CA1159332A - Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator - Google Patents
Rotor for an axial flow rotary separatorInfo
- Publication number
- CA1159332A CA1159332A CA000366748A CA366748A CA1159332A CA 1159332 A CA1159332 A CA 1159332A CA 000366748 A CA000366748 A CA 000366748A CA 366748 A CA366748 A CA 366748A CA 1159332 A CA1159332 A CA 1159332A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- rotor
- housing
- threshing
- crop material
- separator
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Threshing Machine Elements (AREA)
Abstract
ROTOR FOR AN AXIAL FLOW ROTARY SEPARATOR
Abstract of the Disclosure Material control elements carried by the rotor of an axial flow rotary combine separator include inclined blades as well as conventional rasp bars. The inclined blades take various forms but common features include their downstream inclination, (that is in the direction of the axial movement of crop material in the separator) and having a frontal working edge athwart the direction of rotation to engage crop material and deflect or urge it down-stream. The orientation and configuration of the blades results in their working edges being their dominating material control feature while the inclined surfaces have a subordinate role in material control, the actual effect of the surfaces depending on the orientation of their line of slope with respect to the rotor axis.
Abstract of the Disclosure Material control elements carried by the rotor of an axial flow rotary combine separator include inclined blades as well as conventional rasp bars. The inclined blades take various forms but common features include their downstream inclination, (that is in the direction of the axial movement of crop material in the separator) and having a frontal working edge athwart the direction of rotation to engage crop material and deflect or urge it down-stream. The orientation and configuration of the blades results in their working edges being their dominating material control feature while the inclined surfaces have a subordinate role in material control, the actual effect of the surfaces depending on the orientation of their line of slope with respect to the rotor axis.
Description
~3LS~33~
This invention relates to axial flow rotary separators for agricultural crops of a kind typically embodied in combines and more particularly to material control and conveying elements carried on the rotors of such separators.
The mode of operation of such separators is well known.
Crop material is fed into the annular space between a rotor and a stationary housing, which includes grate portions, and through cooperation between rotor and housing the material is propelled in a spiral path through the annular space while grain is threshed and separated from it and expelled through the grates and col-lected for further processing. Typically the rotor includes a first, upstream feed rotor portion designed to receive crop material from a feeder house and convey it into the separator proper.
The internal surface of the housing and the external surface of the rotor are provided with material control elements or features so that the relative motion between the rotor and housing surfaces effects the processing and conveying of the material contained between them. The material control elements used in existing separators vary in detail but, typically, axial indexing is effected by generally helical ribs (either continuous or interrupted) carried usually by the housing but sometimes by the rotor or by both. The rotor typically carries generally axially ~x-tqnding qlqmen-ts which have primarily a processing eunction and only secondarily a conveying function and may include conventional rasp bars in the ~hreshing section and paddles in a separa-ting s~c-tion. The yeneral ~orm oE these elements, particularly thosq on khe rotor, is radially extqnding with respect -to -the axis of the rotor. These relatively simple ancl conventional Eorms of material control elements can be combined fairly readily to prod-uce axial flow ro-tary separator designs which perEorm well in a .~
~ 1 --33;~
1 limited range of crops or crop conditions, for example handling corn and soybeans at moderate moisture contents. However, there is a tendency with conventional material control elements and particularly those of generally radial extent for crop material to collect into "ropes" or fold into wads in advance of the elements, tending to jam or wedge between the rotor and housing and causing serious fluctuations in torque in the rotor drive system (if not actually plugging the machine) and reducing thresh-ing and separating efficiency because of the undesirable bunching of material. The tendency for these conventional material control ; elements to actually lose control of material is especially pronounced in handling the more difficult crop materials, partic-ularly long straw varieties at high moisture contents and especi-ally rice.
A particular problem in axial flow rotary separators is to transform, in as short an axial space as possible, a concentrated stream of crop material delivered by a feeder house into a thin annular mat for efficient reception into the relatively confined annular space of the threshing zone. It is known to provide a stepped grate or concave to permit increased grate or concave clearance at the beginning of the threshing section and also to provide specially designed feed rotor flights in attempts to overcome this problem.
Combin~s embodying axial Elow ro-tary separators potentially have high ~pec:LEia capacity and ver~a-tility but with the makerial con-trol elements and systems so far known, -these poten-tials have been only partially r~alized.
Summary of the Invention Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an axial flow rotary separator less sensitive to crop material condition and type and one in which material flow is uniform, positive and consistent. More particularly, it is an 5~332 1 object to provide material control elements for the rotor of such a separator that improve threshing and separating efficiency by providing good material handling and maintenance of material control as crop material progresses through the machine.
It is an important feature of the invention to use as a rotor functional element a blade with a frontal (with respect to rotor rotation) working edge for primary engagement of crop material as the rotor rotates and so inclined that the blade surfaces play only a selective subordinate role in conveying and controlling the crop material. This concept results in less friction between the rotor elements and the crop material and lower specific power consumption and is particularly effective when harvesting crops at high moisture content.
Another feature of a material control element according to the invention is that its net effect results from the combination of the separate and characteristic effects of the working edge and frontal or leading blade surfaces, respectively. While the working edge must be generally athwart the direction of rotation and oriented so as to have a conveying effect in the desired axial direction, the line of maximum slope or inclination of the blade leading surface, while it must always have a downstream component, that is, a componen-t in the axial direction of flow of material, may, according to the spirit of the invention, be orien-ted anywhere in a broad zone from almost in the direction of rc~-tation to almos-t opposite thak direction alkhough perferably within an appxoximate quadran-t ex-kendincJ Erom approximately ~5 in khe direction o~ ro-ta-tlon to approximately ~5 against -the direckton Oe rotatiQn. ~he dlrection in which kernel~ oE grain colliding with a blade surEace will be deElected depends on this orientation, such collisions tending generally either to acceler-ate or to retard the axial progress of the grain through the separator and to accelerate it either radially inwardly or out-.
.
1 wardly and potentially affecting threshing and separating effi-ciency. This feature of the material control element of the invention may be used selectively in design to optimize the several functions of the material control element according to the portion of the separator in which it is located r or the variety of crop to be handled, or other needs.
Another advantage of the invention is that it allows selec-tive use to be made of the tendency of a leading edge or surface having a backwards slope with respect to the direction of rotor rotation to force material outwards against the concave with a potential for increased separation efficiency.
Another advantage of the invention is that the working edge has a combing action in the crop material which helps in separa-tion and maintaining a uniform and attenuated mat of material, a relatively high population of such elements on a rotor tending to maintain a thinner mat of crop material.
Another feature of the invention is that the downstream inclination of the blade creates a pocket beneath and behind the working edge, providing relief space to avoid compression and bunching of material and permit desirable slippage and tumbling to take place.
When an element according to the invention presents predomi-nately a working edge rather than surface to engage the crop matexial~ -the relatively low Eriction of the edge results in rel~tively high but controlled slippage between the rotor and axop matexial, which is -to say that the relatively slower sp~ed Oe ~he cxop material axound the periphexy of the housing ox grate is approxima-tely a constant proportion oE -the peripheral speed o~
the xotox.
It is anothex featuxe oE the inventi.on that it is adaptable to be used in vaxious poxtions of the separator including the Eeed rotor portion or a transition portion Erom the feed to the 1 threshing section as well as in the threshing and separating sections themselves. In a transition portion, blades according to the invention may be used in an array spanning the rotor transition portion in combination with a ramp-style rasp bar, an element in which both clearance between the "rasps" (or blades) themselves and between rasps and housing progressivly decrease between the upstream and downstream ends of the bars. Material control elements according to the invention may also be used in combination with a variety of other rotor elements such as conven-tional rasp type threshing bars, with radially extending separa-ting bars or as a threshing element in conjunction with a spike-tooth concave.
Brief Description o~ the Drawings Fig. 1 is a side elevation of a combine embodying the invention.
Fig. 2 is an enlarged, partially cut away side elevation of the separator and feeder house of the combine shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a front left, three-quarter perspective view of the rotor of the separator shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4 is a semi-schematic partial side view showing the ramp style rasp bar included in the separator transition portion.
Fig. 5 is a semi-schematic cross sectional view of the threshing section of the separator on line 5--5 of Fig. 2.
Fi~, 6 i~ an enlarged view of a canted angle blade ~removed Erom the ro~or and viewed in the equivalent of a radially inward direction).
Fig 7 is an end view of the canted blade -taken on line 7--7 of ~ig. 6.
~'ig. 8 is an enlarged view of a tilt blade (removed ~rom the rotor and viewed in the equivalent of a radially inward dlrection).
Fig. 9 is an end view of the tilt blade kaken on line 9--9 of Fig. 8.
33~
1 Fig. 10 is an enlarged view of a raked blade for mounting on a rotor viewed in the equivalent of a radially inward direction.
Fig. 11 is a view of the raked blade taken approximately on line 11--11 of Fig. 10.
Fig. 12 is a semi-schematic cut away side view of a separator threshing section including an alternate embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 13 is a cross sectional view taken on line 13--13 of Fig. 12.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment The invention is embodied in a self-propelled combine having a main separator body indicated generally by the numeral 10 and supported by a pair of laterally spaced forward drive wheels 12 and steerable rear wheels 14. An elevated operator's station 16 is mounted forward on the body immediately ahead of a grain tank 18. The central forward portion of the combine body 10 is occu-pied by a fore-and-aft extending axial-flow rotary separator or crop processing unit 20 and a rear mounted engine 22 provides power for propelling the combine and driving its components. A
generally fore-and-aft extending cleaning shoe 2~ is carried beneath the separator 20. A grain unloa~ing system includes a vertical auger conveyor 26 and a swingable unloading auger con-veyor 28.
Mounted immediately ahead of the separator 20 is a header 30 including a ga-thqring unit 32 such as a conventional grain plat-Eorm, and shown in Fig, 1 only, Eor gakhering a crop as the combine advances over a ~ield and deliveri.ng crop material -to an auger :~eeder house 3~ which in turn delivers it rqarwardly and upwardly to -khe .rotary separator 20.
