AU741403B2 - Electrochemical cell - Google Patents

Electrochemical cell Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU741403B2
AU741403B2 AU42422/99A AU4242299A AU741403B2 AU 741403 B2 AU741403 B2 AU 741403B2 AU 42422/99 A AU42422/99 A AU 42422/99A AU 4242299 A AU4242299 A AU 4242299A AU 741403 B2 AU741403 B2 AU 741403B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
concentration
electrode
steady state
mediator
electrodes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU42422/99A
Other versions
AU4242299A (en
Inventor
Thomas William Beck
Alastair Mcindoe Hodges
Oddvar Johansen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
LifeScan Inc
Original Assignee
USF Filtration and Separations Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU59922/96A external-priority patent/AU712939B2/en
Application filed by USF Filtration and Separations Group Inc filed Critical USF Filtration and Separations Group Inc
Priority to AU42422/99A priority Critical patent/AU741403B2/en
Publication of AU4242299A publication Critical patent/AU4242299A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU741403B2 publication Critical patent/AU741403B2/en
Assigned to LIFESCAN, INC. reassignment LIFESCAN, INC. Alteration of Name(s) in Register under S187 Assignors: USF FILTRATION AND SEPARATIONS GROUP INC.
Priority to AU2007202456A priority patent/AU2007202456A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

