AU2020102874A4 - A recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using deep recurrent neural network - Google Patents

A recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using deep recurrent neural network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2020102874A4
AU2020102874A4 AU2020102874A AU2020102874A AU2020102874A4 AU 2020102874 A4 AU2020102874 A4 AU 2020102874A4 AU 2020102874 A AU2020102874 A AU 2020102874A AU 2020102874 A AU2020102874 A AU 2020102874A AU 2020102874 A4 AU2020102874 A4 AU 2020102874A4
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
neural network
recommendation
optimization
structures
aerodynamic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2020102874A
Inventor
Mohammad Shabbir Alam
Pranav Kharbanda
Vishal Khatri
Mohammad Shahnawaz Nasir
Rabi Narayan Panda
Arvind K. Sharma
Kamal Upreti
Ankit Verma
Saroj Kumar Verma
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Khatri Vishal Dr
Verma Saroj Kumar Mr
Nasir Mohammad Shahnawaz Mr
Original Assignee
Khatri Vishal Dr
Verma Saroj Kumar Mr
Nasir Mohammad Shahnawaz Mr
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Khatri Vishal Dr, Verma Saroj Kumar Mr, Nasir Mohammad Shahnawaz Mr filed Critical Khatri Vishal Dr
Priority to AU2020102874A priority Critical patent/AU2020102874A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2020102874A4 publication Critical patent/AU2020102874A4/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/15Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/28Design optimisation, verification or simulation using fluid dynamics, e.g. using Navier-Stokes equations or computational fluid dynamics [CFD]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02Neural networks

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A RECOMMENDATION MODEL FOR AERO DYNAMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURES USING DEEP RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK ABSTRACT During the last 60 years, aerodynamic optimization seems to be an essential part of any aerodynamic architecture, with implementations for aircraft, vehicles, trains, bridges, wind turbines, internal pipe flows and cavities, among many others, and is also important to several areas of technology. With advances in computing resources, automatic design optimization systems have becoming more professional. As illustrated by the non-free lunch theorem, no algorithm will exceed each another on all levels of optimization issues. To resolve such concern, approaches have been suggested for proposing an emerging methodology for problem-solving. Even so, current recommendation models for continuous optimization suffer from poor enforceability and employability, primarily due to the difficulties in obtaining characteristics that can accurately define the major issue configuration and insufficient evidence for the learning of the recommendation model. This work suggests a generalized advice framework to resolve the two problems lay out above. First, a novel approach is suggested to describe the analytical objective function of a continuous optimization problem as a tree that is specifically employed as a component of the issue. In the case of black-box optimization problems which objective function is undefined, a symbolic regressor is used to approximate the tree structure. Using a deep recurrent neural network, a recommendation model is learned to suggest the most effective metaheuristic algorithm for white-or black-box optimization, allowing a big move forward towards a truly automatic algorithm recommendation for continuous optimization. Analytical results on 100,000 benchmark issues revealed that the optimal guidance approach ensures substantially higher efficiency than current models and shows high accessibility to real-world problems. 1| P a g e Algmthn 1 Algantm - - - AlpFnxm9m Sahie ,, Solve Solve ohPrTNm 1 Ponbem 2 ---- Prlo 1n A- ---------------- --------------------- Inde Of e Ilxofte xOof p t ha rn hm 1s t ah mh -.- t l:. n t rar rr I t f I l e IIfier Ferresdo Felmresof Festuses of Iqmt Feture extactionstrategy Problnm1 Problemi2 - - rbe sample I stree2 5amLeii Figure 3: A generic framework for algorithm recommendation IRandom nadchakproblems Train De eurn neural network wite-box p Tree Ip O Indexofthe pblem best algonthm Black-bOX mboli Esinted treel I"P problem [el I~ Figure 4: The design of recommendation system for aero dynamic design of structures 21Page