The rokary separator 20 is shown in some detail in Fig. 2 and includes a fixed fore-and-a~t extending housing 36 surrounding and concentric with a rotor 38. The periphery of the rotor 38 is spaced from the inside of the housing 36 so that there is an 33:Z:
1 anr.ular space 39 (seen best in Fig. 5) extending the length of the separator. The rotor 38 (as seen best in Fig. 3~ includes a forward frusto-conical infeed portion 40 and a generally cylindri-cal main portion including, from front to rear, transition 42, threshing 44, and separating 46 portions. The body or ~rame of the rotor 38 includes a forward frusto-conical infeed portion 50 and a main cylindrical portion 52 and is supported for ro-tation in the combine frame and driven by conventional means (not shown).
The rotor infeed portion 40 carries a set of six circumfer-entially equally spaced generally helical flights 54 rigidlyattached to the infeed rotor body 50 by their inner edges 56.
Each blade 54 has an outer edge 58 and has a somewhat twisted form so that its leading edge 60 and trailing edge 62 are inclined into and away from the direction of rotation, respectively.
The transition portion 42 of the rotor occupies the forward part of the cylindrical body 52 and is contiguous with the infeed portion 40 and includes six circumferentially equally spaced sets of material control elements, each set including a ramp-style rasp bar 64 and an elongated array of tilt blades such as the row 66 shown here. In each set both the ramp-style rasp bar 64 and the row of tilt blades 66 are disposed helical fashion on the rotor body 52, each with their forward ends adjacent the rearward end of an infeed rotor blade 54, but diverging rearwardly so that at the rear of the transition portion 42 the row of tilt blades 66 o~ on~ set convqrges on the downstrea~n encl o:E the ramp-s-tyle rasp b~r 64 o~ -the adjacent set~
~ ach ramp-style rasp bar 64 includes a ramp-llke base 68 increasing in height ~rom front to rear and seen best in Figs. 3 and ~ and, mounted rigidly on the base 68, a series o:E ramp blades 70, each blade extending approximately radlally and, in relation to the rotor body cylindrical portion 52 being angled or helically disposed and mounted so that the spacing between adja-cent blades decreases from front to rear.
1 Each row 66 of tilt blades includes a series of generally triangular tilt blades 72, to be described in detail below.
The threshing portion 44 of the rotor includes six equally circum~erentially spaced axially extending conventional rasp bars 73, each rasp bar being carried and spaced ~rom the rotor body 52 by a generally axially extending threshing bar support 80, seen best in Fig. 5, and including, as is conventional, a plurality of generally radially extending ribs 82.
Extending axially from the forward end of the threshing 10 portion 44 to the rearward end of the separating portion 46 of the rotor and, in the threshing portion 44/ lying between adjacent threshing bars 78, are six circumerentially equally spaced separating bars 84. Each separating bar includes a plurality of canted blades 8Z ~described in detail below), mounted on a carrier 88 (seen best in Fig. 5), which is rigidly attached to the cylin-drical rotor body 52, and includes an outer surface 90, tangential to the rotor and forming a floor for the array of blades 86.
The rotor housing 36 includes solid or imperforate forward ~rusto-conical infeed and cylindrical transition portions 104 and 106, respectively. The infeed por-tion 104 includes a downwardly and forwardly directed opening 108 for receiving crop material from the feeder house 34. Pluralities of fixed lead members such as the raised helical ribs 110 and 112 shown are carried by the inner surfaces of the infeed and transition housing portions 104 ~n~ 10 6, xespecti.~ely.
The threshing and separating sections oE the rotor, 44 and ~ respectively, are surrounded by a spiral rod grate 114 compris-ing a plurality o~ spiral.ly disposed xods 116 supported by a plurali-ty of circum~erentially spaced axially extending spacer bars 11~.
Surrounding the grate 114 are suitable collecting and divert-ing means (not shown .in the drawings) ~or intercepting grain and chaff expelled through the grate and diverting it downwards to the cleaner 24.
_ ~ _ ~3~Z
1 A transversely mounted rotating beater 120 (shown only in Fig. 1~ is disposed immediately adjacent and below the discharge or downstream end of the separator 20 for propelling straw generally rearwardly and onto the ground behind the combine.
An alternative threshing section 122, also embodying the invention and particularly suitable for use in harvesting rice, is shown in Figs. 12 and 13. Material flows axially into the threshing section 122 from an infeed section 124, shown in phantom outline only in Fig. 12. The threshing rotor includes a cylindri-10 cal body 126 which carries six circumferentially equally spacedaxially extending arrays 128 of tilt blades 72a. These blacLes, to be described in detail below, are each similar in form and orientation with respect to the rotor axis to the blades 72 shown -~
in Figs. 2 and 3 and are fixed to the rotor body 126 with all blades inclined equally downstream.
A threshing housing 132 surrounds the rotor threshing portion and includes an upper solid or imperforate cover 13~ carrying a plurality of fixed raised helical lead members 136 and a lower foraminous concave or grate portion 138. Rigidly attached to the grate 138 are two circumferentially spaced rows 140 of spike teeth, of the type used in conventional spike-tooth combine threshing cylinders. Each row 140 comprises a staggered array of teeth, each tooth 142 being inclined upstream at an angl~ apprGxi-mately equal to the downstream inclination of the tilt blades 72a. rrhe -keeth are disposed so -that they overlap radially and as the ro-tor rota-tes each kilt blade 72a passe~ either approximately cen-trally (in terms o~ axial spacing) between adjacent tee-th 142, ox, in -the case of khe endmos-t blades, adjacen-t a splke -tooth.
~he -tilt blade 72 and canted blades 86 shown on the rotor in Figs. 2 and 3 and the tilt blade 72a in the alternative embodiment shown in Figs. 12 and 13 are all particular embodiments of the inclined material control and conveying blade of ~he invention and are shown in more detail and generalized form in Figs. 6 and _ g _ i~L~33;Z~
1 7 (canted blade) and 8 and 9 (tilt blade) respectively. Features characteristic of the lnclined blade of the invention and shared by the canted (86) and tilt blades (72 and 72a) include having a relatively slender body (143 and 143') with approximately parallel inner and outer surfaces (144, 144' and 145, 145' respectively) and being inclined in a generally downstream direction (F, F') with an angle of inclination of the body away from the radial of a and a' respectively as shown in Figs. 7 and 9. It is convenient to express the orientation of the inclination of the blade in 10 terms of the direction of its "line of slope (S, S')", that is to say, the direction of the line of maximum slope of the body surfaces. Such direction is given by the projection of that line in the inclined surface which is perpendicular to the line of intersection of the plane of the inclined surface with a plane parallel to one tangential to the generally cylindrical periphery of the rotor and passing through the blade surface, into the latter plane. Thus, a canted blade (Fig. 6) is, broadly speaking, ; defined as a blade whose line of slope (S) lies in the quadrant bounded by an axially downstream direction (F) and the circum-ferential direction of rotation (R), but pre~erably in the range bounded by an axially downstream direction and one 45~ towards the direction of rotation. A tilt blade (Fig. 8) is one in which the line of slope lS') lies axially downstream.
~ he hlades are shaped so as to presen-t a working edge (146 and l.46') to crop material as the rotor rotates, the edge having, wl-th respea-t to -the direation of rotor rota-tion (R, Rl), leading and trailing portions (147, ].47' and 148, 148' respectively). In keep:lng with the invention, the worklng edges (146, 146') arq oriented so that they have a posi-tive lead angle, that is, the leading portions ~.147, 147') are upstream of the trailing portions (148, 148'), the angle o~ departure of the working edge from a plane normal to the rotor axis being indicated in Figs. 6 and 8 by the letters b and b' respectively. The canted blade 86 of 33Z:
1 this embodiment has a working Pdge (146) perpendicular to its line of slope (S), but it will be appreciated that with a line of slope so oriented, a desired positive working edge lead angle (b) may be obtained with other alignments of working edge in relation to said line of slope, but, o~ course, within the limits predeter-mined by the particular line of slope of the canted blade. In the case of the tilt blade (72, 72a), however, positive working edge lead angle (b') can be obtained only with an edge (146') oblique to the line of slope (S') so that it slopes backwards (with respect to rotor rotation) and outwards.
Each inclined blade also includes a base edge (150, 150') by which, as in the embodiments shown in Figs. 6-9, it may be mounted on a rotor frame or blade carrier surface (151, 151'), the base edge having leading and trailing portions (152, 152' and 154, 154' respectivelyl. The base edge (150, 150') also has a lead angle, that angle between the edge and a plane normal to the axis of the rotor, indicated by the letter c for the canted blade 86 in Fig. 6. In the special case of the tilt blade (72 or 72a), shown in Fig. 8, the corresponding angle c' (not indicated in Fig. 8) ls zero. It should be noted that to simplify the descrip-tion of the essentials of the blades, they have been shown in Figs. 6-9 as mounted on a ~loor-like surface (151, 151') tangen-tial, as it were, to the generally cylindrical periphery of a rotor. Thq base edges (150, 150') will thus, following our above deflnition, be perpendicular to their respective lines oE slope (~, S'). More generally, oE course, the lead angle of the base or inner ed~e (150, 150') is a ~unction of -the angle of inclina tlon oE the blade (a, a') and the (obli~ue) angle which -the edge ma]ces with the line of maxi.mum slope oE the blade. ~nother aspect oE the versatility of the blades of the invention is, therefore, ~hat ~iven a particular blade inclination (a, a') and line o~ slope (S, S'), base edge (150, 150') alignment and/or floor or mounting surface aspect (with respect to a plane tangen-1 tial to the general cylindricality of the rotor periphery) may bechosen to achieve a particular desired base edge lead angle (c, c') to suit a particular application.
Each blade also has a shin edge (156, 156') extending between the leading portions (1~2, 152' and 147, 147') of the base (150, 150') and working (146, 146l) edges respectively and preferably is backward sloping relative to the direction of rotation. Each blade also has a trailing edge ~157, 157') extending between the trailing portions (154, 154' and 148, 148') of the base and working edges (150, 150' and 146, 146') respec-tively. However, it will be understood that the shin (156, 156') and trailing (157, 157') edges as such are not essential features of the blade of the invention. They may, in effect, be co-extensive with the leading and trailing portions of th~ working edge as, for example, in a blade in which the edges are entirely defined by a base edge and a continuously curving working edge ~not shown in the drawings) extending between the opposite extrem-ities of the base edge.
~n operation, as is well known, a self-propelled combine 20 such as the embodiment of the present invention advances over a ~ :
field of crop material which is gathered by the gathering unit 32 and conveyed by way of the feeder house 34 to be engaged by the infeed rotor portion 40, from whence it is conveyed spirally and rearwardly through the separator in the annular space 39 between the rotor 38 and the housing 36 as -the resul-t of the in-teraction between the crop m~terial and the stationary lead members inside the housing 9uch as -the helical members 110 and 112 ancl the ma-terial control and conveying members of the rotor such as -the tilt blades 72 and the canted blades 86.
The threshing of grain from the ears is effected principally by rubbing action between the rasp bars 78 and the grate 114 and separation and expulsion of grain and chaff through the g:rate to be collected and delivered to the cleaner 24 continues as the 332:
1 crop material ls conveyed spirally rearwards. Straw is e~ected rearwardly from the rear of the housing 36 and, with the assis-tance of the beater 120, is discharged rearwardly onto the ground. -~
Clean grain from the cleaner 24 is delivered to the grain tank 18 by conventional conveying means (not shown).
Considering now the particular operational characteristics of the inclined blade of the invention, the canted (86) and tilt (72, 72a) blades shown in detail in Figs. 6, 7, 8 and 9 are referred to as exemplary embodiments. The dominating material conveying and control feature is the working edge (146, 146') while the inner and outer surfaces of the blade (144, 144' and 145~ 145' respectively) play a relatively subordinate role, the importance of which varies according to the orientation of the line of slope ~S, ~') and the downstream inclination of the blades (a and a'). As the rotor rotates, crop material is engaged primarily by the working edge (146, 146'). The downstream incli-nation of the blade creates a pocket or relief space (158, 158'), behind and radially inside of the working edge, concentrating contact between crop material and the blade on the relatively small area of the working edge. Preferably the working edge is without discontinuities so that friction between it and the crop material is low contributing to slippage between the crop material and the rotor and so that the blades, while maintaining control and continuing to advance the material in the axial direction indlcated by the arroW~ ~F~ F'), (due -to the lead angle b, b'), do so with les~ "stress" and power requirement -than conventional material movers such as radially ex-tendlng continuous helical members or near axial radially ex-tending paddles. Note, tha-t while the working edge (146) of the canted blade (86) is approx-imately tangential to the rokor that (146') of the til-t blade (7~, 72a) slopes backwardly and outwardly enhancing the combing effect of the inclined blade and its tendency to attenuate the mat of crop material. The use of an array of inclined blades ~L~5~332 1 minimizes the creation of compressed bunches of material and the "pocket" formed under and behind the working edge allows slippage of material without further compressing the mat of material.
The working edge (146, 146') presents a relatively small impact area for loose grain and so it is the greater bulk of the crop material, material other than grain (MOG) which is conveyed and controlled directly by the working edge. In general it may be said that during the separation process threshed grain is largely conveyed through being carried by the MOG rather than directly by the blades. However, grain kernels threshed from the ears have at least the opportunity of encountering the relatively larger areas of the blade surfaces (particularly the inner sur-faces 144, 144') and while the working edge of the blade of the invention is always oriented to function in generally the same way, to convey and comb the crop material, variations in the orientation of the line of slope (S, S') and angle of inclination of the blade from the radial (a and a') have significant effects on separation according to how the blade surfaces tend to deflect any grain kernels which they encounter. For example, assuming that, relatively, the kernel of grain is approaching a blade on a tangentially circumferential path or trajectory (T, T'), in Figs.
6 and 8 respectively, and considering first the tilt blade (72 or 72a) it can be seen that the kernel can make only tangential contact with the inner 144' blade surface, so that generally speaking a tilt blade ~uch as illustra-ted here has no -tendency to deflqct grain axially either ~ps-trearn or downstream (as indicated by D' in ~ig, 8).
~ n the case o~ the canted blade 86, it can be seen rom Fi~.
6 tha-t a kernel of ~rain approaching the blade relatively on a circum~erential path T that there will be an impact on the inner or leading blade sur~ace 144 and that the orientation of the blade surface is such that the impact will de~lect the grain into a path D having both axially downstream and radially inward :
~L~5~33~
1 (towards the rotor axis) components. In itself this e~fect would seem to hamper separation, the deflection axially downs-tream tending to reduce the time the kernel remains in the separator and the radially inwards deflection carrying the kernel away from the grate through which it must be expelled to complete separa-tion. However, the inclined blade of the invention typically is not used alone but in an array as disclosed here. Such an array is in effect an interrupted material handling and control system producing agitation, combing and reorientation of the MO~/
which, coupled with the centrifugal effect of the spiral path of the MOG within the annular space between rotor and grate, produces a total separating effect which overshadows the apparently nega-tive effect on separation of the inner surface 144 of the canted blade described above.
Compared with the tilt blade 72, 72a where the effect of blade surfaces is minimized the canted blade 86 is a compromise.
The working edge 146 still dominates bringing advantages such as ability to handle wet material without roping but the inclined inner or leading surface 144 athwart the relative direction of movement of the blade R makes significant contact with the crop material to lessen the slippage e~fect created by the exposed edge and provide more direct propulsion of the crop material.
A further embodiment of the inclined blade of the invention, sui-table for use on a separa-tor rotor, is illustrated in ~igs. 10 and 11. In this raked or compound blade 164 the inclinecl inner and outer sur~aces 1~", ]~5" re~pecti~ely, inc:lined in a down-stream direa-tlon, the s~lender body 1~3" and the working edge 1~6"
orienked so as -~o lead or convey material downstream are retained.
However, the raked blade is characterized in -that its line of slope S" fallq between axially downstream and counter to the direction of rotation, but preferably between the axial direction and 45 against the direction o~ rotation. Consequently, with a tangential mounting surface 151", the base or inner edge 150" is g33~
1 disposed athwart the direction of relative movement of the blade (R") with a negative lead angle and, in terms of relative motion between the blade and the crop material and grate, the blade 164 presents a backward sloping outer surface 145". (Note that in this case the outer surface 145" becomes the leading surface.) The raked blade 164 thus presents two anterior or frontal features for initial contact with the crop material, the working edge 146"
and the outer surface 1~5". The effect of the backward and outward orientation of the outer surface 145" is to tend to increase separation efficiency through strongly supplementing the ramp effect of the similarly oriented working edge 146" forcing crop material outwards towards the grate, although an accompanying -increase in friction will increase power required to drive the rotor. In this case a free kernel of grain approaching the blade relatively in a circumferential path T" will encounter the outer surface 145" of the blade and be deflected to a path D" after impact having axially upstream and radially outward components, both apparently aiding separating efficiency, the one through tending to increase the time the kernel remains in the separator and the other through sending it in the direction of expulsion through the grate. The raked blade 164 has so far been discussed as if the blade surfaces 144" and 145" were plane but they may be curved as illustrated in Figs. 10 and 11 so that, for example, the deflecting and material control effect of the outer surface 1~5" will vary from one park o~ a sur~ace to another. Further, the convexity of the ou-ter surface 145li tencls to "soften" -the action of the blade and reduae fxiction by reducing the aggres-siveness o~ -the trailing blade tip 166".
It will now be clear that -the lnclined blades of the inven-tion may be used on a rotor in one or more of the inEeed, thresh-in~ and separating portions of a separator depending upon function ~.
objectives and such variables as type and condition of crops to be handled, proportions of the separator, etc. They may be used, : :
~15~33;2:
1 for example, in axial or helical arrays circumferentially spaced around a rotor, as the only type of element on a particularly axially defined section or in conjunction with other elements such as rasp bars (threshing~ or radial separator bars.
In the above embodiment, in the transition portion 42 of the rotor, the tilt blades 72 are used along with a ramp-style rasp bar 64 (discussed in more detail below). The til-t blades 72 here are of uni~orm height and arranged in helical Eormation 66 on the cylindrical rotor body 52 creating an interrupted helix conveying lQ element effective to reduce wadding or roping compared with a continuous element offering an approximately radial blade surface.
Using an array or multiplicity of relatively smaller elements such as the tilt blades here rather than a continuous member discourages collections or concentrations of material by the rotor elements resulting in a thinner more uniform mat of material and smoother operation with better separation efficiency. The tilt blades 72 in staggered formation are particularly effective here, cooperating with the ramp-style rasp bars 64 to redistribute and condition material received in a concentrated stream from the feeder house 34 and carried into the separator by the infeed rotor portion 40~ into a uniEorm attenuated mat encircling the rotor for reception by the threshing portion 44. Tilt blades are also particularly e~fective in handling rice which has a strong tendency to bunch, kwist and rope ahead of conventional material control e].ements.
It ~hould be no-ted here -that the tilt blade 72 illustrates ano-ther Eace-t o~ -the versatili-ty oE -the inclined blade o~ the invention in that the working edge 146' is not perpendicular to the line oE grea-kest slope oE the inner and outer ~urfaces 144', 143'. It is orien-ted so that with respeat to rotor ~orm and rotation, the work:ing edge is not tangential or circumferential but i8 backwardly sloped, the trailing portion 148' being disposed rearward and radially outward o~ the leading portion 147', tending 1 to enhance the combing ef~ect and also to deflect material radially ou~wards. In the transition portion the latter helps develop the thin mat for threshing and when used in threshing or separating portions tends to improve separa~ion.
Compared with the tilt blades 72 the canted blades 86, carried in axial array on the separator bars 84, extending through-out the threshing and separating portions of the rotor, 44 and 46 respectively, are designed to convey rather more positively so as to move the MOG in a controlled spiral rearwardly for discharge at the downstream end of the separator. At the same tlme the canted blades 86 and the open space between them in each array provide sufficient slippage and agitation so that desired thresh-ing and separating efficiency levels are achieved at acceptable power levels. In the threshing section of the separator the canted blades 86, interspersed between the rasp bars 78, contri-bute to threshing efficiency by a reorientation and agitation of the crop material after it leaves one rasp bar and before it is engaged by the next. Separation efficiency and material handling are interdependent and uniform and positive control of material directly aids separation.
It will be understood that just as the rows 66 of tilt blades of the transition section are disposed helically, the rasp bar.s 78 and separator bars 8~ ~Figs. 2 and 3) and the tilt blade row 128 of the alternate embodiment threshing section (Figs. 12 and 13) may, while still spanning -their given axial extent, also be helica.lly disposecl with respec-t to ~he rotor axis. Such disposition, wl-th an appropriate lead angle may contribu-te to -the -to-tal eEeective axial displacemen-t o~ crop material caused by the blade array but its most importan-t e~Eect is to discourage wadding or ropin~ oE material ahead o~ the blades which may possibly occur even with the inclined blades of the invention in some extreme conditions such as handling long, wet rice straw.
3~
1 Although the present embodiment includes six each of the threshing bars 78 and separator bars 84, it is often desirable to use :Eewer bars, especially in rotors of smaller diameter as are typically used in a multi-rotor separator. Considerations influ-encing the number of bars which may be used efficiently on a given rotor include two which are related to the physical charac-teristics of the crop material to be handled and which are rela-tively independent of rotor diameter. First, i-t is desirable to maintain a certain minimum circumferential spacing between func-tional bars or blades to permit a tumbling or reorientation of material, for efficient threshing and separating. Space must be provided, too, to allow concentrations of crop material, including ears of corn, to enter the separator and be conveyed into the threshing section. Secondly, there is a minimum length for the inclined blade, and particularly for the working edge, below which the material control and conveying potential of the inclined blade is not adequately realized.
It will be understood of course that the operation of the inclined blades of the present invention, discussed above, is achieved in coopera-tion with fixed housings and grates surrounding the rotor on which they are carried. The net result o~ the combined effects of the helical or helically arrayed members or helically disposed features of material control elements of rotor and housing, and Eriction and inertia of the crop material, and relati~e motion between -the rotor and houslng is -to propel crop materlal rearwardly in a spiral path. In practice -thexe is slippage oE the crop material no-t onl~ in xelation to elements such as blades carried by the rokor bu-t also in relation to :Eixed helical lead members (such as the helical in:Eeed members 110, the transition helical members 112 and the spiral rods 116 of the grate), the latter also cont.ributing to material agitation and aiding separation. The total slippage depends on a number o~
variables such as radial clea.rance between the rotor and housing, -- 19 -- .
~L5~33~!:
1 feed rate, etc. as well as the form of the material control elements themselves. The following rotor and inclined blade dimensions are examples only of some which have been tested with good results: length of threshing and separating sections of 900 to 1250 and 1250 to 1500 millimeters respectively; rotor outside diameters of 500 to 900 millimeters with peripheral speeds up to 45 meters/second and rotor to grate or housing clearance of 10 to 15 milllmeters for small grains (higher clearances are desirable for corn); blade heights 40 to 110 millimeters and lengths up to 250 millimeters with axial spacing between blades of 100 to 200 millimeters; blades having angle of inclination from the radial (a) of 30 to 45 and a lead angle (b) of 15 to 30; ratios of blade heights to both length and axial spacing about 1 to 2 gave good results. Circumferential intervals between functional elements (threshing bars, arrays of inclined blades, etc.) of the order of 100 to 200 millimeters or twice the length of the inclined blade are generally desirable. An example of a particu-lar set of compatible specifications for a rotor having six conventional rasp bars 78 and six separator bars 8~ with canted blades 86, for use in small grain such as wheat, is as follows:
rotor diameter 700 millimeters; length of threshing section 1000 millimeters; length of separating section 1~00 millime~ers; rotor peripheral speed 30 meters/second; rotor to grate or housing clearance 15 millimeters; blade height, length and axial spacing 75, lSQ and 150 milli.meters respectively; and angles of inclina--tion from thq rad:Lal (a) and lqad anglq (b) bo-th 30.
It will bq unders-tood also that al-though clearance between ro~or and housing or grate is varied according to crop t~p~ and condition, i-t must be limited so that rotor elements such as ~he inclinecl blades of the invention can maintain control of material and successful operation of the blades dc>es not depend upon the presence oE a housing or grate of a particular form, although they are particularly effective with relatively low friction .
3~32 1 housings with positve lead, similar to that of the present embodiment; and further, that the canted, tilt and raked blades 86, 72, 72a and 164 described above are only examples of possible configurations of the inclined blade.
The special function of the ramp-style rasp bars 64, seen best in Figs. 2, 3, and 4, is to provide for incoming crop mate-rial, a smooth and gradual transition, from the predominantly conveying function of the infeed rotor portion 40 and the upstream portion of the transition section 42 of the rotor, to the thresh-ing section of the rotor 44 and, in particular, to deliver cropmaterial in suitable condition and disposition to the upstream end of the rasp bars 78 of the threshing section. As is apparent, towards the upstream end of the transition portion 42 of the : ro-tor, the tilt blades 72 extend radially beyond the ramp-style rasp bar blades 70 and are dominant in controlling the crop material whereas towards the downstream end of the transition portion 42 of the rotor the ramp style rasp bar blades 70 are closer spaced and, being mounted on the ramp or base 68, extend radially above the tilt blades 72 while the radial clearance between the blades and housing progressively decreases. The combined effect of the decreasing axial spacing between the ramp-style rasp bar blades 70 themselves and rearwardly decreasing tip clearance between the blades 70 and the transition housing :106 is that of a progressi.vely reducing effective radial thickness of the annulax space, which so control~ the incoming crop material as to progressively attenuate it into a relat.ively thin mat, distributed around the circumference of the ro-tor ready for reception into the .relatively thin annular space defined between the rasp threshing bars 78 and the threshing portion of the grate 11~. As the tip clearances between blade and hous.ing, and clear-ances between blades towards the rearward end of -the ramp--style rasp bars 6~ approach those of the rasp bars 78 of the threshing section, threshing begins in the rearward portion of the transi-tion section.
.
This invention relates to axial flow rotary separators for agricultural crops of a kind typically embodied in combines and more particularly to material control and conveying elements carried on the rotors of such separators.
The mode of operation of such separators is well known.
Crop material is fed into the annular space between a rotor and a stationary housing, which includes grate portions, and through cooperation between rotor and housing the material is propelled in a spiral path through the annular space while grain is threshed and separated from it and expelled through the grates and col-lected for further processing. Typically the rotor includes a first, upstream feed rotor portion designed to receive crop material from a feeder house and convey it into the separator proper.
The internal surface of the housing and the external surface of the rotor are provided with material control elements or features so that the relative motion between the rotor and housing surfaces effects the processing and conveying of the material contained between them. The material control elements used in existing separators vary in detail but, typically, axial indexing is effected by generally helical ribs (either continuous or interrupted) carried usually by the housing but sometimes by the rotor or by both. The rotor typically carries generally axially ~x-tqnding qlqmen-ts which have primarily a processing eunction and only secondarily a conveying function and may include conventional rasp bars in the ~hreshing section and paddles in a separa-ting s~c-tion. The yeneral ~orm oE these elements, particularly thosq on khe rotor, is radially extqnding with respect -to -the axis of the rotor. These relatively simple ancl conventional Eorms of material control elements can be combined fairly readily to prod-uce axial flow ro-tary separator designs which perEorm well in a .~
~ 1 --33;~
1 limited range of crops or crop conditions, for example handling corn and soybeans at moderate moisture contents. However, there is a tendency with conventional material control elements and particularly those of generally radial extent for crop material to collect into "ropes" or fold into wads in advance of the elements, tending to jam or wedge between the rotor and housing and causing serious fluctuations in torque in the rotor drive system (if not actually plugging the machine) and reducing thresh-ing and separating efficiency because of the undesirable bunching of material. The tendency for these conventional material control ; elements to actually lose control of material is especially pronounced in handling the more difficult crop materials, partic-ularly long straw varieties at high moisture contents and especi-ally rice.
A particular problem in axial flow rotary separators is to transform, in as short an axial space as possible, a concentrated stream of crop material delivered by a feeder house into a thin annular mat for efficient reception into the relatively confined annular space of the threshing zone. It is known to provide a stepped grate or concave to permit increased grate or concave clearance at the beginning of the threshing section and also to provide specially designed feed rotor flights in attempts to overcome this problem.
Combin~s embodying axial Elow ro-tary separators potentially have high ~pec:LEia capacity and ver~a-tility but with the makerial con-trol elements and systems so far known, -these poten-tials have been only partially r~alized.
Summary of the Invention Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an axial flow rotary separator less sensitive to crop material condition and type and one in which material flow is uniform, positive and consistent. More particularly, it is an 5~332 1 object to provide material control elements for the rotor of such a separator that improve threshing and separating efficiency by providing good material handling and maintenance of material control as crop material progresses through the machine.
It is an important feature of the invention to use as a rotor functional element a blade with a frontal (with respect to rotor rotation) working edge for primary engagement of crop material as the rotor rotates and so inclined that the blade surfaces play only a selective subordinate role in conveying and controlling the crop material. This concept results in less friction between the rotor elements and the crop material and lower specific power consumption and is particularly effective when harvesting crops at high moisture content.
Another feature of a material control element according to the invention is that its net effect results from the combination of the separate and characteristic effects of the working edge and frontal or leading blade surfaces, respectively. While the working edge must be generally athwart the direction of rotation and oriented so as to have a conveying effect in the desired axial direction, the line of maximum slope or inclination of the blade leading surface, while it must always have a downstream component, that is, a componen-t in the axial direction of flow of material, may, according to the spirit of the invention, be orien-ted anywhere in a broad zone from almost in the direction of rc~-tation to almos-t opposite thak direction alkhough perferably within an appxoximate quadran-t ex-kendincJ Erom approximately ~5 in khe direction o~ ro-ta-tlon to approximately ~5 against -the direckton Oe rotatiQn. ~he dlrection in which kernel~ oE grain colliding with a blade surEace will be deElected depends on this orientation, such collisions tending generally either to acceler-ate or to retard the axial progress of the grain through the separator and to accelerate it either radially inwardly or out-.
.
1 wardly and potentially affecting threshing and separating effi-ciency. This feature of the material control element of the invention may be used selectively in design to optimize the several functions of the material control element according to the portion of the separator in which it is located r or the variety of crop to be handled, or other needs.
Another advantage of the invention is that it allows selec-tive use to be made of the tendency of a leading edge or surface having a backwards slope with respect to the direction of rotor rotation to force material outwards against the concave with a potential for increased separation efficiency.
Another advantage of the invention is that the working edge has a combing action in the crop material which helps in separa-tion and maintaining a uniform and attenuated mat of material, a relatively high population of such elements on a rotor tending to maintain a thinner mat of crop material.
Another feature of the invention is that the downstream inclination of the blade creates a pocket beneath and behind the working edge, providing relief space to avoid compression and bunching of material and permit desirable slippage and tumbling to take place.
When an element according to the invention presents predomi-nately a working edge rather than surface to engage the crop matexial~ -the relatively low Eriction of the edge results in rel~tively high but controlled slippage between the rotor and axop matexial, which is -to say that the relatively slower sp~ed Oe ~he cxop material axound the periphexy of the housing ox grate is approxima-tely a constant proportion oE -the peripheral speed o~
the xotox.
It is anothex featuxe oE the inventi.on that it is adaptable to be used in vaxious poxtions of the separator including the Eeed rotor portion or a transition portion Erom the feed to the 1 threshing section as well as in the threshing and separating sections themselves. In a transition portion, blades according to the invention may be used in an array spanning the rotor transition portion in combination with a ramp-style rasp bar, an element in which both clearance between the "rasps" (or blades) themselves and between rasps and housing progressivly decrease between the upstream and downstream ends of the bars. Material control elements according to the invention may also be used in combination with a variety of other rotor elements such as conven-tional rasp type threshing bars, with radially extending separa-ting bars or as a threshing element in conjunction with a spike-tooth concave.
Brief Description o~ the Drawings Fig. 1 is a side elevation of a combine embodying the invention.
Fig. 2 is an enlarged, partially cut away side elevation of the separator and feeder house of the combine shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a front left, three-quarter perspective view of the rotor of the separator shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4 is a semi-schematic partial side view showing the ramp style rasp bar included in the separator transition portion.
Fig. 5 is a semi-schematic cross sectional view of the threshing section of the separator on line 5--5 of Fig. 2.
Fi~, 6 i~ an enlarged view of a canted angle blade ~removed Erom the ro~or and viewed in the equivalent of a radially inward direction).
Fig 7 is an end view of the canted blade -taken on line 7--7 of ~ig. 6.
~'ig. 8 is an enlarged view of a tilt blade (removed ~rom the rotor and viewed in the equivalent of a radially inward dlrection).
Fig. 9 is an end view of the tilt blade kaken on line 9--9 of Fig. 8.
33~
1 Fig. 10 is an enlarged view of a raked blade for mounting on a rotor viewed in the equivalent of a radially inward direction.
Fig. 11 is a view of the raked blade taken approximately on line 11--11 of Fig. 10.
Fig. 12 is a semi-schematic cut away side view of a separator threshing section including an alternate embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 13 is a cross sectional view taken on line 13--13 of Fig. 12.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment The invention is embodied in a self-propelled combine having a main separator body indicated generally by the numeral 10 and supported by a pair of laterally spaced forward drive wheels 12 and steerable rear wheels 14. An elevated operator's station 16 is mounted forward on the body immediately ahead of a grain tank 18. The central forward portion of the combine body 10 is occu-pied by a fore-and-aft extending axial-flow rotary separator or crop processing unit 20 and a rear mounted engine 22 provides power for propelling the combine and driving its components. A
generally fore-and-aft extending cleaning shoe 2~ is carried beneath the separator 20. A grain unloa~ing system includes a vertical auger conveyor 26 and a swingable unloading auger con-veyor 28.
Mounted immediately ahead of the separator 20 is a header 30 including a ga-thqring unit 32 such as a conventional grain plat-Eorm, and shown in Fig, 1 only, Eor gakhering a crop as the combine advances over a ~ield and deliveri.ng crop material -to an auger :~eeder house 3~ which in turn delivers it rqarwardly and upwardly to -khe .rotary separator 20.
The rokary separator 20 is shown in some detail in Fig. 2 and includes a fixed fore-and-a~t extending housing 36 surrounding and concentric with a rotor 38. The periphery of the rotor 38 is spaced from the inside of the housing 36 so that there is an 33:Z:
1 anr.ular space 39 (seen best in Fig. 5) extending the length of the separator. The rotor 38 (as seen best in Fig. 3~ includes a forward frusto-conical infeed portion 40 and a generally cylindri-cal main portion including, from front to rear, transition 42, threshing 44, and separating 46 portions. The body or ~rame of the rotor 38 includes a forward frusto-conical infeed portion 50 and a main cylindrical portion 52 and is supported for ro-tation in the combine frame and driven by conventional means (not shown).
The rotor infeed portion 40 carries a set of six circumfer-entially equally spaced generally helical flights 54 rigidlyattached to the infeed rotor body 50 by their inner edges 56.
Each blade 54 has an outer edge 58 and has a somewhat twisted form so that its leading edge 60 and trailing edge 62 are inclined into and away from the direction of rotation, respectively.
The transition portion 42 of the rotor occupies the forward part of the cylindrical body 52 and is contiguous with the infeed portion 40 and includes six circumferentially equally spaced sets of material control elements, each set including a ramp-style rasp bar 64 and an elongated array of tilt blades such as the row 66 shown here. In each set both the ramp-style rasp bar 64 and the row of tilt blades 66 are disposed helical fashion on the rotor body 52, each with their forward ends adjacent the rearward end of an infeed rotor blade 54, but diverging rearwardly so that at the rear of the transition portion 42 the row of tilt blades 66 o~ on~ set convqrges on the downstrea~n encl o:E the ramp-s-tyle rasp b~r 64 o~ -the adjacent set~
~ ach ramp-style rasp bar 64 includes a ramp-llke base 68 increasing in height ~rom front to rear and seen best in Figs. 3 and ~ and, mounted rigidly on the base 68, a series o:E ramp blades 70, each blade extending approximately radlally and, in relation to the rotor body cylindrical portion 52 being angled or helically disposed and mounted so that the spacing between adja-cent blades decreases from front to rear.
1 Each row 66 of tilt blades includes a series of generally triangular tilt blades 72, to be described in detail below.
The threshing portion 44 of the rotor includes six equally circum~erentially spaced axially extending conventional rasp bars 73, each rasp bar being carried and spaced ~rom the rotor body 52 by a generally axially extending threshing bar support 80, seen best in Fig. 5, and including, as is conventional, a plurality of generally radially extending ribs 82.
Extending axially from the forward end of the threshing 10 portion 44 to the rearward end of the separating portion 46 of the rotor and, in the threshing portion 44/ lying between adjacent threshing bars 78, are six circumerentially equally spaced separating bars 84. Each separating bar includes a plurality of canted blades 8Z ~described in detail below), mounted on a carrier 88 (seen best in Fig. 5), which is rigidly attached to the cylin-drical rotor body 52, and includes an outer surface 90, tangential to the rotor and forming a floor for the array of blades 86.
The rotor housing 36 includes solid or imperforate forward ~rusto-conical infeed and cylindrical transition portions 104 and 106, respectively. The infeed por-tion 104 includes a downwardly and forwardly directed opening 108 for receiving crop material from the feeder house 34. Pluralities of fixed lead members such as the raised helical ribs 110 and 112 shown are carried by the inner surfaces of the infeed and transition housing portions 104 ~n~ 10 6, xespecti.~ely.
The threshing and separating sections oE the rotor, 44 and ~ respectively, are surrounded by a spiral rod grate 114 compris-ing a plurality o~ spiral.ly disposed xods 116 supported by a plurali-ty of circum~erentially spaced axially extending spacer bars 11~.
Surrounding the grate 114 are suitable collecting and divert-ing means (not shown .in the drawings) ~or intercepting grain and chaff expelled through the grate and diverting it downwards to the cleaner 24.
_ ~ _ ~3~Z
1 A transversely mounted rotating beater 120 (shown only in Fig. 1~ is disposed immediately adjacent and below the discharge or downstream end of the separator 20 for propelling straw generally rearwardly and onto the ground behind the combine.
An alternative threshing section 122, also embodying the invention and particularly suitable for use in harvesting rice, is shown in Figs. 12 and 13. Material flows axially into the threshing section 122 from an infeed section 124, shown in phantom outline only in Fig. 12. The threshing rotor includes a cylindri-10 cal body 126 which carries six circumferentially equally spacedaxially extending arrays 128 of tilt blades 72a. These blacLes, to be described in detail below, are each similar in form and orientation with respect to the rotor axis to the blades 72 shown -~
in Figs. 2 and 3 and are fixed to the rotor body 126 with all blades inclined equally downstream.
A threshing housing 132 surrounds the rotor threshing portion and includes an upper solid or imperforate cover 13~ carrying a plurality of fixed raised helical lead members 136 and a lower foraminous concave or grate portion 138. Rigidly attached to the grate 138 are two circumferentially spaced rows 140 of spike teeth, of the type used in conventional spike-tooth combine threshing cylinders. Each row 140 comprises a staggered array of teeth, each tooth 142 being inclined upstream at an angl~ apprGxi-mately equal to the downstream inclination of the tilt blades 72a. rrhe -keeth are disposed so -that they overlap radially and as the ro-tor rota-tes each kilt blade 72a passe~ either approximately cen-trally (in terms o~ axial spacing) between adjacent tee-th 142, ox, in -the case of khe endmos-t blades, adjacen-t a splke -tooth.
~he -tilt blade 72 and canted blades 86 shown on the rotor in Figs. 2 and 3 and the tilt blade 72a in the alternative embodiment shown in Figs. 12 and 13 are all particular embodiments of the inclined material control and conveying blade of ~he invention and are shown in more detail and generalized form in Figs. 6 and _ g _ i~L~33;Z~
1 7 (canted blade) and 8 and 9 (tilt blade) respectively. Features characteristic of the lnclined blade of the invention and shared by the canted (86) and tilt blades (72 and 72a) include having a relatively slender body (143 and 143') with approximately parallel inner and outer surfaces (144, 144' and 145, 145' respectively) and being inclined in a generally downstream direction (F, F') with an angle of inclination of the body away from the radial of a and a' respectively as shown in Figs. 7 and 9. It is convenient to express the orientation of the inclination of the blade in 10 terms of the direction of its "line of slope (S, S')", that is to say, the direction of the line of maximum slope of the body surfaces. Such direction is given by the projection of that line in the inclined surface which is perpendicular to the line of intersection of the plane of the inclined surface with a plane parallel to one tangential to the generally cylindrical periphery of the rotor and passing through the blade surface, into the latter plane. Thus, a canted blade (Fig. 6) is, broadly speaking, ; defined as a blade whose line of slope (S) lies in the quadrant bounded by an axially downstream direction (F) and the circum-ferential direction of rotation (R), but pre~erably in the range bounded by an axially downstream direction and one 45~ towards the direction of rotation. A tilt blade (Fig. 8) is one in which the line of slope lS') lies axially downstream.
~ he hlades are shaped so as to presen-t a working edge (146 and l.46') to crop material as the rotor rotates, the edge having, wl-th respea-t to -the direation of rotor rota-tion (R, Rl), leading and trailing portions (147, ].47' and 148, 148' respectively). In keep:lng with the invention, the worklng edges (146, 146') arq oriented so that they have a posi-tive lead angle, that is, the leading portions ~.147, 147') are upstream of the trailing portions (148, 148'), the angle o~ departure of the working edge from a plane normal to the rotor axis being indicated in Figs. 6 and 8 by the letters b and b' respectively. The canted blade 86 of 33Z:
1 this embodiment has a working Pdge (146) perpendicular to its line of slope (S), but it will be appreciated that with a line of slope so oriented, a desired positive working edge lead angle (b) may be obtained with other alignments of working edge in relation to said line of slope, but, o~ course, within the limits predeter-mined by the particular line of slope of the canted blade. In the case of the tilt blade (72, 72a), however, positive working edge lead angle (b') can be obtained only with an edge (146') oblique to the line of slope (S') so that it slopes backwards (with respect to rotor rotation) and outwards.
Each inclined blade also includes a base edge (150, 150') by which, as in the embodiments shown in Figs. 6-9, it may be mounted on a rotor frame or blade carrier surface (151, 151'), the base edge having leading and trailing portions (152, 152' and 154, 154' respectivelyl. The base edge (150, 150') also has a lead angle, that angle between the edge and a plane normal to the axis of the rotor, indicated by the letter c for the canted blade 86 in Fig. 6. In the special case of the tilt blade (72 or 72a), shown in Fig. 8, the corresponding angle c' (not indicated in Fig. 8) ls zero. It should be noted that to simplify the descrip-tion of the essentials of the blades, they have been shown in Figs. 6-9 as mounted on a ~loor-like surface (151, 151') tangen-tial, as it were, to the generally cylindrical periphery of a rotor. Thq base edges (150, 150') will thus, following our above deflnition, be perpendicular to their respective lines oE slope (~, S'). More generally, oE course, the lead angle of the base or inner ed~e (150, 150') is a ~unction of -the angle of inclina tlon oE the blade (a, a') and the (obli~ue) angle which -the edge ma]ces with the line of maxi.mum slope oE the blade. ~nother aspect oE the versatility of the blades of the invention is, therefore, ~hat ~iven a particular blade inclination (a, a') and line o~ slope (S, S'), base edge (150, 150') alignment and/or floor or mounting surface aspect (with respect to a plane tangen-1 tial to the general cylindricality of the rotor periphery) may bechosen to achieve a particular desired base edge lead angle (c, c') to suit a particular application.
Each blade also has a shin edge (156, 156') extending between the leading portions (1~2, 152' and 147, 147') of the base (150, 150') and working (146, 146l) edges respectively and preferably is backward sloping relative to the direction of rotation. Each blade also has a trailing edge ~157, 157') extending between the trailing portions (154, 154' and 148, 148') of the base and working edges (150, 150' and 146, 146') respec-tively. However, it will be understood that the shin (156, 156') and trailing (157, 157') edges as such are not essential features of the blade of the invention. They may, in effect, be co-extensive with the leading and trailing portions of th~ working edge as, for example, in a blade in which the edges are entirely defined by a base edge and a continuously curving working edge ~not shown in the drawings) extending between the opposite extrem-ities of the base edge.
~n operation, as is well known, a self-propelled combine 20 such as the embodiment of the present invention advances over a ~ :
field of crop material which is gathered by the gathering unit 32 and conveyed by way of the feeder house 34 to be engaged by the infeed rotor portion 40, from whence it is conveyed spirally and rearwardly through the separator in the annular space 39 between the rotor 38 and the housing 36 as -the resul-t of the in-teraction between the crop m~terial and the stationary lead members inside the housing 9uch as -the helical members 110 and 112 ancl the ma-terial control and conveying members of the rotor such as -the tilt blades 72 and the canted blades 86.
The threshing of grain from the ears is effected principally by rubbing action between the rasp bars 78 and the grate 114 and separation and expulsion of grain and chaff through the g:rate to be collected and delivered to the cleaner 24 continues as the 332:
1 crop material ls conveyed spirally rearwards. Straw is e~ected rearwardly from the rear of the housing 36 and, with the assis-tance of the beater 120, is discharged rearwardly onto the ground. -~
Clean grain from the cleaner 24 is delivered to the grain tank 18 by conventional conveying means (not shown).
Considering now the particular operational characteristics of the inclined blade of the invention, the canted (86) and tilt (72, 72a) blades shown in detail in Figs. 6, 7, 8 and 9 are referred to as exemplary embodiments. The dominating material conveying and control feature is the working edge (146, 146') while the inner and outer surfaces of the blade (144, 144' and 145~ 145' respectively) play a relatively subordinate role, the importance of which varies according to the orientation of the line of slope ~S, ~') and the downstream inclination of the blades (a and a'). As the rotor rotates, crop material is engaged primarily by the working edge (146, 146'). The downstream incli-nation of the blade creates a pocket or relief space (158, 158'), behind and radially inside of the working edge, concentrating contact between crop material and the blade on the relatively small area of the working edge. Preferably the working edge is without discontinuities so that friction between it and the crop material is low contributing to slippage between the crop material and the rotor and so that the blades, while maintaining control and continuing to advance the material in the axial direction indlcated by the arroW~ ~F~ F'), (due -to the lead angle b, b'), do so with les~ "stress" and power requirement -than conventional material movers such as radially ex-tendlng continuous helical members or near axial radially ex-tending paddles. Note, tha-t while the working edge (146) of the canted blade (86) is approx-imately tangential to the rokor that (146') of the til-t blade (7~, 72a) slopes backwardly and outwardly enhancing the combing effect of the inclined blade and its tendency to attenuate the mat of crop material. The use of an array of inclined blades ~L~5~332 1 minimizes the creation of compressed bunches of material and the "pocket" formed under and behind the working edge allows slippage of material without further compressing the mat of material.
The working edge (146, 146') presents a relatively small impact area for loose grain and so it is the greater bulk of the crop material, material other than grain (MOG) which is conveyed and controlled directly by the working edge. In general it may be said that during the separation process threshed grain is largely conveyed through being carried by the MOG rather than directly by the blades. However, grain kernels threshed from the ears have at least the opportunity of encountering the relatively larger areas of the blade surfaces (particularly the inner sur-faces 144, 144') and while the working edge of the blade of the invention is always oriented to function in generally the same way, to convey and comb the crop material, variations in the orientation of the line of slope (S, S') and angle of inclination of the blade from the radial (a and a') have significant effects on separation according to how the blade surfaces tend to deflect any grain kernels which they encounter. For example, assuming that, relatively, the kernel of grain is approaching a blade on a tangentially circumferential path or trajectory (T, T'), in Figs.
6 and 8 respectively, and considering first the tilt blade (72 or 72a) it can be seen that the kernel can make only tangential contact with the inner 144' blade surface, so that generally speaking a tilt blade ~uch as illustra-ted here has no -tendency to deflqct grain axially either ~ps-trearn or downstream (as indicated by D' in ~ig, 8).
~ n the case o~ the canted blade 86, it can be seen rom Fi~.
6 tha-t a kernel of ~rain approaching the blade relatively on a circum~erential path T that there will be an impact on the inner or leading blade sur~ace 144 and that the orientation of the blade surface is such that the impact will de~lect the grain into a path D having both axially downstream and radially inward :
~L~5~33~
1 (towards the rotor axis) components. In itself this e~fect would seem to hamper separation, the deflection axially downs-tream tending to reduce the time the kernel remains in the separator and the radially inwards deflection carrying the kernel away from the grate through which it must be expelled to complete separa-tion. However, the inclined blade of the invention typically is not used alone but in an array as disclosed here. Such an array is in effect an interrupted material handling and control system producing agitation, combing and reorientation of the MO~/
which, coupled with the centrifugal effect of the spiral path of the MOG within the annular space between rotor and grate, produces a total separating effect which overshadows the apparently nega-tive effect on separation of the inner surface 144 of the canted blade described above.
Compared with the tilt blade 72, 72a where the effect of blade surfaces is minimized the canted blade 86 is a compromise.
The working edge 146 still dominates bringing advantages such as ability to handle wet material without roping but the inclined inner or leading surface 144 athwart the relative direction of movement of the blade R makes significant contact with the crop material to lessen the slippage e~fect created by the exposed edge and provide more direct propulsion of the crop material.
A further embodiment of the inclined blade of the invention, sui-table for use on a separa-tor rotor, is illustrated in ~igs. 10 and 11. In this raked or compound blade 164 the inclinecl inner and outer sur~aces 1~", ]~5" re~pecti~ely, inc:lined in a down-stream direa-tlon, the s~lender body 1~3" and the working edge 1~6"
orienked so as -~o lead or convey material downstream are retained.
However, the raked blade is characterized in -that its line of slope S" fallq between axially downstream and counter to the direction of rotation, but preferably between the axial direction and 45 against the direction o~ rotation. Consequently, with a tangential mounting surface 151", the base or inner edge 150" is g33~
1 disposed athwart the direction of relative movement of the blade (R") with a negative lead angle and, in terms of relative motion between the blade and the crop material and grate, the blade 164 presents a backward sloping outer surface 145". (Note that in this case the outer surface 145" becomes the leading surface.) The raked blade 164 thus presents two anterior or frontal features for initial contact with the crop material, the working edge 146"
and the outer surface 1~5". The effect of the backward and outward orientation of the outer surface 145" is to tend to increase separation efficiency through strongly supplementing the ramp effect of the similarly oriented working edge 146" forcing crop material outwards towards the grate, although an accompanying -increase in friction will increase power required to drive the rotor. In this case a free kernel of grain approaching the blade relatively in a circumferential path T" will encounter the outer surface 145" of the blade and be deflected to a path D" after impact having axially upstream and radially outward components, both apparently aiding separating efficiency, the one through tending to increase the time the kernel remains in the separator and the other through sending it in the direction of expulsion through the grate. The raked blade 164 has so far been discussed as if the blade surfaces 144" and 145" were plane but they may be curved as illustrated in Figs. 10 and 11 so that, for example, the deflecting and material control effect of the outer surface 1~5" will vary from one park o~ a sur~ace to another. Further, the convexity of the ou-ter surface 145li tencls to "soften" -the action of the blade and reduae fxiction by reducing the aggres-siveness o~ -the trailing blade tip 166".
It will now be clear that -the lnclined blades of the inven-tion may be used on a rotor in one or more of the inEeed, thresh-in~ and separating portions of a separator depending upon function ~.
objectives and such variables as type and condition of crops to be handled, proportions of the separator, etc. They may be used, : :
~15~33;2:
1 for example, in axial or helical arrays circumferentially spaced around a rotor, as the only type of element on a particularly axially defined section or in conjunction with other elements such as rasp bars (threshing~ or radial separator bars.
In the above embodiment, in the transition portion 42 of the rotor, the tilt blades 72 are used along with a ramp-style rasp bar 64 (discussed in more detail below). The til-t blades 72 here are of uni~orm height and arranged in helical Eormation 66 on the cylindrical rotor body 52 creating an interrupted helix conveying lQ element effective to reduce wadding or roping compared with a continuous element offering an approximately radial blade surface.
Using an array or multiplicity of relatively smaller elements such as the tilt blades here rather than a continuous member discourages collections or concentrations of material by the rotor elements resulting in a thinner more uniform mat of material and smoother operation with better separation efficiency. The tilt blades 72 in staggered formation are particularly effective here, cooperating with the ramp-style rasp bars 64 to redistribute and condition material received in a concentrated stream from the feeder house 34 and carried into the separator by the infeed rotor portion 40~ into a uniEorm attenuated mat encircling the rotor for reception by the threshing portion 44. Tilt blades are also particularly e~fective in handling rice which has a strong tendency to bunch, kwist and rope ahead of conventional material control e].ements.
It ~hould be no-ted here -that the tilt blade 72 illustrates ano-ther Eace-t o~ -the versatili-ty oE -the inclined blade o~ the invention in that the working edge 146' is not perpendicular to the line oE grea-kest slope oE the inner and outer ~urfaces 144', 143'. It is orien-ted so that with respeat to rotor ~orm and rotation, the work:ing edge is not tangential or circumferential but i8 backwardly sloped, the trailing portion 148' being disposed rearward and radially outward o~ the leading portion 147', tending 1 to enhance the combing ef~ect and also to deflect material radially ou~wards. In the transition portion the latter helps develop the thin mat for threshing and when used in threshing or separating portions tends to improve separa~ion.
Compared with the tilt blades 72 the canted blades 86, carried in axial array on the separator bars 84, extending through-out the threshing and separating portions of the rotor, 44 and 46 respectively, are designed to convey rather more positively so as to move the MOG in a controlled spiral rearwardly for discharge at the downstream end of the separator. At the same tlme the canted blades 86 and the open space between them in each array provide sufficient slippage and agitation so that desired thresh-ing and separating efficiency levels are achieved at acceptable power levels. In the threshing section of the separator the canted blades 86, interspersed between the rasp bars 78, contri-bute to threshing efficiency by a reorientation and agitation of the crop material after it leaves one rasp bar and before it is engaged by the next. Separation efficiency and material handling are interdependent and uniform and positive control of material directly aids separation.
It will be understood that just as the rows 66 of tilt blades of the transition section are disposed helically, the rasp bar.s 78 and separator bars 8~ ~Figs. 2 and 3) and the tilt blade row 128 of the alternate embodiment threshing section (Figs. 12 and 13) may, while still spanning -their given axial extent, also be helica.lly disposecl with respec-t to ~he rotor axis. Such disposition, wl-th an appropriate lead angle may contribu-te to -the -to-tal eEeective axial displacemen-t o~ crop material caused by the blade array but its most importan-t e~Eect is to discourage wadding or ropin~ oE material ahead o~ the blades which may possibly occur even with the inclined blades of the invention in some extreme conditions such as handling long, wet rice straw.
3~
1 Although the present embodiment includes six each of the threshing bars 78 and separator bars 84, it is often desirable to use :Eewer bars, especially in rotors of smaller diameter as are typically used in a multi-rotor separator. Considerations influ-encing the number of bars which may be used efficiently on a given rotor include two which are related to the physical charac-teristics of the crop material to be handled and which are rela-tively independent of rotor diameter. First, i-t is desirable to maintain a certain minimum circumferential spacing between func-tional bars or blades to permit a tumbling or reorientation of material, for efficient threshing and separating. Space must be provided, too, to allow concentrations of crop material, including ears of corn, to enter the separator and be conveyed into the threshing section. Secondly, there is a minimum length for the inclined blade, and particularly for the working edge, below which the material control and conveying potential of the inclined blade is not adequately realized.
It will be understood of course that the operation of the inclined blades of the present invention, discussed above, is achieved in coopera-tion with fixed housings and grates surrounding the rotor on which they are carried. The net result o~ the combined effects of the helical or helically arrayed members or helically disposed features of material control elements of rotor and housing, and Eriction and inertia of the crop material, and relati~e motion between -the rotor and houslng is -to propel crop materlal rearwardly in a spiral path. In practice -thexe is slippage oE the crop material no-t onl~ in xelation to elements such as blades carried by the rokor bu-t also in relation to :Eixed helical lead members (such as the helical in:Eeed members 110, the transition helical members 112 and the spiral rods 116 of the grate), the latter also cont.ributing to material agitation and aiding separation. The total slippage depends on a number o~
variables such as radial clea.rance between the rotor and housing, -- 19 -- .
~L5~33~!:
1 feed rate, etc. as well as the form of the material control elements themselves. The following rotor and inclined blade dimensions are examples only of some which have been tested with good results: length of threshing and separating sections of 900 to 1250 and 1250 to 1500 millimeters respectively; rotor outside diameters of 500 to 900 millimeters with peripheral speeds up to 45 meters/second and rotor to grate or housing clearance of 10 to 15 milllmeters for small grains (higher clearances are desirable for corn); blade heights 40 to 110 millimeters and lengths up to 250 millimeters with axial spacing between blades of 100 to 200 millimeters; blades having angle of inclination from the radial (a) of 30 to 45 and a lead angle (b) of 15 to 30; ratios of blade heights to both length and axial spacing about 1 to 2 gave good results. Circumferential intervals between functional elements (threshing bars, arrays of inclined blades, etc.) of the order of 100 to 200 millimeters or twice the length of the inclined blade are generally desirable. An example of a particu-lar set of compatible specifications for a rotor having six conventional rasp bars 78 and six separator bars 8~ with canted blades 86, for use in small grain such as wheat, is as follows:
rotor diameter 700 millimeters; length of threshing section 1000 millimeters; length of separating section 1~00 millime~ers; rotor peripheral speed 30 meters/second; rotor to grate or housing clearance 15 millimeters; blade height, length and axial spacing 75, lSQ and 150 milli.meters respectively; and angles of inclina--tion from thq rad:Lal (a) and lqad anglq (b) bo-th 30.
It will bq unders-tood also that al-though clearance between ro~or and housing or grate is varied according to crop t~p~ and condition, i-t must be limited so that rotor elements such as ~he inclinecl blades of the invention can maintain control of material and successful operation of the blades dc>es not depend upon the presence oE a housing or grate of a particular form, although they are particularly effective with relatively low friction .
3~32 1 housings with positve lead, similar to that of the present embodiment; and further, that the canted, tilt and raked blades 86, 72, 72a and 164 described above are only examples of possible configurations of the inclined blade.
The special function of the ramp-style rasp bars 64, seen best in Figs. 2, 3, and 4, is to provide for incoming crop mate-rial, a smooth and gradual transition, from the predominantly conveying function of the infeed rotor portion 40 and the upstream portion of the transition section 42 of the rotor, to the thresh-ing section of the rotor 44 and, in particular, to deliver cropmaterial in suitable condition and disposition to the upstream end of the rasp bars 78 of the threshing section. As is apparent, towards the upstream end of the transition portion 42 of the : ro-tor, the tilt blades 72 extend radially beyond the ramp-style rasp bar blades 70 and are dominant in controlling the crop material whereas towards the downstream end of the transition portion 42 of the rotor the ramp style rasp bar blades 70 are closer spaced and, being mounted on the ramp or base 68, extend radially above the tilt blades 72 while the radial clearance between the blades and housing progressively decreases. The combined effect of the decreasing axial spacing between the ramp-style rasp bar blades 70 themselves and rearwardly decreasing tip clearance between the blades 70 and the transition housing :106 is that of a progressi.vely reducing effective radial thickness of the annulax space, which so control~ the incoming crop material as to progressively attenuate it into a relat.ively thin mat, distributed around the circumference of the ro-tor ready for reception into the .relatively thin annular space defined between the rasp threshing bars 78 and the threshing portion of the grate 11~. As the tip clearances between blade and hous.ing, and clear-ances between blades towards the rearward end of -the ramp--style rasp bars 6~ approach those of the rasp bars 78 of the threshing section, threshing begins in the rearward portion of the transi-tion section.
.
Claims (5)
1. In an axial flow rotary separator for threshing and separating grain crop material and the like having a housing within which a rotor rotates and an axially extending annular space between rotor and housing in which through co-action between rotor and housing crop material is propelled spirally downstream while being threshed and separated, said separator having an upstream feed portion including a housing feed portion for receiving harvested crop material and conveying it downstream and a threshing portion including a housing threshing portion and a rotor threshing portion having a plurality of circumferentially spaced threshing bars, a separator transition portion extending between the separator feed and threshing portions for conveying crop material from the feed to the threshing portions comprising:
a housing transition portion communicating with the housing feed portions and the housing threshing portions at its upstream and downstream ends respectively; and a rotor transition portion rotatably mounted in the housing transition portion including an elongated ramp-style rasp bar substantially spanning the axial extent of the rotor transition portion and including a plurality of spaced side-by-side first raised rib-like elements, the spacing between said elements progressively decreasing in a downstream direction and said bar being disposed so that radial clearance between the housing transition portion and the rib-like elements decreases progressively in a downstream direction.
a housing transition portion communicating with the housing feed portions and the housing threshing portions at its upstream and downstream ends respectively; and a rotor transition portion rotatably mounted in the housing transition portion including an elongated ramp-style rasp bar substantially spanning the axial extent of the rotor transition portion and including a plurality of spaced side-by-side first raised rib-like elements, the spacing between said elements progressively decreasing in a downstream direction and said bar being disposed so that radial clearance between the housing transition portion and the rib-like elements decreases progressively in a downstream direction.
2. In an axial flow rotary separator for threshing and separating grain crop material and the like having a housing within which a rotor rotates and an axially extending annular space between rotor and housing in which through co-action :
between rotor and housing crop material is propelled spirally downstream while being threshed and separated, said separator having an upstream feed portion including a housing feed portion for receiving harvested crop material and conveying it downstream and a threshing portion including a housing threshing portion and a rotor threshing portion having a plurality of circumferentially spaced threshing bars, a separator transition portion extending between the separator feed and threshing portions for conveying crop material from the feed to the threshing portions comprising:
a housing transition portion communicating with the housing feed portions and the housing threshing portions at its upstream and downstream ends respectively;
a rotor transition portion rotatably mounted in the housing transition portion including an elongated ramp-style rasp bar substantially spanning the axial extent of the rotor transition portion and including a plurality of spaced side-by-side first raised rib-like elements, said bar being disposed so that radial clearance between the housing transition portion and the rib-like elements decreases progressively in a downstream direction; and means for propelling crop material downstream carried by the rotor transition portion in a helical disposition, substantially spanning the axial extent of the transition portion and circumferentially spaced from the ramp-style rasp bar.
between rotor and housing crop material is propelled spirally downstream while being threshed and separated, said separator having an upstream feed portion including a housing feed portion for receiving harvested crop material and conveying it downstream and a threshing portion including a housing threshing portion and a rotor threshing portion having a plurality of circumferentially spaced threshing bars, a separator transition portion extending between the separator feed and threshing portions for conveying crop material from the feed to the threshing portions comprising:
a housing transition portion communicating with the housing feed portions and the housing threshing portions at its upstream and downstream ends respectively;
a rotor transition portion rotatably mounted in the housing transition portion including an elongated ramp-style rasp bar substantially spanning the axial extent of the rotor transition portion and including a plurality of spaced side-by-side first raised rib-like elements, said bar being disposed so that radial clearance between the housing transition portion and the rib-like elements decreases progressively in a downstream direction; and means for propelling crop material downstream carried by the rotor transition portion in a helical disposition, substantially spanning the axial extent of the transition portion and circumferentially spaced from the ramp-style rasp bar.
3. The invention defined in claim 2 wherein the means for propelling is a material mover bar substantially spanning the rotor transition portion and including a plurality of axially spaced side-by-side angled material control blades.
4. The invention defined in claim 3 further including a second ramp-style rasp bar circumferentially spaced from the first ramp-style rasp bar and wherein the material mover bar is helically disposed extending between the upstream end of the first ramp-style rasp bar and the downstream end of the second ramp-style rasp bar.
5. In an axial flow rotary separator for treating harvested material such as grain crops and the like having an axially extending annular space defined by and between a stationary housing and a rotor rotating within the housing in which space a mat crop material is processed while being propelled spirally downstream through co-action between rotor and housing, the rotational speed of the crop material being less than that of the rotor due to friction between the material and the housing so that there is relative motion or slippage between the crop material and the rotor, an improved material control bar carried by the rotor and comprising:
a plurality of raised side-by-side axially spaced rib-like elements disposed in an elongated array having an upstream end and a downstream end and disposed so that the spacing between successive elements progressively decreases in a downstream direction, each rib-like element being set at an angle departing from the circumferential such that, due to the relative motion between the rotor and the crop material, crop material engaged by the rib-like elements tends to be deflected downstream, the progressively decreasing axial spacing between the rib-like elements progressively reducing the effective radial thickness of the annular space so that the mat of crop material becomes progressively attenuated and there is an increasing tendency for crop material to be rubbed between the rib-like elements and the housing rather than pass between adjacent elements in a material deflecting relationship with them.
a plurality of raised side-by-side axially spaced rib-like elements disposed in an elongated array having an upstream end and a downstream end and disposed so that the spacing between successive elements progressively decreases in a downstream direction, each rib-like element being set at an angle departing from the circumferential such that, due to the relative motion between the rotor and the crop material, crop material engaged by the rib-like elements tends to be deflected downstream, the progressively decreasing axial spacing between the rib-like elements progressively reducing the effective radial thickness of the annular space so that the mat of crop material becomes progressively attenuated and there is an increasing tendency for crop material to be rubbed between the rib-like elements and the housing rather than pass between adjacent elements in a material deflecting relationship with them.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000366748A CA1159332A (en) | 1978-03-24 | 1980-12-12 | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US889,626 | 1978-03-24 | ||
| US05/889,626 US4178943A (en) | 1978-03-24 | 1978-03-24 | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator |
| CA323,341A CA1096735A (en) | 1978-03-24 | 1979-03-13 | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator |
| CA000366748A CA1159332A (en) | 1978-03-24 | 1980-12-12 | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1159332A true CA1159332A (en) | 1983-12-27 |
Family
ID=27166134
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000366748A Expired CA1159332A (en) | 1978-03-24 | 1980-12-12 | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1159332A (en) |
-
1980
- 1980-12-12 CA CA000366748A patent/CA1159332A/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1096735A (en) | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator | |
| CA1159333A (en) | Separator for an axial flow rotary combine | |
| US4875891A (en) | Separating grate for a grain harvester | |
| US4790128A (en) | Crop harvesting apparatus and methods | |
| US4611605A (en) | Axial flow rotary separator | |
| CA1293901C (en) | Feeding arrangement for an axial flow rotary separator | |
| US4671051A (en) | Crop engaging apparatus and methods | |
| US3946746A (en) | Harvesting machines | |
| US5111645A (en) | Crop harvesting apparatus and methods | |
| US4422463A (en) | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator | |
| CA1091530A (en) | Axial flow separator with stepped threshing bar rotor | |
| CA2028447C (en) | Rotor assembly for an axial-flow combine | |
| US4545188A (en) | Crop engaging device and method | |
| US6296566B1 (en) | Infeed impeller for a rotary combine | |
| EP1872647B1 (en) | Chevron inlet for cross flow fan | |
| US4177821A (en) | Feed rotor for an axial flow rotary combine | |
| US4164947A (en) | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator | |
| US4578934A (en) | Harvesting machine for stripping seeds from a standing crop | |
| US4951453A (en) | Crop harvesting apparatus and methods | |
| US4397319A (en) | Cleaning device for harvesting machines | |
| CA1159332A (en) | Rotor for an axial flow rotary separator | |
| USRE31860E (en) | Harvesting machines | |
| EP0281383B1 (en) | Rotary crop separators and concaves therefor | |
| GB2151893A (en) | Crop engaging apparatus and methods | |
| GB2130864A (en) | Crop engaging apparatus and methods |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |