WO2018083512A1 - Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part - Google Patents

Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018083512A1
WO2018083512A1 PCT/IB2016/001588 IB2016001588W WO2018083512A1 WO 2018083512 A1 WO2018083512 A1 WO 2018083512A1 IB 2016001588 W IB2016001588 W IB 2016001588W WO 2018083512 A1 WO2018083512 A1 WO 2018083512A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
feature
machining
data
attributes
machining method
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2016/001588
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Yahel ARICHA
Tom VAN'T ERVE
Majed Amer
Original Assignee
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. filed Critical Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
Priority to US16/347,635 priority Critical patent/US10921779B2/en
Priority to EP16920603.4A priority patent/EP3535628A4/en
Priority to PCT/IB2016/001588 priority patent/WO2018083512A1/en
Priority to CN201680090499.7A priority patent/CN109891337B/en
Publication of WO2018083512A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018083512A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
    • G05B19/4097Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by using design data to control NC machines, e.g. CAD/CAM
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/35Nc in input of data, input till input file format
    • G05B2219/35086Machining feature extraction, geometry and machining parameters
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/35Nc in input of data, input till input file format
    • G05B2219/35091Feature conversion, from design to process features or else
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • the present disclosure is directed, in general, to computer-aided design (“CAM”), visualization, and manufacturing systems, (“CAM”) systems, product lifecycle management (“PLM”) systems, product data management (“PDM”) systems, and similar systems, that manage data for products, production methods, and production execution and other items (collectively, “Product Data Management” systems or PDM systems). More specifically, the disclosure is directed to virtual tools for manufacturing planning and manufacturing verification, and manufacturing machine controller tools.
  • CAM computer-aided design
  • PLM product lifecycle management
  • PDM product data management
  • PDM product data management
  • part denotes manufacturing parts to be machined
  • feature denotes a shape to be manufactured in the part.
  • features of a part include, but are not limited to, a hole, a step-n-hole (a hole with n diameters), a threaded hole, a slot, and other types of cavities and shapes with specific surface finishing.
  • a machining method is defined by a sequence of machining operations, also called machining cycles, with certain tools.
  • a machining method may be defined within a CAM program or within a program of a machine controller.
  • the typical scenario of a CAM environment is here below discussed for illustration purposes. The skilled in the art will understand that similar considerations apply to the field of machine controllers.
  • machining method databases comprise detailed definitions of the machining methods, applicability of each machining method for the feature shape and sizes, and priority rankings among a plurality of feasible machining methods for a given case.
  • the known techniques for creating and maintaining such a machining database are task consuming and require expensive skilled CAM engineers so that most small/medium job shops cannot afford to have such a machining method database system implemented.
  • Various disclosed embodiments include processes and corresponding systems and computer-readable mediums for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part.
  • the part is an object to be manufactured having a set of features.
  • Each feature is manufactured by at least one machining method.
  • a process includes receiving data of a set of features, each feature data describing a feature to be manufactured and comprising a type of the feature and a set of attributes of the feature.
  • the process includes receiving data of a set of machining methods, each machining method data describing a machining method for manufacturing an associated feature.
  • the process includes analyzing machining methods associated to features of a given type in order to define a set of ranges of feature attributes where said machining methods are applicable.
  • the process includes assigning to each of the machining method a set of ranking values for ordering machining methods applicable in the same range of feature attributes.
  • the process includes receiving data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the type of the additional feature is the given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes.
  • the process includes selecting a set of machining methods which are applicable in a range of feature attributes matching the specific set of attributes.
  • the process includes providing at least one machining method of the selected method set based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to said additional feature as the machining method for manufacturing the additional feature
  • Figure 1 illustrates a block diagram of a data processing system in which an embodiment can be implemented
  • Figure 2 illustrates a schematic view of a part to be manufactured with a plurality of features
  • Figure 3 illustrates a flowchart of a method for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part in accordance with disclosed embodiments.
  • FIGURES 1 through 3 discussed below, and the various embodiments used to describe the principles of the present disclosure in this patent document are by way of illustration only and should not be construed in any way to limit the scope of the disclosure. Those skilled in the art will understand that the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented in any suitably arranged device. The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with reference to exemplary non-limiting embodiments.
  • Embodiments enable to generate a CAM program automatically given as input a 3D model representation, such as e.g. a CAD representation, of a part and their historical CAM programs.
  • Embodiments enable to automatically deduce the applicability rules and the priority rankings of feasible machining methods so that manual work for defining application rules is not required.
  • Embodiments enable to learn from the usage and/or selection of previously defined machining methods so as to improve the suggestion of machining methods to propose for manufacturing a feature of certain type and attributes.
  • Embodiments enable to take into account user feedback to update the method rankings and improve the machining method suggestion.
  • Embodiments allow generating in a fast and automatic manner a machine knowledge database.
  • Embodiments take into account rankings based on crowd usages and selections. [0023] Embodiments reduce costs and are less error prone.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a data processing system 100 in which an embodiment can be implemented, for example as a PDM system particularly configured by software or otherwise to perform the processes as described herein, and in particular as each one of a plurality of interconnected and communicating systems as described herein.
  • the data processing system 100 illustrated can include a processor 102 connected to a level two cache/bridge 104, which is connected in turn to a local system bus 106.
  • Local system bus 106 may be, for example, a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) architecture bus.
  • PCI peripheral component interconnect
  • main memory 108 Also connected to local system bus in the illustrated example are a main memory 108 and a graphics adapter 1 10.
  • the graphics adapter 110 may be connected to display 1 1 1.
  • Other peripherals such as local area network (LAN) / Wide Area Network / Wireless (e.g. WiFi) adapter 112, may also be connected to local system bus 106.
  • LAN local area network
  • WiFi Wide Area Network / Wireless
  • Expansion bus interface 114 connects local system bus 106 to input/output (I/O) bus 116.
  • I/O bus 1 16 is connected to keyboard/mouse adapter 118, disk controller 120, and I/O adapter 122.
  • Disk controller 120 can be connected to a storage 126, which can be any suitable machine usable or machine readable storage medium, including but not limited to nonvolatile, hard-coded type mediums such as read only memories (ROMs) or erasable, electrically programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic tape storage, and user-recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and compact disk read only memories (CD-ROMs) or digital versatile disks (DVDs), and other known optical, electrical, or magnetic storage devices.
  • ROMs read only memories
  • EEPROMs electrically programmable read only memories
  • CD-ROMs compact disk read only memories
  • DVDs digital versatile disks
  • Audio adapter 124 Also connected to I/O bus 116 in the example shown is audio adapter 124, to which speakers (not shown) may be connected for playing sounds.
  • Keyboard/mouse adapter 118 provides a connection for a pointing device (not shown), such as a mouse, trackball, trackpointer, touchscreen, etc.
  • a data processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure can include an operating system employing a graphical user interface.
  • the operating system permits multiple display windows to be presented in the graphical user interface simultaneously, with each display window providing an interface to a different application or to a different instance of the same application.