Description

Algmthn 1 Algantm - - - AlpFnxm9m
Sahie ,, Solve Solve ohPrTNm 1 Ponbem 2 ---- Prlo 1n
Inde Of e Ilxofte xOof p t ha rn A- hm ---------------- 1s t ah mh --------------------- -.- t l:. n t rar rr I t f I l e IIfier
Ferresdo Felmresof Festuses of Iqmt
Feture extactionstrategy
Problnm1 Problemi2 - - rbe sample I stree2 5amLeii
Figure 3: A generic framework for algorithm recommendation
IRandom nadchakproblems Train De eurn neural network
wite-box p Tree Ip O Indexofthe pblem best algonthm
Black-bOX mboli Esinted treel I"P problem I~ [el
Figure 4: The design of recommendation system for aero dynamic design of structures
21Page
A RECOMMENDATION MODEL FOR AERO DYNAMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURES USING DEEP RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK
Description
Field of the Invention:
This invention relates to make a recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using Deep Recurrent neural network. Aero dynamic data modeling contributes to the interpretation of the mapping mechanism among input and output data leveraging the relevant models. The deep recurrent neural network (Deep-RNN) utilized the idea to learn the classification process design.
Background of the invention:
Influenced by the dynamics of evolutionary processes and swarm behaviour in general, several metaheuristics have evolved extensively during the last generations, including genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, ant colony optimization, and among several others. These techniques are high-level strategies which do not depend on the distinct needs of the challenges and have demonstrated attractive competition in tackling various constrained optimization problems. Nevertheless, as shown by the non-free lunch theorem, there is no single methodology which can perform better anything else on all levels of computation problem. A great deal of work has therefore been invested to build strategies suited to particular kinds of problems. While the layouts of specialized applications which demand extensive field expertise, it is challenging for developers to customize evolutionary methods for variety of applications. Rather, current implementations are sometimes chosen for various technologies.
The synthesis of aerodynamics and artificial intelligence stretches prior to the 1940's. Kolmogorov has introduced mathematical training approaches to solve disruption issues. The neural networks are a research focused on mathematical learning. McCulloch and Pitts promoted the initial definition of MLPs. They aimed to understand the process by which the human brain performs complicated activities. Rosenblatt suggested a single-layer perceptron study explored the effects. Even then, it was discovered in 1969 that the perceptron for only one hidden units was unable to
11 P a g e recognize the XOR method. Stimulated by this downside, the configuration of the MLP was suggested by Minsky, yet how does one learn the variable of this template remains unresolved.
According to Zhang that the implementation of aero-elastic optimization with flush restrictions prevents consistency problems associated with dynamic mesh deformation by using a fixed over set mesh approach. Nevertheless, the challenge of constructing a mesh a priori that retains sufficient for the entire construction quest region is always unfeasible. Some metrics, like induced drag, are acutely vulnerable to grid size, and thus the aerodynamic characteristics of the system must be seen to be grid-independent for the core design region for the mesh used. If the aerodynamic features of the body are not representative of the grid, it is very simple for the framework for becoming unsuitable when the geometry and/or flow situations change the optimization technique. This will relate to undefined optimization knowledge and make the optimization phase worthless, as discretization failures of the mesh are manipulated contributing to false layouts.
In accordance with Zhao the Multi-Island GA (MIGA) is employed to refine the flow rate over the aerofoil. MIGA works by splitting the population into sub-populations insulating various locations of the construction area. Alternatives thereby evolve into individual categories with distinct criteria and are routinely encouraged to move among 'islands' and communicate with each generation. A population of 50 solutions distributed over 5 sub-populations was analyzed over 50 generations of approach replication needed each 4 decades. The high level of migrations needed to sustain complexity and low subgroups indicate that the method was quite vulnerable to genetic drift.
Rumelhart et al suggested a back propagation algorithm that tackled the learning issue of MLPs. As of then, MLPs have been turned into Neural Networks that signify the beginning of neural networks. Even then, owing to the lack of computing resources in those periods, and technical constraints, the total amount of secret layers in MLPs is two. The creation of neural networks has been limited and has still reached the winter era.
Nyan et al presented the use of accelerometers and gyroscopes for the device. In this job, the sensors are attached to a board mounted on the Intel PXA255 processor using Zigbee transceivers, in which the necessary data is being processed. Elsewhere in system, a specialized device built on FPGA technology develops information from accelerometers.
21Page
Yildirim et al explains the technique in which the solver reviews the configuration of every nonlinear execution leveraging the backward Euler step size equation. To ease the challenging initialization process, we employ an adaptive CFL methodology focusing on a pseudo-transient continuation. This begins with a limited time step towards reliability and then raises the step size quickly as it reaches a resolution that has the desirable durability features of the backward Euler method during the initial stage, thus attempting a Newton-type algorithm as the cycle time reaches infinite. For every time varying process, an upgrade solution is generated by incorrectly resolving a broad linear structure.
According to Chernukin and Zingg the limited experiments have performed about how the range of factors employed and the associated methodology can influence aerodynamic structures and point out that the distinction among computational models and weak optimizer consolidation can render troublesome. It can be predicted, although never assured, to raise the formulation of the objective function by growing the complexity of the design process. All 8 strategies reached both the optimum and the viability specifications with an objective value differing by about 5 per cent between the regional maxims. The outlines of the design are distinctive and thus indicate that the structural difference among the local optim has identical features of results.
Objects of the Invention:
The main objective is to implement a recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using Deep Recurrent Neural Network.
The second objective is to extract the features from continuous optimization. In the case of black box challenges whose objective function is uncertain, a number of solutions are extracted and their objective values are calculated; a symbolic regressor is then used to approximate the structure for knowing the configurations among the strategies and their empirical variables.
Another is to posit a deep learning classifier for recommend the most suitable metaheuristics for combinatorial computation challenges. In order to train the neural network, a large number of benchmark problems are randomly generated with the aid of the tree structure, and their classifications are gained by examining multiple metaheuristics from each concern.
Summary of the Invention:
31Page
The mentioned approach advocates an innovative tree structure to describe a given tree challenge, and then transform the tree to a reverse Polish phrase as a function of the issue. The suggested approach implies a tree-based technique that can produce an infinite amount of criterion issues of differing degrees of complexity. Compared to current approaches, the suggested testing specimen selection approach will include a wide variety of information for the testing of a high-performance recommendation model. This thesis embraces a deep recurrent neural network as a recommendation model that is far more efficient than that used in existing approaches.
The suggested approach employs the tree classification elements as input properties of the classification model for solving optimization problems. Especially, it translates the tree to the reverse Polish phrase, where the tree signifies the origin of the tree, tree: value denotes the representation of the node, and tree: left and tree: right represents the left and right node, accordingly. It should be remembered that the feature of the concern can also be expressed as an in-order phrase. In particular, the inverse Polish expression is a variable-length recurrent neural network that is used as a classifier.
Various characteristics are then determined on the basis of such quantitative values. It is assumed that the efficiency of the implementation is entirely dependent on the environments of the Problems, and these landscape-related features will widen the gap among method efficiency and challenge complexity. This theory is clear and rational, and it struggles from the computational complexity. Because ad approaches can be evaluated in the principle of fractions for which of the objective functions.
Detailed Description of the Invention:
Figure 1: Aircraft design framework Figure 2: Structure of Deep RNN Figure 3: A generic framework for algorithm recommendation
Figure 4: The design of recommendation system for aero dynamic design of structures
Detailed Description of the Invention:
41Page
Figure 1 shows the overall framework of designing the aircraft design. Figure 2 explains the concept of Deep learning or hierarchical learning is a segment of machine learning that primarily applies commonly adopted neural network principles. It represents a deep, recurrent neural network with hidden layers of L. Each secret phase is transferred periodically to both the next time interval of the current layer and the current time stage of the following level.
Figure 3 illustrates the Recommendation Algorithm that may be called a classification process, where each specimen comprises of attributes reflecting the complexity or layout of the optimization method and the subsequent mark is the dataset of the best fit optimization technique for the challenge. Evidently, the extraction of successful design elements for expressing the properties of the evolutionary algorithms and the development of a high-performance classification model for training the connection among the functionalities and the mark are two essential parts for the effectiveness of the recommendation process. Owing to the sophistication of the attributes in combinatorial optimization problems, most of the current approaches perceive these to be black box difficulties and obtain aspects that reflect environment properties. Particularly, a range of decision variables are examined in the decisions field of the Latin Hypercube sampling problem and its objective parameters are compared.
Figure 4 demonstrates the overall structure of the suggested approach and then a large number of benchmark issues are randomly generated by learning results. The selection technique and their marks are acquired by checking a variety of metaheuristics on them. Notice that the quantities of coefficients are assigned to random variables within [1; 10] and the distribution of random numbers varies within [1; 2]. These troubles are then employed to develop a deep recurrent neural network. In the case of a white-box continuous optimization technique, the tree structure is interpreted and then placed into the neural network. In the case of a black-box continuous optimization problem, the tree is calculated by a symbolic regressor and afterwards loaded into a neural network-based classifier.
51Page

Claims (6)

A RECOMMENDATION MODEL FOR AERO DYNAMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURES USING DEEP RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK CLAIMS
1. A computer-assisted approach for optimizing the configuration of a body surface that passes via a flow area, a process consisting of:
Formulation of a model of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) of the said body requiring at least one CFD estimation;
Review of the measurement of the CFD for at least one defined state of the fluid domain and the achievement of at least one fluid flow on the said substrate of the body;
Assessment of the typical curvature of the surface relative to the position of the structure
2. As with claim 1, Computer-assisted approach for the recognition of system parameters for a predefined series of calculations comprising aerodynamic aircraft structures, including the detection of model parameters in the following steps. Archiving of aerodynamic data source pertaining to aircraft, Choosing a system for neural networking; Separate the identity of the model parameters into a multitude of limited identifiers by splitting linear and non-linear portions of the pre - defined set of coefficients representing aerodynamic models;
3. Following claim 2, claim 3 comprises of Choosing a mode to represent non-linear parts of the preset parameters from a collation or presentation as a neural network Consecutively performing partial identifiers, Calculate the difference among the quantities of the metric and the aerodynamic standard results, and verify the values of the parameters for which the deviation is less than the predetermined limit.
4. The method according to any of claim 2 and 3 comprising Estimation of aerodynamic flow variable according to the direction of flow line;
1 Pag e
Simultaneous visualization flow variable is a pressure gradient. normal curvature and aerodynamic flow variable are visualized graphically on the surface of the body.
5. As with claim 1 and 2, computer-implemented framework for optimizing the configuration of a body surface that passes through a flow area, a computer-implemented system includes: CAD unit for the representation of the said surface and the corresponding mathematical or functional characteristics; 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) module deployed on the device to acquire at least one flow line on the said surface for at least one defined fluid flow condition; And the estimation module is employed for evaluation process.
6. Deep recurrent neural network model is utilized for training the model for a classification task.
2|Page
A RECOMMENDATION MODEL FOR AERO DYNAMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURES USING DEEP RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK
Drawings 2020102874
Figure 1: Aircraft design framework
Figure 2: Structure of Deep RNN
1|Page
Figure 3: A generic framework for algorithm recommendation
Figure 4: The design of recommendation system for aero dynamic design of structures
2|Page
AU2020102874A 2020-10-19 2020-10-19 A recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using deep recurrent neural network Ceased AU2020102874A4 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2020102874A AU2020102874A4 (en) 2020-10-19 2020-10-19 A recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using deep recurrent neural network

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2020102874A AU2020102874A4 (en) 2020-10-19 2020-10-19 A recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using deep recurrent neural network

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2020102874A4 true AU2020102874A4 (en) 2020-12-17

Family

ID=73746694

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2020102874A Ceased AU2020102874A4 (en) 2020-10-19 2020-10-19 A recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using deep recurrent neural network

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2020102874A4 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112711707A (en) * 2020-12-29 2021-04-27 济南浪潮高新科技投资发展有限公司 Family object finding method and equipment based on deep learning recommendation system
CN115408919A (en) * 2022-10-28 2022-11-29 华中科技大学 Method and system for predicting drop impact of reloading airdrop based on neural network
CN115422497A (en) * 2022-08-16 2022-12-02 哈尔滨工业大学 Ordinary differential equation identification method based on convolution differential operator and symbol network
CN116382071A (en) * 2023-02-08 2023-07-04 大连理工大学 Pneumatic parameter intelligent identification method for deep learning network correction compensation
CN116778027A (en) * 2023-08-22 2023-09-19 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所 Curved surface parameterization method and device based on neural network
CN117910392A (en) * 2024-03-19 2024-04-19 上海华模科技有限公司 Method and device for correcting pneumatic model, flight simulator and storage medium
CN117933146A (en) * 2024-03-22 2024-04-26 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Aircraft grid optimization method, device, computer equipment and storage medium

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112711707A (en) * 2020-12-29 2021-04-27 济南浪潮高新科技投资发展有限公司 Family object finding method and equipment based on deep learning recommendation system
CN115422497A (en) * 2022-08-16 2022-12-02 哈尔滨工业大学 Ordinary differential equation identification method based on convolution differential operator and symbol network
CN115408919A (en) * 2022-10-28 2022-11-29 华中科技大学 Method and system for predicting drop impact of reloading airdrop based on neural network
CN116382071A (en) * 2023-02-08 2023-07-04 大连理工大学 Pneumatic parameter intelligent identification method for deep learning network correction compensation
CN116382071B (en) * 2023-02-08 2023-12-22 大连理工大学 Pneumatic parameter intelligent identification method for deep learning network correction compensation
CN116778027A (en) * 2023-08-22 2023-09-19 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所 Curved surface parameterization method and device based on neural network
CN116778027B (en) * 2023-08-22 2023-11-07 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所 Curved surface parameterization method and device based on neural network
CN117910392A (en) * 2024-03-19 2024-04-19 上海华模科技有限公司 Method and device for correcting pneumatic model, flight simulator and storage medium
CN117933146A (en) * 2024-03-22 2024-04-26 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Aircraft grid optimization method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN117933146B (en) * 2024-03-22 2024-06-04 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Aircraft grid optimization method, device, computer equipment and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2020102874A4 (en) A recommendation model for aero dynamic design of structures using deep recurrent neural network
Liu et al. A CNN-based shock detection method in flow visualization
Ramasso et al. Review and analysis of algorithmic approaches developed for prognostics on CMAPSS dataset
Georgiou et al. Learning fluid flows
CN108664690A (en) Long-life electron device reliability lifetime estimation method under more stress based on depth belief network
CN105095918A (en) Multi-robot system fault diagnosis method
Gai et al. A Parameter‐Optimized DBN Using GOA and Its Application in Fault Diagnosis of Gearbox
CN114341880A (en) Techniques for visualizing operation of neural networks
Fahmy et al. Supporting deep neural network safety analysis and retraining through heatmap-based unsupervised learning
RU2689818C1 (en) Method of interpreting artificial neural networks
Yilmaz et al. A deep learning approach to an airfoil inverse design problem
CN106408649B (en) A kind of rule-based body structure evolution design method
Mata et al. Isotropic image analysis for improving cbr forecasting
CN114004155A (en) Transient stability assessment method and device considering topological structure characteristics of power system
US11615321B2 (en) Techniques for modifying the operation of neural networks
Danglade et al. A priori evaluation of simulation models preparation processes using artificial intelligence techniques
Shi et al. Temporal-spatial causal interpretations for vision-based reinforcement learning
Tamilselvan et al. Multi-sensor health diagnosis using deep belief network based state classification
KR20200028249A (en) Facility data fault diagnosis system and method of the same
de Sousa et al. Evolved explainable classifications for lymph node metastases
Chopra et al. Classification of faults in damadics benchmark process control system using self organizing maps
EP3739515A1 (en) Determining a perturbation mask for a classification model
Ming A survey on visualization for explainable classifiers
Hinz et al. Detection of distinctions in car fleets based on measured and simulated data
Drouhard et al. Visual analytics for neuroscience-inspired dynamic architectures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGI Letters patent sealed or granted (innovation patent)
MK22 Patent ceased section 143a(d), or expired - non payment of renewal fee or expiry