EP2636636A1 - Commande de grue avec répartition de la grandeur du dispositif de levage réduite par cinématique - Google Patents
Commande de grue avec répartition de la grandeur du dispositif de levage réduite par cinématique Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2636636A1 EP2636636A1 EP13000100.1A EP13000100A EP2636636A1 EP 2636636 A1 EP2636636 A1 EP 2636636A1 EP 13000100 A EP13000100 A EP 13000100A EP 2636636 A1 EP2636636 A1 EP 2636636A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- hoist
- control
- crane
- operator
- compensation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 68
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 60
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 230000036461 convulsion Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 25
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000004804 winding Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001447 compensatory effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009191 jumping Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241001295925 Gegenes Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004146 energy storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
- B66C13/00—Other constructional features or details
- B66C13/04—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack
- B66C13/06—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
- B66C13/00—Other constructional features or details
- B66C13/18—Control systems or devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
- B66C13/00—Other constructional features or details
- B66C13/04—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
- B66C13/00—Other constructional features or details
- B66C13/04—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack
- B66C13/06—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads
- B66C13/063—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads electrical
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66D—CAPSTANS; WINCHES; TACKLES, e.g. PULLEY BLOCKS; HOISTS
- B66D1/00—Rope, cable, or chain winding mechanisms; Capstans
- B66D1/28—Other constructional details
- B66D1/40—Control devices
- B66D1/48—Control devices automatic
- B66D1/52—Control devices automatic for varying rope or cable tension, e.g. when recovering craft from water
- B66D1/525—Control devices automatic for varying rope or cable tension, e.g. when recovering craft from water electrical
Definitions
- Such a crane control is for example from the DE 10 2008 024513 A1 known.
- a prediction device is provided, which predicts a future movement of the cable suspension point on the basis of the determined current seaward movement and a model of the seaward movement, wherein the web control takes into account the predicted movement in the control of the hoist.
- the at least one kinematically limited size of the hoisting gear can be, for example, the maximum available power and / or the maximum available speed and / or the maximum available acceleration of the hoisting gear.
- the division of the at least one kinematic limited size of the hoist can therefore comprise a distribution of the maximum available power and / or maximum available speed and / or maximum available acceleration of the hoist.
- the maximum available speed and / or the maximum available acceleration of the hoist can be divided by the crane operator between sea state compensation and operator control.
- the distribution is infinitely adjustable at least in a partial area. This allows the crane operator a sensitive distribution of at least one kinematically limited size of the hoist.
- the swell compensation can be switched off by the allocation of the entire at least one kinematically limited size of the hoist for operator control. This makes it possible to switch off the active sea state compensation at the same time by setting the division.
- a continuous adjustment of the distribution of the at least one kinematically limited size of the hoisting gear from and / or to completely switched-off operator control is possible.
- a continuous transition between a pure operator control and active sea state compensation is possible.
- the present invention includes a crane control for a crane having a hoist for lifting a load suspended on a rope.
- the crane control comprises an active sea state compensation, which compensates for the movement of the cable suspension point and / or a Lastabsetzsees due to the sea state at least partially by a control of the hoist.
- an operator control is provided, which controls the hoist based on specifications of the operator.
- the controller has two separate path planning modules, via which trajectories for the sea state compensation and for the operator control are calculated separately. In this way, the crane can continue to be controlled via the operator control in the event of failure of the swell compensation, without the need for a separate control unit and without a different driving behavior.
- the two separate path planning modules are included respectively calculated target trajectories of the position and / or speed and / or acceleration of the hoist.
- the trajectories predetermined by the two separate path planning modules are summed and used as setpoint values for the control and / or regulation of the hoisting gear.
- the regulation of the hoist returns measured values for the position and / or speed of the hoist winch and thus compares the setpoints with actual values.
- the control of the hoist can take into account the dynamics of the drive of the hoist winch.
- a corresponding pilot control can be provided for this purpose.
- this is based on the inversion of a physical model of the dynamics of the drive of the hoist winch.
- the two separate path planning modules take into account at least one limitation of the drive, in each case, and thereby generate desired trajectories which the hoist can actually approach.
- the crane control at least a kinematically limited size between sea state compensation and operator control.
- the maximum available power and / or the maximum available speed and / or the maximum available acceleration of the hoist between the sea state compensation and the operator control is divided.
- the trajectories in the two separate path planning modules then taking into account each assigned at least one kinematic limited size, in particular the maximum available power and / or speed and / or the maximum available acceleration, which on the sea state compensation or the operator control not applicable, calculated.
- the manipulated variable limitation may not be fully utilized by this division of the at least one kinematically limited variable.
- the division of the at least one limited kinematics size allows the use of two completely separate path planning modules, each independently taking into account the drive restriction.
- the swell compensation can have an optimization function which calculates a trajectory based on a predicted movement of the cable suspension point and / or a load release point and taking into account the power available for the swell compensation.
- a trajectory for controlling the hoist is calculated, which compensates as well as possible the predicted movement of the cable suspension point and / or a load release point taking into account the power available for the swell compensation.
- the trajectory can thereby minimize the residual movement of the load due to the movement of the cable suspension point and / or a difference movement between the load and the load release point which arises due to the seaway.
- the crane control according to the present invention advantageously comprises a prediction device which predicts a future movement of the cable suspension point and / or a load release point on the basis of the determined current seaward movement and a model of the seaward movement, wherein a measuring device is provided, which determines the current seaward movement on the basis of sensor data.
