WO2013138176A1 - Method and system for balancing cells with variable bypass current - Google Patents

Method and system for balancing cells with variable bypass current Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013138176A1
WO2013138176A1 PCT/US2013/029863 US2013029863W WO2013138176A1 WO 2013138176 A1 WO2013138176 A1 WO 2013138176A1 US 2013029863 W US2013029863 W US 2013029863W WO 2013138176 A1 WO2013138176 A1 WO 2013138176A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
cell
battery
battery cell
balancing
indication
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2013/029863
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Per Onnerud
Chad Souza
Mark Gerlovin
Phillip E. Partin
Richard V. Chamberlain
Eckart W. Jansen
Original Assignee
Boston-Power, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Boston-Power, Inc. filed Critical Boston-Power, Inc.
Priority to CN201380014710.3A priority Critical patent/CN104221248A/en
Priority to EP13761574.6A priority patent/EP2826128A4/en
Publication of WO2013138176A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013138176A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M10/00Secondary cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M10/42Methods or arrangements for servicing or maintenance of secondary cells or secondary half-cells
    • H01M10/44Methods for charging or discharging
    • H01M10/441Methods for charging or discharging for several batteries or cells simultaneously or sequentially
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J7/00Circuit arrangements for charging or depolarising batteries or for supplying loads from batteries
    • H02J7/0013Circuit arrangements for charging or depolarising batteries or for supplying loads from batteries acting upon several batteries simultaneously or sequentially
    • H02J7/0014Circuits for equalisation of charge between batteries
    • H02J7/0016Circuits for equalisation of charge between batteries using shunting, discharge or bypass circuits
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M2220/00Batteries for particular applications
    • H01M2220/20Batteries in motive systems, e.g. vehicle, ship, plane
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/10Energy storage using batteries
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/60Other road transportation technologies with climate change mitigation effect
    • Y02T10/70Energy storage systems for electromobility, e.g. batteries

Definitions

  • the performance and lifetime of a battery pack is significantly affected by the way it is operated in the field, particularly in demanding applications such as operating electric vehicles. For example, some lithium ion cells connected in series in a battery pack charge and discharge faster than others in the battery pack. The lifetime of the pack degrades significantly if the voltage across one or more if its component cells falls outside a predetermined range (typically 3 volts to 4.20 volts) during discharging or charging. For this reason, battery management systems (BMS) typically are used to monitor cell voltages to maintain voltages in a particular range. The imbalance between cells limits the effective range of operation of the battery pack unless the charge in some cells is rebalanced during operation of the pack.
  • BMS battery management systems
  • balancing techniques are known in the art, the most common of which is passive balancing during charging.
  • the passive vs active nomenclature used here refers to the ability to store/recover energy that is removed from the cell during the balancing process.
  • the energy of one cell is not transferred to another in order to balance the energy stored in the cells. Rather, the energy of one cell is simply dissipated as heat energy until the energy stored within it is about that of another cell with which it is being balanced.
  • an "active" balancing system transfers energy from one cell to another to balance the energy stored in those cells.
  • an inductive energy storage element can be employed to temporarily store energy before transferring it to one or more neighbor cells.
  • FIG. 1 An example of a prior art passive balancing circuit is shown in Fig. 1.
  • the dissipative resistive element, R B is switched using balancing switch transistor, T SB , across any cell that exceeds a predetermined voltage threshold to by-pass lower-capacity cells.
  • T SB balancing switch transistor
  • charge current to lower-capacity cells is being reduced such that higher-capacity cells charge more fully.
  • the resistance value of the R B is typically determined at pack design time in passive balancing systems known to the art. The resistance is calculated by the pack designer to enable a single fixed-balance current level when TS B is activated, acceptable for the nominal cell specification, and it is used for each cell during the entire lifetime of the pack from the first cycle to an end-of-life cycle.
  • Another disadvantage of existing passive balancing techniques is that they treat all cells identically by applying the same balancing resistance to each cell.
  • Embodiments of the invention relate to methods and systems for operating battery packs, and more particularly, to operating battery packs for enhanced
  • a cell balancing circuit may include at least one resistor and at least one respective switch configured in parallel with a battery cell.
  • a control circuit generates a pulse-width modulated (PWM) control signal to the switch.
  • PWM pulse-width modulated
  • the duty cycle of the PWM control signal enables adjustment of the balancing current based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell.
  • a control circuit enables the PWM control signal based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to balance the battery cell.
  • the control circuit controls the switch to partially discharge or reduce the charge current to the battery cell and thereby balance the cell relative to another cell with which the cell is connected in series.
  • the duty cycle of the PWM control signal is selected corresponding to a selected balancing current based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell.
  • the control circuit may also detect a predetermined cycle life of the battery cell, the control circuit selecting the balancing current based on this
  • the indication of past operation may include an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell.
  • the selection of the resistance value is made such that the maximum balancing current required at the end-of-life for the battery cell is achieved when the duty cycle of the PWM control signal is 100%.
  • each of the switches, or a particular combination of the switches may correspond to different periods of a cycle life of the battery cell.
  • a cell balancing circuit may include a plurality of resistors and respective switches configured in parallel with a battery cell.
  • a control circuit enables at least one of the switches, based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to balance the battery cell.
  • the control circuit selects the switches to enable based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell.
  • the indication of past operation may include an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell.
  • each of the switches, or a particular combination of the switches may correspond to different periods of a cycle life of the battery cell.
  • a cell balancing circuit may include a variable resistor configured in parallel with a battery cell, along with a switch configured in series with the variable resistor.
  • a control circuit enables the switch, based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to balance the battery cell. Further, the control circuit controls the resistor value of the variable resistor based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell.
  • the variable resistor may be a digital resistor circuit or an analog circuit.
  • inventions of the invention provide several advantages. For example, by providing a cell balancing circuit having an adjustable balancing current, embodiments of the invention can provide a balancing current for a respective cell that is best suited to the cell's properties or desired performance at any point in the life of the battery cell.
  • a balancing current for a respective cell that is best suited to the cell's properties or desired performance at any point in the life of the battery cell.
  • the cells of a battery can be balanced more efficiently at the early life stage of a battery, thereby reducing the energy typically wasted in balancing, as well as the reduced cycle life resulting from a higher-than-necessary balancing current.
  • the cells can also be balanced more effectively at the end-of-life stage of a battery, by applying maximum available balancing current to ensure that each cell's excess energy is fully dissipated.
  • embodiments of the invention can provide an appropriate balancing current to each cell individually, accounting for different characteristics of each cell of a battery, and thereby provide an efficient and effective balancing current that is specific to the cell.
  • cells can be balanced based on a desired cycle lifetime, thereby ensuring that the battery performs through a minimum number of charges and discharges.
  • FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a prior art, passive balancing circuit.
  • FIGs. 2A-B are block diagrams of a battery system implementing
  • FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of a balancing circuit in one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGs. 4A-B are circuit diagrams of balancing circuits in further embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a balancing circuit and BMS controller in a further embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a signal diagram illustrating operation of the balancing circuit as shown in FIG. 5.
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of battery storage capacity corresponding to operation of a balancing circuit in still another embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating variable stored charge among a plurality of different battery cells according to yet another embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGs. 9A-C are flow charts illustrating operation of a battery management system controller of the invention.
  • the invention includes a system, circuit and method for periodically selecting and adjusting cell balancing current during operation of the battery pack in a manner to control cell and cell-pack lifetime trends, thereby improving cell-pack performance and longevity.
  • Cell balancing current can be adjusted by changing the effective resistance of the balancing circuit. Changing resistance of the balancing circuit of each cell during the operating lifetime of the cell-pack reduces overall balancing time, thereby increasing cell-pack performance. Balancing with different selected resistors while maintaining a fixed overall balancing time controls the lifetime capacity degradation in cells, further increasing overall pack cycle life.
  • FIG. 2A is a block diagram of a battery system 100 employing an
  • a battery pack 150 comprises a number of cells, which may be arranged in a series or parallel configuration, or a combination thereof, or may be configured hierarchically in one or more battery modules.
  • a voltage monitor 130 detects the voltage at the cells and/or modules, and forwards this information to the battery management system (BMS) controller 110.
  • Voltage monitor 130 collectively represents voltage multiplexor 115 and Analogue/Digital converter 116 shown in FIG 2B.
  • BMS controller 110 is equivalent to microcontroller 118 of FIG 2B.
  • the BMS controller 110 Based on the voltage data, as well as information about the battery cells, the BMS controller 110 provides balancing control signals to the balancing electronics 120.
  • the balancing electronics 120 responsive to the control signals, perform balancing operations at one or more of the cells.
  • Battery pack 150 and balancing electronics 120 together represent an embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 2B.
  • FIG. 2B is a block diagram of a battery system 101, comparable to the battery system 100 of Fig. 2A, showing a circuit configuration in further detail.
  • a plurality of balancing circuits 120A-N are each connected in parallel with a respective battery cell 160A-N of a battery pack 150.
  • Voltage monitoring circuitry is incorporated in the BMS controller 112, and includes a voltage multiplexor 115 to receive an indication of voltage levels at each of the nodes between the battery cells 160A-N.
  • An analog-to- digital converter 116 converts the received voltage signals to data usable by the BMS microcontroller 118 for determining the voltage level at each of the battery cells 160A- N.
  • the BMS controller 112 Based on the voltage data, as well as information about the battery cells, the BMS controller 112 provides balancing control signals ("Balance Control 1" ... "Balance Control N") to the balancing electronics 120A-N. Multiple cells may be balanced simultaneously when the BMS controller activates more than one balance control signal. For example, if three cells in the pack are measured to be overcharged, the balancing controller could activate their three corresponding balancing control signals, thereby causing the three cells to discharge at the same time. Operation of the BMS controller 112, as well as configuration and operation of the balancing circuits 120A-N, is described below with reference to Figs. 3-7.
  • FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of a balancing circuit in one embodiment of the invention.
  • multiple discrete resistors R B I , R B 2, R B3 are connected in parallel with a given cell under control of respective balancing control signals and switching transistors QS B I, QS B 2, QS B3 driven by a control circuit (e.g., the BMS controller, Fig. 3).
  • a control circuit e.g., the BMS controller, Fig. 3
  • Different resistance values may be switched into a given cell depending on balancing requirements for that cell.
  • FIGs. 4A-B are circuit diagrams of balancing circuits in further embodiments of the invention.
  • a variable resistor component Q RB and R DB .
  • the balancing circuit shown in Fig. 4A includes an analog controlled resistor component Q RB .
  • the resistor component Q RB may include, for example, a MOSFET transistor biased in a manner such that analog variations in gate voltage produce approximately linear variations in channel resistance to serve as the balancing resistance.
  • the balancing circuit shown in Fig. 4B includes a digitally- controlled resistance circuit R DB , which can be used to control variable resistance with digital control signals driven by the BMS controller.
  • a digitally-controlled resistance circuit is the AD5174 Digital Potentiometer, commercially available from Analog DevicesTM.
  • both of the balancing circuits of Figs. 4A-B enable the selection of a range of resistor values according to a control signal provided by a BMS controller.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a balancing circuit and BMS controller in a further embodiment of the invention.
  • the balancing circuit includes a resistor R B having a fixed value and a transistor Q B configured in parallel to a cell.
  • the transistor Q B receives a balance control signal from a BMS controller.
  • the balance control signal controlling the transistor Q B is a pulse-width modulated (PWM) digital signal.
  • PWM pulse-width modulated
  • the PWM signal varies the time average balancing current during the balancing time interval.
  • the balancing circuit can generate a balancing current 3 ⁇ 4 that varies according to the duty cycle of the balance control signal.
  • PWM control can be implemented in circuit configurations represented in Figs. 1, 2A-B, 3, 4A and 4B as a drive for the balancing switch transistor QS B to control the time-average balancing current.
  • PWM control may be implemented in balancing circuits having multiple selectable resistors, such as the embodiment described above with reference to Fig. 3, in order to provide a variable balancing current I B in addition to the multiple, fixed balancing currents available without PWM control.
  • FIG. 6 is a signal diagram illustrating operation of the balancing circuit as shown in Fig. 5 according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the signal diagram includes the PWM balance control signal during duty cycles of 10% (first column), 50%> (second column) and 90%> (third column), and the corresponding balancing current I B at each duty cycle.
  • the topmost row shows the PWM control signal applied to the switch Q B (Fig. 5).
  • the capacitance of the battery cell (C ce ii) and the balancing circuit DC resistance (R B ) form a 1 st order low-pass filter.
  • the minimum duty cycle D min used to select the minimum balancing current allowed before the balancing circuit is disabled must be specified by the pack designer, then the minimum frequency f m i n can be calculated as follows:
  • Duty Cycle 100 x I B x— %, where I B must be ⁇ — (EQ 2)
  • FIG. 7 is a plot of battery storage capacity (C) over the life (cycle count) of a battery. As illustrated by the distinct plotted lines, storage capacity over the cycle life can differ among battery cells, indicating different rates of cell degradation.
  • Embodiments of the invention may employ a BMS controller (e.g., controllers 110 and 112 in Figs. 2A-B) configured to control a plurality of balancing circuits (e.g., balancing circuits in Figs. 3-4B), to select the resistor value of the balancing circuit based on the detected cycle life region of the battery cell.
  • Cycle life regions are determined by cycle count number and, for example, can divide the operating life of a battery pack into three regions: "early-life,” “middle-life,” and "end-of-life.”
  • resistor values are R B i > R B2 > R B3 .
  • balancing resistor R B i is selected to apply a low balancing current to all cells.
  • balancing resistor R B2 is selected to apply a mid-level balancing current, and during end-of-life, balancing resistor R B is selected to provide a high level of balancing current.
  • resistor values corresponding to the detected age of the cell is used to balance the cell, thereby effectively and optimally balancing the battery cells.
  • the BMS controller may select the resistor value of the balancing circuit based on a desired lifetime performance trend shape.
  • High balancing current is not desirable in a passive balancing system because it generates heat and heat can damage the cells (accelerated loss of capacity). Therefore it is desirable to use the smallest effective balancing current in order to maintain a balanced pack and get the longest possible lifetime performance. So, when the pack is new the balancing current should be low because minimal balancing is needed and the lower balancing current will result in less heat. As the pack ages the balancing current should be increased in order to maintain the same balancing time (performance).
  • design of the pack should include consideration of the maximum balancing current that is needed at the end-of-life to maintain the desired balancing time and the resistor should be selected accordingly.
  • the trade-off is that a higher maximum current is more expensive, so if the cycle life and/or pulse power requirements are less, then cost can be reduced by reducing the maximum balancing current.
  • This life performance trend shaping approach is useful in cases such as where a service warrantee is in effect over a pre-defined time period to insure that capacity degradation due to the balancing system is limited sufficiently to enable the pack to meet its warranty period service
  • Manufacturers will be enabled to determine warranty periods more accurately based on statistical lifetime of, for example, 95% of its cells. The benefit is greater predictability and reduced warranty service expense to the manufacturer.
  • FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating variable stored charge (C) among multiple different battery cells.
  • the multiple discrete resistor value or particular variable resistance setting is selected depending on the in-use requirements of individual cells, such as the different stored charges as shown in Fig. 8.
  • the BMS controller selects correspondingly effective and optimal balancing resistance values on a cell-by-cell basis. The advantage of this approach is that different balancing current levels may be provided to each cell as needed, thereby improving balancing performance and overall cycle lifetime.
  • FIGS. 9A-C are flow charts illustrating operation of a BMS controller.
  • the BMS controller determines the balancing current 3 ⁇ 4 to be generated for a particular cell, and the balancing current I B in turn corresponds to a particular resistor value that may be selected for generating the balancing current I B .
  • the proper resistor or resistor value is selected at a balancing circuit, such as the balancing circuits shown in Figs. 3 and 4A-B, for balancing the respective cell.
  • PWM control as described above with reference to Figs. 5 and 6, may be used to generate a balancing current I B that is equivalent to the current that would be generated through the selected balancing resistor.
  • Figs. 9A-C each provide for resistor selection based on a particular detected value, including the cycle count (number of charges and discharges) of a battery, the full charge capacity of a battery, and desired pack lifetime.
  • a PWM signal may be used to generate a balancing current 3 ⁇ 4 that is equivalent to the current that would be generated through the selected balancing resistor.
  • the balancing current for each battery cell in the system should be selected such that it is as low as possible without extending the required balancing time for the pack.
  • the balancing current for each cell must be selected such that all cells complete balancing at the same time. A particular cell only requires balancing if its capacity is less than the greatest cell capacity within the pack. For each cycle, the capacity of each cell is calculated by the microcontroller 118.
  • the selected balancing current 3 ⁇ 4 for each cell will then be inversely proportional to the cells' calculated capacity C ca i c such that the cell with the lowest capacity C m i n will use the maximum balancing current and the cell with the highest capacity C max will have zero balancing current.
  • Fig. 9A illustrates a process of selecting a balancing resistor based on cycle count of the battery.
  • the present cycle count of the battery cell is compared against a first threshold C EL indicating an end-of-life region of the battery.
  • the present cycle count may be a value, stored at the BMS or other device, that is incremented in response to each cycle of charging and discharging of the battery cell. If the end-of-life threshold is met, then a smaller balancing resistance is selected. Otherwise, the present cycle count is compared against a threshold C ML indicating a middle-life region of the battery.
  • a balancing resistor is selected that is between the smaller and larger resistances employed for end-of-life or early life of the battery. Otherwise, the battery cell is determined to have a cycle count in an early-life region, and a larger balancing resistance is selected. This process may be completed in parallel or sequentially for each of the battery cells in the battery pack.
  • the resistor value is selected, the voltage of each battery cell in the battery pack is measured and stored. If any of the battery cells are detected to have a voltage above a reference voltage threshold V REF , then a respective balancing circuit is activated, employing the selected resistor, to lower the cell voltage to an acceptable value.
  • Fig. 9B illustrates a process of selecting a balancing resistor based on a battery cell's full charge capacity.
  • the measured full-charge capacity of the battery cell is compared against a first threshold (e.g., less than 80%) indicating an end-of-life region of the battery.
  • the full-charge capacity may be a value, stored at the BMS or other device, that is measured periodically by measuring the voltage of the battery at full charge, thereby indicating the present full-charge capacity of the battery cell. If the end- of-life threshold is met, then a smaller balancing resistance is selected.
  • the present cycle count is compared against a second threshold (e.g., less than 90%) indicating a middle-life region of the battery. If the middle-life threshold is met, then a medium balancing resistance is selected that is between the smaller and larger resistances. If the battery cell is determined to have a cycle count in an early-life region, a large balancing resistance is selected. This process may be completed in parallel or sequentially for each of the battery cells in the battery pack.
  • a second threshold e.g., less than 90%
  • the resistor value is selected, the voltage of each battery cell in the battery pack is measured and stored. If any of the battery cells are detected to have a voltage above a reference voltage threshold V REF , then a respective balancing circuit is activated, employing the selected resistor, to lower the cell voltage to an acceptable value.
  • Fig. 9C illustrates a process of selecting a balancing resistor based on a desired cycle lifetime of the battery pack.
  • the desired cycle lifetime (a value of a number of charge/discharge cycles) is compared against a first threshold (e.g., 1500 cycles).
  • the desired cycle life may be a predetermined value, stored at the BMS or other device, that indicates the number of charging cycles that the battery pack is desired to complete with an acceptable charge capacity. If the first threshold is met, then a smaller balancing resistance is selected. Otherwise, the desired cycle lifetime is compared against a second threshold (e.g., 1000 cycles). If the second threshold is met, then a balancing resistance is selected that is between the smaller and larger resistances. Otherwise, a large balancing resistor is selected. This process may be completed in parallel or sequentially for each of the battery cells in the battery pack.
  • a first threshold e.g. 1500 cycles.
  • the desired cycle life may be a predetermined value, stored at the BMS or other device, that indicates
  • the voltage of each battery cell in the battery pack is measured and stored. If any of the battery cells are detected to have a voltage above a reference voltage threshold V REF , then a respective balancing circuit is activated, employing the selected resistor, to lower the cell voltage to an acceptable value.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Charge And Discharge Circuits For Batteries Or The Like (AREA)
  • Secondary Cells (AREA)

Abstract

A circuit for balancing battery cells includes a plurality of resistors configured parallel with the battery cells, and a plurality of switches configured in series with the resistors. A control circuit causes the switches to balance the battery cells based on detected voltage of the battery cells and based on past operation of the cells.

Description

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BALANCING CELLS WITH VARIABLE BYPASS
CURRENT
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.
61/611,802, filed March 16, 2012, the relevant teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The performance and lifetime of a battery pack is significantly affected by the way it is operated in the field, particularly in demanding applications such as operating electric vehicles. For example, some lithium ion cells connected in series in a battery pack charge and discharge faster than others in the battery pack. The lifetime of the pack degrades significantly if the voltage across one or more if its component cells falls outside a predetermined range (typically 3 volts to 4.20 volts) during discharging or charging. For this reason, battery management systems (BMS) typically are used to monitor cell voltages to maintain voltages in a particular range. The imbalance between cells limits the effective range of operation of the battery pack unless the charge in some cells is rebalanced during operation of the pack.
[0003] Several balancing techniques are known in the art, the most common of which is passive balancing during charging. The passive vs active nomenclature used here refers to the ability to store/recover energy that is removed from the cell during the balancing process. In a "passive" system, the energy of one cell is not transferred to another in order to balance the energy stored in the cells. Rather, the energy of one cell is simply dissipated as heat energy until the energy stored within it is about that of another cell with which it is being balanced. In contrast, an "active" balancing system transfers energy from one cell to another to balance the energy stored in those cells. For example, an inductive energy storage element can be employed to temporarily store energy before transferring it to one or more neighbor cells.
[0004] An example of a prior art passive balancing circuit is shown in Fig. 1. Here, during the charging process, the dissipative resistive element, RB, is switched using balancing switch transistor, TSB, across any cell that exceeds a predetermined voltage threshold to by-pass lower-capacity cells. In effect, charge current to lower-capacity cells is being reduced such that higher-capacity cells charge more fully. The resistance value of the RB is typically determined at pack design time in passive balancing systems known to the art. The resistance is calculated by the pack designer to enable a single fixed-balance current level when TSB is activated, acceptable for the nominal cell specification, and it is used for each cell during the entire lifetime of the pack from the first cycle to an end-of-life cycle.
[0005] However, as cells approach their end of life, they often require higher balancing currents to balance charge effectively. A single fixed resistance, while providing effective balancing capacity during a cell's early life, does not provide the needed balancing current at the end of the cell's life. Similarly, at the beginning of a cell's life, charge holding capacities of all the cells typically are at their most equivalent state. During this time, the use of larger-than-required balancing currents, as would be the case with a single fixed resistance for each cell, creates deleterious consequences. For example, increased thermal energy waste is generated by dissipation in balancing resistors, and unneeded additional cycling of the cells results in cell capacity
degradation.
[0006] Another disadvantage of existing passive balancing techniques is that they treat all cells identically by applying the same balancing resistance to each cell.
However, some cells degrade at a faster rate than others, as shown in Fig. 5, and as these cells are not provided with added balancing current capacity, they require longer overall pack-balancing times, thereby reducing performance. In addition, the remaining healthier cells are subject to higher than necessary balancing current, which causes increased capacity degradation. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0007] Embodiments of the invention relate to methods and systems for operating battery packs, and more particularly, to operating battery packs for enhanced
performance and longevity through periodic automated selection and adjustment of cell balancing current values during use.
[0008] In one embodiment, a cell balancing circuit may include at least one resistor and at least one respective switch configured in parallel with a battery cell.A control circuit generates a pulse-width modulated (PWM) control signal to the switch. The duty cycle of the PWM control signal enables adjustment of the balancing current based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell. A control circuit enables the PWM control signal based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to balance the battery cell. The control circuit controls the switch to partially discharge or reduce the charge current to the battery cell and thereby balance the cell relative to another cell with which the cell is connected in series. The duty cycle of the PWM control signal is selected corresponding to a selected balancing current based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell. The control circuit may also detect a predetermined cycle life of the battery cell, the control circuit selecting the balancing current based on this
predetermined cycle life of the battery cell. The indication of past operation may include an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell. The selection of the resistance value is made such that the maximum balancing current required at the end-of-life for the battery cell is achieved when the duty cycle of the PWM control signal is 100%. Further, each of the switches, or a particular combination of the switches, may correspond to different periods of a cycle life of the battery cell.
[0009] In one embodiment, a cell balancing circuit may include a plurality of resistors and respective switches configured in parallel with a battery cell. A control circuit enables at least one of the switches, based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to balance the battery cell. The control circuit selects the switches to enable based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell. The indication of past operation may include an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell. Further, each of the switches, or a particular combination of the switches, may correspond to different periods of a cycle life of the battery cell.
[0010] In further embodiments, a cell balancing circuit may include a variable resistor configured in parallel with a battery cell, along with a switch configured in series with the variable resistor. A control circuit enables the switch, based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to balance the battery cell. Further, the control circuit controls the resistor value of the variable resistor based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell. The variable resistor may be a digital resistor circuit or an analog circuit.
[0011] The invention provides several advantages. For example, by providing a cell balancing circuit having an adjustable balancing current, embodiments of the invention can provide a balancing current for a respective cell that is best suited to the cell's properties or desired performance at any point in the life of the battery cell. By controlling the balancing current in response to the cell's properties, the cells of a battery can be balanced more efficiently at the early life stage of a battery, thereby reducing the energy typically wasted in balancing, as well as the reduced cycle life resulting from a higher-than-necessary balancing current. The cells can also be balanced more effectively at the end-of-life stage of a battery, by applying maximum available balancing current to ensure that each cell's excess energy is fully dissipated. Moreover, embodiments of the invention can provide an appropriate balancing current to each cell individually, accounting for different characteristics of each cell of a battery, and thereby provide an efficient and effective balancing current that is specific to the cell. Further, cells can be balanced based on a desired cycle lifetime, thereby ensuring that the battery performs through a minimum number of charges and discharges.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0012] The foregoing will be apparent from the following more particular description of example embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the
accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
[0013] FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a prior art, passive balancing circuit.
[0014] FIGs. 2A-B are block diagrams of a battery system implementing
embodiments of the invention.
[0015] FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of a balancing circuit in one embodiment of the invention.
[0016] FIGs. 4A-B are circuit diagrams of balancing circuits in further embodiments of the invention.
[0017] FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a balancing circuit and BMS controller in a further embodiment of the invention.
[0018] FIG. 6 is a signal diagram illustrating operation of the balancing circuit as shown in FIG. 5.
[0019] FIG. 7 is a plot of battery storage capacity corresponding to operation of a balancing circuit in still another embodiment of the invention.
[0020] FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating variable stored charge among a plurality of different battery cells according to yet another embodiment of the invention.
[0021] FIGs. 9A-C are flow charts illustrating operation of a battery management system controller of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0022] The invention includes a system, circuit and method for periodically selecting and adjusting cell balancing current during operation of the battery pack in a manner to control cell and cell-pack lifetime trends, thereby improving cell-pack performance and longevity. Cell balancing current can be adjusted by changing the effective resistance of the balancing circuit. Changing resistance of the balancing circuit of each cell during the operating lifetime of the cell-pack reduces overall balancing time, thereby increasing cell-pack performance. Balancing with different selected resistors while maintaining a fixed overall balancing time controls the lifetime capacity degradation in cells, further increasing overall pack cycle life.
[0023] FIG. 2A is a block diagram of a battery system 100 employing an
embodiment of the invention. A battery pack 150 comprises a number of cells, which may be arranged in a series or parallel configuration, or a combination thereof, or may be configured hierarchically in one or more battery modules. A voltage monitor 130 detects the voltage at the cells and/or modules, and forwards this information to the battery management system (BMS) controller 110. Voltage monitor 130 collectively represents voltage multiplexor 115 and Analogue/Digital converter 116 shown in FIG 2B. BMS controller 110 is equivalent to microcontroller 118 of FIG 2B. Based on the voltage data, as well as information about the battery cells, the BMS controller 110 provides balancing control signals to the balancing electronics 120. The balancing electronics 120, responsive to the control signals, perform balancing operations at one or more of the cells. Battery pack 150 and balancing electronics 120 together represent an embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 2B.
[0024] FIG. 2B is a block diagram of a battery system 101, comparable to the battery system 100 of Fig. 2A, showing a circuit configuration in further detail. A plurality of balancing circuits 120A-N are each connected in parallel with a respective battery cell 160A-N of a battery pack 150. Voltage monitoring circuitry is incorporated in the BMS controller 112, and includes a voltage multiplexor 115 to receive an indication of voltage levels at each of the nodes between the battery cells 160A-N. An analog-to- digital converter 116 converts the received voltage signals to data usable by the BMS microcontroller 118 for determining the voltage level at each of the battery cells 160A- N. Based on the voltage data, as well as information about the battery cells, the BMS controller 112 provides balancing control signals ("Balance Control 1" ... "Balance Control N") to the balancing electronics 120A-N. Multiple cells may be balanced simultaneously when the BMS controller activates more than one balance control signal. For example, if three cells in the pack are measured to be overcharged, the balancing controller could activate their three corresponding balancing control signals, thereby causing the three cells to discharge at the same time. Operation of the BMS controller 112, as well as configuration and operation of the balancing circuits 120A-N, is described below with reference to Figs. 3-7.
[0025] FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of a balancing circuit in one embodiment of the invention. Here, multiple discrete resistors RBI , RB2, RB3 are connected in parallel with a given cell under control of respective balancing control signals and switching transistors QSBI, QSB2, QSB3 driven by a control circuit (e.g., the BMS controller, Fig. 3). Different resistance values may be switched into a given cell depending on balancing requirements for that cell.
[0026] FIGs. 4A-B are circuit diagrams of balancing circuits in further embodiments of the invention. In both circuits, a variable resistor component (QRB and RDB,
respectively) is switched (via switch transistor QSB) in parallel with a given cell under control of a balancing control signal and a resistance level signal driven a control circuit (e.g., the BMS controller, Fig. 3). The balancing circuit shown in Fig. 4A includes an analog controlled resistor component QRB. The resistor component QRB may include, for example, a MOSFET transistor biased in a manner such that analog variations in gate voltage produce approximately linear variations in channel resistance to serve as the balancing resistance. The balancing circuit shown in Fig. 4B includes a digitally- controlled resistance circuit RDB, which can be used to control variable resistance with digital control signals driven by the BMS controller. An example of a digitally- controlled resistance circuit is the AD5174 Digital Potentiometer, commercially available from Analog Devices™. In contrast to the selection of one of a plurality of discrete resistors as provided in the embodiment of Fig. 3, both of the balancing circuits of Figs. 4A-B enable the selection of a range of resistor values according to a control signal provided by a BMS controller.
[0027] FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a balancing circuit and BMS controller in a further embodiment of the invention. Here, the balancing circuit includes a resistor RB having a fixed value and a transistor QB configured in parallel to a cell. The transistor QB receives a balance control signal from a BMS controller. The balance control signal controlling the transistor QB is a pulse-width modulated (PWM) digital signal. At certain PWM frequency ranges with a time constant much smaller than the balancing time interval, the PWM signal varies the time average balancing current during the balancing time interval. As a result, the balancing circuit can generate a balancing current ¾ that varies according to the duty cycle of the balance control signal. PWM control can be implemented in circuit configurations represented in Figs. 1, 2A-B, 3, 4A and 4B as a drive for the balancing switch transistor QSB to control the time-average balancing current. In still further embodiments, PWM control may be implemented in balancing circuits having multiple selectable resistors, such as the embodiment described above with reference to Fig. 3, in order to provide a variable balancing current IB in addition to the multiple, fixed balancing currents available without PWM control.
[0028] FIG. 6 is a signal diagram illustrating operation of the balancing circuit as shown in Fig. 5 according to one embodiment of the invention. The signal diagram includes the PWM balance control signal during duty cycles of 10% (first column), 50%> (second column) and 90%> (third column), and the corresponding balancing current IB at each duty cycle. The topmost row shows the PWM control signal applied to the switch QB (Fig. 5). The capacitance of the battery cell (Cceii) and the balancing circuit DC resistance (RB) form a 1st order low-pass filter. The minimum duty cycle Dmin used to select the minimum balancing current allowed before the balancing circuit is disabled must be specified by the pack designer, then the minimum frequency fmin can be calculated as follows:
Figure imgf000010_0001
[0029] In order to reduce switching noise it is desirable to select a minimum PWM frequency and duty cycle which results in a continuous balancing current as shown in the middle row of Fig. 6. If the PWM frequency or duty cycle is too low the balancing current will oscillate as shown in the bottom row of Figure 6 generating significant switching noise. The duty cycle of the PWM balance control signal is varied by increasing or decreasing the "ON" time of the signal. A lower duty cycle results in a lower average current (IB) while a higher duty cycle results in a higher IB, also shown in Figure 6. The equation for selecting a duty cycle based on desired balancing current IB, the voltage of the battery cell Vcell and the balancing circuit resistance RB is as follows:
Duty Cycle = 100 x IB x— %, where IB must be <— (EQ 2)
vcell RB
[0030] FIG. 7 is a plot of battery storage capacity (C) over the life (cycle count) of a battery. As illustrated by the distinct plotted lines, storage capacity over the cycle life can differ among battery cells, indicating different rates of cell degradation.
Embodiments of the invention may employ a BMS controller (e.g., controllers 110 and 112 in Figs. 2A-B) configured to control a plurality of balancing circuits (e.g., balancing circuits in Figs. 3-4B), to select the resistor value of the balancing circuit based on the detected cycle life region of the battery cell. Cycle life regions are determined by cycle count number and, for example, can divide the operating life of a battery pack into three regions: "early-life," "middle-life," and "end-of-life." In one embodiment, using a balancing circuit as shown in Fig. 3, resistor values are RBi > RB2 > RB3. During the early life region, balancing resistor RBi is selected to apply a low balancing current to all cells. During the middle life region, balancing resistor RB2 is selected to apply a mid-level balancing current, and during end-of-life, balancing resistor RB is selected to provide a high level of balancing current. One benefit of this approach is that, as cell capacities degrade through cycle lifetime, resistor values corresponding to the detected age of the cell is used to balance the cell, thereby effectively and optimally balancing the battery cells.
[0031] In a further embodiment, the BMS controller may select the resistor value of the balancing circuit based on a desired lifetime performance trend shape. High balancing current is not desirable in a passive balancing system because it generates heat and heat can damage the cells (accelerated loss of capacity). Therefore it is desirable to use the smallest effective balancing current in order to maintain a balanced pack and get the longest possible lifetime performance. So, when the pack is new the balancing current should be low because minimal balancing is needed and the lower balancing current will result in less heat. As the pack ages the balancing current should be increased in order to maintain the same balancing time (performance). Accordingly, design of the pack should include consideration of the maximum balancing current that is needed at the end-of-life to maintain the desired balancing time and the resistor should be selected accordingly. The trade-off is that a higher maximum current is more expensive, so if the cycle life and/or pulse power requirements are less, then cost can be reduced by reducing the maximum balancing current. This life performance trend shaping approach is useful in cases such as where a service warrantee is in effect over a pre-defined time period to insure that capacity degradation due to the balancing system is limited sufficiently to enable the pack to meet its warranty period service
requirements. Manufacturers will be enabled to determine warranty periods more accurately based on statistical lifetime of, for example, 95% of its cells. The benefit is greater predictability and reduced warranty service expense to the manufacturer.
[0032] FIG. 8 is a plot illustrating variable stored charge (C) among multiple different battery cells. In another embodiment, the multiple discrete resistor value or particular variable resistance setting is selected depending on the in-use requirements of individual cells, such as the different stored charges as shown in Fig. 8. As cells exhibit different charge capacities, some weaker and some stronger, the BMS controller selects correspondingly effective and optimal balancing resistance values on a cell-by-cell basis. The advantage of this approach is that different balancing current levels may be provided to each cell as needed, thereby improving balancing performance and overall cycle lifetime.
[0033] FIGS. 9A-C are flow charts illustrating operation of a BMS controller. In each embodiment, the BMS controller determines the balancing current ¾ to be generated for a particular cell, and the balancing current IB in turn corresponds to a particular resistor value that may be selected for generating the balancing current IB. As a result, the proper resistor or resistor value is selected at a balancing circuit, such as the balancing circuits shown in Figs. 3 and 4A-B, for balancing the respective cell. In further embodiments, PWM control, as described above with reference to Figs. 5 and 6, may be used to generate a balancing current IB that is equivalent to the current that would be generated through the selected balancing resistor.
[0034] Figs. 9A-C each provide for resistor selection based on a particular detected value, including the cycle count (number of charges and discharges) of a battery, the full charge capacity of a battery, and desired pack lifetime. Although each of the processes described below, with reference to Figs. 9A-C, employs a single detected value, embodiments of the invention may employ multiple detected values to determine the proper balancing resistor, and may employ steps from one or more of the processes shown in Figs. 9A-C. Further, these processes may be adapted to implement the PWM control. In particular, a PWM signal may be used to generate a balancing current ¾ that is equivalent to the current that would be generated through the selected balancing resistor. To minimize the heat generated by the balancing resistors during each charge cycle the balancing current for each battery cell in the system should be selected such that it is as low as possible without extending the required balancing time for the pack. To achieve this, the balancing current for each cell must be selected such that all cells complete balancing at the same time. A particular cell only requires balancing if its capacity is less than the greatest cell capacity within the pack. For each cycle, the capacity of each cell is calculated by the microcontroller 118. The selected balancing current ¾ for each cell will then be inversely proportional to the cells' calculated capacity Ccaic such that the cell with the lowest capacity Cmin will use the maximum balancing current and the cell with the highest capacity Cmax will have zero balancing current.
j V cell ^ Cmax—Ccaic (EQ 3) [0035] The equation above is then used to simplify the calculation of PWM duty cycle for each cell using EQ 2 as follows:
Duty Cycle = 100 x Cmax~Ccalc % (EQ 4) [0036] Fig. 9A illustrates a process of selecting a balancing resistor based on cycle count of the battery. Provided that the battery pack to which the battery cell belongs is charging, the present cycle count of the battery cell is compared against a first threshold C EL indicating an end-of-life region of the battery. The present cycle count may be a value, stored at the BMS or other device, that is incremented in response to each cycle of charging and discharging of the battery cell. If the end-of-life threshold is met, then a smaller balancing resistance is selected. Otherwise, the present cycle count is compared against a threshold C ML indicating a middle-life region of the battery. If the middle- life threshold is met, then a balancing resistor is selected that is between the smaller and larger resistances employed for end-of-life or early life of the battery. Otherwise, the battery cell is determined to have a cycle count in an early-life region, and a larger balancing resistance is selected. This process may be completed in parallel or sequentially for each of the battery cells in the battery pack.
[0037] Once the resistor value is selected, the voltage of each battery cell in the battery pack is measured and stored. If any of the battery cells are detected to have a voltage above a reference voltage threshold VREF, then a respective balancing circuit is activated, employing the selected resistor, to lower the cell voltage to an acceptable value.
[0038] Fig. 9B illustrates a process of selecting a balancing resistor based on a battery cell's full charge capacity. Provided that the battery pack to which the battery cell belongs is charging, the measured full-charge capacity of the battery cell is compared against a first threshold (e.g., less than 80%) indicating an end-of-life region of the battery. The full-charge capacity may be a value, stored at the BMS or other device, that is measured periodically by measuring the voltage of the battery at full charge, thereby indicating the present full-charge capacity of the battery cell. If the end- of-life threshold is met, then a smaller balancing resistance is selected. Otherwise, the present cycle count is compared against a second threshold (e.g., less than 90%) indicating a middle-life region of the battery. If the middle-life threshold is met, then a medium balancing resistance is selected that is between the smaller and larger resistances. If the battery cell is determined to have a cycle count in an early-life region, a large balancing resistance is selected. This process may be completed in parallel or sequentially for each of the battery cells in the battery pack.
[0039] Once the resistor value is selected, the voltage of each battery cell in the battery pack is measured and stored. If any of the battery cells are detected to have a voltage above a reference voltage threshold VREF, then a respective balancing circuit is activated, employing the selected resistor, to lower the cell voltage to an acceptable value.
[0040] Fig. 9C illustrates a process of selecting a balancing resistor based on a desired cycle lifetime of the battery pack. Provided that the battery pack to which the battery cell belongs is charging, the desired cycle lifetime (a value of a number of charge/discharge cycles) is compared against a first threshold (e.g., 1500 cycles). The desired cycle life may be a predetermined value, stored at the BMS or other device, that indicates the number of charging cycles that the battery pack is desired to complete with an acceptable charge capacity. If the first threshold is met, then a smaller balancing resistance is selected. Otherwise, the desired cycle lifetime is compared against a second threshold (e.g., 1000 cycles). If the second threshold is met, then a balancing resistance is selected that is between the smaller and larger resistances. Otherwise, a large balancing resistor is selected. This process may be completed in parallel or sequentially for each of the battery cells in the battery pack.
[0041] Once the resistor value is selected, the voltage of each battery cell in the battery pack is measured and stored. If any of the battery cells are detected to have a voltage above a reference voltage threshold VREF, then a respective balancing circuit is activated, employing the selected resistor, to lower the cell voltage to an acceptable value.
[0042] While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to example embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.

Claims

CLAIMS is claimed is:
A system for balancing a plurality of battery cells, comprising:
a) a plurality of battery cells connected in series, at least one of the battery cells including
i) a resistor component configured in parallel with a battery cell, and
ii) a switch configured in series with the resistor component; and b) a control circuit configured to cause the switch, based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to partially discharge the battery cell and thereby balance the cell relative to another cell with which the cell is connected in series, the control circuit generating a pulse-width modulated (PWM) signal, corresponding to a selected balancing current, to the switch.
The system of claim 1 , wherein the control circuit further detects a
predetermined cycle life of the battery cell, and wherein the control circuit selects the balancing current based on the detected predetermined cycle life of the battery cell.
The system of claim 1 , wherein the control circuit is configured to select the balancing current based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to cycle count of the battery.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein the indication of past operation is an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell. The system of claim 3, wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to ; calculated capacity of the battery cell relative to a range of calculated cell capacities of the plurality of battery cells.
The system of claim 6, wherein the control circuit selects the balancing current to minimize heat generation within the plurality of battery cells without extending a period of time required to balance the plurality of battery cells.
The system of claim 1 , wherein a minimum frequency and duty cycle of the PWM control signal are selected to minimize switching noise generated by the control circuit.
A method of balancing a plurality of battery cells, comprising the steps of: a) monitoring a voltage across a battery cell;
b) selecting a balancing current; and
c) generating a pulse-width modulated (PWM) signal to a switch configured in parallel to the battery cell to partially discharge the battery cell and thereby balance the battery cell relative to another battery cell with which the cell is connected in series, the PWM signal corresponding to the selected balancing current.
The method of claim 9, further comprising detecting a predetermined cycle life of the battery cell, the balancing current being selected based on the detected predetermined cycle life of the battery cell.
11. The method of claim 9, further comprising detecting an indication of past
operation of the battery cell, the balancing current being selected based on the indication. The method of claim 11 , wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to cycle count of the battery.
The method of claim 11 , wherein the indication of past operation is an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell.
The method of claim 11 , wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to a calculated capacity of the battery cell relative to a range of calculated cell capacities of the plurality of battery cells.
The method of claim 14, further comprising selecting the balancing current to minimize heat generation within the plurality of battery cells without extending a period of time required to balance the plurality of battery cells.
The method of claim 9, further comprising selecting a minimum frequency and duty cycle of the PWM control signal to minimize switching noise.
A system for balancing a plurality of battery cells, comprising:
a) a plurality of battery cells connected in series, at least one of the battery cells including:
i) a plurality of resistor components configured in parallel with a battery cell, the plurality of resistor components providing plural selectable resistances;
ii) plurality of switches, each of the plurality of switches
configured in series with one of the plurality of resistor components; and b) a control circuit configured to cause at least one of the plurality of switches, based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to partially discharge the battery cell and thereby balance the cell relative to another cell with which the cell is connected in series, the control circuit selecting the at least one of the plurality of switches to generate a balancing current corresponding to a selected balancing current.
The system of claim 17, wherein the control circuit further detects a
predetermined cycle life of the battery cell, and wherein the control circuit selects the balancing current based on the detected predetermined cycle life of the battery cell.
The system of claim 17, wherein the control circuit is configured to select the balancing current based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell.
The system of claim 19, wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to cycle count of the battery.
The system of claim 19, wherein the indication of past operation is an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell.
The system of claim 19, wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to a calculated capacity of the battery cell relative to a range of calculated cell capacities of the plurality of battery cells.
23. The system of claim 22, wherein the control circuit selects the balancing current to minimize heat generation within the plurality of battery cells without extending a period of time required to balance the plurality of battery cells. A system for balancing a plurality of battery cells, comprising:
a) a plurality of battery cells connected in series, at least one of the battery cells including:
i) a variable resistor component configured in parallel with a battery cell, the variable resistor component providing plural selectable resistances;
ii) a switch configured in series with the variable resistor component; and
b) a control circuit configured to cause the switch, based on a detected voltage of the battery cell, to partially discharge the battery cell and thereby balance the cell relative to another cell with which the cell is connected in series, the control circuit selecting a resistor value of the variable resistor to generate a balancing current corresponding to a selected balancing current.
The system of claim 24, wherein the control circuit further detects a predetermined cycle life of the battery cell, and wherein the control circuit selects the balancing current based on the detected predetermined cycle life of the battery cell.
The system of claim 24, wherein the control circuit is configured to select the balancing current based on an indication of past operation of the battery cell.
The system of claim 26, wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to cycle count of the battery cell. The system of claim 26, wherein the indication of past operation is an indication of one or more of a cycle count, full charge capacity and state of health of the battery cell.
The system of claim 26, wherein the indication of past operation corresponds to a calculated capacity of the battery cell relative to a range of calculated cell capacities of the plurality of battery cells.
The system of claim 29, wherein the control circuit selects the balancing current to minimize heat generation within the plurality of battery cells without extending a period of time required to balance the plurality of battery cells.
The circuit of claim 24, wherein the variable resistor includes an analog resistor value control input.
The circuit of claim 24, wherein the variable resistor includes a digital resistor value control input.
PCT/US2013/029863 2012-03-16 2013-03-08 Method and system for balancing cells with variable bypass current WO2013138176A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201380014710.3A CN104221248A (en) 2012-03-16 2013-03-08 Method and system for balancing cells with variable bypass current
EP13761574.6A EP2826128A4 (en) 2012-03-16 2013-03-08 Method and system for balancing cells with variable bypass current

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261611802P 2012-03-16 2012-03-16
US61/611,802 2012-03-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013138176A1 true WO2013138176A1 (en) 2013-09-19

Family

ID=49161675

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2013/029863 WO2013138176A1 (en) 2012-03-16 2013-03-08 Method and system for balancing cells with variable bypass current

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20130278218A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2826128A4 (en)
CN (1) CN104221248A (en)
WO (1) WO2013138176A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013220295A1 (en) * 2013-10-08 2015-04-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating an electrochemical storage network
DE102013220291A1 (en) * 2013-10-08 2015-04-30 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for regulating a voltage of an electrochemical storage network
WO2016155962A1 (en) * 2015-03-30 2016-10-06 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a battery unit

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2645527A1 (en) * 2012-03-26 2013-10-02 Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. Battery pack
KR102028923B1 (en) * 2013-04-11 2019-10-08 에스케이이노베이션 주식회사 Apparatus and method for battery balancing
US10063069B1 (en) 2014-05-23 2018-08-28 Artisan Vehicle Systems Inc. Module maintenance system
US9960396B2 (en) 2013-09-24 2018-05-01 Artisan Vehicle Systems Inc. Module backbone system
DE102015202939A1 (en) * 2015-02-18 2016-08-18 Robert Bosch Gmbh Device and method for balancing the state of charge of battery cells and battery module, battery, battery system, vehicle, computer program and computer program product
CN107852002B (en) 2015-07-14 2021-03-16 沃尔沃卡车集团 Method and system for balancing battery pack
KR102010021B1 (en) * 2015-11-18 2019-08-12 주식회사 엘지화학 Apparatus and method for managing battery pack
CN105553009B (en) * 2015-12-26 2017-03-22 惠州市蓝微新源技术有限公司 Equalization circuit for rapidly balancing battery pack of switch array and control method
US20170219657A1 (en) * 2016-01-28 2017-08-03 Bae Systems Controls Inc. Online battery capacity estimation utilizing passive balancing
DE102016107448A1 (en) * 2016-04-21 2017-10-26 enfas GmbH Energy storage system
JP6496687B2 (en) * 2016-07-21 2019-04-03 矢崎総業株式会社 Battery monitoring system
US10063070B2 (en) * 2016-11-25 2018-08-28 National Chung Shan Institute Of Science And Technology Battery active balancing system
EP3333008B1 (en) * 2016-12-12 2022-06-15 Honeywell International Inc. Adaptive balancing for battery management
JP7067556B2 (en) * 2017-06-20 2022-05-16 株式会社Gsユアサ Failure diagnosis device
JP2021036734A (en) * 2017-10-06 2021-03-04 株式会社村田製作所 Battery pack
CN107863796A (en) * 2017-10-30 2018-03-30 努比亚技术有限公司 Battery electric quantity balancing control circuit, terminal and battery electric quantity balance control method
US10444295B2 (en) * 2017-12-20 2019-10-15 National Chung Shan Institute Of Science And Technology Battery balance management circuit
KR102446380B1 (en) * 2018-02-27 2022-09-21 삼성에스디아이 주식회사 Method and battery management sytem for cell balancing
DE102018209461A1 (en) * 2018-06-13 2019-12-19 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Method for impedance-controlled rapid charging, control unit for a charging system, energy storage and working device
CN109525009B (en) * 2018-10-12 2020-10-30 南京工业大学 Storage battery pack parallel use control system for prolonging load operation time
US11139661B2 (en) * 2018-11-27 2021-10-05 The University Of Toledo Bilevel equalizer for battery cell charge management
KR102372385B1 (en) * 2019-01-03 2022-03-07 주식회사 엘지에너지솔루션 Apparatus for battery balancing, and battery pack including the same
KR20200131621A (en) 2019-05-14 2020-11-24 주식회사 엘지화학 Battery Management System
KR20210039705A (en) * 2019-10-02 2021-04-12 주식회사 엘지화학 Method and system for detecting connection failure in parallel connection cell
CN111208861B (en) * 2020-01-15 2022-01-18 重庆超力电器有限责任公司 PTC power control method and device
CN111564886B (en) * 2020-06-01 2022-04-19 李砚泉 Equalization device based on capacitance network, cascading equalization battery pack and control method
CN113394855B (en) * 2021-07-22 2023-07-18 傲普(上海)新能源有限公司 Centralized power-adjustable BMS passive equalization circuit
EP4239832A1 (en) * 2022-03-04 2023-09-06 NXP USA, Inc. Apparatus and method for balancing voltage of cells within a battery pack
US20240055883A1 (en) * 2022-08-10 2024-02-15 Coast Cutlery Co. Converter for a rechargeable battery
CN117293653A (en) * 2023-11-21 2023-12-26 深圳市柠檬光子科技有限公司 Laser driving circuit and electronic equipment

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090243540A1 (en) * 2008-04-01 2009-10-01 Analog Express Inc. Methods and apparatus for battery charging management
KR20100088369A (en) * 2009-01-30 2010-08-09 에스케이에너지 주식회사 Charge equalization apparatus for series-connected battery string and charge equalization method thereof
WO2010093186A2 (en) * 2009-02-15 2010-08-19 Powertron Engineering Co.,Ltd Apparatus for charging battery cells in balance and control method thereof
US20110068744A1 (en) * 2009-09-18 2011-03-24 American Power Conversion Corporation System and method for battery cell balancing
WO2011114247A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-22 Brusa Elektronik Ag Balancing the states of charge of charge accumulators

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09294337A (en) * 1996-04-24 1997-11-11 Fuji Heavy Ind Ltd Battery charging controlling system for electric vehicle
JPH11234916A (en) * 1998-02-16 1999-08-27 Rohm Co Ltd Lithium ion battery pack
US6518725B2 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-02-11 Semtech Corporation Charge balancing system
JP4605952B2 (en) * 2001-08-29 2011-01-05 株式会社日立製作所 Power storage device and control method thereof
WO2003032464A1 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-04-17 Sanken Electric Co., Ltd. Voltage balance circuit, voltage detecting circuit, voltage balancing method, and voltage detecting method
US20060103350A1 (en) * 2004-11-12 2006-05-18 Akku Power Electronic Co., Ltd. [an equalizing-charge charger]
JP4400536B2 (en) * 2004-12-27 2010-01-20 日産自動車株式会社 Capacity adjustment device and capacity adjustment method for battery pack
JP4888041B2 (en) * 2006-02-16 2012-02-29 株式会社デンソー Battery voltage regulator
JP2007318950A (en) * 2006-05-27 2007-12-06 Gs Yuasa Corporation:Kk Cell voltage balancing device for secondary battery
PL2092627T3 (en) * 2006-11-10 2018-10-31 Lithium Balance A/S A battery management system
US7612530B2 (en) * 2006-11-21 2009-11-03 Industrial Technology Research Institute Bridge battery voltage equalizer
US11218003B2 (en) * 2009-09-22 2022-01-04 Phoenix Broadband Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for intelligent battery charge equalization and monitoring

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090243540A1 (en) * 2008-04-01 2009-10-01 Analog Express Inc. Methods and apparatus for battery charging management
KR20100088369A (en) * 2009-01-30 2010-08-09 에스케이에너지 주식회사 Charge equalization apparatus for series-connected battery string and charge equalization method thereof
WO2010093186A2 (en) * 2009-02-15 2010-08-19 Powertron Engineering Co.,Ltd Apparatus for charging battery cells in balance and control method thereof
US20110068744A1 (en) * 2009-09-18 2011-03-24 American Power Conversion Corporation System and method for battery cell balancing
WO2011114247A1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-09-22 Brusa Elektronik Ag Balancing the states of charge of charge accumulators

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2826128A4 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013220295A1 (en) * 2013-10-08 2015-04-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating an electrochemical storage network
DE102013220291A1 (en) * 2013-10-08 2015-04-30 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for regulating a voltage of an electrochemical storage network
WO2016155962A1 (en) * 2015-03-30 2016-10-06 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a battery unit
CN107431370A (en) * 2015-03-30 2017-12-01 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Method for running battery assembly module
US10355504B2 (en) 2015-03-30 2019-07-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a battery unit
CN107431370B (en) * 2015-03-30 2021-10-12 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Method for operating a battery cell

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104221248A (en) 2014-12-17
US20130278218A1 (en) 2013-10-24
EP2826128A4 (en) 2016-03-23
EP2826128A1 (en) 2015-01-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20130278218A1 (en) Method and system for balancing cells with variable bypass current
US8228042B2 (en) Battery pack charging method
TWI762522B (en) Control device, balance correction device, and power storage system
EP2352218A2 (en) Voltage equalization circuit for electric energy storage device
US8143863B2 (en) Circuits and methods for controlling a current flowing through a battery
US20150318721A1 (en) Voltage balance control device
JP2019165622A (en) Dc charging of intelligent battery
US20090309547A1 (en) Charging method, battery pack and charger for battery pack
EP1814206A1 (en) Battery balancing apparatus
JP5126403B1 (en) Charge / discharge control device
JP6184722B2 (en) Storage cell deterioration determination device, storage cell deterioration determination method, and storage cell deterioration determination program
JP2009017630A (en) Control method for battery capacity
KR102621817B1 (en) Method and battery management sytem for cell balancing
JP4928618B2 (en) Storage module controller
JP2014082900A (en) Equalization device
JP2008011657A (en) Power supply unit
EP3291406A1 (en) Batterieladeverfahren und batterieladevorrichtung zum einsatz des verfahrens
US10749363B2 (en) Semiconductor device, battery system, and battery control method
KR20090103132A (en) Balenced charging apparatus of ultracapacitors and balenced charging method thereof
US11588185B2 (en) Management device and power supply system
JP2008125280A (en) Charger, information processing terminal, and information processing system
KR20200106601A (en) Vehicle and control method therof
JP4764324B2 (en) Energy equalization equipment
JP6221697B2 (en) Voltage difference correction apparatus, voltage difference correction program and method
JP6919701B2 (en) Power storage status adjustment device, battery pack, load system and storage status adjustment method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13761574

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2013761574

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2013761574

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE