US20180180494A1 - High Sensitivity Silicon Piezoresistor Force Sensor - Google Patents
High Sensitivity Silicon Piezoresistor Force Sensor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180180494A1 US20180180494A1 US15/388,483 US201615388483A US2018180494A1 US 20180180494 A1 US20180180494 A1 US 20180180494A1 US 201615388483 A US201615388483 A US 201615388483A US 2018180494 A1 US2018180494 A1 US 2018180494A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- slab
- sense
- elements
- force
- die
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L1/00—Measuring force or stress, in general
- G01L1/18—Measuring force or stress, in general using properties of piezo-resistive materials, i.e. materials of which the ohmic resistance varies according to changes in magnitude or direction of force applied to the material
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L1/00—Measuring force or stress, in general
- G01L1/20—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress
- G01L1/22—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress using resistance strain gauges
- G01L1/2206—Special supports with preselected places to mount the resistance strain gauges; Mounting of supports
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L1/00—Measuring force or stress, in general
- G01L1/20—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress
- G01L1/22—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress using resistance strain gauges
- G01L1/2287—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress using resistance strain gauges constructional details of the strain gauges
- G01L1/2293—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress using resistance strain gauges constructional details of the strain gauges of the semi-conductor type
Definitions
- Force sensors can be used to measure a force or a pressure.
- Various designs can be used and can rely on a displacement of a component or a stress-field applied to a stress-sensitive element or component to measure the presence of a force and/or an amount of the force present on the sensor.
- Force sensors can experience forces above their designed operating ranges (e.g., overforce situations), which can result in damage to the force sensors.
- a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is at least 2/1; one or more bond pads supported by a first side of the chip, each of the one or more bond pads electrically coupled to at least one of the one or more sense elements; a structural frame disposed on the first side of the chip, wherein the structural frame is disposed at least partially about the slab; and one or more electrical contacts extending through the structural frame, wherein the one or more electrical contacts are electrically coupled to the one or more bond pads.
- a method of sensing a force using a sense die may comprise providing a sense die comprising a chip having a slab formed thereon; applying a force to the slab of the sense die; and determining the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via one or more sense elements attached to the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1.
- a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab, and configured to apply a force to the slab; and one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1, and wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the actuation element and the slab.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic cross-section of a sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
- FIGS. 2A-2B illustrate another cross-section of a sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
- FIGS. 3A-3C illustrate a stress map of a surface of a sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
- FIGS. 4A-4B illustrate the relationships between load on the sense die, location of the sense elements, and sensor output according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the relationship between contact radius and load on the sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
- FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate cross sectional views of a sense die that illustrate the relationship between contact radius and load on the sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
- component or feature may,” “can,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “preferably,” “possibly,” “typically,” “optionally,” “for example,” “often,” or “might” (or other such language) be included or have a characteristic, that particular component or feature is not required to be included or to have the characteristic. Such component or feature may be optionally included in some embodiments, or it may be excluded.
- Embodiments of the disclosure include systems and methods for improving the signal output from a sense die configured to detect force applied to the sense die.
- Embodiments of the disclosure may comprise piezoresistive elements unusually close to the center of the die, where the load-bearing actuation element makes contact to the die face. Through stress mapping of the surface of the sense die, it was discovered that there is a small localized area of very high signal-generating stress near the actuation element. When piezoresistive elements are implanted in this location, die sensitivities can be up to 100 times greater or higher than traditional locations for the piezoresistive elements.
- a slab die may have the advantage of significantly higher proof loads (i.e. higher overload protection), while at the same time reducing cost because it is no longer necessity to complete the anisotropic etch. Additionally, this method of positioning the piezoresistive elements may allow for a smaller die to be used, which may lower costs as well.
- Typical uses of piezoresistive elements position the piezoresistive elements at or near the center edge of a formed diaphragm.
- Typical force sensors may use a stress field that is relatively distant from the contact point between the actuation element and the sense die (or the load point).
- Embodiments of the disclosure may use a localized stress field very near the load point. This localized stress field may be much higher in magnitude than the typically used distant stress field, leading to higher die output for a given load.
- a technical benefit of the described method of positioning the piezoresistive elements may include much higher die output for a given load. Additionally, since a full wafer thickness may be used, no specifically-defined diaphragm is required, and therefore the proof load is significantly higher. Also, the costs of the sense die may be reduced because no etch steps are required to form a diaphragm, no specially patterned adhesive is required under the die (just a continuous layer rather than a “picture frame” pattern with an unsupported central area), and a smaller die can be used (costs are proportional to the size of a die, where even a 30% reduction is die side length may translates to a cost reduction of up to 50%). The same general design and orientation of the piezoresistive elements may be similar to a traditional pressure or force sensor, but the location of the piezoresistive elements may be adjusted.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a typical sense die 100 according to some embodiments that can be used to detect a force, including a pressure.
- the sense die 100 can include a diaphragm or slab 102 , and a substrate 140 located near a first surface 103 of the sensor.
- the slab 102 may comprise one or more sense elements 120 , 124 connected to one or more electrical contacts 106 .
- the sense elements 120 , 124 may be located on a second surface 105 of the slab 102 .
- a sidewall 108 can be attached to a portion of a second surface 105 of the sensor.
- An actuation element 110 can be present within a cavity 112 formed by the sidewall 108 and can serve to transfer a force to the second surface 105 of the slab 102 .
- the slab 102 may comprise a solid slab.
- the slab 102 may be attached to the substrate 140 via an adhesive 142 .
- the sense die 100 may be formed from silicon or other semiconductor material. While the sense die 100 is described with respect to being formed from silicon, it should be understood that other materials can also be used. In an embodiment, the sense die 100 can begin as a silicon chip and be processed to form the sense die 100 , as described in more detail herein. In some embodiments, the silicon chip may include a recess formed on the first surface 103 to form a diaphragm 102 . A variety of micro-fabrication techniques including, but not limited to, lithography techniques, wet etching techniques, and dry etching techniques may be used to form the recess.
- the diaphragm 102 may be fabricated on the sense die 100 by back-side etching of a silicon die (e.g., with a KOH etching technique, deep reactive ion etching, or other etching technique). However, it is contemplated that any suitable process may be used, as desired.
- the diaphragm 102 may have a height or thickness that is less than the thickness of the edges of the sense die 100 , thereby forming the diaphragm 102 .
- the diaphragm or slab 102 is configured to flex in response (or at least have some elastic response) to an applied force, creating stress fields that extend through the one or more sense elements 120 and 124 , thereby allowing the applied force to be determined.
- the elastic response of the slab 102 may be microscopic in nature.
- the applied force can be present in the form of a differential pressure across the slab 102 .
- an actuation element 110 may be in contact with the second surface 105 of the slab 102 to transfer a force to the slab 102 .
- the actuation element 110 can comprise a mechanical coupling between an exterior force and the slab 102 .
- the actuation element 110 can comprise a mechanical actuation element configured to transfer a force to the slab 102 .
- the actuation element 110 may include a spherical object (such as the sphere shown in FIG. 1 ), a pin, an extender, a button, any other activation device, and/or a combination thereof. It may be appreciated that other types of actuators may be utilized, such as, for example, slidable mounted plungers or shafts, point of contact type components other than spherical objects, and/or “T”-shaped transfer mechanisms, in accordance with alternative embodiments. If desired, only a portion of an outer surface of the actuation element 110 may be spherical in shape or take on a particular shape.
- the actuation element 110 may be made of any material.
- the actuation element 110 may be formed from stainless steel, a polymer, a ceramic, jeweled, another suitable metal, and/or another suitable material.
- the actuation element 110 may include a stainless steel ball bearing. It is contemplated, however, that other generally spherical and other shaped elements may be used as or as part of the actuation element 110 , if desired, including polymer based objects.
- the deflection resulting from a force applied on the diaphragm through an applied pressure and/or through the actuation element 110 may generally result in the deflection of the slab 102 .
- the slab 102 may be configured to detect a deflection that is predominantly in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the slab 102 .
- the sense die 100 is configured to measure a uniaxial force that is provided normal to the plane of sense die 100 .
- the sense die 100 may have one or more sensing elements 120 and 124 disposed on or adjacent to the slab 102 , such as piezoresistive sensing elements or components formed using suitable fabrication or printing techniques. For example, starting with the silicon sense die 100 , standard pattern, implant, diffusion, and/or metal interconnect processes may be used to form one or more elements 120 and 124 on a surface 103 , 105 of the sense die 100 . For example, one or more piezoresistive sense elements 120 and 124 may be formed on the slab 102 . The piezoresistive sense elements 120 and 124 may be configured to have an electrical resistance that varies according to an applied mechanical stress (e.g. deflection of the slab 102 ). The piezoresistive elements 120 and 124 can thus be used to convert the applied force or pressure into an electrical signal. In some instances, the piezoresistive components may include a silicon piezoresistive material; however, other non-silicon materials may be used.
- One or more bond pads 130 and 134 may be formed on the upper surface 105 of the sense die 100 and adjacent to the slab 102 .
- Metal, diffusion, or other interconnects may be provided to interconnect the one or more piezoresistive sensor elements 120 and 124 and the one or more bond pads 130 and 134 . As shown in FIG. 1 , one or more of the piezoresistive sensor elements 120 and 124 can be electrically coupled to one or more of the bond pads 130 and 134 .
- the sense elements 120 and 124 may comprise a plurality of sense elements, for example two sense elements, three sense elements, four sense elements, or more.
- the bond pads 130 and 134 may comprise a plurality of bond pads, for example two bond pads, three bond pads, four bond pads, or more.
- FIG. 1 indicates typical locations for the piezoresistive elements 120 and 124 . These locations may be selected to be within an area of the slab 102 , where the slab 102 experiences forces from the contact with the actuation element 110 .
- Embodiments of the disclosure describe a sense die 100 where the piezoresistive elements are located much closer to the contact area between the actuation element 110 and the slab 102 (or diaphragm), than a typical sense die.
- FIGS. 2A-2C illustrate cross-sectional views of an actuation element 210 (which may comprise a ball bearing) and a slab 202 of a sense die 200 .
- the actuation element 210 may comprise a spheroid shape.
- the actuation element 210 may contact and apply pressure to a contact area 220 between the actuation element 210 and the slab 202 .
- the slab 202 may comprise a first surface 203 , which may be attached to a structural frame 204 .
- the slab 202 may comprise a second surface 205 configured to contact the actuation element 210 .
- the actuation element 210 may comprise stainless steel. In some embodiments, the actuation element 210 may comprise glass, sapphire, or another similar material. In some embodiments, the total length of the sense die 200 may be reduced by approximately 20% to 30% compared to a typical sense die 200 .
- FIG. 2A illustrates a sense die 200 comprising a slab 202 attached to a substrate 240 via an adhesive layer 242 .
- the slab 202 may comprise sense elements 250 located on the surface 205 of the slab 202 .
- the distance between the sense elements 250 is indicated by distance 260 .
- the width of the slab 202 is indicated by width 262 .
- the slab 202 may comprise an etched cavity 230 on the first surface 203 of the slab 202 .
- the slab 202 may not be etched.
- the slab 202 may not comprise any thinned areas or cavities on either surface 203 and 205 of the slab 202 .
- FIG. 2C illustrates a double cross-section of the slab 202 , illustrating a quarter view of the slab 202 and actuation element 210 .
- the slab 202 may comprise four sense element 250 located about the contact point 220 between the slab 202 and the actuation element 210 .
- the sense elements 250 may be closer together than in a typical sense die. In some embodiments, the distance 260 between the sense elements 250 may be centered on the contact point 220 between the actuation element 210 and the slab 202 .
- the ratio between the width 262 of the slab 202 and the distance 260 between the sense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 3/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between the width 262 of the slab 202 and the distance 260 between the sense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 5/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between the width 262 of the slab 202 and the distance 260 between the sense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 7/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between the width 262 of the slab 202 and the distance 260 between the sense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 11/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between the width 262 of the slab 202 and the distance 260 between the sense elements 250 may be less than approximately 20/1. In some embodiments, the sense elements 250 may not touch one another.
- the location of the sense elements 250 may be chosen based on the anticipated stress at a particular location on the surface 205 of the slab 202 .
- a stress map 300 is shown illustrating the stress fields resulting from a force applied to the second surface 205 of the slab 202 by the actuation element 210 .
- the slab 202 and actuation element 210 are shown above.
- the stress map 300 may comprise a plot of the difference between stress in the x direction (Sx) and stress in the y direction (Sy) or Sx ⁇ Sy. The largest values, both positive and negative, may indicate the locations on the surface 205 of the slab where the stress is the highest in one direction. These areas may be called “hotspots” or high stress areas.
- the stress field generated on the surface 205 at the hotspots 302 and 304 may be significantly greater than the stress field generated at other areas of the surface 205 .
- the hotspots 302 and 304 may create an ideal location for a piezoresistive element to be placed on the surface 205 , where the piezoresistive element may detect the stress created at that location.
- the hotspots 302 and 304 may be located closer to the contact area 220 than typical locations for piezoresistive elements.
- the stress map 300 shown in FIGS. 3A-3B may be cross-sectioned to show a quarter of the total surface 205 of the slab 202 , wherein the corner 310 illustrates the center of the contact area 220 (as shown above) between the actuation element and the slab.
- a full stress map 300 may comprise up to four hotspots 302 , 304 , 306 , and 308 surrounding the center 310 of the contact area 220 between the actuation element and the slab.
- the typical locations for piezoresistive elements are indicated by “x” 322 , 324 , 326 , and 328 .
- the piezoresistive elements (such as 120 and 124 described above) may be placed within one of the hotspots 302 , 304 , 306 , and 308 indicated by the stress map 300 . While the stress at the typical locations 322 , 324 , 326 , and 328 for the piezoresistive elements may be within an area that will detect stress on the slab surface 205 , the hotspots 302 , 304 , 306 , and 308 may produce significantly higher outputs, thereby improving the accuracy and sensitivity of the piezoresistive elements.
- Sx ⁇ Sy stress at the typical locations 322 , 324 , 326 , and 328 for piezoresistive elements may be approximately ⁇ 70 megapascal (MPa), and stress in the hotspots 302 , 304 , 306 , and 308 may be approximately ⁇ 1400 MPa (approximately 20 times higher than the typical stress readings).
- the increased stress reading may produce an increased signal output for the piezoresistive elements.
- the Sx ⁇ Sy stress peak measured on the surface 205 of the slab moves outward radially from the contact area 220 as the load on the surface 205 is increased.
- the hotspots may change in location based on the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via the actuation element. For example, the distance from the center 310 at which the hotspot occurs may increase as the magnitude of the force increases. This concept may be illustrated by the following graphs and figures.
- Piezoresistive elements located at different positions with respect to the center of the surface 205 were evaluated at a range of forces applied to the surface 205 .
- the results are show in the graphs of FIGS. 4A-4B .
- the locations ranged from approximately 39 microns ( ⁇ m) from the center to approximately 310 ⁇ m from the center.
- the sensor output in millivolts (mV) is plotted against the load applied to the slab in Newtons (N).
- N the load applied to the slab in Newtons
- Each line indicates a different location for the piezoresistive elements, measured in radians from the center of the contact area between the slab and the actuation element.
- the traditional location of the piezoresistive elements is also plotted, for reference, wherein the distance from the center is higher in a traditional sensor.
- the sensor output builds as the load increases until the Sx ⁇ Sy peak passes through the location of the piezoresistive element, and then then the output drops off. Sensor function may be optimal before the peak in the lines.
- the graph illustrates the results show in FIG. 4A that have been normalized using a standard of the traditional sensor location output (at a distance of 890 ⁇ m), where the results for each of the locations have been divided by the standard.
- the graph shown in FIG. 4B illustrates that the sensor output may be relatively constant before the peak (for that location), and may be usable for determining stress on the slab at that location.
- an optimal location for the piezoresistive elements may be chosen. For example, if the expected load is less than 5 N, the location for the piezoresistive elements may be chosen to be at a distance of between approximately 30 to 80 ⁇ m from the center. As another example, if the expected load is between 10 and 20 N, the location for the piezoresistive elements may be chosen to be at a distance of between approximately 100 to 120 ⁇ m from the center.
- an additional graph illustrates the approximate relationship between the contact radius between the flat surface of the slab and the curved surface of the spherical actuation element, and the estimated load that will be applied to the sense die.
- FIG. 5 is a plot of the radius of that circle of contact vs. force applied by the actuation element.
- the actuation element may contact one or more of the sense elements during the use life of the sense die.
- the signal from a piezoresistive element located at the typical location of 890 ⁇ m from the center may produce approximately 3.6 mV.
- the signal may rise to approximately 27.3 mV (approximately 7.6 times the typical output).
- the signal may rise to approximately 87.2 mV (approximately 246 times the typical output).
- the closer a piezoresistive element is location to the center i.e. the smaller the distance from the center
- the closest location for the piezoresistive element was approximately 150 ⁇ m from the center.
- the sensor output may be approximately 8.8 mV.
- piezoresistive elements positioned closer to the center of the slab may allow for improved signal output for lower force ranges.
- FIGS. 6A-6B further illustrate the relationship between the contact radius, i.e. the distance from the center 310 of the slab 202 at which the piezoresistive element is located, and the estimated load that will be applied to the sense die.
- the force applied to the actuation element 210 is approximately 25 N.
- the contact radius to the first hotspot 302 is indicated by distance 602 .
- the contact radius to the second hotspot 304 is indicated by distance 604 .
- the force applied to the actuation element 210 is increased to approximately 100 N.
- the distance 602 to the first hotspot 302 has increased accordingly.
- the distance 604 to the second hotspot 304 has increased accordingly. Therefore, the optimal location for the piezoresistive elements to be located at or near a hotspot 302 and 304 depends on the amount of force that is anticipated to be applied to the slab 202 .
- the sensitivity ratio (when compared to a typical sensor) may be greater than approximately 1/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 5/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 10/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 20/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 25/1.
- a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is at least 2/1; one or more bond pads supported by a first side of the chip, each of the one or more bond pads electrically coupled to at least one of the one or more sense elements; a structural frame disposed on the first side of the chip, wherein the structural frame is disposed at least partially about the slab; and one or more electrical contacts extending through the structural frame, wherein the one or more electrical contacts are electrically coupled to the one or more bond pads.
- a second embodiment can include the sense die of the first embodiment, wherein the sense elements comprise piezoresistive elements.
- a third embodiment can include the sense die of the first or second embodiments, further comprising an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab.
- a fourth embodiment can include the sense die of the third embodiment, wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the slab and the actuation element.
- a fifth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to fourth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
- a sixth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to fifth embodiments, the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 10/1.
- a seventh embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to sixth embodiments, wherein the locations of the one or more sense elements are determined by mapping the force on the slab applied by the actuation element, and identifying one or more hotspots on the slab where the force is higher than the surrounding areas.
- An eighth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to seventh embodiments, wherein the locations of the one or more sense elements are determined by determining a correlation between the estimated force that will be applied to the slab and the desired location for sense elements on the slab.
- a method of sensing a force using a sense die may comprise providing a sense die comprising a chip having a slab formed thereon; applying a force to the slab of the sense die; and determining the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via one or more sense elements attached to the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1.
- a tenth embodiment can include the method of the ninth embodiment, further comprising determining a correlation between the estimated force that will be applied to the slab and the desired location for sense elements on the slab.
- An eleventh embodiment can include the method of the tenth embodiment, wherein as the estimated force increases, the desired location for the sense elements increases in distance from the center of the slab.
- a twelfth embodiment can include the method in of any of the ninth to eleventh embodiments, wherein applying a force comprises contacting the slab with an actuation element.
- a thirteenth embodiment can include the method of the twelfth embodiment, wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the slab and the actuation element.
- a fourteenth embodiment can include the method of any of the ninth to thirteenth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
- a fifteenth embodiment can include the method of the any of the ninth to fourteenth embodiments, further comprising mapping the force on the slab applied by the actuation element; identifying one or more hotspots on the slab where the force is higher than the surrounding areas; and determining the location for a piezoresistive element to be located on the slab based on the location of the hotspots.
- a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab, and configured to apply a force to the slab; and one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1, and wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the actuation element and the slab.
- a seventeenth embodiment can include the sense die of the sixteenth embodiment, wherein the sense elements comprise piezoresistive elements.
- An eighteenth embodiment can include the sense die of the sixteenth or seventeenth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
- a nineteenth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the sixteenth to eighteenth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is less than approximately 20/1.
- a twentieth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the sixteenth to nineteenth embodiments, wherein the sense elements are located at or near hotspots identified on the surface of the slab by force mapping.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Pressure Sensors (AREA)
- Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)
Abstract
Embodiments relate to systems and methods for sensing a force using a sense die. A sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab, and configured to apply a force to the slab; and one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is at least 2/1. A method may comprise providing a sense die comprising a chip having a slab formed thereon; applying a force to the slab of the sense die; and determining the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via one or more sense elements attached to the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the sense elements is greater than 2/1.
Description
- Not applicable.
- Not applicable.
- Not applicable.
- In many industrial areas it is necessary to accurately measure the magnitude of a force. Force sensors can be used to measure a force or a pressure. Various designs can be used and can rely on a displacement of a component or a stress-field applied to a stress-sensitive element or component to measure the presence of a force and/or an amount of the force present on the sensor. Force sensors can experience forces above their designed operating ranges (e.g., overforce situations), which can result in damage to the force sensors.
- In an embodiment, a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is at least 2/1; one or more bond pads supported by a first side of the chip, each of the one or more bond pads electrically coupled to at least one of the one or more sense elements; a structural frame disposed on the first side of the chip, wherein the structural frame is disposed at least partially about the slab; and one or more electrical contacts extending through the structural frame, wherein the one or more electrical contacts are electrically coupled to the one or more bond pads.
- In an embodiment, a method of sensing a force using a sense die may comprise providing a sense die comprising a chip having a slab formed thereon; applying a force to the slab of the sense die; and determining the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via one or more sense elements attached to the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1.
- In an embodiment, a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab, and configured to apply a force to the slab; and one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1, and wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the actuation element and the slab.
- For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic cross-section of a sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure. -
FIGS. 2A-2B illustrate another cross-section of a sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure. -
FIGS. 3A-3C illustrate a stress map of a surface of a sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure. -
FIGS. 4A-4B illustrate the relationships between load on the sense die, location of the sense elements, and sensor output according to an embodiment of the disclosure. -
FIG. 5 illustrates the relationship between contact radius and load on the sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure. -
FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate cross sectional views of a sense die that illustrate the relationship between contact radius and load on the sense die according to an embodiment of the disclosure. - It should be understood at the outset that although illustrative implementations of one or more embodiments are illustrated below, the disclosed systems and methods may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not yet in existence. The disclosure should in no way be limited to the illustrative implementations, drawings, and techniques illustrated below, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
- The following brief definition of terms shall apply throughout the application:
- The term “comprising” means including but not limited to, and should be interpreted in the manner it is typically used in the patent context;
- The phrases “in one embodiment,” “according to one embodiment,” and the like generally mean that the particular feature, structure, or characteristic following the phrase may be included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, and may be included in more than one embodiment of the present invention (importantly, such phrases do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment);
- If the specification describes something as “exemplary” or an “example,” it should be understood that refers to a non-exclusive example;
- The terms “about” or “approximately” or the like, when used with a number, may mean that specific number, or alternatively, a range in proximity to the specific number, as understood by persons of skill in the art field; and
- If the specification states a component or feature “may,” “can,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “preferably,” “possibly,” “typically,” “optionally,” “for example,” “often,” or “might” (or other such language) be included or have a characteristic, that particular component or feature is not required to be included or to have the characteristic. Such component or feature may be optionally included in some embodiments, or it may be excluded.
- Embodiments of the disclosure include systems and methods for improving the signal output from a sense die configured to detect force applied to the sense die. Embodiments of the disclosure may comprise piezoresistive elements unusually close to the center of the die, where the load-bearing actuation element makes contact to the die face. Through stress mapping of the surface of the sense die, it was discovered that there is a small localized area of very high signal-generating stress near the actuation element. When piezoresistive elements are implanted in this location, die sensitivities can be up to 100 times greater or higher than traditional locations for the piezoresistive elements. Because the small areas of high stress constitute a localized contact phenomenon, no anisotropic etch is needed to form a diaphragm, and therefore a “slab” die can be used. Using a slab die may have the advantage of significantly higher proof loads (i.e. higher overload protection), while at the same time reducing cost because it is no longer necessity to complete the anisotropic etch. Additionally, this method of positioning the piezoresistive elements may allow for a smaller die to be used, which may lower costs as well.
- Typical uses of piezoresistive elements position the piezoresistive elements at or near the center edge of a formed diaphragm. Typical force sensors may use a stress field that is relatively distant from the contact point between the actuation element and the sense die (or the load point). Embodiments of the disclosure may use a localized stress field very near the load point. This localized stress field may be much higher in magnitude than the typically used distant stress field, leading to higher die output for a given load.
- A technical benefit of the described method of positioning the piezoresistive elements may include much higher die output for a given load. Additionally, since a full wafer thickness may be used, no specifically-defined diaphragm is required, and therefore the proof load is significantly higher. Also, the costs of the sense die may be reduced because no etch steps are required to form a diaphragm, no specially patterned adhesive is required under the die (just a continuous layer rather than a “picture frame” pattern with an unsupported central area), and a smaller die can be used (costs are proportional to the size of a die, where even a 30% reduction is die side length may translates to a cost reduction of up to 50%). The same general design and orientation of the piezoresistive elements may be similar to a traditional pressure or force sensor, but the location of the piezoresistive elements may be adjusted.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a typical sense die 100 according to some embodiments that can be used to detect a force, including a pressure. As shown, thesense die 100 can include a diaphragm orslab 102, and asubstrate 140 located near afirst surface 103 of the sensor. Theslab 102 may comprise one ormore sense elements electrical contacts 106. Thesense elements second surface 105 of theslab 102. Optionally, asidewall 108 can be attached to a portion of asecond surface 105 of the sensor. Anactuation element 110 can be present within acavity 112 formed by thesidewall 108 and can serve to transfer a force to thesecond surface 105 of theslab 102. In some embodiments, theslab 102 may comprise a solid slab. In some embodiments, theslab 102 may be attached to thesubstrate 140 via anadhesive 142. - The sense die 100 may be formed from silicon or other semiconductor material. While the
sense die 100 is described with respect to being formed from silicon, it should be understood that other materials can also be used. In an embodiment, the sense die 100 can begin as a silicon chip and be processed to form the sense die 100, as described in more detail herein. In some embodiments, the silicon chip may include a recess formed on thefirst surface 103 to form adiaphragm 102. A variety of micro-fabrication techniques including, but not limited to, lithography techniques, wet etching techniques, and dry etching techniques may be used to form the recess. In some embodiments, thediaphragm 102 may be fabricated on the sense die 100 by back-side etching of a silicon die (e.g., with a KOH etching technique, deep reactive ion etching, or other etching technique). However, it is contemplated that any suitable process may be used, as desired. Thediaphragm 102 may have a height or thickness that is less than the thickness of the edges of the sense die 100, thereby forming thediaphragm 102. - The diaphragm or
slab 102 is configured to flex in response (or at least have some elastic response) to an applied force, creating stress fields that extend through the one ormore sense elements slab 102 may be microscopic in nature. In some embodiments, the applied force can be present in the form of a differential pressure across theslab 102. In some embodiments, anactuation element 110 may be in contact with thesecond surface 105 of theslab 102 to transfer a force to theslab 102. Theactuation element 110 can comprise a mechanical coupling between an exterior force and theslab 102. In some aspects, theactuation element 110 can comprise a mechanical actuation element configured to transfer a force to theslab 102. In some embodiments, theactuation element 110 may include a spherical object (such as the sphere shown inFIG. 1 ), a pin, an extender, a button, any other activation device, and/or a combination thereof. It may be appreciated that other types of actuators may be utilized, such as, for example, slidable mounted plungers or shafts, point of contact type components other than spherical objects, and/or “T”-shaped transfer mechanisms, in accordance with alternative embodiments. If desired, only a portion of an outer surface of theactuation element 110 may be spherical in shape or take on a particular shape. Theactuation element 110 may be made of any material. For example, theactuation element 110 may be formed from stainless steel, a polymer, a ceramic, jeweled, another suitable metal, and/or another suitable material. In some cases, theactuation element 110 may include a stainless steel ball bearing. It is contemplated, however, that other generally spherical and other shaped elements may be used as or as part of theactuation element 110, if desired, including polymer based objects. - The deflection resulting from a force applied on the diaphragm through an applied pressure and/or through the
actuation element 110 may generally result in the deflection of theslab 102. Theslab 102 may be configured to detect a deflection that is predominantly in a direction perpendicular to the plane of theslab 102. In this sense, the sense die 100 is configured to measure a uniaxial force that is provided normal to the plane of sense die 100. - The sense die 100 may have one or
more sensing elements slab 102, such as piezoresistive sensing elements or components formed using suitable fabrication or printing techniques. For example, starting with the silicon sense die 100, standard pattern, implant, diffusion, and/or metal interconnect processes may be used to form one ormore elements surface piezoresistive sense elements slab 102. Thepiezoresistive sense elements piezoresistive elements - One or
more bond pads upper surface 105 of the sense die 100 and adjacent to theslab 102. Metal, diffusion, or other interconnects may be provided to interconnect the one or morepiezoresistive sensor elements more bond pads FIG. 1 , one or more of thepiezoresistive sensor elements bond pads - In some embodiments, the
sense elements bond pads FIG. 1 indicates typical locations for thepiezoresistive elements slab 102, where theslab 102 experiences forces from the contact with theactuation element 110. - Embodiments of the disclosure describe a sense die 100 where the piezoresistive elements are located much closer to the contact area between the
actuation element 110 and the slab 102 (or diaphragm), than a typical sense die. -
FIGS. 2A-2C illustrate cross-sectional views of an actuation element 210 (which may comprise a ball bearing) and aslab 202 of asense die 200. Theactuation element 210 may comprise a spheroid shape. Theactuation element 210 may contact and apply pressure to acontact area 220 between theactuation element 210 and theslab 202. Theslab 202 may comprise afirst surface 203, which may be attached to astructural frame 204. Theslab 202 may comprise asecond surface 205 configured to contact theactuation element 210. - In some embodiments, the
actuation element 210 may comprise stainless steel. In some embodiments, theactuation element 210 may comprise glass, sapphire, or another similar material. In some embodiments, the total length of the sense die 200 may be reduced by approximately 20% to 30% compared to a typical sense die 200. -
FIG. 2A illustrates a sense die 200 comprising aslab 202 attached to asubstrate 240 via anadhesive layer 242. Theslab 202 may comprisesense elements 250 located on thesurface 205 of theslab 202. The distance between thesense elements 250 is indicated bydistance 260. The width of theslab 202 is indicated bywidth 262. - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 2B , theslab 202 may comprise anetched cavity 230 on thefirst surface 203 of theslab 202. However, in other embodiments, such asFIGS. 2A and 2C , theslab 202 may not be etched. In other words, theslab 202 may not comprise any thinned areas or cavities on eithersurface slab 202. -
FIG. 2C illustrates a double cross-section of theslab 202, illustrating a quarter view of theslab 202 andactuation element 210. Theslab 202 may comprise foursense element 250 located about thecontact point 220 between theslab 202 and theactuation element 210. - In some embodiments, the
sense elements 250 may be closer together than in a typical sense die. In some embodiments, thedistance 260 between thesense elements 250 may be centered on thecontact point 220 between theactuation element 210 and theslab 202. - Referring to
FIG. 2A , in some embodiments, the ratio between thewidth 262 of theslab 202 and thedistance 260 between thesense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 3/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between thewidth 262 of theslab 202 and thedistance 260 between thesense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 5/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between thewidth 262 of theslab 202 and thedistance 260 between thesense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 7/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between thewidth 262 of theslab 202 and thedistance 260 between thesense elements 250 may be greater than approximately 11/1. In some embodiments, the ratio between thewidth 262 of theslab 202 and thedistance 260 between thesense elements 250 may be less than approximately 20/1. In some embodiments, thesense elements 250 may not touch one another. - In some embodiments, the location of the
sense elements 250 may be chosen based on the anticipated stress at a particular location on thesurface 205 of theslab 202. - Referring to
FIGS. 3A-3C , astress map 300 is shown illustrating the stress fields resulting from a force applied to thesecond surface 205 of theslab 202 by theactuation element 210. Theslab 202 andactuation element 210 are shown above. Thestress map 300 may comprise a plot of the difference between stress in the x direction (Sx) and stress in the y direction (Sy) or Sx−Sy. The largest values, both positive and negative, may indicate the locations on thesurface 205 of the slab where the stress is the highest in one direction. These areas may be called “hotspots” or high stress areas. The stress field generated on thesurface 205 at thehotspots surface 205. Thehotspots surface 205, where the piezoresistive element may detect the stress created at that location. Thehotspots contact area 220 than typical locations for piezoresistive elements. - The
stress map 300 shown inFIGS. 3A-3B may be cross-sectioned to show a quarter of thetotal surface 205 of theslab 202, wherein thecorner 310 illustrates the center of the contact area 220 (as shown above) between the actuation element and the slab. Referring toFIG. 3C , afull stress map 300 may comprise up to fourhotspots center 310 of thecontact area 220 between the actuation element and the slab. The typical locations for piezoresistive elements are indicated by “x” 322, 324, 326, and 328. - Using the information from the
stress map 300 shown inFIGS. 3A-3C , the piezoresistive elements (such as 120 and 124 described above) may be placed within one of thehotspots stress map 300. While the stress at thetypical locations slab surface 205, thehotspots typical locations hotspots - Unlike a typical pressure sensor comprising an anisotropic etch, the Sx−Sy stress peak measured on the
surface 205 of the slab moves outward radially from thecontact area 220 as the load on thesurface 205 is increased. In other words, the hotspots may change in location based on the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via the actuation element. For example, the distance from thecenter 310 at which the hotspot occurs may increase as the magnitude of the force increases. This concept may be illustrated by the following graphs and figures. - Piezoresistive elements located at different positions with respect to the center of the
surface 205 were evaluated at a range of forces applied to thesurface 205. The results are show in the graphs ofFIGS. 4A-4B . As an example, the locations ranged from approximately 39 microns (μm) from the center to approximately 310 μm from the center. - Referring to
FIG. 4A , the sensor output in millivolts (mV) is plotted against the load applied to the slab in Newtons (N). Each line indicates a different location for the piezoresistive elements, measured in radians from the center of the contact area between the slab and the actuation element. The traditional location of the piezoresistive elements is also plotted, for reference, wherein the distance from the center is higher in a traditional sensor. For each line on the graph, the sensor output builds as the load increases until the Sx−Sy peak passes through the location of the piezoresistive element, and then then the output drops off. Sensor function may be optimal before the peak in the lines. - Referring to
FIG. 4B , the graph illustrates the results show inFIG. 4A that have been normalized using a standard of the traditional sensor location output (at a distance of 890 μm), where the results for each of the locations have been divided by the standard. The graph shown inFIG. 4B illustrates that the sensor output may be relatively constant before the peak (for that location), and may be usable for determining stress on the slab at that location. - For most sensor applications, it may be possible to estimate the range of the load expected for a particular application. Using the graphs and the estimated load (in N), an optimal location for the piezoresistive elements may be chosen. For example, if the expected load is less than 5 N, the location for the piezoresistive elements may be chosen to be at a distance of between approximately 30 to 80 μm from the center. As another example, if the expected load is between 10 and 20 N, the location for the piezoresistive elements may be chosen to be at a distance of between approximately 100 to 120 μm from the center.
- Referring to
FIG. 5 , an additional graph illustrates the approximate relationship between the contact radius between the flat surface of the slab and the curved surface of the spherical actuation element, and the estimated load that will be applied to the sense die. As the load increases, what is initially a point contact between the slab and the actuation element, widens out into circular contact.FIG. 5 is a plot of the radius of that circle of contact vs. force applied by the actuation element. In some embodiments, it may be desirable to locate the sense elements outside the contact radius, to avoid contact between the actuation element and the sense elements. However, in some embodiments, the actuation element may contact one or more of the sense elements during the use life of the sense die. - To further evaluate the effect of locating the piezoresistive elements closer to the center of a slab, sense die were analyzed to solve for the generated signal. At approximately 1 N force applied to the slab, the signal from a piezoresistive element located at the typical location of 890 μm from the center may produce approximately 3.6 mV. When the location of the piezoresistive element was changed to 310 μm from the center, the signal may rise to approximately 27.3 mV (approximately 7.6 times the typical output). When the location of the piezoresistive element was changed to 150 μm from the center, the signal may rise to approximately 87.2 mV (approximately 246 times the typical output).
- Additionally, it may be desirable to provide accurate measurements for forces lower than 1 N. Force detection in this low range may typically be difficult to achieve with adequate over-load protection. To further evaluate the effect of locating the piezoresistive elements closer to the center of a slab, sense dies were tested to determine the generated signal in force ranges of approximately 1 N (100 g), approximately 0.1 N (10 g), approximately 0.01 N, and approximately 0.001 N.
- As described above, the closer a piezoresistive element is location to the center (i.e. the smaller the distance from the center), the higher the sensitivity of the output signal. In the following results, the closest location for the piezoresistive element was approximately 150 μm from the center. For a force range of 0.1 N, at a location of 150 μm from the center, the sensor output may be approximately 8.8 mV.
- As the force ranges decrease below 1 N, it may be proportionally harder to develop sufficient output signal. Therefore, the use of piezoresistive elements positioned closer to the center of the slab may allow for improved signal output for lower force ranges.
-
FIGS. 6A-6B further illustrate the relationship between the contact radius, i.e. the distance from thecenter 310 of theslab 202 at which the piezoresistive element is located, and the estimated load that will be applied to the sense die. InFIG. 6A , the force applied to theactuation element 210 is approximately 25 N. The contact radius to thefirst hotspot 302 is indicated bydistance 602. Similarly, the contact radius to thesecond hotspot 304 is indicated bydistance 604. - In
FIG. 6B , the force applied to theactuation element 210 is increased to approximately 100 N. Thedistance 602 to thefirst hotspot 302 has increased accordingly. Similarly, thedistance 604 to thesecond hotspot 304 has increased accordingly. Therefore, the optimal location for the piezoresistive elements to be located at or near ahotspot slab 202. - The sensitivity (measured in mV/V) of the sense elements described above was determined via modeling, and then compared to a standard or typical sensor. The different locations of the sense elements were compared to one another as well. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio (when compared to a typical sensor) may be greater than approximately 1/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 5/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 10/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 20/1. In some embodiments, the sensitivity ratio may be greater than approximately 25/1.
- In a first embodiment, a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is at least 2/1; one or more bond pads supported by a first side of the chip, each of the one or more bond pads electrically coupled to at least one of the one or more sense elements; a structural frame disposed on the first side of the chip, wherein the structural frame is disposed at least partially about the slab; and one or more electrical contacts extending through the structural frame, wherein the one or more electrical contacts are electrically coupled to the one or more bond pads.
- A second embodiment can include the sense die of the first embodiment, wherein the sense elements comprise piezoresistive elements.
- A third embodiment can include the sense die of the first or second embodiments, further comprising an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab.
- A fourth embodiment can include the sense die of the third embodiment, wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the slab and the actuation element.
- A fifth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to fourth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
- A sixth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to fifth embodiments, the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 10/1.
- A seventh embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to sixth embodiments, wherein the locations of the one or more sense elements are determined by mapping the force on the slab applied by the actuation element, and identifying one or more hotspots on the slab where the force is higher than the surrounding areas.
- An eighth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the first to seventh embodiments, wherein the locations of the one or more sense elements are determined by determining a correlation between the estimated force that will be applied to the slab and the desired location for sense elements on the slab.
- In a ninth embodiment, a method of sensing a force using a sense die may comprise providing a sense die comprising a chip having a slab formed thereon; applying a force to the slab of the sense die; and determining the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via one or more sense elements attached to the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1.
- A tenth embodiment can include the method of the ninth embodiment, further comprising determining a correlation between the estimated force that will be applied to the slab and the desired location for sense elements on the slab.
- An eleventh embodiment can include the method of the tenth embodiment, wherein as the estimated force increases, the desired location for the sense elements increases in distance from the center of the slab.
- A twelfth embodiment can include the method in of any of the ninth to eleventh embodiments, wherein applying a force comprises contacting the slab with an actuation element.
- A thirteenth embodiment can include the method of the twelfth embodiment, wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the slab and the actuation element.
- A fourteenth embodiment can include the method of any of the ninth to thirteenth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
- A fifteenth embodiment can include the method of the any of the ninth to fourteenth embodiments, further comprising mapping the force on the slab applied by the actuation element; identifying one or more hotspots on the slab where the force is higher than the surrounding areas; and determining the location for a piezoresistive element to be located on the slab based on the location of the hotspots.
- In a sixteenth embodiment, a sense die may comprise a chip comprising a slab; an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab, and configured to apply a force to the slab; and one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1, and wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the actuation element and the slab.
- A seventeenth embodiment can include the sense die of the sixteenth embodiment, wherein the sense elements comprise piezoresistive elements.
- An eighteenth embodiment can include the sense die of the sixteenth or seventeenth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
- A nineteenth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the sixteenth to eighteenth embodiments, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is less than approximately 20/1.
- A twentieth embodiment can include the sense die of any of the sixteenth to nineteenth embodiments, wherein the sense elements are located at or near hotspots identified on the surface of the slab by force mapping.
- While various embodiments in accordance with the principles disclosed herein have been shown and described above, modifications thereof may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and the teachings of the disclosure. The embodiments described herein are representative only and are not intended to be limiting. Many variations, combinations, and modifications are possible and are within the scope of the disclosure. Alternative embodiments that result from combining, integrating, and/or omitting features of the embodiment(s) are also within the scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above, but is defined by the claims which follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated as further disclosure into the specification and the claims are embodiment(s) of the present invention(s). Furthermore, any advantages and features described above may relate to specific embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages or having any or all of the above features.
- Additionally, the section headings used herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 C.F.R. 1.77 or to otherwise provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings might refer to a “Field,” the claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that certain technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a limiting characterization of the invention(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of the claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.
- Use of broader terms such as “comprises,” “includes,” and “having” should be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as “consisting of,” “consisting essentially of,” and “comprised substantially of.” Use of the terms “optionally,” “may,” “might,” “possibly,” and the like with respect to any element of an embodiment means that the element is not required, or alternatively, the element is required, both alternatives being within the scope of the embodiment(s). Also, references to examples are merely provided for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to be exclusive.
- While several embodiments have been provided in the present disclosure, it should be understood that the disclosed systems and methods may be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. The present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the intention is not to be limited to the details given herein. For example, the various elements or components may be combined or integrated in another system or certain features may be omitted or not implemented.
- Also, techniques, systems, subsystems, and methods described and illustrated in the various embodiments as discrete or separate may be combined or integrated with other systems, modules, techniques, or methods without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Other items shown or discussed as directly coupled or communicating with each other may be indirectly coupled or communicating through some interface, device, or intermediate component, whether electrically, mechanically, or otherwise. Other examples of changes, substitutions, and alterations are ascertainable by one skilled in the art and could be made without departing from the spirit and scope disclosed herein.
Claims (20)
1. A sense die comprising:
a chip comprising a slab;
one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is at least approximately 2/1;
one or more bond pads supported by a first side of the chip, each of the one or more bond pads electrically coupled to at least one of the one or more sense elements;
a structural frame disposed on the first side of the chip, wherein the structural frame is disposed at least partially about the slab; and
one or more electrical contacts extending through the structural frame, wherein the one or more electrical contacts are electrically coupled to the one or more bond pads.
2. The sense die of claim 1 , wherein the sense elements comprise piezoresistive elements.
3. The sense die of claim 1 , further comprising an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab.
4. The sense die of claim 3 , wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the slab and the actuation element.
5. The sense die of claim 1 , wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
6. The sense die of claim 1 , wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 10/1.
7. The sense die of claim 1 , wherein the locations of the one or more sense elements are determined by mapping the force on the slab applied by the actuation element, and identifying one or more hotspots on the slab where the force is higher than the surrounding areas.
8. The sense die of claim 1 , wherein the locations of the one or more sense elements are determined by determining a correlation between the estimated force that will be applied to the slab and the desired location for sense elements on the slab.
9. A method of sensing a force using a sense die, the method comprising:
providing a sense die comprising a chip having a slab formed thereon;
applying a force to the slab of the sense die; and
determining the magnitude of the force applied to the slab via one or more sense elements attached to the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1.
10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising determining a correlation between the estimated force that will be applied to the slab and the desired location for sense elements on the slab.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein as the estimated force increases, the desired location for the sense elements increases in distance from the center of the slab.
12. The method of claim 9 , wherein applying a force comprises contacting the slab with an actuation element.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the slab and the actuation element.
14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
15. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:
mapping the force on the slab applied by the actuation element;
identifying one or more hotspots on the slab where the force is higher than the surrounding areas; and
determining the location for a piezoresistive element to be located on the slab based on the location of the hotspots.
16. A sense die comprising:
a chip comprising a slab;
an actuation element configured to contact the slab at or near the center of the slab, and configured to apply a force to the slab; and
one or more sense elements supported by the slab, wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 2/1, and wherein the distance between the sense elements is centered on the contact point between the actuation element and the slab.
17. The sense die of claim 16 , wherein the sense elements comprise piezoresistive elements.
18. The sense die of claim 16 , wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is greater than approximately 5/1.
19. The sense die of claim 16 , wherein the ratio of the width of the slab to the distance between the one or more sense elements is less than approximately 20/1.
20. The sense die of claim 16 , wherein the sense elements are located at or near hotspots identified on the surface of the slab by force mapping.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/388,483 US20180180494A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2016-12-22 | High Sensitivity Silicon Piezoresistor Force Sensor |
EP17206053.5A EP3348981A3 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2017-12-07 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
CN201711392719.4A CN108225626A (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2017-12-21 | Highly sensitive silicon piezoresistance type force snesor |
US16/573,500 US11573136B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2019-09-17 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
US18/150,692 US20230146578A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2023-01-05 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/388,483 US20180180494A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2016-12-22 | High Sensitivity Silicon Piezoresistor Force Sensor |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/573,500 Continuation US11573136B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2019-09-17 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180180494A1 true US20180180494A1 (en) | 2018-06-28 |
Family
ID=60629545
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/388,483 Abandoned US20180180494A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2016-12-22 | High Sensitivity Silicon Piezoresistor Force Sensor |
US16/573,500 Active US11573136B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2019-09-17 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
US18/150,692 Pending US20230146578A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2023-01-05 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/573,500 Active US11573136B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2019-09-17 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
US18/150,692 Pending US20230146578A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2023-01-05 | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US20180180494A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3348981A3 (en) |
CN (1) | CN108225626A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3627124A1 (en) * | 2018-09-24 | 2020-03-25 | Honeywell International Inc. | Miniature size force sensor with bubble detection capabilities |
EP3722765A1 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2020-10-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Load cell |
US11162850B2 (en) | 2019-04-25 | 2021-11-02 | Measurement Specialties, Inc. | Sensor assemblies with integrated electrical connections and diaphragm overload protection |
Citations (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4050313A (en) * | 1975-06-04 | 1977-09-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Semiconductor pressure transducer |
US4173900A (en) * | 1977-03-07 | 1979-11-13 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Semiconductor pressure transducer |
US4317126A (en) * | 1980-04-14 | 1982-02-23 | Motorola, Inc. | Silicon pressure sensor |
US4511878A (en) * | 1982-09-20 | 1985-04-16 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Pressure sensor with improved semiconductor diaphragm |
US5178016A (en) * | 1989-11-15 | 1993-01-12 | Sensym, Incorporated | Silicon pressure sensor chip with a shear element on a sculptured diaphragm |
US5600074A (en) * | 1991-11-15 | 1997-02-04 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Silicon chip for use in a force-detection sensor |
US5614678A (en) * | 1996-02-05 | 1997-03-25 | Kulite Semiconductor Products, Inc. | High pressure piezoresistive transducer |
US5760313A (en) * | 1997-03-05 | 1998-06-02 | Honeywell Inc. | Force sensor with multiple piece actuation system |
US6491647B1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2002-12-10 | Active Signal Technologies, Inc. | Physiological sensing device |
US6595065B2 (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 2003-07-22 | Denso Corporation | Pressure detecting apparatus with metallic diaphragm |
US6658948B2 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2003-12-09 | Denso Corporation | Semiconductor dynamic quantity sensor |
US20040177699A1 (en) * | 2003-03-13 | 2004-09-16 | Denso Corporation | Semiconductor pressure sensor |
US6858451B2 (en) * | 2002-04-24 | 2005-02-22 | Denso Corporation | Method for manufacturing a dynamic quantity detection device |
US7234359B2 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2007-06-26 | Hokuriku Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor force sensor |
US7467891B2 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2008-12-23 | Sensata Technologies, Inc. | Sensor arrangement for measuring a pressure and a temperature in a fluid |
US20100018324A1 (en) * | 2008-07-25 | 2010-01-28 | Wayne Kilian | Pressure-based fluid flow sensor |
US7726197B2 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2010-06-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor package and method of forming same |
US7880247B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2011-02-01 | Vladimir Vaganov | Semiconductor input control device |
US7934429B2 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2011-05-03 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Stress-distribution detecting semiconductor package group and detection method of stress distribution in semiconductor package using the same |
US8327715B2 (en) * | 2009-07-02 | 2012-12-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor apparatus |
US20140137654A1 (en) * | 2012-11-21 | 2014-05-22 | Robert Zwijze | Measuring device for measuring a physical quantity |
US8757001B2 (en) * | 2012-09-27 | 2014-06-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Mechanically coupled force sensor on flexible platform assembly structure |
US8806964B2 (en) * | 2012-03-23 | 2014-08-19 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor |
US20150020601A1 (en) * | 2012-03-02 | 2015-01-22 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Device for Measuring Mechanical Quantity |
US9003899B2 (en) * | 2012-03-23 | 2015-04-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor |
US9003897B2 (en) * | 2012-05-10 | 2015-04-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Temperature compensated force sensor |
US9052246B2 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-06-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor using integral force biasing for improved linearity |
US9164003B2 (en) * | 2012-10-11 | 2015-10-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor with mechanical over-force transfer mechanism |
US9261423B2 (en) * | 2011-02-07 | 2016-02-16 | The Governors Of The University Of Alberta | Piezoresistive load sensor |
US9399572B2 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2016-07-26 | Elmos Semiconductor Ag | Microelectromechanical component and method for testing a microelectromechanical component |
US20160223413A1 (en) * | 2013-07-04 | 2016-08-04 | Rohm Co., Ltd. | Stress sensor and fabrication method for the same |
US20170307457A1 (en) * | 2016-04-20 | 2017-10-26 | Sensata Technologies, Inc. | Method of manufacturing a pressure sensor |
US9983074B2 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2018-05-29 | Hokuriku Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Force detector |
US9995641B2 (en) * | 2013-10-30 | 2018-06-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor with gap-controlled over-force protection |
Family Cites Families (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3566216A (en) | 1968-08-07 | 1971-02-23 | Stow Lab Inc | An electromechanical transducer including a semiconductor and sensitivity controlling coupling means |
US5483994A (en) * | 1995-02-01 | 1996-01-16 | Honeywell, Inc. | Pressure transducer with media isolation and negative pressure measuring capability |
US5644285A (en) | 1995-02-01 | 1997-07-01 | Honeywell Inc. | Pressure transducer with media isolation |
JP3317084B2 (en) | 1995-03-31 | 2002-08-19 | 株式会社豊田中央研究所 | Force sensing element and method of manufacturing the same |
TW364092B (en) | 1997-04-04 | 1999-07-11 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | A load sensor and a pointing equipment incorporating the same |
US5811694A (en) | 1997-06-06 | 1998-09-22 | Bokam Engineering | Force Transducer |
US7290453B2 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2007-11-06 | Amnon Brosh | Composite MEMS pressure sensor configuration |
JP2007255953A (en) | 2006-03-22 | 2007-10-04 | Hitachi Ltd | Dynamic quantity measuring device |
SG137708A1 (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2007-12-28 | St Microelectronics Asia | Piezo-resistive force sensor with bumps on membrane structure |
US7343812B2 (en) * | 2006-06-15 | 2008-03-18 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method to reduce die edge shorting on pressure sensors using conductive elastomeric seals |
US7503221B2 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2009-03-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Dual span absolute pressure sense die |
JP4810690B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2011-11-09 | 株式会社豊田中央研究所 | Force sensing element |
US8316725B2 (en) | 2010-12-15 | 2012-11-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor |
US9728652B2 (en) * | 2012-01-25 | 2017-08-08 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Sensor device and method |
GB2515715A (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2015-01-07 | Continental Automotive Systems | Piezoresistive transducer with low thermal noise |
US20140374848A1 (en) * | 2013-06-24 | 2014-12-25 | Wen Shi Koh | Semiconductor sensor device with metal lid |
US9470593B2 (en) * | 2013-09-12 | 2016-10-18 | Honeywell International Inc. | Media isolated pressure sensor |
US9383270B1 (en) * | 2013-10-28 | 2016-07-05 | Sandia Corporation | Silicon force sensor |
JP6188231B2 (en) | 2014-02-26 | 2017-08-30 | アルプス電気株式会社 | LOAD DETECTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE USING THE LOAD DETECTING DEVICE |
-
2016
- 2016-12-22 US US15/388,483 patent/US20180180494A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2017
- 2017-12-07 EP EP17206053.5A patent/EP3348981A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2017-12-21 CN CN201711392719.4A patent/CN108225626A/en active Pending
-
2019
- 2019-09-17 US US16/573,500 patent/US11573136B2/en active Active
-
2023
- 2023-01-05 US US18/150,692 patent/US20230146578A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4050313A (en) * | 1975-06-04 | 1977-09-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Semiconductor pressure transducer |
US4173900A (en) * | 1977-03-07 | 1979-11-13 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Semiconductor pressure transducer |
US4317126A (en) * | 1980-04-14 | 1982-02-23 | Motorola, Inc. | Silicon pressure sensor |
US4511878A (en) * | 1982-09-20 | 1985-04-16 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Pressure sensor with improved semiconductor diaphragm |
US5178016A (en) * | 1989-11-15 | 1993-01-12 | Sensym, Incorporated | Silicon pressure sensor chip with a shear element on a sculptured diaphragm |
US5600074A (en) * | 1991-11-15 | 1997-02-04 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Silicon chip for use in a force-detection sensor |
US5614678A (en) * | 1996-02-05 | 1997-03-25 | Kulite Semiconductor Products, Inc. | High pressure piezoresistive transducer |
US5760313A (en) * | 1997-03-05 | 1998-06-02 | Honeywell Inc. | Force sensor with multiple piece actuation system |
US6595065B2 (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 2003-07-22 | Denso Corporation | Pressure detecting apparatus with metallic diaphragm |
US6491647B1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2002-12-10 | Active Signal Technologies, Inc. | Physiological sensing device |
US6658948B2 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2003-12-09 | Denso Corporation | Semiconductor dynamic quantity sensor |
US7234359B2 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2007-06-26 | Hokuriku Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor force sensor |
US7360440B2 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2008-04-22 | Hokuriku Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor force sensor |
US6858451B2 (en) * | 2002-04-24 | 2005-02-22 | Denso Corporation | Method for manufacturing a dynamic quantity detection device |
US20040177699A1 (en) * | 2003-03-13 | 2004-09-16 | Denso Corporation | Semiconductor pressure sensor |
US7880247B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2011-02-01 | Vladimir Vaganov | Semiconductor input control device |
US7467891B2 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2008-12-23 | Sensata Technologies, Inc. | Sensor arrangement for measuring a pressure and a temperature in a fluid |
US7726197B2 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2010-06-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor package and method of forming same |
US7934429B2 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2011-05-03 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Stress-distribution detecting semiconductor package group and detection method of stress distribution in semiconductor package using the same |
US20100018324A1 (en) * | 2008-07-25 | 2010-01-28 | Wayne Kilian | Pressure-based fluid flow sensor |
US8327715B2 (en) * | 2009-07-02 | 2012-12-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor apparatus |
US9399572B2 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2016-07-26 | Elmos Semiconductor Ag | Microelectromechanical component and method for testing a microelectromechanical component |
US9261423B2 (en) * | 2011-02-07 | 2016-02-16 | The Governors Of The University Of Alberta | Piezoresistive load sensor |
US20150020601A1 (en) * | 2012-03-02 | 2015-01-22 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Device for Measuring Mechanical Quantity |
US8806964B2 (en) * | 2012-03-23 | 2014-08-19 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor |
US9003899B2 (en) * | 2012-03-23 | 2015-04-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor |
US9003897B2 (en) * | 2012-05-10 | 2015-04-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Temperature compensated force sensor |
US8757001B2 (en) * | 2012-09-27 | 2014-06-24 | Honeywell International Inc. | Mechanically coupled force sensor on flexible platform assembly structure |
US9164003B2 (en) * | 2012-10-11 | 2015-10-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor with mechanical over-force transfer mechanism |
US20140137654A1 (en) * | 2012-11-21 | 2014-05-22 | Robert Zwijze | Measuring device for measuring a physical quantity |
US20160223413A1 (en) * | 2013-07-04 | 2016-08-04 | Rohm Co., Ltd. | Stress sensor and fabrication method for the same |
US9995641B2 (en) * | 2013-10-30 | 2018-06-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor with gap-controlled over-force protection |
US9052246B2 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-06-09 | Honeywell International Inc. | Force sensor using integral force biasing for improved linearity |
US9983074B2 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2018-05-29 | Hokuriku Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Force detector |
US20170307457A1 (en) * | 2016-04-20 | 2017-10-26 | Sensata Technologies, Inc. | Method of manufacturing a pressure sensor |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3627124A1 (en) * | 2018-09-24 | 2020-03-25 | Honeywell International Inc. | Miniature size force sensor with bubble detection capabilities |
US10794786B2 (en) | 2018-09-24 | 2020-10-06 | Honeywell International Inc. | Miniature size force sensor with bubble detection capabilities |
EP3722765A1 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2020-10-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Load cell |
US11156511B2 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2021-10-26 | Honeywell International Inc. | Load cell |
EP3919881A1 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2021-12-08 | Honeywell International Inc. | Load cell |
US11747226B2 (en) | 2019-04-09 | 2023-09-05 | Honeywell International Inc. | Load cell |
US11162850B2 (en) | 2019-04-25 | 2021-11-02 | Measurement Specialties, Inc. | Sensor assemblies with integrated electrical connections and diaphragm overload protection |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3348981A2 (en) | 2018-07-18 |
US20200033207A1 (en) | 2020-01-30 |
EP3348981A3 (en) | 2018-10-03 |
CN108225626A (en) | 2018-06-29 |
US20230146578A1 (en) | 2023-05-11 |
US11573136B2 (en) | 2023-02-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20230146578A1 (en) | High sensitivity silicon piezoresistor force sensor | |
US8511171B2 (en) | Device for measuring environmental forces and method of fabricating the same | |
US10571348B2 (en) | Overforce control through sense die design | |
EP3012638B1 (en) | Silicon diaphragm pressure sensor | |
US9546922B2 (en) | Absolute pressure sensor with improved cap bonding boundary | |
US8671765B2 (en) | Pressure sensor having a diaphragm | |
US20060231521A1 (en) | Technique for manufacturing micro-electro mechanical structures | |
CN106404237B (en) | Pressure sensor chip, preparation method thereof and absolute pressure sensor chip | |
CN107894294B (en) | Silicon-on-insulator MEMS pressure sensing device with cavity and extended shallow polygonal cavity | |
JP2010203818A (en) | Semiconductor sensor and method of manufacturing the same | |
EP3376194B1 (en) | Microelectromechanical systems (mems) force die with buried cavity vented to the edges | |
US8522619B2 (en) | Pressure sensor | |
US9010200B2 (en) | Device for measuring forces and method of making the same | |
EP3580541B1 (en) | Micrometer mechanical force interface | |
JP7508744B2 (en) | Sensor assembly having multiple range structure | |
US20170328797A1 (en) | Pressure sensor device with anchors for die shrinkage and high sensitivity | |
KR20200012728A (en) | Pressure sensor | |
WO2018048788A1 (en) | Buried cavity sense die diaphragm stop for force sensors | |
US11085837B2 (en) | Method for assembling force sensor, involves applying sense die adhesive to place, where sense die material is removed | |
CN111664972A (en) | MEMS pressure sensor and preparation method thereof | |
JPH07113707A (en) | Semiconductor composite function sensor | |
JP2008045911A (en) | Pressure sensor | |
Jeong et al. | Wafer level packaged cantilever array type contact force sensor | |
JPH0694557A (en) | Semiconductor pressure sensor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., A DELWARE CORPORATIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SPELDRICH, BRIAN;DAVIS, RICHARD;SIGNING DATES FROM 20161213 TO 20161215;REEL/FRAME:040754/0389 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |