US3897618A - Powder metallurgy forging - Google Patents

Powder metallurgy forging Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3897618A
US3897618A US448823A US44882374A US3897618A US 3897618 A US3897618 A US 3897618A US 448823 A US448823 A US 448823A US 44882374 A US44882374 A US 44882374A US 3897618 A US3897618 A US 3897618A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
percent
accordance
alloy steel
copper
molybdenum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US448823A
Inventor
Nathan Lewis Church
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huntington Alloys Corp
Original Assignee
International Nickel Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US00238238A external-priority patent/US3837845A/en
Application filed by International Nickel Co Inc filed Critical International Nickel Co Inc
Priority to US448823A priority Critical patent/US3897618A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3897618A publication Critical patent/US3897618A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0257Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements
    • C22C33/0264Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements the maximum content of each alloying element not exceeding 5%
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/17Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces by forging
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0257Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements
    • C22C33/0278Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5%
    • C22C33/0285Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements with at least one alloying element having a minimum content above 5% with Cr, Co, or Ni having a minimum content higher than 5%
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2998/00Supplementary information concerning processes or compositions relating to powder metallurgy
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S29/00Metal working
    • Y10S29/031Pressing powder with other step

Definitions

  • the subject invention is addressed in the main to powder metallurgy alloy steel forging.
  • powder metallurgy has for some time played a prominent role in the production of a number of useful structural components. This has been particularly evident in respect of products not readily responsive to the more conventional meltingcasting-working type processing, notably the production of intricately shaped products, certain refractory metals and alloys, various dispersion hardened materials, etc.
  • powder metalurgy (P/M) forging an historically old and near forgotten art, has received considerable attention since it offers an economically attractive panacea for virtually eliminating porosity while being amenable to automation.
  • powder forging investigations in the steel area seemingly have been confined to relatively conventional wrought alloy compositions and those previously used in the sintering industry, perhaps because their properties were of a known quantity and thus offered some basis for comparison.
  • Illustrative of this are the higher carbon AlSl 4600 type steels.
  • the present invention is particularly concerned with new steels which by virtue of their chemistry enhance the carrying forth of the WM forging process and/or which by virtue of the forging process are rendered particularly useful. It is to be understood, however, that the instant invention does not exclude steels the composition per se of which might heretofore have been known.
  • the present invention contemplates the forging of powder alloy steels characterized at the temperature of forging by a microstructure in which the alloy steel powders are comprised essentially of the ferrite and austenite phases, these phases mutually coacting such that grain growth is retarded during recrystallization.
  • both the ferrite and austenite are present in a volume percentage of at least about percent with their respective grains not exceeding an average ASTM grain size of about 10, the grain size most advantageously being not greater than about ASTM 12.
  • any one or more of a number of benefits follow, e.g., improved die filling, lower forging loads for a given configuration, less oxidation, the likelihood of decreased die wear, breakage or distortion, lower cost, etc.
  • novel alloy steel compositions are considered particularly beneficial since in addition to manifesting low flow strengths at the prerequisite forging temperature they afford high strength at room temperature: about 0.05 to 0. l5 percent carbon; about 0.8 to 25 percent silicon; up to about 2 percent manganese; about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel; about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum; up to about 2 percent, e.g., 0.8 to 1.75 percent, copper; up to 0.2 percent, e.g., 0.02 to 0.12 percent, columbium', up to 0.15 percent or 0.25 percent, e.g., from 0.01 percent or 0.03 to 0.12 percent, oxygen, the balance being essentially iron and impurities.
  • compositions can be compacted and forged to virtually density at about l400l500F., e.g., 1450F., in contrast to temperatures on the order of 16501 800F. commonly employed in conjunction with current low alloy steel P/M forging practice.
  • the volume percentage of each may be as low as 4 or 5 per cent, in striving for an overall good combination of physical and/or mechanical properties, including flow strength, room temperature strength, etc., at least 10 percent, and most beneficially about 20 percent or more, of each should be present at the forging temperature.
  • a microstructure at that point containing, say, I to 2 percent ferrite, balance austenite would be rather unsuitable since, inter alia, it would exhibit a higher flow strength and there would be insufficient ferrite to prevent undesirable grain growth in the austenite.
  • the grains of these phases prior to forging and at the temperature of forging should be at least about ASTM grain size 10 on average.
  • the grains can be larger, e.g., ASTM 8, but generally at the expense of some mechanical or physi cal property.
  • ASTM 14 or smaller is considered beneficial particularly in respect of various properties. Grain size applies to the forged products as well.
  • powder particles while elemental powders might be blended and sintered to the desired composition, it is deemed much preferable to use prealloyed powder. As will be appreciated by the artisan, this can, for example, be accomplished through atomization in which a liquid melt of desired composition is formed and directly converted to powder by using air, steam, inert gas, vacuum or water to bring about atomization. Water atomization, with or without an inert gaseous stream, is considered appropriate since it is commonly employed and is relatively inexpensive. Prealloying and atomization provide for small particle size and grain size. Moreover, it is preferred that the particles as alloyed be of irregular shape as opposed to, say, spherical. This enhances particle interlocking.
  • the alloy powders should not exceed about 500 microns (including oxide film), preferably being less than 275 microns, an advantageous powder mix being one containing not more than 25 percent of powder less than 40 microns in size, the remainder being up to 225 or 275 microns.
  • the surface of the powder particles is substantially, if not completely, comprised of an oxide film but this is beneficial in accordance herewith. This inhibits grain growth within each particle as well as inhibiting growth across interparticle boundaries. Though up to possibly l percent oxygen can be present in the steels, high oxygen impairs toughness, detracts from compacting and sintering prior to forging and re' tards interparticle welding during forging.
  • the oxygen level should not exceed about 0.25 percent and the oxide film thickness should be less than about 5 or microns.
  • the prealloyed powder particles are thereafter compacted to a preform, the shape of which will often, though not necessarily, depend on the shape of the final product.
  • the prealloyed preform is heated to obtain the desired ferritic-austenitic mierostructure whereupon it is forged to shape and full or nearly full density.
  • an appropriate lubricant can be added to the prealloy powder before pressing to the preform.
  • the prefrom can be heated (sintered) prior to forging in accordance with usual practice.
  • the product may, if desired and depending on composition, be further processed, e.g., machined or aged in the case of age hard enable materials or normalized, carburized, nitrided,
  • EXAMPLE I This example is illustrative of a low alloy steel combining high yield strength and good ductility, it being a specific objective of the invention to provide a steel with a yield strength of at least 90,000 psi together with a tensile ductility of about 10 percent or more.
  • Alloy l was sealed in a mild steel metal can (3 inches inside diameter, 6 inches long, A inch thick walls) and rolled (starting temperature of l650F. to fully dense (no obvious voids) inch thick plate, the mill speed being about 40 ft./min.
  • the can was machined off and specimens for room temperature and hot tensile tests were cut from the plates, aged about 4 hrs. at 1000F. and air cooled.
  • the following tensile properties were obtained at room temperature: yield strength, 125,100 psi; ultimate tensile strength, 125,100 psi; elongation (in 0.55 inch), l 1.5 percent; reduction in area, 30.5 percent; R. hardness, 27.2.
  • the steel was tensile tested at various true strain rates. Flow strength was determined at the various strain rates at 1450F
  • the data include a similarly processed and cur rently used powder forging steel (Ailoy A) nominally containing about 0.5 percent C., .35 percent Mn., 0.01 percent P, 0.02 percent S, 0.45 percent Ni and 0.55 percent Mo.
  • Alloy l of the invention had a markedly lower flow strength at all three strain rates. This should contribute to enhanced die filling and/or result in less die wear and distortion in hot forging. it should be emphasized this was achieved notwithstanding that the yield strength thereof exceeded that of Alloy A by about 36,000 psi, the elongation of the latter being only 7.5 percent. Actually, Alloy 1 had a lower flow stress at 1450F. than Alloy A at l650F. Alloy 1 upon being can hot-rolled, heated at 1450F.
  • Alloy 2 tested as in Example I had a microstructure of about 25 35 percent ferrite the remainder being similar to Alloy 1. Grain size was about ASTM 12-14.
  • Alloy 3 is representative of a steel useful for carburization purposes subsequent to forging. After applying a heat treatment cycle quite similar to that used in carburizing (but without the carbon), the heat treatment consisting of 40 min. at 1700F., oil quenching, plus 3 hrs. at 300F. and air cooling, the following properties were obtained: yield strength (0.2 percent offset), [40,300 psi; ultimate tensile strength 188,600 psi; elongation (in 0.55 inch), l4.5 percent; and a reduction in area of 33 percent. These properties are indicative of those to be expected in the core of a carburized part. Carburizing at l700F. at 0.95 percent carbon potential, then oil quenching and tempering at 300F. for 3 hours resulted in lower ductility in another specimen of Alloy 3. About 15 25 percent ferrite, approximately 2 percent austenite with the balance being the decomposition products of austenite, constituted the microstructure as tested in Example I.
  • FIG. 1 graphically depicts the true stress at a true strain rate of about 0.6 in/in/min at a temperature of l450F. for Alloys 1-9.
  • Curve X is specific to Alloy l and spans the 1400F. I500"F. temperature range.
  • Curve Y is specific to Alloy A. It can be seen that I400F. stress for Alloy l is comparable to that of Alloy A at I600F. despite the fact that the latter had the benefit of the much higher temperature.
  • the present invention minimizes this and yet is capable of delivering yield strengths up to l50,000 psi, if desired: and (c) they do not require carefully controlled atmospheres during sintering and heating for forging to prevent earburization.
  • nickel contributes to strength, hardenability and broadens the temperature range over which stable ferriteaustenite structures can be obtained. But, an excess is unwarranted due to cost and may increase resistance to flow at 1400F. to 1500F. by unnecessarily increasing the amount of austenite. Moreover, nickel is particularly useful in bringing about the proper microstructure particularly in counterbalancing the significant effect of silicon in contributing to the formation of ferrite. While manganese might be used in lieu of nickel, toughness suffers and manganese tends to give an oxi dation problem. It should be held to less than 0.4 percent.
  • the molybdenum need not exceed 1.2 percent. At nickel percentages of l and 3 percent the higher molybdenum levels appear to detract from tensile strength. A range of 0.2 to 0.6 percent is satisfactory. Columbium tends to increase flow stress and preferably should not exceed about 0.l percent. It does contribute to tensile strength and a range of 0.02 to 0.08 percent is of benefit. Silicon, as noted, promotes the formation of ferrite but does lower toughness at the higher levels. It is to advantage that it not exceed 2 percent. As to carbon, while it can be omitted it does confer strength ening qualities and it is preferred that at least 0.02 to 0.04 percent be present.
  • chromium, aluminum, vanadium, titanium, tungsten and cobalt can be present. These constituents need not exceed 2 or 3 percent each, with the aluminum plus titanium preferably not exceeding 05 percent. If employed, attention must be given to their respective ferrite, austenite forming tendencies. Aluminum and tungsten might be used in lieu of or together with lower levels of silicon for the purpose of forming ferrite. However, silicon is much preferred since tungsten is of high density and is expensive and an equivalent percentage of aluminum would tend to impart an oxidation problem.
  • composition 120,000 psi and good tensile ductility (above 7.5 percent) is desired, the following range of composition is considered most advantageous: about 0.05 0.15 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 1.5 percent silicon, about 0.5 to 1.2 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 0.4 percent molybdenum, about 1 to 2 percent copper, up to 0.1 percent columbium and the balance iron. While this composition could be carburized, the usefulness of copper, which imparts age hardening capability, would be largely lost since an aging treatment at 900 l000F. could not be used to advantage on a high carbon martensitic part. Thus, for carburizing, these steels should be copper-free or contain less than about 0.5 percent. For higher yield strengths, e.g., l30,000 psi and above, the silicon, nickel and molybdenum levels should be about 2 to 2.5 percent, 2 to 3 percent and 0.8 to 1.2 percent, respectively.
  • steels of specific composition described herein have been directed to powder metallurgy forging, they are also useful in the production of wrought and cast products such as rod, plate and sheet (mill products) particularly when characterized by a finegrained microstrueture.
  • the microstructures are comprised of ferrite and transformed products of austenite, e.g., martensite, bainite, etc. This will depend on composition and rate of cooling as will be appreciated by the artisan. Also, a small percentage of austenite, say, up to 5 percent, might also be present.
  • the alloy steel powder forged is of a composition consisting of about 0.05 to 0.15 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to about 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, about 0.01 to 0.25 percent oxygen, the balance being essentially iron, the particles forming the powder being of irregular shape and further characterized by a particle size of not greater than about 500 microns, a grain size not less than an average ASTM grain size of about 10 and with their outer surfaces being substantially enveloped by an oxide film not greater than about l0 microns in thickness.
  • alloy steel contains from 0.8 to L5 percent silicon, up to 1 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 1.2 percent nickel and about 0.2 to 0.5 percent molybdenum.
  • the alloy steel contains up to 0.4 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, oxygen present in an amount not greater than 1, up to 3 percent each of cobalt, chromium, tungsten, vanadium, up to 0.5 percent in total of aluminum plus titanium and the balance essentially iron.
  • the alloy steel powder forged is of a composition consisting of about 0.05 to 0. l5 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to about 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, about 0.01 to 0.25 percent oxygen, the balance being essentially iron, the particles forming the powder being of irregular shape and further characterized by a particle size of not greater than about 500 microns, a grain size not less than an average ASTM grain size of about 10 and with their outer surfaces bcing substantially enveloped by an oxide film not greater than about 10 microns in thickness.
  • the alloy steel powder contains up to 0.4 percent carbon, about 08 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, oxygen present in an amount not greater than 1 percent, up to 3 percent each of cobalt, chromium, tungsten, vanadium, up to 05 percent in total of aluminum plus titanium and the balance essentially iron.

Abstract

Steel powder forged at a temperature at which the steel is characterized by a microstructure containing specified percentages of ferrite and austenite contributes to low flow stress and other indicated advantages.

Description

United States Patent 1191 Church *Aug. 5, l975 [54] POWDER METALLURGY FORGING 2.942.334 6/1960 Blue 75/,5 BA
2.967.794 l/l9fil Coxe 75/.5 BA [75] memo Church 3.702.791 11/1972 Freche ct a|....... 29/4205 x 3.720.512 3/1973 Yamaguchi el 111.... 75/221 [-73] Assigneez The lnternafional Nickel p y 3.787.205 l/l974 Church 29/4205 X -i New York NY. FOREIGN PATENTS 0R APPLICATIONS l Notice: The portion of the term of this 1.281.734 7/1972 United Kingdom 9 fizfg jg gg gfg f OTHER PUBLICATIONS Shape. E. et al.. Microduplex Processing of Low [22] 1974 Alloy Steels." Journal of Metals, Jan. 1972. pp. [2]] Appl. No.: 448,823 23-29.
Related US. Application Data w [62] Division of Ser. No. 238,238. March 27, 1972. Pat.
No 3.837845- Ass/stun! ExaminerD. C. Reiley, lll
Attorney, Agent. or Firm-Raymond J. Kenny; Ewan [52] us. (:1. 29/4205; 29/420; 29/010. 31 Macouee" [51] Int. Cl 822i 3/24 [58] Field of Search 29/420, 420.5, DIG. 31; [57] ABSTRACT 7 75/5 1, Steel powder forged at a temperature at which the steel is characterized by a microstructure containing specified percentages of ferrite and austenite contrib- [56] UN]TE ;s E S utes to low flow stress and other indicated advantages. 2.809.89! 10/1957 Ennor et al. 75/220 1 Drawing 8" ml I'll I1 I "II "III Il'll IF- IJ lI-lI-III. (Bill I. i l
ll. 1' III Ylllllll' III I'll-P PATENTEU RUB 5 I975 TEMPERATURE (F)- POWDER METALLURGY FORGING This is a division, of application Ser. No. 238,238, filed Mar. 27, 1972, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,837,845.
The subject invention is addressed in the main to powder metallurgy alloy steel forging.
As the metallurgist is aware, powder metallurgy has for some time played a prominent role in the production of a number of useful structural components. This has been particularly evident in respect of products not readily responsive to the more conventional meltingcasting-working type processing, notably the production of intricately shaped products, certain refractory metals and alloys, various dispersion hardened materials, etc.
The virtues of powder metallurgy notwithstanding, the customary compacting and sintering techniques nonetheless gave rise to an attendant porosity problem, i.e., a problem in which products as finally processed are characterized by voids which in turn detract from various mechanical and/or physical properties, e.g., yield strength, impact energy, etc. This difficulty has quite naturally served to restrict the scope and application of powder technologyv To be sure, a number of techniques have been devised to minimize this porosity drawback. Mention might be made of repressing and/or infiltration as well as conducting both the compacting and sintering operations at high temperature. Such procedures, however, do introduce added cost and/or do not lend themselves to mass production techniques.
In recent years powder metalurgy (P/M) forging, an historically old and near forgotten art, has received considerable attention since it offers an economically attractive panacea for virtually eliminating porosity while being amenable to automation. in large part, at least to date, powder forging investigations in the steel area seemingly have been confined to relatively conventional wrought alloy compositions and those previously used in the sintering industry, perhaps because their properties were of a known quantity and thus offered some basis for comparison. Illustrative of this are the higher carbon AlSl 4600 type steels.
Be that as it may, the present invention is particularly concerned with new steels which by virtue of their chemistry enhance the carrying forth of the WM forging process and/or which by virtue of the forging process are rendered particularly useful. It is to be understood, however, that the instant invention does not exclude steels the composition per se of which might heretofore have been known.
It has now been discovered that improvements involving alloy steel powder forging can be brought about provided the forging operation is controlled such that it is conducted at a temperature at which the steel is characterized by a special structure as herein de scribed.
Generally speaking, the present invention contemplates the forging of powder alloy steels characterized at the temperature of forging by a microstructure in which the alloy steel powders are comprised essentially of the ferrite and austenite phases, these phases mutually coacting such that grain growth is retarded during recrystallization. Advantageously, at the forging temperature both the ferrite and austenite are present in a volume percentage of at least about percent with their respective grains not exceeding an average ASTM grain size of about 10, the grain size most advantageously being not greater than about ASTM 12.
In accordance herewith, upon bringing the steels to the desired microstructural condition and forging at a temperature which does not deleteriously disrupt this condition, it is deemed that any one or more of a number of benefits follow, e.g., improved die filling, lower forging loads for a given configuration, less oxidation, the likelihood of decreased die wear, breakage or distortion, lower cost, etc.
For example, with respect to the low alloy steels herein illustrated, it was found that such steels when in the proper ferritic austenitic condition manifest a markedly lower flow stress (less resistance to flow) than might otherwise be the case. In conjunction there with it was further determined that a significantly lower forging temperature could be used as opposed to the necessity of using one much higher as is the prevailing conventional practice. By reason of such (and other) characteristics, it is considered that, for example, longer die life should obtain and, thus, less downtime as well. And as is known, given the complexities of die configurations coupled with the production problems associated therewith, die life is an important economic component in the equation determinative of whether the manufacture of a given product is likely to be competitive.
The following novel alloy steel compositions are considered particularly beneficial since in addition to manifesting low flow strengths at the prerequisite forging temperature they afford high strength at room temperature: about 0.05 to 0. l5 percent carbon; about 0.8 to 25 percent silicon; up to about 2 percent manganese; about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel; about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum; up to about 2 percent, e.g., 0.8 to 1.75 percent, copper; up to 0.2 percent, e.g., 0.02 to 0.12 percent, columbium', up to 0.15 percent or 0.25 percent, e.g., from 0.01 percent or 0.03 to 0.12 percent, oxygen, the balance being essentially iron and impurities. Such compositions can be compacted and forged to virtually density at about l400l500F., e.g., 1450F., in contrast to temperatures on the order of 16501 800F. commonly employed in conjunction with current low alloy steel P/M forging practice.
In terms of the ferrite and austenite phases, while the volume percentage of each may be as low as 4 or 5 per cent, in striving for an overall good combination of physical and/or mechanical properties, including flow strength, room temperature strength, etc., at least 10 percent, and most beneficially about 20 percent or more, of each should be present at the forging temperature. A microstructure at that point containing, say, I to 2 percent ferrite, balance austenite would be rather unsuitable since, inter alia, it would exhibit a higher flow strength and there would be insufficient ferrite to prevent undesirable grain growth in the austenite. In this connection and as indicated above, the grains of these phases prior to forging and at the temperature of forging should be at least about ASTM grain size 10 on average. The grains can be larger, e.g., ASTM 8, but generally at the expense of some mechanical or physi cal property. ASTM 14 or smaller is considered beneficial particularly in respect of various properties. Grain size applies to the forged products as well.
Concerning the powder particles, while elemental powders might be blended and sintered to the desired composition, it is deemed much preferable to use prealloyed powder. As will be appreciated by the artisan, this can, for example, be accomplished through atomization in which a liquid melt of desired composition is formed and directly converted to powder by using air, steam, inert gas, vacuum or water to bring about atomization. Water atomization, with or without an inert gaseous stream, is considered appropriate since it is commonly employed and is relatively inexpensive. Prealloying and atomization provide for small particle size and grain size. Moreover, it is preferred that the particles as alloyed be of irregular shape as opposed to, say, spherical. This enhances particle interlocking.
The alloy powders should not exceed about 500 microns (including oxide film), preferably being less than 275 microns, an advantageous powder mix being one containing not more than 25 percent of powder less than 40 microns in size, the remainder being up to 225 or 275 microns. The surface of the powder particles is substantially, if not completely, comprised of an oxide film but this is beneficial in accordance herewith. This inhibits grain growth within each particle as well as inhibiting growth across interparticle boundaries. Though up to possibly l percent oxygen can be present in the steels, high oxygen impairs toughness, detracts from compacting and sintering prior to forging and re' tards interparticle welding during forging. The oxygen level should not exceed about 0.25 percent and the oxide film thickness should be less than about 5 or microns.
The prealloyed powder particles are thereafter compacted to a preform, the shape of which will often, though not necessarily, depend on the shape of the final product. Thereupon, the prealloyed preform is heated to obtain the desired ferritic-austenitic mierostructure whereupon it is forged to shape and full or nearly full density. As is often done in practice, an appropriate lubricant can be added to the prealloy powder before pressing to the preform. Also, the prefrom can be heated (sintered) prior to forging in accordance with usual practice. Subsequently, the product may, if desired and depending on composition, be further processed, e.g., machined or aged in the case of age hard enable materials or normalized, carburized, nitrided,
etc.
In order to give those skilled in the art a better appreciation of the advantages of the invention, the following data are given.
Several steel compositions were prepared by atomizing prealloyed melts, the chemistry of which are given in Table I. The atomized powders were made from air induction melted heats using a magnesia crucible. Elec trolytic iron and nickel were first charged and melted and then molybdenum pellets were added. The melts were heated to 2850F. and pig iron (to add carbon for carbon boil) added. Following a 5 minute boil half the silicon (ferro form) was added together with pig iron and, if any, ferromanganese, ferrocolumbium and copper, the remainder of the silicon being added. The melts were tapped at 2850F. atomized with argon at 400 psi under an argon atmosphere and the prealloyed powders were then screened into various mesh sizes. Argon was used since water atomization facilities were unavailable.
contained 0.12X Ti and 0.002% B and 0.65% Mn n.u. not added n.d. not determined While all the alloys above were tested, a few specific examples will be given as illustrative.
EXAMPLE I This example is illustrative of a low alloy steel combining high yield strength and good ductility, it being a specific objective of the invention to provide a steel with a yield strength of at least 90,000 psi together with a tensile ductility of about 10 percent or more.
Using 40 to +100 mesh particles, Alloy l was sealed in a mild steel metal can (3 inches inside diameter, 6 inches long, A inch thick walls) and rolled (starting temperature of l650F. to fully dense (no obvious voids) inch thick plate, the mill speed being about 40 ft./min. The can was machined off and specimens for room temperature and hot tensile tests were cut from the plates, aged about 4 hrs. at 1000F. and air cooled. The following tensile properties were obtained at room temperature: yield strength, 125,100 psi; ultimate tensile strength, 125,100 psi; elongation (in 0.55 inch), l 1.5 percent; reduction in area, 30.5 percent; R. hardness, 27.2.
To simulate expected powder forging behavior, the steel was tensile tested at various true strain rates. Flow strength was determined at the various strain rates at 1450F The data include a similarly processed and cur rently used powder forging steel (Ailoy A) nominally containing about 0.5 percent C., .35 percent Mn., 0.01 percent P, 0.02 percent S, 0.45 percent Ni and 0.55 percent Mo.
True Stress True Strain (psi) in/in/min Alloy 1 Alloy A It will be observed that at the temperature of 1450F.
Alloy l of the invention had a markedly lower flow strength at all three strain rates. This should contribute to enhanced die filling and/or result in less die wear and distortion in hot forging. it should be emphasized this was achieved notwithstanding that the yield strength thereof exceeded that of Alloy A by about 36,000 psi, the elongation of the latter being only 7.5 percent. Actually, Alloy 1 had a lower flow stress at 1450F. than Alloy A at l650F. Alloy 1 upon being can hot-rolled, heated at 1450F. for V2 hour and cooled (approximab ing an air cool) had a fine grained microstructure which by visual observation consisted of about 10 to 20 percent ferrite, less than 2 percent austenite (as determined by X-ray), the balance being the decomposition products of austenite. Grain size was less than ASTM EXAMPLE 11 True Stress True Strain (psi) in/in/min. Alloy 2 Alloy A 5,740 [4,200 0.006 IU,57O H1330 0.064 H4290 26,050 0.528
Alloy 2, tested as in Example I, had a microstructure of about 25 35 percent ferrite the remainder being similar to Alloy 1. Grain size was about ASTM 12-14.
EXAMPLE III Alloy 3 is representative of a steel useful for carburization purposes subsequent to forging. After applying a heat treatment cycle quite similar to that used in carburizing (but without the carbon), the heat treatment consisting of 40 min. at 1700F., oil quenching, plus 3 hrs. at 300F. and air cooling, the following properties were obtained: yield strength (0.2 percent offset), [40,300 psi; ultimate tensile strength 188,600 psi; elongation (in 0.55 inch), l4.5 percent; and a reduction in area of 33 percent. These properties are indicative of those to be expected in the core of a carburized part. Carburizing at l700F. at 0.95 percent carbon potential, then oil quenching and tempering at 300F. for 3 hours resulted in lower ductility in another specimen of Alloy 3. About 15 25 percent ferrite, approximately 2 percent austenite with the balance being the decomposition products of austenite, constituted the microstructure as tested in Example I.
FIG. 1 graphically depicts the true stress at a true strain rate of about 0.6 in/in/min at a temperature of l450F. for Alloys 1-9. Curve X is specific to Alloy l and spans the 1400F. I500"F. temperature range. Curve Y is specific to Alloy A. It can be seen that I400F. stress for Alloy l is comparable to that of Alloy A at I600F. despite the fact that the latter had the benefit of the much higher temperature.
Among other attributes of the above steels in comparison with the high carbon AISI 4600 steels and other proposed high carbon steels, might be listed the follow ing: (a) they do not require heating to the austenite range, e.g., l700F. and above, followed by rapid cooling and tempering, a treatment which leads to un wanted oxidation (absent special processing) and which can contribute to distortion; (b) they do not require 0.4 0.5 percent carbon to provide adequate strength upon hardening. High carbon does render such prior art steels austenitic at the forging temperatures employed and does result in high strength steels,
but, high carbon also can contribute to die wear and distortion. The present invention minimizes this and yet is capable of delivering yield strengths up to l50,000 psi, if desired: and (c) they do not require carefully controlled atmospheres during sintering and heating for forging to prevent earburization.
It perhaps should be also mentioned that conventional pre-conditional treatments are unnecessary as a prerequisite to obtaining a fine grain. in prior art wrought alloy steel processing it is common, for exam ple, to hot work a steel while cooling down to and into a duplex region. It is the pre-conditioning working operation which is largely responsible for a fine grain; otherwise, a coarse grain results. Forging as contemplated herein involves virtually an isothermal operation during which continuous recrystallization takes place. This contributes to maintaining a fine grain structure but without need of preconditioning.
With regard to the roles of the individual constituents of the steels of specific composition given herein, nickel contributes to strength, hardenability and broadens the temperature range over which stable ferriteaustenite structures can be obtained. But, an excess is unwarranted due to cost and may increase resistance to flow at 1400F. to 1500F. by unnecessarily increasing the amount of austenite. Moreover, nickel is particularly useful in bringing about the proper microstructure particularly in counterbalancing the significant effect of silicon in contributing to the formation of ferrite. While manganese might be used in lieu of nickel, toughness suffers and manganese tends to give an oxi dation problem. It should be held to less than 0.4 percent.
The molybdenum need not exceed 1.2 percent. At nickel percentages of l and 3 percent the higher molybdenum levels appear to detract from tensile strength. A range of 0.2 to 0.6 percent is satisfactory. Columbium tends to increase flow stress and preferably should not exceed about 0.l percent. It does contribute to tensile strength and a range of 0.02 to 0.08 percent is of benefit. Silicon, as noted, promotes the formation of ferrite but does lower toughness at the higher levels. It is to advantage that it not exceed 2 percent. As to carbon, while it can be omitted it does confer strength ening qualities and it is preferred that at least 0.02 to 0.04 percent be present. High levels, e.g., 0.4 or 0.5 percent, are unnecessary and although they could be used in a properly balanced structure, at desired forging temperatures could result in virtually completely austenitic steels such that, other factors remaining equal, excessive die wear or distortion could ensue. Copper provides age hardening and strength.
Other elements such as chromium, aluminum, vanadium, titanium, tungsten and cobalt can be present. These constituents need not exceed 2 or 3 percent each, with the aluminum plus titanium preferably not exceeding 05 percent. If employed, attention must be given to their respective ferrite, austenite forming tendencies. Aluminum and tungsten might be used in lieu of or together with lower levels of silicon for the purpose of forming ferrite. However, silicon is much preferred since tungsten is of high density and is expensive and an equivalent percentage of aluminum would tend to impart an oxidation problem.
Where a combination of low flow stress over the temperature range of about l400F. 1500F coupled with a room temperature yield strength of 80,000
120,000 psi and good tensile ductility (above 7.5 percent) is desired, the following range of composition is considered most advantageous: about 0.05 0.15 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 1.5 percent silicon, about 0.5 to 1.2 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 0.4 percent molybdenum, about 1 to 2 percent copper, up to 0.1 percent columbium and the balance iron. While this composition could be carburized, the usefulness of copper, which imparts age hardening capability, would be largely lost since an aging treatment at 900 l000F. could not be used to advantage on a high carbon martensitic part. Thus, for carburizing, these steels should be copper-free or contain less than about 0.5 percent. For higher yield strengths, e.g., l30,000 psi and above, the silicon, nickel and molybdenum levels should be about 2 to 2.5 percent, 2 to 3 percent and 0.8 to 1.2 percent, respectively.
While the steels of specific composition described herein have been directed to powder metallurgy forging, they are also useful in the production of wrought and cast products such as rod, plate and sheet (mill products) particularly when characterized by a finegrained microstrueture.
While the present invention is useful in the production of a variety of forged products it is deemed particularly applicable in forming such components as pinions, connecting rods, gears and side gear blanks.
Although as a practical matter it is unlikely, other phases in addition to ferrite and austenite can be present at the forging temperature in amounts which do not have an adverse affect. Inclusions, e.g., sulphide and silicate inclusions, are not deemed to be phases as con templated herein but can be present in small quantities. Upon cooling from forging, the microstructures are comprised of ferrite and transformed products of austenite, e.g., martensite, bainite, etc. This will depend on composition and rate of cooling as will be appreciated by the artisan. Also, a small percentage of austenite, say, up to 5 percent, might also be present.
Although the present invention has been described in conjunction with preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications and variations may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as those skilled in the art will readily un derstand. For example, in addition to powder forging, the alloy powders can be extruded or otherwise worked. Such modifications and variations are considered to be within the purview and scope of the invention and appended claims.
I claim:
1. in the process of steel powder metallurgy hot forging, the improvement of obtaining a lower flow stress during forging which comprises hot forging low alloy steel powder at a temperature in which the steel powder is characterized by a microstructure consisting essentially of ferrite and austenite, each of these phases being present in a volume percentage of at least 4% and such that the grains of each mutually coact to retard grain growth of the other during recrystallization.
2. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the ferrite and austenite are both present in a volume percentage of at least l percent and their respective grain sizes are at least ASTM l0.
3. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the ferrite and austenite are both present in a volume percentage of at least about 20 percent and their respective grain sizes are ASTM 12 or finer.
4. A process in accordance with claim I in which the ferrite is at least 60 percent by volume.
5. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel powder forged is of a composition consisting of about 0.05 to 0.15 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to about 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, about 0.01 to 0.25 percent oxygen, the balance being essentially iron, the particles forming the powder being of irregular shape and further characterized by a particle size of not greater than about 500 microns, a grain size not less than an average ASTM grain size of about 10 and with their outer surfaces being substantially enveloped by an oxide film not greater than about l0 microns in thickness.
6. A process in accordance with claim 5 in which the oxygen contents of the alloy steel does not exceed about 0.15 percent, the particle size is less than 275 microns and the oxide film is not greater than about 5 microns.
7. A process in accordance with claim 5 in which the alloy composition contains copper in an amount sufficient to impart significant hardening and strength upon being cooled from an aging treatment of 900F.- l 000F.
8. A process in accordance with claim 5 in which the alloy contains at least 1 percent copper, at least 0.0l percent columbium and in which the molybdenum does not exceed 1.2 percent.
9. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel contains from 0.8 to L5 percent silicon, up to 1 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 1.2 percent nickel and about 0.2 to 0.5 percent molybdenum.
10. A process in accordance with claim 9 in which the alloy steel contains from about 1 to 2 percent copper.
1]. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel contains from 2 to 2.5 percent silicon, about 2 to 3 percent nickel, about 0.8 to 1.2 percent molybdenum and about 1 to 2 percent copper.
12. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel contains up to 0.4 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, oxygen present in an amount not greater than 1, up to 3 percent each of cobalt, chromium, tungsten, vanadium, up to 0.5 percent in total of aluminum plus titanium and the balance essentially iron.
13. A process in accordance with claim 2 in which the alloy steel powder forged is of a composition consisting of about 0.05 to 0. l5 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to about 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, about 0.01 to 0.25 percent oxygen, the balance being essentially iron, the particles forming the powder being of irregular shape and further characterized by a particle size of not greater than about 500 microns, a grain size not less than an average ASTM grain size of about 10 and with their outer surfaces bcing substantially enveloped by an oxide film not greater than about 10 microns in thickness.
14. A process in accordance with claim 2 in which the alloy steel powder contains up to 0.4 percent carbon, about 08 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, oxygen present in an amount not greater than 1 percent, up to 3 percent each of cobalt, chromium, tungsten, vanadium, up to 05 percent in total of aluminum plus titanium and the balance essentially iron.

Claims (15)

1. IN THE PROCESS OF STEEL POWDER MELTALLURGY HOT FORGING, THE IMPROVEMENT OF OBTAINING A LOWER FLOW STRESS DURING FORGING WHICH COMPRISES HOT FORGING LOW ALLOY STEEL POWDER AT A TEMPERATURE IN WHICH THE STEEL POWDER IS CHARACTERIZED BY A MICROSTRUCTURE CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF FERRITE AND AUSTENITE, EACH OF THESE PHASES BEING PRESENT IN A VOLUME PERCENTAGE OF
2. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the ferrite and austenite are both present in a volume percentage of at least 10 percent and their respective grain sizes are at least ASTM 10.
3. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the ferrite and austenite are both present in a volume percentage of at least about 20 percent and their respective grain sizes are ASTM 12 or finer.
4. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the ferrite is at least 60 percent by volume.
5. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel powder forged is of a composition consisting of about 0.05 to 0.15 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to about 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, about 0.01 to 0.25 percent oxygen, the balance being essentially iron, the particles forming the powder being of irregular shape and further characterized by a particle size of not greater than about 500 microns, a grain size not less than an average ASTM grain size of about 10 and with their outer surfaces being substantially enveloped by an oxide film not greater than about 10 microns in thickness.
6. A process in accordance with claim 5 in which the oxygen contents of the alloy steel does not exceed about 0.15 percent, the particle size is less than 275 microns and the oxide film is not greater than about 5 microns.
7. A process in accordance with claim 5 in which the alloy composition contains copper in an amount sufficient to impart significant hardening and strength upon being cooled from an aging treatment of 900*F.-1000*F.
8. A process in accordance with claim 5 in which the alloy contains at least 1 percent copper, at least 0.01 percent columbium and in which the molybdenum does not exceed 1.2 percent.
9. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel contains from 0.8 to 1.5 percent silicon, up to 1 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 1.2 percent nickel and about 0.2 to 0.5 percent molybdenum.
10. A process in accordance with claim 9 in which the alloy steel contains from about 1 to 2 percent copper.
11. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel contains from 2 to 2.5 percent silicon, about 2 to 3 percent nickel, about 0.8 to 1.2 percent molybdenum and about 1 to 2 percent copper.
12. A process in accordance with claim 1 in which the alloy steel contains up to 0.4 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, oxygen present in an amount not greater than 1, up to 3 percent each of cobalt, chromium, tungsten, vanadium, up to 0.5 percent in total of aluminum plus titanium and the balance essentially iron.
13. A process in accordance with claim 2 in which the alloy steel powder forged is of a composition consisting of about 0.05 to 0.15 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to about 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, about 0.01 to 0.25 percent oxygen, the balance being essentially iron, the particles forming the powder being of irregular shape and further characterized by a particle size of not greater than about 500 microns, a grain size not less than an average ASTM grain size of about 10 and with their outer surfaces being substantially enveloped by an oxide film not greater than about 10 microns in thickness.
14. A process in accordance with claim 2 in which the alloy steel powder contains up to 0.4 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, oxygen present in an amount not greater than 1, up to 3 percent each of cobalt, chromium, tungsten, vanadium, up to 0.5 percent in total of aluminum plus and the balance essentially iron.
15. A process in accordance with claim 3 in which the alloy steel powder contains up to 0.4 percent carbon, about 0.8 to 2.5 percent silicon, up to 2 percent manganese, about 0.5 to 4 percent nickel, about 0.2 to 2 percent molybdenum, up to 0.2 percent columbium, up to 2 percent copper, oxygen present in an amount not greater than 1 percent, up to 3 percent each of cobalt, chromium, tungsten, vanadium, up to 0.5 percent in total of aluminum plus titanium and the balance essentially iron.
US448823A 1972-03-27 1974-03-07 Powder metallurgy forging Expired - Lifetime US3897618A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US448823A US3897618A (en) 1972-03-27 1974-03-07 Powder metallurgy forging

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00238238A US3837845A (en) 1972-03-27 1972-03-27 Oxide coated ferrous metal powder
US448823A US3897618A (en) 1972-03-27 1974-03-07 Powder metallurgy forging

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3897618A true US3897618A (en) 1975-08-05

Family

ID=26931456

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US448823A Expired - Lifetime US3897618A (en) 1972-03-27 1974-03-07 Powder metallurgy forging

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3897618A (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0042654A1 (en) * 1978-10-23 1981-12-30 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Powder metal composition
US4435483A (en) 1981-02-06 1984-03-06 Nyby Uddeholm Powder Aktiebolag Loose sintering of spherical ferritic-austenitic stainless steel powder and porous body
US4609526A (en) * 1984-05-14 1986-09-02 Crucible Materials Corporation Method for compacting alloy powder
US4762679A (en) * 1987-07-06 1988-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Billet conditioning technique for manufacturing powder metallurgy preforms
US4773947A (en) * 1983-08-02 1988-09-27 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Manufacturing process for high temperature carburized case harden steel
US5199971A (en) * 1988-12-19 1993-04-06 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Parts for use in rotary gear pump
US5881356A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-03-09 Bt-Magnettechnologie Gmbh Method for the case-hardening of higher-molybdenum-alloy sintered steels
US6013225A (en) * 1996-10-15 2000-01-11 Zenith Sintered Products, Inc. Surface densification of machine components made by powder metallurgy
EP1068915A1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2001-01-17 Japan as represented by Director General of National Research Institute for Metals High-strength metal solidified material and acid steel and manufacturing methods thereof
EP1344840A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2003-09-17 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Sintered sprocket
CN111902556A (en) * 2018-03-26 2020-11-06 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
KR20200128158A (en) * 2018-03-26 2020-11-11 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2809891A (en) * 1954-10-12 1957-10-15 Aluminum Co Of America Method of making articles from aluminous metal powder
US2942334A (en) * 1957-01-18 1960-06-28 Chrysler Corp Powdered ferrous metals and articles and methods of making the same
US2967794A (en) * 1956-09-12 1961-01-10 Handy & Harman Fine particle magnets
US3702791A (en) * 1970-04-20 1972-11-14 Nasa Method of forming superalloys
US3720512A (en) * 1970-05-06 1973-03-13 Mitsubishi Metal Mining Co Ltd Closed die forging method of making high density ferrous sintered alloys
US3787205A (en) * 1972-05-30 1974-01-22 Int Nickel Co Forging metal powders

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2809891A (en) * 1954-10-12 1957-10-15 Aluminum Co Of America Method of making articles from aluminous metal powder
US2967794A (en) * 1956-09-12 1961-01-10 Handy & Harman Fine particle magnets
US2942334A (en) * 1957-01-18 1960-06-28 Chrysler Corp Powdered ferrous metals and articles and methods of making the same
US3702791A (en) * 1970-04-20 1972-11-14 Nasa Method of forming superalloys
US3720512A (en) * 1970-05-06 1973-03-13 Mitsubishi Metal Mining Co Ltd Closed die forging method of making high density ferrous sintered alloys
US3787205A (en) * 1972-05-30 1974-01-22 Int Nickel Co Forging metal powders

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0042654A1 (en) * 1978-10-23 1981-12-30 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Powder metal composition
US4435483A (en) 1981-02-06 1984-03-06 Nyby Uddeholm Powder Aktiebolag Loose sintering of spherical ferritic-austenitic stainless steel powder and porous body
US4773947A (en) * 1983-08-02 1988-09-27 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Manufacturing process for high temperature carburized case harden steel
US4609526A (en) * 1984-05-14 1986-09-02 Crucible Materials Corporation Method for compacting alloy powder
US4762679A (en) * 1987-07-06 1988-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Billet conditioning technique for manufacturing powder metallurgy preforms
US5199971A (en) * 1988-12-19 1993-04-06 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Parts for use in rotary gear pump
US5881356A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-03-09 Bt-Magnettechnologie Gmbh Method for the case-hardening of higher-molybdenum-alloy sintered steels
US6013225A (en) * 1996-10-15 2000-01-11 Zenith Sintered Products, Inc. Surface densification of machine components made by powder metallurgy
EP1068915A1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2001-01-17 Japan as represented by Director General of National Research Institute for Metals High-strength metal solidified material and acid steel and manufacturing methods thereof
EP1068915A4 (en) * 1998-03-26 2004-12-01 Jp Nat Res Inst For Metals High-strength metal solidified material and acid steel and manufacturing methods thereof
EP1344840A1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2003-09-17 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Sintered sprocket
EP1344840A4 (en) * 2000-10-25 2004-08-25 Honda Motor Co Ltd Sintered sprocket
CN111902556A (en) * 2018-03-26 2020-11-06 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
KR20200128157A (en) * 2018-03-26 2020-11-11 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
KR20200128158A (en) * 2018-03-26 2020-11-11 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
EP3778963A4 (en) * 2018-03-26 2021-02-17 JFE Steel Corporation Powder metallurgy alloy steel powder and powder metallurgy iron-based powder mixture
CN111902556B (en) * 2018-03-26 2021-11-19 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
US11236411B2 (en) 2018-03-26 2022-02-01 Jfe Steel Corporation Alloyed steel powder for powder metallurgy and iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6093405B2 (en) Nitrogen-containing low nickel sintered stainless steel
Davis Alloying: understanding the basics
KR820002180B1 (en) Powder-metallurgy steel article with high vanadium-carbide content
US5856625A (en) Stainless steel powders and articles produced therefrom by powder metallurgy
US5656787A (en) Hi-density sintered alloy
US2828202A (en) Titanium tool steel
US3811961A (en) Boridized steel-bonded carbides
US4121927A (en) Method of producing high carbon hard alloys
US3864809A (en) Process of producing by powder metallurgy techniques a ferritic hot forging of low flow stress
US3897618A (en) Powder metallurgy forging
US5552109A (en) Hi-density sintered alloy and spheroidization method for pre-alloyed powders
US2301805A (en) High-carbon ferrous-base composition for producing articles by powder metallurgy
US3183127A (en) Heat treatable tool steel of high carbide content
US3787205A (en) Forging metal powders
JP4201830B2 (en) Iron-based powder containing chromium, molybdenum and manganese and method for producing sintered body
US3837845A (en) Oxide coated ferrous metal powder
US4255193A (en) Method of manufacture of sintered pressed pieces of iron reinforced by iron oxides
US4049429A (en) Ferritic alloys of low flow stress for P/M forgings
US3655365A (en) High speed tool alloys and process
US5482531A (en) Titanium-free, nickel-containing maraging steel die block article and method of manufacture
Cundill et al. Mechanical properties of sinter/forged low-alloy steels
GB1573052A (en) Method of producing high carbon hard alloys
US4731117A (en) Nickel-base powder metallurgy alloy
GB2298869A (en) Stainless steel powders and articles produced therefrom by powder metallurgy
US3715792A (en) Powder metallurgy sintered corrosion and wear resistant high chromium refractory carbide alloy