AU680999B2 - System and method for monitoring the quality of a fluid - Google Patents

System and method for monitoring the quality of a fluid Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU680999B2
AU680999B2 AU14823/95A AU1482395A AU680999B2 AU 680999 B2 AU680999 B2 AU 680999B2 AU 14823/95 A AU14823/95 A AU 14823/95A AU 1482395 A AU1482395 A AU 1482395A AU 680999 B2 AU680999 B2 AU 680999B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
signal
debris
fluid
signals
moving fluid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
AU14823/95A
Other versions
AU1482395A (en
Inventor
Celia Elizabeth Fisher
Roy Forfitt
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GE Aviation Systems Ltd
Original Assignee
Stewart Hughes Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Stewart Hughes Ltd filed Critical Stewart Hughes Ltd
Publication of AU1482395A publication Critical patent/AU1482395A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU680999B2 publication Critical patent/AU680999B2/en
Assigned to SMITHS AEROSPACE LIMITED reassignment SMITHS AEROSPACE LIMITED Alteration of Name(s) in Register under S187 Assignors: STEWART HUGHES LIMITED
Assigned to GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LIMITED reassignment GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LIMITED Request to Amend Deed and Register Assignors: SMITHS AEROSPACE LIMITED
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)

Description

-1 Lr II I
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION For a Standard Patent
ORIGINAL
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Name of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): STEWART HUGHES LIMITED CELIA ELIZABETH FISHER ROY FORFITT sc
I
o o c o r s e cc u r r a r a r Address for Service: WRAY ASSOCIATES, Primary Industry House, 239 Adelaide Terrace, Perth, Western Australia, 6000.
Attorney Code: WR Invention Title: "SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING THE QUALITY OF A FLUID" The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of preforming it know to us:- ~3~P~sPII -CI~ ~b~ pl -2- THIS INVENTION relates to the monitoring of the quality of a fluid. The invention has particular application to the monitoring of debris and/or impurities in a fluid system such as for example a lubricating system or a cooling system but is not limited to such applications.
In a moving fluid system unwanted debris in the form of say discrete particles may become suspended in the fluid. For example in an engine lubricating system swarf and other particulars produced by wear and tear during the running of the engine will be picked up by the lubricating oil and be carried around the engine by the oil. This is undesirable because the debris can contribute to further wear of the engine thereby reducing the life of the engine. Clearly it is desirable to be able to monitor the debris in the oil in order to determine when the debris content of the oil becomes unacceptable.
Many different methods of monitoring debris in a fluid have been proposed and used. For example, one or several filters of different grades are inserted into a fluid carrying conduit and are removed from time to time for inspection and cleaning. Another approach is simply to draw off a sample of fluid which may be inspected for debris immediately or taken away for subsequent o oC o I I 1 9 11 -C I 2 aanalysis. A further rethod relies on the insertion of magnetic plugs in the body of the conduit. As ferrous debris passes a plug it is attracted by the magnet and "sticks" to the plug. The plugs can be removed from time to time to enable inspection of the debris stuck thereto and cleaning thereof.
Whilst these approaches usually enable satisfactory debris monitoring to be performed they all suffer from limitations. The methods are generally intrusive and in certain situations, where for example a steady and relatively turbulent-free flow is required, are therefore unusable. Many methods also require periodic inspection to obtain a measure of the debris content and thus cannot be used to provide continuous monitoring of 15 the debris. That is to say many of the known methods are unable to provide a real time reading of the debris content of a moving fluid.
The present invention aims to overcome the above discussed and associated disadvantages and limitations.
It is known to measure the total volume flow of a fluid from the teachings of, for example, British Patent SNo. GB-A-1,392,926. This British patent discloses a method and apparatus for on-line measurement of fluid flow in which two pairs of electrodes spaced apart in a fluid stream are energised so that a polarizing current passes between the electrode elements of each pair. The -I ~-IL -rTilL~ rP k~PII I C I L_ I I _I -3polarizing current causes conductivity disturbances in the fluid which disturbances are detected by the two electrode pairs and analysed by cross correlation to derive a measurement of the volume flow of the fluid. Clearly this arrangement has its disadvantages. For example, in order for the polarizing current to cause disturbances in the fluid, the fluid must be an electrolyte.
Furthermore, the conductivity disturbances wili be in the form of gas bubbles in the fluid and such bubbles will be unacceptable in many circumstances.
Australian Patent Application No. AU-A-41176/72 discloses an arrangement by which the flow rate of a fluid can be measured by detecting electrostatic charge in the fluid and analysing the thus detected charge by cross correlation to determine the flow rate of the fluid.
In one aspect the present invention resides in the realisation that debris carried by a fluid will have an electrostatic charge associated with it and that by 0: W.
detecting this electrostatic charge it is possible to monitor a fluid for debris.
15 Accordingly, in one form the present ;nvention provides a method of monitoring 0% 0' the quality of a moving fluid, the method comprising obtaining a signal representing electrostatic charge associated with the moving fluid and with debris and/or impurities carried by the moving fluid from at least one electrostatic sensor at a first location on a path along which the moving fluid 20 moves, processing the obtained signal with another signal representing at least the charge associated with the moving fluid, to extract from the signals the signal components associated with the moving fluid and thereby produce a signal representing electrostatic charge associated with the debris and/or impurities, thus enabling detection of the debris and/or impurities. In the practice of this aspect of the invention at least one signal representing electrostatic charge are obtained from at least one location in a path along which the fluid flows. The signal or signals are processed to establish the speed of flow of the fluid and with this information the signal or signals can be further I IL M 3a processed to remove components associated with the charge in the fluid and to leave components associated with the charge on the debris.
*0
B
B B B B B
BB
B,
B
B B
B.
B B B B
B.
B. B
BB
B.
B B -4- Further, in a second form the invention resides in an apparatus for monitoring the quality of a rr nig fluid, the apparatus comprising at least one electrostatic sensor for producing a signl .,presenting electrostatic charge associated with the fluid and with debris and/or impurities carried by the fluid at a first location on a path along which the fluid moves, and a signal processor for processing the obtained signal with another signal representing at least the charge associated with the moving fluid to extract from the signals the signal components associated with the moving fluid and thereby produce a signal representing electrostatic charge associated with the debris and/or impurities. In practice of the invention the processed signal and/or the conditioned signal or signals can be stored on a suitable medium such as magnetic tape for subsequent further analysis.
V, o .eg.
e a oe* I d~l I I I~LC- The present invention thus provides both a method of and a system for monitoring debris in a fluid which are non-intrusive and are capable of providing continuous monitoring of a fluid. The system can be arranged to operate in real time such that debris can be detected as soon as it passes a detector and remedial action taken before further damage occurs.
In order that the invention may be better understood several embodiments will be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a monitoring system adapted to monitor debris in oil; Figure 2 is a schematic cross-sectioned view of a typical sensor; Figure 3 shows a background signal from one sensor, a background signal from a second sensor and a noise cancelled signal derived from the two background signals; Figure 4 shows similar views to Figure 3 but including information related to the passage of a particle of debris.
*R*
o. Referring now to Figure 1 of the accompanying o°
S
0 •s *o S L _II drawings there is shown a gearbox 1 with an associated oil sump filter and pump 2 connected to the gearbox 1 by way.of a conduit 3. The conduit 3 provides a path for oil from the gearbox to the sump 2 and it will be appreciated that a similar conduit will deliver oil from the sump to the gearbox, the latter conduit being omitted from the drawing for the sake of clarity. Two sensors S1 and S2 are mounted to the conduit 3 some distance apart from each other, in this case 220 mm apart. The sensors Sl, S2 are provided for sensing electrostatic charge and any suitable form of sensor may be used. One form of sensor that we have found to be useful is shown in section in Figure 2 of the accompanying drawings. The sensor shown in Figure 2
S
15 comprises a primary layer of insulation 4 mounted to the surface of the conduit and comprising epoxy resin. The 0S*S Sprimary layer 4 is applied in a strip around
S
substantially the whole circumference of the conduit 3 o* and a self adhesive copper strip 5, typical.y 8 mm wide and 50 microns thick, is secured thereon. Insulated cable 6 is soldered to the copper strip 5 and the copper strip is then encased in a secondary layer of insulation 7 comprising a layer of epoxy resin, the whole sensor being finished with a coating of protective paint.
Returning now to Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings, electrical cables 6, 8 from the sensors Sl, S2 -L B-~UQ I lg I,.
are connected to a signal conditioner 9. The signal conditioner 9 is provided to perform a preliminary conditioning of the signals from the sensors Si, S2.
The signals from the sensors Sl, S2 are induced by electrostatic charge passing the sensors. As such the signals tend to be weak and one purpose of the signal conditioner 9 is to give robustness to the signals. The signal conditioner 9 may also act as a coarse filter to remove noise from the signals and may even include integrating and differentiating circuits if so required.
Signal conditioning and signal conditioning circuits are per se well known and will not be described in any greater detail herein.
Conditioned signals from the signal conditioner 9
CC
15 are recorded by a tape recorder 10 for subsequent o• analysis by a signal processing circuit 11.
Alternatively, or additionally the signal processing may S" be performed by the signal processing circuit 11 on-line and in real time. Results of the signal processing can 20 be displayed on a display 12 in any suitable form for inspection by a user. An oscilloscope 13 may also be connected to the tape recorder 10 to allow a user to inspect the conditioned signals from the signal conditioner 9 prior to processing by the signal processing circuit 11.
As oil flows through the conduit 3 electrostatic I ~h I. 1 ~3 1 charge in the oil induces a signal onto each of the sensors Si, S2. Assuming that the level of charge carried by the debris is not affecued as between normal (healthy) and faulty (unhealthy) running of the gearbox 1 then the charge carried by the debris will be substantially due to the interaction of the debris with the flowing oil, to aeration ct the oil and to the debris impacting with, for example, the walls of the conduit. Even with no debris present in the oil there will be a background signal induced by electrostatic charge generated in a similar manner and carried by the oil and from noise sources such as air bubbles and the like introduced by aeration of the oil.
o. Examples of contemporaneous background signals from 0 15 the sensors Sl and S2 are shown respectively in Figures 3(a) and 3 o'f the accompanying drawings. The flow rate of the oil can be readily determined by, for example, the cross correlation techniques disclosed in the abovementioned British Patent No. 1,392,926. With a a the flow rate known it is possible to process the signals from the sensors to remove much of the noise therefrom. Noise reduction techniques are used to ag". increase the signal to noise ratio of the signals from the sensors. The signals from the sensors have similar time histories and so it is possible to reduce the noise by compensating for the time delay between the sensors I I _r t-~e _911 which delay can be readily determined, by cross correlation of the signals, and differencing the resulting signals. An exemplary signal resulting from such a noise cancelling process is shown in Figure 3(c) of the accompanying drawings. It will be noted that the noise cancelled signal shown in Figure 3(c) is significantly reduced in amplitude as compared to the raw signals from the sensors Sl, S2 as shown in Figures 3(a) and The noice cancelled signal is not entirely smooth because there will nearly always be minor differences between the raw signals which differences will not be removed simply by cross correlation. Such differences will result in signal components that amount to "raise alarms" which can be a* removed by subsequent processing, as will be described in greater detail hereinafter.
When electrostatic charge in the oil travels at the a same speed as the oil, cross correlation and differencing of the signals effectively removes from the signal the component associated with the electrostatic charge. Thus, if debris were moving at the same speed as the oil the charge carried by the debris would not be detectable in the processed signal. It has been found that the debris typically travels at a different velocity than the oil. This is particularly so at locations such as the point of entry to the conduit 3 _I from the gearbox 1 at which point the oil and the debris are both accelerating. At such locations the debris will accelerate at a slower rate than the oil, because it will generally be more massive than the oil. Thus, for a given installation, the siting of the sensors S1, S2 both from each other and within the system on which debris is to be monitored should be given due consideration. Each different installation may require the sensors to be mounted at different locations.
However, the precise location is not pertinent to the present invention and can be readily determined by those possessed of the appropriate skills. The effect of the debris travelling at a slower speed is that the debris will take longer than a given body of oil to pass S. betweer the sensors S1, S2 and therefore the signal o induced on the sensors by the electrostatic charge on the debris will not.be removed by processing.
Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show exemplary signals from the sensors representing the passage of a single debris o* 20 particle past the sensors and Figure 4(c) shows the resulting signal following noise cancellation. It will 9 S be noted that the signal includes one substantial spike 1 representing the presence of the debris, and several small spikes induced by spurious emissions. The spurious spikes, which represent false alarms, are removed by thresholding to leave only an indication of b I I 1C-~ the presence of the debris.
The average amplitude of the background signal varies with the velocity of the oil in the conduit.
Generally speaking there will be less noise for lower flow rates and more noise for higher flow rates. This change in noise level occurs because the aeration of the oil and the interaction of the oil with the air bubbles therein and with the walls of the conduit, for example, increases with an increase in flow rate. Much of the noise at higher flow rates is, of course, eliminated by the above discussed noise elimination techniques.
However, suitable adjustments may nevertheless be S"required. For example to adjust the thresholding level go at which a signal is deemed to represent a particle of 15 debris.
oe o S"Background noise is also affected by changes in flow rate. In particular, background noise is e• *•e substantially larger when fluid flow is starting for the first time than it is during a period of steady flow rate. Under some circumstances the background noise will become so great as to mask any debris related signals. Similarly, debris related signals can become lost in background noise if the fluid flow is or becomes turbulent. Due consideration should also be given to these factors when deciding where to locate and when tp process signals from the sensors.
I~I_ lr Is)$I 12 The detectability of the debris will depend on the size of the debris to a certain extent because this will affect how much charge can be carried. The detectability will also depend on the flow rate of the fluid. However, in tests it has been shown that debris ranging from single particles at 3001m to 6001m, and including multiple particles from 1001m to 6001m, up to steel balls and swarf several millimetres across are all detectable. Whilst lower flow rates produce signals which are more easily processed, the system could cope with flow rates from 8 to 120 litres per minute without any great difficulty.
The form, amplitude and direction of a debris signal is dependent on the size of the debris particle, its proximity to the sensors and the charge that it carries. The debris signal may also be dependent on characteristics of the oil. The above described system can only determine the presence of debris and is not sufficiently sophisticated to be able to distinguish between these differences. However, it is envisaged that by applying sophisticated signal processing to the problem the differences may become distinguishable.
It will, of course, be appreciated that the system as described is perfectly capable of distinguishing between, for example, zero or insignificant levels of debris, steadily increasing levels of debris and sudden .1 -13substantial increases in the level of debris. The system can be arranged to respond to these different conditions in a manner appropriate to the conditions. For example, the system may be arranged to generate an alarm if the level of debris increases above a predetermined threshold, say, or suddenly increases substantially.
The system thus described provides for the monitoring of debris in a fluid and it will be appreciated that many modifications are possible to the system without departing from the ambit of the present invention. For example, the system described above employs two sensors to detect electrostatic charge in the fluid and a twin sensor noise reduction technique to extract debris related information from the signals from the sensors, but according to an alternative embodiment only a single sensor is used and the debris related information is obtained by comparing the signal from the sensor with a reference signal representing the background signal from clear, ie. debris free, oil.
Furthermore, according to another embodiment the invention may be applied to monitoring the quality, ie. the presence or otherwise of impurities, in superheated steam by appropriate modification of the above described embodiments.
Superheated steam is a gaseous fluid, with water droplets being vaporised in the superheated condition, 9* o oo* 14 and it is therefore possible to monitor the steam for debris present therein. Such debris may take the form of limescale deposits originating in a boiler and carried by the superheated steam. In addition, the condition of the superheated steam deteriorating to become saturated steam is also detectable since the steam will comprise both gaseous and liquid phases carrying detectable charge.
The embodiment also has further application to the situation in which superheated steam is injected into the combustor of a gas turbine engine to enhance performance of the engine.
Having thus described the present invention by reference to a preferred embodiment it is to be well understood that the embodiment in question is exemplary only and that r "ifications and variatiohs such as will occur to those possessed of appropriate knowledge and o* o skills may be made without departure from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
S
*e

Claims (13)

1. A method of monitoring the quality of a moving fluid, the method comprising obtaining a signal representing electrostatic charge associated with the moving fluid and with debris and/or impurities carried by the moving fluid from at least one electrostatic sensor at a first location on a path along which the moving fluid moves, processing the obtained signal with another signal representing at least the charge associated with the moving fluid, to extract from the signals the signal components associated with the moving fluid only and thereby produce a signal representing electrostatic charge associated S.a 10 with the debris and/or impurities, thus enabling detection of the debris and/or impurities. o 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the other signal is obtained from a reference signal representing the background signal of debris and/or impurity free fluid. S 15 3. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising, extracting the signal G components representing the charge associated with the moving fluid, •processing the signals in order to establish the speed of flow of the fluid. C
4. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the processed signal is compared to a threshold in order to remove corrponents representing false G* 20 indications of debris and/or impunrities caused by spurious emissions. A method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the threshold is varied with variations in the speed of flow of the moving fluid.
6. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, further comprising monitoring the processed signal as the same is produced for real-time detection of debris and/or impurities. I- II I s Ic; isa~r se I- -16-
7. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, further comprising recording the signals and/or the processed signals for subsequent further analysis.
8. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, further comprising conditioning the signals from the or each electrostatic sensor to facilitate said processing.
9. A method substantially as described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings. apparatus for monitoring the quality of a moving fluid, the apparatus S"comprising at least one electrostatic sensor for producing a signal representing electrostatic charge associated with the moving fluid and with S 10 debris and/or impurities carried by the moving fluid at a first location on a path along which the moving fluid moves, and a signal processor for processing the obtained signal with another signal representing at least the charge associated with the moving fluid, to extract from the signals the signal components associated with the moving fluid aner, thereby produce a signal S 15 representing electrostatic charge associated with the debris and/or impurities.
11.An apparatus as claimed in claim 10, comprising a means for producing a ,°reference signal representing the background signal of debris and/or impurity free fluid and wherein said other signal is obtained from the reference signal. 5 0 a S
12.An apparatus as claimed in claim 10 or 11, wherein the signal processor is arranged, in extracting the signal components representing the charge associated with the moving fluid, to process the signals in order to establish the speed of flow of the fluid.
13.An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 10 to 12, wherein the processor is arranged to compare the processed signal to a threshold and as a result of said comparison to remove components representing false indications of debris caused by spurious emissions. I I' -"BI1~'~-ilCIII I F -17-
14.An apparatus as claimed in claim 13, wherein the processor is arranged to vary the threshold with variations in the speed of flow of the moving fluid. apparatus as claimed in any of claims 10 to 14, further comprising monitoring means for monitoring the processed signal as the same is produced for real-time detection of debris and/or impurities.
16.An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 10 to 15, further comprising recording means for recording the signals and/or the processed signals for subsequent further analysis.
17.An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 10 to 16, further comprising 10 conditioning means for conditioning the signals from the electrostatic sensor go* to facilitate said processing.
18.An apparatus substantially as described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings. Dated this EIGHTH day of March 1995. STEWART HUGHES LIMITED Applicant Wray Associates Perth, Western Australia Patent Attorneys for the Applicant 1 fe U ABSTRACT A system for monitoring debris in a fluid comprises sensors (S1, S2) for detecting electrostatic charge associated with the fluid. A signal representative of the charge is produced by a signal conditioner and is processed to provide information relating to electrostatic charge carried by the debris. The monitoring system can be used to detect debris in any fluid, such as oil or superheated steam. *0 O e S S* el p• r•o o •°e°6 o41 00 O oOQ•O O co 4, Lsl I I
AU14823/95A 1990-11-28 1995-03-08 System and method for monitoring the quality of a fluid Expired AU680999B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9025815 1990-11-28
GB909025815A GB9025815D0 (en) 1990-11-28 1990-11-28 Fluid debris monitoring
GB9113876 1991-06-27

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU90153/91A Division AU655216B2 (en) 1990-11-28 1991-11-28 System and method for monitoring debris in a fluid

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU1482395A AU1482395A (en) 1995-05-18
AU680999B2 true AU680999B2 (en) 1997-08-14

Family

ID=10686084

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU14823/95A Expired AU680999B2 (en) 1990-11-28 1995-03-08 System and method for monitoring the quality of a fluid

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU680999B2 (en)
GB (1) GB9025815D0 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2117518A (en) * 1982-04-01 1983-10-12 Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia Method and device for detecting electrical charge of particles in a gas stream
EP0284392A2 (en) * 1987-03-25 1988-09-28 Stewart Hughes Limited Monitoring of foreign object ingestion in engines
EP0385569A2 (en) * 1989-01-20 1990-09-05 Stewart Hughes Limited Method and device for detecting charged particles in a gas flow

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2117518A (en) * 1982-04-01 1983-10-12 Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia Method and device for detecting electrical charge of particles in a gas stream
EP0284392A2 (en) * 1987-03-25 1988-09-28 Stewart Hughes Limited Monitoring of foreign object ingestion in engines
EP0385569A2 (en) * 1989-01-20 1990-09-05 Stewart Hughes Limited Method and device for detecting charged particles in a gas flow

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1482395A (en) 1995-05-18
GB9025815D0 (en) 1991-01-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU655216B2 (en) System and method for monitoring debris in a fluid
Sun et al. Online oil debris monitoring of rotating machinery: A detailed review of more than three decades
US5148405A (en) Method for monitoring acoustic emissions
AU656840B2 (en) Arrangement for detecting metallic particles carried by a fluid
CA2347567C (en) Non-destructive measurement of pipe wall thickness
JPS582772A (en) Particle detector
KR0169089B1 (en) Transient electromagnetic inspection method and apparatus with moving sensors
US11092534B2 (en) Method for detecting concentration of particles in fluid
US5061364A (en) Diagnostic filter for detecting conductive and semiconductive particles in a fluid stream
Weischedel et al. Electromagnetic testing, a reliable method for the inspection of wire ropes in service
EP1075658B1 (en) Method and device for detecting irregularities in the thickness of the walls of inaccessible metal pipes
AU680999B2 (en) System and method for monitoring the quality of a fluid
EP0269672A1 (en) Device for measuring magnetic particles in a liquid.
RU2668513C1 (en) Metal particles detection in the friction units lubrication system oil and the oil flow speed determining method
CN115180364B (en) Mining conveyor belt foreign matter monitoring device and method based on GMI magnetic sensor
EP0834070B1 (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring a lubricant
US3889522A (en) Pipeline condition analyzer
RU2724309C1 (en) Method of detecting and estimating sizes of single metal particles in lubrication system of friction pairs of power plants
CN114088308A (en) Transport pipeline vibration pickup leakage detection method based on low-reflection chirped grating array
RU2749574C1 (en) Method for determining oil flow speed upon detection of metal particles in diagnostic means for friction units of gas turbine engines
Nestleroth et al. Determining corrosion defect geometry from magnetic flux leakage PIG data
JPH08338220A (en) Magnetic plug with alarming sensor
CN115248119B (en) Online detection device and detection method for defects of heavy-load low-speed bearing
JP2001349873A (en) Data processing method in in-tube inspection device
CN117037423A (en) Railway line geological disaster monitoring method