EP0437946B1 - Web barrier packaging material - Google Patents
Web barrier packaging material Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0437946B1 EP0437946B1 EP90313653A EP90313653A EP0437946B1 EP 0437946 B1 EP0437946 B1 EP 0437946B1 EP 90313653 A EP90313653 A EP 90313653A EP 90313653 A EP90313653 A EP 90313653A EP 0437946 B1 EP0437946 B1 EP 0437946B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- oxygen
- metallic element
- coating
- web
- substrate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C14/00—Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
- C23C14/0021—Reactive sputtering or evaporation
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D81/00—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents
- B65D81/34—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within the package
- B65D81/3446—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within the package specially adapted to be heated by microwaves
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C14/00—Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
- C23C14/06—Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the coating material
- C23C14/0688—Cermets, e.g. mixtures of metal and one or more of carbides, nitrides, oxides or borides
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2581/00—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents
- B65D2581/34—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within
- B65D2581/3437—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within specially adapted to be heated by microwaves
- B65D2581/3439—Means for affecting the heating or cooking properties
- B65D2581/3454—Microwave reactive layer having a specified optical density
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2581/00—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents
- B65D2581/34—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within
- B65D2581/3437—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within specially adapted to be heated by microwaves
- B65D2581/3463—Means for applying microwave reactive material to the package
- B65D2581/3466—Microwave reactive material applied by vacuum, sputter or vapor deposition
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2581/00—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents
- B65D2581/34—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within
- B65D2581/3437—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within specially adapted to be heated by microwaves
- B65D2581/3471—Microwave reactive substances present in the packaging material
- B65D2581/3472—Aluminium or compounds thereof
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2581/00—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents
- B65D2581/34—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within
- B65D2581/3437—Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents for packaging foodstuffs or other articles intended to be cooked or heated within specially adapted to be heated by microwaves
- B65D2581/3471—Microwave reactive substances present in the packaging material
- B65D2581/3479—Other metallic compounds, e.g. silver, gold, copper, nickel
Definitions
- This invention relates to coated web materials suitable for barrier packaging.
- the vacuum deposition of metals with low evaporation temperatures, such as aluminium, onto web substrates to produce films with good barrier to oxygen and/or water vapour suitable for barrier packaging is well known and extremely cost-effective, and has been practised for many years.
- the vacuum deposition of transparent metal oxides or non-metal oxides with good barrier onto web substrates is more difficult because of their much higher evaporation temperatures, but processes for achieving this, such as sputtering or electron beam evaporation, are known. However, these are little used for the production of packaging materials because they are generally slow, technically demanding and consequently uneconomic.
- such coated materials can have a moderate barrier to oxygen and water vapour (using 12 micrometre (12 micron) polyester film as the substrate, an oxygen permeability of 5 cm 3 (cc)/metre 2 /24 hours at 23°C/O % RH and an MVTR of 1.9 grams/metre 2 /24 hours at 38°C/90 % RH are quoted), but these permeabilities are considered insufficient for barrier packaging of oxygen or moisture sensitive foodstuffs requiring long shelf-life.
- the invention provides a web material useful as a packaging material for oxygen- and/or moisture-sensitive foodstuffs, which material comprises a web substrate of film, paper or board having a gas or moisture barrier coating thereon, characterised in that the coating comprises mixture of a metallic element and an oxide of the metallic element, the metallic element and the metallic element oxide are essentially uniformly distributed throughout the coating, and the amount of the metallic element in the coating is greater than zero, and is sufficiently low that the web material is substantially transparent to microwave radiation.
- a method of making the web material described above comprising subjecting a web substrate of film, paper or board to a reactive evaporation process wherein an oxygen-containing gas or vapour is introduced directly into a stream of evaporating metallic element to deposit on the substrate a substantially uniform mixture of the metallic element and metallic element oxide, wherein the relative proportions of the oxygen containing gas or vapour and the evaporating metallic element are such that the amount of the metallic element in the coating is greater than zero, and is sufficiently low that the web material is substantially transparent to microwave radiation.
- the preferred layer of coating can be described as to its thickness and composition as follows. Its thickness is preferably such that the optical density of a metal layer deposited under the same operating conditions but in the absence of oxygen is from 0.4 to 5.0, more preferably from 1.5 to 3.0, higher than the optical density of the uncoated substrate.
- the process parameters can be first adjusted to achieve a metal deposition (in the absence of oxygen) to give the above optical density increase, so that those parameters can thereafter remain unchanged but oxygen is admitted.
- composition of the preferred coating is such that the optical density of the coating measured immediately after its deposition by reactive evaporation, is 0.1 to 0.4 higher than that of the uncoated substrate.
- one way of making preferred coatings of the invention is to first deposit metal alone (no oxygen) to achieve the described coating thickness (measured by optical density increase) and then admit oxygen until the optical density decreases to the range given, and the coatings thereafter formed are preferred coatings of the invention.
- the actual barrier achieved is dependent on the film substrate used, which can include polyester, polyamide, polyolefine, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, polysulphone, polyacrylonitrile or regenerated cellulose films, including copolymers, blends, composites or co-extrusions of these materials, or variants coated with other plastics. Certain papers and boards, coated with suitable plastics, are also included.
- the reactive evaporation process can be applied to any substrate which can be vacuum deposited with a metal such as aluminium.
- poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate or nylon 6 films are preferred, since when coated with the above mentioned metal oxide/metal mixture, they have low permeability to oxygen and water vapour, and are suitable, (where necessary laminated to, or coated with, a heat sealable material such as a polyolefine) for packaging oxygen or moisture sensitive foodstuffs or other materials. Barrier is further enhanced by lamination.
- Such laminates which are substantially transparent to both light and microwave radiation, can be used as environmentally friendly alternatives to laminates of poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate/polyvinylidene chloride/polyethylene, eg. for applications such as lidding of food containers packed using the process of modified or controlled atmosphere packaging. Unlike the polyvinylidene chloride containing laminates, they can be disposed of by incineration without producing hydrogen chloride, which is deleterious to the environment.
- Oxygen and moisture barrier achieved will vary according to the substrate, the metal/oxide coating thickness and the metal/oxide stoichiometry.
- the effect of the last parameter on a metal/oxide coated film based on a poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate substrate is illustrated in example 1 below.
- the metal oxide/metal mixture can be coated on one or both sides of the substrate.
- Two side coating can be advantageous for some applications, eg. a poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate film coated on both sides with the metal oxide/metal mixture, and having good barrier to oxygen and water vapour, can be used as an alternative to aluminium foil in composites, such as board/polyethylene/foil/polyethylene, used for the production of cartons for aseptic packaging of liquids or particulate/liquid suspensions.
- Such alternative composites can be produced by existing processes such as tandem extrusion lamination, or by other lamination techniques. Cartons produced by such techniques have advantages over the traditional foil composite cartons, eg. they can be reheated in microwave ovens.
- a substantially transparent regenerated cellulose film with good barrier to oxygen and water vapour can be produced by coating a regenerated cellulose base film with a lacquer such as those described in our European patent specification no. 0340910A, and then coating with the metal/oxide mixture.
- a film is a more environmentally friendly alternative to the polyvinylidene chloride coated regenerated cellulose films currently used for barrier packaging of foodstuffs.
- a substantially transparent polyolefine film with good barrier to oxygen and water vapour can be produced by coating a polyolefine film with a lacquer such as those described in our European patent specification no. 0340910A, and then coating with the metal/oxide mixture.
- a film can be laminated to a reverse printed film, to produce a barrier laminate with sandwiched print suitable for barrier packaging.
- the metal used in the reactive evaporation process can be any metal which forms an oxide with good barrier properties, such as aluminium, magnesium or tin.
- the gas used in the reactive evaporation process can be oxygen or any other gas or vapour containing oxygen such as water vapour or carbon monoxide or dioxide.
- the oxygen or oxygen gas is introduced directly into the stream of evaporating metal and not otherwise into the vacuum chamber as a whole.
- the gas is preferably introduced via a pipe into the centre of the stream of evaporating metal. This pipe is preferably terminated by a nozzle or other spreading device which will cause the gas to spread throughout the stream, thus producing a consistent mixture of oxide and metal on the substrate with no bands of high metal and high oxide content.
- the coating formed is an essentially homogeneous mixture of metal and metal oxide throughout.
- the thickness of the metal/oxide coating should be in a range such that it provides good adhesion to the substrate and has good mechanical strength and barrier. Thickness is most easily specified by reference to the optical density of a metal layer formed under the same operating conditions but in the absence of oxygen. An optical density of 0.4 to 5.0 higher than the optical density of the substrate gives the required properties, the range 1.5-3.0 being especially preferred. These optical densities of metal appear to equate to coat weights of metal/oxide mixture of approximately 0.04-0.5 and 0.15-0.30 grams/metre 2 , but since these latter coat weights are difficult to measure analytically without specialist equipment, the former specification is preferred.
- the optical density which should be between 0.01 and 0.40 higher than the optical density of the substrate, measured immediately after coating of the mixture on the substrate, which equates approximately to an optical density between 0.0 and 0.25 higher than the optical density of the substrate after fading due to oxidation in the atmosphere has taken place (see example 1).
- barrier begins to deteriorate to an unacceptable level.
- the coating becomes brown in colour and begins to absorb microwave radiation.
- these optical density figures will be additive. It is to be noted that the coated films of the invention are microwave transparent, which places a maximum on the amount of free metal which can be present therein.
- FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings is a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of the apparatus, which comprises a vacuum chamber X for depositing a layer of metal such as aluminium on one surface of a continuous web of plastic film. Within the chamber is a supply reel A from which film Y passes over a cooled drum B to take up reel C. An aperture and shutter assembly D controls the zone of evaporation of a metal supplied from a wire feed E to a ceramic heater block F maintained at a temperature above the evaporation temperature of the metal at the chamber pressure.
- the chamber is provided with an array of collimated light sources J across the width of the film and a corresponding array of photocells K so that the light transmission of the film can be measured after coating.
- the chamber is provided with viewing ports G and is connected at H to vacuum pumps.
- vaporised metal from the heatrer flows in a zone of evaporation, indicated by broken lines Z, towards drum B and condenses on the film overlying the drum.
- a discharge nozzle 10 connected by a pipe 11 to an inlet 12 for receiving a supply of a gas or vapour (not shown).
- the nozzle 10 is located either within the zone Z or between the heaters, and is directed in the direction of vapour flow from the heater to the drum.
- the gas is introduced into the zone of vaporising metal. If the gas is merely introduced into the chamber outside this zone, this produced a pressure rise within the chamber causing unsatisfactory deposition and eventually the mean free path of the vaporised metal is so reduced that no deposition occurs.
- a 1,400 mm wide web of 12 micrometres (12 micron) poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate film (Melinex 800 ex-ICI Films) was placed inside a metallising chamber similar to that shown diagrammatically in Figure 1, and threaded from the offwind position A, over the drum B, onto the wind up position C. Twelve ceramic heaters F were arranged across the web and spaced 20 centimetres from drum B.
- a nozzle 10 was located between each heater, all the nozzles being connected to the inlet 12 to which was connected a supply of oxygen gas. Both the gas supply and the flow to each individual nozzle were controllable by adjustable valves.
- the chamber was evacuated to a pressure of 133.32 kPa (10 -3 torr) and aluminium wire fed to each heater at a rate of 30 grams/minute, with the shutter D closed.
- the web was accelerated to a speed of 300 metres/minute and optical density of the uncoated web measured at 0.04.
- the shutter was then opened in order to coat the film with aluminium. Initially, approximately 25% of the aluminium evaporated was deposited on the web, giving a coating weight of about 0.1 grams/metre 2 and an optical density of about 2.5.
- Heater temperatures and wire feed rates were adjusted to give a generally even optical density across the web (this is not critical to the process).
- Oxygen was then discharged through the nozzles and the flow rate increased until the coating on the film became just transparent, i.e. the optical density of the coated film was 0.04, similar to the optical density of the base film.
- Oxygen flow rates to individual nozzles were adjusted to give an even coating across the web with no significant bands of different optical density. Chamber pressure was maintained at approximately 133.32 kPa (10 -3 torr).
- Oxygen flow rate was then progressively reduced at the main oxygen inlet control, adjusting the flow rates to individual nozzles where necessary to keep optical density even across the web. A range of optical densities from 0.05 to 0.55 were produced.
- Oxygen permeability and MVTR of the 12 micrometres (12 micron) polyester film before metallising were respectively 120 cm 3 (cc)/metre 2 /24 hours (at 23 °C, 0 % RH) and 40 grams/metre 2 /24 hours (at 38 °C, 0 % RH).
- Oxygen permeability and moisture vapour transmission rate of the various samples in the reel are shown graphically in Figures 2 and 3.
- Optical density referred to on the scale is that prior to fading.
- Optical densities after fading are shown in brackets. Tests indicated that barrier was not affected by fading.
- the value of optical density indicated by the arrow on the abscissa indicates that of the base polyester film.
- the values at permeability 6 to 7 and MVTR 2.0 to 2.5 are those of the clear oxide coating.
- the units of oxygen permeability are cm 3 (cc)/m 2 /24 hours at 23 °C/0% RH, and the optical densities in brackets were measured after 1 month.
- the units for MVTR are g/m 2 /24 hours at 38°C/90% RH.
- Samples of film having various optical densities were coated on the oxide surface with a layer of a commercially available two component polyurethane adhesive and dried to give a coat weight of 2.8 grams/metre 2 .
- the adhesive coated surface was then calendered to the corona treated surface of a commercially available 50 micrometres (50 micron) low density polyethylene (LDPE) film and left for one week to allow the adhesive to cure. After curing, oxygen permeability and MVTR were re-measured on the laminate, and showed significant improvement over the original unlaminated film. Results are shown graphically in Figs. 4 and 5.
- the units of oxygen permeability are cm 3 (cc)/m 2 /24 hours at 23°C/ 0% RH.
- the numbers in brackets are the optical density before fading (ie. the original optical density).
- the clear oxide coating has an optical density of 0.04 (oxygen permeability 4 to 5 and MVTR about 1.5).
- materials to the left of the vertical line at O.D. about 0.29 have no microwave interaction, whereas those to the right of the line (ie. greater than about 0.29 OD) do have microwave interaction.
- the coated surface of this film was vacuum deposited with an aluminium/aluminium oxide mixture to an optical density 0.11 higher than the optical density of the original substrate (0.04) by the technique described in Example 1. After fading, the film had a final optical density of 0.07, an oxygen permeability of 5.8 cm 3 (cc)/metre 2 /24 hours at 23 °C/0 % relative humidity (RH) and an MVTR of 0.8 gram/metre 2 /24 hours at 38 °C/90 % RH.
- the oxide coated surface of the film was laminated, using the technique and conditions described in Example 1, to a reverse printed 12 micron poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate film.
- the laminate After lamination and curing of the adhesive, the laminate had an oxygen permeability of 1.0 cm 3 (cc)/metre 2 /24 hours at 23 °C/0 % RH, and MVTR of 0.3 grams/metre 2 /24 hours at 38 °C/90 % RH, an interply bond strength of greater than 300 grams/25 mm, and did not significantly attenuate microwave radiation.
- a 1,400 mm wide web of 320 gauge regenerated cellulose film (Cellophane MS ex-British Cellophane Ltd) was coated on both sides with 1.5 grams/metre 2 of a proprietary solvent-based lacquer based on a polyester resin of the type described in our European patent specification no. 0340910A.
- One surface of this film was vacuum deposited with an aluminium/aluminium oxide mixture to an optical density 0.13 higher than the optical density of the original substrate (0.04) by the technique described in Example 1.
- the film After fading, the film had a final optical density of 0.07, an oxygen permeability of 0.3 cm 3 (cc)/metre 2 /24 hours at 23 °C/0 % RH, an MVTR of 2.9 grams/metre 2 /24 hours at 38 °C/90 % RH, and did not significantly attenuate microwave radiation.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Laminated Bodies (AREA)
- Wrappers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to coated web materials suitable for barrier packaging.
- The vacuum deposition of metals with low evaporation temperatures, such as aluminium, onto web substrates to produce films with good barrier to oxygen and/or water vapour suitable for barrier packaging is well known and extremely cost-effective, and has been practised for many years. The vacuum deposition of transparent metal oxides or non-metal oxides with good barrier onto web substrates is more difficult because of their much higher evaporation temperatures, but processes for achieving this, such as sputtering or electron beam evaporation, are known. However, these are little used for the production of packaging materials because they are generally slow, technically demanding and consequently uneconomic.
- The production of a layered coating of metal and metal oxide (such as aluminium and aluminium oxide) on a web substrate via the reactive evaporation of the metal in the presence of oxygen or an oxygen containing gas or vapour, separating the two components using a baffle, is described in WO-A-82/02687. In the coatings so produced, the relative amounts of the two components vary throughout the coating thickness. Such coated films are described as giving the substrate improved optical and adhesion-promoting properties.
- The production of a transparent metal oxide coating (such as aluminium oxide) on a web substrate via the reactive evaporation of the metal in the presence of oxygen or an oxygen containing gas or vapour, in stoichiometric proportions, is described in our British patent application no. 2210826A. If a suitable substrate is used, such coated materials can have a moderate barrier to oxygen and water vapour (using 12 micrometre (12 micron) polyester film as the substrate, an oxygen permeability of 5 cm3 (cc)/metre2/24 hours at 23°C/O % RH and an MVTR of 1.9 grams/metre2/24 hours at 38°C/90 % RH are quoted), but these permeabilities are considered insufficient for barrier packaging of oxygen or moisture sensitive foodstuffs requiring long shelf-life. Techniques are described in this specification 2210826A for converting the transparent oxide coated film to a material with better barrier, adequate for barrier packaging, such as laminating the oxide coated film to itself, or coating the oxide surface with an organic lacquer and depositing a further layer of transparent oxide on this lacquer. However, such techniques of necessity increase cost and reduce viability to a limited range of packaging applications.
- An article entitled "Characterization of A1-A10x and Sn-SnOx cermet films deposited by reactive evaporation" in Thin Solid Films, 101 (1983), pages 345-356 is an academic study of the effect of A1-A10x stoichiometry on electrical properties.
- We have now found that it is possible to produce economically a web material which has an improved barrier to oxygen and/or water vapour, and yet is still substantially transparent to light and microwave radiation, via a modification to the stoichiometry of the reactive evaporation process, in which the substrate is deposited not with the metal oxide, as described in GB 2210826A, or graded layers of metal and metal oxide, as described in European patent 0070875, but with an intimate mixture of metal oxide and a low level of metal. The coating is an essentially uniform mixture of metal and metal oxide. The relative proportions are limited by the requirement that the mixture be microwave transparent, i.e. the amount of metal must not be so much as to significantly absorb microwaves.
- In one aspect, the invention provides a web material useful as a packaging material for oxygen- and/or moisture-sensitive foodstuffs, which material comprises a web substrate of film, paper or board having a gas or moisture barrier coating thereon, characterised in that the coating comprises mixture of a metallic element and an oxide of the metallic element, the metallic element and the metallic element oxide are essentially uniformly distributed throughout the coating, and the amount of the metallic element in the coating is greater than zero, and is sufficiently low that the web material is substantially transparent to microwave radiation.
- A method of making the web material described above, comprising subjecting a web substrate of film, paper or board to a reactive evaporation process wherein an oxygen-containing gas or vapour is introduced directly into a stream of evaporating metallic element to deposit on the substrate a substantially uniform mixture of the metallic element and metallic element oxide, wherein the relative proportions of the oxygen containing gas or vapour and the evaporating metallic element are such that the amount of the metallic element in the coating is greater than zero, and is sufficiently low that the web material is substantially transparent to microwave radiation.
- The preferred layer of coating can be described as to its thickness and composition as follows. Its thickness is preferably such that the optical density of a metal layer deposited under the same operating conditions but in the absence of oxygen is from 0.4 to 5.0, more preferably from 1.5 to 3.0, higher than the optical density of the uncoated substrate. Thus, in making a preferred coating of the invention, the process parameters can be first adjusted to achieve a metal deposition (in the absence of oxygen) to give the above optical density increase, so that those parameters can thereafter remain unchanged but oxygen is admitted.
- The composition of the preferred coating is such that the optical density of the coating measured immediately after its deposition by reactive evaporation, is 0.1 to 0.4 higher than that of the uncoated substrate. Thus, one way of making preferred coatings of the invention is to first deposit metal alone (no oxygen) to achieve the described coating thickness (measured by optical density increase) and then admit oxygen until the optical density decreases to the range given, and the coatings thereafter formed are preferred coatings of the invention.
- The actual barrier achieved is dependent on the film substrate used, which can include polyester, polyamide, polyolefine, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, polysulphone, polyacrylonitrile or regenerated cellulose films, including copolymers, blends, composites or co-extrusions of these materials, or variants coated with other plastics. Certain papers and boards, coated with suitable plastics, are also included. In general, the reactive evaporation process can be applied to any substrate which can be vacuum deposited with a metal such as aluminium.
- In one embodiment of the invention, poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate or
nylon 6 films are preferred, since when coated with the above mentioned metal oxide/metal mixture, they have low permeability to oxygen and water vapour, and are suitable, (where necessary laminated to, or coated with, a heat sealable material such as a polyolefine) for packaging oxygen or moisture sensitive foodstuffs or other materials. Barrier is further enhanced by lamination. Such laminates, which are substantially transparent to both light and microwave radiation, can be used as environmentally friendly alternatives to laminates of poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate/polyvinylidene chloride/polyethylene, eg. for applications such as lidding of food containers packed using the process of modified or controlled atmosphere packaging. Unlike the polyvinylidene chloride containing laminates, they can be disposed of by incineration without producing hydrogen chloride, which is deleterious to the environment. - Oxygen and moisture barrier achieved will vary according to the substrate, the metal/oxide coating thickness and the metal/oxide stoichiometry. The effect of the last parameter on a metal/oxide coated film based on a poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate substrate is illustrated in example 1 below.
- The metal oxide/metal mixture can be coated on one or both sides of the substrate. Two side coating can be advantageous for some applications, eg. a poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate film coated on both sides with the metal oxide/metal mixture, and having good barrier to oxygen and water vapour, can be used as an alternative to aluminium foil in composites, such as board/polyethylene/foil/polyethylene, used for the production of cartons for aseptic packaging of liquids or particulate/liquid suspensions. Such alternative composites can be produced by existing processes such as tandem extrusion lamination, or by other lamination techniques. Cartons produced by such techniques have advantages over the traditional foil composite cartons, eg. they can be reheated in microwave ovens.
- In another embodiment of the invention, a substantially transparent regenerated cellulose film with good barrier to oxygen and water vapour can be produced by coating a regenerated cellulose base film with a lacquer such as those described in our European patent specification no. 0340910A, and then coating with the metal/oxide mixture. Such a film is a more environmentally friendly alternative to the polyvinylidene chloride coated regenerated cellulose films currently used for barrier packaging of foodstuffs.
- In another embodiment of the invention, a substantially transparent polyolefine film with good barrier to oxygen and water vapour can be produced by coating a polyolefine film with a lacquer such as those described in our European patent specification no. 0340910A, and then coating with the metal/oxide mixture. Such a film can be laminated to a reverse printed film, to produce a barrier laminate with sandwiched print suitable for barrier packaging.
- The metal used in the reactive evaporation process can be any metal which forms an oxide with good barrier properties, such as aluminium, magnesium or tin.
- The gas used in the reactive evaporation process can be oxygen or any other gas or vapour containing oxygen such as water vapour or carbon monoxide or dioxide.
- It is essential that the oxygen or oxygen gas is introduced directly into the stream of evaporating metal and not otherwise into the vacuum chamber as a whole. The gas is preferably introduced via a pipe into the centre of the stream of evaporating metal. This pipe is preferably terminated by a nozzle or other spreading device which will cause the gas to spread throughout the stream, thus producing a consistent mixture of oxide and metal on the substrate with no bands of high metal and high oxide content. Thus, the coating formed is an essentially homogeneous mixture of metal and metal oxide throughout.
- The thickness of the metal/oxide coating should be in a range such that it provides good adhesion to the substrate and has good mechanical strength and barrier. Thickness is most easily specified by reference to the optical density of a metal layer formed under the same operating conditions but in the absence of oxygen. An optical density of 0.4 to 5.0 higher than the optical density of the substrate gives the required properties, the range 1.5-3.0 being especially preferred. These optical densities of metal appear to equate to coat weights of metal/oxide mixture of approximately 0.04-0.5 and 0.15-0.30 grams/metre2, but since these latter coat weights are difficult to measure analytically without specialist equipment, the former specification is preferred.
- We have been unable to determine analytically the preferred ratio of oxide to metal in the mixture. However, it can be defined by reference to the optical density, which should be between 0.01 and 0.40 higher than the optical density of the substrate, measured immediately after coating of the mixture on the substrate, which equates approximately to an optical density between 0.0 and 0.25 higher than the optical density of the substrate after fading due to oxidation in the atmosphere has taken place (see example 1). At the lower limit (i.e. close to the stoichiometric mixture of metal and oxygen), barrier begins to deteriorate to an unacceptable level. At the upper limit (metal rich), the coating becomes brown in colour and begins to absorb microwave radiation. For films coated on both sides, these optical density figures will be additive. It is to be noted that the coated films of the invention are microwave transparent, which places a maximum on the amount of free metal which can be present therein.
- In order that the invention may be more fully understood, reference is made hereafter to the accompanying drawings, in which:
- FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of one form of apparatus arranged to carry out the process of the invention; and
- FIG. 2 is a graph of oxygen permeability (ordinate) against optical density at time of production (abscissa), for polyester film coated with an aluminium/aluminium oxide mixture, as described in Example 1;
- FIG. 3 is a graph of MVTR (ordinate) against optical density at time of production (abscissa), for polyester film coated with an aluminium/aluminium oxide mixture, as described in Example 1;
- FIG. 4 is a graph of oxygen permeability (ordinate) against optical density (abscissa), for a coated polyester/polyethylene laminate as described in Example 1; and
- FIG. 5 is a graph of MVTR (ordinate) against optical density (abscissa) for a coated polyester/polyethylene laminate as described in Example 1.
- The reactive evaporation process of the invention can be carried out in a suitably modified conventional film metallising chamber. Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings is a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of the apparatus, which comprises a vacuum chamber X for depositing a layer of metal such as aluminium on one surface of a continuous web of plastic film. Within the chamber is a supply reel A from which film Y passes over a cooled drum B to take up reel C. An aperture and shutter assembly D controls the zone of evaporation of a metal supplied from a wire feed E to a ceramic heater block F maintained at a temperature above the evaporation temperature of the metal at the chamber pressure. The chamber is provided with an array of collimated light sources J across the width of the film and a corresponding array of photocells K so that the light transmission of the film can be measured after coating. The chamber is provided with viewing ports G and is connected at H to vacuum pumps. When used for conventional metallisation, vaporised metal from the heatrer flows in a zone of evaporation, indicated by broken lines Z, towards drum B and condenses on the film overlying the drum. In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a
discharge nozzle 10 connected by apipe 11 to an inlet 12 for receiving a supply of a gas or vapour (not shown). Thenozzle 10 is located either within the zone Z or between the heaters, and is directed in the direction of vapour flow from the heater to the drum. Several such assemblies may be mounted across the chamber to facilitate coating of wide films. It is a crucial feature of the invention that the gas is introduced into the zone of vaporising metal. If the gas is merely introduced into the chamber outside this zone, this produced a pressure rise within the chamber causing unsatisfactory deposition and eventually the mean free path of the vaporised metal is so reduced that no deposition occurs. - In order that the invention may be more fully understood, the following Examples are given by way of illustration only.
- A 1,400 mm wide web of 12 micrometres (12 micron) poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate film (Melinex 800 ex-ICI Films) was placed inside a metallising chamber similar to that shown diagrammatically in Figure 1, and threaded from the offwind position A, over the drum B, onto the wind up position C. Twelve ceramic heaters F were arranged across the web and spaced 20 centimetres from drum B.
- A
nozzle 10 was located between each heater, all the nozzles being connected to the inlet 12 to which was connected a supply of oxygen gas. Both the gas supply and the flow to each individual nozzle were controllable by adjustable valves. The chamber was evacuated to a pressure of 133.32 kPa (10-3 torr) and aluminium wire fed to each heater at a rate of 30 grams/minute, with the shutter D closed. The web was accelerated to a speed of 300 metres/minute and optical density of the uncoated web measured at 0.04. The shutter was then opened in order to coat the film with aluminium. Initially, approximately 25% of the aluminium evaporated was deposited on the web, giving a coating weight of about 0.1 grams/metre2 and an optical density of about 2.5. Heater temperatures and wire feed rates were adjusted to give a generally even optical density across the web (this is not critical to the process). Oxygen was then discharged through the nozzles and the flow rate increased until the coating on the film became just transparent, i.e. the optical density of the coated film was 0.04, similar to the optical density of the base film. Oxygen flow rates to individual nozzles were adjusted to give an even coating across the web with no significant bands of different optical density. Chamber pressure was maintained at approximately 133.32 kPa (10-3 torr). Oxygen flow rate was then progressively reduced at the main oxygen inlet control, adjusting the flow rates to individual nozzles where necessary to keep optical density even across the web. A range of optical densities from 0.05 to 0.55 were produced. - At the end of the experiment, when the reel was removed from the chamber, and unreeled to obtain samples, thus exposing it to air, its optical density fell rapidly (ie. within a few seconds) by between 0.01 and 0.1. Optical density then declined more slowly (by 0 - 0.05) over a period of about one month, eventually stabilising. Oxygen permeability and MVTR of the 12 micrometres (12 micron) polyester film before metallising were respectively 120 cm3 (cc)/metre2/24 hours (at 23 °C, 0 % RH) and 40 grams/metre2/24 hours (at 38 °C, 0 % RH). Oxygen permeability and moisture vapour transmission rate of the various samples in the reel are shown graphically in Figures 2 and 3. Optical density referred to on the scale is that prior to fading. Optical densities after fading are shown in brackets. Tests indicated that barrier was not affected by fading.
- In Figs. 2 and 3, the value of optical density indicated by the arrow on the abscissa (about 0.04) indicates that of the base polyester film. The values at
permeability 6 to 7 and MVTR 2.0 to 2.5 are those of the clear oxide coating. In Fig. 2, the units of oxygen permeability are cm3 (cc)/m2/24 hours at 23 °C/0% RH, and the optical densities in brackets were measured after 1 month. In Fig. 3, the units for MVTR are g/m2/24 hours at 38°C/90% RH. - Samples of film having various optical densities were coated on the oxide surface with a layer of a commercially available two component polyurethane adhesive and dried to give a coat weight of 2.8 grams/metre2. The adhesive coated surface was then calendered to the corona treated surface of a commercially available 50 micrometres (50 micron) low density polyethylene (LDPE) film and left for one week to allow the adhesive to cure. After curing, oxygen permeability and MVTR were re-measured on the laminate, and showed significant improvement over the original unlaminated film. Results are shown graphically in Figs. 4 and 5.
- In Fig. 4, the units of oxygen permeability are cm3 (cc)/m2/24 hours at 23°C/ 0% RH. In Figs. 4 and 5, the numbers in brackets are the optical density before fading (ie. the original optical density). The clear oxide coating has an optical density of 0.04 (
oxygen permeability 4 to 5 and MVTR about 1.5). On both graphs, materials to the left of the vertical line at O.D. about 0.29, have no microwave interaction, whereas those to the right of the line (ie. greater than about 0.29 OD) do have microwave interaction. - Samples of laminate of various optical densities were made into pouches by heat sealing around 3 sides filled with water and heated in a 600 watt microwave oven. Pouches made from laminate with low optical densities heated up effectively without sparking, but those made with high optical density laminates absorbed the microwave energy, sparked and caused the pouch to deform and leak. The transition between a usable and unusable product appeared to be at about optical density 0.29 (ie. a coating optical density of 0.25 when optical density of the substrate is excluded) equivalent to an optical density of the original coated film before fading of about 0.44 (0.40 after correction for substrate optical density).
- A 1,400mm wide web of a commercially available 40 micrometres (40 micron), low slip, linear low density polyethylene film, corona treated on one side, and having an oxygen permeability of greater than 1,000 cm3 (cc)/metre2/24 hours (at 23 °C/0 % RH) and an MVTR of greater than 5 grams/metre2/24 hours at (38 °C/90 % RH), was coated on the corona treated surface with 1.5 grams/metre2 of a proprietary solvent-based lacquer based on a polyester resin of the type described in our European patent application no. 89303285.4. The coated surface of this film was vacuum deposited with an aluminium/aluminium oxide mixture to an optical density 0.11 higher than the optical density of the original substrate (0.04) by the technique described in Example 1. After fading, the film had a final optical density of 0.07, an oxygen permeability of 5.8 cm3 (cc)/metre2/24 hours at 23 °C/0 % relative humidity (RH) and an MVTR of 0.8 gram/metre2/24 hours at 38 °C/90 % RH. The oxide coated surface of the film was laminated, using the technique and conditions described in Example 1, to a reverse printed 12 micron poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate film. After lamination and curing of the adhesive, the laminate had an oxygen permeability of 1.0 cm3 (cc)/metre2/24 hours at 23 °C/0 % RH, and MVTR of 0.3 grams/metre2/24 hours at 38 °C/90 % RH, an interply bond strength of greater than 300 grams/25 mm, and did not significantly attenuate microwave radiation.
- A 1,400 mm wide web of 320 gauge regenerated cellulose film (Cellophane MS ex-British Cellophane Ltd) was coated on both sides with 1.5 grams/metre2 of a proprietary solvent-based lacquer based on a polyester resin of the type described in our European patent specification no. 0340910A. One surface of this film was vacuum deposited with an aluminium/aluminium oxide mixture to an optical density 0.13 higher than the optical density of the original substrate (0.04) by the technique described in Example 1. After fading, the film had a final optical density of 0.07, an oxygen permeability of 0.3 cm3 (cc)/metre2/24 hours at 23 °C/0 % RH, an MVTR of 2.9 grams/metre2/24 hours at 38 °C/90 % RH, and did not significantly attenuate microwave radiation.
Claims (8)
- A web material useful as a packaging material for oxygen- and/or moisture-sensitive foodstuffs, which material comprises a web substrate of film, paper or board having a gas or moisture barrier coating thereon, characterised in that the coating comprises mixture of a metallic element and an oxide of the metallic element, the metallic element and the metallic element oxide are essentially uniformly distributed throughout the coating, and the amount of the metallic element in the coating is greater than zero, and is sufficiently low that the web material is substantially transparent to microwave radiation.
- A material according to claim 1, wherein the web substrate comprises polyester, polyamide, polyolefin, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, polysulphone, polyacrylonitrile or regenerated cellulose, or any copolymer, blend, composite or co-extrusion thereof, or variant with other plastic materials, or a paper or board coated with a suitable plastics material.
- A material according to claim 2, wherein the web material is poly(ethylene glycol) terephthalate or nylon-6, optionally laminated to or coated with a heat-sealable material.
- A material according to any preceding claim, wherein the metallic element is aluminium, magnesium or tin.
- A material according to any preceding claim which is laminated to another web or coated on another material.
- A method of making a web material according to claim 1, which comprises subjecting a web substrate of film, paper or board to a reactive evaporation process wherein an oxygen-containing gas or vapour is introduced directly into a stream of evaporating metallic element to deposit on the substrate a substantially uniform mixture of the metallic element and metallic element oxide, wherein the relative proportions of the oxygen containing gas or vapour and the evaporating metallic element are such that the amount of the metallic element in the coating is greater than zero, and is sufficiently low that the web material is substantially transparent to microwave radiation.
- A method according to claim 6, wherein the amount of the metallic element deposited is such as to provide, in the absence of oxygen, an optical density of 0.4 to 5.0 greater than the optical density of the uncoated substrate.
- A method according to claim 6, wherein the amount of oxygen-containing gas or vapour introduced is such that the optical density of the coating on the substrate measured immediately after its deposition is 0.1 to 0.4 greater than that of the uncoated substrate, prior to exposure to oxygen.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB898928706A GB8928706D0 (en) | 1989-12-20 | 1989-12-20 | Transparent barrier packaging materials |
GB8928706 | 1989-12-20 |
Publications (4)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0437946A2 EP0437946A2 (en) | 1991-07-24 |
EP0437946A3 EP0437946A3 (en) | 1991-07-31 |
EP0437946B1 true EP0437946B1 (en) | 1997-04-02 |
EP0437946B2 EP0437946B2 (en) | 2000-04-05 |
Family
ID=10668209
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP90313653A Expired - Lifetime EP0437946B2 (en) | 1989-12-20 | 1990-12-14 | Web barrier packaging material |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0437946B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE151039T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69030369T3 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0437946T4 (en) |
GB (1) | GB8928706D0 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10255822B4 (en) * | 2002-11-29 | 2004-10-28 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Process for the vapor deposition of ribbon-shaped substrates with a transparent barrier layer made of aluminum oxide |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9318143D0 (en) | 1993-09-01 | 1993-10-20 | Bowater Packaging Ltd | Microwave interactive barrier films |
IT1276331B1 (en) * | 1994-09-29 | 1997-10-28 | Cetev Cent Tecnolog Vuoto | IMPROVEMENT IN THE PROCESSES OF DEPOSITION OF TRANSPARENT BARRIER LAYERS, PARTIALLY OXIDIZED IN A CONTROLLED WAY |
US5693415A (en) * | 1995-06-21 | 1997-12-02 | Hanita Coatings | Composite film for windows comprising a non-stoichiometric aluminum oxide layer |
DE19845268C1 (en) * | 1998-10-01 | 2000-01-05 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Coating a strip-shaped substrate with a transparent barrier layer of aluminum oxide through reactive evaporation of aluminum |
GB2373744A (en) * | 2001-01-06 | 2002-10-02 | Valmet General Ltd | Coating a flexible web with a metal |
US20090047529A1 (en) * | 2005-08-12 | 2009-02-19 | Kureha Corporation | Gas Barrier Film and Method for Producing the Same |
CZ29098U1 (en) | 2014-12-17 | 2016-02-01 | Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci | Composite planar cellulose-based material |
EP3771751A1 (en) * | 2019-08-02 | 2021-02-03 | AR Metallizing N.V. | Multi-metal layer wvtr barrier products on water vapour and oxygen permeable bio-based substrates |
CN113593885B (en) * | 2021-07-31 | 2022-03-22 | 沭阳康顺磁性器材有限公司 | Preparation process of iron-based soft magnetic core |
EP4335639A1 (en) * | 2022-09-06 | 2024-03-13 | Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A. | Laminated packaging material comprising a barrier layer and packaging container made therefrom |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2210826B (en) * | 1987-10-19 | 1992-08-12 | Bowater Packaging Ltd | Barrier packaging materials |
-
1989
- 1989-12-20 GB GB898928706A patent/GB8928706D0/en active Pending
-
1990
- 1990-12-14 EP EP90313653A patent/EP0437946B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-12-14 DE DE69030369T patent/DE69030369T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-12-14 DK DK90313653T patent/DK0437946T4/en active
- 1990-12-14 AT AT90313653T patent/ATE151039T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10255822B4 (en) * | 2002-11-29 | 2004-10-28 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Process for the vapor deposition of ribbon-shaped substrates with a transparent barrier layer made of aluminum oxide |
US7541070B2 (en) | 2002-11-29 | 2009-06-02 | Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. | Method of vapor-depositing strip-shaped substrates with a transparent barrier layer made of aluminum oxide |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0437946A2 (en) | 1991-07-24 |
ATE151039T1 (en) | 1997-04-15 |
DE69030369T3 (en) | 2000-06-29 |
GB8928706D0 (en) | 1990-02-28 |
EP0437946B2 (en) | 2000-04-05 |
DE69030369D1 (en) | 1997-05-07 |
DE69030369T2 (en) | 1997-07-17 |
DK0437946T4 (en) | 2000-07-31 |
EP0437946A3 (en) | 1991-07-31 |
DK0437946T3 (en) | 1997-04-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
GB2246794A (en) | Process for preparing barrier packaging materials | |
EP0437946B1 (en) | Web barrier packaging material | |
US7192625B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of barrier-forming film | |
US5516555A (en) | Evaporation method for forming a gas barrier film having an organosilicon dispersed discontinuously in an inorganic matrix | |
US5462779A (en) | Thin film multilayer structure as permeation barrier on plastic film | |
US3480464A (en) | Laminate material and method of making | |
US6071626A (en) | Multilayer, high barrier laminate | |
US5641559A (en) | Gas-tight laminated plastic film containing polymer of organosilicic compound | |
US4475241A (en) | Polycarbonate coated films | |
US20050123777A1 (en) | Method for forming a film, by using electrostatic forces | |
WO1998032597A1 (en) | Enhanced barrier vacuum metallized films | |
US3730752A (en) | Method of metal coating a fibrous sheet | |
US20200248298A1 (en) | Gas barrier film production method | |
US5704980A (en) | Method of and apparatus for making plastic film with barrier layers | |
US20200224304A1 (en) | Gas barrier laminated body | |
GB2210899A (en) | High barrier metallised film | |
JP4090551B2 (en) | Transparent barrier film | |
US6296895B1 (en) | Process for the application of a transparent metal oxide layer on a film | |
WO1982003202A1 (en) | Metallized film-paper | |
JP4120865B2 (en) | Gas barrier film roll, laminate using the same, and packaging bag | |
JP4332919B2 (en) | Method for producing gas barrier material | |
MXPA04011631A (en) | Method and arrangement for manufacturing a web-shaped packaging laminate. | |
JPH0555596B2 (en) | ||
JPH06210790A (en) | Gas barrier film | |
JP3557898B2 (en) | Gas barrier material, method for producing the same, and package |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19910905 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19930907 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: REXAM PACKAGING LIMITED |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 19970402 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19970402 Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19970402 Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19970402 Ref country code: ES Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19970402 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 151039 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19970415 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69030369 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19970507 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19970702 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19971214 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: LEYBOLD AG PATENTABTEILUNG Effective date: 19971223 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: LEYBOLD AG PATENTABTEILUNG |
|
PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
NLS | Nl: assignments of ep-patents |
Owner name: REXAM METALLISING LIMITED |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP |
|
PLAW | Interlocutory decision in opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E |
|
PLAW | Interlocutory decision in opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20000405 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
NLR2 | Nl: decision of opposition | ||
ET3 | Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T4 |
|
NLR3 | Nl: receipt of modified translations in the netherlands language after an opposition procedure | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20011212 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20011228 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
BECA | Be: change of holder's address |
Free format text: 20020813 *AMCOR FLEXIBLES UK LTD:HILL HOUSE, 1 LITTLE STREET, GB - LONDON EC4A 3TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030131 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20030701 |
|
BECN | Be: change of holder's name |
Owner name: CAMVAC LTD Effective date: 20090527 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20090611 AND 20090617 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CD |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20091209 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20091214 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20091222 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20100212 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
BE20 | Be: patent expired |
Owner name: CAMVAC LTD Effective date: 20101214 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20101213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20101213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20101214 |