WO2015089604A1 - Structural health monitoring system employing electromechanical impedance technology - Google Patents

Structural health monitoring system employing electromechanical impedance technology Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015089604A1
WO2015089604A1 PCT/BR2014/000444 BR2014000444W WO2015089604A1 WO 2015089604 A1 WO2015089604 A1 WO 2015089604A1 BR 2014000444 W BR2014000444 W BR 2014000444W WO 2015089604 A1 WO2015089604 A1 WO 2015089604A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
transducer
set forth
frequency
analog
health state
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/BR2014/000444
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Camila Gianini GONSALES
Glauco Humberto GOMES
Fernando DOTTA
Maurício HARTMANN
Paulo Anchieta Da Silva
Ricardo Pinheiro Rulli
Carlos Alberto GALLO
Domingo Alves RADE
Elias Bitencourt TEODORO
Luiz Gustavo MARTINS
Marcos Morais DE SOUZA
Roberto Mendes Finzi NETO
Jr. Valder STEFFEN
Original Assignee
Embraer S.A.
Universidade Federal De Uberlândia - Ufu
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Embraer S.A., Universidade Federal De Uberlândia - Ufu filed Critical Embraer S.A.
Priority to CN201480068944.0A priority Critical patent/CN106233135B/en
Priority to EP14833109.3A priority patent/EP3084417B1/en
Priority to BR112016013821-0A priority patent/BR112016013821B1/en
Publication of WO2015089604A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015089604A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04—Analysing solids
    • G01N29/09—Analysing solids by measuring mechanical or acoustic impedance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00—Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007—Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/22—Details, e.g. general constructional or apparatus details
    • G01N29/32—Arrangements for suppressing undesired influences, e.g. temperature or pressure variations, compensating for signal noise
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44—Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44—Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
    • G01N29/4472—Mathematical theories or simulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/01—Indexing codes associated with the measuring variable
    • G01N2291/018—Impedance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
    • G01N2291/023—Solids
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
    • G01N2291/025—Change of phase or condition
    • G01N2291/0258—Structural degradation, e.g. fatigue of composites, ageing of oils
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
    • G01N2291/028—Material parameters
    • G01N2291/0289—Internal structure, e.g. defects, grain size, texture
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/10—Number of transducers
    • G01N2291/106—Number of transducers one or more transducer arrays
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/26—Scanned objects
    • G01N2291/269—Various geometry objects
    • G01N2291/2694—Wings or other aircraft parts

Definitions

  • the technology herein relates to electronic sensing and analysis, and more particularly to methods, systems and techniques for acquiring the structural health state of an aircraft mechanical component based on ascertaining the mechanical impedance of the component.
  • Aircraft parts can become stressed with use. While techniques are known for automatically analyzing changes in vibrational response, it would be helpful to be able to automatically sense and analyze changes in mechanical impedance using techniques that are less complicated, more efficient and less time consuming.
  • Figure 1 shows a one-dimensional model of an example electromechanical impedance due to the interaction of a piezoelectric patch and a monitored structure.
  • Figure 2 illustrates example phase displacement between the excitation sine wave v(t), applied to the transducer, and its correspondent circulating current i(t).
  • Figure 3 shows example instantaneous power, s(t), consumed by the transducer
  • Figures 4(a) and 4(b) illustrate example relationships between the components of the electrical impedance (4(a)), and the components of the consumed electrical power of the transducer (4(b)).
  • Figure 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of how the resistive part of the electromechanical impedance can be measured and calculated.
  • Figure 6 is a schematic block diagram of an example non-limiting specialized data acquisition system used to measure the EMI FRF of each transducer in the monitoring network.
  • Figure 7 illustrates example environmental effects of temperature causing frequency and/or amplitude shifts in the EMI FRF.
  • Figure 8 is a flow chart describing an example non-limiting process implemented to measure each EMI FRF and assess possible damages.
  • Figure 1 shows the well-known one-dimensional model representation of a mechanical system containing an integrated sensor-actuator piezoelectric patch.
  • the solution of the wave equation for the PZT patch bonded to the structure leads to frequency-dependent electrical admittance given by Equation 1 :
  • ⁇ ( ⁇ ) is the electrical admittance (inverse of electrical impedance)
  • Z a and Z s are the PZT's and the structure's mechanical impedances
  • 1 Y ⁇ is the complex Young's modulus of the PZT in the direction 1 under zero electric field
  • d 31 is the piezoelectric coupling constant at zero stress
  • ⁇ is the dielectric loss tangent of the piezoelectric patch
  • a is a geometric constant of the PZT patch.
  • Equation 4 presents this result:
  • Equation 4 The first term of Equation 4 is invariant over the time and includes sufficient information about the phase displacement between v(t) and i(t).
  • Figure 3 illustrates this term and it is commonly called average power.
  • Equation 5 mathematically defines the average power as a function of the phase displacement between v(t) and i(t):
  • FIG. 4(a) The mos impedance Z of the piezoelectric transducer is illustrated in Figure 4(a) where R represents the resistive (real) part of the impedance and X c the reactive (imaginary) part.
  • Figure 4(b) illustrates the relations between the phase displacement ⁇ , the average power P, the reactive power Q, and the apparent power S.
  • the resistance R can be determined by using Equation 6:
  • FIG. 5 An example non-limiting specialized example circuit, illustrated in Figure 5, is able to directly measure ⁇ ( ⁇ ).
  • a precision high speed analog multiplier 51 used to obtain s(t).
  • Low pass filter 52 provides a precision gain regulation.
  • RMS-to-DC converter 53 is used to obtain the RMS value of the circulating current in the transducer in the form of a constant voltage value (DC).
  • Microcontroller 54 is used to coordinate the sensing network and to calculate R, by software, using Equation (6).
  • the microcontroller 54 may execute software instructions stored in a non-transitory storage device such as a random access memory, read only memory, flash memory or the like.
  • the Figure 5 circuit acquires the structural health state of an aircraft mechanical component performs measurements at each frequency point of interest by using a network of transducers and working each one simultaneously as actuator and sensor. Each transducer is individually excited by a sinusoidal, constant frequency and arbitrary amplitude, voltage waveform for each arbitrary frequency point used to interrogate the structure. Dedicated hardware executes an analogical (analog) quantization to measure electrical current and average electrical power consumed by each transducer. With these two variables, the electromechanical signature of the structure is obtained at different areas of the monitored structure.
  • Computer system 61 implements the man-machine- interface (MMI). Several different interface communications may be implemented to communicate with microcontroller 61.
  • the two analog to digital (AD) channels 62 do not require high sample rates, since P me rage and (effective are DC values. A sample rate of a few kSamples/s is more than enough.
  • a programmable Digital Data Synthesis (DDS) 63 is used to generate a precise, frequency and amplitude, sine wave.
  • DDS Digital Data Synthesis
  • Digitally controlled solid state analog switches 64 are highly reliable; these switches individually activate/deactivate each transducer in the sensing network under the control of demultiplexer (decoder) 66 and the microcontroller 61. Shunt resistors 67 are used to sample de circulating current at each transducer.
  • FIG. 8 A complete example non-limiting flowchart for damage assessment is illustrated in Figure 8.
  • the MMI loads/sets the parameter for the current measurement and further calibrations may also be performed.
  • all the processing takes place inside the microcontroller in one example embodiment.
  • the post processing actions and damage assessments take place inside the computer system in this example embodiment.
  • the system loads/sets parameters (71 ) and activates the PZT transducers.
  • the system calculates a frequency point and then starts signal generation. Two kinds of signal acquisition (current and power are acquired and respectively averaged. R is then calculated straightforwardly from I and P. This process can be repeated for multiple frequency points. Once the process has been performed for each of plural frequency points as desired, the system compensates for environmental effects. Then, if the data acquisition is for baseline purposes, the results are stored. If not baseline, then the results are compared with previously stored baseline information to assess damage based on the baseline. If damage is detected, an alert can be issued automatically to a pilot, crew or maintenance person.
  • the technology herein may be embodied as a method, system hardware, embedded firmware and or software as a whole product or as a set of parts that work together in order to achieve the same or similar goal,
  • the software part can be organized into two main sets.
  • the first, called firmware may be embedded in a microcontroller or any other processing system where preprocessing algorithms (averaging, analog and digital quantization and communication interfaces) are implemented to validate, correct and transfer the measurements to a computer system.
  • the second set, called analysis software can operate on a single or multiple computer (stand-alone) or other processing system either atone or connected in a network where remote operation and data visualization is possible.
  • Post-processing algorithms environmental effects compensation
  • damage assessment can be combined to identify structural modifications (damages) at early stages.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
  • Arrangements For Transmission Of Measured Signals (AREA)

Abstract

A method to acquire the structural health state of an aircraft mechanical component performs measurements at each frequency point of interest by using a network of transducers and working each one simultaneously as actuator and sensor. Each transducer is individually excited by a sinusoidal, constant frequency and arbitrary amplitude, voltage waveform for each arbitrary frequency point used to interrogate the structure. A dedicated hardware executes an analogical (analog) quantization to measure electrical current and average electrical power consumed by each transducer. With these two variables, the electromechanical signature of the structure is obtained at different areas of the monitored structure.

Description

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM EMPLOYING ELECTROMECHANICAL
IMPEDANCE TECHNOLOGY
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001 ]
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
[0002] one.
FIELD
[0003] The technology herein relates to electronic sensing and analysis, and more particularly to methods, systems and techniques for acquiring the structural health state of an aircraft mechanical component based on ascertaining the mechanical impedance of the component.
BACKGROUND
[0004] Aircraft parts can become stressed with use. While techniques are known for automatically analyzing changes in vibrational response, it would be helpful to be able to automatically sense and analyze changes in mechanical impedance using techniques that are less complicated, more efficient and less time consuming.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0005]These and other features and advantages will be better and more completely understood by referring to the following detailed description of example non-limiting illustrative embodiments in conjunction with the drawings of which:
[0006] Figure 1 shows a one-dimensional model of an example electromechanical impedance due to the interaction of a piezoelectric patch and a monitored structure.
[0007] Figure 2 illustrates example phase displacement between the excitation sine wave v(t), applied to the transducer, and its correspondent circulating current i(t).
[0008] Figure 3 shows example instantaneous power, s(t), consumed by the transducer
(the dashed line illustrates the average consumed power).
[0009] Figures 4(a) and 4(b) illustrate example relationships between the components of the electrical impedance (4(a)), and the components of the consumed electrical power of the transducer (4(b)).
[0010]Figure 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of how the resistive part of the electromechanical impedance can be measured and calculated. [0011] Figure 6 is a schematic block diagram of an example non-limiting specialized data acquisition system used to measure the EMI FRF of each transducer in the monitoring network.
[0012] Figure 7 illustrates example environmental effects of temperature causing frequency and/or amplitude shifts in the EMI FRF.
[0013] Figure 8 is a flow chart describing an example non-limiting process implemented to measure each EMI FRF and assess possible damages.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[001 ] Figure 1 shows the well-known one-dimensional model representation of a mechanical system containing an integrated sensor-actuator piezoelectric patch. The solution of the wave equation for the PZT patch bonded to the structure leads to frequency-dependent electrical admittance given by Equation 1 :
Figure imgf000004_0001
[0015] From Equation 1 , Υ(ω) is the electrical admittance (inverse of electrical impedance), Za and Zs are the PZT's and the structure's mechanical impedances,
A 2
respectively, 1 Y π is the complex Young's modulus of the PZT in the direction 1 under zero electric field, d31 is the piezoelectric coupling constant at zero stress, is the dielectric constant at zero stress, δ is the dielectric loss tangent of the piezoelectric patch, and a is a geometric constant of the PZT patch.
[0016]This equation indicates that the electrical impedance of the PZT wafer bonded onto the structure is directly related to the mechanical impedance of the host structure. The EMI over a range of frequencies is analogous to a frequency response function (FRF) of the structure, which contains vital information regarding structural integrity.
[0017] Damage causes direct changes in the structural stiffness and/or damping and alters the local dynamic characteristics of the system. As a result, the mechanical impedance is modified by structural damage. Assuming that the properties of the PZT patch remain constant, it turns out that Ζ5(ω) is the structure's impedance that uniquely determines the overall admittance of the electromechanical system. By monitoring the measured EMI and comparing it to a baseline measurement that corresponds to the pristine condition, one can qualitatively determine if incipient structural damage has occurred.
[0018]The innovative method proposed herein from measuring each EMI FRF is based on the calculation of the resistive part of the electromechanical impedance of the active transducer, at each frequency point of interest, based on a simple and reduced set of equations. Figure 2 illustrates that the sinusoidal excitation voltage v(t) applied to the transducer creates a similar waveform current i(t) but with a phase shift Θ. Equations 2 and 3 mathematically describe these two quantities, where ω is the excitation frequency in [rd/s] and V and / are the amplitude values of the excitation voltage and the circulating current, respectively.
v(t) = Vsin(o)t) (2) i(t) = lsin(0)t + Θ) (3)
[0019]The instantaneous power consumed by the transducer, s(t), is obtained by multiplying Equation 2 by Equation 3. Equation 4 presents this result:
VIcos(Q) VIcos o ) cos(Q) VIsin(2cot)■»«(0)
s ~ 2 2 + 2 (4)
[0020] The first term of Equation 4 is invariant over the time and includes sufficient information about the phase displacement between v(t) and i(t). Figure 3 illustrates this term and it is commonly called average power. Equation 5 mathematically defines the average power as a function of the phase displacement between v(t) and i(t):
[0021 ]The mos
Figure imgf000005_0001
impedance Z of the piezoelectric transducer is illustrated in Figure 4(a) where R represents the resistive (real) part of the impedance and Xc the reactive (imaginary) part. Figure 4(b) illustrates the relations between the phase displacement Θ, the average power P, the reactive power Q, and the apparent power S. Using Equation 5, Ohm's Law and the relations illustrated in Figure 4, the resistance R can be determined by using Equation 6:
Figure imgf000006_0001
[0022] Even though the average power is directly dependent on Θ, there is no need to directly measure it.
[0023]An example non-limiting specialized example circuit, illustrated in Figure 5, is able to directly measure Ρ(θ). A precision high speed analog multiplier 51 used to obtain s(t). Low pass filter 52 provides a precision gain regulation. RMS-to-DC converter 53 is used to obtain the RMS value of the circulating current in the transducer in the form of a constant voltage value (DC). Microcontroller 54 is used to coordinate the sensing network and to calculate R, by software, using Equation (6). The microcontroller 54 may execute software instructions stored in a non-transitory storage device such as a random access memory, read only memory, flash memory or the like.
[0024]The process described is repeated for each frequency point in the previously specified range.
[0025]The Figure 5 circuit acquires the structural health state of an aircraft mechanical component performs measurements at each frequency point of interest by using a network of transducers and working each one simultaneously as actuator and sensor. Each transducer is individually excited by a sinusoidal, constant frequency and arbitrary amplitude, voltage waveform for each arbitrary frequency point used to interrogate the structure. Dedicated hardware executes an analogical (analog) quantization to measure electrical current and average electrical power consumed by each transducer. With these two variables, the electromechanical signature of the structure is obtained at different areas of the monitored structure.
[0026JA more complete block diagram is presented in Figure 6 where elements proposed in the example non-limiting embodiment are characterized by their functionalities and structures. Computer system 61 implements the man-machine- interface (MMI). Several different interface communications may be implemented to communicate with microcontroller 61. The two analog to digital (AD) channels 62 do not require high sample rates, since Pmerage and (effective are DC values. A sample rate of a few kSamples/s is more than enough. A programmable Digital Data Synthesis (DDS) 63 is used to generate a precise, frequency and amplitude, sine wave. Digitally controlled solid state analog switches 64 are highly reliable; these switches individually activate/deactivate each transducer in the sensing network under the control of demultiplexer (decoder) 66 and the microcontroller 61. Shunt resistors 67 are used to sample de circulating current at each transducer.
[0027] Environmental effects, such as the temperature illustrated in Figure 7, can cause frequency and/or amplitude shifts in the EMI FRF. The post-processing algorithms identify and compensate these shifts for a known range of temperature and pressure changes.
[0028] A complete example non-limiting flowchart for damage assessment is illustrated in Figure 8. Up to step 71 , the MMI loads/sets the parameter for the current measurement and further calibrations may also be performed. From 72 to 73, all the processing takes place inside the microcontroller in one example embodiment. From 74 forward, the post processing actions and damage assessments take place inside the computer system in this example embodiment.
[0029] After start, setup and calibration, the system loads/sets parameters (71 ) and activates the PZT transducers. The system calculates a frequency point and then starts signal generation. Two kinds of signal acquisition (current and power are acquired and respectively averaged. R is then calculated straightforwardly from I and P. This process can be repeated for multiple frequency points. Once the process has been performed for each of plural frequency points as desired, the system compensates for environmental effects. Then, if the data acquisition is for baseline purposes, the results are stored. If not baseline, then the results are compared with previously stored baseline information to assess damage based on the baseline. If damage is detected, an alert can be issued automatically to a pilot, crew or maintenance person. [0030] The technology herein may be embodied as a method, system hardware, embedded firmware and or software as a whole product or as a set of parts that work together in order to achieve the same or similar goal,
[0031 ] The software part can be organized into two main sets. The first, called firmware, may be embedded in a microcontroller or any other processing system where preprocessing algorithms (averaging, analog and digital quantization and communication interfaces) are implemented to validate, correct and transfer the measurements to a computer system. The second set, called analysis software, can operate on a single or multiple computer (stand-alone) or other processing system either atone or connected in a network where remote operation and data visualization is possible. Post-processing algorithms (environmental effects compensation) and damage assessment can be combined to identify structural modifications (damages) at early stages.
[0032] While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, It is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims

CLAIMS t . A method for acquiring the health state of an object or a structural component using an EM! technique by performing measurements at each frequency point of the interest bandwidth by using one or more piezoelectric transducers operating as sensors/actuators at the same time, the method comprising
a. providin sine wave excitation, at both constant frequency and amplitude, for each frequency point of interest;
b. analog quantizing the RMS circulating current and the average consumed power of the transducer in order to directly measure the resistive part of the electromechanical impedance;
c. compensating for environmental effects; and
d. compensating for static and dynamic loading;
e. wherein the method uses only one transducer to monitor the health state of a pre-determined area of an object or structure.
2, A method as set forth in claim 1 including using a specialized circuit to perform the analog quantizing of both average power and RMS current of the transducer.
3. A method as set forth in claim t further includin using a set of post-processin algorithms to compensate for the effects of changes in temperature and pressure applied on the monitored structure or object.
4. A method as set forth in claim 1 further including monitoring the health state of metallic or non-metallic objects or structures.
5. A method as set forth in claim 1 including avoiding FFT algorithms to generate the EMI FRF responses.
6. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the sample rate of AD channels require only a few kSamples/s of sample rate, independently of the excitation frequency applied to the transducer.
7. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the said interrogation frequency can range from 20kHz to 400kHz.
8. A method of claim 1 further including using the transducer as an exciter and a sensor.
9. A system that can control a network of transducer in order to monitor larger structures, comprising:
an exciter structured to excite a mechanical object or structure with sine wave excitation for each frequency point of interest;
a single transducer coupled to the mechanical object or structure used to monitor the health state of a pre-determined area of the object or structure; an analog quantizer that quantizes the RMS circulating current and the average consumed power of the transducer in order to directly measure the resistive part of the electromechanical impedance; and
a processor coupled to the analog quantizer that compensates for environmental effects and static and dynamic loading.
10. The system of claim 9 wherein the exciter excites at both constant frequency and amplitude.
11. The system of claim 9 wherein the transducer and exciter comprise the same component.
12. The system that is set forth in claim 9 wherein the processor is operative to manage the multiplexing/demultiplexing of the network and the impedance calculations is included.
13. The system of claim 9 wherein the system is a portable system that is battery powered.
PCT/BR2014/000444 2013-12-16 2014-12-15 Structural health monitoring system employing electromechanical impedance technology WO2015089604A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201480068944.0A CN106233135B (en) 2013-12-16 2014-12-15 Using the structural healthy monitoring system of electromechanical resistance technique
EP14833109.3A EP3084417B1 (en) 2013-12-16 2014-12-15 Structural health monitoring system employing electromechanical impedance technology
BR112016013821-0A BR112016013821B1 (en) 2013-12-16 2014-12-15 Structural integrity monitoring systems employing electromechanical impedance technology

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
USUS14/107,576 2013-12-16
US14/107,576 US9664649B2 (en) 2013-12-16 2013-12-16 Structural health monitoring system employing electromechanical impedance technology

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015089604A1 true WO2015089604A1 (en) 2015-06-25

Family

ID=52434455

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/BR2014/000444 WO2015089604A1 (en) 2013-12-16 2014-12-15 Structural health monitoring system employing electromechanical impedance technology

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US9664649B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3084417B1 (en)
CN (1) CN106233135B (en)
BR (1) BR112016013821B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2015089604A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10149631B2 (en) * 2015-07-24 2018-12-11 Embraer S.A. Structural health monitoring sensory system integrated to a self-adapting morphing system
US10816436B2 (en) * 2018-07-06 2020-10-27 The Boeing Company System for temperature insensitive damage detection
CN109764982B (en) * 2019-03-04 2024-04-26 广东省特种设备检测研究院珠海检测院 Wireless piezoelectric sensor for structural health monitoring by piezoelectric impedance method
DE102021106705A1 (en) 2021-03-18 2022-09-22 Technische Universität Braunschweig - Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts Impedance analyzer
CN113686966B (en) * 2021-07-13 2023-08-18 中国船舶重工集团公司第七一五研究所 Standing wave tube measuring method for decoupling characteristic parameters of underwater acoustic material

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6006163A (en) 1997-09-15 1999-12-21 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Active damage interrogation method for structural health monitoring
US7024315B2 (en) * 2001-02-08 2006-04-04 University Of South Carolina In-situ structural health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics system utilizing thin piezoelectric sensors
US20100161283A1 (en) * 2006-10-03 2010-06-24 Xinlin Qing Structural health monitoring network
US7809513B2 (en) 2007-04-16 2010-10-05 Acellent Technologies, Inc. Environmental change compensation in a structural health monitoring system
US8042397B2 (en) * 2007-05-16 2011-10-25 The Boeing Company Damage volume and depth estimation
US7487059B2 (en) 2007-06-21 2009-02-03 The Boeing Company Transducer health diagnostics for structural health monitoring (SHM) systems
US8371170B2 (en) 2008-02-13 2013-02-12 National University Corporation Kyoto Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for diagnosing a damage in a structure
US20090281736A1 (en) * 2008-05-12 2009-11-12 Hyeung-Yun Kim Method and apparatus for concurrent positive and negative actuation in structural health monitoring systems
DE112009004421T8 (en) * 2009-02-25 2012-09-13 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. RFID scanning system without external power supply to query the structural health
DE102009001472A1 (en) * 2009-03-11 2010-09-16 Endress + Hauser Flowtec Ag Vibration-type transducers and in-line meter with such a transducer
US8265889B2 (en) * 2009-08-05 2012-09-11 Acellent Technologies, Inc. Integrated circuit system for controlling structural health monitoring processes and applications therefor
US9217730B2 (en) * 2010-05-17 2015-12-22 Acellent Technologies, Inc. Input-protected structural health monitoring system
DE102010039017B4 (en) * 2010-08-06 2017-09-21 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for active damping of an acoustic transducer
RU2589506C2 (en) * 2011-05-02 2016-07-10 Эндресс+Хаузер Флоутек Аг Vibration-type measurement sensor and measuring system for measurement of density and/or percentage mass flow rate
CN108181506A (en) * 2013-05-09 2018-06-19 天津瑞奇外科器械股份有限公司 Search the method and system of energy converter resonant frequency point

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GYUHAE PARK ET AL: "Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward", SHOCK AND VIBRATION DIGEST, SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC, US, vol. 35, no. 6, 1 November 2003 (2003-11-01), pages 451 - 463, XP009177589, ISSN: 0583-1024 *
NETO R M ET AL: "A low-cost electromechanical impedance-based shm architecture for multiplexed piezoceramic actuators", SHM. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING, SAGE PUBLICATIONS, XX, vol. 10, no. 4, 1 July 2011 (2011-07-01), pages 391 - 402, XP009183178, ISSN: 1475-9217 *
PALOMINO L V ET AL: "Evaluation of the influence of sensor geometry and physical parameters on impedance-based structural health monitoring", SHOCK AND VIBRATION, vol. 19, no. 5, 2012, IOS PRESS NETHERLANDS, pages 811 - 823, XP002737431, ISSN: 1070-9622, DOI: 10.3233/SAV-2012-0690 *
RIM MI-SUN ET AL: "Impedance-based damage assessment using piezoelectric sensors", SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 2011, SPIE, 1000 20TH ST. BELLINGHAM WA 98225-6705 USA, vol. 7981, no. 1, 24 March 2011 (2011-03-24), pages 1 - 7, XP060011440, DOI: 10.1117/12.880210 *
ROBERTO MENDES FINZI NETO ET AL: "System for Structural Health Monitoring based on piezoelectric sensors/actuators", POWER ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE (COBEP), 2011 BRAZILIAN, IEEE, 11 September 2011 (2011-09-11), pages 365 - 371, XP031999286, ISBN: 978-1-4577-1644-7, DOI: 10.1109/COBEP.2011.6085180 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR112016013821A2 (en) 2020-11-03
BR112016013821B1 (en) 2022-02-22
US20150168353A1 (en) 2015-06-18
EP3084417A1 (en) 2016-10-26
CN106233135A (en) 2016-12-14
CN106233135B (en) 2019-10-01
EP3084417B1 (en) 2021-05-26
US9664649B2 (en) 2017-05-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9664649B2 (en) Structural health monitoring system employing electromechanical impedance technology
CN107438758B (en) Method and system for structural health monitoring with frequency synchronization
Finzi Neto et al. A low-cost electromechanical impedance-based SHM architecture for multiplexed piezoceramic actuators
Budoya et al. A comparative study of impedance measurement techniques for structural health monitoring applications
EP2035769A1 (en) Vibration and condition monitoring system and the parts thereof
JP2907737B2 (en) Apparatus for dynamically measuring the distance between facing surfaces of a rotor and a stator in a rotary machine
US7068041B2 (en) Method and system for multi-frequency inductive ratio measurement
RU2686522C2 (en) Method for real-time monitoring of operating conditions of capacitive sensor
Djemana et al. Modelling and simulation of impedance-based damage monitoring of structures
GB2483339A (en) System and method for monitoring health of electrical machines
JP5539762B2 (en) Lightning arrester failure determination method
Priya et al. Low frequency and boundary condition effects on impedance based damage identification
CN109143185A (en) A kind of temperature-compensation method, power detection device and radar system
Tallman Damage detection in nanofiller-modified composites with external circuitry via resonant frequency shifts
EP3329235A1 (en) Multifunctional piezoelectric load sensor assembly
Liang et al. Experimental evaluation of miniature impedance board for loosening monitoring of the threaded pipe connection
CN111579870B (en) Structural member damage monitoring and accumulation degree diagnosis method
Martins et al. Architecture of a remote impedance-based structural health monitoring system for aircraft applications
US20160084789A1 (en) Method for inspecting composite material components
Saar et al. Chirp-based piezo-impedance measurement
Ren et al. The temperature effects on embedded PZT signals in structural health monitoring for composite structures with different thicknesses
RU2497142C1 (en) Receiving hydroacoustic antenna and method of estimating amplitude-frequency characteristics of hydroacoustic receivers
RU2584719C1 (en) Digital method of measuring parameters of piezoelectric elements
Kurnyta et al. Assessment of sensor technologies for aircraft SHM systems
CN105758437B (en) A kind of method and system based on frequency characteristic assessment sensor measurement uncertainty

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14833109

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2014833109

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2014833109

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112016013821

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112016013821

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20160615

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01E

Ref document number: 112016013821

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Free format text: EXPLIQUE A DIVERGENCIA NO NOME DOS INVENTORES CAMILA GIANINI GONSALES E DOMINGO ALVES RADE QUE CONSTA NA PUBLICACAO INTERNACIONAL WO 2015/089604 E O CONSTANTE DA PETICAO INICIAL NO 870160028356

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01E

Ref document number: 112016013821

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Free format text: EM ADITAMENTO A EXIGENCIA PUBLICADA NA RPI 2577, SOLICITA-SE QUE A EXIGENCIA SEJA RESPONDIDA CORRETAMENTE SOB CODIGO DE PETICAO 207, NUM PRAZO DE 60 DIAS, E QUE SEJA EFETUADO O PAGAMENTO DAS DUAS GRUS DE CODIGO 207, ESPECIFICO PARA ESSE TIPO DE SERVICO, CORRESPONDENTES AS DUAS EXIGENCIAS FORMULADAS (RPI 2577 E RPI 2587).

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112016013821

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20160615