  • a cursor in the graphical user interface may be manipulated by a user through the pointing device. The position of the cursor may be changed and/or an event, such as clicking a mouse button, generated to actuate a desired response.
  • One of various commercial operating systems such as a version of Microsoft WindowsTM, a product of Microsoft Corporation located in Redmond, Wash, may be employed if suitably modified.
  • the operating system is modified or created in accordance with the present disclosure as described.
  • LAN/ WAN/ Wireless adapter 112 can be connected to a network 130 (not a part of data processing system 100), which can be any public or private data processing system network or combination of networks, as known to those of skill in the art, including the Internet.
  • Data processing system 100 can communicate over network 130 with server system 140, which is also not part of data processing system 100, but can be implemented, for example, as a separate data processing system 100.
  • One or more of the processor 102, the memory 108, and a simulation program running on the processor 102 receive the inputs via one or more of the local system bus 106, the adapter 1 12, the network 130, the server 140, the interface 114, the I/O bus 116, the disk controller 120, the storage 126, and so on.
  • Receiving can include retrieving from storage 126, receiving from another device or process, receiving via an interaction with a user, or otherwise.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a schematic view of a manufacturing part to be manufactured with a plurality of features.
  • Part 201 is an object having as features holes 202, 203, 204 of different diameters and two slots 205, 206 where slot 205 is a slot of partial rectangle type, and slot 206 is a slot of rectangle type.
  • the part holes are of type step 1 holes with a single diameter.
  • type of a feature denotes the class of the feature (e.g. shape and material).
  • Characteristics of a feature interchangeably denote the dimensions of the feature (e.g. diameter) and the surface finishing of the feature (e.g. threaded). [0033] Example embodiment.
  • Historical three-dimensional (3D) model (e.g. CAD) files of parts to be manufactured and their corresponding machining CAM program files are provided as input to the data processing system.
  • the CAD files comprise a 3D model description of a part with one or more features.
  • the CAM program files include a description of the set of machining methods for manufacturing the parts with their features.
  • Historical CAD files and their corresponding CAM programs of this example were previously defined by CAM engineers.
  • Table 1 comprises n example historical files with 3D representations of parts with corresponding machining methods usable in a manufacturing facility.
  • Feature description include, but are not limited to, feature types and feature characteristics/attributes. Machining description include, but are not limited to, machining operations sequence (e.g. type, properties, ... ), the tools (e.g. type, sizes,). [0040]
  • Table 2 illustrates the found associations between features and machining methods for features of type AA having as attribute a diameter.
  • Table 2 schematically represents the information stored in a machining knowledge database for recognized features of a given type having certain attributes and their corresponding associated machining methods.
  • the machining methods typically include the sequence of operations required to machine the feature, the machining parameters (e.g. speed and feed, step over and other parameters), the assigned tool/s and its/their characteristics.
  • the information of the machining knowledge database represented by Table 2 is analyzed in order to find the application rules of the listed machining methods in terms of attributes of the recognized features. Such analysis may preferably be performed through machine learning techniques.
  • machine learning technique is clustering.
  • the machining methods of Table 2 are clustered so that there is high intra-cluster similarity and low inter-cluster similarity. For example, based on the list of methods per feature type and their characteristics, methods may be grouped into clusters by computing correlations between feature attributes such as e.g. dimensions and the corresponding associated machining methods.
  • cluster Cx comprises machining methods whose application rule applies to features of type AA having as attribute range a diameter smaller or equal than 10 mm
  • cluster Cy is for machining methods whose application rule applies to features of type AA having as attribute range a diameter bigger than 10 mm. All machining methods of one cluster can interchangeably be used for machining each feature of the cluster.
  • Each machining method in a cluster is assigned with a ranking value for prioritizing the selection of a machining method within the cluster.
  • the criterion for assigning ranking values may for example be based on historical usage where a higher ranking value is assigned to machining methods which were used more.
  • Table 3 illustrates the two clusters Cx, Cy resulting from the machining method analysis of the feature attributes and their corresponding associated machining methods, where in the last column ranking values according to usage are assigned.
  • the user is presented with a selection set m of the highest ranked machining methods of the cluster of feasible machining methods. For example for a feature of type AA and diameter 6 mm, the user is provided with a selection of the two highest ranked methods of cluster Clx which are machining method "Method 1 + Tool A " and machining method "Method 3 + Tool C", where the first machining method is having the highest ranking value.
  • the user may accept the provided system selection or may be given the option of changing it. Assume, for example, that the user selects a machining method from the cluster having a lower ranking, e.g. machining method "Method 3 + Tool C".
  • Such different user choice is captured by the system by updating the assigned ranking value accordingly so that a user selection criterion is taken into account, as for example it is shown in resulting Table 4, where machining method "Method 3 + Tool C" gets a ranking value of 4.
  • the suggestion of a machining method such as e.g. a CAM program, provided to a user may be improved based on user usage frequency, user selection and/or user feedback.
  • multiple users may contribute with their machining knowledge so that the machining knowledge base may continuously grow and get updated by community and crowd usage.
  • Figure 3 illustrates a flowchart 300 of a process for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part in accordance with disclosed embodiments.
  • a process can be performed, for example, by system 100 of Figure 1 described above, but the "system" in the process below can be any apparatus configured to perform a process as described.
  • the part is an object to be manufactured having a set of features. Each feature is manufactured by at least one machining method.
  • Each feature data describes a feature to be manufactured.
  • the description of the feature comprises a feature type and a set of feature attributes.
  • the data of the feature is extracted from data of a part by recognizing the feature in the part.
  • Feature and part data may be in form of files or data in a database, in a repository or in the cloud.
  • Each machining method data describes a machining method for manufacturing a feature associated to the machining method.
  • the data of the set of associated machining methods is extracted from data describing a set of machining methods for manufacturing the part with its features. This extraction is done by identifying the machining method to manufacture the recognized feature in the part and by making the corresponding association.
  • the association of machining methods with feature is done by calculating the manufacturing result of at least one machining method and relating it to the feature of the part, e.g. by calculating the tool path operations or by identifying the feature by calculating the material subtracted out of a part.
  • an analysis of the machining methods associated to features of a given type is performed so that a set of ranges of feature attributes where the machining methods are applicable is defined.
  • the analysis is performed via a machine learning technique.
  • machine learning techniques include, but are not limited to, clustering, neural networks, support vector machine (SVM) and others.
  • machining methods of the given type and applicable in the same range of feature attributes are ranked according to a predefined ranking criterion.
  • ranking criteria include, but are not limited to, historical usage, user selection, crowd ranking, expert rankings, overall machining time, energy consumption, level of manufacturing accuracy, and others.
  • At act 325 receiving as input a feature data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the additional feature has not a machining method associated to it yet.
  • the type of the additional feature is the given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes.
  • At act 335 it is provided at least one machining method of the selected methods based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to the additional feature for its manufacturing.
  • EEPROMs programmable read only memories
  • user-recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and compact disk read only memories (CD-ROMs) or digital versatile disks (DVDs).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Numerical Control (AREA)