_G
-1-
AUSTRALIA
PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT
ORIGINAL
S
c.
C
.C C be
C.
Name of Applicant/s: Actual Inventor/s: Address for Service: Invention Title: USF Filtration and Separations Group Inc.
Alastair Mclndoe Hodges and Thomas William Beck and Oddvar Johansen BALDWIN SHELSTON WATERS 60 MARGARET STREET SYDNEY NSW 2000 'ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL' Details of Original Application No. 59922/96 dated 19 JUN 1996 The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- File: 22019.00 la TITLE: ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL So"' FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a biosensor and more particularly to an electrochemical biosensor for determining the concentration of an analyte in a carrier. The invention is a.
particularly useful for determining the concentration of glucose in blood and is described herein with reference to that use but it should be understood that the invention is applicable to other analytic determinations.
a BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Electrochemical biosensors generally comprise a cell having a working electrode, a counter electrode and a reference electrode. Sometimes the function of the counter and reference electrodes are combined in a single electrode called a "counter/reference" electrode or "pseudo reference electrode". As herein used the term "counter electrode" includes a counter/reference electrode where the context so admits.
The sample containing the analyte is brought into contact with a reagent containing an enzyme and a redox mediator in the cell. Either the mediator is reduced (receives at least one electron) while the analyte is oxidised (donates at least one electron) or visa versa. Usually it is the analyte which is oxidised and the mediator which is reduced. The invention will be herein described principally with reference to that system but it is also applicable to systems in which the analyte is reduced and the mediator oxidised.
Electrochemical glucose analysers such as those used by diabetics to monitor blood glucose levels or such as are used in clinics and hospitals are commonly based upon the use of an enzyme such as glucose oxidase dehydrogenase (GOD) and a redox mediator such as a ferricyanide or ferrocyanide. In such prior art system, the sample 10 blood) containing the analyte glucose) is brought into contact with the reagents in the cell. Glucose is oxidised to gluconic acid and the glucose oxidase is thereby reduced. The mediator then re-oxidizes the glucose oxidase and is reduced in the process. The reduced mediator is then re-oxidized when it transfers electrons to the working electrode. After allowing passage of a predetermined time, sufficient to obtain an accurate estimate of the Faraday current, the concentration of glucose is estimated from the magnitude of the current or voltage signal then measured.
Prior art electrochemical cells consist of two (or three) adjacent electrodes spaced apart on one side of an insulator and adapted for connection to a measuring device. A target area on which the blood sample is placed is defined on or between the electrodes.
Co-pending Application PCT/AU95/00207 describes a cell in which electrodes are disposed on opposite sides of a porous membrane, one of the electrodes having a liquid permeable target area.
In the prior art there is a need to separate the working electrode from the counter (or counter/reference) electrode by a sufficient distance to avoid products of electrochemical reaction at one electrode from interfering with those at the other. In practice a separation of the electrodes of more than 500 lm is required to achieve acceptable accuracy.
Each batch of cells is required to have been previously calibrated and leads to inaccuracies during use because of variations within the batch, in sample composition, and in ambient conditions.
It is desired to improve the accuracy and reliability of such biosensors.
10 Achievement of these objectives is made difficult in the case of sensors intended to determine the concentration of analytes in blood because blood contains dissolved gases, ions, colloids, complex micelles, small scale cellular debris, and living cellular components in a predominantly aqueous medium. Any of these may interfere in the determination. Existing sensors are also susceptible to influence from other interfering substances that may be present in the sample and which may be oxidised at the working electrode and mistakenly identified as the analyte of interest. Alternatively, the interfering substances may reduce the oxidised form of the redox mediator. These effects will give artificially elevated estimates of the analyte concentration. Additionally there is always some reduced redox mediator present before the analyte is added and its concentration needs to be known and subtracted from the measured value of reduced mediator to give an accurate concentration of the analyte. Moreover, oxygen in the blood may act as a redox mediator for glucose oxidase dehydrogenase (GOD) in competition with ferrocyanide. Thus high oxygen concentrations can lead to low 4 estimates of glucose concentration. In addition the measurements are sensitive to factors such as changes in humidity, temperature, solution viscosity and haematocrit content.
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to overcome or ameliorate at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art, or to provide a useful alternative.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION According to the first aspect, the invention provides a method for determining the concentration of a reduced (or oxidised) form of a redox species in an electrochemical cell of the kind comprising a working electrode and a counter electrode spaced from the working electrode by a predetermined distance, said method comprising the steps of: applying an electric potential difference between the electrodes, selecting the potential of the working electrode such that the rate of electro-oxidation of the reduced form (or electro-reduction of the oxidised form) of the species is diffusion controlled, .15 selecting the spacing between the working electrode and the counter o• electrode so that reaction products from the counter electrode arrive at the working S"electrode, determining current as a function of time after application of the potential and prior to achievement of a steady state, 20 estimating the magnitude of the steady state current, and obtaining from the change in current with time and the magnitude of the steady state current, a value indicative of the diffusion coefficient and/or of the concentration of the reduced form (or the oxidised form) of the species.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words 'comprise', 'comprising', and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of "including, but not limited to".
The concentration measured in this way is substantially independent of variation if any in the diffusion coefficient of the reduced form, and therefore is compensated for variations in temperature and viscosity. The concentration so measured is independent of variations in haematocrit and other substances which affect the diffusion coefficient of the reduced form of the redox species.
Preferably, a steady state concentration profile of electrochemical reaction products is achieved between the working electrode and counter electrode during the period of a test.
It will be appreciated that the method of the invention is equally applicable for determining the concentration of a reduced form of a redox species or an oxidized form 15 of a redox species in the cell. In the case that the concentration of the reduced form is to o.
