AU2006207868A1 - Method and apparatus for producing dry particles - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for producing dry particles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2006207868A1
AU2006207868A1 AU2006207868A AU2006207868A AU2006207868A1 AU 2006207868 A1 AU2006207868 A1 AU 2006207868A1 AU 2006207868 A AU2006207868 A AU 2006207868A AU 2006207868 A AU2006207868 A AU 2006207868A AU 2006207868 A1 AU2006207868 A1 AU 2006207868A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
particles
nozzle
dry
hgh
solution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
AU2006207868A
Inventor
Richard P Batycky
Charles D Blizzard
Marie Elizabeth Chung
Blair C Jackson
Lloyd P Johnston
Jeffrey D Mintzes
Ernest E Penachio
Jean C Sung
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alkermes Inc
Original Assignee
Alkermes Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2003218256A external-priority patent/AU2003218256C1/en
Application filed by Alkermes Inc filed Critical Alkermes Inc
Priority to AU2006207868A priority Critical patent/AU2006207868A1/en
Publication of AU2006207868A1 publication Critical patent/AU2006207868A1/en
Assigned to ALKERMES, INC. reassignment ALKERMES, INC. Request for Assignment Assignors: ADVANCED INHALATION RESEARCH, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

Regulation 3.2 Revised 2/98
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act, 1990
ORIGINAL
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT NAME OF APPLICANT: ACTUAL INVENTORS: ADDRESS FOR SERVICE: INVENTION TITLE: DETAILS OF ASSOCIATED APPLICATION NO: Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc.
Richard P Batycky Blair C Jackson Lloyd P Johnston Jeffrey D Mintzes Ernest E Penachio Jean C Sung Charles D Blizzard Marie Elizabeth Chung Peter Maxwell and Associates Level 6 Pitt Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING DRY PARTICLES Divisional of Australian Patent Application No. 2003 218 256 filed on 19 March 2003 The following statement is a full description of this invention including the best method of performing it known to us:m:\docs\20031 259\1 05874.doc 00 00 The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for producing dry particles. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for \f producing dry particles that are suitable for inhalation into the lung, and which contain an active agent.
Delivery of drugs and other active agents can be accomplished through the use of dry powder compositions made from particles containing the drug or active agent. In producing such particles, it is often desirable to combine substances with significantly different physical properties to achieve the desired pharmaceutical effect in patients.
Moreover, it is often desirable to produce particles that are a combination of different substances. One way to produce particles containing a combination of different substances is to dissolve the substances in suitable solvents, and then remove the solvents by, for example, evaporation or drying, to yield the desired particles. A major difficulty with this approach is that substances with differing physical properties often have very different solubilities in solvents. Consequently, co-solvents, or a larger mixture of solvents, may be needed to form the solution from which the particles are produced.
However, the use of co-solvents can cause degradation of one of the components, through chemical or physical incompatibility of the components in solution.
One example of the incompatibility of components is the production of particles that contain a hydrophobic component and a hydrophilic component. The production of such particles is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,077,543 to Gordon et al. ("the Gordon patent"). As described in the Gordon patent, a hydrophobic drug solution and a hydrophilic excipient solution are spray dried together to form dry powders containing the drug and the excipient. To solve the incompatibility between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic components, the hydrophilic and hydrophobic components are separately dissolved in different solvents, and separately directed simultaneously through a nozzle into a spray dryer. In this method, the two liquid components are separately delivered to 3
\O
the nozzle that atomizes the two liquid components into droplets that are dried in a spray dryer to form dry particles.
IND One of the drawbacks of the method and apparatus of the Gordon patent is that 0 there is no complete mixing of the two liquid components before being atomized into 00 droplets. Thus, the droplets that are produced are unlikely to be a homogeneous mixture O0 of the two liquid components, nor is there likely to be uniformity among the droplets.
Consequently, the particles that are produced are unlikely to contain a homogeneous O mixture of the drug and excipients, and are unlikely to have uniformity among the Sparticles themselves. Thus, there is a need in the art for an improved method and apparatus for producing dry particles that contain a homogenous mixture of drug and excipient components, with improved uniformity among the particles. There is a particular need in the art for such a method and apparatus where the drug component and excipient component are physically or chemically incompatible in the liquid state.
One important application for dry powder compositions is pulmonary drug delivery. Several properties of the dry particles have been identified that correlate with enhanced delivery to the pulmonary system. For example, it has been found that particles having a tap density less than 0.4 g/cm 3 and an aerodynamic diameter that is between about 1 and about 3 microns (pm) are well suited for delivery to the alveoli or the deep lung. If delivery to the central or upper airways is desired, particles having larger aerodynamic diameters, ranging for example, from about 3 to about 5 microns are preferred. Furthermore, particles having a geometric diameter greater than about microns are believed to more successfully avoid phagocytic engulfment by alveolar macrophages and clearance from the lungs.
There is a need in the art for improved methods for producing particles having selected geometric and aerodynamic sizes optimized for delivery to targeted sites of the pulmonary system. There is a particular need for an apparatus and method that allows for optimization of particle size in real-time, during the particle production process.
The apparatus and method of the present invention, a description of which is fully set forth below, solve the aforementioned problems and difficulties with conventional approaches to producing dry powder compositions.
SAccording to one aspect of the invention there is provided apparatus for IDpreparing a dry powder composition, comprising: 0 a static mixer having an inlet end and an outlet end, said static 00 mixer operative to combine an aqueous component with an organic 00 5 component to form a combination; c-i a means for transporting the aqueous component to the inlet end of said Sstatic mixer; a means for transporting the organic component to the inlet end of said static mixer; 7 05/09/06 i- an atomizer in fluid communication with the outlet end of said static IDmixer, whereby the combination is atomized to form droplets; and 0 a dryer, wherein the droplets are dried in said dryer to form dry particles.
00 Preferably, the atomizer comprises a rotary atomizer having a plurality of 00 5 vanes. The atomizer may comprise an internal mixing nozzle which may be a single-hole nozzle or a six-hole nozzle.
In a preferred form of the invention, the nozzle comprises a mixing chamber, and a liquid feed inlet to the mixing chamber, wherein the liquid feed inlet is positioned at an angle to a longitudinal axis of the nozzle to thereby generate a thin sheet of liquid in the mixing chamber.
The nozzle may be a pressure nozzle and the atomizer may comprise an external mixing nozzle.
05/09/06 IDThe dryer may use nitrogen gas to dry the droplets.
0 The apparatus may further include a bag filter coupled to an output of 00oo the dryer, the dry particles being retained by the bag filter.
IND
oo 5 The means for transporting the aqueous component may comprise a c first pump and the means for transporting the organic component may Scomprise a second pump. The first and second pumps may transport the aqueous component and the organic component at different rates.
05/09/06 i- The apparatus may further include:- IDa geometric particle sizer coupled to said dryer, wherein said 0 geometric particle sizer determines a geometric diameter of the 00oo dry particles; and
IND
oo an aerodynamic particle sizer coupled to said dryer, wherein said c aerodynamic particle sizer determines an aerodynamic diameter
IND
Sof the dry particles.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. The left most digit(s) of a reference number indicates the figure in which the reference number first appears.
FIG. 1A illustrates flow through a static mixer; 05/09/06 SFIG. 1B shows a static mixer suitable for use with the present invention; IND FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a system of the present invention for producing dry particles; 00oo FIG. 3 shows a vaned rotary atomizer suitable for use with the present oo 5 invention; SFIG. 4A illustrates one embodiment of an internal mixing nozzle suitable
IND
Sfor use with the present invention; FIG. 4B illustrates another embodiment of an internal mixing nozzle suitable for use with the present invention; FIG. 4C illustrates yet another embodiment of an internal mixing nozzle suitable for use with the present invention; 05/09/06 FIG. 4D illustrates still another embodiment of an internal mixing nozzle IND suitable for use with the present invention;
O
FIG. 4E illustrates another embodiment of a nozzle suitable for use with oo the 05/09/06 present invention; FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of an external mixing nozzle suitable for use with the present invention; FIG. 6 illustrates an alternate embodiment of a system of the present invention 0 for producing dry particles; 00 FIG. 7 shows a flow chart of one embodiment of a process of the present invention for optimizing particle size; SFIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of a computer system suitable for use with the present invention; FIG. 9 shows a graph of mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) as measured using the system and method of the present invention versus MMAD measured using a multi-stage liquid impinger (MSLI); and FIG 10. shows a graph that illustrates the effect of the order of addition on soluble aggregate (dimer) levels as a function of ethanol concentration.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Overview The present invention is directed to apparatus and methods for preparing dry particles. The present invention has particular applicability for preparing dry particles, and dry powder compositions, for inhalation into the lung for therapeutic purposes.
Particularly, preferred dry particles include those described and disclosed in the following eleven applications: "Inhalable Sustained Therapeutic Formulations," Appl.
No. 60/366,479 (filed March 20, 2002); "Inhalable Salmeterol and Ipratropium Compositions," Appl. No. 60/366,449 (filed March 20, 2002); "Inhalable Salmeterol and Ipratropium Compositions," Appl. No. 60/366,354 (filed March 20, 2002); "Inhalable Salmeterol and Ipratropium Compositions," Appl. No. 60/366,470 (filed March 2002); "Inhalable Salmeterol and Ipratropium Compositions," Appl. No. 60/366,487 (filed March 20, 2002); "Inhalable Salmeterol and Ipratropium Compositions," Appl.
No. 60/366,440 (filed March 20, 2002); "hGH (Human Growth Hormone) Formulations
ID
NO
O
for Pulmonary Administration," Appl. No. 60/366,488 (filed March 20, 2002); "Pulmonary Delivery for LevoDOPA," Appl. No. 60/366,471 (filed March 20, 2002); "Inhalable Sustained Therapeutic Formulations," Appl. No. xx/xxx,xxx, Attorney Docket 00 No. 2685.2034-001 US (filed March 19, 2003); "hGH (Human Growth Hormone) 00 Formulations for Pulmonary Administration," Appl. No. xx/xxx,xxx, Attorney Docket SNo. 2685.2040-001 US (filed March 19, 2003); and "Pulmonary Delivery for SLevoDOPA," Appl. No. xx/xxxxxx, Attorney Docket No. 2685.2044-001 US (filed O March 19, 2003), the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference. The description that follows will provide examples of preparing such dry particles. However, it should be understood by one skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to preparing dry particles, or dry powder compositions, suitable for inhalation into the lung, and that dry particles for other purposes can be prepared. As used herein, the term "dry" refers to particles that have a moisture and/or residual solvent content such that the powder is physically and chemically stable in storage at room temperature, and is readily dispersible in an inhalation device to form an aerosol. The moisture and residual solvent content of the particles can be below 10 wt%, can be below 7 wt%, or can be lower.
fhe present invention solves the problems associated with preparing dry particles that contain incompatible components by providing a method and apparatus that ensures a homogeneous mixture of the components in the finished dry particle product, and improves uniformity among the particles themselves. As used herein, "incompatible components" refers to components that may be chemically or physically incompatible with each other when in contact. One example of incompatible components is a protein in aqueous solution in which the protein is stable, and an organic solution containing hydrophobic substances. The aqueous protein solution is incompatible with the hydrophobic organic solution since the organic solution will cause degradation of the protein. In the method of the present invention, the incompatible components, such as a hydrophilic component and a hydrophobic component, are prepared and maintained separately from each other until just prior to the particle production process. The term "hydrophobic component" refers to materials that are insoluble or sparingly or poorly soluble in water. Such compositions typically have a solubility below 5 mg/ml, usually below 1 mg/ml, in water. The term "hydrophilic component" refers to materials that are highly soluble in water. Typical aqueous solubilities of hydrophilic components will be (Nj greater than 5 mg/mI, usually greater than 50 mg/mI, and can be greater than 100 mg/mI.
The incompatible hydrophobic and hydrophilic components are combined in a static mixer to form a combination that is a homogeneous mixture of the incompatible components. Immediately thereafter, the combination is atomized into droplets that are dried to form the dry particles. Through the use of the static mixer, the incompatible 00 components can be very rapidly combined into a homogeneous mixture. The use of the 00 static mixer significantly reduces the amount of time the incompatible components are in contact with each other, thereby minimizing or eliminating the degradation effects IND resulting from such contact. The use of the static mixer also ensures a complete mixing of the incompatible components before atomnization so that each droplet, and thus each finished dry particle, has substantially the same composition. Uniformity in the composition of the particles at the particle scale is a significant factor in the efficacy of the dry particles when used for therapeutic purposes.
When preparing dry particles and dry powder compositions for inhalation, it is desirable to increase the porosity of the particles so that the particles can be inhaled into the lung, preferably into the deep lung. The present invention advantageously optimizes process conditions for increasing and controlling particle porosity. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, an internal mixing two-fluid nozzle is used to atomize a liquid feed stream to form atomized droplets. In an internal mixing two-fluid nozzle, one or more gas streams impinge upon a liquid feed stream to atomize the liquid feed stream into atomized droplets that exit the nozzle. Such a nozzle allows for intimate contact between the gas (such as nitrogen) and the liquid feed stream. This increases the amount of gas in the liquid feed stream and the resulting droplets. When the droplets are dried, the exiting gas contributes to the porosity of the finished dry particles. Increased gas in the droplets can also be achieved through the use of amrnonium bicarbonate, or other volatile salts, in the liquid feed streamn. In alternative embodiments of the present invention, a variety of nozzle types may be used, including but not limited to a singlehole nozzle, a six-hole nozzle, and a pressure nozzle.
If dry particles are being produced for inhalation into the lung, then it is important to control the size of the particles during the production process. The particles can be characterized by aerodynamic diameter (da) and geometric diameter (dg).
Aerodynamic diameter can be determined using a "time-of- flight" measurement system _1
O
00 havailable from TSI, Inc., St. Paul, MN. Such a device measures the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of the particles, as well as complete particle size N distributions (PSD).
Laser diffraction techniques can be used to determine particle geometric diameter. One such device is the Insitec online particle sizer, available from Malvem Instruments Ltd. The Insitec device consists of an optical sensor head, a signal processing unit, and a computer for instrument control and data collection and analysis.
The Insitec device measures volume median geometric diameter (VMGD) of the particles in real-time as they are produced. In addition to VMGD, the Insitec device generates complete particle size distributions (PSD), which allows an operator to visually determine the polydispersity of the particles being generated.
Through the apparatus and method of the present invention, optimization of particle size is accomplished in real-time during particle production. In the process of the present invention, the density of the particles is used as an optimization variable. The density of the particles is adjusted until the measured geometric diameter is equal to the geometric diameter calculated from the equation da d s g ,p One significant advantage of this method is that the liquid stream to be atomized and dried into particles needs to be sprayed for only about three minutes to collect sufficient data to optimize the process variables. This allows for the rapid screening of multiple process conditions using a minimal amount of material. Moreover, the total length of spraying time and material required is significantly reduced.
The size distribution of airborne particles can be measured through gravimetric analysis through the use of, for example, an Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI), Anderson Instruments, Smyrna, GA. The ACI is a multi-stage device that separates aerosols into distinct fractions based on aerodynamic size. The size cutoffs of each stage are dependent upon the flow rate at which the ACI is operated. For the examples and discussion herein, a flow rate of 60 L/min is used, unless indicated otherwise.
13 t" At each stage of the ACI, an aerosol stream passes through a series of nozzles, Cd and impinges upon an impaction plate. Particles with sufficient inertia impact the plate, while those with insufficient inertia to impact the plate remain in the aerosol stream, and O are carried to the next stage. Each successive stage has a higher aerosol velocity in the nozzle so that smaller diameter particles are collected at each successive stage. Particles 00 too small to be collected on the last stage are collected on a collection filter.
00 A two-stage ACI (ACI-2) is particularly advantageous for characterizing and kD optimizing dry particles for inhalation. The first fraction is referred to as or Fine Particle Fraction This fraction corresponds to the percentage of particles having an aerodynamic diameter of less than 5.6 um. The fraction of the particles that passes this stage and is deposited on the collection filter is referred to as or Fine Particle Fraction This fraction corresponds to the percentage of particles having an aerodynamic diameter of less than 3.4 am. FPF(5.6) has been demonstrated to correlate to the fraction of the dry particles that is capable of inhalation into the lung of a patient. FPF(3.4) has been demonstrated to correlate to that fraction that is capable of reaching the deep lung of a patient. The foregoing correlations provide a quantitative indicator that can be used with the process of the present invention to optimize the production process and the resulting finished dry particles for inhalation into the lung.
In a further embodiment, a three-stage ACI (ACI-3) is used for particle characterization and optimization. The ACI-3 consists of only the top three stages of the eight-stage ACI and allows for the collection of three separate powder fractions. For example, the ACI-3 configuration can consist of 20 pm pore (stages -1 and 1) and 150 gm pore (stage 2) stainless steel screens which can be saturated with methanol. The fraction of the powder that passes the final stage of ACI-3 is referred to as FPF(3.3) Apparatus and Methods of the Present Invention The apparatus and methods of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures. As will be described below in more detail with respect to FIG. 2, a static mixer is used to combine two liquid components to form a combination. The combination is atomized to produce droplets that are dried to form dry particles. In one embodiment of the present invention, the two liquid components are a hydrophilic component and a hydrophobic component. In another embodiment, the two V- components are such that combining the two causes degradation in one of the N components. In yet another embodiment, one component is a hydrophilic component and the other component is an organic solvent.
00 IN Static or motionless mixers consist of a conduit or tube in which is received a number of static mixing elements. Static mixers provide uniform mixing in a relatively 1short length of conduit, and in a relatively short period of time. With static mixers, the Sfluid moves through the mixer, rather than some part of the mixer, such as a blade, C moving through the fluid. Flow through one embodiment of a static mixer is illustrated in FIG. 1A. A pump (not shown) introduces a stream of one or more fluids into an inlet end of a static mixer 10 as shown generally at 1. The stream is split and forced to opposite outside walls as shown generally at 2. A vortex is created axial to the centerline of static mixer 10, as shown generally at 3. The vortex is sheared and the process recurs, but with the opposite rotation, as shown generally at 4. The clockwise/counter-clockwise motion ensures a homogeneous product that exits an outlet end of static mixer One embodiment of a static mixer is shown in FIG. lB. Static mixer 10 includes a number of stationary or static mixing elements 14 arranged in a series within a conduit or pipe 12. The number of elements can range from, for example, 4 to 32 or more.
Conduit 12 is circular in cross-section and open at opposite ends for introducing (inlet end 18) and withdrawing (outlet end 16) fluids. Mixing element 14 comprises segments 142. Each segment 142 consists of a plurality of generally flat plates or vanes 144. The two substantially identical segments 142 are preferably axially staggered with respect to each other. A static mixer as shown in FIG. 1B is more fully described in U.S. Patent No.
4,511,258, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Turning now to FIG. 2, one embodiment of a system of the present invention for producing dry particles is shown. The system includes a first feed vessel 210 and a second feed vessel 220. As will be explained in more detail below with respect to the various examples, feed vessel 210 can contain, for example, a hydrophilic component, an aqueous solution, or other suitable liquid component. Feed vessel 220 can contain, for example, a hydrophobic component, an organic solution, or other suitable liquid component. The contents of feed vessel 210 and feed vessel 220 are transported, via suitable means, to an inlet end of a static mixer 230. In one embodiment of the present invention, the means for transporting is a first pump 212 for the contents of feed vessel 210, and a second pump 222 for the contents of feed vessel 220. Alternatively, a single pump could be used to transport the contents of feed vessels 210 and 220 to the inlet end IND of static mixer 230. As would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, other means for transporting the contents of feed vessels 210 and 220 could be used. In one 00 embodiment of the present invention, feed vessels 210 and 220 contain the same volume 00 of liquid, and pumps 212 and 222 are operated at substantially the same rate. In other embodiments, pumps 212 and 222 are operated at different rates. Pumps 212 and 222 IND may be gear pumps, or other types of pumps as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
The contents of feed vessels 210 and 220 are combined in static mixer 230 to form a combination. The combination is a homogeneous mixture of the liquid components entering the inlet end of static mixer 230. As illustrated in FIG. 2, static mixer 230 may be oriented in a horizontal configuration, a central axis of static mixer 230 is perpendicular to a central axis of a spray dryer 250. Preferably, static mixer 230 Is oriented in a vertical configuration, as shown, for example, in FIG. 6 (discussed in more detail below). Static mixers suitable for use with the present invention are illustrated in FIGS. IA and IB, and include model 1/4-21 made by Koflo Corporation and the ISG (Interfacial Surface Generator Mixer (Catalog #S01-012) made by Ross Engineering, Inc., Savannah, Georgia. The ISG Mixer comprises mixing elements enclosed in a pipe housing and shaped so that adjacent elements form a tetrahedral chamber. Holes through the elements provide the flow path.
An outlet end of static mixer 230 is in fluid communication with an atomizer 240. Atomizer 240 atomizes the combination flowing out of static mixer 230 into droplets. Because the combination flowing out of static mixer 230 is a homogeneous mixture of the input liquid components, the droplets formed by atomizer 240 will also contain a homogeneous mixture of the input liquid components. Atomizers suitable for use with the present invention include, but are not limited to, rotary atomizers, two-fluid mixing nozzles, and pressure, ultrasonic, vibrating plate, and electrostatic nozzles, and combinations of the foregoing. Atomizers suitable for use with the present invention will be described in more detail below with respect to FIGS.
NO
0 c pe In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the combination formed in 0 static mixer 230 is atomized immediately after the combination is formed. That is, the outflow of static mixer 230 flows into atomizer 240 for atomization. This is particularly 00 advantageous when first feed vessel 210 and second feed vessel 220 contain incompatible 00 components since the contact between the incompatible components will be minimized.
Nin The droplets formed by atomizer 240 are dried in spray dryer 250 to form dry Sparticles. Because the droplets formed by atomizer 240 contain a homogeneous mixture of the input liquid components, the dry particles formed by spray dryer 250 will also contain a homogeneous mixture of the input liquid components. Spray dryers suitable for use with the present invention include a Mobile Minor, EX Model manufactured by Niro, Columbia, MD. Other commercially available spray dryers from suppliers such as Niro, APV Systems, Denmark the APV Anhydro Model), and Swenson, Harvey, IL, also can be employed, as can scaled-up spray dryers suitable for industrial capacity production lines.
.k drying gas is used in spray dryer 250 to dry the droplets to form dried particles. Examples of gases suitable for use with the present invention include, but are not limited to, air, nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide, helium, and combinations or mixtures thereof. In a preferred embodiment, nitrogen gas is used. As illustrated in FIG. 2, a nitrogen gas supply 252 is coupled to spray dryer 250, through suitable valves and regulators as would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
A bag house 260 is coupled to an outlet end 254 of spray dryer 250. Disposed within bag house 260 is a bag filter 262. A gas-solid stream, made up of the drying gas and the dry particles, exits outlet end 254. Exhaust lines 266 provide exhaust for spray dryer 250 and bag house 260. The gas-solid stream exiting spray dryer 250 enters bag house 260. Bag filter 262 retains the dry particles, and allows the hot gas stream, containing the drying gas, and evaporated water and solvents, to pass. Preferably, bag filter 262 is made from a material such as Gore-Tex®, available from W.L. Gore Associate, Inc., Newark, DE. Dry particles are collected at a product collection point 264 by running a back pulse of nitrogen across bag filter 262.
The collected particles can then be screened, for example, using size screening methods known to one skilled in the art. In one embodiment of the present invention,
/I
N single dosages of the collected dry particles are measured, and the single dosages are then Spackaged, using techniques well known to one skilled in the art. in this manner, a unit dose of a dry powder composition can be formed by placing a therapeutically effective O amount of dry powder composition made up of particles into a unit dose receptacle.
00 One embodiment of an atomizer suitable for use with the system depicted in IN FIG. 2 is a vaned rotary atomizer, such as rotary atomizer 300 illustrated in FIG. 3.
Rotary atomizer 300 includes a spinning wheel 320 that spins about an axis 330. Liquid f feed enters rotary atomizer 300 at an inlet point 302, and is distributed across wheel 320, as depicted generally at 304. Wheel 320 disperses the liquid feed into a spray of fine droplets. The spin rate of the wheel is controlled, as is the liquid feed rate. By controlling the spin rate and liquid feed rate, the characteristics of the spray can be controlled, such as droplet size. Rotary atomizer 300 is configured with 24 vanes 310. It should be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that rotary atomizers with other number of vanes 310 can be used with the present invention. For example, a rotary atomizer having 4 vanes, or a vaneless rotary atomizer, could also be used.
Alternate embodiments of an atomizer suitable for use with the system shown in FIG. 2 are shown in FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, and 5. FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, and depict two-fluid nozzles that atomize a liquid feed stream through the use of one or more gas streams that impinge upon the liquid feed stream. One example of an internal mixing nozzle 400, is illustrated in FIG. 4A. In the internal mixing nozzle 400, gas 420 impinges on a liquid feed stream 410 in a mixing chamber 430 that is internal to internal mixing nozzle 400. A spray of atomized droplets 440 exits internal mixing nozzle 400 through a single hole. As would be apparent to one skilled in the art, any number of gas streams, including a single gas stream, could be used.
I FIG. 4B illustrates another example of an internal mixing nozzle, a single-hole nozzle 450. The single-hole nozzle 450 operates under the same principles as the internal mixing nozzle 400 depicted in FIG 4A. The gas is supplied through inlet 451, and the liquid is supplied through inlet 452. The gas impinges on the liquid in a mixing chamber 458 in air cap 453. A spray of atomized droplets 457 exits the single-hole nozzle 450 through a single hole. The single-hole nozzle comprises an air cap 453, a fluid cap 454, a retainer ring 455, and a gasket 456.
j FIG. 4C illustrates another example of an internal mixing nozzle, a six-hole nozzle 460. The six-hole nozzle operates under the same principles as the single-hole nozzle, except that the air cap 461 in the six-hole nozzle has six holes 462. The gas is 00 supplied through inlet 463, and the liquid is supplied through inlet 464. The gas impinges 00 on the liquid in a mixing chamber 468 in air cap 461. Sprays of atomized droplets 469 F"- Sexit the six-hole nozzle 460 through holes 462. The six-hole nozzle comprises an air cap ,O 461, a fluid cap 465, a retainer ring 466, and a gasket 467.
c FIG. 4D illustrates yet another example of an internal mixing nozzle, a sheeting action nozzle 470. While this nozzle operates under principles similar to the single-hole and six-hole nozzles, the different configuration of the nozzle depicted in FIG. 4D results in a different atomizing effect. In nozzle 470, the liquid feed stream 471 enters the mixing chamber 472 in a direction angular, and preferably lateral, to the nozzle's longitudinal axis. Liquid feed stream 471 enters the mixing chamber 472 through a liquid feed inlet 476, which is at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the nozzle 470. The liquid flows to and down the sides of the mixing chamber 472 in a thin sheet. The gas 473 impinges upon the thin sheet of liquid at the nozzle hole 474. A spray of atomized droplets 475 exits the nozzle 470. One example of a nozzle similar in design to the nozzle depicted in FIG. 4D is the Flomax series of nozzles (Catalog #FM1) manufactured by Spraying Systems Co., Wheaton, Illinois.
FIG. 4E illustrates yet another example of a nozzle, a pressure nozzle 480, suitable for use with the system shown in FIG. 2. The pressure nozzle 480 does not need a gas stream to atomize droplets. Instead, it uses the pressure of the liquid to spray atomized droplets from the nozzle 480. Pressure applied to the liquid within the nozzle 480 forces the liquid out of the nozzle hole 481. A rotational force is imparted to the liquid before it reaches the nozzle hole 481. This rotational force may be applied, for example, by a slotted insert 482 featuring multiple small cross-sectional feed inserts 483 leading to the nozzle hole 481. In the example depicted in FIG. 4E, the cross-sectional feed inserts 483 are aligned on a diagonal to the nozzle hole 481. The spray of atomized droplets from each of the cross-sectional feed inserts 483 therefore exits the nozzle hole 481 with angular momentum. Collectively, the angular momentum in the sprays from each of the cross-sectional feed inserts 483 yields a conical spray of atomized droplets.
FIG. 5 depicts an external mixing nozzle 500. In external mixing nozzle two gas streams 520 impinge on a liquid feed stream 510 in a mixing zone 530 that is adjacent to the external edge of external mixing nozzle 500. A spray of atomized IND droplets 540 is formed external to external mixing nozzle 500. As would be apparent to one skilled in the art, other numbers of gas streams, including a single gas stream, could 00 be used.
00 In order to produce particles optimized for inhalation and pulmonary drug delivery, optimization experiments were conducted to enhance porosity during the atomization step of the dry particle production process. Through these experiments it was determined that changing the mode of atomnization affects porosity, and that porosity can be controlled through the selection of the type of atomizer.
Three rotary atomizers were tested, all of which had a configuration substantially as shown in FIG. 3. The three atomizers differed in the number of vanes 310 on wheel 320. One had four vanes one had 24 vanes and one was vaneless. The V4 and the V24 wheels were operated using similar process conditions, shown below in Table 1, to obtain particles with similar geometric sizes, shown below in Table 2. Because of the increased number of vanes, the V24 wheel could not be operated at as a high an rpm as the V4 wheel.
Wnet Outlet Atomizer Drying Gas Atomizer Temperature Temperature Speed Pressure Feed Rate Wheel (OC) (rpm) (mmHzO) (niL/mm) V4 120 55 50000 98 63 V24 120 62 34000 110 TABLE I Geometric Size Measured Fine Particle Fraction Run Wheel 0.5 bar 2 bar 3 bar 4 bar 5.6 lim 3.4 pm Number Type 294053 V4 9.5 8.9 8 6.7 72 56 294054 V24 1 9.2 7.5 6.5 5.3 65 48 TABLE 2 The data in Table 2 suggest that particles produced using the V4 wheel are larger and more porous have higher FPF(5.6) and FPF(3.4)) than particles produced using the V24 wheel. One reason for this difference could be differences in "air 0 pumping" between the two atomizers. "Air pumping" occurs with rotary atomizers because, as the wheels spin, the wheels act as a fan, drawing air through the wheel. At
OO
O0 the flow or feed rates to the atomizers typically used with the present invention, the V24 0 vanes do not completely fill with liquid. Consequently, there is a path for the air to flow Sover the liquid in the vane, with only a portion being entrained in the liquid to be atomized. The V4 vanes operate similarly, but because the vanes are physically smaller, Sthe V4 vanes are usually filled with liquid during operation. Consequently, the air and atomization gas must both pass simultaneously through the vane, rather than over the vane. This allows for a more intimate contact between the air and liquid to be atomized.
This intimate contact between gas and liquid induces more porosity in the resulting dry particle.
S The increase of porosity in the particles resulting from the gas/liquid contact can be seen by comparing the particles produced with vaned atomizers with particles produced using a vaneless atomizer. Vaneless atomizers do not generate a strong air pumping effect. A V4 and a vaneless atomizer were operated using similar process conditions, shown below in Table 3. As can be seen from Table 4, the particles produced using the vaneless atomizer were both smaller and more dense (lower FPF(5.6) and FPF(3.4)) than the particles produced using the V4 atomizer.
Inlet Outlet Atomizer Drying Gas Atomizer Temperature Temperature Speed Pressure Feed Rate Wheel (rpm) (mmH 2 0) (mL/min) V4 155 63 60000 98 52.5 Vaneless 155 63 50000 98 52.5 TABLE 3 Geometric Size Measured Fine Particle Fraction Run Wheel 0.5 bar 2 bar 3 bar 4 bar <5.6 lm <3.4 pm Number Type 294088 V4 14.2 12.5 11.2 9.9 70 294089 Vaneless 5.4 5 4.8 4.2 63 TABLE 4 (In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a two-fluid nozzle is used to increase the contact between gas and liquid during the atomization step to increase the Sporosity of the resulting dry particles. As described above, a two-fluid nozzle is I configured to allow for mixing of two fluids, such as a gas and a liquid, during atomization. The mixing can occur either externally (using, for example, a nozzle such as 00 that shown in FIG. 5) or internally (using, for example, a nozzle such as that shown in 00 FIG. 4A, 4B, 4C, or 4D) with respect to the nozzle itself. Examples using the mixing O nozzles shown in FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, or 4E are disclosed below in connection with IND Tables 14-25.
C1 Experiments were conducted with an external mixing nozzle substantially as shown in FIG. 5 at nozzle or system pressures ranging from 15 to 40 psi. As shown below in Table 5, the FPF(5.6) ranged from 76 to 81% and the FPF(3.4) ranged from 59 to 63%. Changes in porosity as a function of increasing gas rates were not observed with external mixing nozzles.
System Geometric Size Measured Fine Particle Fraction Run Nozzle Number Pressure (psi) 0.5 bar 2 bar 3 bar 4 bar <5.6 pm 3.4 tm 294141 15 9.4 8.4 7.3 5.3 81 63 294132C 20 9.5 7.5 6.7 4.9 77 61 294132B 40 8.4 9.4 7.1 6.4 76 59 TABLE Experiments were conducted using an internal mixing nozzle substantially as shown in FIG. 4A. Use of internal mixing nozzles likely allows for more intimate contact between the liquid and gas, thereby resulting in dry particles having higher porosity, as evidenced by higher FPF(5.6) and FPF(3.4). Experiments were conducted to test the effect of nozzle pressure and the effect of the mass flow ratio of gas to liquid. As evidenced by the data in Table 6 below, more porous particles can be obtained at higher operating pressures with an internal mixing nozzle. The pressure effect may be a reflection of the higher gas/liquid ratio of run 294152A compared to that of run 294151 As evidenced by the data in Table 7 below, more porous particles can be obtained at higher gas:liquid flow rates with an internal mixing nozzle. The operating conditions for use with an internal mixing nozzle that optimized the geometric size and the porosity/fine particle fraction are shown below in Table 8.
oZ Geometric Size Measured Run Number System Nozzle Pressure (psi) 0.5 bar 2 bar 3 bar 4 bar Fine Particle Fraction 5.6 pm 3 4 Am 76 64 R 3bar 4ba 294151 68 294152A 100 12 10.3 8.8 11.5 8.8 8.3 TABLE6 Geometric Size Measured Fine Particle Fraction Run Gas/Liquid Number Ratio 0.5 bar 2 bar 3 bar 4 bar 5.6 pm <3.4 pm 294150A 1 12.9 12.3 10.1 8.1 76 64 294150C 1.5 14 11.8 9.8 7.8 82 TABLE 7 System Geometric Size Measured Fine Particle Fraction Nozzle Run Gas/Liquid Pressure Number Ratio (ps) 0.5 bar 2 bar 3 bar 4 bar 5.6 pm <3.4 pm 342012B 1.9 58 10.8 10.4 8 6.5 90 81 TABLE 8 As noted above, the present invention advantageously optimizes process conditions for increasing and controlling the porosity of the dry particles through the use of the internal mixing two-fluid nozzle. In another aspect of the present invention, particle porosity is increased through the use of volatile salts. Carbonation of one of the liquid components used to form the dry particles induces porosity in the resulting dried particles by nucleation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 The nucleation of CO 2 induces multiple phases (gas and liquid) in an atomized droplet, with the gas phase being inaccessible for the excipients. Such heterogeneous nature of the atomized droplet leads to increased porosity in the resulting dry particle once drying is complete. The tap density of the dry particles can be used as a measure of porosity. The more porous the dry particles, the lower the observed tap density. It has been found that particles spray dried from a carbonated formulation solution have much lower tap density than particles spray dried from an otherwise identical solution.
An experiment was conducted using a formulation of 60/18/18/4 (DPPC/ Lactose/Albumin/Albuterol sulfate). Four batches were prepared. The aqueous phase of two batches were sparged with CO 2 the other two were not treated with CO 2 The spray dry conditions were well controlled for all four batches so that they were operated at the same process condition. A vaned rotary atomizer (V24) was used in this experiment.
The results are shown in Table 9 below.
Batch Sparging Outlet T Feed Rate Atomizer Tap Density No. CO, Inlet T (ml/min) Speed (rpm) (g/cc) 1 No 110 56-57 40 18000 0.09 2 Yes 110 56-57 40 18000 0.065 3 No 110 56-57 40 18000 0.091 4 Yes 110 56-57 40 18000 0.059 TABLE9 From the data shown in Table 9 above, it is quite clear that particles manufactured by the solution sparged with CO 2 have lower tap density, with a more porous structure. Therefore, sparging the spray drying solution with CO 2 helps to increase porosity of the particles.
In a preferred aspect of the present invention, increased porosity, and consequently lower tap density, can be achieved through the use of ammonium bicarbonate (NH 4
HCO
3 in one of the liquid components used to form the dry particles.
In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, carbonation of one of the liquid components, or of the combination solution, could be achieved by sparging with CO 2 at reduced temperature (4 0 C) or pressurizing with CO 2 also preferably at reduced temperature. The carbonate components (HCO 3
CO
3 2 C0 2 would not remain in the final dry particles as they are volatile species. They would be eliminated during the drying process. Use of carbonate components or other volatile salts have the advantage of avoiding the use of higher temperatures for inducing porosity. Additionally, carbonate components can advantageously be used over mild pH ranges where protein stability is maximized. Moreover, the pH of the resulting dry particles can be adjusted through the addition of appropriate counter ions.
As described above, the addition of volatile salts to the solution used to form dry particles increases the porosity of the particles. The addition of volatile salts also increases the production of insoluble complexes, the production of which can be used to control the release rate of the active agent in the particles, both proteins and small molecules. The formation of an insoluble complex begins with the interaction between, ij for example, two species when they are dissolved together. In solution, molecules of opposite charge are attracted to each other via electrostatic forces. When the ionic species are limited to oppositely charged forms A and B, then A and B will attract to each 00 other. If A and B interact strongly enough, they are likely to form an insoluble complex 00 AxBy, where x and y are the stoichiometric coefficients describing the ratio(s) with which SA and B tend to associate. This complex can stay in suspension, or may form a IN precipitate that will settle or flocculate. If additional ionic species are present, the Sadditional species will compete with A and B on a charge basis and tend to reduce the strength of the interaction between A and B, thereby decreasing the tendency of A and B to form an insoluble complex. If the additional ionic species can be selectively removed, A and B will then form an insoluble complex.
Insoluble material can interfere with the production of large porous particles that are of particular utility for pulmonary drug delivery. It is often desirable to have large porous particles that contain species A and B, where A and B have the tendency to form an insoluble complex AxBy. Higher ionic strength decreases the strength of the interaction between A and B, rendering A and B more soluble in the process solution. As the material is spray dried, the volatile salt is preferentially removed from the droplets as the dry particles are formed. The insoluble complex ABy may subsequently form in the nearly-dried particles, but the porous structure has already formed in those particles.
The following non-limiting examples illustrate the use of ammonium bicarbonate to produce particles having a low aerodynamic diameter, which results in a low tap density and high porosity. It should be understood by one skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the use of ammonium bicarbonate, and that other suitable volatile salts could also be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
Examples Porous Bovine Albumin Particles 350 mg of bovine serum albumin, 100 mg of anhydrous sodium citrate, 66 mg of calcium chloride dihydrate, and 10 g of ammonium bicarbonate were dissolved in 500 mL of sterile water. The resulting feed solution was spray dried using a Niro spray dryer equipped with a rotary atomizer. The drying gas (dry nitrogen) was delivered at a flow 19S rate of approximately 100 kg/h with a 170 0 C inlet temperature, and a 61 0 C outlet temperature. The feed solution was delivered to the atomizer/spray dryer at 60 ml/min Sliquid flow rate. The atomizer was operated at 29,000 rpm, with -2 inches of water I pressure in the spraying chamber of the spray dryer. The resulting dry particles had a mass mean aerodynamic diameter of 4.03 pm, and a volume mean geometric diameter of 00 7.76 gm at 1 bar.
OO
00 48 mg of bovine serum albumin, 20 mg of anhydrous sodium citrate, 13 mg of Cr calcium chloride dihydrate, 28 mg of maltodextrin (Ml00) and 10 g of ammonium Sbicarbonate were dissolved in 1000 mL of sterile water. The resulting feed solution was Cr spray dried using a Niro spray dryer equipped with a rotary atomizer. The drying gas (dry nitrogen) was delivered at a flow rate of approximately 100 kg/h with a 170 0 C inlet temperature, and a 56 0 C outlet temperature. The feed solution was delivered to the atomizer/spray dryer at 60 ml/min liquid flow rate. The atomizer was operated at 29,000 rpm, with -2 inches of water pressure in the spraying chamber of the spray dryer. The resulting dry particles had a mass mean aerodynamic diameter of 3.97 gim, and a volume mean geometric diameter of 15.01 pm at 1 bar.
Porous Humanized IgG Antibody Particles 47.35 ml of 50.7 mg/ml humanized monoclonal IgGI antibody solution was added to 1000 mL water 1.6 g of DPPC was added to 1000 mL isopropyl alcohol. The two solutions were mixed by slowly adding the ethanol solution to the aqueous solution immediately prior to spray drying. The resulting feed solution was spray dried using a Niro spray dryer equipped with a rotary atomizer. The drying gas (dry nitrogen) was delivered at a flow rate of approximately 110 kg/h with a 100 0 C inlet temperature, and a 45°C outlet temperature. The feed solution was delivered to the atomizer/spray dryer at 50 ml/min liquid flow rate. The atomizer was operated at 34,500 rpm, with -2 inches of water pressure in the spraying chamber of the spray dryer. The resulting dry particles had a mass mean aerodynamic diameter of 3.01 pm, and a volume mean geometric diameter of 9.17 um at 1 bar.
Porous Human Growth Hormone Particles 2.63 g hGH, 1.03 g sucrose, 1.58 g leucine, 368 mg sodium phosphate, 26.25 mg and 52.5 g ammonium bicarbonate was added to 3675 mL water (pH=7.4).
c^1 C/ 1575 mL of ethanol was slowly added to the aqueous solution immediately prior to spray I drying. The resulting feed solution was spray dried using a Niro spray dryer equipped with a rotary atomizer. The drying gas (dry nitrogen) was delivered at a flow rate of 00 approximately 110 kg/h with a 139 0 C inlet temperature, and a 62 0 C outlet temperature.
00 The feed solution was delivered to the atomizer/spray dryer at 60 ml/min liquid flow rate.
SThe atomizer was operated at 34,000 rpm, with -5 inches of water pressure in the s spraying chamber of the spray dryer. The resulting dry particles had a mass mean aerodynamic diameter of 1.94 um, and a volume mean geometric diameter of 5.8 Am at I bar.
Particles containing 93 wt% hGH and 7 wt% sodium phosphate were prepared as follows. The aqueous solution was prepared by adding 328 mg of sodium phosphate monobasic to 400 mL of water for irrigation (Braun). The pH was adjusted to 7.4 using N NaOH. 15 g of ammonium bicarbonate (Spectrum Chemicals) was added to the sodium phosphate buffer. 200 mL of ethanol (Pharmco) was added to complete the aqueous solution. The aqueous solution was combined in a static mixer with 400 mL of 14g/L hGH solution (5.6 g hGH dissolved in sodium phosphate buffer at pH=7.4). The combined solution was spray dried under the following process conditions: Inlet temperature 115 0
C
Outlet temperature from the drying drum 70 0
C
Nitrogen drying gas 110 kg/hr Nitrogen atomization gas 46 g/min 2 Fluid internal mixing nozzle atomizer Nitrogen atomization pressure 65 psi Liquid feed rate 25 ml/min Liquid feed temperature 22°C Pressure in drying chamber -2.0 in water The resulting particles had a FPF(5.6) of 84%, and a FPF(3.4) of 77%, both a7
O
Smeasured using a 2-stage ACI. The volume mean geometric diameter was 8.9 pm at bar.
IN Porous Albuterol Sulfate Par'icles mg of albuterol sulfate, 460 mg of maltodextrin, 350 mg of leucine, 110 mg 00 of Pluronic F68, and 10 g of ammonium bicarbonate were dissolved in 500 mL of sterile 00 water. The aqueous solution was mixed with 500 mL of ethanol. The resulting feed solution was spray dried using a Niro spray dryer equipped with a rotary atomizer. The drying gas (dry nitrogen) was delivered at a flow rate of approximately 100 kg/h with a S150*C inlet temperature, and a 62°C outlet temperature. The feed solution was delivered to the atomizer/spray dryer at 65 ml/min liquid flow rate. The atomizer was operated at 22,000 rpm, with 39 mm of water pressure in the spraying chamber of the spray dryer.
The resulting dry particles had a mass mean aerodynamic diameter of 3.33 gm, and a volume mean geometric diameter of 11.5 pm at 4 bar.
Porous Danazol Particles 800 mg of danazol, 1.6 g of maltodextrin, 1.2 g leucine, 400 mg of polyethyleneglycol (PEG) 1500, and 40 g of ammonium bicarbonate were dissolved in 2 L of sterile water. The aqueous solution was mixed with 2 L of ethanol. The resulting feed solution was spray dried using a Niro spray dryer equipped with a rotary atomizer.
The drying gas (dry nitrogen) was delivered at a flow rate of approximately 100 kg/h with a 155*C inlet temperature, and a 64°C outlet temperature. The feed solution was delivered to the atomizer/spray dryer at 70 ml/min liquid flow rate. The atomizer was operated at 22,000 rpm, with 39 mm of water pressure in the spraying chamber of the spray dryer. The resulting dry particles had a mass mean aerodynamic diameter of 2.69 pm, and a volume mean geometric diameter of 10.6 lpm at 4 bar.
Turning now to FIG. 6, an alternate embodiment of a system 600 for producing dry particles is shown. System 600 will be explained for the exemplary situation of combining an aqueous solution 610 with an ethanol solution 620 to form dry particles.
As would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, system 600 is not limited to use of an aqueous solution and an ethanol solution. For example, system 600 could be used to combine other hydrophilic and hydrophobic components, other aqueous and organic components, or a hydrophilic component and an organic solvent, to form dry particles.
System 600 could also be used to combine two components to form dry particles where N the combination of the two components causes degradation in one of the components.
As illustrated in FIG. 6, aqueous solution 600 is transported via a gear pump 614 00 IN and a flow meter 612 to a static mixer 630. Ethanol (EtOH) solution 620 is transported 00 via a gear pump 624 and a flow meter 622 to static mixer 630. In one embodiment of the present invention, the same volume of aqueous solution 610 and ethanol solution 620 is used, and pumps 614 and 624 are operated at substantially the same rate to deliver the respective solutions to static mixer 630 at substantially the same rate. In other embodiments, pumps 614 and 624 are operated at different rates. As would be apparent to one skilled in the art, the concentration of components in the final dry particles can be used to determine the pump rates for pumps 614 and 624. For example, in one embodiment of the present invention, the volumes of aqueous solution 610 and ethanol solution 620 are selected to each be completely consumed during the spray drying process. In such an embodiment, the pump rates for pumps 614 and 624 are selected so that solutions 610 and 620 are both used up. As would be appreciated by one skilled in the art, other types of pumps, or other means for transporting the solutions to static mixer 630 could be used. Alternatively, a single pump could be used to deliver both solutions to static mixer 630. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 6, static mixer 630 is oriented in a vertical configuration, a central axis of static mixer 630 is parallel to a central axis of a spray dryer 650. Alternatively, static mixer 630 could be configured in an inclined configuration, at an acute angle with respect to the central axis of spray dryer 650. The inclined or vertical configuration of static mixer 630 helps ensure laminar flow, with any bubbling or gassing at the top. Preferably, the inputs to the static mixer flow upwards to provide more homogeneous mixing, and to prevent channeling. Static mixers suitable for use with the present invention are illustrated in FIGS. IA and 1B, and include model 1/4- 21, made by Koflo Corporation.
An outlet end of static mixer 630 is in fluid communication with a two-fluid nozzle 640 that is used to atomize the combination flowing out of static mixer 630 into droplets. In an alternative embodiment of system 600, a rotary atomizer, such as rotary atomizer 300 depicted in FIG. 3, is used in place of nozzle 640. Because the combination flowing out of static mixer 630 is a homogeneous mixture of the input liquid components (aqueous solution and ethanol solution), the droplets formed by nozzle 640 will also a contain a homogeneous mixture of the input liquid components. Nozzle 640 can be an internal mixing nozzle such as that shown in FIG. 4, or an external mixing nozzle such as Vthat shown in FIG. 5. Preferably, nozzle 640 is an internal mixing nozzle.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 6, a nitrogen gas stream 642 is input to nozzle 640 to atomize the combination flowing out of static mixer 630. As discussed above with 00 Irespect to FIGS. 4 and 5, nitrogen gas stream 642 can be a single gas stream, or divided 00 into a plurality of gas streams, to impinge upon the liquid combination to atomize it into ~droplets. As would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, other gases could be used to atomize the liquid combination into droplets, and the present invention is not limited to ~the use of nitrogen as the atomizing gas stream.
The atomized droplets from nozzle 640 are dried in spray dryer 650. Nitrogen from a nitrogen gas supply 652 is heated by a heater 654 and input to spray dryer 650. A flow meter 656 and a temperature measurement point 658 are used to monitor the flow and temperature of the nitrogen gas input to spray dryer 650. As would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, other drying gases could be used in spray dryer 650, such as, but not limited to, air, argon, carbon dioxide, helium, and combinations or mixtures thereof. In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, the drying gas input to spray dryer 650 is the same input used to atomize the liquid combination in nozzle 640. A mixture of gas and dried particles or powder exits from spray dryer 650 at an outlet 659. A flow conditioner 660 and temperature measurement point 662 are used to condition and monitor the characteristics of the gas-powder mixture exiting spray dryer 650. A flow conditioner suitable for use with the present invention is made by Vortab, San Marcos, CA.
SFlow conditioner 660 conditions the gas-powder mixture exiting spray dryer 650 so that the particles contained in the gas stream can be characterized by measuring the geometric diameter and the aerodynamic diameter of the particles. Flow conditioner 660 provides a more homogeneous powder distribution in the piping by imparting turbulent conditions to the gaseous stream. The more homogeneous powder distribution prevents selective or skewed sampling in the downstream sizers. After conditioning by flow conditioner 660, a sample of the gas-powder mixture flows through a geometric sizer 670 and an aerodynamic sizer 672, the operation of which will be discussed in more detail V- below. The sample of the gas-powder mixture is used to determine geometric and O aerodynamic size. After sizing, the sample is deposited on a filter (not shown) for later disposal. The bulk of the gas-powder mixture flows directly out of flow conditioner 660 00 and the dry particles are collected on a bag filter 680 that retains the dry particle product 00 while allowing the gas to pass through to an exhaust 684 and for solvent stripping. The dry particle product is removed from bag filter 680, such as by running a back pulse of IN nitrogen across bag filter 680, and is collected in a product collection vessel 682.
C. Geometric sizer 670 preferably measures volume median geometric diameter (VMGD) of the particles. An exemplary geometric sizer is the Insitec online particle sizer, available from Malvem Instruments Ltd. The Insitec device consists of an optical sensor head, a signal processing unit, and a computer for instrument control and data collection and analysis. Aerodynamic sizer 672 preferably measures mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of the particles. An exemplary aerodynamic sizer is the PS Model 3321, available from TSI, Inc., St. Paul, MN. In one embodiment of the present invention, a computer 674 is coupled to geometric sizer 670 and to aerodynamic sizer 672. Computer 674 is used to carry out the optimization process of the present invention, described in more detail below with respect to FIG. 7. In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, a computer or processor that is part of aerodynamic sizer 672 or geometric sizer 670 is used to carry out the optimization process of the present invention.
Conventional optimization of a spray drying process is a time consuming and material intensive process, requiring the manipulation of multiple process variables, such as inlet temperature, outlet temperature, atomizer speed, drum pressure, gas flow rate, and liquid feed rate, and multiple product formulations. A typical optimization run would involve selecting a formulation and a set of process conditions, spraying the material under the selected conditions, collecting the finished dry particle powder, and characterizing the dry particles using various in vitro techniques, such as laser diffraction techniques (HELOS diffractometer and a RODOS disperser) to measure geometric diameter, an aerosizer to measure aerodynamic diameter, an ACI to measure size distribution, and measurement of tap density. Once the results of the characterization tests were complete, then the process parameters could be adjusted to optimize the characteristics of the particles. Approximately 2-3 g of material, and about two hours, are Srequired for each such optimization run. To completely optimize process conditions to obtain final desired powder characteristics, hundreds of runs may be required. Thus, GO conventional optimization of the spray drying process is inefficient, time consuming, and INO expensive.
The system and method of the present invention significantly decreases the time 00 \0 and material required to optimize the spray drying process. Using the system and method 00 of the present invention, an operator can evaluate particle characteristics in real time during the spray drying process without having to run the traditional in vitro
\D
characterization assays after the fact. Using the system and method of the present C invention, process conditions can be modified in real time to optimize particle size to produce particles having a desired geometric and/or aerodynamic diameter.
Geometric sizer 670 can be used to measure the geometric diameter of the particles, and aerodynamic sizer 672 can be used to measure the aerodynamic diameter of the particles. However, in order for the aerodynamic measurement to be made, the density of the particles must be known prior to the measurement. Density geometric diameter and aerodynamic diameter are related by the following equation: da ds Jp The process of the present invention uses density as the optimization variable to achieve particles having the desired aerodynamic and/or geometric diameters.
One embodiment of a process of the present invention for optimizing particle size is illustrated in FIG. 7. In a step 710, an initial particle density is selected, and provided to aerodynamic sizer 672. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention for preparation of dry particles suitable for inhalation into the lung, preferably into the deep lung, an initial particle density of 0.06 g/cm 3 is used. It should be apparent to one skilled in the art that other initial particle densities can be selected, depending upon the particular particle to be produced. In a step 720, a measured aerodynamic diameter (d m and a measured geometric diameter (d m are obtained using aerodynamic sizer 672 and geometric sizer 670, respectively. In a step 730, a calculated geometric diameter (d c is calculated from the initial particle density and the measured aerodynamic diameter using the equation VJ. dm =dc If the estimated initial particle density 0.06 g/cm 3 was correct for the 00 particles being produced, then the calculated geometric diameter should be substantially 00 equal to the measured geometric diameter measured by geometric sizer 670. If the O calculated geometric diameter and the measured geometric diameter do not match, then a INC new density is input into aerodynamic sizer 672 and processing returns to step 730 to re- Scalculate geometric diameter. This process continues until the calculated geometric diameter and the measured geometric diameter match. This iterative process is illustrated in FIG. 7. In a step 740, it is determined whether d d m The calculated geometric diameter is compared to the measured geometric diameter to determine a differential. If there is a differential, then, in a step 760, the particle density is adjusted, and processing returns to step 730 to again calculate geometric diameter using the adjusted value for particle density. Increasing the density decreases the geometric diameter. Decreasing the density increases the geometric diameter. The geometric diameter is again calculated in step 730, and compared to the measured geometric diameter in step 740. This process repeats until in step 740 it is determined that the calculated geometric diameter is substantially equal to the measured geometric diameter, at which point the particle production process continues, as shown in a step 750.
When using the process of the present invention as shown in FIG. 7, solutions are spray dried to form dry particles, and the aerodynamic and geometric diameters are measured. Process conditions (flow rates, temperatures, etc.) are held constant during the measurement of the aerodynamic and geometric diameters. Once the measurements are made, solvents can then be run through the spray drying system while the density iteration is calculated (steps 730, 740, and 760 in FIG. This represents a significant savings of costly material, such as the aqueous solution containing active agent.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the density iteration is done with aerodynamic diameter as a fixed variable. In such an embodiment, the density is changed until the calculated geometric diameter is substantially equal to the measured geometric diameter. Once the density iteration is complete, then the density, aerodynamic diameter, and geometric diameter of the particles are known. At that point, process conditions (gas and/or liquid flow rates, temperatures, process solutions) can be changed to achieve a 33 Sdifferent density, aerodynamic, or geometric diameter. Alternatively, a process condition or process solution can be modified to determine its affect on density, aerodynamic cJ diameter and geometric diameter.
INO
In another embodiment of the present invention, the density iteration is done with geometric diameter as a fixed variable. In such an embodiment, process conditions, 00 IO such as gas flow rate, are adjusted to achieve a desired measured geometric diameter.
00 Aerodynamic diameter is measured. Density is then changed until the calculated geometric diameter is substantially equal to the measured geometric diameter. Once the
INO
density iteration is complete, then the density, aerodynamic diameter, and geometric diameter of the particles are known. By fixing geometric diameter in the density optimization process, particles having the same geometric diameter can be produced under different process conditions to facilitate comparisons between particles of the same geometric diameter.
Once the process reaches step 750, an operator has three values to use in decisions regarding the dry particles that have been produced to that point: geometric diameter, aerodynamic diameter; and density. One advantage of the method of the present invention is that the liquid combination from static mixer 630 needs to be atomized into spray dryer 650 for only about three minutes for the data to be collected and step 750 reached for a particular set of process conditions. In this manner, multiple sets of process conditions can be rapidly screened using a minimal amount of material.
For example, once step 750 is reached, the density, geometric diameter, and aerodynamic diameter of the particles are known for a given set of process conditions and process solutions. If the desired density, geometric diameter, or aerodynamic diameter has not been achieved, then the process conditions can be modified and the density iteration process repeated. Alternatively, a particular process condition or process material can be changed, and its affect on density, aerodynamic diameter, and geometric diameter determined.
To produce dry particles that can penetrate deep into the lung, the desired geometric diameter is in the range of from about 7 to about 10 lm. Using the method and apparatus of the present invention as depicted in FIGS. 6 and 7, the density used by aerodynamic sizer 672 is adjusted to minimize particle density, while the measured C geometric diameter is held constant in the 7-10 mrn range. For example, dry particles IND containing hGH were made using the apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6 by selecting an initial particle density of 0.06 g/cm 3 The desired geometric diameter size 00 range for reaching the deep lung is in the range of from about 7 to about 10 jgm, and 00 aerodynamic diameter size range of from about I to about 3 jm. The aerodynamic diameter was measured using the initial particle density of 0.06 g/cm 3 and the geometric diameter was measured. The geometric diameter was calculated, and compared to the measured geometric diameter. To reach the deep lung, the measured geometric diameter, and consequently the calculated geometric diameter, should be in the range of from about 7 to about 10 gm. If the calculated geometric diameter was not the same as the measured geometric diameter, the density value used in the aerodynamic sizer was reduced, and the process repeated. By minimizing particle density and holding the geometric diameter constant in the desired range, particles having the desired geometric diameter, as well as the desired low aerodynamic diameter, were produced.
The use of density as a valid optimization variable for producing particles of the desired aerodynamic diameter is demonstrated by the graph shown in FIG. 9. FIG. 9 shows a graph of mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) in irn as measured using the system and method of the present invention described above with reference to FIGS.
6 and 7, versus MMAD measured using a conventional multi-stage liquid impinger (MSLI). A MSLI works on the same basic principles as an ACI device described above.
However, instead of having dry metal plates for stages like an ACI, a MSLI has liquidcontaining stages. Each MSLI stage consists of an ethanol-wetted glass flit. The wetted stage is used to prevent bouncing and re-etrainment, which can occur using the ACI. The purpose of the liquid is to eliminate the presence of bounce in the system, typically leading to greater accuracy than an ACI. The MSLI used for the data illustrated in FIG. 9 included 5 stages. As can be seen from FIG. 9, the MMAD measured using the density iteration process of the present invention (y-axis) correlated well with the MMAD measured using an MSLI (x-axis), with the MMAD measured using the density iteration process being a reliable predictor of trends in MMAD measured using the MSLI.
As noted above with respect to FIGS. 6 and 7, a computer or computer system can be used to control the aerodynamic and/or geometric particle sizers, and to carry out the particle size optimization process. An exemplary computer system suitable for use CN with the present invention is shown in Figure 8. The computer system 802 includes one Sor more processors, such as a processor 804. The processor 804 is connected to a communication bus 806. After reading this description, it will become apparent to a O person skilled in the relevant art how to implement the invention using other computer systems and/or computer architectures.
00 00 The computer system 802 also includes a main memory 808, preferably random Saccess memory (RAM), and can also include a secondary memory 810. The secondary \memory 810 can include, for example, a hard disk drive 812 and/or a removable storage Sdrive 814, representing a floppy disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, etc. The removable storage drive 814 reads from and/or writes to a removable storage unit 818 in a well-known manner. The removable storage unit 818, represents a floppy disk, magnetic tape, optical disk, etc. which is read by and written to by the removable storage drive 814. As will be appreciated, the removable storage unit 818 includes a computer usable storage medium having stored therein computer software and/or data.
In alternative embodiments, the secondary memory 810 may include other similar means for allowing computer programs or other instructions to be loaded into the computer system 802. Such means can include, for example, a removable storage unit 822 and an interface 820. Examples of such can include a program cartridge and cartridge interface (such as that found in video game devices), a removable memory chip (such as an EPROM, or PROM) and associated socket, and other removable storage units 822 and interfaces 820 which allow software and data to be transferred from the removable storage unit 822 to the computer system 802.
The computer system 802 can also include a communications interface 824. The communications interface 824 allows software and data to be transferred between the computer system 802 and external devices. Examples of the communications interface 824 can include a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet card), a communications port, a PCMCIA slot and card, etc. Software and data transferred via the communications interface 824 are in the form of signals 826 that can be electronic, electromagnetic, optical or other signals capable of being received by the communications interface 824. Signals 826 are provided to communications interface via a channel 828. A channel 828 carries signals 826 and can be implemented using wire or cable, fiber optics, a phone line, a cellular phone link, an RF link and other 0 communications channels.
00 In this document, the terms "computer program medium" and "computer usable OO medium" are used to generally refer to media such as the removable storage device 818, a hard disk installed in hard disk drive 812, and signals 826. These computer program Sproducts are means for providing software to the computer system 802.
SComputer programs (also called computer control logic) are stored in the main memory 808 and/or the secondary memory 810. Computer programs can also be received via the communications interface 824. Such computer programs, when executed, enable the computer system 802 to perform the features of the present invention as discussed herein. In particular, the computer programs, when executed, enable the processor 804 to perform the features of the present invention. Accordingly, such computer programs represent controllers of the computer system 802.
In an embodiment where the invention is implemented using software, the software may be stored in a computer program product and loaded into the computer system 802 using the removable storage drive 814, the hard drive 812 or the communications interface 824. The control logic (software), when executed by the processor 804, causes the processor 804 to perform the functions of the invention as described herein.
In another embodiment, the invention is implemented primarily in hardware using, for example, hardware components such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Implementation of such a hardware state machine so as to perform the functions described herein will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s). In yet another embodiment, the invention is implemented using a combination of both hardware and software.
In a preferred embodiment, the spray dried particles of the invention have a tap density less than about 0.4 g/cm 3 Particles that have a tap density of less than about 0.4 g/cm 3 are referred to herein as "aerodynamically light particles". More preferred are particles having a tap density less than about 0.1 g/cm 3 Tap density can be measured by using instruments known to those skilled in the art such as, but not limited to, the Dual 31 Platform Microprocessor Controlled Tap Density Tester (Vankel Technology, Cary, NC) or a GeoPycT M instrument (Micrometrics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA 30093). Tap density is a standard measure of the envelope mass density. Tap density can be determined using the method of USP Bulk Density and Tapped Density, United States Pharmacopoeia convention, Rockville, MD, 10" Supplement, 4950-4951, 1999. Features 00 that can contribute to low tap density include irregular surface texture and porous 00 structure.
C' The envelope mass density of an isotropic particle is defined as the mass of the O particle divided by the minimum sphere envelope volume within which it can be C< enclosed. In one embodiment of the invention, the particles have an envelope mass density of less than about 0.4 g/cm 3 Aerodynamically light particles have a preferred size, a volume median geometric diameter (VMGD) of at least about 5 un. In one embodiment, the VMGD is from about 5 pm to about 30 pm. In another embodiment of the invention, the particles have a VMGD ranging from about 10 pm to about 30 pn. In other embodiments, the particles have a median diameter, mass median diameter (MMD), a mass median envelope diameter (MMED) or a mass median geometric diameter (MMGD) of at least for example from about 5 pm to about 30 nm.
The diameter of the spray-dried particles, for example, the VMGD, can be measured using a laser diffraction instrument (for example Helos, manufactured by Sympatec, Princeton, NJ). Other instruments for measuring particle diameter are well known in the art. The diameter of particles in a sample will range depending upon factors such as particle composition and methods of synthesis. The distribution of size of particles in a sample can be selected to permit optimal deposition to targeted sites within the respiratory tract.
Aerodynamically light particles preferably have "mass median aerodynamic diameter" (MMAD), also referred to herein as "aerodynamic diameter", between about 1 pm and about 5 pm. In another embodiment of the invention, the MMAD is between about 1 pm and about 3 pm. In a further embodiment, the MMAD is between about 3 pm and about 5 pm.
j Experimentally, aerodynamic diameter can be determined by employing a O gravitational settling method, whereby the time for an ensemble of particles to settle a certain distance is used to infer directly the aerodynamic diameter of the particles. An 0 indirect method for measuring the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) is the 0 multi-stage liquid impinger (MSLI).
Particles that have a tap density less than about 0.4 g/cm 3 median diameters of at least about 5 min, and an aerodynamic diameter of between about 1 pm and about C /un, preferably between about 1 mn and about 3 Gm, are more capable of escaping inertial and gravitational deposition in the oropharyngeal region, and are targeted to the airways, particularly the deep lung. The use of larger, more porous particles is advantageous since they are able to aerosolize more efficiently than smaller, denser aerosol particles such as those currently used for inhalation therapies.
In another embodiment of the invention, the particles have an envelope mass density, also referred to herein as "mass density" of less than about 0.4 g/cm 3 Particles also having a mean diameter of between about 5 pm and about 30 pm are preferred.
Mass density and the relationship between mass density, mean diameter and aerodynamic diameter are discussed in U. S. Application No. 08/655,570, filed on May 24, 1996, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In a preferred embodiment, the aerodynamic diameter of particles having a mass density less than about 0.4 g/cm 3 and a mean diameter of between about 5 pmn and about 30 pm mass mean aerodynamic diameter is between about 1 pm and about 5 mn.
In comparison to smaller, relatively denser particles the larger aerodynamically light particles, preferably having a median diameter of at least about 5 pm, also can potentially more successfully avoid phagocytic engulfment by alveolar macrophages and clearance from the lungs, due to size exclusion of the particles from the phagocytes' cytosolic space. Phagocytosis of particles by alveolar macrophages diminishes precipitously as particle diameter increases beyond about 3 pm. Kawaguchi, et al., Biomaterials 7: 61-66 (1986); Krenis, L.J. and Strauss, Proc. Soc. Exp. Med., 107: 748-750 (1961); and Rudt, S. and Muller, J. Contr. Rel., 22: 263-272 (1992). For particles of statistically isotropic shape, such as spheres with rough surfaces, the particle Senvelope volume is approximately equivalent to the volume of cytosolic space required within a macrophage for complete particle phagocytosis.
SThe particles may be fabricated with the appropriate material, surface roughness, diameter and tap density for localized delivery to selected regions of the respiratory tract 00 such as the deep lung or upper or central airways. For example, higher density or larger O particles may be used for upper airway delivery, or a mixture of varying sized particles in a sample, provided with the same or different therapeutic agent may be administered to target different regions of the lung in one administration. Particles having an aerodynamic diameter ranging from about 3 to about 5 pm are preferred for delivery to C the central and upper airways. Particles having and aerodynamic diameter ranging from about 1 to about 3 mun are preferred for delivery to the deep lung.
Inertial impaction and gravitational settling of aerosols are predominant deposition mechanisms in the airways and acini of the lungs during normal breathing conditions. Edwards, J. Aerosol Sci., 26: 293-317 (1995). The importance of both deposition mechanisms increases in proportion to the mass of aerosols and not to particle (or envelope) volume. Since the site of aerosol deposition in the lungs is determined by the mass of the aerosol (at least for particles of mean aerodynamic diameter greater than approximately 1 an), diminishing the tap density by increasing particle surface irregularities and particle porosity permits the delivery of larger particle envelope volumes into the lungs, all other physical parameters being equal.
The low tap density particles have a small aerodynamic diameter in comparison to the actual envelope sphere diameter. The aerodynamic diameter, is related to the envelope sphere diameter, d (Gonda, "Physico-chemical principles in aerosol delivery," in Topics in Pharmaceutical Sciences 1991 (eds. D.J.A. Crommelin and K.K.
Midha), pp. 95-117, Stuttgart: Medpharm Scientific Publishers, 1992)), by the formula: d= d fp where the envelope mass p is in units of g/cm 3 Maximal deposition of monodispersed aerosol particles in the alveolar region of the human lung occurs for an aerodynamic diameter of approximately d.=3 pm. Heyder, J. et al., J Aerosol Sci., 17: 811-825 (1986). Due to their small envelope mass density, the actual diameter d of V aerodynamically light particles comprising a monodisperse inhaled powder that will 0 exhibit maximum deep-lung deposition is: 00 d 3/ p pm (where p 1 g/cm 3 \0 00 where d is always greater than 3 mn. For example, aerodynamically light particles that c display an envelope mass density, p 0.1 g/cm 3 will exhibit a maximum deposition for Sparticles having envelope diameters as large as 9.5 pm. The increased particle size Ci diminishes interparticle adhesion forces. Visser, Powder Technology, 58: 1-10. Thus, large particle size increases efficiency of aerosolization to the deep lung for particles of low envelope mass density, in addition to contributing to lower phagocytic losses.
The aerodynamic diameter can be calculated to provide for maximum deposition within the lungs. Previously this was achieved by the use of very small particles of less than about five microns in diameter, preferably between about one and about three microns, which are then subject to phagocytosis. Selection of particles which have a larger diameter, but which are sufficiently light (hence the characterization "aerodynamically light"), results in an equivalent delivery to the lungs, but the larger size particles are not phagocytosed.
In one embodiment of the invention, the particles include a biologically active (bioactive) compound, for example a therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agent.
Bioactive compounds or agents also are referred to herein as drugs, active agents, or medicaments. The amount of bioactive agent present in the particles generally ranges between about 0.1 weight and about 100% weight, preferably between about weight and about 100% weight.
Examples of biologically active agents include synthetic inorganic and organic compounds, proteins, peptides, polypeptides, DNA and RNA nucleic acid sequences having therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic activities. Nucleic acid sequences include genes, antisense molecules which bind to complementary DNA or RNA and inhibit transcription, and ribozymes. The agents to be incorporated can have a variety of biological activities, such as vasoactive agents, neuroactive agents, hormones, anticoagulants, immunomodulating agents, cytotoxic agents, prophylactic agents, antibiotics, antivirals, antisense, antigens, and antibodies. Compounds with a wide range -1 of molecular weight can be used, for example, between 100 and 500,000 grams or more per mole.
N The particles can include a therapeutic agent for local delivery within the lung, such as agents for the treatment of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease C0 (COPD), emphysema, or cystic fibrosis, or for systemic treatment. For example, genes IND for the treatment of diseases such as cystic fibrosis can be administered, as can beta agonists steroids, anticholinergics and leukotriene modifiers for asthma. Other specific therapeutic agents include, but are not limited to, human growth hormone, insulin, calcitonin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone I (LHRH), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor parathyroid hormone and PTH-related peptide, somatostatin, testosterone, progesterone, estradiol, nicotine, fentanyl, norethisterone, clonidine, scopolamine, salicylate, cromolyn sodium, salmeterol, formeterol, albuterol, epinephrine, L-dopa, and diazepam, as well as medicaments that primarily target the central nervous system, kidneys, heart or other organs.
Diagnostic agents include but are not limited to imaging agents which include commercially available agents used in positron emission tomography (PET), computer assisted tomography (CAT), single photon emission computerized tomography, x-ray, fluoroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Examples of suitable materials for use as contrast agents in MRI include but are not limited to the gadolinium chelates currently available, such as diethylene triamine pentacetic acid (DTPA) and gadopentotate dimeglumine, as well as iron, magnesium, manganese, copper and chromium.
Examples of materials useful for CAT and x-rays include iodine based materials for intravenous administration, such as ionic monomers typified by diatrizoate and iothalamate, non-ionic monomers such as iopamidol, isohexol, and ioversol, non-ionic dimers, such as iotrol and iodixanol, and ionic dimers, for example, ioxagalte.
The particles can include additional component(s). Such additional components may be referred to herein as excipients, and can include, for example, phospholipids, surfactants, amino acids, and polymers. In a preferred embodiment, the particles include one or more phospholipids, such as, for example, a phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidyiglycerol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol or a combination thereof In one embodiment, the phospholipids are endogenous to the lung. Specific examples of phospholipids are shown in Table 00 Combinations of phospholipids can also be employed.
00 Dilaurylolyphosphatidylcholine (C 12:0) DLPC NDiinyristoylphosphatidylcholine (C14:0) DMPC Dipalmitaylphosphatidylcholine (C 16:0) DPPC Distearoylphosphatidylcholine (Cl 8:0) DSPC Dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (C 18: 1) DOPC DilaurylolylphosphatidylglyceroI
DLPG
Dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol
DMTG
Dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol
DPPG
Distearoylphosphatidylglycerol
DSPG
Dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol
DOPG
Dixnyristoyl phosphatidic acid DMPA Dixnyristoyl phosphatidic acid DMPA Dipalinitoyl phosphatidic acid DPPA Dipalmitoyl phosphatidic acid DPPA Dimyristoyl phosphatidylethanolarnine DMPE Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylethanolamine DPPE Dimyristoyl phosphatidylserine DMPS Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylserine DPPS Dipalmitoyl sphingomyelin DPSP Distearoyl sphingomyelin DSSP TABLE ',harged phospholipids also can be employed. Examples of charged phospholipids are described in U.S. Patent Application entitled "Particles for Inhalation Having Sustained Release Properties," 09/752,106 filed on December 29, 2000, and in U.S. Patent Application, 09/752,109 entitled "Particles for Inhalation Having Sustained Release Properties", filed on December 29, 2000; the entire contents of both are incorporated herein by reference.
Nc The phospholipid can be present in the particles in an amount ranging from about 5 weight percent to about about 95 weight Preferably, it can be present in the particles in an amount ranging from about 20 weight to about 80 weight 0 The phospholipids or combinations thereof can be selected to impart controlled 00 release properties to the spray dried particles produced by the methods of the invention.
ND Particles having controlled release properties and methods of modulating release of a biologically active agent are described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.
60/150,742 entitled "Modulation of Release From Dry Powder Formulations by SControlling Matrix Transition," filed on August 25, 1999 and U.S. Non-Provisional C'I Patent Application 09/644,736, filed on August 23, 2000, with the title "Modulation of Release From Dry Powder Formulations". The contents of both are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
In another embodiment of the invention particles include a surfactant. As used herein, the term "surfactant" refers to any agent which preferentially absorbs to an interface between two immiscible phases, such as the interface between water and an organic polymer solution, a water/air interface or organic solvent/air interface.
Surfactants generally possess a hydrophilic moiety and a lipophilic moiety, such that, upon absorbing to microparticles, they tend to present moieties to the external environment that do not attract similarly-coated particles, thus reducing particle agglomeration. Surfactants may also promote absorption of a therapeutic or diagnostic agent and increase bioavailability of the agent.
In addition to lung surfactants, such as, for example, the phospholipids discussed above, suitable surfactants include but are not limited to hexadecanol; fatty alcohols such as polyethylene glycol (PEG); polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether; a surface active fatty acid, such as palmitic acid or oleic acid; glycocholate; surfactin; a poloxamer; a sorbitan fatty acid ester such as sorbitan trioleate (Span 85), Tween 20 or Tween 80 (Polyoxyethylene Sorbitan Monooleate); and tyloxapol.
The surfactant can be present in the particles in an amount ranging from about 0.01 weight to about 5 weight Preferably, it can be present in the particles in an amount ranging from about 0.1 weight to about 1.0 weight C/ Methods of preparing and administering particles including surfactants, and, in Sparticular phospholipids, are disclosed in U.S. Patent No 5,855,913, issued on January 1999 to Hanes et al. and in U.S. Patent No. 5,985,309, issued on November 16, 1999 to 00 Edwards et al. The teachings of both are incorporated herein by reference in their 00 entirety.
Ci In another embodiment of the invention, the particles include an amino acid.
O Hydrophobic amino acids are preferred. Suitable amino acids include naturally occurring C' and non-naturally occurring hydrophobic amino acids. Examples of amino acids which can be employed include, but are not limited to: glycine, proline, alanine, cysteine, methionine, valine, leucine, tyrosine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, tryptophan. Preferred hydrophobic amino acids, include but not limited to, leucine, isoleucine, alanine, valine, phenylalanine, glycine and tryptophan. Amino acids which include combinations of hydrophobic amino acids can also be employed. Non-naturally occurring amino acids include, for example, beta-amino acids. Both D, L and racemic configurations of hydrophobic amino acids can be employed. Suitable hydrophobic amino acids can also include amino acid analogs. As used herein, an amino acid analog includes the D or L configuration of an amino acid having the following formula: -NH-CHR-CO-, wherein R is an aliphatic group, a substituted aliphatic group, a benzyl group, a substituted benzyl group, an aromatic group or a substituted aromatic group and wherein R does not correspond to the side chain of a naturally-occurring amino acid. As used herein, aliphatic groups include straight chained, branched or cyclic C1-C8 hydrocarbons which are completely saturated, which contain one or two heteroatoms such as nitrogen, oxygen or sulfur and/or which contain one or more units of unsaturation. Aromatic groups include carbocyclic aromatic groups such as phenyl and naphthyl and heterocyclic aromatic groups such as imidazolyl, indolyl, thienyl, furanyl, pyridyl, pyranyl, oxazolyl, benzothienyl, benzofuranyl, quinolinyl, isoquinolinyl and acridintyl.
Suitable substituents on an aliphatic, aromatic or benzyl group include -OH, halogen -Cl, -I and -O(aliphatic, substituted aliphatic, benzyl, substituted benzyl, aryl or substituted aryl group), -CN, -N02, -COOH, -NH2, -NH(aliphatic group, substituted aliphatic, benzyl, substituted benzyl, aryl or substituted aryl group), N(aliphatic group, substituted aliphatic, benzyl, substituted benzyl, aryl or substituted aryl group)2, -COO(aliphatic group, substituted aliphatic, benzyl, substituted benzyl, aryl L4S (or substituted aryl group), -CONH2, -CONH(aliphatic, substituted aliphatic group, benzyl, substituted benzyl, aryl or substituted aryl group)), -SH, -S(aliphatic, substituted Saliphatic, benzyl, substituted benzyl, aromatic or substituted aromatic group) and -NH- C(=NH)-NH2. A substituted benzylic or aromatic group can also have an aliphatic or substituted aliphatic group as a substituent. A substituted aliphatic group can also have a 00 benzyl, substituted benzyl, aryl or substituted aryl group as a substituent. A substituted 00 aliphatic, substituted aromatic or substituted benzyl group can have one or more t"- O substituents. Modifying an amino acid substituent can increase, for example, the I0 lypophilicity or hydrophobicity of natural amino acids which are hydrophilic.
C, A number of the suitable amino acids, amino acid analogs and salts thereof can be obtained commercially. Others can be synthesized by methods known in the art.
Synthetic techniques are described, for example, in Green and Wuts, "Protecting Groups in Organic Synthesis John Wiley and Sons, Chapters 5 and 7, 1991.
Hydrophobicity is generally defined with respect to the partition of an amino acid between a nonpolar solvent and water. Hydrophobic amino acids are those acids which show a preference for the nonpolar solvent. Relative hydrophobicity of amino acids can be expressed on a hydrophobicity scale on which glycine has the value 0.5. On such a scale, amino acids which have a preference for water have values below 0.5 and those that have a preference for nonpolar solvents have a value above 0.5. As used herein, the term hydrophobic amino acid refers to an amino acid that, on the hydrophobicity scale has a value greater or equal to 0.5, in other words, has a tendency to partition in the nonpolar acid which is at least equal to that of glycine.
Combinations of hydrophobic amino acids can also be employed. Furthermore, combinations of hydrophobic and hydrophilic (preferentially partitioning in water) amino acids, where the overall combination is hydrophobic, can also be employed.
Combinations of one or more amino acids and one or more phospholipids or surfactants can also be employed.
1 The amino acid can be present in the particles in an amount from about 0 weight to about 60 weight Preferably, the amino acid can be present in the particles in an amount ranging from about 5 weight to about 30 weight The salt of a hydrophobic amino acid can be present in the liquid feed in an amount from about 0 weight to about
L^
weight Preferably, the amino acid salt is present in the liquid feed in an amount O ranging from about 5 weight to about 30 weight Methods of forming and delivering particles which include an amino acid are described in U.S. Patent Application 00 No 09/382,959, filed on August 25, 1999, entitled "Use of Simple Amino Acids to Form 00 Porous Particles During Spray Drying" and in U.S. Patent Application 09/644,320 filed O on August 23, 2000, entitled "Use of Simple Amino Acids to Form Porous Particles"; the ,0 teachings of both are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Cr In another embodiment of the invention, the particles include a carboxylate moiety and a multivalent metal salt. One or more phospholipids also can be included.
Such compositions are described in U.S. Provisional Application 60/150,662, filed on August 25, 1999, entitled "Formulation for Spray-Drying Large Porous Particles," and U.S. Patent Application 09/644,105 filed on August 23, 2000, entitled "Formulation for Spray-Drying Large Porous Particles"; the teachings of both are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In a preferred embodiment, the particles include sodium citrate and calcium chloride.
Biocompatible, and preferably biodegradable polymers also can be included in the particles. Particles including such polymeric materials are described in U.S. Patent No. 5,874,064, issued on February 23, 1999 to Edwards et al., the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and in U.S. Patent 6,136,295, issued on October 24, 2000 to Edwards et al., the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The particles can also include a material such as, for example, dextran, polysaccharides, lactose, trehalose, cyclodextrins, proteins, peptides, polypeptides, fatty acids, inorganic compounds, phosphates.
The total concentration of solids in the liquid feed from which the particles are formed ranges from about 0.1% to about 0.5% and higher. Solids can include biologically active agent, excipient, phospholipid, surfactants, salts, buffers, metals, and other compounds.
Particles produced by the methods of the invention and which include a medicament, for example one or more of the bioactive agents described above, can be 41 c1 administered to the respiratory tract of a patient in need of treatment, prophylaxis or Sdiagnosis. Administration of particles to the respiratory system can be by means known in the art. For example, particles are delivered from an inhalation device. In a preferred O embodiment, particles are administered via a dry powder inhaler (DPI). Metered-doseinhalers (MDI), or instillation techniques, also can be employed.
00 00 Various suitable devices and methods of inhalation which can be used to administer particles to a patient's respiratory tract are known in the art. For example, f suitable inhalers are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,069,819, issued August 5, 1976 to Valentini, et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,995,385 issued February 26, 1991 to Valentini, et al., and U.S. Patent No. 5,997,848 issued December 7, 1999 to Patton, et al. Other examples of suitable inhalers include, but are not limited to, the Spinhaler@ (Fisons, Loughborough, Rotahaler@ (Glaxo-Wellcome, Research Triangle Technology Park, North Carolina), FlowCaps® (Hovione, Loures, Portugal), Inhalator@ (Boehringer- Ingelheim, Germany), and the Aerolizer@ (Novartis, Switzerland), the Diskhaler@ (Glaxo-Wellcome, RTP, NC) and others known to those skilled in the art. Yet other examples of suitable inhalers include those disclosed in the following United States patent applications: "Inhalation Device and Method," Appl. No. 09/835,302 (filed April 16, 2001) and "Inhalation Device and Method," Appl. No. 10/268,059 (filed Oct. 2002), the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Preferably, particles administered to the respiratory tract travel through the upper airways (oropharynx and larynx), the lower airways which include the trachea followed by bifurcations into the bronchi and bronchioli and through the terminal bronchioli which in turn divide into respiratory bronchioli leading then to the ultimate respiratory zone, the alveoli or the deep lung. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, most of the mass of particles deposits in the deep lung. In another embodiment of the invention, delivery is primarily to the central airways. Delivery to the upper airways can also be obtained.
In one embodiment of the invention, delivery to the pulmonary system of particles is in a single, breath-actuated step, as described in U.S. Non-Provisional Patent Application, "High Efficient Delivery of a Large Therapeutic Mass Aerosol", Application No. 09/591,307, filed June 9, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference in its rC/j entirety. In another embodiment of the invention, at least 50% of the mass of the NO particles stored in the inhaler receptacle is delivered to a subject's respiratory system in a single, breath-activated step. In a further embodiment, at least 5 milligrams and 00 preferably at least 10 milligrams of a medicament is delivered by administering, in a 00 single breath, to a subject's respiratory tract particles enclosed in the receptacle. r"- Amounts as high as 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 50 milligrams can be delivered.
C"1 SAs used herein, the term "effective amount" means the amount needed to achieve the desired therapeutic or diagnostic effect or efficacy. The actual effective amounts of drug can vary according to the specific drug or combination thereof being utilized, the particular composition formulated, the mode of administration, and the age, weight, condition of the patient, and severity of the symptoms or condition being treated.
Dosages for a particular patient can be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art using conventional considerations, by means of an appropriate, conventional pharmacological protocol). In one example, effective amounts of albuterol sulfate range from about 100 micrograms (pg) to about 1.0 milligram (mg).
Aerosol dosage, formulations and delivery systems also may be selected for a particular therapeutic application, as described, for example, in Gonda, I. "Aerosols for delivery of therapeutic and diagnostic agents to the respiratory tract," in Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 6: 273-313, 1990; and in Moren, "Aerosol dosage forms and formulations," in: Aerosols in Medicine. Principles, Diagnosis and Therapy, Moren, et al., Eds, Esevier, Amsterdam, 1985.
The particles of the invention can be employed in compositions suitable for drug delivery to the pulmonary system. For example, such compositions can include the particles and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for administration to a patient, preferably for administration via inhalation. The particles may be administered alone or in any appropriate pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, such as a liquid, for example saline, or a powder, for administration to the respiratory system. They can be codelivered with larger carrier particles, not including a therapeutic agent, the latter possessing mass median diameters for example in the range between about 50 lim and about 100 /n.
The present invention will be further understood by reference to the following 0 non-limiting examples.
O Examples 0 Preparation of Dry Particles Containing hGH 00 In a preferred aspect of the present invention, it was desired to prepare inhalable QO dry particles containing hGH (human growth hormone) that would maximize the amount of active hGH that reached the alveolar space. To do so, it was determined that the inhalable dry particles should have a FPF(5.6) of at least about 85% and a FPF(3.4) of at 8 least about 55%. It was also desired to have at least 95% of the hGH in the dry particles CI be "readily extractable", that is, soluble in buffer solution. When the hGH is exposed to incompatible components, for example, organic solutions such as ethanol solution, the hGH degrades or denatures, resulting in degradation products that include insoluble aggregates and soluble dimer. The method and apparatus of the present invention were developed to minimize the amount of insoluble aggregates and soluble dimer in the finished dry particles by minimizing the contact between the hGH solution and the incompatible ethanol solution by combining them rapidly in a static mixer.
The following examples illustrate preparation of inhalable dry particles containing hGH. Unless indicated otherwise, bulk raw hGH was supplied by Eli Lilly, Inc. as lyophilized powder. 1,2 Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholine (DPPC) was obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids. USP grade 200 proof ethyl alcohol and USP (United States Pharmacopeia) Sterile Water for Irrigation were used.
56.1 wt% hGH/40.6 wt% DPPC/3.3 wt% sodium phosphate The dry particles were prepared in accordance with the following procedure, using equipment substantially the same as that illustrated in FIG. 2. The lyophilized hGH powder was allowed to warm to room temperature for at least V2 hour. The hGH was dissolved in 1.7 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to form a concentrated hGH solution. The pH of the hGH concentrate was increased to 7.4 using 1.0 N NaOH. The hGH concentrate was passed through a Millipore .22 tm Opticap filter. The concentration of the hGH concentrate was determined using a Beckman Du® 640 spectrophotometer. The hGH concentrate solution was diluted with 1.7 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to achieve an hGH concentration of 3.57 g/Kg. The resulting 6 Vj aqueous solution was transferred to a sealed vessel, such as feed vessel 210. The organic I solution was prepared by dissolving the DPPC in 200 proof ethyl alcohol to a concentration of 1.40 g/Kg. The organic solution was transferred into a sealed vessel, 00 such as feed vessel 220.
OO
00 The aqueous phase was pumped at 15 ml/min 3 ml/min, and the organic phase C' was pumped at 35 ml/min 3 ml/min into a twelve inch long static mixer, such as static mixer 230. The combination liquid flowed from the static mixer into a rotary atomizer C'1 (such as atomizer 240) using a 24 vaned rotary atomizer wheel (Niro) operating at 34,500 rpm 2000 rpm. The combination was atomized into small droplets, which entered the Niro Size 1 spray dryer (such as spray dryer 250) utilizing dry nitrogen gas flowing at 105 Kg/hr 4 Kg/hr. The inlet temperature of the spray dryer was maintained at 88"C such that the outlet temperature fell within the range of 45*C 2*C. The particles were collected in a bag house, such as bag house 260. The resulting dry particles had a mean MMAD of 2.52 tm and a mean VMGD of 10.20 Am.
Size-exclusion HPLC was used to detect and quantitate aggregate formation in the resulting dry particles. As described in more detail below, samples were dissolved in mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and in 67% 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 33% n-propanol, and filtered through 0.45 um syringe filters prior to chromatography. Using this technique, hGH elutes as monomer (main peak) at a retention time of 12 to 17 minutes. The appearance of a leading shoulder on the monomer main peak indicates the presence of soluble dimer. The amount of soluble dimer and soluble monomer can be obtained by determining their respective peak areas.
The amount of insoluble aggregate is calculated from the following formula: Insoluble Aggregate A/B x Area Correction) X 100% A=Monomer Peak Area of hGH dry particles dissolved in 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer.
B=Monomer Peak Area of hGH dry particles dissolved in 67% 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 containing 33% n-propanol.
Area Correction=1.027 (accounts for the difference of the hGH standard peak area between injections from 33% n-propanol and buffer).
s/ NSize exclusion HPLC was carried out using a Waters 2690 HPLC system q' operating in isocratic mode with a Waters 2487 UV Detector and a Tosohas TSK G3000SW, 10 pm (7.5 mm x 300 mm) column. The size exclusion column was run at 0 0.6 ml/min using a 0.063 M sodium phosphate buffer:isopropyl alcohol (97:3) mobile phase, at pH 7.0. UV detection was at 214 nm.
00 OO OO An alternative method for determining soluble and insoluble aggregates in protein such as hGH is described below. This method is performed using size exclusion ,1 HPLC with detection at 214 nm on a Waters 2690 system with a Waters 2486 dual Swavelength detector. A TSK GEL 3000SW 7.5 mm x 300 mm column is used for the separation with a 63 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0 containing 3% IPA mobile phase flowing at 0.6 mL/min for 30 min/run at room temperature. Manual integration is performed to quantify monomer, high molecular weight protein (soluble aggregates) and acid dissolved hGH (insoluble aggregates) areas versus a hGH reference standard calibration curve.
The procedure is as follows: Weigh 20 mg of hGH into a scintillation vial and transfer in 20 ml of diluent mM potassium phosphate). This is approximately 0.8 mg/mL hGH monomer.
Gently disperse powder solution.
Remove approximately 3 ml and filter into an HPLC vial and inject 20 tL onto the SE HPLC column. This solution is used to determine the hGH monomer content and the amount of high molecular weight protein (soluble aggregates).
Remove a further 1 ml and transfer to a centrifuge tube. (Perform in duplicate.) Centrifuge for 10 minutes at 14,000 rpm. Remove and discard the supernatant.
Wash the pellet to remove soluble hGH with 1 ml of water, and centrifuge for minutes. Repeat this three times.
Following the third washing and removal of the water, centrifuge the tubes one more time to remove any remaining water. Do not disrupt the pellet.
5.2 C1 Reconstitute the pellet with 1 ml of 0.01N HCI, and allow it to dissolve for minutes.
Transfer the solution to a HPLC vial and inject 100 pL onto the column.
O
00 The buffer soluble hGH content is determined from the injection of the first solution. The insoluble hGH content is determined from injection of the second solution S nin 0.01N HC1. The percent readily extractable hGH is calculated as buffer soluble hGH O divided by total hGH content (soluble plus insoluble hGH).
Three experimental runs were made to determine the effect of time in the incompatible ethanol solution on the integrity of the hGH protein. For two of the experiments, a static mixer was not used. Rather, the aqueous and organic solutions were combined, and the combination was maintained for a period of time prior to atomization and spray drying. In the first experiment (sample 2 in Table 11 below), the aqueous and the organic solutions were combined prior to spraying, such that the final volume was 1.25 L, and the resulting combination was spray dried over a period of 25 minutes. In the second experiment (sample 1 in Table 11 below), the aqueous and organic solutions were combined prior to spraying, such that the final volume was 28 L, and the resulting combination was spray dried over a period of 8 hours (560 minutes). In the third experiment, (sample 3 in Table 11 below), the static mixer was used so that the exposure of the hGH to ethanol was about 6 seconds (0.1 minute). The total batch size for sample 3 was 0.375 L of the aqueous solution and 0.875 L of the ethanol solution.
Static Maximum Exposure Soluble Insoluble Sample Mixer Time (minutes) Aggregate Aggregate 1 No 560 1.60% 26% 2 No 25 5.40% 14% 3 Yes 0.1 3.90% 9% TABLE 11 All of the samples in Table 11 were prepared under the same conditions, with the exception of the amount of exposure time between the aqueous and ethanol solutions prior to spray drying. As can be seen from the results in Table 11, the insoluble aggregate of the hGH monomer increased as a function of exposure time to 70% (v/v) 53 ethanol solution. Use of the static mixer decreased the insoluble aggregates by about S17%.
I 93.5 wt% hGH/6.5 wt Sodium Phosphate 10 p/L Ammonium O Bicarbonate; 12 E/ Solids 0 Lipid-free particles with a formulation containing hGH and sodium phosphate 00 monohydrate were prepared as follows using apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6.
F The aqueous solution was prepared by preparing a bulk sodium phosphate solution at 100mM at pH 7.4 and a bulk ammonium bicarbonate solution at 50 g/L. 52 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 was added to 268 mL of water for irrigation. To C, this was added 200 mL of the 50 g/L ammonium bicarbonate solution and 200 mL of ethanol. The resulting solution was combined in a static mixer with 280 mL of bulk hGH at 40 g/L in 1.7 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH=7.4. Solute concentration in the combined solution was 12 g/L. The combined solution was spray dried under the following process conditions: Inlet temperature 74 0
C
Outlet temperature from the drying drum Nitrogen drying gas 110 kg/hr Nitrogen atomization gas 64 g/min 2 Fluid internal mixing nozzle atomizer Nitrogen atomization pressure 90 psi Liquid feed rate 25 ml/min Liquid feed temperature 22°C Pressure in drying chamber -2.0 in water The resulting particles had a FPF(5.6) of 75%, and a FPF(3.4) of 70%, both measured using a 2-stage ACI. The volume mean geometric diameter was 8 im at bar. The resulting particles had a soluble dimer fraction of 1.2% and a readily extractable hGH fraction of 97.5%.
The combination solution flowing out of the static mixer was fed into a twofluid nozzle atomizer located above the spray dryer, such as atomizer 640. The contact between the atomized droplets from the atomizer and the heated nitrogen caused the 0 0 liquid to evaporate from the droplets, resulting in dry porous particles. The resulting gas- 00 solid stream was fed to bag filter 680 that retained the resulting dry particles, and allowed Sthe hot gas stream containing the drying gas (nitrogen), evaporated water, and ethanol to IND pass. The dry particles were collected into product collection vessel 682.
ri In order to obtain dry particles of particular physical and chemical characteristics, in vitro characterization tests can be carried out on the finished dry particles, and the process parameters adjusted accordingly, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. Particles produced using the apparatus shown in FIG. 2 had a VMGD of 8.4 um, FPF(5.6) of 89% to 93%, readily extractable hGH fraction of 95.5%, and a soluble dimer fraction of Particles containing 93.5 wt% hGH and 6.5 wt% sodium phosphate were produced using the apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6. In this manner, the desired aerodynamic diameter, geometric diameter, and particle density could be obtained for these particles in real-time, during the production process.
wt% hGH/14 wt% DPPC/6 wt% Sodium Phosphate; 15 pL Ammonium Bicarbonate; 6 /L Solids Particles with a formulation containing hGH, DPPC, and sodium phosphate were prepared as follows using apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6. The aqueous solution was prepared by preparing a bulk sodium phosphate solution at pH 7.4 and a bulk ammonium bicarbonate solution. 280 mg of sodium phosphate monobasic was added to 457 mL of water for irrigation. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 using 1.0 N NaOH.
To this was added 15 g of ammonium bicarbonate and 200 mL of ethanol. 343 mL of 14 g/L hGH bulk solution (4.8 g of hGH in 1.7 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.4) was added to complete the aqueous solution. 840 mg of DPPC was added to 200 mL of ethanol to form the ethanol solution. The aqueous solution was combined in a static mixer with the ethanol solution using a flow rate of 24 mL/min for the aqueous solution and a flow rate of 6 mL/min for the ethanol solution. Solute concentration in the combined solution was 6 g/L. The combined solution was spray dried under the following conditions: Inlet temperature 120 0
C.
Outlet temperature from the drying drum 0 Nitrogen drying gas 110 kg/hr.
00 Nitrogen atomization gas 40 g/min.
O
00 2 fluid internal mixing nozzle atomizer.
s0 Nitrogen atomization pressure 65 psi.
CI Liquid feed rate 30 mL/min (24 mL/min aqueous and 6 mL/min ethanol).
Liquid feed temperature 22°C.
Pressure in drying chamber -2.0 in water.
The resulting particles had a FPF of 89%, and a FPF of 76%, both measured using a 2-stage ACI. The volume mean geometric diameter was 7.4 Mn at bar. The resulting particles had a soluble dimer fraction of 3.5% and a readily extractable hGH fraction of 95.6%.
Through the process of the present invention, the formation of protein aggregates can be minimized. For example, reduced protein aggregation is achieved through, among other things, using the static mixer and controlling the level of ethanol in the ethanol solution.
A comparison of powders produced with either batch or static mixing is shown below in Table 12. All of the lots were produced using substantially the same process materials, and process conditions. The five combined lots produced with batch mixing generate a lower level of high molecular weight (HMW) protein (soluble dimer HMW protein) than is generated using a static mixing process (n 4 lots). Batch mixing of the spray-dry solution containing 20% ethanol appears beneficial, as it might allow time to disrupt hydrophobic interactions between the hGH molecules, and thus reduce hGH aggregation. When ethanol is added to the diluted hGH aqueous phase via the static mixer, a prolonged ethanol-aqueous interface occurs and this results in powders having somewhat higher levels of soluble aggregates. This occurs because the hGH in the )aqueous phase is exposed to higher than optimal ethanol levels which can cause the hGH Sto unfold and denature. If a static mixer is used for the mixing process, then the hGH is preferably added as a concentrate to a diluted ethanol/aqueous phase. This is equivalent 00 to adding the hGH last in batch mixing. This is preferred because it eliminates exposing 00 the hGH to high ethanol levels which can perturb its protein structure. The effect of the order of addition on soluble aggregate (dimer) levels as a function of ethanol concentration is shown in FIG. 10. The soluble aggregates level is reduced by adding the hGH last (right column), until the ethanol concentration exceeds about Insoluble Lots N= hGH Monomer HMW Protein Aggregates Mixing 79.6% 3.3% 4.4% batch 4 78.4% 5.0% 5.9% static TABLE 12 Conversely, at higher levels of ethanol destabilization of the protein structure may occur, and static mixing was demonstrated to be a better method of mixing because it reduces the time of exposure of the hGH to the ethanol phase (Table 13). This results in powders with lower levels of insoluble aggregates. It has been demonstrated (data not shown) that the time of exposure of the hGH to the ethanol can affect the level of soluble aggregate formed in the spray-drying formulation solution.
Insoluble Lot Number HMW Protein Aggregates Organic, Excipient, Mixing 3-63063 5.4% 14.0% 70%, EtOH, batch 3-10697 3.9% 9.0% 70%, EtOH, static TABLE 13 93.5 wt% hGH/6.5 wt Sodium Phosphate Lipid-free particles with a formulation containing hGH and sodium phosphate monohydrate were prepared as follows using an apparatus substantially as shown in FIG.
6. The aqueous solution was prepared by dissolving 0.78 g sodium phosphate dibasic in 500 mL of Water for Irrigation (WFI). To this was added 11.74 bulk hGH lyophilization powder with water content of The organic solution was prepared by dissolving of ammonium bicarbonate in 300 mL of water for irrigation, then combined with 200 mL of ethanol. The aqueous solution, at a pH of about 7 and the organic solution were 57 combined in a static mixer prior to being introduced to the spray dryer nozzle. Solute concentration in the combined solution was 12 g/L. The combined solution was spray dried under the following process conditions:
\O
Inlet temperature 74°C 00 Outlet temperature from the drying drum 00 Nitrogen drying gas 110 kg/hr Nitrogen atomization gas 80 g/min 2 Fluid internal mixing nozzle atomizer Nitrogen atomization back pressure 100 psi Liquid feed rate 25 ml/min Liquid feed temperature 22 0
C
Pressure in drying chamber -2.0 in water The resulting particles had a FPF(3.3) of 69%, measured using a 3-stage wetted screen ACI. The volume mean geometric diameter was 7.0 gm at 1.0 bar. The resulting particles had a HMWP of 1.5% and a readily extractable hGH fraction of 96%.
The combination solution flowing out of the static mixer was fed into a twofluid nozzle atomizer located above the spray dryer, such as atomizer 640. The contact between the atomized droplets from the atomizer and the heated nitrogen caused the liquid to evaporate from the droplets, resulting in dry porous particles. The resulting gassolid stream was fed to bag filter 680 that retained the resulting dry particles, and allowed the hot gas stream containing the drying gas (nitrogen), evaporated water, and ethanol to pass. The dry particles were collected into product collection vessel 682.
In order to obtain dry particles of particular physical and chemical characteristics, in vitro characterization tests can be carried out on the finished dry particles, and the process parameters adjusted accordingly, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. Particles containing 93.5 wt% hGH and 6.5 wt% sodium phosphate 58 Swere produced using the apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6. In this manner, the 0 desired aerodynamic diameter, geometric diameter, and particle density could be obtained for these particles in real-time, during the production process.
00 I The apparatus and method of the present invention may be adjusted in a variety of ways, including but not limited to those described in this example, in order to adjust Spowder characteristics. For example, lipid-free particles with a formulation containing ShGH and sodium phosphate monohydrate were prepared as prescribed in Tables 14, CN and 16, using an apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6. The hGH powders obtained from these methods are characterized in Table 17.
Sheeting Single-hole Six-hole Action Pressure Composition Nozzle Nozzle Nozzle Nozzle hGH concentration, wt. 93.5 93.5 93.5 93.5 Sodium phosphate 6.5 6.5 6.5 concentration, wt. Tween concentration, wt. 0-11.2 0-0.1 0 0 Solids concentration, g/L 6-30 6-60 15 5-12 Ammonium Bicarbonate 0-30 0-40 3040 concentration, g/L Overall ethanol 20 20 20 concentration, vol. Overall WFI 80 80 80 concentration, vol. Concentration of WFI in 60-70 60 60 organic phase, vol. TABLE 14 FORMULATIONS USED Mixer Type Order of Solution Preparation Single-hole Nozzle Batch and Static Organic Phase: 1. Amm. Bicarb 2. WFI 3. Ethanol Aqueous Phase: 1. Sodium Phos.
2. WFI 3. hGH Wet and Dry
I
Six-hole Nozzle Static (Two Solutions) Organic Phase: 1. Amm. Bicarb 2. WFI 3. Ethanol Aqueous Phase: 1. Sodium Phos.
2. WFI 3. hGH Wet and Dry Sheeting Action Nozzle Static (Two Solutions) Organic Phase: 1. Amm. Bicarb 2. WFI 3. Ethanol Aqueous Phase: 1. Sodium Phos.
2. WFI 3. hGH Dry Pressure Nozzle Static (Two Solutions) Organic Phase: 1. Anm. Bicarb 2. WFI 3. Ethanol Aqueous Phase: 1. Sodium Phos.
2. WFI 3. hGH Dry Method of Solution Prenaration TABLE 15 SOLUTION PREPARATION As indicated in Table 15, "wet" and "dry" methods of solution preparation were used. The wet method comprises mixing multiple solutions (including a concentrated hGH solution and various buffer concentrations) in order to form the final solutions that are mixed in the batch or static mixer. This method requires multiple in-process calculations and mixing many solutions, including a concentrated hGH solution and various buffer concentrations, to produce the final solutions.
The dry method comprises dissolving dry ingredients directly in the final solutions that are mixed in the batch or static mixer. The dry method eliminates inprocess calculations and removes the need for different buffer preparations. Instead, the dry method requires initial calculations of the amount of sodium phosphate dibasic, hGH lyophilization powder and water needed to achieve the desired solution concentrations, taking into account the moisture content of the beginning bulk powder. Those amounts are then dissolved in the appropriate solutions.
Singlehole Nn77lf Six-hole Nn-^l Na- *&J 00 O0 00 0N Operating Pressure in Spray Dryer,
W.C.
Spray Dryer Outlet Temperature, °C Atomization Gas Rate, g/min.
Aqueous Feed Rate, mL/min.
Organic Flow Rate, miLmin.
Total Feed Rate, mlJmin.
Drying Gas Rate, kg/hr.
Mass Gas to Feed Ratio -2 -2 35-70 35-65 38-120 50-120 4-37.5 5-20 7.5-37.5 5-20 10-75 10-40 80-125 110 1.5-11.1 1.4-13.3 16 PROCESS CONDITIONS Sheeting Action Nozzle -2 45-65 200-315 5-40 5-40 10-80 110 4.2-17.5 Pressure Nozzle -2 50-71
N/A
110-120
N/A
TABLE
4.2-17.5
N/A
In this example, a spray dryer operating pressure of water column was used. As is apparent to one of skill in the art, other spray drying pressures (for example, may be used, depending upon variations in equipment or other production parameters.
Sheeting Pressure Single-hole Nozzle Six-hole Nozzle Action Nozzle Nozzle VMGD bar 4.3-17.4 9.0-25.4 9.8-10.6 21.6 FPF< 3.3 29-75 49-84 50/66 45-48 0 micron FPF Method ACI-3 ACI-3 ACI-3 ACI-3 28.3 1pm 60 1pm 28.3 1pm 60 1pm 28.3 1pm 28.3 Ipm Readily 91-96 92.6-98.3 96.6-98.1 98 Extractable HMWP 0.9-1.7 0.8-3.4 1.6-2.6 1.6 TABLE 17 RANGE OF CHARACTERIZATION
RESULTS
The single-hole, two-fluid nozzle depicted in FIG. 4B was used in this example.
Sample parameters used and powder properties obtained in this example using the singlehole nozzle are set forth in Tables 18 and 19.
Feed Solution Solids Concentration 12 g/L Ammonium Bicarbonate cone. 30 g/L Solvent: Ethanol/Water (vol/vol%) 20/80 Process Conditions Feed Rate 25 mL/min.
Atomization Gas Rate 80 g/min.
Drying Gas Rate 110 kg/hr.
Spray Dryer Outlet Temperature 40 0
C
TABLE 18 SAMPLE SOLUTION AND PROCESS CONDITIONS FOR SINGLE-HOLE NOZZLE
VMGD
n=14 HMWP RE (1 bar) FPFm 3 .3Mm Method Average 1.5 95.9 6.7 69 ACI-3, AIR 1, 1pm StDev 0.3 0.8 0.9 4 ACI-3, AIRI, 1pm Range 1.1-2.4 94.4-97.5 5.3-8.1 61-75 ACI-3, AIR1, lpm TABLE 19 SAMPLE POWDER PROPERTIES WITH SINGLE-HOLE NOZZLE The six-hole nozzle depicted in FIG. 4C was also used in this example. The sixhole nozzle generally produced powders with larger geometric size and lower density than those produced with the single-hole nozzle. The six-hole nozzle can also process higher solids concentrations, which increases production rates and helps with readily extractable values. Sample parameters used and powder properties obtained from this example using the six-hole nozzle are set forth in Tables 20 and 21.
Feed Solution Ammonium Bicarbonate cone. 30 g/L Solvent: Ethanol/Water (vol/vol%) 20/80 Process Conditions Atomization Gas Rate 120 g/min.
Drying Gas Rate 110 kg/hr.
Spray Dryer Outlet Temperature TABLE 20 SAMPLE SOLUTION AND PROCESS CONDITIONS FOR SIX-HOLE NOZZLE Liquid Solids Feed VMGD FPF, Concentration Rate HMWP RE (1 bar) 3 .3pm Method 10 1.9 97.7 8.2 66 ACI-3, AIRI, 1pm 20 1.7 97.7 9.3 63 ACI-3, AIR1, 1pm 10 1.5 97.4 7.3 57 ACI-3, AIRI, Ipm 20 1.6 97.9 8.8 58 ACI-3, AIRI, 1pm TABLE 21 SAMPLE POWDER PROPERTIES WITH SIX-HOLE NOZZLE The sheeting action nozzle depicted in FIG. 4D was also used in this example.
This nozzle appears to be a gentler nozzle on the protein, as seen in higher readily extractable value. Adjusting the size of this nozzle can yield higher FPF values and smaller VMGD values. Sample parameters used and powder properties obtained from this example using the nozzle depicted in FIG. 4D are set forth in Tables 22 and 23.
Feed Solution Solids Concentration 15 g/L Ammonium Bicarbonate cone. 30 g/L Solvent: Ethanol/Water (vol/vol%) 20/80 Process Conditions Feed Rate 20 mUmin.
Atomization Gas Rate 315 g/min.
Drying Gas Rate 110 kg/hr.
Spray Dryer Outlet Temperature TABLE 22 SAMPLE SOLUTION AND PROCESS CONDITIONS FOR SHEETING ACTION NOZZLE HMWP RE VMGD (1 bar) FPF, 3.3pm Method 1.7 98.1 10.3 48 ACI-3, Ch H, 28.3 Ipm TABLE 23 SAMPLE POWDER PROPERTIES WITH SHEETING ACTION NOZZLE The pressure nozzle depicted in FIG. 4E was also used in this example. The pressure nozzle is less damaging to the chemical integrity of the hGH in the powder because there is no atomizing gas to produce an air-liquid interface. Sample parameters used and powder properties obtained from this example using the pressure nozzle are set forth in Tables 24 and 43 N Nozzle Nozzle hole diameter 0.016 Core no. 206 Feed Solution Solids Concentration 12 g/L Ammonium Bicarbonate cone. 30 g/L IO Solvent: Ethanol/Water (vol/vol%) 20/80 Process Conditions Feed Rate 68 mL/min.
Atomization Gas Rate 315 g/min.
00Drying Gas Rate 110 kg/hr.
Spray Dryer Outlet Temperature 00 TABLE 24 SAMPLE SOLUTION AND PROCESS CONDITIONS FOR PRESSURE NOZZLE \N HMWP RE VMGD (1 bar) FPFT 33pm Method 1.6 98.0 21.6 0 ACI-3, AIR, 601pm TABLE 25 SAMPLE POWDER PROPERTIES WITH PRESSURE NOZZLE The addition of non-ionic surfactants to solutions containing hGH significantly reduces the formation of insoluble aggregates during exposure to an air/liquid interface.
In particular, use of the surfactant Tween 80 (which is approved for use in a commercial inhalation product for the treatment of asthma (Pulmicort Respules)) reduces the amount of insoluble aggregates of hGH in solution. Non-ionic surfactants, such as Tween preferentially adsorb to air-water interfaces and stabilize proteins against aggregate during processing, such as spray drying. However, excessive use of non-ionic surfactants such as Tween 80 is not preferred in pulmonary products. The addition of low levels of Tween 80 wt to hGH formulations made with the single-hole nozzle increased the readily extractable protein product in the powder to The addition of 0.1-0.2 wt Tween 80 had some effect but did not provide as much protection. A sample of results from this example are set forth in Table 26.
Tween 80 RE 0.1 97.1 0.2 97.1 2.8 99.9 5.6 99.9 11.2 99.9 TABLE 26 The solids concentration is the total concentration of hGH plus any non-volatile excipients used in the formulation solution. Increasing solids concentration tends to increase readily extractable hGH and powder production and tends to reduce FPF. The range of solids concentration explored for the single-hole nozzle was 2-30 g/L and for the 6+ six-hole nozzle was 6-60 g/L. Representative results from this example are set forth in Tables 27 and 28.
Nozzle Single-hole Single-hole Single-hole Solids Cone.
2 3 5
I
HMWP
3.5 5.0 6.1 TABLE 27 Insoluble Aggregates 13.0 6.8 2.2 2.2 Solids
VMGD
Nozzle Cone. HMWP RE (1 bar) FPF, <33pm FPF 3.4c m Single- 8 3.2 98.2 6.1 82 hole Single- 12 1.8 98.2 7.3 69 hole Single- 12 1.5 97.7 8.2 77 hole Single- 30 1.1 96.1 6.2 hole Six- 15 1.2 97.0 12.7 hole Six- 60 1.6 97.9 8.8 58 hole TABLE 28 Ammonium bicarbonate is used as a volatile solid in the spray drying solution to help achieve desirable physical characteristics in the final particles. As the concentration of ammonium bicarbonate increases, FPF and powder dispersibility improve. However, higher levels increase the HMWP and decrease the readily extractable protein product.
The range of ammonium bicarbonate concentration explored for the single-hole nozzle was 0-30 g/L and for the six-hole nozzle was 0-40 g/L. A sample of results from this example are set forth in Table 29.
IND
IND
0, Ammonium Bicarb
VMGD
Nozzle Cone. HMWP RE (1 bar) FPF, 3.3m FPF, 3.4 m Single- 10 1.1 97.9 9.1 69 hole Single- 29 2.0 96.6 7.6 77 hole Single- 0 1.2 95.5 12.4 52 hole Single- 30 1.2 95.5 5.6 hole TABLE 29 The addition of alcohol as a co-solvent to the aqueous phase in appropriate amounts helps achieve desired physical characteristics and reduces protein aggregation.
Too much alcohol content, however, results in detrimental structural changes in the protein. There are two alcohol levels that can affect the hGH: overall alcohol content of the solvent system and alcohol content that the hGH is exposed to upon mixing. The optimum overall alcohol content for the combined solvents was found to be 20/80 (v/v ethanol/water. Contact between hGH and high concentration ethanol was minimized by diluting the ethanol with water prior to combining it with the aqueous hGH solution.
First, the ethanol was diluted to 40 vol and mixed with an equal amount of 100% aqueous hGH solution to create a final feed solution of 20 vol ethanol. This procedure improved the end product To test the effects of further dilution of the organic phase, further tests were conducted lowering the ethanol content to 30 vol and then mixed with the aqueous hGH phase at a ratio of 2:1 organic:aqueous. In both cases, the singlehole nozzle was used. Representative results from this example are set forth in Table Water Content in Organic Organic: Phase Aqueous VMGD (vol Ratio HMWP RE (1 bar) FPF, 33gm Method 1:1 1.6 95.4 6.1 70 ACI-3, AIR1, 1pm 2:1 1.6 95.9 6.5 68 ACI-3, AIRI, 1pm TABLE Spray dryer outlet temperature is the temperature at the outlet of the spray drying drum. As the outlet temperature increases, the HMWP and the FPF increase and Qo the moisture content decreases. The range of spray dryer outlet temperature explored for the single-hole nozzle was 35-70 "C and for the six-hole nozzle was 35-65 Sample results from this example are set forth in Table 31.
VMGD FPF, Nozzle HMWP RE (1 bar) 33pgm Method Single- 40 1.5 97.2 7.1 57 ACI-3, Ch H, hole 28.3 1pm Single- 60 2.1 96.3 6.6 65 ACI-3, Ch H, hole 28.3 1pm TABLE 31 Atomization gas rate is the rate of the high-velocity gas that creates the liquid droplets in two-fluid atomization. The mass gas to liquid ratio (atomization gas to liquid feed rate) affects mean droplet size. Increase in the ratio decreases droplet size, which may in turn increase FPF. Thus, as atomization gas rate increases, the VMGD tends to decrease as the FPF increases. The range of atomization gas rate explored for the singlehole nozzle was 38-120 g/min and for the six-hole nozzle was 50-120 g/min.
Representative results from this example are set forth in Table 32.
Atomization VMGD FPF, Nozzle Gas Rate HMWP RE (1 bar) 3.3am FPF, 3.4gm Single- 46 1.2 97.5 9.6 hole Single- 64 1.1 97.9 9.1 69 hole Single- 64 1.2 97.9 7.9 71 hole Single- 80 1.3 98.6 8.1 78 hole Single- 46 1.6 94.0 9.3 54 hole Single- 120 2.4 95.3 7.9 58 hole TABLE 32 The liquid feed rate is the rate at which the liquid solutions are pumped into the atomizer and spray dryer. As the feed rates increase, the gas to liquid ratio decreases and thus the VMGD tends to increase as the FPF decreases. The range of liquid feed rates explored for the single-hole nozzle was 10-75 mL/min and for the six-hole nozzle was 10-40 mLmin. Representative results from this example are set forth in Table 33.
Liquid VMGD FPF, Nozzle Feed Rate HMWP RE (1 bar) 3.3m FPFD 3.4gm Single- 15 2.2 97.3 7.5 77 hole Single- 50 1.8 96.6 8.4 66 hole Six- 25 3.4 97.4 10.2 66 hole Six- 40 3.0 97.3 15.1 43 hole TABLE 33 [0208] The drying gas rate is the rate of the heating gas used to dry the droplets. This rate also controls the residence time within the dryer. The range of drying gas rate explored for the single-hole nozzle was 80-125 kg/hr. Sample results from this example are set forth in Table 34.
Drying VMGD FPF, Nozzle Gas Rate HMWP RE (1 bar) 3.4tm Method Single- 80 1.7 97.9 N/A N/A N/A hole Single- 110 2.1 97.8 N/A N/A N/A hole Single- 110 2.8 N/A 7.3 71 ACI-2, AIRI, hole 1pm Single- 125 2.4 N/A 8.0 70 ACI-2, AIRI, hole Ipm TABLE 34 ,As would be apparent to one of skill in the art, other drying gas rates may be used, depending upon variations in equipment or other production parameters (for example, the size of the dryer). In this example a size 1 dryer was used. Use of other size dryers may entail approximately the same liquid feed to drying gas ratio (mL liq/kg gas), which ranged from 4.8 to 56.25 mL liq/kg gas in this example.
Preparation ofDry Particles Containing Insulin Particles with a formulation containing insulin, DPPC, and sodium citrate were prepared using apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 2, and as described above for hGH. The resulting particles contained 60 wt% DPPC, 30 wt% insulin, and 10 wt% sodium citrate. A 1 L total combination volume was used, with a total solute concentration of 3 g/L in 60/40 ethanol/water. The aqueous solution was prepared as V) follows. 630 mg of citric acid monohydrate was added to 1.0 L of USP water to form L of 3.0 mM citrate buffer. The pH was adjusted to 2.5 with 1.0 N HC1. 900 mg insulin was dissolved in 400 mL of the citrate buffer. The pH was adjusted to pH 6.7 using 1.0 N 00 NaOH. The organic solution was prepared by dissolving 1.8 g of DPPC in 600 mL of 00 ethanol. 400 mL of water was added to the organic solution for a total volume of 1 L.
Ci The aqueous insulin solution and the organic solution were combined in a static Smixer, such as static mixer 230. The outflow of the static mixer flowed into rotary atomizer 240, and the resulting atomized droplets were spray dried in spray dryer 250.
The resulting 60 wt% DPPC, 30 wt% insulin, and 10 wt% sodium citrate particles were collected from bag house 260 into a container.
In order to obtain dry particles of particular physical and chemical characteristics, in vitro characterization tests can be carried out on the finished dry particles, and the process parameters adjusted accordingly, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. Alternatively, particles containing 60 wt%/ DPPC, 30 wt% insulin, and wt% sodium citrate could be produced using the apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6. In this manner, the desired aerodynamic diameter, geometric diameter, and particle density could be obtained for these particles in real-time, during the production process.
Preparation ofDry Particles Containing Humanized Monoclonal IgGI Antibody Particles with a formulation containing humanized monoclonal IgGI antibody and DPPC were prepared using apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 2, and as described above for hGH. The resulting particles contained 80 wt% humanized monoclonal IgGI antibody and 20 wt%/ DPPC. A 2 L total combination volume was used, with a total solute concentration of 1.0 g/L in 30/70 ethanol/water. The aqueous solution was prepared as follows. 25.0 mL of 47.8 mg/mL humanized monoclonal IgGI antibody solution was added to 1400 mL of USP water. The organic solution was prepared by mixing 0.8 g DPPC with 600 mL of ethanol.
The aqueous solution and the organic solution were combined in a static mixer, such as static mixer 230. The outflow of the static mixer flowed into rotary atomizer 240, and the resulting atomized droplets were spray dried in spray dryer 250. The resulting C particles were collected from bag house 260 into a container.
I In order to obtain dry particles of particular physical and chemical characteristics, in vitro characterization tests can be carried out on the finished dry particles, and the process parameters adjusted accordingly, as would be apparent to one 0 skilled in the art. Alternatively, particles containing 80 wt% humanized monoclonal 00 0- IgGI antibody and 20 wt% DPPC could be produced using the apparatus substantially as CN shown in FIG. 6. In this manner, the desired aerodynamic diameter, geometric diameter, I and particle density could be obtained for these particles in real-time, during the production process.
Preparation of Dry Particles Containing Epinepbrine Particles with a formulation containing epinephrine and leucine were prepared using apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 2, and as described above for hGH. The resulting particles contained 18 wt% epinephrine bitartrate and 82 wt%/ leucine. An aqueous solution was prepared as follows: 900 mg epinephrine bitartrate and 4.1 g leucine were added to 300 mL of USP water and dissolved by stirring.
The 300 mL of aqueous solution and 700 mL of ethanol were combined in a static mixer, such as static mixer 230. This resulted in spray drying a 1.0 liter total combination volume, with a total solute concentration of 5.0 g/L in 70/30 ethanol/water.
The outflow of the static mixer flowed into an atomizer, such as rotary atomizer 240, at an atomization rate of 19.5 gfmin and a feed rate of 65 ml/min. The resulting atomized droplets were spray dried using dry nitrogen as the drying gas in spray dryer 250. The resulting particles were collected from bag house 260 into a container.
In order to obtain dry particles of particular physical and chemical characteristics, in vitro characterization tests can be carried out on the finished dry particles, and the process parameters adjusted accordingly, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. Alternatively, particles containing 18 wt% epinephrine and 82 wt% leucine could be produced using the apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6. In this manner, the desired aerodynamic diameter, geometric diameter, and particle density could be obtained for these particles in real-time, during the production process.
V Preparation of Dry Particles Containing Salmeterol Xinafoate S Particles with a formulation containing salmeterol xinafoate, leucine, and DSPC were prepared using apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 2, and as described above 0 0 for hGH. The resulting particles contained 74.55 wt%/ DSPC, 24 wt% leucine, and 1.45 00 wt% salmeterol xinafoate. A 1 L total combination volume was used, with a total solute r"concentration of 1.0 g/L in 70/30 ethanol/water. The aqueous solution was prepared as 0follows. 240 mg leucine was dissolved in 300 mL of USP water. The organic solution 0 was prepared by dissolving 745.5 mg DSPC in 700 mL of ethanol. 14.5 mg salmeterol xinafoate was dissolved in the DSPC/ethanol solution. Both solutions were separately heated to J The aqueous solution and the organic solution were combined in a static mixer, such as static mixer 230. The outflow of the static mixer flowed into rotary atomizer 240, and the resulting atomized droplets were spray dried in spray dryer 250. The resulting particles were collected from bag house 260 into a container.
I In order to obtain dry particles of particular physical and chemical characteristics, in vitro characterization tests can be carried out on the finished dry particles, and the process parameters adjusted accordingly, as would be apparent to one skilled in the art. Alternatively, particles containing 74.55 wt%/ DSPC, 24 wt% leucine, and 1.45 wt% salmeterol xinafoate could be produced using the apparatus substantially as shown in FIG. 6. In this manner, the desired aerodynamic diameter, geometric diameter, and particle density could be obtained for these particles in real-time, during the production process.
Preparation of Dry Particles Containing Other Active Agents Based upon the above examples and description, it would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art how to prepare dry particles containing other active agents using the methods and apparatus of the present invention. For example, the apparatus of FIGS. 2 and 6 could be used to prepare dry particles containing a combination of salmeterol and ipatroprium bromide in substantially the same manner as described above for salmeterol.
The apparatus of FIGS. 2 and 6 can also be used, for example, to prepare dry particles containing albuterol sulfate, DPPC, DSPC, and leucine. The aqueous solution would be prepared by dissolving 200 mg leucine in 300 mL water to form an aqueous phase, and dissolving 40 mg of albuterol sulfate in the aqueous phase to form the aqueous solution.
The organic solution would be prepared by dissolving 380 mg DPPC in 700 mL of ethanol to form an organic phase, and dissolving 380 mg DSPC in the organic phase to O form the organic solution. The aqueous solution and the organic solution would be heated separately to 50°C. The aqueous solution and the organic solution would be o combined in a static mixer, such as static mixer 230. The outflow of the static mixer 0 would flow into rotary atomizer 240, and the resulting atomized droplets would be spray
F"-
Sdried in spray dryer 250. The resulting particles would be collected from bag house 260 IN into a container. The resulting particles would contain 38 wt% DPPC, 38 wt% DSPC, 0wt% leucine, and 4 wt% albuterol sulfate.
Conclusion While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. The present invention is not limited to the preparation of dry particles for inhalation, nor is it limited to a particular active agent, excipient, or solvent, nor is the present invention limited to a particular scale, batch size or particle size. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the abovedescribed exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
',2

Claims (14)

1. An apparatus for preparing a dry powder composition, comprising: 00 0 a a static mixer having an inlet end and an outlet end, said static 00 mixer operative to combine an aqueous component with an organic (Ni component to form a combination; a means for transporting the aqueous component to the inlet end of said static mixer; a means for transporting the organic component to the inlet end of said static mixer; an atomizer in fluid communication with the outlet end of said static mixer, whereby the combination is atomized to form droplets; and a dryer, wherein the droplets are dried in said dryer to form dry particles.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said atomizer comprises a rotary atomizer.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said rotary atomizer comprises a plurality of vanes.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said atomizer comprises an internal mixing nozzle.
The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the nozzle is a single-hole nozzle.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the nozzle is a six-hole nozzle. 05/09/06
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the nozzle comprises a mixing IDchamber, and a liquid feed inlet to the mixing chamber, wherein the liquid feed 0 inlet is positioned at an angle to a longitudinal axis of the nozzle to thereby 00 generate a thin sheet of liquid in the mixing chamber. IND 00
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the nozzle is a pressure nozzle. IND
9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said atomizer comprises an external mixing nozzle.
The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said dryer uses nitrogen gas to dry the droplets.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a bag filter coupled to an output of said dryer, wherein the dry particles are retained by said bag filter.
12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said means for transporting the aqueous component comprises a first pump and said means for transporting the organic component comprises a second pump.
13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein said first pump and said second pump transport the aqueous component and the organic component at different rates.
14. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising: 05/09/06 Sa geometric particle sizer coupled to said dryer, wherein said O geometric particle sizer determines a geometric diameter of the 0 dry particles; and 00 an aerodynamic particle sizer coupled to said dryer, wherein said 00 aerodynamic particle sizer determines an aerodynamic diameter Sof the dry particles. (NO Apparatus for preparing a dry powder composition substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Dated this 5 day of September 2006 Advanced Inhalation Research, Inc. Patent Attorneys for the Applicant PETER MAXWELL AND ASSOCIATES 05/09/06
AU2006207868A 2002-03-20 2006-09-06 Method and apparatus for producing dry particles Abandoned AU2006207868A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2006207868A AU2006207868A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2006-09-06 Method and apparatus for producing dry particles

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/101,563 2002-03-20
AU2003218256A AU2003218256C1 (en) 2002-03-20 2003-03-19 Method and apparatus for producing dry particles
AU2006207868A AU2006207868A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2006-09-06 Method and apparatus for producing dry particles

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2003218256A Division AU2003218256C1 (en) 2002-03-20 2003-03-19 Method and apparatus for producing dry particles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2006207868A1 true AU2006207868A1 (en) 2006-09-28

Family

ID=37075454

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2006207868A Abandoned AU2006207868A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2006-09-06 Method and apparatus for producing dry particles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2006207868A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2147674A1 (en) * 2008-07-24 2010-01-27 Besins Healthcare Transdermal pharmaceutical compositions comprising danazol
CN111624071A (en) * 2020-06-17 2020-09-04 北京雪迪龙科技股份有限公司 Generation device and method for standard particles with various particle sizes
CN114699780A (en) * 2022-03-22 2022-07-05 北京金轮坤天特种机械有限公司 Atomizer and powder preparation facilities of direct preparation of superfine spherical powder that agglomerates
WO2023094826A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-06-01 Orexo Ab Pharmaceutical composition comprising adrenaline
WO2023094816A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-06-01 Orexo Ab Pharmaceutical device for use in intranasal administration
US11737980B2 (en) 2020-05-18 2023-08-29 Orexo Ab Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2147674A1 (en) * 2008-07-24 2010-01-27 Besins Healthcare Transdermal pharmaceutical compositions comprising danazol
WO2010010168A1 (en) * 2008-07-24 2010-01-28 Besins Healthcare Transdermal pharmaceutical compositions comprising danazol
AU2009273211B2 (en) * 2008-07-24 2014-07-24 Besins Healthcare Luxembourg Sarl Transdermal pharmaceutical compositions comprising danazol
US11737980B2 (en) 2020-05-18 2023-08-29 Orexo Ab Pharmaceutical composition for drug delivery
CN111624071A (en) * 2020-06-17 2020-09-04 北京雪迪龙科技股份有限公司 Generation device and method for standard particles with various particle sizes
WO2023094826A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-06-01 Orexo Ab Pharmaceutical composition comprising adrenaline
WO2023094816A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-06-01 Orexo Ab Pharmaceutical device for use in intranasal administration
US20230310349A1 (en) * 2021-11-25 2023-10-05 Orexo Ab New pharmaceutical device for use in intranasal administration
US11957647B2 (en) 2021-11-25 2024-04-16 Orexo Ab Pharmaceutical composition comprising adrenaline
CN114699780A (en) * 2022-03-22 2022-07-05 北京金轮坤天特种机械有限公司 Atomizer and powder preparation facilities of direct preparation of superfine spherical powder that agglomerates

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1485069B1 (en) Method for producing dry particles
EP1379219B1 (en) Large, porous particles produced by controlling humidity during a spray draying process
AU2002258865A1 (en) Large, porous particles produced controlling humidity during a spray drying process
US8586093B2 (en) Pulmonary delivery for levodopa
AU2003218308B2 (en) hGH (human growth hormone) formulations for pulmonary administration
AU2006207868A1 (en) Method and apparatus for producing dry particles
AU2003218256C1 (en) Method and apparatus for producing dry particles
AU2006202536A1 (en) hGH (Human Growth Hormone) Formulations for Pulmonary Administration

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PC1 Assignment before grant (sect. 113)

Owner name: ALKERMES, INC.

Free format text: FORMER APPLICANT(S): ADVANCED INHALATION RESEARCH, INC.

MK4 Application lapsed section 142(2)(d) - no continuation fee paid for the application