AU2003203419A1 - Mixed cell diagnostic systems - Google Patents

Description

P/00/011 Regulation 3.2

AUSTRALIA

Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE

SPECIFICATION

FOR A STANDARD PATENT

ORIGINAL

TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Name of Applicant: I a Actual Inventor(s): r

F

Address for Service: A

P

Invention Title: Iv Details of Original Application )iagnostic Hybrids, Inc nd University Hospitals of Cleveland )AVID R SCHOLL IUNG T HUANG 'ATRICIA GAIL RAY GOODRUM Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys 0 Box 222, Mitcham, SA 5062 lixed Cell Diagnostic Systems No. 37616/99 dated 26th April 1999 The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us:- MIXED CELL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen. The present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Despite recent advances in methods for the detection of viruses using molecular methods, the detection and identification of these organisms in cell culture remains the "gold standard" by which most viral diseases are definitively diagnosed and the method against which newer methods are compared (See Wiedbrauk and Johnston, Manual of Clinical Virology. Raven Press. Inc., New York, NY [1993], pp. 1-17). Cell cultures are also used for the detection and identification of other intracellular parasites, especially obligate intracellular parasites such as Chlamydia and Rickettsia.

There are two general types of cell culture methods used for virus identification. The first method uses identification of virus-induced cytopathic effect (CPE) as an endpoint for virus detection. The second method utilizes molecular methods to identify the presence of virus before CPE is evident in the infected cultures. Both methods utilize cell cultures, which may present problems for small laboratories with limited expertise in cell culturing methods.

space, funding, equipment, and supplies. Depending upon the cells used, cell cultures can be difficult to maintain and often require the efforts of skilled laboratorians. In addition, cell cultures require equipment such as cell culture hoods, inverted microscopes (for observation of cells), incubators with CO, lines, and other equipment not readily available in many laboratories.

CPFE-BI:ased Tests L't-lbscId tcts tilcn rc uiic lon^g !icuktiofn ilncs. ais virus-induced C(I'L only becomes evident alter multiple rounds of viral replication and spread of virus to neighboring cells the cells arc "permissive" for viral infection). Virus spread results in the destruction of the cells surrounding the cell originally infected. CPE-based tests have been latraditionally conducted in tubes or flasks containing a single cell type that is adhered or anchored to the sides and/or bottom of the tube or flask. As the virus must infect a cell.

replicate, and spread to neighboring cells in which the process is repeated. results can be delayed for at least 28 days. Indeed, results are often not available for 7-28 days after inoculation of the cell culture with the virus suspension (See Leland. Clinical Virology, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia [1996], pp. 60-65). The time necessary to establish visible CPE is dependent upon the rate of viral replication, which can vary among cell types and viruses.

Thus, the amount of time needed to detect virus in a sample can greatly vary.

Pre-CPE Tests In contrast to CPE-based tests, pre-CPE tests require only entry of the virus into a susceptible host cell and detectable expression of at least one early virus-specific antigen or nucleic acid. Detection of the virus-specific analyte or other indicator is accomplished by a number of methods labeled antibodies, the polymerase chain reaction [PCR], or the use of other reporters, such as the ELVISTM system). Expression of early viral genes has been shown to be very rapid in many virus-host cell systems in vitro. Thus, use of pre-CPE based virus tests significantly reduces the time required to detect and identify viruses in clinical specimens.

Pre-CPE detection of virus is often accomplished by using monolayers of adherent cells grown on 12 mm round coverslips contained in 1 dram shell vials the "shell vial" method or technique). The shell vial technique uses centrifugation of the specimen to force viral introduction into cells and enhance viral isolation. These vials are prepared by dispensing cells into sterile shell vials containing coverslips. The vial are incubated in an upright position until the cells form a monolayer on the coverslip. For shell vial inoculation, the culture medium is decanted from the vial, processed sample the clinical specimen) is added to the cell monolayer, and the vial is centrifuged at low speed, often for one hour.

After centrifugation, fresh culture medium is added to each vial. The vials are then incubated for the desired period of time. At the end of the incubation period, the coverslips are stained using anl Ianlign detection method immunofluorescence) or the cells are evaluated via 311 n )lccul:n dialnostic techniques.

In addition to viruses, shell vials are also commonly used for the detection and identilication of Chlamydia, as other methods available for the detection and identification of -2these organisms are quite cumbersome, as well as time and reagent-consuming (See e.g..

Wiedbrauk and Johnston, supra, pp. 64-76).

The major advantage of these pre-CPE testing methods is that rapid test results arc often possible. One major disadvantage to pre-CPE testing of shell vial cultures is that this type of test is feasible and cost-effective only if one or a few viral agents are sought for identification, and if a high proportion of specimens are likely to be positive (See e.g..

Schmidt and Emmons. "General Principles of Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Viral, Rickettsial, and Chlamydial Infections," in Schmidt and Emmons Diagnostic Procedures for Viral. Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections, American Public Health Association, Washington. [1989], at p. 4).

Clinical Specimens For example, the presence of skin vesicles in the genital area of a patient is highly suspicious for infection by herpes simplex virus (HSV). Typically, the physician will obtain a specimen from the affected region a vesicle) and order a CPE or a pre-CPE virus test on a single. HSV-susceptible cell line. These cell lines are often supplied either in tubes.

shell vials, or multi-well plates microtiter plates). After inoculation of the cell line and an appropriate incubation time, confirmation of the presence of HSV in the sample can be accomplished using one or more of the many analytical methods immunofluorescence.

immunoperoxidase, nucleic acid probes, or substrates for virus-induced reporter genes).

For detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV), shell vials containing cells from a single cell line human fibroblast cell lines, such as lung [MRC-5 cells] or foreskin [HFF] cells) are often used. The cells are grown to confluency on the coverslip within the vial, the sample is added to the vial, the vial is incubated for 24-48 hours or longer, and an immunofluorescent method is used to detect expression of CMV early antigen.

Accurate differential diagnosis is significantly more difficult in virus diseases due to respiratory, gastrointestinal, genital, or parenteral routes of transmission because many pathogenic viruses are capable of eliciting similar symptoms or the infection is sub-clinical (i the si g ns and symptoms are not readily apparent).

the respiratory viruses. rhinoviruses and corona viruses arc responsible or a larg proportion of upper respiratory infections. Once these viruses reach the upper respiratory mucosa, they attach to and infect epithelial cells. Typically, these infections last only a few days and self-resolve. Other respiratory viruses, such as the influenzas, parainfluenzas.

A 111111111 WO 99/55917 PCT/US99/09015 respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and various adenoviruses attach to and infect ciliated, columnar epithelial cells. The virus-infected cells lyse, resulting in the release of enzymes and activate complement, resulting in a local mononuclear inflammatory response. Normal airway clearance mechanisms fail because of the failure of the epithelial cells to function normally. These cells may also slough off. Cell debris from dead and dying cells often obstructs airways, and the host becomes very susceptible to secondary bacterial infection and/or superinfection. All of these viruses may progress to lower respiratory involvement and pneumonia. After replication in the respiratory epithelial cells, adenovirus may travel via the blood to the lymphoid tissues in all areas of the body, causing systemic infection or disease.

Standard clinical virology practice is to inoculate multiple tubes of cell cultures with the specimen throat swab, nasopharyngeal swab, or sputum specimen) as the tropism of each type of virus for specific cell types is often very narrow only one type of virus may grow optimally on a single cell type). This narrow tropism of virus for a limited number of cell types creates at least two major practical problems for both CPE and pre-CPE virus testing.

First. primary monkey kidney cells are currently the cell line of choice for isolation of influenza viruses. The manufacture of these cells requires the quarantine of source animals for long periods prior to sacrifice and cell culture preparation. This quarantine period is used to monitor the animals for good health and allows time to test the animals for infection by endogenous simian viruses such as foamy virus, SV5, and SV40. The quarantine period also greatly reduces, but does not eliminate, the possibility that the monkeys are infected with Monkey B Virus, a herpesvirus that is highly fatal to humans. In addition, there are other problems related to the use of monkeys for the production of primary cell cultures, including the reduction in the stock of suitable animals due to importation concerns and monkey population considerations.

Second, additional continuous cell lines are required in order to detect respiratory viruses other than influenza virus. Thus, multiple cell lines are used in order to diagnose the viral infection/disease of each patient. The need for multiple units of individual cell lines is compounded in methods using pre-CPE tests lor detection and identilication of respiratory v\iruse s I'ie-(TI' testing lor respiratory virusCs requires the expenditure of si1lnilicant labor in handling covcrslips, the added expense of molecular reagents used with multiple cell lines for both positive and negative specimens, and the significant labor associated with microscopically reading each of the multiple cell lines inoculated in the panel of cell lines.

However, despite these drawbacks, shell vial technology using single cell types in multiple units (tubes, shell vials, etc.), is still currently used to detect respiratory viruses, as it is a proven method. For example, detection of RSV in 16 hours using shell vials containing only HEp-2 cells yielded more positives than antigen detection methods applied directly to the clinical specimen, and as many positives as conventional cell cultures (Smith et al., J. Clin.Microbiol., 29:463-465 [1991 Isolation of other respiratory viruses has also been possible with shell vial cultures containing a monolayer of a single cell type. For example, using vials of primary monkey kidney cells and A549 cells incubated for 40 hours, 83% of adenoviruses,94% of influenza B, and 80% of parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3 were identified (Rabalais et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 30:1505- 1508 [1992]). In another report, 50% of adenoviruses, 94% of influenza A viruses, 100% of influenza B viruses, and 100% of parainfluenza viruses, in shell vials of primary rhesus monkey kidney cells, and 92% of RSV in shell vials of HEp-2 cells incubated for 2-4 days (See Olsen et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 31:422-425 [1993]; and Leland, Clinical Virology, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA[1996], at p. 85-86).

Although these methods provide relatively rapid results as opposed to the long incubation periods often necessary for CPE tests), there remains a need in clinical and reference virology laboratories for cell culture methods and compositions for the reliable detection and identification of viruses in a single, easy-to-manipulate unit that provides rapid detection and identification in a cost-effective manner, while also providing the sensitivity of a diagnostic assay system.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION For the purpose of this specification the word "comprising" means "including but not limited to", and the word "comprise" has a corresponding meaning.

Reference in this specification to a document is not to be taken as an admission that the disclosure therein constitutes common general knowledge in Australia.

The present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen. The present invention also provides compositions and methods to evaluate the susceptibility of a organisms to antimicrobial agents.

In particular, the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable for the detection of viruses using CPE-based and pre-CPE methods. The preferred embodiments encompass mixed cell cultures which contain at least two different cell types. In some preferred embodiments, the mixed cell cultures contain two different cell types, while in other embodiments, the mixed cell cultures contain three or more different cell types. Thus, it is intended that the present invention encompass compositions in which at least two cell types are mixed together in one container flask, tube, shell vial, or any other container suitable for the growth of cells). Importantly, each cell type within these mixed cell cultures retains its susceptibility to viruses and other intracellular parasites as if it was in a single cell culture a cell culture that contains only one cell type, as known in the art). In addition, the mixed cell cultures of the present invention remain viable for as long as required for their use in diagnostic assays. In particularly preferred embodiments, the cell types included within mixed cell cultures are present in approximately the same ratio for a two cell type mixed, there is a 50:50 ratio of cell types). However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular ratio of cell types in mixed culture, as various detection systems may be optimized using different ratios. For example, in some circumstances, a two cell mixture of 45:55, 40:60, or even 35:75, may be more suited than a 50:50 ratio.

The present invention also provides methods and compositions suitable for the detection and identification of non-viral obligate intracellular and intracellular parasites, such as members of the Chlamydiales and Ricketsiales.