0: ••be determined the potential of the working electrode must be maintained such that the o• rate of electro oxidation of the reduced form is diffusion controlled in step and it is 000o the concentration of the reduced form that is obtained in step In the case that the 000000 concentration of oxidized form is to be determined, the potential of the working 20 electrode must be maintained such that the rate of electro reduction of the oxidized form o..
.is diffusion controlled in step and it is the concentration of the oxidized form that is obtained in step *0 0.
6 For preference, the spacing of the electrodes is less than 500 mm apart, with the spacing being selected such that the steady state current is achieved within a desired time.
The redox species may be an analyte or may be a redox mediator.
In preferred embodiments of the method a mediator is used and the concentration of the reduced (or oxidized) form of the mediator is in turn indicative of the concentration of an analyte and a measure of the diffusion coefficient of the reduced (or oxidized) form of the mediator is determined as a precursor to the determination of the .o concentration of the analyte.
10 For preference the cell comprises a working electrode and counter/reference electrode. If a reference electrode separate from a counter electrode is used, then the reference electrode may be in any convenient location in which it is in contact with the sample in the sensor.
In contrast to prior art, when conducting the method of the invention, the electrodes are sufficiently close that the products of electrochemical reaction at the counter electrode migrate to the working electrode during the period of the test. For example, in an enzyme ferricyanide system, the ferrocyanide produced at the counter electrode diffuses to the working electrode.
This allows a steady state concentration profile to be achieved between the electrodes leading to a steady state current. This in turn allows the diffusion coefficient and concentration of the redox species (mediator) to be measured independently of sample variations and therefore greatly improves accuracy and reliability.
7 The method also permits the haematocrit concentration of blood to be determined from the diffusion coefficient by use of look-up tables (or by separation of red cells from plasma and measurement of the diffusion coefficient of the red cell fraction) and the plasma fraction, and comparing the two.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention will now be more particularly described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein: Figure 1 is a schematic drawing (not to scale) of a first embodiment according to the invention shown in side elevation.
10 Figure 2 shows the embodiment of Figure 1 in plan, viewed from above.
00 Figure 3 shows the embodiment of Figure 1 in plan, viewed from below.
Figure 4 shows the embodiment of Figure 1 viewed in end elevation.
o° Figure 5 is a schematic drawing (not to scale) of a second embodiment according to the invention in side elevation.
0 o Figure 6 shows the embodiment of Figure 5 in plan, viewed from above.
Figure 7 is a schematic drawing (not to scale) of a third embodiment according to the invention, in side elevation.
Figure 8 shows the embodiment of Figure 7 in plan, viewed from above.
Figure 9 is a schematic drawing (not to scale) according to the invention in plan view, viewed from above.
Figure 10 shows the embodiment of Figure 9 in end elevation.
Figure 11 shows the embodiment of Figure 9 in side elevation.
8 Figure 12 shows a schematic drawing (not to scale) of a hollow cell embodiment according to the invention, viewed in cross section.
Figure 13 is a graph showing a plot of current (ordinate axis) versus time (coordinate axis) during conduct of a method according to the invention.
Figure 14 is a further graph of use in explaining the method of the invention.
In Figures 5 to 12, components corresponding in function to components of the embodiment of Figures 1 to 4 are identified by identical numerals or indicia.
e* DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS *.i ,With reference to Figures 1 to 4 there is shown a first embodiment of apparatus 10 of the invention, in this case a biosensor for determining glucose in blood. The embodiment comprises a thin strip membrane 1 having upper and lower surfaces 2, 3 "•and having a cell zone 4 defined between a working electrode 5 disposed on upper surface 2 and a counter electrode 6 disposed on lower surface 3. The membrane thickness is selected so that the electrodes are separated by a distance which is sufficiently close that the products of electrochemical reaction at the counter electrode *.i migrate to the working electrode during the time of the test and a steady state diffusion profile is substantially achieved. Typically, will be less than 500 .Lm. A sample deposition or "target" area 7 defined on upper surface 2 of membrane 1 is spaced at a distance greater than the membrane thickness from cell zone 4. Membrane 1 has a diffusion zone 8 extending between target area 7 and cell zone 4. A suitable reagent including a redox mediator an enzyme and a pH buffer are contained within cell zone 4 of the membrane and/or between cell zone 4 and target area 7. The reagent may also include stabilisers and the like.
In some cases it is preferable to locate the enzyme and mediator and/or the buffer in different zones of the membrane. For example the mediator may be initially located within electrochemical cell zone 4 while the enzyme may be situated below target area 7 or in diffusion zone 8.
Haemoglobin releases oxygen at low pH's, but at higher pH's it binds oxygen very firmly. Oxygen acts as a redox mediator for glucose oxidase dehydrogenase (GOD). In a glucose sensor this competes with the redox mediator leading to low estimates of glucose concentration. Therefore if desired a first pH buffer can be contained in the vicinity of target area 7 to raise the pH to such a level that all the 10 oxygen is bound to haemoglobin. Such a pH would be non-optimal for GOD/glucose kinetics and would consequently be detrimental to the speed and sensitivity of the test.
-•In a preferred embodiment of the invention a second pH buffer is contained as a reagent -*o in the vicinity of the working electrode to restore the pH to kinetically optimal levels.
The use of a second buffer does not cause oxygen to be released from the haemoglobin as the haemoglobin is contained within the blood cells which are retained near blood target area 7 or are retarded in diffusion in comparison with the plasma and therefore not influenced by the second buffer. In this manner oxygen interference may be greatly reduced or eliminated.
In use of the sensor a drop of blood containing a concentration of glucose to be determined is placed on target zone 7. The blood components wick towards cell zone 4, the plasma component diffusing more rapidly than red blood cells so that a plasma front reaches cell zone 4 in advance of blood cells.
When the plasma wicks into contact with the reagent, the reagent is dissolved and a reaction occurs that oxidises the analyte and reduces the mediator. After allowing a predetermined time to complete this reaction an electric potential difference is applied between the working electrode and the counter electrode. The potential of the working electrode is kept sufficiently anodic such that the rate of electro oxidation of the reduced form of the mediator at the working electrode is determined by the rate of diffusion of the reduced form of the mediator to the working electrode, and not by the rate of electron transfer across the electrode/solution interface.
In addition the concentration of the oxidised form of the mediator at the counter o* 0: 10 electrode is maintained at a level sufficient to ensure that when a current flows in the electrochemical cell the potential of the counter electrode, and thus also the potential of ••the working electrode, is not shifted so far in the cathodic direction that the potential of the working electrode is no longer in the diffusion controlled region. That is to say, the
S.
0.0*concentration of the oxidized form at the counter electrode must be sufficient to maintain diffusion controlled electro oxidation of the reduced form of the mediator at the working S. S electrode.
The behaviour of a thin layer cell is such that if both oxidised and reduced forms of the redox couple are present, eventually a steady state concentration profile is established across the cell. This results in a steady state current. It has been found that by comparing a measure of the steady state current with the rate at which the current varies in the current transient before the steady state is achieved, the diffusion coefficient of the redox mediator can be measured as well as its concentration. This is in contrast to the Cottrell current that is measured in the prior art. By measuring the Cottrell current at 11 known times after application of a potential to the sensor electrodes it is only possible to determine the product concentration times square root of the diffusion coefficient and therefore it is not possible to determine the concentration of the mediator independent of its diffusion coefficient.
In a cell according to the current invention, by solving the appropriate diffusion equations it can be shown that over a restricted time range a plot of ln(i/i" vs time (measured in seconds) is linear and has a slope (denoted by S) which is equal to -47r 2 D/1 2 where is the current at time "i 0 is the steady state current, is the diffusion coefficient in cm 2/sec, is the distance between the electrodes in cm and "7t" is S. S 10 approximately 3.14159. The concentration of reduced mediator present when the potential was applied between the electrodes is given by 27 2i/FA1 S, where is Faraday's constant, A is the working electrode area and the other symbols are as given above. As this later formula uses S it includes the measured value of the diffusion coefficient.
Since 1 is a constant for a given cell, measurement of i as a function of time and i enable the value of the diffusion coefficient of the redox mediator to be calculated and the concentration of the analyte to be determined.
Moreover the determination of analyte concentration compensates for any variation to the diffusion coefficient of the species which is electro oxidised or electro reduced at the working electrode. Changes in the value of the diffusion coefficient may occur as a result of changes in the temperature and viscosity of the solution or variation of the membrane permeability. Other adjustments to the measured value of the concentration may be necessary to account for other factors such as changes to the cell 12 geometry, changes to the enzyme chemistry or other factors which may effect the measured concentration. If the measurement is made on plasma substantially free of haematocrit (which if present causes variation in the diffusion coefficient of the redox mediator) the accuracy of the method is further improved.
Each of electrodes 5, 6 has a predefined area. In the embodiments of figures 1 to 4 cell zone 4 is defined by edges 9, 10, 11 of the membrane which correspond with edges o• of electrodes 5, 6 and by leading (with respect to target area 7) edges 12, 13 of the electrodes. In the present example the electrodes are about 600 angstrom thick and are 0. 00 from 1 to 5 mm wide.
Optionally, both sides of the membrane are covered with the exception of the target area 7 by laminating layers 14 (omitted from plan views) which serves to prevent So. evaporation of water from the sample and to provide mechanical robustness to the *0000apparatus. Evaporation of water is undesirable as it concentrates the sample, allows the electrodes to dry out, and allows the solution to cool, affecting the diffusion coefficient and slowing the enzyme kinetics, although diffusion coefficient can be estimated as above.
A second embodiment according to the invention, shown in Figures 5 and 6, differs from the first embodiment by inclusion of a second working electrode 25 and counter/reference electrode 26 defining a second cell zone 24 therebetween. These electrodes are also spaced apart by less than 500 urm in the present example. Second electrodes 25, 26 are situated intermediate cell zone 4 and target area 7. In this embodiment the redox mediator is contained in the membrane below or adjacent to target area 7 or intermediate target area 7 and first cell zone 4. The enzyme is contained 13 in the membrane in the first cell zone 4 and second cell zone 24. The enzyme does not extend into second cell 24. In this case when blood is added to the target area, it dissolves the redox mediator. This wicks along the membrane so that second electrochemical cell 24 contains redox mediator analyte and serum including electrochemically interfering substances. First electrochemical cell receives mediator, analyte, serum containing electrochemically interfering substances, and enzyme.
Potential is now applied between both working electrodes and the counter electrode or o• electrodes but the change in current with time is measured separately for each pair. This •allows the determination of the concentration of reduced mediator in the absence of analyte plus the concentration of electrochemically interfering substances in the second electrochemical cell and the concentration of these plus analyte in the first S* •electrochemical cell. Subtraction of the one value from the other gives the absolute concentration of analyte.
The same benefit is achieved by a different geometry in the embodiment of Figures 7 and 8 in which the second working electrode and second counter/reference electrode define the second cell 24 on the side of target area 7 remote from first electrochemical cell 4. In this case the enzyme may be contained in the membrane strip between the target area and cell 1. The redox mediator may be in the vicinity of the target area or between the target area and each cell. The diffusion coefficient of mediator is lowered by undissolved enzyme and the arrangement of Figures 7 and 8 has the advantage of keeping enzyme out of the thin layer cells and allowing a faster test (as the steady state current is reached more quickly). Furthermore the diffusion constant of 14 redox mediator is then the same in both thin layer cells allowing more accurate subtraction of interference.
Although the embodiments of Figures 1 to 8 are unitary sensors, it will be understood that a plurality of sensors may be formed on a single membrane as shown in the embodiment of Figures 9 to 11. In this case the electrodes of one sensor are conductively comnnected to those of an adjacent sensor. Sensors may be used S. successively and severed from the strip after use.
In the embodiment of Figures 9 to 11 electrode dimensions are defined in the diffusion direction (indicated by arrow) by the width of the electrode in that direction.
The effective dimension of the electrode in a direction transverse to diffusion direction is defined between compressed volumes 16 of the membrane in a manner more fully described in co-pending Application PCT/AU96/00210, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. For clarity optional laminated layer 14 of Figure 1 has been omitted from figures 9 to 11.
In the embodiment of Figure 12 there is shown a hollow cell according to the invention wherein the electrodes 5, 6 are supported by spaced apart polymer walls 30 to define a hollow cell. An opening 31 is provided on one side of the cell whereby a sample can be admitted into cavity 32. In this embodiment a membrane is not used. As in previous embodiments, the electrodes are spaced apart by less than 500 rm, preferably 20 400 [tm and more preferably 20 200 jim. Desirably the effective cell volume is 1.5 microlitres or less.
It will be understood that the method of the invention may be performed with a cell constructed in accord with co-pending application PCT/AU95/00207 or cells of other known design, provided these are modified to provide a sufficiently small distance between electrode faces.
The method of the invention will now be further exemplified with reference to figures 13 and 14.
EXAMPLE 1 A membrane 130 microns thick was coated on both sides with a layer of Platinum 60 nanometers thick. An area of 12.6 sq. mm was defined by compressing the membrane. 1.5 microlitres of a solution containing 0.2 Molar potassium ferricyanide and 1% by weight glucose oxidase dehydrogenase was added to the defined area of the membrane and the water allowed to evaporate.
The platinum layers were then connected to a potentiostat to be used as the working and counter/reference electrodes. 3.0 microlitres of an aqueous solution containing 5 millimolar D-glucose and 0.9 wt NaCl was dropped on to the defined i area of the membrane. After an elapse of 20 seconds a voltage of 300 millivolts was applied between the working and counter/reference electrodes and the current recorded for a further 30 seconds at intervals of 0.1 seconds.
Figure 13 is a graph of current versus time based on the above measurements.
Using a value of the steady state current of 26.9 microamps the function ln(i/26.9 1) was computed and plotted versus time. The slope of the graph (Figure 14) is -0.342 which corresponds to a diffusion coefficient of 1.5 x 10 6 cm 2 per second and a corrected glucose concentration (subtracting background ferrocyanide) of 5.0 millimolar.
The steady state current is one in which no further significant current change occurs during the test. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, a minimum i II nl 1 b 16 current may be reached after which there may be a drift due to factors such as lateral diffusion, evaporation, interfering electrochemical reactions or the like. However, in practice it is not difficult to estimate the "steady state" current One method for doing so involves approximating an initial value for Using the fit of the i versus t data to the theoretical curve a better estimate of i' is then obtained. This is repeated reiteratively until the measured value and approximated value converge to within an *i :acceptable difference, thus yielding an estimated i'.
In practice, the measurements of current i at time t are made between a minimum time t min and a maximum time t max after the potential is applied. The minimum and maximum time are determined by the applicability of the equations and can readily be S-determined by experiment of a routine nature. If desired the test may be repeated by switching. off the voltage and allowing the concentration profiles of the redox species to return towards their initial states.
It is to be understood that the analysis of the current v. time curve to obtain values of the Diffusion Co-efficient and/or concentration is not limited to the method given above but could also be achieved by othermethods.
It will be understood that in practice of the invention an electrical signal is issued by the apparatus which is indicative of change in current with time. The signal may be an analogue or digital signal or may be a series of signals issued at predetermined time intervals. These signals may be processed by means of a microprocessor or other conventional circuit to perform the required calculations in accordance with stored algorithms to yield an output signal indicative of the diffusion coefficient, analyte 17 concentration, haemrnatocrit concentration or the like respectively. One or more such output signals may be displayed by means of an analogue or digital display.
It is also possible by suitable cell design to operate the cell as a depletion cell measuring the current required to deplete the mediator. For example in the embodiment of Figure 5 the method of the invention may be performed using electrodes 5, 6, which are spaced apart by less than 500 ptm. An amperometric or voltametric depletion measurement may be made using electrodes 5 and 26 which are spaced apart more than a• 500 pam and such that there is no interference between the redox species being :i amperometrically determined at electrodes 5, 26.
The depletion measurement may be made prior to, during or subsequent to, the measurement of diffusion coefficient by the method of the invention. This enables a substantial improvement in accuracy and reproducibility to be obtained.
In the embodiments described the membrane is preferably an asymmetric porous membrane of the kind described in US 4,629,563 and US 4,774,039 both of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference. However symmetrical porous membranes may be employed. The membrane may be in the form of a sheet, tube, hollow fibre or other suitable form.
If the membrane is asymmetric the target area is preferably on the more open side of the asymmetric membrane. The uncompressed membrane desirably has a thickness of from 20 to 500 p.m. The minimum thickness is selected having regard to speed, sensitivity, accuracy and cost. If desired a gel may be employed to separate haematocrit from GOD. The gel may be present between the electrodes and/or in the space between the sample application area and the electrodes.
18 The working electrode is of any suitable metal for example gold, silver, platinum, palladium, iridium, lead, a suitable alloy. The working electrode may be preformed or formed in situ by any suitable method for example sputtering, evaporation under partial vacuum, by electrodeless plating, electroplating, or the like. Suitable non-metal conductors may also be used for electrode construction. For example, conducting polymers such as poly(pyrrole), poly(aniline), porphyrin "wires", poly(isoprene) and poly (cis-butadiene) doped with iodine and "ladder polymers". Other non-metal electrodes may be graphite or carbon mixed with a binder, or a carbon filled plastic.
9* Inorganic electrodes such as In 2 03 or SnO 2 may also be used. The counter/reference S. •10 electrode may for example be of similar construction to the working electrode. Nickel 9 S-hydroxide or a silver halide may also be used to form the counter/reference electrode.
Silver chloride may be employed but it will be understood that chloridisation may not be necessary and silver may be used if sufficient chloride ions are present in the blood i sample. Although in the embodiments described the working electrode is shown on the upper surface of the biosensor and the counter/reference electrode is on the lower surface, these may be reversed.
It is preferable that the working electrode and counter (or counter/reference) electrodes are of substantially the same effective geometric area.
If a separate reference and counter electrode are employed, they may be of similar construction. The reference electrode can be in any suitable location.
It will be understood that the features of one embodiment herein described may be combined with those of another. The invention is not limited to use with any particular combination of enzyme and mediator and combinations such as are described 19 in EP 0351892 or elsewhere may be employed. The system may be used to determine analytes other than glucose (for example, cholesterol) by suitable adaptation of reagents and by appropriate membrane selection. The system may also be adapted for use with media other than blood. For example the method may be employed to determine the concentration of contaminants such as chlorine, iron, lead, cadmium, copper, etc., in water.
Although the cells herein described have generally planar and parallel electrodes e it will be understood that other configurations may be employed, for example one electrode could be a rod or needle and the other a concentric sleeve.
10 It will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the disclosure hereof the invention may be embodied in other forms without departing from the inventive concept herein disclosed.

Claims (11)

1. A method for determining the concentration of a reduced (or oxidised) form of a redox species in an electrochemical cell of the kind comprising a working electrode and a counter electrode spaced from the working electrode by a predetermined distance, said method comprising the steps of: applying an electric potential difference between the electrodes, selecting the potential of the working electrode such that the rate of S• electro-oxidation of the reduced form (or electro-reduction of the oxidised form) of the species is diffusion controlled, selecting the spacing between the working electrode and the counter electrode so that reaction products from the counter electrode arrive at the working -•-electrode, determining current as a function of time after application of the potential "and prior to achievement of a steady state, estimating the magnitude of the steady state current, and obtaining from the change in current with time and the magnitude of the steady state current, a value indicative of the diffusion coefficient and/or of the concentration of the reduced form (or the oxidised form) of the species.
2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein a steady state concentration profile of electrochemical reaction products is achieved between the working electrode and counter electrode during the period of a test. 21
3. A method according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 wherein the electrodes are separated by less than 500 jim.
4. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the redox species is a mediator and the concentration of the reduced (or oxidised) form of the mediator is indicative of the concentration of an analyte and wherein a measure of the diffusion coefficient of the reduced (or oxidised) form of the mediator is determined as a .9 precursor to the determination of the concentration of the analyte. S*
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the steady state current is estimated by approximating an initial value for the steady state current, 10 measuring a discrepancy between measured current versus time data and a theoretical curve, and using the degree of discrepancy, if any, to obtain a better estimate of the S steady state current.
6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the redox species is an analyte.
7. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the redox species is a mediator.
8. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the cell comprises a working electrode, a counter electrode and a separate reference electrode.
9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the spacing between the electrodes is selected such that the steady state current is achieved within a desired time.
A method substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the Examples.
11. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 10 when used for determining haematocrit of whole blood. DATED this 2nd Day of August, 1999 USF FILTRATION AND SEPARATIONS GROUP INC. Attorney: PAUL G. HARRISON Fellow Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia of BALDWIN SHELSTON WATERS
AU42422/99A 1995-06-19 1999-08-02 Electrochemical cell Expired AU741403B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU42422/99A AU741403B2 (en) 1995-06-19 1999-08-02 Electrochemical cell
AU2007202456A AU2007202456A1 (en) 1999-08-02 2007-05-29 Wall panel

