficients of different regions and the dimensionality of the diffusion process are known a prioYi, then the domain sizes in the system can be extracted by fitting a simulated diffusion profile to the experimental data. The simulated profile can be obtained by numerically solving the diffusion equation with appropriate initial and boundary conditions. It is also clear that if diffusivities are isotropic, then only the minimum domain distances will be probed since the 0 shortest path for the establishment of spin equilibration lies along this direction (D. L.
Vanderhart (1990) Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp. 34: 125). The domain distances that can be observed using spin diffusion range from about 2 nm to 100 nm. The upper bound for the observable domain distance will depend upon the time in which it is possible to observe the magnetization polarization. This is governed by the spin lattice relaxation of protons in the 5 sample. Though there is a limitation on the maximum domain distance observable, there are many multiphase polymer systems that exhibit domains of the order that can be investigated by the spin diffusion technique. For example, long periods in semicrystalline polymers and domain sizes in many block copolymers fall well within the range of detection by spin diffusion [K. J. Packer et al. (1984) J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. 22: 589; Kimura et al (1992) PolymeY
0 33: 493; Cai et al. (1993) Polymer 34: 267].
Collagen fibers were spun and cross linked into fibers using collagen dissolved in fluorinated solvent or dissolved in a water-fluorinated solvent mixture.
Although collagen fibers could not be produced from 1-2 wt% solutions in water, either changing the temperature .5 or altering the solvent system can produce pure collagen fibers. By increasing the temperature to 36 °C formation of collagen fibers were noted. Fluorinated alcohol/water mixtures can serve as alternate solvents systems to produce collagen fibers. For example production of collagen fibers in the 300-800 nm diameter range could be achieved from spinning 10-15 wt% of collagen in such fluorinated solvents. The solvent compositions used were (a) 10 mole%
trifluoroethanol (TFE)/90 mole % water and (b) 10 mole % hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)/90 0 mole% water. Collagen spinning can also be effected from combinations of water with other fluorinated alcohols.
The most important step in the spin diffusion experiment is the creation of the magnetization gradient. The magnetization gradient is usually realized by using an appropriate 5 selection sequence. For multiphase systems that display a large gradient in mobility between constituent phases, a simple filter based on spin-spin relaxation (T2) can be used to selectively retain the magnetization of the more mobile phase. For example, consider a blend of two components A and B with disparately different T2's. If A has a TZ of 100 ,us and B has a T2 of 1 ms, then by applying a T2 filter of 700 ~s, one can destroy the magnetization in A and ;0 selectively retain the magnetization in B, thereby creating a magnetization gradient. This is the basis of the Goldman-Shen experiment and many variations thereof that have been used to probe domain distances in polymer blends [US Patent No. 5,911,942 (1999)]. For the system under consideration, the two components, PEO and collagen, have very different Tg's (Tg,~°llagen 125 °C and Tg,PEO ~ -65 °C) and are hence amenable for investigation via the mobility-based ;5 approach. The simple TZ filter was replaced with a dipolar filter selection sequence. The dipolar filter was selected since it provides greater tunability and has been presented as a technique that can overcome spectral distortions produced by multi-quantum effects that are prevalent at short spin diffusion times [Egger et al. (1992) J. Appl. Poly.
Sci. 44: 289].
.0 Fig. 21 shows the CP/MAS/TOSS and DP/MAS spectra of collagen, PEO and an electrospun fabric of 1:2 collagen/PEO. The CP spectrum of the collagen/PEO
fabric appears to be a simple superposition of the CP spectra of collagen and PEO in that it shows the resonances from both collagen and PEO. The DP spectra typically discriminate against the more rigid regions in the sample. The DP spectrum of collagen (not shown) indicates that it 45 is very rigid at the measuring temperature (24 °C). The reported glass transition of dry collagen is approximately 125 °C rendering collagen rigid at room temperature. The DP
spectrum of PEO (not shown) indicates that PEO is highly mobile at room temperature (Tg, PEO - 65 °C). In the case of the collagen/PEO fabric the DP spectrum clearly shows that PEO
is highly mobile when compared to collagen. This vast difference in mobility between collagen and PEO can be exploited in terms of a 1H dipolar magnetization transfer experiment to 0 provide information about the domain sizes in the fabric.
The most important step in the spin diffusion experiment is the establishment of the initial magnetization gradient. Fig. 22A shows the 1H spectra of an electrospun 1:2 collagen-PEO fabric before and after the application of the dipolar filter. The spectrum acquired before 5 the application of the filter is a superposition of a broad (rigid) and a narrow (mobile) component. ' The spectrum acquired after the application of the filter shows only the narrow component indicating that the filter has destroyed the magnetization associated with the rigid regions. In order to ascertain the chemical identity of the regions selected after the application of the filter, a CP/MAS sequence was appended to the spin diffusion sequence as described in 0 the experimental section. The 13C CP/MAS spectra are shown in Fig. 22B. It is clear from the CP/MAS spectra that the filter selectively retains magnetization in the more mobile PEO
regions while destroying the magnetization in the more rigid collagen regions.
Thus the chosen filter parameters result in an efficient establishment of magnetization gradient in the sample. Similar results were obtained with a 1:1 fabric sample.
,5 The spin diffusion data for l: l and 1:2 fabric blends are shown in Fig. 23.
The inset in Figure 7 shows the initial time data. From the inset it is clear that the magnetization in the source phase contacts the sink phase slower in the 1:1 blend than in the 1:2 blend (the initial portion of the curve for the 1:1 blend is sigmoidal while it is linear for the 1:2 blend). This 0 is indicative of the presence of an interface in the 1:1 blend while there is very little or no interface in the 1:2 blend. The formation of an interface in the case of the 1:1 blend is not surprising since the potential exists for hydrogen bonding between the ether oxygen of the PEO
and protons of the amino group in collagen. The presence of associative interactions has known to produce phase mixing in polymer blends. Thus, mere visual inspection of the initial time data suggests that mechanically stronger fabrics could be produced from the 1:1 blend due to the presence of an interface.
The dotted lines in the figure represent the theoretical (expected) end value of spin diffusion. As expected the theoretical end value for the 1:2 blend (0.74) is greater than the 1:1 0 blend (0.59) since more of the mobile phase is available for selection in the 1:2 blend. These theoretical values are calculated assuming that the entire PEO phase is available for selection.
However it must be borne in mind that PEO is capable of crystallizing in the blend.
Crystallization of PEO accounts for the difference between the observed and expected end values of spin diffusion. Crystallization of the source phase results in the lowering of the 5 expected end value. From the observed end values it becomes evident that the 1:2 blend has a higher degree of crystallinity than the 1:1 blend. Indeed DSC experiments conducted on the electrospun fabrics show that the degree of crystallinity in the 1:2 blend is around 36 % while that in the 1:1 blend is 12 % . From these data it can be surmised that crystallization induced phase separation occurs in the 1:2 blend precluding the formation of a substantial interface.
,0 Non-woven fabrics were formed from collagen/PEO fibers generated from a 2 wt%
of type I collagen-PEO solution at a flow rate of 100~,LlmL and uniaxial stress-strain properties characterized in the dry state. A pure PEO fabric sample had the lowest tensile strength of 90 KPa and a modulus of 7 MPa. The tensile strength and modulus of. a 1:2 collagen-PEO blend ,5 were 270 KPa and 8 MPa, respectively. Maximum values were observed for the 1:1 blend with a tensile strength of 370 I~I'a and a modulus of 12 MPa. NMR analysis, as reported .
above, suggested that the superior mechanical properties, observed for collagen-PEO blends of weight ratio 1:1, were due to the maximization of intermolecular interactions between the PEO and collagen components.
.0 Type I collagen-PEO fibers and non-woven fiber networks were produced by the electrospimiing of a weak acid solution of lyophilized collagen purified from rat tail tendon.
Fibers were generated at ambient temperature and pressure with optimal fiber formation observed with use of an 18 kV electric field and a 15-cm distance between the spinneret and .5 plate collector. Fiber morphology was influenced by solution viscosity, conductivity, and flow rate. As determined by high-resolution SEM and TEM, highly uniform fibers with a diameter range of 100 - 150 nm were produced from a 2 wt% solution of collagen-PEO (1:l weight ratio, 34 mM NaCI) at a flow rate of 100~,L/min. The ultimate tensile strength of the resulting non-woven fabric was 370 KPa with an elastic modulus of 12 MPa.
0 Efforts to process collagen into man-made fibers have been limited, and generally approaches to date have been confined to wet spinning methodologies. Wet spinning involves the extrusion of a protein solution through a spinneret into an acid-salt coagulating bath, which usually contains aqueous ammonium sulfate, acetic acid, isopropanol, or acetone. Further treatments in ethanol and acetone solutions are often required for fiber dehydration.
5 Limitations of this approach include the use of biologically toxic solvent systems that preclude the fabrication in real time of hybrid protein-cell constructs, as well as conditions which likely induce significant conformational changes in native protein structure, including protein denaturation. Finally, wet spinning is largely confined to the generation of fibers that range from tens to hundreds of microns in diameter. In contrast, the process outlined herein provides 0 a convenient, non-toxic, non-denaturing approach for the generation collagen-containing nanofibers and non-woven fabrics that have applications in medical and veterinary prostheses, artificial organs, wound healing and tissue engineering, and as hemostatic agents.
Bioconjugate techniques involving the manipulation of various amino acid side chain ,5 residues have become commonplace in modern biochemistry. Our strategy involved the covalent attachment of an acrylate moiety to lysine and hydroxylysine side chains. Via nucleophilic attack, methacryloyl anhydride was used to acylate the E-amino group of the lysine and hydroxylysine residues. Once modified, the gelatin was crosslinked using eosin-Y/
triethanolamine/ 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone free radical photoinitiation [Cruise et al. (1998) supra].
.0 By using the technique of electrospinning [Renelcer, (1996; supra; Huang (2000) supra], we formed fibers with diameters in the nanometer range (<1 ~,m). These sizes have been reported to closely approximate fiber morphology through out much of the extracellular matrix. [Birk, 1991 #10] By spinning acrylate-modified gelatin into various constructs (i.e.
sheets and tubes) and subsequent crosslinking, an integrated protein matrix structure can be formed in an expeditious and precise manner.
Fig. 24 shows the 1H NMR spectra of gelatin and acrylate modified gelatin in recorded at 45 °C. Incorporation of double bonds in the system can be inferred from the 0 presence of two new peaks in the spectrum of gelatin methacrylamide.
Integrating the double bond region provides a measure of the degree of functionalization (DOF). DOF
was defined as the ratio of the amino moieties functionalized to the total number of amino moieties in the gelatin prior to functionalization. In this case the DOF was calculated be around 73 % . It has already been shown by Van de Bulcke et. al (vide infra) that the DOF could be varied by 5 changing the methacryloyl anhydride to the gelatin ratio. A range of gelatin-based materials with different DOF's can be obtained using this reaction.
Acrylate functionalized gelatin was processed into films to examine the effect of crosslinking on mechanical properties. The film samples for the study were prepared ;0 according to the procedures outlined hereinbelow. The effects of photoinitiator concentration and irradiation time on the crosslinking process were investigated. The results of these studies could then be used to optimize the crosslinking conditions during fiber production.
Crosslinking optimization studies were performed on film samples since they were much easier to process than the fiber samples.
;5 For the first study three samples were prepared. The concentration of gelatin methacrylamide was the same in each of the three samples while the photoinitiator concentration was varied from standard to high. The solvent was allowed to evaporate and the film samples were formed. The dry films were exposed to an hour of irradiation using a Dyna-~0 Lume visible light source at 70mW/cm2. The sample was cut into strips for tensile testing.
The studies were then performed on the hydrated samples. Eight samples were tested for each photoinitiator concentration.
Fig. 25 shows the stress-strain data for crosslinked gelatin methacrylamide films with 45 varying photoinitiator concentration. Going from the standard to medium photoinitiator concentration provides a moderate increase in modulus while significantly decreasing the strain to failure. However, going from medium to high photoinitiator concentrations decreased the modulus slightly. Hubell et. al have previously reported that the photopolymerization process can be adversely affected by increasing the concentration of TEA. Increased TEA
concentrations are believed to lead to more radicals being generated, and these radicals in turn 0 can react and terminate the process. However, increasing VP concentration negates the effect of increasing TEA concentration by providing more sites where the photo-generated radicals can attack. The potentially negative effect of increased TEA concentration is overcome by increased VP concentration at medium photoinitiator concentration. However at the high concentration conditions, the TEA effect dominates, leading to a decrease in the modulus. In 5 going from standard to medium concentration the gain in the modulus was not appreciable.
Moreover, it is desirable to use as little of the photoinitiator as possible to achieve the desired level of crosslinking. Accordingly, it was decided to use the standard concentration for the remainder of the study.
.0 To study the effect of irradiation time on the degree of crosslinking, seven 5 wt%
gelatin methacrylamide solution samples were prepared. Each sample was irradiated by a visible light source for varying lengths of time starting from 1/a hour to 3 1/a hours. Fig. 26 shows the ultimate tensile strength, modulus, and strain to failure of hydrated samples as a function of irradiation time. The ultimate tensile strength and the modulus increased. with ;5 increasing irradiation times while the strain to failure decreased. No significant change in the mechanical properties is observed past two hours of irradiation. The mechanical data indicate that two hours of visible light irradiation is sufficient to complete the crosslinking reaction in the conditions described herein. .
~0 To ascertain whether the reaction had gone to completion, 13C solid-state NMIZ
spectroscopy was conducted on the samples from the same batch that was used for used for tensile testing. The crosslinked sample was irradiated for two hours. The 13C
CP/MAS/TOSS
spectra of gelatin methacrylamide and crosslinked gelatin methacrylamide is shown in Fig. 27.
The gelatin methacrylamide spectrum shows two resonances due to the double bond carbons.
s 5 However, in the spectrum of the crosslinked material these resonances have completely disappeared, indicating that the crosslinking reaction has gone to completion.
When the NMR
data is taken in conjunction with the mechanical data, it conclusively shows that crosslinking is complete for the given DOF in two hours. Although time consuming, solid-state NMR can be used to map the degree of crosslinking as a function of irradiation time.
An approximate degree of crosslinking can be calculated using the rubber elasticity theory.
According to the 0 theory the modulus is given by E=3pRTlM~
where E is the modulus, p is the density, R the gas constant, T the temperature, and M~the average molecular weight between crosslinks. M~ can be calculated from the measured modulus (from the tensile testing experiments) and this quantity is inversely proportional to the 5 degree of crosslinking. Thus degree of crosslinking is directly proportional to the modulus of the material. Thus modulus measurements can also be used to provide a rough estimate of the degree of crosslinking. Natural elastin has a modulus of abut 0.9 to about 1.1 MP*.
Calculations show that about 50 to about 75 % cross linking is needed in the crosslinked modified elastin or elastin mimetic in order to mimic the elastic modulus of native arterial ;0 elastin. An IR spectroscopic analysis, especially with respect to the C=C
stretch at 1650-1680 cm 1 of the methacrylamide-functionalized elastin led to an estimate of the %
of cross linkage (based on Peak deconvolution) at about 53 to 64 % .
Electrospinning was also used to produce acrylate modified fibers and fabric networks ;5 of crosslinked gelatin. The description of the apparatus has been provided in detail in the previous section. The field strength, deposition distance and flow rate were kept constant at 18 kV, 10 cm, and 30 ~,L/min respectively. 18-kV field strength and 10-cm deposition distance seemed to provide the best fiber splays, while increasing the flow rate beyond 30~,L/min lead to the formation of droplets. Fibers formed from both unmodified gelatin and ~0 acrylate modified gelatin using the aforementioned parameters were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy to delineate their morphology. The concentration of gelatin in solution was found to be the major variable affecting fiber morphology.
SEM micrographs of unmodified gelatin fibers electrospun from a 25 wt%
solution .5 show that uniform fibers in the 200-500 nm diameter range were produced.
For SEM
examination of fibers spun from 15 and 20 wt% solutions of acrylated gelatin containing standard concentration of the photoinitiator, the fibers formed from the 15 wt% solution showed significant beading. Beading in electrospun fibers is undesirable and lead to poor mechanical properties. Reneker et. al have reported that addition of NaCI to the solution mixture decreases the beads formed during electrospinning. However, the fibers formed from LO the 20 wt% solution of gelatin methacrylamide showed lesser propensity to form beads when compared to fibers formed from the 15 wt% solution. Although spinning experiments have not been carried out on 25 wt% solutions of the acrylated gelatin, the fibers formed from 25 wt% unmodified gelatin in water suggest that increasing concentration will yield non-beaded fibers obviating the need for the addition of NaCI or any other salt. The fiber diameters in case 5 of the acrylate modified samples were in the 500 to 1500nm diameter range.
The significant increase in the fiber diameter in the acrylated fibers is due to bead formation.
Electrospinning for extended periods of time will yield a nonwoven fabric network that consists of nano-diameter fibers. However, if a rotating mandrel is used instead of a plate, a '0 nonwoven tube of crosslinked gelatin can be produced. Fig. 29A shows a nonwoven tube of crosslinked gelatin, 5 cm in length and 14 mm in diameter. The diameter of the tubes can be varied by increasing or decreasing the size of the mandrel. Fig. 29B also shows the tube in the hydrated state (i.e., immersed in water). The tube retains its shape even after prolonged immersion in water, indicating that the crosslinking reaction has proceeded to completion.
~.5 Thus using the electrospinning method and the chemistry outlined one can begin to form constructs, which may have applications in the medical field.
The network porosity of the nonwoven fabrics was measured using pulsed field gradient NMR spectroscopy (PFGNMR). In the case of free diffusion through Brownian motion, a .0 concentration gradient initially having the form of a pulse will gradually become Gaussian with time. However in case of diffusion in a confinement or pore, the concentration profile does not become Gaussian due to the limitation imposed by the pore boundaries. At a time when the diffusion profile in the pore becomes independent of time, it becomes a measure of the pore radius or size if the self diffusion coefficient (D) of the fluid is known a prioYi. PFGNMR
~5 utilizes this concept for the measurement of pore sizes.
Fig. 29A shows the diffusion profiles measured as a function of the magnetic field gradient strength (G) for varying lengths of time. It can be observed that the profiles measured at 800 ms and 1000 ms are almost similar indicating that the diffusion profile has equilibrated with time. Thus, the 1000-ms diffusion profile can be used to determine the pore size. In Fig.
29B the normalized intensity is plotted as a function of a parameter a2 that is given by az - Yz~zGz L 0 5 , where y is the gyromagnetic ratio, G the magnetic field gradient and b is the time between gradients. In the case where the pore sizes are uniform, a plot of normalized intensity versus a2 would be linear with a slope that is related to the pore size. It is clearly seen from the figure that the plot is nonlinear suggesting a distribution of pore sizes. In order to determine an average pore size one can use any distribution that is realistic and fits the data l5 well. In this case we have employed a Gaussian distribution of pore sizes.
The mathematical relationship between the diffusion profile and the pore radius in the case of a Gaussian distribution of pore sizes has already been determined by Callaghan et. al,.
~ IC~G)0) =-a2Ro2 ('1+a'zaz~ 1- 2lnCl+a'Zaz~ (1) where Rfl is the mean pore radius, and az is the twice the variance of the distribution. Figure ~0 10(b) shows the fit using (1) to the 1000-ms data. Nonlinear optimization module of Mathematics software was used for fit. From the fit, an average pore size of 73.4 ~,m with a standard deviation of 33.6 ~,m was obtained.
Monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies, preferably monoclonal, specifically reacting with 25 a particular protein of interest rnay be made by methods known in the art.
See, e. g. , Harlow and Lane (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories; Goding (1986) Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice, 2d ed., Academic Press, New York.
Standard techniques for cloning, DNA isolation, amplification and purification, for 30 enzymatic reactions involving DNA ligase, DNA polymerase, restriction endonucleases and the like, and various separation techniques are those known and commonly employed by those skilled in the art. A number of standard techniques are described in Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Plainview, New York;
Maniatis et al. (1982) Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Plainview, New York; Wu (ed.) (1993) Meth. Enzymol. 2~8, Part I; Wu (ed.) (1979) Meth Enzymol. 68; Wu et al. (eds.) (1983) Meth. Enzymol. 100 and 101; Grossman and Moldave (eds.) Meth.
Enzymol. 65; Miller (ed.) (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor 0 Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Old and Primrose (1981) Principles of Gene Manipulation, University of California Press, Berkeley; Schleif and Wensink (1982) Practical Methods in Molecular Biology; Glover (ed.) (1985) DNA Cloning Vol. I and II, IRL Press, Oxford, UK; Hames and Higgins (eds.) (1985) NucleicAcid Hybridization, IRL
Press, Oxford, UK; and Setlow and Hollaender (1979) Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, Vols.
5 1-4, Plenum Press, New York. Abbreviations and nomenclature, where employed, are deemed standard in the field and commonly used in professional journals such as those cited herein.
All references cited in the present application are incorporated by reference herein to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the present disclosure.
;0 The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as claimed herein. Any variations in the exemplified articles which occur to the skilled artisan are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention.
;5 EXAMPLES
Example 1: Production of the Synthetic Elastin An elastin-mimetic synthetic protein ((-Val-Pro-Gly-Val-Gly-)4(-Val-Pro-Gly-Lys-Gly ))s9 of molecular weight 81 kDa was synthesized by a recombinant genetic engineering method, ~0 the details of which have been reported elsewhere (McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32:
3643-3648; McMillan, R. A. and Conticello, R. P. (2000) Macromolecules 33:
4809-4821;
McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 32: 9067-9070]. A concatameric synthetic gene of 3000 base pairs encodes a repetitive polypeptide comprising 39 repeats of the elastin-mimetic sequence. The protein polymer was expressed from recombinant plasmid pRAMl in E. coli ~5 strain BLR(DE3) under the regulatory control of a lac promoter with isopropyl ~3-thiogalactopyranoside induction. It was purified to a high yield (64 mg/L) by reversible, temperature-induced precipitation from the cell lysate. The sequence of the protein polymer has been confirmed by automated Edman degradation and MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy of site-specific proteolytic cleavage fragments. Structural analysis of this recombinant protein has also included SDS PAGE, as well as 1H and 13C NMR [McMillan et al. (1999) Macromolecules 0 32: 3643-3648; McMillan, R. A. and Conticello, R. P. (2000) Macromolecules 33: 4809-4821] .
Example 2: Other Materials Low molecular weight silicone oils from Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
5 were used as standards for measurements of solution viscosity.
Methacryloyl anhydride, eosin Y (EY, 5 wt% in water), triethanolamine (TEA) and 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (VP) were obtained from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI) and were used as received. A UV sensitive radical photoinitiator 1-(4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl)-2-hydroxy-2-,0 methyl-1-propan-1-one (Irgacure 2959) was kindly supplied by Ciba Speciality Chemicals (Tarrytown, NY). Dialysis was conducted using Spectra/pro membrane (MWCO 6000-8000) obtained from VWR Scientific (West Chester, PA).
Polyethylene oxide) (PEO) with a nominal molecular weight of 900 kD was obtained ;5 from Aldrich. Acid-soluble collagen was derived from tail tendons obtained from Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 250 to 350 grams using a protocol similar to that described by Silver and Trelstad.l9 Briefly, tendon fibers were extracted from rat tails using a wire stripper, immersed in 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0; 10 fibers per 100 mL), and stirred for 4 hours at room temperature. The soluble component was separated from the insoluble portion after .0 centrifugation at 30,OOOg at 4 °C for 30 min and then sequentially filtered through 0.65 and 0.45 ~,m filters (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). NaCI was added to the filtrate so as to obtain a salt concentration of 0.7 M. The mixture was then allowed to stir for 1 hour and the precipitate collected after an one-hour centrifugation at 30,000 g and 4 °C. The pellet was allowed to dissolve overnight in 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0) and dialyzed against 20 mM
phosphate 05 buffer (disodium hydrogen phosphate at pH 7.4) for at least 8 hours at room temperature. A
second dialysis was then performed against a 20 mM phosphate buffer solution for at least 4 hours at 4 °C. The dialyzate was centrifuged at 30,000 g at 4 °C
for 1 hour and the pellet was then dialyzed overnight against a solution of 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0) to obtain a collagen solution at a final concentration of 10 mg/mL. The solution was stored at 4 °C.
0 Lyophilized collagen was obtained by dialyzing the collagen solution overnight against distilled, deionized water (18 MS2~cm, Continental), followed by lyophilization. Prior to use, lyophilized collagen was dissolved in 10 mM HCl at room temperature for 1 hour. The identity and purity of the collagen samples was confirmed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis .
Gelatin (Type A - Porcine Skin, 300 Bloom; product #G-2500) and 2,2,2-trifluororethanol were purchased from Sigma Chemical Inc., St. Louis, MO.
Methacryloyl anhydride (94 % ), Eosin-Y Swt. % in water, 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (99 + %), and triethanolamine (98 % ) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Inc. , Milwaukee, WI.
;0 Phosphate buffer used was an aqueous solution of sodium dihydrogen phosphate, monohydrate (J.T.Baker Inc., Phillipsburg, NJ) and disodium hydrogen phosphate (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) .
Example 3: Fiber Spinning ;5 Elastin-mimetic peptide polymers were spun into fibers using an electrospinning technique, as detailed elsewhere. Briefly, peptide polymer solutions (10 - 15 wt% ) were prepared in ultrafiltered grade, distilled, deionized water (18 MS~~cm, Continental) by mixing for 12 hrs at 4°C. With the aid of a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Inc., Holliston, MA), the solution was extruded at ambient temperature and pressure and at a defined flow rate .0 through a positively charged metal blunt tipped needle (22Gx1.5 inch). The needle was connected to a 1 mL syringe using TygonT"" (trademark of San Diego Plastics, Inc. National City, CA, plastic tubing) tubing (l.6mm i.d.). Fibers were collected on a grounded aluminum plate located below the tip of the needle. A high voltage, low current power supply (ES30P/DDPM, Gamma High Voltage Research, Inc., Ormand Beach, FL) was utilized to establish the necessary electric potential gradient, which was varied between 0 and 30 kV as indicated. Either positive or negative polarity can be used to run the electrospinning process.
Vstart and Vstop, defined as the electric potential necessary to initiate or terminate jet formation, respectively were determined for different concentrations of elastin-mimetic polypeptide solutions .
Fabric samples were produced by electrospinning solutions for extended periods of time. The apparatus was modified to include a rotating mandrel to produce fabric samples.
The fabric samples were collected on an aluminum foil wrapped around the grounded mandrel placed at a prescribed horizontal distance with respect to the charged tip of the needle.
Collagen-PEO solutions (1-2 wt % ) were prepared in 10 mM HCl (pH 2.0) by mixing for 2 hours at ambient temperature. With the aid of a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Inc.), the solution was extruded at ambient temperature and pressure and at a defined flow rate through a positively charged metal blunt tipped needle (22G x 1.5 inch).
Fibers were collected ,0 on a grounded aluminum plate located below the tip of the needle. A high voltage, low current power supply (ES30P/DDPM, Gamma High Voltage Research, Inc) was utilized to establish the electric potential gradient, which was varied between 0 and 30 kV, as indicated.
Example 4: Synthesis of Methacrylate-Modified Elastin and Fiber Spinning ;5 The procedure for acrylate modification of amino-containing compounds developed by Van den Bulcke et al. was followed [Van Den Bulcke et al. (2000) Biomacromolecules 1: 31] .
The elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide was dissolved in pH 7.5 phosphate buffer solution. The solution was cooled to 5 °C and an excess of methacryloyl anhydride was added. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 8 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted and was dialyzed .0 against distilled water at room temperature for 48 hours with frequent changes in the dialyzate solution. The dialyzate was subsequently freeze-dried and stored at room temperature. The degree of functionalization (DOF) was defined as the ratio of amino moieties functionalized to the total number of amino moieties in elastin prior to functionalization.
DOF could be varied by changing the methacryloyl anhydride to elastin ratio.
Electrospinning was used to spin fibers of AME from aqueous solutions.
Solution concentration, flow rate and operating voltage were found to be the critical parameters 0 affecting the spinning process. The details of the technique and optimization of process parameters to yield smooth nanofibers have been discussed in detail in an earlier report.
[Huang et al. (2000) MacYOmolecules 33, 2989]. A solution of 10-15 wt% AME(65) polymer in ddH20 was prepared with the addition of 5 wt% (of the protein polymer content) of triethanolamine, as free radical crosslinker. For example, to each 100 mgs of protein polymer, 5 5 mgs of triethanolamine or approximately 50 ,uL of the stock EY/TEA/VP
solution was added. A field strength of 18 kV was chosen for fiber formation and the distance between the syringe tip and the collecting plate was fixed at 15 cm. The flow rate was 50 ~.1/min. A stock solution of EY photoinitiator was prepared as 10 mM EY, 225 mM TEA, and 37 mM
VP in water. Irgacure 2959 was directly added to the prepared protein solution.
,0 For the purpose of crosslinking studies four samples of 15 wt% AME(65) solution in ddH20 were prepared. Eosin Y was added to the first solution (amount of photoinitiator corresponded to 3 wt% of the protein in solution) and IRGACURE 2959°
was added to the second (amount of photoinitiator corresponded to 6 wt% of the protein in solution). In order ;5 to ensure uniform dispersion of the photoinitiator, both solutions were stirred in the dark for 12 hours. Additional samples that did not contain photoinitiator were irradiated and used for comparative analysis. All samples were dried under vacuum for 24 hours.
Subsequent to drying, the Eosin Y and Irgacure containing samples were irradiated under visible light for 45 minutes and UV light (365 nm) for 30 minutes, respectively.
.0 Example 5: Preparation of non-woven acrylated gelatin fabrics:
To prepare acrylate modified gelatin, a 5-weight % solution of gelatin was made in lOmM phosphate buffer solution, pH 7.5. To this solution a four times excess of methacryloyl anhydride (in relation to target amino acid residues) was added to the solution.
The reaction was then stirred at 40°C for 4 hours. The solution was then dialyzed using a SpectralPor membrane (MWCO: 6-8,000) against 60 volumes of ddH20 at 40°C for 48hrs with constant changes in the dialyzing solution. The solution was then lyophilized and the dialyzate was stored at -30°C.
5 % weight solutions (150mg of acrylated gelatin in 1278~,L ddH20/ 222,uL
photo initiator solution) were prepared and plated into 29.14 cm2 polystyrene dishes. Solutions were made using the standard, medium and high photoinitiator preparations. The solvent was allowed to evaporate at room temperature (24°C, 43 % relative humidity). After drying, the 5 samples were exposed to a visible light source (Dyna-Lume "dyna-light" #240-380, 70mW/cm2) for various periods from 30 minutes to 31/2 hours for crosslinking.
The films were then prepared for mechanical testing as outlined earlier.
The gelatin electrospinning apparatus consisted of a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus), ;0 a syringe, an I8 gauge blunt end needle (Popper and Sons, Inc.), a grounded rotating metallic l4mm O.D. mandrel (for production of tubes), a grounded lOcm by 10 cm aluminum covered plate (for flat fabric production), an electric mandrel rotor, a Dyna-Lume °'dyna-light" #240-380, and a high voltage source (Gamma High Voltage, HV power supply, c.f., Figure 1(a)).
Solutions of gelatin and acrylated gelatin (150 mgs) were prepared in concentrations from '.5 l0wt% to 25wt% in ddH20 along with 222 ~,L of the high concentration photo initiator solution. The syringe containing the acrylated gelatin/photo initiator solution was shielded during spinning with an opaque tape to prevent premature crosslinking. The needle was heated using a heating lamp to avoid gelation in the needle and to maintain uniform flow rate.
The temperature profile across the syringe and the needle was obtained with a type K
.0 thermocouple. Temperature readings were obtained across four points (labeled Tl through T4 in the figure) in the syringe. The profiles were measured after steady state had been achieved.
By varying the setting on the heat lamp, the temperature in the needle could be adjusted to desired levels. The temperature was maintained between 45 and 55 °C.
The applied field of lBkV and deposition distance of 10 cm were kept constant for all runs. A flow rate of 30 ~uL/min was maintained during electrospinning, because flow rates in excess of 30 ,uL/min produced droplets. The fibers on deposition were exposed to light throughout the spinning process and for an additional two hours after fiber spinning had ceased. To function as a release agent a layer of polyethylene oxide (MW " 900 kDa) was deposited on the aluminum foil to achieve a 100~,m thick covering. The acrylated gelatin fibers were then deposited on 0 top of the PEO layer. Deposition time varied depending on the volume of material to be spun.
Example 6: Image capture of non-woven fabric samples and analysis of fiber diameter and orientation distribution Fabrics were generated by electrospinning at a 150 ,ul/min from a 15 wt%
solution of 5 elastin-mimetic peptide polymer. Specimens were placed directly on a mirror and imaged using a directional lighting arrangement where light is collimated using an "on-axis" system comprised of both a diffuser and a beam-splitter. Light passes through the sample and is reflected vertically off the mirror surface back to a CCD camera. Specular reflections from fiber surfaces do not reach the camera. Thus, fibers, regardless of their position within the ,0 fabric, merely block the light, appear dark, and are in focus. Captured images underwent segmentation or "threshholding" in order to isolate individual fibers from background. In this process, local contrast enhancement procedures were utilized including relaxation and edge thresholding techniques. Analysis also required skeletonizing of the image in which the backbone of individual fibers, corresponding to an image one pixel wide, was determined.
;5 Skeletonizing requires generating a "distance map" of the image that represents the minimum distance from each pixel belonging to an object to the background. Therefore, the highest value in the distance transform image correlates with the object center, and the peak line coincides with the axis or skeleton of the object. By using the skeleton as a guide for tracking the distance transformed image, the intensities (distances) from the fiber center to background ~0 can be determined in order to compute the diameter at all points along the skeleton. Similarly, fiber orientation is characterized by utilizing a chord-tracking algorithm, which tracks fixed small segments of individual fibers. Details of these automated image analysis techniques, as applied to fiber networks in the form of non-woven fabrics, are provided elsewhere [Pourdeyhimi et al (1999) Textile Res. J. 69: 233-236; Pourdeyhimi et al (2001) Textile Res.
J. 71: 157-164]. Analysis of fiber diameter and orientation distribution was based upon a minimum of 10 image fields obtained from at least two separate samples.
Example 7: Stress-strain properties of non-woven fabrics Uniaxial tensile tests were performed elastin-mimetic materials on a Textechno Favimat 0 (Herbert Stein GmbH & Co. KG, Germany). Dry samples were tested at an extension rate of 5 mm/min and an initial gauge length of 10 mm. The maximum range of the load cell is 210 cN. A total of eight samples were analyzed.
Uniaxial tensile testing of collagen/PEO material was performed on a Minimat 5 (Miniature Materials Tester, Rheometric Scientific, Inc., Piscataway, NJ).
Dry collagen-PEO
fabric samples were tested at an extension rate of 2 mm/min and at an initial gage length of 8mm. The maximum range of the load cell is 20 N. A total of six samples were analyzed.
Samples thickness was determined by use of a profilometer (Tencor Alphastep 500) at different points along the sample and an average sample thickness of 0.05 mm was obtained. The ,0 samples were cut at a width of Smm.
A miniature materials tester Minimat 2000 (Rheometric Scientific, Piscataway, NJ) was used to determine the tensile properties of the unmodified and the modified elastin fabrics . The machine was used in the tensile deformation mode with a 20N load cell and a strain rate of 1 ;5 mm/min. Fabric samples (lOmm x 1.5 mm ~e 0.05 mm) were used as test specimens with a gauge length of 8mm. For each sample, eight specimens were tested and average modulus and tensile strength values were determined.
Example 8: Instrumentation .0 All 1H NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker AMX 500 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 500 MHz. Thirty-two scans were acquired for signal-to-noise averaging. A recycle delay of 30 seconds was used to ensure quantitative spectra. In all cases D20 was used as the internal standard and a concentration of IO mg/ml wa's employed.
All solid-state NMR experiments were conducted at room temperature on a Bruker DSX
300 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 300 MHz in a Bruker double 0 resonance MAS probehead. Standard cross polarization (CP) pulse sequence was employed under conditions of magic angle spinning (MAS). A spinning speed of 5 kHz was employed.
A TOSS sequence was used in conjunction with CP to provide a spectrum free of spinning sidebands [Dixon, W. T. (1982) J. Chem. Phys. 77, 1800; Dixon et al. (1982) J.
Magh.
Reson. 49, 341]. A 4.5-,us 1H 90° pulse, a 1-ms contact time, a 9-,us 13C 180° pulse and a 3-5 sec recycle delay were employed with 5000 - 16000 scans accumulated for signal averaging.
In studies of collagen fibers, all 1H NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Bruker AMX 500 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 500 MHz.
Thirty-two scans were acquired for signal-to-noise averaging and a recycle delay of 30 seconds ,0 was used to ensure quantitative spectra. In all cases D2O was used as the internal standard and a concentration of 10 mg/mL was employed.
All solid-state NMR experiments were conducted at room temperature on a Bruker DSX
300 spectrometer operating at a 1H resonance frequency of 300 MHz in a Bruker double ,5 resonance MAS probehead. Standard cross polarization (CP) pulse sequence was employed under conditions of magic angle spinning (MAS). A spinning speed of S kHz was employed.
A TOSS sequence was used in conjunction with CP to provide a spectrum free of spinning sidebands.a° A 4.5-,us 1H 90° pulse, a 1-ms contact time, a 9-,us I3C 180° pulse, and a 3-sec recycle delay were employed with accumulation of 5000 to 16000 scans for signal averaging.
.0 Direct polarization (DP) experiments were conducted with a recycle delay of 1 s, a 13C
90°pulse length of 4.5 ,us, and a MAS rate of 5 kHz. For DP
experiments, 1024 scans were acquired.
1H Bipolar magnetization transfer experiments were conducted under static conditions (without magic-angle sample spinning). Recycle delays of 5 s, 1H 90°
pulse lengths of 4.5 ,us, and 1H 180° pulse lengths of 9 ,us were used. The timing diagram for the spin diffusion pulse sequence has been reported in detail elsewhere.21 A Bipolar filter selection sequence consisting of twelve 90° pulses separated by 10-,us delays was employed for 20 consecutive loops to 0 establish the initial magnetization gradient. Thirty-two scans were accumulated for signal averaging and the spin diffusion time (tSD) was incremented from 1,us to 800 ms. Correction for spin-lattice relaxation during the spin diffusion time was achieved by repeating the experiment with the selection filter removed (# Bipolar filter cycles, n = 0).
The data acquired with and without the selection cycles were normalized with respect to the first time point and 5 the spectral intensity corresponding to the mobile domain. The ratio of IPSO
(with selection) to IpEO (without selection) provided the spin diffusion data as a function of tSD.
In order to examine the chemical structure of the component selected using the Bipolar filter, a CP sequence was appended to the Bipolar filter sequence. For this experiment, a 3-sec !0 recycle delay, a 4.5-,us 1H 90° pulse, and a 1-ms contact time were used. The experiment was conducted under conditions of MAS with a spinning speed of 5 kHz and 10,000 scans were acquired for signal averaging.
Temperature-dependent turbidimetry measurements were recorded in an Ultrospec !5 UV/visible spectrophotometer equipped with a programmable Peltier Cell and temperature control unit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. (Piscataway, NJ). Inverse temperature transitions of elastin-mimetic polypentapeptide and its acrylate modified analogs were monitored in ddH20 solution (concentration of 0.5 - 0.7 mg/ml) at 280 nm.
SO An in-lens field emission scamiing electron microscope (ISI DS-130F
Schottky Field Emission SEM, York Electron Optics Ltd., York, UK) was used and operated at 5 or 25 kV.
High-definition topographic images at low ("' 1,000 x) and medium (30,000 x) magnifications and high resolution, and high magnification images (z 100,000x) were digitally recorded with very short dwell times and without beam induced damage. Fiber samples were deposited onto i5 silicon chips for SEM studies. The silicon chips were subsequently mounted onto aluminum specimen stubs with silver paste, degassed for 30 minutes, and coated with a 1 nm chromium (Cr) ultrathin film using a Denton DV-602 Turbo Magnetron Sputter System.
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging a JEOL 1210 TEM was operated at 70 kV voltage. Fiber samples were deposited onto silicon chips and carbon coated grids for 0 scanning and transmission EM studies, respectively. Samples containing silicon chips were subsequently mounted onto aluminum specimen stubs with silver paste, degassed for 30 minutes, and coated with a 1 nm chromium (Cr) ultrathin film using a Denton DV-602 Turbo Magnetron Sputter System.
5 Visible light irradiation was performed using a DynaLume quartz halogen illuminator equipped with a heat shield obtained from Scientific Instruments. Ultraviolet irradiation was performed with an UVP 8-watt handheld model (model UVL-18) operating at 365 nm.
Bulk viscosity was determined using silicone oil viscosity standards (Brookfield ;0 Engineering Laboratories, Inc.) and solution conductivity determined using a conductivity flow cell (BIORAD, Hercules, CA).
Table I. The viscosity for the 2wt% Lyophilized Collagen of different PEO
ratio and fixed 34 mM NaCI
Collagen PEO Collagen / PEO weightViscosity Concentration Concentration ratio (cp) m /ml Mg/ml 20 0.67 30 : 1 289 20 2 10 : 1 475 20 4 5 : 1 592 20 10 2 : 1 1150 20 20 1 : 1 5536 40 I 1 : 2 - ~ 6198 Table II. Conductivity of the 2wt% Lyophilized Collagen Dissolved in the HCl solution (pH=2.0) [NaCI] mM 1 2 3 Average Conductivity 0 1.45 1.42 1.44 1.44 15 1.54 1.56 1.55 1.55 25 2.06 2.05 2.06 ~ 2.06 _ -34 2.27 2.26 2.25 2.26 Table III. The ultimate tensile strength and modulus of pure PE , collagen/PEO
of 1 1 and 1 : 2 weight ratio nonwoven fabric samples Fabric Samples Tensile Strength (Mpa)Modulus (Gpa) Pure PEO 0.09 0.007 1 : 1 Collagen/PEO 0.37 0.012 1 : 2 Collagen/PEO 0.27 0.008 SEQUENCE LISTING
<110> Emory University Chaikof, Elliot Huang, Lei Nagapudi, Karthik Conticello, Vincent <120> Native Protein Mimetic Fibers, Fiber Networks and Fabrics for Medical Use <130> 29-OZ WO
<140> unassigned <141> 2001-04-20 <l50> US 60/221,828 <151> 2000-07-28 <150> US 60/198,792 <151> 2000-04-20 <160> 4 <170> PatentIn version 3.0 <210> 1 <211> 4 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motif of elastin mimetic protein.
<400> 1 Val Pro Gly Gly <210> 2 <211> 5 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motif in elastin mimetic protein <400> 2 Val Pro Gly Val Gly , <210> 3 <211> 6 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motif in elastin mimetic protein <400> 3 Ala Pro Gly Val Gly Val <210> 4 <211> 25 <212> PRT
<213> artificial, sequence motifs in elastin mimetic protein <400> 4 Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Val Gly Val Pro Gly Lys Gly
Claims (20)
1. A fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric comprising at least one cross linked protein selected from the group consisting of elastin, an elastin mimetic protein, gelatin and collagen.
2. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 1 further comprising a synthetic polymer.
3 The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 2 wherein the synthetic polymer is water soluble polymer.
4. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 3 wherein the water soluble polymer is poly(ethylene oxide).
5. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim of claims 1 to 4 wherein the cross linked protein is formed from a functionalized protein, wherein a functional group is selected from the group consisting of acrylamide moiety, a methacrylamide moiety and a vinyl group.
6. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 5 wherein the functional moiety is a vinyl group or a methacrylamide and wherein cross linking is mediated by a photoinitiator and photoirradiation.
7. The fibers, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 4 or 5 wherein the crosslinking is mediated by glutaraldehyde.
8. The fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 5 wherein the fibers are present as alternating layers of cross linked collagen and cross linked gelatin.
9. The fiber network or nonwoven of claim 5 wherein the fibers are present as alternating layers of cross linked collagen and cross linked elastin or cross linked elastin mimetic protein.
10. The fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 10 wherein the proteins are cross linked after layering of the cross linked collagen and cross linked gelatin.
11. The fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 10 further comprising living cells.
12. The fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 11 wherein the living cells are selected from the group consisting of endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, stem cells, chondrocyytes, osteoblasts or a human or animal cell which has been transformed or transfected to produce a protein of interest.
13. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 3 wherein the fiber formed of cross linked collagen and poly(ethylene) oxide.
14. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 13 further comprising at least one therapeutic compound.
15. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of claim 14 wherein the at least one therapeutic compound promotes wound healing.
16. The fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of any of claims 4 to 15 wherein said fiber network or nonwoven fabric is fabricated as a planar sheet or as a tubular conduit.
17. The use of the fiber, fiber network or nonwoven fabric of any of claims 2 to 16 in the fabrication of a medical implant or wound dressing having improved biocompatibility over non biomaterial implants.
18. The use according to claim 17 wherein the medical implant is a graft for skin, vein, artery, ureter, bladder, esophagus, intestine, stomach, heart valve, heart muscle or tendon.
19. The use of claim 17 wherein implant is used to reinforce closure of a surgical incision.
20. The use according to claim 17 wherein the surgical incision is associated with a lung biopsy or an intestinal anastomasis.
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US19879200P | 2000-04-20 | 2000-04-20 | |
US60/198,792 | 2000-04-20 | ||
US22182800P | 2000-07-28 | 2000-07-28 | |
US60/221,828 | 2000-07-28 | ||
PCT/US2001/012918 WO2001080921A2 (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2001-04-20 | Native protein mimetic fibers, fiber networks and fabrics for medical use |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2406862A1 true CA2406862A1 (en) | 2001-11-01 |
Family
ID=26894159
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002406862A Abandoned CA2406862A1 (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2001-04-20 | Native protein mimetic fibers, fiber networks and fabrics for medical use |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1274469A2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2004525268A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2001255544A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2406862A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001080921A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020081732A1 (en) | 2000-10-18 | 2002-06-27 | Bowlin Gary L. | Electroprocessing in drug delivery and cell encapsulation |
WO2001078800A1 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2001-10-25 | Emory University | Antithrombogenic membrane mimetic compositions and methods |
AU2001283055A1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2002-02-13 | Emory University | Biological component comprising artificial membrane |
AU2438702A (en) | 2000-10-18 | 2002-04-29 | Univ Virginia Commonwealth | Electroprocessing in drug delivery and cell encapsulation |
ES2312495T3 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2009-03-01 | Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation | ELECTROPROCESSED COLLAGEN. |
WO2002055021A2 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2002-07-18 | Univ Emory | Glycopolymers and free radical polymerization methods |
EP1545638A1 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2005-06-29 | Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd. | Controlled release therapeutic wound dressings |
GB2393724B (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2006-04-12 | Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd | Controlled release therapeutic wound dressings |
EP1422242A1 (en) * | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-26 | Emory University | Plastic and elastic protein copolymers |
JP2004231633A (en) * | 2002-11-22 | 2004-08-19 | Emory Univ | Plastic and elastic protein copolymer |
AU2003236491B2 (en) * | 2002-11-22 | 2010-05-13 | Emory University | Plastic and elastic protein copolymers |
US20040126405A1 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2004-07-01 | Scimed Life Systems, Inc. | Engineered scaffolds for promoting growth of cells |
WO2004062697A2 (en) | 2003-01-07 | 2004-07-29 | Tufts University | Silk fibroin materials and use thereof |
EP1698356A4 (en) * | 2003-12-26 | 2007-03-14 | Cardio Inc | Decellularized tissue and method of preparing the same |
US7833978B2 (en) | 2004-02-20 | 2010-11-16 | Emory University | Thrombomodulin derivatives and conjugates |
US7824672B2 (en) | 2004-03-26 | 2010-11-02 | Emory University | Method for coating living cells |
WO2006041130A1 (en) * | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | National University Corporation Hokkaido University | Gel for zymography |
US7993738B2 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2011-08-09 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Modified porous materials and method of forming the same |
US8728463B2 (en) | 2005-03-11 | 2014-05-20 | Wake Forest University Health Science | Production of tissue engineered digits and limbs |
CA2602050C (en) | 2005-03-11 | 2013-12-03 | Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Production of tissue engineered heart valves |
US20060204539A1 (en) | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-14 | Anthony Atala | Electrospun cell matrices |
JP5232636B2 (en) | 2005-03-11 | 2013-07-10 | ウエイク・フオレスト・ユニバーシテイ・ヘルス・サイエンシズ | Tissue engineered blood vessels |
US8846624B2 (en) | 2006-09-11 | 2014-09-30 | Emory University | Modified protein polymers |
CA2669114C (en) | 2006-11-13 | 2014-12-16 | The University Of Sydney | Use of tropoelastin for repair or restoration of tissue |
WO2008093342A2 (en) | 2007-02-01 | 2008-08-07 | Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd. | Albumin fibers and fabrics and methods of generating and using same |
DE102007044648B4 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2020-11-26 | Carl Freudenberg Kg | Bioresorbable gelatin non-woven fabric |
EP2295630A1 (en) * | 2009-09-11 | 2011-03-16 | Basf Se | Method for producing coated protein fibres |
US10092679B2 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2018-10-09 | Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Laminous vascular constructs combining cell sheet engineering and electrospinning technologies |
CN105326581B (en) * | 2015-09-29 | 2017-12-26 | 中国科学院金属研究所 | A kind of method for preparing polyethylene glycol protein fiber composite heart valve prosthesis |
JP6612664B2 (en) * | 2016-03-16 | 2019-11-27 | 株式会社東芝 | Fiber orientation sheet |
US10801140B2 (en) | 2016-03-16 | 2020-10-13 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Fiber sheet and method for manufacturing same |
CN111529759B (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2021-12-07 | 东华大学 | Macroporous bone tissue engineering scaffold capable of sustainably releasing inorganic active ingredients and preparation method thereof |
CN111961164B (en) * | 2020-09-18 | 2022-04-05 | 宜宾惠美纤维新材料股份有限公司 | Cashmere protein and preparation method of cashmere protein fiber |
EP4292618A1 (en) * | 2021-02-09 | 2023-12-20 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | Gelatine-containing device |
CN113230461B (en) * | 2021-05-06 | 2022-02-15 | 东华大学 | Micro-nanofiber-hydrogel tissue engineering ureter and preparation method thereof |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4474851A (en) * | 1981-10-02 | 1984-10-02 | The University Of Alabama In Birmingham | Elastomeric composite material comprising a polypeptide |
WO1987006238A1 (en) * | 1986-04-17 | 1987-10-22 | University Of Alabama At Birmingham | Segmented polypeptide bioeleastomers to modulate elastic modulus |
FR2655048A1 (en) * | 1989-11-27 | 1991-05-31 | Inst Nat Sante Rech Med | PROCESS FOR OBTAINING BIOACTIVE COPOLYMERS BY GRAFTING VINYL PATTERNS AND RESULTING GRAFT COPOLYMERS. |
AU737125B2 (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 2001-08-09 | Kenton W. Gregory | Method for using tropoelastin and for producing tropoelastin biomaterials |
AU736784B2 (en) * | 1997-06-03 | 2001-08-02 | Celltran Limited | New medicaments based on polymers composed of methacrylamide-modified gelatin |
DE60018814T2 (en) * | 1999-01-21 | 2006-04-06 | Nipro Corp. | Sewable membrane for adhesion prevention |
-
2001
- 2001-04-20 EP EP01928716A patent/EP1274469A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-04-20 JP JP2001578015A patent/JP2004525268A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-04-20 CA CA002406862A patent/CA2406862A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-04-20 AU AU2001255544A patent/AU2001255544A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-04-20 WO PCT/US2001/012918 patent/WO2001080921A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2001255544A1 (en) | 2001-11-07 |
WO2001080921A3 (en) | 2002-02-28 |
WO2001080921A2 (en) | 2001-11-01 |
JP2004525268A (en) | 2004-08-19 |
EP1274469A2 (en) | 2003-01-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20040110439A1 (en) | Native protein mimetic fibers, fiber networks and fabrics for medical use | |
CA2406862A1 (en) | Native protein mimetic fibers, fiber networks and fabrics for medical use | |
Daamen et al. | Elastin as a biomaterial for tissue engineering | |
Farasatkia et al. | Transparent silk/gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) fibrillar film for corneal regeneration | |
EP0850074B1 (en) | Biomaterials for preventing post-surgical adhesions comprised of hyaluronic acid derivatives | |
Khadka et al. | Protein-and peptide-based electrospun nanofibers in medical biomaterials | |
EP2125050B1 (en) | Albumin fibers and fabrics and methods of generating and using same | |
US5171273A (en) | Synthetic collagen orthopaedic structures such as grafts, tendons and other structures | |
Zhang et al. | Dehydrothermally crosslinked collagen/hydroxyapatite composite for enhanced in vivo bone repair | |
Fullana et al. | Electrospun collagen and its applications in regenerative medicine | |
Vandghanooni et al. | Natural polypeptides-based electrically conductive biomaterials for tissue engineering | |
Ghezzi et al. | Mesenchymal stem cell‐seeded multilayered dense collagen‐silk fibroin hybrid for tissue engineering applications | |
Nair et al. | Polysaccharide-based hydrogels for targeted drug delivery | |
Kathyayani et al. | Investigation of miscibiliy and physicochemical properties of synthetic polypeptide with collagen blends and their wound healing characteristics | |
JP4417909B2 (en) | Elastin molded body and production method thereof | |
CN113209384B (en) | Pelvic floor patch for gynecology and preparation method thereof | |
Ullah et al. | Current trends and biomedical applications of resorbable polymers | |
Grumezescu et al. | Materials for biomedical engineering: absorbable polymers | |
de Torre et al. | Stimuli-responsive protein fibers for advanced applications | |
Yavuzsoy | Preservation of the collagen structure by coaxial electrospinning method | |
KR20220150308A (en) | Tissue Engineering Scaffolds | |
Raj | Chitin biopolymer in tissue engineering | |
Wnek | Electrospun collagen and its applications in regenerative medicine | |
Arnoult | A Novel Benign Solution for Collagen Processing | |
Meng | Polymer biomaterial constructs for regenerative medicine and functional biological systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Discontinued |