AU679334B2

AU679334B2 - Footwear

Info

Publication number: AU679334B2
Application number: AU17128/95A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Anthony Evans
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 1994-02-23
Filing date: 1995-02-22
Publication date: 1997-06-26
Anticipated expiration: 2015-02-22
Also published as: MX9603517A; ES2135700T3; AU1712895A; ATE181216T1; EP0744907B1; CN1155832A; JPH09509347A; CA2183880A1; WO1995022915A1; EP0744907A1; DE69510332D1; BR9506939A; CN1122469C; GB9403420D0; DE69510332T2

Abstract

A football boot has a plurality of studs (11) disposed in a pattern which includes a part of at least one ring (12, 14). The studs (11) are asymmetric in that they provide grip along a first axis (A-A) and permit sliding along another axis (B-B) in a manner to encourage self cleaning. The studs are arranged with their respective first axes (A-A) aligned along the locus of the ring and their respective second axes (B-B) aligned transversely of the ring.

Description

I

This invention relates to an article of Gtudded footwear for use in sport or in another activity wherein aft enhanced grip is required for use on a natural or artificial penetrable surface such as grass, clay, particulate all-weather surfaces, Tartan (Registered Trade Mark) track surf acesI artificial turf such as I"Astroturf 1t (Regiatered Trade Mark) and all comparable natural and artificial surface.-. Hereinafter the term "boot" will be used to denoto each and any article of footwear.

Conventional studded boots, such as football boots, each have a sole from which project a number of fixed or removable studs. The studs have been in the form of vertical (or steep) sided cylindrical, conical or frustro-conical bodies, or bodies which are made up of cylindrical and frustro-conical parts. Known studded boots have had several disadvantages.

Firstly, the number of studs has been limited, because the provision of a relatively large number of relatively closelyspaced studs simply encourages the build-up of a pad of surface material (such as mud and grass) between the studs, forming a platform which negates the effect of the studs.

Limitation of the number of studs to as few as four or six on the sole of a boot eliminates this problem, but causes such a boot to be uncomfortable and/or unstable on hard surfaces with an attendant danger of discomfort or injury due to tripping or falling, or due to excessive pressure being applied to small parts of a wearer's foot.

Additionally, ouch etude have to he large enough to grip firmly in wot/muddy conditions and thus are often so long ao to give an excessivo grip in drier conditiono which nay occur at different timos, or in different part, of a playing surface. Such excessive grip can cause a wearer's hoot to "lock" to a ourface when a sudden turn in made or occurs and there is a possibility of injury from thin circumstance.

US 4392312 describes an alternative shoe having two different types of studs. One type of stud comprises three partially overlapping frustro-conical stud parts. Although the studs are generally arcuate in shape the longer faces of the studs are not "streamlined". Hence dirt accumulates in grooves in the longer faces of the stud. The profile of the two longer faces is the same.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a studded boot ("boot" meaning any article of footwear) wherein the above disadvantages are obviated or minimised.

The present invention provides a boot having a plurality of studs for penetrating a penetrable surface, said studs depending from the base of the boot, the studs being in the form of an arcuate body having, when viewed in underneath plan, a first axis and a second axis transverse to the first axis, the body providing at each end of the first axis a ramp surface which leads in an inclined manner substantially from a surface of the boot base substantially to a crown surface AMENDED

SHEET

zz.

of the stud body and the body having a barrier surfaco provided at one of the ends of the second zxis, the stud being asymmetric about the first axis in the plane of the second axis, so that when the stud penetratesa eeabeurce a force tending to cause movement of the stud along the second axis in o.-e direction J.G resisted and said stud grips the surface, and a force tending to cause movement of the stud along the first axis is not substantially resisted, the stud performing movement relative to the surface tending to wipe any accumulated surface material from its surfaces at the ends of the second axis and wherein at least some of the studs are disposed in a pattern which includes one or more partial or complete rings, the studs being arranged such that the barrier surface of the stud is located at the inside of the ring and the outer stud surface, that is the surface located at the outside of the ring, is, at least in part, convex and wherein' the barrier surface of the stud is more steep than the outer stud surface.

The ring can be circular or non-circular.

Each stud can be longer along its first axis than along its second axis.

The barrier surfaces can be a flat planar surface or can be slightly concave or convex. The, or each, barrier surface of each stud can merge with its end ramp surfaces by smooth transition or at sharp edges. The crown surface of each said A ONFO SUET r 05) 1 1 4 stud can be a flat planar surfvae or can be a smooth, (lone like surface and can merge smoothly or sharply wi.th the ramp and barrier ourfacon. The first axis of the stud can be a straigxht line or can be a curbed line such as a fraction of a circle.

Each ramp surface can, when the stud is viewed along the second axis, have a convex profile adjacent the base surface and a concave profile between the convex profile and the stud crown surface.

The studs can be integral with the boot base, for example by being moulded therewith, or can be attached to the base by a screw-in or plug-and-socket arrangement, A respective array of studs can be provided on a heal and sole portion of the boot base.

The invention will be described further, by way of example, with ref erence~ to the accompanying drawings, wherein: Fig..l is an underneath plan view of a stud of a first preferred embodiment of the boot of the invention; lig.2 is a cross-sectional view on line A-A; Fig.3 is a cross-sectional view on line B-B; Fict.4 is an underneath plan view of a preferred embodiment of the boot of the invention; z~L AMENDED SHEET

I

is a perspective view o£ a second shape of the stud; Fig.6 is a cross-sectional view on line A-A of Fig.7 is a plan view of a third shape of stud; Fig.8 is a plan view of a fourth shape of stud; Fig.9 is a cross-sectional view on line A-A of Fig.7 or 8; is a cross-sectional view on line B-B of Fig.8; Fig.11 is a cross-sectional view on line B-B of Fig.7; Fig.12 is an underneath plan view of a second preferred boot having studs in a different array; Fig.13 is a perspective view of a further shape of stud; Fig.14 is a cross-section on line B-B of Fig.13; and 16 are vertical cross-sectional views illustrating boots of the invention in use; Figs.I/A. to 17d are sketches illustrating possible ring arrays of studs on the bases of boots of the invention; Fig.18a is a perspective view of a variation; and Fig.18h is a vertical cross-sectional view showing the variation of Fig.18A.

Referring to the drawings, Fig.4 is an underneath plan view showing the base 10 of a preferred boot of the invention having a plurality of studs 11 arranged in a first array 12 on a sole 13 of the base 10 and a second array 14 on a heel of the base In this and ensuing embodiments the studs 11 are shown AMEN'OD S EET'

II

6 as being integrally formed with the base 10 as by moulding or comparable forming processes. However, it is possible that the studs 11 could be individually attachable to the base by fasteners or by a screw or plug-and-socket arrangement. This feature is not germane to the invention and is therefore not described in detail.

Referring to Figs. 1 to 3 it will be seen that each stud 11 is in the form of a solid body 16 having a first axis A-A and a second axis B-B. The second axis B-B can be at right angles to axis A-A but does not have to be so. Considered in cross-section along axis A-A the body 16 has at each end of the axis A-A a ramp surface 17 leading from the base surface 18 to a crown surface 19 of the stud 11. The ramp surface 17 is divided into a concave part 17a adjacent surface 18 and a convex part 17h adjacent the crown surface 19. The stud 11 is longer along the first axis A-A than it is along second axis B-B. Viewed in cross-section on axis B-B (Fig.3) it will be seen that the stud body 16 provides a steep barrier surface on one side and a less-steep barrier surface 21 on its other side. Barrier surface 20 can be flat in inverted plan view, slightly concave as shown, or slightly convex. Barrier surface 21 will normally be convexly curved.

The ratio of the length of the stud 17 along axis A-A to the width along axis B-B (at comparable levels below surface 18) is illustrated in Figs. 1 to 3 as being about 3:1. This ratio can vary from 1:1 to 10:1, but a range from 2:1 to 5:1 AMENDED SHEET -0 0

I

7 is preferred and gives a best balance between the conflicting needs of gripping power and intrinsic strength. The ratio of the "height" of the stud 11, i.e. the vertical distance from surface 18 to the lowermost crown surface 19 of the stud 11, to the width of the stud at the level of surface 18 is illustrated as being about 1:1.3. However, variations from 1:0.7 up to 1:3 are possible. A preferred range is from 1:1 to 1:2.

It will be appreciated that the stud 11 presents a "streamlined" shape in each direction along axis A-A and upon being urged to travel along axis A-A whilst penetrating a surface will tend to slide easily through the surface creating a groove or channel therein. Contact between the faces of the stud during such travel will tend to wipe surface material from the stud during such travel, particularly surface material (such as mud or grass) which tends to accumulate adjacent barrier surfaces 20 and 21. These surfaces are thus kept clear of obstruction. When a force is applied to the stud 11 in a direction along the axis B-B, the steep barrier surfaces 20,21 act to cause the stud 11 to grip a surface firmly and militate against the wearer slipping.

Fig.4 shows how the plurality of studs 11 are arranged in the two arrays 12 and 14, one on the sole and the second on the heel of the boot 10. The heel array 14 is of lesser importance as heel pivoting is relatively rare, and seldom causes injury. However, the previously-discussed problem of AMENDED

SHEET

I"

8 "locking" of the boot to a surface possibly causing an ankle injury is particularly relevant to the sole portion. Fig.4 shows how an array of studs on the sole is arranged in rings 22,23,24 (each as hereinbefore defined) surrounding a central area of the sole. Axes A-A of the studs 11 are aligned along the rings 22,23,24 with steeper surfaces 20 on the inside.

Here, circular rings are shown but oval, elliptical or other shaped rings are possible. Ring 22 is complete, ring 23 is substantially complete, but ring 24 is only partial. The effect of the disposition of the studs in array 12 is to provide an improved tendency to allow the boot to pivot about a central part of the sole, whilst not impairing resistance to liner movement of the sole relative to a surface.

Figs. 5 and 6 illustrate a second possible shape of stud 26. Stud 26 is a curved block or blade like form having planar ramp surfaces 27 at its ends. Longer axis A-A is curved.

Figs. 7 to 11 illustrate third and fourth studs 28 and 29, differing from stud 11 mainly in that their inner barrier surfaces 30,31 are planar and can slightly convex respectively. Stud 28 is symmetrical along axis B-B as seen in Fig.l1. Both have profiles on axis A-A as shown in Fig.9.

Fig.12 is comparable to Fig.4 but shows modified arrays 32,33 of studs on sole and heel.

AMENDED

SHEET

I

9 Fig.13,14,14a show a stud 36 whose general shape is comparable to that of Figs. 1 to 3, but whose ratio of length along A-A to width along B-B is about 1.5:1, and there is only one barrier surface 37. This stud 36 is effective to grip only when moved in one direction along B-B.

Figs. 15 and 16 are sketches which illustrate an additional advantage of the array dispositions of the studs f this invention when the studs 38 are distinctly asymmetric on axis B-B (for example the studs of Figs. 1 to 3 and Figs.

13 to 14a). The barrier surfaces 39 in these cases are on the inside of the rings. Referring to Fig.16, a conventional boot with steep sided studs 41 is shown in the act of being brought into contact with a surface 42 with a component of motion in the direction of arrow 43. In this circumstance upstream studs 41a may make first contact with and dig into the surface 42 and grip first, causing the boot to tilt about its upstream edge 44, leading to instability and possible injury. In Fig.15, if first contact occurs at studs 38a they do not grip, but tend to slide until downstream studs 38b come into engagement and grip with leading surfaces 38b. This means that the grip or braking force is applied to the sole near at its downstream edge 45, thus reducing the tendency for it to tilt. Grip is assured, but a sudden grip and tilt is avoided.

The invention is not limited to the precise details of the foregoing and variations can be made thereto. For ,;A4NDED SHEET.

mom 6(! example, a boot of the invention may have some but not all of its studs of shape corresponding to those described and illustrated. For example, studs on the boot sole may be in accordance with the invention, whereas heel studs may be of conventional form. Many other variations are possible.

By means of the invention herein disclosed, it is possible to provide an article of sports footwear wherein the stud formation and configuration will provide grip in any direction of linear thrust whilst permitting rotation. The density of stud distribution and the stud size may be varied according to the sport and the playing surface and conditions involved, whilst the number of studs provided in any instance may be in excess of the number of conventional studs which could be used in like circumstances due to the self-cleaning characteristics of the stud of the invention.

Furthermore, the stud of the present invention will allow of the use of a lighter, and more flexible sole material in the construction of this article of footwear finally, a possible variation of the profile of the ramp surface will provide for a corresponding variation in the resistance to rotation of the article in use.

Figs. 18a and 18b illustrate a construction wherein the size of the stud 45 can be varied by replacement of an upper part thereof to suit different playing surfaces and/or conditions and/or sports. This variation of stud 45 has a AMENDED

SHEET

I 11 bane 4#1 inteqral with or sec-ured to a fAhoefhown). (olase 46 haG a central upotanding core 47 which can be acc~onmoted with i roee 48 in a crown, 49 whose shap in conmpementary to that of base 46 and forri therewith a stud of shape conparable to that in any of the earlier enodimenta. A pin So of plantic or like material passes through aligned hols in the crown 49 and core 47 to retain tho crown 49. The pin so can be an interference fVt in the holes.

A snall plier-liko tool (not shown) can be uSed to insert and rem ove the pins when a stud needs to be removed or replaced. Otuds can be replaced because of wear, or for replacement by hiahor or lower atuds to suit differont ground conditions.

many other variations are poooiblo within the scope of the invention.

AMEWnEO

SHEET

Claims

1. A bothavi~ng a plurality of studs for penetrating a penotrcaile surface, -,aid atudo depending fromi the base of the boot, the studs being in the fornm of an arcuate body having, when viewed in underneath plan, a first axis and a second axis transverse to the first axis# the body providing at ech end of the first axis a ramp surface which leaua- in an inclined manner substantially from a surface of the boot base substantially to a crown surface of the stud body and the body having a barrier surface provided at one of the ends of the second axtis, the stud icing asymmatric about the first axis in the plane of~ the second axis, so that when the stud penetrates a penetrable surface, a force tending to cause movement of the stud along the second axis in one direction is resisted and said stud grips the surf ace, and a force tending to cause movement of the stud along the first axis is not substantially resisted, the stud performing movement relative to the surface tending to wipe any accumulated surface material from its surfaces at the ends of the second axis and wherein at least some of the studs are disposed in. a pattern which includes one or more partial or complete rings, the studs being arranged such that the barrier surface of the stud is located at the inside of the ring and the outer stud surface, that is the surface located at the outside of the ring, in, at least in part, convex and wherein the barrier surf ace of the "stud is m ore steep than the outer stud surf ace. AMEND PDn SHET 13

2. A boot as claimed in claim 1, wherein the stud is longer along its first axis than its second axis.

3. A boot as clained in claim I or clai.m 2, wherein the barrier surface is a flat planar surface.

4. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the barrier surface is concave.

S. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said ramp surface, when viewed along the second axis, has a convex profile adjacent the base surface and a concave profile between the convex profile and the stud crown profile.

6. A boot as claimed in any of claims 1 to 4, wherein the said ram'p surfaco is convex.

7, A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein at least some of the stude are integral with the boot. a.

A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein at least some of the studs are attached to the boot base by a screw-in or plug-and-socket arrangement.

9. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein at least one of the studs does not have a flat crown surface.

A boot as claimed in any preceding claim.i, wherein the AMENDED SHEET 14 ratio of the length of the stud along the first axis to the length of the stud along the second axis is in the range from 1:1 to 10:1.

11. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the ratio of the length of the stud along the first axis to the length of the stud along the second axis is in the range from 2:1 to 5:1.

12. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the ratio of the length of the stud from the sole to the crown surface of the stud to the width of the stud is in the range from 1:0.7 to 1:3.

13. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the ratio of the length of the stud from the sole to the crown surface of the stud to the width of the stud is in the range from 1:1 to 1:2.

14. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the outer stud surface is wholly convex.

A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the outer stud surface, when viewed in a horizontal plane, is a plane curve.

16. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein a respective array of said studs is provided on a he.1 and a AMENDED SHEET rof I sole portion of the boot base.

17. A boot as claimed in claim 16, wherein the array of studs on the sole is arranged in partial or complete rings surrounding a central area of the sole.

18. A boot as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein all of the studs are similarly shaped. AMENDED SHEET