- the forecasting device predicts the future movement of the cable suspension point and / or a load release point in the vertical direction. The movement in the horizontal direction, however, can be neglected.
- the forecasting device and / or the measuring device can be designed as shown in the DE 10 2008 024513 A1 is described.
- the trajectories are determined in each case in the path planning modules described above.
- the crane control system has at least one control element, via which the crane operator can set the distribution of the available at least one kinematically limited variable, and in particular can specify the weighting factor.
- the distribution of the available at least one kinematically limited size during the stroke can be changed.
- This allows the crane operator to provide more power, for example, for operator control, if he wants a faster lift.
- more power can be applied to the swell compensation if the crane operator feels that the swell is not sufficiently compensated.
- the crane operator can respond flexibly to changes in the weather and sea state.
- the change in the distribution of the available at least one kinematic limited size is carried out as described above by changing the weighting factor.
- the crane control according to the invention further has a calculation function which calculates the currently available at least one kinematically limited variable.
- the maximum available power and / or speed and / or acceleration of the lifting mechanism can be calculated. Since the maximum available power or the maximum available speed and / or acceleration of the hoist can change during the stroke, it can be adapted via the calculation function to the current conditions of the stroke.
- the calculation function takes into account the length of the unwound cable and / or the cable force and / or the power available for driving the hoisting gear.
- the maximum available speed and / or acceleration of the hoist can be different, since the weight of the unwound rope, especially in strokes with very long cables loaded the hoist.
- the maximum available speed and / or acceleration of the hoist can vary depending on the mass of the lifted load.
- this is also taken into account.
- the currently available at least one kinematically limited variable is divided according to the specification of the crane operator between sea state compensation and operator control, in particular based on the weighting factor prescribed by the crane operator.
- the optimization function of the swell compensation can initially include a change in the distribution of the available at least one kinematic limited variable and / or a change in the available at least one kinematic limited variable during a stroke only at the end of the prediction horizon. This enables a stable optimization function over the entire prediction horizon.
- the altered available at least one kinematic limited variable is then pushed to the beginning of the prediction horizon as the time progresses.
- the optimization can be carried out at each time step on the basis of an updated forecast of the movement of the load pick-up point.
- the first value of the desired trajectory can be used to control the lifting mechanism. If an updated desired trajectory is then available, again only its first value is used for regulation.
- the operator control calculates, based on a signal given by an operator through an input device, the speed of the hoist winch desired by the operator.
- a hand lever can be provided.
- the desired speed can be calculated as the predetermined by the position of the input device portion of the maximum available speed for the operator control.
- the desired trajectory is generated by integration of the maximum allowable positive jerk until the maximum acceleration is reached. This ensures that the hoist is not overloaded by the operator control.
- the maximum acceleration corresponds to the proportion of the maximum available acceleration of the lifting mechanism, which is assigned to the operator control.
- the present invention further comprises a crane with a crane control as described above.
- the crane can be arranged on a float.
- the crane may be a ship crane. Alternatively, it may also be an offshore crane, a port crane or a crawler crane.
- the present invention further comprises a floating body with a crane according to the present invention, in particular a ship with a crane according to the invention.
- the present invention comprises the use of a crane according to the invention or a crane control according to the invention for raising and / or lowering a load located in the water and / or the use of a crane according to the invention or a crane control according to the invention for raising and / or lowering a load of and or on a load settling position in the water, for example on a ship.
- the present invention comprises the use of the crane according to the invention or the crane control according to the invention for deep-sea turns and / or the loading and / or unloading of ships.
- the present invention further includes a method of controlling a crane having a hoist for lifting a load suspended on a rope.
- compensating a sea state compensation by an automatic control of the hoist, the movement of the rope suspension point and / or Lastabsetzcons due to the sea state at least partially.
- the hoist is controlled based on specifications of the operator via an operator control.
- a second aspect it is provided that separate trajectories for the sea state compensation and for the operator control are calculated.
- the method is preferably carried out as already described in greater detail with regard to the crane control and its function according to the invention. Furthermore advantageously, the method according to the invention serves for the purpose of use, which has also already been described above.
- the method according to the invention can be carried out by means of a crane control, as has been shown above, or with the aid of a crane, as has been described above.
- the present invention further comprises software with code for carrying out a method according to the invention.
- the software can be stored on a machine-readable data carrier.
- a crane control according to the invention can be implemented.
- Figure 0 shows an embodiment of a crane 1 with a crane control according to the invention for controlling the hoist 5.
- the hoist 5 has a hoist winch, which moves the cable 4.
- the rope 4 is connected via a cable suspension point 2, in the exemplary embodiment, a deflection roller at the end of Crane jib, guided on crane. By moving the cable 4, a load hanging on the rope 3 can be raised or lowered.
- At least one sensor may be provided which measures the position and / or speed of the hoist and transmits corresponding signals to the crane control.
- the crane 1 is arranged in the embodiment on a float 6, here a ship. Like also in Figure 0 to recognize the float 6 moves due to the sea at its six degrees of freedom. As a result, the arranged on the float 6 crane 1 and the cable suspension point 2 is moved.
- the crane control according to the present invention may have an active sea state compensation, which at least partially compensates for a control of the hoist and the movement of the cable suspension point 2 due to the sea.
- the vertical movement of the cable suspension point due to the sea is at least partially compensated.
- the sea state compensation may include a measuring device which determines a current sea state movement from sensor data.
- the measuring device may comprise sensors which are arranged on the crane foundation.
- these may be gyroscopes and / or inclination angle sensors.
- three gyroscopes and three inclination angle sensors are provided.
- a prediction device can be provided which predicts a future movement of the cable suspension point 2 on the basis of the determined seaward movement and a model of the seaward movement.
- the forecasting device predicts only the vertical movement of the cable suspension point.
- Sometimes. can be converted in the context of the measuring and / or the forecasting device, a movement of the ship at the point of the sensors of the measuring device in a movement of the cable suspension point.
- the forecasting device and the measuring device are advantageously designed as shown in the DE 10 2008 024513 A1 is described in more detail.
- the hoist winch of the hoist 5 is hydraulically driven in the embodiment.
- a hydraulic circuit of hydraulic pump and hydraulic motor is provided, via which the hoist winch is driven.
- a hydraulic accumulator can be provided, via which energy is stored when the load is lowered, so that this energy is available when lifting the load.
- a follow-up control consisting of a precontrol and a feedback in the form of a two-degree-of-freedom structure is used in the exemplary embodiment.
- the feedforward control is calculated by a differential parameterization and requires twice continuously differentiable reference trajectories.
- v max and a max are divided by means of a weighting factor 0 ⁇ k l ⁇ 1 (cf. Fig. 1 ). This is specified by the crane driver and thus allows the individual distribution of power, which is available for the compensation or the method of the load.
- a weighting factor 0 ⁇ k l ⁇ 1 (cf. Fig. 1 ).
- a change of k l can be carried out during operation. Since the maximum possible travel speed or acceleration depends on the total mass of rope and load, v max and a max can also change during operation. Therefore, the valid values are also transferred to the trajectory planning.
- the crane operator can easily and intuitively adjust the influence of the active sea state compensation.
- the first part of the chapter first explains the generation of reference trajectories y a * . y ⁇ a * and y ⁇ a * for compensating the vertical movement of the cable suspension point.
- the essential aspect here is that with the planned Trajectories the vertical motion is compensated as far as it is possible due to the given and set by k l restrictions.
- the second part of the chapter deals with the planning of trajectories y l * . y ⁇ l * and y ⁇ l * for moving the load. These are generated directly from the hand lever signal of the crane driver w hh . The calculation is done by adding the maximum allowable jerk.
- trajectory planning for the compensating movement of the hoisting winch, sufficiently smooth trajectories are to be generated from the predicted vertical positions and speeds of the rope suspending point, taking into account the valid drive restrictions.
- This task is considered below as a limited optimization problem, which is to be solved online in each time step. Therefore, the approach is similar to the design of a model-predictive control, but in the sense of a model-predictive trajectory generation.
- an optimal time sequence for the compensation movement can then be determined.
- an emergency function can be implemented in this concept, in case the optimization does not find a valid solution, independently of the regulation. It consists of a simplified trajectory planning, whereupon the regulation resorts to such an emergency situation and continues to control the winds.
- the third derivation must be made at the earliest y ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ a * be considered as capable of jumping.
- making only the fourth derivative y a * can be considered as capable of jumping.
- the jerk y ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ a * plan at least steadily and the Trajektoriengener ist for the compensation movement is based on the in Fig. 2 illustrated fourth order integrator chain.
- this time-continuous model first becomes on the grid ⁇ 0 ⁇ ⁇ 1 ⁇ ... ⁇ ⁇ K p - 1 ⁇ ⁇ K p where K p represents the number of prediction steps for the prediction of the vertical movement of the cable suspension point.
- Fig. 3 makes it clear that the selected grid is not equidistant, which reduces the number of necessary nodes on the horizon. This makes it possible to keep the dimension of the optimal control problem to be solved small.
- the influence of the grosser discretization towards the end of the horizon does not adversely affect the planned trajectory since the prediction of vertical position and velocity towards the end of the prediction horizon is less accurate.
- a trajectory is to be planned which follows the predicted vertical movement of the cable suspension point as close as possible and at the same time satisfies the given restrictions.
- ⁇ a ( ⁇ k ) represents a reduction factor chosen so that the respective limit at the end of the horizon is 95% of that at the beginning of the horizon.
- ⁇ a ( ⁇ k ) follows from linear interpolation. The reduction of the restrictions along the horizon increases the robustness of the method with respect to the existence of permissible solutions.
- the jerk limitations are j max and the derivative of the jerk d d t ⁇ j Max constant. To increase the lifespan of the hoist winch and the entire crane, they are selected for maximum shock load. There are no restrictions on the position condition.
- Fig. 4 clarifies this procedure based on the speed limit.
- care must also be taken that it matches its maximum permissible derivative. This means that, for example, the speed limit (1- k l ) v max may be reduced at most as fast as the current acceleration limitation (1 k l ) a max permits.
- a constrained initial condition x a ( ⁇ 0 ) always has a solution which in turn does not violate the updated constraints. However, it takes the complete prediction horizon until a changed restriction finally affects the planned trajectories at the beginning of the horizon.
- the optimal control problem is through to be minimized square merit function (1.5), the system model (1.4) and the inequality constraints of (1.8) and (1.9) in the form of a linear-quadratic optimization problem (QP problem for Q uadratic P rogramming PROBLEM) completely given.
- QP problem for Q uadratic P rogramming PROBLEM
- the value x a ( ⁇ 1 ) calculated in the last optimization step for the time step ⁇ 1 is used as the initial condition.
- the actual solution to the QP problem is calculated in each time step using a numerical method known as the QP solver.
- the sampling time for the trajectory planning of the compensatory motion is greater than the discretization time of all remaining components of the active sea state compensation; thus ⁇ > ⁇ t .
- the simulation of the integrator chain takes place Fig. 2 outside the optimization with the faster sampling time ⁇ t instead.
- the states x a ( ⁇ 0 ) are used as an initial condition for the simulation, and the manipulated variable at the beginning of the prediction horizon u a ( ⁇ 0 ) is written to the integrator chain as a constant input.
- Fig. 5 shows, it also serves as the input of a third-order integrator chain.
- the planned trajectories must also meet the currently valid speed and acceleration restrictions which result for the lever control in k l v max and k l a max .
- the hand lever signal of the crane driver -100 ⁇ w hh ⁇ 100 is interpreted as a relative speed specification in relation to the currently maximum permissible speed k l v max .
- the setpoint speed currently given by the hand lever depends on the hand lever position w hh , the variable weighting factor k l and the current maximum permissible winch speed v max .
- the task of trajectory planning for the hand lever control can now be specified as follows: From the setpoint speed given by the hand lever, a continuously differentiable speed profile is to be generated so that the acceleration has a steady course. As a method for this task offers a so-called jerk-on.
- the maximum permissible jerk j max in a first phase acts on the input of the integrator chain until the maximum permissible acceleration is reached.
- the speed is increased with constant acceleration; and in the last phase, the maximum permissible negative jerk is switched on so that the desired final speed is reached.
- Fig. 7 illustrates an exemplary course of the jerk for a speed change together with the switching times.
- T l , 0 denotes the time at which a rescheduling takes place.
- the times T l , 1 , T l , 2 and T l , 3 each refer to the calculated switching times between the individual phases. Their calculation is outlined in the following paragraph.
- a new situation occurs as soon as the setpoint speed v hh * or the currently valid maximum acceleration for the hand lever control k l a max changes.
- the desired speed may change due to a new hand lever position w hh or by a new specification of k l or v max (cf. Fig. 6 ). Analogously, a variation of the maximum valid acceleration by k l or a max is possible.
- y ⁇ l * T l . 1 y ⁇ l * T l . 0 + ⁇ ⁇ T 1 ⁇ y ⁇ l * T l . 0 + 1 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ T 1 2 ⁇ u l . 1 .
- y ⁇ l * T l . 1 y ⁇ l * T l . 0 + ⁇ ⁇ T 1 ⁇ u l . 1
- y ⁇ l * T l . 1 y ⁇ l * T l . 0 + ⁇ ⁇ T 1 ⁇ u l . 1
- y ⁇ l * T l . 3 y ⁇ l * T l . 1 + ⁇ ⁇ T 2 ⁇ y ⁇ l * T l . 1 .
- y ⁇ l * T l . 2 y ⁇ l * T l . 1 .
- u l , 2 0 was assumed.
- y ⁇ l * T l . 3 y ⁇ l * T l . 2 + ⁇ ⁇ T 3 ⁇ y ⁇ l * T l . 2 + 1 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ T 3 2 ⁇ u l . 3 .
- y ⁇ l * T l . 3 y ⁇ l * T l . 2 + ⁇ ⁇ T 3 ⁇ u l . 3 ,
- the speed and acceleration curves to be planned y ⁇ l * and y ⁇ ⁇ l * can be calculated analytically with the individual switching times. It should be mentioned here that the trajectories planned by the switching times are often not traversed completely, since a new situation occurs before reaching the switching time T l , 3 , as a result a rescheduling takes place and new switching times are calculated. As already mentioned, a new situation occurs by a change of w hh , V max , a max or k l .
- Fig. 8 shows a trajectory exemplified by the method presented.
- the course of the trajectories includes both cases, which can occur on the basis of (1.24).
- the maximum allowable acceleration due to the hand lever position is not fully achieved.
- the associated position history is calculated according to Fig. 5 by integrating the velocity profile, the position being initialized at startup by the rope length currently being handled by the hoist winch.
- the control consists of two different modes of operation: the active sea state compensation for decoupling the vertical load movement from the ship movement with free-hanging load and the constant voltage control to avoid slack rope, as soon as the load is deposited on the seabed.
- the sea state compensation is initially active. Based on a detection of the settling process is automatically switched to the constant voltage control.
- Fig. 9 illustrates the overall concept with the associated control and control variables.
- each of the two different modes of operation could also be implemented without the other mode of operation.
- a constant voltage mode as described below, can also be used independently of the use of the crane on a ship and independently of an active sea state compensation.
- Active hoist compensation is intended to control the hoist winch so that the winch movement controls the vertical movement of the rope suspension point z a H compensates and the crane operator moves the load with the help of the hand lever in the considered as inertial h-coordinate system.
- the driver In order for the driver to have the required predictive behavior for minimizing the compensation error, it is converted by a pilot control and stabilization part in the form of a two-degree-of-freedom structure.
- the feedforward control is calculated from a differential parameterization with the aid of the flat output of the wind dynamics and results from the planned trajectories for moving the load y l * . y ⁇ l * and y ⁇ l * and the negative trajectories for the compensation movement - y a * .
- the cable force at the load F sl should be regulated to a constant amount in order to avoid slack rope. Therefore, in this mode of operation, the hand lever is deactivated and the trajectories planned from the hand lever signal are no longer applied.
- the control of the winch is again by a two-degree-of-freedom structure with pilot control and stabilization part.
- the length l s is obtained indirectly from the angle of rotation ⁇ h measured using an incremental encoder and the winding radius r h ( j l ) dependent on the winding position j l .
- the associated cable speed i s can be calculated by numerical differentiation with suitable low-pass filtering.
- the cable force F c acting on the cable suspension point is detected by means of a force measuring axis.
- Fig. 10 illustrates the control of the hoist winch for the active sea state compensation with a block diagram in the frequency domain.
- the compensation of the vertical movement of the cable suspension point acting as an input disturbance on the cable system G s , z ( s ) takes place Z a H s purely pre-taxing; Rope and load dynamics are neglected.
- the rope's own dynamics are excited, but in practice it can be assumed that the resulting load movement in the water is strongly damped and decays very rapidly.
- Neglecting the compensation movement Y a * s can be the reference size Y H * s be approximated at constant or stationary Handhebelauslenkung as a ramp-shaped signal, since in such a case, a constant target speed v hh * is present.
- the open chain K a (s) G h (s) must therefore have l 2 behavior [9].
- the decrease in the negative spring force ⁇ F c is calculated in each case with respect to the last high point F c in the measured force signal F c .
- the force signal is preprocessed by a corresponding low-pass filter.
- ⁇ 1 ⁇ 1 and the maximum value ⁇ F c , max were determined experimentally.
- the two parameters ⁇ 2 ⁇ 1 and F ⁇ ⁇ c . m ⁇ a ⁇ x were also determined experimentally.
- the crane operator manually maneuvers the change from the constant tension mode to the active sea state compensation with the load suspended.
- Fig. 11 shows the converted control of the hoist winch in the constant voltage mode in a block diagram in the frequency domain.
- the output of the cable system F c ( s ) ie the force measured at the cable suspension point, is returned instead of the output of the winch system Y h ( s ).
- the measured force F c ( s ) is based on (2.12) the force change ⁇ F c ( s ) and the static force Weight m e g + ⁇ s l s g , which is referred to in the image area with M ( s ) together.
- the cable system is again approximated as a spring-mass system.
- the precontrol F ( s ) of the two-degree-of-freedom structure is identical to that for active sea state compensation and given by (2.2) or (2.3). However, in the constant voltage mode, the hand lever signal is not applied, which is why the reference trajectory only from the negative target speed and - acceleration - y ⁇ a * and - y ⁇ ⁇ a * exists for the compensation movement.
- the pilot control component initially compensates for the vertical movement of the cable suspension point Z a H s , However, there is no direct stabilization of the winch position by a return of Y h ( s ). This is done indirectly by the return of the measured force signal.
- the compensation error E a ( s ) is compensated by a stable transfer function G CT , 1 ( s ) and the wind position stabilized indirectly.
- the request to the controller K s ( s ) also results in this case from the expected command signal F c * s . which after a transition phase by the constant desired force F c * from (2.21).
- the open chain must have K s ( s ) G h ( s ) G s, F ( s ) l behavior.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Control And Safety Of Cranes (AREA)
- Jib Cranes (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102012004802A DE102012004802A1 (de) | 2012-03-09 | 2012-03-09 | Kransteuerung mit Aufteilung einer kinematisch beschränkten Größe des Hubwerks |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2636636A1 true EP2636636A1 (fr) | 2013-09-11 |
EP2636636B1 EP2636636B1 (fr) | 2016-05-18 |
Family
ID=47559261
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13000100.1A Active EP2636636B1 (fr) | 2012-03-09 | 2013-01-09 | Commande de grue avec répartition de la grandeur du dispositif de levage réduite par cinématique |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9790061B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP2636636B1 (fr) |
JP (1) | JP6189055B2 (fr) |
KR (1) | KR102028074B1 (fr) |
CN (1) | CN103303798B (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102012004802A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10925637B2 (en) * | 2010-03-11 | 2021-02-23 | Mainstay Medical Limited | Methods of implanting electrode leads for use with implantable neuromuscular electrical stimulator |
DE102012004802A1 (de) * | 2012-03-09 | 2013-09-12 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Kransteuerung mit Aufteilung einer kinematisch beschränkten Größe des Hubwerks |
DE102016000351A1 (de) | 2016-01-14 | 2017-07-20 | Liebherr-Werk Biberach Gmbh | Kran-, Baumaschinen- oder Flurförderzeug-Simulator |
DE102016000353A1 (de) * | 2016-01-14 | 2017-07-20 | Liebherr-Components Biberach Gmbh | Kran-, Baumaschinen- oder Flurförderzeug-Simulator |
EP3226095A1 (fr) | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-04 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Système et procédé de navigation d'un véhicule de plongée à navigation autonome lors de l'entrée dans une station d'arrêt |
CN106081944B (zh) * | 2016-05-06 | 2019-02-12 | 江苏宏强船舶重工有限公司 | 一种重吊船的节本型吊重试验方法 |
JP6763233B2 (ja) * | 2016-08-17 | 2020-09-30 | 富士電機株式会社 | 制御装置、クレーン駆動装置、クレーン装置、プログラムおよび制御方法 |
JP2019532220A (ja) * | 2016-09-02 | 2019-11-07 | ナショナル オイルウェル ヴァーコ ノルウェー アーエス | 洋上風車建設方法 |
US11320021B2 (en) | 2016-12-08 | 2022-05-03 | Taiyuan University Of Technology | Method and device for preventing impact vibration of lift system |
CN110719886B (zh) * | 2017-04-24 | 2022-02-08 | 伊特里克公司 | 用于在海上船上使用的运动补偿起重机 |
EP3453669A1 (fr) * | 2017-09-08 | 2019-03-13 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Dispositif de commande pour un engin de levage et son procédé de fonctionnement |
JP7059605B2 (ja) * | 2017-12-08 | 2022-04-26 | 富士電機株式会社 | クレーンの運転制御装置 |
NL2020389B1 (en) * | 2018-02-06 | 2019-08-14 | Itrec Bv | A crane |
RU195445U1 (ru) | 2018-02-08 | 2020-01-28 | Вита Инклината Текнолоджис, Инк. | Устройство устойчивости груза на внешней подвеске |
JP7172256B2 (ja) * | 2018-07-31 | 2022-11-16 | 株式会社タダノ | クレーン |
JP7084347B2 (ja) * | 2019-03-29 | 2022-06-14 | グローブライド株式会社 | ウインチ制御システム |
DE102020126689A1 (de) * | 2020-10-12 | 2022-04-14 | Volocopter Gmbh | Fluggerät sowie Verfahren und rechnergestütztes System zur Steuerung eines Fluggeräts |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002000543A2 (fr) * | 2000-06-28 | 2002-01-03 | Sandia Corporation | Systeme et procede de commande destines a commander une charge utile dans une grue a plateforme mobile |
WO2005090226A1 (fr) * | 2004-03-19 | 2005-09-29 | Subsea 7 Bv | Dispositif et procede de compensation du pilonnement |
EP2123588A1 (fr) * | 2008-05-21 | 2009-11-25 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH | Commande de grue dotée d'une suite active de houle |
Family Cites Families (65)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5842118B2 (ja) * | 1973-07-27 | 1983-09-17 | オオジセイキコウギヨウ カブシキガイシヤ | カクダイサレタハンイデヘイコウウンドウスルユアツクレ−ンソウチ |
FR2344490A1 (fr) * | 1976-03-18 | 1977-10-14 | Elf Aquitaine | Dispositif de compensation des variations de distance entre un objet flottant sur l'eau et le fond de celle-ci |
GB1569595A (en) * | 1976-09-01 | 1980-06-18 | Secretary Industry Brit | Cranes |
US4349179A (en) * | 1979-06-19 | 1982-09-14 | Gec Mechanical Handling Limited | Control means for motion compensation devices |
US4448396A (en) * | 1982-02-25 | 1984-05-15 | American Hoist & Derrick Company | Heave motion compensation apparatus |
US4624450A (en) | 1984-09-20 | 1986-11-25 | Paccar Inc. | Constant tension hoisting system |
DE3643114C2 (de) | 1986-01-13 | 1995-06-01 | Rexroth Mannesmann Gmbh | Windensteuerung mit Seegangsfolgeeinrichtung |
JPS6317793A (ja) * | 1986-07-11 | 1988-01-25 | 株式会社日立製作所 | クレ−ンの制御方式 |
FI86533C (fi) * | 1989-06-12 | 1992-09-10 | Kone Oy | Foerfarande foer daempning av svaengningarna hos en kranlast. |
JP2899107B2 (ja) * | 1990-11-27 | 1999-06-02 | 石川島播磨重工業株式会社 | フローティングクレーンの揺動影響除去装置 |
US5117992A (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 1992-06-02 | Virginia International Terminals, Inc. | System for learning control commands to robotically move a load, especially suitable for use in cranes to reduce load sway |
US5209302A (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1993-05-11 | Retsco, Inc. | Semi-active heave compensation system for marine vessels |
US5392935A (en) * | 1992-10-06 | 1995-02-28 | Obayashi Corporation | Control system for cable crane |
FR2698344B1 (fr) * | 1992-11-23 | 1994-12-30 | Telemecanique | Dispositif de régulation du transfert d'une charge suspendue. |
JPH0776490A (ja) * | 1993-09-09 | 1995-03-20 | Komatsu Ltd | クレーンの旋回自動停止制御装置 |
JPH07187568A (ja) * | 1993-12-28 | 1995-07-25 | Komatsu Ltd | クレーンの制御装置 |
KR970003508B1 (ko) * | 1994-03-25 | 1997-03-18 | 한국원자력연구소 | 크레인의 진동방지를 위한 속도 제어 방법 |
US6135301A (en) * | 1994-03-28 | 2000-10-24 | Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Swaying hoisted load-piece damping control apparatus |
US5443566A (en) * | 1994-05-23 | 1995-08-22 | General Electric Company | Electronic antisway control |
US5510988A (en) * | 1994-12-19 | 1996-04-23 | General Motors Corporation | Vehicle chassis control system |
US5785191A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1998-07-28 | Sandia Corporation | Operator control systems and methods for swing-free gantry-style cranes |
DE19645812C1 (de) | 1996-11-07 | 1998-02-26 | Stahl R Foerdertech Gmbh | Steuerungsanordnung mit Erkennung des Gewichts der Last |
JP3150636B2 (ja) * | 1996-12-06 | 2001-03-26 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | クレーンの巻き下げ衝突防止装置 |
US6439407B1 (en) * | 1998-07-13 | 2002-08-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce | System for stabilizing and controlling a hoisted load |
US6216789B1 (en) * | 1999-07-19 | 2001-04-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Heave compensated wireline logging winch system and method of use |
US6082947A (en) * | 1999-08-17 | 2000-07-04 | Adamson; James E. | Coordinated motion marine lifting device |
US6631300B1 (en) * | 1999-11-05 | 2003-10-07 | Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Nonlinear active control of dynamical systems |
GB9929102D0 (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2000-02-02 | Electric Drive Systems S A | Maritime reeling system |
JP3501103B2 (ja) * | 2000-05-24 | 2004-03-02 | コベルコ建機株式会社 | 船上クレーン装置の吊り動作制御方法及び装置 |
DE10029579B4 (de) * | 2000-06-15 | 2011-03-24 | Hofer, Eberhard P., Prof. Dr. | Verfahren zur Orientierung der Last in Krananlagen |
EP1328913A4 (fr) | 2000-09-27 | 2004-09-22 | Oceaneering Int Inc | Procede et systeme pour controler un deploiement rapide |
PT1326798E (pt) * | 2000-10-19 | 2006-07-31 | Liebherr Werk Nenzing | Guindaste ou escavadora para movimentacao de uma carga suspensa num cabo portador, com amortecimento pendular da carga. |
US6588610B2 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2003-07-08 | National University Of Singapore | Anti-sway control of a crane under operator's command |
US6826452B1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2004-11-30 | The Penn State Research Foundation | Cable array robot for material handling |
US6871840B2 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2005-03-29 | Oceaneering International, Inc. | System and method for motion compensation utilizing an underwater sensor |
JP2004332890A (ja) * | 2003-05-12 | 2004-11-25 | Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd | 上下動補償機能付巻上げ装置 |
US7793763B2 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2010-09-14 | University Of Maryland, Baltimore County | System and method for damping vibrations in elevator cables |
US7289875B2 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2007-10-30 | Siemens Technology-To-Business Center Llc | Systems and methods for sway control |
US6932325B1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-08-23 | Dynacon, Inc. | Active-over-passive coordinated motion winch |
GB0509993D0 (en) * | 2005-05-17 | 2005-06-22 | Bamford Antony S | Load sharing riser tensioning system |
DE102005034677A1 (de) * | 2005-07-25 | 2007-02-01 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh, Nenzing | Kran |
US7599762B2 (en) * | 2005-08-24 | 2009-10-06 | Rockwell Automatino Technologies, Inc. | Model-based control for crane control and underway replenishment |
US7831333B2 (en) * | 2006-03-14 | 2010-11-09 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Method for the automatic transfer of a load hanging at a load rope of a crane or excavator with a load oscillation damping and a trajectory planner |
EP2054335B1 (fr) * | 2006-08-15 | 2012-04-04 | Hydralift Amclyde, Inc. | Compensateur actif direct de mouvement de tangage actif/passif à poulie unique |
DE102006040782A1 (de) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-20 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh, Nenzing | Sicherungs- und Steuerungsverfahren für Krane |
EP2092402B1 (fr) * | 2006-12-06 | 2015-08-05 | National Oilwell Varco, L.P. | Procédé et appareil pour la compensation active du tangage |
US7367464B1 (en) * | 2007-01-30 | 2008-05-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Pendulation control system with active rider block tagline system for shipboard cranes |
DE102007039408A1 (de) * | 2007-05-16 | 2008-11-20 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Kransteuerung, Kran und Verfahren |
JP2010538944A (ja) * | 2007-09-14 | 2010-12-16 | グッドクレーン コーポレーション | 運動補償システム |
NO336258B1 (no) * | 2007-09-19 | 2015-07-06 | Nat Oilwell Varco Norway As | Fremgangsmåte og anordning for løftkompensering. |
TWI444939B (zh) * | 2008-01-10 | 2014-07-11 | Univ Nat Taiwan | 工程吊車之模擬系統及其方法 |
FI120789B (fi) * | 2008-06-23 | 2010-03-15 | Konecranes Oyj | Menetelmä nopeussäädettävän nostinkäytön moottorin pyörimisnopeuden ohjaamiseksi ja nostinkäyttö |
US8316947B2 (en) * | 2008-08-14 | 2012-11-27 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for deployment of a subsea well intervention system |
US8195368B1 (en) * | 2008-11-07 | 2012-06-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Coordinated control of two shipboard cranes for cargo transfer with ship motion compensation |
EP2275340B1 (fr) * | 2009-05-22 | 2017-10-11 | Keppel Fels Ltd | Installation d'éolienne en mer |
KR101144863B1 (ko) * | 2009-06-09 | 2012-05-14 | 최기윤 | 인풋 쉐이핑을 위한 호이스트 길이 측정방법 |
DE102009032269A1 (de) * | 2009-07-08 | 2011-01-13 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Kransteuerung zur Ansteuerung eines Hubwerkes eines Kranes |
DE102009032267A1 (de) * | 2009-07-08 | 2011-01-13 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh, Nenzing | Kran zum Umschlagen einer an einem Lastseil hängenden Last |
CN101713982A (zh) * | 2009-11-06 | 2010-05-26 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | 一种主动式波浪补偿控制*** |
US9132997B2 (en) * | 2010-04-23 | 2015-09-15 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Crane control systems and methods |
DE102012004737A1 (de) * | 2012-03-08 | 2013-09-12 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Hydrauliksystem und Kran |
DE102012004803A1 (de) * | 2012-03-09 | 2013-09-12 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Kransteuerung mit Antriebsbeschränkung |
DE102012004914A1 (de) * | 2012-03-09 | 2013-09-12 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Kransteuerung mit Seilkraftmodus |
DE102012004802A1 (de) * | 2012-03-09 | 2013-09-12 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh | Kransteuerung mit Aufteilung einer kinematisch beschränkten Größe des Hubwerks |
US9688516B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-27 | Oil States Industries, Inc. | Elastomeric load compensators for load compensation of cranes |
-
2012
- 2012-03-09 DE DE102012004802A patent/DE102012004802A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2013
- 2013-01-09 EP EP13000100.1A patent/EP2636636B1/fr active Active
- 2013-03-06 JP JP2013044638A patent/JP6189055B2/ja active Active
- 2013-03-07 US US13/788,828 patent/US9790061B2/en active Active
- 2013-03-08 KR KR1020130025047A patent/KR102028074B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2013-03-11 CN CN201310076835.0A patent/CN103303798B/zh active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002000543A2 (fr) * | 2000-06-28 | 2002-01-03 | Sandia Corporation | Systeme et procede de commande destines a commander une charge utile dans une grue a plateforme mobile |
WO2005090226A1 (fr) * | 2004-03-19 | 2005-09-29 | Subsea 7 Bv | Dispositif et procede de compensation du pilonnement |
EP2123588A1 (fr) * | 2008-05-21 | 2009-11-25 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH | Commande de grue dotée d'une suite active de houle |
DE102008024513A1 (de) | 2008-05-21 | 2009-11-26 | Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh, Nenzing | Kransteuerung mit aktiver Seegangsfolge |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN103303798A (zh) | 2013-09-18 |
JP2013184824A (ja) | 2013-09-19 |
DE102012004802A1 (de) | 2013-09-12 |
CN103303798B (zh) | 2017-03-01 |
KR20130103432A (ko) | 2013-09-23 |
KR102028074B1 (ko) | 2019-10-02 |
US20130245815A1 (en) | 2013-09-19 |
US9790061B2 (en) | 2017-10-17 |
EP2636636B1 (fr) | 2016-05-18 |
JP6189055B2 (ja) | 2017-08-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2636636B1 (fr) | Commande de grue avec répartition de la grandeur du dispositif de levage réduite par cinématique | |
EP2636635B1 (fr) | Commande de grue avec mode de traction de câble | |
EP2636632B1 (fr) | Commande de grue avec limite d'entraînement | |
EP3649072B1 (fr) | Grue et procédé de commande d'une telle grue | |
DE102018005068A1 (de) | Kran und Verfahren zum Steuern eines solchen Krans | |
EP1628902B1 (fr) | Grue ou excavatrice destinee a la manipulation d'une charge suspendue a un cable presentant un systeme de guidage optimise | |
EP2272784B1 (fr) | Grue pour envelopper une charge suspendue à un câble porteur | |
EP2272786B1 (fr) | Commande de grue pour la commande d'un dispositif de levage de grue | |
DE19907989B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Bahnregelung von Kranen und Vorrichtung zum bahngenauen Verfahren einer Last | |
EP4013713B1 (fr) | Grue et procédé de commande d'une telle grue | |
EP2298687A2 (fr) | Système de détection de la masse de charge d'une charge suspendue à une corde de levage de grue | |
DE102009030784A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Steuern des Betriebs eines Fahrzeugs | |
DE202010002309U1 (de) | Reglereinrichtung für Helikopter | |
AT520008B1 (de) | Verfahren zum Dämpfen von Drehschwingungen eines Lastaufnahmeelements einer Hebeeinrichtung | |
DE102015100669A1 (de) | Anti-pendel-steuerverfahren mit einstellbarer unterstützung für den transport einer schwebenden last | |
WO2009030586A1 (fr) | Dispositif de régulation destiné à atténuer les mouvements pendulaires d'une charge suspendue à un câble | |
DE19920431A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Lastpendeldämpfung an Kranen mit reduzierter Sensorik | |
EP2987759B1 (fr) | Grue ayant un mouvement oscillant défini pour atteindre un emplacement cible | |
DE102021121818A1 (de) | Turmdrehkran, Verfahren und Steuerungseinheit zum Betreiben eines Turmdrehkrans, Laufkatze und Katzfahrwerk | |
EP4406905A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de fonctionnement d'une grue à flèche rotative et grue à flèche rotative | |
DE102022123785A1 (de) | Arbeitsgerät mit einem mechanischen Schlitzwandgreifer und Verfahren zum Durchführen eines Arbeitsschritts eines solchen | |
EP2110357A1 (fr) | Procédé d'amortissement d'oscillations d'une charge de biens en vrac guidée par une grue, programme de commande et système d'automatisation de grue | |
EP3326957A1 (fr) | Procédé de fonctionnement d'une grue |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130612 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B66C 13/06 20060101ALI20151014BHEP Ipc: B66D 1/52 20060101AFI20151014BHEP Ipc: B66C 13/04 20060101ALI20151014BHEP Ipc: B66C 13/18 20060101ALI20151014BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160113 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: SAWODNY, OLIVER, DR.-ING. Inventor name: EBERHARTER, JOHANNES KARL, DR. Inventor name: SCHNEIDER, KLAUS, DR. Inventor name: KUECHLER, SEBASTIAN, DI |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 800274 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160615 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502013002989 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160819 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160919 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502013002989 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170131 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170131 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170131 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170131 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170109 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170109 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 800274 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180109 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180109 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130109 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160918 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230704 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20240126 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240201 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240124 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Payment date: 20240129 Year of fee payment: 12 |