AU3676799A - Biosensor for and method of electrogenerated chemiluminescent detection of nucleic acid adsorbed to solid surface - Google Patents

Description

S F Ref: 370714D1

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT

ORIGINAL

*0* *C

S*

S

S

5 I- S Name and Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor(s): Address for Service: Invention Title: IGEN International, Inc.

16020 Industrial Drive Gaithersburg Maryland 20877 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Allen J. Bard and Xiao-Hong Xu Spruson Ferguson, Patent Attorneys Level 33 St Martins Tower, 31 Market Street Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia Biosensor for and Method of Electrogenerated Chemiluminescent Detection of Nucleic Acid Adsorbed to a Solid Surface The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 5845 Title of the Invention BIOSENSOR FOR AND METHOD OF ELECTROGENERATED CHEMILUMINESCENT DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID ADSORBED TO A SOLID SURFACE Field Of Invention The present invention relates to the diagnostic field, and especially nucleic acid diagnostics. In particular, the present invention relates to a probe or sensor having a film containing metal centers, its preparation where a single-strand or double-strand nucleic acid sequence is immobilized thereon on, and its use in the subsequent detection of the nucleic acid by labelling with luminescent metal chelates.

In addition to using the subject biosensor for nucleic acid diagnostics based on a surface designed modified electrical sensor, chips or electrode, immobilization and hybridization of nucleic acid such as DNA on a selfassembled thin film via surface reaction is also useful in studying molecular recognition of DNA.

Background Of Invention Nucleic acid diagnostics has become an important area in molecular biology and biotechnology studies, with applications to the determinations of disease and food contaminating organisms and in forensic and environmental investigations. The development of new DNA biosensors has led to the application of several detection techniques such as optical methods luminescence, ellipsometry and pseudo- Brewster angle reflectometry), piezoelectric devices SAW, QCM), and electrochemical techniques CV and SWV).

Of particular interest are labels which can be made to luminesce through photochemical, chemical, and electrochemical reaction schemes. In particular, electrochemiluminescent methods of determining the presence of labelled materials are preferred over other methods for many reasons. They are highly diagnostic of the presence of a particular label, sensitive, nonhazardous, inexpensive and can be used in a wide variety of applications. Suitable labels comprise electrochemiluminescent compounds, including organic compounds and metal chelates.

For example, electrochemiluminescent ruthenium- and 15 osmium-containing labels have been used in methods for detecting and quantifying analytes of interest in liquid media Patent Nos. 5,310,687; 5,238,808; and 5,221,605). In addition, the application of electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) measurements to the detection of solution 20 phase DNA intercalated with ruthenium-containing labels has been described (Carter, M.T. et al. (1990) Bioconuate Chem 2:257-263). However, reaction schemes that are viable in the solution phase are often not applicable in the solid phase.

More importantly, the detection of solution phase analytes such as DNA has several drawbacks relative to detection of analytes absorbed to solid surfaces. The advantages for detecting DNA via solid phase techniques as opposed to solution techniques are: more sensitive (detection of monolayer quantities); easier to separate DNA from sample (avoid interferences); and possibility of detection of several different DNA in single analysis, with localized probes, as in sequencing studies.

These luminescent systems are of increasing importance in diagnostics. For example, in U.S. Pat. No.

4,372,745, chemiluminescent labels are used in immunochemical applications where the labels are excited into a luminescent state by reaction of the label with HO0 2 and an oxalate. In these systems,

H

2 0 2 oxidatively converts the oxalate into a high energy derivati *high energy derivative, which then excites the label. It is expected, that in principle, the H 2 0 2 and an oxalate reaction scheme should work wi+h cheme should work with any luminescent material that is stable under the oxidizing conditions of the assay, and can be excited by the high energy oxalate derivative. Unfortunately Sthis very versatility is a major drawback of the 4,372,745 patent: lack of selectivity or specificity, typical biological fluids containing the analyte of interest also 20 contain a large number of potentially luminescent substances that can cause high background levels of luminescence.

Thus a need exists for a solid phase system, a biosensor, and method that provides the necessary '.specificity absent systems that rely on the HO, and oxalate reaction scheme; and do not depend on solution techniques.

The present invention overcomes the limitations and drawbacks -3of the prior art.

Summary Of Invention The present invention provides a biosensor and its use for electrogenerated chemiluminescent detection of nucleic acid absorbed to a solid surface via the use of ruthenium- and osmium-containing chemiluminescent labels.

An object of the present invention is to provide a film containing an aluminum (III) alkanebisphosphonate layer having metallic aluminum centers, ionic aluminum Al(III) centers, for bonding to single-strand or double-strand :::DNA immobilized to said aluminum centers. The aluminum

(III)

Salkanebisphosphonate can be provided as a biosensor having a coating of A1 2

(C

4 BP) to bond to SS-DNA or ds-DNA.

A further object of the present invention is to provide a biosensor in the form of chips or electrodes with adsorbed DNA that is labelled with a luminescent label, such as an osmium or ruthenium moiety.

,A still further object of the present invention is to prepare a biosensor by treating a silicon wafer to form a chromium layer and juxtaposed gold layer, then contacting the layered wafer with an anchoring agent; and subsequently immersing the product in Al(NO 3 3 bisphosphonic acid 2

)POH

2 and A1(NO 3 )3 aqueous solutions.

Another object of the present invention involves the detection of a nucleic acid by labelling with luminescent metal chelates.

I

A further object of the present invention is to apply electrogenerated chemiluminescent techniques to a plurality, arrayed, oligonucleotide probes.

These and other objects will become more apparent from the following detailed description and drawings.

Brief Description Of The Drawings Fig. 1 shows a schematic representation of the silicon electrode of the present invention containing ionic aluminum Al(III) sites.

Fig. 2 shows immobilization of ds-DNA on a o A1(C 4 BP) film and interaction of Ru(phen) 3 2+ with the ds-DNA.

Figs. 3A-3C show first second and third scans. ECL emission-potential 15 transients at the Al 2

(C

4 BP)/DNA-Ru (phen)2+ electrode in 0.19 M phosphate buffer, pH 7, containing 0.13 M TPrA. (Scanning was halted and the solution stirred after each scan.) Scans were initiated at 0 V and 20' were directed toward more positive potentials. Scan rate, 50 mV/s.

i Figs. 4A-4C show schematic representations of immobilization of ss-DNA tagged with Ru(bpy) 3 2+ on the film (Fig. 4A); immobilization of ss-DNA on the film and hybridization of complementary strand

DNA

tagged with Ru (bpy) 3 (Fig.- 4B); 1immlobilization of poly(dA) on the film, hybridization of poly(dT), and then interaction of Ru(phen) 3 2 with the ds- DNA(poly(dA)epoly(dT)) where the 9 represents an ECL active species.

Figures 5A-5C show a cyclic voltamnaogram (Fig. an emission-potential transient of the Al 2

(C

4 BP) Ss-DNA-Ru (bpy) 3 2 electrode in 0.19 M phosphate buffer/0.13 M TPrA, pH 7 (Fig. 5B); and an emission-potential transient ofthe A1 2

(C

4 BP)X\-1 ss-DNA in the same solution (Fig. 5C) The electrode used in the experiments shown in Figures 15 5A-5C was prepared as described in the .specification with immersion in a 1.38 AM X-1 ss-DNA-Ru(bpy) 3 2+ or X-1 SS-DNA solution for -4 hrespectively. In each case, the potential was scanned from 0 to ~1.60 V atv 50 mV/s.

::::*Figure 6 shows an emission-time transient for the A1 2

(C

4 BP)/X\-l SS-DNA-Ru(bpy) 3 2+ electrode in 0.19 M phosphate buffer,'O.13 M TPrA, pH 7, .:when the potential was stepped from 0 to 1.5 V.

Figures 7A and 7B show ECL emission-potential transients at the Alm(CBP)/X\-lc ss-DNA/X\-l -6ss-DNA-Ru(bpy) 2 electrode (Fig. 7A) and at the Al,(C 4

BP)/X-

1 ss-DNA/X-1 ss-DNA- Ru(bpy) 3 2 electrode (Fig. 7B) where both electrodes are immersed in 0.19 M phosphate buffer, pH 7, containing 0.13 M TPrA and the potential was scanned from 0 to 1.60 at scan rate, 50 Mv/s.

Figures 8A and 8B show ECL emission-potential transients at the A1 2 (CBP) /poly(dA) /poly(dT)/Ru(phen) 2+ electrode (Fig. 8A) and at the Al 2

(C

4 BP) /poly(dA)/Ru(phen)2+ electrode (Fig. 8B) where both electrodes are immersed in 0.19 M phosphate buffer, pH 7, 15 containing 0.13 M TPrA, and the potential was scanned from 0 to 1.60 at scan rate, 50 mV/s.

-Figures 9A-9C show TEM images of Au substrate coated on a Formvar film on a #400 Cu grid (Fig.

9A); the A1 2

(C

4 BP) film on the Au substrate (Fig. 9B); immobilized calf thymus ds-DNA on the A1,(C 4 BP) film, prepared by immersing the film in a 1.65 mM [NP] of ds-DNA solution for 4 h (Fig. 9C).

Figures 10A-10C show TEM images of the A21(C,BP) film on Au substrate coated on a Formvar film (Fig. 10A); immobilized calf thymus ds-DNA on the A 2 1(C 4 BP) film, prepared by immersing the film in a 1.65 mM [NP] of ds-DNA solution, for -4 h (Fig. immobilized sonicated calf thymus ds-DNA on the A1 2

(C

4 BP) film, prepared by immersing the film in a 1.65 mM [NP] of ds-DNA solution, sonicated for -6 h at room-temperature, for -4 h. (Fig. Figures 11A 11B show sequencing via array 10 hybridization.

Detailed Description Of Invention The present invention relates to a sensor and method of detecting nucleic acids using the sensor. The sensor can be a chip, electrode, or an appropriately modified surface for 15 adsorbing ss-DNA or ds-DNA. The nucleic acids detected by the method of the present invention include DNA, cDNA or any synthetic variant thereof. A nucleic acid as used throughout the specification and in the claims is meant DNA or any synthetic variant thereof.

5* 20 Examples of DNAs detectable by the present method include chromosome DNA, plasmid DNA, viral DNA, bacterial

DNA

and recombinant DNA. The length of nucleic acid sequence capable of detection by the present method ranges from about 2.7 nm to about 200 nm. In a preferred embodiment, the nucleic acid sequence ranges from 8 base pair (bp) nucleotides to 3,000 base pair nucleotides. In a most -8preferred embodiment ranges from about 30 bp nucleotides to 1,500 bp nucleotides.

In the present invention, the nucleic acid sequence to be detected may be of purified nucleic acid or may be present in a biological sample. Biological samples in which nucleic acids can be detected using the method of the present invention include but are not limited to biological fluids, serum, saliva, hair, skin, etc. Alternatively, the nucleic acid can be purified from a sample using methods known to those skilled in the art (Current Protocols in Electrobiology (1994 ed. Ausubel, F.M. et al. John Wiley Sons, Inc.)).

The aluminum (III) alkanebisphosphonate preferably Sused is a A1 2

(C

4 BP), also [Al 2

C

4 BP), film bearing biosensor and 15 is prepared as follows. Silicon wafers were soaked in trichloroethylene for 30 min, rinsed twice with 2-propanol, rinsed with excess amount of deionized water, and then dried with a stream of dry nitrogen. The clean silicon wafers were primed with a 50 A chromium layer followed by deposition of a 20 2000 A gold layer. Chromium and gold targets (99.999%) were used to sputter the films onto the wafers in a MRC Model 8620 system at 10 2 torr. Other techniques, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to apply the Au or Cr layers, can also be used.

The gold surface supported on the silicon wafers was cleaned with hot chromic acid (saturated KCr,O, in 90% HSO,) for -10 s and then rinsed with copious amounts of water. This process was repeated until the surface contact angle with water was less than 150. The clean Au surface was then immediately soaked in an anchoring agent, 0.5 mM 4mercaptobutylphosphonic acid (MBPA) solution in absolute ethanol for -24 h. See Fig. 1. The phosphoric acid terminated surface was then thoroughly rinsed with the ethanol, dried with a stream of N 2 and then immersed alternately in 5 mM Al(NO 3 3 5 mM bisphosphonic acid

(H

2 0 3

P(CH

2 4

PO

3

H

2 and 5 mM Al(N0 3 3 aqueous solution, taking -4 h for each immersion, with washing with water between each step.

Although the preferred embodiment contemplates the use of Al centers, other metal centers, such as, lanthanum (La) and zirconium (Zr) are also contemplated. In addition, although a

C

4 specie was utilized in producing the alkanebisphosphonate film, other chain links, C-C 6 may be utilized, which result in adequate spacing of the aluminum ions on the surface of the film to permit contact with the phosphates of the DNA backbone. In other words, the "spacer" may range from 2 to 16 carbons in length.

The sensor described above is used by: a) adsorbing a nucleic acid onto a film containing metal centers; b) reacting nucleic acid adsorbed to said film with a luminescent metal label; and c) detecting the nucleic acid metal label chelates formed in step b) via electrogenerated chemiluminescence of said chelates.

In step the film to which the nucleic acid is adsorbed should contain metal ions which are suitably spaced on the surface of the film to allow interaction of the metal with the phosphate backbone of the nucleic acid sequence.

