AU648871B2 - Joining of a concrete element to a support - Google Patents

Description

bo"'4 8 7 Regulation 3.2

AUSTRALIA

Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT

(ORIGINAL)

*t a Name of Applicant: SOCIETE CIVILE DES BREVETS DE HENRI VIDAL Address for Service: Invention Title: DAVIES COLLISON CAVE, Patent Attorneys, 1 Little Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000.

"Joining of a Concrete Element to a Support" The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us: 1 920304,rshdaLO51,div-of-34752.Iei I la, 5924/014.573 Joininc of a cgncrete element to a su~prt This invention concerns improvements in or relating to the joining of prefabricated concrete elements which comprise at least one counterfort and at least one facing panel, to form an earth retaining counterfort wall.

It is a general practice in the construction of reinforced concrete structures to connect elements of the structure to each other by casting one element e.g.

a counterfort with reinforcing bars protruding therefrom and then casting the next element e.g. a facing so as to embed the protruding bars. In this way the elements are permanently secured together in a rigid manner with the reinforcing bars protected by their concrete cover from the effects of rain, ground water and so forth.

An alternative method of connecting a concrete element to another concrete element or to another member such as a steel girder is by the use of bolts.

There are however certain types of cona-este structure, namely counterfort walls, in which the practice has always been to use steel reinforcement projecting from a previously cast element to form a connection with the next element to be cast, so that the use of a bolted connection is of itself a major advance in the art. Previous practice has been to cast a counterfort, or more usually a pair of counterforts, with steel reinforcement projecting therefrom, and then once the concrete has hardened a facing is cast to form an integral unit with the counterfort(s). The shuttering for the facing must be accurately positioned and while this is time consuming there are further delays in waiting for the concrete which L.rms the 35 facing to harden and in removing the shuttering.

Further, since a typical wall has a height of lom it is 41 not urually practical for the casting to take place in

S

F-A IRA

A)

1* -2 the final position of use. Thus each cou-nterfort is normally arranged horizontally while the facing is cast and eventually the whole unit which has considerable weight must be lifted to the vertical position by a crane.

At this stage it has been found to be virtually impossible to avoid small kcnockcs which chip away the concrete at any corners and eda..s and lead to crackcs and other imperfections. if the damage is excessive it is sometimes necessary to discard the whole unit. However these problems have been thought to be unavoidable in vi ew of the requirement to erect a sound structure in which the counterfort and the facing form an integral reinforced concrete unit.

We have now discovered that many of the problems of the prior art can be substantially eliminated by forming the facing by bolting one or more prefabricated facing panels to the counterfort(s).

Thus viewed from one aspect the invention provides an earth retaining counterfort wall having a footing and prefabricated concrete elements which comprise at least one counterfort and a plurality of facing panels arranged above one another, each of such panels being attached to the counterfort or counterforts by at least one bolted joint, and each joint comprising a bolt cast into and projecting from one of the prefabricated elements and through a hole formed in the other prefabricated element, fixing means, such as a nut, being mounted on the free end1 of the bolt to secure the prefabricated elements together.

Viewed from another aspect, the invention provides a method of erecting an earth retaining counterfort wall, the method comprising providing a footing, provl 4 &,!ig prefabricated concrete elements comprising at least one counterfort and a plurality of facing panels, mounting the prefabricated elements on the footing with said facing panels being arranged one above another and with each facing panel secured to the at least one counterfort by at least one bol ted joint, each joint comprising a bolt cast into dnd projecting from one of the prefabricated elements 3 through a hole formed in the other prefabricated element, and fixing means on the free end of the bolt to secure the prefabricated elements together.

A plurality of panels is attached to each counterfort in order to reduce the weight of each individual panel. Preferably, the facing panels will be bolted to at least two substantially parallel counterforts.

With such an arrangement the prefabricated panels can be rqlatively quickly and accurately attached to the counterfort(s) on site, while the joints provicbi the required degree of strength and rigidity. In general, assembly on site takes less space than the casting method since no moulds or shuttering are required and since the individual elements are all normally flat, transport is greatly facilitated as compared with monolithic counterfort wall units.

The panels may be attached with the counterfort in the final, vertical position of use, but in practice the counterfort will normally be arranged horizontally during attachment of the panels. If any panels are then damaged when the whole unit is lifted by a crane or otherwise to the vertical position, the individual damaged panels can be replaced as necessary, rather than discarding the whole unit.

The panels will normally be prefabricated away from the site and are preferably protected from knocks during storage and transport by suitable packaging. The structure will normally comprise a plurality of counterforts in a row and these counterforts may also be prefabricated and packaged for protection in the same way.

:A further advantage is that a large number of identical panels can be prefabricated and used in walls of different height. Only a few of the panels, for exLmple those used at the top of the structure, may need to be of different configuration. The panels may be provided with grooves, striations, coloring or other A VT Ct" 4 markings so as to give the structure a striking or attractive appearance such as patterns when a plurality of panels make up the facing. A typical panel may be rectangular e.g. 2.0 m by 1.0 m and their abutting edges may be separated by a strip of water seal material. The abutting edges may conveniently be keyed to provide an interlocking surface which may help to reduce water seepage.

The panels may be provided with a rearwardly projecting bolt and the counterfort may have a hole in its front edge ending in a recess accessible from the side to permit the nut to be mounted on the bolt of the panel. Preferably however the bolt projects from the front edge of the counterfort and the panel is formed 15 with the hole, the nut being mounted on the bolt at the front of the panel. Two joints between each panel and each counterfort are normally sufficient.

Preferably there is provided a spacer located between the counterfort and the facing p-anel, a 20 resilient annular plug located in the hole at its rear end and surrounding the bolt to form a first substantially watertight seal, and a second substantially watertight seal at the front end of the r hole.

With such an arrangement the hole is sealed at both ends so that water cannot penetrate into the hole and thus lead to corrosion problems. The resilient annular plug serves to locate the concrete element relative to the support by virtue of its engagement in the hole. At the same time, the spacer between the -oncrete element and the support prevents these two members from coming into direct contact and thus ensures that they can be joined together in the correct positions without surface irregularities of the concrete element interfering with the joint. Thus the concrete facing panel can be quickly and effectively joined to the counterfort by a joint protected from the intrusion of water.

5 It may be possible to position the spacer between the facing panel and the counterfort at a location separate from the other parts of the joint, but preferably the spacer is in the form of a ring extending round the plug thereby ensuring that the desired spacing is provided at least in the region of the plug. The spacer may for example be a separate ring which is placed round the plug, but preferably the spacer is integral with the plug so as to form a one piece unit which both seals the hole and spaces the concrete element from the support. Such a one piece unit is particularly advantageous since it performs both sealing and spacing functions.

The plug may be arranged to mate with the surface :i 15 of the concrete element from which the bolt projects and thus form a seal with this surface. In a preferred •arrangement the counterfort has a recess into which the plug extends. This can ensure that the plug is accurately positioned relative to the counterfort and 20 forms a particularly good seal therewith. The counterfort may be cast with a portion of the plug embedded in the concrete and a portion projecting outwardly for engagement in the hole of the facing panel. In such circumstances the bolt will normally have a base portion which is also embedded in the concrete during casting so as to be firmly anchored, the base portion of the bolt within the concrete preferably being bent at least once, and more preferably twice, to ensure good anchorage thereof.

The plug may be cylindrical or some other convenient shape and will normally be loca d in the hole with a force fit. This not only compresses the resilient material of the plug firmly against the side walls of the hole but also against the sides of the bolt to provide a secure water seal. The plug is preferably of tapering configuaration, being smallest where it projects into the hole and increasing in size in the 6 direction towards the counterfort. This facilitates engagement of the hole in the facing panel with the plug. Furthermore when the plug is extended into a recess in the counterfort as mentioned above its tapering configuration assists the plug in remaining in the recess.

In a preferred embodiment the hole is lined by a plastics sleeve arranged to surround the bolt and having an enlarged diameter at the end of the hole which faces the counterfort, the plug being located between the bolt and the sleeve. The sleeve which may be of PVC provides further protection against moisture for the bolt while its portion with an enlarged diameter provides an 0eoee opening into which the plug can be inserted. A further e oo 15 advantage of the sleeve is that direct contact between ee S"the wall of the hole in the concrete and the bolt is r S"avoided, so that during assembly the bolt does not chip or crack the concrete as the facing panel and S 20 counterfort are moved together.

The second substantially watertight seal at the end of the hole remote from the counterfort may take a number of forms. For example the fixing means and any protruding part of the bolt may simply be coated with a oe suitable waterproof material. Preferably the fixing 25 means is a nut which is covered by a waterproof adhesive oo applied to the nut and to the region of the facing panel around the nut, and a cap is secured in position by said adhesive. While the cap provides additional protection for the joint in many cases it will also serve as a decorative element.

rhe resilient plug may be formed of any suitable material and a particularly good seal is obtained by the use of neoprene. The bolt will normally be formed of steel which is preferably galvanised for additional protection.

Certain preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to 7 the accompanying drawings in which:- Fig. 1 shows a side elevation, partly in section, of a structure comprising a counterfort wall having a plurality of panels joined to a counterfort; Fig. 2 shows a section through a typical joint between a panel and a counterfort; Fig. 3 shows one stage during assembly of another embodiment of a counterfort wall; and Fig. 4 shows the completed assembly of Fig. 3 being lifted into position.

Referring to Fig. 1, the counterfort wall 1 comprises a counterfort 2 to which a plurality of facing •panels 3 are attached by bolted joints 4, and a footing •5 for supporting the wall. The footing rests on a 15 distribution plate 6 which is also engaged by the o lowermost facing panel 3. An erection bolt 7 extends between the distribution plate and the counterfort 2 and is arranged so that during construction a nut on the bolt is raised or lowered to adjust the orientation of the unit consisting of the counterfort and panels. Once S" thn correct adjustment is made the footing 5 is cast and embeds reinforcing bars (not shown) protruding from the :bottom of the counterfort. The rear face of the counterfort includes a bend 40 which provides savings in the amount of concrete used.

Fig. 2 shows in detail one of the bolted joints between the counterfort 2 and one of the panels 3. A bolt 8 has a base portion 9 which is precast into the counterfort and which is bent twice through 90° for firm anchorage. The bolt projects outwardly from the counterfort and has at its free end a threaded portion which is engaged by a nut 11. During casting of the counterfort a resilient annular plug 12 is arranged to surround the bolt 8 and is formed along its length with a shoulder 13 for assisting in correctly positioning the plug as the counterfort is cast. The plug thus causes a recess 14 to be formed in the concrete and since the 8 plug is of tapered configuration it tends to stay in this recess once the concrete has hardened.

The plug also has an integral spacing ring adjacent the shoulder 13 and arranged to space apart the counterfort 2 and the panel 3.

The facing panel 3 is formed with a hole 16 which is lined by a plastics e.g. PVC sleeve 17 of diameter slightly greater than that of the bolt 8. The sleeve has a funnel shaped portion at the end of the hole which faces the counterfort and thus is widened at its opening 18 where the plug is received. This opening is in fact slightly smaller than the part of the plug which is inserted therein, resulting in resilient deformation of the plug and assisting the quality of the seal.

15 At the front face of the panel 3 a washer 19 sits a'i in a recess 20 of the panel and the nut 11 is tightened onto the washer to secure the panel to the counterfort.

Such tightening may be effected by a torque wrench or the like. A layer of epoxy resin 41 is applied over the i 20 nut, the protruding threaded portion 10 of the bolt and S• an annular zone around the bolt on the face of the panel to form a waterproof seal. The seal is assisted further by a decorative cap 21 adhered to the epoxy resin.

Figs. 3 and 4 illustrate a second embodiment in which a unit 22 is made up of prefabricated facing panels 3 bolted to a pair of counterforts 24 by means of bolts 8 which protrude at intervals from the front surface 25 of the counterforts. Each counterfort is made of reinforced concrete and has a rear thickened flange 42 integral with a thinner web 43. The counterforts are held by their flanges on suitable supports 26 and temporary braces 27 are used to maintain their front portions at the correct spacing while the panels 3 are bolted into position at joints 4. Each panel includes four joints for this purpose, and in the illustrated embodiment the panels also have grooves 28 and recesses 29 on their front faces to provide a 9 rusticated facing.

Once assembly of the unit 22 is complete it may be hoisted by a crane or the like to a vertical position, as shown in Fig. 4. Once the unit is correctly positioned, the reinforcing bars 30 projecting from the bottom of the unit are embedded in concrete cast to form the footing of the retaining wall.

An example of a counterfort in accordance with the preferred embodiments has a height of 10 m and is intended to retain an earth mass having a specific gravity of 1.8 and a coefficient of thrust of 0.33, Thus for a lower panel the force on one square metre of panel will be F 0.33 x 10 x 1.8 x 9.8 58 kN. Using as the bolt a 14 mm steel bar with an effective diameter in the region of the nut of 12 mm and an elastic limit of 5100 kg/cm 2 the force required to reach the elastic limit of the bolt is in general 56 kN. The panel has dimensions 2.0 m by 1.0 m and is connected to two counterforts, two bolts for each counterfort. Thus, the 20 theoretical factor of safety against reaching the elastic limit is (56 x 58 which is approximately equal to 2. If there are three counterforts, and altogether six bolts, this value will be 3.

These values are theoretical in that in practice counterforts of height 10 m have a significant rear edge which creates a certain arching effect in the soil which reduces the actual pressure of earth on the panel.

Tests have been carried out to confirm these calculations.

Claims (18)

1. An earth retaining counterfort wall having a footing and prefabricated concrete elements which comprise at least one counterfort and a plurality of facing panels arranged above one another, each of such panels being attached to the counterfort or countei:forts by at least one bolted joint, and each joint comprising a bolt cast into and projecting from one of the prefabricated elements and through a hole formed in the other prefabricated element, fixing means being mounted on the free end of the bolt to secure the prefabricated elements together.

2. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in claim 1, wherein the bolt is cast in a respective facing panel and projects rearwardly therefrom.

3. A. earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in claim 2, wherein the hole of the respective counterfort to which the facing panel is bolted is formed in the front edge of the counterfort and ends in a recess accessible from the side to permit the fixing means to be mounted on the bolt.

4. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in e. claim 1, wherein the bolt is case in a respective counterfort and projects from the front edge thereof, the hole being formed in the respective facing panel bolted to the counterfort, and tho fixing means being mounted on the bolt at the front of the facing panel.

5. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in claim 4, wherein the front face of the facing panel is 35 formed with a recess in its front face of wider diameter than that of the hole, and a washer is positioned in said recess between said facing panel and said fixing 'RA4/ -NTw 11 means.

6. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in claim 4 or 5, further comprising a spacer located between the counterfort and the facing panel, a resilient annular plug located in the hole at its rear end and surrounding the bolt to form a first substantially wtertight seal, and a se-ond substantially watertight seal at the front end of the hole.

7. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in claim 1, fuL.ner comprising a acing ring between the prefabricated concrete elements that are secured together, and a washer between said other prefabricated concrete element and said fixing means.

8. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in any preceding claim, further comprising a plate on which the footing rests, and an erection bolt extending between the at least one counterfort and the plate for adjusting the orientation of the counterfort during construction.

9. An aarth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the at least one counterfort has a rear edge including a bend, such that an angle between the front edge and the r. ar edge of the at least one counterfort at the top thereof is smaller 30 than at the bottom thereof. S S:

10. An eerth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the plurality of facing panels arranged one above the other form a substantially vertical facing. 12

11. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein each of the plurality of facing panels arranged one above the other is bolted to a pair of substantially parallel and laterally spaced counterforts.

12. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in claim 11, wherein the counterforts include reinforcing bars extending downwardly from the rear of a bottom end of the counterforts and a concrete portion extending downwardly from the front of said bottom end, and wherein the lowermost facing panel is positioned with a lovier edge thereof at a position higher than that of a bottom end of said downwardly extending concrete portion.

13. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in claim 11, wherein the lowermost facing panel has a portion extending downwardly below a bottom end of the counterfort, and wherein the footing is cast behind the downwardly extending portion of said lowermost facing panel in engagement therewith.

14. An earth retaining counterfort wall as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the abutting edges of adjacent facing panels are sealed with water seal material.

15. A method of erecting an earth retaining counterfort wall, the method comprising providing a footing, providing prefabricated concrete elements compribing at least one counterfort and a plurality of facing panels, mounting the prefabricated elements on the footing with said facing panels being arranged one above another anu 35 with each facing panel secured to the at least one counterfort by at least one bolted joint, each joint comprising a bolt cast into and projecting from one of *ooo ee oo 5b g* 9 e S.. A 13 the prefabricated elements through a hole formed in the other prefabricated element, and fixing means on the free end of the bolt to secure the prefabricated elements together.

16. A method as claimed in clai'm 15, further comprising holding a pair of counterforts substantially parallel and laterally spaced from each other by temporary braces, bolting the plurality of facing panels to the counterforts, and removing the braces.

17. A method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the facing panels are secured to the counterforts with the latter in a final, vertical position of use.

18. A z-thod as claimed in claim 16, wherein the counterforts are arranged horizontally during securing of the facing panels thereto. Dated this 7th day of February, 1994 SOCIETF CIVILE DES BREVETS DE HENRI VIDAL :By Its Patent Attorneys DAVIES COLLISON CAVE .ee 13 ABSTRACT Joining of a concrete element to a support A concrete facing panel 3 is joined to a counterfort 2 by means of a pair of bolted joints 4. Each joint comprises a hole 16 in the panel through which a bolt 8 projecting from the counterfort 2 passes, and a nut 11 mounted on the threaded end of the bolt. A resilient plug 12 is located in the hole at its end facing the counterfort to form a first watertight seal, the plug including an integral spacing ring 15 to space apart the panel and the counterfort. A second watertight seal is provided by a layer of epoxy resin 41 applied 15 over the nut 11. *9 *S o S o*« *o