WO2011066318A2 - Fermentation of carbohydrate - Google Patents
Fermentation of carbohydrate Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2011066318A2 WO2011066318A2 PCT/US2010/057875 US2010057875W WO2011066318A2 WO 2011066318 A2 WO2011066318 A2 WO 2011066318A2 US 2010057875 W US2010057875 W US 2010057875W WO 2011066318 A2 WO2011066318 A2 WO 2011066318A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- fermentation
- carbohydrate
- ethanol
- fermented
- yeast
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
- C12P7/00—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
- C12P7/02—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
- C12P7/04—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
- C12P7/06—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
- C12P7/08—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage produced as by-product or from waste or cellulosic material substrate
- C12P7/10—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage produced as by-product or from waste or cellulosic material substrate substrate containing cellulosic material
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/10—Biofuels, e.g. bio-diesel
Definitions
- a high yield method for producing ethanol from carbohydrate fermentation by treating incoming carbohydrate material with an aldehyde, a fatty acid, a terpene and a surfactant.
- Ethanol a promising biofuel from renewable resources, is produced from the starch of cereal grains (corn, sorghum, wheat, triticale, rye, malted barley, rice), tuber crops (potatoes) or by direct use of the sugar in molasses, sugar cane juice or sugar beet juice. Ethanol can also be produced by fermentation of cellulose-based material (switch grass, pine trees), but this technology has not been widely commercialized.
- the process of ethanol production from cereals begins with the hydrolysis of starch.
- the hydrolysis of starch results in the conversion of amylose, a mostly linear a-D-(l-4)-glucan, and branched amylopectin, a a -D-(l-4)-glucan which has a -D-(l-6) linkages at the branch point, into fermentable sugars that subsequently are converted to ethanol by yeast (Majovic, 2006), bacteria (Dien, 2003).
- Bacteria are used for the production of ethanol from mostly cellulose containing material, they include Zymomonas spp., engineered E. coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Zymomonas mobilis, Acetivibrio celluloyticus vAthin others (Dien, 2003)
- whole corn kernel is ground and mixed with water.
- the mixture is then steam cooked to gelatinize starch and to decrease bacterial contamination.
- enzymes and yeast are added to start the fermentation process to produce ethanol.
- Dry milling and wet milling are the two primary processes used to make ethanol in the United States.
- the entire corn kernel or other starchy material is ground into flour and mixed with water to form a slurry.
- enzymes are added to the mixture, which is processed in a high-temperature cooker, cooled and transferred to fermenters where yeast is added and the conversion of sugar to ethanol begins.
- the resulting mixture is transferred to distillation columns where the ethanol is separated.
- the solids resulting after fermentation and ethanol separation are processed to produce distiller's dried grains with solubles (DDGS) which is used for animal production, e.g. poultry, swine, and cattle feed. More than 80% of today's ethanol capacity utilizes the dry mill process (RPS, 2006).
- the grain is soaked or steeped in water to facilitate the separation of the grain into its basic nutritional components, such as corn germ, fiber, gluten and starch components.
- the corn slurry is processed through a series of grinders and the components separated .
- the gluten component is filtered and dried to produce the corn gluten meal (CGM), a high-protein product used as a feed ingredient in animal operations.
- CGM corn gluten meal
- the starch and any remaining water from the mash are then processed in one of three ways: Fermented into ethanol, dried and sold as dried or modified corn starch, or processed into corn syrup (RFS, 2006).
- Both the wet and dry mill processes utilize only the starch portion of the corn kernel for ethanol production.
- the remaining protein, fat, fiber and other nutritional components remain available for use as animal feed.
- yeast culture is added to the starch kernel portion of the corn and incubated 72 hours to allow sufficient time for the yeast population to increase to the necessary concentration (Maye, 2006). It takes from 45 to 60 minutes for the yeast population to double. It takes many hours of such propagation to produce the quantity of yeast necessary to ferment such a large quantity of sugar solution (Maye, 2006).
- a process called raw starch hydrolysis converts starch to sugar which is then fermented to ethanol, bypassing conventional starch gelatinization conditions.
- the enzymes used in the saccharification/fermentation are fungal alpha amylase and glucoamylase (amyloglucosidase) (Thomas, 2001). This simultaneous saccharifi cation and fermentation allows for higher concentrations of starch to be fermented and results in higher levels of ethanol. If the sugar source is from crops such as sugar cane, sugar beets, fruit or molasses, saccharification is not necessary and fermentation can begin with the addition of yeast and water (Maye, 2006).