Examples of metal centers suitable for use in binding to nucleic acid phosphate groups are aluminum, lanthanum, and zirconium. In a preferred embodiment, the film contains an aluminum Al (III) metal center.

The nucleic acid adsorbed to the film in step of the method of the present invention may be either doublestranded or single-stranded. When a single-stranded nucleic acid is adsorbed to the film, the adsorbed single-stranded nucleic acid is then hybridized to a complementary singlestranded nucleic acid sequence. Conditions of hybridization 15 are utilized which promote base pairing between the singlestranded DNA adsorbed to the film in its complementary sequence. Factors influencing hybridization between nucleic acid sequences are known to those skilled in the art and include salt concentration of the hybridization solution, hybridization temperature and stringency of post-hybridization washes. In addition, the length of hybridization may also be controlled to optimize binding. Satiable buffers in which to carry out the hybridization reaction include 5mM Tris buffer, pH 7 containing 50 mM NaCl.

25 The complementary single-stranded nucleic acid sequence hybridized with the nucleic acid adsorbed to the film may be unlabeled or labeled with a luminescent metal label.

-11- Suitable luminescent labels include ruthenium- and osmiumcontaining labels where ruthenium or osmium are bound to at least one polydentate ligand. If the metal has greater than one polydentate ligand, the polydentate ligands may be the same or different. (Other known ECL active labels can-also be utilized that emit at different wave lengths such as organic ECL labels, e.g. sulfonated-9,10-diphenylanthracene.) Polydentate ligands of either ruthenium or osmium include aromatic and aliphatic ligands. Suitable aromatic polydentate 10 ligands include aromatic heterocyclic ligands. Preferred 4 aromatic heterocyclic ligands are nitrogen-containing, such as, for example, bipyridyl, bipyrazyl, terpyridyl, and S.0 phenanthrolyl. If the metal chelate has greater than one polydentate ligand, the polydentate ligands may be the same or different.

suitable polydentate ligands may be unsubstituted, or substituted by any of a large number of substituents known to the art. Suitable substituents include for example, alkyl, substituted alkyl, aryl, substituted aryl, aralkyl, substituted aralkyl, carboxylate, carboxaldehyde, carboxamide, cyano, amino, hydroxy, imino, hydroxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl, amidine, guanidinium, ureide, sulfur-containing groups, phosphorous containing groups, and the carboxylate ester of Nhydroxysuccinimide.

The ruthenium or osmium may have one or more monodentate ligands, a wide variety of which are known to the art. Suitable monodentate ligands include, for example, -12carbon monoxide, cyanides, isocyanides, halides, and aliphatic, aromatic and heterocyclic phosphines, amines, stibines, and arsines. A more complete list of the ligands, monodentate and polydentate ligands, that can be used in the present invention are set forth in U.S. Patent Nos.

5,310,687, 5,238,808 and 5,221,605, the subject matter of which are incorporated herein by reference.

It is also within the scope of this invention for one or more of the ligands of the metal to be attached to additional chemical labels, such as, for example, radioactive isotopes, fluorescent compounds, or additional luminescent ruthenium- or osmium-containing centers.

The complementary single-stranded nucleic acid may be tagged with the preferred luminescent metal labels of the 15 present invention via co-valent bonding to one or more of the polydentate ligands of the metal label through one more amide linkages. This linkage may be oriented so that the nucleic *acid is bonded directly either to the carbinol or to the nitrogen of the amide linkage. These chemical moieties may be ionized. A more elaborate description of methods for attaching a luminescent ruthenium-containing or osmium- Scontaining label to amino groups of biological substances such as nucleic acid is provided in U.S. Patent No. 5,221,605 :o incorporated by reference.

In an alternative embodiment, the complementary single-stranded nucleic acid is unlabeled and hence, hybridization to a single-stranded nucleic acid adsorbed to a -13film results in generation of unlabeled double-stranded nucleic acid adsorbed to the film. Thus, double-stranded nucleic acid can be adsorbed to the film directly or can be created by first adsorbing single-stranded nucleic acid to the film and then hybridizing the adsorbed nucleic acid with its complementary suc so n u c l e i c a c i d w i t h i t s complementary sequence. In either case, the film containing the adsorbed double-stranded nucleic acid is then immersed in a solution containing luminescent metal label or a solution suitable for promoting intercalation of the metal with the 10 double-stranded t of th e m e ta l w ith th e S0 double-stranded nucleic acid. Examples of suitable solutions include, but are not limited to water.

S-A nucleic acid in which the luminescent metal t ai n i n g l a bels ineclat ontaining labels intercalates to produce nucleic acid--metal r label chelates is then detected by inducing the metal label 15 resent in the chelates to emit electromagnetic radiation by creating an excited state of the metal species that will luminesce at wave lengths from about 20 nanometers to about 900 nanometers, at ambient temperatures. Intercalation (or c0 more generally, association) of the ECL labeled species with DNA depends upon the experimental conditions in which the label is artially inserted between th base pairs of DNA. 0 0 is considered "association" because of an electrostatic i n t e r a c t i o n sbetwe p o A interaction between a positively-charged label and the negatively-charged phosphate groups on the DNA. The exact nature of the interaction of Ru(phen)32+ with DNA is uncertain, but is believed to be intercalation The temperature must be below the melt ^e temperature must be below the melting point of ds-DNA, preferably about 25-300

C.

-14- The pH is typically near 7, but within a range of about 5 to about 8. The intercalation or association reaction must be given sufficient time to occur; about 30 to about 60 minutes, although times as short as 10 minutes also work.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the metal label is excited by exposing the nucleic acid-metal label chelates to electrochemical energy. The potential at which the oxidation of the metal label will occur depends upon the exact structure of the metal label as well as factors such as the co-reactant utilized, the pH of the solution and the nature of the electrode used. Examples of suitable coreactants which, when incubated with the nucleic acid-metal label chelates in the presence of the electrochemical energy, will result in emission of the metal label intercalated with the nucleic acid, include tripropylamine (TPrA), oxalate or other organic acid such as pyruvate, lactate, malonate, tartrate and citrate. This oxidation can also be performed chemically, with some strong oxidants such as PbO, or a Ce(IV) salt.

Those of ordinary skill in the art recognize how to determine the optimal potential and emission wave length of an C electrochemiluminescent system. The electrochemiluminescent species may be measured by any suitable mechanism such as measurement of an electric current or emitted electromagnetic 25 radiation. For example, the rate of energy inputted into the system can provide a measure of the luminescent species.