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPN3639 1995-06-19
AU59922/96A AU712939B2 (en) 1995-06-19 1996-06-19 Electrochemical cell
AU42422/99A AU741403B2 (en) 1995-06-19 1999-08-02 Electrochemical cell

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU59922/96A Division AU712939B2 (en) 1995-06-19 1996-06-19 Electrochemical cell

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU4242299A AU4242299A (en) 1999-11-11
AU741403B2 true AU741403B2 (en) 2001-11-29

Family

ID=3745120

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU42423/99A Expired AU735132B2 (en) 1995-06-19 1999-08-02 Electrochemical cell
AU42422/99A Expired AU741403B2 (en) 1995-06-19 1999-08-02 Electrochemical cell

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU42423/99A Expired AU735132B2 (en) 1995-06-19 1999-08-02 Electrochemical cell

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (2) AU735132B2 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0025591A1 (en) * 1979-09-12 1981-03-25 Luperox GmbH Process for cross-linking polymers and/or copolymers by means of radical initiators in the presence of oxygen
AU3104293A (en) * 1992-01-14 1993-07-15 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Viscometer
WO1994002842A1 (en) * 1992-07-28 1994-02-03 The Victoria University Of Manchester Analytical method for the detection and measurement of paracetamol

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0025591A1 (en) * 1979-09-12 1981-03-25 Luperox GmbH Process for cross-linking polymers and/or copolymers by means of radical initiators in the presence of oxygen
AU3104293A (en) * 1992-01-14 1993-07-15 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Viscometer
WO1994002842A1 (en) * 1992-07-28 1994-02-03 The Victoria University Of Manchester Analytical method for the detection and measurement of paracetamol

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU4242299A (en) 1999-11-11
AU735132B2 (en) 2001-06-28
AU4242399A (en) 1999-11-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9075004B2 (en) Electrochemical cell
US6284125B1 (en) Electrochemical cell
RU2305279C2 (en) Device and method for determining concentration of reduced form or oxidized form of reduction-oxidation substance in liquid sample
AU741403B2 (en) Electrochemical cell

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
PC Assignment registered

Owner name: LIFESCAN, INC.

Free format text: FORMER OWNER WAS: USF FILTRATION AND SEPARATIONS GROUP INC.