Abstract

Systems and a process for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part by receiving data of a set of features, each feature data describing a feature to be manufactured and comprising a type of the feature and a set of attributes of the feature. A set of ranking values are assigned to each machining method for ordering machining methods applicable in the same range of feature attributes. Data of an additional feature to be manufactured is received, wherein the type of the additional feature is said given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes. At least one machining method of the selected methods is provided based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to the additional feature as the machining method for manufacturing the additional feature.

Description

PROCESS AND SYSEM FOR PROVIDING A MACHINING METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A FEATURE IN A PART
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure is directed, in general, to computer-aided design ("CAM"), visualization, and manufacturing systems, ("CAM") systems, product lifecycle management ("PLM") systems, product data management ("PDM") systems, and similar systems, that manage data for products, production methods, and production execution and other items (collectively, "Product Data Management" systems or PDM systems). More specifically, the disclosure is directed to virtual tools for manufacturing planning and manufacturing verification, and manufacturing machine controller tools.
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0002] In the field of industrial manufacturing, in order to machine a part with one or more features, detailed machining methods need to be defined. As used herein the term "part" denotes manufacturing parts to be machined, and the term "feature" denotes a shape to be manufactured in the part. Examples of features of a part include, but are not limited to, a hole, a step-n-hole (a hole with n diameters), a threaded hole, a slot, and other types of cavities and shapes with specific surface finishing.
[0003] A machining method is defined by a sequence of machining operations, also called machining cycles, with certain tools. In the field of industrial automation, a machining method may be defined within a CAM program or within a program of a machine controller. The typical scenario of a CAM environment is here below discussed for illustration purposes. The skilled in the art will understand that similar considerations apply to the field of machine controllers.
[0004] Although for similar industrial cases, e.g. similar parts or similar features within parts, similar machining methods are defined by the CAM engineer, especially if she he works within the same company, in reality in most industrial scenario there is unfortunately still too little re-usage of previous CAM programs. [0005] In order to reuse CAM programs, databases of machining methods associated to the part features need to be generated. Such machining method databases comprise detailed definitions of the machining methods, applicability of each machining method for the feature shape and sizes, and priority rankings among a plurality of feasible machining methods for a given case. The known techniques for creating and maintaining such a machining database are task consuming and require expensive skilled CAM engineers so that most small/medium job shops cannot afford to have such a machining method database system implemented.
[0006] Therefore improved techniques are desirable.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0007] Various disclosed embodiments include processes and corresponding systems and computer-readable mediums for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part. The part is an object to be manufactured having a set of features. Each feature is manufactured by at least one machining method. A process includes receiving data of a set of features, each feature data describing a feature to be manufactured and comprising a type of the feature and a set of attributes of the feature. The process includes receiving data of a set of machining methods, each machining method data describing a machining method for manufacturing an associated feature. The process includes analyzing machining methods associated to features of a given type in order to define a set of ranges of feature attributes where said machining methods are applicable. The process includes assigning to each of the machining method a set of ranking values for ordering machining methods applicable in the same range of feature attributes. The process includes receiving data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the type of the additional feature is the given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes. The process includes selecting a set of machining methods which are applicable in a range of feature attributes matching the specific set of attributes. The process includes providing at least one machining method of the selected method set based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to said additional feature as the machining method for manufacturing the additional feature
[0008] The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present disclosure so that those skilled in the art may better understand the detailed description that follows. Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be described hereinafter that form the subject of the claims. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that they may readily use the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art will also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the disclosure in its broadest form.
[0009] Before undertaking the DETAILED DESCRIPTION below, it may be advantageous to set forth definitions of certain words or phrases used throughout this patent document: the terms "include" and "comprise," as well as derivatives thereof, mean inclusion without limitation; the term "or" is inclusive, meaning and/or; the phrases "associated with" and "associated therewith," as well as derivatives thereof, may mean to include, be included within, interconnect with, contain, be contained within, connect to or with, couple to or with, be communicable with, cooperate with, interleave, juxtapose, be proximate to, be bound to or with, have, have a property of, or the like; and the term "controller" means any device, system or part thereof that controls at least one operation, whether such a device is implemented in hardware, firmware, software or some combination of at least two of the same. It should be noted that the functionality associated with any particular controller may be centralized or distributed, whether locally or remotely. Definitions for certain words and phrases are provided throughout this patent document, and those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that such definitions apply in many, if not most, instances to prior as well as future uses of such defined words and phrases. While some terms may include a wide variety of embodiments, the appended claims may expressly limit these terms to specific embodiments. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like numbers designate like objects, and in which:
[0011] Figure 1 illustrates a block diagram of a data processing system in which an embodiment can be implemented;
[0012] Figure 2 illustrates a schematic view of a part to be manufactured with a plurality of features;
[0013] Figure 3 illustrates a flowchart of a method for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part in accordance with disclosed embodiments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0014] FIGURES 1 through 3, discussed below, and the various embodiments used to describe the principles of the present disclosure in this patent document are by way of illustration only and should not be construed in any way to limit the scope of the disclosure. Those skilled in the art will understand that the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented in any suitably arranged device. The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with reference to exemplary non-limiting embodiments.
[0015] Previous techniques are not satisfactory. [0016] With embodiments, to the benefit of CAM engineers and machine operators, machining methods for manufacturing a part feature of a given type can be automatically generated. Such machining methods may be part of a CAM program or of a controller program. [0017] Embodiments enable to generate a CAM program automatically given as input a 3D model representation, such as e.g. a CAD representation, of a part and their historical CAM programs.
[0018] Embodiments enable to automatically deduce the applicability rules and the priority rankings of feasible machining methods so that manual work for defining application rules is not required.
[0019] Embodiments enable to learn from the usage and/or selection of previously defined machining methods so as to improve the suggestion of machining methods to propose for manufacturing a feature of certain type and attributes.