Suitable measurements include, for example, measurements of electric current when the luminescent species is generated electrochemically, the rate of reductant or oxidant utilization when the luminescent species is generated chemically or the absorption of electromagnetic energy in photoluminescent techniques. In addition, of course, the luminescent species can be detected by measuring the emitted electromagnetic radiation. All of these measurements can be made either as continuous, rate-based measurements, or as cumulative methods which accumulate the signal over a long 10 period of time. An example of rate-based measurements would l* be by using photomultiplier tubes, photodiodes or phototransistors to produce electric currents proportional in agnitude to the incident light intensity. Examples of cumulative methods are the integration of rate-based data, and 15 the use of photographic film to provide cumulative data directly.

All of these luminescence-based methods entail epeated luminescence by the ruthenium-containing compound.

The repetitive nature of the detectable event distinguishes these labels from radioactive isotopes or bound Schemiluminescent molecules such as luminol. The latter labels produce a detectable event only once per molecule (or atom) of label, thereby limiting their detectability.

The following examples illustrate various aspects of the invention but are in no way intended to limit the scope thereof. Analysis was performed in a Plexiglas cell designed for ECL and electrochemical studies using the film of the -16r

C

present invention, a gold surface supported on the silicon wafer containing metallic sites, Al. A saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE) and a platinum wire counter electrode were used for all measurements. The electrochemical measurements coupled with ECL experiments were carried out with a Model 175 universal programmer, a Model 173 potentiostat (Princeton Applied Research, PAR, Princeton,

NJ),

and an Ominigraphic 2000 X-Y recorder (Houston Instruments Houston, TX). The ECL emission was detected by a Model C123 single-photon-counting system (Hamamatsu Corp., Bridgewater, NJ) utilizing a Hamamatsu R928P PMT, cooled to -20 0 C in a Model TE 308 TSRF cooler controller (Products for Research Inc., Danvers, MA) The meter output was fed into the y-axis of the x-y recorder, and the signal from the potentiostat was fed into the x-axis to afford ECL intensity versus bias potential display. Solution analysis by ECL was carried out 0 with a QPCR analyzer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk,

CT).

A MRC (Materials Research Corporation, Orangeburg 20 NY) Model 8620 sputtering system at 10. torr, with an RF power of 150 W and RF peak to peak voltage of 1.8 KV, was used to sputter gold (99.999%) on silicon wafers.

Polydeoxyadenylic acid (Poly(dA)), polythymidylic acid (poly(dT), polydeoxycytidylic acid (poly(dc)) and calf thymus (CT) ss-DNA and ds-DNA were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) and were used without additional purification. The ss-DNA samples, X-1 DNA (5'GAAAATGTGCTGACCGGACATGAAAATGAG3'), (Seq. ID. No. 1) X DNA tagged with Ru(bpy), 2 (SRu(bpy),2+- GAAAATGTGCTGACCGGACATGAAAATGAG3'), (Seq. ID. No. 2) and a complementary strand X-ic DNA (5'CTCATTTTCATGTCCGGTCAGCACATTTTC3'), were obtained from Perkin-Elmer and diluted with a 5 mM tris buffer containing mM NaCl(pH Synthesis of ss-DNA can be carried out on a DNA synthesizer Applied Biosystems, Model 381A). See also L.J. McBride and M.H. Cruthers, Tetrahedron Letters, 24, 245 (1983).

SThe reagents used in the following examples include trich ethylene 2 -propanol tripropylamine (TPrA) Ru(bpy) 3 Cl,.6H0, Ru(phen) 3 cl 20 ethyl alcohol (200 Proof), Al(N03) 3 .9H 2 0, K 2 Cr 2

O

7 NaH 2

PO

4 and tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane and were used as received without purification.

Bisphosphonic acid

H

2 03P(CH 2 4 PO3H 2

(C

4 BPA), and 4- Smercaptobutylphosponic acid (MBPA) were synthesized in accordance with the techniques taught by Mallouk et al, 115, 11855 (1993). The assay buffer for ECL experiments contained 0.13 M TPrA and 0.19 M phosphate buffer, prepared by dissolving TPrA into a NaH 2

PO

4 solution and adjusting the pH to 7 with 1 M NaOH.

Deionized water from a Millipore Milli-Q (18 Mn-cm) system was used to prepare all aqueous solutions and to rinse the electrode surface.

TEM Sample Preparation.

TEM samples were prepared by coating Au on a Formvar film on a #400 Cu grid with a vacum evaporator (Edwards 306), -18fabricating the A1 2 (CBP) film on Au following the procedure described above and then immobilizing DNA on the Al, (C 4 Bp) film. A transmission electron microscope (JEOL 100CX) at KV was used to image the Au substrate, the A1 2

(C

4 BP) film and the immobilized

DNA.

-19- Example i Electroqenerated Chemiluminescent Detection of Immobilized ds-DNA usinc A Ruthenium Label.

Calf thymus ds-DNA was immobilized on the surface of an A1 2

(C

4 BP) film by immersing the film in a solution of DNA (1.9 mM in nucleotide phosphate, NP) for 4 h (Figs. 1 and 2).

The film was then rinsed three times with 4-mL portions of deionized water and then immersed for 4 h in either an aqueous 0.56 mM Ru(phen) 3 Cl 2 solution or a 0.12 mM Ru(phen) 3 (C10 4 solution in MeCN. Ru(phen) 3 2 associates with ds-DNA and can be detected through its electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL). Alternatively, the film could be soaked in a mixed ds- DNA (1.9 mM NP) and Ru(phen) 3 Cl 2 (0.12mM) solution for 4 h to produce the adsorbed layer.

15 ECL was produced by scanning the potential of the electrode following film formation, DNA adsorption, and Ru(phen) 3 2 association, from 0 to 1.6 V vs. a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) while it was immersed in a solution of 0.19 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 0.13 M tri-npropylamine (TPrA). Typical ECL transients, detected with a single-photon-counting apparatus, are shown in Figures 3A-3C.

Emission arises from the energetic electron-transfer reaction between electrogenerated Ru(phen) 3 3 and an intermediate in the oxidation of TPrA: DNA-Ru(phen) 3 2 (ads) e DNA-Ru(phen) 3 3 [1]

CH

3 CHCH,-N-Pr 2 e CH 3 CHCH.NPr,' [2]

CH

3 CHCH,NPr+

CH

3 CHCHNPr, H [3] DNA-Ru (phen), 3 CH 3 CH2CHNPrDNA-Ru (phen) 3 +CH 3 CH,CHNPr 4] DNA-Ru(phen)2+ DNA-Ru(phen) 3 2 hv The emission intensity decreased on a second scan and none was seen on a third, suggesting loss of Ru(phen) 3 3 from the film and diffusion into the bulk solution.

In a control experiment, an electrode with a film of Al 2

(C

4 BP) that had not been treated with DNA was soaked for 4 h in either an aqueous 0.56 mM Ru(phen) 3 2+ or a 0.12 mM Ru(phen) 3 2 in MeCN solution and then rinsed with MeCN and water. This electrode showed no ECL emission upon potential sweep in the same TPrA solution described above, demonstrating the adzorption of Ru(phen) 3 2 on the A1 2

(C

4 BP) film does not occur. The ability to generate Ru(phen) 3 3 electrochemically in this ECL experiment demonstrates that the Al 2 (CBP) film and 15 the DNA layer do not prevent heterogeneous electron-transfer reactions.

To obtain further evidence for Al,(CBP) film Sformation and DNA immobilization, experiments were undertaken with a gold-coated quartz crystal and a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). The gold was repeatedly treated with hot chromic acid and then rinsed with water and EtOH until the surface was hydrophilic, as indicated by contact angle measurements. The crystal frequency was then measured in air during different stages of Al,(C4BP) film formation, after DNA 25 adsorption, and after Ru(phen) 3 2 association. The film was rinsed after each step with deionized water and dried in a -21stream of N 2 before measurement of the frequency. Results are shown in Table 1.

too** :*too.

to.

-22- Table 1. Frequency ana M(ass Changes on a QCX Plate for- Film Groth DN mmblization an R(en2+ i in After immflersion in: fs Anz I gph(lfc2 MBPAb -70 137 1 Al (N0 3 -27 53 i

C

4

BPA

4 -145 283 2 A I-(N0 33 -25 19 ds-DNAI -24 470.3) Ru (iphen., 2 ~f -18 350.1 Immnersions were Sequential in order given from top to bottom; bare surface was gold; bare crystal frequency, 6.011329 MI-z.

MM MEPA in EtoH for 24 h.

aq. Al(N 3 )3 for 4 h.

d MM: ~phosphoric acid for 4 h.

is Calf thymnus DNA (3.a 8MM NP) for 4 h.

*2. f~ 0.24 mM Ru(phen) 3 2 in MeCN for 4 h.

The variation addrift of the signal over the series of measurements was about 1 Hz.

hAssuming roughness factor for gold of 2 (total surface area, 0. 6 cm 2 For comparison, for a close-packed monolayer of MBPA, r 0.6 x 10-9 mol/cm 2 Assuming an Al(H 2 o) 3 3 until adsorbed.

S Corresponding to moles of nucleotide phosphate (NP) per cm 2 Clearly, the crystal frequency decreases as the Al,(CBP) film f or s and DNA and Ru (phen 3 are a d s or b e d o n t e s r a showing an increase of mass on the crystal during the different stages. The mass change, Am, can be related to the -23frequency change, Af, by the Sauerbrey equation: Am p /2F 2 )Af where

F

0 is the fundamental frequency of the unloaded crystal (6 MHz), A is the electrode area (0.159 cm 2 p, is the density of quartz (2.65 g/cm') and A, is the shear modulus of quartz (2.95 x 10" dyne/cm 2 With these constants, Am (ng) -1.95 Af (Hz) The mass changes calculated in this way are also given in Table 1. These can be converted to approximate surface concentrations, r, assuming a roughness factor of 2 total surface area of both sides of the quartz crystal of 0.6 Scm2). ECL could also be detected from both gold surfaces of the quartz crystal, when used as a substrate for A1 2

(C

4 BP) film formation DNA adsorption and Ru(phen) 3 2 association and then scanned in the TPrA solution.

The electrode surface can be designed with i* immobilized DNA without adsorbing a detector molecule, SRu(phen) 3 A ds-DNA on the surface can be detected by electrogenerated chemiluminescence of associated Ru(phen) 3 Single-stranded DNA can also be immobilized on the Al1(C 4

BP)

film surface and then hybridized with complementary DNA in solution with detection of the ds-DNA produced by ECL.

-24r xample 2 inle-trand DNA immobiliztion and hbridization X-1 tagged ss-DNA labeled with Ru(bpy)3 2 was immobilized on an aluminum phosphate film of the present invention by immersing the film in the DNA solution (Fig. 4A).

The amount of immobilized DNA-Ru(bpy) 3 2+ on the surface was determined by ECL resulting from the oxidation of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ and TPrA in a solution.

Untagged X-lc ss-DNA was immobilized on an aluminum phosphate of the present invention. The X-ic ss-DNA containing film was incubated in a complementary strand X-1 tagged ss-DNA solution at 600C for 5 min and then cooled to room temperature gradually; during this cooling the ss-DNA hybridized with the compleentary strand DNA (Fig. 4B). The *hy 15 hybridized DNA-Ru(bpy)3+ on the film was detected by ECL as h l m w a s detected by ECL as described above.

Poly(dA) was immobilized on an aluminum phosphate film of the present invention by soaking the film in a Spoly(dA) solution. After the immobilization, poly(dT) was hybridized with poly(dA) to produce poly(dA) poly(dT) ds-DNA on the surface by incubating the film in a poly(dT) solution .o *at 70 0 C for 5 min and then cooled to the room temperature gradually (Fig. 4C). To intercalate Ru(phen) 3 2 into the ds- DNA (poly(dA)opoly(dT)), the Al,(C4BP)/poly(dA) poly(dT) film 25 was treated with a Ru(phen) 3 2 solution. The hybridized poly(dA)*poly(dT)-Ru(phen) 3 on the surface was determined by ECL based on the oxidation of Ru(phen) 3 2 and TPrA in the solution.

Example 3 Immobilization and Detection of 30 bp ss-DNA.

Immobilized On Aluminum Phosphate Film.

The aluminum phosphate film, prepared as described above was immersed in a 1.38 AM solution of X-l 30 bp ss-DNA (tagged with Ru(bpy) 3 for -2 h. This was employed as a working electrode for an ECL experiment in a 0.19 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 0.13 M TPrA. Cyclic voltammograms 10 and emission transients were obtained by scanning the potential of the electrode from 0 to 1.6 V vs, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE). A representative voltammogram and emission detected with a single-photon-counting system are shown in Figures 5A-5C. The broad oxidation was at 1.2 V 15 and a small reduction wave at -0.35 V observed in the *0 voltammogram (Fig. 5A) arise from the oxidation of TPrA, Ru(bpy) 3 2 and the Au substrate and the reduction of the oxide o. of Au. The ECL emission from the A1 2

(C

4 BP)/X-l ss-DNA- Ru(bpy) 3 2 electrode (Fig. 5B) demonstrates that the X-1 30 bp 9* 20 ss-DNA-Ru(bpy) 3 2 was immobilized on the film. The decay of the light intensity as a function of time was also investigated with the single-photon-counting system. The light intensity detected by the photomultiplier tube, when the potential was stepped from 0 to 1.50 V, decreased with time (Fig. The decay of intensity with time suggests desorption of ss-DNA-Ru(bpy) 3 2 from the electrode surface or -26irreversible decomposition of the emitter. Emission results from the energetic electron-.transfer reaction between electrogenerated Ru(bpy 3 3 and an intermediate in the oxidation of TPrA: ~~DNA-Ru (bpy) 3 (ads) DNA-Ru (bpy) 3 3

CH

3 CHCHji4Pr 2 -e

CH

3

CH

2

CH

2 Ppr 2 [7]

CH

3

CH

2

CH

2 i'Pr 2

CH

3

CH

2 HNPr 2 H+ 18) DNA-Ru (bpy)3 3 3 ++CHCH,L'HNPr 2 -DNA-Ru (bpy) 3 2+*+CH 3 CH,CHNPr [9) DNA-Ru(bpy) 3 2 DNA-Ru (bpy) 3 2 ht) No ECL emission was observed from a film prepared by immersing it in solution of unlabeled ss-DNA: 1.38 ALM X-1 30 bp ss-DNA *0 00 or a 0.37 AM4 X-lc 30 bp ss-DNA solution (Fig. A control experiment with the aluminum phosphate *film immersed in a 304 nM Ru(bpy) 3 2 solution for 4 h shows a negligible ECL signal, indicating that Ru(bpy) 3 2 does not adsorb on the film and oxidize.

Example 4 Detection of 30 bp s-DNA Hybridized to *0 0Complementary SS-DNA Tagged With A Ruthenium Label.

After the immobilization of unlabeled X-lc 30 bp ss- DNA on the A1 2 (CBP) filmn, the film was immersed in a 1.38 AM complementary strand ss-DNA (tagged with Ru(bpy) 2 (X-1 30 bp ss-DNA-Ru(bpy)3 solution. The film in the solution was gradually heated to 60 0 C in water bath, incubated at 60'C for -27min. and then slowly cooled to room-temperature, during which the X-1 ss-DNA-Ru(bpy)2+ was hybridized with the complementary strand X-lc SS-DNA on the surface as illustrated in Fig. 4B. The film with hybridized DNA was employed as the working electrode in an ECL cell as described above. The ECL emission from the film was observed as shown in Fig. 7A.

However, when X-1 ss-DNA, rather than X-lc ss-DNA, was immobilized on the film and followed by the same hybridization procedure as described above by incubating the film in the X-i ss-DNA-Ru(bpy) 3 2 solution, heating to 60oC, and then cooling to room-temperature, no obvious ECL emission was evident as shown in Fig. 7B. This demonstrates that the ECL emission in Fig. 7A arises from the hybridization of immobilized X-lc ss- DNA with 1 ss-DNA-Ru(bpy)2+ in the solution. The emission 15 again results from the oxidation of Ru(bpy)2+-tagged hybridized ss-DNA and TPrA in the solution as described by Eqs. In this experiment the A1 2 (C,BP) film should be incubated in the X-1 ss-DNA solution for a sufficiently 4 long time (at least 4 h) to cover all possible Al (III) binding sites on the film with the X-l ss-DNA before the A1,(CBP)/X-1 ss-DNA electrode is exposed to the X-1 ss-DNA- Ru(bpy) 3 It is preferred to cover all A3 adsorption sites to avoid emission from the film/X-i ss-DNA/X-1 ss-DNA- Ru(bpy) 3 2 arising from some immobilization of ss-DNA- 25 Ru(bpy) 3 2 -28- ZXaM~le R u h n D e t e c t i n o .f P o vRA b r i di z e dA t o4-- ~d u s a Rt nium Label.

The aluminum Phosphonate film,' prepared as described above, was immersed in a 21 AM Poly(dA) solution for -4 h, then in a 0.24 MM Ru(phen) 3 2 solution for -4 h. When the A12 (C4BP) /poly (cA) /Ru (phen) 32+ film was employed as a working electrode in a solution of 0.19 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 0.13 M TPrA, no ECL emission was observed (Fig.

10 8A). This is consistent with the lack of association of *RU(phen)32+ with SS-DNA. However, a film of poly(dA) ~*hybridized With only poly(dT) to form ds-DNA did produce

ECL.

This film, formed by immersion in the poly(dA)solution, was incubated in a 38 AM poly(dT) solution (gradually heated to 15 700C in a water bath, incubated at 70 0 C for 5 min and then slowly cooled to room temperature). It was then treated with a 0.24 mM Ru(phen) 3 2 aqueous solution and used as a working electrode in the TPrA-containing phosphate buffer for ECL investigation. ECL emission was observed as shown in a 20 representative emission transient (Fig. 8B), demonstrating that poly(dT) in the solution hybridized with the poiy(d.A) on the surface to produce a ds-DNA flpoly(dA)9poly(dT] and Ru(phen) 3 2 intercalated with the ds-DNA as shown in Fig. 4c.

These examples show that Ru(phen) 3 2 only intercalates with ds-DNA [poiydA)Opoly(dT], but not with ss- DNA Intercalation of Ru(phen) '21 with ss-DNA and ds-DNA, ECL emission was measured from a 43 nil Ru(phen) 3 2 -29solution, a 43 nM Ru(phen) 2 containing 57 pM nucleotide phosphate of calf thymnus ss-DNA and a 43 nM Ru(phen) 3 2 containing 33 juM [NP] of calf thymnus ds-DNA with a QPCR analyzer. Results are given in Table 2, Table 2 ECL Of Solutions of 43 nX Ru(phen) 3 2 withsB-DA an ds-NA Solution I II It Ru (phen) 3 2+ alone ss-DNA+Ru (phen) 3 2+ ds-DNA+Ru (phen)3 2+ Coc.NP 0M 0 57 33 ECL(cts/s) 10068±23 10052+12 7779+268 Ratio of moles of nucleotide phosphate (NP) of ss-DNA to Ru (phen) 3 2 1.3 X 104 bRatio of moles of nucleotide phosphate (NP) of ds-DNA to Ru (phen) 3 2 7.7 indicating that the ECL emission decreased after ds-DNA was added to the Rutphen) 3 2 solution. A negligible change, however, in the ECL signal was shown when ss-DNA was added, further demonstrating that Ru(phen) 3 2 only intercalates with ds-DNA, but not with ss-DNA.

Z0 A control experiment in which a film, after the :immobilization of poly(dA) was incubated in a 21 AM poly(dA) or a 46 A~M poly(dC) solution instead of poly(dT) (70 0 C for min then cooled to room-temperature) and then treated with Ru (phen) 3 2 for -2 h produces no ECL emission. This indicates that the Al 2

(C

4 BP) /poly electrode can distinguish a complementary strand of poly(dT) DNA from non-complementary ones.

-31- Example 6 TEM Images of the film and calf thymus ds-DNA.

Samples, prepared by coating Au on a Formvar film on a #400 Cu grid with a vacuum evaporator, fabricating the aluminum phosphate film on the Au as described above, and then immobilizing DNA on the Al 2

(C

4 BP) film by immersing the film in a 1.65 mM [NP] of calf thymus ds-DNA for 4 h, were imaged with a transmission electron microscope (TEM) at 80 KV. As shown in Figs. 9A-9C the featureless Au substrate (Fig. 9A) shows 10 formation of crystalline islands of Al2(C 4 BP) film (Fig. 9B) and clumps of DNA (Fig. 9C). The film (Fig. 10A) was then treated with either 1.65 mM [NP] calf thymus ds-DNA (Fig. or an identical solution of ds-DNA that had been subjected to sonication for 6 h (Fig. 10C). The results indicate that The results indicate that 15 smaller clumps of DNA are adsorbed on the film after a r e adsorbed on the film after sonication.

S. A further embodiment of the invention is shown in Figs. 11A and 11B. A sensor surface having a multilayer film with bonding groups is provided with a complete set of 20 oligonucleotide probes using similar techniques described above for adsorbing ds-DNA and for SS-DNA. See Fig. 11A. The sensor surface of Fig. 11A is contacted with DNA to be sequenced. The above disclosed ECL procedures are then used to recognize zones with a complementary sequence. (Fig. 11B).

When chips are used, different types of ss-DNA that make up a test sequence are attached to the surface of a chip to make an array. The chip array is then exposed to the -32sample solution to be sample solution to be sequenced, with formation of ds-DNA at the appropriate location being recognized by the ECL approach.

Although the invention has been described in conjunction with the specific embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description.

Accordingly, the invention is intended to embrace all of the alternatives and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

3 e -33- -33- SEQUENCE

LISTING

GENERAL

INFORMATION:

APPLICANTS: Allen J. Bard and Xia-Hong Hu (ii) TITLE OF THE INVENTION: BIOSENSOR FOR AND METHOD OF ELECTROGENERATED

CHEMILUMINESCENT

DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID ADSORBED TO A SOLID

SURFACE

(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 3 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE

ADDRESS:

ADDRESSEE: Morgan Finnegan STREET: 1299 Pennsylvania Ave.,

N.W.,

Suite 960 CITY: Washington STATE: District of Columbia ZIP CODE: 20004 COMPUTER READABLE

FORM:

MEDIUM TYPE: Diskette, 3.50 inch, 1.44 Mb storage COMPUTER: IBM COMPATIBLE OPERATING SYSTEM: MS-DOS SOFTWARE: WordPerfect 5.1 (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION

DATA:

APPLICATION NUMBER: 08/296,630 FILING DATE: 08/26/94 CLASSIFICATION:

N/A

(vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA:

N/A

ATTORNEY/AGENT

INFORMATION:

NAME: Michael S. Marcus REGISTRATION NUMBER: 31,727 REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 23247001 (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION

INFORMATION:

TELEPHONE: (202) 857-7887 o TELEFAX: (202) 857-7929 INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 1: SEQUENCE

CHARACTERISTICS:

LENGTH: TYPE: nucleic acid STRANDEDNESS: single TOPOLOGY: linear 34 (ii) MOLECULE

TYPE:

(iii) HYPOTHETICAL:

NO

(iv) ANTI-SENSE:

NO

FRAGMENT TYPE: LAMBDA (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:

ORGANISM:

STRAIN:

INDIVIDUAL

ISOLATE:

DEVELOPMENTAL

STAGE:

HAPLOTYPE:

TISSUE TYPE: CELL TYPE: CELL LINE:

ORGANELLE:

(vii) IMMEDIATE SOURCE:

LIBRARY:

CLONE:

(viii) POSITION IN GENOME: CHROMOSOME SEGMENT:

N/A

MAP POSITION: N/A UNITS: N/A (ix) FEATURE:

NAME/KEY:

LOCATION: N/A IDENTIFICATION METHOD: OTHER INFORMATION:

N/A

PUBLICATION

INFORMATION:

AUTHORS:

TITLE:

JOURNAL:

VOLUME:

ISSUE:

PAGES:

DATE:

DOCUMENT NUMBER: FILING DATE: PUBLICATION

DATE:

RELEVANT RESIDUES In SEQ ID NO: 1: (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 1: GAAAATGTGC TGACCGGACA TGAAAATGAG INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 2: 35 SEQUENCE

CHARACTERISTICS:

LENGTH:

TYPE:

STRANDEDNESS single TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE

TYPE:

(iii) HYPOTHETICAL:

NO

(iv) ANIT-SENSE:

N/A

FRAGMENT TYPE: LAMBDA (vi) ORIGINAL

SOURCE:

ORGANISM:

STRAIN:

INDIVIDUAL

ISOLATE:

DEVELOPMENTALSTGE

HAPLOTYPE:

TISSUJE

TYPE:

CELL TYPE: CELL LINE:

ORGANELLE:

(vii) IMMEDIATE

SOURCE:

LIBRARY:

CLONE:

(viii) POSITION IN GENOME: CHROMOSOME SEGMENT:

N/A

S. S MAP POSITION:

N/A

UNITS:

N/A

(ix) FEATURE:

INAME/KEY:

LOCATION:

N/A

IDENTIFICATION

METHOD:

OTHER INFORMATION:

N/A

PUBLICATION INFORMATION: 5(A)

AUTHORS:

TITLE:

JOURNAL:

VOLUME:

ISSUE:

PAGES:

DATE:

DOCUMENT

NUMBER:

FILING

DATE:

PUBLICATION

DATE:

RELEVNT RESIDUES In SEQ ID NO: 2 36 (Xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 2: CTCATTTT~ TGTCCGGTCA CCACATTTTC a.

a a a. a a a.

a. a a a a a a.

a a a. a a a a.

37

Claims (35)

1. A method of detecting nucleic acids comprising: a. forming a sensor surface bearing a film having metallic centers; b. adsorbing at least one nucleic acid onto to said metal centers; c. reacting nucleic acid adsorbed to said film with a luminescent metal label; and d. detecting the nucleic acid metal label chelates formed in step via electrogenerated chemiluminescence of said chelates.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid of step is double-stranded. S3. The method of claim i, wherein the nucleic acid of step is single-stranded. The method of claim 3, wherein step further comprises binding the single-stranded nucleic acid adsorbed to the film, to a complementary single-stranded nucleic acid sequence. The method of claim 1, wherein said electrogenerated chemiluminescence arises from a reaction of an electrogenerated metal label in the nucleic acid -metal label 38 -r chelate and a suitable coreactant.

6. The method of claim wherein said electrogenerated metal label is produced via emission from the sensor which is an electrode.

7. A method of detecting nucleic acids comprising: a. forming an electrode by adsorbing at least one nucleic acid onto said electrode; b. reacting nucleic acid adsorbed to said electrode with a luminescent label; and *5 c. detecting the nucleic acid label formed in step via electrogenerated chemiluminescence.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the nucleic acid of step is double-stranded. The method of claim 7, wherein the nucleic acid of step is single-stranded. S.. The method of claim 7, wherein said electrogenerated chemiluminescence arises from a reaction of an chemiluminescene arises from a reaction of an 39 electrogenerated metal label in the nucleic acid metal label chelate and a suitable coreactant. e coreactant.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said electrogenerated metal label is produced via emission from the electrode.

13. An aluminum alkanebisphosphonate biosensor comprising: 5 a substrate and a first metallic layer; and **a Saan aluminum alkanebisphosphonate r forming (Al) metallic centers. 1 S.

14. A biosensor according to claim 13, wherein said Sbiosensor further includes said aluminum includes single-strand DNA immobilized to said aluminum centers. A biosensor according to claim 14, wherein said DNA is labelled with and an osmium or ruthenium moiety.

16. A biosensor according to claim 13, wherein said biosensor further includes double-strand DNA immobilized to said aluminum centers. is labelled with an osmium or ruthenium moiety. is labelled- wit an osiu or ruthenium 1 moiety. 40 41

18. A method of preparing a biosensor for nucleic acid, comprising: a) treating a silicon wafer to form a chromium layer and juxtaposed gold layer; b) contacting said layered wafer with an anchoring agent; and c) immersing the product of step b) alternately in Al(N0 3 3 bisphosphonic (H20 3 P(CH2) 4 PO3H 2 and Al(N0 3 3 aqueous solutions.

19. A biosensor comprising: an electrode substrate, adsorbed ss-DNA or ds-DNA immobilised on said electrode, and a detectable label on said ss-DNA or ds-DNA wherein the detectable 10 label is capable of being oxidised or reduced.

20. A biosensor according to claim 19, wherein said DNA is labelled with an osmium or ruthenium moiety or a luminescent label.

21. A method of detecting nucleic acids, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the Examples. 15

22. An aluminum alkanebisphosphonate biosensor, substantially as hereinbefore *99: described with reference to any one of the Examples.

23. An aluminum alkanebisphosphonate biosensor, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

24. A method of preparing a biosensor, substantially as hereinbefore described 20 with reference to any one of the Examples.

25. A method of preparing a biosensor, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

26. A biosensor, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the Examples.

27. A biosensor, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

28. A method of detecting an analyte of interest in a sample comprising: a) contacting said sample with a sensor, said sensor comprising a first complexing species immobolized on an electrode thereby forming an electrode-analyte complex, wherein one or more of said first complexing species is capable of binding with said analyte or with a second complexing species, wherein at least one of said first complexing species and said second complexing species is capable of binding with said analyte; [R:\LIBF]04537.doc:mcc 42 b) providing said complexed analyte with an electrochemiluminescent metal label to form a chelate; and c) detecting the chelate formed in step via electrogenerated chemiluminescence of said chelate. s

29. The method of claim 28, wherein said electrochemiluminesent metal label comprises a ruthenium-containing or osmium-containing compound. The method of claim 28, wherein said electrode comprises a substrate having at least one metallic layer.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein said at least one metallic layer comprises a gold surface.

32. A method of detecting a binding reaction comprising: exposing an electrode having a first binding reagent immobilized on a surface thereof to a solution containing a second binding reagent, said second binding reagent comprising an electrochemiluminescent label and being capable of binding with said first binding reagent; forming a complex comprising said first binding reagent and said second binding reagent on said electrode; and inducing said electrochemiluminescent label to electrochemiluminesce.

33. A method of detecting the presence of an analyte of interest in a sample comprising: exposing an electrode to a sample, said electrode having a binding reagent immobilized on a surface of said electrode, said binding reagent capable of binding with a first complex, said first complex including said analyte of interest and an electrochemiluminescent label; and forming a second complex at the surface of said electrode, said second complex comprising said binding reagent and said first complex; and inducing said electrochemiluminescent label to electrochemiluminesce.

34. A method of detecting a binding reaction comprising: exposing an electrode to a sample containing a first binding reagent thereby immobilizing said first binding reagent on said electrode; exposing said electrode having said immobilized first binding reagent to a solution containing a second binding reagent including an electrochemiluminescent label, said second binding reagent capable of binding with said immobilized first binding [R:\LIBF]04537.do: ncc 43 reagent thereby forming an immobilized complex comprising said immobilized first binding reagent and said second binding reagent; and inducing said electrochemiluminescent label to electrochemiluminesce. A method of detecting the presence of an analyte of interest in a sample comprising: exposing an electrode to a sample containing an analyte of interest thereby immobilizing said analyte of interest on said electrode; exposing said electrode having said immobilized analyte of interest to a solution containing a binding reagent comprising an electrochemiluminescent label, said 0t binding reagent capable of binding with said immobilized analyte of interest thereby forming a complex comprising said immobilized analyte and said binding reagent; and inducing said electrochemiluminescent label to electrochemiluminesce.

36. A sensor comprising an electrode and a complex immobilized on a surface thereof, said complex comprising a binding reagent and an electrochemiluminescent is label.

37. The method of claim 34, wherein said electrochemiluminescent label comprises a ruthenium-containing or osmium-containing compound.

38. The method of claim 35, wherein said electrochemiluminescent label °ocomprises a ruthenium-containing or osmium-containing compound.

39. The method of claim 36, wherein said electrochemiluminescent label comprises a ruthenium-containing or osmium-containing compound.

40. The method of claim 37, wherein said electrochemiluminescent label comprises a ruthenium-containing or osmium-containing compound.

41. The sensor of claim 38, wherein said electrochemiluminescent label comprises a ruthenium-containing or osmium-containing compound.

42. The method of claim 34, wherein said electrode comprises a self-assembled thin film.

43. The method of claim 42, wherein said electrode comprises a gold surface and said self-assembled thin film comprises thiols on said gold surface.

44. The method of claim 42, wherein said self-assembled thin film comprises an aluminium (III) alkanebisphosphonate layer having metallic aluminum centers. The method of claim 34, wherein said first binding reagent comprises nucleic acid. [R:\LIBF]04537.doc:mcc 44

46. The method of claim 34, wherein said second binding reagent comprises nucleic acid. Dated 25 June, 1999 Igen International, Inc. Patent Attorneys for the Applicant/Nominated Person SPRUSON FERGUSON 00 0e1 6 S000 S s S. S 5 S 0toa O* e agog Do FR:\LI3F]04537.dociioc