CA1218973A - Wear and abrasion resistant wall structure, particularly for mills for grinding a charge comprising magnetic material - Google Patents

Abstract

Abstract of the Disclosure:

An abrasion or wear resistant wall structure, par-ticularly a wall in a mill for grinding a charge includ-ing magnetic material, has at least the side subjected to abrasion formed by an abrasion resistant wall material, for example in the form of shell plates and lifters.
The wall structure has magnet means so placed as to at-tract magnetic particles in the charge and retain said particles as an additional, automatically regenerating abrasion protective layer on the side of the wall subject-ed to abrasion.

Description

The present invention relates to a method for de-creasing wear on a surface due to relative movement and contact of said surface with a fluid medium of abrasive particles. Such surfaces may have the form of wall surfaces in chutes, ducts, conveyor belt unloading stations etc., but above all in mills. In the mining industry use is thus made of mills for grinding ore, in which the walls are subjected to heavy wear and are therefore constituted by or coated with a wear and abrasion resistant wall material. Such mills may comprise ball or rod mills for grinding ore containing a given amount of magnetic material. The mills may be of the type for primary and secondary grinding in which the material to be ground consists of magnetic material, for example mag-netite, and in which the coarse material of the charge con-stitutes grinding balls or pebbles, so-called autogenous grinding.
As already mentioned, the mills for such purposes must have a wear and abrasion resistant inner side. There-fore, the mills are often provided with a lining of abrasion resistant material, such as elastomeric or plastic material, ceramic material or sometimes steel material. The lining of abrasion resistant material is usually fastened by mechanical means such as fastening bolts, clamping ribs or like means.
However, in U.S. Patent 3,913,851 (October 21, 1975, Sven E.
Andersson) the inventor suggests that a wear resistant rubber lining for mills and chutes be magnetically retained to the inner side of the mill barrel or chute in that the side of the wear resistant rubber layer facing the barrel or chute has been laminated with a layer of permanent-magnetic material.

, ;) Mill linings mainly have two tasks. One is to provide a protection for the mill barrel and the end walls there-of against mechanical and corrosive abrasion, and the other is to transmit energy from the mill to the charge.
This implies that the appearanc~ of the inner side of the mill, the so-called profile, is of great importance to the grinding capacity, particularly in secondary grinding (fine grinding).
It has also been tried to improve the function and durability of the mill lining in various ways and use has been made of sundry materials having different pro-files on the inner side of the lining. Especially in handling hard minerals, such as sulphide and the like ores, steel material has had a relatively short life because a not negligible loss of material has arisen by corrosion in we-t grinding apart from the factual and virtual mechanical abrasion. Therefore ~ttempts have been made to use rubber as a substitute for steel linings.
In addition to its good wear resistant properties, com-pared to steel, rubber has a better resistance tocorrosion and also a sound reducing effect on the ~rind-ing operation. Further, the rubber lining is consider-ably more lightweight than steel linings. However, an inherent disadvantage of rubber is its lesser ability to withstand sliding abrasion, as compared to steel.
In conventional mill linings having longitudinal shell plates and so-called lifters, it is important that said lifters be replaced when they have been subjected to so heavy an abrasion that the charge begins to slide along the lining. When the lifters are exposed to sliding abrasion, they are thus subjected to acce-lerated wear, and as a consequence the interjacent shell plates will also commence to wear rapidly. To rea-lize a good lining economy the lifters therefore have to be replaced in due time; usually three to four sets of lifters are worn out for each set of shell plates.
Change of lifters is effected at a time when the lining ~8~3 profile is better than that of a new lining, as for ca-pacity and fine-grinding properties. After a change of lifters the grindin,g capacity may often be lowered by 10-20~.
Rubber lifters thus suffer from~the drawbacks that the grinding capacity will vary considerably during their life of use and tnat the lifters will have to be changed when the lining profile is at its best; in other words, one mus~ allow for a running-in pQriod of lower capacity and undesirable coarse rests in tne discharged material ground. This particularly a~plies to fine ~rinding operations in mills running at a speed of over 75% of the so-called critical sp~ed.
Exchange of lifters and barrel plates inuolves quite some costs in terms of dismounting and mounting as well as standstill costs.
It would be highly desirable if a mill lining could bR worn to the same extent all over the lining and if the life thereof could be ext~nded to periods of one year or more so that the necessary exchanges could ' be performed during normal standstill periods, that is the holiday period.
To eliminate the need for lifters in ball mills, Norwegian Patent 22,213 suggest the use of electromagnets 25' or liftina, during the rotation of the mill, the grind-ing balls of magnetic material to the requisite height level and then letting them fall onto the material be-ing gxound. ~ccording to said Norwegian Patent the electromagnets are arranged close to the outer side of a mill barrel c~nsisting of lamellae of magneti2able r,la-terial, the arrangement being such that the grinding balls are retained against the mill barrel solely as they nre lifted to a suitable level.
In mills for grinding non-macnetical material, electromagnets have also been used for magnetic sepa-ration of undesirable magnetic substances in the ma-terial being ground. Such a magnetic separating apparatus :3L21~ 3 is disclosed by German Patent 482,598. In this case the elec-tromagnets thus do not serve as a substitute for lifters but to separate the undesirable matter and safeguard that said matter is discharged through the respective outlet of the separating apparatus.
One object of the present invention therefore is to improve the linings of prior art mills and to permit extend-ing their life.
Another object of the invention is to provide a wear protection for walls automatically regenerating itself.
A further object of the invention is to provide a mill barrel with means producing an automatically regener-ating wear protection on the inner side of the mill barrel.
It is often desirable to have the possibility of in-creasing the speed of rotatlon of the mill since the grindingcapacity rapidly increases, as the speed increases up to and over the so-called cri-tical speed. At a speed of 80-85% and more of the critical speed the lining profile cannot comprise lifters but the lining must present a smooth inner side. Dur-ing grinding the lining will thereby be exposed to slidingabrasion, from which an accelerated wear results. Comprehen-sive grinding experiments with secondary grinding (fine grinding) at so-called supercritical speed have proved to yield very good grinding results, However~ this type of grinding could not be made economically profi-table because the current lining materials would entail too high lining costs. To improve the life of the lining the wear due to sliding abrasion of the lining must be reduced. Still another object of the invention therefore is to reduce the wear due to said sliding abrasion also in this type of mills.
The present invention provides a me-thod for decreas-ing the wear on a surface, due to relative movement and con-tact of said surface with a fluid medium of abrasive part-icles, the weight percent of said particles amounting to a significant part of the total weight of said medium. The method comprises: providing said surface with a magnetic at-traction of sufficient magnitude to attract an a~ount of mag-netic particles which will provide a sacrificial layer there-on consisting essentially of such magnetic particles, saidlayer having a thickness effective to materially decrease the wear on the surface underlying said sacrificial layer, and maintaining said magnetic attraction during said contact, whereby the particles in said sacrificial layer, which are eroded or dislodged, may be replenished by new magnetic part-icles from said fluid stream.
At least the side of a structure which is subjected to wear and abrasion is preferably constituted by or coated with an abrasion resistant wall material, for example in form of shell plates and lifters.
The wall structure may have magnet means so placed as to attract magnetic particles in the charge and retain said particles in the form of an automatically regenerating abrasion protective layer on the surface of the wall struct-ure subjected to wear and abrasion, within at least suchzones as are normally exposed to a heavier abrasion than -the other zones of the wall structure.
When the invention is utilized for mills driven at high speed and having a smooth inner side, the harmful slid-ing abrasion can be restric-ted by furnishing the smooth lin-ing, in conformity with the present invention, with magnets in a sys-tem that provides an all-covering bed of magnetic particles, a "fluidized bed", which is magnetically retained in such a profile that the charge is raised to a suitable level for maximum grinding capacity. Abnormal shearing forces between the charge and the mill barrel are taken up in said fluidized bed, thereby preventing an exaggerated sliding dir-ectly against the inner side of the lining.
When the invention is to be utilized for the grind `,.`~ ~

5a ing on non-magnetic material, such as sulphide ores, one must add magnetic material, for example magnetite, to the charge to obtain the automatically regenerating abrasion protective layer on the lining. The magnetic material should be rela-tively fine-grained (up to about 5mm). As the finer material will come to lie at the mill barrel the magnetic material will place itself at the zones on the lining to be coated with the automatically abrasion protective layer. Magnetic residues, if any accompanying the ground material out of the mill can be collected by causing the ground material to pass a simple------~~~~~~~~~~~~ --~ .
.

q73 magnetic separating drum of conventional construction at the outlet of the mill. These residues can th~n again be introduced into the grinding cycle or be otherwise col-lected.
A great advantage which is inherent in the pres~nt invention is that the magnetic circuit when pexmanent mag-nets are used will be constantly closed, on the one hand, by metal inserts or the mill barrel or drum made from a magnetic metal material and, on the other hand, by the fine-grained layer of magnetic particles attracted b~ the magnets. This will automatically provide a good safety against demagnetization.
As mentioned in the foregoing, it has already been suggested to use magnetism in conjunctionwith mill bar-rels. In the mill disclosed by U.S. Patent 3,913,851the abrasion and wear resistant elastomer lining of the mill is kept in position against the inner side of the mill barrel by magnetism. In this case, the elasto--mer lining proper is thus kept in position by magnetic forces replacing the normal mechanical anchorage of the lining. With the exception of the erbociment shown in Fig. 3 of that patent, there is no closed mag-netic circuit on the side of the magnets remote from the mill barrel, and, thus, there is a great risk of succes-sive demagnetization.
The present invention however is based on the rea-li~ation that magnetism might be used to provide an automatically regenerating wear protection layer for the inner side of the mill barrel, which may in it-self have been formed from an abrasion and wear resis-tant material, for example elastomeric material. The invention is thus based on a technical idea different from that of the U.S. Patent 3,913,851.
In the mill disclosed by the ~bove-mentioned Nor-wegian Patent 22,213 the grinding balls of iron shallbe lifted in relation to, and then be allowed to fall down onto, the material which is to be ground and which there-:~L2~ 3 fore sha]l not partake in the lifting operation in whichthe magnetic grinding balls of iron are attracted against the inner side of the mill barrel by the stationary electromagnets arranged outside the mill barrel. In said prior art mill the object of the electromagnets - is a different one from that of the magnets in the wall structure exposed to wear according to the present in-vention and besides the magnetization is supposed to be temporarily interrupted for release of the grind-ing balls such that said balls can fall onto the mate~
rial being ground, which stays by gravity in the lower region of the mill by sliding along the mill barrel, thereby exposing it to abrasion and necessitating a lining of abrasion resistant material even though the wear caused by the grinding balls proper has been re-duced. The present invention has another object name-ly that of providing a wear protection which pro-tects the wall structure, particularly the mill wall, against abrasion and which automatically regenerates itself.
These and further objects of the invention as well as the advantages gained thereby will appear in the course of the following description of some preferred embodiments illustrated in the accom~anying drawings in which:
Figs. 1-3 illustrate three embodiments of a mill having a wall structure in accordance with the present invention and show sections through part of the mill barrel and the lining fixed thereto;
Figs. ~ and 5 illustrate a further embodiment of a mill having a wall structure in accordance with the present invention, Fig. 5 showing a section on line V-V
in Fig. 4;
Figs. 6-9 show sections of further embodiments of mills having wall structures in accordance with the invention;
Figs. 10 and 11 illustrate an embodiment of a stan-dardized wall element exploiting the principles of the invention, Fig. 10 showing a cross-section on line X-~
in Fig. 11, and Fig. 11 showing a longitudinal section on line XI-XI in Fig. 10;
Fig~ 12 shows a section corresponding to Fig. 10 when the standard element is mounted in a mill barreli and Fig. 13 illustrates how the principles of the inven-tion may be applied to protect other wall structures than those in mill barrels.
The mill shown in Fig. 1 has a mill barrel 10 with a lining clamped to the inner side thereof. Said lining comprises shell plates 11 of wear resistant rubber and has protruding fastening flanges 12. The lining also comprises lifters 13 which include an elastomer or rub-ber portion 14 with an undercut groove 15 therein for accommodating a metal bar 16 with bolts 17 welded there-to which project through holes in the mill barrel and cooperate with wash~rs 18 and nuts 19. T-bolts may be substituted for said bolts and said bars. The mill lin-ing 11, 13 is thus kept in position in that the protrud-ing fastening flanges 12 of the barrel plates 11 are clamped to the mill barrel 10 by means of the metal bar 16 located in the undercut groove 15 of the lifters 14. Other methods for fastening the lining also fall within the scope of the invention.
According to the invention, the lifters 13 have been provided with inserts 20, to which a number of permanent magnets 21 are secured. The permanent mag-nets project slightly from the surfaces of the lifters13 at their leading sides when the mill rotates in the direction of the arrow 22. It may sometimes be advan-tageous however to have the permanent magnets terminate immediately below the surfaces of the lifters. The ~south and north poles of the permanent magnets 21 are alternateIy facing outwards and the permanent magnets will thus attract magnetic partiGles in the charge of the mill such that said particles are retained in the form of a layer 23. This layer serves as an automatical-ly regenerating wear protection means for the lifters 13 since the charge impinges upon said layer and ls pre-vented from exerting an equally heavy abrading ef-fect on the lifters as if no layer 23 existed. The magnetic particles in the layer 23 may certainly come loose when the charge impinges upon the layer 23 but new maynetic particles in the charge will be attracted so that the protective layer 23 is maintained intact also during the continued rotation of the mill barrel.
In Fig. 1 the automatically regenerating wear pro-tecting means of magnetic particles has been illustrated only on the left-hand lifter to make a comparison with conventional lifters appear more clearly. At the rignt-hand lifter it is shown by dash and dot lines 100, 101, 102 and 103 how a conventional lifter entirely of rub-ber material changed its profile during the course of a lengthy test in a mill where the inventive principle was tested simultaneously with the use of conventional lifters. The portions 14 of the lifters 13, the shell plates and the conventional lifters consisted of the same wear resistant rubber material. The mill had a diameter of 5.9 m and was continuously driven for secon dary grinding with the aid of lumps of magnetite and of quartz in mixture (particle size maximum 60 mm), so-called pebbles. The conventional lifters originally had the profile represented by line 100, while lines 101, 102 and 103 represent the profiles of the remaining lifter rests after continuous operation for 7 months, 14 months and 21 months, respectively. When profile 103 had been reached, i.e. after 21 months, the time had come to insert new conventional lifters. ~fter the sarne time the rubber portion 14 of the lifters 13 equipped with permanent magnets 21 had been subjected to wear in :~2~ 3 a minor degree only, as has been shown by the dotted line 14' on the right-hand lifter in Fig. 1.
It could be established during the testing period that the autornatically regenerating wear protection layer 23 was not entirely homogeneous but comprised an inner per se homogeneous layer 23' of very fine-grained magne-tic material and an outer inhomogeneous layer 23" of coarser magnetic mineral particles and heavily worn down magnetite grinding bodies or pebbles.
The testsmade thus show that the invention results in an extraordinarily essential improvement of the life of tne mill lining by the provision of the automatically regenerating wear protection layer 23 of magnetic fine-grained material contained in the charge.
Fig. 2 shows another example of how it has been found possible to utilize the invention ror the protection of a mill barrel against wear. In this case the mill had been desiyned as a primary mill, i.e. a mill for grind-ing of coarse starting material. The mill lining had been given a wave`shape in that the shell plates 24 had been formed as steps having a low portion 25 and a high portion 26 which is however lower than the upper side of the lifters 27. The fixation of the lifters and the shell plates had been realized in substantially the same manner as in Fig. 1. In the embodiment according to Fig. 2, however, not only the lifters 27 but also the shell plates 24 had been provided with metal inserts 20 and permanent magnets 21 secured thereto. As a result, the permanent magnets placed on successively higher levels will provide a slightly inclined surface profile with a protective layer 23 of magnetic particles which were attracted b,~ the permanent magnets in the sar.le way as in Fig. 1. Also in this case it could be established that the protective layer 23 had a laminar composition including an inner fine-grained part layer 23' and outer, coarser part layers 23". The layer 23, when tested in a mill having a diameter of 2,9 m, had a thickness of about 5 cm and contained some worn down grinding balls. The layer 23 formed a conti~uous fluidized bed which offered an efficient protection against the abrasion of the lining.
Fig. 3 shows a further mbodiment in which lifters 28 produced from a rubber or elastomeric material are vulcanized to a metal sheet 29 which protrudes in either direction. These lifters are kept in position with the aid of rubber or elastomer elements 30 having a metal profile member 31 vulcanized there-nto and co-operating with T-bolts 32, washers 33 and nuts 34, saia elements 30 clamping the metal sheet 29 to the Mill bar-rel 10. Same as in the earliPr described embo~iments, the lifter 28 has permanent magnets 21 vulcanized there-into. Said magnets 21 are mounted on a metal insert 20 and retain a reaenerative, protective la~er 23 which is formed by magnetic particles in the charge ~f the mill being attractedan~ retained by the permanent mag-nets21. In this case the permanent magnets have been placed in such a manner that the protective layer 23 also extends a distance beyond the lifter proper, thus protecting also the low portion in front of the lifter where normally high abrasion occurs.
Figs. 4 and 5 show still another e~bodiment of the invention in which the lifters are otherwise designed and provided with a protective shield. The mill barrel 10 is thus lined with shell plates 35 which are united with metal sheets 36 projecting in either direction.
Between successive shell plates 35 there are arranged lifters 37 having an outer protective sheath 38 of non-magnetic, wear resistant metallic material. Inwardlyof the metal protective shield 38 there are provided permanent maynets ~1 which are secured to an insert 20 of magnetic metallic material. The permanent maynets and the insert are kept in position with the aid of a poly-urethane rubber layer 39. Other plastic or elastomericmaterials are conceivable. The lifters are kept in posi-sition with the aid of a pro.ile bar 40 inserted therein, 7~

which is held clamped against thè undercut groove form-ed in the lifters by means of bolts 41 and nuts 47 which penetrate the mill barrel 10. The perm~nent mag-nets 21 are arranged with their south and north poles as indicated on the drawings such that a protective layer 23 of magnetic particles from the charge will be formed on the outer side of the protective shield 38.
The lifters 37 can be given a relatively short length, for example of 100 mm. The requisite total lifter length is obtained by placing several lifters one after the other and retaining them with the aid of a common fastening bar 40 or with the aid of several such fastening bars fol-lowing upon each other. This embodiment is especially intended for Use in rod grinding, i.e. grinding in mills where use is made of rod-shaped grinding bodies and in which there is the risk that worn spear-like rod ends will penentrate into the lifters and damage them. The magnet system is symmetrically designed, which means that the rotation of the mill can be reversed.
Fig. 6 shows a similar embodiment in which the p~r-manent magnets are placed in a symmetrical arrangement.
In this case the lifter 43 of rubber or other elastomeric material has a metal profile member 44 vulcanized there-to, in which an undercut grooye ~5 is provided for co-operation with T-bolts 46 and nuts 47 . The lifter clamps shell plates 35 in position with the aid of the metal sheets 86 vulcanized to said shell plates.
In the embodiment according to Fig. 6 the perma-nent magnets 21 are secured to an insert 20 and havetheir active pole surfaces at the bottom of conical recesses 48. As a result, particulate magnetic material in the charge will fill out said conical recesses and thus serve as a regenerative, protective layer outside the permanent magnets and also outside the rubber or elastomer portions of the lifters 43. In this case, too, the lifter is symmetrical, for which reason the direction ~2~ 73 of rotation of the mill can be reversed.
In the embodiments earlier describedj permanent rnag-nets have been utilized to form the regenerative, pro-tective layer of magentic particles. In Fig. 7 is shown a further embodiment in which el~ctromagnets are em-ployed for the same purpose. Said en~odiment resembles that of Figs. 4 and 5, but instead of a protective shield of non-magnetic material, use is made of embedded magne-tic steel plates 49 which serve as pole plates ~n electromagnets 50 secured to a magnetic steel insert 20.
The magnets 50, the insert 20 and the pole plates 49 are secured by casting in a polyurethane rubber layer 39 which protrudes from between the pole plates 49. With the aid of the electromagnets 50 which are connected by leads (not shown) to a power source ~not shown), there is ~ormed a regenerative, protective layer 23 of magnetic particles comprisPd in the charge. In this case also the lifter is syrnmetrical so that the direction of rotation of the mill can be reversed.
The embodiments illustrated, in which the magnets are secured to an insert vulcanized into elastomeric, plastic or rubber material, provide the grea~ advantage that the magnetswill be resiliently retained and as a con-sequence are capable of better withstanding heavy shocks from large pieces of material in the charge.
Figs. 8 and 9 show a still further embodiment of a wall structure according to the present invention, utilized in a ball mill. The lining comprises two types of standard elements, one type corresponding to the shell plates while the other type corresponds to the "lifters", even though this mill has no lifting means projecting into the interior of the mill. The elernents 51 corresponding to the shell plates have metal sheets S2 vulcanized thereinto on their sides facing the mill barrel 10, and the rubber ~art 53 of the element extends with a layer 54 over said metal sheets. Perma-nent magnets 21 and metal inserts 20 connected to them 7~

and serving as magnet cores are vulcanized into the ele-ments 51. Pxotectïve plates 55 of non-magnetic metal ma-terial are secured to the outer sides of the permanent magnets 21 for their protection. The parts 53 of the shell elements 51, which parts are formed from elasto-meric material, have rib-shaped elevated portions 56 between the rows of permanent magnets to cause the layer of particles forming the protective layer 23 to curve arcuately upwards between adjacent magnets and to reduce the risks of the protective layer 23 being caused, during the initial formation thereof, to slide along the lining because of shearing forces.
The wall elements 57 corresponding to the lifters similarly have permanent magnets 21, metal inserts 20 and protective plates 55 which together with a me-tal profile bar 58 having an undercut groove 59 are vulcanized or embedded in the elastomer portion 60 of the wall elements 57. ~he elastomer portion which may consist of polyurethane rubber, extends with a layer 61 beneath a part of the metal profile bar 58 and has a rib-shaped elevated portion 62. The wall elements 57 are secured to the mill barrel 10 by means of T-bolts 46 and nuts 47, thereby clamping the barrel plates 51 in position~
In the embodiment illustrated, each of the elements 51 and 57 comprises four permanent magnets and two me-tal inserts 20 such that the elements are relatively small and readily handled at the mounting thereof. They ma~ o~ course be manufactured in optional lengths.
In the embodiment shown in Figs. 8 and 9, a con-tinuous protective layer 23 of reasonably uniform thick-ness made up of magnetic particles in the material be-ing ground will be retained against the lining. In the embodiment illustrated, the shell plates 51 have but two rows of permanent magnets 21,but with broader barrel plates still more rows of magnets can of course be placed ~eside each other.

~ igs. 10-12 show a lining which is used in a mill and is formed from standard elements. The s-tandard elements 63 which are manufactured with the shape illustrated in Figs. 10 and 11, comprise permanent magnets 21 em-bedded in e-lastomeric material 64, preferably polyurethane rubber or some suitable plastic material, so that the elastomeric material will constitute elevated portions 65 with longitudinal V-shaped recesses 66 formed therein. The elastomeric material leaves one longitudinal side of the permanent magnets free such that the magnets slight-ly protrude from the elastorneric material. However, the magnets can be allowed to protrude from the elastomeric material also on the opposite longitudinal side. It will be realized that in this embodiment no metal in-sert of magnetic material is embedded in the elastomericmaterial. Instead,the magnetic circuit between the per-manent magnets is closed by means of the metal wall, in the present instance a mill barrel, to be equipped with a wear protection means. This will appear from Fig.12. In the said embodiment, magnetism is thus uti-lized not only to produce the protective layer 23 of magnetic particles but also to retain the lining aSainst its support. The adaptation of the elements 63 to the arcuate shape of the mill barrel is fa-cilitated by the recesses 66 and the bridges 67 ofelastomeric material remaining beneath them, which serve as elastomer springs. The standard elements 63 are of unsymmetrical shape to facilitate a correct orien-~ation of the elements and their perrnanent magnets in relation to the~adjacent elements.
The invention has been described in the foregoing with reference to rotary mill barrels, but it is realized that the invention is also useful for vibratory mills and also for the protection of wall surfaces other than mill barrels.
The invention is thus useful for many different ty~es of wall structures which are subjected to abrasion by material containing magnetic particles which can form the contemplated, automatically regenerating protective layer. By way of example, reference is made to Fig. 13 which shows an unloading station 69 for a conveyor belt S 70 which conveys particulate material containing mag-netic particles, for example mangetic concentrates.
Fig. 13 is only schematical, and the wall elements 68 can to advantage be formed in conformity with Figs. 10 and 11, although elevated portions 65 are not neces-sarily required~ Alternatlvely, the wall elements canbe formed as shown in Figs. 8 and 9. As will appear from Fig. 13, the principles of the invention have been applied only to the most exposed parts of the unloading station 69 and the chute 71 beneath it, which may open above a fuxther conveyor 72, a carriage, a bin of ma terial, a screen or like means.
This is a division of Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 355,357, filed July 3, 1980.

Claims (10)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A method for decreasing the wear on a surface, due to relative movement and contact of said surface with a fluid medium of abrasive particles, the weight percent of said particles amounting to a significant part of the total weight of said medium, such contact being for a period of time and such relative movement being of a degree, sufficient to cause excessive wear on said surface, which comprises:
providing said surface, with a magnetic attraction of sufficient magnitude to attract an amount of magnetic particles which will provide a sacrificial layer thereon, consisting essentially of such magnetic particles, said layer having a thickness, (a) of at least a monolayer of such magnetic particles and (b) effective to materially decrease the wear on the surface underlying said sacrificial layer; and maintaining said magnetic attraction during said contact, whereby the particles in said sacrificial layer which are eroded or dislodged may be replenished by new magnetic particles from said fluid stream to provide said materially decreased wear.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said fluid medium is a process stream containing abrasive treatment particles amounting to at least 3% of the weight thereof, and at least a small portion of said treatment particles exhibit a magnetizable character.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the magnetic attraction of said underlying surface is of a magnitude which will permit the passage of virtually all the particles in said process stream except that amount necessary to continually provide said sacrificial layer.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the magnetic attraction of said surface is provided by a stratum of material essentially composed of a magnetically hard composite.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the magnetic attraction of the underlying surface is provided by an externally applied magnetic field.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amount of treatment particles in said fluid medium which exhibit a magnetizable character, is insufficient to provide an effective sacrificial layer, said method further comprising adding an amount of magnetizable, non-treatment particles in an amount at least sufficient to provide such an effective layer.

7 The method of claim 6, wherein said non-treatment particles are added in a continual manner to said fluid medium so as to form said sacrificial layer.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein said non-treatment particles are magnetically affixed to said underlying surface, prior to the introduction of said fluid medium to contact said surface.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein said surface is provided with a magnetic attraction of sufficient magnitude to prevent substantial dislodgement of such magnetizable, non-treatment particles.

10. A method for decreasing the wear on a surface, due to relative movement and contact of said surface with a fluid medium of abrasive particles, the weight percent of said particles amounting to a significant part of the total weight of said medium, which comprises;
providing said surface with a magnetic attraction of sufficient magnitude to attract an amount of magnetic particles which will provide a sacrificial layer thereon consisting essentially of such magnetic particles, said layer having a thickness effective to materially decrease the wear on the surface underlying said sacrificial layer, and maintaining said magnetic attraction during said contact, whereby the particles in said sacrificial layer, which are eroded or dislodged, may be replenished by new magnetic particles from said fluid stream.