[0020] Embodiments enable to take into account user feedback to update the method rankings and improve the machining method suggestion.
[0021] Embodiments allow generating in a fast and automatic manner a machine knowledge database.
[0022] Embodiments take into account rankings based on crowd usages and selections. [0023] Embodiments reduce costs and are less error prone.
[0024] Figure 1 illustrates a block diagram of a data processing system 100 in which an embodiment can be implemented, for example as a PDM system particularly configured by software or otherwise to perform the processes as described herein, and in particular as each one of a plurality of interconnected and communicating systems as described herein. The data processing system 100 illustrated can include a processor 102 connected to a level two cache/bridge 104, which is connected in turn to a local system bus 106. Local system bus 106 may be, for example, a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) architecture bus. Also connected to local system bus in the illustrated example are a main memory 108 and a graphics adapter 1 10. The graphics adapter 110 may be connected to display 1 1 1. [0025] Other peripherals, such as local area network (LAN) / Wide Area Network / Wireless (e.g. WiFi) adapter 112, may also be connected to local system bus 106.
Expansion bus interface 114 connects local system bus 106 to input/output (I/O) bus 116. I/O bus 1 16 is connected to keyboard/mouse adapter 118, disk controller 120, and I/O adapter 122. Disk controller 120 can be connected to a storage 126, which can be any suitable machine usable or machine readable storage medium, including but not limited to nonvolatile, hard-coded type mediums such as read only memories (ROMs) or erasable, electrically programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic tape storage, and user-recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and compact disk read only memories (CD-ROMs) or digital versatile disks (DVDs), and other known optical, electrical, or magnetic storage devices.
[0026] Also connected to I/O bus 116 in the example shown is audio adapter 124, to which speakers (not shown) may be connected for playing sounds. Keyboard/mouse adapter 118 provides a connection for a pointing device (not shown), such as a mouse, trackball, trackpointer, touchscreen, etc.
[0027] Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the hardware illustrated in Figure 1 may vary for particular implementations. For example, other peripheral devices, such as an optical disk drive and the like, also may be used in addition or in place of the hardware illustrated. The illustrated example is provided for the purpose of explanation only and is not meant to imply architectural limitations with respect to the present disclosure. [0028] A data processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure can include an operating system employing a graphical user interface. The operating system permits multiple display windows to be presented in the graphical user interface simultaneously, with each display window providing an interface to a different application or to a different instance of the same application. A cursor in the graphical user interface may be manipulated by a user through the pointing device. The position of the cursor may be changed and/or an event, such as clicking a mouse button, generated to actuate a desired response.
[0029] One of various commercial operating systems, such as a version of Microsoft Windows™, a product of Microsoft Corporation located in Redmond, Wash, may be employed if suitably modified. The operating system is modified or created in accordance with the present disclosure as described.
[0030] LAN/ WAN/ Wireless adapter 112 can be connected to a network 130 (not a part of data processing system 100), which can be any public or private data processing system network or combination of networks, as known to those of skill in the art, including the Internet. Data processing system 100 can communicate over network 130 with server system 140, which is also not part of data processing system 100, but can be implemented, for example, as a separate data processing system 100.
[0031] One or more of the processor 102, the memory 108, and a simulation program running on the processor 102 receive the inputs via one or more of the local system bus 106, the adapter 1 12, the network 130, the server 140, the interface 114, the I/O bus 116, the disk controller 120, the storage 126, and so on. Receiving, as used herein, can include retrieving from storage 126, receiving from another device or process, receiving via an interaction with a user, or otherwise.
[0032] Figure 2 illustrates a schematic view of a manufacturing part to be manufactured with a plurality of features. Part 201 is an object having as features holes 202, 203, 204 of different diameters and two slots 205, 206 where slot 205 is a slot of partial rectangle type, and slot 206 is a slot of rectangle type. The part holes are of type step 1 holes with a single diameter. As used herein, the term "type" of a feature denotes the class of the feature (e.g. shape and material). As used herein, the terms "attributes" or
"characteristics" of a feature interchangeably denote the dimensions of the feature (e.g. diameter) and the surface finishing of the feature (e.g. threaded). [0033] Example embodiment.
[0034] An example embodiment is described below, illustrated also through Tables 1 to 4.
[0035] Historical three-dimensional (3D) model (e.g. CAD) files of parts to be manufactured and their corresponding machining CAM program files are provided as input to the data processing system. The CAD files comprise a 3D model description of a part with one or more features. The CAM program files include a description of the set of machining methods for manufacturing the parts with their features.
[0036] Historical CAD files and their corresponding CAM programs of this example were previously defined by CAM engineers. Table 1 comprises n example historical files with 3D representations of parts with corresponding machining methods usable in a manufacturing facility.
[0037]
CAD + CAM teaching examples
Example _l.prt
Example _2.prt
I Example n.prt
Table 1
[0038] From the data of the files of Table 1, associations between recognized features and their corresponding extracted machining methods are generated as follows:
- running feature recognition on the CAD file to identify the features present in a part;
- for each recognized feature, finding the machining method that was applied by the CAM engineer for manufacturing such recognized feature;
- for each recognized feature, associating its corresponding machining method. [0039] Descriptions of features and of machining methods are stored in a database. Feature description include, but are not limited to, feature types and feature characteristics/attributes. Machining description include, but are not limited to, machining operations sequence (e.g. type, properties, ... ), the tools (e.g. type, sizes,...). [0040]
Figure imgf000010_0001
Table 2
[0041] Table 2 illustrates the found associations between features and machining methods for features of type AA having as attribute a diameter. Table 2 schematically represents the information stored in a machining knowledge database for recognized features of a given type having certain attributes and their corresponding associated machining methods. The machining methods typically include the sequence of operations required to machine the feature, the machining parameters (e.g. speed and feed, step over and other parameters), the assigned tool/s and its/their characteristics.
[0042] The information of the machining knowledge database represented by Table 2 is analyzed in order to find the application rules of the listed machining methods in terms of attributes of the recognized features. Such analysis may preferably be performed through machine learning techniques. One example of machine learning technique is clustering. The machining methods of Table 2 are clustered so that there is high intra-cluster similarity and low inter-cluster similarity. For example, based on the list of methods per feature type and their characteristics, methods may be grouped into clusters by computing correlations between feature attributes such as e.g. dimensions and the corresponding associated machining methods.
[0043] From the machining method clusters, application rules are deduced in terms of feature attributes, e.g. cluster Cx comprises machining methods whose application rule applies to features of type AA having as attribute range a diameter smaller or equal than 10 mm, cluster Cy is for machining methods whose application rule applies to features of type AA having as attribute range a diameter bigger than 10 mm. All machining methods of one cluster can interchangeably be used for machining each feature of the cluster.
[0044] Each machining method in a cluster is assigned with a ranking value for prioritizing the selection of a machining method within the cluster. The criterion for assigning ranking values may for example be based on historical usage where a higher ranking value is assigned to machining methods which were used more.
[0045]
Figure imgf000011_0001
Table 3
[0046] Table 3 illustrates the two clusters Cx, Cy resulting from the machining method analysis of the feature attributes and their corresponding associated machining methods, where in the last column ranking values according to usage are assigned.
[0047] When a CAM engineer loads a new CAD file of a manufacturing part having no corresponding CAM program associated to it, he/she is provided with a proposal for each recognized feature of type AA based on the machining methods of the machining knowledge database and their rankings. A selection of valid machining methods applicable for the input attribute range ordered according to the assigned ranking value is provided to the user.
[0048] The user is presented with a selection set m of the highest ranked machining methods of the cluster of feasible machining methods. For example for a feature of type AA and diameter 6 mm, the user is provided with a selection of the two highest ranked methods of cluster Clx which are machining method "Method 1 + Tool A " and machining method "Method 3 + Tool C", where the first machining method is having the highest ranking value. The user may accept the provided system selection or may be given the option of changing it. Assume, for example, that the user selects a machining method from the cluster having a lower ranking, e.g. machining method "Method 3 + Tool C". Such different user choice is captured by the system by updating the assigned ranking value accordingly so that a user selection criterion is taken into account, as for example it is shown in resulting Table 4, where machining method "Method 3 + Tool C" gets a ranking value of 4.
[0049]
Figure imgf000012_0001
Table 4 [0050] Advantageously, the suggestion of a machining method, such as e.g. a CAM program, provided to a user may be improved based on user usage frequency, user selection and/or user feedback. In other embodiments, multiple users may contribute with their machining knowledge so that the machining knowledge base may continuously grow and get updated by community and crowd usage.
[0051] Figure 3 illustrates a flowchart 300 of a process for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part in accordance with disclosed embodiments. Such a process can be performed, for example, by system 100 of Figure 1 described above, but the "system" in the process below can be any apparatus configured to perform a process as described.
[0052] The part is an object to be manufactured having a set of features. Each feature is manufactured by at least one machining method.
[0053] At act 305, data of a set of features is received as input. Each feature data describes a feature to be manufactured. The description of the feature comprises a feature type and a set of feature attributes. In other embodiments, the data of the feature is extracted from data of a part by recognizing the feature in the part. In the art, there are several data formats for providing 3D descriptions of parts and their features; an example of it is a CAD format or other 3D formats like e.g. Initial Graphics Exchange Specification (IGES) and STEP formats. Feature and part data may be in form of files or data in a database, in a repository or in the cloud.
[0054] At act 310, data of a set of machining methods is received as input. Each machining method data describes a machining method for manufacturing a feature associated to the machining method. In other embodiments, the data of the set of associated machining methods is extracted from data describing a set of machining methods for manufacturing the part with its features. This extraction is done by identifying the machining method to manufacture the recognized feature in the part and by making the corresponding association. In some embodiments, the association of machining methods with feature is done by calculating the manufacturing result of at least one machining method and relating it to the feature of the part, e.g. by calculating the tool path operations or by identifying the feature by calculating the material subtracted out of a part. In the art, there are several machining method data formats and files; an example of it is a CAM program file.
[0055] At act 315, an analysis of the machining methods associated to features of a given type is performed so that a set of ranges of feature attributes where the machining methods are applicable is defined. In some embodiments, the analysis is performed via a machine learning technique. Examples of machine learning techniques include, but are not limited to, clustering, neural networks, support vector machine (SVM) and others.
[0056] At act 320, machining methods of the given type and applicable in the same range of feature attributes are ranked according to a predefined ranking criterion. Examples of ranking criteria include, but are not limited to, historical usage, user selection, crowd ranking, expert rankings, overall machining time, energy consumption, level of manufacturing accuracy, and others.
[0057] At act 325, receiving as input a feature data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the additional feature has not a machining method associated to it yet. The type of the additional feature is the given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes.
[0058] At act 330, a set of machining methods for the feature of the given type and applicable in the feature attribute range matching the specific set of attributes is selected.
[0059] At act 335, it is provided at least one machining method of the selected methods based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to the additional feature for its manufacturing.
[0060] Of course, those of skill in the art will recognize that, unless specifically indicated or required by the sequence of operations, certain steps in the processes described above may be omitted, performed concurrently or sequentially, or performed in a different order.
[0061] Those skilled in the art will recognize that, for simplicity and clarity, the full structure and operation of all data processing systems suitable for use with the present disclosure is not being illustrated or described herein. Instead, only so much of a data processing system as is unique to the present disclosure or necessary for an understanding of the present disclosure is illustrated and described. The remainder of the construction and operation of data processing system 100 may conform to any of the various current implementations and practices known in the art.
[0062] It is important to note that while the disclosure includes a description in the context of a fully functional system, those skilled in the art will appreciate that at least portions of the mechanism of the present disclosure are capable of being distributed in the form of instructions contained within a machine-usable, computer-usable, or computer- readable medium in any of a variety of forms, and that the present disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of instruction or signal bearing medium or storage medium utilized to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of machine usable/readable or computer usable/readable mediums include: nonvolatile, hard-coded type mediums such as read only memories (ROMs) or erasable, electrically
programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), and user-recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and compact disk read only memories (CD-ROMs) or digital versatile disks (DVDs).
[0063] Although an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure has been described in detail, those skilled in the art will understand that various changes, substitutions, variations, and improvements disclosed herein may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure in its broadest form.
[0064] None of the description in the present application should be read as implying that any particular element, step, or function is an essential element which must be included in the claim scope: the scope of patented subject matter is defined only by the allowed claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A process for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part by a data processing system, wherein said part is an object to be manufactured having a set of features, each feature being manufactured by at least one machining method; the process comprising the following steps:
a) receiving data of a set of features, each feature data describing a feature to be manufactured and comprising a type of the feature and a set of attributes of the feature; b) receiving data of a set of machining methods, each machining method data describing a machining method for manufacturing an associated feature;
c) analyzing machining methods associated to features of a given type in order to define a set of ranges of feature attributes where said machining methods are applicable; d) assigning to each of said machining method a set of ranking values for ordering machining methods applicable in the same range of feature attributes;
e) receiving data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the type of the additional feature is said given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes;
f) selecting a set of machining methods which are applicable in a range of feature attributes matching the specific set of attributes;
g) providing at least one machining method from said selected method set based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to said additional feature as the machining method for manufacturing said additional feature.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein:
- in said receiving step a), the feature data is extracted from data of a part by recognizing the feature in the part;
- in said receiving step b), the set of machining methods data is extracted from machining data describing a set of machining methods for manufacturing the part and the set of part features, by identifying the associated machining method to manufacture said recognized feature.
3. The process of claim 2, wherein said identifying sub-step is performed by calculating the manufacturing result of at least one machining method.
4. The process of claim 1, wherein said ranking values are assigned based on ranking criteria selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following:
- usage;
- user selection;
- crowd ranking;
- expert ranking;
- overall machining time;
- energy consumption;
- level of accuracy.
5. The process of claim 1, wherein the part description data is included in a CAD file and/or the machining data is included in a CAM program file.
6. The process of claim 1, wherein said analyzing step c) is performed via a machine learning technique.
7. A process for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part by a data processing system, wherein said part is an object to be manufactured having a set of features, each feature being manufactured by at least one machining method; the process comprising the following steps:
a) receiving data of a set of features, each feature data describing a feature to be manufactured and comprising a type of the feature and a set of attributes of the feature; wherein the feature data is extracted from data of a part by recognizing the feature in the part;
b) receiving data of a set of machining methods , each machining method data describing a machining method for manufacturing an associated feature; wherein the set of machining methods data is extracted from machining data describing a set of machining methods for manufacturing the part and the set of part features, by identifying the associated machining method to manufacture said recognized feature
c) via a machine learning technique, analyzing machining methods associated to features of a given type in order to define a set of ranges of feature attributes where said machining methods are applicable;
d) assigning to each of said machining method a set of ranking values for ordering machining methods applicable in the same range of feature attributes;
e) receiving data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the type of the additi onal feature is said given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes;
f) selecting a set of machining methods which are applicable in a range of feature attributes matching the specific set of attributes;
g) providing at least one machining method from said selected method set based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to said additional feature as the machining method for manufacturing said additional feature.
8. A data processing system comprising:
a processor; and
an accessible memory, the data processing system particularly configured to:
a) receiving data of a set of features, each feature data describing a feature to be manufactured and comprising a type of the feature and a set of attributes of the feature; b) receiving data of a set of machining methods , each machining method data describing a machining method for manufacturing an associated feature;
c) analyzing machining methods associated to features of a given type in order to define a set of ranges of feature attributes where said machining methods are applicable; d) assigning to each of said machining method a set of ranking values for ordering machining methods applicable in the same range of feature attributes;
e) receiving data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the type of the additional feature is said given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes; f) selecting a set of machining methods which are applicable in a range of feature attributes matching the specific set of attributes;
g) providing at least one machining method from said selected method set based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to said additional feature as the machining method for manufacturing said additional feature.
9. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein:
- the received feature data is extracted from data of a part by recognizing the feature in the part;
- the received set of machining methods data is extracted from machining data
describing a set of machining methods for manufacturing the part and the set of part features, by identifying the associated machining method to manufacture said recognized feature.
10. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein said ranking values are assigned based on ranking criteria selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following:
- usage;
- user selection;
- crowd ranking;
- expert ranking;
- overall machining time;
- energy consumption;
- level of accuracy.
11. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein the part description data is included in a CAD file and/or the machining data is included in a CAM program file.
12. The data processing system of claim 8, wherein the analyzing is performed via a machine learning technique.
13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with executable instructions that, when executed, cause one or more data processing systems to:
a) receiving data of a set of features, each feature data describing a feature to be manufactured and comprising a type of the feature and a set of attributes of the feature; b) receiving data of a set of machining methods , each machining method data describing a machining method for manufacturing an associated feature;
c) analyzing machining methods associated to features of a given type in order to define a set of ranges of feature attributes where said machining methods are applicable; d) assigning to each of said machining method a set of ranking values for ordering machining methods applicable in the same range of feature attributes;
e) receiving data of an additional feature to be manufactured, wherein the type of the additional feature is said given type and the set of attributes of the additional feature is a specific set of attributes;
f) selecting a set of machining methods which are applicable in a range of feature attributes matching the specific set of attributes;
g) providing at least one machining method from said selected method set based on its assigned ranking value to be associated to said additional feature as the machining method for manufacturing said additional feature.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein:
- the received feature data is extracted from data of a part by recognizing the feature in the part;
- the received set of machining methods data is extracted from machining data
describing a set of machining methods for manufacturing the part and the set of part features, by identifying the associated machining method to manufacture said recognized feature.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein said ranking values are assigned based on ranking criteria selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following:
- usage; - user selection;
- crowd ranking;
- expert ranking;
- overall machining time;
- energy consumption;
- level of accuracy.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13„ wherein the part description data is included in a CAD file and/or the machining data is included in a CAM program file.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the analyzing is performed via a machine learning technique.
PCT/IB2016/001588 2016-11-04 2016-11-04 Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part WO2018083512A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/347,635 US10921779B2 (en) 2016-11-04 2016-11-04 Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part
EP16920603.4A EP3535628A4 (en) 2016-11-04 2016-11-04 Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part
PCT/IB2016/001588 WO2018083512A1 (en) 2016-11-04 2016-11-04 Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part
CN201680090499.7A CN109891337B (en) 2016-11-04 2016-11-04 Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing features in a part

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/IB2016/001588 WO2018083512A1 (en) 2016-11-04 2016-11-04 Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018083512A1 true WO2018083512A1 (en) 2018-05-11

Family

ID=62076746

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2016/001588 WO2018083512A1 (en) 2016-11-04 2016-11-04 Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US10921779B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3535628A4 (en)
CN (1) CN109891337B (en)
WO (1) WO2018083512A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3582048A1 (en) * 2018-06-14 2019-12-18 Sandvik Machining Solutions AB Machining based on strategies selected based on prioritized aspects of manufacturing
EP3663997A1 (en) * 2018-12-07 2020-06-10 Sap Se Machine learning based resource allocation in a manufacturing plant
CN111487925A (en) * 2019-01-29 2020-08-04 财团法人台湾发展研究院 Sharing method for machining program of numerical control machine tool
WO2020169186A1 (en) * 2019-02-19 2020-08-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for cycle-based programming of a control program for a numerically controlled machine tool
DE102022127792A1 (en) 2022-10-20 2024-04-25 Technische Universität Wien COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR USE IN A COMPUTER-AID PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3945381A1 (en) * 2020-07-31 2022-02-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Production of surfaces determinable by means of cone segments using a machine tool

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6047225A (en) 1997-01-17 2000-04-04 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Automatic programming apparatus and method
WO2004068275A2 (en) * 2003-01-17 2004-08-12 Dp Technology Corp. Rule-based system and method for machining a part
US20050038821A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2005-02-17 Wallen Todd Alan Method and system for capturing, managing and disseminating manufacturing knowledge
EP1677168A1 (en) 2003-10-23 2006-07-05 Fujitsu Limited Machining information creating device, program, and machining information creating method
US20070038329A1 (en) * 2004-12-14 2007-02-15 Pravin Khurana System, method, and article of manufacture for determining a process plan for forming features in a part
US20140379119A1 (en) * 2013-06-20 2014-12-25 Maro Sciacchitano System for remote and automated manufacture of products from user data

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013192219A2 (en) * 2012-06-19 2013-12-27 D.P. Technology Corp. Cam integrated cnc control of machines
JP2014186657A (en) * 2013-03-25 2014-10-02 Hitachi Power Solutions Co Ltd Generation program for nc program for mold material pattern processing, and generation device for nc program for mold material pattern processing
EP2796954B1 (en) * 2013-04-23 2015-11-25 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Numerical controller with notification of a CAM system when the part program is changed
US20160011584A1 (en) * 2013-05-15 2016-01-14 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Numerical-control machining-program creation device
US20150025672A1 (en) * 2013-07-18 2015-01-22 Kennametal Inc. System and method for selecting cutting tools
CN103761357A (en) * 2013-12-24 2014-04-30 西安工业大学 Method for making feature modeling system on the basis of extensive markup language (XML) in unigraphics (UG) environment
US20160098033A1 (en) * 2014-10-06 2016-04-07 General Electric Company Semantic manufacturing

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6047225A (en) 1997-01-17 2000-04-04 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Automatic programming apparatus and method
US20050038821A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2005-02-17 Wallen Todd Alan Method and system for capturing, managing and disseminating manufacturing knowledge
WO2004068275A2 (en) * 2003-01-17 2004-08-12 Dp Technology Corp. Rule-based system and method for machining a part
EP1677168A1 (en) 2003-10-23 2006-07-05 Fujitsu Limited Machining information creating device, program, and machining information creating method
US20070038329A1 (en) * 2004-12-14 2007-02-15 Pravin Khurana System, method, and article of manufacture for determining a process plan for forming features in a part
US20140379119A1 (en) * 2013-06-20 2014-12-25 Maro Sciacchitano System for remote and automated manufacture of products from user data

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3535628A4

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3582048A1 (en) * 2018-06-14 2019-12-18 Sandvik Machining Solutions AB Machining based on strategies selected based on prioritized aspects of manufacturing
EP3582047A1 (en) * 2018-06-14 2019-12-18 Sandvik Machining Solutions AB Selection of strategy for machining a composite geometric feature
WO2019238797A1 (en) * 2018-06-14 2019-12-19 Sandvik Machining Solutions Ab Selection of strategy for machining a composite geometric feature
WO2019238755A1 (en) * 2018-06-14 2019-12-19 Sandvik Machining Solutions Ab Machining based on strategies selected based on prioritized aspects of manufacturing
CN112424711A (en) * 2018-06-14 2021-02-26 山特维克加工解决方案股份有限公司 Processing based on strategies selected according to preferential manufacturing aspects
CN112424710A (en) * 2018-06-14 2021-02-26 山特维克加工解决方案股份有限公司 Selection of strategies for machining composite geometric features
US11733674B2 (en) 2018-06-14 2023-08-22 Sandvik Machining Solutions Ab Selection of strategy for machining a composite geometric feature
EP3663997A1 (en) * 2018-12-07 2020-06-10 Sap Se Machine learning based resource allocation in a manufacturing plant
CN111487925A (en) * 2019-01-29 2020-08-04 财团法人台湾发展研究院 Sharing method for machining program of numerical control machine tool
WO2020169186A1 (en) * 2019-02-19 2020-08-27 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for cycle-based programming of a control program for a numerically controlled machine tool
DE102022127792A1 (en) 2022-10-20 2024-04-25 Technische Universität Wien COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR USE IN A COMPUTER-AID PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM
WO2024084053A1 (en) 2022-10-20 2024-04-25 Technische Universität Wien Computer-implemented method for use in a computer-aided production system, and production system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3535628A1 (en) 2019-09-11
CN109891337B (en) 2022-04-19
CN109891337A (en) 2019-06-14
US20190310608A1 (en) 2019-10-10
EP3535628A4 (en) 2020-06-24
US10921779B2 (en) 2021-02-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10921779B2 (en) Process and system for providing a machining method for manufacturing a feature in a part
Peng et al. Applying RBR and CBR to develop a VR based integrated system for machining fixture design
EP3166081A2 (en) Method and system for positioning a virtual object in a virtual simulation environment
JP2020532814A (en) Manufacturing design correction system
EP2942685B1 (en) Method for robotic energy saving tool search
CN107077519A (en) Structure for increasing material manufacturing is orientated
WO2014008220A1 (en) Ordering optional constraints in a variational system
JP2018022476A (en) Querying database with morphology criterion
US20200160210A1 (en) Method and system for predicting a motion trajectory of a robot moving between a given pair of robotic locations
EP3353692A1 (en) Method, data processing system and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for automatically assembling components in a computer-aided design (cad) environment
Adjoul et al. Algorithmic strategy for optimizing product design considering the production costs
EP3696709A1 (en) Expert knowledge framework driven hybrid manufacturing systems and methods
US9864802B2 (en) Rules-based knowledge-driven search filters
JPWO2006100712A1 (en) Design support device, design support method, design support program
Jeba Singh* et al. Feature-based design for process planning of machining processes with optimization using genetic algorithms
Gaoliang et al. Using CBR to develop a VR‐based integrated system for machining fixture design
US20120120052A1 (en) Automatic tolerancing of geometrical templates
EP3005000B1 (en) Feature geometry aspect recognition and machining
US20220342381A1 (en) Managing a machine tool method, for example method of mapping toolpath data and machine code, a control device, and a machine tool
WO2017159173A1 (en) Analysis model creation assistance device and analysis model creation assistance method
JP2007148692A (en) Concept design support device, medium recording concept design support program, and method of supporting concept design
CN112567372A (en) CAD system using rule-driven product and manufacturing information
US20160357879A1 (en) Method and apparatus for checking the buildability of a virtual prototype
JP5299471B2 (en) Information processing program and information processing method
US20230305512A1 (en) Managing a postprocessor for machining with a machine tool method, computer system, and machine tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16920603

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2016920603

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20190604