AU2002334163A1 - State recovery - Google Patents

State recovery

Info

Publication number
AU2002334163A1
AU2002334163A1 AU2002334163A AU2002334163A AU2002334163A1 AU 2002334163 A1 AU2002334163 A1 AU 2002334163A1 AU 2002334163 A AU2002334163 A AU 2002334163A AU 2002334163 A AU2002334163 A AU 2002334163A AU 2002334163 A1 AU2002334163 A1 AU 2002334163A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
state
increment
counter
decrement
requests
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2002334163A
Other versions
AU2002334163B2 (en
Inventor
William Box
Richard Hughes
Allan Jenkins
Ian Middleton
Keith Sterling
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Jacobs Rimell Ltd
Original Assignee
Jacobs Rimell Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB0124702A external-priority patent/GB2381088B/en
Application filed by Jacobs Rimell Ltd filed Critical Jacobs Rimell Ltd
Publication of AU2002334163A1 publication Critical patent/AU2002334163A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2002334163B2 publication Critical patent/AU2002334163B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

State recovery
The invention relates to a method of recovering the modelled state of a system
In many electronic systems it is necessary to provide a framework to facilitate the storage of state information derived from monitoring entities within an external system. An example where this might be required is in a transaction based system with a high request inter-arrival rate such as that of monitoring a number of users logged on to a computer network.
In such systems, the problems of modelling the system and the state of the system are non-trivial. One approach that is used is to model the system using state counters associated with individual entities within the system, representing for example, the usage of the entity at any one instant in time. The required operations on these counters simply comprise increment and decrement requests.
Typically, in transaction based systems which have a high request inter-arrival rate, the option of storing this data in non-volatile memory can be dismissed due to the lengthy access times. Therefore volatile memory is the only option. However, in using volatile memory there is the risk that all state information will be lost in the case of a system failure of the monitoring system.
One known approach to the recovery of state information in a transaction based system, where one or more counters represent the correct, instantaneous state of the monitored system, when a failure of the monitoring application occurs and the state counters are lost, is to reset all the counters to zero, implicitly accepting that all the previous state data is lost and unrecoverable. The monitoring operation then continues as before and the counters are adjusted in response to incoming transaction requests.
The known approach suffers from the problem that the system will receive decrement requests which relate to the initial state before failure. However, the appropriate counters should not be decremented as they will tend to a negative value, thus misrepresenting the correct, instantaneous state of the monitored system. This occurs since there will be decrement requests received relating to increment requests received during the initial state. The problem with this is that the current state counters have no knowledge of what the state of the system was in the initial state. Therefore, any decrement requests received relating to increment requests received during the initial state will be deducted from the current state counters incorrectly.
The present invention seeks to provide a method of recovering the modelled state of a system.
According to the invention there is provided a method of recovering the state of a system, which system comprises at least one counter, which counter represents an instantaneous state of an element in the system, whereby the counter will increase in value in response to an increment request and decrease in value in response to a decrement request, wherein each increment request is paired with a decrement request.
The method of the invention advantageously pairs the increment and decrement requests. This permits the system in the recovery state to distinguish between known decrement requests, i.e. those corresponding to increment requests received in the recovery state, and unknown decrement requests, i.e. those corresponding to increment requests received in initial state. The unknown decrement requests can be discarded and hence have no effect on the recovery state. The counters will then tend to converge with the true state of the system.
In a preferred embodiment, the increment and decrement requests are paired using an index key shared between the increment and decrement requests. Preferably the system comprises a plurality of counters. Preferably the or each counter refers to a user session. Preferably, the state of the or each counter is held in volatile memory comprising a part of the system.
An exemplary embodiment will now be described in greater detail with reference to the drawing, in which:
Fig. 1 shows a graph of the state of a single counter A typical application where the monitoring of the state of a system is in the field of concurrency control such as a connection to an internet service provider or online licensing and gaming applications. Figure 1 shows a graph showing the state of a single counter over a period of time. The counter can refer to a user session such as a dialled up connection to an internet service provider. However, it is also possible to group individual users if this is appropriate so that a counter refers to all users in a particular geographic region or all users belonging to the same organisation. The former is applicable in the case of a vISP and the latter in the case of a corporate contract.
The period from t=0 to represents the initial state of the system, where ti represents the time at which the monitoring system fails. t2 represents the time at which the system recovers and begins to process increment and decrement requests. t represents the time at which the recovery state represents the true state of the system being monitored, the time between t2 and t3 representing the recovery state. The thin line represents the true state of the system and the bold line represents the recovery state. The time t3 will be reached once all of the decrement requests relating to increments from the initial state have been processed.
One method of pairing increment and decrement requests is to use a shared index key between increment and decrement requests associated with the usage of a particular entity, which can be defined in the data model of the system. Other methods of pairing increment and decrement requests are possible depending on the language and data constructs used in the implementation.
In addition to user sessions, it is possible for the counters to refer to other forms of user activity such as number of accesses to a piece of content or to a certain application or the volume of data transferred.

Claims (5)

Claims
1. A method of recovering the state of a distributed networked system, which system comprises at least one counter, which counter represents an instantaneous state of an entity in a system, whereby the counter will increase in value in response to an increment request and decrease in value in response to a decrement request, wherein each increment request is paired with a decrement request.
2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein the increment and decrement requests are paired using an index key shared between the increment and decrement requests.
3. A method according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein the system comprises a plurality of counters.
4. A method of recovering the state of a system according to any one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the or each counter refers to a user session.
5. A method of recovering the state of a system according to any one of Claims 1 to 4, wherein the state of the or each counter is held in volatile memory comprising a part of the system.
AU2002334163A 2001-10-15 2002-10-15 State recovery Ceased AU2002334163B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0124702A GB2381088B (en) 2001-10-15 2001-10-15 State recovery
GB0124702.2 2001-10-15
PCT/GB2002/004667 WO2003034223A2 (en) 2001-10-15 2002-10-15 State recovery

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2002334163A1 true AU2002334163A1 (en) 2003-07-03
AU2002334163B2 AU2002334163B2 (en) 2007-04-05

Family

ID=9923843

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2002334163A Ceased AU2002334163B2 (en) 2001-10-15 2002-10-15 State recovery

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US7580997B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1436702A2 (en)
JP (1) JP2005505852A (en)
KR (1) KR20040044552A (en)
AU (1) AU2002334163B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2463606A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2381088B (en)
IL (1) IL161376A0 (en)
WO (1) WO2003034223A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9152400B2 (en) * 2013-04-18 2015-10-06 Facebook, Inc. Eliminating redundant reference count operations in intermediate representation of script code
US8990789B2 (en) 2013-04-18 2015-03-24 Facebook, Inc. Optimizing intermediate representation of script code by eliminating redundant reference count operations

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS61134852A (en) * 1984-12-06 1986-06-21 Nec Corp Microcomputer
US4716524A (en) * 1985-04-04 1987-12-29 Texas Instruments Incorporated Apparatus and method removing increment/decrement pairs to decimate a block reference stream
DE3804266A1 (en) * 1988-02-11 1989-09-14 Leitz Wild Gmbh GRAY CODE CONVERTER WITH ERROR SIGNAL
GB2252475A (en) * 1990-11-21 1992-08-05 Motorola Inc Recording error events particularly in radiotelephones
US5289460A (en) * 1992-07-31 1994-02-22 International Business Machines Corp. Maintenance of message distribution trees in a communications network
ATE154712T1 (en) * 1992-08-21 1997-07-15 Siemens Ag METHOD FOR MONITORING TIMING OF PROGRAM PROCESSING
GB2281986B (en) * 1993-09-15 1997-08-06 Advanced Risc Mach Ltd Data processing reset
JP2916420B2 (en) * 1996-09-04 1999-07-05 株式会社東芝 Checkpoint processing acceleration device and data processing method
US5987621A (en) * 1997-04-25 1999-11-16 Emc Corporation Hardware and software failover services for a file server
US6157955A (en) * 1998-06-15 2000-12-05 Intel Corporation Packet processing system including a policy engine having a classification unit
US6625750B1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2003-09-23 Emc Corporation Hardware and software failover services for a file server

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9489268B2 (en) System and method to proactively maintain a consistent recovery point objective (RPO) across data centers
US8806219B2 (en) Time-based function back-off
EP2721451B1 (en) Energy management gateways and processes
US7412520B2 (en) Systems and methods for recoverable workflow
US20100299447A1 (en) Data Replication
AU2005222564A1 (en) Method to Chain Events in a System Event Log
CN112929291A (en) Distributed current limiting method based on redis, computer equipment and storage medium
US8281178B2 (en) Hybrid computer security clock
US10305974B2 (en) Ranking system
CA2428285A1 (en) Method and/or system and/or apparatus for multiple interface remotely configurable power supply
US20050044239A1 (en) State recovery
AU2002334163A1 (en) State recovery
CN113766013B (en) Session creation method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN113810356A (en) Cloud server encryption management method and system
CN108874948A (en) A kind of site resource access method and device
JP2009116678A (en) Web server
US7107423B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for data retrieval
JP2018181012A (en) Business cooperation system and business cooperation method
CN111367466B (en) Disk retirement method and device
US11126509B2 (en) Method and system for efficient resource usage through intelligent reporting
CN113852508A (en) Communication method and device under scene of equipment batch deployment
CN110990195A (en) Data recovery method, equipment and storage medium
CN112132349A (en) Performance data processing method and device, computer equipment and computer readable medium
TWM588929U (en) Automatic updating system for application program
JP2018026036A (en) Information processing device, information processing method and program