- biofilms can act as reservoirs of bacteria that continuously reintroduce contaminants (Bischoff, 2009).
- a variety of gram positive and gram negative bacteria have been isolated from fuel ethanol fermentation including species of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Staphylococcus,
- Lactobacilli contamination in the range of 10 6 to 10 7 cfu/mL corn slurry can reduce ethanol yield by 1-3%.
- carbohydrate losses to Lactobacilli can make the difference between profitability and non-profitability (Bayrock, 2007).
- Lactobacilli not only tolerate low pH, high acidity and relatively high concentrations of ethanol, but they also multiply under conditions of alcoholic fermentation (Thomas, 2001).
- Bacterial contaminants compete for growth factors needed by yeast and also produce by-products that are inhibitory to yeast, particularly lactic and acetic acids.
- the contamination of carbohydrate slurry during the course of alcoholic fermentation results in a) decreased ethanol yield, b) increased channeling of carbohydrates for the production of glycerol and lactic acids, c) a rapid loss of the yeast viability after exhaustion of fermentable sugars, and d) decreased proliferation of yeast in the mash in which the contaminating
- Lactobacilli has already grown to a high number (Thomas, 2001).
- Lactobacillus byproducts i.e. acetic and lactic acids
- acetic and lactic acids i.e. acetic and lactic acids
- the lactic acid content of the mash approaches 0.8% and/or acetic acid concentration exceeds 0.05%, the ethanol producing yeast are stressed (Bayrock, 2007).
- Lactobacilli may stress yeast cells, which release nutrients, particularly amino acids and peptides that can stimulate bacterial growth (Oliva-Neto, 2004).
- a lactic acid concentration of 8 g L in a beet molasses batch fermentation reduced yeast viability by 95% and alcohol production rate by 80% (Bayrock, 2001).
- Lactobacillus in the ethanol fermentation can decrease ethanol yield by 44% after 4 days of pH controlled operation. This coincides with an increase in L parac sei to >10 10 cfu/mL and a fourfold increase in lactic acid concentration to 20 g/L. An 80% reduction in yeast density was seen with concentrations of ethanol, lactic acid and acetic acid of 70, 38 and 7.5 g L respectively (Bayrock ,2001).
- Methods to control bacteria include the addition of more yeast culture, stringent cleaning and sanitation, acid washing of yeast destined for reuse, and the use of antibiotics during fermentation (Hynes, 1997).
- An increased yeast inoculation rate of 3 x 10 7 cfu/mL mash resulted in greater than 80% decrease in lactic acid production by L. plantarum and greater than 55% decrease in lactic acid production by L. paracasei, when mash was infected with 1 x 10 8
- antiseptics such as hydrogen peroxide, potassium metabi sulfite, and 3,4,4'- trichlorocarbanilide
- antibiotics such as penicillin, tetracycline, monensin and virginiamycin.
- Penicillin and virginiamycin are commercially sold today to treat bacterial infections of fuel ethanol fermentation and some facilities use these antibiotics prophylactically (Skinner, 2004).
- virginiamycin One very effective bacterial control program involves the use of virginiamycin. Some characteristics of virginiamycin are a) at low concentrations, e.g., 0.3 to 5 ppm it is effective against a number of microorganisms including Lactobacilli, b) the microorganisms do not tend to develop resistance, c) it does not significantly inhibit the yeast, d) it is not affected by the pH or alcohol concentration, and e) it is inactivated during ethanol distillation, therefore no residue remains in the alcohol or distilled grains (Bayrock, 2007; Narendranath, 2000; Hynes, 1997).
- virginiamycin is the only antibiotic known to be used at the dry-grind plant (Bischoff, 2007).
- the recommended dose of virginiamycin in fuel ethanol fermentations is generally 0.25 to 2.0 ppm (Bischoff, 2009) but the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) varies from 0.5 to greater than 64 ppm (Hynes, 1997).
- L fermentum could be selectively controlled by hydrogen peroxide at concentrations of 1 to 10 mM in an ethanol fermentation process (Narendranath, 2000). Lactobacillus does not have the enzyme catalase, so it cannot decompose hydrogen peroxide and therefore is unable to eliminate its toxic effect (Narendranath, 2000).
- Urea hydrogen peroxide has been used as an antiseptic for topical applications on wounds and against gingivitis and dental plaque (Narendranath, 2000) and also serves as an antibacterial during fermentation. UHP not only exhibits excellent bactericidal activity against Lactobacillus but also has an important advantage of providing usable nitrogen in the form of urea for stimulating yeast growth and fermentation rates (Narendranath, 2000).
- Sulfites demonstrate bactericidal activity only in the presence of oxygen and were more effective in killing facultative L. casei which possess high levels of hydrogen peroxide related enzymes, including peroxidase (Chang, 1997). Bacterial load was also decreased when the concentration of sulfite ranged from 100 to 400 mg/L but only in the presence of oxygen. This concentration did not affect yeast populations (Chang, 1997).
- Succinic acid by itself at levels of 600 mg/L reduces Lactobacillus concentrations by 78%, in the presence of ethanol that reduction is up to 96% (Oliva-Neto 2004).
- a microbial adherence inhibitor in the form of fowl egg antibodies and specific to lactic acid-producing microorganisms has been developed for use in fermenters (Nash 2009).
- OlivaNeto P., M.A. Ferreira and F. Yokoya, 2004. Screening for yeast with antibacterial properties from ethanol distillery. Bioresource Technology 92: 1-6.
- An object of the invention is to provide a chemical composition that prevents "stuck fermentation” during ethanol production by inhibiting or reducing the growth of Lactobacillus spp. and other bacteria during fermentation of corn, other starch or cellulose based material.
- Another object is to provide a method of fermenting carbohydrates to ethanol, comprising: a) treating carbohydrate to be fermented with a composition containing
- an aldehyde selected from the group consisting of formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and mixtures thereof,
- organic acids selected from C 1 to C 2 fatty acids, their salts, glycerides and esters thereof, and
- Another obj ect of the invention is to provide a method of increasing ethanol production in an initially stuck fermentation system by adding a composition comprising:
- an aldehyde selected from the group consisting of formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and mixtures thereof,
- Another object of the invention is to reduce the use of antibiotics during the fermentation of carbohydrates adding to the fermentation system a composition comprising:
- an aldehyde selected from the group consisting of formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and mixtures thereof,
- Another object of the invention is to reduce the antibiotic presence in the resulting sub- product of carbohydrates fermentation e.g. distilled grains, corn gluten and others.
- Another object of the invention is to reduce antibiotic residues in animal products by feeding the animals sub-products of fermentation resulting from non-antibiotics but the present invention treated substrates.
- Another object is to inhibit the development of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria which occur during fermentation.
- Another object is to increase the yield of ethanol from fermented carbohydrate.
- “Stuck Fermentation” occurs when fermentation of starch to ethanol is incomplete and has stopped due to high bacterial concentration and acid content in the ferm enter. "Weight percent” (wt.%) of a component is based on the total weight of the formulation or composition in which the component is included.
- Aldehyde includes formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, and other active aldehydes.
- Organic acid includes formic, acetic, propionic, butyric and other C 1 to C 24 fatty acids, or mono-, di-, or triglycerides of C 1 to C 24 organic fatty acids or their esters.
- Antimicrobial terpene can include allyl disulfide, citral, pinene, nerol, geraniol, carvacrol, eugenol, carvone, anethole, camphor, menthol, limonene, farnesol, carotene, thymol, borneol, myrcene, terpenene, linalool, or mixtures thereof. More specifically, the terpenes may comprise allyl disulfide, thymol, citral, eugenol, limonene, carvacrol, and carvone, or mixtures thereof.
- the terpene component may include other terpenes with anti-microbial properties and essential oils.
- Bacteria that may interfere with ethanol fermentation include Lactobacillus and
- Leuconostoc which cause the most problems.
- Other such bacteria include Pediococcus,
- antibiotics are the common biocide, e.g., virginimicin, penicillin, clindamycin, tylosin, chloramphenicol, cephalosporin and tetracycline.
- biocides include carbamates, quaternary ammonium compounds, phenols and antibiotics (e.g., virginiamycin, penicillin, clindamycin, tylosin, chloramphenicol, cephalosporin and
- an effective amount of a compound means an amount capable of performing the function or having the property for which the effective amount is expressed, such as a non-toxic but sufficient amount to provide anti-microbial benefits. Thus an effective amount may be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art by routine experimentation.
- Formulations vary not only in the concentrations of the major components, e.g., aldehydes, the organic acids, but also in the type of terpenes, surfactant(s) and water
- This invention can be modified by adding or deleting the terpene, type of organic acid, and using other type of surfactant.
- composition(s) In general, a composition of the invention contains:
- an aldehyde selected from the group consisting of formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and mixtures thereof,
- antimicrobial terpenes, plant extracts or essential oils containing terpenes can be used in the compositions of this invention as well as the more purified terpenes.
- Terpenes are readily available commercially or can be produced by methods known in the art, such as solvent extraction or steam extraction/distillation or chemical synthesis.
- the surfactant is non-ionic including ethoxylated castor oil surfactants with 1 to 200 ethylene molecules distributed normally around the mean, preferably a mean of 10 to 80.
- Other surfactants with similar characteristics can be used including Tween surfactants.
- the present invention is effective against bacteria.
- infective agents include Lactobacillus spp., E. coli, Salmonella spp., Clostridium spp., Campylobacter spp., Shigella spp., Brachyspira spp., Listeria spp., Arcobacter spp., and others.
- the mixture of the present invention is applied by a spray nozzle.
- the mixture is applied so as to provide a uniform and homogeneous distribution throughout the carbohydrate substrate.
- the objective of this study was to determine the effect of a Formula A on the survival of Lactobacillus.
- Lactobacillus plantarum (B-4496) was obtained from USDA-Microbial Genomics and
- the objective of this study was to determine the effect of Formula A on the survival of yeast and Lactobacillus during fermentation.
- Lactobacillus plantarum (B-4496), obtained from USDA-Microbial Genomics and
- Lactobacillus but did not affect the level of yeast.
- the objective of this study was to determine the effect of Formula A on the survival of yeast and Lactobacillus during fermentation.
- Naturally contaminated whole com was obtained from a commercial source.
- the naturally occurring Lactobacillus count in corn was found to be 300 cfu/g.
- whole corn was treated with Formula A at 0, 1, 2 and 3 kg/MT.
- 20g of corn from each treatment was finely ground and added to glass fermenters with water, enzyme and yeast as described below. Samples taken at 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours were analyzed for yeast and Lactobacillus counts. The treatments are as follows:
- the objective of this study was to determine the effect of Formula A on the survival of yeast and Lactobacillus during fermentation.
- Naturally contaminated whole corn was obtained from a commercial source.
- the naturally occurring Lactobacillus count in corn was found to be 300 cfu/g.
- whole corn was treated with Formula A at 0, 1, 2 and 3 kg/MT.
- 20g of corn from each treatment was finely ground and added to glass fermenters with water, enzyme and yeast as described below.
- Lactobacillus plantarum (B-4496) grown in MRS broth was added to the fermentation bottles (0.1 ml of 6.2 x lO 5 cfu/mL). Samples were taken after 72 hours fermentation for yeast and Lactobacillus counts. Treatments are listed on the following table.
- the objective of this study was to determine the effect of Formula A on the survival of yeast and Lactobacillus during fermentation.
- Naturally contaminated whole corn was obtained from a commercial source.
- the naturally occurring Lactobacillus count in corn was found to be 300 cfu/g.
- whole corn was treated with Formula A at 0, 1, 2 and 3 kg/MT.
- 20g of corn from each treatment was finely ground and added to glass fermenters with water, enzyme and yeast as described below.
- Lactobacillus plantarum (B-4496) grown in MRS broth was added to the fermentation bottles (0.1 ml of 6.2 x 10 5 cfu/mL). Samples were taken after 72 hours fermentation for yeast and Lactobacillus counts.
- the objective of this study was to determine the effect the formaldehyde on the survival of yeast and lactobacillus during fermentation.
- Lactobacillus plantarum inoculum did not multiply in any of the treatments.
- Formaldehyde produces a slightly decrease (1 log) in cfu's when Lactobacillus was added a higher concentrations.
- Formaldehyde treatment decreased the density of fermentation solution indicating an increase in ethanol content.
- Ethanol production and microbiological profile were analyzed in four fermentation studies using corn treated with 0 (control), 0.45 and 0.90 Kg MT Formaldehyde. Ground corn and water were mixed and incubated at room temperature in a air-tight 250-ml fermenter jars for 6 hours. This was done in order to increase the naturally occurring Lactobacillus in corn. Previous studies have shown that the level of Lactobacillus is less than 100 cfu/gr in corn. The other reagents were added into the fermenters as described in the following table.
- fermenters were sealed with a cap containing a water trap. Fermenters were kept under constant stirring (low speed) at room temperature (21-23 °C) for 72 hours before sampling for yeast, Lactobacillus and alcohol production. Lactobacillus counts were determined on MRS broth containing 1.5% DifcoTM Agar. Plates were incubated in an anaerobic chamber at 37°C for 48 hours and colonies enumerated. Yeast counts were determined on PDA plates. Plates were incubated at 27°C for 48 hours and colonies enumerated. Alcohol was determined by FT- IR. (FOSS system).
- Wild Lactobacillus and yeast/mold profile were determined in four studies using corn treated with 0 (control), 0.45 and 0.90 Kg MT Formaldehyde (HCHO). Ground corn and water were mixed and incubated at room temperature (21-23 °C) in an anaerobic environment for 24 hours.. To 5 gr of ground corn 45 ml of Butterfield was added and incubated overnight in a closed container while stirring at at room temperature. After incubation, samples were taken to enumerate wild yeast/mold and Lactobacillus. Results are presented in the following table.
Landscapes
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (8)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA2774048A CA2774048C (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Fermentation of carbohydrate |
ES10833878T ES2854723T3 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Carbohydrate fermentation |
PL10833878T PL2504445T3 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Fermentation of carbohydrate |
BRPI1006058-8A BRPI1006058B1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | METHOD OF FERMENTATION OF A STARCH TO ETHANOL AND FERMENTATION BROTH |
EP10833878.1A EP2504445B1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Fermentation of carbohydrate |
US13/388,664 US8883470B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Fermentation of carbohydrate |
LTEP10833878.1T LT2504445T (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Fermentation of carbohydrate |
CN201080052624.8A CN102666864B (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Fermentation of carbohydrate |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US26459609P | 2009-11-25 | 2009-11-25 | |
US61/264,596 | 2009-11-25 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2011066318A2 true WO2011066318A2 (en) | 2011-06-03 |
WO2011066318A3 WO2011066318A3 (en) | 2011-10-20 |
Family
ID=44067203
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/057875 WO2011066318A2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2010-11-23 | Fermentation of carbohydrate |
Country Status (11)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8883470B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2504445B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102666864B (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI1006058B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2774048C (en) |
ES (1) | ES2854723T3 (en) |
HU (1) | HUE053162T2 (en) |
LT (1) | LT2504445T (en) |
PL (1) | PL2504445T3 (en) |
PT (1) | PT2504445T (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011066318A2 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013074277A3 (en) * | 2011-11-10 | 2013-07-11 | Anitox Corporation | Controlling bacterial biofilms in ethanol production |
EP2686433A1 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2014-01-22 | POET Research, Inc. | Systems and methods for improving ethanol yield |
EP2723189A1 (en) * | 2011-06-26 | 2014-04-30 | Anitox Corporation | Cold weather formulation for conditioning animal feed |
US20140134693A1 (en) * | 2012-11-15 | 2014-05-15 | Anitox Corporation | Eliminating the Need of Acidification in Bioethanol Production |
AU2011227374B2 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2014-06-19 | Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. | Processes using antibiotic alternatives in bioethanol production |
CN104364383A (en) * | 2012-06-15 | 2015-02-18 | 纳幕尔杜邦公司 | Use of virginiamycin for bacterial contamination control in fermentations using zymomonas mobilis |
WO2016149268A1 (en) * | 2015-03-16 | 2016-09-22 | Healthpro Brands, Inc. | Methods and compositions to control undesirable microorganisms in fermentation processes |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102905559A (en) * | 2010-05-27 | 2013-01-30 | 三得利控股株式会社 | Beverage containing essential oil |
WO2015025538A1 (en) * | 2013-08-20 | 2015-02-26 | サンノプコ株式会社 | Additive for bioethanol fermentation process and method for producing bioethanol |
SI24570A (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2015-06-30 | Medis D.O.O. | New strains of the genus Lactobacillus and use thereof |
JP6774591B2 (en) * | 2015-02-17 | 2020-10-28 | サンノプコ株式会社 | Additives for bioethanol fermentation process and method for producing bioethanol |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070292919A1 (en) | 2006-06-16 | 2007-12-20 | Polymer Ventures, Inc. | Composition and methods for improving the production of fermentation operations |
WO2009001205A2 (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2008-12-31 | Dow Brasil Sudeste Industrial Ltda. | Methods to control bacterial growth in fermentation processes |
WO2009010836A2 (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2009-01-22 | Dow Brasil Sudeste Industrial Ltda. | Control of bacteria in fermentation processes |
US20090117129A1 (en) | 2007-04-10 | 2009-05-07 | Peter Nash | Immunogen adherence inhibitor directed to lactobacillus organisms and method of making and using it |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1723271A (en) * | 1926-10-21 | 1929-08-06 | Celanese Corp | Treatment of cellulose derivatives |
US5505976A (en) * | 1992-12-30 | 1996-04-09 | Anitox Corporation | Contamination-resistant animal feedstuffs |
US20040044087A1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2004-03-04 | Maye John Paul | Use of hop acids in fuel ethanol production |
US6908995B2 (en) | 2001-01-05 | 2005-06-21 | David H. Blount | Production of carbohydrates, alcohol and resins from biomass |
WO2007145857A1 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2007-12-21 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation | Method of reducing the growth of lactobacilli in a process of ethanol procuction by yeast fermentation comprising adding a pristinamycin-type antimicrobial agent and/or a polyether ionophore antimicrobial agent in form |
CA2823043C (en) * | 2006-10-26 | 2014-08-19 | Xyleco, Inc. | Methods of processing biomass comprising electron-beam radiation |
CN101743616B (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2012-02-22 | 株式会社半导体能源研究所 | Manufacturing method of semiconductor device |
-
2010
- 2010-11-23 LT LTEP10833878.1T patent/LT2504445T/en unknown
- 2010-11-23 EP EP10833878.1A patent/EP2504445B1/en active Active
- 2010-11-23 ES ES10833878T patent/ES2854723T3/en active Active
- 2010-11-23 WO PCT/US2010/057875 patent/WO2011066318A2/en active Application Filing
- 2010-11-23 HU HUE10833878A patent/HUE053162T2/en unknown
- 2010-11-23 PL PL10833878T patent/PL2504445T3/en unknown
- 2010-11-23 PT PT108338781T patent/PT2504445T/en unknown
- 2010-11-23 US US13/388,664 patent/US8883470B2/en active Active
- 2010-11-23 CN CN201080052624.8A patent/CN102666864B/en active Active
- 2010-11-23 CA CA2774048A patent/CA2774048C/en active Active
- 2010-11-23 BR BRPI1006058-8A patent/BRPI1006058B1/en active IP Right Grant
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070292919A1 (en) | 2006-06-16 | 2007-12-20 | Polymer Ventures, Inc. | Composition and methods for improving the production of fermentation operations |
US20090117129A1 (en) | 2007-04-10 | 2009-05-07 | Peter Nash | Immunogen adherence inhibitor directed to lactobacillus organisms and method of making and using it |
WO2009001205A2 (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2008-12-31 | Dow Brasil Sudeste Industrial Ltda. | Methods to control bacterial growth in fermentation processes |
WO2009010836A2 (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2009-01-22 | Dow Brasil Sudeste Industrial Ltda. | Control of bacteria in fermentation processes |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
OLIVA NETO, P.; M.A. FERREIRA; F. YOKOYA: "Screening for yeast with antibacterial properties from ethanol distillery", BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, vol. 92, 2004, pages 1 - 6 |
RFA ''RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION, 2006 |
See also references of EP2504445A4 |
SKINNER, K.A.; T.D. LEATHERS: "Bacterial Contaminants of Fuel Ethanol Production", J. IND. MICROBIOL. BIOTECH., vol. 31, 2004, pages 401 - 408 |
SKINNER-NEMEC, K.A.; N. N NICHOLS; T.D. LEATHERS: "Biofilm formation by bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production", BIOTECHNOL. LETT., vol. 29, 2007, pages 379 - 383, XP019477804 |
THOMAS, K.C.; S.H. HYNES; W.M. INGLEDEW: "Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi-continuous alcoholic fermentation on corn mash", J. APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, vol. 90, 2001, pages 819 - 828 |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8951960B2 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2015-02-10 | Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. | Synergistic combination of DBNPA and polycyclic antibacterial peptide as biocide in bioethanol production |
AU2011227374B2 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2014-06-19 | Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. | Processes using antibiotic alternatives in bioethanol production |
EP2686433A1 (en) | 2011-03-14 | 2014-01-22 | POET Research, Inc. | Systems and methods for improving ethanol yield |
EP2723189A4 (en) * | 2011-06-26 | 2014-11-19 | Anitox Corp | Cold weather formulation for conditioning animal feed |
EP2723189A1 (en) * | 2011-06-26 | 2014-04-30 | Anitox Corporation | Cold weather formulation for conditioning animal feed |
US10980251B2 (en) | 2011-06-26 | 2021-04-20 | Anitox Corporation | Cold weather formulation for conditioning animal feed |
CN103930554A (en) * | 2011-11-10 | 2014-07-16 | 阿尼托克斯公司 | Controlling bacterial biofilms in ethanol production |
US20140308726A1 (en) * | 2011-11-10 | 2014-10-16 | Anitox Corporation | Controlling Bacterial Biofilms in Ethanol Production |
WO2013074277A3 (en) * | 2011-11-10 | 2013-07-11 | Anitox Corporation | Controlling bacterial biofilms in ethanol production |
EP2776569A4 (en) * | 2011-11-10 | 2015-07-29 | Anitox Corp | Controlling bacterial biofilms in ethanol production |
CN104364383A (en) * | 2012-06-15 | 2015-02-18 | 纳幕尔杜邦公司 | Use of virginiamycin for bacterial contamination control in fermentations using zymomonas mobilis |
EP2733214A1 (en) * | 2012-11-15 | 2014-05-21 | Anitox Corporation | Eliminating the need of acidification in bioethanol production |
US20140134693A1 (en) * | 2012-11-15 | 2014-05-15 | Anitox Corporation | Eliminating the Need of Acidification in Bioethanol Production |
WO2016149268A1 (en) * | 2015-03-16 | 2016-09-22 | Healthpro Brands, Inc. | Methods and compositions to control undesirable microorganisms in fermentation processes |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2011066318A3 (en) | 2011-10-20 |
CA2774048A1 (en) | 2011-06-03 |
ES2854723T3 (en) | 2021-09-22 |
LT2504445T (en) | 2021-02-25 |
US20120225465A1 (en) | 2012-09-06 |
HUE053162T2 (en) | 2021-06-28 |
US8883470B2 (en) | 2014-11-11 |
BRPI1006058B1 (en) | 2024-01-23 |
EP2504445B1 (en) | 2020-11-18 |
CN102666864A (en) | 2012-09-12 |
PT2504445T (en) | 2021-02-16 |
BRPI1006058A2 (en) | 2015-09-01 |
CA2774048C (en) | 2015-05-19 |
CN102666864B (en) | 2014-01-22 |
EP2504445A2 (en) | 2012-10-03 |
PL2504445T3 (en) | 2021-06-28 |
EP2504445A4 (en) | 2013-09-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8883470B2 (en) | Fermentation of carbohydrate | |
EP2955231B1 (en) | Processes using antibiotic alternatives in bioethanol production | |
US11046977B2 (en) | Process for the manufacture of butanol or acetone | |
MX2011009745A (en) | Compositions and methods for conversion of lignocellulosic material to fermentable sugars and products produced therefrom. | |
CA2822441C (en) | Use of a nitrogen-free peroxygen-releasing compound to reduce growth of contaminant microorganisms in ethanol fermentation | |
DK2958438T3 (en) | Mycotoxin binders | |
WO2013074277A2 (en) | Controlling bacterial biofilms in ethanol production | |
WO2016044723A1 (en) | Method for treatment of microorganisms during propagation, conditioning and fermentation using hops acid extracts and nisin | |
CA2832621A1 (en) | Eliminating the need of acidification in bioethanol production |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201080052624.8 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10833878 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13388664 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2774048 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010833878 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: BR Ref legal event code: B01A Ref document number: PI1006058 Country of ref document: BR |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI1006058 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20110630 |