CA1199676A - Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine - Google Patents

Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine

Info

Publication number
CA1199676A
CA1199676A CA000434932A CA434932A CA1199676A CA 1199676 A CA1199676 A CA 1199676A CA 000434932 A CA000434932 A CA 000434932A CA 434932 A CA434932 A CA 434932A CA 1199676 A CA1199676 A CA 1199676A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
signal
torque
machine
command
stator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA000434932A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Bimal K. Bose
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Priority to CA000434932A priority Critical patent/CA1199676A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1199676A publication Critical patent/CA1199676A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Control Of Ac Motors In General (AREA)

Abstract

SCALAR DECOUPLED CONTROL FOR AN INDUCTION MACHINE
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A scalar control supplemented by a decoupler transfer function control is provided to develop frequency and voltage commands for a voltage controlled inverter driving an induction machine. The machine torque is controlled by the slip and corresponding torque producing component of stator current. The rotor flux is maintained constant by the flux component of stator current. The total stator current is controlled in the outer loop to hold rotor flux constant with desired torque during steady state conditions and the decoupler compensator varies stator voltage to maintain rotor flux constant during transient conditions.

Description

~ RD 14083 SCALAR DECOUPLED CONTROL FO~ AN INDUCTION MACHINE
Background of the Invention This invention relates to a control for a solid state adjustable speed induction machine drive and more particularly to a control for achieving fast transient response.
Traditionally, induction motors have been controlled by scalar methods where all the control and feedback signals are processed in scalar (d.c.) form.

Since an induction motor is basically a coupled system where a variation of either the voltage or frequency applied to the motor stator affects both the motor torque and rotor 1ux, scalar controls using feedback give inherently sluggish response. A commanded increase in the torque ~esults in an initial temporary dip in the rotor flux due to inherent coupling which in turn decreases the motor torque. The feedback signal will gradually respond to restore the rotor flux and the commanded torque will be achieved.

Another type of induction motor control uses vector control methods. The a.c. machine is controlled as a d.c. machine by decoupling the flux and torque components of the stator currents. There are principally two different vector control methods. The first method is the closed loop or direct control method which achieves decoupling by using feedback of the rotor flux vectors and is used typically when operating above 10% of base speed where the flux vectors can be estimated or measured with reasonable accuracy. The second method is the open loop or indirect vector control method which depends on feedback of rotating electrical vectors which are synthesized by the addition of a slip angle to ~ ~ ~ ~ RD 14083 the rotor mechanical position vector. The open loop method can be used over the entire speed range including zero speed. The vetor control methods while effective during steady state operation, strictly speaking, only achieve quasi decoupling during current transient conditions. The phasor diagrams used to explain the vector control operation are not strictly valid with respect to transient conditions when the machine response is governed by the direct-quadrature (d-q) axis equations. The quasi decoupling achieved is more decoupling than would be achieved without the control but less than full decoupling.
In applications where fast response is needed such as in servo applications and in motors used in driving rolling mills, d.c. machines are mainly used at present.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an induction motor control that achieves fast response at various operating points using a simplified control, It is a further object of the present invention to achieve decoupling between the commanded frequency and rotor flux in a scalar control during static and dynamic conditions at all operating points.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a scalar decoupled control having fast transient res~onse and four-quadrant operating capability.
Summary of the Invention In one aspect of the present invention an induction machine drive is provided which uses a scalar control supplemented by a decoupler function generator ~ 6 RD 14083 to maintain rotor flux constant during both steady state and transient conditions. The control provides a stator voltage command and a stator frequency command to control the variable frequency power supplied by a voltage fed inverter to the induction machine. An external machine torque command is used to generate a machine slip command. A stator current command is generated Erom the slip command by a first function generator which maintains rotor flux constant and generates the torque component of stator current during steady state conditions. ~he stator current command is compared to the actual stator current to develop an error signal. The error signal is used to generate a first stator voltage command. A stator frequency command is ob-tained by adding a signal representative of the rotor frequency to the slip command. A second function generator is responsive to changes in the frequency command and provides a time dependent output to compensate the first stator voltage command to maintain the rotor flux constant during transient conditions.

Brief Description of the Drawing The features of the invention believed to be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention itself, both as to organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which:
Figure 1 is a part block diagram, part schematic diagram respresentative of a drive system including a decoupler, in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 2 is a block diagram representation of ~ ~ ~ RD 14083 the decoupler of Figure 1 and a look-up table controller to supply appropriate coefficients to the decoupler;
Figure 3 is a block diagram representation of a small signal model o~ an induction motor;
Figure 4 is a graph showing the steady state operating cells in the T-~ r plane of the look-up table employed in the apparatus of Figure 2;
Figure 5 shows steady state voltage-frequency curves for constant rotor flux, helpful in explaining the operation of Fi~ure l; and Figure 6 shows a per phase steady state equiva-lent circui~ of an induction motor wlth rotor leakage inductance helpful in explaining the operation of Figure 1.
Detailed Description of the Invention Referring now to the drawing wherein like numerals indicate like elements, there is shown in Figure 1 a speed control loop having an electrical speed command ~r*. The commanded electrical speecl is compared to the actual electrical rotor speed ~ in summer 1. The relationship between the electrical rotor speed ~r and the mechanical rotor speed ~n is = P2 ~ m where P is the number of poles, ~r and ~n are measured in radians/sec.. The speed error signal is passed through a proportional plus integral regulator 3 to provide a torque command Te which when positive indicates motor2ng and when negative indicates regeneration. The commanded torque is compared to the calculated torque Te in summer 5. The tor~ue error signal is passed through a proportional plus integral regulator 7 to provide a slip command ~ sl . ~ limiter circuit ~ limits the ma~imum and minimum values of - ~ ~ 9 ~ RD 14083 the slip command. The slip command rom limiter circuit % is added to the rotor speed ~ r in a summer 9 to obtain a stator voltage frequency command ~ e measured in radian~/sec.. The slip command is also provided to a function generator 11 to determine the stator current command I to achieve constant rotor flux ~r and regulate torque component of stator current. The relationship between stator currents Is and slip ~ sl is shown in equation (1).

/ ~ 2 2 Is = ~r / 1 + r ~ sl (1) where is the rotor flux;
m is the mutual inductance referred to the stator;
Lr is the rotor inducance referred to the stator;
Rr is the rotor resistance referred to the stator;
and 1 is the slip in radians per second.
As can be seen from equation (1) I has two components. The first is a flux component and the other is related to slip and is the tor~ue component.
When the rotor flux is held constant the stator current is a function of the slip.
The stator current is offset at zero slip by a current equal to the magnetizing current so that during machine operation the rotor flux can be maintained constant during transitions through zero slip.

The desired stator current I .is compared to the actual stator current Is in a summer 13. The error signal is passed through a proportional plus integral regulator 15 ~o develop a first voltage command signal -~ V , If it is desired to achieve yreater accuracy and to adjust for possible saturation effects, a feedback signal can be used to modify the error signal at summer 13 at speeds typically above .1 per unit by comparing the desired rotor flux with the measured rotor flux in a summer 17 and passing the resulting error signal through a proportional plus integral regulator 19 to provide the s~lmer 13 with a stator current error signal Is.
To achieve decoupling of the undamental frequency command from the rotor flux, the fundamental frequency command ~ e is passed through a decoupler 21 to provide a compensating signal Vs ' The compensating signal and the first voltage command signal ~ ~V * are summed in a summer 23 to provide a compensated stator voltage command Vs . The compensated stator voltage * *
command Vs and the stator :Ere~uency command ~e are the two command signals applied to a voltage-fed inverter with pulse width modulation (PWM) control 25. Inverter and PWM control 25 is supplied from a three phase a.c.
supply (not shown) through a three phase diode rectifier 27, and the d.c. output of the three phase diode recti~ier is applied to the inverter and PWM control 25.
A capacitor 29 is connected across the input terminals of the voltage-fed inverter. The inverter and PWM

control 25 comprises base drive circui~s, a carrier waveform generator and a pulse width modulatorO The inverter and PWM ccntrol supplies three phase pulse ~ ~ ~ ~ RD 14083 width modulated pulses to a three phase induction machine 31. The induction machine 31 has flux sensing coils 33, 35 and 37 inserted in the motor. A tachometer 39 is driven by the rotor of machine 31. A torque and rotor flux processor circuit 41 receives input signals of the three phase current supplied to the machine from sensors 43, 45 and 47 and air gap voltages from sensing coils 33, 35 and 37. The air gap voltages are integrated in processor circuit 41 to obtain the air gap fluxes.
Processor circuit 41 compensates the air gap flux with the machine rotor leakage reactance to obtain the rotor flux. The air ~ap voltages and machine currents are also used by processor circuit 41 to measure machine torque. A circuit for generating rotor flux and torque from machine currents and air gap voltages and which may be employed as a component of processor circuit 41, is shown in U.S. Patent 4,258,302 - A. B. Plunkett -issued March 24, 1981 and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. If flux coils are not available, rotor flux can be calculated Erom stator voltages and currents. A stator current processor may typically be comprised of a three-phase to two-phase converter 49 and a circuit 50 which determines the square root of the sum of the squares of the two phase output of co~verter 49. The three-phase to two-phase converter 49 receives as input signals each of the three machine currents.
An implementation of the decoupler circuit 21 is shown in more detail in Figure 2. A microcomputer with look-up table 61 receives as an input a si~nal corresponding to the difference between the commanded and actual torque Te* T , the difference between the ~ ~ RD 14083 commanded rotor fre~uency and the actual rotor fre~uency and the actual xotor frequency ~ r ~ ~r~ the actual torgue Te and the rotor frequency ~ . The torque command Te is developed from a speed control error in regulator circuit 3, the rotor speed is available from tachometer 39 (shown in Figure l) and the commanded rotor frequency can be obtained by subtracting commanded slip ~sl* from the commanded stator frequency ~ *. The microcomputer has seven parallel outputs connected to seven digital-to-analog converters (DACs) 63-69. The DACs 63-69, are connected to multipliers 71-77, respectively, to adjust the coefficients aO', al , a2 ~ bo ' l 2 3 according to the look-up table output.
The commanded stator frequency ~e* is the input signal to the analog decoupler circuit 79 and is connected to each of the multipliers 74-77. A summer 83 receives the output signal of multiplier 7~ which is the product of the coefficient loaded into the multiplier by the microcomputer and the signal ~ *, at a non-inverting input, and receives the output signal of multiplier 71 at an inverting input. The output of the summer 83 is connected to an analog integrator 85. A summer 87 receives at its non-inverting inpu-ts the output signal from integrator 85 and multiplier 75 and at its inverting input the output of multiplier 72. The output of summer 87 is connected to an analog integrator 89. A summer 91 receives at its non-inverting inputs the output signal from multiplier 76 and integrator 89, respectively and at its inverting input the output signal of multiplier 73. The output of summer 91 is connected to an integrator 93. A summer 95 sums the output signals from integrator 93 and multiplier 77. The output of summer 95 is connected to an operational ampliEier 81 Eor adjusting the scale and the polarity of the outpu-t slgnal~ The output of the summer 95 is also connected to multipliers 71, 72 and 73. The output oE amplifier 81 is the stator voltage +' command v which is supplied to the inverter.
The induction machine 31 can be modeled as a multivariable nonlinear coupled system where each of the outputs, rotor flux and machine torque, can be shown to be a function of the control variables stator voltage and frequency. The dynamics of the inverter and pwm control are neglected in the model. At any steady state operating point, the system can be linearized by a small signal perturbation method to arrive at the machine transfer functions as shown in Figure 3. The transfer function Kl l(S) in block 101 represents the contribution B(s) made by a change in stator voltage to the rotor flux. Th transfer function 4A4 ~s) in block 103 represents the B(s) contribution made by a change in commanded frequency to the machine torque. The transfer function K2 2( ) B(sj of block 105 represents the contribution made by a change of stator voltage to the machine torque. The transfer function K 3( ) of block 107 represents the reduction 3 _ _ of rotor flux resulting from a positive increase of commanded frequency. A summer 109 subtracts the contribution from block 107 from the contribution of block 101 to arrive at the rotor flux. A summer 111 adds the contribution from block 103 to the contribution of block 105 to arrive at the machine torque.
To explain how the model shown in Figure 3 works, ~ ~ RD 10483 we will look at what happens when the frequency ~e is incrementally increased, which can happen as a result of increase in the torque command. The rotor flux is reduced by the transfer function K3A3(s)/B(s). Since torque is being regulated by the slip control for a fixed rotor flux, the effect of K3A3(s)/B(s) has to be eliminated under all operating conditions to achieve a rapid response to changes by the torque command.
To accomplish this, a decoupler transfer function shown in equation (2) F(s) = ~ A3~s) 1 B(s) = K3 A3(S) (2) 3 ~T~- X Kl ~ Kl Al(s) is implemented in decoupler circuit 21 with the gains K3 and Kl appropriately scaled to K3' and Kl'- To achieve rapid response to changes in torque command the rotor flu~ must be held constant during transient conditions. Compensating the voltage command for changes due tothe frequency command decouples the frequency command from the rotor flux. If the machine model were linear, the decoupler parameters would always remain constant at differenct operating points. For a non-linear model as we have here, however, the machine transfer function parameters will vary at each operating point and therefore t~e decoupler has to be adaptive to compensate for these variations. To avoid computational rigor which causes real time delay in implementing the decoupler, a look-up table can be used to store precalculated resul-ts as will be described in further detail hereinbelow. The transfer function in equation
(2) is a ratio of polynomials of the Laplace operator s.

From the state equations of the systern with given para-meters, the steady state operating conditions are solved ~ ~ ~ RD 14083 at diEferent steady state operating points, the system is linearized by small signal perturbation and the poles and zeroes and gain are solved for the specified input and output variables, namely torque, flux and rotor frequency. The Laplace transform of the linearized system at a particular operating point is of the form shown in equation (3) F(s) = C l+DlS+D2S +D3s (3) l~Els+E2s +E3s 1' 2' D3, El, E2 and E3 are constants and s is the Laplace operator.
Taking the inverse Laplace transorm, eqaation
(3) can be written in the form of a linear differential equation shown in expression (4) a2 Y + al y + aO Y = bo x + bl x + b2 x + b3 x (4) where y is the third derivative with respect to time, y is the second derivative with respect to time, Y is the first derivative with respect to time:
and aO, all a2, bo/ bl, b2 and b3 are constant coefficients.
When the decoupler parameters are solved at different electrical steady state operating points in the torque and rotor speed plane, (rotor flux being kept constant) the resulting coefficientsin the differential equations, after appropriate scaling to be useful in an analog circuit, are stored as shown in the look-up table in Figure 4. The look-up table, which is part of a microcomputer, can be divided into di~ferent cells shown lettered A-P. The torque, rotor flux and the rotor speed define the operating point parameters (rotor flux is held constant at all operating conditions). Operating points from zero to base speed and from zero to ma~imum motoring and generating torque are shown.
The coefficients stored in cell A correspond to operating points from zero to rated torque and from zero to 25% base speed. Therefore when the operating conditions fall anywhere within the cell the coefficients corresponding to cell A will be addressed.
The appropriate coefficients are set by determing the operating point in the torque and rotor frequency plane during steady state conditions and setting the appropriately scaled coeficients a ', 1 2 ~ O ~ bl ~ b2 ~ and b3' in the analog computer shown in Figure 2. As evident in Figure 2, there are seven coefficients and therefore seven output lines from the look-up table memory as shown in Figure 4. The coefficients are changed from digital to analog signals in digital to analog converters (DACs) to set the coefficients in the analog circuit 79 shown in Figure 2.
The operation of the controller shown in Figure 1 will now be described. A speed command ~ r is supplied to a speed control loop which generates a torque command for the torque control loop. The torque is controlled by the slip command c~sl which is obtained from the torque control loop. The difference between the commanded torque obtained from the speed control loop and the actual torque from the torque processor circuit 41 is applied to a proportional plus integral regulator 7 to generate the slip. The rotor speed from the tachometer 39 is added to the slip to obtain the voltage frequency cnmm~n~
~e for the inverter. A stator current command Is is ~9~ RD 14083 generated from the slip command by the function generator ll to provide the desired constant rotor flux and generate the tor~ue component of stator current during steady state conditions. The current loop error which is the difference between the commanded current Is and the acutal current I is determined by three-phase to two-phase circuit 49 and square root circuit 50 from motor currents and is applied to a proportional plus integral regulator 15 to generate the incremental signal ~ +Vs* which adds to the decoupler command V *' to generate the inverter voltage command Vs*. The input signal provided to the decoupler 21 is the commanded frequency.
The flux control loop may remain open through-out the entire speed range of the motor, but it is desirable to close the loop through a switch 12, typically when operating above 10% of the base speed, for precision control of machine rotor flux. The inverter commands of voltage magnitude Vs* and frequency ~ * are scalar analog signals which can be supplied either to a microprocessor pulse width modulator to generate inverter switching waves or processed through dedicated hardware as in the present embodiment.
Figure 5 shows typical steady state voltage-frequency curves for constant rotor flux under both motoring and regenerating conditions. This figure helps to qualitatively explain the approximate operation of the control system in steady state conditions. The dotted line shows operating with zero slip. Assuming - 13 ~

~ ~ ~ ~ RD 14083 that the initial operating point is P, with the slope of the curve m corresponds to the gain K3 /Kl of the decoupler, then the decoupler provides the voltage command Vs*' = ml ~ 1 whieh is supplemented by the current loop compensation ~ V 1 to attain the steady state point P. If the operating point is shifted to Q by incrementally inereasing ~el to 4~e2' the new s e 2 e2 nd Vs2 rom decoupler and current loop respectively. In practical implementations, tYPiCallY ml=m2=m=K3'/Kl' as shown in the figure The transient operation of the decoupler will now be qualitatively explained with the help o Figure 6 which shows the simplified per phase equalivalent circuit neglecting the rotor leakage inductance. Here, m= ~ , Id is the magnetizing or flux component of eurrent and Iqs is the torque component of the current.
The stator resistanee Rs and the stator induetance s are shown in series with one another and the parallel combination of the magnetizing inductance Z~
referred to the stator and the ro-tor impedance Zl referred to the stator. Assuming slip remains constant but speed gradually increases, the impedances Zm and Z
will increase proportional to frequency, which will correspondingly raise Vsl by way of the decoupler.

The stator current I and the components I and I will s ds qs remain the same and, therefore, ~ V * will remain practi-cally unaltered. If a transient increase of ~e occurs due to the increase of ~ l*~ this will tend to decrease the size cf y m and increase Iqs for the same Is~ but the decoupler will transiently increase Vs*' to maintain ~ constant. Meanwhile~ the current control loop with a higher Is* command will tend to restore a steady ~ ~ ~ ~ RD 14083 state concll-tion by a ~ ~Vs* command.
When the steady state condition of the machine is reached as determined by the difference between commanded and actual frequency being less than predeter-mined values, the coefficients stored in the cell in the memory corresponding to the constant values of torque and electrical speed are set in the analog circuit multipliers of Figure 2 which implements the transfer function. The purpose of the decoupler, which is 10 ~ implemented by the analog circuit, is to compensate for the coupling between the frequency and rotor flux to keep the rotor flux constant during transient conditions and therefor provide a rapid response. When a new steady state condition is achieved, the coefficients in the look-up table corresponding to the present steady state torque and constant frequency values will be set in the analog computer multipliers. During steady state conditions, the decoupler provides a gain which, together with the stator current feedback loop, provides the constant flux level~ During transient conditions the decoupler provides more than a ~ain; specifically, the decoupler provides a response that is dependent on the variation, with respect to time, of the input para-meter (frequency) to counteract the interaction between frequency and rotor flux -taking place in the induction machine so that constant rotor flux can be maintained. With constant rotor flux maintained during transient conditions, transient response to torque commands will be quick. The coupling between changes in commanded voltage and torque ser~es ,o increase the amount of torque response.
Assuming the machine is at zero speed and within rated torque, the coefficlents associated with cell A are set in the multipliers, and a torque command for maximum torque then occurs. The machine will accelerate and when maximum torque is achieved at a constant machine speed (assuming a constant load), the coefficient corresponding to the operating point in the torque speed plane will be loaded in the multipliers. The coefficients in any one cell can be used for a transient response to any other cell during transient motoring or regenerating. The compensation of the decoupler will be most accurate when the least number of cells are traversed during transient conditions.
The foregoing describes a scalar decoupled control for an induction machine that achieves fast response by decoupling the commanded frequency from the rotor flux during static and dynamic conditions at all operating poin-ts.
While only certain preferred features of the invention have been shown by way of illustration, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (7)

    The embodiments of the invention in which an exclu-sive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
    1. An induction machine drive for achieving fast transient response, comprising:
    a voltage fed inverter providing variable frequency a.c. power to the induction machine;
    torque sensing means coupled to said machine for generating a signal indicative of actual machine torque;
    first comparison means coupled to said torque sensing means for comparing a commanded torque signal to said signal indicative of actual machine torque to generate a commanded torque error;
    slip command generating means for generating a slip command from the commanded torque error;
    a first function generator coupled to said slip generating means and being responsive to commanded slip for providing a stator current magnitude command to maintain rotor flux constant during steady state condition at a predetermined value dependent on a predetermined relationship between slip and stator current, said stator current magnitude command providing a torque producing component;
    stator current measuring means coupled to said induction machine for generating a signal indicative of actual stator current;
    second comparison means coupled to said stator current measuring means and to said first function generator for comparing commanded stator current with actual stator current to generate a stator current error signal;
    stator voltage command signal generating means responsive to said stator current error signal
  1. Claim 1 - Continued:
    for generating a first stator voltage command signal;
    signal generating means responsive to rotor speed of said machine for generating a signal indicative of actual rotor speed;
    first summation means coupling said slip command generating means and signal generating means to said inverter, said first summation means adding said slip command to said actual rotor speed to generate a sator frequency command for said inverter;
    a second function generator coupled to said summation means and being responsive to changes in commanded stator frequency for generating a decoupling signal to compensate said first stator voltage command to maintain rotor flux constant at said predetermined value during transient conditions due to changes in the commanded machine stator frequency; and second summation means coupling said second function generator and said stator voltage command signal generating means to said inverter, said second summation means adding the decoupling signal from said second function generator to said first stator voltage command signal for supplying a compensated stator voltage command signal to said inverter.
  2. 2. The induction machine drive of claim 1 wherein said second function generator comprises means for implementing a transfer function having changeable coefficients, means for determining when said machine is operating in steady state, and means for changing said coefficients of said transfer function implementation when said machine has been determined to be operating in steady state conditions to values dependent upon the present operating point of the machine.
  3. 3. The induction machine of claim 2 wherein said second function generator further comprises means for storing said coefficients for use in said transfer function implementation dependent on operating conditions.
  4. 4. The induction machine of claim 3 wherein means for determining when said machine is operating in steady state comprises means for determining when the difference between commanded and actual torque is less than a predetermined limit and when the difference between the commanded frequency and the actual frequency is below a predetermined limit at the same time.
  5. 5. The induction machine drive of claim 4 wherein the present operating point of the machine during steady state used with said second function generator is determined by the actual measure torque and actual measured speed of the machine.
  6. 6. The induction machine drive of claim 1 further comprising third comparison means coupled to said signal generating means for comparing said signal indicative of actual rotor speed to a commanded speed signal, and regulator means coupled to said third comparison means and providing as an output signal said commanded torque signal.
    7. The induction machine drive of claim 1 further comprising means for measuring rotor flux, means for generating a command proportional to the desired constant rotor flux, means for comparing the commanded to the actual rotor flux to develop an error signal, regulator means for adjusting said error signal to provide
  7. Claim 7 (continued) a stator current command, and means to increment the stator current error signal generated by said second comparison means by the amount of the regulator output.
CA000434932A 1983-08-19 1983-08-19 Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine Expired CA1199676A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000434932A CA1199676A (en) 1983-08-19 1983-08-19 Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA000434932A CA1199676A (en) 1983-08-19 1983-08-19 Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1199676A true CA1199676A (en) 1986-01-21

Family

ID=4125909

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000434932A Expired CA1199676A (en) 1983-08-19 1983-08-19 Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA1199676A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4418308A (en) Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine
US4453116A (en) Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine using current control
US7683568B2 (en) Motor drive using flux adjustment to control power factor
EP0279415B1 (en) Induction motor control apparatus
US6166514A (en) Apparatus and method for controlling induction motor
KR900005766B1 (en) Control system for pwm inverter
US4282473A (en) Rotating field machine drive and method
US4800327A (en) Three-phase induction motor control method
KR900007111B1 (en) Method of controlling a three-phase induction motor
US5532570A (en) Variable speed control apparatus for induction motor
Kanmachi et al. Sensor-less speed control of an induction motor with no influence of secondary resistance variation
Koga et al. Constitution of V/f control for reducing the steady-state speed error to zero in induction motor drive system
EP0536569A2 (en) AC motor control apparatus and control apparatus of electric rolling stock using the same
US4001660A (en) Regulating the torque of an induction motor
US4509003A (en) Vector control method and system for an induction motor
US5923144A (en) Frequency generator for a motor controller
JPH0344508B2 (en)
US4510430A (en) Vector control method and system for an induction motor
GB2280798A (en) Stator flux oriented control for induction motor
EP0121792B1 (en) Vector control method and system for an induction motor
CA1199676A (en) Scalar decoupled control for an induction machine
US4048550A (en) Flux corrective control apparatus for motor drives
JP2579119B2 (en) Vector controller for induction motor
JPH0683586B2 (en) Induction motor slip control system
JPS6038960B2 (en) Inverter voltage control device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry