AU753993B2

AU753993B2 - Hydroplane

Info

Publication number: AU753993B2
Application number: AU50726/99A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Jury Mikhailovich Bannikov; Anatoly Sergeevich Klyagin; Viktor Azarievich Lukashevsky; Konstantin Khristoforovich Marbashev; Alexei Leonidovich Maximov; Sergei Anatolievich Porodnikov; Andrei Anatolievich Sorokin
Original assignee: Zakrytoe Aktsionernoe Obschestvo "otdelenie Morskikh Sistem Okb Im Po Sukhogo"
Current assignee: Zakrytoe Aktsionernoe Obschestvo "otdelenie Morskikh Sistem Okb Im Po Sukhogo"
Priority date: 1998-07-15
Filing date: 1999-07-09
Publication date: 2002-10-31
Anticipated expiration: 2019-07-09
Also published as: AU5072699A; CN1316961A; EE200100028A; WO2000003914A1; EP1104739A1; CN1123483C; EP1104739A4

Description

HYDROPLANE

Field of the Invention This invention relates to the shipbuilding field and, in particular to the construction of hydroplane or planing craft provided with extendable interceptors.

s Prior Art There are hydroplanes or planing crafts that are known to have a hull with a deadrise bottom and controllable aft and forward interceptors (spoilers) mounted in recesses arranged in the bottom.

The high speed craft described in patent RU 2096240 of 1997, has a hull with a deadrise bottom provided with a forward and aft transverse planing steps and extendable interceptors that are mounted behind the steps and divided symmetrically into portside and starboard-side sections. An automatic interceptor control system permits the interceptors to be used as pitch and roll control elements.

However, the optimization of speed and seakeeping performance of the known craft, improvement of its operational efficiency and enhancement of comfort level for passengers and crew can only be achieved due to the operation of the control system.

Generally, these hydroplanes use a propeller as a propulsive device, which is connected to the main engine located in the central or aft section of the hull by means of shaftlines supported by shaft brackets (Inventor's Certificate SU 1025574).

20 The disadvantages of the known hydroplane are an increased drag due to projecting parts of the shaftline and rudders as well as considerable space inside the hydroplane taken up by the main engines, shaftlines and auxiliary equipment.

There is a planing craft that is known to have a water-jet propulsive device that provides better efficiency at higher speeds compared to the craft fitted with propellers (SU 200452). However, this craft does not use interceptors that would considerably improve its speed and seakeeping performance.

Object of the Invention It is an object of the present invention to substantially overcome or at least ameliorate one or more of the disadvantages of the prior art, or at least to provide a useful S 30 alternative.

Summary of the Invention The present invention provides a hydroplane having a hull with a deadrise bottom and aft extendable interceptors and provided with a propulsive device mounted at the aft end of the hydroplane, wherein the propulsive device is of water-jet type and its q s water intake opening is arranged in the bottom of the hull forward of the interceptors.

[R:\LIBLL] 13534.doc:caa The preferred embodiment preferably combines the advantages of interceptors with those of waterjets on hydroplane, the resultant effect of using each of these components being supplemented by an additional effect obtainable at a certain arrangement of interceptors relative to the water-jet intake openings in the hydroplane's bottom.

According to the preferred embodiment a hydroplane has a hull with a deadrise bottom and aft extendable interceptors and is provided with one or more water-jets at the aft part of the hydroplane, the water intake openings of water-jets being arranged in the hull's bottom forward of the interceptors.

A hydroplane may also be provided with bow (forward) interceptors. The bottom may have an aft and a forward transverse planing steps with interceptors, in this particular case, mounted behind the steps.

The deadrise angle of the bottom may vary along the hydroplane's length, the optimum angle range being 60 to 120 at the forward step and 0' to 60 at the aft step.

Brief Description of the Drawings The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to an exemplifying embodiment thereof and also with reference to the accompanying drawings in which Figure 1 is a schematic side view of an inventive hydroplane Figure 2 is a schematic bottom view of an inventive hydroplane Figure 3 is a schematic stern view of an inventive hydroplane Proportions between individual components and structural elements shown in the drawings are modified for better representations.

The detailed description of the invention The hydroplane illustrated in Figure 1 has a hull 1 with a deadrise bottom 2 and aft interceptors 3 and 4 (for portside and starboard-side respectively) that are capable of moving out of a slot in the bottom (not shown) or from behind the aft transverse planing step 5. The hydroplane is provided with one (or more) water-jet 6 mounted at the aft end of the hydroplane, the intake opening 7 of the water-jet 6 being arranged in the bottom 2 S 30 of the hull 1 forward of the interceptors 3 and 4 as shown in Figure 2.

The hydroplane may also be fitted with forward interceptors 8 and 9 that are located behind the forward transverse step 10, port and starboard. The forward, or bow step 10 is arranged on the hull's bottom forward of its center of gravity 11. If necessary, the interceptors 8 and 9 can be divided into sections (not shown in the drawings) that are then controlled [R:\LIBLL] 13534.doc:caa individually to compensate for pitch and roll motions in a seaway.

The aft interceptors 3 and 4 and the forward interceptors 8 and 9 if fitted (see Figures 2 and 3) are constructed with a sharp outer edge, which secures a continuous flow separation at the edge.

The deadrise angle of the bottom varies along the hydroplane's length from 60 to 120 at the forward step 8 to 0' to 60 at the aft step 4. Optimum deadrise angles for each planing step of a specific hydroplane are determined from model tank tests. The increase of deadrise angles over the above-stated maximum values will result in a lower drag-lift ratio for the hydroplane while their decrease beyond the above-stated ranges will somewhat improve it but will also cause problems for stable planing and increase vertical accelerations experienced during the ride in a seaway.

The bottom surface of the hydroplane forward of each planing step has symmetrical flat areas that coincide with the areas of the bottom surface wetted during the planing mode of operation, as determined from the model tests. The flat areas 12 forward of the forward planing step are of triangular or trapezoidal shape. The flat areas 13 forward of the aft planing step may also have a trapezoidal shape but more often their outline is of more complicated form.

To provide a minimum drag of the hydroplane, the travels of the forward and aft interceptors or their sections are determined depending of the speed of the hydroplane. The optimum relationship is determined from the model tests with subsequent refining based on the results of full-scale trials.

Travel of the individual interceptors or their sections is controlled by an automatic control system that provides for an increased motion stability and better maneuverability of the hydroplane in the calm sea conditions and for roll and pitch motions damping and reduction of vertical accelerations when riding in a seaway. During reverse running or stern-to mooring operations the interceptors are retracted to a position within the planing steps (or into the bottom slots) to protect them from damage.

When the hydroplane is riding with the interceptors 3 and 4 projected some distance beyond the aft planing step 5 (or the respective slot), an area of increased pressure is generated immediately ahead of the interceptors. It is within this area of increased pressure that the water-jet intake opening 7 is located, which location permits to take in water under higher pressure and thus to enhance the operating efficiency of water jets

Claims

1. A hydroplane having a hull with a deadrise bottom and aft extendable interceptors and provided with a propulsive device mounted at the aft end of the hydroplane, wherein the propulsive device is of water-jet type and its water intake opening is arranged in the bottom of the hull forward of the interceptors.

2. The hydroplane according to claim 1, wherein the hydroplane has forward interceptors, the hydroplane's bottom has an aft and a forward transverse planing steps and the interceptors are mounted behind the steps.

3. The hydroplane according to claim 2, wherein the deadrise angle of the hydroplane's bottom is in the range from 60 to 12° at the forward step and from 00 to 60 at the aft step.

4. The hydroplane according to claim 3, wherein the bottom surface before each step has symmetrical flat areas, the flat areas before the forward step being of triangular or trapezoidal shape. 20

5. A hydroplane having a hull with a deadrise bottom and aft extendable interceptors substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Dated 22 August, 2002 Zakrytoe Aktsionernoe Obschestvo "Otdelenie Morskikh Sistem OKB IM. P.O. Sukhogo Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON oet [R:\LIBLL]13534.doc:caa