WO2005069040A1 - Analog to digital conversion shift error correction - Google Patents
Analog to digital conversion shift error correction Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005069040A1 WO2005069040A1 PCT/IB2005/050043 IB2005050043W WO2005069040A1 WO 2005069040 A1 WO2005069040 A1 WO 2005069040A1 IB 2005050043 W IB2005050043 W IB 2005050043W WO 2005069040 A1 WO2005069040 A1 WO 2005069040A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- samples
- subset
- digital
- pulse
- sampling
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
- G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
- G01T1/16—Measuring radiation intensity
- G01T1/161—Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
- G01T1/164—Scintigraphy
- G01T1/1641—Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras
- G01T1/1647—Processing of scintigraphic data
Definitions
- the present application relates to the digital processing arts.
- the invention finds particular application in connection with a technique for correction of inconsistencies arising during pulse integration in analog to digital converters in nuclear medicine due to shifts in the timing of samples and will be described with particular reference thereto. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention finds application in a variety of applications where an analog pulse is digitally integrated.
- Nuclear medicine imaging involves the detection of radiation, such as gamma photons, from a subject under investigation.
- Gamma photon detectors for use in nuclear medicine imaging typically include a number of photo ultiplier tubes coupled to a scintillation crystal.
- a cascade of lower energy photons typically in the UV band
- the nearest photomultiplier tubes detect the cascade of lower energy photons and each produces an analogous electrical signal in the form of an analog event pulse.
- a measure of the total energy of the pulse is then used, in combination with that of other pulses, to recreate an image depicting radio isotope distribution in the subject.
- the total energy of the pulse is related to its integral, i.e., the area under a plot of energy vs. time. In conventional analog systems, the energy of the pulse is stored as an analog change level which is then measured directly.
- ADCs analog to digital converters
- the amplitude of the electrical pulse signal is digitized at some continuous sampling frequency, and the digital samples scanned digitally to generate the integrated value.
- the digital values are summed for a fixed number of samples. This summation forms a representation of the integrated electrical signal.
- ADC shift error This arises from the inability to match the start of each pulse accurately to the sampling intervals.
- the time distribution of gamma photons interacting with the detector is continuous .
- the ADC samples however, at a fixed sampling frequency.
- the ADC does not sample the electrical signal in a manner that is consistent from pulse to pulse.
- the ADC samples can be shifted temporally by + of the ADC sample period. This is the ADC shift error.
- the pulse has a pure Gaussian shape, and the total integration period encompasses the entire event period, then the ADC shift error does not result in a variation of the integral.
- the pulses have a Poisson distribution (generally, a sharp rise followed by a slower decline) . While the pulses are often reshaped in the analog domain prior to conversion, they still do not follow a strictly Gaussian distribution. Because of the non-ideal pulse shape, the ADC shift error results in a variation in the determined energy of the pulse.
- the distribution of the variation in determined pulse energy adds in quadrature with the underlying variation of the scintillator and photomultiplier tubes. This effectively widens the observed distribution of event energies . Since event energy is a primary means of discriminating good events from bad events, a widening of the observed distribution of good events leads to a widening of the discrimination window, thus increasing the likelihood of contamination by bad events. If the discrimination window is not widened, a loss in sensitivity results. In either case, image quality is reduced. In conventional gamma cameras, the contributions of the scintillation crystal and photomultiplier tubes to the energy resolution of the camera are greater than that of the ACD shift error, so the ADC shift error does not have a significant effect on the overall resolution.
- FWHM full width at half maximum
- an integration period (the time between samples) of 20 ns and 5 samples, a FWHM of about 25% may be obtained. This drops to 13% when the integration period is reduced to 16 ns and to 5% when an integration period of 10 ns is used. Further reductions to about 1.5% are achieved by increasing the number of samples from 5 to 8, at the 10 ns integration period. While shortening the integration period (reduces the FWHM, some amount of loss will always be present. Additionally, there are practical limits to the frequency of sampling.
- the present invention provides a new and improved method and apparatus which overcome the above-referenced problems and others .
- a method of reducing errors resulting from a temporal shift between an analog pulse and digital sampling intervals includes digitally sampling the analog pulse at a plurality of spaced sampling intervals to generate a set of digital samples. An integral is determined from the samples in the set. A subset of the samples is selected. A correction factor is determined from the subset of samples. The correction factor is applied to the integral to generate a corrected integral value .
- a system for reducing temporal shift errors between an analog pulse and a digital sampling interval is provided.
- the system includes a means for digitally sampling the analog pulse at sampling intervals to generate a set of digital samples, a means for determining an integral of the analog pulse from the set of digital samples, a means for selecting a subset of the digital values, a means for determining a correction factor from the subset of digital samples, and a means for applying the correction to the integral .
- a system for correcting a signal is provided.
- the system includes means for sampling the signal at intervals of time to generate a set of test samples .
- a correction table includes a plurality of codes, each of the codes corresponding to a relationship between samples in a subset of predicted samples . Each of the subsets of predicted samples is selected from a different set of predicted samples.
- Each of the sets of predicted samples is shifted in time by a time interval which is less than an interval between samples.
- Each of the codes is associated with a corresponding correction factor.
- Means are provided for (a) assigning a code to the set of test samples corresponding to a relationship between a subset of the test samples, (b) accessing the correction table to determine a correction factor corresponding to the code, and (c) applying the correction factor to an integration of the set of test samples.
- a system for reducing temporal shift errors between an analog pulse and a digital sampling interval is provided.
- the system includes an analog to digital converter for sampling the pulse at intervals of time to generate a set of digital samples.
- a correction table assigns a correction factor to each of a plurality of codes, each of the codes corresponding to a relationship amongst samples in a subset of calibration samples .
- Each of the subsets of calibration samples is selected from a different set of calibration samples.
- Each of the sets of calibration samples are shifted in time relative to a sampling interval.
- a processor calculates an integral of the pulse from the digital values and the correction factor.
- a method for correcting a signal includes sampling the signal at intervals of time to generate a set of test samples.
- a correction table which includes a plurality of codes is accessed. Each of the codes corresponds to a relationship between samples in a subset of predicted samples .
- Each of the subsets of predicted samples is selected from a different set of predicted samples .
- Each of the sets of predicted samples is shifted in time, relative to other sets of predicted samples, by a time interval which is less than the interval between samples.
- Each of the codes is associated with a corresponding correction factor.
- a code is assigned to the .set of test samples corresponding to a relationship between a subset of the test samples.
- the correction table is accessed to determine a correction factor corresponding to the code.
- An integration of the set of test samples is performed and the correction factor applied to the integration of the set of test samples.
- Another advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention is that it enables a time stamp for a pulse to be created.
- Another advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention is that energy resolution of a gamma camera is improved. Still further advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
- FIGURE 1 is a schematic diagram of a gamma camera and energy processing system according to the present invention
- FIGURE 2 is an enlarged sectional view of one of the detector heads of FIGURE 1
- FIGURE 3 is an exemplary plot of a normalized scintillation pulse, before and after Gaussian shaping.
- a nuclear medicine imaging device A such as a gamma camera, includes one or more detector heads 10 (three in the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 1) .
- Each head detects radiation, such as gamma photons, from a subject in a region 12 under investigation, such as a patient.
- the radiation is the result of the decay of a radiopharmaceutical, which decay emits a radiation photon of characteristic energy.
- Each of the detector heads 10 includes a number of photomultiplier tubes 14 optically coupled to a scintillation crystal 16.
- a gamma photon interacts with the scintillation crystal generating a pulse of light or scintillation.
- the event is recognized by a timing channel of an analog to digital converter (ADC) 18.
- ADC analog to digital converter
- Each photomultiplier tube 14 which views the scintillation produces an analogous electrical signal in the form of an event pulse which is proportional to the amount of received light.
- the ADC 18 includes sampling software which samples the pulse at a selected frequency. For example, as illustrated in FIGURE 3, energy samples Si, S 2 , S 3 , . . . S of the pulse at sequential times ti, t 2 , t 3 , . . .
- ADC does not detect the exact starting point t 0 of the pulse (i.e., at zero time) .
- there is an ADC shift error of t ⁇ -to which has a value of between 0 (in the rare event that the first sample coincides exactly with the start of the pulse) and (t 2 -t ⁇ ) .
- Shaping of the pulse is optionally performed prior to sampling of the pulse to create a more Gaussian distribution.
- a processor 22 receives the sampled digital pulse energy values, Si, S 2 , S 3 , S5 from the ADC.
- the processor performs an integration of the samples to obtain an uncorrected value for the total energy of the pulse e.g., Si + S 2 + S 3 + S 4 + S 5 .
- the processor uses a subset of these samples to create a code which correlates with a relationship between the samples in the subset. For example, a, plurality of selected consecutive samples e.g., Si, S 2 , and S 3 is selected to form the subset. The samples in the subset are preferably selected to encompass a portion of • the energy distribution in which the energy is changing rapidly, preferably spanning the peak energy P e .
- the processor 22 accesses a correction algorithm table 24 to obtain a correction factor related to the code. The correction factor is then applied to the integrated value of the energy (e.g., the two are multiplied) to generate a corrected energy value. The effect of ACD shift error on the resulting integrated energies is thereby eliminated or reduced.
- the corrected energy values of all tubes who saw the same event are summed and the sum is sent to an image processor and memory 26, which compares the total energy of each scintillation with the characteristic energy of the radiopharmaceutical to identify valid signals.
- the spatial location of the head, each viewing photomultiplier tube, and the relative amplitude P e of the signals from viewing photomultiplier for each valid event are reconstructured into a three dimensional image.
- a video processor 28 withdraws selected portions of the data from the image memory 26 to generate corresponding human-readable displays on a video monitor 30. Typical displays include reprojections, selected slices or planes, and the like.
- the correction factor is a function of a predicted relationship between the subset of samples (Si, S 2 , S 3 ) of the input pulse, the shift error, and its effect on the uncorrected energy value. This predicted relationship is based on an understanding of the expected shape of the pulse. Knowing the general shape of the signal, these relationships can be determined. As the ADC shift error is varied, the relationship changes in a manner which is calculable and which can be encoded. Additionally, the amount of variation in the energy signal can be estimated, relative to the energy signal at an ADC shift error of zero. A ratio of the estimated energy signal at an ADC shift error of j to an estimated energy . signal at an ADC shift error of 0 (zero) forms a set of correction factors.
- a set of correction factors is determined from a predicted pulse and the corresponding relationship between a selected set of samples is encoded.
- the correction factors are determined from a predicted energy distribution curve of a pulse.
- the predicted pulse is one which is anticipated to be similar in shape to an actual pulse to be integrated.
- the predicted pulse distribution curve may be based on a priori knowledge of the pulse shape.
- a gated integrator is employed with an analog system to create a plot of an actual energy pulse from the nuclear medicine device A or a similar device. The gated integrator allows a pulse to be analyzed with is little or no sample error.
- a proposed plot is created, e.g., a Poisson or Gaussian distribution.
- a set of correction factors is determined from the curve .
- the correction factors are applied to a plurality of real pulses. It is then determined whether an improvement in energy resolution is achieved. This procedure may go through many iterations, each iteration evaluated to determine whether it improves the energy resolution.
- the correction factors and associated values for each of a plurality of shift errors are determined for the predicted pulse, integration period, and total number of samples, as follows: 1.
- These samples may be taken from the raw pulse energies or, as illustrated in FIGURE 3, after smoothing of the curve to achieve a more Gaussian distribution.
- the shift errors are preferably equally spaced in time over the range of possible shift errors. For example, if the integration period p is J nanoseconds (ns) , correction factors for shift errors of 1, 2, 3, . . . J ns are obtained.
- determining correction factors for about 6-25 spaced shift errors is generally sufficient. For example, for sampling at 10 ns intervals, selecting shift errors of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ns is sufficient to provide a substantial improvement in FWHM, i.e., the energy resolution of the nuclear medicine device.
- the integration period p is the same for both the determination of correction factors and for the sampling of an actual pulse. 2.
- the predicted curve is integrated analytically at each of the shift errors to obtain energy values Eo to E p . 3. A subset of N samples is selected from the samples for each integration.
- the selected samples in the subset are the same as those which will later be used for the correction of an actual pulse.
- the samples in the subset may be consecutive or non-consecutive.
- the samples in the subset are preferably in a region of rapidly changing energy, spanning or adjacent to the peak. While all samples in the set could, in theory, be selected (and thus, for the purposes of this application be considered a subset) , it is not necessary to use all samples, and could result in an unmanageable amount of data for the processor to handle. In general, about two to four samples in the subset is generally sufficient. 4.
- Each sample in the subset is normalized to the maximum sample in the integration. For example, the highest energy is given a value of 1 and the samples in the subset are assigned a value of the ratio of the energy of • the sample to the energy of the highest sample. 5.
- the value of each normalized sample is encoded as an M-bit value, where M is preferably between 3 and' 6.
- M is preferably between 3 and' 6.
- the value of M will depend, in part, on the data handling capacity of the processor.
- a value of 4 provides an adequate range of code values while being amenable to current processor capabilities. For example, the values are all multiplied by a common factor (15 in the case of a 4-bit code) , and expressed as an integer. The integer is then converted to binary code. 6.
- the normalized and factor multiplied code values of a subset are 0, 8, and 15, when converted to a binary, twelve bit code, they are expressed as 0000 1000 1111 (i.e., equivalent to the number 143 in the decimal system) . 7.
- the correction factor has a value of 1 at zero shift error. As the shift error varies, the value of the correction factor changes, but not generally in a linear fashion . 8.
- the correction table 24 is generated, as illustrated in Table 1.
- the correction table is completed by assigning correction factors based on the nearest defined code or interpolating correction factors from two or more nearest defined codes.
- the correction table 24 can be fed into the processor, if it has been created separately.
- the correction table 24 can then be applied to actual pulses .
- Application of the correction table to an actual pulse is done on an event by event basis according to the following steps. 1.
- a set of energy samples Si, S 2 , S 3 , . . . S ⁇ 0 of the actual "test" pulse at times ti, t 2 , t 3 , . . . tio is taken.
- samples may be taken from the raw pulse energies or, as illustrated in FIGURE 3, after smoothing of the curve to achieve a more Gaussian distribution.
- the maximum energy value of the set of energy samples from the test pulse is determined.
- a subset of energy samples is selected. The same subset as was used to form the correction table is used, e.g., samples Si, S 2 , S 3 of the test pulse at times ti, t 2 , t 3 . 4.
- the subset sample values are normalized to the maximum value in the set of samples, as described for forming the correction table. 5.
- the subset is encoded as described in steps 5 and 6 above for the correction table to generate a NxM-bit code C j . 6.
- the generated code Cj is matched by the processor to the corresponding correction factor. Where the code is not listed in the correction table, the next lowest numerical code is selected and the corresponding correction factor for that code is read from the table . 7.
- the integrated result from the entire set of samples is multiplied by the correction factor to generate a corrected energy value.
- some of the samples in the set may be corrected to account for the effects of piling up prior to integration. The correction of the energy value in this way increases the resolution possible with the nuclear medicine device A by reducing one potential source of error.
- the technique allows scintillation crystals with higher energy resolution to be used without the ADC shift error overwhelming the resolution benefits gained.
- the correction table is also optionally used to determine the start time of the pulse. Knowing the code value, the corresponding ACD shift can be read from the table. By subtraction of the ACD shift from the actual time at which the first sample was taken, the time at which the pulse commenced is determined. Creating a time stamp for the pulse in this way finds application, for example, in positron emission tomography (PET) systems, to create a time to digital conversion.
- PET positron emission tomography
- Subsets comprising the first three samples Si, S 2 , S 3 are used from each ACD shift error to generate a code.
- the Si, S 2 , S 3 values are normalized to the maximum value at each shift error.
- Each of the normalized values is then multiplied by a common factor: 15 in the present example.
- the codes for the three values are then concatenated to form a 12 bit code.
- the corresponding values for Si and S 2 in the subset are both zero, so the concatenated code is 000000001110, equivalent to a decimal code of 14. This is the code assigned to a shift error of 0.
- Corresponding codes for each of the other shift errors are then determined, as shown in Table 3.
- the correction table is then entered into the processor 22 of the nuclear medicine device A, to be used on actual test pulses which are sampled at the same integration period and number of samples.
- the set of samples from each event is examined to determine the maximum sample.
- Samples in subset Si, S 2 , S 3 are then normalized to the maximum sample and 4-bit codes are generated.
- the 4-bit codes are concatenated to a 12 bit code and this is used to index the correction table.
- the resulting correction factor is multiplied by the integration of the set of samples to form the corrected energy value.
- the value of Si is always zero. Thus, it does not affect the relationship between the three samples in the subset.
- test pulse was analytically integrated in this manner a thousand times using ADC shift errors that are uniformly distributed between 0 and the integration period (10 ns in this case) .
- a partial list of those integrations is shown in Table 5.
- the resulting FWHM for the corrected data is 0.35%. This is a substantial improvement over the 5% FWHM without correction. It will be noticed that the method works even for negative ADC shift errors, i.e., those where the first sample was taken prior to the actual start time of the pulse.
- the invention has been described in terms of correction of energy values in an energy pulse from a gamma photon detector used in nuclear medicine imaging. This includes Single Photon Emission Planar Imaging, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) , and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) systems. It will be appreciated that energy pulses from other sources may be similarly corrected for errors due to difficulties in beginning the sampling a uniform time interval after the start of the pulse.
- the application may also extend generally to any situation where a continuously randomly occurring signal of limited duration and known shape is sampled by a fixed frequency ADC and where the integral of the sampled signal is desired.
- the invention finds wider application in treating data obtained from other sources where a variable is plotted against a determinate such as electrical current vs.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine (AREA)
- Analogue/Digital Conversion (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP05702573A EP1706759A1 (en) | 2004-01-13 | 2005-01-05 | Analog to digital conversion shift error correction |
US10/597,019 US7649175B2 (en) | 2004-01-13 | 2005-01-05 | Analog to digital conversion shift error correction |
JP2006548502A JP2007518095A (en) | 2004-01-13 | 2005-01-05 | Analog-digital conversion shift error correction |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US53607504P | 2004-01-13 | 2004-01-13 | |
US60/536,075 | 2004-01-13 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2005069040A1 true WO2005069040A1 (en) | 2005-07-28 |
Family
ID=34794381
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2005/050043 WO2005069040A1 (en) | 2004-01-13 | 2005-01-05 | Analog to digital conversion shift error correction |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7649175B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1706759A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007518095A (en) |
CN (1) | CN100498377C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005069040A1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2009115956A2 (en) * | 2008-03-19 | 2009-09-24 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Single photon radiation detector |
EP2208088A2 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2010-07-21 | The University of Washington | Data acquisition for positron emission tomography |
CN102216809A (en) * | 2008-08-01 | 2011-10-12 | 普尔斯特有限责任公司 | Pileup rejection in an energy-dispersive radiation spectrometry system |
CN103080774A (en) * | 2010-09-06 | 2013-05-01 | 株式会社岛津制作所 | Radiation detector |
WO2014001926A1 (en) * | 2012-06-27 | 2014-01-03 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Digital positron emission tomography (dpet) energy calibration method |
US9052497B2 (en) | 2011-03-10 | 2015-06-09 | King Abdulaziz City For Science And Technology | Computing imaging data using intensity correlation interferometry |
US9099214B2 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2015-08-04 | King Abdulaziz City For Science And Technology | Controlling microparticles through a light field having controllable intensity and periodicity of maxima thereof |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI366168B (en) * | 2007-05-02 | 2012-06-11 | Novatek Microelectronics Corp | Controlling device of liquid crystal display |
WO2011081892A2 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2011-07-07 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. | Radiation detection system and method of analyzing an electrical pulse output by a radiation detector |
JP5555660B2 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2014-07-23 | 日立Geニュークリア・エナジー株式会社 | Radiation measurement apparatus and method |
US8547257B2 (en) * | 2011-10-26 | 2013-10-01 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Digital error correction in an analog-to-digital converter |
US9176240B2 (en) * | 2012-07-18 | 2015-11-03 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus and method for channel count reduction in solid-state-based positron emission tomography |
JP5930896B2 (en) * | 2012-07-19 | 2016-06-08 | 富士フイルム株式会社 | Radiation detector, radiation detector control program, and radiation detector control method |
US9910162B2 (en) * | 2014-06-12 | 2018-03-06 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Calibrating in single photon emission computed tomography with multi-emission energies |
US9634680B1 (en) * | 2016-10-24 | 2017-04-25 | Keysight Technologies, Inc. | Large-error detection and correction of digital sample sequence from analog-to-digital converter |
EP4098984A1 (en) | 2017-09-19 | 2022-12-07 | Beckman Coulter Inc. | Analog light measuring and photon counting in chemiluminescence measurements |
JP7302737B2 (en) * | 2020-03-16 | 2023-07-04 | 株式会社島津製作所 | List Mode Image Reconstruction Method and Nuclear Medicine Diagnostic Apparatus |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5371362A (en) * | 1990-11-21 | 1994-12-06 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | Nuclear detection process with base potential correction and correspnding apparatus (particularly a gamma-camera) |
EP0706065A2 (en) * | 1994-10-03 | 1996-04-10 | Adac Laboratories | Improved gamma camera system |
EP1104890A2 (en) * | 1994-10-04 | 2001-06-06 | Adac Laboratories | Gamma camera system |
US6252232B1 (en) * | 1998-06-29 | 2001-06-26 | General Electric Company | Digital integrator |
US6291825B1 (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2001-09-18 | Adac Laboratories | Method and apparatus for performing pulse pile-up corrections in a gamma camera system |
EP1148348A2 (en) * | 2000-04-18 | 2001-10-24 | Marconi Medical Systems, Inc. | Nuclear camera |
US20030042423A1 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2003-03-06 | Hugo Bertelsen | Gamma camera with automatic adjustment of the energy spectrum |
US20030116713A1 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2003-06-26 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Event localization and fall-off correction by distance-dependent weighting |
US20030213913A1 (en) * | 2002-01-28 | 2003-11-20 | Cti Pet Systems, Inc. | Continuous sampling and digital integration for pet scintillation |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3015697B2 (en) * | 1995-01-11 | 2000-03-06 | 株式会社東芝 | Radiation energy spectrum measurement device |
EP0880821B1 (en) * | 1995-08-14 | 2003-12-17 | William K. Warburton | Method and apparatus for digitally based high speed x-ray spectrometer |
US5689115A (en) * | 1995-11-24 | 1997-11-18 | Elscint Ltd. | Advanced nuclear medicine system |
US5872363A (en) * | 1997-01-14 | 1999-02-16 | Eg&G Instruments, Inc. | Automatic pole zero adjustment circuit for an ionizing radiation spectroscopy system |
US6470285B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2002-10-22 | Analyser Systems Ag | Method and apparatus for multi-parameter digital pulse pileup rejection |
US6374192B1 (en) * | 1999-09-23 | 2002-04-16 | Constellation Technology Corp. | Apparatus and method for automatic correction of pole-zero error in a spectroscopy system |
US7045802B2 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2006-05-16 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for coincidence imaging digital triggering |
-
2005
- 2005-01-05 JP JP2006548502A patent/JP2007518095A/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-01-05 CN CNB2005800022885A patent/CN100498377C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-05 EP EP05702573A patent/EP1706759A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-01-05 WO PCT/IB2005/050043 patent/WO2005069040A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-01-05 US US10/597,019 patent/US7649175B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5371362A (en) * | 1990-11-21 | 1994-12-06 | Commissariat A L'energie Atomique | Nuclear detection process with base potential correction and correspnding apparatus (particularly a gamma-camera) |
EP0706065A2 (en) * | 1994-10-03 | 1996-04-10 | Adac Laboratories | Improved gamma camera system |
EP1104890A2 (en) * | 1994-10-04 | 2001-06-06 | Adac Laboratories | Gamma camera system |
US6252232B1 (en) * | 1998-06-29 | 2001-06-26 | General Electric Company | Digital integrator |
US6291825B1 (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2001-09-18 | Adac Laboratories | Method and apparatus for performing pulse pile-up corrections in a gamma camera system |
EP1148348A2 (en) * | 2000-04-18 | 2001-10-24 | Marconi Medical Systems, Inc. | Nuclear camera |
US20030116713A1 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2003-06-26 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Event localization and fall-off correction by distance-dependent weighting |
US6603125B1 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2003-08-05 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. | Event localization and fall-off correction by distance-dependent weighting |
US20030042423A1 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2003-03-06 | Hugo Bertelsen | Gamma camera with automatic adjustment of the energy spectrum |
US20030213913A1 (en) * | 2002-01-28 | 2003-11-20 | Cti Pet Systems, Inc. | Continuous sampling and digital integration for pet scintillation |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2208088A2 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2010-07-21 | The University of Washington | Data acquisition for positron emission tomography |
EP2208088A4 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2014-10-29 | Univ Washington | Data acquisition for positron emission tomography |
WO2009115956A2 (en) * | 2008-03-19 | 2009-09-24 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Single photon radiation detector |
WO2009115956A3 (en) * | 2008-03-19 | 2010-06-10 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Single photon radiation detector |
US8723132B2 (en) | 2008-03-19 | 2014-05-13 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Single photon radiation detector |
CN102216809A (en) * | 2008-08-01 | 2011-10-12 | 普尔斯特有限责任公司 | Pileup rejection in an energy-dispersive radiation spectrometry system |
CN103080774A (en) * | 2010-09-06 | 2013-05-01 | 株式会社岛津制作所 | Radiation detector |
CN103080774B (en) * | 2010-09-06 | 2015-04-22 | 株式会社岛津制作所 | Radiation detector |
US9052497B2 (en) | 2011-03-10 | 2015-06-09 | King Abdulaziz City For Science And Technology | Computing imaging data using intensity correlation interferometry |
US9099214B2 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2015-08-04 | King Abdulaziz City For Science And Technology | Controlling microparticles through a light field having controllable intensity and periodicity of maxima thereof |
WO2014001926A1 (en) * | 2012-06-27 | 2014-01-03 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Digital positron emission tomography (dpet) energy calibration method |
US10371836B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2019-08-06 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Digital positron emission tomography (DPET) energy calibration method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7649175B2 (en) | 2010-01-19 |
EP1706759A1 (en) | 2006-10-04 |
US20090020704A1 (en) | 2009-01-22 |
CN100498377C (en) | 2009-06-10 |
CN1910474A (en) | 2007-02-07 |
JP2007518095A (en) | 2007-07-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7649175B2 (en) | Analog to digital conversion shift error correction | |
EP2049917B1 (en) | Time of flight measurements in positron emission tomography | |
JP4160275B2 (en) | Energy measuring method and measuring device | |
Milster et al. | A full-field modular gamma camera | |
US7405405B2 (en) | Method and system for reconstructing an image in a positron emission tomography (PET) system | |
US8080780B2 (en) | Apparatus and associated methodology for improving timing resolution in gamma ray detection | |
US6603125B1 (en) | Event localization and fall-off correction by distance-dependent weighting | |
US6525323B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for improved estimation of characteristics of pulses detected by a nuclear camera | |
US7227149B2 (en) | Method and system for positron emission tomography image reconstruction | |
JPH06258441A (en) | Imaging apparatus of radiation | |
US20060000979A1 (en) | Device and method for digitizing pet radiation events | |
JPWO2007043137A1 (en) | Nuclear medicine diagnostic equipment | |
US5517544A (en) | Afterglow artifact reduction | |
Germano et al. | Investigation of count rate and deadtime characteristics of a high resolution PET system | |
CN107440734B (en) | PET scanning method and device | |
JP6125309B2 (en) | Random coincidence counting estimation method and random coincidence counting estimation apparatus | |
US5371362A (en) | Nuclear detection process with base potential correction and correspnding apparatus (particularly a gamma-camera) | |
WO2001031552A1 (en) | Differential correction method and apparatus | |
US6348692B1 (en) | Device and method for nuclear locating by iterative computing of barycenter, and application to gamma-cameras | |
EP0589467B1 (en) | Nuclear medicine imaging apparatus | |
JP2972936B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for combining scintillation pulse wave height data | |
JP3231219B2 (en) | Liquid scintillation counter | |
US6333503B1 (en) | Device and process for nuclear location by weighted barycenter calculation using parallel-operating detectors, and application to gamma cameras | |
JP2706990B2 (en) | Method for determining radioactivity and liquid scintillation counter | |
Rowe et al. | A full-field modular gamma camera |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2005702573 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2006548502 Country of ref document: JP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 10597019 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200580002288.5 Country of ref document: CN |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: DE |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2005702573 Country of ref document: EP |