The present invention also contemplates compositions comprising a cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein the cell culture comprises at least two cell types susceptible to infection by at least one intracellular parasite. In some preferred embodiments of the composition, the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type. In some embodiments, the first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and the second cell type consists of mink lung cells. In other embodiments, the first cell type consists of mink lung cells and the second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells.

In yet other embodiments, the first cell type consists of human lung carcinoma cells and the second cell type consists of human mucoepidermoid cells. In still other embodiments, the first cell type consists of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and the second cell type consists of human embryonic lung cells. In further embodiments, the cell type consists of human epidermoid laryngeal carcinoma cells and the second cell type consists of McCoy cells. In additional embodiments, the first cell type consists of mink lung cells and the second cell type consists of human diploid lung cells.

In some preferred cmbodiments. the cell types ol the composition rc susceptible to respiratory viruses, including but not limited to influenza viruses of any type Influenza A. Influenza B. and Influenza C) and/or strain. RSV. cytomegalovirus, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses. In yet other embodiments, the cell types of the composition are susceptible to enteroviruses, including but not limited to any type and/or strain of echovirus, poliovirus, and Coxsackie virus Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruses, it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A.

The present invention also provides methods for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of providing a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites: and a mixed cell culture comprising at least two cell types: inoculating the mixed cell culture with the sample to produce an inoculated culture; and observing the inoculated culture for the presence of the one or more intracellular parasites.

In some embodiments of the method, the intracellular parasite is a virus. In some particularly preferred embodiments, the virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses. respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses. coronoviruses, and adenoviruses. In yet other embodiments of the methods, the virus is an enterovirus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of poliovirus, Coxsackic viruses and echoviruses Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruses. it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A. In still other preferred embodiments, the virus is a herpes virus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1. Herpes Simplex Type 2. Cytomegalovirus.

Varicella-Zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, Human Herpes Virus 6. Human Herpes Virus 7.

and Human Herpes Virus 8. In yet other preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia. In still other particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is C. trachomatis.

In some preferred embodiments of the methods, the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type. In some preferred embodiments, the first cell type is a mink lung cell. :nd the sccolnd cell type is a hunmn mucoepidermoid cell In other preferred cmbodliments. the l11rs cell type is ;i huliflo Lreen monnke kid ney cel l nd the second cell type is a human mucocpidermoid cell. In yet another alternative embodiment, the first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and the second cell type is a mink

I

lung cell. In still other embodiments, the first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and the second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type.

It is contemplated that the methods of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) and/or other intracellular organism of interest.

The present invention also provides methods for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, comprising the steps of providing: a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and a mixed cell culture comprising a first cell type and a second cell type; inoculating the mixed cell culture with the sample to produce an inoculated culture: and observing the inoculated culture for the presence of the one or more intracellular parasites.

In some particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is a virus. In some particularly preferred embodiments, the virus is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus. influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus.

rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses. In yet other embodiments of the methods. the virus is an enterovirus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of poliovirus, Coxsackie viruses and echoviruses (e.g.

Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruscs. it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A. In still other preferred embodiments, the virus is a herpes virus. In other particularly preferred embodiments, the herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus.

Varicella-Zoster virus. Epstein-Barr virus, Human Herpes Virus 6. Human Herpes Virus 7.

and Human Herpes Virus 8. In yet other preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is a member of the genus Chlamydia. In still other particularly preferred embodiments, the intracellular parasite is C. trachomatis.

In some preferred embodiments of the methods, the cell types comprise a first cell type and a second cell type. In some preferred embodiments, the first cell type is a mink lung cell. and the second cell type is a human m ucoepidermoid cell. In other prclcrred 3(I embodilcnts, the lirst cell type is a huffalo green mnllkc\ kidney cell and the second cell type is a human nucoepidermoid cell. In yet another alternative embodiment, the first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and the second cell type is a mink -8lung cell. In still other embodiments, the first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and the second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type.

It is contemplated that the methods of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) and/or other intracellular organism of interest.

The present invention further provides methods for the detection of influenza virus.

comprising the steps of providing a sample suspected of containing influenza virus, and mink lung cells; inoculating the mink lung cells with the sample; and detecting the presence of the influenza within the mink lung cells. In particularly preferred embodiments, the mink lung cells are MvlLu cells. In alternative embodiments, the influenza virus is selected from the group consisting of Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C.

It is contemplated that the methods of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) and/or other intracellular organism of interest.

In one embodiment, the present invention provides methods for the detection of infectious virus in a specimen comprising the steps of: a) providing a specimen suspected of containing a virus, a cell line permissive for infection by the virus, and a genetically engineered cell line containing an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a promoter sequence derived from the virus, wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene. and wherein the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of the virus; b) mixing together the permissive cell line and the genetically engineered cell line to create a mixed cell culture; c) inoculating the mixed cell culture with the specimen under conditions which permit the infection of the mixed cell culture by the virus; and d) detecting the expression of the reporter gene and thereby detecting the presence of virus in the specimen. In one preferred embodiment, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 80-99% of the permissive cell line and 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line. In other preferred embodiments. the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of equal proportions of the cell types used in the mixture.

In one embodiment of the method. the genetically engineered cell line contains an oligonudeltidc having J sequence compIising a herpesvirus inducible promoter opcrably linked to a reporter gene selected from the group comprising the Escherichia coli lacZ gene and a lucifcrase gene. In one preferred embodiment of the method, the genetically engineered cell line is BI-IKICPIOLacZ. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP6LacZ. However, it is not intended that the reporter gene be limited to the lacZ and luciferase genes. Indeed, it is contemplated that any suitable reporter gene known to those in the art will be useful in the method of the present invention.

It is also contemplated that various permissive cell lines will be useful in the method of the present invention. In one embodiment, the permissive cell line is permissive for infection with herpesvirus. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the permissive cell line is It is contemplated that the method of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) of interest. Thus, for mixed cultures in which genetically engineered cell lines are used, it is contemplated that the pattern of reporter gene expression present in a test sample from a clinical specimen) will be compared to the patterns of reporter gene expression in control samples known to be positive and/or negative for the virus(es) of interest. It is also contemplated that effects unrelated to the expression of the reporter gene will be detectable, including but not limited to CPE.

These effects, alone and in combination with the reporter gene expression may be used to detect the presence of viral infection.

The present invention also provides methods for the typing of infectious herpesvirus in specimens, comprising the steps of: a) providing a specimen suspected of containing one or more members of the herpesvirus family, a cell line permissive for infection by one or more members of the herpesvirus family, a genetically engineered cell line containing an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a promoter sequence derived from a member of the herpesvirus family wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of herpesvirus and wherein the expression of the reporter gene varies in a distinguishable manner as a result of the presence of different members of the herpesvirus family: b) mixing together the permissive cell line and the genetically engineered cell line to create a mixed cell culture; c) inoculating this mixed cell culture with the specimen under conditions which permit the infection of the mixed cell culture by members of the herpesvirus family. wherein the infection results in a distinguishable pattern of expression hb the reporter .1 gene; detecting the expression of the crporter gene and thlerely detecting the presence ol one or more members of the herpesvirus family in the specimen: and e) identifying the presence of a specific member of the herpesvirus family based upon the resulting distinguishable pattern. It is contemplated that this pattern of expression will be observable 10 by various assisted and non-assisted methods, including visual observation by eye, spectrophotometric observation, etc. It is not intended that the detection of distinguishable pattern(s) be limited to any particular method of detection.

In a preferred embodiment of the typing method of the present invention, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 80-99% of the permissive cell line and 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line. In yet other preferred embodiments, the cell types are in approximate equal proportions in the mixed cell cultures. As with the first method described, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular herpesvirus. In one particular embodiment, the member of the herpesvirus family detected and typed using the method of the present invention is selected from the group comprising HSV-1. HSV-2, CMV, VZV. EBV. and human herpes viruses such as HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8. It is intended that one or more herpesviruses may be detected and typed in one specimen. In this manner, co-infection with multiple herpesviruses may be diagnosed. For example, it is contemplated that mixed infections with HSV-I and HSV-2 may be detectable and the infections distinguished using the methods of the present invention.

In one embodiment of the typing method, the reporter gene comprises E. coli lacZ gene. However, it is not intended that the reporter gene be limited to lacZ. Indeed, it is contemplated that any reporter gene may be used in this method. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the detection of the reporter gene is accomplished through the use of histochemical staining. It is contemplated that one member of the herpesvirus family will produce an histochemically pattern of expression that is distinguishable from the histochemical patterns produced by other members of the herpesvirus family. In this manner, it is possible to use the methods of the present invention to distinguish infection with one herpesvirus from infection with another herpesvirus.

It is contemplated that the method of the present invention will be used in conjunction with controls of known positivity and negativity for the virus(es) of interest. Thus, it is contemplated that the pattern of expression present in a test sample from a clinical specimen) will be compared to the patterns of expression in control samples known to be positive and/or necative for the virus(es) of interest. It is also contemplated that effects uinrelated ito th(e expression ol the i tl -ler t 1 wil l CIe delectable. ineludin tIIi- i not limited it CPE. These eftects. alone and in combination with reporter gene expression may be used to detect the presence of viral infection, as well as provide information to distinguish between viruses.

1I In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a composition comprising a mixed cell culture, wherein the mixed cell culture comprises the combination of a genetically engineered cell line transformed with a promoter sequence from a virus, wherein the promoter sequence is operably linked to a reporter gene, and wherein expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of virus, and a non-engineered cell line which is permissive for virus infection.

In one embodiment of the composition, the mixed cell culture is a mixture consisting of 1-20% of the genetically engineered cell line and 80-99% of the permissive cell line. In yet other preferred embodiments, the cell types are in approximate equal proportions in the mixed cell cultures. In one preferred embodiment of the composition, the genetically engineered cell line component may comprise a promoter for a gene that encodes ribonucleotide reductase. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the promoter may comprise genes that encode one or more subunits of ribonucleotide reductase. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICPIOLacZ, while in another particularly preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line is BHKICP6LacZ. In an alternative embodiment of the composition, the genetically engineered cell line comprises an E. coli lacZ gene positioned 3' to a virus inducible promoter. It is contemplated that this lacZ gene be positioned immediately 3' to this virus-inducible promoter. However, it is not intended that these sequences will be contiguous. Indeed.,it is contemplated only that the reporter and promoter genes are operably linked. Furthermore, it is contemplated that the composition will comprise promoter sequences from any virus, including but not limited to members of the herpesvirus family. It is also contemplated that the non-engineered cell line be permissive for infection by any number of viruses, including but not limited to members of the herpesvirus family.

In one preferred embodiment, the composition includes a genetically engineered cell line which includes a promoter for a gene that encodes a ribonucleotide reductase large subunit and the virus is a member of the herpesvirus family selected from the group consisting of HSV-I, HSV-2. CMV. VZV, EBV. HHV-6, HHV-7. and HI-IV-8. However, it is not intended that the present invention he limited to any pirlicult r herpesvirus. In one preferred embodiment, the geneitically engineered cell line component contains an ICPI0 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-2, while in another preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line comprises an ICP6 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-1.

12 It is contemplated that the detection of reporter gene expression be accomplished through the use of various methods, including, but not limited to colorimetric. fluorimetric or luminometric assays or assay systems. In one preferred embodiment, the reporter gene encodes P-galactosidase.

In one embodiment, the composition includes a genetically engineered cell line that is a mammalian cell line susceptible to infection by virus. In one preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered cell line comprises baby hamster kidney cells cell lines derived from BHK cells). In one embodiment, the composition includes a permissive cell line that is permissive to infection by herpesviruses, including but not limited to HSV-1 and H-SV-2. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the permissive cell line is MRC-5. It is not intended that the composition of the present invention be limited to detection of viral infection based on the expression of the reporter gene, as effects such as CPE may also be detectable.

The present invention also provides a kit for assaying for the presence of infectious herpesvirus in a specimen. The kit includes: a) a supply of a mixed cell line comprised of a cell line of genetically engineered mammalian cells susceptible to infection by herpesvirus, wherein the cell line contains an oligonucleotide having a sequence comprising a virus promoter sequence operably linked to a reporter gene, and where the expression of the reporter gene is dependent upon and quantitatively proportional to the presence of virus in the specimen; and a cell line permissive for virus; and b) a supply of reagents to detect the expression of the reporter gene. It is not intended that the promoter sequences present within the genetically engineered cell line be limited to any particular virus or virus family. It is contemplated that any virus promoter will be useful in the kit of the present invention.

However, in one preferred embodiment, herpesvirus promoter sequences are present in the genetically engineered cell line.

It is contemplated that various promoter sequences will be useful in the kit of the present invention. However, in a preferred embodiment, the promoter encodes either a complete ribonucleotide reductase enzyme, or in the alternative, subunits of ribonucleotide reductasc. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the promoter sequence contains a promcoter Ir a; clc that encode.s a rihonucleotide reductse larCe subunit and the herpesvirus 0 is a hlrpesvirus lamil member selected from the uroup consisinO of IISV-I. IHSV-2. CMV.

VZV. EBV. I-HV-6. HHIV-7. and HHV-8. However, it is not intended that the kit will be limited to this list of herpesviruses. Indeed, it is contemplated that any herpesvirus may be detected using the present kit. In one particularly preferred embodiment of the kit. the 13 promoter sequence contains an ICPIO promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-2.

while in an alternative preferred embodiment, the promoter sequence contains an ICP6 promoter and the herpesvirus family member is HSV-1.

In one preferred embodiment of the kit, the promoter sequence present in the genetically engineered cell line comprises an E. coli lacZ gene that is operably linked to a herpesvirus inducible promoter. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the genetically engineered mammalian cells are BHKICPIOLacZ cells, while in an alternative embodiment, the cells are BHKICP6LacZ cells.

In one preferred embodiment, the reporter gene encodes p-galactosidase. However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular reporter gene. It is also contemplated that the reporter gene will encode any number of enzymes that are amenable to detection by various methods, including but not limited to such methods as colorimetric, fluorimetric or luminometric assay systems. In one preferred embodiment of the kit, the reagents provided for the detection of reporter gene expression may include, but are not limited to. solutions of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-p-D-galactopyranoside. o-nitrophenylgalactopyranoside solution, and fluorescein di-P-D-galactopyranoside. However, it is not intended to limit the kit to these assay systems, as other systems radiomnetric assay systems) may be useful.

It is contemplated that the kit of the present invention may also include additional components, such as materials suitable for positive and negative controls and instructions for use. It is not intended that the kit of the present invention be limited to the mixed cell line and reagents for the detection of reporter gene expression. It is also intended that the kit will be useful for detection of viral effects on cells other than and unrelated to reporter gene expression. For example, it is contemplated that the kit may be useful for detection of CPE.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention generally relates to the field of diagnostic microbiology, and more particularly, to compositions and methods for detecting and differentiating one or more viruses or other intracellular parasites present in a specimen. The present inventicon also 3d provides compositions and methods 1t evaluate the susceptibility of a oruani .sms to antimicrobial agents.

The present invention provides methods and compositions for the detection of several different viruses, as well as other intracellular organisms present in clinical and other 14 specimens in a single cell culture unit comprised of a mixture of cells grown in a manner to co-exist as a monolaycr of relatively equivalent ratio and demonstrating complementary susceptibilities to a wider range of viruses and/or other organisms than could be detected by each individual cell line. For example, the viral assays involve inoculating a cell mixture with a specimen suspected of containing a virus, allowing a sufficient period of time for the virus infectious cycle to proceed, followed by the detection and/or quantification of the number of virus-infected cells to determine the number of infectious virions in the specimen.

This detection step may be accomplished using any number of available confirmation methods, including specific viral antigen detection using antigen-specific antibodies, nucleic acid probes, and reporter gene detection. The assay also provides reliable methods and compositions for the quantification of the number of infectious virions present in a sample.

In addition, the methods and compositions of the present invention are sufficiently sensitive that the presence of a single virion in a specimen may be detected.

The present invention also provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of various cell types traditionally used in single cell assays. In preferred embodiments, the cells are mixed to produce mixed monolayer cell cultures. One such mixed cell culture includes mink lung MvlLu) cells co-cultivated with human mucoepidermoid cells NCI- H292; also referred to as "H292" cells). This cell mixture is susceptible to viruses such as influenza A. influenza B. RSV. parainfluenza types 1. 2. and 3. adenovirus. and CMV the group of viruses most commonly associated with respiratory virus disease). In other mixed cultures, buffalo green monkey kidney cells (BGMK) are co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells for the detection and identification of enteroviruses, such as poliovirus, echoviruses and Coxsackie B virus Coxsackie A and B viruses), and numbered EV strains. In addition to enteroviruses, it is contemplated that the present invention encompass cell types that are susceptible to picornaviruses such as Hepatitis A.

The present invention also provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of different cell types traditionally used in single cell assays that are co-cultivated with genetically engineered cells. In particularly preferred embodiments, the genetically engineered cell line is a D)NA-transfected cell line that is susceptible lo infection hv a virus.

0( the cell line ha\inlg beenI staiily trainsfolirmied \ith a; chimeprc e ne comprising v irusinducible promoter and a gene coding for an enzyme, the expression of the enzyme being dependent upon the presence of the virus. Such genetically engineered cells are, for example.

described in U.S. Patent No. 5,418,132, herein incorporated by reference. In one preferred 15 embodiment, a cell mixture includes human lung fibroblasts MRC-5 cells) co-cultivated with a stable baby hamster kidney (BIIK) cell line, the genome of which has been engineered to contain the E. coli lacZ gene behind 3' to) an inducible HSV promoter. HSV-1 ICP6 promoter (BHK/ICP6LacZ-5 cells are available from the ATCC as CRL-12072). This cell mixture is susceptible to infection by CMV and HSV types 1 and 2.

In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides compositions comprising novel mixtures of different types of genetically engineered cells. In particularly preferred embodiments, the genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line that is susceptible to infection by a virus, the cell line having been stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter and a gene coding for an enzyme, the expression of the enzyme being dependent upon the presence of the virus. The second genetically engineered cell line is a DNA-transfected cell line susceptible to viral infection, which is stably transformed with a chimeric gene comprising a virus-inducible promoter, and a gene encoding a second enzyme an enzyme that is different from that associated with the first cell line), in which the expression of the second enzyme is dependent upon the presence of a second virus. In one preferred embodiment, a cell mixture is prepared in which engineered BHK cells BHK/ICP6/LacZ-5 cells) are co-cultivated with a stable mink lung cell line (Mvl Lu). the genome of which has been engineered to contain the an inducible CMV promoter (the CMV UL45 promoter); these cells are referred to as "MLID5" cells, and are disclosed in U.S. Patent Appln. Ser. No. 08/846.026. herein incorporated by reference.

This cell mixture is susceptible to infection by CMV and HSV virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2). with CMV infecting the genetically engineered BHK cells, and HSV-1 and HSV-2 preferentially infecting the mink lung cells. In another embodiment, the present invention contemplates the use of genetically engineered cells mink lung cells) in which the cell genome is engineered to contain the firefly luciferase gene behind 3' to) an inducible CMV promoter; these cells are also described in U.S. Patent Appln. Ser. No.

08/846.026. However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular cell types or cell lines, nor is it intended that the present invention be limited to any particular comhinations of cells. It is also not intended that the present invention he limited in terms o(1 (the genetically eniiineered cells.

l hc following Table provides a matrix which indicates the ability of various cells to form single, confluent monolayers. as well as co-cultivated, conlluent, mixed cell monolayers.

16- Table 1. Cell Cultures CV-1I BGMK McCo* B 1-1K* 2 34 5 No CV-l 1 N o BGMK

C+

BFI1K* A549 HEp-2

C

Mv ILu

NCI-

H292 Denotes ,11nLlc cell types producing con1fluent monolayers Denotes; ,oe degree of dimorphic, mixed monolayer Yes Denotes,:1 cciiti res that appeal' Very) Utiform1, withl an1 Ceen C iStribUtion No Denotes cell immutres that did not appear to work Denotes gcnica~llY engineered ELVIS BHK cells.

A549 6 HEp-2 7 Yes Mv I Lu 8

NCI-

1-1292 9 In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides kits for assaying samples for the presence of infectious viruses. In these kits. mixed cell cultures are provided which facilitate the detection and identification of particular virus groups (e.g.,viruses associated with respiratory infections/diseases). In the kits, co-cultivated cells are supplied either frozen or dispensed ready for use) in shell vials, tubes, or multiwell plates. These cells are susceptible to infection by the virus group of interest as indicated by the sample type. In preferred embodiments, the kits also include reagents necessary to detect expression of viral antigens or virus-induced reporter gene expression.

One of the several advantages of the present invention is that it provides rapid and sensitive assay systems for the detection and identification of a single virus type from a multiplicity of possibilities, in a single mixed cell unit that is suitable for diagnostic assay.

Thus, the present invention eliminates the need for multiple cell lines cultured in individual containers, provides reliable results in 1-3 days following inoculation of the cell cultures, rather than 1-28 days. eliminates the necessity of working with primary cell cultures, provides an efficient screening method for grouping and preliminary identification of viruses, and provides assay systems that are highly specific for viruses capable of inducing reporter gene expression. Thus, the present invention clearly fulfills a need that has been heretofore unmet in the field of diagnostic virology.

Definitions The terms "sample" and "specimen" in the present specification and claims are used in their broadest sense. On the one hand, they are meant to include a specimen or culture. On the other hand. they are meant to include both biological and environmental samples. These terms encompasses all types of samples obtained from humans and other animals, including but not limited to, body fluids such as urine, blood, fecal matter, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

semen, sputum. and saliva, as well as solid tissue. These terms also refers to swabs and other sampling devices which are commonly used to obtain samples for culture of microorganisms.

Biological samples may be animal, including human, fluid or tissue. food products and ingredients such as dairy items, vegetables, meat and meat by-products. and waste.

linvironmentll samples include environmental material such as surface matter. soil. wa't. and industrial samples, as well as samples obtained from food and dairy processing instruments.

apparatus. equipment, disposable, and non-disposable items. These examples are not to be construed as limiting the sample types applicable to the present invention.

18 Whether biological or environmental, a sample suspected of containing microorganisms may (or may not) first be subjected to an enrichment means to create a "pure culture" of microorganisms. By "enrichment means" or "enrichment treatment," the present invention contemplates conventional techniques for isolating a particular microorganism of interest away from other microorganisms by means of any culture medium and/or technique, and (ii) novel techniques for isolating particular microorganisms away from other microorganisms. It is not intended that the present invention be limited only to one enrichment step or type of enrichment means. For example, it is within the scope of the present invention, following subjecting a sample to a conventional enrichment means, to subject the resultant preparation to further purification such that a pure culture of a strain of a species of interest is produced. This pure culture may then be analyzed by the medium and method of the present invention.

As used herein, the term "organism" and "microorganism." are used to refer to any species or type of microorganism, including but not limited to viruses and bacteria, including rickettsia and chlamydia. Thus, the term encompasses, but is not limited to DNA and RNA viruses, as well as organisms within the orders Rickettsiales and Chlamv.diales.

As used herein, the term "culture," refers to any sample or specimen which is suspected of containing one or more microorganisms. "Pure cultures" are cultures in which the organisms present are only of one strain of a particular genus and species. This is in, contrast to "mixed cultures," which are cultures in which more than one genus and/or species of microorganism are present.

As used herein, the term "cell type." refers to any cell, regardless of its source or characteristics.

As used herein, the term "cell line," refers to cells that are cultured in vitro, including primary cell lines, finite cell lines, continuous cell lines, and transformed cell lines.

As used herein, the terms "primary cell culture," and "primary culture." refer to cell cultures that have been directly obtained from animal or insect tissue. These cultures may be derived from adults as well as fetal tissue.

As used herein, the crnm "liniec cell lines." refer it cell culures thnt nue capable of ;t limited number ol populatioLi d(liouWilms, prior to senescence.

As used herein, the term "continuous cell lines." refer to cell cultures that have undergone a "crisis" phase during which a population of cells in a primary or tinite cell line apparently ceases to grow, but yet a population of cells emerges with the general 19 characteristics of a reduced cell size, higher growth rate, higher cloning efficiency, increased tumorigenicity, and a variable chromosomal complement. These cells often result from spontaneous transformation in vitro. These cells have an indefinite lifespan.

As used herein, the term "transformed cell lines," refers to cell cultures that have been transformed into continuous cell lines with the characteristics as described above.

Transformed cell lines can be derived directly from tumor tissue and also by in vitro transformation of cells with whole virus SV40 or EBV), or DNA fragments derived from a transforming virus using vector systems.

As used herein, the term "hybridomas," refers to cells produced by fusing two cell types together. Commonly used hybridomas include those created by the fusion of antibodvsecreting B cells from an immunized animal, with a malignant myeloma cell line capable of indefinite growth in vitro. These cells are cloned and used to prepare monoclonal antibodies.

As used herein, the term "mixed cell culture," refers to a mixture of two types of cells.

In some preferred embodiments, the cells are cell lines that are not genetically engineered, while in other preferred embodiments the cells are genetically engineered cell lines. In some embodiments, the one or more of the cell types is re "permissive" virus is capable of replication and spread from cell to cell within the culture). The present invention encompasses any combination of cell types suitable for the detection, identification, and/or quantitation of viruses in samples, including mixed cell cultures in which all of the cell types used are not genetically engineered, mixtures in which one or more of the cell types are genetically engineered and the remaining cell types are not genetically engineered, and mixtures in which all of the cell types are genetically engineered.

As used herein, the term "suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites." refers to cell cultures that can be successfully used to detect the presence of an intracellular parasite in a sample. In preferred embodiments, the cell cultures are capable of maintaining their susceptibility to infection and/or support replication of the intracellular parasite. It is not intended that the present invention be limited to a particular cell type or intracellular parasite.

As used herein, the term "susceptible to infection" refers to the ability of a cell to become infected with virus or another intracellular organism. Although it encompasscs 3 "permissive" infections. it is not intended that the term be so limited. as it is intended that the term encompass circumstances in which a cell is infected, but the organism does not necessarily replicate and/or spread from the infected cell to other cells. The phrase "viral 20 proliferation." as used herein describes the spread or passage of infectious virus from a permissive cell type to additional cells of either a permissive or susceptible character.

As used herein, the terms "monolayer," "monolayer culture," and "monolayer cell culture." refer to cells that have adhered to a substrate and grow in as a layer that is one cell in thickness. Monolayers may be grown in any format, including but not limited to flasks, tubes, coverslips shell vials), roller bottles, etc. Cells may also be grown attached to microcarriers, including but not limited to beads.

As used herein, the term "suspension." and "suspension culture," refers to cells that survive and proliferate without being attached to a substrate. Suspension cultures are typically produced using hematopoietic cells, transformed cell lines, and cells from malignant tumors.

As used herein, the terms "culture media," and "cell culture media," refers to media that are suitable to support the growth of cells in vitro cell cultures). It is not intended that the term be limited to any particular culture medium. For example, it is intended that the definition encompass outgrowth as well as maintenance media. Indeed, it is intended that the term encompass any culture medium suitable for the growth of the cell cultures of interest.

As used herein, the term "obligate intracellular parasite," (or "obligate intracellular organism) refers to any organism which requires an intracellular environment for its survival and/or replication. Obligate intracellular parasites include viruses, as well as many other organisms. including certain bacteria most members of the orders Rickelnsiales Coxiella. Rickettsia and Ehrlichia and Chlamydiales C. trachomatis. C. psittaci], etc).

The term "intracellular parasite," refers to any organism that may be found within the cells of a host animal, including but not limited to obligate intracellular parasites briefly described above. For example, intracellular parasites include organisms such as Brucella, Listeria.

Mycobacterium M. tuberculosis and M. leprae), and Plasmodium. as well as Rochalimea.

As used herein, the term "antimicrobial." is used in reference to any compound which inhibits the growth of, or kills microorganisms. It is intended that the term he used in its broadest sense. :in(l includes. but is not limited to compounds such as antihiotics which are produced naturall\ or( synthetically It is also intended that the term includes compounds and elements that are useful for inhibiting the growth of. or killing microorganisms.

As used herein, the terms "chromogenic compound." and "chromogcnic substrate," refer to any compound useful in detection systems by their light absorption or emission -21 characteristics. The term is intended to encompass any enzymatic cleavage products, soluble, as well as insoluble, which are detectable either visually or with optical machinery. Included within the designation "chromogenic" are all enzymatic substrates which produce an end product which is detectable as a color change. This includes, but is not limited to any color, as used in the traditional sense of "colors," such as indigo, blue. red, yellow, green, orange, brown, etc., as well as fluorochromic or fluorogenic compounds. which produce colors detectable with fluorescence the yellow-green of fluorescein. the red of rhodamine, etc.).

It is intended that such other indicators as dyes pH) and luminogenic compounds be encompassed within this definition.

As used herein, the commonly used meaning of the terms "pl- indicator," "redox indicator," and "oxidation-reduction indicator," are intended. Thus. "pH indicator," encompasses all compounds commonly used for detection of pH changes, including, but not limited to phenol red, neutral red, bromthymol blue, bromcresol purple, bromcresol green, bromchlorophenol blue, m-cresol purple, thymol blue, bromcresol purple, xylenol blue.

methyl red, methyl orange, and cresol red. The terms "redox indicator," and "oxidationreduction indicator." encompasses all compounds commonly used for detection of oxidation/reduction potentials including, but not limited to various types or forms of tetrazolium, resazurin. and methylene blue.

As used herein, the term "inoculating suspension," or "inoculant." is used in reference to a suspension which may be inoculated with organisms to be tested. It is not intended that the term "inoculating suspension," be limited to a particular fluid or liquid substance. For example, inoculating suspensions may be comprised of water, saline, or an aqueous solution.

It is also contemplated that an inoculating suspension may include a component to which water, saline or any aqueous material is added. It is contemplated in one embodiment, that the component comprises at least one component useful for the intended microorganism. It is not intended that the present invention be limited to a particular component.

As used herein, the term "kit," is used in reference to a combination of reagents and other materials.

As used herein, the term "primary isolation" refers to the process of culturing 3( orguansims directly Iromni samiple. As used herein, the termi "isolation." rclcrs to any cultivation of organisms, whether it be primary isolation or any subsequent cultivation, including "passage," or "transfer," of stock cultures of organisms for maintenance and/or use.

22 As used herein, the term "presumptive diagnosis," refers to a preliminary diagnosis which gives some guidance to the treating physician as to the etiologic organism involved in the patient's disease. Presumptive diagnoses are often based on "prcsumptive identifications." which as used herein refer to the preliminary identification of a microorganism.

As used herein, the term "definitive diagnosis," is used to refer to a final diagnosis in which the etiologic agent of the patient's disease has been identified. The term "definitive identification" is used in reference to the final identification of an organism to the genus and/or species level.

The term "recombinant DNA molecule," as used herein refers to a DNA molecule which is comprised of segments of DNA joined together by means of molecular biological techniques.

DNA molecules are said to have ends" and ends" because mononucleotides are reacted to make oligonucleotides in a manner such that the 5' phosphate of one mononucleotide pentose ring is attached to the 3' oxygen of its neighbor in one direction via a phosphodiester linkage. Therefore, an end of an oligonucleotides is referred to as the end" if its 5' phosphate is not linked to the 3' oxygen of a mononucleotide pentose ring and as the end" if its 3' oxygen is not linked to a 5' phosphate of a subsequent mononucleotide pentose ring. As used herein, a nucleic acid sequence. even if internal to a larger oligonucleotide, also may be said to have 5' and 3 ends. In either a linear or circular DNA molecule, discrete elements are referred to as being "upstream" or 5' of the "downstream" or 3' elements. This terminology reflects the fact that transcription proceeds in a 5' to 3' fashion along .the DNA strand. The promoter and enhancer elements which direct transcription of a linked gene are generally located 5' or upstream of the coding region (enhancer elements can exert their effect even when located 3' of the promoter element and the coding region). Transcription termination and polyadenylation signals are located 3' or downstream of the coding region.

The term "an oligonucleotide having a nucleotide sequence encoding a gene." refers to a DNA sequence comprising the coding region of a gene or. in other words, the DNA sequence which encodes a gene product. The coding region may he present in either a cl)NA or gcnomic I)NA form. Suitable control elements such as enhancers. promoters. splice junctions. polyadenylation signals, etc. may be placed in close proximity to the coding region of the gene if needed to permit proper initiation of transcription and/or correct processing of the primary RNA transcript. Alternatively, the coding region utilized in the vectors of the 23 present invention may contain endogenous enhancers and/or promoters, splice junctions.

intervening sequences, polyadenylation signals, etc. or a combination of both endogenous and exogenous control elements.

The term "transcription unit," as used herein refers to the segment of DNA between the sites of initiation and termination of transcription and the regulatory elements necessary for the efficient initiation and termination. For example, a segment of DNA comprising an enhancer/promoter, a coding region, and a termination and polyadenylation sequence comprises a transcription unit.

The term "regulatory element," as used herein refers to a genetic element which controls some aspect of the expression of nucleic acid sequences. For example, a promoter is a regulatory element which facilitates the initiation of transcription of an operably linked coding region. Other regulatory elements are splicing signals, polyadenylation signals, termination signals, etc. (defined infra).

The terms "reporter gene construct," or "reporter gene vector." as used herein refers to a recombinant DNA molecule containing a sequence encoding the product of a reporter gene and appropriate nucleic acid sequences necessary for the expression of the operably linked coding sequence in a particular host organism. Eukaryotic cells are known to utilize promoters, enhancers, and termination and polyadenylation signals.

The term "reporter gene," refers to an oligonucleotide having a sequence encoding a gene product (typically an enzyme) which is easily and quantifiably assayed when a construct comprising the reporter gene sequence operably linked to a heterologous promoter and/or enhancer element is introduced into cells containing (or which can be made to contain) the factors necessary for the activation of the promoter and/or enhancer elements. Examples of reporter genes include but are not limited to bacterial genes encoding p-galactosidase (lacZ), the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) genes, firefly luciferase genes and genes encoding -glucuronidase (GUS).

Transcriptional control signals in eukaryotes comprise "promoter" and "enhancer" elements. Promoters and enhancers consist of short arrays of DNA sequences that interact specifically with cellular proteins involved in transcription (Maniatis. 'et Science 236:1237 119i71) I'lronmotr and enhancer elements have been isolated from a vanritev cukar\otic sources including genes in yeast, insect and mammalian cells and viruses (analogous control elements promoters, are also found in prokaryotes]). The selection of a particular promoter and enhancer depends on what cell type is to be used to express the protein of 24 interest. Some eukaryotic promoters and enhancers have a broad host range while others arc functional in a limited subset of cell types (for review sec Voss, el al., Trends Biochem. Sci..

11:287 [1986], and Maniatis, et al., supra [1987]). For example, the SV40 early gene enhancer is very active in a wide variety of cell types from many mammalian species and has been widely used for the expression of proteins in mammalian cells (Dijkema. et al., EMBO J. 4:761 [1985]). Two other examples of promoter/enhancer elements active in a broad range of mammalian cell types are those from the human elongation factor lao gene (Uetsuki el al., J. Biol. Chem., 264:5791 [1989]; Kim el al., Gene 91:217 [1990]; and Mizushima and Nagata, Nuc. Acids. Res.. 18:5322 [1990]) and the long terminal repeats of the Rous sarcoma virus (Gorman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:6777 [1982]). and the human cytomegalovirus (Boshart ei al., Cell 41:521 [1985]).

The term "promoter/enhancer," denotes a segment of DNA which contains sequences capable of providing both promoter and enhancer functions (for example, the long terminal repeats of retroviruses contain both promoter and enhancer functions). The enhancer/promoter may be "endogenous," or "exogenous," or "heterologous." An endogenous enhancer/promoter is one which is naturally linked with a given gene in the genome. An exogenous (heterologous) enhancer/promoter is one which is placed in juxtaposition to a gene by means of genetic manipulation molecular biological techniques).

The presence of "splicing signals," on an expression vector often results in higher levels of expression of the recombinant transcript. Splicing signals mediate the removal of introns from the primary RNA transcript and consist of a splice donor and acceptor site (Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York [1989], pp. 16.7-16.8). A commonly used splice donor and acceptor site is the splice junction from the 16S RNA of Efficient expression of recombinant DNA sequences in eukaryotic cells requires signals directing the efficient termination and polyadenylation of the resulting transcript.

Transcription termination signals are generally found downstream of the polyadenylation signal and are a few hundred nucleotides in length. The term "poly A site." or "poly A sequence." as used herein denotes a DNA sequence which directs hoth the termination and polyadenylation of the nascent KNA transcript IftTicieit polyadenylation of lth recombinant transcript is desirable as transcripts lacking a poly A tail are unstable and are rapidly degraded. The poly A signal utilized in an expression vector may be "heterologous" or "endogenous." An endogenous poly A signal is one that is found naturally at the 3' end of 25 the coding region of a given gene in the genome. A heterologous poly A signal is one which is isolated from one gene and placed 3' of another gene. A commonly used heterologous poly A signal is the SV40 poly A signal. The SV40 poly A signal is contained on a 237 bp BamHI/Bcll restriction fragment and directs both termination and polyadenylation (Sambrook, supra, at 16.6-16.7). This 237 bp fragment is contained within a 671 bp BamHI/Pstl restriction fragment.

The term "genetically engineered cell line." refers to a cell line that contains heterologous DNA introduced into the cell line by means of molecular biological techniques recombinant DNA technology).

The term "stable transfection," or "stably transfected," refers to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the transfected cell. The term "stable transfectant." refers to a cell which has stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA.

The term "stable transfection" (or "stably transfected"), refers to the introduction and integration of foreign DNA into the genome of the transfected cell. The term "stable transfectant." refers to a cell which has stably integrated foreign DNA into the genomic DNA.

The term "selectable marker." as used herein refers to the use of a gene which encodes an enzymatic activity that confers resistance to an antibiotic or drug upon the cell in which the selectable marker is expressed. Selectable markers may be "dominant": a dominant selectable marker encodes an enzymatic activity which can be detected in any mammalian cell line. Examples of dominant selectable markers include the bacterial aminoglycoside 3' phosphotransferase gene (also referred to as the neo gene) which confers resistance to the drug G418 in mammalian cells, the bacterial hygromycin G phosphotransferase (hyg) gene which confers resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin and the bacterial xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase gene (also referred to as the gpt gene) which confers the ability to grow in the presence of mycophenolic acid. Other selectable markers are not dominant in that their use must be in conjunction with a cell line that lacks the relevant enzyme activity.

Examples of non-dominant selectable markers include the thymidine kinase (tk) gene which is used in conjunction with tk cell lines, the CAD gene which is used in con'unction with CADdclicient cells and the mammalian hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) gene which is used in conjunction with hprt cell lines. A review of the use lo selectahle markers in mammalian cell lines is provided in Sambrook et al.. supra at pp. 16.9-16.15.

The terms "nucleic acid molecule encoding." "DNA sequence encoding," and "DNA encoding." refer to the order or sequence of deoxyribonucleotides along a strand of 26 deoxyribonucleic acid. The order of these deoxyribonuclcotides determines the order of amino acids along the polypeptide (protein) chain. The DNA sequence thus codes for the amino acid sequence.

The terms "confluent" or "confluency" as used herein in reference to an adherent cell line define a condition wherein cells throughout a culture are in contact with each other creating what appears to be a continuous sheet or "monolayer" of cells.

The terms "cytopathic effect" or "CPE" as used herein describe changes in cellular structure a pathologic effect) resulting from external agents such viruses. Common cytopathic effects include cell destruction, syncytia fused giant cells) formation, cell rounding vacuole formation, and formation of inclusion bodies. CPE results from actions of a virus on permissive cells that negatively affect the ability of the permissive cellular host to preform its required functions to remain viable. In in vitro cell culture systems, CPE is evident when cells, as part of a confluent monolayer. show regions of non-confluence after contact with a specimen that contains a virus. The observed microscopic effect is generally focal in nature and the foci is initiated by a single virion. However, depending upon viral load in the sample. CPE may be observed throughout the monolayer after a sufficient period of incubation. Cells demonstrating viral induced CPE usually change morphology to a rounded shape, and over a prolonged period of time can die and be released form their anchorage points in the monolayer. When many cells reach the point of focal destruction, the area is called a viral plaque, which appears as a hole in the monolayer. Cytopathic effects are readily discernable and distinguishable by those skilled in the art.

The abbreviation "ONPG." represents o-Nitrophenyl-p-D-Galactopyranoside. ONPG is a substrate for the enzyme p-galactosidase (p-gal). The reaction between ONPG and p-gal produces a yellow product which can be quantified spectrophotometrically at 405 nm.

The abbreviation "X-gal," represents the chemical compound 5-bromo-4-chloro-3indolyl-P-D-galactopyranoside. a substrate for the enzyme p-galactosidase. The reaction between X-gal and p-galactosidase results in the formation of a blue precipitate which is visually discernable.

The term "hvhriwix." represents a product of Diagnostic llvhrids. Inc.. Athens. Ohio \Vhich alloVs for quantificanion of certain viral INA in an intected mtonolver of cells by DNA hybridization. "DNA hybridization" is the annealing of two complementary DNA molecules whose base sequences match according to the rules of base pairing. DNA hybridization is used to identify or quantify an unknown or "target" DNA by hybridization to 27 a known DNA or "probe." The probe is typically labeled with a reporter molecule such as 251. a radioisotope which can be detected and quantified with a gamma counter.

The phrase "plaque reduction assay," or "PRA," as used herein describes a standard method used to determine efficacy of anti-viral drugs by enumerating a decrease in plaque formation in a cell monolayer exposed to a drug. A "plaque" is a defined area of "CPE." It is usually the result of infection of the cell monolayer with a single infectious virus which then replicates and spreads to adjacent cells of the monolayer. A plaque may also be referred to as a "focus of viral infection." The term "permissive" as used herein describes the sequence of interactive events between a virus and its putative host cell. The process begins with viral adsorption to the host cell surface and ends with release of infectious virions. A cell is "permissive" if it readily permits the spread of virus to other cells. Many methods are available for the determination of the permissiveness of a given cell line, including, but not limited to plaque reduction assays. comparisons of the production and/or quantitation of viral proteins based on results obtained from gel electrophoresis, relative comparisons using hybridization analysis to analyze DNA or RNA content, etc.

The term "susceptible," as used herein describes the extent that a permissive or nonpermissive host cell can adsorb and be penetrated by a virus. A cell line may be susceptible without being permissive in that it can be penetrated but not release virions. A permissive cell line however must be susceptible.

The phrase "seed on," as used herein describes the act of transferring an aqueous solution of suspended cells into a vessel containing cells adhered to a surface, after which the vessel is stored for a sufficient period of time to allow the suspended cells or "seeds" to settle out by gravity and attach in a relatively uniform manner to the adhered cells and become integrated into the final cell monolayer as a mixture. A "mixed cell monolayer," results from the "seed on" process.

The phrase "seed in," as used herein describes the mixing of two or more aqueous solutions of suspended tissue culture cells, each cell suspension having different cellular properties. and transfer of such mixture of cells into a vessel which is stored for a sufficient period of time to allow the suspended cells to settle out by eravity and attach in a relatively unilorm manner such that the distribution of any single cell type is indicative of the relative ratio of the cells in the original mixture.

28 The term "starts," as used herein refers to the reporter cells which represent a primary infection of virus. The virus infects a reporter cell (a genetically engineered cell) and induces the expression of the reporter gene. A reporter cell can be non-permissive (i.e.

permissiveness of the reporter cells is not required) and still produce starts.

EXPERIMENTAL

The following examples are provided in order to demonstrate and further illustrate certain preferred embodiments and aspects of the present invention and are not to be construed as limiting the scope thereof.

In the experimental disclosure which follows, the following abbreviations apply: eq (equivalents); M (Molar); 1 iM (micromolar); N (Normal); mol (moles): mmol (millimoles); Lmol (micromoles); nmol (nanomoles): g (grams); mg (milligrams); -tg (micrograms); ng (nanograms): 1 or L (liters); ml (milliliters); tl. (microliters): cm (centimeters): mm (millimeters); pm (micrometers); nm (nanometers); xg (times gravity):°C (degrees Centigrade): FBS (fetal bovine serum): PBS (phosphate buffered saline: HEPES hydroxyethyl]piperazine-N'-[2-ethanesulfonic acid]); HBSS (Hank's Balanced Salt Solution); MEM (Minimal Essential Medium): EMEM (Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium); BBL (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems. Cockeysville. MD): DIFCO (Difco Laboratories.

Detroit. MI); U.S. Biochemical Biochemical Corp.. Cleveland. OH): Chemicon (Chemicon, Inc.. Temecula, CA): Dako (Dako Corporation, Carpinteria. CA): Fisher (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA); Sigma (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland); Bartel's (Bartels, Issaquah. WA); and BioWhittaker (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD).

The cells used during the development of the present invention and described in the following Examples, were obtained from the ATCC, with the exception being that the BGMK and PRMK cells were obtained from BioWhittaker, and the MRC-5 cells were obtained from both ATCC and BioWhittaker. The ATCC numbers of the cells are indicated in the following Table.

29 Table 2. ATCC Cell Lines Cell Line ATCC Number CCL-l 12072 A549 CCL-185 Cv- I HEp-2 CCL-23 hs27 HFF, CRL-1634 Mv 1Lu C0,-64 McCoy CCL- 1696 NCI-H292 CCL- 1848 CCL-171 WI-38 Vero CCL-81 MDCK (NBL-2) CCL-3 4 BHK21 HEL299 CCL-137 1-a CCL-2 EXAMPLE I Co-Cultivation of Cells In this Example, mixed cell cultures were established In which single, dim-orphic cell sheets were produced at confluency.

In these experiments, all of the cell lines were cultured to confluency in sterile polystyrene flasks in EMEM (Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium) with 25 mM HEPES. 7% fetal bovine serum (FBS). 2 niM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptornycin (100 Units/10O pag per ml ofimedium each).

CCl s to KC cultured were harvested hy first rinising' sou-cc celcli ml)aycrs with) I lank's Balanccd SaIlt Solu.tion (l-IISS) without inagnesiurn or calcIL1urn. Dcpcndi ng up1n1 111C cell line, the cells were dissociated by adding trypsin (0.125% in HBSS, wvithout calclim oW magnesium) or trypsin-EDTA (0.25% in I mM EDTA in HBSS, without calcium or' 30 magnesium), or directly to the cell monolayer, and incubating for approximately 5 minutes at ambient temperature. Ten volumes of cell culture medium was added to each trypsinized cell suspension and the cells were repeatedly pipetted in order to produce near-single cell suspensions without cell aggregates). Each trypsinized cell suspension was diluted in an adequate volume of culture medium to produce an optical density of cell suspension suitable to produce a confluent monolayer of cells within 2-3 days of incubation in a 96-well microtiter plate. For single cell monolayers one cell type per well), 0.2 ml of suspension was used to inoculate each well. For example, the final cell preparations ranged from a final optical density at 500 nm of 0.012 OD units/ml for CV-1 cells to 0.03 OD units/ml for HEp-2 cells.

Cell mixture monolayers were produced by co-planting two distinct cell types at an equal volume of each diluted cell suspension 0.1 ml of each cell type was used to inoculate each well of a 96-well microtiter plate). The cells were allowed to attach to the well surface by gravity for 30-60 minutes, and the inoculated microtiter plates were incubated for up to three days at 36 0 C in 5% CO, with 95% relative humidity.

Periodically during incubation, single and mixed monolayers were checked for overall viability. The mixed cell culture monolayers were also checked for the ability of the cell lines to co-exist and develop as a single cell sheet a single monolayer). with two distinct cell morphologies dimorphic cell sheets), at an approximately equal density of each cell type. At confluency. the cells were treated with a methylene blue staining solution to fix the cells and stain them a light blue in order to provide contrast for visualization using light microscopy.

Some of the mixed monolayers successfully grew as a mixed cell monolayer adhered to the well surfaces, exhibiting a smooth, evenly distributed monolayer. These mixed cultures were designated as "morphologic category In these cultures, each cell type could be easily distinguished and appeared to survive well in a mixed monolayer. giving the appearance of a single cell distribution. Mixed monolayers composed of HEp-2 and McCoy cells displayed this morphology.

Some of the mixed monolaveis successfully grew as a mixed monolaver adhered to the well surlaces. hut exhibited two distinct morphlogies at contlucncv. These mixed cultures were designated as "morphologic category In these cultures, separate. distinct patches of each cell line co-existed within the monolayer, giving the appearance of oil mixing with water. Although an understanding of the mechanism is not necessary in order to use the -31 present invention, it is likely that this appearance is most likely the result of contact inhibition between two specific cell types. The relative sizes of the patches was found primarily to be a function of how evenly the cells were distributed at cell planting. The more even the cell distribution at planting, the patches or islands were smaller as the monolayer reached confluency. Examples of monolayers that produced this appearance were mink lung cells cocultivated with NCI-H292 cells, mink lung cells co-cultivated by buffalo green monkey kidney (BGMK) cells, and human lung carcinoma A549 cells co-cultivated with NCI-H292 cells.

However, some cells types could not produce a mixed cell monolayer, when mixed at relatively equal cell numbers at planting in the same culture medium. In some of these cultures, only one of the cell types was found to be viable the culture was effectively a single cell type). Examples of mixed cell cultures that were found to be unsuitable for the production of mixed monolayers include human embryonic lung fibroblasts (MRC-5 cells) cocultivated with BGMK cells. In this mixture, the MRC-5 cells become toxic and form aggregates of dead cells soon after planting. Thus, at confluency, the monolayer only contains one functional, viable cell type, the BGMK cells. Thus, this cell mixture was found to be unsuitable for producing mixed cell monolayers as the cells failed to form mixed cell monolayers of either a smooth or dimorphic morphologic type.

EXAMPLE 2 Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Mixed Cell Cultures In this Example, mixed cell cultures were used to detect various respiratory viruses including Influenza A. RSV. adenoviruses, parainfluenza viruses, and Influenza B, present in clinical specimens. The mixed cells used in these experiments were MvlLu (mink lung cells) and NCI-H292 (human mucoepidermoid cells).

Cell Lines Confluent T-225 flasks of MvlLu and 1-1292 cells were prepared in -MEIM with TEPITS. 10% I1BS. 2 mM L-glutaminc. and 50 pg/ml cntamicin. ie cells were harvested by irst rinsing them in 30 ml HBSS without magnesium and calcium. The cells were then dissociated from the flask by brief exposure until the cells lifted from the bottom of the flask) to 7 ml trypsin-EDTA solution as described in Example I. Then, 30 ml media was 32 added to the cells to prepare a cell suspension concentrate. The optical density of each cell suspension was determined at 500 nm, using 3 ml of cells. Typically, the OD reading was 0.2/ml for both the MvlLu and 1-1292 cells. In addition to the MvlLu and 1-1292 cells, rhesus monkey kidney cells (PRMK), A549 cells, and MDCK cells were used in the present Example. These additional cell lines were prepared in single cell cultures as known in the art.

Mixed Cell Cultures When each cell suspension concentrate was determined to be 0.2 OD units/ml, 5.2 ml of the MvlLu. and 8.7 ml H292 cell suspensions were added to 86.1 ml of culture medium.

in order to provide an acceptable working ratio of each cell type it was a preparation of diluted mixed cells). This ratio was devised in order to achieve a confluent monolayer, in which each cell type covered a substantially equivalent surface area within 1-3 days postplanting of the diluted mixed cells. Prior to dispensing, care was taken to prepare homogenous suspensions of diluted mixed cells. The mixed cells were dispensed at 0.75 ml per glass shell vial glass vial containing a sterile glass coverslip). After planting, the vials were allowed to sit for 60 minutes at ambient temperature so that the cells could settle by gravity and produce a more optimum cell distribution of each cell type. The mixed cells were then incubated for 1-3 days at 36 0 C in 5% CO,, at 95% relative humidity.

Subsequently, the shell vials were stored at ambient temperature to maintain each cell type at substantively equivalent surface ratios for up to 10 days from achieving confluency.

Samples and Processing Nasopharyngeal specimens submitted to a diagnostic virology laboratory were obtained from patients exhibiting influenza-like symptoms. The specimens were centrifuged to produce a cell pellet for direct antigen testing, and a specimen supernatant for inoculation of various cell cultures. The cell pellet was resuspended in phosphate buffer to prepare a cell suspension and 25 pl portions of the cell suspension were spotted onto a glass slide and dried.

Each spot o( cells on the slide were then fixed with fixative acetone), and incubated for minuts witl iuldividual antibody solutions (Bartels) capable ofl rcco nizin variolus respiratory viruses, including influenza A and RSV. as well as other respiratory viruses. A second antibody solution containing fluorescein (FITC) labelled goat anti-mouse antibodies and counterstain (Bartel's) was added to cover each cell spot on the slides, and incubated for .3 an additional 30 minutes at 35-37 0 C. The counterstain in the FITC-goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue. which stains the cells and appears red under fluorescence.

Slides prepared from the nasopharyngeal specimens were observed for positive virusinfected), apple green staining fluorescent cells, using epifluorescence at 100-400X magnification.

In addition, 0.2 ml aliquots of the specimen supernatant were inoculated onto various cell cultures prepared in shell vials containing glass coverslips. The cell cultures included primary rhesus monkey kidney cells (PRMK; ViroMed or BioWhittaker). MvlLu cells (Diagnostic Hybrids) HEp-2 cells (Diagnostic Hybrids), MDCK. A549. and H292 cells, as single cell monolayers. as well as mixed cell monolayers of MvlLu and H292 cells, produced as described above.

Each inoculated shell vial was centrifuged for 60 minutes at 700 xg, and then incubated for 1-3 days at 36 0 C, in appropriate culture medium EMEM containing 0.5 to 2% FBS. 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin [100 Units/100 tug per ml of medium each]). After incubation, the culture medium was decanted, and the cells were fixed to the glass coverslip with a solution of acetone and methanol (50:50. An antibody solution (Chemicon or Bartel's) containing a pool of monoclonal antibodies to multiple respiratory viruses, including Influenza A and RSV. as well as other respiratory viruses was added to cover each coverslip. The coverslips were then incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C. The antibody solution was then removed and the coverslips were rinsed with PBS. A second antibody solution containing fluorescein (FITC) labelled goat anti-mouse antibodies and counterstain (Bartel's) was added to cover each coverslip. and incubated for an additional minutes at 35-37 0 C. The counterstain in the FITC-goat anti-mouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red under fluorescence. Shell vial coverslips prepared from the nasopharyngeal specimens inoculated cultures) were observed for positive virus-infected), apple green staining, fluorescent cells, using epifluorescence at 100-400X magnification.

Results 3( Some specimens demonstrated a positive direct antgIen rcaction on tII cell spot incubated with Influenza A monoclonal antibody. These specimens also demonstrated fluorescent staining on the single cell MvlLu coverslip and the MvlLu/-1292 mixed cell coverslip, but no or very little fluorescence on the single cell H292 coverslip. The H292 cells 34 are cither not susceptible to this strain of Influenza A, or are significantly less susceptible, such that infection is not detectable. Additionally. in some cases in specimens with low virus titers), the culture systems were more sensitive than the direct antigen detection method.

Also, while the single PRMK cell cultures the "gold standard" cells used to detect Influenza A) were positive for the presence of Influenza A, with many specimens, the numbers of infected cells and the total of number of positive specimens were lower than those identified as positive by the mixed cell monolayers.

In addition, both the MDCK and PRMK cells missed one low titer specimen positive for Influenza A by direct antigen testing (IFA), and one other specimen that was also positive for Influenza A by IFA. while the MvlLu cells detected the virus in all of the samples determined to be positive based on direct antigen detection (IFA).

Some specimens demonstrated a positive direct antigen reaction on the cell spot incubated with RSV monoclonal antibody. These specimens also demonstrated fluorescent staining on the single cell H292 coverslip and the MV1Lu/H292 mixed cell coverslip. but no or very little fluorescence on the single cell MVILu coverslip. H292 cells are susceptible to RSV infection, while MvlLu cells are not susceptible (or are significantly less susceptible.

such that infection is not detectable). In addition to the mixed cell cultures. HEp-2 cells the "gold standard" cells used to detect RSV) were also observed for the presence of RSV: the performance of HEp-2 cells was generally less sensitive than that of the MvlLu and H292 mixed cell monolayers. or the H292 single cell monolayers. These results with Influenza A tested in mink lung cells was very surprising, as the detection of Influenza A using these cells has previously not been described.

Adenoviruses identified from five clinical specimens based on direct antigen testing (IFA) were detected in the H292 and cell culture mixes, while the PRMK cells missed two of the low titer specimens there were two false negatives). Thus, H292 and the mixed cultures were more sensitive than PRMK for detection of adenoviruses. While the A549 cells may provide slightly more positive cells, the 292 cells, mixed cell cultures, and A549 cells detected an equal number of positive specimens.

Panrinfluenza viruses were also detected in the H292 and mixed cell cultures. while the PlRM1K cells missed one low titer specimen.

These results clearly show that the mixed cell cultures were equal in sensitivity to the single cell (1-1292 and MvlLu) cultures. Thus. the mixed cells provide savings in material.

time, space, and labor, while providing the same level of sensitivity in the detection of 35 respiratory viruses as single cell cultures presently commonly used in diagnostic virology laboratories.

Influenza B Specimens In addition to the samples discussed above, various dilutions of multiple Influenza B strains obtained from the ATCC were tested in MDCK, MvlLu. and PRMK cells. The following table provides the results of these experiments. In this Table, "MD" refers to the "Maryland" strain, "HK" refers to the "Hong Kong" strain, "TW" refers to the "Taiwan" strain, and "MA" refers to the "Massachusetts" strain.

Table 3. Comparison of Influenza B Virus Detection From Prototype Viruses by MDCK, ML, and PRMK Cells These crsults indicate that Mvl Lu, MD)CK( and PLMK l ar c omnparable lior the detection of multiple Influenza B virus strains. I hus. these cell lines were identliied as good candidates for mixed cell cultures, as well as single cell cultures for the identification of this virus.

36 EXAMPLE 3 Detection of CMV in Mixed Cell Cultures In this Example, mixed cell cultures of MvlLu and NCI-H292 cells were used to detect the presence of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV).

The Towne strain of HCMV (ATCC #VR977) was amplified in MRC-5 cells to a titer of greater than 10 6 /ml, and frozen at -85 0 C in EMEM containing 10% FBS. Serial dilutions of HCMV were prepared and inoculated into single monolayers of mink lung (MvlLu) cells, MRC-5 cells, and mixed cell monolayers of MvlLu and H292 cells. Each infected cell culture system was centrifuged for 60 minutes at 700 xg, and then incubated for 24 hours at 36 0 C in 5% CO,, in appropriate culture medium EMEM containing FBS). The culture medium was removed and the cells were fixed to the glass coverslip using a solution of 80% acetone in water. A sufficient amount of HCMV antibody solution (Chemicon) was added to cover each coverslip and incubated for 30 minutes at 35-37 0 C. The antibody solution was removed, and the coverslip was rinsed with PBS. A second antibody solution consisting of FITC-labelled goat anti-mouse antiserum was added to cover each coverslip and incubated an additional 30 minutes at 35-37°C. The specimens were then observed under epifluorescence at 100-400X magnification for positive CMV-infected), nuclear staining, fluorescent cells.

As described in previous Examples, the counterstain in the FITC-labelled goat antimouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells and appears red, when excited by fluorescent light. Fluorescent, apple green nuclear stain was observed in the MvlLu single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers, but not in the H292 cells, as the MvlLu cells are susceptible to HCMV infection, while H292 cells are not (or the H292 cells are significantly less sensitive). The MRC-5 cells the "gold standard" cells for detection of HCMV) performed about the same as the mixed cell monolayer, as these cultures had a similar number of infected cells as the cells in the mixed monolayer.

EXAMPLE 4 Detection of Entcroviruses in Mixed Cell Cultures 1n this II.xample. mixed cell cultures were used to detect the cnteroviruses. Coxsackic B virus and Echovirus. In these experiments, a mixed cell monolayer of BGMK and NC1- H292 cells were used.

37 Confluent T-225 flasks of BGMK and H292 cells were prepared in EMEM with mM HEPES. 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 tg/ml gentamicin. The cells were harvested by first rinsing in 30 ml HBSS without magnesium and calcium, and were then dissociated from the flasks by a brief treatment of 7 ml trypsin-EDTA solution (as described in Example Then, an additional 30 ml of culture medium (EMEM with HEPES, FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 lig/ml gentamicin) was added to the suspension to produce a cell suspension concentrate. The optical density at 500 nm was determined for each suspension, using 3 ml of cells. Typically, the OD reading was 0.2/ml for both the BGMK and H292 cell suspensions.

Next. 3 ml of BGMK cell suspension and 8 ml of H292 cell suspension (both suspensions were at 0.2 OD units/ml) were then added to 29 ml of the culture medium mM HEPES, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 tg/ml gentamicin) to provide an acceptable working ratio of each cell type in a diluted mixed cell suspension. This ratio was intended to achieve a confluent monolayer consisting of each cell type covering substantially equivalent surface area within 1-3 days post-planting of the diluted mixed cells. Care was exercised to prepare a homogenous suspension of diluted mixed cells prior to dispensing 0.75 ml to each of 100 glass shell vials, each of which contained a sterile glass coverslip. The vials were allowed to sit for 60 minutes post-planting at ambient temperature to allow the cells to settle by gravity and produce a more optimum cell distribution. The vials were then were moved to an incubator for incubation at 36°C for 1-3 days in 5% at 95% relative humidity.

Stock virus suspensions and clinical specimens shown to contain Coxsackie B virus or echovirus were used to infect BGMK/H292 cell mixtures, as well as single cell monolayers of BGMK, H292. MRC-5, and PRMK cells. For clinical samples, throat swab. nasopharyngeal swab, sputum, stool, and rectal swabs were collected from patients, placed in viral transport medium, and filtered through 0.45 Upm filter to remove possible bacterial and fungal contaminants prior to inoculation of cell cultures. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected from patients was placed in viral transport medium, and used directly for inoculation of cells. For inoculation of shell vials, the media present in the vials were removed and fresh media added.

Then, 0.2 ml of specimen was inoculated into each vial. The inoculated vials were centrifuged at 700 xg for 45-60 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, the vials were incubated at 37 0 C for 1-3 days, and viral presence was detected using immunolluorescent staining.

38 For staining, the medium was removed from each vial and the cells were fixed on the coverslip with acetone. The coverslip was removed from each vial, and stained with 25 ipl primary antibody (mouse monoclonal antibody directed against cnteroviruses [Dako]). for minutes at 37°C. After washing with PBS, 25 tl of the FITC-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (Dako) was used as a secondary antibody for staining, and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes.

After another wash, the coverslips were mounted on slides and observed under fluorescence.

The presence of one or more specific fluorescent-stained cells on the coverslip was considered to be a positive.

As described in previous Examples, the counterstain in the FITC-labelled goat antimouse antibody solution contains Evans Blue, which stains the cells, and appears red upon exposure to fluorescent light. For Coxsackie B virus detection, fluorescent. apple green stain was observed in many of the BGMK cells in the BGMK single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers primarily in the BGMK cells, but not in as many H292 cells, as BGMK cells are more susceptible to Coxsackie B virus infection. For some types of Coxsackie B virus isolates, H292 cells are not as susceptible (or the H292 cells are significantly less susceptible). The "gold standard" cell line PRMK cells) did not exhibit the same number of infected cells as the mixed cell monolayers.

For detection of echovirus, fluorescent, apple green stain was observed in many H292 cells in the 1-1292 single cell monolayer and in the mixed cell monolayers. primarily in the H292 cells, but not in as many BGMK cells, as H292 cells are more susceptible to echovirus infection, while BGMK cells are not as susceptible (or the BGMK cells are significantly less sensitive). The "gold standard" line MRC-5 cells) performed, but did not appear to have as many infected cells as the mixed cell monolayers. In the case of the BGMK/H292 mixed cell monolayers infected with high titer samples of enteroviruses, cell-specific virus mediated cytopathic effect (CPE) was evident the CPE was observed in BGMK cells when Coxsackie B virus was present at high titer, and CPE was observed in H292 cells when echovirus was present at high titer).

39 EXAMPLE Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus and HCMV in Mixed Cell Cultures In this Example, mixed cell cultures are used to detect herpes simplex virus (HSV) and HCMV. using a mixed cell monolayer of genetically engineered baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells ATCC #CCL-12072) and MvlLu cells.

The BHK and MvlLu cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced. These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above. The cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with virus or clinical samples, incubated, and fixed, as described above.

HCMV is detected in the MvlLu cells, using antibody as described in Example 3 above, and HSV (HSV-1 and HSV-2) are identified using a P-galactosidase staining kit detecting the reporter gene induced by the virus infecting the genetically engineered BHK cells).

EXAMPLE 6 Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Mixed Cell Cultures In this Example. mixed cell cultures are used to detect a panel of respiratory viruses.

In these experiments, three cell types are combined so as to produce a mixed cell culture that is capable of detecting at least three viruses.

First, A549, H292, and mink lung MvlLu) cells cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced. In preferred embodiments, the cells are diluted such that the mixed cells in culture will be in approximately the same proportions These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above. The cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with virus or clinical samples.

incubated, and fixed, as described above.

3) 1 he viruses capable of infecting these cells arc detected and identilied using the methods described in Example 2 above. In these mixed cell cultures, the 292 cells are used to detect the presence of parainfluenza viruses and RSV, while the A549 cells are used to 40 detect the presence of adenoviruses, and the mink lung cells are used to detect the presence of influenza viruses Influenza A and B).

EXAMPLE 7 Detection of HSV and Chlamnydia in Mixed Cell Cultures In this Example, mixed cell cultures are provided which allow the detection of two organisms commonly associated with sexually transmitted diseases. In these experiments, mink lung cells MvlLu) useful for the detection of HSV are mixed with McCoy cells useful for the detection of C. trachomatis.

First. McCoy cells and mink lung MvlLu) cells cells are grown in flasks, trypsinized, and mixed as described in previous Examples, such that a suitable dilution of mixed cells is produced. In preferred embodiments, the cells are diluted such that the mixed cells in culture will be in approximately the same proportions. These mixed cell dilutions are then used to inoculate sterile glass shell vials containing coverslips, as described above. The cells are then centrifuged and inoculated with samples clinical samples), incubated, and fixed. as described above.

The organisms capable of infecting these cells HSV infects the mink lung cells, while C; trachomatis infects the McCoy cells) are detected and identified using the methods described in Example 2 above. As with the other mixed cell culture systems. the presence of virus and/or C. trachomatis may be detected by other methods, such as the observation of CPE, animal inoculation, etc. Thus, it is not intended that the mixed cell culture assay systems of this Example or any of the preceding examples be limited to any particular method of microorganism detection, identification, and/or quantitation.

From the above, it is clear that the present invention provides many advantages over presently used methods in diagnostic microbiology.

All publications and patents mentioned in the above specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the described method and system )I thel invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing fmrom the scope and spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in diagnostic microbiology and virology, cell culture, and/or related fields arc intended to be within the scope of the following claims.

42

Claims (69)

1. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types including a first cell type and a second cell type, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, wherein the first and second cell types are selected from the combination consisting respectrive of; buffalo green monkey kidney cells and mink lung cells; mink lung cells and human mucoepidermoid cells; human lung carcinoma cells and human mucoepidermoid; buffalo green monkey kidney cells and human embryonic lung cells; human epidermoid laryngeal carcinoma cells and McCoy cells; mink lung cells and human diploid lung cells; and mink lung cells, and a cell other than said mink lung cells wherein in the combination listed last said intracellular parasite is selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus and in the combination listed last said mink lung cells, and a cell other than said mink lung cells are susceptible to infection by at least one intracellular parasite including a virus selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus.

2. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types including a first cell type and a second cell type, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, wherein said first cell type consists of mink lung cells, and said second cell type consists of a cell other than said mink lung cells, and wherein said first and second cell types are susceptible to infection by at least one intracellular parasite including a virus selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus.

3. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, and wherein said cell types include a first cell type consisting of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and a second cell type consisting of mink lung cells.

4. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, and wherein said cell types include a first cell type consisting of mink lung cells and a second cell type consisting of human mucoepidermoid cells. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, and wherein said cell types include a first cell type consisting, of human lung carcinoma cells and a second cell type consisting of human mucoepidermoid cells.

6. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, and wherein said cell types include a first cell type consisting of buffalo green monkey kidney cells and a second cell type consisting of human embryonic lung cells.

7. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, and wherein said cell types include a first cell type consisting of human epidermoid laryngeal carcinoma cells and a second cell type consisting of McCoy cells.

8. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites, wherein said mixed cell culture includes at least two cell types, wherein said two cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture, and wherein said cell types include a first cell type consisting of mink lung cells and a second cell type consisting of human diploid lung cells.

9. A method for the detection and identification of influenza virus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing influenza virus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including mink lung cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said influenza virus.

10. The method of Claim 9, wherein said sample is further suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites other than said influenza virus.

11. The method of Claim 10, wherein said intracellular parasite is selected from the group consisting of cytomegalovirus, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses.

12. The method of Claim 9, wherein said first cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.

13. A method for the detection and identification of an enterovirus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing an enterovirus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least two cell types; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said enterovirus.

14. The method of Claim 13, wherein said enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of Cosacki viruses and echoviruses. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least a buffalo green monkey kidney cell and a human mucoepidermoid cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites.

16. The method of Claim 9, wherein said first cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell.

17. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least a first genetically engineered cell type and a second genetically engineered cell type; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites.

18. A method for the detection and identification of a member of the genus Chlamydia in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing a member of the genus Chlamydia; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least two cell types; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said member of the genus Chlamydia.

19. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and ii) a mixed cell culture including a mink lung cell and a human mucoepidermoid cell; 47 b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites. A method for the detection and identification of an enterovirus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing an enterovirus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including a first cell type and a second cell type; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said enterovirus.

21. The method of Claim 22, wherein said enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of Cosackie viruses, echoviruses, and polioviruses.

22. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and ii) a mixed cell culture including a buffalo green monkey kidney cell and a human mucoepidermoid cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites.

23. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and ii) a mixed cell culture including a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell and a mink lung cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites.

24. A method for the detection and identification of intracellular parasites in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and ii) a mixed cell culture including a first genetically engineered cell type and a second genetically engineered cell type; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites. A method for the detection and identification of a member of the genus Chlamydia in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more intracellular parasites; and ii) a mixed cell culture including a first cell type and a second cell type; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said one or more intracellular parasites.

26. A method for the detection of influenza virus, including the steps of a) providing a sample suspected of containing influenza virus, and mink lung cells; b) inoculating said mink lung cells with said sample; and c) detecting the presence of said influenza within said mink lung cells.

27. The method of Claim 29, wherein said mink lung cells are MvlLu cells.

28. The method of Claim 29, wherein said influenza virus is selected from the group consisting of Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C.

29. The composition of Claim 3, wherein said mink lung cells are MvlLu cells. The composition of Claim 4, wherein said mink lung cells are MvlLu cells.

31. are H292 cells

32. are H292 cells

33. are A549 cells The composition of Claim 4, wherein said human mucoepidermoid cells The composition of Claim 5, wherein said human mucoepidermoid cells The composition of Claim 5, wherein said human lung carcinoma cells The composition of Claim 6, wherein said human embryonic lung cells lls.

34. are MRC-5 ce The composition of Claim 2, wherein said second cell type is capable of detecting one or more intracellular parasites selected from cytomegalovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses.

36. The composition of Claim 2, wherein said influenza virus is selected from Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C.

37. The composition of Claim 2, wherein said second cell type is a human mucoepidermoid cell.

38. The composition of Claim 37, wherein said mink lung cells are MvlLu cells and said human mucoepidermoid cell is H292.

39. The composition of Claim 2, wherein said second cell type is a human lung carcinoma cell. The composition of Claim 39, whcrein said mink lung cells are MvlLu cells and said human lung carcinoma cell is A549.

41. The composition of Claim 2, wherein said second cell type is a genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell.

42. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus, wherein said mixed cell culture includes mink lung cells and H292 cells, and wherein said mink lung cells and said 11292 cells remain viable in said mixed cell culture.

43. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of intracellular parasites selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus, wherein said mixed cell culture includes mink lung cells and A549 cells, and wherein said mink lung cells and said A549 cells remain viable in said mixed cell culture.

44. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of enterovirus, wherein said mixed cell culture includes buffalo green monkey kidney cells and a first cell type selected from human mucoepidermoid cell and human lung carcinoma cell, and wherein said buffalo green monkey kidney cells, said human mucoepidermoid cell, and said human lung carcinoma cell remain viable in said mixed cell culture.

45. The composition of Claim 44, wherein said human mucoepidermoid cell is H292.

46. The composition of Claim 44, wherein said human lung carcinoma cell is A549.

47. The composition of Claim 44, wherein said enterovirus is selected from Coxsackie viruses, polioviruses, and echoviruses.

48. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of herpes virus, wherein said mixed cell culture includes MRC-5 cells and CV-1 cells, and wherein said MRC-5 cells and said CV-1 cells remain viable in said mixed cell culture.

49. The composition of Claim 48, wherein said herpes virus is selected from Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella-Zoster Virus, Epstein-Barr Virus, Human Herpes Virus 6, Human Herpes Virus 7, and Human Herpes Virus 8. A composition including a mixed cell culture suitable for the detection of at least one intracellular parasite, wherein said mixed cell culture includes a first genetically engineered cell type and a second genetically engineered cell type, and wherein said first and second genetically engineered cell types remain viable in said mixed cell culture.

51. The composition of Claim 50, wherein said intracellular parasite is a virus.

52. The composition of Claim 51, wherein said virus is selected from cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses.

53. A composition including a mixed cell culture for the detection of a member of the genus Chlamydia, wherein said cells include McCoy cells and a first cell type, and wherein said member of the genus Chlamydia and said McCoy cells remain viable in said mixed cell culture. 54 The composition of Claim 56, wherein said first cell type is a mink lung cell. The composition of Claim 54, wherein said mink lung cell is MvlLu.

56. including: a) A method for the detection and identification of enterovirus in a sample, providing: i) a sample suspected of containing enterovirus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least two cell types, wherein said cell types include a first cell type and a second cell type, and wherein said first cell type is buffalo green monkey kidney cell and said second cell type is selected from human mucoepidermoid cell and human lung carcinoma cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said enterovirus.

57. The method of Claim 56, wherein said human lung carcinoma cell is A549.

58. The method of Claim 56, wherein said mixed cell culture includes two cell types, wherein the first cell type is buffalo green monkey kidney cell and the second cell type is selected from human mucoepidermoid cell and human lung carcinoma cell.

59. The method of Claim 56, wherein said enterovirus is selected from the group consisting of Coxsackie viruses, polioviruses, and echoviruses.

60. A method for the detection and identification of herpes virus in a sample, including: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing herpes virus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least two cell types, wherein said cell types include a first cell type and a second cell type, and wherein said first cell type is MRC-5 and said second cell type is CV-1; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said herpes virus.

61. The method of Claim 60, wherein said mixed cell culture includes two cell types, wherein the first cell type is MRC-5 and the second cell type is CV-1.

62. The method of Claim 60, wherein said herpes virus is selected from the group consisting of Herpes Simplex Type 1, Herpes Simplex Type 2, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella-Zoster Virus, Epstein-Barr Virus, Human Herpes Virus 6, Human Herpes Virus 7, and Human Herpes Virus 8.

63. A method for the detection and identification of a virus selected from cytomegalovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinoviruses, coronoviruses, and adenoviruses, in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing one or more of said viruses; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least two cell types, wherein said cell types include a first cell type and a second cell type, and wherein said first cell type is a first genetically engineered cell type and said second cell type is a second genetically engineered cell type; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of one or more of said viruses.

64. A method for the detection and identification of a member of the genus Chlamydia in a sample, including: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing a member of the genus Chlamydia; and ii) a mixed cell culture including at least two cell types, wherein said cell types include a first cell type and a second cell type, and wherein said first cell type is McCoy cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of at least one of said member of the genus Chlamydia. The method of Claim 64, wherein said mixed cell culture includes two cell types, wherein said first cell type is a McCoy cell.

66. The method of Claim 9, wherein said influenza virus is selected from the group consisting of Influenza A, Influenza B, and Influenza C. 67 The method of Claim 9, wherein said mink lung cells are MvlLu cells.

68. The method of Claim 9, wherein said first cell type is a human lung carcinoma cell.

69. The method of Claim 68, wherein said human lung carcinoma cell is A549. The method of Claim 9, wherein said mixed cell culture consists of mink lung cell and a first cell type.

71. A method for the detection and identification of cytomegalovirus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing cytomegalovirus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including MRC-5 cells and at least one cell type selected from McCoy cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, A549 cell, HEp-2 cell, MvlLu cell, and H292 cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said cytomegalovirus.

72. A method for the detection and identification of enterovirus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing enterovirus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including CV-1 cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type selected from MRC-5 cell, McCoy cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, A549 cell, HEp-2 cell, MvlLu cell, and H292 cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said enterovirus.

73. A method for the detection and identification of enterovirus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing enterovirus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including buffalo green monkey cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type selected from cell, CV- 1 cell, McCoy cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, A-549 cell, HEp-2 cell, MvlLu cell, and H292 cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said enterovirus.

74. A method for the detection and identification of herpes simplex virus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing herpes simplex virus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type selected from MRC-5 cell, CV-1 cell, buffalo green monkey kidney cell, McCoy cell, A549 cell, HEp-2 cell, MvlLu cell, and H292 cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said herpes simplex virus. A method for the detection and identification of adenovirus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing adenovirus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including A549 cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type selected from MRC-5 cell, CV-1 cell, buffalo green monkey kidney cell, McCoy cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, HEp-2 cell, MvlLu cell, and H292 cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said adenovirus.

76. A method for the detection and identification of respiratory syncytial virus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing respiratory syncytial virus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including HEp-2 cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type selected from MRC-5 cell, CV-1 cell, buffalo green monkey kidney cell, McCoy cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, A549 cell, MvlLu cell, and H292 cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said respiratory syncytial virus.

77. A method for the detection and identification of a virus selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing a virus selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including MvlLu cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type selected from MRC-5 cell, CV-1 cell, buffalo green monkey kidney cell, McCoy cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, A549 cell, HEp- 2 cell, and H292 cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said virus selected from influenza virus and parainfluenza virus.

78. A method for the detection and identification of a virus selected from respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, and parainfluenza virus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing a virus selected from respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, and parainfluenza virus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including H292 cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type selected from MRC-5 cell, CV-1 cell, buffalo green monkey kidney cell, McCoy cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, A549 cell, HEp- 2 cell, and MvlLu cell; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said virus selected from respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, and parainfluenza virus.

79. The method of Claim 64, wherein said second cell type is selected from MRC-5 cell, CV-1 cell, buffalo green monkey kidney cell, genetically engineered baby hamster kidney cell, A549 cell, HEp-2 cell, MvlLu cell, and H292 cell. A method for the detection and identification of parainfluenza virus in a sample, including the steps of: a) providing: i) a sample suspected of containing parainfluenza virus; and ii) a mixed cell culture including mink lung cells and at least one cell type which includes a first cell type; b) inoculating said mixed cell culture with said sample to produce an inoculated culture; and c) observing said inoculated culture for the presence of said parainfluenza virus.

81. The method of Claim 80, wherein said mink lung cells are Mv Lu cells.

82. The method of Claim 80, wherein said parainfluenza virus is selected from the group consisting of type 1, type 2 and type 3.

83. A method for the detection of parainfluenza virus, including the steps of a) providing mink lung cells and a sample suspected of containing parainfluenza virus; b) inoculating said mink lung cells with said sample; and c) detecting the presence of said parainfluenza virus within said mink lung cells.

84. The method of Claim 26, wherein said mink lung cells are MvlLu cells. 58 The method of Claim 26, wherein said parainfluenza virus is selected from the group consisting of type 1, type 2 and type 3. DATED this 4th day of April 2003 DIAGNOSTIC HYBRIDS, INC and UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND By their Patent Attorneys A.P.T. Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys